A systematic review on the sensory reinnervation of free flaps for tongue reconstruction: Does improved sensibility imply functional benefits?
Tongue reconstruction after (hemi)glossectomy including sensory recovery is challenging. Although sensory recovery could improve functional outcome, no consensus on the need for reinnervation of the neo-tongue exists. Therefore, a systematic review was performed to determine if sensory reinnervation...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Baas, Martijn [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2015 |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Umfang: |
11 |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Optical modeling of nickel-base alloys oxidized in pressurized water reactor - 2012transfer abstract, JPRAS, Amsterdam [u.a.] |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:68 ; year:2015 ; number:8 ; pages:1025-1035 ; extent:11 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1016/j.bjps.2015.04.020 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
ELV028886569 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ELV028886569 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230623194828.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 180603s2015 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.bjps.2015.04.020 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a GBVA2015009000014.pica |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)ELV028886569 | ||
| 035 | |a (ELSEVIER)S1748-6815(15)00201-6 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 082 | 0 | |a 610 | |
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 610 |q DE-600 |
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 070 |q VZ |
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 660 |q VZ |
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 333.7 |a 610 |q VZ |
| 084 | |a 43.12 |2 bkl | ||
| 084 | |a 43.13 |2 bkl | ||
| 084 | |a 44.13 |2 bkl | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Baas, Martijn |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a A systematic review on the sensory reinnervation of free flaps for tongue reconstruction: Does improved sensibility imply functional benefits? |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2015 | |
| 300 | |a 11 | ||
| 336 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zzz |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b z |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zu |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Tongue reconstruction after (hemi)glossectomy including sensory recovery is challenging. Although sensory recovery could improve functional outcome, no consensus on the need for reinnervation of the neo-tongue exists. Therefore, a systematic review was performed to determine if sensory reinnervation of free flaps in tongue reconstruction is better than no sensory reinnervation. The secondary study aim was to assess the effect of sensory reinnervation on overall functional outcome, such as speech and deglutition. | ||
| 650 | 7 | |a Nerve reinnervation |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Sensory recovery |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Tongue reconstruction |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Free flaps |2 Elsevier | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Duraku, Liron S. |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Corten, Eveline M.L. |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Mureau, Marc A.M. |4 oth | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |n Elsevier |t Optical modeling of nickel-base alloys oxidized in pressurized water reactor |d 2012transfer abstract |d JPRAS |g Amsterdam [u.a.] |w (DE-627)ELV016014596 |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:68 |g year:2015 |g number:8 |g pages:1025-1035 |g extent:11 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2015.04.020 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_U | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ELV | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_U | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-PHA | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OPC-GGO | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_20 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_40 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_70 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2050 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2110 | ||
| 936 | b | k | |a 43.12 |j Umweltchemie |q VZ |
| 936 | b | k | |a 43.13 |j Umwelttoxikologie |q VZ |
| 936 | b | k | |a 44.13 |j Medizinische Ökologie |q VZ |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 68 |j 2015 |e 8 |h 1025-1035 |g 11 | ||
| 953 | |2 045F |a 610 | ||
| author_variant |
m b mb |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
baasmartijndurakulironscortenevelinemlmu:2015----:sseairveoteesrrinrainfrelpfrogeeosrcinosmrvde |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2015 |
| bklnumber |
43.12 43.13 44.13 |
| publishDate |
2015 |
| allfields |
10.1016/j.bjps.2015.04.020 doi GBVA2015009000014.pica (DE-627)ELV028886569 (ELSEVIER)S1748-6815(15)00201-6 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 610 610 DE-600 070 VZ 660 VZ 333.7 610 VZ 43.12 bkl 43.13 bkl 44.13 bkl Baas, Martijn verfasserin aut A systematic review on the sensory reinnervation of free flaps for tongue reconstruction: Does improved sensibility imply functional benefits? 2015 11 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Tongue reconstruction after (hemi)glossectomy including sensory recovery is challenging. Although sensory recovery could improve functional outcome, no consensus on the need for reinnervation of the neo-tongue exists. Therefore, a systematic review was performed to determine if sensory reinnervation of free flaps in tongue reconstruction is better than no sensory reinnervation. The secondary study aim was to assess the effect of sensory reinnervation on overall functional outcome, such as speech and deglutition. Nerve reinnervation Elsevier Sensory recovery Elsevier Tongue reconstruction Elsevier Free flaps Elsevier Duraku, Liron S. oth Corten, Eveline M.L. oth Mureau, Marc A.M. oth Enthalten in Elsevier Optical modeling of nickel-base alloys oxidized in pressurized water reactor 2012transfer abstract JPRAS Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV016014596 volume:68 year:2015 number:8 pages:1025-1035 extent:11 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2015.04.020 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA SSG-OPC-GGO GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2110 43.12 Umweltchemie VZ 43.13 Umwelttoxikologie VZ 44.13 Medizinische Ökologie VZ AR 68 2015 8 1025-1035 11 045F 610 |
| spelling |
10.1016/j.bjps.2015.04.020 doi GBVA2015009000014.pica (DE-627)ELV028886569 (ELSEVIER)S1748-6815(15)00201-6 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 610 610 DE-600 070 VZ 660 VZ 333.7 610 VZ 43.12 bkl 43.13 bkl 44.13 bkl Baas, Martijn verfasserin aut A systematic review on the sensory reinnervation of free flaps for tongue reconstruction: Does improved sensibility imply functional benefits? 2015 11 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Tongue reconstruction after (hemi)glossectomy including sensory recovery is challenging. Although sensory recovery could improve functional outcome, no consensus on the need for reinnervation of the neo-tongue exists. Therefore, a systematic review was performed to determine if sensory reinnervation of free flaps in tongue reconstruction is better than no sensory reinnervation. The secondary study aim was to assess the effect of sensory reinnervation on overall functional outcome, such as speech and deglutition. Nerve reinnervation Elsevier Sensory recovery Elsevier Tongue reconstruction Elsevier Free flaps Elsevier Duraku, Liron S. oth Corten, Eveline M.L. oth Mureau, Marc A.M. oth Enthalten in Elsevier Optical modeling of nickel-base alloys oxidized in pressurized water reactor 2012transfer abstract JPRAS Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV016014596 volume:68 year:2015 number:8 pages:1025-1035 extent:11 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2015.04.020 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA SSG-OPC-GGO GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2110 43.12 Umweltchemie VZ 43.13 Umwelttoxikologie VZ 44.13 Medizinische Ökologie VZ AR 68 2015 8 1025-1035 11 045F 610 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1016/j.bjps.2015.04.020 doi GBVA2015009000014.pica (DE-627)ELV028886569 (ELSEVIER)S1748-6815(15)00201-6 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 610 610 DE-600 070 VZ 660 VZ 333.7 610 VZ 43.12 bkl 43.13 bkl 44.13 bkl Baas, Martijn verfasserin aut A systematic review on the sensory reinnervation of free flaps for tongue reconstruction: Does improved sensibility imply functional benefits? 2015 11 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Tongue reconstruction after (hemi)glossectomy including sensory recovery is challenging. Although sensory recovery could improve functional outcome, no consensus on the need for reinnervation of the neo-tongue exists. Therefore, a systematic review was performed to determine if sensory reinnervation of free flaps in tongue reconstruction is better than no sensory reinnervation. The secondary study aim was to assess the effect of sensory reinnervation on overall functional outcome, such as speech and deglutition. Nerve reinnervation Elsevier Sensory recovery Elsevier Tongue reconstruction Elsevier Free flaps Elsevier Duraku, Liron S. oth Corten, Eveline M.L. oth Mureau, Marc A.M. oth Enthalten in Elsevier Optical modeling of nickel-base alloys oxidized in pressurized water reactor 2012transfer abstract JPRAS Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV016014596 volume:68 year:2015 number:8 pages:1025-1035 extent:11 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2015.04.020 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA SSG-OPC-GGO GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2110 43.12 Umweltchemie VZ 43.13 Umwelttoxikologie VZ 44.13 Medizinische Ökologie VZ AR 68 2015 8 1025-1035 11 045F 610 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1016/j.bjps.2015.04.020 doi GBVA2015009000014.pica (DE-627)ELV028886569 (ELSEVIER)S1748-6815(15)00201-6 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 610 610 DE-600 070 VZ 660 VZ 333.7 610 VZ 43.12 bkl 43.13 bkl 44.13 bkl Baas, Martijn verfasserin aut A systematic review on the sensory reinnervation of free flaps for tongue reconstruction: Does improved sensibility imply functional benefits? 2015 11 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Tongue reconstruction after (hemi)glossectomy including sensory recovery is challenging. Although sensory recovery could improve functional outcome, no consensus on the need for reinnervation of the neo-tongue exists. Therefore, a systematic review was performed to determine if sensory reinnervation of free flaps in tongue reconstruction is better than no sensory reinnervation. The secondary study aim was to assess the effect of sensory reinnervation on overall functional outcome, such as speech and deglutition. Nerve reinnervation Elsevier Sensory recovery Elsevier Tongue reconstruction Elsevier Free flaps Elsevier Duraku, Liron S. oth Corten, Eveline M.L. oth Mureau, Marc A.M. oth Enthalten in Elsevier Optical modeling of nickel-base alloys oxidized in pressurized water reactor 2012transfer abstract JPRAS Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV016014596 volume:68 year:2015 number:8 pages:1025-1035 extent:11 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2015.04.020 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA SSG-OPC-GGO GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2110 43.12 Umweltchemie VZ 43.13 Umwelttoxikologie VZ 44.13 Medizinische Ökologie VZ AR 68 2015 8 1025-1035 11 045F 610 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1016/j.bjps.2015.04.020 doi GBVA2015009000014.pica (DE-627)ELV028886569 (ELSEVIER)S1748-6815(15)00201-6 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 610 610 DE-600 070 VZ 660 VZ 333.7 610 VZ 43.12 bkl 43.13 bkl 44.13 bkl Baas, Martijn verfasserin aut A systematic review on the sensory reinnervation of free flaps for tongue reconstruction: Does improved sensibility imply functional benefits? 2015 11 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Tongue reconstruction after (hemi)glossectomy including sensory recovery is challenging. Although sensory recovery could improve functional outcome, no consensus on the need for reinnervation of the neo-tongue exists. Therefore, a systematic review was performed to determine if sensory reinnervation of free flaps in tongue reconstruction is better than no sensory reinnervation. The secondary study aim was to assess the effect of sensory reinnervation on overall functional outcome, such as speech and deglutition. Nerve reinnervation Elsevier Sensory recovery Elsevier Tongue reconstruction Elsevier Free flaps Elsevier Duraku, Liron S. oth Corten, Eveline M.L. oth Mureau, Marc A.M. oth Enthalten in Elsevier Optical modeling of nickel-base alloys oxidized in pressurized water reactor 2012transfer abstract JPRAS Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV016014596 volume:68 year:2015 number:8 pages:1025-1035 extent:11 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2015.04.020 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA SSG-OPC-GGO GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2110 43.12 Umweltchemie VZ 43.13 Umwelttoxikologie VZ 44.13 Medizinische Ökologie VZ AR 68 2015 8 1025-1035 11 045F 610 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in Optical modeling of nickel-base alloys oxidized in pressurized water reactor Amsterdam [u.a.] volume:68 year:2015 number:8 pages:1025-1035 extent:11 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in Optical modeling of nickel-base alloys oxidized in pressurized water reactor Amsterdam [u.a.] volume:68 year:2015 number:8 pages:1025-1035 extent:11 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| bklname |
Umweltchemie Umwelttoxikologie Medizinische Ökologie |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
Nerve reinnervation Sensory recovery Tongue reconstruction Free flaps |
| dewey-raw |
610 |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
Optical modeling of nickel-base alloys oxidized in pressurized water reactor |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Baas, Martijn @@aut@@ Duraku, Liron S. @@oth@@ Corten, Eveline M.L. @@oth@@ Mureau, Marc A.M. @@oth@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2015-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
ELV016014596 |
| dewey-sort |
3610 |
| id |
ELV028886569 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV028886569</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230623194828.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">180603s2015 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.bjps.2015.04.020</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">GBVA2015009000014.pica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV028886569</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S1748-6815(15)00201-6</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">610</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">610</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">070</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">660</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">333.7</subfield><subfield code="a">610</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">43.12</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">43.13</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">44.13</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Baas, Martijn</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">A systematic review on the sensory reinnervation of free flaps for tongue reconstruction: Does improved sensibility imply functional benefits?</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Tongue reconstruction after (hemi)glossectomy including sensory recovery is challenging. Although sensory recovery could improve functional outcome, no consensus on the need for reinnervation of the neo-tongue exists. Therefore, a systematic review was performed to determine if sensory reinnervation of free flaps in tongue reconstruction is better than no sensory reinnervation. The secondary study aim was to assess the effect of sensory reinnervation on overall functional outcome, such as speech and deglutition.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Nerve reinnervation</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Sensory recovery</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Tongue reconstruction</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Free flaps</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Duraku, Liron S.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Corten, Eveline M.L.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Mureau, Marc A.M.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="n">Elsevier</subfield><subfield code="t">Optical modeling of nickel-base alloys oxidized in pressurized water reactor</subfield><subfield code="d">2012transfer abstract</subfield><subfield code="d">JPRAS</subfield><subfield code="g">Amsterdam [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)ELV016014596</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:68</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2015</subfield><subfield code="g">number:8</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:1025-1035</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2015.04.020</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OPC-GGO</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2050</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">43.12</subfield><subfield code="j">Umweltchemie</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">43.13</subfield><subfield code="j">Umwelttoxikologie</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">44.13</subfield><subfield code="j">Medizinische Ökologie</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">68</subfield><subfield code="j">2015</subfield><subfield code="e">8</subfield><subfield code="h">1025-1035</subfield><subfield code="g">11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="953" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="2">045F</subfield><subfield code="a">610</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Baas, Martijn |
| spellingShingle |
Baas, Martijn ddc 610 ddc 070 ddc 660 ddc 333.7 bkl 43.12 bkl 43.13 bkl 44.13 Elsevier Nerve reinnervation Elsevier Sensory recovery Elsevier Tongue reconstruction Elsevier Free flaps A systematic review on the sensory reinnervation of free flaps for tongue reconstruction: Does improved sensibility imply functional benefits? |
| authorStr |
Baas, Martijn |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)ELV016014596 |
| format |
electronic Article |
| dewey-ones |
610 - Medicine & health 070 - News media, journalism & publishing 660 - Chemical engineering 333 - Economics of land & energy |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut |
| collection |
elsevier |
| remote_str |
true |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| topic_title |
610 610 DE-600 070 VZ 660 VZ 333.7 610 VZ 43.12 bkl 43.13 bkl 44.13 bkl A systematic review on the sensory reinnervation of free flaps for tongue reconstruction: Does improved sensibility imply functional benefits? Nerve reinnervation Elsevier Sensory recovery Elsevier Tongue reconstruction Elsevier Free flaps Elsevier |
| topic |
ddc 610 ddc 070 ddc 660 ddc 333.7 bkl 43.12 bkl 43.13 bkl 44.13 Elsevier Nerve reinnervation Elsevier Sensory recovery Elsevier Tongue reconstruction Elsevier Free flaps |
| topic_unstemmed |
ddc 610 ddc 070 ddc 660 ddc 333.7 bkl 43.12 bkl 43.13 bkl 44.13 Elsevier Nerve reinnervation Elsevier Sensory recovery Elsevier Tongue reconstruction Elsevier Free flaps |
| topic_browse |
ddc 610 ddc 070 ddc 660 ddc 333.7 bkl 43.12 bkl 43.13 bkl 44.13 Elsevier Nerve reinnervation Elsevier Sensory recovery Elsevier Tongue reconstruction Elsevier Free flaps |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
zu |
| author2_variant |
l s d ls lsd e m c em emc m a m ma mam |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Optical modeling of nickel-base alloys oxidized in pressurized water reactor |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
ELV016014596 |
| dewey-tens |
610 - Medicine & health 070 - News media, journalism & publishing 660 - Chemical engineering 330 - Economics |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Optical modeling of nickel-base alloys oxidized in pressurized water reactor |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)ELV016014596 |
| title |
A systematic review on the sensory reinnervation of free flaps for tongue reconstruction: Does improved sensibility imply functional benefits? |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)ELV028886569 (ELSEVIER)S1748-6815(15)00201-6 |
| title_full |
A systematic review on the sensory reinnervation of free flaps for tongue reconstruction: Does improved sensibility imply functional benefits? |
| author_sort |
Baas, Martijn |
| journal |
Optical modeling of nickel-base alloys oxidized in pressurized water reactor |
| journalStr |
Optical modeling of nickel-base alloys oxidized in pressurized water reactor |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| dewey-hundreds |
600 - Technology 000 - Computer science, information & general works 300 - Social sciences |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2015 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
zzz |
| container_start_page |
1025 |
| author_browse |
Baas, Martijn |
| container_volume |
68 |
| physical |
11 |
| class |
610 610 DE-600 070 VZ 660 VZ 333.7 610 VZ 43.12 bkl 43.13 bkl 44.13 bkl |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Baas, Martijn |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1016/j.bjps.2015.04.020 |
| dewey-full |
610 070 660 333.7 |
| title_sort |
a systematic review on the sensory reinnervation of free flaps for tongue reconstruction: does improved sensibility imply functional benefits? |
| title_auth |
A systematic review on the sensory reinnervation of free flaps for tongue reconstruction: Does improved sensibility imply functional benefits? |
| abstract |
Tongue reconstruction after (hemi)glossectomy including sensory recovery is challenging. Although sensory recovery could improve functional outcome, no consensus on the need for reinnervation of the neo-tongue exists. Therefore, a systematic review was performed to determine if sensory reinnervation of free flaps in tongue reconstruction is better than no sensory reinnervation. The secondary study aim was to assess the effect of sensory reinnervation on overall functional outcome, such as speech and deglutition. |
| abstractGer |
Tongue reconstruction after (hemi)glossectomy including sensory recovery is challenging. Although sensory recovery could improve functional outcome, no consensus on the need for reinnervation of the neo-tongue exists. Therefore, a systematic review was performed to determine if sensory reinnervation of free flaps in tongue reconstruction is better than no sensory reinnervation. The secondary study aim was to assess the effect of sensory reinnervation on overall functional outcome, such as speech and deglutition. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
Tongue reconstruction after (hemi)glossectomy including sensory recovery is challenging. Although sensory recovery could improve functional outcome, no consensus on the need for reinnervation of the neo-tongue exists. Therefore, a systematic review was performed to determine if sensory reinnervation of free flaps in tongue reconstruction is better than no sensory reinnervation. The secondary study aim was to assess the effect of sensory reinnervation on overall functional outcome, such as speech and deglutition. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA SSG-OPC-GGO GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2110 |
| container_issue |
8 |
| title_short |
A systematic review on the sensory reinnervation of free flaps for tongue reconstruction: Does improved sensibility imply functional benefits? |
| url |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2015.04.020 |
| remote_bool |
true |
| author2 |
Duraku, Liron S. Corten, Eveline M.L. Mureau, Marc A.M. |
| author2Str |
Duraku, Liron S. Corten, Eveline M.L. Mureau, Marc A.M. |
| ppnlink |
ELV016014596 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
z |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| author2_role |
oth oth oth |
| doi_str |
10.1016/j.bjps.2015.04.020 |
| up_date |
2024-07-06T19:58:37.936Z |
| _version_ |
1803861012445659136 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV028886569</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230623194828.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">180603s2015 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.bjps.2015.04.020</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">GBVA2015009000014.pica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV028886569</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S1748-6815(15)00201-6</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">610</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">610</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">070</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">660</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">333.7</subfield><subfield code="a">610</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">43.12</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">43.13</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">44.13</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Baas, Martijn</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">A systematic review on the sensory reinnervation of free flaps for tongue reconstruction: Does improved sensibility imply functional benefits?</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Tongue reconstruction after (hemi)glossectomy including sensory recovery is challenging. Although sensory recovery could improve functional outcome, no consensus on the need for reinnervation of the neo-tongue exists. Therefore, a systematic review was performed to determine if sensory reinnervation of free flaps in tongue reconstruction is better than no sensory reinnervation. The secondary study aim was to assess the effect of sensory reinnervation on overall functional outcome, such as speech and deglutition.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Nerve reinnervation</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Sensory recovery</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Tongue reconstruction</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Free flaps</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Duraku, Liron S.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Corten, Eveline M.L.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Mureau, Marc A.M.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="n">Elsevier</subfield><subfield code="t">Optical modeling of nickel-base alloys oxidized in pressurized water reactor</subfield><subfield code="d">2012transfer abstract</subfield><subfield code="d">JPRAS</subfield><subfield code="g">Amsterdam [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)ELV016014596</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:68</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2015</subfield><subfield code="g">number:8</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:1025-1035</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2015.04.020</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OPC-GGO</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2050</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">43.12</subfield><subfield code="j">Umweltchemie</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">43.13</subfield><subfield code="j">Umwelttoxikologie</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">44.13</subfield><subfield code="j">Medizinische Ökologie</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">68</subfield><subfield code="j">2015</subfield><subfield code="e">8</subfield><subfield code="h">1025-1035</subfield><subfield code="g">11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="953" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="2">045F</subfield><subfield code="a">610</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.400016 |