Commentary: Tempo of evolutionary change in ecological systems
As ecology and evolutionary biology developed during the 20th century one thing that frustrated an integration of research programs in these areas was the assumption that ecological and evolutionary processes operated on very different time scales. In 1961 the ecologist Lawrence Slobodkin reflected...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Collins, James P. [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2015transfer abstract |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Umfang: |
3 |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Environmentally friendly microwave ionic liquids synthesis of hybrids from cellulose and AgX (X=Cl, Br) - Dong, Yan-Yan ELSEVIER, 2013, Amsterdam [u.a.] |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:50 ; year:2015 ; pages:80-82 ; extent:3 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1016/j.shpsc.2015.01.007 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
ELV028656253 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ELV028656253 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230625161857.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 180603s2015 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.shpsc.2015.01.007 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a GBVA2015002000029.pica |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)ELV028656253 | ||
| 035 | |a (ELSEVIER)S1369-8486(15)00009-6 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 082 | 0 | |a 100 |a 900 | |
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 100 |q DE-600 |
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 900 |q DE-600 |
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 540 |q VZ |
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 660 |q VZ |
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 540 |q VZ |
| 084 | |a BIODIV |q DE-30 |2 fid | ||
| 084 | |a 42.13 |2 bkl | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Collins, James P. |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Commentary: Tempo of evolutionary change in ecological systems |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2015transfer abstract | |
| 300 | |a 3 | ||
| 336 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zzz |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b z |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zu |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a As ecology and evolutionary biology developed during the 20th century one thing that frustrated an integration of research programs in these areas was the assumption that ecological and evolutionary processes operated on very different time scales. In 1961 the ecologist Lawrence Slobodkin reflected this assumption in his distinction between “evolutionary time” and “ecological time.” This commentary reflects on the four papers in this Special Section that advance our understanding of the history of research at the intersection of phenotypes, genotypes, ecology, and evolution using plants as study organisms. Early in the 20th century at least some researchers, especially in agricultural systems, were already using observations and experiments to show how natural selection could operate over relatively short time periods and small spatial scales. These four studies offer a more nuanced view of the history of our understanding of the rate of phenotypic change via natural selection and the use of experiments to study evolutionary change. They illuminate the route that has led to the current presumption that in many cases ecological and evolutionary processes may indeed operate on similar, not dissimilar, time scales. | ||
| 520 | |a As ecology and evolutionary biology developed during the 20th century one thing that frustrated an integration of research programs in these areas was the assumption that ecological and evolutionary processes operated on very different time scales. In 1961 the ecologist Lawrence Slobodkin reflected this assumption in his distinction between “evolutionary time” and “ecological time.” This commentary reflects on the four papers in this Special Section that advance our understanding of the history of research at the intersection of phenotypes, genotypes, ecology, and evolution using plants as study organisms. Early in the 20th century at least some researchers, especially in agricultural systems, were already using observations and experiments to show how natural selection could operate over relatively short time periods and small spatial scales. These four studies offer a more nuanced view of the history of our understanding of the rate of phenotypic change via natural selection and the use of experiments to study evolutionary change. They illuminate the route that has led to the current presumption that in many cases ecological and evolutionary processes may indeed operate on similar, not dissimilar, time scales. | ||
| 650 | 7 | |a Evolutionary ecology |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Ecological and evolutionary time |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Ecology and evolution |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a History |2 Elsevier | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |n Elsevier Science |a Dong, Yan-Yan ELSEVIER |t Environmentally friendly microwave ionic liquids synthesis of hybrids from cellulose and AgX (X=Cl, Br) |d 2013 |g Amsterdam [u.a.] |w (DE-627)ELV016617487 |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:50 |g year:2015 |g pages:80-82 |g extent:3 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsc.2015.01.007 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_U | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ELV | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_U | ||
| 912 | |a FID-BIODIV | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-PHA | ||
| 936 | b | k | |a 42.13 |j Molekularbiologie |q VZ |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 50 |j 2015 |h 80-82 |g 3 | ||
| 953 | |2 045F |a 100 | ||
| author_variant |
j p c jp jpc |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
collinsjamesp:2015----:omnayepoeouinrcagie |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2015transfer abstract |
| bklnumber |
42.13 |
| publishDate |
2015 |
| allfields |
10.1016/j.shpsc.2015.01.007 doi GBVA2015002000029.pica (DE-627)ELV028656253 (ELSEVIER)S1369-8486(15)00009-6 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 100 900 100 DE-600 900 DE-600 540 VZ 660 VZ 540 VZ BIODIV DE-30 fid 42.13 bkl Collins, James P. verfasserin aut Commentary: Tempo of evolutionary change in ecological systems 2015transfer abstract 3 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier As ecology and evolutionary biology developed during the 20th century one thing that frustrated an integration of research programs in these areas was the assumption that ecological and evolutionary processes operated on very different time scales. In 1961 the ecologist Lawrence Slobodkin reflected this assumption in his distinction between “evolutionary time” and “ecological time.” This commentary reflects on the four papers in this Special Section that advance our understanding of the history of research at the intersection of phenotypes, genotypes, ecology, and evolution using plants as study organisms. Early in the 20th century at least some researchers, especially in agricultural systems, were already using observations and experiments to show how natural selection could operate over relatively short time periods and small spatial scales. These four studies offer a more nuanced view of the history of our understanding of the rate of phenotypic change via natural selection and the use of experiments to study evolutionary change. They illuminate the route that has led to the current presumption that in many cases ecological and evolutionary processes may indeed operate on similar, not dissimilar, time scales. As ecology and evolutionary biology developed during the 20th century one thing that frustrated an integration of research programs in these areas was the assumption that ecological and evolutionary processes operated on very different time scales. In 1961 the ecologist Lawrence Slobodkin reflected this assumption in his distinction between “evolutionary time” and “ecological time.” This commentary reflects on the four papers in this Special Section that advance our understanding of the history of research at the intersection of phenotypes, genotypes, ecology, and evolution using plants as study organisms. Early in the 20th century at least some researchers, especially in agricultural systems, were already using observations and experiments to show how natural selection could operate over relatively short time periods and small spatial scales. These four studies offer a more nuanced view of the history of our understanding of the rate of phenotypic change via natural selection and the use of experiments to study evolutionary change. They illuminate the route that has led to the current presumption that in many cases ecological and evolutionary processes may indeed operate on similar, not dissimilar, time scales. Evolutionary ecology Elsevier Ecological and evolutionary time Elsevier Ecology and evolution Elsevier History Elsevier Enthalten in Elsevier Science Dong, Yan-Yan ELSEVIER Environmentally friendly microwave ionic liquids synthesis of hybrids from cellulose and AgX (X=Cl, Br) 2013 Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV016617487 volume:50 year:2015 pages:80-82 extent:3 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsc.2015.01.007 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U FID-BIODIV SSG-OLC-PHA 42.13 Molekularbiologie VZ AR 50 2015 80-82 3 045F 100 |
| spelling |
10.1016/j.shpsc.2015.01.007 doi GBVA2015002000029.pica (DE-627)ELV028656253 (ELSEVIER)S1369-8486(15)00009-6 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 100 900 100 DE-600 900 DE-600 540 VZ 660 VZ 540 VZ BIODIV DE-30 fid 42.13 bkl Collins, James P. verfasserin aut Commentary: Tempo of evolutionary change in ecological systems 2015transfer abstract 3 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier As ecology and evolutionary biology developed during the 20th century one thing that frustrated an integration of research programs in these areas was the assumption that ecological and evolutionary processes operated on very different time scales. In 1961 the ecologist Lawrence Slobodkin reflected this assumption in his distinction between “evolutionary time” and “ecological time.” This commentary reflects on the four papers in this Special Section that advance our understanding of the history of research at the intersection of phenotypes, genotypes, ecology, and evolution using plants as study organisms. Early in the 20th century at least some researchers, especially in agricultural systems, were already using observations and experiments to show how natural selection could operate over relatively short time periods and small spatial scales. These four studies offer a more nuanced view of the history of our understanding of the rate of phenotypic change via natural selection and the use of experiments to study evolutionary change. They illuminate the route that has led to the current presumption that in many cases ecological and evolutionary processes may indeed operate on similar, not dissimilar, time scales. As ecology and evolutionary biology developed during the 20th century one thing that frustrated an integration of research programs in these areas was the assumption that ecological and evolutionary processes operated on very different time scales. In 1961 the ecologist Lawrence Slobodkin reflected this assumption in his distinction between “evolutionary time” and “ecological time.” This commentary reflects on the four papers in this Special Section that advance our understanding of the history of research at the intersection of phenotypes, genotypes, ecology, and evolution using plants as study organisms. Early in the 20th century at least some researchers, especially in agricultural systems, were already using observations and experiments to show how natural selection could operate over relatively short time periods and small spatial scales. These four studies offer a more nuanced view of the history of our understanding of the rate of phenotypic change via natural selection and the use of experiments to study evolutionary change. They illuminate the route that has led to the current presumption that in many cases ecological and evolutionary processes may indeed operate on similar, not dissimilar, time scales. Evolutionary ecology Elsevier Ecological and evolutionary time Elsevier Ecology and evolution Elsevier History Elsevier Enthalten in Elsevier Science Dong, Yan-Yan ELSEVIER Environmentally friendly microwave ionic liquids synthesis of hybrids from cellulose and AgX (X=Cl, Br) 2013 Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV016617487 volume:50 year:2015 pages:80-82 extent:3 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsc.2015.01.007 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U FID-BIODIV SSG-OLC-PHA 42.13 Molekularbiologie VZ AR 50 2015 80-82 3 045F 100 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1016/j.shpsc.2015.01.007 doi GBVA2015002000029.pica (DE-627)ELV028656253 (ELSEVIER)S1369-8486(15)00009-6 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 100 900 100 DE-600 900 DE-600 540 VZ 660 VZ 540 VZ BIODIV DE-30 fid 42.13 bkl Collins, James P. verfasserin aut Commentary: Tempo of evolutionary change in ecological systems 2015transfer abstract 3 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier As ecology and evolutionary biology developed during the 20th century one thing that frustrated an integration of research programs in these areas was the assumption that ecological and evolutionary processes operated on very different time scales. In 1961 the ecologist Lawrence Slobodkin reflected this assumption in his distinction between “evolutionary time” and “ecological time.” This commentary reflects on the four papers in this Special Section that advance our understanding of the history of research at the intersection of phenotypes, genotypes, ecology, and evolution using plants as study organisms. Early in the 20th century at least some researchers, especially in agricultural systems, were already using observations and experiments to show how natural selection could operate over relatively short time periods and small spatial scales. These four studies offer a more nuanced view of the history of our understanding of the rate of phenotypic change via natural selection and the use of experiments to study evolutionary change. They illuminate the route that has led to the current presumption that in many cases ecological and evolutionary processes may indeed operate on similar, not dissimilar, time scales. As ecology and evolutionary biology developed during the 20th century one thing that frustrated an integration of research programs in these areas was the assumption that ecological and evolutionary processes operated on very different time scales. In 1961 the ecologist Lawrence Slobodkin reflected this assumption in his distinction between “evolutionary time” and “ecological time.” This commentary reflects on the four papers in this Special Section that advance our understanding of the history of research at the intersection of phenotypes, genotypes, ecology, and evolution using plants as study organisms. Early in the 20th century at least some researchers, especially in agricultural systems, were already using observations and experiments to show how natural selection could operate over relatively short time periods and small spatial scales. These four studies offer a more nuanced view of the history of our understanding of the rate of phenotypic change via natural selection and the use of experiments to study evolutionary change. They illuminate the route that has led to the current presumption that in many cases ecological and evolutionary processes may indeed operate on similar, not dissimilar, time scales. Evolutionary ecology Elsevier Ecological and evolutionary time Elsevier Ecology and evolution Elsevier History Elsevier Enthalten in Elsevier Science Dong, Yan-Yan ELSEVIER Environmentally friendly microwave ionic liquids synthesis of hybrids from cellulose and AgX (X=Cl, Br) 2013 Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV016617487 volume:50 year:2015 pages:80-82 extent:3 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsc.2015.01.007 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U FID-BIODIV SSG-OLC-PHA 42.13 Molekularbiologie VZ AR 50 2015 80-82 3 045F 100 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1016/j.shpsc.2015.01.007 doi GBVA2015002000029.pica (DE-627)ELV028656253 (ELSEVIER)S1369-8486(15)00009-6 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 100 900 100 DE-600 900 DE-600 540 VZ 660 VZ 540 VZ BIODIV DE-30 fid 42.13 bkl Collins, James P. verfasserin aut Commentary: Tempo of evolutionary change in ecological systems 2015transfer abstract 3 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier As ecology and evolutionary biology developed during the 20th century one thing that frustrated an integration of research programs in these areas was the assumption that ecological and evolutionary processes operated on very different time scales. In 1961 the ecologist Lawrence Slobodkin reflected this assumption in his distinction between “evolutionary time” and “ecological time.” This commentary reflects on the four papers in this Special Section that advance our understanding of the history of research at the intersection of phenotypes, genotypes, ecology, and evolution using plants as study organisms. Early in the 20th century at least some researchers, especially in agricultural systems, were already using observations and experiments to show how natural selection could operate over relatively short time periods and small spatial scales. These four studies offer a more nuanced view of the history of our understanding of the rate of phenotypic change via natural selection and the use of experiments to study evolutionary change. They illuminate the route that has led to the current presumption that in many cases ecological and evolutionary processes may indeed operate on similar, not dissimilar, time scales. As ecology and evolutionary biology developed during the 20th century one thing that frustrated an integration of research programs in these areas was the assumption that ecological and evolutionary processes operated on very different time scales. In 1961 the ecologist Lawrence Slobodkin reflected this assumption in his distinction between “evolutionary time” and “ecological time.” This commentary reflects on the four papers in this Special Section that advance our understanding of the history of research at the intersection of phenotypes, genotypes, ecology, and evolution using plants as study organisms. Early in the 20th century at least some researchers, especially in agricultural systems, were already using observations and experiments to show how natural selection could operate over relatively short time periods and small spatial scales. These four studies offer a more nuanced view of the history of our understanding of the rate of phenotypic change via natural selection and the use of experiments to study evolutionary change. They illuminate the route that has led to the current presumption that in many cases ecological and evolutionary processes may indeed operate on similar, not dissimilar, time scales. Evolutionary ecology Elsevier Ecological and evolutionary time Elsevier Ecology and evolution Elsevier History Elsevier Enthalten in Elsevier Science Dong, Yan-Yan ELSEVIER Environmentally friendly microwave ionic liquids synthesis of hybrids from cellulose and AgX (X=Cl, Br) 2013 Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV016617487 volume:50 year:2015 pages:80-82 extent:3 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsc.2015.01.007 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U FID-BIODIV SSG-OLC-PHA 42.13 Molekularbiologie VZ AR 50 2015 80-82 3 045F 100 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1016/j.shpsc.2015.01.007 doi GBVA2015002000029.pica (DE-627)ELV028656253 (ELSEVIER)S1369-8486(15)00009-6 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 100 900 100 DE-600 900 DE-600 540 VZ 660 VZ 540 VZ BIODIV DE-30 fid 42.13 bkl Collins, James P. verfasserin aut Commentary: Tempo of evolutionary change in ecological systems 2015transfer abstract 3 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier As ecology and evolutionary biology developed during the 20th century one thing that frustrated an integration of research programs in these areas was the assumption that ecological and evolutionary processes operated on very different time scales. In 1961 the ecologist Lawrence Slobodkin reflected this assumption in his distinction between “evolutionary time” and “ecological time.” This commentary reflects on the four papers in this Special Section that advance our understanding of the history of research at the intersection of phenotypes, genotypes, ecology, and evolution using plants as study organisms. Early in the 20th century at least some researchers, especially in agricultural systems, were already using observations and experiments to show how natural selection could operate over relatively short time periods and small spatial scales. These four studies offer a more nuanced view of the history of our understanding of the rate of phenotypic change via natural selection and the use of experiments to study evolutionary change. They illuminate the route that has led to the current presumption that in many cases ecological and evolutionary processes may indeed operate on similar, not dissimilar, time scales. As ecology and evolutionary biology developed during the 20th century one thing that frustrated an integration of research programs in these areas was the assumption that ecological and evolutionary processes operated on very different time scales. In 1961 the ecologist Lawrence Slobodkin reflected this assumption in his distinction between “evolutionary time” and “ecological time.” This commentary reflects on the four papers in this Special Section that advance our understanding of the history of research at the intersection of phenotypes, genotypes, ecology, and evolution using plants as study organisms. Early in the 20th century at least some researchers, especially in agricultural systems, were already using observations and experiments to show how natural selection could operate over relatively short time periods and small spatial scales. These four studies offer a more nuanced view of the history of our understanding of the rate of phenotypic change via natural selection and the use of experiments to study evolutionary change. They illuminate the route that has led to the current presumption that in many cases ecological and evolutionary processes may indeed operate on similar, not dissimilar, time scales. Evolutionary ecology Elsevier Ecological and evolutionary time Elsevier Ecology and evolution Elsevier History Elsevier Enthalten in Elsevier Science Dong, Yan-Yan ELSEVIER Environmentally friendly microwave ionic liquids synthesis of hybrids from cellulose and AgX (X=Cl, Br) 2013 Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV016617487 volume:50 year:2015 pages:80-82 extent:3 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsc.2015.01.007 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U FID-BIODIV SSG-OLC-PHA 42.13 Molekularbiologie VZ AR 50 2015 80-82 3 045F 100 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in Environmentally friendly microwave ionic liquids synthesis of hybrids from cellulose and AgX (X=Cl, Br) Amsterdam [u.a.] volume:50 year:2015 pages:80-82 extent:3 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in Environmentally friendly microwave ionic liquids synthesis of hybrids from cellulose and AgX (X=Cl, Br) Amsterdam [u.a.] volume:50 year:2015 pages:80-82 extent:3 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| bklname |
Molekularbiologie |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
Evolutionary ecology Ecological and evolutionary time Ecology and evolution History |
| dewey-raw |
100 |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
Environmentally friendly microwave ionic liquids synthesis of hybrids from cellulose and AgX (X=Cl, Br) |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Collins, James P. @@aut@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2015-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
ELV016617487 |
| dewey-sort |
3100 |
| id |
ELV028656253 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV028656253</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230625161857.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">180603s2015 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.shpsc.2015.01.007</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">GBVA2015002000029.pica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV028656253</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S1369-8486(15)00009-6</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">100</subfield><subfield code="a">900</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">100</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">900</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">540</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">660</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">540</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">BIODIV</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-30</subfield><subfield code="2">fid</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">42.13</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Collins, James P.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Commentary: Tempo of evolutionary change in ecological systems</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2015transfer abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">3</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">As ecology and evolutionary biology developed during the 20th century one thing that frustrated an integration of research programs in these areas was the assumption that ecological and evolutionary processes operated on very different time scales. In 1961 the ecologist Lawrence Slobodkin reflected this assumption in his distinction between “evolutionary time” and “ecological time.” This commentary reflects on the four papers in this Special Section that advance our understanding of the history of research at the intersection of phenotypes, genotypes, ecology, and evolution using plants as study organisms. Early in the 20th century at least some researchers, especially in agricultural systems, were already using observations and experiments to show how natural selection could operate over relatively short time periods and small spatial scales. These four studies offer a more nuanced view of the history of our understanding of the rate of phenotypic change via natural selection and the use of experiments to study evolutionary change. They illuminate the route that has led to the current presumption that in many cases ecological and evolutionary processes may indeed operate on similar, not dissimilar, time scales.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">As ecology and evolutionary biology developed during the 20th century one thing that frustrated an integration of research programs in these areas was the assumption that ecological and evolutionary processes operated on very different time scales. In 1961 the ecologist Lawrence Slobodkin reflected this assumption in his distinction between “evolutionary time” and “ecological time.” This commentary reflects on the four papers in this Special Section that advance our understanding of the history of research at the intersection of phenotypes, genotypes, ecology, and evolution using plants as study organisms. Early in the 20th century at least some researchers, especially in agricultural systems, were already using observations and experiments to show how natural selection could operate over relatively short time periods and small spatial scales. These four studies offer a more nuanced view of the history of our understanding of the rate of phenotypic change via natural selection and the use of experiments to study evolutionary change. They illuminate the route that has led to the current presumption that in many cases ecological and evolutionary processes may indeed operate on similar, not dissimilar, time scales.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Evolutionary ecology</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Ecological and evolutionary time</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Ecology and evolution</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">History</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="n">Elsevier Science</subfield><subfield code="a">Dong, Yan-Yan ELSEVIER</subfield><subfield code="t">Environmentally friendly microwave ionic liquids synthesis of hybrids from cellulose and AgX (X=Cl, Br)</subfield><subfield code="d">2013</subfield><subfield code="g">Amsterdam [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)ELV016617487</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:50</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2015</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:80-82</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:3</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsc.2015.01.007</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">FID-BIODIV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">42.13</subfield><subfield code="j">Molekularbiologie</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">50</subfield><subfield code="j">2015</subfield><subfield code="h">80-82</subfield><subfield code="g">3</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="953" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="2">045F</subfield><subfield code="a">100</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Collins, James P. |
| spellingShingle |
Collins, James P. ddc 100 ddc 900 ddc 540 ddc 660 fid BIODIV bkl 42.13 Elsevier Evolutionary ecology Elsevier Ecological and evolutionary time Elsevier Ecology and evolution Elsevier History Commentary: Tempo of evolutionary change in ecological systems |
| authorStr |
Collins, James P. |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)ELV016617487 |
| format |
electronic Article |
| dewey-ones |
100 - Philosophy & psychology 900 - History & geography 540 - Chemistry & allied sciences 660 - Chemical engineering |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut |
| collection |
elsevier |
| remote_str |
true |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| topic_title |
100 900 100 DE-600 900 DE-600 540 VZ 660 VZ BIODIV DE-30 fid 42.13 bkl Commentary: Tempo of evolutionary change in ecological systems Evolutionary ecology Elsevier Ecological and evolutionary time Elsevier Ecology and evolution Elsevier History Elsevier |
| topic |
ddc 100 ddc 900 ddc 540 ddc 660 fid BIODIV bkl 42.13 Elsevier Evolutionary ecology Elsevier Ecological and evolutionary time Elsevier Ecology and evolution Elsevier History |
| topic_unstemmed |
ddc 100 ddc 900 ddc 540 ddc 660 fid BIODIV bkl 42.13 Elsevier Evolutionary ecology Elsevier Ecological and evolutionary time Elsevier Ecology and evolution Elsevier History |
| topic_browse |
ddc 100 ddc 900 ddc 540 ddc 660 fid BIODIV bkl 42.13 Elsevier Evolutionary ecology Elsevier Ecological and evolutionary time Elsevier Ecology and evolution Elsevier History |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
zu |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Environmentally friendly microwave ionic liquids synthesis of hybrids from cellulose and AgX (X=Cl, Br) |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
ELV016617487 |
| dewey-tens |
100 - Philosophy 900 - History 540 - Chemistry 660 - Chemical engineering |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Environmentally friendly microwave ionic liquids synthesis of hybrids from cellulose and AgX (X=Cl, Br) |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)ELV016617487 |
| title |
Commentary: Tempo of evolutionary change in ecological systems |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)ELV028656253 (ELSEVIER)S1369-8486(15)00009-6 |
| title_full |
Commentary: Tempo of evolutionary change in ecological systems |
| author_sort |
Collins, James P. |
| journal |
Environmentally friendly microwave ionic liquids synthesis of hybrids from cellulose and AgX (X=Cl, Br) |
| journalStr |
Environmentally friendly microwave ionic liquids synthesis of hybrids from cellulose and AgX (X=Cl, Br) |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| dewey-hundreds |
100 - Philosophy & psychology 900 - History & geography 500 - Science 600 - Technology |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2015 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
zzz |
| container_start_page |
80 |
| author_browse |
Collins, James P. |
| container_volume |
50 |
| physical |
3 |
| class |
100 900 100 DE-600 900 DE-600 540 VZ 660 VZ BIODIV DE-30 fid 42.13 bkl |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Collins, James P. |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1016/j.shpsc.2015.01.007 |
| dewey-full |
100 900 540 660 |
| title_sort |
commentary: tempo of evolutionary change in ecological systems |
| title_auth |
Commentary: Tempo of evolutionary change in ecological systems |
| abstract |
As ecology and evolutionary biology developed during the 20th century one thing that frustrated an integration of research programs in these areas was the assumption that ecological and evolutionary processes operated on very different time scales. In 1961 the ecologist Lawrence Slobodkin reflected this assumption in his distinction between “evolutionary time” and “ecological time.” This commentary reflects on the four papers in this Special Section that advance our understanding of the history of research at the intersection of phenotypes, genotypes, ecology, and evolution using plants as study organisms. Early in the 20th century at least some researchers, especially in agricultural systems, were already using observations and experiments to show how natural selection could operate over relatively short time periods and small spatial scales. These four studies offer a more nuanced view of the history of our understanding of the rate of phenotypic change via natural selection and the use of experiments to study evolutionary change. They illuminate the route that has led to the current presumption that in many cases ecological and evolutionary processes may indeed operate on similar, not dissimilar, time scales. |
| abstractGer |
As ecology and evolutionary biology developed during the 20th century one thing that frustrated an integration of research programs in these areas was the assumption that ecological and evolutionary processes operated on very different time scales. In 1961 the ecologist Lawrence Slobodkin reflected this assumption in his distinction between “evolutionary time” and “ecological time.” This commentary reflects on the four papers in this Special Section that advance our understanding of the history of research at the intersection of phenotypes, genotypes, ecology, and evolution using plants as study organisms. Early in the 20th century at least some researchers, especially in agricultural systems, were already using observations and experiments to show how natural selection could operate over relatively short time periods and small spatial scales. These four studies offer a more nuanced view of the history of our understanding of the rate of phenotypic change via natural selection and the use of experiments to study evolutionary change. They illuminate the route that has led to the current presumption that in many cases ecological and evolutionary processes may indeed operate on similar, not dissimilar, time scales. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
As ecology and evolutionary biology developed during the 20th century one thing that frustrated an integration of research programs in these areas was the assumption that ecological and evolutionary processes operated on very different time scales. In 1961 the ecologist Lawrence Slobodkin reflected this assumption in his distinction between “evolutionary time” and “ecological time.” This commentary reflects on the four papers in this Special Section that advance our understanding of the history of research at the intersection of phenotypes, genotypes, ecology, and evolution using plants as study organisms. Early in the 20th century at least some researchers, especially in agricultural systems, were already using observations and experiments to show how natural selection could operate over relatively short time periods and small spatial scales. These four studies offer a more nuanced view of the history of our understanding of the rate of phenotypic change via natural selection and the use of experiments to study evolutionary change. They illuminate the route that has led to the current presumption that in many cases ecological and evolutionary processes may indeed operate on similar, not dissimilar, time scales. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U FID-BIODIV SSG-OLC-PHA |
| title_short |
Commentary: Tempo of evolutionary change in ecological systems |
| url |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsc.2015.01.007 |
| remote_bool |
true |
| ppnlink |
ELV016617487 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
z |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| doi_str |
10.1016/j.shpsc.2015.01.007 |
| up_date |
2024-07-06T19:23:02.791Z |
| _version_ |
1803858773584904193 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV028656253</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230625161857.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">180603s2015 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.shpsc.2015.01.007</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">GBVA2015002000029.pica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV028656253</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S1369-8486(15)00009-6</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">100</subfield><subfield code="a">900</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">100</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">900</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">540</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">660</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">540</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">BIODIV</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-30</subfield><subfield code="2">fid</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">42.13</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Collins, James P.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Commentary: Tempo of evolutionary change in ecological systems</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2015transfer abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">3</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">As ecology and evolutionary biology developed during the 20th century one thing that frustrated an integration of research programs in these areas was the assumption that ecological and evolutionary processes operated on very different time scales. In 1961 the ecologist Lawrence Slobodkin reflected this assumption in his distinction between “evolutionary time” and “ecological time.” This commentary reflects on the four papers in this Special Section that advance our understanding of the history of research at the intersection of phenotypes, genotypes, ecology, and evolution using plants as study organisms. Early in the 20th century at least some researchers, especially in agricultural systems, were already using observations and experiments to show how natural selection could operate over relatively short time periods and small spatial scales. These four studies offer a more nuanced view of the history of our understanding of the rate of phenotypic change via natural selection and the use of experiments to study evolutionary change. They illuminate the route that has led to the current presumption that in many cases ecological and evolutionary processes may indeed operate on similar, not dissimilar, time scales.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">As ecology and evolutionary biology developed during the 20th century one thing that frustrated an integration of research programs in these areas was the assumption that ecological and evolutionary processes operated on very different time scales. In 1961 the ecologist Lawrence Slobodkin reflected this assumption in his distinction between “evolutionary time” and “ecological time.” This commentary reflects on the four papers in this Special Section that advance our understanding of the history of research at the intersection of phenotypes, genotypes, ecology, and evolution using plants as study organisms. Early in the 20th century at least some researchers, especially in agricultural systems, were already using observations and experiments to show how natural selection could operate over relatively short time periods and small spatial scales. These four studies offer a more nuanced view of the history of our understanding of the rate of phenotypic change via natural selection and the use of experiments to study evolutionary change. They illuminate the route that has led to the current presumption that in many cases ecological and evolutionary processes may indeed operate on similar, not dissimilar, time scales.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Evolutionary ecology</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Ecological and evolutionary time</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Ecology and evolution</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">History</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="n">Elsevier Science</subfield><subfield code="a">Dong, Yan-Yan ELSEVIER</subfield><subfield code="t">Environmentally friendly microwave ionic liquids synthesis of hybrids from cellulose and AgX (X=Cl, Br)</subfield><subfield code="d">2013</subfield><subfield code="g">Amsterdam [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)ELV016617487</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:50</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2015</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:80-82</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:3</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsc.2015.01.007</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">FID-BIODIV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">42.13</subfield><subfield code="j">Molekularbiologie</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">50</subfield><subfield code="j">2015</subfield><subfield code="h">80-82</subfield><subfield code="g">3</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="953" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="2">045F</subfield><subfield code="a">100</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.3977394 |