Model for gas hydrates applied to CCS systems part III. Results and implementation in TREND 2.0
In this study divided in a series of three articles, the model for pure CO2 hydrate by Jäger et al. [Fluid Phase Equilib. 338 (2013) 100–113] has been improved and extended to other gases relevant in Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) applications. The new hydrate model is inspired by the model for na...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Jäger, Andreas [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2016transfer abstract |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Umfang: |
12 |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Fabrication and compressive behaviour of an aluminium foam composite - Li, Yong-gang ELSEVIER, 2015, an international journal, New York, NY [u.a.] |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:429 ; year:2016 ; day:15 ; month:12 ; pages:55-66 ; extent:12 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1016/j.fluid.2016.08.027 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
ELV029786983 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ELV029786983 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230625175459.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 180603s2016 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.fluid.2016.08.027 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a GBVA2016013000005.pica |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)ELV029786983 | ||
| 035 | |a (ELSEVIER)S0378-3812(16)30401-0 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 082 | 0 | |a 660 |a 540 | |
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 660 |q DE-600 |
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 540 |q DE-600 |
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 670 |q VZ |
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 540 |q VZ |
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 630 |q VZ |
| 100 | 1 | |a Jäger, Andreas |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Model for gas hydrates applied to CCS systems part III. Results and implementation in TREND 2.0 |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2016transfer abstract | |
| 300 | |a 12 | ||
| 336 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zzz |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b z |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zu |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a In this study divided in a series of three articles, the model for pure CO2 hydrate by Jäger et al. [Fluid Phase Equilib. 338 (2013) 100–113] has been improved and extended to other gases relevant in Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) applications. The new hydrate model is inspired by the model for natural gas hydrates by Ballard and Sloan [Fluid Phase Equilib. 194 (2002) 371–383], which belongs to the family of van der Waals and Platteeuw (vdWP) models [Adv. Chem. Phys. 2 (1959) 1]. The new model is combined with highly accurate equations of state (EoS) in form of the Helmholtz energy for fluid phases and with Gibbs energy models for pure solid phases. In part I, a critical analysis of the main parameters of the vdWP-based hydrate model was performed. A multi-property fitting algorithm developed for optimization of parameters of the new hydrate model is introduced in part II. Results of the model, including phase equilibria with hydrates, composition of hydrates, and enthalpy of formation of hydrates are provided in this article (part III). The model results are for most hydrate formers better or comparable to the results of the model of Ballard and Sloan. However, for ethane hydrates the overall results are worse which is discussed in the results section. The model has been implemented in the software package TREND 2.0 by Span et al. [Thermodynamic Reference and Engineering Data 2.0. (2015) Lehrstuhl fuer Thermodynamik, Ruhr-Universitaet Bochum]. Example calculations with the new hydrate model implemented in TREND 2.0 and applied to CCS-relevant problems are shown and discussed. | ||
| 520 | |a In this study divided in a series of three articles, the model for pure CO2 hydrate by Jäger et al. [Fluid Phase Equilib. 338 (2013) 100–113] has been improved and extended to other gases relevant in Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) applications. The new hydrate model is inspired by the model for natural gas hydrates by Ballard and Sloan [Fluid Phase Equilib. 194 (2002) 371–383], which belongs to the family of van der Waals and Platteeuw (vdWP) models [Adv. Chem. Phys. 2 (1959) 1]. The new model is combined with highly accurate equations of state (EoS) in form of the Helmholtz energy for fluid phases and with Gibbs energy models for pure solid phases. In part I, a critical analysis of the main parameters of the vdWP-based hydrate model was performed. A multi-property fitting algorithm developed for optimization of parameters of the new hydrate model is introduced in part II. Results of the model, including phase equilibria with hydrates, composition of hydrates, and enthalpy of formation of hydrates are provided in this article (part III). The model results are for most hydrate formers better or comparable to the results of the model of Ballard and Sloan. However, for ethane hydrates the overall results are worse which is discussed in the results section. The model has been implemented in the software package TREND 2.0 by Span et al. [Thermodynamic Reference and Engineering Data 2.0. (2015) Lehrstuhl fuer Thermodynamik, Ruhr-Universitaet Bochum]. Example calculations with the new hydrate model implemented in TREND 2.0 and applied to CCS-relevant problems are shown and discussed. | ||
| 650 | 7 | |a Gas hydrate |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a CCS |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Enthalpy |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Phase equilibria |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Reference equation of state |2 Elsevier | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Vinš, Václav |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Span, Roland |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Hrubý, Jan |4 oth | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |n Science Direct |a Li, Yong-gang ELSEVIER |t Fabrication and compressive behaviour of an aluminium foam composite |d 2015 |d an international journal |g New York, NY [u.a.] |w (DE-627)ELV013241125 |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:429 |g year:2016 |g day:15 |g month:12 |g pages:55-66 |g extent:12 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fluid.2016.08.027 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_U | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ELV | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_U | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-PHA | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_31 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_40 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_100 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_136 | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 429 |j 2016 |b 15 |c 1215 |h 55-66 |g 12 | ||
| 953 | |2 045F |a 660 | ||
| author_variant |
a j aj |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
jgerandreasvinvclavspanrolandhrubjan:2016----:oefrahdaeapidocssesatirslsni |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2016transfer abstract |
| publishDate |
2016 |
| allfields |
10.1016/j.fluid.2016.08.027 doi GBVA2016013000005.pica (DE-627)ELV029786983 (ELSEVIER)S0378-3812(16)30401-0 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 660 540 660 DE-600 540 DE-600 670 VZ 540 VZ 630 VZ Jäger, Andreas verfasserin aut Model for gas hydrates applied to CCS systems part III. Results and implementation in TREND 2.0 2016transfer abstract 12 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier In this study divided in a series of three articles, the model for pure CO2 hydrate by Jäger et al. [Fluid Phase Equilib. 338 (2013) 100–113] has been improved and extended to other gases relevant in Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) applications. The new hydrate model is inspired by the model for natural gas hydrates by Ballard and Sloan [Fluid Phase Equilib. 194 (2002) 371–383], which belongs to the family of van der Waals and Platteeuw (vdWP) models [Adv. Chem. Phys. 2 (1959) 1]. The new model is combined with highly accurate equations of state (EoS) in form of the Helmholtz energy for fluid phases and with Gibbs energy models for pure solid phases. In part I, a critical analysis of the main parameters of the vdWP-based hydrate model was performed. A multi-property fitting algorithm developed for optimization of parameters of the new hydrate model is introduced in part II. Results of the model, including phase equilibria with hydrates, composition of hydrates, and enthalpy of formation of hydrates are provided in this article (part III). The model results are for most hydrate formers better or comparable to the results of the model of Ballard and Sloan. However, for ethane hydrates the overall results are worse which is discussed in the results section. The model has been implemented in the software package TREND 2.0 by Span et al. [Thermodynamic Reference and Engineering Data 2.0. (2015) Lehrstuhl fuer Thermodynamik, Ruhr-Universitaet Bochum]. Example calculations with the new hydrate model implemented in TREND 2.0 and applied to CCS-relevant problems are shown and discussed. In this study divided in a series of three articles, the model for pure CO2 hydrate by Jäger et al. [Fluid Phase Equilib. 338 (2013) 100–113] has been improved and extended to other gases relevant in Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) applications. The new hydrate model is inspired by the model for natural gas hydrates by Ballard and Sloan [Fluid Phase Equilib. 194 (2002) 371–383], which belongs to the family of van der Waals and Platteeuw (vdWP) models [Adv. Chem. Phys. 2 (1959) 1]. The new model is combined with highly accurate equations of state (EoS) in form of the Helmholtz energy for fluid phases and with Gibbs energy models for pure solid phases. In part I, a critical analysis of the main parameters of the vdWP-based hydrate model was performed. A multi-property fitting algorithm developed for optimization of parameters of the new hydrate model is introduced in part II. Results of the model, including phase equilibria with hydrates, composition of hydrates, and enthalpy of formation of hydrates are provided in this article (part III). The model results are for most hydrate formers better or comparable to the results of the model of Ballard and Sloan. However, for ethane hydrates the overall results are worse which is discussed in the results section. The model has been implemented in the software package TREND 2.0 by Span et al. [Thermodynamic Reference and Engineering Data 2.0. (2015) Lehrstuhl fuer Thermodynamik, Ruhr-Universitaet Bochum]. Example calculations with the new hydrate model implemented in TREND 2.0 and applied to CCS-relevant problems are shown and discussed. Gas hydrate Elsevier CCS Elsevier Enthalpy Elsevier Phase equilibria Elsevier Reference equation of state Elsevier Vinš, Václav oth Span, Roland oth Hrubý, Jan oth Enthalten in Science Direct Li, Yong-gang ELSEVIER Fabrication and compressive behaviour of an aluminium foam composite 2015 an international journal New York, NY [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV013241125 volume:429 year:2016 day:15 month:12 pages:55-66 extent:12 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fluid.2016.08.027 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_136 AR 429 2016 15 1215 55-66 12 045F 660 |
| spelling |
10.1016/j.fluid.2016.08.027 doi GBVA2016013000005.pica (DE-627)ELV029786983 (ELSEVIER)S0378-3812(16)30401-0 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 660 540 660 DE-600 540 DE-600 670 VZ 540 VZ 630 VZ Jäger, Andreas verfasserin aut Model for gas hydrates applied to CCS systems part III. Results and implementation in TREND 2.0 2016transfer abstract 12 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier In this study divided in a series of three articles, the model for pure CO2 hydrate by Jäger et al. [Fluid Phase Equilib. 338 (2013) 100–113] has been improved and extended to other gases relevant in Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) applications. The new hydrate model is inspired by the model for natural gas hydrates by Ballard and Sloan [Fluid Phase Equilib. 194 (2002) 371–383], which belongs to the family of van der Waals and Platteeuw (vdWP) models [Adv. Chem. Phys. 2 (1959) 1]. The new model is combined with highly accurate equations of state (EoS) in form of the Helmholtz energy for fluid phases and with Gibbs energy models for pure solid phases. In part I, a critical analysis of the main parameters of the vdWP-based hydrate model was performed. A multi-property fitting algorithm developed for optimization of parameters of the new hydrate model is introduced in part II. Results of the model, including phase equilibria with hydrates, composition of hydrates, and enthalpy of formation of hydrates are provided in this article (part III). The model results are for most hydrate formers better or comparable to the results of the model of Ballard and Sloan. However, for ethane hydrates the overall results are worse which is discussed in the results section. The model has been implemented in the software package TREND 2.0 by Span et al. [Thermodynamic Reference and Engineering Data 2.0. (2015) Lehrstuhl fuer Thermodynamik, Ruhr-Universitaet Bochum]. Example calculations with the new hydrate model implemented in TREND 2.0 and applied to CCS-relevant problems are shown and discussed. In this study divided in a series of three articles, the model for pure CO2 hydrate by Jäger et al. [Fluid Phase Equilib. 338 (2013) 100–113] has been improved and extended to other gases relevant in Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) applications. The new hydrate model is inspired by the model for natural gas hydrates by Ballard and Sloan [Fluid Phase Equilib. 194 (2002) 371–383], which belongs to the family of van der Waals and Platteeuw (vdWP) models [Adv. Chem. Phys. 2 (1959) 1]. The new model is combined with highly accurate equations of state (EoS) in form of the Helmholtz energy for fluid phases and with Gibbs energy models for pure solid phases. In part I, a critical analysis of the main parameters of the vdWP-based hydrate model was performed. A multi-property fitting algorithm developed for optimization of parameters of the new hydrate model is introduced in part II. Results of the model, including phase equilibria with hydrates, composition of hydrates, and enthalpy of formation of hydrates are provided in this article (part III). The model results are for most hydrate formers better or comparable to the results of the model of Ballard and Sloan. However, for ethane hydrates the overall results are worse which is discussed in the results section. The model has been implemented in the software package TREND 2.0 by Span et al. [Thermodynamic Reference and Engineering Data 2.0. (2015) Lehrstuhl fuer Thermodynamik, Ruhr-Universitaet Bochum]. Example calculations with the new hydrate model implemented in TREND 2.0 and applied to CCS-relevant problems are shown and discussed. Gas hydrate Elsevier CCS Elsevier Enthalpy Elsevier Phase equilibria Elsevier Reference equation of state Elsevier Vinš, Václav oth Span, Roland oth Hrubý, Jan oth Enthalten in Science Direct Li, Yong-gang ELSEVIER Fabrication and compressive behaviour of an aluminium foam composite 2015 an international journal New York, NY [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV013241125 volume:429 year:2016 day:15 month:12 pages:55-66 extent:12 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fluid.2016.08.027 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_136 AR 429 2016 15 1215 55-66 12 045F 660 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1016/j.fluid.2016.08.027 doi GBVA2016013000005.pica (DE-627)ELV029786983 (ELSEVIER)S0378-3812(16)30401-0 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 660 540 660 DE-600 540 DE-600 670 VZ 540 VZ 630 VZ Jäger, Andreas verfasserin aut Model for gas hydrates applied to CCS systems part III. Results and implementation in TREND 2.0 2016transfer abstract 12 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier In this study divided in a series of three articles, the model for pure CO2 hydrate by Jäger et al. [Fluid Phase Equilib. 338 (2013) 100–113] has been improved and extended to other gases relevant in Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) applications. The new hydrate model is inspired by the model for natural gas hydrates by Ballard and Sloan [Fluid Phase Equilib. 194 (2002) 371–383], which belongs to the family of van der Waals and Platteeuw (vdWP) models [Adv. Chem. Phys. 2 (1959) 1]. The new model is combined with highly accurate equations of state (EoS) in form of the Helmholtz energy for fluid phases and with Gibbs energy models for pure solid phases. In part I, a critical analysis of the main parameters of the vdWP-based hydrate model was performed. A multi-property fitting algorithm developed for optimization of parameters of the new hydrate model is introduced in part II. Results of the model, including phase equilibria with hydrates, composition of hydrates, and enthalpy of formation of hydrates are provided in this article (part III). The model results are for most hydrate formers better or comparable to the results of the model of Ballard and Sloan. However, for ethane hydrates the overall results are worse which is discussed in the results section. The model has been implemented in the software package TREND 2.0 by Span et al. [Thermodynamic Reference and Engineering Data 2.0. (2015) Lehrstuhl fuer Thermodynamik, Ruhr-Universitaet Bochum]. Example calculations with the new hydrate model implemented in TREND 2.0 and applied to CCS-relevant problems are shown and discussed. In this study divided in a series of three articles, the model for pure CO2 hydrate by Jäger et al. [Fluid Phase Equilib. 338 (2013) 100–113] has been improved and extended to other gases relevant in Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) applications. The new hydrate model is inspired by the model for natural gas hydrates by Ballard and Sloan [Fluid Phase Equilib. 194 (2002) 371–383], which belongs to the family of van der Waals and Platteeuw (vdWP) models [Adv. Chem. Phys. 2 (1959) 1]. The new model is combined with highly accurate equations of state (EoS) in form of the Helmholtz energy for fluid phases and with Gibbs energy models for pure solid phases. In part I, a critical analysis of the main parameters of the vdWP-based hydrate model was performed. A multi-property fitting algorithm developed for optimization of parameters of the new hydrate model is introduced in part II. Results of the model, including phase equilibria with hydrates, composition of hydrates, and enthalpy of formation of hydrates are provided in this article (part III). The model results are for most hydrate formers better or comparable to the results of the model of Ballard and Sloan. However, for ethane hydrates the overall results are worse which is discussed in the results section. The model has been implemented in the software package TREND 2.0 by Span et al. [Thermodynamic Reference and Engineering Data 2.0. (2015) Lehrstuhl fuer Thermodynamik, Ruhr-Universitaet Bochum]. Example calculations with the new hydrate model implemented in TREND 2.0 and applied to CCS-relevant problems are shown and discussed. Gas hydrate Elsevier CCS Elsevier Enthalpy Elsevier Phase equilibria Elsevier Reference equation of state Elsevier Vinš, Václav oth Span, Roland oth Hrubý, Jan oth Enthalten in Science Direct Li, Yong-gang ELSEVIER Fabrication and compressive behaviour of an aluminium foam composite 2015 an international journal New York, NY [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV013241125 volume:429 year:2016 day:15 month:12 pages:55-66 extent:12 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fluid.2016.08.027 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_136 AR 429 2016 15 1215 55-66 12 045F 660 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1016/j.fluid.2016.08.027 doi GBVA2016013000005.pica (DE-627)ELV029786983 (ELSEVIER)S0378-3812(16)30401-0 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 660 540 660 DE-600 540 DE-600 670 VZ 540 VZ 630 VZ Jäger, Andreas verfasserin aut Model for gas hydrates applied to CCS systems part III. Results and implementation in TREND 2.0 2016transfer abstract 12 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier In this study divided in a series of three articles, the model for pure CO2 hydrate by Jäger et al. [Fluid Phase Equilib. 338 (2013) 100–113] has been improved and extended to other gases relevant in Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) applications. The new hydrate model is inspired by the model for natural gas hydrates by Ballard and Sloan [Fluid Phase Equilib. 194 (2002) 371–383], which belongs to the family of van der Waals and Platteeuw (vdWP) models [Adv. Chem. Phys. 2 (1959) 1]. The new model is combined with highly accurate equations of state (EoS) in form of the Helmholtz energy for fluid phases and with Gibbs energy models for pure solid phases. In part I, a critical analysis of the main parameters of the vdWP-based hydrate model was performed. A multi-property fitting algorithm developed for optimization of parameters of the new hydrate model is introduced in part II. Results of the model, including phase equilibria with hydrates, composition of hydrates, and enthalpy of formation of hydrates are provided in this article (part III). The model results are for most hydrate formers better or comparable to the results of the model of Ballard and Sloan. However, for ethane hydrates the overall results are worse which is discussed in the results section. The model has been implemented in the software package TREND 2.0 by Span et al. [Thermodynamic Reference and Engineering Data 2.0. (2015) Lehrstuhl fuer Thermodynamik, Ruhr-Universitaet Bochum]. Example calculations with the new hydrate model implemented in TREND 2.0 and applied to CCS-relevant problems are shown and discussed. In this study divided in a series of three articles, the model for pure CO2 hydrate by Jäger et al. [Fluid Phase Equilib. 338 (2013) 100–113] has been improved and extended to other gases relevant in Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) applications. The new hydrate model is inspired by the model for natural gas hydrates by Ballard and Sloan [Fluid Phase Equilib. 194 (2002) 371–383], which belongs to the family of van der Waals and Platteeuw (vdWP) models [Adv. Chem. Phys. 2 (1959) 1]. The new model is combined with highly accurate equations of state (EoS) in form of the Helmholtz energy for fluid phases and with Gibbs energy models for pure solid phases. In part I, a critical analysis of the main parameters of the vdWP-based hydrate model was performed. A multi-property fitting algorithm developed for optimization of parameters of the new hydrate model is introduced in part II. Results of the model, including phase equilibria with hydrates, composition of hydrates, and enthalpy of formation of hydrates are provided in this article (part III). The model results are for most hydrate formers better or comparable to the results of the model of Ballard and Sloan. However, for ethane hydrates the overall results are worse which is discussed in the results section. The model has been implemented in the software package TREND 2.0 by Span et al. [Thermodynamic Reference and Engineering Data 2.0. (2015) Lehrstuhl fuer Thermodynamik, Ruhr-Universitaet Bochum]. Example calculations with the new hydrate model implemented in TREND 2.0 and applied to CCS-relevant problems are shown and discussed. Gas hydrate Elsevier CCS Elsevier Enthalpy Elsevier Phase equilibria Elsevier Reference equation of state Elsevier Vinš, Václav oth Span, Roland oth Hrubý, Jan oth Enthalten in Science Direct Li, Yong-gang ELSEVIER Fabrication and compressive behaviour of an aluminium foam composite 2015 an international journal New York, NY [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV013241125 volume:429 year:2016 day:15 month:12 pages:55-66 extent:12 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fluid.2016.08.027 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_136 AR 429 2016 15 1215 55-66 12 045F 660 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1016/j.fluid.2016.08.027 doi GBVA2016013000005.pica (DE-627)ELV029786983 (ELSEVIER)S0378-3812(16)30401-0 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 660 540 660 DE-600 540 DE-600 670 VZ 540 VZ 630 VZ Jäger, Andreas verfasserin aut Model for gas hydrates applied to CCS systems part III. Results and implementation in TREND 2.0 2016transfer abstract 12 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier In this study divided in a series of three articles, the model for pure CO2 hydrate by Jäger et al. [Fluid Phase Equilib. 338 (2013) 100–113] has been improved and extended to other gases relevant in Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) applications. The new hydrate model is inspired by the model for natural gas hydrates by Ballard and Sloan [Fluid Phase Equilib. 194 (2002) 371–383], which belongs to the family of van der Waals and Platteeuw (vdWP) models [Adv. Chem. Phys. 2 (1959) 1]. The new model is combined with highly accurate equations of state (EoS) in form of the Helmholtz energy for fluid phases and with Gibbs energy models for pure solid phases. In part I, a critical analysis of the main parameters of the vdWP-based hydrate model was performed. A multi-property fitting algorithm developed for optimization of parameters of the new hydrate model is introduced in part II. Results of the model, including phase equilibria with hydrates, composition of hydrates, and enthalpy of formation of hydrates are provided in this article (part III). The model results are for most hydrate formers better or comparable to the results of the model of Ballard and Sloan. However, for ethane hydrates the overall results are worse which is discussed in the results section. The model has been implemented in the software package TREND 2.0 by Span et al. [Thermodynamic Reference and Engineering Data 2.0. (2015) Lehrstuhl fuer Thermodynamik, Ruhr-Universitaet Bochum]. Example calculations with the new hydrate model implemented in TREND 2.0 and applied to CCS-relevant problems are shown and discussed. In this study divided in a series of three articles, the model for pure CO2 hydrate by Jäger et al. [Fluid Phase Equilib. 338 (2013) 100–113] has been improved and extended to other gases relevant in Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) applications. The new hydrate model is inspired by the model for natural gas hydrates by Ballard and Sloan [Fluid Phase Equilib. 194 (2002) 371–383], which belongs to the family of van der Waals and Platteeuw (vdWP) models [Adv. Chem. Phys. 2 (1959) 1]. The new model is combined with highly accurate equations of state (EoS) in form of the Helmholtz energy for fluid phases and with Gibbs energy models for pure solid phases. In part I, a critical analysis of the main parameters of the vdWP-based hydrate model was performed. A multi-property fitting algorithm developed for optimization of parameters of the new hydrate model is introduced in part II. Results of the model, including phase equilibria with hydrates, composition of hydrates, and enthalpy of formation of hydrates are provided in this article (part III). The model results are for most hydrate formers better or comparable to the results of the model of Ballard and Sloan. However, for ethane hydrates the overall results are worse which is discussed in the results section. The model has been implemented in the software package TREND 2.0 by Span et al. [Thermodynamic Reference and Engineering Data 2.0. (2015) Lehrstuhl fuer Thermodynamik, Ruhr-Universitaet Bochum]. Example calculations with the new hydrate model implemented in TREND 2.0 and applied to CCS-relevant problems are shown and discussed. Gas hydrate Elsevier CCS Elsevier Enthalpy Elsevier Phase equilibria Elsevier Reference equation of state Elsevier Vinš, Václav oth Span, Roland oth Hrubý, Jan oth Enthalten in Science Direct Li, Yong-gang ELSEVIER Fabrication and compressive behaviour of an aluminium foam composite 2015 an international journal New York, NY [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV013241125 volume:429 year:2016 day:15 month:12 pages:55-66 extent:12 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fluid.2016.08.027 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_136 AR 429 2016 15 1215 55-66 12 045F 660 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in Fabrication and compressive behaviour of an aluminium foam composite New York, NY [u.a.] volume:429 year:2016 day:15 month:12 pages:55-66 extent:12 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in Fabrication and compressive behaviour of an aluminium foam composite New York, NY [u.a.] volume:429 year:2016 day:15 month:12 pages:55-66 extent:12 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
Gas hydrate CCS Enthalpy Phase equilibria Reference equation of state |
| dewey-raw |
660 |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
Fabrication and compressive behaviour of an aluminium foam composite |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Jäger, Andreas @@aut@@ Vinš, Václav @@oth@@ Span, Roland @@oth@@ Hrubý, Jan @@oth@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2016-01-15T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
ELV013241125 |
| dewey-sort |
3660 |
| id |
ELV029786983 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV029786983</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230625175459.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">180603s2016 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.fluid.2016.08.027</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">GBVA2016013000005.pica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV029786983</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0378-3812(16)30401-0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">660</subfield><subfield code="a">540</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">660</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">540</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">670</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">540</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">630</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Jäger, Andreas</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Model for gas hydrates applied to CCS systems part III. Results and implementation in TREND 2.0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2016transfer abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">12</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">In this study divided in a series of three articles, the model for pure CO2 hydrate by Jäger et al. [Fluid Phase Equilib. 338 (2013) 100–113] has been improved and extended to other gases relevant in Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) applications. The new hydrate model is inspired by the model for natural gas hydrates by Ballard and Sloan [Fluid Phase Equilib. 194 (2002) 371–383], which belongs to the family of van der Waals and Platteeuw (vdWP) models [Adv. Chem. Phys. 2 (1959) 1]. The new model is combined with highly accurate equations of state (EoS) in form of the Helmholtz energy for fluid phases and with Gibbs energy models for pure solid phases. In part I, a critical analysis of the main parameters of the vdWP-based hydrate model was performed. A multi-property fitting algorithm developed for optimization of parameters of the new hydrate model is introduced in part II. Results of the model, including phase equilibria with hydrates, composition of hydrates, and enthalpy of formation of hydrates are provided in this article (part III). The model results are for most hydrate formers better or comparable to the results of the model of Ballard and Sloan. However, for ethane hydrates the overall results are worse which is discussed in the results section. The model has been implemented in the software package TREND 2.0 by Span et al. [Thermodynamic Reference and Engineering Data 2.0. (2015) Lehrstuhl fuer Thermodynamik, Ruhr-Universitaet Bochum]. Example calculations with the new hydrate model implemented in TREND 2.0 and applied to CCS-relevant problems are shown and discussed.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">In this study divided in a series of three articles, the model for pure CO2 hydrate by Jäger et al. [Fluid Phase Equilib. 338 (2013) 100–113] has been improved and extended to other gases relevant in Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) applications. The new hydrate model is inspired by the model for natural gas hydrates by Ballard and Sloan [Fluid Phase Equilib. 194 (2002) 371–383], which belongs to the family of van der Waals and Platteeuw (vdWP) models [Adv. Chem. Phys. 2 (1959) 1]. The new model is combined with highly accurate equations of state (EoS) in form of the Helmholtz energy for fluid phases and with Gibbs energy models for pure solid phases. In part I, a critical analysis of the main parameters of the vdWP-based hydrate model was performed. A multi-property fitting algorithm developed for optimization of parameters of the new hydrate model is introduced in part II. Results of the model, including phase equilibria with hydrates, composition of hydrates, and enthalpy of formation of hydrates are provided in this article (part III). The model results are for most hydrate formers better or comparable to the results of the model of Ballard and Sloan. However, for ethane hydrates the overall results are worse which is discussed in the results section. The model has been implemented in the software package TREND 2.0 by Span et al. [Thermodynamic Reference and Engineering Data 2.0. (2015) Lehrstuhl fuer Thermodynamik, Ruhr-Universitaet Bochum]. Example calculations with the new hydrate model implemented in TREND 2.0 and applied to CCS-relevant problems are shown and discussed.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Gas hydrate</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">CCS</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Enthalpy</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Phase equilibria</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Reference equation of state</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Vinš, Václav</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Span, Roland</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Hrubý, Jan</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="n">Science Direct</subfield><subfield code="a">Li, Yong-gang ELSEVIER</subfield><subfield code="t">Fabrication and compressive behaviour of an aluminium foam composite</subfield><subfield code="d">2015</subfield><subfield code="d">an international journal</subfield><subfield code="g">New York, NY [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)ELV013241125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:429</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2016</subfield><subfield code="g">day:15</subfield><subfield code="g">month:12</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:55-66</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:12</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fluid.2016.08.027</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_100</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_136</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">429</subfield><subfield code="j">2016</subfield><subfield code="b">15</subfield><subfield code="c">1215</subfield><subfield code="h">55-66</subfield><subfield code="g">12</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="953" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="2">045F</subfield><subfield code="a">660</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Jäger, Andreas |
| spellingShingle |
Jäger, Andreas ddc 660 ddc 540 ddc 670 ddc 630 Elsevier Gas hydrate Elsevier CCS Elsevier Enthalpy Elsevier Phase equilibria Elsevier Reference equation of state Model for gas hydrates applied to CCS systems part III. Results and implementation in TREND 2.0 |
| authorStr |
Jäger, Andreas |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)ELV013241125 |
| format |
electronic Article |
| dewey-ones |
660 - Chemical engineering 540 - Chemistry & allied sciences 670 - Manufacturing 630 - Agriculture & related technologies |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut |
| collection |
elsevier |
| remote_str |
true |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| topic_title |
660 540 660 DE-600 540 DE-600 670 VZ 540 VZ 630 VZ Model for gas hydrates applied to CCS systems part III. Results and implementation in TREND 2.0 Gas hydrate Elsevier CCS Elsevier Enthalpy Elsevier Phase equilibria Elsevier Reference equation of state Elsevier |
| topic |
ddc 660 ddc 540 ddc 670 ddc 630 Elsevier Gas hydrate Elsevier CCS Elsevier Enthalpy Elsevier Phase equilibria Elsevier Reference equation of state |
| topic_unstemmed |
ddc 660 ddc 540 ddc 670 ddc 630 Elsevier Gas hydrate Elsevier CCS Elsevier Enthalpy Elsevier Phase equilibria Elsevier Reference equation of state |
| topic_browse |
ddc 660 ddc 540 ddc 670 ddc 630 Elsevier Gas hydrate Elsevier CCS Elsevier Enthalpy Elsevier Phase equilibria Elsevier Reference equation of state |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
zu |
| author2_variant |
v v vv r s rs j h jh |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Fabrication and compressive behaviour of an aluminium foam composite |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
ELV013241125 |
| dewey-tens |
660 - Chemical engineering 540 - Chemistry 670 - Manufacturing 630 - Agriculture |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Fabrication and compressive behaviour of an aluminium foam composite |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)ELV013241125 |
| title |
Model for gas hydrates applied to CCS systems part III. Results and implementation in TREND 2.0 |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)ELV029786983 (ELSEVIER)S0378-3812(16)30401-0 |
| title_full |
Model for gas hydrates applied to CCS systems part III. Results and implementation in TREND 2.0 |
| author_sort |
Jäger, Andreas |
| journal |
Fabrication and compressive behaviour of an aluminium foam composite |
| journalStr |
Fabrication and compressive behaviour of an aluminium foam composite |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| dewey-hundreds |
600 - Technology 500 - Science |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2016 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
zzz |
| container_start_page |
55 |
| author_browse |
Jäger, Andreas |
| container_volume |
429 |
| physical |
12 |
| class |
660 540 660 DE-600 540 DE-600 670 VZ 540 VZ 630 VZ |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Jäger, Andreas |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1016/j.fluid.2016.08.027 |
| dewey-full |
660 540 670 630 |
| title_sort |
model for gas hydrates applied to ccs systems part iii. results and implementation in trend 2.0 |
| title_auth |
Model for gas hydrates applied to CCS systems part III. Results and implementation in TREND 2.0 |
| abstract |
In this study divided in a series of three articles, the model for pure CO2 hydrate by Jäger et al. [Fluid Phase Equilib. 338 (2013) 100–113] has been improved and extended to other gases relevant in Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) applications. The new hydrate model is inspired by the model for natural gas hydrates by Ballard and Sloan [Fluid Phase Equilib. 194 (2002) 371–383], which belongs to the family of van der Waals and Platteeuw (vdWP) models [Adv. Chem. Phys. 2 (1959) 1]. The new model is combined with highly accurate equations of state (EoS) in form of the Helmholtz energy for fluid phases and with Gibbs energy models for pure solid phases. In part I, a critical analysis of the main parameters of the vdWP-based hydrate model was performed. A multi-property fitting algorithm developed for optimization of parameters of the new hydrate model is introduced in part II. Results of the model, including phase equilibria with hydrates, composition of hydrates, and enthalpy of formation of hydrates are provided in this article (part III). The model results are for most hydrate formers better or comparable to the results of the model of Ballard and Sloan. However, for ethane hydrates the overall results are worse which is discussed in the results section. The model has been implemented in the software package TREND 2.0 by Span et al. [Thermodynamic Reference and Engineering Data 2.0. (2015) Lehrstuhl fuer Thermodynamik, Ruhr-Universitaet Bochum]. Example calculations with the new hydrate model implemented in TREND 2.0 and applied to CCS-relevant problems are shown and discussed. |
| abstractGer |
In this study divided in a series of three articles, the model for pure CO2 hydrate by Jäger et al. [Fluid Phase Equilib. 338 (2013) 100–113] has been improved and extended to other gases relevant in Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) applications. The new hydrate model is inspired by the model for natural gas hydrates by Ballard and Sloan [Fluid Phase Equilib. 194 (2002) 371–383], which belongs to the family of van der Waals and Platteeuw (vdWP) models [Adv. Chem. Phys. 2 (1959) 1]. The new model is combined with highly accurate equations of state (EoS) in form of the Helmholtz energy for fluid phases and with Gibbs energy models for pure solid phases. In part I, a critical analysis of the main parameters of the vdWP-based hydrate model was performed. A multi-property fitting algorithm developed for optimization of parameters of the new hydrate model is introduced in part II. Results of the model, including phase equilibria with hydrates, composition of hydrates, and enthalpy of formation of hydrates are provided in this article (part III). The model results are for most hydrate formers better or comparable to the results of the model of Ballard and Sloan. However, for ethane hydrates the overall results are worse which is discussed in the results section. The model has been implemented in the software package TREND 2.0 by Span et al. [Thermodynamic Reference and Engineering Data 2.0. (2015) Lehrstuhl fuer Thermodynamik, Ruhr-Universitaet Bochum]. Example calculations with the new hydrate model implemented in TREND 2.0 and applied to CCS-relevant problems are shown and discussed. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
In this study divided in a series of three articles, the model for pure CO2 hydrate by Jäger et al. [Fluid Phase Equilib. 338 (2013) 100–113] has been improved and extended to other gases relevant in Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) applications. The new hydrate model is inspired by the model for natural gas hydrates by Ballard and Sloan [Fluid Phase Equilib. 194 (2002) 371–383], which belongs to the family of van der Waals and Platteeuw (vdWP) models [Adv. Chem. Phys. 2 (1959) 1]. The new model is combined with highly accurate equations of state (EoS) in form of the Helmholtz energy for fluid phases and with Gibbs energy models for pure solid phases. In part I, a critical analysis of the main parameters of the vdWP-based hydrate model was performed. A multi-property fitting algorithm developed for optimization of parameters of the new hydrate model is introduced in part II. Results of the model, including phase equilibria with hydrates, composition of hydrates, and enthalpy of formation of hydrates are provided in this article (part III). The model results are for most hydrate formers better or comparable to the results of the model of Ballard and Sloan. However, for ethane hydrates the overall results are worse which is discussed in the results section. The model has been implemented in the software package TREND 2.0 by Span et al. [Thermodynamic Reference and Engineering Data 2.0. (2015) Lehrstuhl fuer Thermodynamik, Ruhr-Universitaet Bochum]. Example calculations with the new hydrate model implemented in TREND 2.0 and applied to CCS-relevant problems are shown and discussed. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_136 |
| title_short |
Model for gas hydrates applied to CCS systems part III. Results and implementation in TREND 2.0 |
| url |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fluid.2016.08.027 |
| remote_bool |
true |
| author2 |
Vinš, Václav Span, Roland Hrubý, Jan |
| author2Str |
Vinš, Václav Span, Roland Hrubý, Jan |
| ppnlink |
ELV013241125 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
z |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| author2_role |
oth oth oth |
| doi_str |
10.1016/j.fluid.2016.08.027 |
| up_date |
2024-07-06T22:22:19.439Z |
| _version_ |
1803870052748886016 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV029786983</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230625175459.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">180603s2016 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.fluid.2016.08.027</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">GBVA2016013000005.pica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV029786983</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0378-3812(16)30401-0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">660</subfield><subfield code="a">540</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">660</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">540</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">670</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">540</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">630</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Jäger, Andreas</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Model for gas hydrates applied to CCS systems part III. Results and implementation in TREND 2.0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2016transfer abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">12</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">In this study divided in a series of three articles, the model for pure CO2 hydrate by Jäger et al. [Fluid Phase Equilib. 338 (2013) 100–113] has been improved and extended to other gases relevant in Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) applications. The new hydrate model is inspired by the model for natural gas hydrates by Ballard and Sloan [Fluid Phase Equilib. 194 (2002) 371–383], which belongs to the family of van der Waals and Platteeuw (vdWP) models [Adv. Chem. Phys. 2 (1959) 1]. The new model is combined with highly accurate equations of state (EoS) in form of the Helmholtz energy for fluid phases and with Gibbs energy models for pure solid phases. In part I, a critical analysis of the main parameters of the vdWP-based hydrate model was performed. A multi-property fitting algorithm developed for optimization of parameters of the new hydrate model is introduced in part II. Results of the model, including phase equilibria with hydrates, composition of hydrates, and enthalpy of formation of hydrates are provided in this article (part III). The model results are for most hydrate formers better or comparable to the results of the model of Ballard and Sloan. However, for ethane hydrates the overall results are worse which is discussed in the results section. The model has been implemented in the software package TREND 2.0 by Span et al. [Thermodynamic Reference and Engineering Data 2.0. (2015) Lehrstuhl fuer Thermodynamik, Ruhr-Universitaet Bochum]. Example calculations with the new hydrate model implemented in TREND 2.0 and applied to CCS-relevant problems are shown and discussed.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">In this study divided in a series of three articles, the model for pure CO2 hydrate by Jäger et al. [Fluid Phase Equilib. 338 (2013) 100–113] has been improved and extended to other gases relevant in Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) applications. The new hydrate model is inspired by the model for natural gas hydrates by Ballard and Sloan [Fluid Phase Equilib. 194 (2002) 371–383], which belongs to the family of van der Waals and Platteeuw (vdWP) models [Adv. Chem. Phys. 2 (1959) 1]. The new model is combined with highly accurate equations of state (EoS) in form of the Helmholtz energy for fluid phases and with Gibbs energy models for pure solid phases. In part I, a critical analysis of the main parameters of the vdWP-based hydrate model was performed. A multi-property fitting algorithm developed for optimization of parameters of the new hydrate model is introduced in part II. Results of the model, including phase equilibria with hydrates, composition of hydrates, and enthalpy of formation of hydrates are provided in this article (part III). The model results are for most hydrate formers better or comparable to the results of the model of Ballard and Sloan. However, for ethane hydrates the overall results are worse which is discussed in the results section. The model has been implemented in the software package TREND 2.0 by Span et al. [Thermodynamic Reference and Engineering Data 2.0. (2015) Lehrstuhl fuer Thermodynamik, Ruhr-Universitaet Bochum]. Example calculations with the new hydrate model implemented in TREND 2.0 and applied to CCS-relevant problems are shown and discussed.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Gas hydrate</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">CCS</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Enthalpy</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Phase equilibria</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Reference equation of state</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Vinš, Václav</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Span, Roland</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Hrubý, Jan</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="n">Science Direct</subfield><subfield code="a">Li, Yong-gang ELSEVIER</subfield><subfield code="t">Fabrication and compressive behaviour of an aluminium foam composite</subfield><subfield code="d">2015</subfield><subfield code="d">an international journal</subfield><subfield code="g">New York, NY [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)ELV013241125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:429</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2016</subfield><subfield code="g">day:15</subfield><subfield code="g">month:12</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:55-66</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:12</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fluid.2016.08.027</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_100</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_136</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">429</subfield><subfield code="j">2016</subfield><subfield code="b">15</subfield><subfield code="c">1215</subfield><subfield code="h">55-66</subfield><subfield code="g">12</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="953" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="2">045F</subfield><subfield code="a">660</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.399315 |