Boundary velocity method for continuum shape sensitivity of nonlinear fluid–structure interaction problems
A Continuum Sensitivity Equation (CSE) method was developed in local derivative form for fluid–structure shape design problems. The boundary velocity method was used to derive the continuum sensitivity equations and sensitivity boundary conditions in local derivative form for a built-up joined beam...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Liu, Shaobin [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2013transfer abstract |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Umfang: |
18 |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Safety and usefulness of minimally-invasive biopsy of minor salivary glands in internal medicine: Searching for systemic infiltrative diseases - Brito-Zerón, P. ELSEVIER, 2013, Orlando, Fla |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:40 ; year:2013 ; pages:284-301 ; extent:18 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2013.05.003 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
ELV027369897 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ELV027369897 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230625151845.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 180603s2013 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2013.05.003 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a GBVA2013014000022.pica |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)ELV027369897 | ||
| 035 | |a (ELSEVIER)S0889-9746(13)00119-9 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 082 | 0 | |a 530 | |
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 530 |q DE-600 |
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 610 |q VZ |
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 550 |q VZ |
| 084 | |a 38.48 |2 bkl | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Liu, Shaobin |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Boundary velocity method for continuum shape sensitivity of nonlinear fluid–structure interaction problems |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2013transfer abstract | |
| 300 | |a 18 | ||
| 336 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zzz |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b z |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zu |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a A Continuum Sensitivity Equation (CSE) method was developed in local derivative form for fluid–structure shape design problems. The boundary velocity method was used to derive the continuum sensitivity equations and sensitivity boundary conditions in local derivative form for a built-up joined beam structure under transient aerodynamic loads. For nonlinear problems, when the Newton–Raphson method is used, the tangent stiffness matrix yields the desired sensitivity coefficient matrix for solving the linear sensitivity equations in the Galerkin finite element formulation. For built-up structures with strain discontinuity, the local sensitivity variables are not continuous at the joints, requiring special treatment to assemble the elemental local sensitivities and the generalized force vector. The coupled fluid–structure physics and continuum sensitivity equations for gust response of a nonlinear joined beam with an airfoil model were posed and solved. The results were compared to the results obtained by finite difference (FD) method. | ||
| 520 | |a A Continuum Sensitivity Equation (CSE) method was developed in local derivative form for fluid–structure shape design problems. The boundary velocity method was used to derive the continuum sensitivity equations and sensitivity boundary conditions in local derivative form for a built-up joined beam structure under transient aerodynamic loads. For nonlinear problems, when the Newton–Raphson method is used, the tangent stiffness matrix yields the desired sensitivity coefficient matrix for solving the linear sensitivity equations in the Galerkin finite element formulation. For built-up structures with strain discontinuity, the local sensitivity variables are not continuous at the joints, requiring special treatment to assemble the elemental local sensitivities and the generalized force vector. The coupled fluid–structure physics and continuum sensitivity equations for gust response of a nonlinear joined beam with an airfoil model were posed and solved. The results were compared to the results obtained by finite difference (FD) method. | ||
| 650 | 7 | |a Fluid–structure interaction |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Shape sensitivity analysis |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Continuum sensitivity method |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Boundary velocity method |2 Elsevier | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Canfield, Robert A. |4 oth | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |n Elsevier |a Brito-Zerón, P. ELSEVIER |t Safety and usefulness of minimally-invasive biopsy of minor salivary glands in internal medicine: Searching for systemic infiltrative diseases |d 2013 |g Orlando, Fla |w (DE-627)ELV017003725 |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:40 |g year:2013 |g pages:284-301 |g extent:18 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2013.05.003 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_U | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ELV | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_U | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OPC-GGO | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OPC-GEO | ||
| 936 | b | k | |a 38.48 |j Marine Geologie |q VZ |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 40 |j 2013 |h 284-301 |g 18 | ||
| 953 | |2 045F |a 530 | ||
| author_variant |
s l sl |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
liushaobincanfieldroberta:2013----:onayeoiyehdocniumhpsniiiyfolnafudt |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2013transfer abstract |
| bklnumber |
38.48 |
| publishDate |
2013 |
| allfields |
10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2013.05.003 doi GBVA2013014000022.pica (DE-627)ELV027369897 (ELSEVIER)S0889-9746(13)00119-9 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 530 530 DE-600 610 VZ 550 VZ 38.48 bkl Liu, Shaobin verfasserin aut Boundary velocity method for continuum shape sensitivity of nonlinear fluid–structure interaction problems 2013transfer abstract 18 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier A Continuum Sensitivity Equation (CSE) method was developed in local derivative form for fluid–structure shape design problems. The boundary velocity method was used to derive the continuum sensitivity equations and sensitivity boundary conditions in local derivative form for a built-up joined beam structure under transient aerodynamic loads. For nonlinear problems, when the Newton–Raphson method is used, the tangent stiffness matrix yields the desired sensitivity coefficient matrix for solving the linear sensitivity equations in the Galerkin finite element formulation. For built-up structures with strain discontinuity, the local sensitivity variables are not continuous at the joints, requiring special treatment to assemble the elemental local sensitivities and the generalized force vector. The coupled fluid–structure physics and continuum sensitivity equations for gust response of a nonlinear joined beam with an airfoil model were posed and solved. The results were compared to the results obtained by finite difference (FD) method. A Continuum Sensitivity Equation (CSE) method was developed in local derivative form for fluid–structure shape design problems. The boundary velocity method was used to derive the continuum sensitivity equations and sensitivity boundary conditions in local derivative form for a built-up joined beam structure under transient aerodynamic loads. For nonlinear problems, when the Newton–Raphson method is used, the tangent stiffness matrix yields the desired sensitivity coefficient matrix for solving the linear sensitivity equations in the Galerkin finite element formulation. For built-up structures with strain discontinuity, the local sensitivity variables are not continuous at the joints, requiring special treatment to assemble the elemental local sensitivities and the generalized force vector. The coupled fluid–structure physics and continuum sensitivity equations for gust response of a nonlinear joined beam with an airfoil model were posed and solved. The results were compared to the results obtained by finite difference (FD) method. Fluid–structure interaction Elsevier Shape sensitivity analysis Elsevier Continuum sensitivity method Elsevier Boundary velocity method Elsevier Canfield, Robert A. oth Enthalten in Elsevier Brito-Zerón, P. ELSEVIER Safety and usefulness of minimally-invasive biopsy of minor salivary glands in internal medicine: Searching for systemic infiltrative diseases 2013 Orlando, Fla (DE-627)ELV017003725 volume:40 year:2013 pages:284-301 extent:18 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2013.05.003 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OPC-GGO SSG-OPC-GEO 38.48 Marine Geologie VZ AR 40 2013 284-301 18 045F 530 |
| spelling |
10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2013.05.003 doi GBVA2013014000022.pica (DE-627)ELV027369897 (ELSEVIER)S0889-9746(13)00119-9 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 530 530 DE-600 610 VZ 550 VZ 38.48 bkl Liu, Shaobin verfasserin aut Boundary velocity method for continuum shape sensitivity of nonlinear fluid–structure interaction problems 2013transfer abstract 18 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier A Continuum Sensitivity Equation (CSE) method was developed in local derivative form for fluid–structure shape design problems. The boundary velocity method was used to derive the continuum sensitivity equations and sensitivity boundary conditions in local derivative form for a built-up joined beam structure under transient aerodynamic loads. For nonlinear problems, when the Newton–Raphson method is used, the tangent stiffness matrix yields the desired sensitivity coefficient matrix for solving the linear sensitivity equations in the Galerkin finite element formulation. For built-up structures with strain discontinuity, the local sensitivity variables are not continuous at the joints, requiring special treatment to assemble the elemental local sensitivities and the generalized force vector. The coupled fluid–structure physics and continuum sensitivity equations for gust response of a nonlinear joined beam with an airfoil model were posed and solved. The results were compared to the results obtained by finite difference (FD) method. A Continuum Sensitivity Equation (CSE) method was developed in local derivative form for fluid–structure shape design problems. The boundary velocity method was used to derive the continuum sensitivity equations and sensitivity boundary conditions in local derivative form for a built-up joined beam structure under transient aerodynamic loads. For nonlinear problems, when the Newton–Raphson method is used, the tangent stiffness matrix yields the desired sensitivity coefficient matrix for solving the linear sensitivity equations in the Galerkin finite element formulation. For built-up structures with strain discontinuity, the local sensitivity variables are not continuous at the joints, requiring special treatment to assemble the elemental local sensitivities and the generalized force vector. The coupled fluid–structure physics and continuum sensitivity equations for gust response of a nonlinear joined beam with an airfoil model were posed and solved. The results were compared to the results obtained by finite difference (FD) method. Fluid–structure interaction Elsevier Shape sensitivity analysis Elsevier Continuum sensitivity method Elsevier Boundary velocity method Elsevier Canfield, Robert A. oth Enthalten in Elsevier Brito-Zerón, P. ELSEVIER Safety and usefulness of minimally-invasive biopsy of minor salivary glands in internal medicine: Searching for systemic infiltrative diseases 2013 Orlando, Fla (DE-627)ELV017003725 volume:40 year:2013 pages:284-301 extent:18 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2013.05.003 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OPC-GGO SSG-OPC-GEO 38.48 Marine Geologie VZ AR 40 2013 284-301 18 045F 530 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2013.05.003 doi GBVA2013014000022.pica (DE-627)ELV027369897 (ELSEVIER)S0889-9746(13)00119-9 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 530 530 DE-600 610 VZ 550 VZ 38.48 bkl Liu, Shaobin verfasserin aut Boundary velocity method for continuum shape sensitivity of nonlinear fluid–structure interaction problems 2013transfer abstract 18 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier A Continuum Sensitivity Equation (CSE) method was developed in local derivative form for fluid–structure shape design problems. The boundary velocity method was used to derive the continuum sensitivity equations and sensitivity boundary conditions in local derivative form for a built-up joined beam structure under transient aerodynamic loads. For nonlinear problems, when the Newton–Raphson method is used, the tangent stiffness matrix yields the desired sensitivity coefficient matrix for solving the linear sensitivity equations in the Galerkin finite element formulation. For built-up structures with strain discontinuity, the local sensitivity variables are not continuous at the joints, requiring special treatment to assemble the elemental local sensitivities and the generalized force vector. The coupled fluid–structure physics and continuum sensitivity equations for gust response of a nonlinear joined beam with an airfoil model were posed and solved. The results were compared to the results obtained by finite difference (FD) method. A Continuum Sensitivity Equation (CSE) method was developed in local derivative form for fluid–structure shape design problems. The boundary velocity method was used to derive the continuum sensitivity equations and sensitivity boundary conditions in local derivative form for a built-up joined beam structure under transient aerodynamic loads. For nonlinear problems, when the Newton–Raphson method is used, the tangent stiffness matrix yields the desired sensitivity coefficient matrix for solving the linear sensitivity equations in the Galerkin finite element formulation. For built-up structures with strain discontinuity, the local sensitivity variables are not continuous at the joints, requiring special treatment to assemble the elemental local sensitivities and the generalized force vector. The coupled fluid–structure physics and continuum sensitivity equations for gust response of a nonlinear joined beam with an airfoil model were posed and solved. The results were compared to the results obtained by finite difference (FD) method. Fluid–structure interaction Elsevier Shape sensitivity analysis Elsevier Continuum sensitivity method Elsevier Boundary velocity method Elsevier Canfield, Robert A. oth Enthalten in Elsevier Brito-Zerón, P. ELSEVIER Safety and usefulness of minimally-invasive biopsy of minor salivary glands in internal medicine: Searching for systemic infiltrative diseases 2013 Orlando, Fla (DE-627)ELV017003725 volume:40 year:2013 pages:284-301 extent:18 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2013.05.003 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OPC-GGO SSG-OPC-GEO 38.48 Marine Geologie VZ AR 40 2013 284-301 18 045F 530 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2013.05.003 doi GBVA2013014000022.pica (DE-627)ELV027369897 (ELSEVIER)S0889-9746(13)00119-9 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 530 530 DE-600 610 VZ 550 VZ 38.48 bkl Liu, Shaobin verfasserin aut Boundary velocity method for continuum shape sensitivity of nonlinear fluid–structure interaction problems 2013transfer abstract 18 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier A Continuum Sensitivity Equation (CSE) method was developed in local derivative form for fluid–structure shape design problems. The boundary velocity method was used to derive the continuum sensitivity equations and sensitivity boundary conditions in local derivative form for a built-up joined beam structure under transient aerodynamic loads. For nonlinear problems, when the Newton–Raphson method is used, the tangent stiffness matrix yields the desired sensitivity coefficient matrix for solving the linear sensitivity equations in the Galerkin finite element formulation. For built-up structures with strain discontinuity, the local sensitivity variables are not continuous at the joints, requiring special treatment to assemble the elemental local sensitivities and the generalized force vector. The coupled fluid–structure physics and continuum sensitivity equations for gust response of a nonlinear joined beam with an airfoil model were posed and solved. The results were compared to the results obtained by finite difference (FD) method. A Continuum Sensitivity Equation (CSE) method was developed in local derivative form for fluid–structure shape design problems. The boundary velocity method was used to derive the continuum sensitivity equations and sensitivity boundary conditions in local derivative form for a built-up joined beam structure under transient aerodynamic loads. For nonlinear problems, when the Newton–Raphson method is used, the tangent stiffness matrix yields the desired sensitivity coefficient matrix for solving the linear sensitivity equations in the Galerkin finite element formulation. For built-up structures with strain discontinuity, the local sensitivity variables are not continuous at the joints, requiring special treatment to assemble the elemental local sensitivities and the generalized force vector. The coupled fluid–structure physics and continuum sensitivity equations for gust response of a nonlinear joined beam with an airfoil model were posed and solved. The results were compared to the results obtained by finite difference (FD) method. Fluid–structure interaction Elsevier Shape sensitivity analysis Elsevier Continuum sensitivity method Elsevier Boundary velocity method Elsevier Canfield, Robert A. oth Enthalten in Elsevier Brito-Zerón, P. ELSEVIER Safety and usefulness of minimally-invasive biopsy of minor salivary glands in internal medicine: Searching for systemic infiltrative diseases 2013 Orlando, Fla (DE-627)ELV017003725 volume:40 year:2013 pages:284-301 extent:18 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2013.05.003 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OPC-GGO SSG-OPC-GEO 38.48 Marine Geologie VZ AR 40 2013 284-301 18 045F 530 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2013.05.003 doi GBVA2013014000022.pica (DE-627)ELV027369897 (ELSEVIER)S0889-9746(13)00119-9 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 530 530 DE-600 610 VZ 550 VZ 38.48 bkl Liu, Shaobin verfasserin aut Boundary velocity method for continuum shape sensitivity of nonlinear fluid–structure interaction problems 2013transfer abstract 18 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier A Continuum Sensitivity Equation (CSE) method was developed in local derivative form for fluid–structure shape design problems. The boundary velocity method was used to derive the continuum sensitivity equations and sensitivity boundary conditions in local derivative form for a built-up joined beam structure under transient aerodynamic loads. For nonlinear problems, when the Newton–Raphson method is used, the tangent stiffness matrix yields the desired sensitivity coefficient matrix for solving the linear sensitivity equations in the Galerkin finite element formulation. For built-up structures with strain discontinuity, the local sensitivity variables are not continuous at the joints, requiring special treatment to assemble the elemental local sensitivities and the generalized force vector. The coupled fluid–structure physics and continuum sensitivity equations for gust response of a nonlinear joined beam with an airfoil model were posed and solved. The results were compared to the results obtained by finite difference (FD) method. A Continuum Sensitivity Equation (CSE) method was developed in local derivative form for fluid–structure shape design problems. The boundary velocity method was used to derive the continuum sensitivity equations and sensitivity boundary conditions in local derivative form for a built-up joined beam structure under transient aerodynamic loads. For nonlinear problems, when the Newton–Raphson method is used, the tangent stiffness matrix yields the desired sensitivity coefficient matrix for solving the linear sensitivity equations in the Galerkin finite element formulation. For built-up structures with strain discontinuity, the local sensitivity variables are not continuous at the joints, requiring special treatment to assemble the elemental local sensitivities and the generalized force vector. The coupled fluid–structure physics and continuum sensitivity equations for gust response of a nonlinear joined beam with an airfoil model were posed and solved. The results were compared to the results obtained by finite difference (FD) method. Fluid–structure interaction Elsevier Shape sensitivity analysis Elsevier Continuum sensitivity method Elsevier Boundary velocity method Elsevier Canfield, Robert A. oth Enthalten in Elsevier Brito-Zerón, P. ELSEVIER Safety and usefulness of minimally-invasive biopsy of minor salivary glands in internal medicine: Searching for systemic infiltrative diseases 2013 Orlando, Fla (DE-627)ELV017003725 volume:40 year:2013 pages:284-301 extent:18 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2013.05.003 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OPC-GGO SSG-OPC-GEO 38.48 Marine Geologie VZ AR 40 2013 284-301 18 045F 530 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in Safety and usefulness of minimally-invasive biopsy of minor salivary glands in internal medicine: Searching for systemic infiltrative diseases Orlando, Fla volume:40 year:2013 pages:284-301 extent:18 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in Safety and usefulness of minimally-invasive biopsy of minor salivary glands in internal medicine: Searching for systemic infiltrative diseases Orlando, Fla volume:40 year:2013 pages:284-301 extent:18 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| bklname |
Marine Geologie |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
Fluid–structure interaction Shape sensitivity analysis Continuum sensitivity method Boundary velocity method |
| dewey-raw |
530 |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
Safety and usefulness of minimally-invasive biopsy of minor salivary glands in internal medicine: Searching for systemic infiltrative diseases |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Liu, Shaobin @@aut@@ Canfield, Robert A. @@oth@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2013-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
ELV017003725 |
| dewey-sort |
3530 |
| id |
ELV027369897 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV027369897</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230625151845.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">180603s2013 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2013.05.003</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">GBVA2013014000022.pica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV027369897</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0889-9746(13)00119-9</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">530</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">530</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">610</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">550</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">38.48</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Liu, Shaobin</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Boundary velocity method for continuum shape sensitivity of nonlinear fluid–structure interaction problems</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2013transfer abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">18</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">A Continuum Sensitivity Equation (CSE) method was developed in local derivative form for fluid–structure shape design problems. The boundary velocity method was used to derive the continuum sensitivity equations and sensitivity boundary conditions in local derivative form for a built-up joined beam structure under transient aerodynamic loads. For nonlinear problems, when the Newton–Raphson method is used, the tangent stiffness matrix yields the desired sensitivity coefficient matrix for solving the linear sensitivity equations in the Galerkin finite element formulation. For built-up structures with strain discontinuity, the local sensitivity variables are not continuous at the joints, requiring special treatment to assemble the elemental local sensitivities and the generalized force vector. The coupled fluid–structure physics and continuum sensitivity equations for gust response of a nonlinear joined beam with an airfoil model were posed and solved. The results were compared to the results obtained by finite difference (FD) method.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">A Continuum Sensitivity Equation (CSE) method was developed in local derivative form for fluid–structure shape design problems. The boundary velocity method was used to derive the continuum sensitivity equations and sensitivity boundary conditions in local derivative form for a built-up joined beam structure under transient aerodynamic loads. For nonlinear problems, when the Newton–Raphson method is used, the tangent stiffness matrix yields the desired sensitivity coefficient matrix for solving the linear sensitivity equations in the Galerkin finite element formulation. For built-up structures with strain discontinuity, the local sensitivity variables are not continuous at the joints, requiring special treatment to assemble the elemental local sensitivities and the generalized force vector. The coupled fluid–structure physics and continuum sensitivity equations for gust response of a nonlinear joined beam with an airfoil model were posed and solved. The results were compared to the results obtained by finite difference (FD) method.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Fluid–structure interaction</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Shape sensitivity analysis</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Continuum sensitivity method</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Boundary velocity method</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Canfield, Robert A.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="n">Elsevier</subfield><subfield code="a">Brito-Zerón, P. ELSEVIER</subfield><subfield code="t">Safety and usefulness of minimally-invasive biopsy of minor salivary glands in internal medicine: Searching for systemic infiltrative diseases</subfield><subfield code="d">2013</subfield><subfield code="g">Orlando, Fla</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)ELV017003725</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:40</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2013</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:284-301</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:18</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2013.05.003</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OPC-GGO</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OPC-GEO</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">38.48</subfield><subfield code="j">Marine Geologie</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">40</subfield><subfield code="j">2013</subfield><subfield code="h">284-301</subfield><subfield code="g">18</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="953" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="2">045F</subfield><subfield code="a">530</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Liu, Shaobin |
| spellingShingle |
Liu, Shaobin ddc 530 ddc 610 ddc 550 bkl 38.48 Elsevier Fluid–structure interaction Elsevier Shape sensitivity analysis Elsevier Continuum sensitivity method Elsevier Boundary velocity method Boundary velocity method for continuum shape sensitivity of nonlinear fluid–structure interaction problems |
| authorStr |
Liu, Shaobin |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)ELV017003725 |
| format |
electronic Article |
| dewey-ones |
530 - Physics 610 - Medicine & health 550 - Earth sciences |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut |
| collection |
elsevier |
| remote_str |
true |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| topic_title |
530 530 DE-600 610 VZ 550 VZ 38.48 bkl Boundary velocity method for continuum shape sensitivity of nonlinear fluid–structure interaction problems Fluid–structure interaction Elsevier Shape sensitivity analysis Elsevier Continuum sensitivity method Elsevier Boundary velocity method Elsevier |
| topic |
ddc 530 ddc 610 ddc 550 bkl 38.48 Elsevier Fluid–structure interaction Elsevier Shape sensitivity analysis Elsevier Continuum sensitivity method Elsevier Boundary velocity method |
| topic_unstemmed |
ddc 530 ddc 610 ddc 550 bkl 38.48 Elsevier Fluid–structure interaction Elsevier Shape sensitivity analysis Elsevier Continuum sensitivity method Elsevier Boundary velocity method |
| topic_browse |
ddc 530 ddc 610 ddc 550 bkl 38.48 Elsevier Fluid–structure interaction Elsevier Shape sensitivity analysis Elsevier Continuum sensitivity method Elsevier Boundary velocity method |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
zu |
| author2_variant |
r a c ra rac |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Safety and usefulness of minimally-invasive biopsy of minor salivary glands in internal medicine: Searching for systemic infiltrative diseases |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
ELV017003725 |
| dewey-tens |
530 - Physics 610 - Medicine & health 550 - Earth sciences & geology |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Safety and usefulness of minimally-invasive biopsy of minor salivary glands in internal medicine: Searching for systemic infiltrative diseases |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)ELV017003725 |
| title |
Boundary velocity method for continuum shape sensitivity of nonlinear fluid–structure interaction problems |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)ELV027369897 (ELSEVIER)S0889-9746(13)00119-9 |
| title_full |
Boundary velocity method for continuum shape sensitivity of nonlinear fluid–structure interaction problems |
| author_sort |
Liu, Shaobin |
| journal |
Safety and usefulness of minimally-invasive biopsy of minor salivary glands in internal medicine: Searching for systemic infiltrative diseases |
| journalStr |
Safety and usefulness of minimally-invasive biopsy of minor salivary glands in internal medicine: Searching for systemic infiltrative diseases |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| dewey-hundreds |
500 - Science 600 - Technology |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2013 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
zzz |
| container_start_page |
284 |
| author_browse |
Liu, Shaobin |
| container_volume |
40 |
| physical |
18 |
| class |
530 530 DE-600 610 VZ 550 VZ 38.48 bkl |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Liu, Shaobin |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2013.05.003 |
| dewey-full |
530 610 550 |
| title_sort |
boundary velocity method for continuum shape sensitivity of nonlinear fluid–structure interaction problems |
| title_auth |
Boundary velocity method for continuum shape sensitivity of nonlinear fluid–structure interaction problems |
| abstract |
A Continuum Sensitivity Equation (CSE) method was developed in local derivative form for fluid–structure shape design problems. The boundary velocity method was used to derive the continuum sensitivity equations and sensitivity boundary conditions in local derivative form for a built-up joined beam structure under transient aerodynamic loads. For nonlinear problems, when the Newton–Raphson method is used, the tangent stiffness matrix yields the desired sensitivity coefficient matrix for solving the linear sensitivity equations in the Galerkin finite element formulation. For built-up structures with strain discontinuity, the local sensitivity variables are not continuous at the joints, requiring special treatment to assemble the elemental local sensitivities and the generalized force vector. The coupled fluid–structure physics and continuum sensitivity equations for gust response of a nonlinear joined beam with an airfoil model were posed and solved. The results were compared to the results obtained by finite difference (FD) method. |
| abstractGer |
A Continuum Sensitivity Equation (CSE) method was developed in local derivative form for fluid–structure shape design problems. The boundary velocity method was used to derive the continuum sensitivity equations and sensitivity boundary conditions in local derivative form for a built-up joined beam structure under transient aerodynamic loads. For nonlinear problems, when the Newton–Raphson method is used, the tangent stiffness matrix yields the desired sensitivity coefficient matrix for solving the linear sensitivity equations in the Galerkin finite element formulation. For built-up structures with strain discontinuity, the local sensitivity variables are not continuous at the joints, requiring special treatment to assemble the elemental local sensitivities and the generalized force vector. The coupled fluid–structure physics and continuum sensitivity equations for gust response of a nonlinear joined beam with an airfoil model were posed and solved. The results were compared to the results obtained by finite difference (FD) method. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
A Continuum Sensitivity Equation (CSE) method was developed in local derivative form for fluid–structure shape design problems. The boundary velocity method was used to derive the continuum sensitivity equations and sensitivity boundary conditions in local derivative form for a built-up joined beam structure under transient aerodynamic loads. For nonlinear problems, when the Newton–Raphson method is used, the tangent stiffness matrix yields the desired sensitivity coefficient matrix for solving the linear sensitivity equations in the Galerkin finite element formulation. For built-up structures with strain discontinuity, the local sensitivity variables are not continuous at the joints, requiring special treatment to assemble the elemental local sensitivities and the generalized force vector. The coupled fluid–structure physics and continuum sensitivity equations for gust response of a nonlinear joined beam with an airfoil model were posed and solved. The results were compared to the results obtained by finite difference (FD) method. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OPC-GGO SSG-OPC-GEO |
| title_short |
Boundary velocity method for continuum shape sensitivity of nonlinear fluid–structure interaction problems |
| url |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2013.05.003 |
| remote_bool |
true |
| author2 |
Canfield, Robert A. |
| author2Str |
Canfield, Robert A. |
| ppnlink |
ELV017003725 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
z |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| author2_role |
oth |
| doi_str |
10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2013.05.003 |
| up_date |
2024-07-06T21:41:23.979Z |
| _version_ |
1803867478012461056 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV027369897</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230625151845.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">180603s2013 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2013.05.003</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">GBVA2013014000022.pica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV027369897</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0889-9746(13)00119-9</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">530</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">530</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">610</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">550</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">38.48</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Liu, Shaobin</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Boundary velocity method for continuum shape sensitivity of nonlinear fluid–structure interaction problems</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2013transfer abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">18</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">A Continuum Sensitivity Equation (CSE) method was developed in local derivative form for fluid–structure shape design problems. The boundary velocity method was used to derive the continuum sensitivity equations and sensitivity boundary conditions in local derivative form for a built-up joined beam structure under transient aerodynamic loads. For nonlinear problems, when the Newton–Raphson method is used, the tangent stiffness matrix yields the desired sensitivity coefficient matrix for solving the linear sensitivity equations in the Galerkin finite element formulation. For built-up structures with strain discontinuity, the local sensitivity variables are not continuous at the joints, requiring special treatment to assemble the elemental local sensitivities and the generalized force vector. The coupled fluid–structure physics and continuum sensitivity equations for gust response of a nonlinear joined beam with an airfoil model were posed and solved. The results were compared to the results obtained by finite difference (FD) method.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">A Continuum Sensitivity Equation (CSE) method was developed in local derivative form for fluid–structure shape design problems. The boundary velocity method was used to derive the continuum sensitivity equations and sensitivity boundary conditions in local derivative form for a built-up joined beam structure under transient aerodynamic loads. For nonlinear problems, when the Newton–Raphson method is used, the tangent stiffness matrix yields the desired sensitivity coefficient matrix for solving the linear sensitivity equations in the Galerkin finite element formulation. For built-up structures with strain discontinuity, the local sensitivity variables are not continuous at the joints, requiring special treatment to assemble the elemental local sensitivities and the generalized force vector. The coupled fluid–structure physics and continuum sensitivity equations for gust response of a nonlinear joined beam with an airfoil model were posed and solved. The results were compared to the results obtained by finite difference (FD) method.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Fluid–structure interaction</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Shape sensitivity analysis</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Continuum sensitivity method</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Boundary velocity method</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Canfield, Robert A.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="n">Elsevier</subfield><subfield code="a">Brito-Zerón, P. ELSEVIER</subfield><subfield code="t">Safety and usefulness of minimally-invasive biopsy of minor salivary glands in internal medicine: Searching for systemic infiltrative diseases</subfield><subfield code="d">2013</subfield><subfield code="g">Orlando, Fla</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)ELV017003725</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:40</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2013</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:284-301</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:18</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2013.05.003</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OPC-GGO</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OPC-GEO</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">38.48</subfield><subfield code="j">Marine Geologie</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">40</subfield><subfield code="j">2013</subfield><subfield code="h">284-301</subfield><subfield code="g">18</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="953" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="2">045F</subfield><subfield code="a">530</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.400361 |