Assessing geomorphic sensitivity in relation to river capacity for adjustment
River sensitivity describes the nature and rate of channel adjustments. An approach to analysis of geomorphic river sensitivity outlined in this paper relates potential sensitivity based on the expected capacity of adjustment for a river type to the recent history of channel adjustment. This approac...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Reid, H.E. [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2015transfer abstract |
|---|
| Umfang: |
14 |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Islamic finance development and banking ESG scores: Evidence from a cross-country analysis - Paltrinieri, Andrea ELSEVIER, 2019, Amsterdam [u.a.] |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:251 ; year:2015 ; day:15 ; month:12 ; pages:108-121 ; extent:14 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1016/j.geomorph.2015.09.009 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
ELV028795555 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ELV028795555 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230625163122.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 180603s2015 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.geomorph.2015.09.009 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a GBVA2015006000017.pica |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)ELV028795555 | ||
| 035 | |a (ELSEVIER)S0169-555X(15)30145-8 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 082 | 0 | |a 910 | |
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 910 |q DE-600 |
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 650 |q VZ |
| 100 | 1 | |a Reid, H.E. |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Assessing geomorphic sensitivity in relation to river capacity for adjustment |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2015transfer abstract | |
| 300 | |a 14 | ||
| 336 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zzz |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b z |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zu |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a River sensitivity describes the nature and rate of channel adjustments. An approach to analysis of geomorphic river sensitivity outlined in this paper relates potential sensitivity based on the expected capacity of adjustment for a river type to the recent history of channel adjustment. This approach was trialled to assess low, moderate and high geomorphic sensitivity for four different types of river (10 reaches in total) along the Lower Tongariro River, North Island, New Zealand. Building upon the River Styles framework, river types were differentiated based upon valley setting (width and confinement), channel planform, geomorphic unit assemblages and bed material size. From this, the behavioural regime and potential for adjustment (type and extent) were determined. Historical maps and aerial photographs were geo-rectified and the channel planform digitised to assess channel adjustments for each reach from 1928 to 2007. Floodplain width controlled by terraces, exerted a strong influence upon reach scale sensitivity for the partly-confined, wandering, cobble-bed river. Although forced boundaries occur infrequently, the width of the active channel zone is constrained. An unconfined braided river reach directly downstream of the terrace-confined section was the most geomorphically sensitive reach. The channel in this reach adjusted recurrently to sediment inputs that were flushed through more confined, better connected upstream reaches. A meandering, sand-bed river in downstream reaches has exhibited negligible rates of channel migration. However, channel narrowing in this reach and the associated delta indicate that the system is approaching a threshold condition, beyond which channel avulsion is likely to occur. As this would trigger more rapid migration, this reach is considered to be more geomorphically sensitive than analysis of its low migration rate alone would indicate. This demonstrates how sensitivity is fashioned both by the behavioural regime of a reach and flow/sediment input from upstream. The approach to assess geomorphic river sensitivity outlined here could support ‘room to move’ or ‘freedom space’ approaches to river management by relating likely channel adjustments for the type of river under consideration to the area of land that is required to contain ‘natural’ patterns and rates of geomorphic functionality. | ||
| 520 | |a River sensitivity describes the nature and rate of channel adjustments. An approach to analysis of geomorphic river sensitivity outlined in this paper relates potential sensitivity based on the expected capacity of adjustment for a river type to the recent history of channel adjustment. This approach was trialled to assess low, moderate and high geomorphic sensitivity for four different types of river (10 reaches in total) along the Lower Tongariro River, North Island, New Zealand. Building upon the River Styles framework, river types were differentiated based upon valley setting (width and confinement), channel planform, geomorphic unit assemblages and bed material size. From this, the behavioural regime and potential for adjustment (type and extent) were determined. Historical maps and aerial photographs were geo-rectified and the channel planform digitised to assess channel adjustments for each reach from 1928 to 2007. Floodplain width controlled by terraces, exerted a strong influence upon reach scale sensitivity for the partly-confined, wandering, cobble-bed river. Although forced boundaries occur infrequently, the width of the active channel zone is constrained. An unconfined braided river reach directly downstream of the terrace-confined section was the most geomorphically sensitive reach. The channel in this reach adjusted recurrently to sediment inputs that were flushed through more confined, better connected upstream reaches. A meandering, sand-bed river in downstream reaches has exhibited negligible rates of channel migration. However, channel narrowing in this reach and the associated delta indicate that the system is approaching a threshold condition, beyond which channel avulsion is likely to occur. As this would trigger more rapid migration, this reach is considered to be more geomorphically sensitive than analysis of its low migration rate alone would indicate. This demonstrates how sensitivity is fashioned both by the behavioural regime of a reach and flow/sediment input from upstream. The approach to assess geomorphic river sensitivity outlined here could support ‘room to move’ or ‘freedom space’ approaches to river management by relating likely channel adjustments for the type of river under consideration to the area of land that is required to contain ‘natural’ patterns and rates of geomorphic functionality. | ||
| 700 | 1 | |a Brierley, G.J. |4 oth | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |n Elsevier Science |a Paltrinieri, Andrea ELSEVIER |t Islamic finance development and banking ESG scores: Evidence from a cross-country analysis |d 2019 |g Amsterdam [u.a.] |w (DE-627)ELV003279995 |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:251 |g year:2015 |g day:15 |g month:12 |g pages:108-121 |g extent:14 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2015.09.009 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_U | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ELV | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_U | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 251 |j 2015 |b 15 |c 1215 |h 108-121 |g 14 | ||
| 953 | |2 045F |a 910 | ||
| author_variant |
h r hr |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
reidhebrierleygj:2015----:sesngoopisniiiyneainoiecp |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2015transfer abstract |
| publishDate |
2015 |
| allfields |
10.1016/j.geomorph.2015.09.009 doi GBVA2015006000017.pica (DE-627)ELV028795555 (ELSEVIER)S0169-555X(15)30145-8 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 910 910 DE-600 650 VZ Reid, H.E. verfasserin aut Assessing geomorphic sensitivity in relation to river capacity for adjustment 2015transfer abstract 14 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier River sensitivity describes the nature and rate of channel adjustments. An approach to analysis of geomorphic river sensitivity outlined in this paper relates potential sensitivity based on the expected capacity of adjustment for a river type to the recent history of channel adjustment. This approach was trialled to assess low, moderate and high geomorphic sensitivity for four different types of river (10 reaches in total) along the Lower Tongariro River, North Island, New Zealand. Building upon the River Styles framework, river types were differentiated based upon valley setting (width and confinement), channel planform, geomorphic unit assemblages and bed material size. From this, the behavioural regime and potential for adjustment (type and extent) were determined. Historical maps and aerial photographs were geo-rectified and the channel planform digitised to assess channel adjustments for each reach from 1928 to 2007. Floodplain width controlled by terraces, exerted a strong influence upon reach scale sensitivity for the partly-confined, wandering, cobble-bed river. Although forced boundaries occur infrequently, the width of the active channel zone is constrained. An unconfined braided river reach directly downstream of the terrace-confined section was the most geomorphically sensitive reach. The channel in this reach adjusted recurrently to sediment inputs that were flushed through more confined, better connected upstream reaches. A meandering, sand-bed river in downstream reaches has exhibited negligible rates of channel migration. However, channel narrowing in this reach and the associated delta indicate that the system is approaching a threshold condition, beyond which channel avulsion is likely to occur. As this would trigger more rapid migration, this reach is considered to be more geomorphically sensitive than analysis of its low migration rate alone would indicate. This demonstrates how sensitivity is fashioned both by the behavioural regime of a reach and flow/sediment input from upstream. The approach to assess geomorphic river sensitivity outlined here could support ‘room to move’ or ‘freedom space’ approaches to river management by relating likely channel adjustments for the type of river under consideration to the area of land that is required to contain ‘natural’ patterns and rates of geomorphic functionality. River sensitivity describes the nature and rate of channel adjustments. An approach to analysis of geomorphic river sensitivity outlined in this paper relates potential sensitivity based on the expected capacity of adjustment for a river type to the recent history of channel adjustment. This approach was trialled to assess low, moderate and high geomorphic sensitivity for four different types of river (10 reaches in total) along the Lower Tongariro River, North Island, New Zealand. Building upon the River Styles framework, river types were differentiated based upon valley setting (width and confinement), channel planform, geomorphic unit assemblages and bed material size. From this, the behavioural regime and potential for adjustment (type and extent) were determined. Historical maps and aerial photographs were geo-rectified and the channel planform digitised to assess channel adjustments for each reach from 1928 to 2007. Floodplain width controlled by terraces, exerted a strong influence upon reach scale sensitivity for the partly-confined, wandering, cobble-bed river. Although forced boundaries occur infrequently, the width of the active channel zone is constrained. An unconfined braided river reach directly downstream of the terrace-confined section was the most geomorphically sensitive reach. The channel in this reach adjusted recurrently to sediment inputs that were flushed through more confined, better connected upstream reaches. A meandering, sand-bed river in downstream reaches has exhibited negligible rates of channel migration. However, channel narrowing in this reach and the associated delta indicate that the system is approaching a threshold condition, beyond which channel avulsion is likely to occur. As this would trigger more rapid migration, this reach is considered to be more geomorphically sensitive than analysis of its low migration rate alone would indicate. This demonstrates how sensitivity is fashioned both by the behavioural regime of a reach and flow/sediment input from upstream. The approach to assess geomorphic river sensitivity outlined here could support ‘room to move’ or ‘freedom space’ approaches to river management by relating likely channel adjustments for the type of river under consideration to the area of land that is required to contain ‘natural’ patterns and rates of geomorphic functionality. Brierley, G.J. oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Paltrinieri, Andrea ELSEVIER Islamic finance development and banking ESG scores: Evidence from a cross-country analysis 2019 Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV003279995 volume:251 year:2015 day:15 month:12 pages:108-121 extent:14 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2015.09.009 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U AR 251 2015 15 1215 108-121 14 045F 910 |
| spelling |
10.1016/j.geomorph.2015.09.009 doi GBVA2015006000017.pica (DE-627)ELV028795555 (ELSEVIER)S0169-555X(15)30145-8 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 910 910 DE-600 650 VZ Reid, H.E. verfasserin aut Assessing geomorphic sensitivity in relation to river capacity for adjustment 2015transfer abstract 14 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier River sensitivity describes the nature and rate of channel adjustments. An approach to analysis of geomorphic river sensitivity outlined in this paper relates potential sensitivity based on the expected capacity of adjustment for a river type to the recent history of channel adjustment. This approach was trialled to assess low, moderate and high geomorphic sensitivity for four different types of river (10 reaches in total) along the Lower Tongariro River, North Island, New Zealand. Building upon the River Styles framework, river types were differentiated based upon valley setting (width and confinement), channel planform, geomorphic unit assemblages and bed material size. From this, the behavioural regime and potential for adjustment (type and extent) were determined. Historical maps and aerial photographs were geo-rectified and the channel planform digitised to assess channel adjustments for each reach from 1928 to 2007. Floodplain width controlled by terraces, exerted a strong influence upon reach scale sensitivity for the partly-confined, wandering, cobble-bed river. Although forced boundaries occur infrequently, the width of the active channel zone is constrained. An unconfined braided river reach directly downstream of the terrace-confined section was the most geomorphically sensitive reach. The channel in this reach adjusted recurrently to sediment inputs that were flushed through more confined, better connected upstream reaches. A meandering, sand-bed river in downstream reaches has exhibited negligible rates of channel migration. However, channel narrowing in this reach and the associated delta indicate that the system is approaching a threshold condition, beyond which channel avulsion is likely to occur. As this would trigger more rapid migration, this reach is considered to be more geomorphically sensitive than analysis of its low migration rate alone would indicate. This demonstrates how sensitivity is fashioned both by the behavioural regime of a reach and flow/sediment input from upstream. The approach to assess geomorphic river sensitivity outlined here could support ‘room to move’ or ‘freedom space’ approaches to river management by relating likely channel adjustments for the type of river under consideration to the area of land that is required to contain ‘natural’ patterns and rates of geomorphic functionality. River sensitivity describes the nature and rate of channel adjustments. An approach to analysis of geomorphic river sensitivity outlined in this paper relates potential sensitivity based on the expected capacity of adjustment for a river type to the recent history of channel adjustment. This approach was trialled to assess low, moderate and high geomorphic sensitivity for four different types of river (10 reaches in total) along the Lower Tongariro River, North Island, New Zealand. Building upon the River Styles framework, river types were differentiated based upon valley setting (width and confinement), channel planform, geomorphic unit assemblages and bed material size. From this, the behavioural regime and potential for adjustment (type and extent) were determined. Historical maps and aerial photographs were geo-rectified and the channel planform digitised to assess channel adjustments for each reach from 1928 to 2007. Floodplain width controlled by terraces, exerted a strong influence upon reach scale sensitivity for the partly-confined, wandering, cobble-bed river. Although forced boundaries occur infrequently, the width of the active channel zone is constrained. An unconfined braided river reach directly downstream of the terrace-confined section was the most geomorphically sensitive reach. The channel in this reach adjusted recurrently to sediment inputs that were flushed through more confined, better connected upstream reaches. A meandering, sand-bed river in downstream reaches has exhibited negligible rates of channel migration. However, channel narrowing in this reach and the associated delta indicate that the system is approaching a threshold condition, beyond which channel avulsion is likely to occur. As this would trigger more rapid migration, this reach is considered to be more geomorphically sensitive than analysis of its low migration rate alone would indicate. This demonstrates how sensitivity is fashioned both by the behavioural regime of a reach and flow/sediment input from upstream. The approach to assess geomorphic river sensitivity outlined here could support ‘room to move’ or ‘freedom space’ approaches to river management by relating likely channel adjustments for the type of river under consideration to the area of land that is required to contain ‘natural’ patterns and rates of geomorphic functionality. Brierley, G.J. oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Paltrinieri, Andrea ELSEVIER Islamic finance development and banking ESG scores: Evidence from a cross-country analysis 2019 Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV003279995 volume:251 year:2015 day:15 month:12 pages:108-121 extent:14 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2015.09.009 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U AR 251 2015 15 1215 108-121 14 045F 910 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1016/j.geomorph.2015.09.009 doi GBVA2015006000017.pica (DE-627)ELV028795555 (ELSEVIER)S0169-555X(15)30145-8 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 910 910 DE-600 650 VZ Reid, H.E. verfasserin aut Assessing geomorphic sensitivity in relation to river capacity for adjustment 2015transfer abstract 14 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier River sensitivity describes the nature and rate of channel adjustments. An approach to analysis of geomorphic river sensitivity outlined in this paper relates potential sensitivity based on the expected capacity of adjustment for a river type to the recent history of channel adjustment. This approach was trialled to assess low, moderate and high geomorphic sensitivity for four different types of river (10 reaches in total) along the Lower Tongariro River, North Island, New Zealand. Building upon the River Styles framework, river types were differentiated based upon valley setting (width and confinement), channel planform, geomorphic unit assemblages and bed material size. From this, the behavioural regime and potential for adjustment (type and extent) were determined. Historical maps and aerial photographs were geo-rectified and the channel planform digitised to assess channel adjustments for each reach from 1928 to 2007. Floodplain width controlled by terraces, exerted a strong influence upon reach scale sensitivity for the partly-confined, wandering, cobble-bed river. Although forced boundaries occur infrequently, the width of the active channel zone is constrained. An unconfined braided river reach directly downstream of the terrace-confined section was the most geomorphically sensitive reach. The channel in this reach adjusted recurrently to sediment inputs that were flushed through more confined, better connected upstream reaches. A meandering, sand-bed river in downstream reaches has exhibited negligible rates of channel migration. However, channel narrowing in this reach and the associated delta indicate that the system is approaching a threshold condition, beyond which channel avulsion is likely to occur. As this would trigger more rapid migration, this reach is considered to be more geomorphically sensitive than analysis of its low migration rate alone would indicate. This demonstrates how sensitivity is fashioned both by the behavioural regime of a reach and flow/sediment input from upstream. The approach to assess geomorphic river sensitivity outlined here could support ‘room to move’ or ‘freedom space’ approaches to river management by relating likely channel adjustments for the type of river under consideration to the area of land that is required to contain ‘natural’ patterns and rates of geomorphic functionality. River sensitivity describes the nature and rate of channel adjustments. An approach to analysis of geomorphic river sensitivity outlined in this paper relates potential sensitivity based on the expected capacity of adjustment for a river type to the recent history of channel adjustment. This approach was trialled to assess low, moderate and high geomorphic sensitivity for four different types of river (10 reaches in total) along the Lower Tongariro River, North Island, New Zealand. Building upon the River Styles framework, river types were differentiated based upon valley setting (width and confinement), channel planform, geomorphic unit assemblages and bed material size. From this, the behavioural regime and potential for adjustment (type and extent) were determined. Historical maps and aerial photographs were geo-rectified and the channel planform digitised to assess channel adjustments for each reach from 1928 to 2007. Floodplain width controlled by terraces, exerted a strong influence upon reach scale sensitivity for the partly-confined, wandering, cobble-bed river. Although forced boundaries occur infrequently, the width of the active channel zone is constrained. An unconfined braided river reach directly downstream of the terrace-confined section was the most geomorphically sensitive reach. The channel in this reach adjusted recurrently to sediment inputs that were flushed through more confined, better connected upstream reaches. A meandering, sand-bed river in downstream reaches has exhibited negligible rates of channel migration. However, channel narrowing in this reach and the associated delta indicate that the system is approaching a threshold condition, beyond which channel avulsion is likely to occur. As this would trigger more rapid migration, this reach is considered to be more geomorphically sensitive than analysis of its low migration rate alone would indicate. This demonstrates how sensitivity is fashioned both by the behavioural regime of a reach and flow/sediment input from upstream. The approach to assess geomorphic river sensitivity outlined here could support ‘room to move’ or ‘freedom space’ approaches to river management by relating likely channel adjustments for the type of river under consideration to the area of land that is required to contain ‘natural’ patterns and rates of geomorphic functionality. Brierley, G.J. oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Paltrinieri, Andrea ELSEVIER Islamic finance development and banking ESG scores: Evidence from a cross-country analysis 2019 Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV003279995 volume:251 year:2015 day:15 month:12 pages:108-121 extent:14 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2015.09.009 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U AR 251 2015 15 1215 108-121 14 045F 910 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1016/j.geomorph.2015.09.009 doi GBVA2015006000017.pica (DE-627)ELV028795555 (ELSEVIER)S0169-555X(15)30145-8 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 910 910 DE-600 650 VZ Reid, H.E. verfasserin aut Assessing geomorphic sensitivity in relation to river capacity for adjustment 2015transfer abstract 14 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier River sensitivity describes the nature and rate of channel adjustments. An approach to analysis of geomorphic river sensitivity outlined in this paper relates potential sensitivity based on the expected capacity of adjustment for a river type to the recent history of channel adjustment. This approach was trialled to assess low, moderate and high geomorphic sensitivity for four different types of river (10 reaches in total) along the Lower Tongariro River, North Island, New Zealand. Building upon the River Styles framework, river types were differentiated based upon valley setting (width and confinement), channel planform, geomorphic unit assemblages and bed material size. From this, the behavioural regime and potential for adjustment (type and extent) were determined. Historical maps and aerial photographs were geo-rectified and the channel planform digitised to assess channel adjustments for each reach from 1928 to 2007. Floodplain width controlled by terraces, exerted a strong influence upon reach scale sensitivity for the partly-confined, wandering, cobble-bed river. Although forced boundaries occur infrequently, the width of the active channel zone is constrained. An unconfined braided river reach directly downstream of the terrace-confined section was the most geomorphically sensitive reach. The channel in this reach adjusted recurrently to sediment inputs that were flushed through more confined, better connected upstream reaches. A meandering, sand-bed river in downstream reaches has exhibited negligible rates of channel migration. However, channel narrowing in this reach and the associated delta indicate that the system is approaching a threshold condition, beyond which channel avulsion is likely to occur. As this would trigger more rapid migration, this reach is considered to be more geomorphically sensitive than analysis of its low migration rate alone would indicate. This demonstrates how sensitivity is fashioned both by the behavioural regime of a reach and flow/sediment input from upstream. The approach to assess geomorphic river sensitivity outlined here could support ‘room to move’ or ‘freedom space’ approaches to river management by relating likely channel adjustments for the type of river under consideration to the area of land that is required to contain ‘natural’ patterns and rates of geomorphic functionality. River sensitivity describes the nature and rate of channel adjustments. An approach to analysis of geomorphic river sensitivity outlined in this paper relates potential sensitivity based on the expected capacity of adjustment for a river type to the recent history of channel adjustment. This approach was trialled to assess low, moderate and high geomorphic sensitivity for four different types of river (10 reaches in total) along the Lower Tongariro River, North Island, New Zealand. Building upon the River Styles framework, river types were differentiated based upon valley setting (width and confinement), channel planform, geomorphic unit assemblages and bed material size. From this, the behavioural regime and potential for adjustment (type and extent) were determined. Historical maps and aerial photographs were geo-rectified and the channel planform digitised to assess channel adjustments for each reach from 1928 to 2007. Floodplain width controlled by terraces, exerted a strong influence upon reach scale sensitivity for the partly-confined, wandering, cobble-bed river. Although forced boundaries occur infrequently, the width of the active channel zone is constrained. An unconfined braided river reach directly downstream of the terrace-confined section was the most geomorphically sensitive reach. The channel in this reach adjusted recurrently to sediment inputs that were flushed through more confined, better connected upstream reaches. A meandering, sand-bed river in downstream reaches has exhibited negligible rates of channel migration. However, channel narrowing in this reach and the associated delta indicate that the system is approaching a threshold condition, beyond which channel avulsion is likely to occur. As this would trigger more rapid migration, this reach is considered to be more geomorphically sensitive than analysis of its low migration rate alone would indicate. This demonstrates how sensitivity is fashioned both by the behavioural regime of a reach and flow/sediment input from upstream. The approach to assess geomorphic river sensitivity outlined here could support ‘room to move’ or ‘freedom space’ approaches to river management by relating likely channel adjustments for the type of river under consideration to the area of land that is required to contain ‘natural’ patterns and rates of geomorphic functionality. Brierley, G.J. oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Paltrinieri, Andrea ELSEVIER Islamic finance development and banking ESG scores: Evidence from a cross-country analysis 2019 Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV003279995 volume:251 year:2015 day:15 month:12 pages:108-121 extent:14 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2015.09.009 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U AR 251 2015 15 1215 108-121 14 045F 910 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1016/j.geomorph.2015.09.009 doi GBVA2015006000017.pica (DE-627)ELV028795555 (ELSEVIER)S0169-555X(15)30145-8 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 910 910 DE-600 650 VZ Reid, H.E. verfasserin aut Assessing geomorphic sensitivity in relation to river capacity for adjustment 2015transfer abstract 14 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier River sensitivity describes the nature and rate of channel adjustments. An approach to analysis of geomorphic river sensitivity outlined in this paper relates potential sensitivity based on the expected capacity of adjustment for a river type to the recent history of channel adjustment. This approach was trialled to assess low, moderate and high geomorphic sensitivity for four different types of river (10 reaches in total) along the Lower Tongariro River, North Island, New Zealand. Building upon the River Styles framework, river types were differentiated based upon valley setting (width and confinement), channel planform, geomorphic unit assemblages and bed material size. From this, the behavioural regime and potential for adjustment (type and extent) were determined. Historical maps and aerial photographs were geo-rectified and the channel planform digitised to assess channel adjustments for each reach from 1928 to 2007. Floodplain width controlled by terraces, exerted a strong influence upon reach scale sensitivity for the partly-confined, wandering, cobble-bed river. Although forced boundaries occur infrequently, the width of the active channel zone is constrained. An unconfined braided river reach directly downstream of the terrace-confined section was the most geomorphically sensitive reach. The channel in this reach adjusted recurrently to sediment inputs that were flushed through more confined, better connected upstream reaches. A meandering, sand-bed river in downstream reaches has exhibited negligible rates of channel migration. However, channel narrowing in this reach and the associated delta indicate that the system is approaching a threshold condition, beyond which channel avulsion is likely to occur. As this would trigger more rapid migration, this reach is considered to be more geomorphically sensitive than analysis of its low migration rate alone would indicate. This demonstrates how sensitivity is fashioned both by the behavioural regime of a reach and flow/sediment input from upstream. The approach to assess geomorphic river sensitivity outlined here could support ‘room to move’ or ‘freedom space’ approaches to river management by relating likely channel adjustments for the type of river under consideration to the area of land that is required to contain ‘natural’ patterns and rates of geomorphic functionality. River sensitivity describes the nature and rate of channel adjustments. An approach to analysis of geomorphic river sensitivity outlined in this paper relates potential sensitivity based on the expected capacity of adjustment for a river type to the recent history of channel adjustment. This approach was trialled to assess low, moderate and high geomorphic sensitivity for four different types of river (10 reaches in total) along the Lower Tongariro River, North Island, New Zealand. Building upon the River Styles framework, river types were differentiated based upon valley setting (width and confinement), channel planform, geomorphic unit assemblages and bed material size. From this, the behavioural regime and potential for adjustment (type and extent) were determined. Historical maps and aerial photographs were geo-rectified and the channel planform digitised to assess channel adjustments for each reach from 1928 to 2007. Floodplain width controlled by terraces, exerted a strong influence upon reach scale sensitivity for the partly-confined, wandering, cobble-bed river. Although forced boundaries occur infrequently, the width of the active channel zone is constrained. An unconfined braided river reach directly downstream of the terrace-confined section was the most geomorphically sensitive reach. The channel in this reach adjusted recurrently to sediment inputs that were flushed through more confined, better connected upstream reaches. A meandering, sand-bed river in downstream reaches has exhibited negligible rates of channel migration. However, channel narrowing in this reach and the associated delta indicate that the system is approaching a threshold condition, beyond which channel avulsion is likely to occur. As this would trigger more rapid migration, this reach is considered to be more geomorphically sensitive than analysis of its low migration rate alone would indicate. This demonstrates how sensitivity is fashioned both by the behavioural regime of a reach and flow/sediment input from upstream. The approach to assess geomorphic river sensitivity outlined here could support ‘room to move’ or ‘freedom space’ approaches to river management by relating likely channel adjustments for the type of river under consideration to the area of land that is required to contain ‘natural’ patterns and rates of geomorphic functionality. Brierley, G.J. oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Paltrinieri, Andrea ELSEVIER Islamic finance development and banking ESG scores: Evidence from a cross-country analysis 2019 Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV003279995 volume:251 year:2015 day:15 month:12 pages:108-121 extent:14 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2015.09.009 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U AR 251 2015 15 1215 108-121 14 045F 910 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in Islamic finance development and banking ESG scores: Evidence from a cross-country analysis Amsterdam [u.a.] volume:251 year:2015 day:15 month:12 pages:108-121 extent:14 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in Islamic finance development and banking ESG scores: Evidence from a cross-country analysis Amsterdam [u.a.] volume:251 year:2015 day:15 month:12 pages:108-121 extent:14 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| dewey-raw |
910 |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
Islamic finance development and banking ESG scores: Evidence from a cross-country analysis |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Reid, H.E. @@aut@@ Brierley, G.J. @@oth@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2015-01-15T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
ELV003279995 |
| dewey-sort |
3910 |
| id |
ELV028795555 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV028795555</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230625163122.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">180603s2015 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.geomorph.2015.09.009</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">GBVA2015006000017.pica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV028795555</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0169-555X(15)30145-8</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">910</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">910</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">650</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Reid, H.E.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Assessing geomorphic sensitivity in relation to river capacity for adjustment</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2015transfer abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">14</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">River sensitivity describes the nature and rate of channel adjustments. An approach to analysis of geomorphic river sensitivity outlined in this paper relates potential sensitivity based on the expected capacity of adjustment for a river type to the recent history of channel adjustment. This approach was trialled to assess low, moderate and high geomorphic sensitivity for four different types of river (10 reaches in total) along the Lower Tongariro River, North Island, New Zealand. Building upon the River Styles framework, river types were differentiated based upon valley setting (width and confinement), channel planform, geomorphic unit assemblages and bed material size. From this, the behavioural regime and potential for adjustment (type and extent) were determined. Historical maps and aerial photographs were geo-rectified and the channel planform digitised to assess channel adjustments for each reach from 1928 to 2007. Floodplain width controlled by terraces, exerted a strong influence upon reach scale sensitivity for the partly-confined, wandering, cobble-bed river. Although forced boundaries occur infrequently, the width of the active channel zone is constrained. An unconfined braided river reach directly downstream of the terrace-confined section was the most geomorphically sensitive reach. The channel in this reach adjusted recurrently to sediment inputs that were flushed through more confined, better connected upstream reaches. A meandering, sand-bed river in downstream reaches has exhibited negligible rates of channel migration. However, channel narrowing in this reach and the associated delta indicate that the system is approaching a threshold condition, beyond which channel avulsion is likely to occur. As this would trigger more rapid migration, this reach is considered to be more geomorphically sensitive than analysis of its low migration rate alone would indicate. This demonstrates how sensitivity is fashioned both by the behavioural regime of a reach and flow/sediment input from upstream. The approach to assess geomorphic river sensitivity outlined here could support ‘room to move’ or ‘freedom space’ approaches to river management by relating likely channel adjustments for the type of river under consideration to the area of land that is required to contain ‘natural’ patterns and rates of geomorphic functionality.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">River sensitivity describes the nature and rate of channel adjustments. An approach to analysis of geomorphic river sensitivity outlined in this paper relates potential sensitivity based on the expected capacity of adjustment for a river type to the recent history of channel adjustment. This approach was trialled to assess low, moderate and high geomorphic sensitivity for four different types of river (10 reaches in total) along the Lower Tongariro River, North Island, New Zealand. Building upon the River Styles framework, river types were differentiated based upon valley setting (width and confinement), channel planform, geomorphic unit assemblages and bed material size. From this, the behavioural regime and potential for adjustment (type and extent) were determined. Historical maps and aerial photographs were geo-rectified and the channel planform digitised to assess channel adjustments for each reach from 1928 to 2007. Floodplain width controlled by terraces, exerted a strong influence upon reach scale sensitivity for the partly-confined, wandering, cobble-bed river. Although forced boundaries occur infrequently, the width of the active channel zone is constrained. An unconfined braided river reach directly downstream of the terrace-confined section was the most geomorphically sensitive reach. The channel in this reach adjusted recurrently to sediment inputs that were flushed through more confined, better connected upstream reaches. A meandering, sand-bed river in downstream reaches has exhibited negligible rates of channel migration. However, channel narrowing in this reach and the associated delta indicate that the system is approaching a threshold condition, beyond which channel avulsion is likely to occur. As this would trigger more rapid migration, this reach is considered to be more geomorphically sensitive than analysis of its low migration rate alone would indicate. This demonstrates how sensitivity is fashioned both by the behavioural regime of a reach and flow/sediment input from upstream. The approach to assess geomorphic river sensitivity outlined here could support ‘room to move’ or ‘freedom space’ approaches to river management by relating likely channel adjustments for the type of river under consideration to the area of land that is required to contain ‘natural’ patterns and rates of geomorphic functionality.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Brierley, G.J.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="n">Elsevier Science</subfield><subfield code="a">Paltrinieri, Andrea ELSEVIER</subfield><subfield code="t">Islamic finance development and banking ESG scores: Evidence from a cross-country analysis</subfield><subfield code="d">2019</subfield><subfield code="g">Amsterdam [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)ELV003279995</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:251</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2015</subfield><subfield code="g">day:15</subfield><subfield code="g">month:12</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:108-121</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:14</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2015.09.009</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">251</subfield><subfield code="j">2015</subfield><subfield code="b">15</subfield><subfield code="c">1215</subfield><subfield code="h">108-121</subfield><subfield code="g">14</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="953" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="2">045F</subfield><subfield code="a">910</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Reid, H.E. |
| spellingShingle |
Reid, H.E. ddc 910 ddc 650 Assessing geomorphic sensitivity in relation to river capacity for adjustment |
| authorStr |
Reid, H.E. |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)ELV003279995 |
| format |
electronic Article |
| dewey-ones |
910 - Geography & travel 650 - Management & auxiliary services |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut |
| collection |
elsevier |
| remote_str |
true |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| topic_title |
910 910 DE-600 650 VZ Assessing geomorphic sensitivity in relation to river capacity for adjustment |
| topic |
ddc 910 ddc 650 |
| topic_unstemmed |
ddc 910 ddc 650 |
| topic_browse |
ddc 910 ddc 650 |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
zu |
| author2_variant |
g b gb |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Islamic finance development and banking ESG scores: Evidence from a cross-country analysis |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
ELV003279995 |
| dewey-tens |
910 - Geography & travel 650 - Management & public relations |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Islamic finance development and banking ESG scores: Evidence from a cross-country analysis |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)ELV003279995 |
| title |
Assessing geomorphic sensitivity in relation to river capacity for adjustment |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)ELV028795555 (ELSEVIER)S0169-555X(15)30145-8 |
| title_full |
Assessing geomorphic sensitivity in relation to river capacity for adjustment |
| author_sort |
Reid, H.E. |
| journal |
Islamic finance development and banking ESG scores: Evidence from a cross-country analysis |
| journalStr |
Islamic finance development and banking ESG scores: Evidence from a cross-country analysis |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| dewey-hundreds |
900 - History & geography 600 - Technology |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2015 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
zzz |
| container_start_page |
108 |
| author_browse |
Reid, H.E. |
| container_volume |
251 |
| physical |
14 |
| class |
910 910 DE-600 650 VZ |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Reid, H.E. |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1016/j.geomorph.2015.09.009 |
| dewey-full |
910 650 |
| title_sort |
assessing geomorphic sensitivity in relation to river capacity for adjustment |
| title_auth |
Assessing geomorphic sensitivity in relation to river capacity for adjustment |
| abstract |
River sensitivity describes the nature and rate of channel adjustments. An approach to analysis of geomorphic river sensitivity outlined in this paper relates potential sensitivity based on the expected capacity of adjustment for a river type to the recent history of channel adjustment. This approach was trialled to assess low, moderate and high geomorphic sensitivity for four different types of river (10 reaches in total) along the Lower Tongariro River, North Island, New Zealand. Building upon the River Styles framework, river types were differentiated based upon valley setting (width and confinement), channel planform, geomorphic unit assemblages and bed material size. From this, the behavioural regime and potential for adjustment (type and extent) were determined. Historical maps and aerial photographs were geo-rectified and the channel planform digitised to assess channel adjustments for each reach from 1928 to 2007. Floodplain width controlled by terraces, exerted a strong influence upon reach scale sensitivity for the partly-confined, wandering, cobble-bed river. Although forced boundaries occur infrequently, the width of the active channel zone is constrained. An unconfined braided river reach directly downstream of the terrace-confined section was the most geomorphically sensitive reach. The channel in this reach adjusted recurrently to sediment inputs that were flushed through more confined, better connected upstream reaches. A meandering, sand-bed river in downstream reaches has exhibited negligible rates of channel migration. However, channel narrowing in this reach and the associated delta indicate that the system is approaching a threshold condition, beyond which channel avulsion is likely to occur. As this would trigger more rapid migration, this reach is considered to be more geomorphically sensitive than analysis of its low migration rate alone would indicate. This demonstrates how sensitivity is fashioned both by the behavioural regime of a reach and flow/sediment input from upstream. The approach to assess geomorphic river sensitivity outlined here could support ‘room to move’ or ‘freedom space’ approaches to river management by relating likely channel adjustments for the type of river under consideration to the area of land that is required to contain ‘natural’ patterns and rates of geomorphic functionality. |
| abstractGer |
River sensitivity describes the nature and rate of channel adjustments. An approach to analysis of geomorphic river sensitivity outlined in this paper relates potential sensitivity based on the expected capacity of adjustment for a river type to the recent history of channel adjustment. This approach was trialled to assess low, moderate and high geomorphic sensitivity for four different types of river (10 reaches in total) along the Lower Tongariro River, North Island, New Zealand. Building upon the River Styles framework, river types were differentiated based upon valley setting (width and confinement), channel planform, geomorphic unit assemblages and bed material size. From this, the behavioural regime and potential for adjustment (type and extent) were determined. Historical maps and aerial photographs were geo-rectified and the channel planform digitised to assess channel adjustments for each reach from 1928 to 2007. Floodplain width controlled by terraces, exerted a strong influence upon reach scale sensitivity for the partly-confined, wandering, cobble-bed river. Although forced boundaries occur infrequently, the width of the active channel zone is constrained. An unconfined braided river reach directly downstream of the terrace-confined section was the most geomorphically sensitive reach. The channel in this reach adjusted recurrently to sediment inputs that were flushed through more confined, better connected upstream reaches. A meandering, sand-bed river in downstream reaches has exhibited negligible rates of channel migration. However, channel narrowing in this reach and the associated delta indicate that the system is approaching a threshold condition, beyond which channel avulsion is likely to occur. As this would trigger more rapid migration, this reach is considered to be more geomorphically sensitive than analysis of its low migration rate alone would indicate. This demonstrates how sensitivity is fashioned both by the behavioural regime of a reach and flow/sediment input from upstream. The approach to assess geomorphic river sensitivity outlined here could support ‘room to move’ or ‘freedom space’ approaches to river management by relating likely channel adjustments for the type of river under consideration to the area of land that is required to contain ‘natural’ patterns and rates of geomorphic functionality. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
River sensitivity describes the nature and rate of channel adjustments. An approach to analysis of geomorphic river sensitivity outlined in this paper relates potential sensitivity based on the expected capacity of adjustment for a river type to the recent history of channel adjustment. This approach was trialled to assess low, moderate and high geomorphic sensitivity for four different types of river (10 reaches in total) along the Lower Tongariro River, North Island, New Zealand. Building upon the River Styles framework, river types were differentiated based upon valley setting (width and confinement), channel planform, geomorphic unit assemblages and bed material size. From this, the behavioural regime and potential for adjustment (type and extent) were determined. Historical maps and aerial photographs were geo-rectified and the channel planform digitised to assess channel adjustments for each reach from 1928 to 2007. Floodplain width controlled by terraces, exerted a strong influence upon reach scale sensitivity for the partly-confined, wandering, cobble-bed river. Although forced boundaries occur infrequently, the width of the active channel zone is constrained. An unconfined braided river reach directly downstream of the terrace-confined section was the most geomorphically sensitive reach. The channel in this reach adjusted recurrently to sediment inputs that were flushed through more confined, better connected upstream reaches. A meandering, sand-bed river in downstream reaches has exhibited negligible rates of channel migration. However, channel narrowing in this reach and the associated delta indicate that the system is approaching a threshold condition, beyond which channel avulsion is likely to occur. As this would trigger more rapid migration, this reach is considered to be more geomorphically sensitive than analysis of its low migration rate alone would indicate. This demonstrates how sensitivity is fashioned both by the behavioural regime of a reach and flow/sediment input from upstream. The approach to assess geomorphic river sensitivity outlined here could support ‘room to move’ or ‘freedom space’ approaches to river management by relating likely channel adjustments for the type of river under consideration to the area of land that is required to contain ‘natural’ patterns and rates of geomorphic functionality. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U |
| title_short |
Assessing geomorphic sensitivity in relation to river capacity for adjustment |
| url |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2015.09.009 |
| remote_bool |
true |
| author2 |
Brierley, G.J. |
| author2Str |
Brierley, G.J. |
| ppnlink |
ELV003279995 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
z |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| author2_role |
oth |
| doi_str |
10.1016/j.geomorph.2015.09.009 |
| up_date |
2024-07-06T19:44:41.941Z |
| _version_ |
1803860135841366016 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV028795555</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230625163122.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">180603s2015 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.geomorph.2015.09.009</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">GBVA2015006000017.pica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV028795555</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0169-555X(15)30145-8</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">910</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">910</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">650</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Reid, H.E.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Assessing geomorphic sensitivity in relation to river capacity for adjustment</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2015transfer abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">14</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">River sensitivity describes the nature and rate of channel adjustments. An approach to analysis of geomorphic river sensitivity outlined in this paper relates potential sensitivity based on the expected capacity of adjustment for a river type to the recent history of channel adjustment. This approach was trialled to assess low, moderate and high geomorphic sensitivity for four different types of river (10 reaches in total) along the Lower Tongariro River, North Island, New Zealand. Building upon the River Styles framework, river types were differentiated based upon valley setting (width and confinement), channel planform, geomorphic unit assemblages and bed material size. From this, the behavioural regime and potential for adjustment (type and extent) were determined. Historical maps and aerial photographs were geo-rectified and the channel planform digitised to assess channel adjustments for each reach from 1928 to 2007. Floodplain width controlled by terraces, exerted a strong influence upon reach scale sensitivity for the partly-confined, wandering, cobble-bed river. Although forced boundaries occur infrequently, the width of the active channel zone is constrained. An unconfined braided river reach directly downstream of the terrace-confined section was the most geomorphically sensitive reach. The channel in this reach adjusted recurrently to sediment inputs that were flushed through more confined, better connected upstream reaches. A meandering, sand-bed river in downstream reaches has exhibited negligible rates of channel migration. However, channel narrowing in this reach and the associated delta indicate that the system is approaching a threshold condition, beyond which channel avulsion is likely to occur. As this would trigger more rapid migration, this reach is considered to be more geomorphically sensitive than analysis of its low migration rate alone would indicate. This demonstrates how sensitivity is fashioned both by the behavioural regime of a reach and flow/sediment input from upstream. The approach to assess geomorphic river sensitivity outlined here could support ‘room to move’ or ‘freedom space’ approaches to river management by relating likely channel adjustments for the type of river under consideration to the area of land that is required to contain ‘natural’ patterns and rates of geomorphic functionality.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">River sensitivity describes the nature and rate of channel adjustments. An approach to analysis of geomorphic river sensitivity outlined in this paper relates potential sensitivity based on the expected capacity of adjustment for a river type to the recent history of channel adjustment. This approach was trialled to assess low, moderate and high geomorphic sensitivity for four different types of river (10 reaches in total) along the Lower Tongariro River, North Island, New Zealand. Building upon the River Styles framework, river types were differentiated based upon valley setting (width and confinement), channel planform, geomorphic unit assemblages and bed material size. From this, the behavioural regime and potential for adjustment (type and extent) were determined. Historical maps and aerial photographs were geo-rectified and the channel planform digitised to assess channel adjustments for each reach from 1928 to 2007. Floodplain width controlled by terraces, exerted a strong influence upon reach scale sensitivity for the partly-confined, wandering, cobble-bed river. Although forced boundaries occur infrequently, the width of the active channel zone is constrained. An unconfined braided river reach directly downstream of the terrace-confined section was the most geomorphically sensitive reach. The channel in this reach adjusted recurrently to sediment inputs that were flushed through more confined, better connected upstream reaches. A meandering, sand-bed river in downstream reaches has exhibited negligible rates of channel migration. However, channel narrowing in this reach and the associated delta indicate that the system is approaching a threshold condition, beyond which channel avulsion is likely to occur. As this would trigger more rapid migration, this reach is considered to be more geomorphically sensitive than analysis of its low migration rate alone would indicate. This demonstrates how sensitivity is fashioned both by the behavioural regime of a reach and flow/sediment input from upstream. The approach to assess geomorphic river sensitivity outlined here could support ‘room to move’ or ‘freedom space’ approaches to river management by relating likely channel adjustments for the type of river under consideration to the area of land that is required to contain ‘natural’ patterns and rates of geomorphic functionality.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Brierley, G.J.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="n">Elsevier Science</subfield><subfield code="a">Paltrinieri, Andrea ELSEVIER</subfield><subfield code="t">Islamic finance development and banking ESG scores: Evidence from a cross-country analysis</subfield><subfield code="d">2019</subfield><subfield code="g">Amsterdam [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)ELV003279995</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:251</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2015</subfield><subfield code="g">day:15</subfield><subfield code="g">month:12</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:108-121</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:14</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2015.09.009</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">251</subfield><subfield code="j">2015</subfield><subfield code="b">15</subfield><subfield code="c">1215</subfield><subfield code="h">108-121</subfield><subfield code="g">14</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="953" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="2">045F</subfield><subfield code="a">910</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.3996277 |