Prevalence of marijuana use does not differentially increase among youth after states pass medical marijuana laws: Commentary on and reanalysis of US National Survey on Drug Use in Households data 2002–2011
There is considerable interest in the effects of medical marijuana laws (MML) on marijuana use in the USA, particularly among youth. The article by “The effect of medical cannabis laws on juvenile cannabis use” concludes that “implementation of medical cannabis laws increase juvenile cannabis use”....
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Wall, Melanie M. [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2016transfer abstract |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Umfang: |
5 |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Age-related changes in the impact of valence on self-referential processing in female adolescents and young adults - Moses-Payne, M.E. ELSEVIER, 2021, official journal of the International Harm Reduction Association (IHRA), Amsterdam [u.a.] |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:29 ; year:2016 ; pages:9-13 ; extent:5 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1016/j.drugpo.2016.01.015 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
ELV029906334 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ELV029906334 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230625175825.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 180603s2016 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.drugpo.2016.01.015 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a GBVA2016016000023.pica |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)ELV029906334 | ||
| 035 | |a (ELSEVIER)S0955-3959(16)00038-4 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 082 | 0 | |a 610 | |
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 610 |q DE-600 |
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 150 |q VZ |
| 084 | |a LING |q DE-30 |2 fid | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Wall, Melanie M. |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Prevalence of marijuana use does not differentially increase among youth after states pass medical marijuana laws: Commentary on and reanalysis of US National Survey on Drug Use in Households data 2002–2011 |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2016transfer abstract | |
| 300 | |a 5 | ||
| 336 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zzz |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b z |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zu |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a There is considerable interest in the effects of medical marijuana laws (MML) on marijuana use in the USA, particularly among youth. The article by “The effect of medical cannabis laws on juvenile cannabis use” concludes that “implementation of medical cannabis laws increase juvenile cannabis use”. This result is opposite to the findings of other studies that analysed the same US National Survey on Drug Use in Households data as well as opposite to studies analysing other national data which show no increase or even a decrease in youth marijuana use after the passage of MML. We provide a replication of the Stolzenberg et al. results and demonstrate how the comparison they are making is actually driven by differences between states with and without MML rather than being driven by pre and post-MML changes within states. We show that Stolzenberg et al. do not properly control for the fact that states that pass MML during 2002–2011 tend to already have higher past-month marijuana use before passing the MML in the first place. We further show that when within-state changes are properly considered and pre-MML prevalence is properly controlled, there is no evidence of a differential increase in past-month marijuana use in youth that can be attributed to state MML. | ||
| 520 | |a There is considerable interest in the effects of medical marijuana laws (MML) on marijuana use in the USA, particularly among youth. The article by “The effect of medical cannabis laws on juvenile cannabis use” concludes that “implementation of medical cannabis laws increase juvenile cannabis use”. This result is opposite to the findings of other studies that analysed the same US National Survey on Drug Use in Households data as well as opposite to studies analysing other national data which show no increase or even a decrease in youth marijuana use after the passage of MML. We provide a replication of the Stolzenberg et al. results and demonstrate how the comparison they are making is actually driven by differences between states with and without MML rather than being driven by pre and post-MML changes within states. We show that Stolzenberg et al. do not properly control for the fact that states that pass MML during 2002–2011 tend to already have higher past-month marijuana use before passing the MML in the first place. We further show that when within-state changes are properly considered and pre-MML prevalence is properly controlled, there is no evidence of a differential increase in past-month marijuana use in youth that can be attributed to state MML. | ||
| 650 | 7 | |a Medical marijuana laws |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Observational data analysis |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Pre–post tests |2 Elsevier | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Mauro, Christine |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Hasin, Deborah S. |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Keyes, Katherine M. |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Cerda, Magdalena |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Martins, Silvia S. |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Feng, Tianshu |4 oth | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |n Elsevier Science |a Moses-Payne, M.E. ELSEVIER |t Age-related changes in the impact of valence on self-referential processing in female adolescents and young adults |d 2021 |d official journal of the International Harm Reduction Association (IHRA) |g Amsterdam [u.a.] |w (DE-627)ELV007294042 |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:29 |g year:2016 |g pages:9-13 |g extent:5 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2016.01.015 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_U | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ELV | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_U | ||
| 912 | |a FID-LING | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 29 |j 2016 |h 9-13 |g 5 | ||
| 953 | |2 045F |a 610 | ||
| author_variant |
m m w mm mmw |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
wallmelaniemmaurochristinehasindeborahsk:2016----:rvlnefaiunueosodfeetalicesaogotatrttsaseiamrjaaasomnaynnraayioun |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2016transfer abstract |
| publishDate |
2016 |
| allfields |
10.1016/j.drugpo.2016.01.015 doi GBVA2016016000023.pica (DE-627)ELV029906334 (ELSEVIER)S0955-3959(16)00038-4 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 610 610 DE-600 150 VZ LING DE-30 fid Wall, Melanie M. verfasserin aut Prevalence of marijuana use does not differentially increase among youth after states pass medical marijuana laws: Commentary on and reanalysis of US National Survey on Drug Use in Households data 2002–2011 2016transfer abstract 5 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier There is considerable interest in the effects of medical marijuana laws (MML) on marijuana use in the USA, particularly among youth. The article by “The effect of medical cannabis laws on juvenile cannabis use” concludes that “implementation of medical cannabis laws increase juvenile cannabis use”. This result is opposite to the findings of other studies that analysed the same US National Survey on Drug Use in Households data as well as opposite to studies analysing other national data which show no increase or even a decrease in youth marijuana use after the passage of MML. We provide a replication of the Stolzenberg et al. results and demonstrate how the comparison they are making is actually driven by differences between states with and without MML rather than being driven by pre and post-MML changes within states. We show that Stolzenberg et al. do not properly control for the fact that states that pass MML during 2002–2011 tend to already have higher past-month marijuana use before passing the MML in the first place. We further show that when within-state changes are properly considered and pre-MML prevalence is properly controlled, there is no evidence of a differential increase in past-month marijuana use in youth that can be attributed to state MML. There is considerable interest in the effects of medical marijuana laws (MML) on marijuana use in the USA, particularly among youth. The article by “The effect of medical cannabis laws on juvenile cannabis use” concludes that “implementation of medical cannabis laws increase juvenile cannabis use”. This result is opposite to the findings of other studies that analysed the same US National Survey on Drug Use in Households data as well as opposite to studies analysing other national data which show no increase or even a decrease in youth marijuana use after the passage of MML. We provide a replication of the Stolzenberg et al. results and demonstrate how the comparison they are making is actually driven by differences between states with and without MML rather than being driven by pre and post-MML changes within states. We show that Stolzenberg et al. do not properly control for the fact that states that pass MML during 2002–2011 tend to already have higher past-month marijuana use before passing the MML in the first place. We further show that when within-state changes are properly considered and pre-MML prevalence is properly controlled, there is no evidence of a differential increase in past-month marijuana use in youth that can be attributed to state MML. Medical marijuana laws Elsevier Observational data analysis Elsevier Pre–post tests Elsevier Mauro, Christine oth Hasin, Deborah S. oth Keyes, Katherine M. oth Cerda, Magdalena oth Martins, Silvia S. oth Feng, Tianshu oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Moses-Payne, M.E. ELSEVIER Age-related changes in the impact of valence on self-referential processing in female adolescents and young adults 2021 official journal of the International Harm Reduction Association (IHRA) Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV007294042 volume:29 year:2016 pages:9-13 extent:5 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2016.01.015 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U FID-LING AR 29 2016 9-13 5 045F 610 |
| spelling |
10.1016/j.drugpo.2016.01.015 doi GBVA2016016000023.pica (DE-627)ELV029906334 (ELSEVIER)S0955-3959(16)00038-4 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 610 610 DE-600 150 VZ LING DE-30 fid Wall, Melanie M. verfasserin aut Prevalence of marijuana use does not differentially increase among youth after states pass medical marijuana laws: Commentary on and reanalysis of US National Survey on Drug Use in Households data 2002–2011 2016transfer abstract 5 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier There is considerable interest in the effects of medical marijuana laws (MML) on marijuana use in the USA, particularly among youth. The article by “The effect of medical cannabis laws on juvenile cannabis use” concludes that “implementation of medical cannabis laws increase juvenile cannabis use”. This result is opposite to the findings of other studies that analysed the same US National Survey on Drug Use in Households data as well as opposite to studies analysing other national data which show no increase or even a decrease in youth marijuana use after the passage of MML. We provide a replication of the Stolzenberg et al. results and demonstrate how the comparison they are making is actually driven by differences between states with and without MML rather than being driven by pre and post-MML changes within states. We show that Stolzenberg et al. do not properly control for the fact that states that pass MML during 2002–2011 tend to already have higher past-month marijuana use before passing the MML in the first place. We further show that when within-state changes are properly considered and pre-MML prevalence is properly controlled, there is no evidence of a differential increase in past-month marijuana use in youth that can be attributed to state MML. There is considerable interest in the effects of medical marijuana laws (MML) on marijuana use in the USA, particularly among youth. The article by “The effect of medical cannabis laws on juvenile cannabis use” concludes that “implementation of medical cannabis laws increase juvenile cannabis use”. This result is opposite to the findings of other studies that analysed the same US National Survey on Drug Use in Households data as well as opposite to studies analysing other national data which show no increase or even a decrease in youth marijuana use after the passage of MML. We provide a replication of the Stolzenberg et al. results and demonstrate how the comparison they are making is actually driven by differences between states with and without MML rather than being driven by pre and post-MML changes within states. We show that Stolzenberg et al. do not properly control for the fact that states that pass MML during 2002–2011 tend to already have higher past-month marijuana use before passing the MML in the first place. We further show that when within-state changes are properly considered and pre-MML prevalence is properly controlled, there is no evidence of a differential increase in past-month marijuana use in youth that can be attributed to state MML. Medical marijuana laws Elsevier Observational data analysis Elsevier Pre–post tests Elsevier Mauro, Christine oth Hasin, Deborah S. oth Keyes, Katherine M. oth Cerda, Magdalena oth Martins, Silvia S. oth Feng, Tianshu oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Moses-Payne, M.E. ELSEVIER Age-related changes in the impact of valence on self-referential processing in female adolescents and young adults 2021 official journal of the International Harm Reduction Association (IHRA) Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV007294042 volume:29 year:2016 pages:9-13 extent:5 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2016.01.015 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U FID-LING AR 29 2016 9-13 5 045F 610 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1016/j.drugpo.2016.01.015 doi GBVA2016016000023.pica (DE-627)ELV029906334 (ELSEVIER)S0955-3959(16)00038-4 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 610 610 DE-600 150 VZ LING DE-30 fid Wall, Melanie M. verfasserin aut Prevalence of marijuana use does not differentially increase among youth after states pass medical marijuana laws: Commentary on and reanalysis of US National Survey on Drug Use in Households data 2002–2011 2016transfer abstract 5 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier There is considerable interest in the effects of medical marijuana laws (MML) on marijuana use in the USA, particularly among youth. The article by “The effect of medical cannabis laws on juvenile cannabis use” concludes that “implementation of medical cannabis laws increase juvenile cannabis use”. This result is opposite to the findings of other studies that analysed the same US National Survey on Drug Use in Households data as well as opposite to studies analysing other national data which show no increase or even a decrease in youth marijuana use after the passage of MML. We provide a replication of the Stolzenberg et al. results and demonstrate how the comparison they are making is actually driven by differences between states with and without MML rather than being driven by pre and post-MML changes within states. We show that Stolzenberg et al. do not properly control for the fact that states that pass MML during 2002–2011 tend to already have higher past-month marijuana use before passing the MML in the first place. We further show that when within-state changes are properly considered and pre-MML prevalence is properly controlled, there is no evidence of a differential increase in past-month marijuana use in youth that can be attributed to state MML. There is considerable interest in the effects of medical marijuana laws (MML) on marijuana use in the USA, particularly among youth. The article by “The effect of medical cannabis laws on juvenile cannabis use” concludes that “implementation of medical cannabis laws increase juvenile cannabis use”. This result is opposite to the findings of other studies that analysed the same US National Survey on Drug Use in Households data as well as opposite to studies analysing other national data which show no increase or even a decrease in youth marijuana use after the passage of MML. We provide a replication of the Stolzenberg et al. results and demonstrate how the comparison they are making is actually driven by differences between states with and without MML rather than being driven by pre and post-MML changes within states. We show that Stolzenberg et al. do not properly control for the fact that states that pass MML during 2002–2011 tend to already have higher past-month marijuana use before passing the MML in the first place. We further show that when within-state changes are properly considered and pre-MML prevalence is properly controlled, there is no evidence of a differential increase in past-month marijuana use in youth that can be attributed to state MML. Medical marijuana laws Elsevier Observational data analysis Elsevier Pre–post tests Elsevier Mauro, Christine oth Hasin, Deborah S. oth Keyes, Katherine M. oth Cerda, Magdalena oth Martins, Silvia S. oth Feng, Tianshu oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Moses-Payne, M.E. ELSEVIER Age-related changes in the impact of valence on self-referential processing in female adolescents and young adults 2021 official journal of the International Harm Reduction Association (IHRA) Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV007294042 volume:29 year:2016 pages:9-13 extent:5 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2016.01.015 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U FID-LING AR 29 2016 9-13 5 045F 610 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1016/j.drugpo.2016.01.015 doi GBVA2016016000023.pica (DE-627)ELV029906334 (ELSEVIER)S0955-3959(16)00038-4 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 610 610 DE-600 150 VZ LING DE-30 fid Wall, Melanie M. verfasserin aut Prevalence of marijuana use does not differentially increase among youth after states pass medical marijuana laws: Commentary on and reanalysis of US National Survey on Drug Use in Households data 2002–2011 2016transfer abstract 5 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier There is considerable interest in the effects of medical marijuana laws (MML) on marijuana use in the USA, particularly among youth. The article by “The effect of medical cannabis laws on juvenile cannabis use” concludes that “implementation of medical cannabis laws increase juvenile cannabis use”. This result is opposite to the findings of other studies that analysed the same US National Survey on Drug Use in Households data as well as opposite to studies analysing other national data which show no increase or even a decrease in youth marijuana use after the passage of MML. We provide a replication of the Stolzenberg et al. results and demonstrate how the comparison they are making is actually driven by differences between states with and without MML rather than being driven by pre and post-MML changes within states. We show that Stolzenberg et al. do not properly control for the fact that states that pass MML during 2002–2011 tend to already have higher past-month marijuana use before passing the MML in the first place. We further show that when within-state changes are properly considered and pre-MML prevalence is properly controlled, there is no evidence of a differential increase in past-month marijuana use in youth that can be attributed to state MML. There is considerable interest in the effects of medical marijuana laws (MML) on marijuana use in the USA, particularly among youth. The article by “The effect of medical cannabis laws on juvenile cannabis use” concludes that “implementation of medical cannabis laws increase juvenile cannabis use”. This result is opposite to the findings of other studies that analysed the same US National Survey on Drug Use in Households data as well as opposite to studies analysing other national data which show no increase or even a decrease in youth marijuana use after the passage of MML. We provide a replication of the Stolzenberg et al. results and demonstrate how the comparison they are making is actually driven by differences between states with and without MML rather than being driven by pre and post-MML changes within states. We show that Stolzenberg et al. do not properly control for the fact that states that pass MML during 2002–2011 tend to already have higher past-month marijuana use before passing the MML in the first place. We further show that when within-state changes are properly considered and pre-MML prevalence is properly controlled, there is no evidence of a differential increase in past-month marijuana use in youth that can be attributed to state MML. Medical marijuana laws Elsevier Observational data analysis Elsevier Pre–post tests Elsevier Mauro, Christine oth Hasin, Deborah S. oth Keyes, Katherine M. oth Cerda, Magdalena oth Martins, Silvia S. oth Feng, Tianshu oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Moses-Payne, M.E. ELSEVIER Age-related changes in the impact of valence on self-referential processing in female adolescents and young adults 2021 official journal of the International Harm Reduction Association (IHRA) Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV007294042 volume:29 year:2016 pages:9-13 extent:5 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2016.01.015 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U FID-LING AR 29 2016 9-13 5 045F 610 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1016/j.drugpo.2016.01.015 doi GBVA2016016000023.pica (DE-627)ELV029906334 (ELSEVIER)S0955-3959(16)00038-4 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 610 610 DE-600 150 VZ LING DE-30 fid Wall, Melanie M. verfasserin aut Prevalence of marijuana use does not differentially increase among youth after states pass medical marijuana laws: Commentary on and reanalysis of US National Survey on Drug Use in Households data 2002–2011 2016transfer abstract 5 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier There is considerable interest in the effects of medical marijuana laws (MML) on marijuana use in the USA, particularly among youth. The article by “The effect of medical cannabis laws on juvenile cannabis use” concludes that “implementation of medical cannabis laws increase juvenile cannabis use”. This result is opposite to the findings of other studies that analysed the same US National Survey on Drug Use in Households data as well as opposite to studies analysing other national data which show no increase or even a decrease in youth marijuana use after the passage of MML. We provide a replication of the Stolzenberg et al. results and demonstrate how the comparison they are making is actually driven by differences between states with and without MML rather than being driven by pre and post-MML changes within states. We show that Stolzenberg et al. do not properly control for the fact that states that pass MML during 2002–2011 tend to already have higher past-month marijuana use before passing the MML in the first place. We further show that when within-state changes are properly considered and pre-MML prevalence is properly controlled, there is no evidence of a differential increase in past-month marijuana use in youth that can be attributed to state MML. There is considerable interest in the effects of medical marijuana laws (MML) on marijuana use in the USA, particularly among youth. The article by “The effect of medical cannabis laws on juvenile cannabis use” concludes that “implementation of medical cannabis laws increase juvenile cannabis use”. This result is opposite to the findings of other studies that analysed the same US National Survey on Drug Use in Households data as well as opposite to studies analysing other national data which show no increase or even a decrease in youth marijuana use after the passage of MML. We provide a replication of the Stolzenberg et al. results and demonstrate how the comparison they are making is actually driven by differences between states with and without MML rather than being driven by pre and post-MML changes within states. We show that Stolzenberg et al. do not properly control for the fact that states that pass MML during 2002–2011 tend to already have higher past-month marijuana use before passing the MML in the first place. We further show that when within-state changes are properly considered and pre-MML prevalence is properly controlled, there is no evidence of a differential increase in past-month marijuana use in youth that can be attributed to state MML. Medical marijuana laws Elsevier Observational data analysis Elsevier Pre–post tests Elsevier Mauro, Christine oth Hasin, Deborah S. oth Keyes, Katherine M. oth Cerda, Magdalena oth Martins, Silvia S. oth Feng, Tianshu oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Moses-Payne, M.E. ELSEVIER Age-related changes in the impact of valence on self-referential processing in female adolescents and young adults 2021 official journal of the International Harm Reduction Association (IHRA) Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV007294042 volume:29 year:2016 pages:9-13 extent:5 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2016.01.015 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U FID-LING AR 29 2016 9-13 5 045F 610 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in Age-related changes in the impact of valence on self-referential processing in female adolescents and young adults Amsterdam [u.a.] volume:29 year:2016 pages:9-13 extent:5 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in Age-related changes in the impact of valence on self-referential processing in female adolescents and young adults Amsterdam [u.a.] volume:29 year:2016 pages:9-13 extent:5 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
Medical marijuana laws Observational data analysis Pre–post tests |
| dewey-raw |
610 |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
Age-related changes in the impact of valence on self-referential processing in female adolescents and young adults |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Wall, Melanie M. @@aut@@ Mauro, Christine @@oth@@ Hasin, Deborah S. @@oth@@ Keyes, Katherine M. @@oth@@ Cerda, Magdalena @@oth@@ Martins, Silvia S. @@oth@@ Feng, Tianshu @@oth@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2016-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
ELV007294042 |
| dewey-sort |
3610 |
| id |
ELV029906334 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV029906334</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230625175825.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">180603s2016 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.drugpo.2016.01.015</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">GBVA2016016000023.pica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV029906334</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0955-3959(16)00038-4</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">610</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">610</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">150</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">LING</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-30</subfield><subfield code="2">fid</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Wall, Melanie M.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Prevalence of marijuana use does not differentially increase among youth after states pass medical marijuana laws: Commentary on and reanalysis of US National Survey on Drug Use in Households data 2002–2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2016transfer abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">5</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">There is considerable interest in the effects of medical marijuana laws (MML) on marijuana use in the USA, particularly among youth. The article by “The effect of medical cannabis laws on juvenile cannabis use” concludes that “implementation of medical cannabis laws increase juvenile cannabis use”. This result is opposite to the findings of other studies that analysed the same US National Survey on Drug Use in Households data as well as opposite to studies analysing other national data which show no increase or even a decrease in youth marijuana use after the passage of MML. We provide a replication of the Stolzenberg et al. results and demonstrate how the comparison they are making is actually driven by differences between states with and without MML rather than being driven by pre and post-MML changes within states. We show that Stolzenberg et al. do not properly control for the fact that states that pass MML during 2002–2011 tend to already have higher past-month marijuana use before passing the MML in the first place. We further show that when within-state changes are properly considered and pre-MML prevalence is properly controlled, there is no evidence of a differential increase in past-month marijuana use in youth that can be attributed to state MML.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">There is considerable interest in the effects of medical marijuana laws (MML) on marijuana use in the USA, particularly among youth. The article by “The effect of medical cannabis laws on juvenile cannabis use” concludes that “implementation of medical cannabis laws increase juvenile cannabis use”. This result is opposite to the findings of other studies that analysed the same US National Survey on Drug Use in Households data as well as opposite to studies analysing other national data which show no increase or even a decrease in youth marijuana use after the passage of MML. We provide a replication of the Stolzenberg et al. results and demonstrate how the comparison they are making is actually driven by differences between states with and without MML rather than being driven by pre and post-MML changes within states. We show that Stolzenberg et al. do not properly control for the fact that states that pass MML during 2002–2011 tend to already have higher past-month marijuana use before passing the MML in the first place. We further show that when within-state changes are properly considered and pre-MML prevalence is properly controlled, there is no evidence of a differential increase in past-month marijuana use in youth that can be attributed to state MML.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Medical marijuana laws</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Observational data analysis</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Pre–post tests</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Mauro, Christine</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Hasin, Deborah S.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Keyes, Katherine M.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Cerda, Magdalena</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Martins, Silvia S.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Feng, Tianshu</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="n">Elsevier Science</subfield><subfield code="a">Moses-Payne, M.E. ELSEVIER</subfield><subfield code="t">Age-related changes in the impact of valence on self-referential processing in female adolescents and young adults</subfield><subfield code="d">2021</subfield><subfield code="d">official journal of the International Harm Reduction Association (IHRA)</subfield><subfield code="g">Amsterdam [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)ELV007294042</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:29</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2016</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:9-13</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:5</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2016.01.015</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">FID-LING</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">29</subfield><subfield code="j">2016</subfield><subfield code="h">9-13</subfield><subfield code="g">5</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="953" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="2">045F</subfield><subfield code="a">610</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Wall, Melanie M. |
| spellingShingle |
Wall, Melanie M. ddc 610 ddc 150 fid LING Elsevier Medical marijuana laws Elsevier Observational data analysis Elsevier Pre–post tests Prevalence of marijuana use does not differentially increase among youth after states pass medical marijuana laws: Commentary on and reanalysis of US National Survey on Drug Use in Households data 2002–2011 |
| authorStr |
Wall, Melanie M. |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)ELV007294042 |
| format |
electronic Article |
| dewey-ones |
610 - Medicine & health 150 - Psychology |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut |
| collection |
elsevier |
| remote_str |
true |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| topic_title |
610 610 DE-600 150 VZ LING DE-30 fid Prevalence of marijuana use does not differentially increase among youth after states pass medical marijuana laws: Commentary on and reanalysis of US National Survey on Drug Use in Households data 2002–2011 Medical marijuana laws Elsevier Observational data analysis Elsevier Pre–post tests Elsevier |
| topic |
ddc 610 ddc 150 fid LING Elsevier Medical marijuana laws Elsevier Observational data analysis Elsevier Pre–post tests |
| topic_unstemmed |
ddc 610 ddc 150 fid LING Elsevier Medical marijuana laws Elsevier Observational data analysis Elsevier Pre–post tests |
| topic_browse |
ddc 610 ddc 150 fid LING Elsevier Medical marijuana laws Elsevier Observational data analysis Elsevier Pre–post tests |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
zu |
| author2_variant |
c m cm d s h ds dsh k m k km kmk m c mc s s m ss ssm t f tf |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Age-related changes in the impact of valence on self-referential processing in female adolescents and young adults |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
ELV007294042 |
| dewey-tens |
610 - Medicine & health 150 - Psychology |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Age-related changes in the impact of valence on self-referential processing in female adolescents and young adults |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)ELV007294042 |
| title |
Prevalence of marijuana use does not differentially increase among youth after states pass medical marijuana laws: Commentary on and reanalysis of US National Survey on Drug Use in Households data 2002–2011 |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)ELV029906334 (ELSEVIER)S0955-3959(16)00038-4 |
| title_full |
Prevalence of marijuana use does not differentially increase among youth after states pass medical marijuana laws: Commentary on and reanalysis of US National Survey on Drug Use in Households data 2002–2011 |
| author_sort |
Wall, Melanie M. |
| journal |
Age-related changes in the impact of valence on self-referential processing in female adolescents and young adults |
| journalStr |
Age-related changes in the impact of valence on self-referential processing in female adolescents and young adults |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| dewey-hundreds |
600 - Technology 100 - Philosophy & psychology |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2016 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
zzz |
| container_start_page |
9 |
| author_browse |
Wall, Melanie M. |
| container_volume |
29 |
| physical |
5 |
| class |
610 610 DE-600 150 VZ LING DE-30 fid |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Wall, Melanie M. |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1016/j.drugpo.2016.01.015 |
| dewey-full |
610 150 |
| title_sort |
prevalence of marijuana use does not differentially increase among youth after states pass medical marijuana laws: commentary on and reanalysis of us national survey on drug use in households data 2002–2011 |
| title_auth |
Prevalence of marijuana use does not differentially increase among youth after states pass medical marijuana laws: Commentary on and reanalysis of US National Survey on Drug Use in Households data 2002–2011 |
| abstract |
There is considerable interest in the effects of medical marijuana laws (MML) on marijuana use in the USA, particularly among youth. The article by “The effect of medical cannabis laws on juvenile cannabis use” concludes that “implementation of medical cannabis laws increase juvenile cannabis use”. This result is opposite to the findings of other studies that analysed the same US National Survey on Drug Use in Households data as well as opposite to studies analysing other national data which show no increase or even a decrease in youth marijuana use after the passage of MML. We provide a replication of the Stolzenberg et al. results and demonstrate how the comparison they are making is actually driven by differences between states with and without MML rather than being driven by pre and post-MML changes within states. We show that Stolzenberg et al. do not properly control for the fact that states that pass MML during 2002–2011 tend to already have higher past-month marijuana use before passing the MML in the first place. We further show that when within-state changes are properly considered and pre-MML prevalence is properly controlled, there is no evidence of a differential increase in past-month marijuana use in youth that can be attributed to state MML. |
| abstractGer |
There is considerable interest in the effects of medical marijuana laws (MML) on marijuana use in the USA, particularly among youth. The article by “The effect of medical cannabis laws on juvenile cannabis use” concludes that “implementation of medical cannabis laws increase juvenile cannabis use”. This result is opposite to the findings of other studies that analysed the same US National Survey on Drug Use in Households data as well as opposite to studies analysing other national data which show no increase or even a decrease in youth marijuana use after the passage of MML. We provide a replication of the Stolzenberg et al. results and demonstrate how the comparison they are making is actually driven by differences between states with and without MML rather than being driven by pre and post-MML changes within states. We show that Stolzenberg et al. do not properly control for the fact that states that pass MML during 2002–2011 tend to already have higher past-month marijuana use before passing the MML in the first place. We further show that when within-state changes are properly considered and pre-MML prevalence is properly controlled, there is no evidence of a differential increase in past-month marijuana use in youth that can be attributed to state MML. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
There is considerable interest in the effects of medical marijuana laws (MML) on marijuana use in the USA, particularly among youth. The article by “The effect of medical cannabis laws on juvenile cannabis use” concludes that “implementation of medical cannabis laws increase juvenile cannabis use”. This result is opposite to the findings of other studies that analysed the same US National Survey on Drug Use in Households data as well as opposite to studies analysing other national data which show no increase or even a decrease in youth marijuana use after the passage of MML. We provide a replication of the Stolzenberg et al. results and demonstrate how the comparison they are making is actually driven by differences between states with and without MML rather than being driven by pre and post-MML changes within states. We show that Stolzenberg et al. do not properly control for the fact that states that pass MML during 2002–2011 tend to already have higher past-month marijuana use before passing the MML in the first place. We further show that when within-state changes are properly considered and pre-MML prevalence is properly controlled, there is no evidence of a differential increase in past-month marijuana use in youth that can be attributed to state MML. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U FID-LING |
| title_short |
Prevalence of marijuana use does not differentially increase among youth after states pass medical marijuana laws: Commentary on and reanalysis of US National Survey on Drug Use in Households data 2002–2011 |
| url |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2016.01.015 |
| remote_bool |
true |
| author2 |
Mauro, Christine Hasin, Deborah S. Keyes, Katherine M. Cerda, Magdalena Martins, Silvia S. Feng, Tianshu |
| author2Str |
Mauro, Christine Hasin, Deborah S. Keyes, Katherine M. Cerda, Magdalena Martins, Silvia S. Feng, Tianshu |
| ppnlink |
ELV007294042 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
z |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| author2_role |
oth oth oth oth oth oth |
| doi_str |
10.1016/j.drugpo.2016.01.015 |
| up_date |
2024-07-06T22:40:59.083Z |
| _version_ |
1803871226780712960 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV029906334</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230625175825.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">180603s2016 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.drugpo.2016.01.015</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">GBVA2016016000023.pica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV029906334</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0955-3959(16)00038-4</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">610</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">610</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">150</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">LING</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-30</subfield><subfield code="2">fid</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Wall, Melanie M.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Prevalence of marijuana use does not differentially increase among youth after states pass medical marijuana laws: Commentary on and reanalysis of US National Survey on Drug Use in Households data 2002–2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2016transfer abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">5</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">There is considerable interest in the effects of medical marijuana laws (MML) on marijuana use in the USA, particularly among youth. The article by “The effect of medical cannabis laws on juvenile cannabis use” concludes that “implementation of medical cannabis laws increase juvenile cannabis use”. This result is opposite to the findings of other studies that analysed the same US National Survey on Drug Use in Households data as well as opposite to studies analysing other national data which show no increase or even a decrease in youth marijuana use after the passage of MML. We provide a replication of the Stolzenberg et al. results and demonstrate how the comparison they are making is actually driven by differences between states with and without MML rather than being driven by pre and post-MML changes within states. We show that Stolzenberg et al. do not properly control for the fact that states that pass MML during 2002–2011 tend to already have higher past-month marijuana use before passing the MML in the first place. We further show that when within-state changes are properly considered and pre-MML prevalence is properly controlled, there is no evidence of a differential increase in past-month marijuana use in youth that can be attributed to state MML.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">There is considerable interest in the effects of medical marijuana laws (MML) on marijuana use in the USA, particularly among youth. The article by “The effect of medical cannabis laws on juvenile cannabis use” concludes that “implementation of medical cannabis laws increase juvenile cannabis use”. This result is opposite to the findings of other studies that analysed the same US National Survey on Drug Use in Households data as well as opposite to studies analysing other national data which show no increase or even a decrease in youth marijuana use after the passage of MML. We provide a replication of the Stolzenberg et al. results and demonstrate how the comparison they are making is actually driven by differences between states with and without MML rather than being driven by pre and post-MML changes within states. We show that Stolzenberg et al. do not properly control for the fact that states that pass MML during 2002–2011 tend to already have higher past-month marijuana use before passing the MML in the first place. We further show that when within-state changes are properly considered and pre-MML prevalence is properly controlled, there is no evidence of a differential increase in past-month marijuana use in youth that can be attributed to state MML.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Medical marijuana laws</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Observational data analysis</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Pre–post tests</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Mauro, Christine</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Hasin, Deborah S.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Keyes, Katherine M.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Cerda, Magdalena</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Martins, Silvia S.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Feng, Tianshu</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="n">Elsevier Science</subfield><subfield code="a">Moses-Payne, M.E. ELSEVIER</subfield><subfield code="t">Age-related changes in the impact of valence on self-referential processing in female adolescents and young adults</subfield><subfield code="d">2021</subfield><subfield code="d">official journal of the International Harm Reduction Association (IHRA)</subfield><subfield code="g">Amsterdam [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)ELV007294042</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:29</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2016</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:9-13</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:5</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2016.01.015</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">FID-LING</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">29</subfield><subfield code="j">2016</subfield><subfield code="h">9-13</subfield><subfield code="g">5</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="953" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="2">045F</subfield><subfield code="a">610</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.4000645 |