Risk characterization of antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella in meat products
Antimicrobial resistance is considered to be a major public health concern in the framework of Horizon 2020. The risk to human health from foodborne antimicrobial resistant microorganisms can be determined and assessed using risk analysis tools in accordance with Codex principles. Therefore, the obj...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Doménech, Eva [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2015transfer abstract |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Umfang: |
6 |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Defining Tumour Shape Irregularity for Preoperative Risk Stratification of Clinically Localised Renal Cell Carcinoma - Tanaka, Hajime ELSEVIER, 2022, Amsterdam [u.a.] |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:57 ; year:2015 ; pages:18-23 ; extent:6 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1016/j.foodcont.2015.04.001 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
ELV02383708X |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ELV02383708X | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230625141748.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 180603s2015 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.foodcont.2015.04.001 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a GBVA2015016000016.pica |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)ELV02383708X | ||
| 035 | |a (ELSEVIER)S0956-7135(15)00198-X | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 082 | 0 | |a 630 |a 640 | |
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 630 |q DE-600 |
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 640 |q DE-600 |
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 610 |q VZ |
| 100 | 1 | |a Doménech, Eva |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Risk characterization of antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella in meat products |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2015transfer abstract | |
| 300 | |a 6 | ||
| 336 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zzz |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b z |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zu |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Antimicrobial resistance is considered to be a major public health concern in the framework of Horizon 2020. The risk to human health from foodborne antimicrobial resistant microorganisms can be determined and assessed using risk analysis tools in accordance with Codex principles. Therefore, the objective of this work was to determine the qualitative risk characterization of the presence of Salmonella resistant strains in meat products. Consequently, a total of 2050 whole and minced samples of poultry, pork and beef, were assessed. Samples were obtained by the Official Food Control Services of the Valencian administration (Spain), in the province of Valencia between January 2006 and June 2012. Salmonella was not found in any samples of beef. Salmonella strains isolated in poultry and pork samples were not resistant to amikacin, amoxicillin, cephalothin ciprofloxacin levofloxacin and ofloxacin. However, Salmonella isolates found in poultry had a high level of resistance to nalidixic acid, while those found in pork were more resistant to tetracycline and ampicillin. Furthermore, 41% of Salmonella isolates were resistant to three or more antibiotics. Finally, considering these results as exposure and taking into account the severity of the potential adverse health effects related to the different antimicrobials, risk characterization was estimated. As a result, three cases were classified as “Very high additional risk” all of them in minced meat, two cases in poultry (gentamicin and nalidixic acid) and one in pork (ampicillin). In the rest of the cases of resistance, the risk was classified as “high additional risk”. This highlights the importance of continued surveillance and the need to take measures in the primary sector in order to minimize the risk for the consumer. | ||
| 520 | |a Antimicrobial resistance is considered to be a major public health concern in the framework of Horizon 2020. The risk to human health from foodborne antimicrobial resistant microorganisms can be determined and assessed using risk analysis tools in accordance with Codex principles. Therefore, the objective of this work was to determine the qualitative risk characterization of the presence of Salmonella resistant strains in meat products. Consequently, a total of 2050 whole and minced samples of poultry, pork and beef, were assessed. Samples were obtained by the Official Food Control Services of the Valencian administration (Spain), in the province of Valencia between January 2006 and June 2012. Salmonella was not found in any samples of beef. Salmonella strains isolated in poultry and pork samples were not resistant to amikacin, amoxicillin, cephalothin ciprofloxacin levofloxacin and ofloxacin. However, Salmonella isolates found in poultry had a high level of resistance to nalidixic acid, while those found in pork were more resistant to tetracycline and ampicillin. Furthermore, 41% of Salmonella isolates were resistant to three or more antibiotics. Finally, considering these results as exposure and taking into account the severity of the potential adverse health effects related to the different antimicrobials, risk characterization was estimated. As a result, three cases were classified as “Very high additional risk” all of them in minced meat, two cases in poultry (gentamicin and nalidixic acid) and one in pork (ampicillin). In the rest of the cases of resistance, the risk was classified as “high additional risk”. This highlights the importance of continued surveillance and the need to take measures in the primary sector in order to minimize the risk for the consumer. | ||
| 650 | 7 | |a Official control |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Poultry |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Food safety |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Beef |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Antimicrobial resistance |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Pork |2 Elsevier | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Jiménez-Belenguer, Ana |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Pérez, Rosa |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Ferrús, María Antonia |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Escriche, Isabel |4 oth | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |n Elsevier Science |a Tanaka, Hajime ELSEVIER |t Defining Tumour Shape Irregularity for Preoperative Risk Stratification of Clinically Localised Renal Cell Carcinoma |d 2022 |g Amsterdam [u.a.] |w (DE-627)ELV009139680 |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:57 |g year:2015 |g pages:18-23 |g extent:6 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2015.04.001 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_U | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ELV | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_U | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-PHA | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 57 |j 2015 |h 18-23 |g 6 | ||
| 953 | |2 045F |a 630 | ||
| author_variant |
e d ed |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
domnechevajimnezbelengueranaprezrosaferr:2015----:ikhrceiainfniirbarssacosl |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2015transfer abstract |
| publishDate |
2015 |
| allfields |
10.1016/j.foodcont.2015.04.001 doi GBVA2015016000016.pica (DE-627)ELV02383708X (ELSEVIER)S0956-7135(15)00198-X DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 630 640 630 DE-600 640 DE-600 610 VZ Doménech, Eva verfasserin aut Risk characterization of antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella in meat products 2015transfer abstract 6 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Antimicrobial resistance is considered to be a major public health concern in the framework of Horizon 2020. The risk to human health from foodborne antimicrobial resistant microorganisms can be determined and assessed using risk analysis tools in accordance with Codex principles. Therefore, the objective of this work was to determine the qualitative risk characterization of the presence of Salmonella resistant strains in meat products. Consequently, a total of 2050 whole and minced samples of poultry, pork and beef, were assessed. Samples were obtained by the Official Food Control Services of the Valencian administration (Spain), in the province of Valencia between January 2006 and June 2012. Salmonella was not found in any samples of beef. Salmonella strains isolated in poultry and pork samples were not resistant to amikacin, amoxicillin, cephalothin ciprofloxacin levofloxacin and ofloxacin. However, Salmonella isolates found in poultry had a high level of resistance to nalidixic acid, while those found in pork were more resistant to tetracycline and ampicillin. Furthermore, 41% of Salmonella isolates were resistant to three or more antibiotics. Finally, considering these results as exposure and taking into account the severity of the potential adverse health effects related to the different antimicrobials, risk characterization was estimated. As a result, three cases were classified as “Very high additional risk” all of them in minced meat, two cases in poultry (gentamicin and nalidixic acid) and one in pork (ampicillin). In the rest of the cases of resistance, the risk was classified as “high additional risk”. This highlights the importance of continued surveillance and the need to take measures in the primary sector in order to minimize the risk for the consumer. Antimicrobial resistance is considered to be a major public health concern in the framework of Horizon 2020. The risk to human health from foodborne antimicrobial resistant microorganisms can be determined and assessed using risk analysis tools in accordance with Codex principles. Therefore, the objective of this work was to determine the qualitative risk characterization of the presence of Salmonella resistant strains in meat products. Consequently, a total of 2050 whole and minced samples of poultry, pork and beef, were assessed. Samples were obtained by the Official Food Control Services of the Valencian administration (Spain), in the province of Valencia between January 2006 and June 2012. Salmonella was not found in any samples of beef. Salmonella strains isolated in poultry and pork samples were not resistant to amikacin, amoxicillin, cephalothin ciprofloxacin levofloxacin and ofloxacin. However, Salmonella isolates found in poultry had a high level of resistance to nalidixic acid, while those found in pork were more resistant to tetracycline and ampicillin. Furthermore, 41% of Salmonella isolates were resistant to three or more antibiotics. Finally, considering these results as exposure and taking into account the severity of the potential adverse health effects related to the different antimicrobials, risk characterization was estimated. As a result, three cases were classified as “Very high additional risk” all of them in minced meat, two cases in poultry (gentamicin and nalidixic acid) and one in pork (ampicillin). In the rest of the cases of resistance, the risk was classified as “high additional risk”. This highlights the importance of continued surveillance and the need to take measures in the primary sector in order to minimize the risk for the consumer. Official control Elsevier Poultry Elsevier Food safety Elsevier Beef Elsevier Antimicrobial resistance Elsevier Pork Elsevier Jiménez-Belenguer, Ana oth Pérez, Rosa oth Ferrús, María Antonia oth Escriche, Isabel oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Tanaka, Hajime ELSEVIER Defining Tumour Shape Irregularity for Preoperative Risk Stratification of Clinically Localised Renal Cell Carcinoma 2022 Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV009139680 volume:57 year:2015 pages:18-23 extent:6 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2015.04.001 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA AR 57 2015 18-23 6 045F 630 |
| spelling |
10.1016/j.foodcont.2015.04.001 doi GBVA2015016000016.pica (DE-627)ELV02383708X (ELSEVIER)S0956-7135(15)00198-X DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 630 640 630 DE-600 640 DE-600 610 VZ Doménech, Eva verfasserin aut Risk characterization of antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella in meat products 2015transfer abstract 6 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Antimicrobial resistance is considered to be a major public health concern in the framework of Horizon 2020. The risk to human health from foodborne antimicrobial resistant microorganisms can be determined and assessed using risk analysis tools in accordance with Codex principles. Therefore, the objective of this work was to determine the qualitative risk characterization of the presence of Salmonella resistant strains in meat products. Consequently, a total of 2050 whole and minced samples of poultry, pork and beef, were assessed. Samples were obtained by the Official Food Control Services of the Valencian administration (Spain), in the province of Valencia between January 2006 and June 2012. Salmonella was not found in any samples of beef. Salmonella strains isolated in poultry and pork samples were not resistant to amikacin, amoxicillin, cephalothin ciprofloxacin levofloxacin and ofloxacin. However, Salmonella isolates found in poultry had a high level of resistance to nalidixic acid, while those found in pork were more resistant to tetracycline and ampicillin. Furthermore, 41% of Salmonella isolates were resistant to three or more antibiotics. Finally, considering these results as exposure and taking into account the severity of the potential adverse health effects related to the different antimicrobials, risk characterization was estimated. As a result, three cases were classified as “Very high additional risk” all of them in minced meat, two cases in poultry (gentamicin and nalidixic acid) and one in pork (ampicillin). In the rest of the cases of resistance, the risk was classified as “high additional risk”. This highlights the importance of continued surveillance and the need to take measures in the primary sector in order to minimize the risk for the consumer. Antimicrobial resistance is considered to be a major public health concern in the framework of Horizon 2020. The risk to human health from foodborne antimicrobial resistant microorganisms can be determined and assessed using risk analysis tools in accordance with Codex principles. Therefore, the objective of this work was to determine the qualitative risk characterization of the presence of Salmonella resistant strains in meat products. Consequently, a total of 2050 whole and minced samples of poultry, pork and beef, were assessed. Samples were obtained by the Official Food Control Services of the Valencian administration (Spain), in the province of Valencia between January 2006 and June 2012. Salmonella was not found in any samples of beef. Salmonella strains isolated in poultry and pork samples were not resistant to amikacin, amoxicillin, cephalothin ciprofloxacin levofloxacin and ofloxacin. However, Salmonella isolates found in poultry had a high level of resistance to nalidixic acid, while those found in pork were more resistant to tetracycline and ampicillin. Furthermore, 41% of Salmonella isolates were resistant to three or more antibiotics. Finally, considering these results as exposure and taking into account the severity of the potential adverse health effects related to the different antimicrobials, risk characterization was estimated. As a result, three cases were classified as “Very high additional risk” all of them in minced meat, two cases in poultry (gentamicin and nalidixic acid) and one in pork (ampicillin). In the rest of the cases of resistance, the risk was classified as “high additional risk”. This highlights the importance of continued surveillance and the need to take measures in the primary sector in order to minimize the risk for the consumer. Official control Elsevier Poultry Elsevier Food safety Elsevier Beef Elsevier Antimicrobial resistance Elsevier Pork Elsevier Jiménez-Belenguer, Ana oth Pérez, Rosa oth Ferrús, María Antonia oth Escriche, Isabel oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Tanaka, Hajime ELSEVIER Defining Tumour Shape Irregularity for Preoperative Risk Stratification of Clinically Localised Renal Cell Carcinoma 2022 Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV009139680 volume:57 year:2015 pages:18-23 extent:6 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2015.04.001 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA AR 57 2015 18-23 6 045F 630 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1016/j.foodcont.2015.04.001 doi GBVA2015016000016.pica (DE-627)ELV02383708X (ELSEVIER)S0956-7135(15)00198-X DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 630 640 630 DE-600 640 DE-600 610 VZ Doménech, Eva verfasserin aut Risk characterization of antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella in meat products 2015transfer abstract 6 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Antimicrobial resistance is considered to be a major public health concern in the framework of Horizon 2020. The risk to human health from foodborne antimicrobial resistant microorganisms can be determined and assessed using risk analysis tools in accordance with Codex principles. Therefore, the objective of this work was to determine the qualitative risk characterization of the presence of Salmonella resistant strains in meat products. Consequently, a total of 2050 whole and minced samples of poultry, pork and beef, were assessed. Samples were obtained by the Official Food Control Services of the Valencian administration (Spain), in the province of Valencia between January 2006 and June 2012. Salmonella was not found in any samples of beef. Salmonella strains isolated in poultry and pork samples were not resistant to amikacin, amoxicillin, cephalothin ciprofloxacin levofloxacin and ofloxacin. However, Salmonella isolates found in poultry had a high level of resistance to nalidixic acid, while those found in pork were more resistant to tetracycline and ampicillin. Furthermore, 41% of Salmonella isolates were resistant to three or more antibiotics. Finally, considering these results as exposure and taking into account the severity of the potential adverse health effects related to the different antimicrobials, risk characterization was estimated. As a result, three cases were classified as “Very high additional risk” all of them in minced meat, two cases in poultry (gentamicin and nalidixic acid) and one in pork (ampicillin). In the rest of the cases of resistance, the risk was classified as “high additional risk”. This highlights the importance of continued surveillance and the need to take measures in the primary sector in order to minimize the risk for the consumer. Antimicrobial resistance is considered to be a major public health concern in the framework of Horizon 2020. The risk to human health from foodborne antimicrobial resistant microorganisms can be determined and assessed using risk analysis tools in accordance with Codex principles. Therefore, the objective of this work was to determine the qualitative risk characterization of the presence of Salmonella resistant strains in meat products. Consequently, a total of 2050 whole and minced samples of poultry, pork and beef, were assessed. Samples were obtained by the Official Food Control Services of the Valencian administration (Spain), in the province of Valencia between January 2006 and June 2012. Salmonella was not found in any samples of beef. Salmonella strains isolated in poultry and pork samples were not resistant to amikacin, amoxicillin, cephalothin ciprofloxacin levofloxacin and ofloxacin. However, Salmonella isolates found in poultry had a high level of resistance to nalidixic acid, while those found in pork were more resistant to tetracycline and ampicillin. Furthermore, 41% of Salmonella isolates were resistant to three or more antibiotics. Finally, considering these results as exposure and taking into account the severity of the potential adverse health effects related to the different antimicrobials, risk characterization was estimated. As a result, three cases were classified as “Very high additional risk” all of them in minced meat, two cases in poultry (gentamicin and nalidixic acid) and one in pork (ampicillin). In the rest of the cases of resistance, the risk was classified as “high additional risk”. This highlights the importance of continued surveillance and the need to take measures in the primary sector in order to minimize the risk for the consumer. Official control Elsevier Poultry Elsevier Food safety Elsevier Beef Elsevier Antimicrobial resistance Elsevier Pork Elsevier Jiménez-Belenguer, Ana oth Pérez, Rosa oth Ferrús, María Antonia oth Escriche, Isabel oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Tanaka, Hajime ELSEVIER Defining Tumour Shape Irregularity for Preoperative Risk Stratification of Clinically Localised Renal Cell Carcinoma 2022 Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV009139680 volume:57 year:2015 pages:18-23 extent:6 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2015.04.001 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA AR 57 2015 18-23 6 045F 630 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1016/j.foodcont.2015.04.001 doi GBVA2015016000016.pica (DE-627)ELV02383708X (ELSEVIER)S0956-7135(15)00198-X DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 630 640 630 DE-600 640 DE-600 610 VZ Doménech, Eva verfasserin aut Risk characterization of antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella in meat products 2015transfer abstract 6 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Antimicrobial resistance is considered to be a major public health concern in the framework of Horizon 2020. The risk to human health from foodborne antimicrobial resistant microorganisms can be determined and assessed using risk analysis tools in accordance with Codex principles. Therefore, the objective of this work was to determine the qualitative risk characterization of the presence of Salmonella resistant strains in meat products. Consequently, a total of 2050 whole and minced samples of poultry, pork and beef, were assessed. Samples were obtained by the Official Food Control Services of the Valencian administration (Spain), in the province of Valencia between January 2006 and June 2012. Salmonella was not found in any samples of beef. Salmonella strains isolated in poultry and pork samples were not resistant to amikacin, amoxicillin, cephalothin ciprofloxacin levofloxacin and ofloxacin. However, Salmonella isolates found in poultry had a high level of resistance to nalidixic acid, while those found in pork were more resistant to tetracycline and ampicillin. Furthermore, 41% of Salmonella isolates were resistant to three or more antibiotics. Finally, considering these results as exposure and taking into account the severity of the potential adverse health effects related to the different antimicrobials, risk characterization was estimated. As a result, three cases were classified as “Very high additional risk” all of them in minced meat, two cases in poultry (gentamicin and nalidixic acid) and one in pork (ampicillin). In the rest of the cases of resistance, the risk was classified as “high additional risk”. This highlights the importance of continued surveillance and the need to take measures in the primary sector in order to minimize the risk for the consumer. Antimicrobial resistance is considered to be a major public health concern in the framework of Horizon 2020. The risk to human health from foodborne antimicrobial resistant microorganisms can be determined and assessed using risk analysis tools in accordance with Codex principles. Therefore, the objective of this work was to determine the qualitative risk characterization of the presence of Salmonella resistant strains in meat products. Consequently, a total of 2050 whole and minced samples of poultry, pork and beef, were assessed. Samples were obtained by the Official Food Control Services of the Valencian administration (Spain), in the province of Valencia between January 2006 and June 2012. Salmonella was not found in any samples of beef. Salmonella strains isolated in poultry and pork samples were not resistant to amikacin, amoxicillin, cephalothin ciprofloxacin levofloxacin and ofloxacin. However, Salmonella isolates found in poultry had a high level of resistance to nalidixic acid, while those found in pork were more resistant to tetracycline and ampicillin. Furthermore, 41% of Salmonella isolates were resistant to three or more antibiotics. Finally, considering these results as exposure and taking into account the severity of the potential adverse health effects related to the different antimicrobials, risk characterization was estimated. As a result, three cases were classified as “Very high additional risk” all of them in minced meat, two cases in poultry (gentamicin and nalidixic acid) and one in pork (ampicillin). In the rest of the cases of resistance, the risk was classified as “high additional risk”. This highlights the importance of continued surveillance and the need to take measures in the primary sector in order to minimize the risk for the consumer. Official control Elsevier Poultry Elsevier Food safety Elsevier Beef Elsevier Antimicrobial resistance Elsevier Pork Elsevier Jiménez-Belenguer, Ana oth Pérez, Rosa oth Ferrús, María Antonia oth Escriche, Isabel oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Tanaka, Hajime ELSEVIER Defining Tumour Shape Irregularity for Preoperative Risk Stratification of Clinically Localised Renal Cell Carcinoma 2022 Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV009139680 volume:57 year:2015 pages:18-23 extent:6 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2015.04.001 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA AR 57 2015 18-23 6 045F 630 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1016/j.foodcont.2015.04.001 doi GBVA2015016000016.pica (DE-627)ELV02383708X (ELSEVIER)S0956-7135(15)00198-X DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 630 640 630 DE-600 640 DE-600 610 VZ Doménech, Eva verfasserin aut Risk characterization of antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella in meat products 2015transfer abstract 6 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Antimicrobial resistance is considered to be a major public health concern in the framework of Horizon 2020. The risk to human health from foodborne antimicrobial resistant microorganisms can be determined and assessed using risk analysis tools in accordance with Codex principles. Therefore, the objective of this work was to determine the qualitative risk characterization of the presence of Salmonella resistant strains in meat products. Consequently, a total of 2050 whole and minced samples of poultry, pork and beef, were assessed. Samples were obtained by the Official Food Control Services of the Valencian administration (Spain), in the province of Valencia between January 2006 and June 2012. Salmonella was not found in any samples of beef. Salmonella strains isolated in poultry and pork samples were not resistant to amikacin, amoxicillin, cephalothin ciprofloxacin levofloxacin and ofloxacin. However, Salmonella isolates found in poultry had a high level of resistance to nalidixic acid, while those found in pork were more resistant to tetracycline and ampicillin. Furthermore, 41% of Salmonella isolates were resistant to three or more antibiotics. Finally, considering these results as exposure and taking into account the severity of the potential adverse health effects related to the different antimicrobials, risk characterization was estimated. As a result, three cases were classified as “Very high additional risk” all of them in minced meat, two cases in poultry (gentamicin and nalidixic acid) and one in pork (ampicillin). In the rest of the cases of resistance, the risk was classified as “high additional risk”. This highlights the importance of continued surveillance and the need to take measures in the primary sector in order to minimize the risk for the consumer. Antimicrobial resistance is considered to be a major public health concern in the framework of Horizon 2020. The risk to human health from foodborne antimicrobial resistant microorganisms can be determined and assessed using risk analysis tools in accordance with Codex principles. Therefore, the objective of this work was to determine the qualitative risk characterization of the presence of Salmonella resistant strains in meat products. Consequently, a total of 2050 whole and minced samples of poultry, pork and beef, were assessed. Samples were obtained by the Official Food Control Services of the Valencian administration (Spain), in the province of Valencia between January 2006 and June 2012. Salmonella was not found in any samples of beef. Salmonella strains isolated in poultry and pork samples were not resistant to amikacin, amoxicillin, cephalothin ciprofloxacin levofloxacin and ofloxacin. However, Salmonella isolates found in poultry had a high level of resistance to nalidixic acid, while those found in pork were more resistant to tetracycline and ampicillin. Furthermore, 41% of Salmonella isolates were resistant to three or more antibiotics. Finally, considering these results as exposure and taking into account the severity of the potential adverse health effects related to the different antimicrobials, risk characterization was estimated. As a result, three cases were classified as “Very high additional risk” all of them in minced meat, two cases in poultry (gentamicin and nalidixic acid) and one in pork (ampicillin). In the rest of the cases of resistance, the risk was classified as “high additional risk”. This highlights the importance of continued surveillance and the need to take measures in the primary sector in order to minimize the risk for the consumer. Official control Elsevier Poultry Elsevier Food safety Elsevier Beef Elsevier Antimicrobial resistance Elsevier Pork Elsevier Jiménez-Belenguer, Ana oth Pérez, Rosa oth Ferrús, María Antonia oth Escriche, Isabel oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Tanaka, Hajime ELSEVIER Defining Tumour Shape Irregularity for Preoperative Risk Stratification of Clinically Localised Renal Cell Carcinoma 2022 Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV009139680 volume:57 year:2015 pages:18-23 extent:6 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2015.04.001 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA AR 57 2015 18-23 6 045F 630 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in Defining Tumour Shape Irregularity for Preoperative Risk Stratification of Clinically Localised Renal Cell Carcinoma Amsterdam [u.a.] volume:57 year:2015 pages:18-23 extent:6 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in Defining Tumour Shape Irregularity for Preoperative Risk Stratification of Clinically Localised Renal Cell Carcinoma Amsterdam [u.a.] volume:57 year:2015 pages:18-23 extent:6 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
Official control Poultry Food safety Beef Antimicrobial resistance Pork |
| dewey-raw |
630 |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
Defining Tumour Shape Irregularity for Preoperative Risk Stratification of Clinically Localised Renal Cell Carcinoma |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Doménech, Eva @@aut@@ Jiménez-Belenguer, Ana @@oth@@ Pérez, Rosa @@oth@@ Ferrús, María Antonia @@oth@@ Escriche, Isabel @@oth@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2015-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
ELV009139680 |
| dewey-sort |
3630 |
| id |
ELV02383708X |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV02383708X</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230625141748.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">180603s2015 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.foodcont.2015.04.001</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">GBVA2015016000016.pica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV02383708X</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0956-7135(15)00198-X</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">630</subfield><subfield code="a">640</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">630</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">640</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">610</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Doménech, Eva</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Risk characterization of antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella in meat products</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2015transfer abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">6</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Antimicrobial resistance is considered to be a major public health concern in the framework of Horizon 2020. The risk to human health from foodborne antimicrobial resistant microorganisms can be determined and assessed using risk analysis tools in accordance with Codex principles. Therefore, the objective of this work was to determine the qualitative risk characterization of the presence of Salmonella resistant strains in meat products. Consequently, a total of 2050 whole and minced samples of poultry, pork and beef, were assessed. Samples were obtained by the Official Food Control Services of the Valencian administration (Spain), in the province of Valencia between January 2006 and June 2012. Salmonella was not found in any samples of beef. Salmonella strains isolated in poultry and pork samples were not resistant to amikacin, amoxicillin, cephalothin ciprofloxacin levofloxacin and ofloxacin. However, Salmonella isolates found in poultry had a high level of resistance to nalidixic acid, while those found in pork were more resistant to tetracycline and ampicillin. Furthermore, 41% of Salmonella isolates were resistant to three or more antibiotics. Finally, considering these results as exposure and taking into account the severity of the potential adverse health effects related to the different antimicrobials, risk characterization was estimated. As a result, three cases were classified as “Very high additional risk” all of them in minced meat, two cases in poultry (gentamicin and nalidixic acid) and one in pork (ampicillin). In the rest of the cases of resistance, the risk was classified as “high additional risk”. This highlights the importance of continued surveillance and the need to take measures in the primary sector in order to minimize the risk for the consumer.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Antimicrobial resistance is considered to be a major public health concern in the framework of Horizon 2020. The risk to human health from foodborne antimicrobial resistant microorganisms can be determined and assessed using risk analysis tools in accordance with Codex principles. Therefore, the objective of this work was to determine the qualitative risk characterization of the presence of Salmonella resistant strains in meat products. Consequently, a total of 2050 whole and minced samples of poultry, pork and beef, were assessed. Samples were obtained by the Official Food Control Services of the Valencian administration (Spain), in the province of Valencia between January 2006 and June 2012. Salmonella was not found in any samples of beef. Salmonella strains isolated in poultry and pork samples were not resistant to amikacin, amoxicillin, cephalothin ciprofloxacin levofloxacin and ofloxacin. However, Salmonella isolates found in poultry had a high level of resistance to nalidixic acid, while those found in pork were more resistant to tetracycline and ampicillin. Furthermore, 41% of Salmonella isolates were resistant to three or more antibiotics. Finally, considering these results as exposure and taking into account the severity of the potential adverse health effects related to the different antimicrobials, risk characterization was estimated. As a result, three cases were classified as “Very high additional risk” all of them in minced meat, two cases in poultry (gentamicin and nalidixic acid) and one in pork (ampicillin). In the rest of the cases of resistance, the risk was classified as “high additional risk”. This highlights the importance of continued surveillance and the need to take measures in the primary sector in order to minimize the risk for the consumer.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Official control</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Poultry</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Food safety</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Beef</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Antimicrobial resistance</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Pork</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Jiménez-Belenguer, Ana</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Pérez, Rosa</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ferrús, María Antonia</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Escriche, Isabel</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="n">Elsevier Science</subfield><subfield code="a">Tanaka, Hajime ELSEVIER</subfield><subfield code="t">Defining Tumour Shape Irregularity for Preoperative Risk Stratification of Clinically Localised Renal Cell Carcinoma</subfield><subfield code="d">2022</subfield><subfield code="g">Amsterdam [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)ELV009139680</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:57</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2015</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:18-23</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:6</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2015.04.001</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">57</subfield><subfield code="j">2015</subfield><subfield code="h">18-23</subfield><subfield code="g">6</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="953" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="2">045F</subfield><subfield code="a">630</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Doménech, Eva |
| spellingShingle |
Doménech, Eva ddc 630 ddc 640 ddc 610 Elsevier Official control Elsevier Poultry Elsevier Food safety Elsevier Beef Elsevier Antimicrobial resistance Elsevier Pork Risk characterization of antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella in meat products |
| authorStr |
Doménech, Eva |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)ELV009139680 |
| format |
electronic Article |
| dewey-ones |
630 - Agriculture & related technologies 640 - Home & family management 610 - Medicine & health |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut |
| collection |
elsevier |
| remote_str |
true |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| topic_title |
630 640 630 DE-600 640 DE-600 610 VZ Risk characterization of antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella in meat products Official control Elsevier Poultry Elsevier Food safety Elsevier Beef Elsevier Antimicrobial resistance Elsevier Pork Elsevier |
| topic |
ddc 630 ddc 640 ddc 610 Elsevier Official control Elsevier Poultry Elsevier Food safety Elsevier Beef Elsevier Antimicrobial resistance Elsevier Pork |
| topic_unstemmed |
ddc 630 ddc 640 ddc 610 Elsevier Official control Elsevier Poultry Elsevier Food safety Elsevier Beef Elsevier Antimicrobial resistance Elsevier Pork |
| topic_browse |
ddc 630 ddc 640 ddc 610 Elsevier Official control Elsevier Poultry Elsevier Food safety Elsevier Beef Elsevier Antimicrobial resistance Elsevier Pork |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
zu |
| author2_variant |
a j b ajb r p rp m a f ma maf i e ie |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Defining Tumour Shape Irregularity for Preoperative Risk Stratification of Clinically Localised Renal Cell Carcinoma |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
ELV009139680 |
| dewey-tens |
630 - Agriculture 640 - Home & family management 610 - Medicine & health |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Defining Tumour Shape Irregularity for Preoperative Risk Stratification of Clinically Localised Renal Cell Carcinoma |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)ELV009139680 |
| title |
Risk characterization of antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella in meat products |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)ELV02383708X (ELSEVIER)S0956-7135(15)00198-X |
| title_full |
Risk characterization of antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella in meat products |
| author_sort |
Doménech, Eva |
| journal |
Defining Tumour Shape Irregularity for Preoperative Risk Stratification of Clinically Localised Renal Cell Carcinoma |
| journalStr |
Defining Tumour Shape Irregularity for Preoperative Risk Stratification of Clinically Localised Renal Cell Carcinoma |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| dewey-hundreds |
600 - Technology |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2015 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
zzz |
| container_start_page |
18 |
| author_browse |
Doménech, Eva |
| container_volume |
57 |
| physical |
6 |
| class |
630 640 630 DE-600 640 DE-600 610 VZ |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Doménech, Eva |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1016/j.foodcont.2015.04.001 |
| dewey-full |
630 640 610 |
| title_sort |
risk characterization of antimicrobial resistance of salmonella in meat products |
| title_auth |
Risk characterization of antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella in meat products |
| abstract |
Antimicrobial resistance is considered to be a major public health concern in the framework of Horizon 2020. The risk to human health from foodborne antimicrobial resistant microorganisms can be determined and assessed using risk analysis tools in accordance with Codex principles. Therefore, the objective of this work was to determine the qualitative risk characterization of the presence of Salmonella resistant strains in meat products. Consequently, a total of 2050 whole and minced samples of poultry, pork and beef, were assessed. Samples were obtained by the Official Food Control Services of the Valencian administration (Spain), in the province of Valencia between January 2006 and June 2012. Salmonella was not found in any samples of beef. Salmonella strains isolated in poultry and pork samples were not resistant to amikacin, amoxicillin, cephalothin ciprofloxacin levofloxacin and ofloxacin. However, Salmonella isolates found in poultry had a high level of resistance to nalidixic acid, while those found in pork were more resistant to tetracycline and ampicillin. Furthermore, 41% of Salmonella isolates were resistant to three or more antibiotics. Finally, considering these results as exposure and taking into account the severity of the potential adverse health effects related to the different antimicrobials, risk characterization was estimated. As a result, three cases were classified as “Very high additional risk” all of them in minced meat, two cases in poultry (gentamicin and nalidixic acid) and one in pork (ampicillin). In the rest of the cases of resistance, the risk was classified as “high additional risk”. This highlights the importance of continued surveillance and the need to take measures in the primary sector in order to minimize the risk for the consumer. |
| abstractGer |
Antimicrobial resistance is considered to be a major public health concern in the framework of Horizon 2020. The risk to human health from foodborne antimicrobial resistant microorganisms can be determined and assessed using risk analysis tools in accordance with Codex principles. Therefore, the objective of this work was to determine the qualitative risk characterization of the presence of Salmonella resistant strains in meat products. Consequently, a total of 2050 whole and minced samples of poultry, pork and beef, were assessed. Samples were obtained by the Official Food Control Services of the Valencian administration (Spain), in the province of Valencia between January 2006 and June 2012. Salmonella was not found in any samples of beef. Salmonella strains isolated in poultry and pork samples were not resistant to amikacin, amoxicillin, cephalothin ciprofloxacin levofloxacin and ofloxacin. However, Salmonella isolates found in poultry had a high level of resistance to nalidixic acid, while those found in pork were more resistant to tetracycline and ampicillin. Furthermore, 41% of Salmonella isolates were resistant to three or more antibiotics. Finally, considering these results as exposure and taking into account the severity of the potential adverse health effects related to the different antimicrobials, risk characterization was estimated. As a result, three cases were classified as “Very high additional risk” all of them in minced meat, two cases in poultry (gentamicin and nalidixic acid) and one in pork (ampicillin). In the rest of the cases of resistance, the risk was classified as “high additional risk”. This highlights the importance of continued surveillance and the need to take measures in the primary sector in order to minimize the risk for the consumer. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
Antimicrobial resistance is considered to be a major public health concern in the framework of Horizon 2020. The risk to human health from foodborne antimicrobial resistant microorganisms can be determined and assessed using risk analysis tools in accordance with Codex principles. Therefore, the objective of this work was to determine the qualitative risk characterization of the presence of Salmonella resistant strains in meat products. Consequently, a total of 2050 whole and minced samples of poultry, pork and beef, were assessed. Samples were obtained by the Official Food Control Services of the Valencian administration (Spain), in the province of Valencia between January 2006 and June 2012. Salmonella was not found in any samples of beef. Salmonella strains isolated in poultry and pork samples were not resistant to amikacin, amoxicillin, cephalothin ciprofloxacin levofloxacin and ofloxacin. However, Salmonella isolates found in poultry had a high level of resistance to nalidixic acid, while those found in pork were more resistant to tetracycline and ampicillin. Furthermore, 41% of Salmonella isolates were resistant to three or more antibiotics. Finally, considering these results as exposure and taking into account the severity of the potential adverse health effects related to the different antimicrobials, risk characterization was estimated. As a result, three cases were classified as “Very high additional risk” all of them in minced meat, two cases in poultry (gentamicin and nalidixic acid) and one in pork (ampicillin). In the rest of the cases of resistance, the risk was classified as “high additional risk”. This highlights the importance of continued surveillance and the need to take measures in the primary sector in order to minimize the risk for the consumer. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA |
| title_short |
Risk characterization of antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella in meat products |
| url |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2015.04.001 |
| remote_bool |
true |
| author2 |
Jiménez-Belenguer, Ana Pérez, Rosa Ferrús, María Antonia Escriche, Isabel |
| author2Str |
Jiménez-Belenguer, Ana Pérez, Rosa Ferrús, María Antonia Escriche, Isabel |
| ppnlink |
ELV009139680 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
z |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| author2_role |
oth oth oth oth |
| doi_str |
10.1016/j.foodcont.2015.04.001 |
| up_date |
2024-07-06T19:51:25.732Z |
| _version_ |
1803860559249014784 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV02383708X</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230625141748.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">180603s2015 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.foodcont.2015.04.001</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">GBVA2015016000016.pica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV02383708X</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0956-7135(15)00198-X</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">630</subfield><subfield code="a">640</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">630</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">640</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">610</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Doménech, Eva</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Risk characterization of antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella in meat products</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2015transfer abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">6</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Antimicrobial resistance is considered to be a major public health concern in the framework of Horizon 2020. The risk to human health from foodborne antimicrobial resistant microorganisms can be determined and assessed using risk analysis tools in accordance with Codex principles. Therefore, the objective of this work was to determine the qualitative risk characterization of the presence of Salmonella resistant strains in meat products. Consequently, a total of 2050 whole and minced samples of poultry, pork and beef, were assessed. Samples were obtained by the Official Food Control Services of the Valencian administration (Spain), in the province of Valencia between January 2006 and June 2012. Salmonella was not found in any samples of beef. Salmonella strains isolated in poultry and pork samples were not resistant to amikacin, amoxicillin, cephalothin ciprofloxacin levofloxacin and ofloxacin. However, Salmonella isolates found in poultry had a high level of resistance to nalidixic acid, while those found in pork were more resistant to tetracycline and ampicillin. Furthermore, 41% of Salmonella isolates were resistant to three or more antibiotics. Finally, considering these results as exposure and taking into account the severity of the potential adverse health effects related to the different antimicrobials, risk characterization was estimated. As a result, three cases were classified as “Very high additional risk” all of them in minced meat, two cases in poultry (gentamicin and nalidixic acid) and one in pork (ampicillin). In the rest of the cases of resistance, the risk was classified as “high additional risk”. This highlights the importance of continued surveillance and the need to take measures in the primary sector in order to minimize the risk for the consumer.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Antimicrobial resistance is considered to be a major public health concern in the framework of Horizon 2020. The risk to human health from foodborne antimicrobial resistant microorganisms can be determined and assessed using risk analysis tools in accordance with Codex principles. Therefore, the objective of this work was to determine the qualitative risk characterization of the presence of Salmonella resistant strains in meat products. Consequently, a total of 2050 whole and minced samples of poultry, pork and beef, were assessed. Samples were obtained by the Official Food Control Services of the Valencian administration (Spain), in the province of Valencia between January 2006 and June 2012. Salmonella was not found in any samples of beef. Salmonella strains isolated in poultry and pork samples were not resistant to amikacin, amoxicillin, cephalothin ciprofloxacin levofloxacin and ofloxacin. However, Salmonella isolates found in poultry had a high level of resistance to nalidixic acid, while those found in pork were more resistant to tetracycline and ampicillin. Furthermore, 41% of Salmonella isolates were resistant to three or more antibiotics. Finally, considering these results as exposure and taking into account the severity of the potential adverse health effects related to the different antimicrobials, risk characterization was estimated. As a result, three cases were classified as “Very high additional risk” all of them in minced meat, two cases in poultry (gentamicin and nalidixic acid) and one in pork (ampicillin). In the rest of the cases of resistance, the risk was classified as “high additional risk”. This highlights the importance of continued surveillance and the need to take measures in the primary sector in order to minimize the risk for the consumer.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Official control</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Poultry</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Food safety</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Beef</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Antimicrobial resistance</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Pork</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Jiménez-Belenguer, Ana</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Pérez, Rosa</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ferrús, María Antonia</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Escriche, Isabel</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="n">Elsevier Science</subfield><subfield code="a">Tanaka, Hajime ELSEVIER</subfield><subfield code="t">Defining Tumour Shape Irregularity for Preoperative Risk Stratification of Clinically Localised Renal Cell Carcinoma</subfield><subfield code="d">2022</subfield><subfield code="g">Amsterdam [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)ELV009139680</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:57</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2015</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:18-23</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:6</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2015.04.001</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">57</subfield><subfield code="j">2015</subfield><subfield code="h">18-23</subfield><subfield code="g">6</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="953" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="2">045F</subfield><subfield code="a">630</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.3996267 |