Because I'm worth it: The impact of given versus perceived status on preferential treatment effectiveness
Prior research shows that preferential treatments offered by companies to their best customers do not always contribute to enhanced satisfaction and may even elicit negative consequences. Most studies link this dissatisfaction to the type or level of benefits offered; this article investigates anoth...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Pez, Virginie [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2015transfer abstract |
|---|
| Umfang: |
7 |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: RETRACTED: Shuffling pathway of anti-twinning in body-centered-cubic metals - Xie, Hongxian ELSEVIER, 2022, JBR, New York, NY |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:68 ; year:2015 ; number:12 ; pages:2477-2483 ; extent:7 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.06.034 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
ELV028686489 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ELV028686489 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230625162222.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 180603s2015 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.06.034 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a GBVA2015004000007.pica |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)ELV028686489 | ||
| 035 | |a (ELSEVIER)S0148-2963(15)00265-9 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 082 | 0 | |a 650 | |
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 650 |q DE-600 |
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 670 |q VZ |
| 084 | |a 51.00 |2 bkl | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Pez, Virginie |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Because I'm worth it: The impact of given versus perceived status on preferential treatment effectiveness |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2015transfer abstract | |
| 300 | |a 7 | ||
| 336 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zzz |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b z |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zu |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Prior research shows that preferential treatments offered by companies to their best customers do not always contribute to enhanced satisfaction and may even elicit negative consequences. Most studies link this dissatisfaction to the type or level of benefits offered; this article investigates another cause, namely, a targeting mismatch, such that the wrong customers receive the rewards designed for the best customers. Two quantitative studies involving more than 600 customers (one conducted with a leading European service company and one conducted with an external market research firm panel) demonstrate that better explanations of the perceived legitimacy of preferential treatment and satisfaction stem from the consumer's own perceptions of his or her status rather than from the objective status that the company grants to the consumer. Three antecedents of perceived status (perceived spending level, perceived seniority, and need for distinction) offer insights for companies that seek to refine their efforts to target their best customers with special marketing efforts. | ||
| 520 | |a Prior research shows that preferential treatments offered by companies to their best customers do not always contribute to enhanced satisfaction and may even elicit negative consequences. Most studies link this dissatisfaction to the type or level of benefits offered; this article investigates another cause, namely, a targeting mismatch, such that the wrong customers receive the rewards designed for the best customers. Two quantitative studies involving more than 600 customers (one conducted with a leading European service company and one conducted with an external market research firm panel) demonstrate that better explanations of the perceived legitimacy of preferential treatment and satisfaction stem from the consumer's own perceptions of his or her status rather than from the objective status that the company grants to the consumer. Three antecedents of perceived status (perceived spending level, perceived seniority, and need for distinction) offer insights for companies that seek to refine their efforts to target their best customers with special marketing efforts. | ||
| 700 | 1 | |a Butori, Raphaëlle |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a de Kerviler, Gwarlann |4 oth | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |n Elsevier |a Xie, Hongxian ELSEVIER |t RETRACTED: Shuffling pathway of anti-twinning in body-centered-cubic metals |d 2022 |d JBR |g New York, NY |w (DE-627)ELV008600120 |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:68 |g year:2015 |g number:12 |g pages:2477-2483 |g extent:7 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.06.034 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_U | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ELV | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_U | ||
| 936 | b | k | |a 51.00 |j Werkstoffkunde: Allgemeines |q VZ |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 68 |j 2015 |e 12 |h 2477-2483 |g 7 | ||
| 953 | |2 045F |a 650 | ||
| author_variant |
v p vp |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
pezvirginiebutoriraphalledekervilergwarl:2015----:easiwrhthipcogvnesseciesauopeeeta |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2015transfer abstract |
| bklnumber |
51.00 |
| publishDate |
2015 |
| allfields |
10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.06.034 doi GBVA2015004000007.pica (DE-627)ELV028686489 (ELSEVIER)S0148-2963(15)00265-9 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 650 650 DE-600 670 VZ 51.00 bkl Pez, Virginie verfasserin aut Because I'm worth it: The impact of given versus perceived status on preferential treatment effectiveness 2015transfer abstract 7 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Prior research shows that preferential treatments offered by companies to their best customers do not always contribute to enhanced satisfaction and may even elicit negative consequences. Most studies link this dissatisfaction to the type or level of benefits offered; this article investigates another cause, namely, a targeting mismatch, such that the wrong customers receive the rewards designed for the best customers. Two quantitative studies involving more than 600 customers (one conducted with a leading European service company and one conducted with an external market research firm panel) demonstrate that better explanations of the perceived legitimacy of preferential treatment and satisfaction stem from the consumer's own perceptions of his or her status rather than from the objective status that the company grants to the consumer. Three antecedents of perceived status (perceived spending level, perceived seniority, and need for distinction) offer insights for companies that seek to refine their efforts to target their best customers with special marketing efforts. Prior research shows that preferential treatments offered by companies to their best customers do not always contribute to enhanced satisfaction and may even elicit negative consequences. Most studies link this dissatisfaction to the type or level of benefits offered; this article investigates another cause, namely, a targeting mismatch, such that the wrong customers receive the rewards designed for the best customers. Two quantitative studies involving more than 600 customers (one conducted with a leading European service company and one conducted with an external market research firm panel) demonstrate that better explanations of the perceived legitimacy of preferential treatment and satisfaction stem from the consumer's own perceptions of his or her status rather than from the objective status that the company grants to the consumer. Three antecedents of perceived status (perceived spending level, perceived seniority, and need for distinction) offer insights for companies that seek to refine their efforts to target their best customers with special marketing efforts. Butori, Raphaëlle oth de Kerviler, Gwarlann oth Enthalten in Elsevier Xie, Hongxian ELSEVIER RETRACTED: Shuffling pathway of anti-twinning in body-centered-cubic metals 2022 JBR New York, NY (DE-627)ELV008600120 volume:68 year:2015 number:12 pages:2477-2483 extent:7 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.06.034 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U 51.00 Werkstoffkunde: Allgemeines VZ AR 68 2015 12 2477-2483 7 045F 650 |
| spelling |
10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.06.034 doi GBVA2015004000007.pica (DE-627)ELV028686489 (ELSEVIER)S0148-2963(15)00265-9 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 650 650 DE-600 670 VZ 51.00 bkl Pez, Virginie verfasserin aut Because I'm worth it: The impact of given versus perceived status on preferential treatment effectiveness 2015transfer abstract 7 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Prior research shows that preferential treatments offered by companies to their best customers do not always contribute to enhanced satisfaction and may even elicit negative consequences. Most studies link this dissatisfaction to the type or level of benefits offered; this article investigates another cause, namely, a targeting mismatch, such that the wrong customers receive the rewards designed for the best customers. Two quantitative studies involving more than 600 customers (one conducted with a leading European service company and one conducted with an external market research firm panel) demonstrate that better explanations of the perceived legitimacy of preferential treatment and satisfaction stem from the consumer's own perceptions of his or her status rather than from the objective status that the company grants to the consumer. Three antecedents of perceived status (perceived spending level, perceived seniority, and need for distinction) offer insights for companies that seek to refine their efforts to target their best customers with special marketing efforts. Prior research shows that preferential treatments offered by companies to their best customers do not always contribute to enhanced satisfaction and may even elicit negative consequences. Most studies link this dissatisfaction to the type or level of benefits offered; this article investigates another cause, namely, a targeting mismatch, such that the wrong customers receive the rewards designed for the best customers. Two quantitative studies involving more than 600 customers (one conducted with a leading European service company and one conducted with an external market research firm panel) demonstrate that better explanations of the perceived legitimacy of preferential treatment and satisfaction stem from the consumer's own perceptions of his or her status rather than from the objective status that the company grants to the consumer. Three antecedents of perceived status (perceived spending level, perceived seniority, and need for distinction) offer insights for companies that seek to refine their efforts to target their best customers with special marketing efforts. Butori, Raphaëlle oth de Kerviler, Gwarlann oth Enthalten in Elsevier Xie, Hongxian ELSEVIER RETRACTED: Shuffling pathway of anti-twinning in body-centered-cubic metals 2022 JBR New York, NY (DE-627)ELV008600120 volume:68 year:2015 number:12 pages:2477-2483 extent:7 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.06.034 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U 51.00 Werkstoffkunde: Allgemeines VZ AR 68 2015 12 2477-2483 7 045F 650 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.06.034 doi GBVA2015004000007.pica (DE-627)ELV028686489 (ELSEVIER)S0148-2963(15)00265-9 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 650 650 DE-600 670 VZ 51.00 bkl Pez, Virginie verfasserin aut Because I'm worth it: The impact of given versus perceived status on preferential treatment effectiveness 2015transfer abstract 7 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Prior research shows that preferential treatments offered by companies to their best customers do not always contribute to enhanced satisfaction and may even elicit negative consequences. Most studies link this dissatisfaction to the type or level of benefits offered; this article investigates another cause, namely, a targeting mismatch, such that the wrong customers receive the rewards designed for the best customers. Two quantitative studies involving more than 600 customers (one conducted with a leading European service company and one conducted with an external market research firm panel) demonstrate that better explanations of the perceived legitimacy of preferential treatment and satisfaction stem from the consumer's own perceptions of his or her status rather than from the objective status that the company grants to the consumer. Three antecedents of perceived status (perceived spending level, perceived seniority, and need for distinction) offer insights for companies that seek to refine their efforts to target their best customers with special marketing efforts. Prior research shows that preferential treatments offered by companies to their best customers do not always contribute to enhanced satisfaction and may even elicit negative consequences. Most studies link this dissatisfaction to the type or level of benefits offered; this article investigates another cause, namely, a targeting mismatch, such that the wrong customers receive the rewards designed for the best customers. Two quantitative studies involving more than 600 customers (one conducted with a leading European service company and one conducted with an external market research firm panel) demonstrate that better explanations of the perceived legitimacy of preferential treatment and satisfaction stem from the consumer's own perceptions of his or her status rather than from the objective status that the company grants to the consumer. Three antecedents of perceived status (perceived spending level, perceived seniority, and need for distinction) offer insights for companies that seek to refine their efforts to target their best customers with special marketing efforts. Butori, Raphaëlle oth de Kerviler, Gwarlann oth Enthalten in Elsevier Xie, Hongxian ELSEVIER RETRACTED: Shuffling pathway of anti-twinning in body-centered-cubic metals 2022 JBR New York, NY (DE-627)ELV008600120 volume:68 year:2015 number:12 pages:2477-2483 extent:7 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.06.034 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U 51.00 Werkstoffkunde: Allgemeines VZ AR 68 2015 12 2477-2483 7 045F 650 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.06.034 doi GBVA2015004000007.pica (DE-627)ELV028686489 (ELSEVIER)S0148-2963(15)00265-9 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 650 650 DE-600 670 VZ 51.00 bkl Pez, Virginie verfasserin aut Because I'm worth it: The impact of given versus perceived status on preferential treatment effectiveness 2015transfer abstract 7 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Prior research shows that preferential treatments offered by companies to their best customers do not always contribute to enhanced satisfaction and may even elicit negative consequences. Most studies link this dissatisfaction to the type or level of benefits offered; this article investigates another cause, namely, a targeting mismatch, such that the wrong customers receive the rewards designed for the best customers. Two quantitative studies involving more than 600 customers (one conducted with a leading European service company and one conducted with an external market research firm panel) demonstrate that better explanations of the perceived legitimacy of preferential treatment and satisfaction stem from the consumer's own perceptions of his or her status rather than from the objective status that the company grants to the consumer. Three antecedents of perceived status (perceived spending level, perceived seniority, and need for distinction) offer insights for companies that seek to refine their efforts to target their best customers with special marketing efforts. Prior research shows that preferential treatments offered by companies to their best customers do not always contribute to enhanced satisfaction and may even elicit negative consequences. Most studies link this dissatisfaction to the type or level of benefits offered; this article investigates another cause, namely, a targeting mismatch, such that the wrong customers receive the rewards designed for the best customers. Two quantitative studies involving more than 600 customers (one conducted with a leading European service company and one conducted with an external market research firm panel) demonstrate that better explanations of the perceived legitimacy of preferential treatment and satisfaction stem from the consumer's own perceptions of his or her status rather than from the objective status that the company grants to the consumer. Three antecedents of perceived status (perceived spending level, perceived seniority, and need for distinction) offer insights for companies that seek to refine their efforts to target their best customers with special marketing efforts. Butori, Raphaëlle oth de Kerviler, Gwarlann oth Enthalten in Elsevier Xie, Hongxian ELSEVIER RETRACTED: Shuffling pathway of anti-twinning in body-centered-cubic metals 2022 JBR New York, NY (DE-627)ELV008600120 volume:68 year:2015 number:12 pages:2477-2483 extent:7 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.06.034 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U 51.00 Werkstoffkunde: Allgemeines VZ AR 68 2015 12 2477-2483 7 045F 650 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.06.034 doi GBVA2015004000007.pica (DE-627)ELV028686489 (ELSEVIER)S0148-2963(15)00265-9 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 650 650 DE-600 670 VZ 51.00 bkl Pez, Virginie verfasserin aut Because I'm worth it: The impact of given versus perceived status on preferential treatment effectiveness 2015transfer abstract 7 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Prior research shows that preferential treatments offered by companies to their best customers do not always contribute to enhanced satisfaction and may even elicit negative consequences. Most studies link this dissatisfaction to the type or level of benefits offered; this article investigates another cause, namely, a targeting mismatch, such that the wrong customers receive the rewards designed for the best customers. Two quantitative studies involving more than 600 customers (one conducted with a leading European service company and one conducted with an external market research firm panel) demonstrate that better explanations of the perceived legitimacy of preferential treatment and satisfaction stem from the consumer's own perceptions of his or her status rather than from the objective status that the company grants to the consumer. Three antecedents of perceived status (perceived spending level, perceived seniority, and need for distinction) offer insights for companies that seek to refine their efforts to target their best customers with special marketing efforts. Prior research shows that preferential treatments offered by companies to their best customers do not always contribute to enhanced satisfaction and may even elicit negative consequences. Most studies link this dissatisfaction to the type or level of benefits offered; this article investigates another cause, namely, a targeting mismatch, such that the wrong customers receive the rewards designed for the best customers. Two quantitative studies involving more than 600 customers (one conducted with a leading European service company and one conducted with an external market research firm panel) demonstrate that better explanations of the perceived legitimacy of preferential treatment and satisfaction stem from the consumer's own perceptions of his or her status rather than from the objective status that the company grants to the consumer. Three antecedents of perceived status (perceived spending level, perceived seniority, and need for distinction) offer insights for companies that seek to refine their efforts to target their best customers with special marketing efforts. Butori, Raphaëlle oth de Kerviler, Gwarlann oth Enthalten in Elsevier Xie, Hongxian ELSEVIER RETRACTED: Shuffling pathway of anti-twinning in body-centered-cubic metals 2022 JBR New York, NY (DE-627)ELV008600120 volume:68 year:2015 number:12 pages:2477-2483 extent:7 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.06.034 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U 51.00 Werkstoffkunde: Allgemeines VZ AR 68 2015 12 2477-2483 7 045F 650 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in RETRACTED: Shuffling pathway of anti-twinning in body-centered-cubic metals New York, NY volume:68 year:2015 number:12 pages:2477-2483 extent:7 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in RETRACTED: Shuffling pathway of anti-twinning in body-centered-cubic metals New York, NY volume:68 year:2015 number:12 pages:2477-2483 extent:7 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| bklname |
Werkstoffkunde: Allgemeines |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| dewey-raw |
650 |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
RETRACTED: Shuffling pathway of anti-twinning in body-centered-cubic metals |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Pez, Virginie @@aut@@ Butori, Raphaëlle @@oth@@ de Kerviler, Gwarlann @@oth@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2015-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
ELV008600120 |
| dewey-sort |
3650 |
| id |
ELV028686489 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV028686489</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230625162222.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">180603s2015 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.06.034</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">GBVA2015004000007.pica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV028686489</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0148-2963(15)00265-9</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">650</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">650</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">670</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">51.00</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Pez, Virginie</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Because I'm worth it: The impact of given versus perceived status on preferential treatment effectiveness</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2015transfer abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">7</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Prior research shows that preferential treatments offered by companies to their best customers do not always contribute to enhanced satisfaction and may even elicit negative consequences. Most studies link this dissatisfaction to the type or level of benefits offered; this article investigates another cause, namely, a targeting mismatch, such that the wrong customers receive the rewards designed for the best customers. Two quantitative studies involving more than 600 customers (one conducted with a leading European service company and one conducted with an external market research firm panel) demonstrate that better explanations of the perceived legitimacy of preferential treatment and satisfaction stem from the consumer's own perceptions of his or her status rather than from the objective status that the company grants to the consumer. Three antecedents of perceived status (perceived spending level, perceived seniority, and need for distinction) offer insights for companies that seek to refine their efforts to target their best customers with special marketing efforts.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Prior research shows that preferential treatments offered by companies to their best customers do not always contribute to enhanced satisfaction and may even elicit negative consequences. Most studies link this dissatisfaction to the type or level of benefits offered; this article investigates another cause, namely, a targeting mismatch, such that the wrong customers receive the rewards designed for the best customers. Two quantitative studies involving more than 600 customers (one conducted with a leading European service company and one conducted with an external market research firm panel) demonstrate that better explanations of the perceived legitimacy of preferential treatment and satisfaction stem from the consumer's own perceptions of his or her status rather than from the objective status that the company grants to the consumer. Three antecedents of perceived status (perceived spending level, perceived seniority, and need for distinction) offer insights for companies that seek to refine their efforts to target their best customers with special marketing efforts.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Butori, Raphaëlle</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">de Kerviler, Gwarlann</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="n">Elsevier</subfield><subfield code="a">Xie, Hongxian ELSEVIER</subfield><subfield code="t">RETRACTED: Shuffling pathway of anti-twinning in body-centered-cubic metals</subfield><subfield code="d">2022</subfield><subfield code="d">JBR</subfield><subfield code="g">New York, NY</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)ELV008600120</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:68</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2015</subfield><subfield code="g">number:12</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:2477-2483</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:7</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.06.034</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">51.00</subfield><subfield code="j">Werkstoffkunde: Allgemeines</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">68</subfield><subfield code="j">2015</subfield><subfield code="e">12</subfield><subfield code="h">2477-2483</subfield><subfield code="g">7</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="953" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="2">045F</subfield><subfield code="a">650</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Pez, Virginie |
| spellingShingle |
Pez, Virginie ddc 650 ddc 670 bkl 51.00 Because I'm worth it: The impact of given versus perceived status on preferential treatment effectiveness |
| authorStr |
Pez, Virginie |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)ELV008600120 |
| format |
electronic Article |
| dewey-ones |
650 - Management & auxiliary services 670 - Manufacturing |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut |
| collection |
elsevier |
| remote_str |
true |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| topic_title |
650 650 DE-600 670 VZ 51.00 bkl Because I'm worth it: The impact of given versus perceived status on preferential treatment effectiveness |
| topic |
ddc 650 ddc 670 bkl 51.00 |
| topic_unstemmed |
ddc 650 ddc 670 bkl 51.00 |
| topic_browse |
ddc 650 ddc 670 bkl 51.00 |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
zu |
| author2_variant |
r b rb k g d kg kgd |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
RETRACTED: Shuffling pathway of anti-twinning in body-centered-cubic metals |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
ELV008600120 |
| dewey-tens |
650 - Management & public relations 670 - Manufacturing |
| hierarchy_top_title |
RETRACTED: Shuffling pathway of anti-twinning in body-centered-cubic metals |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)ELV008600120 |
| title |
Because I'm worth it: The impact of given versus perceived status on preferential treatment effectiveness |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)ELV028686489 (ELSEVIER)S0148-2963(15)00265-9 |
| title_full |
Because I'm worth it: The impact of given versus perceived status on preferential treatment effectiveness |
| author_sort |
Pez, Virginie |
| journal |
RETRACTED: Shuffling pathway of anti-twinning in body-centered-cubic metals |
| journalStr |
RETRACTED: Shuffling pathway of anti-twinning in body-centered-cubic metals |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| dewey-hundreds |
600 - Technology |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2015 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
zzz |
| container_start_page |
2477 |
| author_browse |
Pez, Virginie |
| container_volume |
68 |
| physical |
7 |
| class |
650 650 DE-600 670 VZ 51.00 bkl |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Pez, Virginie |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.06.034 |
| dewey-full |
650 670 |
| title_sort |
because i'm worth it: the impact of given versus perceived status on preferential treatment effectiveness |
| title_auth |
Because I'm worth it: The impact of given versus perceived status on preferential treatment effectiveness |
| abstract |
Prior research shows that preferential treatments offered by companies to their best customers do not always contribute to enhanced satisfaction and may even elicit negative consequences. Most studies link this dissatisfaction to the type or level of benefits offered; this article investigates another cause, namely, a targeting mismatch, such that the wrong customers receive the rewards designed for the best customers. Two quantitative studies involving more than 600 customers (one conducted with a leading European service company and one conducted with an external market research firm panel) demonstrate that better explanations of the perceived legitimacy of preferential treatment and satisfaction stem from the consumer's own perceptions of his or her status rather than from the objective status that the company grants to the consumer. Three antecedents of perceived status (perceived spending level, perceived seniority, and need for distinction) offer insights for companies that seek to refine their efforts to target their best customers with special marketing efforts. |
| abstractGer |
Prior research shows that preferential treatments offered by companies to their best customers do not always contribute to enhanced satisfaction and may even elicit negative consequences. Most studies link this dissatisfaction to the type or level of benefits offered; this article investigates another cause, namely, a targeting mismatch, such that the wrong customers receive the rewards designed for the best customers. Two quantitative studies involving more than 600 customers (one conducted with a leading European service company and one conducted with an external market research firm panel) demonstrate that better explanations of the perceived legitimacy of preferential treatment and satisfaction stem from the consumer's own perceptions of his or her status rather than from the objective status that the company grants to the consumer. Three antecedents of perceived status (perceived spending level, perceived seniority, and need for distinction) offer insights for companies that seek to refine their efforts to target their best customers with special marketing efforts. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
Prior research shows that preferential treatments offered by companies to their best customers do not always contribute to enhanced satisfaction and may even elicit negative consequences. Most studies link this dissatisfaction to the type or level of benefits offered; this article investigates another cause, namely, a targeting mismatch, such that the wrong customers receive the rewards designed for the best customers. Two quantitative studies involving more than 600 customers (one conducted with a leading European service company and one conducted with an external market research firm panel) demonstrate that better explanations of the perceived legitimacy of preferential treatment and satisfaction stem from the consumer's own perceptions of his or her status rather than from the objective status that the company grants to the consumer. Three antecedents of perceived status (perceived spending level, perceived seniority, and need for distinction) offer insights for companies that seek to refine their efforts to target their best customers with special marketing efforts. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U |
| container_issue |
12 |
| title_short |
Because I'm worth it: The impact of given versus perceived status on preferential treatment effectiveness |
| url |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.06.034 |
| remote_bool |
true |
| author2 |
Butori, Raphaëlle de Kerviler, Gwarlann |
| author2Str |
Butori, Raphaëlle de Kerviler, Gwarlann |
| ppnlink |
ELV008600120 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
z |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| author2_role |
oth oth |
| doi_str |
10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.06.034 |
| up_date |
2024-07-06T19:28:09.915Z |
| _version_ |
1803859095626711040 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV028686489</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230625162222.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">180603s2015 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.06.034</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">GBVA2015004000007.pica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV028686489</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0148-2963(15)00265-9</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">650</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">650</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">670</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">51.00</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Pez, Virginie</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Because I'm worth it: The impact of given versus perceived status on preferential treatment effectiveness</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2015transfer abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">7</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Prior research shows that preferential treatments offered by companies to their best customers do not always contribute to enhanced satisfaction and may even elicit negative consequences. Most studies link this dissatisfaction to the type or level of benefits offered; this article investigates another cause, namely, a targeting mismatch, such that the wrong customers receive the rewards designed for the best customers. Two quantitative studies involving more than 600 customers (one conducted with a leading European service company and one conducted with an external market research firm panel) demonstrate that better explanations of the perceived legitimacy of preferential treatment and satisfaction stem from the consumer's own perceptions of his or her status rather than from the objective status that the company grants to the consumer. Three antecedents of perceived status (perceived spending level, perceived seniority, and need for distinction) offer insights for companies that seek to refine their efforts to target their best customers with special marketing efforts.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Prior research shows that preferential treatments offered by companies to their best customers do not always contribute to enhanced satisfaction and may even elicit negative consequences. Most studies link this dissatisfaction to the type or level of benefits offered; this article investigates another cause, namely, a targeting mismatch, such that the wrong customers receive the rewards designed for the best customers. Two quantitative studies involving more than 600 customers (one conducted with a leading European service company and one conducted with an external market research firm panel) demonstrate that better explanations of the perceived legitimacy of preferential treatment and satisfaction stem from the consumer's own perceptions of his or her status rather than from the objective status that the company grants to the consumer. Three antecedents of perceived status (perceived spending level, perceived seniority, and need for distinction) offer insights for companies that seek to refine their efforts to target their best customers with special marketing efforts.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Butori, Raphaëlle</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">de Kerviler, Gwarlann</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="n">Elsevier</subfield><subfield code="a">Xie, Hongxian ELSEVIER</subfield><subfield code="t">RETRACTED: Shuffling pathway of anti-twinning in body-centered-cubic metals</subfield><subfield code="d">2022</subfield><subfield code="d">JBR</subfield><subfield code="g">New York, NY</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)ELV008600120</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:68</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2015</subfield><subfield code="g">number:12</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:2477-2483</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:7</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.06.034</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">51.00</subfield><subfield code="j">Werkstoffkunde: Allgemeines</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">68</subfield><subfield code="j">2015</subfield><subfield code="e">12</subfield><subfield code="h">2477-2483</subfield><subfield code="g">7</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="953" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="2">045F</subfield><subfield code="a">650</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.400531 |