Environmental analysis of bio-CCS in an integrated oxy-fuel combustion power plant with CO2 transport and storage
Oxy-fuel combustion (OFC) belongs to one of the three commonly known clean coal technologies for which practical application may be in the offing. Similarly to conventional power plants, there is a possibility of biomass co-firing, thus an additional reduction of CO2 emission is possible. Including...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Gładysz, Paweł [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2016transfer abstract |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Umfang: |
10 |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Lag time of modern bomb-pulse radiocarbon in human bone tissues: New data from Brazil - Ubelaker, Douglas H. ELSEVIER, 2021, Amsterdam [u.a.] |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:85 ; year:2016 ; pages:109-118 ; extent:10 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1016/j.biombioe.2015.12.008 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
ELV024695580 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ELV024695580 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230625143322.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 180603s2016 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.biombioe.2015.12.008 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a GBVA2016017000010.pica |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)ELV024695580 | ||
| 035 | |a (ELSEVIER)S0961-9534(15)30181-1 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 082 | 0 | |a 630 |a 640 |a 530 | |
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 630 |q DE-600 |
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 640 |q DE-600 |
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 530 |q DE-600 |
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 340 |a 610 |q VZ |
| 084 | |a 2 |2 ssgn | ||
| 084 | |a INTRECHT |q DE-1a |2 fid | ||
| 084 | |a 44.72 |2 bkl | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Gładysz, Paweł |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Environmental analysis of bio-CCS in an integrated oxy-fuel combustion power plant with CO2 transport and storage |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2016transfer abstract | |
| 300 | |a 10 | ||
| 336 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zzz |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b z |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zu |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Oxy-fuel combustion (OFC) belongs to one of the three commonly known clean coal technologies for which practical application may be in the offing. Similarly to conventional power plants, there is a possibility of biomass co-firing, thus an additional reduction of CO2 emission is possible. Including the biomass in the fuel mixture of an integrated OFC power plant allows to obtain the so called “neutral” CO2 status as biomass combustion does not contribute to anthropogenic CO2 emissions. In OFC power plants without biomass co-firing, even if 100% of CO2 is captured, there are still additional CO2 emissions in processes like fossil fuel extraction, transportation and preparation. The same assumption applies also to biomass and other materials (e.g. limestone or raw water). A higher share of biomass in the fuel mixture can lead to “negative” CO2 emissions with may be helpful to compensate the unfulfilled goals in other sectors where reduction is required. The paper presents the system approach to the environmental analysis based on the “input–output” method and both the index of the thermoecological cost and cumulative CO2 emissions. Thermoecological cost includes, the cumulative exergy consumption of non-renewable energy sources and additional exergy consumption due to harmful emissions to the atmosphere. In order to investigate the impact of bio-CCS (both biomass co-firing and dedicated biomass boilers) on the net thermoecological cost of electricity production and cumulative CO2 emissions five cases have been analyzed. | ||
| 520 | |a Oxy-fuel combustion (OFC) belongs to one of the three commonly known clean coal technologies for which practical application may be in the offing. Similarly to conventional power plants, there is a possibility of biomass co-firing, thus an additional reduction of CO2 emission is possible. Including the biomass in the fuel mixture of an integrated OFC power plant allows to obtain the so called “neutral” CO2 status as biomass combustion does not contribute to anthropogenic CO2 emissions. In OFC power plants without biomass co-firing, even if 100% of CO2 is captured, there are still additional CO2 emissions in processes like fossil fuel extraction, transportation and preparation. The same assumption applies also to biomass and other materials (e.g. limestone or raw water). A higher share of biomass in the fuel mixture can lead to “negative” CO2 emissions with may be helpful to compensate the unfulfilled goals in other sectors where reduction is required. The paper presents the system approach to the environmental analysis based on the “input–output” method and both the index of the thermoecological cost and cumulative CO2 emissions. Thermoecological cost includes, the cumulative exergy consumption of non-renewable energy sources and additional exergy consumption due to harmful emissions to the atmosphere. In order to investigate the impact of bio-CCS (both biomass co-firing and dedicated biomass boilers) on the net thermoecological cost of electricity production and cumulative CO2 emissions five cases have been analyzed. | ||
| 650 | 7 | |a Biomass |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Thermoecological cost |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Oxy-fuel combustion |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Cumulative CO2 emission |2 Elsevier | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Ziębik, Andrzej |4 oth | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |n Elsevier Science |a Ubelaker, Douglas H. ELSEVIER |t Lag time of modern bomb-pulse radiocarbon in human bone tissues: New data from Brazil |d 2021 |g Amsterdam [u.a.] |w (DE-627)ELV007277822 |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:85 |g year:2016 |g pages:109-118 |g extent:10 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2015.12.008 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_U | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ELV | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_U | ||
| 912 | |a FID-INTRECHT | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-PHA | ||
| 936 | b | k | |a 44.72 |j Rechtsmedizin |q VZ |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 85 |j 2016 |h 109-118 |g 10 | ||
| 953 | |2 045F |a 630 | ||
| author_variant |
p g pg |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
gadyszpawezibikandrzej:2016----:niomnaaayiobociaitgaeoyulobsinoepati |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2016transfer abstract |
| bklnumber |
44.72 |
| publishDate |
2016 |
| allfields |
10.1016/j.biombioe.2015.12.008 doi GBVA2016017000010.pica (DE-627)ELV024695580 (ELSEVIER)S0961-9534(15)30181-1 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 630 640 530 630 DE-600 640 DE-600 530 DE-600 340 610 VZ 2 ssgn INTRECHT DE-1a fid 44.72 bkl Gładysz, Paweł verfasserin aut Environmental analysis of bio-CCS in an integrated oxy-fuel combustion power plant with CO2 transport and storage 2016transfer abstract 10 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Oxy-fuel combustion (OFC) belongs to one of the three commonly known clean coal technologies for which practical application may be in the offing. Similarly to conventional power plants, there is a possibility of biomass co-firing, thus an additional reduction of CO2 emission is possible. Including the biomass in the fuel mixture of an integrated OFC power plant allows to obtain the so called “neutral” CO2 status as biomass combustion does not contribute to anthropogenic CO2 emissions. In OFC power plants without biomass co-firing, even if 100% of CO2 is captured, there are still additional CO2 emissions in processes like fossil fuel extraction, transportation and preparation. The same assumption applies also to biomass and other materials (e.g. limestone or raw water). A higher share of biomass in the fuel mixture can lead to “negative” CO2 emissions with may be helpful to compensate the unfulfilled goals in other sectors where reduction is required. The paper presents the system approach to the environmental analysis based on the “input–output” method and both the index of the thermoecological cost and cumulative CO2 emissions. Thermoecological cost includes, the cumulative exergy consumption of non-renewable energy sources and additional exergy consumption due to harmful emissions to the atmosphere. In order to investigate the impact of bio-CCS (both biomass co-firing and dedicated biomass boilers) on the net thermoecological cost of electricity production and cumulative CO2 emissions five cases have been analyzed. Oxy-fuel combustion (OFC) belongs to one of the three commonly known clean coal technologies for which practical application may be in the offing. Similarly to conventional power plants, there is a possibility of biomass co-firing, thus an additional reduction of CO2 emission is possible. Including the biomass in the fuel mixture of an integrated OFC power plant allows to obtain the so called “neutral” CO2 status as biomass combustion does not contribute to anthropogenic CO2 emissions. In OFC power plants without biomass co-firing, even if 100% of CO2 is captured, there are still additional CO2 emissions in processes like fossil fuel extraction, transportation and preparation. The same assumption applies also to biomass and other materials (e.g. limestone or raw water). A higher share of biomass in the fuel mixture can lead to “negative” CO2 emissions with may be helpful to compensate the unfulfilled goals in other sectors where reduction is required. The paper presents the system approach to the environmental analysis based on the “input–output” method and both the index of the thermoecological cost and cumulative CO2 emissions. Thermoecological cost includes, the cumulative exergy consumption of non-renewable energy sources and additional exergy consumption due to harmful emissions to the atmosphere. In order to investigate the impact of bio-CCS (both biomass co-firing and dedicated biomass boilers) on the net thermoecological cost of electricity production and cumulative CO2 emissions five cases have been analyzed. Biomass Elsevier Thermoecological cost Elsevier Oxy-fuel combustion Elsevier Cumulative CO2 emission Elsevier Ziębik, Andrzej oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Ubelaker, Douglas H. ELSEVIER Lag time of modern bomb-pulse radiocarbon in human bone tissues: New data from Brazil 2021 Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV007277822 volume:85 year:2016 pages:109-118 extent:10 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2015.12.008 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U FID-INTRECHT SSG-OLC-PHA 44.72 Rechtsmedizin VZ AR 85 2016 109-118 10 045F 630 |
| spelling |
10.1016/j.biombioe.2015.12.008 doi GBVA2016017000010.pica (DE-627)ELV024695580 (ELSEVIER)S0961-9534(15)30181-1 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 630 640 530 630 DE-600 640 DE-600 530 DE-600 340 610 VZ 2 ssgn INTRECHT DE-1a fid 44.72 bkl Gładysz, Paweł verfasserin aut Environmental analysis of bio-CCS in an integrated oxy-fuel combustion power plant with CO2 transport and storage 2016transfer abstract 10 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Oxy-fuel combustion (OFC) belongs to one of the three commonly known clean coal technologies for which practical application may be in the offing. Similarly to conventional power plants, there is a possibility of biomass co-firing, thus an additional reduction of CO2 emission is possible. Including the biomass in the fuel mixture of an integrated OFC power plant allows to obtain the so called “neutral” CO2 status as biomass combustion does not contribute to anthropogenic CO2 emissions. In OFC power plants without biomass co-firing, even if 100% of CO2 is captured, there are still additional CO2 emissions in processes like fossil fuel extraction, transportation and preparation. The same assumption applies also to biomass and other materials (e.g. limestone or raw water). A higher share of biomass in the fuel mixture can lead to “negative” CO2 emissions with may be helpful to compensate the unfulfilled goals in other sectors where reduction is required. The paper presents the system approach to the environmental analysis based on the “input–output” method and both the index of the thermoecological cost and cumulative CO2 emissions. Thermoecological cost includes, the cumulative exergy consumption of non-renewable energy sources and additional exergy consumption due to harmful emissions to the atmosphere. In order to investigate the impact of bio-CCS (both biomass co-firing and dedicated biomass boilers) on the net thermoecological cost of electricity production and cumulative CO2 emissions five cases have been analyzed. Oxy-fuel combustion (OFC) belongs to one of the three commonly known clean coal technologies for which practical application may be in the offing. Similarly to conventional power plants, there is a possibility of biomass co-firing, thus an additional reduction of CO2 emission is possible. Including the biomass in the fuel mixture of an integrated OFC power plant allows to obtain the so called “neutral” CO2 status as biomass combustion does not contribute to anthropogenic CO2 emissions. In OFC power plants without biomass co-firing, even if 100% of CO2 is captured, there are still additional CO2 emissions in processes like fossil fuel extraction, transportation and preparation. The same assumption applies also to biomass and other materials (e.g. limestone or raw water). A higher share of biomass in the fuel mixture can lead to “negative” CO2 emissions with may be helpful to compensate the unfulfilled goals in other sectors where reduction is required. The paper presents the system approach to the environmental analysis based on the “input–output” method and both the index of the thermoecological cost and cumulative CO2 emissions. Thermoecological cost includes, the cumulative exergy consumption of non-renewable energy sources and additional exergy consumption due to harmful emissions to the atmosphere. In order to investigate the impact of bio-CCS (both biomass co-firing and dedicated biomass boilers) on the net thermoecological cost of electricity production and cumulative CO2 emissions five cases have been analyzed. Biomass Elsevier Thermoecological cost Elsevier Oxy-fuel combustion Elsevier Cumulative CO2 emission Elsevier Ziębik, Andrzej oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Ubelaker, Douglas H. ELSEVIER Lag time of modern bomb-pulse radiocarbon in human bone tissues: New data from Brazil 2021 Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV007277822 volume:85 year:2016 pages:109-118 extent:10 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2015.12.008 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U FID-INTRECHT SSG-OLC-PHA 44.72 Rechtsmedizin VZ AR 85 2016 109-118 10 045F 630 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1016/j.biombioe.2015.12.008 doi GBVA2016017000010.pica (DE-627)ELV024695580 (ELSEVIER)S0961-9534(15)30181-1 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 630 640 530 630 DE-600 640 DE-600 530 DE-600 340 610 VZ 2 ssgn INTRECHT DE-1a fid 44.72 bkl Gładysz, Paweł verfasserin aut Environmental analysis of bio-CCS in an integrated oxy-fuel combustion power plant with CO2 transport and storage 2016transfer abstract 10 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Oxy-fuel combustion (OFC) belongs to one of the three commonly known clean coal technologies for which practical application may be in the offing. Similarly to conventional power plants, there is a possibility of biomass co-firing, thus an additional reduction of CO2 emission is possible. Including the biomass in the fuel mixture of an integrated OFC power plant allows to obtain the so called “neutral” CO2 status as biomass combustion does not contribute to anthropogenic CO2 emissions. In OFC power plants without biomass co-firing, even if 100% of CO2 is captured, there are still additional CO2 emissions in processes like fossil fuel extraction, transportation and preparation. The same assumption applies also to biomass and other materials (e.g. limestone or raw water). A higher share of biomass in the fuel mixture can lead to “negative” CO2 emissions with may be helpful to compensate the unfulfilled goals in other sectors where reduction is required. The paper presents the system approach to the environmental analysis based on the “input–output” method and both the index of the thermoecological cost and cumulative CO2 emissions. Thermoecological cost includes, the cumulative exergy consumption of non-renewable energy sources and additional exergy consumption due to harmful emissions to the atmosphere. In order to investigate the impact of bio-CCS (both biomass co-firing and dedicated biomass boilers) on the net thermoecological cost of electricity production and cumulative CO2 emissions five cases have been analyzed. Oxy-fuel combustion (OFC) belongs to one of the three commonly known clean coal technologies for which practical application may be in the offing. Similarly to conventional power plants, there is a possibility of biomass co-firing, thus an additional reduction of CO2 emission is possible. Including the biomass in the fuel mixture of an integrated OFC power plant allows to obtain the so called “neutral” CO2 status as biomass combustion does not contribute to anthropogenic CO2 emissions. In OFC power plants without biomass co-firing, even if 100% of CO2 is captured, there are still additional CO2 emissions in processes like fossil fuel extraction, transportation and preparation. The same assumption applies also to biomass and other materials (e.g. limestone or raw water). A higher share of biomass in the fuel mixture can lead to “negative” CO2 emissions with may be helpful to compensate the unfulfilled goals in other sectors where reduction is required. The paper presents the system approach to the environmental analysis based on the “input–output” method and both the index of the thermoecological cost and cumulative CO2 emissions. Thermoecological cost includes, the cumulative exergy consumption of non-renewable energy sources and additional exergy consumption due to harmful emissions to the atmosphere. In order to investigate the impact of bio-CCS (both biomass co-firing and dedicated biomass boilers) on the net thermoecological cost of electricity production and cumulative CO2 emissions five cases have been analyzed. Biomass Elsevier Thermoecological cost Elsevier Oxy-fuel combustion Elsevier Cumulative CO2 emission Elsevier Ziębik, Andrzej oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Ubelaker, Douglas H. ELSEVIER Lag time of modern bomb-pulse radiocarbon in human bone tissues: New data from Brazil 2021 Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV007277822 volume:85 year:2016 pages:109-118 extent:10 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2015.12.008 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U FID-INTRECHT SSG-OLC-PHA 44.72 Rechtsmedizin VZ AR 85 2016 109-118 10 045F 630 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1016/j.biombioe.2015.12.008 doi GBVA2016017000010.pica (DE-627)ELV024695580 (ELSEVIER)S0961-9534(15)30181-1 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 630 640 530 630 DE-600 640 DE-600 530 DE-600 340 610 VZ 2 ssgn INTRECHT DE-1a fid 44.72 bkl Gładysz, Paweł verfasserin aut Environmental analysis of bio-CCS in an integrated oxy-fuel combustion power plant with CO2 transport and storage 2016transfer abstract 10 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Oxy-fuel combustion (OFC) belongs to one of the three commonly known clean coal technologies for which practical application may be in the offing. Similarly to conventional power plants, there is a possibility of biomass co-firing, thus an additional reduction of CO2 emission is possible. Including the biomass in the fuel mixture of an integrated OFC power plant allows to obtain the so called “neutral” CO2 status as biomass combustion does not contribute to anthropogenic CO2 emissions. In OFC power plants without biomass co-firing, even if 100% of CO2 is captured, there are still additional CO2 emissions in processes like fossil fuel extraction, transportation and preparation. The same assumption applies also to biomass and other materials (e.g. limestone or raw water). A higher share of biomass in the fuel mixture can lead to “negative” CO2 emissions with may be helpful to compensate the unfulfilled goals in other sectors where reduction is required. The paper presents the system approach to the environmental analysis based on the “input–output” method and both the index of the thermoecological cost and cumulative CO2 emissions. Thermoecological cost includes, the cumulative exergy consumption of non-renewable energy sources and additional exergy consumption due to harmful emissions to the atmosphere. In order to investigate the impact of bio-CCS (both biomass co-firing and dedicated biomass boilers) on the net thermoecological cost of electricity production and cumulative CO2 emissions five cases have been analyzed. Oxy-fuel combustion (OFC) belongs to one of the three commonly known clean coal technologies for which practical application may be in the offing. Similarly to conventional power plants, there is a possibility of biomass co-firing, thus an additional reduction of CO2 emission is possible. Including the biomass in the fuel mixture of an integrated OFC power plant allows to obtain the so called “neutral” CO2 status as biomass combustion does not contribute to anthropogenic CO2 emissions. In OFC power plants without biomass co-firing, even if 100% of CO2 is captured, there are still additional CO2 emissions in processes like fossil fuel extraction, transportation and preparation. The same assumption applies also to biomass and other materials (e.g. limestone or raw water). A higher share of biomass in the fuel mixture can lead to “negative” CO2 emissions with may be helpful to compensate the unfulfilled goals in other sectors where reduction is required. The paper presents the system approach to the environmental analysis based on the “input–output” method and both the index of the thermoecological cost and cumulative CO2 emissions. Thermoecological cost includes, the cumulative exergy consumption of non-renewable energy sources and additional exergy consumption due to harmful emissions to the atmosphere. In order to investigate the impact of bio-CCS (both biomass co-firing and dedicated biomass boilers) on the net thermoecological cost of electricity production and cumulative CO2 emissions five cases have been analyzed. Biomass Elsevier Thermoecological cost Elsevier Oxy-fuel combustion Elsevier Cumulative CO2 emission Elsevier Ziębik, Andrzej oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Ubelaker, Douglas H. ELSEVIER Lag time of modern bomb-pulse radiocarbon in human bone tissues: New data from Brazil 2021 Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV007277822 volume:85 year:2016 pages:109-118 extent:10 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2015.12.008 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U FID-INTRECHT SSG-OLC-PHA 44.72 Rechtsmedizin VZ AR 85 2016 109-118 10 045F 630 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1016/j.biombioe.2015.12.008 doi GBVA2016017000010.pica (DE-627)ELV024695580 (ELSEVIER)S0961-9534(15)30181-1 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 630 640 530 630 DE-600 640 DE-600 530 DE-600 340 610 VZ 2 ssgn INTRECHT DE-1a fid 44.72 bkl Gładysz, Paweł verfasserin aut Environmental analysis of bio-CCS in an integrated oxy-fuel combustion power plant with CO2 transport and storage 2016transfer abstract 10 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Oxy-fuel combustion (OFC) belongs to one of the three commonly known clean coal technologies for which practical application may be in the offing. Similarly to conventional power plants, there is a possibility of biomass co-firing, thus an additional reduction of CO2 emission is possible. Including the biomass in the fuel mixture of an integrated OFC power plant allows to obtain the so called “neutral” CO2 status as biomass combustion does not contribute to anthropogenic CO2 emissions. In OFC power plants without biomass co-firing, even if 100% of CO2 is captured, there are still additional CO2 emissions in processes like fossil fuel extraction, transportation and preparation. The same assumption applies also to biomass and other materials (e.g. limestone or raw water). A higher share of biomass in the fuel mixture can lead to “negative” CO2 emissions with may be helpful to compensate the unfulfilled goals in other sectors where reduction is required. The paper presents the system approach to the environmental analysis based on the “input–output” method and both the index of the thermoecological cost and cumulative CO2 emissions. Thermoecological cost includes, the cumulative exergy consumption of non-renewable energy sources and additional exergy consumption due to harmful emissions to the atmosphere. In order to investigate the impact of bio-CCS (both biomass co-firing and dedicated biomass boilers) on the net thermoecological cost of electricity production and cumulative CO2 emissions five cases have been analyzed. Oxy-fuel combustion (OFC) belongs to one of the three commonly known clean coal technologies for which practical application may be in the offing. Similarly to conventional power plants, there is a possibility of biomass co-firing, thus an additional reduction of CO2 emission is possible. Including the biomass in the fuel mixture of an integrated OFC power plant allows to obtain the so called “neutral” CO2 status as biomass combustion does not contribute to anthropogenic CO2 emissions. In OFC power plants without biomass co-firing, even if 100% of CO2 is captured, there are still additional CO2 emissions in processes like fossil fuel extraction, transportation and preparation. The same assumption applies also to biomass and other materials (e.g. limestone or raw water). A higher share of biomass in the fuel mixture can lead to “negative” CO2 emissions with may be helpful to compensate the unfulfilled goals in other sectors where reduction is required. The paper presents the system approach to the environmental analysis based on the “input–output” method and both the index of the thermoecological cost and cumulative CO2 emissions. Thermoecological cost includes, the cumulative exergy consumption of non-renewable energy sources and additional exergy consumption due to harmful emissions to the atmosphere. In order to investigate the impact of bio-CCS (both biomass co-firing and dedicated biomass boilers) on the net thermoecological cost of electricity production and cumulative CO2 emissions five cases have been analyzed. Biomass Elsevier Thermoecological cost Elsevier Oxy-fuel combustion Elsevier Cumulative CO2 emission Elsevier Ziębik, Andrzej oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Ubelaker, Douglas H. ELSEVIER Lag time of modern bomb-pulse radiocarbon in human bone tissues: New data from Brazil 2021 Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV007277822 volume:85 year:2016 pages:109-118 extent:10 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2015.12.008 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U FID-INTRECHT SSG-OLC-PHA 44.72 Rechtsmedizin VZ AR 85 2016 109-118 10 045F 630 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in Lag time of modern bomb-pulse radiocarbon in human bone tissues: New data from Brazil Amsterdam [u.a.] volume:85 year:2016 pages:109-118 extent:10 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in Lag time of modern bomb-pulse radiocarbon in human bone tissues: New data from Brazil Amsterdam [u.a.] volume:85 year:2016 pages:109-118 extent:10 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| bklname |
Rechtsmedizin |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
Biomass Thermoecological cost Oxy-fuel combustion Cumulative CO2 emission |
| dewey-raw |
630 |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
Lag time of modern bomb-pulse radiocarbon in human bone tissues: New data from Brazil |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Gładysz, Paweł @@aut@@ Ziębik, Andrzej @@oth@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2016-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
ELV007277822 |
| dewey-sort |
3630 |
| id |
ELV024695580 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV024695580</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230625143322.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">180603s2016 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.biombioe.2015.12.008</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">GBVA2016017000010.pica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV024695580</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0961-9534(15)30181-1</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">630</subfield><subfield code="a">640</subfield><subfield code="a">530</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">630</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">640</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">530</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">340</subfield><subfield code="a">610</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">2</subfield><subfield code="2">ssgn</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">INTRECHT</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-1a</subfield><subfield code="2">fid</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">44.72</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Gładysz, Paweł</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Environmental analysis of bio-CCS in an integrated oxy-fuel combustion power plant with CO2 transport and storage</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2016transfer abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Oxy-fuel combustion (OFC) belongs to one of the three commonly known clean coal technologies for which practical application may be in the offing. Similarly to conventional power plants, there is a possibility of biomass co-firing, thus an additional reduction of CO2 emission is possible. Including the biomass in the fuel mixture of an integrated OFC power plant allows to obtain the so called “neutral” CO2 status as biomass combustion does not contribute to anthropogenic CO2 emissions. In OFC power plants without biomass co-firing, even if 100% of CO2 is captured, there are still additional CO2 emissions in processes like fossil fuel extraction, transportation and preparation. The same assumption applies also to biomass and other materials (e.g. limestone or raw water). A higher share of biomass in the fuel mixture can lead to “negative” CO2 emissions with may be helpful to compensate the unfulfilled goals in other sectors where reduction is required. The paper presents the system approach to the environmental analysis based on the “input–output” method and both the index of the thermoecological cost and cumulative CO2 emissions. Thermoecological cost includes, the cumulative exergy consumption of non-renewable energy sources and additional exergy consumption due to harmful emissions to the atmosphere. In order to investigate the impact of bio-CCS (both biomass co-firing and dedicated biomass boilers) on the net thermoecological cost of electricity production and cumulative CO2 emissions five cases have been analyzed.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Oxy-fuel combustion (OFC) belongs to one of the three commonly known clean coal technologies for which practical application may be in the offing. Similarly to conventional power plants, there is a possibility of biomass co-firing, thus an additional reduction of CO2 emission is possible. Including the biomass in the fuel mixture of an integrated OFC power plant allows to obtain the so called “neutral” CO2 status as biomass combustion does not contribute to anthropogenic CO2 emissions. In OFC power plants without biomass co-firing, even if 100% of CO2 is captured, there are still additional CO2 emissions in processes like fossil fuel extraction, transportation and preparation. The same assumption applies also to biomass and other materials (e.g. limestone or raw water). A higher share of biomass in the fuel mixture can lead to “negative” CO2 emissions with may be helpful to compensate the unfulfilled goals in other sectors where reduction is required. The paper presents the system approach to the environmental analysis based on the “input–output” method and both the index of the thermoecological cost and cumulative CO2 emissions. Thermoecological cost includes, the cumulative exergy consumption of non-renewable energy sources and additional exergy consumption due to harmful emissions to the atmosphere. In order to investigate the impact of bio-CCS (both biomass co-firing and dedicated biomass boilers) on the net thermoecological cost of electricity production and cumulative CO2 emissions five cases have been analyzed.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Biomass</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Thermoecological cost</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Oxy-fuel combustion</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Cumulative CO2 emission</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ziębik, Andrzej</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="n">Elsevier Science</subfield><subfield code="a">Ubelaker, Douglas H. ELSEVIER</subfield><subfield code="t">Lag time of modern bomb-pulse radiocarbon in human bone tissues: New data from Brazil</subfield><subfield code="d">2021</subfield><subfield code="g">Amsterdam [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)ELV007277822</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:85</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2016</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:109-118</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:10</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2015.12.008</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">FID-INTRECHT</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">44.72</subfield><subfield code="j">Rechtsmedizin</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">85</subfield><subfield code="j">2016</subfield><subfield code="h">109-118</subfield><subfield code="g">10</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="953" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="2">045F</subfield><subfield code="a">630</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Gładysz, Paweł |
| spellingShingle |
Gładysz, Paweł ddc 630 ddc 640 ddc 530 ddc 340 ssgn 2 fid INTRECHT bkl 44.72 Elsevier Biomass Elsevier Thermoecological cost Elsevier Oxy-fuel combustion Elsevier Cumulative CO2 emission Environmental analysis of bio-CCS in an integrated oxy-fuel combustion power plant with CO2 transport and storage |
| authorStr |
Gładysz, Paweł |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)ELV007277822 |
| format |
electronic Article |
| dewey-ones |
630 - Agriculture & related technologies 640 - Home & family management 530 - Physics 340 - Law 610 - Medicine & health |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut |
| collection |
elsevier |
| remote_str |
true |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| topic_title |
630 640 530 630 DE-600 640 DE-600 530 DE-600 340 610 VZ 2 ssgn INTRECHT DE-1a fid 44.72 bkl Environmental analysis of bio-CCS in an integrated oxy-fuel combustion power plant with CO2 transport and storage Biomass Elsevier Thermoecological cost Elsevier Oxy-fuel combustion Elsevier Cumulative CO2 emission Elsevier |
| topic |
ddc 630 ddc 640 ddc 530 ddc 340 ssgn 2 fid INTRECHT bkl 44.72 Elsevier Biomass Elsevier Thermoecological cost Elsevier Oxy-fuel combustion Elsevier Cumulative CO2 emission |
| topic_unstemmed |
ddc 630 ddc 640 ddc 530 ddc 340 ssgn 2 fid INTRECHT bkl 44.72 Elsevier Biomass Elsevier Thermoecological cost Elsevier Oxy-fuel combustion Elsevier Cumulative CO2 emission |
| topic_browse |
ddc 630 ddc 640 ddc 530 ddc 340 ssgn 2 fid INTRECHT bkl 44.72 Elsevier Biomass Elsevier Thermoecological cost Elsevier Oxy-fuel combustion Elsevier Cumulative CO2 emission |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
zu |
| author2_variant |
a z az |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Lag time of modern bomb-pulse radiocarbon in human bone tissues: New data from Brazil |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
ELV007277822 |
| dewey-tens |
630 - Agriculture 640 - Home & family management 530 - Physics 340 - Law 610 - Medicine & health |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Lag time of modern bomb-pulse radiocarbon in human bone tissues: New data from Brazil |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)ELV007277822 |
| title |
Environmental analysis of bio-CCS in an integrated oxy-fuel combustion power plant with CO2 transport and storage |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)ELV024695580 (ELSEVIER)S0961-9534(15)30181-1 |
| title_full |
Environmental analysis of bio-CCS in an integrated oxy-fuel combustion power plant with CO2 transport and storage |
| author_sort |
Gładysz, Paweł |
| journal |
Lag time of modern bomb-pulse radiocarbon in human bone tissues: New data from Brazil |
| journalStr |
Lag time of modern bomb-pulse radiocarbon in human bone tissues: New data from Brazil |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| dewey-hundreds |
600 - Technology 500 - Science 300 - Social sciences |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2016 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
zzz |
| container_start_page |
109 |
| author_browse |
Gładysz, Paweł |
| container_volume |
85 |
| physical |
10 |
| class |
630 640 530 630 DE-600 640 DE-600 530 DE-600 340 610 VZ 2 ssgn INTRECHT DE-1a fid 44.72 bkl |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Gładysz, Paweł |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1016/j.biombioe.2015.12.008 |
| dewey-full |
630 640 530 340 610 |
| title_sort |
environmental analysis of bio-ccs in an integrated oxy-fuel combustion power plant with co2 transport and storage |
| title_auth |
Environmental analysis of bio-CCS in an integrated oxy-fuel combustion power plant with CO2 transport and storage |
| abstract |
Oxy-fuel combustion (OFC) belongs to one of the three commonly known clean coal technologies for which practical application may be in the offing. Similarly to conventional power plants, there is a possibility of biomass co-firing, thus an additional reduction of CO2 emission is possible. Including the biomass in the fuel mixture of an integrated OFC power plant allows to obtain the so called “neutral” CO2 status as biomass combustion does not contribute to anthropogenic CO2 emissions. In OFC power plants without biomass co-firing, even if 100% of CO2 is captured, there are still additional CO2 emissions in processes like fossil fuel extraction, transportation and preparation. The same assumption applies also to biomass and other materials (e.g. limestone or raw water). A higher share of biomass in the fuel mixture can lead to “negative” CO2 emissions with may be helpful to compensate the unfulfilled goals in other sectors where reduction is required. The paper presents the system approach to the environmental analysis based on the “input–output” method and both the index of the thermoecological cost and cumulative CO2 emissions. Thermoecological cost includes, the cumulative exergy consumption of non-renewable energy sources and additional exergy consumption due to harmful emissions to the atmosphere. In order to investigate the impact of bio-CCS (both biomass co-firing and dedicated biomass boilers) on the net thermoecological cost of electricity production and cumulative CO2 emissions five cases have been analyzed. |
| abstractGer |
Oxy-fuel combustion (OFC) belongs to one of the three commonly known clean coal technologies for which practical application may be in the offing. Similarly to conventional power plants, there is a possibility of biomass co-firing, thus an additional reduction of CO2 emission is possible. Including the biomass in the fuel mixture of an integrated OFC power plant allows to obtain the so called “neutral” CO2 status as biomass combustion does not contribute to anthropogenic CO2 emissions. In OFC power plants without biomass co-firing, even if 100% of CO2 is captured, there are still additional CO2 emissions in processes like fossil fuel extraction, transportation and preparation. The same assumption applies also to biomass and other materials (e.g. limestone or raw water). A higher share of biomass in the fuel mixture can lead to “negative” CO2 emissions with may be helpful to compensate the unfulfilled goals in other sectors where reduction is required. The paper presents the system approach to the environmental analysis based on the “input–output” method and both the index of the thermoecological cost and cumulative CO2 emissions. Thermoecological cost includes, the cumulative exergy consumption of non-renewable energy sources and additional exergy consumption due to harmful emissions to the atmosphere. In order to investigate the impact of bio-CCS (both biomass co-firing and dedicated biomass boilers) on the net thermoecological cost of electricity production and cumulative CO2 emissions five cases have been analyzed. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
Oxy-fuel combustion (OFC) belongs to one of the three commonly known clean coal technologies for which practical application may be in the offing. Similarly to conventional power plants, there is a possibility of biomass co-firing, thus an additional reduction of CO2 emission is possible. Including the biomass in the fuel mixture of an integrated OFC power plant allows to obtain the so called “neutral” CO2 status as biomass combustion does not contribute to anthropogenic CO2 emissions. In OFC power plants without biomass co-firing, even if 100% of CO2 is captured, there are still additional CO2 emissions in processes like fossil fuel extraction, transportation and preparation. The same assumption applies also to biomass and other materials (e.g. limestone or raw water). A higher share of biomass in the fuel mixture can lead to “negative” CO2 emissions with may be helpful to compensate the unfulfilled goals in other sectors where reduction is required. The paper presents the system approach to the environmental analysis based on the “input–output” method and both the index of the thermoecological cost and cumulative CO2 emissions. Thermoecological cost includes, the cumulative exergy consumption of non-renewable energy sources and additional exergy consumption due to harmful emissions to the atmosphere. In order to investigate the impact of bio-CCS (both biomass co-firing and dedicated biomass boilers) on the net thermoecological cost of electricity production and cumulative CO2 emissions five cases have been analyzed. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U FID-INTRECHT SSG-OLC-PHA |
| title_short |
Environmental analysis of bio-CCS in an integrated oxy-fuel combustion power plant with CO2 transport and storage |
| url |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2015.12.008 |
| remote_bool |
true |
| author2 |
Ziębik, Andrzej |
| author2Str |
Ziębik, Andrzej |
| ppnlink |
ELV007277822 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
z |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| author2_role |
oth |
| doi_str |
10.1016/j.biombioe.2015.12.008 |
| up_date |
2024-07-06T22:06:27.498Z |
| _version_ |
1803869054566400000 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV024695580</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230625143322.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">180603s2016 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.biombioe.2015.12.008</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">GBVA2016017000010.pica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV024695580</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0961-9534(15)30181-1</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">630</subfield><subfield code="a">640</subfield><subfield code="a">530</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">630</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">640</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">530</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">340</subfield><subfield code="a">610</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">2</subfield><subfield code="2">ssgn</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">INTRECHT</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-1a</subfield><subfield code="2">fid</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">44.72</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Gładysz, Paweł</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Environmental analysis of bio-CCS in an integrated oxy-fuel combustion power plant with CO2 transport and storage</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2016transfer abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Oxy-fuel combustion (OFC) belongs to one of the three commonly known clean coal technologies for which practical application may be in the offing. Similarly to conventional power plants, there is a possibility of biomass co-firing, thus an additional reduction of CO2 emission is possible. Including the biomass in the fuel mixture of an integrated OFC power plant allows to obtain the so called “neutral” CO2 status as biomass combustion does not contribute to anthropogenic CO2 emissions. In OFC power plants without biomass co-firing, even if 100% of CO2 is captured, there are still additional CO2 emissions in processes like fossil fuel extraction, transportation and preparation. The same assumption applies also to biomass and other materials (e.g. limestone or raw water). A higher share of biomass in the fuel mixture can lead to “negative” CO2 emissions with may be helpful to compensate the unfulfilled goals in other sectors where reduction is required. The paper presents the system approach to the environmental analysis based on the “input–output” method and both the index of the thermoecological cost and cumulative CO2 emissions. Thermoecological cost includes, the cumulative exergy consumption of non-renewable energy sources and additional exergy consumption due to harmful emissions to the atmosphere. In order to investigate the impact of bio-CCS (both biomass co-firing and dedicated biomass boilers) on the net thermoecological cost of electricity production and cumulative CO2 emissions five cases have been analyzed.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Oxy-fuel combustion (OFC) belongs to one of the three commonly known clean coal technologies for which practical application may be in the offing. Similarly to conventional power plants, there is a possibility of biomass co-firing, thus an additional reduction of CO2 emission is possible. Including the biomass in the fuel mixture of an integrated OFC power plant allows to obtain the so called “neutral” CO2 status as biomass combustion does not contribute to anthropogenic CO2 emissions. In OFC power plants without biomass co-firing, even if 100% of CO2 is captured, there are still additional CO2 emissions in processes like fossil fuel extraction, transportation and preparation. The same assumption applies also to biomass and other materials (e.g. limestone or raw water). A higher share of biomass in the fuel mixture can lead to “negative” CO2 emissions with may be helpful to compensate the unfulfilled goals in other sectors where reduction is required. The paper presents the system approach to the environmental analysis based on the “input–output” method and both the index of the thermoecological cost and cumulative CO2 emissions. Thermoecological cost includes, the cumulative exergy consumption of non-renewable energy sources and additional exergy consumption due to harmful emissions to the atmosphere. In order to investigate the impact of bio-CCS (both biomass co-firing and dedicated biomass boilers) on the net thermoecological cost of electricity production and cumulative CO2 emissions five cases have been analyzed.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Biomass</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Thermoecological cost</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Oxy-fuel combustion</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Cumulative CO2 emission</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ziębik, Andrzej</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="n">Elsevier Science</subfield><subfield code="a">Ubelaker, Douglas H. ELSEVIER</subfield><subfield code="t">Lag time of modern bomb-pulse radiocarbon in human bone tissues: New data from Brazil</subfield><subfield code="d">2021</subfield><subfield code="g">Amsterdam [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)ELV007277822</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:85</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2016</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:109-118</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:10</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2015.12.008</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">FID-INTRECHT</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">44.72</subfield><subfield code="j">Rechtsmedizin</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">85</subfield><subfield code="j">2016</subfield><subfield code="h">109-118</subfield><subfield code="g">10</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="953" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="2">045F</subfield><subfield code="a">630</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.4010506 |