Detecting syntactic and semantic anomalies in schizophrenia
One of the major challenges in the study of language in schizophrenia is to identify specific levels of the linguistic structure that might be selectively impaired. While historically a main semantic deficit has been widely claimed, results are mixed, with also evidence of syntactic impairment. This...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Moro, Andrea [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2015transfer abstract |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Umfang: |
11 |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Articles That May Change Your Practice: Pelvic Binders Revisited - MacDonald, Russell D. ELSEVIER, 2023, an international journal in behavioural and cognitive neuroscience, Amsterdam [u.a.] |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:79 ; year:2015 ; pages:147-157 ; extent:11 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.10.030 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
ELV024057614 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ELV024057614 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230625142137.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 180603s2015 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.10.030 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a GBVA2015023000012.pica |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)ELV024057614 | ||
| 035 | |a (ELSEVIER)S0028-3932(15)30206-2 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 082 | 0 | |a 610 | |
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 610 |q DE-600 |
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 610 |q VZ |
| 084 | |a 44.71 |2 bkl | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Moro, Andrea |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Detecting syntactic and semantic anomalies in schizophrenia |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2015transfer abstract | |
| 300 | |a 11 | ||
| 336 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zzz |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b z |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zu |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a One of the major challenges in the study of language in schizophrenia is to identify specific levels of the linguistic structure that might be selectively impaired. While historically a main semantic deficit has been widely claimed, results are mixed, with also evidence of syntactic impairment. This might be due to heterogeneity in materials and paradigms across studies, which often do not allow to tap into single linguistic components. Moreover, the interaction between linguistic and neurocognitive deficits is still unclear. In this study, we concentrated on syntactic and semantic knowledge. We employed an anomaly detection task including short and long sentences with either syntactic errors violating the principles of Universal Grammar, or a novel form of semantic errors, resulting from a contradiction in the computation of the whole sentence meaning. Fifty-eight patients with diagnosis of schizophrenia were compared to 30 healthy subjects. Results showed that, in patients, only the ability to identify syntactic anomaly, both in short and long sentences, was impaired. This result cannot be explained by working memory abilities or psychopathological features. These findings suggest the presence of an impairment of syntactic knowledge in schizophrenia, at least partially independent of the cognitive and psychopathological profile. On the contrary, we cannot conclude that there is a semantic impairment, at least in terms of compositional semantics abilities. | ||
| 520 | |a One of the major challenges in the study of language in schizophrenia is to identify specific levels of the linguistic structure that might be selectively impaired. While historically a main semantic deficit has been widely claimed, results are mixed, with also evidence of syntactic impairment. This might be due to heterogeneity in materials and paradigms across studies, which often do not allow to tap into single linguistic components. Moreover, the interaction between linguistic and neurocognitive deficits is still unclear. In this study, we concentrated on syntactic and semantic knowledge. We employed an anomaly detection task including short and long sentences with either syntactic errors violating the principles of Universal Grammar, or a novel form of semantic errors, resulting from a contradiction in the computation of the whole sentence meaning. Fifty-eight patients with diagnosis of schizophrenia were compared to 30 healthy subjects. Results showed that, in patients, only the ability to identify syntactic anomaly, both in short and long sentences, was impaired. This result cannot be explained by working memory abilities or psychopathological features. These findings suggest the presence of an impairment of syntactic knowledge in schizophrenia, at least partially independent of the cognitive and psychopathological profile. On the contrary, we cannot conclude that there is a semantic impairment, at least in terms of compositional semantics abilities. | ||
| 650 | 7 | |a Language |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Semantics |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Grammaticality judgments |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Schizophrenia |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Anomaly |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Syntax |2 Elsevier | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Bambini, Valentina |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Bosia, Marta |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Anselmetti, Simona |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Riccaboni, Roberta |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Cappa, Stefano F. |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Smeraldi, Enrico |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Cavallaro, Roberto |4 oth | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |n Elsevier Science |a MacDonald, Russell D. ELSEVIER |t Articles That May Change Your Practice: Pelvic Binders Revisited |d 2023 |d an international journal in behavioural and cognitive neuroscience |g Amsterdam [u.a.] |w (DE-627)ELV009449108 |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:79 |g year:2015 |g pages:147-157 |g extent:11 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.10.030 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_U | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ELV | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_U | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-PHA | ||
| 936 | b | k | |a 44.71 |j Verkehrsmedizin |q VZ |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 79 |j 2015 |h 147-157 |g 11 | ||
| 953 | |2 045F |a 610 | ||
| author_variant |
a m am |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
moroandreabambinivalentinabosiamartaanse:2015----:eetnsnatcnsmniaoais |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2015transfer abstract |
| bklnumber |
44.71 |
| publishDate |
2015 |
| allfields |
10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.10.030 doi GBVA2015023000012.pica (DE-627)ELV024057614 (ELSEVIER)S0028-3932(15)30206-2 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 610 610 DE-600 610 VZ 44.71 bkl Moro, Andrea verfasserin aut Detecting syntactic and semantic anomalies in schizophrenia 2015transfer abstract 11 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier One of the major challenges in the study of language in schizophrenia is to identify specific levels of the linguistic structure that might be selectively impaired. While historically a main semantic deficit has been widely claimed, results are mixed, with also evidence of syntactic impairment. This might be due to heterogeneity in materials and paradigms across studies, which often do not allow to tap into single linguistic components. Moreover, the interaction between linguistic and neurocognitive deficits is still unclear. In this study, we concentrated on syntactic and semantic knowledge. We employed an anomaly detection task including short and long sentences with either syntactic errors violating the principles of Universal Grammar, or a novel form of semantic errors, resulting from a contradiction in the computation of the whole sentence meaning. Fifty-eight patients with diagnosis of schizophrenia were compared to 30 healthy subjects. Results showed that, in patients, only the ability to identify syntactic anomaly, both in short and long sentences, was impaired. This result cannot be explained by working memory abilities or psychopathological features. These findings suggest the presence of an impairment of syntactic knowledge in schizophrenia, at least partially independent of the cognitive and psychopathological profile. On the contrary, we cannot conclude that there is a semantic impairment, at least in terms of compositional semantics abilities. One of the major challenges in the study of language in schizophrenia is to identify specific levels of the linguistic structure that might be selectively impaired. While historically a main semantic deficit has been widely claimed, results are mixed, with also evidence of syntactic impairment. This might be due to heterogeneity in materials and paradigms across studies, which often do not allow to tap into single linguistic components. Moreover, the interaction between linguistic and neurocognitive deficits is still unclear. In this study, we concentrated on syntactic and semantic knowledge. We employed an anomaly detection task including short and long sentences with either syntactic errors violating the principles of Universal Grammar, or a novel form of semantic errors, resulting from a contradiction in the computation of the whole sentence meaning. Fifty-eight patients with diagnosis of schizophrenia were compared to 30 healthy subjects. Results showed that, in patients, only the ability to identify syntactic anomaly, both in short and long sentences, was impaired. This result cannot be explained by working memory abilities or psychopathological features. These findings suggest the presence of an impairment of syntactic knowledge in schizophrenia, at least partially independent of the cognitive and psychopathological profile. On the contrary, we cannot conclude that there is a semantic impairment, at least in terms of compositional semantics abilities. Language Elsevier Semantics Elsevier Grammaticality judgments Elsevier Schizophrenia Elsevier Anomaly Elsevier Syntax Elsevier Bambini, Valentina oth Bosia, Marta oth Anselmetti, Simona oth Riccaboni, Roberta oth Cappa, Stefano F. oth Smeraldi, Enrico oth Cavallaro, Roberto oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science MacDonald, Russell D. ELSEVIER Articles That May Change Your Practice: Pelvic Binders Revisited 2023 an international journal in behavioural and cognitive neuroscience Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV009449108 volume:79 year:2015 pages:147-157 extent:11 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.10.030 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA 44.71 Verkehrsmedizin VZ AR 79 2015 147-157 11 045F 610 |
| spelling |
10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.10.030 doi GBVA2015023000012.pica (DE-627)ELV024057614 (ELSEVIER)S0028-3932(15)30206-2 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 610 610 DE-600 610 VZ 44.71 bkl Moro, Andrea verfasserin aut Detecting syntactic and semantic anomalies in schizophrenia 2015transfer abstract 11 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier One of the major challenges in the study of language in schizophrenia is to identify specific levels of the linguistic structure that might be selectively impaired. While historically a main semantic deficit has been widely claimed, results are mixed, with also evidence of syntactic impairment. This might be due to heterogeneity in materials and paradigms across studies, which often do not allow to tap into single linguistic components. Moreover, the interaction between linguistic and neurocognitive deficits is still unclear. In this study, we concentrated on syntactic and semantic knowledge. We employed an anomaly detection task including short and long sentences with either syntactic errors violating the principles of Universal Grammar, or a novel form of semantic errors, resulting from a contradiction in the computation of the whole sentence meaning. Fifty-eight patients with diagnosis of schizophrenia were compared to 30 healthy subjects. Results showed that, in patients, only the ability to identify syntactic anomaly, both in short and long sentences, was impaired. This result cannot be explained by working memory abilities or psychopathological features. These findings suggest the presence of an impairment of syntactic knowledge in schizophrenia, at least partially independent of the cognitive and psychopathological profile. On the contrary, we cannot conclude that there is a semantic impairment, at least in terms of compositional semantics abilities. One of the major challenges in the study of language in schizophrenia is to identify specific levels of the linguistic structure that might be selectively impaired. While historically a main semantic deficit has been widely claimed, results are mixed, with also evidence of syntactic impairment. This might be due to heterogeneity in materials and paradigms across studies, which often do not allow to tap into single linguistic components. Moreover, the interaction between linguistic and neurocognitive deficits is still unclear. In this study, we concentrated on syntactic and semantic knowledge. We employed an anomaly detection task including short and long sentences with either syntactic errors violating the principles of Universal Grammar, or a novel form of semantic errors, resulting from a contradiction in the computation of the whole sentence meaning. Fifty-eight patients with diagnosis of schizophrenia were compared to 30 healthy subjects. Results showed that, in patients, only the ability to identify syntactic anomaly, both in short and long sentences, was impaired. This result cannot be explained by working memory abilities or psychopathological features. These findings suggest the presence of an impairment of syntactic knowledge in schizophrenia, at least partially independent of the cognitive and psychopathological profile. On the contrary, we cannot conclude that there is a semantic impairment, at least in terms of compositional semantics abilities. Language Elsevier Semantics Elsevier Grammaticality judgments Elsevier Schizophrenia Elsevier Anomaly Elsevier Syntax Elsevier Bambini, Valentina oth Bosia, Marta oth Anselmetti, Simona oth Riccaboni, Roberta oth Cappa, Stefano F. oth Smeraldi, Enrico oth Cavallaro, Roberto oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science MacDonald, Russell D. ELSEVIER Articles That May Change Your Practice: Pelvic Binders Revisited 2023 an international journal in behavioural and cognitive neuroscience Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV009449108 volume:79 year:2015 pages:147-157 extent:11 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.10.030 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA 44.71 Verkehrsmedizin VZ AR 79 2015 147-157 11 045F 610 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.10.030 doi GBVA2015023000012.pica (DE-627)ELV024057614 (ELSEVIER)S0028-3932(15)30206-2 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 610 610 DE-600 610 VZ 44.71 bkl Moro, Andrea verfasserin aut Detecting syntactic and semantic anomalies in schizophrenia 2015transfer abstract 11 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier One of the major challenges in the study of language in schizophrenia is to identify specific levels of the linguistic structure that might be selectively impaired. While historically a main semantic deficit has been widely claimed, results are mixed, with also evidence of syntactic impairment. This might be due to heterogeneity in materials and paradigms across studies, which often do not allow to tap into single linguistic components. Moreover, the interaction between linguistic and neurocognitive deficits is still unclear. In this study, we concentrated on syntactic and semantic knowledge. We employed an anomaly detection task including short and long sentences with either syntactic errors violating the principles of Universal Grammar, or a novel form of semantic errors, resulting from a contradiction in the computation of the whole sentence meaning. Fifty-eight patients with diagnosis of schizophrenia were compared to 30 healthy subjects. Results showed that, in patients, only the ability to identify syntactic anomaly, both in short and long sentences, was impaired. This result cannot be explained by working memory abilities or psychopathological features. These findings suggest the presence of an impairment of syntactic knowledge in schizophrenia, at least partially independent of the cognitive and psychopathological profile. On the contrary, we cannot conclude that there is a semantic impairment, at least in terms of compositional semantics abilities. One of the major challenges in the study of language in schizophrenia is to identify specific levels of the linguistic structure that might be selectively impaired. While historically a main semantic deficit has been widely claimed, results are mixed, with also evidence of syntactic impairment. This might be due to heterogeneity in materials and paradigms across studies, which often do not allow to tap into single linguistic components. Moreover, the interaction between linguistic and neurocognitive deficits is still unclear. In this study, we concentrated on syntactic and semantic knowledge. We employed an anomaly detection task including short and long sentences with either syntactic errors violating the principles of Universal Grammar, or a novel form of semantic errors, resulting from a contradiction in the computation of the whole sentence meaning. Fifty-eight patients with diagnosis of schizophrenia were compared to 30 healthy subjects. Results showed that, in patients, only the ability to identify syntactic anomaly, both in short and long sentences, was impaired. This result cannot be explained by working memory abilities or psychopathological features. These findings suggest the presence of an impairment of syntactic knowledge in schizophrenia, at least partially independent of the cognitive and psychopathological profile. On the contrary, we cannot conclude that there is a semantic impairment, at least in terms of compositional semantics abilities. Language Elsevier Semantics Elsevier Grammaticality judgments Elsevier Schizophrenia Elsevier Anomaly Elsevier Syntax Elsevier Bambini, Valentina oth Bosia, Marta oth Anselmetti, Simona oth Riccaboni, Roberta oth Cappa, Stefano F. oth Smeraldi, Enrico oth Cavallaro, Roberto oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science MacDonald, Russell D. ELSEVIER Articles That May Change Your Practice: Pelvic Binders Revisited 2023 an international journal in behavioural and cognitive neuroscience Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV009449108 volume:79 year:2015 pages:147-157 extent:11 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.10.030 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA 44.71 Verkehrsmedizin VZ AR 79 2015 147-157 11 045F 610 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.10.030 doi GBVA2015023000012.pica (DE-627)ELV024057614 (ELSEVIER)S0028-3932(15)30206-2 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 610 610 DE-600 610 VZ 44.71 bkl Moro, Andrea verfasserin aut Detecting syntactic and semantic anomalies in schizophrenia 2015transfer abstract 11 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier One of the major challenges in the study of language in schizophrenia is to identify specific levels of the linguistic structure that might be selectively impaired. While historically a main semantic deficit has been widely claimed, results are mixed, with also evidence of syntactic impairment. This might be due to heterogeneity in materials and paradigms across studies, which often do not allow to tap into single linguistic components. Moreover, the interaction between linguistic and neurocognitive deficits is still unclear. In this study, we concentrated on syntactic and semantic knowledge. We employed an anomaly detection task including short and long sentences with either syntactic errors violating the principles of Universal Grammar, or a novel form of semantic errors, resulting from a contradiction in the computation of the whole sentence meaning. Fifty-eight patients with diagnosis of schizophrenia were compared to 30 healthy subjects. Results showed that, in patients, only the ability to identify syntactic anomaly, both in short and long sentences, was impaired. This result cannot be explained by working memory abilities or psychopathological features. These findings suggest the presence of an impairment of syntactic knowledge in schizophrenia, at least partially independent of the cognitive and psychopathological profile. On the contrary, we cannot conclude that there is a semantic impairment, at least in terms of compositional semantics abilities. One of the major challenges in the study of language in schizophrenia is to identify specific levels of the linguistic structure that might be selectively impaired. While historically a main semantic deficit has been widely claimed, results are mixed, with also evidence of syntactic impairment. This might be due to heterogeneity in materials and paradigms across studies, which often do not allow to tap into single linguistic components. Moreover, the interaction between linguistic and neurocognitive deficits is still unclear. In this study, we concentrated on syntactic and semantic knowledge. We employed an anomaly detection task including short and long sentences with either syntactic errors violating the principles of Universal Grammar, or a novel form of semantic errors, resulting from a contradiction in the computation of the whole sentence meaning. Fifty-eight patients with diagnosis of schizophrenia were compared to 30 healthy subjects. Results showed that, in patients, only the ability to identify syntactic anomaly, both in short and long sentences, was impaired. This result cannot be explained by working memory abilities or psychopathological features. These findings suggest the presence of an impairment of syntactic knowledge in schizophrenia, at least partially independent of the cognitive and psychopathological profile. On the contrary, we cannot conclude that there is a semantic impairment, at least in terms of compositional semantics abilities. Language Elsevier Semantics Elsevier Grammaticality judgments Elsevier Schizophrenia Elsevier Anomaly Elsevier Syntax Elsevier Bambini, Valentina oth Bosia, Marta oth Anselmetti, Simona oth Riccaboni, Roberta oth Cappa, Stefano F. oth Smeraldi, Enrico oth Cavallaro, Roberto oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science MacDonald, Russell D. ELSEVIER Articles That May Change Your Practice: Pelvic Binders Revisited 2023 an international journal in behavioural and cognitive neuroscience Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV009449108 volume:79 year:2015 pages:147-157 extent:11 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.10.030 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA 44.71 Verkehrsmedizin VZ AR 79 2015 147-157 11 045F 610 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.10.030 doi GBVA2015023000012.pica (DE-627)ELV024057614 (ELSEVIER)S0028-3932(15)30206-2 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 610 610 DE-600 610 VZ 44.71 bkl Moro, Andrea verfasserin aut Detecting syntactic and semantic anomalies in schizophrenia 2015transfer abstract 11 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier One of the major challenges in the study of language in schizophrenia is to identify specific levels of the linguistic structure that might be selectively impaired. While historically a main semantic deficit has been widely claimed, results are mixed, with also evidence of syntactic impairment. This might be due to heterogeneity in materials and paradigms across studies, which often do not allow to tap into single linguistic components. Moreover, the interaction between linguistic and neurocognitive deficits is still unclear. In this study, we concentrated on syntactic and semantic knowledge. We employed an anomaly detection task including short and long sentences with either syntactic errors violating the principles of Universal Grammar, or a novel form of semantic errors, resulting from a contradiction in the computation of the whole sentence meaning. Fifty-eight patients with diagnosis of schizophrenia were compared to 30 healthy subjects. Results showed that, in patients, only the ability to identify syntactic anomaly, both in short and long sentences, was impaired. This result cannot be explained by working memory abilities or psychopathological features. These findings suggest the presence of an impairment of syntactic knowledge in schizophrenia, at least partially independent of the cognitive and psychopathological profile. On the contrary, we cannot conclude that there is a semantic impairment, at least in terms of compositional semantics abilities. One of the major challenges in the study of language in schizophrenia is to identify specific levels of the linguistic structure that might be selectively impaired. While historically a main semantic deficit has been widely claimed, results are mixed, with also evidence of syntactic impairment. This might be due to heterogeneity in materials and paradigms across studies, which often do not allow to tap into single linguistic components. Moreover, the interaction between linguistic and neurocognitive deficits is still unclear. In this study, we concentrated on syntactic and semantic knowledge. We employed an anomaly detection task including short and long sentences with either syntactic errors violating the principles of Universal Grammar, or a novel form of semantic errors, resulting from a contradiction in the computation of the whole sentence meaning. Fifty-eight patients with diagnosis of schizophrenia were compared to 30 healthy subjects. Results showed that, in patients, only the ability to identify syntactic anomaly, both in short and long sentences, was impaired. This result cannot be explained by working memory abilities or psychopathological features. These findings suggest the presence of an impairment of syntactic knowledge in schizophrenia, at least partially independent of the cognitive and psychopathological profile. On the contrary, we cannot conclude that there is a semantic impairment, at least in terms of compositional semantics abilities. Language Elsevier Semantics Elsevier Grammaticality judgments Elsevier Schizophrenia Elsevier Anomaly Elsevier Syntax Elsevier Bambini, Valentina oth Bosia, Marta oth Anselmetti, Simona oth Riccaboni, Roberta oth Cappa, Stefano F. oth Smeraldi, Enrico oth Cavallaro, Roberto oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science MacDonald, Russell D. ELSEVIER Articles That May Change Your Practice: Pelvic Binders Revisited 2023 an international journal in behavioural and cognitive neuroscience Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV009449108 volume:79 year:2015 pages:147-157 extent:11 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.10.030 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA 44.71 Verkehrsmedizin VZ AR 79 2015 147-157 11 045F 610 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in Articles That May Change Your Practice: Pelvic Binders Revisited Amsterdam [u.a.] volume:79 year:2015 pages:147-157 extent:11 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in Articles That May Change Your Practice: Pelvic Binders Revisited Amsterdam [u.a.] volume:79 year:2015 pages:147-157 extent:11 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| bklname |
Verkehrsmedizin |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
Language Semantics Grammaticality judgments Schizophrenia Anomaly Syntax |
| dewey-raw |
610 |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
Articles That May Change Your Practice: Pelvic Binders Revisited |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Moro, Andrea @@aut@@ Bambini, Valentina @@oth@@ Bosia, Marta @@oth@@ Anselmetti, Simona @@oth@@ Riccaboni, Roberta @@oth@@ Cappa, Stefano F. @@oth@@ Smeraldi, Enrico @@oth@@ Cavallaro, Roberto @@oth@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2015-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
ELV009449108 |
| dewey-sort |
3610 |
| id |
ELV024057614 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV024057614</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230625142137.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">180603s2015 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.10.030</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">GBVA2015023000012.pica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV024057614</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0028-3932(15)30206-2</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">610</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">610</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">610</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">44.71</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Moro, Andrea</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Detecting syntactic and semantic anomalies in schizophrenia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2015transfer abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">One of the major challenges in the study of language in schizophrenia is to identify specific levels of the linguistic structure that might be selectively impaired. While historically a main semantic deficit has been widely claimed, results are mixed, with also evidence of syntactic impairment. This might be due to heterogeneity in materials and paradigms across studies, which often do not allow to tap into single linguistic components. Moreover, the interaction between linguistic and neurocognitive deficits is still unclear. In this study, we concentrated on syntactic and semantic knowledge. We employed an anomaly detection task including short and long sentences with either syntactic errors violating the principles of Universal Grammar, or a novel form of semantic errors, resulting from a contradiction in the computation of the whole sentence meaning. Fifty-eight patients with diagnosis of schizophrenia were compared to 30 healthy subjects. Results showed that, in patients, only the ability to identify syntactic anomaly, both in short and long sentences, was impaired. This result cannot be explained by working memory abilities or psychopathological features. These findings suggest the presence of an impairment of syntactic knowledge in schizophrenia, at least partially independent of the cognitive and psychopathological profile. On the contrary, we cannot conclude that there is a semantic impairment, at least in terms of compositional semantics abilities.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">One of the major challenges in the study of language in schizophrenia is to identify specific levels of the linguistic structure that might be selectively impaired. While historically a main semantic deficit has been widely claimed, results are mixed, with also evidence of syntactic impairment. This might be due to heterogeneity in materials and paradigms across studies, which often do not allow to tap into single linguistic components. Moreover, the interaction between linguistic and neurocognitive deficits is still unclear. In this study, we concentrated on syntactic and semantic knowledge. We employed an anomaly detection task including short and long sentences with either syntactic errors violating the principles of Universal Grammar, or a novel form of semantic errors, resulting from a contradiction in the computation of the whole sentence meaning. Fifty-eight patients with diagnosis of schizophrenia were compared to 30 healthy subjects. Results showed that, in patients, only the ability to identify syntactic anomaly, both in short and long sentences, was impaired. This result cannot be explained by working memory abilities or psychopathological features. These findings suggest the presence of an impairment of syntactic knowledge in schizophrenia, at least partially independent of the cognitive and psychopathological profile. On the contrary, we cannot conclude that there is a semantic impairment, at least in terms of compositional semantics abilities.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Language</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Semantics</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Grammaticality judgments</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Schizophrenia</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Anomaly</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Syntax</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Bambini, Valentina</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Bosia, Marta</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Anselmetti, Simona</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Riccaboni, Roberta</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Cappa, Stefano F.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Smeraldi, Enrico</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Cavallaro, Roberto</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="n">Elsevier Science</subfield><subfield code="a">MacDonald, Russell D. ELSEVIER</subfield><subfield code="t">Articles That May Change Your Practice: Pelvic Binders Revisited</subfield><subfield code="d">2023</subfield><subfield code="d">an international journal in behavioural and cognitive neuroscience</subfield><subfield code="g">Amsterdam [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)ELV009449108</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:79</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2015</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:147-157</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.10.030</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">44.71</subfield><subfield code="j">Verkehrsmedizin</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">79</subfield><subfield code="j">2015</subfield><subfield code="h">147-157</subfield><subfield code="g">11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="953" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="2">045F</subfield><subfield code="a">610</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Moro, Andrea |
| spellingShingle |
Moro, Andrea ddc 610 bkl 44.71 Elsevier Language Elsevier Semantics Elsevier Grammaticality judgments Elsevier Schizophrenia Elsevier Anomaly Elsevier Syntax Detecting syntactic and semantic anomalies in schizophrenia |
| authorStr |
Moro, Andrea |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)ELV009449108 |
| format |
electronic Article |
| dewey-ones |
610 - Medicine & health |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut |
| collection |
elsevier |
| remote_str |
true |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| topic_title |
610 610 DE-600 610 VZ 44.71 bkl Detecting syntactic and semantic anomalies in schizophrenia Language Elsevier Semantics Elsevier Grammaticality judgments Elsevier Schizophrenia Elsevier Anomaly Elsevier Syntax Elsevier |
| topic |
ddc 610 bkl 44.71 Elsevier Language Elsevier Semantics Elsevier Grammaticality judgments Elsevier Schizophrenia Elsevier Anomaly Elsevier Syntax |
| topic_unstemmed |
ddc 610 bkl 44.71 Elsevier Language Elsevier Semantics Elsevier Grammaticality judgments Elsevier Schizophrenia Elsevier Anomaly Elsevier Syntax |
| topic_browse |
ddc 610 bkl 44.71 Elsevier Language Elsevier Semantics Elsevier Grammaticality judgments Elsevier Schizophrenia Elsevier Anomaly Elsevier Syntax |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
zu |
| author2_variant |
v b vb m b mb s a sa r r rr s f c sf sfc e s es r c rc |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Articles That May Change Your Practice: Pelvic Binders Revisited |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
ELV009449108 |
| dewey-tens |
610 - Medicine & health |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Articles That May Change Your Practice: Pelvic Binders Revisited |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)ELV009449108 |
| title |
Detecting syntactic and semantic anomalies in schizophrenia |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)ELV024057614 (ELSEVIER)S0028-3932(15)30206-2 |
| title_full |
Detecting syntactic and semantic anomalies in schizophrenia |
| author_sort |
Moro, Andrea |
| journal |
Articles That May Change Your Practice: Pelvic Binders Revisited |
| journalStr |
Articles That May Change Your Practice: Pelvic Binders Revisited |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| dewey-hundreds |
600 - Technology |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2015 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
zzz |
| container_start_page |
147 |
| author_browse |
Moro, Andrea |
| container_volume |
79 |
| physical |
11 |
| class |
610 610 DE-600 610 VZ 44.71 bkl |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Moro, Andrea |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.10.030 |
| dewey-full |
610 |
| title_sort |
detecting syntactic and semantic anomalies in schizophrenia |
| title_auth |
Detecting syntactic and semantic anomalies in schizophrenia |
| abstract |
One of the major challenges in the study of language in schizophrenia is to identify specific levels of the linguistic structure that might be selectively impaired. While historically a main semantic deficit has been widely claimed, results are mixed, with also evidence of syntactic impairment. This might be due to heterogeneity in materials and paradigms across studies, which often do not allow to tap into single linguistic components. Moreover, the interaction between linguistic and neurocognitive deficits is still unclear. In this study, we concentrated on syntactic and semantic knowledge. We employed an anomaly detection task including short and long sentences with either syntactic errors violating the principles of Universal Grammar, or a novel form of semantic errors, resulting from a contradiction in the computation of the whole sentence meaning. Fifty-eight patients with diagnosis of schizophrenia were compared to 30 healthy subjects. Results showed that, in patients, only the ability to identify syntactic anomaly, both in short and long sentences, was impaired. This result cannot be explained by working memory abilities or psychopathological features. These findings suggest the presence of an impairment of syntactic knowledge in schizophrenia, at least partially independent of the cognitive and psychopathological profile. On the contrary, we cannot conclude that there is a semantic impairment, at least in terms of compositional semantics abilities. |
| abstractGer |
One of the major challenges in the study of language in schizophrenia is to identify specific levels of the linguistic structure that might be selectively impaired. While historically a main semantic deficit has been widely claimed, results are mixed, with also evidence of syntactic impairment. This might be due to heterogeneity in materials and paradigms across studies, which often do not allow to tap into single linguistic components. Moreover, the interaction between linguistic and neurocognitive deficits is still unclear. In this study, we concentrated on syntactic and semantic knowledge. We employed an anomaly detection task including short and long sentences with either syntactic errors violating the principles of Universal Grammar, or a novel form of semantic errors, resulting from a contradiction in the computation of the whole sentence meaning. Fifty-eight patients with diagnosis of schizophrenia were compared to 30 healthy subjects. Results showed that, in patients, only the ability to identify syntactic anomaly, both in short and long sentences, was impaired. This result cannot be explained by working memory abilities or psychopathological features. These findings suggest the presence of an impairment of syntactic knowledge in schizophrenia, at least partially independent of the cognitive and psychopathological profile. On the contrary, we cannot conclude that there is a semantic impairment, at least in terms of compositional semantics abilities. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
One of the major challenges in the study of language in schizophrenia is to identify specific levels of the linguistic structure that might be selectively impaired. While historically a main semantic deficit has been widely claimed, results are mixed, with also evidence of syntactic impairment. This might be due to heterogeneity in materials and paradigms across studies, which often do not allow to tap into single linguistic components. Moreover, the interaction between linguistic and neurocognitive deficits is still unclear. In this study, we concentrated on syntactic and semantic knowledge. We employed an anomaly detection task including short and long sentences with either syntactic errors violating the principles of Universal Grammar, or a novel form of semantic errors, resulting from a contradiction in the computation of the whole sentence meaning. Fifty-eight patients with diagnosis of schizophrenia were compared to 30 healthy subjects. Results showed that, in patients, only the ability to identify syntactic anomaly, both in short and long sentences, was impaired. This result cannot be explained by working memory abilities or psychopathological features. These findings suggest the presence of an impairment of syntactic knowledge in schizophrenia, at least partially independent of the cognitive and psychopathological profile. On the contrary, we cannot conclude that there is a semantic impairment, at least in terms of compositional semantics abilities. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA |
| title_short |
Detecting syntactic and semantic anomalies in schizophrenia |
| url |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.10.030 |
| remote_bool |
true |
| author2 |
Bambini, Valentina Bosia, Marta Anselmetti, Simona Riccaboni, Roberta Cappa, Stefano F. Smeraldi, Enrico Cavallaro, Roberto |
| author2Str |
Bambini, Valentina Bosia, Marta Anselmetti, Simona Riccaboni, Roberta Cappa, Stefano F. Smeraldi, Enrico Cavallaro, Roberto |
| ppnlink |
ELV009449108 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
z |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| author2_role |
oth oth oth oth oth oth oth |
| doi_str |
10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.10.030 |
| up_date |
2024-07-06T20:25:01.707Z |
| _version_ |
1803862673150967808 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV024057614</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230625142137.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">180603s2015 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.10.030</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">GBVA2015023000012.pica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV024057614</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0028-3932(15)30206-2</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">610</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">610</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">610</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">44.71</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Moro, Andrea</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Detecting syntactic and semantic anomalies in schizophrenia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2015transfer abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">One of the major challenges in the study of language in schizophrenia is to identify specific levels of the linguistic structure that might be selectively impaired. While historically a main semantic deficit has been widely claimed, results are mixed, with also evidence of syntactic impairment. This might be due to heterogeneity in materials and paradigms across studies, which often do not allow to tap into single linguistic components. Moreover, the interaction between linguistic and neurocognitive deficits is still unclear. In this study, we concentrated on syntactic and semantic knowledge. We employed an anomaly detection task including short and long sentences with either syntactic errors violating the principles of Universal Grammar, or a novel form of semantic errors, resulting from a contradiction in the computation of the whole sentence meaning. Fifty-eight patients with diagnosis of schizophrenia were compared to 30 healthy subjects. Results showed that, in patients, only the ability to identify syntactic anomaly, both in short and long sentences, was impaired. This result cannot be explained by working memory abilities or psychopathological features. These findings suggest the presence of an impairment of syntactic knowledge in schizophrenia, at least partially independent of the cognitive and psychopathological profile. On the contrary, we cannot conclude that there is a semantic impairment, at least in terms of compositional semantics abilities.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">One of the major challenges in the study of language in schizophrenia is to identify specific levels of the linguistic structure that might be selectively impaired. While historically a main semantic deficit has been widely claimed, results are mixed, with also evidence of syntactic impairment. This might be due to heterogeneity in materials and paradigms across studies, which often do not allow to tap into single linguistic components. Moreover, the interaction between linguistic and neurocognitive deficits is still unclear. In this study, we concentrated on syntactic and semantic knowledge. We employed an anomaly detection task including short and long sentences with either syntactic errors violating the principles of Universal Grammar, or a novel form of semantic errors, resulting from a contradiction in the computation of the whole sentence meaning. Fifty-eight patients with diagnosis of schizophrenia were compared to 30 healthy subjects. Results showed that, in patients, only the ability to identify syntactic anomaly, both in short and long sentences, was impaired. This result cannot be explained by working memory abilities or psychopathological features. These findings suggest the presence of an impairment of syntactic knowledge in schizophrenia, at least partially independent of the cognitive and psychopathological profile. On the contrary, we cannot conclude that there is a semantic impairment, at least in terms of compositional semantics abilities.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Language</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Semantics</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Grammaticality judgments</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Schizophrenia</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Anomaly</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Syntax</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Bambini, Valentina</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Bosia, Marta</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Anselmetti, Simona</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Riccaboni, Roberta</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Cappa, Stefano F.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Smeraldi, Enrico</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Cavallaro, Roberto</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="n">Elsevier Science</subfield><subfield code="a">MacDonald, Russell D. ELSEVIER</subfield><subfield code="t">Articles That May Change Your Practice: Pelvic Binders Revisited</subfield><subfield code="d">2023</subfield><subfield code="d">an international journal in behavioural and cognitive neuroscience</subfield><subfield code="g">Amsterdam [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)ELV009449108</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:79</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2015</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:147-157</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.10.030</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">44.71</subfield><subfield code="j">Verkehrsmedizin</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">79</subfield><subfield code="j">2015</subfield><subfield code="h">147-157</subfield><subfield code="g">11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="953" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="2">045F</subfield><subfield code="a">610</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.40125 |