Performance of dry anaerobic technology in the co-digestion of rural organic solid wastes in China
The dry anaerobic co-digestion of LW (livestock waste), OFHW (organic fraction of household waste), and AR (agricultural residue) was evaluated in terms of pH stability, organic removal rate, and methane yield. The total quantity of the solids involved in the digestion was adjusted to 25%. All the r...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Yang, Tianxue [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2015transfer abstract |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Umfang: |
6 |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Rheological analysis of itraconazole-polymer mixtures to determine optimal melt extrusion temperature for development of amorphous solid dispersion - Solanki, Nayan ELSEVIER, 2017, the international journal, Amsterdam [u.a.] |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:93 ; year:2015 ; day:15 ; month:12 ; pages:2497-2502 ; extent:6 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1016/j.energy.2015.10.014 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
ELV023620048 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ELV023620048 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230625141511.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 180603s2015 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.energy.2015.10.014 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a GBVA2015012000005.pica |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)ELV023620048 | ||
| 035 | |a (ELSEVIER)S0360-5442(15)01378-X | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 082 | 0 | |a 600 | |
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 600 |q DE-600 |
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 610 |q VZ |
| 084 | |a 15,3 |2 ssgn | ||
| 084 | |a PHARM |q DE-84 |2 fid | ||
| 084 | |a 44.40 |2 bkl | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Yang, Tianxue |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Performance of dry anaerobic technology in the co-digestion of rural organic solid wastes in China |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2015transfer abstract | |
| 300 | |a 6 | ||
| 336 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zzz |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b z |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zu |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a The dry anaerobic co-digestion of LW (livestock waste), OFHW (organic fraction of household waste), and AR (agricultural residue) was evaluated in terms of pH stability, organic removal rate, and methane yield. The total quantity of the solids involved in the digestion was adjusted to 25%. All the reactors were inoculated by 20% (in dry weight) of the municipal sludge. The dynamic changes in the pH values of the LW-AR-OFHW mixture co-digestions underwent four stages and differed from those of wet anaerobic digestion. The decrease in VS (volatile solids), volume, and weight of the LW-AR-OFHW mixtures was higher than those in AR and OFHW. The VS, volume, and weight reductions in LW-AR-OFHW co-digestion were 54.7%, 82.2%, and 72.7%, respectively. However, the VS, volume, and weight reductions in AR were only 11.1%, 20.5%, and 19.8%, respectively, and those in OFHW were only 27.4%, 45.0%, and 40.9%, respectively. The LW-AR-OFHW mixture co-digestions enhanced the methane production of the co-digester (256 m3/ton VS), whereas AR and OFHW produced only 12 and 93 m3 methane/ton VS, respectively. | ||
| 520 | |a The dry anaerobic co-digestion of LW (livestock waste), OFHW (organic fraction of household waste), and AR (agricultural residue) was evaluated in terms of pH stability, organic removal rate, and methane yield. The total quantity of the solids involved in the digestion was adjusted to 25%. All the reactors were inoculated by 20% (in dry weight) of the municipal sludge. The dynamic changes in the pH values of the LW-AR-OFHW mixture co-digestions underwent four stages and differed from those of wet anaerobic digestion. The decrease in VS (volatile solids), volume, and weight of the LW-AR-OFHW mixtures was higher than those in AR and OFHW. The VS, volume, and weight reductions in LW-AR-OFHW co-digestion were 54.7%, 82.2%, and 72.7%, respectively. However, the VS, volume, and weight reductions in AR were only 11.1%, 20.5%, and 19.8%, respectively, and those in OFHW were only 27.4%, 45.0%, and 40.9%, respectively. The LW-AR-OFHW mixture co-digestions enhanced the methane production of the co-digester (256 m3/ton VS), whereas AR and OFHW produced only 12 and 93 m3 methane/ton VS, respectively. | ||
| 650 | 7 | |a Rural organic solid waste |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Multiple wastes |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Dry anaerobic co-digestion |2 Elsevier | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Li, Yingjun |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Gao, Jixi |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Huang, Caihong |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Chen, Bin |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Zhang, Lieyu |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Wang, Xiaowei |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Zhao, Ying |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Xi, Beidou |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Li, Xiang |4 oth | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |n Elsevier Science |a Solanki, Nayan ELSEVIER |t Rheological analysis of itraconazole-polymer mixtures to determine optimal melt extrusion temperature for development of amorphous solid dispersion |d 2017 |d the international journal |g Amsterdam [u.a.] |w (DE-627)ELV000529575 |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:93 |g year:2015 |g day:15 |g month:12 |g pages:2497-2502 |g extent:6 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2015.10.014 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_U | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ELV | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_U | ||
| 912 | |a FID-PHARM | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-PHA | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OPC-PHA | ||
| 936 | b | k | |a 44.40 |j Pharmazie |j Pharmazeutika |q VZ |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 93 |j 2015 |b 15 |c 1215 |h 2497-2502 |g 6 | ||
| 953 | |2 045F |a 600 | ||
| author_variant |
t y ty |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
yangtianxueliyingjungaojixihuangcaihongc:2015----:efracodyneoitcnlgiteoietoorrlr |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2015transfer abstract |
| bklnumber |
44.40 |
| publishDate |
2015 |
| allfields |
10.1016/j.energy.2015.10.014 doi GBVA2015012000005.pica (DE-627)ELV023620048 (ELSEVIER)S0360-5442(15)01378-X DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 600 600 DE-600 610 VZ 15,3 ssgn PHARM DE-84 fid 44.40 bkl Yang, Tianxue verfasserin aut Performance of dry anaerobic technology in the co-digestion of rural organic solid wastes in China 2015transfer abstract 6 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier The dry anaerobic co-digestion of LW (livestock waste), OFHW (organic fraction of household waste), and AR (agricultural residue) was evaluated in terms of pH stability, organic removal rate, and methane yield. The total quantity of the solids involved in the digestion was adjusted to 25%. All the reactors were inoculated by 20% (in dry weight) of the municipal sludge. The dynamic changes in the pH values of the LW-AR-OFHW mixture co-digestions underwent four stages and differed from those of wet anaerobic digestion. The decrease in VS (volatile solids), volume, and weight of the LW-AR-OFHW mixtures was higher than those in AR and OFHW. The VS, volume, and weight reductions in LW-AR-OFHW co-digestion were 54.7%, 82.2%, and 72.7%, respectively. However, the VS, volume, and weight reductions in AR were only 11.1%, 20.5%, and 19.8%, respectively, and those in OFHW were only 27.4%, 45.0%, and 40.9%, respectively. The LW-AR-OFHW mixture co-digestions enhanced the methane production of the co-digester (256 m3/ton VS), whereas AR and OFHW produced only 12 and 93 m3 methane/ton VS, respectively. The dry anaerobic co-digestion of LW (livestock waste), OFHW (organic fraction of household waste), and AR (agricultural residue) was evaluated in terms of pH stability, organic removal rate, and methane yield. The total quantity of the solids involved in the digestion was adjusted to 25%. All the reactors were inoculated by 20% (in dry weight) of the municipal sludge. The dynamic changes in the pH values of the LW-AR-OFHW mixture co-digestions underwent four stages and differed from those of wet anaerobic digestion. The decrease in VS (volatile solids), volume, and weight of the LW-AR-OFHW mixtures was higher than those in AR and OFHW. The VS, volume, and weight reductions in LW-AR-OFHW co-digestion were 54.7%, 82.2%, and 72.7%, respectively. However, the VS, volume, and weight reductions in AR were only 11.1%, 20.5%, and 19.8%, respectively, and those in OFHW were only 27.4%, 45.0%, and 40.9%, respectively. The LW-AR-OFHW mixture co-digestions enhanced the methane production of the co-digester (256 m3/ton VS), whereas AR and OFHW produced only 12 and 93 m3 methane/ton VS, respectively. Rural organic solid waste Elsevier Multiple wastes Elsevier Dry anaerobic co-digestion Elsevier Li, Yingjun oth Gao, Jixi oth Huang, Caihong oth Chen, Bin oth Zhang, Lieyu oth Wang, Xiaowei oth Zhao, Ying oth Xi, Beidou oth Li, Xiang oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Solanki, Nayan ELSEVIER Rheological analysis of itraconazole-polymer mixtures to determine optimal melt extrusion temperature for development of amorphous solid dispersion 2017 the international journal Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV000529575 volume:93 year:2015 day:15 month:12 pages:2497-2502 extent:6 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2015.10.014 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U FID-PHARM SSG-OLC-PHA SSG-OPC-PHA 44.40 Pharmazie Pharmazeutika VZ AR 93 2015 15 1215 2497-2502 6 045F 600 |
| spelling |
10.1016/j.energy.2015.10.014 doi GBVA2015012000005.pica (DE-627)ELV023620048 (ELSEVIER)S0360-5442(15)01378-X DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 600 600 DE-600 610 VZ 15,3 ssgn PHARM DE-84 fid 44.40 bkl Yang, Tianxue verfasserin aut Performance of dry anaerobic technology in the co-digestion of rural organic solid wastes in China 2015transfer abstract 6 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier The dry anaerobic co-digestion of LW (livestock waste), OFHW (organic fraction of household waste), and AR (agricultural residue) was evaluated in terms of pH stability, organic removal rate, and methane yield. The total quantity of the solids involved in the digestion was adjusted to 25%. All the reactors were inoculated by 20% (in dry weight) of the municipal sludge. The dynamic changes in the pH values of the LW-AR-OFHW mixture co-digestions underwent four stages and differed from those of wet anaerobic digestion. The decrease in VS (volatile solids), volume, and weight of the LW-AR-OFHW mixtures was higher than those in AR and OFHW. The VS, volume, and weight reductions in LW-AR-OFHW co-digestion were 54.7%, 82.2%, and 72.7%, respectively. However, the VS, volume, and weight reductions in AR were only 11.1%, 20.5%, and 19.8%, respectively, and those in OFHW were only 27.4%, 45.0%, and 40.9%, respectively. The LW-AR-OFHW mixture co-digestions enhanced the methane production of the co-digester (256 m3/ton VS), whereas AR and OFHW produced only 12 and 93 m3 methane/ton VS, respectively. The dry anaerobic co-digestion of LW (livestock waste), OFHW (organic fraction of household waste), and AR (agricultural residue) was evaluated in terms of pH stability, organic removal rate, and methane yield. The total quantity of the solids involved in the digestion was adjusted to 25%. All the reactors were inoculated by 20% (in dry weight) of the municipal sludge. The dynamic changes in the pH values of the LW-AR-OFHW mixture co-digestions underwent four stages and differed from those of wet anaerobic digestion. The decrease in VS (volatile solids), volume, and weight of the LW-AR-OFHW mixtures was higher than those in AR and OFHW. The VS, volume, and weight reductions in LW-AR-OFHW co-digestion were 54.7%, 82.2%, and 72.7%, respectively. However, the VS, volume, and weight reductions in AR were only 11.1%, 20.5%, and 19.8%, respectively, and those in OFHW were only 27.4%, 45.0%, and 40.9%, respectively. The LW-AR-OFHW mixture co-digestions enhanced the methane production of the co-digester (256 m3/ton VS), whereas AR and OFHW produced only 12 and 93 m3 methane/ton VS, respectively. Rural organic solid waste Elsevier Multiple wastes Elsevier Dry anaerobic co-digestion Elsevier Li, Yingjun oth Gao, Jixi oth Huang, Caihong oth Chen, Bin oth Zhang, Lieyu oth Wang, Xiaowei oth Zhao, Ying oth Xi, Beidou oth Li, Xiang oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Solanki, Nayan ELSEVIER Rheological analysis of itraconazole-polymer mixtures to determine optimal melt extrusion temperature for development of amorphous solid dispersion 2017 the international journal Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV000529575 volume:93 year:2015 day:15 month:12 pages:2497-2502 extent:6 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2015.10.014 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U FID-PHARM SSG-OLC-PHA SSG-OPC-PHA 44.40 Pharmazie Pharmazeutika VZ AR 93 2015 15 1215 2497-2502 6 045F 600 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1016/j.energy.2015.10.014 doi GBVA2015012000005.pica (DE-627)ELV023620048 (ELSEVIER)S0360-5442(15)01378-X DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 600 600 DE-600 610 VZ 15,3 ssgn PHARM DE-84 fid 44.40 bkl Yang, Tianxue verfasserin aut Performance of dry anaerobic technology in the co-digestion of rural organic solid wastes in China 2015transfer abstract 6 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier The dry anaerobic co-digestion of LW (livestock waste), OFHW (organic fraction of household waste), and AR (agricultural residue) was evaluated in terms of pH stability, organic removal rate, and methane yield. The total quantity of the solids involved in the digestion was adjusted to 25%. All the reactors were inoculated by 20% (in dry weight) of the municipal sludge. The dynamic changes in the pH values of the LW-AR-OFHW mixture co-digestions underwent four stages and differed from those of wet anaerobic digestion. The decrease in VS (volatile solids), volume, and weight of the LW-AR-OFHW mixtures was higher than those in AR and OFHW. The VS, volume, and weight reductions in LW-AR-OFHW co-digestion were 54.7%, 82.2%, and 72.7%, respectively. However, the VS, volume, and weight reductions in AR were only 11.1%, 20.5%, and 19.8%, respectively, and those in OFHW were only 27.4%, 45.0%, and 40.9%, respectively. The LW-AR-OFHW mixture co-digestions enhanced the methane production of the co-digester (256 m3/ton VS), whereas AR and OFHW produced only 12 and 93 m3 methane/ton VS, respectively. The dry anaerobic co-digestion of LW (livestock waste), OFHW (organic fraction of household waste), and AR (agricultural residue) was evaluated in terms of pH stability, organic removal rate, and methane yield. The total quantity of the solids involved in the digestion was adjusted to 25%. All the reactors were inoculated by 20% (in dry weight) of the municipal sludge. The dynamic changes in the pH values of the LW-AR-OFHW mixture co-digestions underwent four stages and differed from those of wet anaerobic digestion. The decrease in VS (volatile solids), volume, and weight of the LW-AR-OFHW mixtures was higher than those in AR and OFHW. The VS, volume, and weight reductions in LW-AR-OFHW co-digestion were 54.7%, 82.2%, and 72.7%, respectively. However, the VS, volume, and weight reductions in AR were only 11.1%, 20.5%, and 19.8%, respectively, and those in OFHW were only 27.4%, 45.0%, and 40.9%, respectively. The LW-AR-OFHW mixture co-digestions enhanced the methane production of the co-digester (256 m3/ton VS), whereas AR and OFHW produced only 12 and 93 m3 methane/ton VS, respectively. Rural organic solid waste Elsevier Multiple wastes Elsevier Dry anaerobic co-digestion Elsevier Li, Yingjun oth Gao, Jixi oth Huang, Caihong oth Chen, Bin oth Zhang, Lieyu oth Wang, Xiaowei oth Zhao, Ying oth Xi, Beidou oth Li, Xiang oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Solanki, Nayan ELSEVIER Rheological analysis of itraconazole-polymer mixtures to determine optimal melt extrusion temperature for development of amorphous solid dispersion 2017 the international journal Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV000529575 volume:93 year:2015 day:15 month:12 pages:2497-2502 extent:6 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2015.10.014 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U FID-PHARM SSG-OLC-PHA SSG-OPC-PHA 44.40 Pharmazie Pharmazeutika VZ AR 93 2015 15 1215 2497-2502 6 045F 600 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1016/j.energy.2015.10.014 doi GBVA2015012000005.pica (DE-627)ELV023620048 (ELSEVIER)S0360-5442(15)01378-X DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 600 600 DE-600 610 VZ 15,3 ssgn PHARM DE-84 fid 44.40 bkl Yang, Tianxue verfasserin aut Performance of dry anaerobic technology in the co-digestion of rural organic solid wastes in China 2015transfer abstract 6 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier The dry anaerobic co-digestion of LW (livestock waste), OFHW (organic fraction of household waste), and AR (agricultural residue) was evaluated in terms of pH stability, organic removal rate, and methane yield. The total quantity of the solids involved in the digestion was adjusted to 25%. All the reactors were inoculated by 20% (in dry weight) of the municipal sludge. The dynamic changes in the pH values of the LW-AR-OFHW mixture co-digestions underwent four stages and differed from those of wet anaerobic digestion. The decrease in VS (volatile solids), volume, and weight of the LW-AR-OFHW mixtures was higher than those in AR and OFHW. The VS, volume, and weight reductions in LW-AR-OFHW co-digestion were 54.7%, 82.2%, and 72.7%, respectively. However, the VS, volume, and weight reductions in AR were only 11.1%, 20.5%, and 19.8%, respectively, and those in OFHW were only 27.4%, 45.0%, and 40.9%, respectively. The LW-AR-OFHW mixture co-digestions enhanced the methane production of the co-digester (256 m3/ton VS), whereas AR and OFHW produced only 12 and 93 m3 methane/ton VS, respectively. The dry anaerobic co-digestion of LW (livestock waste), OFHW (organic fraction of household waste), and AR (agricultural residue) was evaluated in terms of pH stability, organic removal rate, and methane yield. The total quantity of the solids involved in the digestion was adjusted to 25%. All the reactors were inoculated by 20% (in dry weight) of the municipal sludge. The dynamic changes in the pH values of the LW-AR-OFHW mixture co-digestions underwent four stages and differed from those of wet anaerobic digestion. The decrease in VS (volatile solids), volume, and weight of the LW-AR-OFHW mixtures was higher than those in AR and OFHW. The VS, volume, and weight reductions in LW-AR-OFHW co-digestion were 54.7%, 82.2%, and 72.7%, respectively. However, the VS, volume, and weight reductions in AR were only 11.1%, 20.5%, and 19.8%, respectively, and those in OFHW were only 27.4%, 45.0%, and 40.9%, respectively. The LW-AR-OFHW mixture co-digestions enhanced the methane production of the co-digester (256 m3/ton VS), whereas AR and OFHW produced only 12 and 93 m3 methane/ton VS, respectively. Rural organic solid waste Elsevier Multiple wastes Elsevier Dry anaerobic co-digestion Elsevier Li, Yingjun oth Gao, Jixi oth Huang, Caihong oth Chen, Bin oth Zhang, Lieyu oth Wang, Xiaowei oth Zhao, Ying oth Xi, Beidou oth Li, Xiang oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Solanki, Nayan ELSEVIER Rheological analysis of itraconazole-polymer mixtures to determine optimal melt extrusion temperature for development of amorphous solid dispersion 2017 the international journal Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV000529575 volume:93 year:2015 day:15 month:12 pages:2497-2502 extent:6 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2015.10.014 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U FID-PHARM SSG-OLC-PHA SSG-OPC-PHA 44.40 Pharmazie Pharmazeutika VZ AR 93 2015 15 1215 2497-2502 6 045F 600 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1016/j.energy.2015.10.014 doi GBVA2015012000005.pica (DE-627)ELV023620048 (ELSEVIER)S0360-5442(15)01378-X DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 600 600 DE-600 610 VZ 15,3 ssgn PHARM DE-84 fid 44.40 bkl Yang, Tianxue verfasserin aut Performance of dry anaerobic technology in the co-digestion of rural organic solid wastes in China 2015transfer abstract 6 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier The dry anaerobic co-digestion of LW (livestock waste), OFHW (organic fraction of household waste), and AR (agricultural residue) was evaluated in terms of pH stability, organic removal rate, and methane yield. The total quantity of the solids involved in the digestion was adjusted to 25%. All the reactors were inoculated by 20% (in dry weight) of the municipal sludge. The dynamic changes in the pH values of the LW-AR-OFHW mixture co-digestions underwent four stages and differed from those of wet anaerobic digestion. The decrease in VS (volatile solids), volume, and weight of the LW-AR-OFHW mixtures was higher than those in AR and OFHW. The VS, volume, and weight reductions in LW-AR-OFHW co-digestion were 54.7%, 82.2%, and 72.7%, respectively. However, the VS, volume, and weight reductions in AR were only 11.1%, 20.5%, and 19.8%, respectively, and those in OFHW were only 27.4%, 45.0%, and 40.9%, respectively. The LW-AR-OFHW mixture co-digestions enhanced the methane production of the co-digester (256 m3/ton VS), whereas AR and OFHW produced only 12 and 93 m3 methane/ton VS, respectively. The dry anaerobic co-digestion of LW (livestock waste), OFHW (organic fraction of household waste), and AR (agricultural residue) was evaluated in terms of pH stability, organic removal rate, and methane yield. The total quantity of the solids involved in the digestion was adjusted to 25%. All the reactors were inoculated by 20% (in dry weight) of the municipal sludge. The dynamic changes in the pH values of the LW-AR-OFHW mixture co-digestions underwent four stages and differed from those of wet anaerobic digestion. The decrease in VS (volatile solids), volume, and weight of the LW-AR-OFHW mixtures was higher than those in AR and OFHW. The VS, volume, and weight reductions in LW-AR-OFHW co-digestion were 54.7%, 82.2%, and 72.7%, respectively. However, the VS, volume, and weight reductions in AR were only 11.1%, 20.5%, and 19.8%, respectively, and those in OFHW were only 27.4%, 45.0%, and 40.9%, respectively. The LW-AR-OFHW mixture co-digestions enhanced the methane production of the co-digester (256 m3/ton VS), whereas AR and OFHW produced only 12 and 93 m3 methane/ton VS, respectively. Rural organic solid waste Elsevier Multiple wastes Elsevier Dry anaerobic co-digestion Elsevier Li, Yingjun oth Gao, Jixi oth Huang, Caihong oth Chen, Bin oth Zhang, Lieyu oth Wang, Xiaowei oth Zhao, Ying oth Xi, Beidou oth Li, Xiang oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Solanki, Nayan ELSEVIER Rheological analysis of itraconazole-polymer mixtures to determine optimal melt extrusion temperature for development of amorphous solid dispersion 2017 the international journal Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV000529575 volume:93 year:2015 day:15 month:12 pages:2497-2502 extent:6 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2015.10.014 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U FID-PHARM SSG-OLC-PHA SSG-OPC-PHA 44.40 Pharmazie Pharmazeutika VZ AR 93 2015 15 1215 2497-2502 6 045F 600 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in Rheological analysis of itraconazole-polymer mixtures to determine optimal melt extrusion temperature for development of amorphous solid dispersion Amsterdam [u.a.] volume:93 year:2015 day:15 month:12 pages:2497-2502 extent:6 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in Rheological analysis of itraconazole-polymer mixtures to determine optimal melt extrusion temperature for development of amorphous solid dispersion Amsterdam [u.a.] volume:93 year:2015 day:15 month:12 pages:2497-2502 extent:6 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| bklname |
Pharmazie Pharmazeutika |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
Rural organic solid waste Multiple wastes Dry anaerobic co-digestion |
| dewey-raw |
600 |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
Rheological analysis of itraconazole-polymer mixtures to determine optimal melt extrusion temperature for development of amorphous solid dispersion |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Yang, Tianxue @@aut@@ Li, Yingjun @@oth@@ Gao, Jixi @@oth@@ Huang, Caihong @@oth@@ Chen, Bin @@oth@@ Zhang, Lieyu @@oth@@ Wang, Xiaowei @@oth@@ Zhao, Ying @@oth@@ Xi, Beidou @@oth@@ Li, Xiang @@oth@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2015-01-15T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
ELV000529575 |
| dewey-sort |
3600 |
| id |
ELV023620048 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV023620048</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230625141511.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">180603s2015 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.energy.2015.10.014</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">GBVA2015012000005.pica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV023620048</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0360-5442(15)01378-X</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">600</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">610</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">15,3</subfield><subfield code="2">ssgn</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">PHARM</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-84</subfield><subfield code="2">fid</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">44.40</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Yang, Tianxue</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Performance of dry anaerobic technology in the co-digestion of rural organic solid wastes in China</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2015transfer abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">6</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The dry anaerobic co-digestion of LW (livestock waste), OFHW (organic fraction of household waste), and AR (agricultural residue) was evaluated in terms of pH stability, organic removal rate, and methane yield. The total quantity of the solids involved in the digestion was adjusted to 25%. All the reactors were inoculated by 20% (in dry weight) of the municipal sludge. The dynamic changes in the pH values of the LW-AR-OFHW mixture co-digestions underwent four stages and differed from those of wet anaerobic digestion. The decrease in VS (volatile solids), volume, and weight of the LW-AR-OFHW mixtures was higher than those in AR and OFHW. The VS, volume, and weight reductions in LW-AR-OFHW co-digestion were 54.7%, 82.2%, and 72.7%, respectively. However, the VS, volume, and weight reductions in AR were only 11.1%, 20.5%, and 19.8%, respectively, and those in OFHW were only 27.4%, 45.0%, and 40.9%, respectively. The LW-AR-OFHW mixture co-digestions enhanced the methane production of the co-digester (256 m3/ton VS), whereas AR and OFHW produced only 12 and 93 m3 methane/ton VS, respectively.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The dry anaerobic co-digestion of LW (livestock waste), OFHW (organic fraction of household waste), and AR (agricultural residue) was evaluated in terms of pH stability, organic removal rate, and methane yield. The total quantity of the solids involved in the digestion was adjusted to 25%. All the reactors were inoculated by 20% (in dry weight) of the municipal sludge. The dynamic changes in the pH values of the LW-AR-OFHW mixture co-digestions underwent four stages and differed from those of wet anaerobic digestion. The decrease in VS (volatile solids), volume, and weight of the LW-AR-OFHW mixtures was higher than those in AR and OFHW. The VS, volume, and weight reductions in LW-AR-OFHW co-digestion were 54.7%, 82.2%, and 72.7%, respectively. However, the VS, volume, and weight reductions in AR were only 11.1%, 20.5%, and 19.8%, respectively, and those in OFHW were only 27.4%, 45.0%, and 40.9%, respectively. The LW-AR-OFHW mixture co-digestions enhanced the methane production of the co-digester (256 m3/ton VS), whereas AR and OFHW produced only 12 and 93 m3 methane/ton VS, respectively.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Rural organic solid waste</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Multiple wastes</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Dry anaerobic co-digestion</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Li, Yingjun</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Gao, Jixi</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Huang, Caihong</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Chen, Bin</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Zhang, Lieyu</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Wang, Xiaowei</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Zhao, Ying</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Xi, Beidou</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Li, Xiang</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="n">Elsevier Science</subfield><subfield code="a">Solanki, Nayan ELSEVIER</subfield><subfield code="t">Rheological analysis of itraconazole-polymer mixtures to determine optimal melt extrusion temperature for development of amorphous solid dispersion</subfield><subfield code="d">2017</subfield><subfield code="d">the international journal</subfield><subfield code="g">Amsterdam [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)ELV000529575</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:93</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2015</subfield><subfield code="g">day:15</subfield><subfield code="g">month:12</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:2497-2502</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:6</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2015.10.014</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">FID-PHARM</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OPC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">44.40</subfield><subfield code="j">Pharmazie</subfield><subfield code="j">Pharmazeutika</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">93</subfield><subfield code="j">2015</subfield><subfield code="b">15</subfield><subfield code="c">1215</subfield><subfield code="h">2497-2502</subfield><subfield code="g">6</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="953" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="2">045F</subfield><subfield code="a">600</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Yang, Tianxue |
| spellingShingle |
Yang, Tianxue ddc 600 ddc 610 ssgn 15,3 fid PHARM bkl 44.40 Elsevier Rural organic solid waste Elsevier Multiple wastes Elsevier Dry anaerobic co-digestion Performance of dry anaerobic technology in the co-digestion of rural organic solid wastes in China |
| authorStr |
Yang, Tianxue |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)ELV000529575 |
| format |
electronic Article |
| dewey-ones |
600 - Technology 610 - Medicine & health |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut |
| collection |
elsevier |
| remote_str |
true |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| topic_title |
600 600 DE-600 610 VZ 15,3 ssgn PHARM DE-84 fid 44.40 bkl Performance of dry anaerobic technology in the co-digestion of rural organic solid wastes in China Rural organic solid waste Elsevier Multiple wastes Elsevier Dry anaerobic co-digestion Elsevier |
| topic |
ddc 600 ddc 610 ssgn 15,3 fid PHARM bkl 44.40 Elsevier Rural organic solid waste Elsevier Multiple wastes Elsevier Dry anaerobic co-digestion |
| topic_unstemmed |
ddc 600 ddc 610 ssgn 15,3 fid PHARM bkl 44.40 Elsevier Rural organic solid waste Elsevier Multiple wastes Elsevier Dry anaerobic co-digestion |
| topic_browse |
ddc 600 ddc 610 ssgn 15,3 fid PHARM bkl 44.40 Elsevier Rural organic solid waste Elsevier Multiple wastes Elsevier Dry anaerobic co-digestion |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
zu |
| author2_variant |
y l yl j g jg c h ch b c bc l z lz x w xw y z yz b x bx x l xl |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Rheological analysis of itraconazole-polymer mixtures to determine optimal melt extrusion temperature for development of amorphous solid dispersion |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
ELV000529575 |
| dewey-tens |
600 - Technology 610 - Medicine & health |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Rheological analysis of itraconazole-polymer mixtures to determine optimal melt extrusion temperature for development of amorphous solid dispersion |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)ELV000529575 |
| title |
Performance of dry anaerobic technology in the co-digestion of rural organic solid wastes in China |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)ELV023620048 (ELSEVIER)S0360-5442(15)01378-X |
| title_full |
Performance of dry anaerobic technology in the co-digestion of rural organic solid wastes in China |
| author_sort |
Yang, Tianxue |
| journal |
Rheological analysis of itraconazole-polymer mixtures to determine optimal melt extrusion temperature for development of amorphous solid dispersion |
| journalStr |
Rheological analysis of itraconazole-polymer mixtures to determine optimal melt extrusion temperature for development of amorphous solid dispersion |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| dewey-hundreds |
600 - Technology |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2015 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
zzz |
| container_start_page |
2497 |
| author_browse |
Yang, Tianxue |
| container_volume |
93 |
| physical |
6 |
| class |
600 600 DE-600 610 VZ 15,3 ssgn PHARM DE-84 fid 44.40 bkl |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Yang, Tianxue |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1016/j.energy.2015.10.014 |
| dewey-full |
600 610 |
| title_sort |
performance of dry anaerobic technology in the co-digestion of rural organic solid wastes in china |
| title_auth |
Performance of dry anaerobic technology in the co-digestion of rural organic solid wastes in China |
| abstract |
The dry anaerobic co-digestion of LW (livestock waste), OFHW (organic fraction of household waste), and AR (agricultural residue) was evaluated in terms of pH stability, organic removal rate, and methane yield. The total quantity of the solids involved in the digestion was adjusted to 25%. All the reactors were inoculated by 20% (in dry weight) of the municipal sludge. The dynamic changes in the pH values of the LW-AR-OFHW mixture co-digestions underwent four stages and differed from those of wet anaerobic digestion. The decrease in VS (volatile solids), volume, and weight of the LW-AR-OFHW mixtures was higher than those in AR and OFHW. The VS, volume, and weight reductions in LW-AR-OFHW co-digestion were 54.7%, 82.2%, and 72.7%, respectively. However, the VS, volume, and weight reductions in AR were only 11.1%, 20.5%, and 19.8%, respectively, and those in OFHW were only 27.4%, 45.0%, and 40.9%, respectively. The LW-AR-OFHW mixture co-digestions enhanced the methane production of the co-digester (256 m3/ton VS), whereas AR and OFHW produced only 12 and 93 m3 methane/ton VS, respectively. |
| abstractGer |
The dry anaerobic co-digestion of LW (livestock waste), OFHW (organic fraction of household waste), and AR (agricultural residue) was evaluated in terms of pH stability, organic removal rate, and methane yield. The total quantity of the solids involved in the digestion was adjusted to 25%. All the reactors were inoculated by 20% (in dry weight) of the municipal sludge. The dynamic changes in the pH values of the LW-AR-OFHW mixture co-digestions underwent four stages and differed from those of wet anaerobic digestion. The decrease in VS (volatile solids), volume, and weight of the LW-AR-OFHW mixtures was higher than those in AR and OFHW. The VS, volume, and weight reductions in LW-AR-OFHW co-digestion were 54.7%, 82.2%, and 72.7%, respectively. However, the VS, volume, and weight reductions in AR were only 11.1%, 20.5%, and 19.8%, respectively, and those in OFHW were only 27.4%, 45.0%, and 40.9%, respectively. The LW-AR-OFHW mixture co-digestions enhanced the methane production of the co-digester (256 m3/ton VS), whereas AR and OFHW produced only 12 and 93 m3 methane/ton VS, respectively. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
The dry anaerobic co-digestion of LW (livestock waste), OFHW (organic fraction of household waste), and AR (agricultural residue) was evaluated in terms of pH stability, organic removal rate, and methane yield. The total quantity of the solids involved in the digestion was adjusted to 25%. All the reactors were inoculated by 20% (in dry weight) of the municipal sludge. The dynamic changes in the pH values of the LW-AR-OFHW mixture co-digestions underwent four stages and differed from those of wet anaerobic digestion. The decrease in VS (volatile solids), volume, and weight of the LW-AR-OFHW mixtures was higher than those in AR and OFHW. The VS, volume, and weight reductions in LW-AR-OFHW co-digestion were 54.7%, 82.2%, and 72.7%, respectively. However, the VS, volume, and weight reductions in AR were only 11.1%, 20.5%, and 19.8%, respectively, and those in OFHW were only 27.4%, 45.0%, and 40.9%, respectively. The LW-AR-OFHW mixture co-digestions enhanced the methane production of the co-digester (256 m3/ton VS), whereas AR and OFHW produced only 12 and 93 m3 methane/ton VS, respectively. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U FID-PHARM SSG-OLC-PHA SSG-OPC-PHA |
| title_short |
Performance of dry anaerobic technology in the co-digestion of rural organic solid wastes in China |
| url |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2015.10.014 |
| remote_bool |
true |
| author2 |
Li, Yingjun Gao, Jixi Huang, Caihong Chen, Bin Zhang, Lieyu Wang, Xiaowei Zhao, Ying Xi, Beidou Li, Xiang |
| author2Str |
Li, Yingjun Gao, Jixi Huang, Caihong Chen, Bin Zhang, Lieyu Wang, Xiaowei Zhao, Ying Xi, Beidou Li, Xiang |
| ppnlink |
ELV000529575 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
z |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| author2_role |
oth oth oth oth oth oth oth oth oth |
| doi_str |
10.1016/j.energy.2015.10.014 |
| up_date |
2024-07-06T19:19:26.883Z |
| _version_ |
1803858547190005760 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV023620048</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230625141511.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">180603s2015 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.energy.2015.10.014</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">GBVA2015012000005.pica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV023620048</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0360-5442(15)01378-X</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">600</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">610</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">15,3</subfield><subfield code="2">ssgn</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">PHARM</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-84</subfield><subfield code="2">fid</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">44.40</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Yang, Tianxue</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Performance of dry anaerobic technology in the co-digestion of rural organic solid wastes in China</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2015transfer abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">6</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The dry anaerobic co-digestion of LW (livestock waste), OFHW (organic fraction of household waste), and AR (agricultural residue) was evaluated in terms of pH stability, organic removal rate, and methane yield. The total quantity of the solids involved in the digestion was adjusted to 25%. All the reactors were inoculated by 20% (in dry weight) of the municipal sludge. The dynamic changes in the pH values of the LW-AR-OFHW mixture co-digestions underwent four stages and differed from those of wet anaerobic digestion. The decrease in VS (volatile solids), volume, and weight of the LW-AR-OFHW mixtures was higher than those in AR and OFHW. The VS, volume, and weight reductions in LW-AR-OFHW co-digestion were 54.7%, 82.2%, and 72.7%, respectively. However, the VS, volume, and weight reductions in AR were only 11.1%, 20.5%, and 19.8%, respectively, and those in OFHW were only 27.4%, 45.0%, and 40.9%, respectively. The LW-AR-OFHW mixture co-digestions enhanced the methane production of the co-digester (256 m3/ton VS), whereas AR and OFHW produced only 12 and 93 m3 methane/ton VS, respectively.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The dry anaerobic co-digestion of LW (livestock waste), OFHW (organic fraction of household waste), and AR (agricultural residue) was evaluated in terms of pH stability, organic removal rate, and methane yield. The total quantity of the solids involved in the digestion was adjusted to 25%. All the reactors were inoculated by 20% (in dry weight) of the municipal sludge. The dynamic changes in the pH values of the LW-AR-OFHW mixture co-digestions underwent four stages and differed from those of wet anaerobic digestion. The decrease in VS (volatile solids), volume, and weight of the LW-AR-OFHW mixtures was higher than those in AR and OFHW. The VS, volume, and weight reductions in LW-AR-OFHW co-digestion were 54.7%, 82.2%, and 72.7%, respectively. However, the VS, volume, and weight reductions in AR were only 11.1%, 20.5%, and 19.8%, respectively, and those in OFHW were only 27.4%, 45.0%, and 40.9%, respectively. The LW-AR-OFHW mixture co-digestions enhanced the methane production of the co-digester (256 m3/ton VS), whereas AR and OFHW produced only 12 and 93 m3 methane/ton VS, respectively.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Rural organic solid waste</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Multiple wastes</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Dry anaerobic co-digestion</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Li, Yingjun</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Gao, Jixi</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Huang, Caihong</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Chen, Bin</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Zhang, Lieyu</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Wang, Xiaowei</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Zhao, Ying</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Xi, Beidou</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Li, Xiang</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="n">Elsevier Science</subfield><subfield code="a">Solanki, Nayan ELSEVIER</subfield><subfield code="t">Rheological analysis of itraconazole-polymer mixtures to determine optimal melt extrusion temperature for development of amorphous solid dispersion</subfield><subfield code="d">2017</subfield><subfield code="d">the international journal</subfield><subfield code="g">Amsterdam [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)ELV000529575</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:93</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2015</subfield><subfield code="g">day:15</subfield><subfield code="g">month:12</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:2497-2502</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:6</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2015.10.014</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">FID-PHARM</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OPC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">44.40</subfield><subfield code="j">Pharmazie</subfield><subfield code="j">Pharmazeutika</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">93</subfield><subfield code="j">2015</subfield><subfield code="b">15</subfield><subfield code="c">1215</subfield><subfield code="h">2497-2502</subfield><subfield code="g">6</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="953" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="2">045F</subfield><subfield code="a">600</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.3998337 |