Continuous-time models of group selection, and the dynamical insufficiency of kin selection models
Traditionally, the process of group selection has been described mathematically by discrete-time models, and analyzed using tools like the Price equation. This approach makes implicit assumptions about the process that are not valid in general, like the central role of synchronized mass-dispersion a...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Autor*in: |
Simon, Burton [verfasserIn] |
---|
Format: |
E-Artikel |
---|---|
Sprache: |
Englisch |
Erschienen: |
2014transfer abstract |
---|
Schlagwörter: |
---|
Umfang: |
10 |
---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Dissolution versus cementation and its role in determining tight sandstone quality: A case study from the Upper Paleozoic in northeastern Ordos Basin, China - Li, Yong ELSEVIER, 2020, Amsterdam |
---|---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:349 ; year:2014 ; day:21 ; month:05 ; pages:22-31 ; extent:10 |
Links: |
---|
DOI / URN: |
10.1016/j.jtbi.2014.01.030 |
---|
Katalog-ID: |
ELV028473205 |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | ELV028473205 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20230625160253.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 180603s2014 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.jtbi.2014.01.030 |2 doi | |
028 | 5 | 2 | |a GBVA2014021000012.pica |
035 | |a (DE-627)ELV028473205 | ||
035 | |a (ELSEVIER)S0022-5193(14)00047-2 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
082 | 0 | |a 570 | |
082 | 0 | 4 | |a 570 |q DE-600 |
082 | 0 | 4 | |a 660 |q VZ |
100 | 1 | |a Simon, Burton |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Continuous-time models of group selection, and the dynamical insufficiency of kin selection models |
264 | 1 | |c 2014transfer abstract | |
300 | |a 10 | ||
336 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zzz |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b z |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zu |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a Traditionally, the process of group selection has been described mathematically by discrete-time models, and analyzed using tools like the Price equation. This approach makes implicit assumptions about the process that are not valid in general, like the central role of synchronized mass-dispersion and group re-formation events. In many important examples (like hunter–gatherer tribes) there are no mass-dispersion events, and the group-level events that do occur, like fission, fusion, and extinction, occur asynchronously. Examples like these can be fully analyzed by the equations of two-level population dynamics (described here) so their models are dynamically sufficient. However, it will be shown that examples like these cannot be fully analyzed by kin selection (inclusive fitness) methods because kin selection versions of group selection models are not dynamically sufficient. This is a critical mathematical difference between group selection and kin selection models, which implies that the two theories are not mathematically equivalent. | ||
520 | |a Traditionally, the process of group selection has been described mathematically by discrete-time models, and analyzed using tools like the Price equation. This approach makes implicit assumptions about the process that are not valid in general, like the central role of synchronized mass-dispersion and group re-formation events. In many important examples (like hunter–gatherer tribes) there are no mass-dispersion events, and the group-level events that do occur, like fission, fusion, and extinction, occur asynchronously. Examples like these can be fully analyzed by the equations of two-level population dynamics (described here) so their models are dynamically sufficient. However, it will be shown that examples like these cannot be fully analyzed by kin selection (inclusive fitness) methods because kin selection versions of group selection models are not dynamically sufficient. This is a critical mathematical difference between group selection and kin selection models, which implies that the two theories are not mathematically equivalent. | ||
650 | 7 | |a Mass-dispersion events |2 Elsevier | |
650 | 7 | |a Asynchronous group-level events |2 Elsevier | |
650 | 7 | |a KS=GS |2 Elsevier | |
650 | 7 | |a Price equation |2 Elsevier | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |n Elsevier Ltd |a Li, Yong ELSEVIER |t Dissolution versus cementation and its role in determining tight sandstone quality: A case study from the Upper Paleozoic in northeastern Ordos Basin, China |d 2020 |g Amsterdam |w (DE-627)ELV004081676 |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:349 |g year:2014 |g day:21 |g month:05 |g pages:22-31 |g extent:10 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtbi.2014.01.030 |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_U | ||
912 | |a GBV_ELV | ||
912 | |a SYSFLAG_U | ||
912 | |a SSG-OLC-PHA | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 349 |j 2014 |b 21 |c 0521 |h 22-31 |g 10 | ||
953 | |2 045F |a 570 |
author_variant |
b s bs |
---|---|
matchkey_str |
simonburton:2014----:otnosieoesfruslcinnteyaiaisfiin |
hierarchy_sort_str |
2014transfer abstract |
publishDate |
2014 |
allfields |
10.1016/j.jtbi.2014.01.030 doi GBVA2014021000012.pica (DE-627)ELV028473205 (ELSEVIER)S0022-5193(14)00047-2 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 570 570 DE-600 660 VZ Simon, Burton verfasserin aut Continuous-time models of group selection, and the dynamical insufficiency of kin selection models 2014transfer abstract 10 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Traditionally, the process of group selection has been described mathematically by discrete-time models, and analyzed using tools like the Price equation. This approach makes implicit assumptions about the process that are not valid in general, like the central role of synchronized mass-dispersion and group re-formation events. In many important examples (like hunter–gatherer tribes) there are no mass-dispersion events, and the group-level events that do occur, like fission, fusion, and extinction, occur asynchronously. Examples like these can be fully analyzed by the equations of two-level population dynamics (described here) so their models are dynamically sufficient. However, it will be shown that examples like these cannot be fully analyzed by kin selection (inclusive fitness) methods because kin selection versions of group selection models are not dynamically sufficient. This is a critical mathematical difference between group selection and kin selection models, which implies that the two theories are not mathematically equivalent. Traditionally, the process of group selection has been described mathematically by discrete-time models, and analyzed using tools like the Price equation. This approach makes implicit assumptions about the process that are not valid in general, like the central role of synchronized mass-dispersion and group re-formation events. In many important examples (like hunter–gatherer tribes) there are no mass-dispersion events, and the group-level events that do occur, like fission, fusion, and extinction, occur asynchronously. Examples like these can be fully analyzed by the equations of two-level population dynamics (described here) so their models are dynamically sufficient. However, it will be shown that examples like these cannot be fully analyzed by kin selection (inclusive fitness) methods because kin selection versions of group selection models are not dynamically sufficient. This is a critical mathematical difference between group selection and kin selection models, which implies that the two theories are not mathematically equivalent. Mass-dispersion events Elsevier Asynchronous group-level events Elsevier KS=GS Elsevier Price equation Elsevier Enthalten in Elsevier Ltd Li, Yong ELSEVIER Dissolution versus cementation and its role in determining tight sandstone quality: A case study from the Upper Paleozoic in northeastern Ordos Basin, China 2020 Amsterdam (DE-627)ELV004081676 volume:349 year:2014 day:21 month:05 pages:22-31 extent:10 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtbi.2014.01.030 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA AR 349 2014 21 0521 22-31 10 045F 570 |
spelling |
10.1016/j.jtbi.2014.01.030 doi GBVA2014021000012.pica (DE-627)ELV028473205 (ELSEVIER)S0022-5193(14)00047-2 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 570 570 DE-600 660 VZ Simon, Burton verfasserin aut Continuous-time models of group selection, and the dynamical insufficiency of kin selection models 2014transfer abstract 10 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Traditionally, the process of group selection has been described mathematically by discrete-time models, and analyzed using tools like the Price equation. This approach makes implicit assumptions about the process that are not valid in general, like the central role of synchronized mass-dispersion and group re-formation events. In many important examples (like hunter–gatherer tribes) there are no mass-dispersion events, and the group-level events that do occur, like fission, fusion, and extinction, occur asynchronously. Examples like these can be fully analyzed by the equations of two-level population dynamics (described here) so their models are dynamically sufficient. However, it will be shown that examples like these cannot be fully analyzed by kin selection (inclusive fitness) methods because kin selection versions of group selection models are not dynamically sufficient. This is a critical mathematical difference between group selection and kin selection models, which implies that the two theories are not mathematically equivalent. Traditionally, the process of group selection has been described mathematically by discrete-time models, and analyzed using tools like the Price equation. This approach makes implicit assumptions about the process that are not valid in general, like the central role of synchronized mass-dispersion and group re-formation events. In many important examples (like hunter–gatherer tribes) there are no mass-dispersion events, and the group-level events that do occur, like fission, fusion, and extinction, occur asynchronously. Examples like these can be fully analyzed by the equations of two-level population dynamics (described here) so their models are dynamically sufficient. However, it will be shown that examples like these cannot be fully analyzed by kin selection (inclusive fitness) methods because kin selection versions of group selection models are not dynamically sufficient. This is a critical mathematical difference between group selection and kin selection models, which implies that the two theories are not mathematically equivalent. Mass-dispersion events Elsevier Asynchronous group-level events Elsevier KS=GS Elsevier Price equation Elsevier Enthalten in Elsevier Ltd Li, Yong ELSEVIER Dissolution versus cementation and its role in determining tight sandstone quality: A case study from the Upper Paleozoic in northeastern Ordos Basin, China 2020 Amsterdam (DE-627)ELV004081676 volume:349 year:2014 day:21 month:05 pages:22-31 extent:10 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtbi.2014.01.030 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA AR 349 2014 21 0521 22-31 10 045F 570 |
allfields_unstemmed |
10.1016/j.jtbi.2014.01.030 doi GBVA2014021000012.pica (DE-627)ELV028473205 (ELSEVIER)S0022-5193(14)00047-2 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 570 570 DE-600 660 VZ Simon, Burton verfasserin aut Continuous-time models of group selection, and the dynamical insufficiency of kin selection models 2014transfer abstract 10 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Traditionally, the process of group selection has been described mathematically by discrete-time models, and analyzed using tools like the Price equation. This approach makes implicit assumptions about the process that are not valid in general, like the central role of synchronized mass-dispersion and group re-formation events. In many important examples (like hunter–gatherer tribes) there are no mass-dispersion events, and the group-level events that do occur, like fission, fusion, and extinction, occur asynchronously. Examples like these can be fully analyzed by the equations of two-level population dynamics (described here) so their models are dynamically sufficient. However, it will be shown that examples like these cannot be fully analyzed by kin selection (inclusive fitness) methods because kin selection versions of group selection models are not dynamically sufficient. This is a critical mathematical difference between group selection and kin selection models, which implies that the two theories are not mathematically equivalent. Traditionally, the process of group selection has been described mathematically by discrete-time models, and analyzed using tools like the Price equation. This approach makes implicit assumptions about the process that are not valid in general, like the central role of synchronized mass-dispersion and group re-formation events. In many important examples (like hunter–gatherer tribes) there are no mass-dispersion events, and the group-level events that do occur, like fission, fusion, and extinction, occur asynchronously. Examples like these can be fully analyzed by the equations of two-level population dynamics (described here) so their models are dynamically sufficient. However, it will be shown that examples like these cannot be fully analyzed by kin selection (inclusive fitness) methods because kin selection versions of group selection models are not dynamically sufficient. This is a critical mathematical difference between group selection and kin selection models, which implies that the two theories are not mathematically equivalent. Mass-dispersion events Elsevier Asynchronous group-level events Elsevier KS=GS Elsevier Price equation Elsevier Enthalten in Elsevier Ltd Li, Yong ELSEVIER Dissolution versus cementation and its role in determining tight sandstone quality: A case study from the Upper Paleozoic in northeastern Ordos Basin, China 2020 Amsterdam (DE-627)ELV004081676 volume:349 year:2014 day:21 month:05 pages:22-31 extent:10 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtbi.2014.01.030 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA AR 349 2014 21 0521 22-31 10 045F 570 |
allfieldsGer |
10.1016/j.jtbi.2014.01.030 doi GBVA2014021000012.pica (DE-627)ELV028473205 (ELSEVIER)S0022-5193(14)00047-2 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 570 570 DE-600 660 VZ Simon, Burton verfasserin aut Continuous-time models of group selection, and the dynamical insufficiency of kin selection models 2014transfer abstract 10 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Traditionally, the process of group selection has been described mathematically by discrete-time models, and analyzed using tools like the Price equation. This approach makes implicit assumptions about the process that are not valid in general, like the central role of synchronized mass-dispersion and group re-formation events. In many important examples (like hunter–gatherer tribes) there are no mass-dispersion events, and the group-level events that do occur, like fission, fusion, and extinction, occur asynchronously. Examples like these can be fully analyzed by the equations of two-level population dynamics (described here) so their models are dynamically sufficient. However, it will be shown that examples like these cannot be fully analyzed by kin selection (inclusive fitness) methods because kin selection versions of group selection models are not dynamically sufficient. This is a critical mathematical difference between group selection and kin selection models, which implies that the two theories are not mathematically equivalent. Traditionally, the process of group selection has been described mathematically by discrete-time models, and analyzed using tools like the Price equation. This approach makes implicit assumptions about the process that are not valid in general, like the central role of synchronized mass-dispersion and group re-formation events. In many important examples (like hunter–gatherer tribes) there are no mass-dispersion events, and the group-level events that do occur, like fission, fusion, and extinction, occur asynchronously. Examples like these can be fully analyzed by the equations of two-level population dynamics (described here) so their models are dynamically sufficient. However, it will be shown that examples like these cannot be fully analyzed by kin selection (inclusive fitness) methods because kin selection versions of group selection models are not dynamically sufficient. This is a critical mathematical difference between group selection and kin selection models, which implies that the two theories are not mathematically equivalent. Mass-dispersion events Elsevier Asynchronous group-level events Elsevier KS=GS Elsevier Price equation Elsevier Enthalten in Elsevier Ltd Li, Yong ELSEVIER Dissolution versus cementation and its role in determining tight sandstone quality: A case study from the Upper Paleozoic in northeastern Ordos Basin, China 2020 Amsterdam (DE-627)ELV004081676 volume:349 year:2014 day:21 month:05 pages:22-31 extent:10 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtbi.2014.01.030 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA AR 349 2014 21 0521 22-31 10 045F 570 |
allfieldsSound |
10.1016/j.jtbi.2014.01.030 doi GBVA2014021000012.pica (DE-627)ELV028473205 (ELSEVIER)S0022-5193(14)00047-2 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 570 570 DE-600 660 VZ Simon, Burton verfasserin aut Continuous-time models of group selection, and the dynamical insufficiency of kin selection models 2014transfer abstract 10 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Traditionally, the process of group selection has been described mathematically by discrete-time models, and analyzed using tools like the Price equation. This approach makes implicit assumptions about the process that are not valid in general, like the central role of synchronized mass-dispersion and group re-formation events. In many important examples (like hunter–gatherer tribes) there are no mass-dispersion events, and the group-level events that do occur, like fission, fusion, and extinction, occur asynchronously. Examples like these can be fully analyzed by the equations of two-level population dynamics (described here) so their models are dynamically sufficient. However, it will be shown that examples like these cannot be fully analyzed by kin selection (inclusive fitness) methods because kin selection versions of group selection models are not dynamically sufficient. This is a critical mathematical difference between group selection and kin selection models, which implies that the two theories are not mathematically equivalent. Traditionally, the process of group selection has been described mathematically by discrete-time models, and analyzed using tools like the Price equation. This approach makes implicit assumptions about the process that are not valid in general, like the central role of synchronized mass-dispersion and group re-formation events. In many important examples (like hunter–gatherer tribes) there are no mass-dispersion events, and the group-level events that do occur, like fission, fusion, and extinction, occur asynchronously. Examples like these can be fully analyzed by the equations of two-level population dynamics (described here) so their models are dynamically sufficient. However, it will be shown that examples like these cannot be fully analyzed by kin selection (inclusive fitness) methods because kin selection versions of group selection models are not dynamically sufficient. This is a critical mathematical difference between group selection and kin selection models, which implies that the two theories are not mathematically equivalent. Mass-dispersion events Elsevier Asynchronous group-level events Elsevier KS=GS Elsevier Price equation Elsevier Enthalten in Elsevier Ltd Li, Yong ELSEVIER Dissolution versus cementation and its role in determining tight sandstone quality: A case study from the Upper Paleozoic in northeastern Ordos Basin, China 2020 Amsterdam (DE-627)ELV004081676 volume:349 year:2014 day:21 month:05 pages:22-31 extent:10 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtbi.2014.01.030 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA AR 349 2014 21 0521 22-31 10 045F 570 |
language |
English |
source |
Enthalten in Dissolution versus cementation and its role in determining tight sandstone quality: A case study from the Upper Paleozoic in northeastern Ordos Basin, China Amsterdam volume:349 year:2014 day:21 month:05 pages:22-31 extent:10 |
sourceStr |
Enthalten in Dissolution versus cementation and its role in determining tight sandstone quality: A case study from the Upper Paleozoic in northeastern Ordos Basin, China Amsterdam volume:349 year:2014 day:21 month:05 pages:22-31 extent:10 |
format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
institution |
findex.gbv.de |
topic_facet |
Mass-dispersion events Asynchronous group-level events KS=GS Price equation |
dewey-raw |
570 |
isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
container_title |
Dissolution versus cementation and its role in determining tight sandstone quality: A case study from the Upper Paleozoic in northeastern Ordos Basin, China |
authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Simon, Burton @@aut@@ |
publishDateDaySort_date |
2014-01-21T00:00:00Z |
hierarchy_top_id |
ELV004081676 |
dewey-sort |
3570 |
id |
ELV028473205 |
language_de |
englisch |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV028473205</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230625160253.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">180603s2014 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.jtbi.2014.01.030</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">GBVA2014021000012.pica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV028473205</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0022-5193(14)00047-2</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">570</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">570</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">660</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Simon, Burton</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Continuous-time models of group selection, and the dynamical insufficiency of kin selection models</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2014transfer abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Traditionally, the process of group selection has been described mathematically by discrete-time models, and analyzed using tools like the Price equation. This approach makes implicit assumptions about the process that are not valid in general, like the central role of synchronized mass-dispersion and group re-formation events. In many important examples (like hunter–gatherer tribes) there are no mass-dispersion events, and the group-level events that do occur, like fission, fusion, and extinction, occur asynchronously. Examples like these can be fully analyzed by the equations of two-level population dynamics (described here) so their models are dynamically sufficient. However, it will be shown that examples like these cannot be fully analyzed by kin selection (inclusive fitness) methods because kin selection versions of group selection models are not dynamically sufficient. This is a critical mathematical difference between group selection and kin selection models, which implies that the two theories are not mathematically equivalent.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Traditionally, the process of group selection has been described mathematically by discrete-time models, and analyzed using tools like the Price equation. This approach makes implicit assumptions about the process that are not valid in general, like the central role of synchronized mass-dispersion and group re-formation events. In many important examples (like hunter–gatherer tribes) there are no mass-dispersion events, and the group-level events that do occur, like fission, fusion, and extinction, occur asynchronously. Examples like these can be fully analyzed by the equations of two-level population dynamics (described here) so their models are dynamically sufficient. However, it will be shown that examples like these cannot be fully analyzed by kin selection (inclusive fitness) methods because kin selection versions of group selection models are not dynamically sufficient. This is a critical mathematical difference between group selection and kin selection models, which implies that the two theories are not mathematically equivalent.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Mass-dispersion events</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Asynchronous group-level events</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">KS=GS</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Price equation</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="n">Elsevier Ltd</subfield><subfield code="a">Li, Yong ELSEVIER</subfield><subfield code="t">Dissolution versus cementation and its role in determining tight sandstone quality: A case study from the Upper Paleozoic in northeastern Ordos Basin, China</subfield><subfield code="d">2020</subfield><subfield code="g">Amsterdam</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)ELV004081676</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:349</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2014</subfield><subfield code="g">day:21</subfield><subfield code="g">month:05</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:22-31</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:10</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtbi.2014.01.030</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">349</subfield><subfield code="j">2014</subfield><subfield code="b">21</subfield><subfield code="c">0521</subfield><subfield code="h">22-31</subfield><subfield code="g">10</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="953" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="2">045F</subfield><subfield code="a">570</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
author |
Simon, Burton |
spellingShingle |
Simon, Burton ddc 570 ddc 660 Elsevier Mass-dispersion events Elsevier Asynchronous group-level events Elsevier KS=GS Elsevier Price equation Continuous-time models of group selection, and the dynamical insufficiency of kin selection models |
authorStr |
Simon, Burton |
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)ELV004081676 |
format |
electronic Article |
dewey-ones |
570 - Life sciences; biology 660 - Chemical engineering |
delete_txt_mv |
keep |
author_role |
aut |
collection |
elsevier |
remote_str |
true |
illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
topic_title |
570 570 DE-600 660 VZ Continuous-time models of group selection, and the dynamical insufficiency of kin selection models Mass-dispersion events Elsevier Asynchronous group-level events Elsevier KS=GS Elsevier Price equation Elsevier |
topic |
ddc 570 ddc 660 Elsevier Mass-dispersion events Elsevier Asynchronous group-level events Elsevier KS=GS Elsevier Price equation |
topic_unstemmed |
ddc 570 ddc 660 Elsevier Mass-dispersion events Elsevier Asynchronous group-level events Elsevier KS=GS Elsevier Price equation |
topic_browse |
ddc 570 ddc 660 Elsevier Mass-dispersion events Elsevier Asynchronous group-level events Elsevier KS=GS Elsevier Price equation |
format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
carriertype_str_mv |
zu |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Dissolution versus cementation and its role in determining tight sandstone quality: A case study from the Upper Paleozoic in northeastern Ordos Basin, China |
hierarchy_parent_id |
ELV004081676 |
dewey-tens |
570 - Life sciences; biology 660 - Chemical engineering |
hierarchy_top_title |
Dissolution versus cementation and its role in determining tight sandstone quality: A case study from the Upper Paleozoic in northeastern Ordos Basin, China |
isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)ELV004081676 |
title |
Continuous-time models of group selection, and the dynamical insufficiency of kin selection models |
ctrlnum |
(DE-627)ELV028473205 (ELSEVIER)S0022-5193(14)00047-2 |
title_full |
Continuous-time models of group selection, and the dynamical insufficiency of kin selection models |
author_sort |
Simon, Burton |
journal |
Dissolution versus cementation and its role in determining tight sandstone quality: A case study from the Upper Paleozoic in northeastern Ordos Basin, China |
journalStr |
Dissolution versus cementation and its role in determining tight sandstone quality: A case study from the Upper Paleozoic in northeastern Ordos Basin, China |
lang_code |
eng |
isOA_bool |
false |
dewey-hundreds |
500 - Science 600 - Technology |
recordtype |
marc |
publishDateSort |
2014 |
contenttype_str_mv |
zzz |
container_start_page |
22 |
author_browse |
Simon, Burton |
container_volume |
349 |
physical |
10 |
class |
570 570 DE-600 660 VZ |
format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
author-letter |
Simon, Burton |
doi_str_mv |
10.1016/j.jtbi.2014.01.030 |
dewey-full |
570 660 |
title_sort |
continuous-time models of group selection, and the dynamical insufficiency of kin selection models |
title_auth |
Continuous-time models of group selection, and the dynamical insufficiency of kin selection models |
abstract |
Traditionally, the process of group selection has been described mathematically by discrete-time models, and analyzed using tools like the Price equation. This approach makes implicit assumptions about the process that are not valid in general, like the central role of synchronized mass-dispersion and group re-formation events. In many important examples (like hunter–gatherer tribes) there are no mass-dispersion events, and the group-level events that do occur, like fission, fusion, and extinction, occur asynchronously. Examples like these can be fully analyzed by the equations of two-level population dynamics (described here) so their models are dynamically sufficient. However, it will be shown that examples like these cannot be fully analyzed by kin selection (inclusive fitness) methods because kin selection versions of group selection models are not dynamically sufficient. This is a critical mathematical difference between group selection and kin selection models, which implies that the two theories are not mathematically equivalent. |
abstractGer |
Traditionally, the process of group selection has been described mathematically by discrete-time models, and analyzed using tools like the Price equation. This approach makes implicit assumptions about the process that are not valid in general, like the central role of synchronized mass-dispersion and group re-formation events. In many important examples (like hunter–gatherer tribes) there are no mass-dispersion events, and the group-level events that do occur, like fission, fusion, and extinction, occur asynchronously. Examples like these can be fully analyzed by the equations of two-level population dynamics (described here) so their models are dynamically sufficient. However, it will be shown that examples like these cannot be fully analyzed by kin selection (inclusive fitness) methods because kin selection versions of group selection models are not dynamically sufficient. This is a critical mathematical difference between group selection and kin selection models, which implies that the two theories are not mathematically equivalent. |
abstract_unstemmed |
Traditionally, the process of group selection has been described mathematically by discrete-time models, and analyzed using tools like the Price equation. This approach makes implicit assumptions about the process that are not valid in general, like the central role of synchronized mass-dispersion and group re-formation events. In many important examples (like hunter–gatherer tribes) there are no mass-dispersion events, and the group-level events that do occur, like fission, fusion, and extinction, occur asynchronously. Examples like these can be fully analyzed by the equations of two-level population dynamics (described here) so their models are dynamically sufficient. However, it will be shown that examples like these cannot be fully analyzed by kin selection (inclusive fitness) methods because kin selection versions of group selection models are not dynamically sufficient. This is a critical mathematical difference between group selection and kin selection models, which implies that the two theories are not mathematically equivalent. |
collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA |
title_short |
Continuous-time models of group selection, and the dynamical insufficiency of kin selection models |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtbi.2014.01.030 |
remote_bool |
true |
ppnlink |
ELV004081676 |
mediatype_str_mv |
z |
isOA_txt |
false |
hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
doi_str |
10.1016/j.jtbi.2014.01.030 |
up_date |
2024-07-06T18:54:42.391Z |
_version_ |
1803856990585225216 |
fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV028473205</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230625160253.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">180603s2014 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.jtbi.2014.01.030</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">GBVA2014021000012.pica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV028473205</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0022-5193(14)00047-2</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">570</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">570</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">660</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Simon, Burton</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Continuous-time models of group selection, and the dynamical insufficiency of kin selection models</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2014transfer abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Traditionally, the process of group selection has been described mathematically by discrete-time models, and analyzed using tools like the Price equation. This approach makes implicit assumptions about the process that are not valid in general, like the central role of synchronized mass-dispersion and group re-formation events. In many important examples (like hunter–gatherer tribes) there are no mass-dispersion events, and the group-level events that do occur, like fission, fusion, and extinction, occur asynchronously. Examples like these can be fully analyzed by the equations of two-level population dynamics (described here) so their models are dynamically sufficient. However, it will be shown that examples like these cannot be fully analyzed by kin selection (inclusive fitness) methods because kin selection versions of group selection models are not dynamically sufficient. This is a critical mathematical difference between group selection and kin selection models, which implies that the two theories are not mathematically equivalent.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Traditionally, the process of group selection has been described mathematically by discrete-time models, and analyzed using tools like the Price equation. This approach makes implicit assumptions about the process that are not valid in general, like the central role of synchronized mass-dispersion and group re-formation events. In many important examples (like hunter–gatherer tribes) there are no mass-dispersion events, and the group-level events that do occur, like fission, fusion, and extinction, occur asynchronously. Examples like these can be fully analyzed by the equations of two-level population dynamics (described here) so their models are dynamically sufficient. However, it will be shown that examples like these cannot be fully analyzed by kin selection (inclusive fitness) methods because kin selection versions of group selection models are not dynamically sufficient. This is a critical mathematical difference between group selection and kin selection models, which implies that the two theories are not mathematically equivalent.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Mass-dispersion events</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Asynchronous group-level events</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">KS=GS</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Price equation</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="n">Elsevier Ltd</subfield><subfield code="a">Li, Yong ELSEVIER</subfield><subfield code="t">Dissolution versus cementation and its role in determining tight sandstone quality: A case study from the Upper Paleozoic in northeastern Ordos Basin, China</subfield><subfield code="d">2020</subfield><subfield code="g">Amsterdam</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)ELV004081676</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:349</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2014</subfield><subfield code="g">day:21</subfield><subfield code="g">month:05</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:22-31</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:10</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtbi.2014.01.030</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">349</subfield><subfield code="j">2014</subfield><subfield code="b">21</subfield><subfield code="c">0521</subfield><subfield code="h">22-31</subfield><subfield code="g">10</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="953" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="2">045F</subfield><subfield code="a">570</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
score |
7.3996124 |