Machinability of lithium disilicate glass ceramic in in vitro dental diamond bur adjusting process
Esthetic high-strength lithium disilicate glass ceramics (LDGC) are used for monolithic crowns and bridges produced in dental CAD/CAM and oral adjusting processes, which machinability affects the restorative quality. A machinability study has been made in the simulated oral clinical machining of LDG...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Autor*in: |
Song, Xiao-Fei [verfasserIn] |
---|
Format: |
E-Artikel |
---|---|
Sprache: |
Englisch |
Erschienen: |
2016transfer abstract |
---|
Schlagwörter: |
Surface roughness and integrity |
---|
Umfang: |
15 |
---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: A volume-shrinkage-based method for quantifying the inward solidification heat transfer of a phase change material filled in spherical capsules - Liu, Min-Jie ELSEVIER, 2016, Amsterdam [u.a.] |
---|---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:53 ; year:2016 ; pages:78-92 ; extent:15 |
Links: |
---|
DOI / URN: |
10.1016/j.jmbbm.2015.08.003 |
---|
Katalog-ID: |
ELV024421340 |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | ELV024421340 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20230625142826.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 180603s2016 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2015.08.003 |2 doi | |
028 | 5 | 2 | |a GBVA2016009000029.pica |
035 | |a (DE-627)ELV024421340 | ||
035 | |a (ELSEVIER)S1751-6161(15)00274-X | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
082 | 0 | |a 570 | |
082 | 0 | 4 | |a 570 |q DE-600 |
082 | 0 | 4 | |a 690 |q VZ |
084 | |a 52.43 |2 bkl | ||
084 | |a 52.52 |2 bkl | ||
084 | |a 52.42 |2 bkl | ||
084 | |a 50.38 |2 bkl | ||
100 | 1 | |a Song, Xiao-Fei |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Machinability of lithium disilicate glass ceramic in in vitro dental diamond bur adjusting process |
264 | 1 | |c 2016transfer abstract | |
300 | |a 15 | ||
336 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zzz |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b z |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zu |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a Esthetic high-strength lithium disilicate glass ceramics (LDGC) are used for monolithic crowns and bridges produced in dental CAD/CAM and oral adjusting processes, which machinability affects the restorative quality. A machinability study has been made in the simulated oral clinical machining of LDGC with a dental handpiece and diamond burs, regarding the diamond tool wear and chip control, machining forces and energy, surface finish and integrity. Machining forces, speeds and energy in in vitro dental adjusting of LDGC were measured by a high-speed data acquisition and force sensor system. Machined LDGC surfaces were assessed using three-dimensional non-contact chromatic confocal optical profilometry and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Diamond bur morphology and LDGC chip shapes were also examined using SEM. Minimum tool wear but significant LDGC chip accumulations were found. Machining forces and energy significantly depended on machining conditions (p<0.05) and were significantly higher than other glass ceramics (p<0.05). Machining speeds dropped more rapidly with increased removal rates than other glass ceramics (p<0.05). Two material machinability indices associated with the hardness, Young’s modulus and fracture toughness were derived based on the normal force-removal rate relations, which ranked LDGC the most difficult to machine among glass ceramics. Surface roughness for machined LDGC was comparable for other glass ceramics. The removal mechanisms of LDGC were dominated by penetration-induced brittle fracture and shear-induced plastic deformation. Unlike most other glass ceramics, distinct intergranular and transgranular fractures of lithium disilicate crystals were found in LDGC. This research provides the fundamental data for dental clinicians on the machinability of LDGC in intraoral adjustments. | ||
520 | |a Esthetic high-strength lithium disilicate glass ceramics (LDGC) are used for monolithic crowns and bridges produced in dental CAD/CAM and oral adjusting processes, which machinability affects the restorative quality. A machinability study has been made in the simulated oral clinical machining of LDGC with a dental handpiece and diamond burs, regarding the diamond tool wear and chip control, machining forces and energy, surface finish and integrity. Machining forces, speeds and energy in in vitro dental adjusting of LDGC were measured by a high-speed data acquisition and force sensor system. Machined LDGC surfaces were assessed using three-dimensional non-contact chromatic confocal optical profilometry and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Diamond bur morphology and LDGC chip shapes were also examined using SEM. Minimum tool wear but significant LDGC chip accumulations were found. Machining forces and energy significantly depended on machining conditions (p<0.05) and were significantly higher than other glass ceramics (p<0.05). Machining speeds dropped more rapidly with increased removal rates than other glass ceramics (p<0.05). Two material machinability indices associated with the hardness, Young’s modulus and fracture toughness were derived based on the normal force-removal rate relations, which ranked LDGC the most difficult to machine among glass ceramics. Surface roughness for machined LDGC was comparable for other glass ceramics. The removal mechanisms of LDGC were dominated by penetration-induced brittle fracture and shear-induced plastic deformation. Unlike most other glass ceramics, distinct intergranular and transgranular fractures of lithium disilicate crystals were found in LDGC. This research provides the fundamental data for dental clinicians on the machinability of LDGC in intraoral adjustments. | ||
650 | 7 | |a Surface roughness and integrity |2 Elsevier | |
650 | 7 | |a Machinability |2 Elsevier | |
650 | 7 | |a Lithium disilicate glass ceramic (LDGC) |2 Elsevier | |
650 | 7 | |a Dental adjusting |2 Elsevier | |
650 | 7 | |a Forces |2 Elsevier | |
650 | 7 | |a Specific machining energy |2 Elsevier | |
700 | 1 | |a Ren, Hai-Tao |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Yin, Ling |4 oth | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |n Elsevier |a Liu, Min-Jie ELSEVIER |t A volume-shrinkage-based method for quantifying the inward solidification heat transfer of a phase change material filled in spherical capsules |d 2016 |g Amsterdam [u.a.] |w (DE-627)ELV009727671 |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:53 |g year:2016 |g pages:78-92 |g extent:15 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2015.08.003 |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_U | ||
912 | |a GBV_ELV | ||
912 | |a SYSFLAG_U | ||
936 | b | k | |a 52.43 |j Kältetechnik |q VZ |
936 | b | k | |a 52.52 |j Thermische Energieerzeugung |j Wärmetechnik |q VZ |
936 | b | k | |a 52.42 |j Heizungstechnik |j Lüftungstechnik |j Klimatechnik |q VZ |
936 | b | k | |a 50.38 |j Technische Thermodynamik |q VZ |
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 53 |j 2016 |h 78-92 |g 15 | ||
953 | |2 045F |a 570 |
author_variant |
x f s xfs |
---|---|
matchkey_str |
songxiaofeirenhaitaoyinling:2016----:ahnbltoltimiiiaelscrmcnnirdnada |
hierarchy_sort_str |
2016transfer abstract |
bklnumber |
52.43 52.52 52.42 50.38 |
publishDate |
2016 |
allfields |
10.1016/j.jmbbm.2015.08.003 doi GBVA2016009000029.pica (DE-627)ELV024421340 (ELSEVIER)S1751-6161(15)00274-X DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 570 570 DE-600 690 VZ 52.43 bkl 52.52 bkl 52.42 bkl 50.38 bkl Song, Xiao-Fei verfasserin aut Machinability of lithium disilicate glass ceramic in in vitro dental diamond bur adjusting process 2016transfer abstract 15 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Esthetic high-strength lithium disilicate glass ceramics (LDGC) are used for monolithic crowns and bridges produced in dental CAD/CAM and oral adjusting processes, which machinability affects the restorative quality. A machinability study has been made in the simulated oral clinical machining of LDGC with a dental handpiece and diamond burs, regarding the diamond tool wear and chip control, machining forces and energy, surface finish and integrity. Machining forces, speeds and energy in in vitro dental adjusting of LDGC were measured by a high-speed data acquisition and force sensor system. Machined LDGC surfaces were assessed using three-dimensional non-contact chromatic confocal optical profilometry and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Diamond bur morphology and LDGC chip shapes were also examined using SEM. Minimum tool wear but significant LDGC chip accumulations were found. Machining forces and energy significantly depended on machining conditions (p<0.05) and were significantly higher than other glass ceramics (p<0.05). Machining speeds dropped more rapidly with increased removal rates than other glass ceramics (p<0.05). Two material machinability indices associated with the hardness, Young’s modulus and fracture toughness were derived based on the normal force-removal rate relations, which ranked LDGC the most difficult to machine among glass ceramics. Surface roughness for machined LDGC was comparable for other glass ceramics. The removal mechanisms of LDGC were dominated by penetration-induced brittle fracture and shear-induced plastic deformation. Unlike most other glass ceramics, distinct intergranular and transgranular fractures of lithium disilicate crystals were found in LDGC. This research provides the fundamental data for dental clinicians on the machinability of LDGC in intraoral adjustments. Esthetic high-strength lithium disilicate glass ceramics (LDGC) are used for monolithic crowns and bridges produced in dental CAD/CAM and oral adjusting processes, which machinability affects the restorative quality. A machinability study has been made in the simulated oral clinical machining of LDGC with a dental handpiece and diamond burs, regarding the diamond tool wear and chip control, machining forces and energy, surface finish and integrity. Machining forces, speeds and energy in in vitro dental adjusting of LDGC were measured by a high-speed data acquisition and force sensor system. Machined LDGC surfaces were assessed using three-dimensional non-contact chromatic confocal optical profilometry and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Diamond bur morphology and LDGC chip shapes were also examined using SEM. Minimum tool wear but significant LDGC chip accumulations were found. Machining forces and energy significantly depended on machining conditions (p<0.05) and were significantly higher than other glass ceramics (p<0.05). Machining speeds dropped more rapidly with increased removal rates than other glass ceramics (p<0.05). Two material machinability indices associated with the hardness, Young’s modulus and fracture toughness were derived based on the normal force-removal rate relations, which ranked LDGC the most difficult to machine among glass ceramics. Surface roughness for machined LDGC was comparable for other glass ceramics. The removal mechanisms of LDGC were dominated by penetration-induced brittle fracture and shear-induced plastic deformation. Unlike most other glass ceramics, distinct intergranular and transgranular fractures of lithium disilicate crystals were found in LDGC. This research provides the fundamental data for dental clinicians on the machinability of LDGC in intraoral adjustments. Surface roughness and integrity Elsevier Machinability Elsevier Lithium disilicate glass ceramic (LDGC) Elsevier Dental adjusting Elsevier Forces Elsevier Specific machining energy Elsevier Ren, Hai-Tao oth Yin, Ling oth Enthalten in Elsevier Liu, Min-Jie ELSEVIER A volume-shrinkage-based method for quantifying the inward solidification heat transfer of a phase change material filled in spherical capsules 2016 Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV009727671 volume:53 year:2016 pages:78-92 extent:15 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2015.08.003 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U 52.43 Kältetechnik VZ 52.52 Thermische Energieerzeugung Wärmetechnik VZ 52.42 Heizungstechnik Lüftungstechnik Klimatechnik VZ 50.38 Technische Thermodynamik VZ AR 53 2016 78-92 15 045F 570 |
spelling |
10.1016/j.jmbbm.2015.08.003 doi GBVA2016009000029.pica (DE-627)ELV024421340 (ELSEVIER)S1751-6161(15)00274-X DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 570 570 DE-600 690 VZ 52.43 bkl 52.52 bkl 52.42 bkl 50.38 bkl Song, Xiao-Fei verfasserin aut Machinability of lithium disilicate glass ceramic in in vitro dental diamond bur adjusting process 2016transfer abstract 15 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Esthetic high-strength lithium disilicate glass ceramics (LDGC) are used for monolithic crowns and bridges produced in dental CAD/CAM and oral adjusting processes, which machinability affects the restorative quality. A machinability study has been made in the simulated oral clinical machining of LDGC with a dental handpiece and diamond burs, regarding the diamond tool wear and chip control, machining forces and energy, surface finish and integrity. Machining forces, speeds and energy in in vitro dental adjusting of LDGC were measured by a high-speed data acquisition and force sensor system. Machined LDGC surfaces were assessed using three-dimensional non-contact chromatic confocal optical profilometry and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Diamond bur morphology and LDGC chip shapes were also examined using SEM. Minimum tool wear but significant LDGC chip accumulations were found. Machining forces and energy significantly depended on machining conditions (p<0.05) and were significantly higher than other glass ceramics (p<0.05). Machining speeds dropped more rapidly with increased removal rates than other glass ceramics (p<0.05). Two material machinability indices associated with the hardness, Young’s modulus and fracture toughness were derived based on the normal force-removal rate relations, which ranked LDGC the most difficult to machine among glass ceramics. Surface roughness for machined LDGC was comparable for other glass ceramics. The removal mechanisms of LDGC were dominated by penetration-induced brittle fracture and shear-induced plastic deformation. Unlike most other glass ceramics, distinct intergranular and transgranular fractures of lithium disilicate crystals were found in LDGC. This research provides the fundamental data for dental clinicians on the machinability of LDGC in intraoral adjustments. Esthetic high-strength lithium disilicate glass ceramics (LDGC) are used for monolithic crowns and bridges produced in dental CAD/CAM and oral adjusting processes, which machinability affects the restorative quality. A machinability study has been made in the simulated oral clinical machining of LDGC with a dental handpiece and diamond burs, regarding the diamond tool wear and chip control, machining forces and energy, surface finish and integrity. Machining forces, speeds and energy in in vitro dental adjusting of LDGC were measured by a high-speed data acquisition and force sensor system. Machined LDGC surfaces were assessed using three-dimensional non-contact chromatic confocal optical profilometry and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Diamond bur morphology and LDGC chip shapes were also examined using SEM. Minimum tool wear but significant LDGC chip accumulations were found. Machining forces and energy significantly depended on machining conditions (p<0.05) and were significantly higher than other glass ceramics (p<0.05). Machining speeds dropped more rapidly with increased removal rates than other glass ceramics (p<0.05). Two material machinability indices associated with the hardness, Young’s modulus and fracture toughness were derived based on the normal force-removal rate relations, which ranked LDGC the most difficult to machine among glass ceramics. Surface roughness for machined LDGC was comparable for other glass ceramics. The removal mechanisms of LDGC were dominated by penetration-induced brittle fracture and shear-induced plastic deformation. Unlike most other glass ceramics, distinct intergranular and transgranular fractures of lithium disilicate crystals were found in LDGC. This research provides the fundamental data for dental clinicians on the machinability of LDGC in intraoral adjustments. Surface roughness and integrity Elsevier Machinability Elsevier Lithium disilicate glass ceramic (LDGC) Elsevier Dental adjusting Elsevier Forces Elsevier Specific machining energy Elsevier Ren, Hai-Tao oth Yin, Ling oth Enthalten in Elsevier Liu, Min-Jie ELSEVIER A volume-shrinkage-based method for quantifying the inward solidification heat transfer of a phase change material filled in spherical capsules 2016 Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV009727671 volume:53 year:2016 pages:78-92 extent:15 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2015.08.003 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U 52.43 Kältetechnik VZ 52.52 Thermische Energieerzeugung Wärmetechnik VZ 52.42 Heizungstechnik Lüftungstechnik Klimatechnik VZ 50.38 Technische Thermodynamik VZ AR 53 2016 78-92 15 045F 570 |
allfields_unstemmed |
10.1016/j.jmbbm.2015.08.003 doi GBVA2016009000029.pica (DE-627)ELV024421340 (ELSEVIER)S1751-6161(15)00274-X DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 570 570 DE-600 690 VZ 52.43 bkl 52.52 bkl 52.42 bkl 50.38 bkl Song, Xiao-Fei verfasserin aut Machinability of lithium disilicate glass ceramic in in vitro dental diamond bur adjusting process 2016transfer abstract 15 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Esthetic high-strength lithium disilicate glass ceramics (LDGC) are used for monolithic crowns and bridges produced in dental CAD/CAM and oral adjusting processes, which machinability affects the restorative quality. A machinability study has been made in the simulated oral clinical machining of LDGC with a dental handpiece and diamond burs, regarding the diamond tool wear and chip control, machining forces and energy, surface finish and integrity. Machining forces, speeds and energy in in vitro dental adjusting of LDGC were measured by a high-speed data acquisition and force sensor system. Machined LDGC surfaces were assessed using three-dimensional non-contact chromatic confocal optical profilometry and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Diamond bur morphology and LDGC chip shapes were also examined using SEM. Minimum tool wear but significant LDGC chip accumulations were found. Machining forces and energy significantly depended on machining conditions (p<0.05) and were significantly higher than other glass ceramics (p<0.05). Machining speeds dropped more rapidly with increased removal rates than other glass ceramics (p<0.05). Two material machinability indices associated with the hardness, Young’s modulus and fracture toughness were derived based on the normal force-removal rate relations, which ranked LDGC the most difficult to machine among glass ceramics. Surface roughness for machined LDGC was comparable for other glass ceramics. The removal mechanisms of LDGC were dominated by penetration-induced brittle fracture and shear-induced plastic deformation. Unlike most other glass ceramics, distinct intergranular and transgranular fractures of lithium disilicate crystals were found in LDGC. This research provides the fundamental data for dental clinicians on the machinability of LDGC in intraoral adjustments. Esthetic high-strength lithium disilicate glass ceramics (LDGC) are used for monolithic crowns and bridges produced in dental CAD/CAM and oral adjusting processes, which machinability affects the restorative quality. A machinability study has been made in the simulated oral clinical machining of LDGC with a dental handpiece and diamond burs, regarding the diamond tool wear and chip control, machining forces and energy, surface finish and integrity. Machining forces, speeds and energy in in vitro dental adjusting of LDGC were measured by a high-speed data acquisition and force sensor system. Machined LDGC surfaces were assessed using three-dimensional non-contact chromatic confocal optical profilometry and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Diamond bur morphology and LDGC chip shapes were also examined using SEM. Minimum tool wear but significant LDGC chip accumulations were found. Machining forces and energy significantly depended on machining conditions (p<0.05) and were significantly higher than other glass ceramics (p<0.05). Machining speeds dropped more rapidly with increased removal rates than other glass ceramics (p<0.05). Two material machinability indices associated with the hardness, Young’s modulus and fracture toughness were derived based on the normal force-removal rate relations, which ranked LDGC the most difficult to machine among glass ceramics. Surface roughness for machined LDGC was comparable for other glass ceramics. The removal mechanisms of LDGC were dominated by penetration-induced brittle fracture and shear-induced plastic deformation. Unlike most other glass ceramics, distinct intergranular and transgranular fractures of lithium disilicate crystals were found in LDGC. This research provides the fundamental data for dental clinicians on the machinability of LDGC in intraoral adjustments. Surface roughness and integrity Elsevier Machinability Elsevier Lithium disilicate glass ceramic (LDGC) Elsevier Dental adjusting Elsevier Forces Elsevier Specific machining energy Elsevier Ren, Hai-Tao oth Yin, Ling oth Enthalten in Elsevier Liu, Min-Jie ELSEVIER A volume-shrinkage-based method for quantifying the inward solidification heat transfer of a phase change material filled in spherical capsules 2016 Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV009727671 volume:53 year:2016 pages:78-92 extent:15 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2015.08.003 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U 52.43 Kältetechnik VZ 52.52 Thermische Energieerzeugung Wärmetechnik VZ 52.42 Heizungstechnik Lüftungstechnik Klimatechnik VZ 50.38 Technische Thermodynamik VZ AR 53 2016 78-92 15 045F 570 |
allfieldsGer |
10.1016/j.jmbbm.2015.08.003 doi GBVA2016009000029.pica (DE-627)ELV024421340 (ELSEVIER)S1751-6161(15)00274-X DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 570 570 DE-600 690 VZ 52.43 bkl 52.52 bkl 52.42 bkl 50.38 bkl Song, Xiao-Fei verfasserin aut Machinability of lithium disilicate glass ceramic in in vitro dental diamond bur adjusting process 2016transfer abstract 15 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Esthetic high-strength lithium disilicate glass ceramics (LDGC) are used for monolithic crowns and bridges produced in dental CAD/CAM and oral adjusting processes, which machinability affects the restorative quality. A machinability study has been made in the simulated oral clinical machining of LDGC with a dental handpiece and diamond burs, regarding the diamond tool wear and chip control, machining forces and energy, surface finish and integrity. Machining forces, speeds and energy in in vitro dental adjusting of LDGC were measured by a high-speed data acquisition and force sensor system. Machined LDGC surfaces were assessed using three-dimensional non-contact chromatic confocal optical profilometry and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Diamond bur morphology and LDGC chip shapes were also examined using SEM. Minimum tool wear but significant LDGC chip accumulations were found. Machining forces and energy significantly depended on machining conditions (p<0.05) and were significantly higher than other glass ceramics (p<0.05). Machining speeds dropped more rapidly with increased removal rates than other glass ceramics (p<0.05). Two material machinability indices associated with the hardness, Young’s modulus and fracture toughness were derived based on the normal force-removal rate relations, which ranked LDGC the most difficult to machine among glass ceramics. Surface roughness for machined LDGC was comparable for other glass ceramics. The removal mechanisms of LDGC were dominated by penetration-induced brittle fracture and shear-induced plastic deformation. Unlike most other glass ceramics, distinct intergranular and transgranular fractures of lithium disilicate crystals were found in LDGC. This research provides the fundamental data for dental clinicians on the machinability of LDGC in intraoral adjustments. Esthetic high-strength lithium disilicate glass ceramics (LDGC) are used for monolithic crowns and bridges produced in dental CAD/CAM and oral adjusting processes, which machinability affects the restorative quality. A machinability study has been made in the simulated oral clinical machining of LDGC with a dental handpiece and diamond burs, regarding the diamond tool wear and chip control, machining forces and energy, surface finish and integrity. Machining forces, speeds and energy in in vitro dental adjusting of LDGC were measured by a high-speed data acquisition and force sensor system. Machined LDGC surfaces were assessed using three-dimensional non-contact chromatic confocal optical profilometry and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Diamond bur morphology and LDGC chip shapes were also examined using SEM. Minimum tool wear but significant LDGC chip accumulations were found. Machining forces and energy significantly depended on machining conditions (p<0.05) and were significantly higher than other glass ceramics (p<0.05). Machining speeds dropped more rapidly with increased removal rates than other glass ceramics (p<0.05). Two material machinability indices associated with the hardness, Young’s modulus and fracture toughness were derived based on the normal force-removal rate relations, which ranked LDGC the most difficult to machine among glass ceramics. Surface roughness for machined LDGC was comparable for other glass ceramics. The removal mechanisms of LDGC were dominated by penetration-induced brittle fracture and shear-induced plastic deformation. Unlike most other glass ceramics, distinct intergranular and transgranular fractures of lithium disilicate crystals were found in LDGC. This research provides the fundamental data for dental clinicians on the machinability of LDGC in intraoral adjustments. Surface roughness and integrity Elsevier Machinability Elsevier Lithium disilicate glass ceramic (LDGC) Elsevier Dental adjusting Elsevier Forces Elsevier Specific machining energy Elsevier Ren, Hai-Tao oth Yin, Ling oth Enthalten in Elsevier Liu, Min-Jie ELSEVIER A volume-shrinkage-based method for quantifying the inward solidification heat transfer of a phase change material filled in spherical capsules 2016 Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV009727671 volume:53 year:2016 pages:78-92 extent:15 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2015.08.003 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U 52.43 Kältetechnik VZ 52.52 Thermische Energieerzeugung Wärmetechnik VZ 52.42 Heizungstechnik Lüftungstechnik Klimatechnik VZ 50.38 Technische Thermodynamik VZ AR 53 2016 78-92 15 045F 570 |
allfieldsSound |
10.1016/j.jmbbm.2015.08.003 doi GBVA2016009000029.pica (DE-627)ELV024421340 (ELSEVIER)S1751-6161(15)00274-X DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 570 570 DE-600 690 VZ 52.43 bkl 52.52 bkl 52.42 bkl 50.38 bkl Song, Xiao-Fei verfasserin aut Machinability of lithium disilicate glass ceramic in in vitro dental diamond bur adjusting process 2016transfer abstract 15 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Esthetic high-strength lithium disilicate glass ceramics (LDGC) are used for monolithic crowns and bridges produced in dental CAD/CAM and oral adjusting processes, which machinability affects the restorative quality. A machinability study has been made in the simulated oral clinical machining of LDGC with a dental handpiece and diamond burs, regarding the diamond tool wear and chip control, machining forces and energy, surface finish and integrity. Machining forces, speeds and energy in in vitro dental adjusting of LDGC were measured by a high-speed data acquisition and force sensor system. Machined LDGC surfaces were assessed using three-dimensional non-contact chromatic confocal optical profilometry and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Diamond bur morphology and LDGC chip shapes were also examined using SEM. Minimum tool wear but significant LDGC chip accumulations were found. Machining forces and energy significantly depended on machining conditions (p<0.05) and were significantly higher than other glass ceramics (p<0.05). Machining speeds dropped more rapidly with increased removal rates than other glass ceramics (p<0.05). Two material machinability indices associated with the hardness, Young’s modulus and fracture toughness were derived based on the normal force-removal rate relations, which ranked LDGC the most difficult to machine among glass ceramics. Surface roughness for machined LDGC was comparable for other glass ceramics. The removal mechanisms of LDGC were dominated by penetration-induced brittle fracture and shear-induced plastic deformation. Unlike most other glass ceramics, distinct intergranular and transgranular fractures of lithium disilicate crystals were found in LDGC. This research provides the fundamental data for dental clinicians on the machinability of LDGC in intraoral adjustments. Esthetic high-strength lithium disilicate glass ceramics (LDGC) are used for monolithic crowns and bridges produced in dental CAD/CAM and oral adjusting processes, which machinability affects the restorative quality. A machinability study has been made in the simulated oral clinical machining of LDGC with a dental handpiece and diamond burs, regarding the diamond tool wear and chip control, machining forces and energy, surface finish and integrity. Machining forces, speeds and energy in in vitro dental adjusting of LDGC were measured by a high-speed data acquisition and force sensor system. Machined LDGC surfaces were assessed using three-dimensional non-contact chromatic confocal optical profilometry and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Diamond bur morphology and LDGC chip shapes were also examined using SEM. Minimum tool wear but significant LDGC chip accumulations were found. Machining forces and energy significantly depended on machining conditions (p<0.05) and were significantly higher than other glass ceramics (p<0.05). Machining speeds dropped more rapidly with increased removal rates than other glass ceramics (p<0.05). Two material machinability indices associated with the hardness, Young’s modulus and fracture toughness were derived based on the normal force-removal rate relations, which ranked LDGC the most difficult to machine among glass ceramics. Surface roughness for machined LDGC was comparable for other glass ceramics. The removal mechanisms of LDGC were dominated by penetration-induced brittle fracture and shear-induced plastic deformation. Unlike most other glass ceramics, distinct intergranular and transgranular fractures of lithium disilicate crystals were found in LDGC. This research provides the fundamental data for dental clinicians on the machinability of LDGC in intraoral adjustments. Surface roughness and integrity Elsevier Machinability Elsevier Lithium disilicate glass ceramic (LDGC) Elsevier Dental adjusting Elsevier Forces Elsevier Specific machining energy Elsevier Ren, Hai-Tao oth Yin, Ling oth Enthalten in Elsevier Liu, Min-Jie ELSEVIER A volume-shrinkage-based method for quantifying the inward solidification heat transfer of a phase change material filled in spherical capsules 2016 Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV009727671 volume:53 year:2016 pages:78-92 extent:15 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2015.08.003 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U 52.43 Kältetechnik VZ 52.52 Thermische Energieerzeugung Wärmetechnik VZ 52.42 Heizungstechnik Lüftungstechnik Klimatechnik VZ 50.38 Technische Thermodynamik VZ AR 53 2016 78-92 15 045F 570 |
language |
English |
source |
Enthalten in A volume-shrinkage-based method for quantifying the inward solidification heat transfer of a phase change material filled in spherical capsules Amsterdam [u.a.] volume:53 year:2016 pages:78-92 extent:15 |
sourceStr |
Enthalten in A volume-shrinkage-based method for quantifying the inward solidification heat transfer of a phase change material filled in spherical capsules Amsterdam [u.a.] volume:53 year:2016 pages:78-92 extent:15 |
format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
bklname |
Kältetechnik Thermische Energieerzeugung Wärmetechnik Heizungstechnik Lüftungstechnik Klimatechnik Technische Thermodynamik |
institution |
findex.gbv.de |
topic_facet |
Surface roughness and integrity Machinability Lithium disilicate glass ceramic (LDGC) Dental adjusting Forces Specific machining energy |
dewey-raw |
570 |
isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
container_title |
A volume-shrinkage-based method for quantifying the inward solidification heat transfer of a phase change material filled in spherical capsules |
authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Song, Xiao-Fei @@aut@@ Ren, Hai-Tao @@oth@@ Yin, Ling @@oth@@ |
publishDateDaySort_date |
2016-01-01T00:00:00Z |
hierarchy_top_id |
ELV009727671 |
dewey-sort |
3570 |
id |
ELV024421340 |
language_de |
englisch |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV024421340</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230625142826.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">180603s2016 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.jmbbm.2015.08.003</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">GBVA2016009000029.pica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV024421340</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S1751-6161(15)00274-X</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">570</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">570</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">690</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">52.43</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">52.52</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">52.42</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">50.38</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Song, Xiao-Fei</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Machinability of lithium disilicate glass ceramic in in vitro dental diamond bur adjusting process</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2016transfer abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">15</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Esthetic high-strength lithium disilicate glass ceramics (LDGC) are used for monolithic crowns and bridges produced in dental CAD/CAM and oral adjusting processes, which machinability affects the restorative quality. A machinability study has been made in the simulated oral clinical machining of LDGC with a dental handpiece and diamond burs, regarding the diamond tool wear and chip control, machining forces and energy, surface finish and integrity. Machining forces, speeds and energy in in vitro dental adjusting of LDGC were measured by a high-speed data acquisition and force sensor system. Machined LDGC surfaces were assessed using three-dimensional non-contact chromatic confocal optical profilometry and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Diamond bur morphology and LDGC chip shapes were also examined using SEM. Minimum tool wear but significant LDGC chip accumulations were found. Machining forces and energy significantly depended on machining conditions (p<0.05) and were significantly higher than other glass ceramics (p<0.05). Machining speeds dropped more rapidly with increased removal rates than other glass ceramics (p<0.05). Two material machinability indices associated with the hardness, Young’s modulus and fracture toughness were derived based on the normal force-removal rate relations, which ranked LDGC the most difficult to machine among glass ceramics. Surface roughness for machined LDGC was comparable for other glass ceramics. The removal mechanisms of LDGC were dominated by penetration-induced brittle fracture and shear-induced plastic deformation. Unlike most other glass ceramics, distinct intergranular and transgranular fractures of lithium disilicate crystals were found in LDGC. This research provides the fundamental data for dental clinicians on the machinability of LDGC in intraoral adjustments.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Esthetic high-strength lithium disilicate glass ceramics (LDGC) are used for monolithic crowns and bridges produced in dental CAD/CAM and oral adjusting processes, which machinability affects the restorative quality. A machinability study has been made in the simulated oral clinical machining of LDGC with a dental handpiece and diamond burs, regarding the diamond tool wear and chip control, machining forces and energy, surface finish and integrity. Machining forces, speeds and energy in in vitro dental adjusting of LDGC were measured by a high-speed data acquisition and force sensor system. Machined LDGC surfaces were assessed using three-dimensional non-contact chromatic confocal optical profilometry and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Diamond bur morphology and LDGC chip shapes were also examined using SEM. Minimum tool wear but significant LDGC chip accumulations were found. Machining forces and energy significantly depended on machining conditions (p<0.05) and were significantly higher than other glass ceramics (p<0.05). Machining speeds dropped more rapidly with increased removal rates than other glass ceramics (p<0.05). Two material machinability indices associated with the hardness, Young’s modulus and fracture toughness were derived based on the normal force-removal rate relations, which ranked LDGC the most difficult to machine among glass ceramics. Surface roughness for machined LDGC was comparable for other glass ceramics. The removal mechanisms of LDGC were dominated by penetration-induced brittle fracture and shear-induced plastic deformation. Unlike most other glass ceramics, distinct intergranular and transgranular fractures of lithium disilicate crystals were found in LDGC. This research provides the fundamental data for dental clinicians on the machinability of LDGC in intraoral adjustments.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Surface roughness and integrity</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Machinability</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Lithium disilicate glass ceramic (LDGC)</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Dental adjusting</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Forces</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Specific machining energy</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ren, Hai-Tao</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Yin, Ling</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="n">Elsevier</subfield><subfield code="a">Liu, Min-Jie ELSEVIER</subfield><subfield code="t">A volume-shrinkage-based method for quantifying the inward solidification heat transfer of a phase change material filled in spherical capsules</subfield><subfield code="d">2016</subfield><subfield code="g">Amsterdam [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)ELV009727671</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:53</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2016</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:78-92</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:15</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2015.08.003</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">52.43</subfield><subfield code="j">Kältetechnik</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">52.52</subfield><subfield code="j">Thermische Energieerzeugung</subfield><subfield code="j">Wärmetechnik</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">52.42</subfield><subfield code="j">Heizungstechnik</subfield><subfield code="j">Lüftungstechnik</subfield><subfield code="j">Klimatechnik</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">50.38</subfield><subfield code="j">Technische Thermodynamik</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">53</subfield><subfield code="j">2016</subfield><subfield code="h">78-92</subfield><subfield code="g">15</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="953" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="2">045F</subfield><subfield code="a">570</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
author |
Song, Xiao-Fei |
spellingShingle |
Song, Xiao-Fei ddc 570 ddc 690 bkl 52.43 bkl 52.52 bkl 52.42 bkl 50.38 Elsevier Surface roughness and integrity Elsevier Machinability Elsevier Lithium disilicate glass ceramic (LDGC) Elsevier Dental adjusting Elsevier Forces Elsevier Specific machining energy Machinability of lithium disilicate glass ceramic in in vitro dental diamond bur adjusting process |
authorStr |
Song, Xiao-Fei |
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)ELV009727671 |
format |
electronic Article |
dewey-ones |
570 - Life sciences; biology 690 - Buildings |
delete_txt_mv |
keep |
author_role |
aut |
collection |
elsevier |
remote_str |
true |
illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
topic_title |
570 570 DE-600 690 VZ 52.43 bkl 52.52 bkl 52.42 bkl 50.38 bkl Machinability of lithium disilicate glass ceramic in in vitro dental diamond bur adjusting process Surface roughness and integrity Elsevier Machinability Elsevier Lithium disilicate glass ceramic (LDGC) Elsevier Dental adjusting Elsevier Forces Elsevier Specific machining energy Elsevier |
topic |
ddc 570 ddc 690 bkl 52.43 bkl 52.52 bkl 52.42 bkl 50.38 Elsevier Surface roughness and integrity Elsevier Machinability Elsevier Lithium disilicate glass ceramic (LDGC) Elsevier Dental adjusting Elsevier Forces Elsevier Specific machining energy |
topic_unstemmed |
ddc 570 ddc 690 bkl 52.43 bkl 52.52 bkl 52.42 bkl 50.38 Elsevier Surface roughness and integrity Elsevier Machinability Elsevier Lithium disilicate glass ceramic (LDGC) Elsevier Dental adjusting Elsevier Forces Elsevier Specific machining energy |
topic_browse |
ddc 570 ddc 690 bkl 52.43 bkl 52.52 bkl 52.42 bkl 50.38 Elsevier Surface roughness and integrity Elsevier Machinability Elsevier Lithium disilicate glass ceramic (LDGC) Elsevier Dental adjusting Elsevier Forces Elsevier Specific machining energy |
format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
carriertype_str_mv |
zu |
author2_variant |
h t r htr l y ly |
hierarchy_parent_title |
A volume-shrinkage-based method for quantifying the inward solidification heat transfer of a phase change material filled in spherical capsules |
hierarchy_parent_id |
ELV009727671 |
dewey-tens |
570 - Life sciences; biology 690 - Building & construction |
hierarchy_top_title |
A volume-shrinkage-based method for quantifying the inward solidification heat transfer of a phase change material filled in spherical capsules |
isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)ELV009727671 |
title |
Machinability of lithium disilicate glass ceramic in in vitro dental diamond bur adjusting process |
ctrlnum |
(DE-627)ELV024421340 (ELSEVIER)S1751-6161(15)00274-X |
title_full |
Machinability of lithium disilicate glass ceramic in in vitro dental diamond bur adjusting process |
author_sort |
Song, Xiao-Fei |
journal |
A volume-shrinkage-based method for quantifying the inward solidification heat transfer of a phase change material filled in spherical capsules |
journalStr |
A volume-shrinkage-based method for quantifying the inward solidification heat transfer of a phase change material filled in spherical capsules |
lang_code |
eng |
isOA_bool |
false |
dewey-hundreds |
500 - Science 600 - Technology |
recordtype |
marc |
publishDateSort |
2016 |
contenttype_str_mv |
zzz |
container_start_page |
78 |
author_browse |
Song, Xiao-Fei |
container_volume |
53 |
physical |
15 |
class |
570 570 DE-600 690 VZ 52.43 bkl 52.52 bkl 52.42 bkl 50.38 bkl |
format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
author-letter |
Song, Xiao-Fei |
doi_str_mv |
10.1016/j.jmbbm.2015.08.003 |
dewey-full |
570 690 |
title_sort |
machinability of lithium disilicate glass ceramic in in vitro dental diamond bur adjusting process |
title_auth |
Machinability of lithium disilicate glass ceramic in in vitro dental diamond bur adjusting process |
abstract |
Esthetic high-strength lithium disilicate glass ceramics (LDGC) are used for monolithic crowns and bridges produced in dental CAD/CAM and oral adjusting processes, which machinability affects the restorative quality. A machinability study has been made in the simulated oral clinical machining of LDGC with a dental handpiece and diamond burs, regarding the diamond tool wear and chip control, machining forces and energy, surface finish and integrity. Machining forces, speeds and energy in in vitro dental adjusting of LDGC were measured by a high-speed data acquisition and force sensor system. Machined LDGC surfaces were assessed using three-dimensional non-contact chromatic confocal optical profilometry and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Diamond bur morphology and LDGC chip shapes were also examined using SEM. Minimum tool wear but significant LDGC chip accumulations were found. Machining forces and energy significantly depended on machining conditions (p<0.05) and were significantly higher than other glass ceramics (p<0.05). Machining speeds dropped more rapidly with increased removal rates than other glass ceramics (p<0.05). Two material machinability indices associated with the hardness, Young’s modulus and fracture toughness were derived based on the normal force-removal rate relations, which ranked LDGC the most difficult to machine among glass ceramics. Surface roughness for machined LDGC was comparable for other glass ceramics. The removal mechanisms of LDGC were dominated by penetration-induced brittle fracture and shear-induced plastic deformation. Unlike most other glass ceramics, distinct intergranular and transgranular fractures of lithium disilicate crystals were found in LDGC. This research provides the fundamental data for dental clinicians on the machinability of LDGC in intraoral adjustments. |
abstractGer |
Esthetic high-strength lithium disilicate glass ceramics (LDGC) are used for monolithic crowns and bridges produced in dental CAD/CAM and oral adjusting processes, which machinability affects the restorative quality. A machinability study has been made in the simulated oral clinical machining of LDGC with a dental handpiece and diamond burs, regarding the diamond tool wear and chip control, machining forces and energy, surface finish and integrity. Machining forces, speeds and energy in in vitro dental adjusting of LDGC were measured by a high-speed data acquisition and force sensor system. Machined LDGC surfaces were assessed using three-dimensional non-contact chromatic confocal optical profilometry and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Diamond bur morphology and LDGC chip shapes were also examined using SEM. Minimum tool wear but significant LDGC chip accumulations were found. Machining forces and energy significantly depended on machining conditions (p<0.05) and were significantly higher than other glass ceramics (p<0.05). Machining speeds dropped more rapidly with increased removal rates than other glass ceramics (p<0.05). Two material machinability indices associated with the hardness, Young’s modulus and fracture toughness were derived based on the normal force-removal rate relations, which ranked LDGC the most difficult to machine among glass ceramics. Surface roughness for machined LDGC was comparable for other glass ceramics. The removal mechanisms of LDGC were dominated by penetration-induced brittle fracture and shear-induced plastic deformation. Unlike most other glass ceramics, distinct intergranular and transgranular fractures of lithium disilicate crystals were found in LDGC. This research provides the fundamental data for dental clinicians on the machinability of LDGC in intraoral adjustments. |
abstract_unstemmed |
Esthetic high-strength lithium disilicate glass ceramics (LDGC) are used for monolithic crowns and bridges produced in dental CAD/CAM and oral adjusting processes, which machinability affects the restorative quality. A machinability study has been made in the simulated oral clinical machining of LDGC with a dental handpiece and diamond burs, regarding the diamond tool wear and chip control, machining forces and energy, surface finish and integrity. Machining forces, speeds and energy in in vitro dental adjusting of LDGC were measured by a high-speed data acquisition and force sensor system. Machined LDGC surfaces were assessed using three-dimensional non-contact chromatic confocal optical profilometry and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Diamond bur morphology and LDGC chip shapes were also examined using SEM. Minimum tool wear but significant LDGC chip accumulations were found. Machining forces and energy significantly depended on machining conditions (p<0.05) and were significantly higher than other glass ceramics (p<0.05). Machining speeds dropped more rapidly with increased removal rates than other glass ceramics (p<0.05). Two material machinability indices associated with the hardness, Young’s modulus and fracture toughness were derived based on the normal force-removal rate relations, which ranked LDGC the most difficult to machine among glass ceramics. Surface roughness for machined LDGC was comparable for other glass ceramics. The removal mechanisms of LDGC were dominated by penetration-induced brittle fracture and shear-induced plastic deformation. Unlike most other glass ceramics, distinct intergranular and transgranular fractures of lithium disilicate crystals were found in LDGC. This research provides the fundamental data for dental clinicians on the machinability of LDGC in intraoral adjustments. |
collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U |
title_short |
Machinability of lithium disilicate glass ceramic in in vitro dental diamond bur adjusting process |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2015.08.003 |
remote_bool |
true |
author2 |
Ren, Hai-Tao Yin, Ling |
author2Str |
Ren, Hai-Tao Yin, Ling |
ppnlink |
ELV009727671 |
mediatype_str_mv |
z |
isOA_txt |
false |
hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
author2_role |
oth oth |
doi_str |
10.1016/j.jmbbm.2015.08.003 |
up_date |
2024-07-06T21:23:22.557Z |
_version_ |
1803866344059305984 |
fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV024421340</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230625142826.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">180603s2016 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.jmbbm.2015.08.003</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">GBVA2016009000029.pica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV024421340</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S1751-6161(15)00274-X</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">570</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">570</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">690</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">52.43</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">52.52</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">52.42</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">50.38</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Song, Xiao-Fei</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Machinability of lithium disilicate glass ceramic in in vitro dental diamond bur adjusting process</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2016transfer abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">15</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Esthetic high-strength lithium disilicate glass ceramics (LDGC) are used for monolithic crowns and bridges produced in dental CAD/CAM and oral adjusting processes, which machinability affects the restorative quality. A machinability study has been made in the simulated oral clinical machining of LDGC with a dental handpiece and diamond burs, regarding the diamond tool wear and chip control, machining forces and energy, surface finish and integrity. Machining forces, speeds and energy in in vitro dental adjusting of LDGC were measured by a high-speed data acquisition and force sensor system. Machined LDGC surfaces were assessed using three-dimensional non-contact chromatic confocal optical profilometry and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Diamond bur morphology and LDGC chip shapes were also examined using SEM. Minimum tool wear but significant LDGC chip accumulations were found. Machining forces and energy significantly depended on machining conditions (p<0.05) and were significantly higher than other glass ceramics (p<0.05). Machining speeds dropped more rapidly with increased removal rates than other glass ceramics (p<0.05). Two material machinability indices associated with the hardness, Young’s modulus and fracture toughness were derived based on the normal force-removal rate relations, which ranked LDGC the most difficult to machine among glass ceramics. Surface roughness for machined LDGC was comparable for other glass ceramics. The removal mechanisms of LDGC were dominated by penetration-induced brittle fracture and shear-induced plastic deformation. Unlike most other glass ceramics, distinct intergranular and transgranular fractures of lithium disilicate crystals were found in LDGC. This research provides the fundamental data for dental clinicians on the machinability of LDGC in intraoral adjustments.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Esthetic high-strength lithium disilicate glass ceramics (LDGC) are used for monolithic crowns and bridges produced in dental CAD/CAM and oral adjusting processes, which machinability affects the restorative quality. A machinability study has been made in the simulated oral clinical machining of LDGC with a dental handpiece and diamond burs, regarding the diamond tool wear and chip control, machining forces and energy, surface finish and integrity. Machining forces, speeds and energy in in vitro dental adjusting of LDGC were measured by a high-speed data acquisition and force sensor system. Machined LDGC surfaces were assessed using three-dimensional non-contact chromatic confocal optical profilometry and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Diamond bur morphology and LDGC chip shapes were also examined using SEM. Minimum tool wear but significant LDGC chip accumulations were found. Machining forces and energy significantly depended on machining conditions (p<0.05) and were significantly higher than other glass ceramics (p<0.05). Machining speeds dropped more rapidly with increased removal rates than other glass ceramics (p<0.05). Two material machinability indices associated with the hardness, Young’s modulus and fracture toughness were derived based on the normal force-removal rate relations, which ranked LDGC the most difficult to machine among glass ceramics. Surface roughness for machined LDGC was comparable for other glass ceramics. The removal mechanisms of LDGC were dominated by penetration-induced brittle fracture and shear-induced plastic deformation. Unlike most other glass ceramics, distinct intergranular and transgranular fractures of lithium disilicate crystals were found in LDGC. This research provides the fundamental data for dental clinicians on the machinability of LDGC in intraoral adjustments.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Surface roughness and integrity</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Machinability</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Lithium disilicate glass ceramic (LDGC)</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Dental adjusting</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Forces</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Specific machining energy</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ren, Hai-Tao</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Yin, Ling</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="n">Elsevier</subfield><subfield code="a">Liu, Min-Jie ELSEVIER</subfield><subfield code="t">A volume-shrinkage-based method for quantifying the inward solidification heat transfer of a phase change material filled in spherical capsules</subfield><subfield code="d">2016</subfield><subfield code="g">Amsterdam [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)ELV009727671</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:53</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2016</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:78-92</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:15</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2015.08.003</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">52.43</subfield><subfield code="j">Kältetechnik</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">52.52</subfield><subfield code="j">Thermische Energieerzeugung</subfield><subfield code="j">Wärmetechnik</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">52.42</subfield><subfield code="j">Heizungstechnik</subfield><subfield code="j">Lüftungstechnik</subfield><subfield code="j">Klimatechnik</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">50.38</subfield><subfield code="j">Technische Thermodynamik</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">53</subfield><subfield code="j">2016</subfield><subfield code="h">78-92</subfield><subfield code="g">15</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="953" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="2">045F</subfield><subfield code="a">570</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
score |
7.4008274 |