Intravascular imaging in coronary artery disease
Although it is the method used by most interventional cardiologists to assess the severity of coronary artery disease and guide treatment, coronary angiography has many known limitations, particularly the fact that it is a lumenogram depicting foreshortened, shadowgraph, planar projections of the co...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Mintz, Gary S [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2017transfer abstract |
|---|
| Umfang: |
17 |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Effects of shape functions on flexural–torsional buckling of fixed circular arches - Dou, Chao ELSEVIER, 2013, London [u.a.] |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:390 ; year:2017 ; number:10096 ; day:19 ; month:08 ; pages:793-809 ; extent:17 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31957-8 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
ELV025033301 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ELV025033301 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230625144059.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 180603s2017 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31957-8 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a GBVA2017002000012.pica |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)ELV025033301 | ||
| 035 | |a (ELSEVIER)S0140-6736(17)31957-8 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 082 | 0 | |a 610 | |
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 610 |q DE-600 |
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 690 |q VZ |
| 084 | |a 38.38 |2 bkl | ||
| 084 | |a 56.20 |2 bkl | ||
| 084 | |a 56.11 |2 bkl | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Mintz, Gary S |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Intravascular imaging in coronary artery disease |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2017transfer abstract | |
| 300 | |a 17 | ||
| 336 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zzz |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b z |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zu |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Although it is the method used by most interventional cardiologists to assess the severity of coronary artery disease and guide treatment, coronary angiography has many known limitations, particularly the fact that it is a lumenogram depicting foreshortened, shadowgraph, planar projections of the contrast-filled lumen rather than imaging the diseased vessel itself. Intravascular imaging—intravascular ultrasound and more recently optical coherence tomography—provide a tomographical or cross-sectional image of the coronary arteries. These techniques are clinically useful to answer questions such as whether the stenosis is clinically relevant; the identification of the culprit lesion; or whether the plaque (or patient) is at high risk of future adverse events. They can also be used to optimise stent implantation to minimise stent-related adverse events, provide answers to the likelihood of distal embolisation or peri-procedural myocardial infarction during stent implantation, and provide reasons for stent thrombosis or restenosis. This review considers the usefulness of intravascular imaging in day-to-day practice. | ||
| 520 | |a Although it is the method used by most interventional cardiologists to assess the severity of coronary artery disease and guide treatment, coronary angiography has many known limitations, particularly the fact that it is a lumenogram depicting foreshortened, shadowgraph, planar projections of the contrast-filled lumen rather than imaging the diseased vessel itself. Intravascular imaging—intravascular ultrasound and more recently optical coherence tomography—provide a tomographical or cross-sectional image of the coronary arteries. These techniques are clinically useful to answer questions such as whether the stenosis is clinically relevant; the identification of the culprit lesion; or whether the plaque (or patient) is at high risk of future adverse events. They can also be used to optimise stent implantation to minimise stent-related adverse events, provide answers to the likelihood of distal embolisation or peri-procedural myocardial infarction during stent implantation, and provide reasons for stent thrombosis or restenosis. This review considers the usefulness of intravascular imaging in day-to-day practice. | ||
| 700 | 1 | |a Guagliumi, Giulio |4 oth | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |n Elsevier |a Dou, Chao ELSEVIER |t Effects of shape functions on flexural–torsional buckling of fixed circular arches |d 2013 |g London [u.a.] |w (DE-627)ELV007685041 |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:390 |g year:2017 |g number:10096 |g day:19 |g month:08 |g pages:793-809 |g extent:17 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31957-8 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_U | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ELV | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_U | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OPC-GEO | ||
| 936 | b | k | |a 38.38 |j Seismologie |q VZ |
| 936 | b | k | |a 56.20 |j Ingenieurgeologie |j Bodenmechanik |q VZ |
| 936 | b | k | |a 56.11 |j Baukonstruktion |q VZ |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 390 |j 2017 |e 10096 |b 19 |c 0819 |h 793-809 |g 17 | ||
| 953 | |2 045F |a 610 | ||
| author_variant |
g s m gs gsm |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
mintzgarysguagliumigiulio:2017----:nrvsuaiaignooay |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2017transfer abstract |
| bklnumber |
38.38 56.20 56.11 |
| publishDate |
2017 |
| allfields |
10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31957-8 doi GBVA2017002000012.pica (DE-627)ELV025033301 (ELSEVIER)S0140-6736(17)31957-8 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 610 610 DE-600 690 VZ 38.38 bkl 56.20 bkl 56.11 bkl Mintz, Gary S verfasserin aut Intravascular imaging in coronary artery disease 2017transfer abstract 17 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Although it is the method used by most interventional cardiologists to assess the severity of coronary artery disease and guide treatment, coronary angiography has many known limitations, particularly the fact that it is a lumenogram depicting foreshortened, shadowgraph, planar projections of the contrast-filled lumen rather than imaging the diseased vessel itself. Intravascular imaging—intravascular ultrasound and more recently optical coherence tomography—provide a tomographical or cross-sectional image of the coronary arteries. These techniques are clinically useful to answer questions such as whether the stenosis is clinically relevant; the identification of the culprit lesion; or whether the plaque (or patient) is at high risk of future adverse events. They can also be used to optimise stent implantation to minimise stent-related adverse events, provide answers to the likelihood of distal embolisation or peri-procedural myocardial infarction during stent implantation, and provide reasons for stent thrombosis or restenosis. This review considers the usefulness of intravascular imaging in day-to-day practice. Although it is the method used by most interventional cardiologists to assess the severity of coronary artery disease and guide treatment, coronary angiography has many known limitations, particularly the fact that it is a lumenogram depicting foreshortened, shadowgraph, planar projections of the contrast-filled lumen rather than imaging the diseased vessel itself. Intravascular imaging—intravascular ultrasound and more recently optical coherence tomography—provide a tomographical or cross-sectional image of the coronary arteries. These techniques are clinically useful to answer questions such as whether the stenosis is clinically relevant; the identification of the culprit lesion; or whether the plaque (or patient) is at high risk of future adverse events. They can also be used to optimise stent implantation to minimise stent-related adverse events, provide answers to the likelihood of distal embolisation or peri-procedural myocardial infarction during stent implantation, and provide reasons for stent thrombosis or restenosis. This review considers the usefulness of intravascular imaging in day-to-day practice. Guagliumi, Giulio oth Enthalten in Elsevier Dou, Chao ELSEVIER Effects of shape functions on flexural–torsional buckling of fixed circular arches 2013 London [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV007685041 volume:390 year:2017 number:10096 day:19 month:08 pages:793-809 extent:17 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31957-8 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OPC-GEO 38.38 Seismologie VZ 56.20 Ingenieurgeologie Bodenmechanik VZ 56.11 Baukonstruktion VZ AR 390 2017 10096 19 0819 793-809 17 045F 610 |
| spelling |
10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31957-8 doi GBVA2017002000012.pica (DE-627)ELV025033301 (ELSEVIER)S0140-6736(17)31957-8 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 610 610 DE-600 690 VZ 38.38 bkl 56.20 bkl 56.11 bkl Mintz, Gary S verfasserin aut Intravascular imaging in coronary artery disease 2017transfer abstract 17 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Although it is the method used by most interventional cardiologists to assess the severity of coronary artery disease and guide treatment, coronary angiography has many known limitations, particularly the fact that it is a lumenogram depicting foreshortened, shadowgraph, planar projections of the contrast-filled lumen rather than imaging the diseased vessel itself. Intravascular imaging—intravascular ultrasound and more recently optical coherence tomography—provide a tomographical or cross-sectional image of the coronary arteries. These techniques are clinically useful to answer questions such as whether the stenosis is clinically relevant; the identification of the culprit lesion; or whether the plaque (or patient) is at high risk of future adverse events. They can also be used to optimise stent implantation to minimise stent-related adverse events, provide answers to the likelihood of distal embolisation or peri-procedural myocardial infarction during stent implantation, and provide reasons for stent thrombosis or restenosis. This review considers the usefulness of intravascular imaging in day-to-day practice. Although it is the method used by most interventional cardiologists to assess the severity of coronary artery disease and guide treatment, coronary angiography has many known limitations, particularly the fact that it is a lumenogram depicting foreshortened, shadowgraph, planar projections of the contrast-filled lumen rather than imaging the diseased vessel itself. Intravascular imaging—intravascular ultrasound and more recently optical coherence tomography—provide a tomographical or cross-sectional image of the coronary arteries. These techniques are clinically useful to answer questions such as whether the stenosis is clinically relevant; the identification of the culprit lesion; or whether the plaque (or patient) is at high risk of future adverse events. They can also be used to optimise stent implantation to minimise stent-related adverse events, provide answers to the likelihood of distal embolisation or peri-procedural myocardial infarction during stent implantation, and provide reasons for stent thrombosis or restenosis. This review considers the usefulness of intravascular imaging in day-to-day practice. Guagliumi, Giulio oth Enthalten in Elsevier Dou, Chao ELSEVIER Effects of shape functions on flexural–torsional buckling of fixed circular arches 2013 London [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV007685041 volume:390 year:2017 number:10096 day:19 month:08 pages:793-809 extent:17 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31957-8 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OPC-GEO 38.38 Seismologie VZ 56.20 Ingenieurgeologie Bodenmechanik VZ 56.11 Baukonstruktion VZ AR 390 2017 10096 19 0819 793-809 17 045F 610 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31957-8 doi GBVA2017002000012.pica (DE-627)ELV025033301 (ELSEVIER)S0140-6736(17)31957-8 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 610 610 DE-600 690 VZ 38.38 bkl 56.20 bkl 56.11 bkl Mintz, Gary S verfasserin aut Intravascular imaging in coronary artery disease 2017transfer abstract 17 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Although it is the method used by most interventional cardiologists to assess the severity of coronary artery disease and guide treatment, coronary angiography has many known limitations, particularly the fact that it is a lumenogram depicting foreshortened, shadowgraph, planar projections of the contrast-filled lumen rather than imaging the diseased vessel itself. Intravascular imaging—intravascular ultrasound and more recently optical coherence tomography—provide a tomographical or cross-sectional image of the coronary arteries. These techniques are clinically useful to answer questions such as whether the stenosis is clinically relevant; the identification of the culprit lesion; or whether the plaque (or patient) is at high risk of future adverse events. They can also be used to optimise stent implantation to minimise stent-related adverse events, provide answers to the likelihood of distal embolisation or peri-procedural myocardial infarction during stent implantation, and provide reasons for stent thrombosis or restenosis. This review considers the usefulness of intravascular imaging in day-to-day practice. Although it is the method used by most interventional cardiologists to assess the severity of coronary artery disease and guide treatment, coronary angiography has many known limitations, particularly the fact that it is a lumenogram depicting foreshortened, shadowgraph, planar projections of the contrast-filled lumen rather than imaging the diseased vessel itself. Intravascular imaging—intravascular ultrasound and more recently optical coherence tomography—provide a tomographical or cross-sectional image of the coronary arteries. These techniques are clinically useful to answer questions such as whether the stenosis is clinically relevant; the identification of the culprit lesion; or whether the plaque (or patient) is at high risk of future adverse events. They can also be used to optimise stent implantation to minimise stent-related adverse events, provide answers to the likelihood of distal embolisation or peri-procedural myocardial infarction during stent implantation, and provide reasons for stent thrombosis or restenosis. This review considers the usefulness of intravascular imaging in day-to-day practice. Guagliumi, Giulio oth Enthalten in Elsevier Dou, Chao ELSEVIER Effects of shape functions on flexural–torsional buckling of fixed circular arches 2013 London [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV007685041 volume:390 year:2017 number:10096 day:19 month:08 pages:793-809 extent:17 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31957-8 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OPC-GEO 38.38 Seismologie VZ 56.20 Ingenieurgeologie Bodenmechanik VZ 56.11 Baukonstruktion VZ AR 390 2017 10096 19 0819 793-809 17 045F 610 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31957-8 doi GBVA2017002000012.pica (DE-627)ELV025033301 (ELSEVIER)S0140-6736(17)31957-8 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 610 610 DE-600 690 VZ 38.38 bkl 56.20 bkl 56.11 bkl Mintz, Gary S verfasserin aut Intravascular imaging in coronary artery disease 2017transfer abstract 17 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Although it is the method used by most interventional cardiologists to assess the severity of coronary artery disease and guide treatment, coronary angiography has many known limitations, particularly the fact that it is a lumenogram depicting foreshortened, shadowgraph, planar projections of the contrast-filled lumen rather than imaging the diseased vessel itself. Intravascular imaging—intravascular ultrasound and more recently optical coherence tomography—provide a tomographical or cross-sectional image of the coronary arteries. These techniques are clinically useful to answer questions such as whether the stenosis is clinically relevant; the identification of the culprit lesion; or whether the plaque (or patient) is at high risk of future adverse events. They can also be used to optimise stent implantation to minimise stent-related adverse events, provide answers to the likelihood of distal embolisation or peri-procedural myocardial infarction during stent implantation, and provide reasons for stent thrombosis or restenosis. This review considers the usefulness of intravascular imaging in day-to-day practice. Although it is the method used by most interventional cardiologists to assess the severity of coronary artery disease and guide treatment, coronary angiography has many known limitations, particularly the fact that it is a lumenogram depicting foreshortened, shadowgraph, planar projections of the contrast-filled lumen rather than imaging the diseased vessel itself. Intravascular imaging—intravascular ultrasound and more recently optical coherence tomography—provide a tomographical or cross-sectional image of the coronary arteries. These techniques are clinically useful to answer questions such as whether the stenosis is clinically relevant; the identification of the culprit lesion; or whether the plaque (or patient) is at high risk of future adverse events. They can also be used to optimise stent implantation to minimise stent-related adverse events, provide answers to the likelihood of distal embolisation or peri-procedural myocardial infarction during stent implantation, and provide reasons for stent thrombosis or restenosis. This review considers the usefulness of intravascular imaging in day-to-day practice. Guagliumi, Giulio oth Enthalten in Elsevier Dou, Chao ELSEVIER Effects of shape functions on flexural–torsional buckling of fixed circular arches 2013 London [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV007685041 volume:390 year:2017 number:10096 day:19 month:08 pages:793-809 extent:17 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31957-8 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OPC-GEO 38.38 Seismologie VZ 56.20 Ingenieurgeologie Bodenmechanik VZ 56.11 Baukonstruktion VZ AR 390 2017 10096 19 0819 793-809 17 045F 610 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31957-8 doi GBVA2017002000012.pica (DE-627)ELV025033301 (ELSEVIER)S0140-6736(17)31957-8 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 610 610 DE-600 690 VZ 38.38 bkl 56.20 bkl 56.11 bkl Mintz, Gary S verfasserin aut Intravascular imaging in coronary artery disease 2017transfer abstract 17 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Although it is the method used by most interventional cardiologists to assess the severity of coronary artery disease and guide treatment, coronary angiography has many known limitations, particularly the fact that it is a lumenogram depicting foreshortened, shadowgraph, planar projections of the contrast-filled lumen rather than imaging the diseased vessel itself. Intravascular imaging—intravascular ultrasound and more recently optical coherence tomography—provide a tomographical or cross-sectional image of the coronary arteries. These techniques are clinically useful to answer questions such as whether the stenosis is clinically relevant; the identification of the culprit lesion; or whether the plaque (or patient) is at high risk of future adverse events. They can also be used to optimise stent implantation to minimise stent-related adverse events, provide answers to the likelihood of distal embolisation or peri-procedural myocardial infarction during stent implantation, and provide reasons for stent thrombosis or restenosis. This review considers the usefulness of intravascular imaging in day-to-day practice. Although it is the method used by most interventional cardiologists to assess the severity of coronary artery disease and guide treatment, coronary angiography has many known limitations, particularly the fact that it is a lumenogram depicting foreshortened, shadowgraph, planar projections of the contrast-filled lumen rather than imaging the diseased vessel itself. Intravascular imaging—intravascular ultrasound and more recently optical coherence tomography—provide a tomographical or cross-sectional image of the coronary arteries. These techniques are clinically useful to answer questions such as whether the stenosis is clinically relevant; the identification of the culprit lesion; or whether the plaque (or patient) is at high risk of future adverse events. They can also be used to optimise stent implantation to minimise stent-related adverse events, provide answers to the likelihood of distal embolisation or peri-procedural myocardial infarction during stent implantation, and provide reasons for stent thrombosis or restenosis. This review considers the usefulness of intravascular imaging in day-to-day practice. Guagliumi, Giulio oth Enthalten in Elsevier Dou, Chao ELSEVIER Effects of shape functions on flexural–torsional buckling of fixed circular arches 2013 London [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV007685041 volume:390 year:2017 number:10096 day:19 month:08 pages:793-809 extent:17 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31957-8 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OPC-GEO 38.38 Seismologie VZ 56.20 Ingenieurgeologie Bodenmechanik VZ 56.11 Baukonstruktion VZ AR 390 2017 10096 19 0819 793-809 17 045F 610 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in Effects of shape functions on flexural–torsional buckling of fixed circular arches London [u.a.] volume:390 year:2017 number:10096 day:19 month:08 pages:793-809 extent:17 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in Effects of shape functions on flexural–torsional buckling of fixed circular arches London [u.a.] volume:390 year:2017 number:10096 day:19 month:08 pages:793-809 extent:17 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| bklname |
Seismologie Ingenieurgeologie Bodenmechanik Baukonstruktion |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| dewey-raw |
610 |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
Effects of shape functions on flexural–torsional buckling of fixed circular arches |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Mintz, Gary S @@aut@@ Guagliumi, Giulio @@oth@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2017-01-19T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
ELV007685041 |
| dewey-sort |
3610 |
| id |
ELV025033301 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV025033301</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230625144059.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">180603s2017 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31957-8</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">GBVA2017002000012.pica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV025033301</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0140-6736(17)31957-8</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">610</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">610</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">690</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">38.38</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">56.20</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">56.11</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Mintz, Gary S</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Intravascular imaging in coronary artery disease</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2017transfer abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">17</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Although it is the method used by most interventional cardiologists to assess the severity of coronary artery disease and guide treatment, coronary angiography has many known limitations, particularly the fact that it is a lumenogram depicting foreshortened, shadowgraph, planar projections of the contrast-filled lumen rather than imaging the diseased vessel itself. Intravascular imaging—intravascular ultrasound and more recently optical coherence tomography—provide a tomographical or cross-sectional image of the coronary arteries. These techniques are clinically useful to answer questions such as whether the stenosis is clinically relevant; the identification of the culprit lesion; or whether the plaque (or patient) is at high risk of future adverse events. They can also be used to optimise stent implantation to minimise stent-related adverse events, provide answers to the likelihood of distal embolisation or peri-procedural myocardial infarction during stent implantation, and provide reasons for stent thrombosis or restenosis. This review considers the usefulness of intravascular imaging in day-to-day practice.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Although it is the method used by most interventional cardiologists to assess the severity of coronary artery disease and guide treatment, coronary angiography has many known limitations, particularly the fact that it is a lumenogram depicting foreshortened, shadowgraph, planar projections of the contrast-filled lumen rather than imaging the diseased vessel itself. Intravascular imaging—intravascular ultrasound and more recently optical coherence tomography—provide a tomographical or cross-sectional image of the coronary arteries. These techniques are clinically useful to answer questions such as whether the stenosis is clinically relevant; the identification of the culprit lesion; or whether the plaque (or patient) is at high risk of future adverse events. They can also be used to optimise stent implantation to minimise stent-related adverse events, provide answers to the likelihood of distal embolisation or peri-procedural myocardial infarction during stent implantation, and provide reasons for stent thrombosis or restenosis. This review considers the usefulness of intravascular imaging in day-to-day practice.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Guagliumi, Giulio</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="n">Elsevier</subfield><subfield code="a">Dou, Chao ELSEVIER</subfield><subfield code="t">Effects of shape functions on flexural–torsional buckling of fixed circular arches</subfield><subfield code="d">2013</subfield><subfield code="g">London [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)ELV007685041</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:390</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2017</subfield><subfield code="g">number:10096</subfield><subfield code="g">day:19</subfield><subfield code="g">month:08</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:793-809</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:17</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31957-8</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OPC-GEO</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">38.38</subfield><subfield code="j">Seismologie</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">56.20</subfield><subfield code="j">Ingenieurgeologie</subfield><subfield code="j">Bodenmechanik</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">56.11</subfield><subfield code="j">Baukonstruktion</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">390</subfield><subfield code="j">2017</subfield><subfield code="e">10096</subfield><subfield code="b">19</subfield><subfield code="c">0819</subfield><subfield code="h">793-809</subfield><subfield code="g">17</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="953" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="2">045F</subfield><subfield code="a">610</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Mintz, Gary S |
| spellingShingle |
Mintz, Gary S ddc 610 ddc 690 bkl 38.38 bkl 56.20 bkl 56.11 Intravascular imaging in coronary artery disease |
| authorStr |
Mintz, Gary S |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)ELV007685041 |
| format |
electronic Article |
| dewey-ones |
610 - Medicine & health 690 - Buildings |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut |
| collection |
elsevier |
| remote_str |
true |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| topic_title |
610 610 DE-600 690 VZ 38.38 bkl 56.20 bkl 56.11 bkl Intravascular imaging in coronary artery disease |
| topic |
ddc 610 ddc 690 bkl 38.38 bkl 56.20 bkl 56.11 |
| topic_unstemmed |
ddc 610 ddc 690 bkl 38.38 bkl 56.20 bkl 56.11 |
| topic_browse |
ddc 610 ddc 690 bkl 38.38 bkl 56.20 bkl 56.11 |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
zu |
| author2_variant |
g g gg |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Effects of shape functions on flexural–torsional buckling of fixed circular arches |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
ELV007685041 |
| dewey-tens |
610 - Medicine & health 690 - Building & construction |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Effects of shape functions on flexural–torsional buckling of fixed circular arches |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)ELV007685041 |
| title |
Intravascular imaging in coronary artery disease |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)ELV025033301 (ELSEVIER)S0140-6736(17)31957-8 |
| title_full |
Intravascular imaging in coronary artery disease |
| author_sort |
Mintz, Gary S |
| journal |
Effects of shape functions on flexural–torsional buckling of fixed circular arches |
| journalStr |
Effects of shape functions on flexural–torsional buckling of fixed circular arches |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| dewey-hundreds |
600 - Technology |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2017 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
zzz |
| container_start_page |
793 |
| author_browse |
Mintz, Gary S |
| container_volume |
390 |
| physical |
17 |
| class |
610 610 DE-600 690 VZ 38.38 bkl 56.20 bkl 56.11 bkl |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Mintz, Gary S |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31957-8 |
| dewey-full |
610 690 |
| title_sort |
intravascular imaging in coronary artery disease |
| title_auth |
Intravascular imaging in coronary artery disease |
| abstract |
Although it is the method used by most interventional cardiologists to assess the severity of coronary artery disease and guide treatment, coronary angiography has many known limitations, particularly the fact that it is a lumenogram depicting foreshortened, shadowgraph, planar projections of the contrast-filled lumen rather than imaging the diseased vessel itself. Intravascular imaging—intravascular ultrasound and more recently optical coherence tomography—provide a tomographical or cross-sectional image of the coronary arteries. These techniques are clinically useful to answer questions such as whether the stenosis is clinically relevant; the identification of the culprit lesion; or whether the plaque (or patient) is at high risk of future adverse events. They can also be used to optimise stent implantation to minimise stent-related adverse events, provide answers to the likelihood of distal embolisation or peri-procedural myocardial infarction during stent implantation, and provide reasons for stent thrombosis or restenosis. This review considers the usefulness of intravascular imaging in day-to-day practice. |
| abstractGer |
Although it is the method used by most interventional cardiologists to assess the severity of coronary artery disease and guide treatment, coronary angiography has many known limitations, particularly the fact that it is a lumenogram depicting foreshortened, shadowgraph, planar projections of the contrast-filled lumen rather than imaging the diseased vessel itself. Intravascular imaging—intravascular ultrasound and more recently optical coherence tomography—provide a tomographical or cross-sectional image of the coronary arteries. These techniques are clinically useful to answer questions such as whether the stenosis is clinically relevant; the identification of the culprit lesion; or whether the plaque (or patient) is at high risk of future adverse events. They can also be used to optimise stent implantation to minimise stent-related adverse events, provide answers to the likelihood of distal embolisation or peri-procedural myocardial infarction during stent implantation, and provide reasons for stent thrombosis or restenosis. This review considers the usefulness of intravascular imaging in day-to-day practice. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
Although it is the method used by most interventional cardiologists to assess the severity of coronary artery disease and guide treatment, coronary angiography has many known limitations, particularly the fact that it is a lumenogram depicting foreshortened, shadowgraph, planar projections of the contrast-filled lumen rather than imaging the diseased vessel itself. Intravascular imaging—intravascular ultrasound and more recently optical coherence tomography—provide a tomographical or cross-sectional image of the coronary arteries. These techniques are clinically useful to answer questions such as whether the stenosis is clinically relevant; the identification of the culprit lesion; or whether the plaque (or patient) is at high risk of future adverse events. They can also be used to optimise stent implantation to minimise stent-related adverse events, provide answers to the likelihood of distal embolisation or peri-procedural myocardial infarction during stent implantation, and provide reasons for stent thrombosis or restenosis. This review considers the usefulness of intravascular imaging in day-to-day practice. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OPC-GEO |
| container_issue |
10096 |
| title_short |
Intravascular imaging in coronary artery disease |
| url |
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31957-8 |
| remote_bool |
true |
| author2 |
Guagliumi, Giulio |
| author2Str |
Guagliumi, Giulio |
| ppnlink |
ELV007685041 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
z |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| author2_role |
oth |
| doi_str |
10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31957-8 |
| up_date |
2024-07-06T23:02:26.051Z |
| _version_ |
1803872576263421952 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV025033301</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230625144059.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">180603s2017 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31957-8</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">GBVA2017002000012.pica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV025033301</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0140-6736(17)31957-8</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">610</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">610</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">690</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">38.38</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">56.20</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">56.11</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Mintz, Gary S</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Intravascular imaging in coronary artery disease</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2017transfer abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">17</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Although it is the method used by most interventional cardiologists to assess the severity of coronary artery disease and guide treatment, coronary angiography has many known limitations, particularly the fact that it is a lumenogram depicting foreshortened, shadowgraph, planar projections of the contrast-filled lumen rather than imaging the diseased vessel itself. Intravascular imaging—intravascular ultrasound and more recently optical coherence tomography—provide a tomographical or cross-sectional image of the coronary arteries. These techniques are clinically useful to answer questions such as whether the stenosis is clinically relevant; the identification of the culprit lesion; or whether the plaque (or patient) is at high risk of future adverse events. They can also be used to optimise stent implantation to minimise stent-related adverse events, provide answers to the likelihood of distal embolisation or peri-procedural myocardial infarction during stent implantation, and provide reasons for stent thrombosis or restenosis. This review considers the usefulness of intravascular imaging in day-to-day practice.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Although it is the method used by most interventional cardiologists to assess the severity of coronary artery disease and guide treatment, coronary angiography has many known limitations, particularly the fact that it is a lumenogram depicting foreshortened, shadowgraph, planar projections of the contrast-filled lumen rather than imaging the diseased vessel itself. Intravascular imaging—intravascular ultrasound and more recently optical coherence tomography—provide a tomographical or cross-sectional image of the coronary arteries. These techniques are clinically useful to answer questions such as whether the stenosis is clinically relevant; the identification of the culprit lesion; or whether the plaque (or patient) is at high risk of future adverse events. They can also be used to optimise stent implantation to minimise stent-related adverse events, provide answers to the likelihood of distal embolisation or peri-procedural myocardial infarction during stent implantation, and provide reasons for stent thrombosis or restenosis. This review considers the usefulness of intravascular imaging in day-to-day practice.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Guagliumi, Giulio</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="n">Elsevier</subfield><subfield code="a">Dou, Chao ELSEVIER</subfield><subfield code="t">Effects of shape functions on flexural–torsional buckling of fixed circular arches</subfield><subfield code="d">2013</subfield><subfield code="g">London [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)ELV007685041</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:390</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2017</subfield><subfield code="g">number:10096</subfield><subfield code="g">day:19</subfield><subfield code="g">month:08</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:793-809</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:17</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31957-8</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OPC-GEO</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">38.38</subfield><subfield code="j">Seismologie</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">56.20</subfield><subfield code="j">Ingenieurgeologie</subfield><subfield code="j">Bodenmechanik</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">56.11</subfield><subfield code="j">Baukonstruktion</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">390</subfield><subfield code="j">2017</subfield><subfield code="e">10096</subfield><subfield code="b">19</subfield><subfield code="c">0819</subfield><subfield code="h">793-809</subfield><subfield code="g">17</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="953" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="2">045F</subfield><subfield code="a">610</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.402647 |