Superficial shoulder muscle co-activations during lifting tasks: Influence of lifting height, weight and phase
This study aimed to assess the level of co-activation of the superficial shoulder muscles during lifting movement. Boxes containing three different loads (6, 12, and 18kg) were lifted by fourteen subjects from the waist to shoulder or eye level. The 3D kinematics and electromyograms of the three del...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Blache, Y. [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2015transfer abstract |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Umfang: |
8 |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Emerging roles of miRNAs in the development of pancreatic cancer - Fathi, Mohadeseh ELSEVIER, 2021, official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiology and Kinesiology, Amsterdam [u.a.] |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:25 ; year:2015 ; number:2 ; pages:355-362 ; extent:8 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1016/j.jelekin.2014.11.004 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
ELV029229677 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ELV029229677 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230625171227.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 180603s2015 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.jelekin.2014.11.004 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a GBVA2015018000029.pica |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)ELV029229677 | ||
| 035 | |a (ELSEVIER)S1050-6411(14)00241-7 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 082 | 0 | |a 610 | |
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 610 |q DE-600 |
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 610 |q VZ |
| 084 | |a 44.40 |2 bkl | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Blache, Y. |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Superficial shoulder muscle co-activations during lifting tasks: Influence of lifting height, weight and phase |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2015transfer abstract | |
| 300 | |a 8 | ||
| 336 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zzz |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b z |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zu |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a This study aimed to assess the level of co-activation of the superficial shoulder muscles during lifting movement. Boxes containing three different loads (6, 12, and 18kg) were lifted by fourteen subjects from the waist to shoulder or eye level. The 3D kinematics and electromyograms of the three deltoids, latissimus dorsi and pectoralis major were recorded. A musculoskeletal model was used to determine direction of the moment arm of these muscles. Finally an index of muscle co-activation named the muscle focus was used to evaluate the effects of lifting height, weight lifted and phase (pulling, lifting and dropping phases) on superficial shoulder muscle coactivation. The muscle focus was lower (more co-contraction) during the dropping phase compared to the two other phases (−13%, p <0.001). This was explained by greater muscle activations and by a change in the direction of the muscle moment arm as a function of glenohumeral joint position. Consequently, the function of the shoulder superficial muscles varied with respect to the glenohumeral joint position. To increase the superficial muscle coactivation during the dropping phase may be a solution to increase glenohumeral joint stiffness. | ||
| 520 | |a This study aimed to assess the level of co-activation of the superficial shoulder muscles during lifting movement. Boxes containing three different loads (6, 12, and 18kg) were lifted by fourteen subjects from the waist to shoulder or eye level. The 3D kinematics and electromyograms of the three deltoids, latissimus dorsi and pectoralis major were recorded. A musculoskeletal model was used to determine direction of the moment arm of these muscles. Finally an index of muscle co-activation named the muscle focus was used to evaluate the effects of lifting height, weight lifted and phase (pulling, lifting and dropping phases) on superficial shoulder muscle coactivation. The muscle focus was lower (more co-contraction) during the dropping phase compared to the two other phases (−13%, p <0.001). This was explained by greater muscle activations and by a change in the direction of the muscle moment arm as a function of glenohumeral joint position. Consequently, the function of the shoulder superficial muscles varied with respect to the glenohumeral joint position. To increase the superficial muscle coactivation during the dropping phase may be a solution to increase glenohumeral joint stiffness. | ||
| 650 | 7 | |a Muscle focus |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Co-contraction |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Glenohumeral joint |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Electromyography |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Moment arm |2 Elsevier | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Dal Maso, F. |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Desmoulins, L. |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Plamondon, A. |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Begon, M. |4 oth | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |n Elsevier Science |a Fathi, Mohadeseh ELSEVIER |t Emerging roles of miRNAs in the development of pancreatic cancer |d 2021 |d official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiology and Kinesiology |g Amsterdam [u.a.] |w (DE-627)ELV006547923 |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:25 |g year:2015 |g number:2 |g pages:355-362 |g extent:8 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelekin.2014.11.004 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_U | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ELV | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_U | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-PHA | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OPC-PHA | ||
| 936 | b | k | |a 44.40 |j Pharmazie |j Pharmazeutika |q VZ |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 25 |j 2015 |e 2 |h 355-362 |g 8 | ||
| 953 | |2 045F |a 610 | ||
| author_variant |
y b yb |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
blacheydalmasofdesmoulinslplamondonabego:2015----:uefcasolemslcatvtosuigitntssnlecol |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2015transfer abstract |
| bklnumber |
44.40 |
| publishDate |
2015 |
| allfields |
10.1016/j.jelekin.2014.11.004 doi GBVA2015018000029.pica (DE-627)ELV029229677 (ELSEVIER)S1050-6411(14)00241-7 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 610 610 DE-600 610 VZ 44.40 bkl Blache, Y. verfasserin aut Superficial shoulder muscle co-activations during lifting tasks: Influence of lifting height, weight and phase 2015transfer abstract 8 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier This study aimed to assess the level of co-activation of the superficial shoulder muscles during lifting movement. Boxes containing three different loads (6, 12, and 18kg) were lifted by fourteen subjects from the waist to shoulder or eye level. The 3D kinematics and electromyograms of the three deltoids, latissimus dorsi and pectoralis major were recorded. A musculoskeletal model was used to determine direction of the moment arm of these muscles. Finally an index of muscle co-activation named the muscle focus was used to evaluate the effects of lifting height, weight lifted and phase (pulling, lifting and dropping phases) on superficial shoulder muscle coactivation. The muscle focus was lower (more co-contraction) during the dropping phase compared to the two other phases (−13%, p <0.001). This was explained by greater muscle activations and by a change in the direction of the muscle moment arm as a function of glenohumeral joint position. Consequently, the function of the shoulder superficial muscles varied with respect to the glenohumeral joint position. To increase the superficial muscle coactivation during the dropping phase may be a solution to increase glenohumeral joint stiffness. This study aimed to assess the level of co-activation of the superficial shoulder muscles during lifting movement. Boxes containing three different loads (6, 12, and 18kg) were lifted by fourteen subjects from the waist to shoulder or eye level. The 3D kinematics and electromyograms of the three deltoids, latissimus dorsi and pectoralis major were recorded. A musculoskeletal model was used to determine direction of the moment arm of these muscles. Finally an index of muscle co-activation named the muscle focus was used to evaluate the effects of lifting height, weight lifted and phase (pulling, lifting and dropping phases) on superficial shoulder muscle coactivation. The muscle focus was lower (more co-contraction) during the dropping phase compared to the two other phases (−13%, p <0.001). This was explained by greater muscle activations and by a change in the direction of the muscle moment arm as a function of glenohumeral joint position. Consequently, the function of the shoulder superficial muscles varied with respect to the glenohumeral joint position. To increase the superficial muscle coactivation during the dropping phase may be a solution to increase glenohumeral joint stiffness. Muscle focus Elsevier Co-contraction Elsevier Glenohumeral joint Elsevier Electromyography Elsevier Moment arm Elsevier Dal Maso, F. oth Desmoulins, L. oth Plamondon, A. oth Begon, M. oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Fathi, Mohadeseh ELSEVIER Emerging roles of miRNAs in the development of pancreatic cancer 2021 official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiology and Kinesiology Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV006547923 volume:25 year:2015 number:2 pages:355-362 extent:8 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelekin.2014.11.004 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA SSG-OPC-PHA 44.40 Pharmazie Pharmazeutika VZ AR 25 2015 2 355-362 8 045F 610 |
| spelling |
10.1016/j.jelekin.2014.11.004 doi GBVA2015018000029.pica (DE-627)ELV029229677 (ELSEVIER)S1050-6411(14)00241-7 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 610 610 DE-600 610 VZ 44.40 bkl Blache, Y. verfasserin aut Superficial shoulder muscle co-activations during lifting tasks: Influence of lifting height, weight and phase 2015transfer abstract 8 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier This study aimed to assess the level of co-activation of the superficial shoulder muscles during lifting movement. Boxes containing three different loads (6, 12, and 18kg) were lifted by fourteen subjects from the waist to shoulder or eye level. The 3D kinematics and electromyograms of the three deltoids, latissimus dorsi and pectoralis major were recorded. A musculoskeletal model was used to determine direction of the moment arm of these muscles. Finally an index of muscle co-activation named the muscle focus was used to evaluate the effects of lifting height, weight lifted and phase (pulling, lifting and dropping phases) on superficial shoulder muscle coactivation. The muscle focus was lower (more co-contraction) during the dropping phase compared to the two other phases (−13%, p <0.001). This was explained by greater muscle activations and by a change in the direction of the muscle moment arm as a function of glenohumeral joint position. Consequently, the function of the shoulder superficial muscles varied with respect to the glenohumeral joint position. To increase the superficial muscle coactivation during the dropping phase may be a solution to increase glenohumeral joint stiffness. This study aimed to assess the level of co-activation of the superficial shoulder muscles during lifting movement. Boxes containing three different loads (6, 12, and 18kg) were lifted by fourteen subjects from the waist to shoulder or eye level. The 3D kinematics and electromyograms of the three deltoids, latissimus dorsi and pectoralis major were recorded. A musculoskeletal model was used to determine direction of the moment arm of these muscles. Finally an index of muscle co-activation named the muscle focus was used to evaluate the effects of lifting height, weight lifted and phase (pulling, lifting and dropping phases) on superficial shoulder muscle coactivation. The muscle focus was lower (more co-contraction) during the dropping phase compared to the two other phases (−13%, p <0.001). This was explained by greater muscle activations and by a change in the direction of the muscle moment arm as a function of glenohumeral joint position. Consequently, the function of the shoulder superficial muscles varied with respect to the glenohumeral joint position. To increase the superficial muscle coactivation during the dropping phase may be a solution to increase glenohumeral joint stiffness. Muscle focus Elsevier Co-contraction Elsevier Glenohumeral joint Elsevier Electromyography Elsevier Moment arm Elsevier Dal Maso, F. oth Desmoulins, L. oth Plamondon, A. oth Begon, M. oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Fathi, Mohadeseh ELSEVIER Emerging roles of miRNAs in the development of pancreatic cancer 2021 official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiology and Kinesiology Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV006547923 volume:25 year:2015 number:2 pages:355-362 extent:8 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelekin.2014.11.004 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA SSG-OPC-PHA 44.40 Pharmazie Pharmazeutika VZ AR 25 2015 2 355-362 8 045F 610 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1016/j.jelekin.2014.11.004 doi GBVA2015018000029.pica (DE-627)ELV029229677 (ELSEVIER)S1050-6411(14)00241-7 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 610 610 DE-600 610 VZ 44.40 bkl Blache, Y. verfasserin aut Superficial shoulder muscle co-activations during lifting tasks: Influence of lifting height, weight and phase 2015transfer abstract 8 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier This study aimed to assess the level of co-activation of the superficial shoulder muscles during lifting movement. Boxes containing three different loads (6, 12, and 18kg) were lifted by fourteen subjects from the waist to shoulder or eye level. The 3D kinematics and electromyograms of the three deltoids, latissimus dorsi and pectoralis major were recorded. A musculoskeletal model was used to determine direction of the moment arm of these muscles. Finally an index of muscle co-activation named the muscle focus was used to evaluate the effects of lifting height, weight lifted and phase (pulling, lifting and dropping phases) on superficial shoulder muscle coactivation. The muscle focus was lower (more co-contraction) during the dropping phase compared to the two other phases (−13%, p <0.001). This was explained by greater muscle activations and by a change in the direction of the muscle moment arm as a function of glenohumeral joint position. Consequently, the function of the shoulder superficial muscles varied with respect to the glenohumeral joint position. To increase the superficial muscle coactivation during the dropping phase may be a solution to increase glenohumeral joint stiffness. This study aimed to assess the level of co-activation of the superficial shoulder muscles during lifting movement. Boxes containing three different loads (6, 12, and 18kg) were lifted by fourteen subjects from the waist to shoulder or eye level. The 3D kinematics and electromyograms of the three deltoids, latissimus dorsi and pectoralis major were recorded. A musculoskeletal model was used to determine direction of the moment arm of these muscles. Finally an index of muscle co-activation named the muscle focus was used to evaluate the effects of lifting height, weight lifted and phase (pulling, lifting and dropping phases) on superficial shoulder muscle coactivation. The muscle focus was lower (more co-contraction) during the dropping phase compared to the two other phases (−13%, p <0.001). This was explained by greater muscle activations and by a change in the direction of the muscle moment arm as a function of glenohumeral joint position. Consequently, the function of the shoulder superficial muscles varied with respect to the glenohumeral joint position. To increase the superficial muscle coactivation during the dropping phase may be a solution to increase glenohumeral joint stiffness. Muscle focus Elsevier Co-contraction Elsevier Glenohumeral joint Elsevier Electromyography Elsevier Moment arm Elsevier Dal Maso, F. oth Desmoulins, L. oth Plamondon, A. oth Begon, M. oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Fathi, Mohadeseh ELSEVIER Emerging roles of miRNAs in the development of pancreatic cancer 2021 official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiology and Kinesiology Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV006547923 volume:25 year:2015 number:2 pages:355-362 extent:8 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelekin.2014.11.004 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA SSG-OPC-PHA 44.40 Pharmazie Pharmazeutika VZ AR 25 2015 2 355-362 8 045F 610 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1016/j.jelekin.2014.11.004 doi GBVA2015018000029.pica (DE-627)ELV029229677 (ELSEVIER)S1050-6411(14)00241-7 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 610 610 DE-600 610 VZ 44.40 bkl Blache, Y. verfasserin aut Superficial shoulder muscle co-activations during lifting tasks: Influence of lifting height, weight and phase 2015transfer abstract 8 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier This study aimed to assess the level of co-activation of the superficial shoulder muscles during lifting movement. Boxes containing three different loads (6, 12, and 18kg) were lifted by fourteen subjects from the waist to shoulder or eye level. The 3D kinematics and electromyograms of the three deltoids, latissimus dorsi and pectoralis major were recorded. A musculoskeletal model was used to determine direction of the moment arm of these muscles. Finally an index of muscle co-activation named the muscle focus was used to evaluate the effects of lifting height, weight lifted and phase (pulling, lifting and dropping phases) on superficial shoulder muscle coactivation. The muscle focus was lower (more co-contraction) during the dropping phase compared to the two other phases (−13%, p <0.001). This was explained by greater muscle activations and by a change in the direction of the muscle moment arm as a function of glenohumeral joint position. Consequently, the function of the shoulder superficial muscles varied with respect to the glenohumeral joint position. To increase the superficial muscle coactivation during the dropping phase may be a solution to increase glenohumeral joint stiffness. This study aimed to assess the level of co-activation of the superficial shoulder muscles during lifting movement. Boxes containing three different loads (6, 12, and 18kg) were lifted by fourteen subjects from the waist to shoulder or eye level. The 3D kinematics and electromyograms of the three deltoids, latissimus dorsi and pectoralis major were recorded. A musculoskeletal model was used to determine direction of the moment arm of these muscles. Finally an index of muscle co-activation named the muscle focus was used to evaluate the effects of lifting height, weight lifted and phase (pulling, lifting and dropping phases) on superficial shoulder muscle coactivation. The muscle focus was lower (more co-contraction) during the dropping phase compared to the two other phases (−13%, p <0.001). This was explained by greater muscle activations and by a change in the direction of the muscle moment arm as a function of glenohumeral joint position. Consequently, the function of the shoulder superficial muscles varied with respect to the glenohumeral joint position. To increase the superficial muscle coactivation during the dropping phase may be a solution to increase glenohumeral joint stiffness. Muscle focus Elsevier Co-contraction Elsevier Glenohumeral joint Elsevier Electromyography Elsevier Moment arm Elsevier Dal Maso, F. oth Desmoulins, L. oth Plamondon, A. oth Begon, M. oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Fathi, Mohadeseh ELSEVIER Emerging roles of miRNAs in the development of pancreatic cancer 2021 official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiology and Kinesiology Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV006547923 volume:25 year:2015 number:2 pages:355-362 extent:8 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelekin.2014.11.004 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA SSG-OPC-PHA 44.40 Pharmazie Pharmazeutika VZ AR 25 2015 2 355-362 8 045F 610 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1016/j.jelekin.2014.11.004 doi GBVA2015018000029.pica (DE-627)ELV029229677 (ELSEVIER)S1050-6411(14)00241-7 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 610 610 DE-600 610 VZ 44.40 bkl Blache, Y. verfasserin aut Superficial shoulder muscle co-activations during lifting tasks: Influence of lifting height, weight and phase 2015transfer abstract 8 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier This study aimed to assess the level of co-activation of the superficial shoulder muscles during lifting movement. Boxes containing three different loads (6, 12, and 18kg) were lifted by fourteen subjects from the waist to shoulder or eye level. The 3D kinematics and electromyograms of the three deltoids, latissimus dorsi and pectoralis major were recorded. A musculoskeletal model was used to determine direction of the moment arm of these muscles. Finally an index of muscle co-activation named the muscle focus was used to evaluate the effects of lifting height, weight lifted and phase (pulling, lifting and dropping phases) on superficial shoulder muscle coactivation. The muscle focus was lower (more co-contraction) during the dropping phase compared to the two other phases (−13%, p <0.001). This was explained by greater muscle activations and by a change in the direction of the muscle moment arm as a function of glenohumeral joint position. Consequently, the function of the shoulder superficial muscles varied with respect to the glenohumeral joint position. To increase the superficial muscle coactivation during the dropping phase may be a solution to increase glenohumeral joint stiffness. This study aimed to assess the level of co-activation of the superficial shoulder muscles during lifting movement. Boxes containing three different loads (6, 12, and 18kg) were lifted by fourteen subjects from the waist to shoulder or eye level. The 3D kinematics and electromyograms of the three deltoids, latissimus dorsi and pectoralis major were recorded. A musculoskeletal model was used to determine direction of the moment arm of these muscles. Finally an index of muscle co-activation named the muscle focus was used to evaluate the effects of lifting height, weight lifted and phase (pulling, lifting and dropping phases) on superficial shoulder muscle coactivation. The muscle focus was lower (more co-contraction) during the dropping phase compared to the two other phases (−13%, p <0.001). This was explained by greater muscle activations and by a change in the direction of the muscle moment arm as a function of glenohumeral joint position. Consequently, the function of the shoulder superficial muscles varied with respect to the glenohumeral joint position. To increase the superficial muscle coactivation during the dropping phase may be a solution to increase glenohumeral joint stiffness. Muscle focus Elsevier Co-contraction Elsevier Glenohumeral joint Elsevier Electromyography Elsevier Moment arm Elsevier Dal Maso, F. oth Desmoulins, L. oth Plamondon, A. oth Begon, M. oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Fathi, Mohadeseh ELSEVIER Emerging roles of miRNAs in the development of pancreatic cancer 2021 official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiology and Kinesiology Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV006547923 volume:25 year:2015 number:2 pages:355-362 extent:8 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelekin.2014.11.004 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA SSG-OPC-PHA 44.40 Pharmazie Pharmazeutika VZ AR 25 2015 2 355-362 8 045F 610 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in Emerging roles of miRNAs in the development of pancreatic cancer Amsterdam [u.a.] volume:25 year:2015 number:2 pages:355-362 extent:8 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in Emerging roles of miRNAs in the development of pancreatic cancer Amsterdam [u.a.] volume:25 year:2015 number:2 pages:355-362 extent:8 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| bklname |
Pharmazie Pharmazeutika |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
Muscle focus Co-contraction Glenohumeral joint Electromyography Moment arm |
| dewey-raw |
610 |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
Emerging roles of miRNAs in the development of pancreatic cancer |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Blache, Y. @@aut@@ Dal Maso, F. @@oth@@ Desmoulins, L. @@oth@@ Plamondon, A. @@oth@@ Begon, M. @@oth@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2015-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
ELV006547923 |
| dewey-sort |
3610 |
| id |
ELV029229677 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV029229677</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230625171227.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">180603s2015 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.jelekin.2014.11.004</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">GBVA2015018000029.pica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV029229677</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S1050-6411(14)00241-7</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">610</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">610</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">610</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">44.40</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Blache, Y.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Superficial shoulder muscle co-activations during lifting tasks: Influence of lifting height, weight and phase</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2015transfer abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">8</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">This study aimed to assess the level of co-activation of the superficial shoulder muscles during lifting movement. Boxes containing three different loads (6, 12, and 18kg) were lifted by fourteen subjects from the waist to shoulder or eye level. The 3D kinematics and electromyograms of the three deltoids, latissimus dorsi and pectoralis major were recorded. A musculoskeletal model was used to determine direction of the moment arm of these muscles. Finally an index of muscle co-activation named the muscle focus was used to evaluate the effects of lifting height, weight lifted and phase (pulling, lifting and dropping phases) on superficial shoulder muscle coactivation. The muscle focus was lower (more co-contraction) during the dropping phase compared to the two other phases (−13%, p <0.001). This was explained by greater muscle activations and by a change in the direction of the muscle moment arm as a function of glenohumeral joint position. Consequently, the function of the shoulder superficial muscles varied with respect to the glenohumeral joint position. To increase the superficial muscle coactivation during the dropping phase may be a solution to increase glenohumeral joint stiffness.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">This study aimed to assess the level of co-activation of the superficial shoulder muscles during lifting movement. Boxes containing three different loads (6, 12, and 18kg) were lifted by fourteen subjects from the waist to shoulder or eye level. The 3D kinematics and electromyograms of the three deltoids, latissimus dorsi and pectoralis major were recorded. A musculoskeletal model was used to determine direction of the moment arm of these muscles. Finally an index of muscle co-activation named the muscle focus was used to evaluate the effects of lifting height, weight lifted and phase (pulling, lifting and dropping phases) on superficial shoulder muscle coactivation. The muscle focus was lower (more co-contraction) during the dropping phase compared to the two other phases (−13%, p <0.001). This was explained by greater muscle activations and by a change in the direction of the muscle moment arm as a function of glenohumeral joint position. Consequently, the function of the shoulder superficial muscles varied with respect to the glenohumeral joint position. To increase the superficial muscle coactivation during the dropping phase may be a solution to increase glenohumeral joint stiffness.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Muscle focus</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Co-contraction</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Glenohumeral joint</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Electromyography</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Moment arm</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Dal Maso, F.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Desmoulins, L.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Plamondon, A.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Begon, M.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="n">Elsevier Science</subfield><subfield code="a">Fathi, Mohadeseh ELSEVIER</subfield><subfield code="t">Emerging roles of miRNAs in the development of pancreatic cancer</subfield><subfield code="d">2021</subfield><subfield code="d">official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiology and Kinesiology</subfield><subfield code="g">Amsterdam [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)ELV006547923</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:25</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2015</subfield><subfield code="g">number:2</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:355-362</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:8</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelekin.2014.11.004</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OPC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">44.40</subfield><subfield code="j">Pharmazie</subfield><subfield code="j">Pharmazeutika</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">25</subfield><subfield code="j">2015</subfield><subfield code="e">2</subfield><subfield code="h">355-362</subfield><subfield code="g">8</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="953" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="2">045F</subfield><subfield code="a">610</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Blache, Y. |
| spellingShingle |
Blache, Y. ddc 610 bkl 44.40 Elsevier Muscle focus Elsevier Co-contraction Elsevier Glenohumeral joint Elsevier Electromyography Elsevier Moment arm Superficial shoulder muscle co-activations during lifting tasks: Influence of lifting height, weight and phase |
| authorStr |
Blache, Y. |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)ELV006547923 |
| format |
electronic Article |
| dewey-ones |
610 - Medicine & health |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut |
| collection |
elsevier |
| remote_str |
true |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| topic_title |
610 610 DE-600 610 VZ 44.40 bkl Superficial shoulder muscle co-activations during lifting tasks: Influence of lifting height, weight and phase Muscle focus Elsevier Co-contraction Elsevier Glenohumeral joint Elsevier Electromyography Elsevier Moment arm Elsevier |
| topic |
ddc 610 bkl 44.40 Elsevier Muscle focus Elsevier Co-contraction Elsevier Glenohumeral joint Elsevier Electromyography Elsevier Moment arm |
| topic_unstemmed |
ddc 610 bkl 44.40 Elsevier Muscle focus Elsevier Co-contraction Elsevier Glenohumeral joint Elsevier Electromyography Elsevier Moment arm |
| topic_browse |
ddc 610 bkl 44.40 Elsevier Muscle focus Elsevier Co-contraction Elsevier Glenohumeral joint Elsevier Electromyography Elsevier Moment arm |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
zu |
| author2_variant |
m f d mf mfd l d ld a p ap m b mb |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Emerging roles of miRNAs in the development of pancreatic cancer |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
ELV006547923 |
| dewey-tens |
610 - Medicine & health |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Emerging roles of miRNAs in the development of pancreatic cancer |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)ELV006547923 |
| title |
Superficial shoulder muscle co-activations during lifting tasks: Influence of lifting height, weight and phase |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)ELV029229677 (ELSEVIER)S1050-6411(14)00241-7 |
| title_full |
Superficial shoulder muscle co-activations during lifting tasks: Influence of lifting height, weight and phase |
| author_sort |
Blache, Y. |
| journal |
Emerging roles of miRNAs in the development of pancreatic cancer |
| journalStr |
Emerging roles of miRNAs in the development of pancreatic cancer |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| dewey-hundreds |
600 - Technology |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2015 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
zzz |
| container_start_page |
355 |
| author_browse |
Blache, Y. |
| container_volume |
25 |
| physical |
8 |
| class |
610 610 DE-600 610 VZ 44.40 bkl |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Blache, Y. |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1016/j.jelekin.2014.11.004 |
| dewey-full |
610 |
| title_sort |
superficial shoulder muscle co-activations during lifting tasks: influence of lifting height, weight and phase |
| title_auth |
Superficial shoulder muscle co-activations during lifting tasks: Influence of lifting height, weight and phase |
| abstract |
This study aimed to assess the level of co-activation of the superficial shoulder muscles during lifting movement. Boxes containing three different loads (6, 12, and 18kg) were lifted by fourteen subjects from the waist to shoulder or eye level. The 3D kinematics and electromyograms of the three deltoids, latissimus dorsi and pectoralis major were recorded. A musculoskeletal model was used to determine direction of the moment arm of these muscles. Finally an index of muscle co-activation named the muscle focus was used to evaluate the effects of lifting height, weight lifted and phase (pulling, lifting and dropping phases) on superficial shoulder muscle coactivation. The muscle focus was lower (more co-contraction) during the dropping phase compared to the two other phases (−13%, p <0.001). This was explained by greater muscle activations and by a change in the direction of the muscle moment arm as a function of glenohumeral joint position. Consequently, the function of the shoulder superficial muscles varied with respect to the glenohumeral joint position. To increase the superficial muscle coactivation during the dropping phase may be a solution to increase glenohumeral joint stiffness. |
| abstractGer |
This study aimed to assess the level of co-activation of the superficial shoulder muscles during lifting movement. Boxes containing three different loads (6, 12, and 18kg) were lifted by fourteen subjects from the waist to shoulder or eye level. The 3D kinematics and electromyograms of the three deltoids, latissimus dorsi and pectoralis major were recorded. A musculoskeletal model was used to determine direction of the moment arm of these muscles. Finally an index of muscle co-activation named the muscle focus was used to evaluate the effects of lifting height, weight lifted and phase (pulling, lifting and dropping phases) on superficial shoulder muscle coactivation. The muscle focus was lower (more co-contraction) during the dropping phase compared to the two other phases (−13%, p <0.001). This was explained by greater muscle activations and by a change in the direction of the muscle moment arm as a function of glenohumeral joint position. Consequently, the function of the shoulder superficial muscles varied with respect to the glenohumeral joint position. To increase the superficial muscle coactivation during the dropping phase may be a solution to increase glenohumeral joint stiffness. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
This study aimed to assess the level of co-activation of the superficial shoulder muscles during lifting movement. Boxes containing three different loads (6, 12, and 18kg) were lifted by fourteen subjects from the waist to shoulder or eye level. The 3D kinematics and electromyograms of the three deltoids, latissimus dorsi and pectoralis major were recorded. A musculoskeletal model was used to determine direction of the moment arm of these muscles. Finally an index of muscle co-activation named the muscle focus was used to evaluate the effects of lifting height, weight lifted and phase (pulling, lifting and dropping phases) on superficial shoulder muscle coactivation. The muscle focus was lower (more co-contraction) during the dropping phase compared to the two other phases (−13%, p <0.001). This was explained by greater muscle activations and by a change in the direction of the muscle moment arm as a function of glenohumeral joint position. Consequently, the function of the shoulder superficial muscles varied with respect to the glenohumeral joint position. To increase the superficial muscle coactivation during the dropping phase may be a solution to increase glenohumeral joint stiffness. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA SSG-OPC-PHA |
| container_issue |
2 |
| title_short |
Superficial shoulder muscle co-activations during lifting tasks: Influence of lifting height, weight and phase |
| url |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelekin.2014.11.004 |
| remote_bool |
true |
| author2 |
Dal Maso, F. Desmoulins, L. Plamondon, A. Begon, M. |
| author2Str |
Dal Maso, F. Desmoulins, L. Plamondon, A. Begon, M. |
| ppnlink |
ELV006547923 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
z |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| author2_role |
oth oth oth oth |
| doi_str |
10.1016/j.jelekin.2014.11.004 |
| up_date |
2024-07-06T20:53:45.962Z |
| _version_ |
1803864481164427264 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV029229677</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230625171227.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">180603s2015 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.jelekin.2014.11.004</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">GBVA2015018000029.pica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV029229677</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S1050-6411(14)00241-7</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">610</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">610</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">610</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">44.40</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Blache, Y.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Superficial shoulder muscle co-activations during lifting tasks: Influence of lifting height, weight and phase</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2015transfer abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">8</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">This study aimed to assess the level of co-activation of the superficial shoulder muscles during lifting movement. Boxes containing three different loads (6, 12, and 18kg) were lifted by fourteen subjects from the waist to shoulder or eye level. The 3D kinematics and electromyograms of the three deltoids, latissimus dorsi and pectoralis major were recorded. A musculoskeletal model was used to determine direction of the moment arm of these muscles. Finally an index of muscle co-activation named the muscle focus was used to evaluate the effects of lifting height, weight lifted and phase (pulling, lifting and dropping phases) on superficial shoulder muscle coactivation. The muscle focus was lower (more co-contraction) during the dropping phase compared to the two other phases (−13%, p <0.001). This was explained by greater muscle activations and by a change in the direction of the muscle moment arm as a function of glenohumeral joint position. Consequently, the function of the shoulder superficial muscles varied with respect to the glenohumeral joint position. To increase the superficial muscle coactivation during the dropping phase may be a solution to increase glenohumeral joint stiffness.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">This study aimed to assess the level of co-activation of the superficial shoulder muscles during lifting movement. Boxes containing three different loads (6, 12, and 18kg) were lifted by fourteen subjects from the waist to shoulder or eye level. The 3D kinematics and electromyograms of the three deltoids, latissimus dorsi and pectoralis major were recorded. A musculoskeletal model was used to determine direction of the moment arm of these muscles. Finally an index of muscle co-activation named the muscle focus was used to evaluate the effects of lifting height, weight lifted and phase (pulling, lifting and dropping phases) on superficial shoulder muscle coactivation. The muscle focus was lower (more co-contraction) during the dropping phase compared to the two other phases (−13%, p <0.001). This was explained by greater muscle activations and by a change in the direction of the muscle moment arm as a function of glenohumeral joint position. Consequently, the function of the shoulder superficial muscles varied with respect to the glenohumeral joint position. To increase the superficial muscle coactivation during the dropping phase may be a solution to increase glenohumeral joint stiffness.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Muscle focus</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Co-contraction</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Glenohumeral joint</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Electromyography</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Moment arm</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Dal Maso, F.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Desmoulins, L.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Plamondon, A.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Begon, M.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="n">Elsevier Science</subfield><subfield code="a">Fathi, Mohadeseh ELSEVIER</subfield><subfield code="t">Emerging roles of miRNAs in the development of pancreatic cancer</subfield><subfield code="d">2021</subfield><subfield code="d">official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiology and Kinesiology</subfield><subfield code="g">Amsterdam [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)ELV006547923</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:25</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2015</subfield><subfield code="g">number:2</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:355-362</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:8</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelekin.2014.11.004</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OPC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">44.40</subfield><subfield code="j">Pharmazie</subfield><subfield code="j">Pharmazeutika</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">25</subfield><subfield code="j">2015</subfield><subfield code="e">2</subfield><subfield code="h">355-362</subfield><subfield code="g">8</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="953" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="2">045F</subfield><subfield code="a">610</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.400504 |