Cellulose-hemicellulose interactions during fast pyrolysis with different temperatures and mixing methods
In this work, the cellulose-hemicellulose interaction during pyrolysis was investigated to study the impacts of sample preparation, temperature, mixing ratio on the light products distribution. Cellulose-hemicellulose interactions were studied by Py-GC-MS with different temperatures (500, 600, 700 °...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Wu, Shiliang [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2016transfer abstract |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Umfang: |
9 |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Lag time of modern bomb-pulse radiocarbon in human bone tissues: New data from Brazil - Ubelaker, Douglas H. ELSEVIER, 2021, Amsterdam [u.a.] |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:95 ; year:2016 ; pages:55-63 ; extent:9 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1016/j.biombioe.2016.09.015 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
ELV02469469X |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ELV02469469X | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230625143321.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 180603s2016 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.biombioe.2016.09.015 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a GBVA2016017000010.pica |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)ELV02469469X | ||
| 035 | |a (ELSEVIER)S0961-9534(16)30305-1 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 082 | 0 | |a 630 |a 640 |a 530 | |
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 630 |q DE-600 |
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 640 |q DE-600 |
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 530 |q DE-600 |
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 340 |a 610 |q VZ |
| 084 | |a 2 |2 ssgn | ||
| 084 | |a INTRECHT |q DE-1a |2 fid | ||
| 084 | |a 44.72 |2 bkl | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Wu, Shiliang |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Cellulose-hemicellulose interactions during fast pyrolysis with different temperatures and mixing methods |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2016transfer abstract | |
| 300 | |a 9 | ||
| 336 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zzz |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b z |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zu |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a In this work, the cellulose-hemicellulose interaction during pyrolysis was investigated to study the impacts of sample preparation, temperature, mixing ratio on the light products distribution. Cellulose-hemicellulose interactions were studied by Py-GC-MS with different temperatures (500, 600, 700 °C), mixing ratios (mass ratio 1:1 and 5:2), and mixing methods (physical and native mixtures). Generally speaking, cellulose-hemicellulose interaction would significantly promote the formation of hemicellulose-derived products and CO2, while inhibit part of cellulose-derived products, especially the formation of levoglucosan. Moreover, the native cellulose-hemicellulose mixture had the most distinct impact on the product distributions. A statistic method has been used to evaluate the strength of cellulose-hemicellulose interaction and compared with cellulose-lignin interaction, finding that mixing method had the strongest influence on cellulose-hemicellulose interaction, followed by temperature, and mixing ratio had the weakest influence. Most importantly, the interaction between cellulose-hemicellulose was weaker than cellulose-lignin. | ||
| 520 | |a In this work, the cellulose-hemicellulose interaction during pyrolysis was investigated to study the impacts of sample preparation, temperature, mixing ratio on the light products distribution. Cellulose-hemicellulose interactions were studied by Py-GC-MS with different temperatures (500, 600, 700 °C), mixing ratios (mass ratio 1:1 and 5:2), and mixing methods (physical and native mixtures). Generally speaking, cellulose-hemicellulose interaction would significantly promote the formation of hemicellulose-derived products and CO2, while inhibit part of cellulose-derived products, especially the formation of levoglucosan. Moreover, the native cellulose-hemicellulose mixture had the most distinct impact on the product distributions. A statistic method has been used to evaluate the strength of cellulose-hemicellulose interaction and compared with cellulose-lignin interaction, finding that mixing method had the strongest influence on cellulose-hemicellulose interaction, followed by temperature, and mixing ratio had the weakest influence. Most importantly, the interaction between cellulose-hemicellulose was weaker than cellulose-lignin. | ||
| 650 | 7 | |a Pyrolysis |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Hemicellulose |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Py-GC-MS |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Interaction |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Cellulose |2 Elsevier | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Shen, Dekui |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Hu, Jun |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Zhang, Huiyan |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Xiao, Rui |4 oth | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |n Elsevier Science |a Ubelaker, Douglas H. ELSEVIER |t Lag time of modern bomb-pulse radiocarbon in human bone tissues: New data from Brazil |d 2021 |g Amsterdam [u.a.] |w (DE-627)ELV007277822 |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:95 |g year:2016 |g pages:55-63 |g extent:9 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2016.09.015 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_U | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ELV | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_U | ||
| 912 | |a FID-INTRECHT | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-PHA | ||
| 936 | b | k | |a 44.72 |j Rechtsmedizin |q VZ |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 95 |j 2016 |h 55-63 |g 9 | ||
| 953 | |2 045F |a 630 | ||
| author_variant |
s w sw |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
wushiliangshendekuihujunzhanghuiyanxiaor:2016----:ellshmcluoeneatosuigatyoyiwtdfeete |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2016transfer abstract |
| bklnumber |
44.72 |
| publishDate |
2016 |
| allfields |
10.1016/j.biombioe.2016.09.015 doi GBVA2016017000010.pica (DE-627)ELV02469469X (ELSEVIER)S0961-9534(16)30305-1 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 630 640 530 630 DE-600 640 DE-600 530 DE-600 340 610 VZ 2 ssgn INTRECHT DE-1a fid 44.72 bkl Wu, Shiliang verfasserin aut Cellulose-hemicellulose interactions during fast pyrolysis with different temperatures and mixing methods 2016transfer abstract 9 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier In this work, the cellulose-hemicellulose interaction during pyrolysis was investigated to study the impacts of sample preparation, temperature, mixing ratio on the light products distribution. Cellulose-hemicellulose interactions were studied by Py-GC-MS with different temperatures (500, 600, 700 °C), mixing ratios (mass ratio 1:1 and 5:2), and mixing methods (physical and native mixtures). Generally speaking, cellulose-hemicellulose interaction would significantly promote the formation of hemicellulose-derived products and CO2, while inhibit part of cellulose-derived products, especially the formation of levoglucosan. Moreover, the native cellulose-hemicellulose mixture had the most distinct impact on the product distributions. A statistic method has been used to evaluate the strength of cellulose-hemicellulose interaction and compared with cellulose-lignin interaction, finding that mixing method had the strongest influence on cellulose-hemicellulose interaction, followed by temperature, and mixing ratio had the weakest influence. Most importantly, the interaction between cellulose-hemicellulose was weaker than cellulose-lignin. In this work, the cellulose-hemicellulose interaction during pyrolysis was investigated to study the impacts of sample preparation, temperature, mixing ratio on the light products distribution. Cellulose-hemicellulose interactions were studied by Py-GC-MS with different temperatures (500, 600, 700 °C), mixing ratios (mass ratio 1:1 and 5:2), and mixing methods (physical and native mixtures). Generally speaking, cellulose-hemicellulose interaction would significantly promote the formation of hemicellulose-derived products and CO2, while inhibit part of cellulose-derived products, especially the formation of levoglucosan. Moreover, the native cellulose-hemicellulose mixture had the most distinct impact on the product distributions. A statistic method has been used to evaluate the strength of cellulose-hemicellulose interaction and compared with cellulose-lignin interaction, finding that mixing method had the strongest influence on cellulose-hemicellulose interaction, followed by temperature, and mixing ratio had the weakest influence. Most importantly, the interaction between cellulose-hemicellulose was weaker than cellulose-lignin. Pyrolysis Elsevier Hemicellulose Elsevier Py-GC-MS Elsevier Interaction Elsevier Cellulose Elsevier Shen, Dekui oth Hu, Jun oth Zhang, Huiyan oth Xiao, Rui oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Ubelaker, Douglas H. ELSEVIER Lag time of modern bomb-pulse radiocarbon in human bone tissues: New data from Brazil 2021 Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV007277822 volume:95 year:2016 pages:55-63 extent:9 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2016.09.015 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U FID-INTRECHT SSG-OLC-PHA 44.72 Rechtsmedizin VZ AR 95 2016 55-63 9 045F 630 |
| spelling |
10.1016/j.biombioe.2016.09.015 doi GBVA2016017000010.pica (DE-627)ELV02469469X (ELSEVIER)S0961-9534(16)30305-1 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 630 640 530 630 DE-600 640 DE-600 530 DE-600 340 610 VZ 2 ssgn INTRECHT DE-1a fid 44.72 bkl Wu, Shiliang verfasserin aut Cellulose-hemicellulose interactions during fast pyrolysis with different temperatures and mixing methods 2016transfer abstract 9 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier In this work, the cellulose-hemicellulose interaction during pyrolysis was investigated to study the impacts of sample preparation, temperature, mixing ratio on the light products distribution. Cellulose-hemicellulose interactions were studied by Py-GC-MS with different temperatures (500, 600, 700 °C), mixing ratios (mass ratio 1:1 and 5:2), and mixing methods (physical and native mixtures). Generally speaking, cellulose-hemicellulose interaction would significantly promote the formation of hemicellulose-derived products and CO2, while inhibit part of cellulose-derived products, especially the formation of levoglucosan. Moreover, the native cellulose-hemicellulose mixture had the most distinct impact on the product distributions. A statistic method has been used to evaluate the strength of cellulose-hemicellulose interaction and compared with cellulose-lignin interaction, finding that mixing method had the strongest influence on cellulose-hemicellulose interaction, followed by temperature, and mixing ratio had the weakest influence. Most importantly, the interaction between cellulose-hemicellulose was weaker than cellulose-lignin. In this work, the cellulose-hemicellulose interaction during pyrolysis was investigated to study the impacts of sample preparation, temperature, mixing ratio on the light products distribution. Cellulose-hemicellulose interactions were studied by Py-GC-MS with different temperatures (500, 600, 700 °C), mixing ratios (mass ratio 1:1 and 5:2), and mixing methods (physical and native mixtures). Generally speaking, cellulose-hemicellulose interaction would significantly promote the formation of hemicellulose-derived products and CO2, while inhibit part of cellulose-derived products, especially the formation of levoglucosan. Moreover, the native cellulose-hemicellulose mixture had the most distinct impact on the product distributions. A statistic method has been used to evaluate the strength of cellulose-hemicellulose interaction and compared with cellulose-lignin interaction, finding that mixing method had the strongest influence on cellulose-hemicellulose interaction, followed by temperature, and mixing ratio had the weakest influence. Most importantly, the interaction between cellulose-hemicellulose was weaker than cellulose-lignin. Pyrolysis Elsevier Hemicellulose Elsevier Py-GC-MS Elsevier Interaction Elsevier Cellulose Elsevier Shen, Dekui oth Hu, Jun oth Zhang, Huiyan oth Xiao, Rui oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Ubelaker, Douglas H. ELSEVIER Lag time of modern bomb-pulse radiocarbon in human bone tissues: New data from Brazil 2021 Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV007277822 volume:95 year:2016 pages:55-63 extent:9 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2016.09.015 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U FID-INTRECHT SSG-OLC-PHA 44.72 Rechtsmedizin VZ AR 95 2016 55-63 9 045F 630 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1016/j.biombioe.2016.09.015 doi GBVA2016017000010.pica (DE-627)ELV02469469X (ELSEVIER)S0961-9534(16)30305-1 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 630 640 530 630 DE-600 640 DE-600 530 DE-600 340 610 VZ 2 ssgn INTRECHT DE-1a fid 44.72 bkl Wu, Shiliang verfasserin aut Cellulose-hemicellulose interactions during fast pyrolysis with different temperatures and mixing methods 2016transfer abstract 9 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier In this work, the cellulose-hemicellulose interaction during pyrolysis was investigated to study the impacts of sample preparation, temperature, mixing ratio on the light products distribution. Cellulose-hemicellulose interactions were studied by Py-GC-MS with different temperatures (500, 600, 700 °C), mixing ratios (mass ratio 1:1 and 5:2), and mixing methods (physical and native mixtures). Generally speaking, cellulose-hemicellulose interaction would significantly promote the formation of hemicellulose-derived products and CO2, while inhibit part of cellulose-derived products, especially the formation of levoglucosan. Moreover, the native cellulose-hemicellulose mixture had the most distinct impact on the product distributions. A statistic method has been used to evaluate the strength of cellulose-hemicellulose interaction and compared with cellulose-lignin interaction, finding that mixing method had the strongest influence on cellulose-hemicellulose interaction, followed by temperature, and mixing ratio had the weakest influence. Most importantly, the interaction between cellulose-hemicellulose was weaker than cellulose-lignin. In this work, the cellulose-hemicellulose interaction during pyrolysis was investigated to study the impacts of sample preparation, temperature, mixing ratio on the light products distribution. Cellulose-hemicellulose interactions were studied by Py-GC-MS with different temperatures (500, 600, 700 °C), mixing ratios (mass ratio 1:1 and 5:2), and mixing methods (physical and native mixtures). Generally speaking, cellulose-hemicellulose interaction would significantly promote the formation of hemicellulose-derived products and CO2, while inhibit part of cellulose-derived products, especially the formation of levoglucosan. Moreover, the native cellulose-hemicellulose mixture had the most distinct impact on the product distributions. A statistic method has been used to evaluate the strength of cellulose-hemicellulose interaction and compared with cellulose-lignin interaction, finding that mixing method had the strongest influence on cellulose-hemicellulose interaction, followed by temperature, and mixing ratio had the weakest influence. Most importantly, the interaction between cellulose-hemicellulose was weaker than cellulose-lignin. Pyrolysis Elsevier Hemicellulose Elsevier Py-GC-MS Elsevier Interaction Elsevier Cellulose Elsevier Shen, Dekui oth Hu, Jun oth Zhang, Huiyan oth Xiao, Rui oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Ubelaker, Douglas H. ELSEVIER Lag time of modern bomb-pulse radiocarbon in human bone tissues: New data from Brazil 2021 Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV007277822 volume:95 year:2016 pages:55-63 extent:9 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2016.09.015 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U FID-INTRECHT SSG-OLC-PHA 44.72 Rechtsmedizin VZ AR 95 2016 55-63 9 045F 630 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1016/j.biombioe.2016.09.015 doi GBVA2016017000010.pica (DE-627)ELV02469469X (ELSEVIER)S0961-9534(16)30305-1 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 630 640 530 630 DE-600 640 DE-600 530 DE-600 340 610 VZ 2 ssgn INTRECHT DE-1a fid 44.72 bkl Wu, Shiliang verfasserin aut Cellulose-hemicellulose interactions during fast pyrolysis with different temperatures and mixing methods 2016transfer abstract 9 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier In this work, the cellulose-hemicellulose interaction during pyrolysis was investigated to study the impacts of sample preparation, temperature, mixing ratio on the light products distribution. Cellulose-hemicellulose interactions were studied by Py-GC-MS with different temperatures (500, 600, 700 °C), mixing ratios (mass ratio 1:1 and 5:2), and mixing methods (physical and native mixtures). Generally speaking, cellulose-hemicellulose interaction would significantly promote the formation of hemicellulose-derived products and CO2, while inhibit part of cellulose-derived products, especially the formation of levoglucosan. Moreover, the native cellulose-hemicellulose mixture had the most distinct impact on the product distributions. A statistic method has been used to evaluate the strength of cellulose-hemicellulose interaction and compared with cellulose-lignin interaction, finding that mixing method had the strongest influence on cellulose-hemicellulose interaction, followed by temperature, and mixing ratio had the weakest influence. Most importantly, the interaction between cellulose-hemicellulose was weaker than cellulose-lignin. In this work, the cellulose-hemicellulose interaction during pyrolysis was investigated to study the impacts of sample preparation, temperature, mixing ratio on the light products distribution. Cellulose-hemicellulose interactions were studied by Py-GC-MS with different temperatures (500, 600, 700 °C), mixing ratios (mass ratio 1:1 and 5:2), and mixing methods (physical and native mixtures). Generally speaking, cellulose-hemicellulose interaction would significantly promote the formation of hemicellulose-derived products and CO2, while inhibit part of cellulose-derived products, especially the formation of levoglucosan. Moreover, the native cellulose-hemicellulose mixture had the most distinct impact on the product distributions. A statistic method has been used to evaluate the strength of cellulose-hemicellulose interaction and compared with cellulose-lignin interaction, finding that mixing method had the strongest influence on cellulose-hemicellulose interaction, followed by temperature, and mixing ratio had the weakest influence. Most importantly, the interaction between cellulose-hemicellulose was weaker than cellulose-lignin. Pyrolysis Elsevier Hemicellulose Elsevier Py-GC-MS Elsevier Interaction Elsevier Cellulose Elsevier Shen, Dekui oth Hu, Jun oth Zhang, Huiyan oth Xiao, Rui oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Ubelaker, Douglas H. ELSEVIER Lag time of modern bomb-pulse radiocarbon in human bone tissues: New data from Brazil 2021 Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV007277822 volume:95 year:2016 pages:55-63 extent:9 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2016.09.015 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U FID-INTRECHT SSG-OLC-PHA 44.72 Rechtsmedizin VZ AR 95 2016 55-63 9 045F 630 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1016/j.biombioe.2016.09.015 doi GBVA2016017000010.pica (DE-627)ELV02469469X (ELSEVIER)S0961-9534(16)30305-1 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 630 640 530 630 DE-600 640 DE-600 530 DE-600 340 610 VZ 2 ssgn INTRECHT DE-1a fid 44.72 bkl Wu, Shiliang verfasserin aut Cellulose-hemicellulose interactions during fast pyrolysis with different temperatures and mixing methods 2016transfer abstract 9 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier In this work, the cellulose-hemicellulose interaction during pyrolysis was investigated to study the impacts of sample preparation, temperature, mixing ratio on the light products distribution. Cellulose-hemicellulose interactions were studied by Py-GC-MS with different temperatures (500, 600, 700 °C), mixing ratios (mass ratio 1:1 and 5:2), and mixing methods (physical and native mixtures). Generally speaking, cellulose-hemicellulose interaction would significantly promote the formation of hemicellulose-derived products and CO2, while inhibit part of cellulose-derived products, especially the formation of levoglucosan. Moreover, the native cellulose-hemicellulose mixture had the most distinct impact on the product distributions. A statistic method has been used to evaluate the strength of cellulose-hemicellulose interaction and compared with cellulose-lignin interaction, finding that mixing method had the strongest influence on cellulose-hemicellulose interaction, followed by temperature, and mixing ratio had the weakest influence. Most importantly, the interaction between cellulose-hemicellulose was weaker than cellulose-lignin. In this work, the cellulose-hemicellulose interaction during pyrolysis was investigated to study the impacts of sample preparation, temperature, mixing ratio on the light products distribution. Cellulose-hemicellulose interactions were studied by Py-GC-MS with different temperatures (500, 600, 700 °C), mixing ratios (mass ratio 1:1 and 5:2), and mixing methods (physical and native mixtures). Generally speaking, cellulose-hemicellulose interaction would significantly promote the formation of hemicellulose-derived products and CO2, while inhibit part of cellulose-derived products, especially the formation of levoglucosan. Moreover, the native cellulose-hemicellulose mixture had the most distinct impact on the product distributions. A statistic method has been used to evaluate the strength of cellulose-hemicellulose interaction and compared with cellulose-lignin interaction, finding that mixing method had the strongest influence on cellulose-hemicellulose interaction, followed by temperature, and mixing ratio had the weakest influence. Most importantly, the interaction between cellulose-hemicellulose was weaker than cellulose-lignin. Pyrolysis Elsevier Hemicellulose Elsevier Py-GC-MS Elsevier Interaction Elsevier Cellulose Elsevier Shen, Dekui oth Hu, Jun oth Zhang, Huiyan oth Xiao, Rui oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Ubelaker, Douglas H. ELSEVIER Lag time of modern bomb-pulse radiocarbon in human bone tissues: New data from Brazil 2021 Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV007277822 volume:95 year:2016 pages:55-63 extent:9 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2016.09.015 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U FID-INTRECHT SSG-OLC-PHA 44.72 Rechtsmedizin VZ AR 95 2016 55-63 9 045F 630 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in Lag time of modern bomb-pulse radiocarbon in human bone tissues: New data from Brazil Amsterdam [u.a.] volume:95 year:2016 pages:55-63 extent:9 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in Lag time of modern bomb-pulse radiocarbon in human bone tissues: New data from Brazil Amsterdam [u.a.] volume:95 year:2016 pages:55-63 extent:9 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| bklname |
Rechtsmedizin |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
Pyrolysis Hemicellulose Py-GC-MS Interaction Cellulose |
| dewey-raw |
630 |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
Lag time of modern bomb-pulse radiocarbon in human bone tissues: New data from Brazil |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Wu, Shiliang @@aut@@ Shen, Dekui @@oth@@ Hu, Jun @@oth@@ Zhang, Huiyan @@oth@@ Xiao, Rui @@oth@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2016-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
ELV007277822 |
| dewey-sort |
3630 |
| id |
ELV02469469X |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV02469469X</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230625143321.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">180603s2016 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.biombioe.2016.09.015</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">GBVA2016017000010.pica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV02469469X</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0961-9534(16)30305-1</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">630</subfield><subfield code="a">640</subfield><subfield code="a">530</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">630</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">640</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">530</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">340</subfield><subfield code="a">610</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">2</subfield><subfield code="2">ssgn</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">INTRECHT</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-1a</subfield><subfield code="2">fid</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">44.72</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Wu, Shiliang</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Cellulose-hemicellulose interactions during fast pyrolysis with different temperatures and mixing methods</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2016transfer abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">In this work, the cellulose-hemicellulose interaction during pyrolysis was investigated to study the impacts of sample preparation, temperature, mixing ratio on the light products distribution. Cellulose-hemicellulose interactions were studied by Py-GC-MS with different temperatures (500, 600, 700 °C), mixing ratios (mass ratio 1:1 and 5:2), and mixing methods (physical and native mixtures). Generally speaking, cellulose-hemicellulose interaction would significantly promote the formation of hemicellulose-derived products and CO2, while inhibit part of cellulose-derived products, especially the formation of levoglucosan. Moreover, the native cellulose-hemicellulose mixture had the most distinct impact on the product distributions. A statistic method has been used to evaluate the strength of cellulose-hemicellulose interaction and compared with cellulose-lignin interaction, finding that mixing method had the strongest influence on cellulose-hemicellulose interaction, followed by temperature, and mixing ratio had the weakest influence. Most importantly, the interaction between cellulose-hemicellulose was weaker than cellulose-lignin.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">In this work, the cellulose-hemicellulose interaction during pyrolysis was investigated to study the impacts of sample preparation, temperature, mixing ratio on the light products distribution. Cellulose-hemicellulose interactions were studied by Py-GC-MS with different temperatures (500, 600, 700 °C), mixing ratios (mass ratio 1:1 and 5:2), and mixing methods (physical and native mixtures). Generally speaking, cellulose-hemicellulose interaction would significantly promote the formation of hemicellulose-derived products and CO2, while inhibit part of cellulose-derived products, especially the formation of levoglucosan. Moreover, the native cellulose-hemicellulose mixture had the most distinct impact on the product distributions. A statistic method has been used to evaluate the strength of cellulose-hemicellulose interaction and compared with cellulose-lignin interaction, finding that mixing method had the strongest influence on cellulose-hemicellulose interaction, followed by temperature, and mixing ratio had the weakest influence. Most importantly, the interaction between cellulose-hemicellulose was weaker than cellulose-lignin.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Pyrolysis</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Hemicellulose</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Py-GC-MS</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Interaction</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Cellulose</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Shen, Dekui</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Hu, Jun</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Zhang, Huiyan</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Xiao, Rui</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="n">Elsevier Science</subfield><subfield code="a">Ubelaker, Douglas H. ELSEVIER</subfield><subfield code="t">Lag time of modern bomb-pulse radiocarbon in human bone tissues: New data from Brazil</subfield><subfield code="d">2021</subfield><subfield code="g">Amsterdam [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)ELV007277822</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:95</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2016</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:55-63</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:9</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2016.09.015</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">FID-INTRECHT</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">44.72</subfield><subfield code="j">Rechtsmedizin</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">95</subfield><subfield code="j">2016</subfield><subfield code="h">55-63</subfield><subfield code="g">9</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="953" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="2">045F</subfield><subfield code="a">630</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Wu, Shiliang |
| spellingShingle |
Wu, Shiliang ddc 630 ddc 640 ddc 530 ddc 340 ssgn 2 fid INTRECHT bkl 44.72 Elsevier Pyrolysis Elsevier Hemicellulose Elsevier Py-GC-MS Elsevier Interaction Elsevier Cellulose Cellulose-hemicellulose interactions during fast pyrolysis with different temperatures and mixing methods |
| authorStr |
Wu, Shiliang |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)ELV007277822 |
| format |
electronic Article |
| dewey-ones |
630 - Agriculture & related technologies 640 - Home & family management 530 - Physics 340 - Law 610 - Medicine & health |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut |
| collection |
elsevier |
| remote_str |
true |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| topic_title |
630 640 530 630 DE-600 640 DE-600 530 DE-600 340 610 VZ 2 ssgn INTRECHT DE-1a fid 44.72 bkl Cellulose-hemicellulose interactions during fast pyrolysis with different temperatures and mixing methods Pyrolysis Elsevier Hemicellulose Elsevier Py-GC-MS Elsevier Interaction Elsevier Cellulose Elsevier |
| topic |
ddc 630 ddc 640 ddc 530 ddc 340 ssgn 2 fid INTRECHT bkl 44.72 Elsevier Pyrolysis Elsevier Hemicellulose Elsevier Py-GC-MS Elsevier Interaction Elsevier Cellulose |
| topic_unstemmed |
ddc 630 ddc 640 ddc 530 ddc 340 ssgn 2 fid INTRECHT bkl 44.72 Elsevier Pyrolysis Elsevier Hemicellulose Elsevier Py-GC-MS Elsevier Interaction Elsevier Cellulose |
| topic_browse |
ddc 630 ddc 640 ddc 530 ddc 340 ssgn 2 fid INTRECHT bkl 44.72 Elsevier Pyrolysis Elsevier Hemicellulose Elsevier Py-GC-MS Elsevier Interaction Elsevier Cellulose |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
zu |
| author2_variant |
d s ds j h jh h z hz r x rx |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Lag time of modern bomb-pulse radiocarbon in human bone tissues: New data from Brazil |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
ELV007277822 |
| dewey-tens |
630 - Agriculture 640 - Home & family management 530 - Physics 340 - Law 610 - Medicine & health |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Lag time of modern bomb-pulse radiocarbon in human bone tissues: New data from Brazil |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)ELV007277822 |
| title |
Cellulose-hemicellulose interactions during fast pyrolysis with different temperatures and mixing methods |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)ELV02469469X (ELSEVIER)S0961-9534(16)30305-1 |
| title_full |
Cellulose-hemicellulose interactions during fast pyrolysis with different temperatures and mixing methods |
| author_sort |
Wu, Shiliang |
| journal |
Lag time of modern bomb-pulse radiocarbon in human bone tissues: New data from Brazil |
| journalStr |
Lag time of modern bomb-pulse radiocarbon in human bone tissues: New data from Brazil |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| dewey-hundreds |
600 - Technology 500 - Science 300 - Social sciences |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2016 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
zzz |
| container_start_page |
55 |
| author_browse |
Wu, Shiliang |
| container_volume |
95 |
| physical |
9 |
| class |
630 640 530 630 DE-600 640 DE-600 530 DE-600 340 610 VZ 2 ssgn INTRECHT DE-1a fid 44.72 bkl |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Wu, Shiliang |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1016/j.biombioe.2016.09.015 |
| dewey-full |
630 640 530 340 610 |
| title_sort |
cellulose-hemicellulose interactions during fast pyrolysis with different temperatures and mixing methods |
| title_auth |
Cellulose-hemicellulose interactions during fast pyrolysis with different temperatures and mixing methods |
| abstract |
In this work, the cellulose-hemicellulose interaction during pyrolysis was investigated to study the impacts of sample preparation, temperature, mixing ratio on the light products distribution. Cellulose-hemicellulose interactions were studied by Py-GC-MS with different temperatures (500, 600, 700 °C), mixing ratios (mass ratio 1:1 and 5:2), and mixing methods (physical and native mixtures). Generally speaking, cellulose-hemicellulose interaction would significantly promote the formation of hemicellulose-derived products and CO2, while inhibit part of cellulose-derived products, especially the formation of levoglucosan. Moreover, the native cellulose-hemicellulose mixture had the most distinct impact on the product distributions. A statistic method has been used to evaluate the strength of cellulose-hemicellulose interaction and compared with cellulose-lignin interaction, finding that mixing method had the strongest influence on cellulose-hemicellulose interaction, followed by temperature, and mixing ratio had the weakest influence. Most importantly, the interaction between cellulose-hemicellulose was weaker than cellulose-lignin. |
| abstractGer |
In this work, the cellulose-hemicellulose interaction during pyrolysis was investigated to study the impacts of sample preparation, temperature, mixing ratio on the light products distribution. Cellulose-hemicellulose interactions were studied by Py-GC-MS with different temperatures (500, 600, 700 °C), mixing ratios (mass ratio 1:1 and 5:2), and mixing methods (physical and native mixtures). Generally speaking, cellulose-hemicellulose interaction would significantly promote the formation of hemicellulose-derived products and CO2, while inhibit part of cellulose-derived products, especially the formation of levoglucosan. Moreover, the native cellulose-hemicellulose mixture had the most distinct impact on the product distributions. A statistic method has been used to evaluate the strength of cellulose-hemicellulose interaction and compared with cellulose-lignin interaction, finding that mixing method had the strongest influence on cellulose-hemicellulose interaction, followed by temperature, and mixing ratio had the weakest influence. Most importantly, the interaction between cellulose-hemicellulose was weaker than cellulose-lignin. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
In this work, the cellulose-hemicellulose interaction during pyrolysis was investigated to study the impacts of sample preparation, temperature, mixing ratio on the light products distribution. Cellulose-hemicellulose interactions were studied by Py-GC-MS with different temperatures (500, 600, 700 °C), mixing ratios (mass ratio 1:1 and 5:2), and mixing methods (physical and native mixtures). Generally speaking, cellulose-hemicellulose interaction would significantly promote the formation of hemicellulose-derived products and CO2, while inhibit part of cellulose-derived products, especially the formation of levoglucosan. Moreover, the native cellulose-hemicellulose mixture had the most distinct impact on the product distributions. A statistic method has been used to evaluate the strength of cellulose-hemicellulose interaction and compared with cellulose-lignin interaction, finding that mixing method had the strongest influence on cellulose-hemicellulose interaction, followed by temperature, and mixing ratio had the weakest influence. Most importantly, the interaction between cellulose-hemicellulose was weaker than cellulose-lignin. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U FID-INTRECHT SSG-OLC-PHA |
| title_short |
Cellulose-hemicellulose interactions during fast pyrolysis with different temperatures and mixing methods |
| url |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2016.09.015 |
| remote_bool |
true |
| author2 |
Shen, Dekui Hu, Jun Zhang, Huiyan Xiao, Rui |
| author2Str |
Shen, Dekui Hu, Jun Zhang, Huiyan Xiao, Rui |
| ppnlink |
ELV007277822 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
z |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| author2_role |
oth oth oth oth |
| doi_str |
10.1016/j.biombioe.2016.09.015 |
| up_date |
2024-07-06T22:06:14.811Z |
| _version_ |
1803869041263116288 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV02469469X</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230625143321.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">180603s2016 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.biombioe.2016.09.015</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">GBVA2016017000010.pica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV02469469X</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0961-9534(16)30305-1</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">630</subfield><subfield code="a">640</subfield><subfield code="a">530</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">630</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">640</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">530</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">340</subfield><subfield code="a">610</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">2</subfield><subfield code="2">ssgn</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">INTRECHT</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-1a</subfield><subfield code="2">fid</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">44.72</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Wu, Shiliang</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Cellulose-hemicellulose interactions during fast pyrolysis with different temperatures and mixing methods</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2016transfer abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">In this work, the cellulose-hemicellulose interaction during pyrolysis was investigated to study the impacts of sample preparation, temperature, mixing ratio on the light products distribution. Cellulose-hemicellulose interactions were studied by Py-GC-MS with different temperatures (500, 600, 700 °C), mixing ratios (mass ratio 1:1 and 5:2), and mixing methods (physical and native mixtures). Generally speaking, cellulose-hemicellulose interaction would significantly promote the formation of hemicellulose-derived products and CO2, while inhibit part of cellulose-derived products, especially the formation of levoglucosan. Moreover, the native cellulose-hemicellulose mixture had the most distinct impact on the product distributions. A statistic method has been used to evaluate the strength of cellulose-hemicellulose interaction and compared with cellulose-lignin interaction, finding that mixing method had the strongest influence on cellulose-hemicellulose interaction, followed by temperature, and mixing ratio had the weakest influence. Most importantly, the interaction between cellulose-hemicellulose was weaker than cellulose-lignin.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">In this work, the cellulose-hemicellulose interaction during pyrolysis was investigated to study the impacts of sample preparation, temperature, mixing ratio on the light products distribution. Cellulose-hemicellulose interactions were studied by Py-GC-MS with different temperatures (500, 600, 700 °C), mixing ratios (mass ratio 1:1 and 5:2), and mixing methods (physical and native mixtures). Generally speaking, cellulose-hemicellulose interaction would significantly promote the formation of hemicellulose-derived products and CO2, while inhibit part of cellulose-derived products, especially the formation of levoglucosan. Moreover, the native cellulose-hemicellulose mixture had the most distinct impact on the product distributions. A statistic method has been used to evaluate the strength of cellulose-hemicellulose interaction and compared with cellulose-lignin interaction, finding that mixing method had the strongest influence on cellulose-hemicellulose interaction, followed by temperature, and mixing ratio had the weakest influence. Most importantly, the interaction between cellulose-hemicellulose was weaker than cellulose-lignin.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Pyrolysis</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Hemicellulose</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Py-GC-MS</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Interaction</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Cellulose</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Shen, Dekui</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Hu, Jun</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Zhang, Huiyan</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Xiao, Rui</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="n">Elsevier Science</subfield><subfield code="a">Ubelaker, Douglas H. ELSEVIER</subfield><subfield code="t">Lag time of modern bomb-pulse radiocarbon in human bone tissues: New data from Brazil</subfield><subfield code="d">2021</subfield><subfield code="g">Amsterdam [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)ELV007277822</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:95</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2016</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:55-63</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:9</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2016.09.015</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">FID-INTRECHT</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">44.72</subfield><subfield code="j">Rechtsmedizin</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">95</subfield><subfield code="j">2016</subfield><subfield code="h">55-63</subfield><subfield code="g">9</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="953" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="2">045F</subfield><subfield code="a">630</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.4021015 |