Comparison of dry deposition estimates of AERMOD and CALPUFF from area sources in flat terrain
The dry deposition algorithms of AERMOD and CALPUFF were compared, studying emissions from hypothetical area and point sources in flat terrain. The deposited fractions calculated by AERMOD and CALPUFF are different for the C, D and F stability classes. In all the studied scenarios the differences be...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Tartakovsky, Dmitry [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2016transfer abstract |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Umfang: |
3 |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: The internal pudendal artery turnover (IPAT) flap: A new, simple and reliable technique for perineal reconstruction - Nassar, M.K. ELSEVIER, 2021, Amsterdam [u.a.] |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:142 ; year:2016 ; pages:430-432 ; extent:3 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.08.035 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
ELV030017300 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ELV030017300 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230625180230.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 180603s2016 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.08.035 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001214.pica |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)ELV030017300 | ||
| 035 | |a (ELSEVIER)S1352-2310(16)30628-8 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 610 |q VZ |
| 084 | |a 44.65 |2 bkl | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Tartakovsky, Dmitry |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Comparison of dry deposition estimates of AERMOD and CALPUFF from area sources in flat terrain |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2016transfer abstract | |
| 300 | |a 3 | ||
| 336 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zzz |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b z |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zu |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a The dry deposition algorithms of AERMOD and CALPUFF were compared, studying emissions from hypothetical area and point sources in flat terrain. The deposited fractions calculated by AERMOD and CALPUFF are different for the C, D and F stability classes. In all the studied scenarios the differences between the deposited fractions calculated by AERMOD and CALPUFF are much smaller than those calculated previously in complex terrain. Yet, the detected differences in the deposited fractions may affect the ambient concentrations calculated by AERMOD and CALPUFF in the receptor points as a part of an environmental impact assessment and lead to different conclusions on the residents' exposure. The distinct account of AERMOD and CALPUFF to certain wind speeds and stability classes, and their different algorithms for calculating the dispersion coefficients, is the only explanation for the different estimates of deposited fractions between AERMOD and CALPUFF over absolutely flat terrain. | ||
| 520 | |a The dry deposition algorithms of AERMOD and CALPUFF were compared, studying emissions from hypothetical area and point sources in flat terrain. The deposited fractions calculated by AERMOD and CALPUFF are different for the C, D and F stability classes. In all the studied scenarios the differences between the deposited fractions calculated by AERMOD and CALPUFF are much smaller than those calculated previously in complex terrain. Yet, the detected differences in the deposited fractions may affect the ambient concentrations calculated by AERMOD and CALPUFF in the receptor points as a part of an environmental impact assessment and lead to different conclusions on the residents' exposure. The distinct account of AERMOD and CALPUFF to certain wind speeds and stability classes, and their different algorithms for calculating the dispersion coefficients, is the only explanation for the different estimates of deposited fractions between AERMOD and CALPUFF over absolutely flat terrain. | ||
| 650 | 7 | |a Dispersion modeling |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a CALPUFF |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Particulate matter |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a AERMOD |2 Elsevier | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Stern, Eli |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Broday, David M. |4 oth | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |n Elsevier Science |a Nassar, M.K. ELSEVIER |t The internal pudendal artery turnover (IPAT) flap: A new, simple and reliable technique for perineal reconstruction |d 2021 |g Amsterdam [u.a.] |w (DE-627)ELV00656139X |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:142 |g year:2016 |g pages:430-432 |g extent:3 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.08.035 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_U | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ELV | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_U | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-PHA | ||
| 936 | b | k | |a 44.65 |j Chirurgie |q VZ |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 142 |j 2016 |h 430-432 |g 3 | ||
| author_variant |
d t dt |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
tartakovskydmitrysternelibrodaydavidm:2016----:oprsnfrdpstoetmtsfemdnclufrmra |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2016transfer abstract |
| bklnumber |
44.65 |
| publishDate |
2016 |
| allfields |
10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.08.035 doi /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001214.pica (DE-627)ELV030017300 (ELSEVIER)S1352-2310(16)30628-8 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 610 VZ 44.65 bkl Tartakovsky, Dmitry verfasserin aut Comparison of dry deposition estimates of AERMOD and CALPUFF from area sources in flat terrain 2016transfer abstract 3 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier The dry deposition algorithms of AERMOD and CALPUFF were compared, studying emissions from hypothetical area and point sources in flat terrain. The deposited fractions calculated by AERMOD and CALPUFF are different for the C, D and F stability classes. In all the studied scenarios the differences between the deposited fractions calculated by AERMOD and CALPUFF are much smaller than those calculated previously in complex terrain. Yet, the detected differences in the deposited fractions may affect the ambient concentrations calculated by AERMOD and CALPUFF in the receptor points as a part of an environmental impact assessment and lead to different conclusions on the residents' exposure. The distinct account of AERMOD and CALPUFF to certain wind speeds and stability classes, and their different algorithms for calculating the dispersion coefficients, is the only explanation for the different estimates of deposited fractions between AERMOD and CALPUFF over absolutely flat terrain. The dry deposition algorithms of AERMOD and CALPUFF were compared, studying emissions from hypothetical area and point sources in flat terrain. The deposited fractions calculated by AERMOD and CALPUFF are different for the C, D and F stability classes. In all the studied scenarios the differences between the deposited fractions calculated by AERMOD and CALPUFF are much smaller than those calculated previously in complex terrain. Yet, the detected differences in the deposited fractions may affect the ambient concentrations calculated by AERMOD and CALPUFF in the receptor points as a part of an environmental impact assessment and lead to different conclusions on the residents' exposure. The distinct account of AERMOD and CALPUFF to certain wind speeds and stability classes, and their different algorithms for calculating the dispersion coefficients, is the only explanation for the different estimates of deposited fractions between AERMOD and CALPUFF over absolutely flat terrain. Dispersion modeling Elsevier CALPUFF Elsevier Particulate matter Elsevier AERMOD Elsevier Stern, Eli oth Broday, David M. oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Nassar, M.K. ELSEVIER The internal pudendal artery turnover (IPAT) flap: A new, simple and reliable technique for perineal reconstruction 2021 Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV00656139X volume:142 year:2016 pages:430-432 extent:3 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.08.035 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA 44.65 Chirurgie VZ AR 142 2016 430-432 3 |
| spelling |
10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.08.035 doi /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001214.pica (DE-627)ELV030017300 (ELSEVIER)S1352-2310(16)30628-8 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 610 VZ 44.65 bkl Tartakovsky, Dmitry verfasserin aut Comparison of dry deposition estimates of AERMOD and CALPUFF from area sources in flat terrain 2016transfer abstract 3 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier The dry deposition algorithms of AERMOD and CALPUFF were compared, studying emissions from hypothetical area and point sources in flat terrain. The deposited fractions calculated by AERMOD and CALPUFF are different for the C, D and F stability classes. In all the studied scenarios the differences between the deposited fractions calculated by AERMOD and CALPUFF are much smaller than those calculated previously in complex terrain. Yet, the detected differences in the deposited fractions may affect the ambient concentrations calculated by AERMOD and CALPUFF in the receptor points as a part of an environmental impact assessment and lead to different conclusions on the residents' exposure. The distinct account of AERMOD and CALPUFF to certain wind speeds and stability classes, and their different algorithms for calculating the dispersion coefficients, is the only explanation for the different estimates of deposited fractions between AERMOD and CALPUFF over absolutely flat terrain. The dry deposition algorithms of AERMOD and CALPUFF were compared, studying emissions from hypothetical area and point sources in flat terrain. The deposited fractions calculated by AERMOD and CALPUFF are different for the C, D and F stability classes. In all the studied scenarios the differences between the deposited fractions calculated by AERMOD and CALPUFF are much smaller than those calculated previously in complex terrain. Yet, the detected differences in the deposited fractions may affect the ambient concentrations calculated by AERMOD and CALPUFF in the receptor points as a part of an environmental impact assessment and lead to different conclusions on the residents' exposure. The distinct account of AERMOD and CALPUFF to certain wind speeds and stability classes, and their different algorithms for calculating the dispersion coefficients, is the only explanation for the different estimates of deposited fractions between AERMOD and CALPUFF over absolutely flat terrain. Dispersion modeling Elsevier CALPUFF Elsevier Particulate matter Elsevier AERMOD Elsevier Stern, Eli oth Broday, David M. oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Nassar, M.K. ELSEVIER The internal pudendal artery turnover (IPAT) flap: A new, simple and reliable technique for perineal reconstruction 2021 Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV00656139X volume:142 year:2016 pages:430-432 extent:3 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.08.035 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA 44.65 Chirurgie VZ AR 142 2016 430-432 3 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.08.035 doi /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001214.pica (DE-627)ELV030017300 (ELSEVIER)S1352-2310(16)30628-8 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 610 VZ 44.65 bkl Tartakovsky, Dmitry verfasserin aut Comparison of dry deposition estimates of AERMOD and CALPUFF from area sources in flat terrain 2016transfer abstract 3 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier The dry deposition algorithms of AERMOD and CALPUFF were compared, studying emissions from hypothetical area and point sources in flat terrain. The deposited fractions calculated by AERMOD and CALPUFF are different for the C, D and F stability classes. In all the studied scenarios the differences between the deposited fractions calculated by AERMOD and CALPUFF are much smaller than those calculated previously in complex terrain. Yet, the detected differences in the deposited fractions may affect the ambient concentrations calculated by AERMOD and CALPUFF in the receptor points as a part of an environmental impact assessment and lead to different conclusions on the residents' exposure. The distinct account of AERMOD and CALPUFF to certain wind speeds and stability classes, and their different algorithms for calculating the dispersion coefficients, is the only explanation for the different estimates of deposited fractions between AERMOD and CALPUFF over absolutely flat terrain. The dry deposition algorithms of AERMOD and CALPUFF were compared, studying emissions from hypothetical area and point sources in flat terrain. The deposited fractions calculated by AERMOD and CALPUFF are different for the C, D and F stability classes. In all the studied scenarios the differences between the deposited fractions calculated by AERMOD and CALPUFF are much smaller than those calculated previously in complex terrain. Yet, the detected differences in the deposited fractions may affect the ambient concentrations calculated by AERMOD and CALPUFF in the receptor points as a part of an environmental impact assessment and lead to different conclusions on the residents' exposure. The distinct account of AERMOD and CALPUFF to certain wind speeds and stability classes, and their different algorithms for calculating the dispersion coefficients, is the only explanation for the different estimates of deposited fractions between AERMOD and CALPUFF over absolutely flat terrain. Dispersion modeling Elsevier CALPUFF Elsevier Particulate matter Elsevier AERMOD Elsevier Stern, Eli oth Broday, David M. oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Nassar, M.K. ELSEVIER The internal pudendal artery turnover (IPAT) flap: A new, simple and reliable technique for perineal reconstruction 2021 Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV00656139X volume:142 year:2016 pages:430-432 extent:3 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.08.035 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA 44.65 Chirurgie VZ AR 142 2016 430-432 3 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.08.035 doi /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001214.pica (DE-627)ELV030017300 (ELSEVIER)S1352-2310(16)30628-8 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 610 VZ 44.65 bkl Tartakovsky, Dmitry verfasserin aut Comparison of dry deposition estimates of AERMOD and CALPUFF from area sources in flat terrain 2016transfer abstract 3 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier The dry deposition algorithms of AERMOD and CALPUFF were compared, studying emissions from hypothetical area and point sources in flat terrain. The deposited fractions calculated by AERMOD and CALPUFF are different for the C, D and F stability classes. In all the studied scenarios the differences between the deposited fractions calculated by AERMOD and CALPUFF are much smaller than those calculated previously in complex terrain. Yet, the detected differences in the deposited fractions may affect the ambient concentrations calculated by AERMOD and CALPUFF in the receptor points as a part of an environmental impact assessment and lead to different conclusions on the residents' exposure. The distinct account of AERMOD and CALPUFF to certain wind speeds and stability classes, and their different algorithms for calculating the dispersion coefficients, is the only explanation for the different estimates of deposited fractions between AERMOD and CALPUFF over absolutely flat terrain. The dry deposition algorithms of AERMOD and CALPUFF were compared, studying emissions from hypothetical area and point sources in flat terrain. The deposited fractions calculated by AERMOD and CALPUFF are different for the C, D and F stability classes. In all the studied scenarios the differences between the deposited fractions calculated by AERMOD and CALPUFF are much smaller than those calculated previously in complex terrain. Yet, the detected differences in the deposited fractions may affect the ambient concentrations calculated by AERMOD and CALPUFF in the receptor points as a part of an environmental impact assessment and lead to different conclusions on the residents' exposure. The distinct account of AERMOD and CALPUFF to certain wind speeds and stability classes, and their different algorithms for calculating the dispersion coefficients, is the only explanation for the different estimates of deposited fractions between AERMOD and CALPUFF over absolutely flat terrain. Dispersion modeling Elsevier CALPUFF Elsevier Particulate matter Elsevier AERMOD Elsevier Stern, Eli oth Broday, David M. oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Nassar, M.K. ELSEVIER The internal pudendal artery turnover (IPAT) flap: A new, simple and reliable technique for perineal reconstruction 2021 Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV00656139X volume:142 year:2016 pages:430-432 extent:3 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.08.035 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA 44.65 Chirurgie VZ AR 142 2016 430-432 3 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.08.035 doi /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001214.pica (DE-627)ELV030017300 (ELSEVIER)S1352-2310(16)30628-8 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 610 VZ 44.65 bkl Tartakovsky, Dmitry verfasserin aut Comparison of dry deposition estimates of AERMOD and CALPUFF from area sources in flat terrain 2016transfer abstract 3 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier The dry deposition algorithms of AERMOD and CALPUFF were compared, studying emissions from hypothetical area and point sources in flat terrain. The deposited fractions calculated by AERMOD and CALPUFF are different for the C, D and F stability classes. In all the studied scenarios the differences between the deposited fractions calculated by AERMOD and CALPUFF are much smaller than those calculated previously in complex terrain. Yet, the detected differences in the deposited fractions may affect the ambient concentrations calculated by AERMOD and CALPUFF in the receptor points as a part of an environmental impact assessment and lead to different conclusions on the residents' exposure. The distinct account of AERMOD and CALPUFF to certain wind speeds and stability classes, and their different algorithms for calculating the dispersion coefficients, is the only explanation for the different estimates of deposited fractions between AERMOD and CALPUFF over absolutely flat terrain. The dry deposition algorithms of AERMOD and CALPUFF were compared, studying emissions from hypothetical area and point sources in flat terrain. The deposited fractions calculated by AERMOD and CALPUFF are different for the C, D and F stability classes. In all the studied scenarios the differences between the deposited fractions calculated by AERMOD and CALPUFF are much smaller than those calculated previously in complex terrain. Yet, the detected differences in the deposited fractions may affect the ambient concentrations calculated by AERMOD and CALPUFF in the receptor points as a part of an environmental impact assessment and lead to different conclusions on the residents' exposure. The distinct account of AERMOD and CALPUFF to certain wind speeds and stability classes, and their different algorithms for calculating the dispersion coefficients, is the only explanation for the different estimates of deposited fractions between AERMOD and CALPUFF over absolutely flat terrain. Dispersion modeling Elsevier CALPUFF Elsevier Particulate matter Elsevier AERMOD Elsevier Stern, Eli oth Broday, David M. oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Nassar, M.K. ELSEVIER The internal pudendal artery turnover (IPAT) flap: A new, simple and reliable technique for perineal reconstruction 2021 Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV00656139X volume:142 year:2016 pages:430-432 extent:3 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.08.035 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA 44.65 Chirurgie VZ AR 142 2016 430-432 3 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in The internal pudendal artery turnover (IPAT) flap: A new, simple and reliable technique for perineal reconstruction Amsterdam [u.a.] volume:142 year:2016 pages:430-432 extent:3 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in The internal pudendal artery turnover (IPAT) flap: A new, simple and reliable technique for perineal reconstruction Amsterdam [u.a.] volume:142 year:2016 pages:430-432 extent:3 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| bklname |
Chirurgie |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
Dispersion modeling CALPUFF Particulate matter AERMOD |
| dewey-raw |
610 |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
The internal pudendal artery turnover (IPAT) flap: A new, simple and reliable technique for perineal reconstruction |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Tartakovsky, Dmitry @@aut@@ Stern, Eli @@oth@@ Broday, David M. @@oth@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2016-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
ELV00656139X |
| dewey-sort |
3610 |
| id |
ELV030017300 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV030017300</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230625180230.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">180603s2016 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.08.035</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">/cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001214.pica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV030017300</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S1352-2310(16)30628-8</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">610</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">44.65</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Tartakovsky, Dmitry</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Comparison of dry deposition estimates of AERMOD and CALPUFF from area sources in flat terrain</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2016transfer abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">3</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The dry deposition algorithms of AERMOD and CALPUFF were compared, studying emissions from hypothetical area and point sources in flat terrain. The deposited fractions calculated by AERMOD and CALPUFF are different for the C, D and F stability classes. In all the studied scenarios the differences between the deposited fractions calculated by AERMOD and CALPUFF are much smaller than those calculated previously in complex terrain. Yet, the detected differences in the deposited fractions may affect the ambient concentrations calculated by AERMOD and CALPUFF in the receptor points as a part of an environmental impact assessment and lead to different conclusions on the residents' exposure. The distinct account of AERMOD and CALPUFF to certain wind speeds and stability classes, and their different algorithms for calculating the dispersion coefficients, is the only explanation for the different estimates of deposited fractions between AERMOD and CALPUFF over absolutely flat terrain.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The dry deposition algorithms of AERMOD and CALPUFF were compared, studying emissions from hypothetical area and point sources in flat terrain. The deposited fractions calculated by AERMOD and CALPUFF are different for the C, D and F stability classes. In all the studied scenarios the differences between the deposited fractions calculated by AERMOD and CALPUFF are much smaller than those calculated previously in complex terrain. Yet, the detected differences in the deposited fractions may affect the ambient concentrations calculated by AERMOD and CALPUFF in the receptor points as a part of an environmental impact assessment and lead to different conclusions on the residents' exposure. The distinct account of AERMOD and CALPUFF to certain wind speeds and stability classes, and their different algorithms for calculating the dispersion coefficients, is the only explanation for the different estimates of deposited fractions between AERMOD and CALPUFF over absolutely flat terrain.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Dispersion modeling</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">CALPUFF</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Particulate matter</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">AERMOD</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Stern, Eli</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Broday, David M.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="n">Elsevier Science</subfield><subfield code="a">Nassar, M.K. ELSEVIER</subfield><subfield code="t">The internal pudendal artery turnover (IPAT) flap: A new, simple and reliable technique for perineal reconstruction</subfield><subfield code="d">2021</subfield><subfield code="g">Amsterdam [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)ELV00656139X</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:142</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2016</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:430-432</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:3</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.08.035</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">44.65</subfield><subfield code="j">Chirurgie</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">142</subfield><subfield code="j">2016</subfield><subfield code="h">430-432</subfield><subfield code="g">3</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Tartakovsky, Dmitry |
| spellingShingle |
Tartakovsky, Dmitry ddc 610 bkl 44.65 Elsevier Dispersion modeling Elsevier CALPUFF Elsevier Particulate matter Elsevier AERMOD Comparison of dry deposition estimates of AERMOD and CALPUFF from area sources in flat terrain |
| authorStr |
Tartakovsky, Dmitry |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)ELV00656139X |
| format |
electronic Article |
| dewey-ones |
610 - Medicine & health |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut |
| collection |
elsevier |
| remote_str |
true |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| topic_title |
610 VZ 44.65 bkl Comparison of dry deposition estimates of AERMOD and CALPUFF from area sources in flat terrain Dispersion modeling Elsevier CALPUFF Elsevier Particulate matter Elsevier AERMOD Elsevier |
| topic |
ddc 610 bkl 44.65 Elsevier Dispersion modeling Elsevier CALPUFF Elsevier Particulate matter Elsevier AERMOD |
| topic_unstemmed |
ddc 610 bkl 44.65 Elsevier Dispersion modeling Elsevier CALPUFF Elsevier Particulate matter Elsevier AERMOD |
| topic_browse |
ddc 610 bkl 44.65 Elsevier Dispersion modeling Elsevier CALPUFF Elsevier Particulate matter Elsevier AERMOD |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
zu |
| author2_variant |
e s es d m b dm dmb |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
The internal pudendal artery turnover (IPAT) flap: A new, simple and reliable technique for perineal reconstruction |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
ELV00656139X |
| dewey-tens |
610 - Medicine & health |
| hierarchy_top_title |
The internal pudendal artery turnover (IPAT) flap: A new, simple and reliable technique for perineal reconstruction |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)ELV00656139X |
| title |
Comparison of dry deposition estimates of AERMOD and CALPUFF from area sources in flat terrain |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)ELV030017300 (ELSEVIER)S1352-2310(16)30628-8 |
| title_full |
Comparison of dry deposition estimates of AERMOD and CALPUFF from area sources in flat terrain |
| author_sort |
Tartakovsky, Dmitry |
| journal |
The internal pudendal artery turnover (IPAT) flap: A new, simple and reliable technique for perineal reconstruction |
| journalStr |
The internal pudendal artery turnover (IPAT) flap: A new, simple and reliable technique for perineal reconstruction |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| dewey-hundreds |
600 - Technology |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2016 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
zzz |
| container_start_page |
430 |
| author_browse |
Tartakovsky, Dmitry |
| container_volume |
142 |
| physical |
3 |
| class |
610 VZ 44.65 bkl |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Tartakovsky, Dmitry |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.08.035 |
| dewey-full |
610 |
| title_sort |
comparison of dry deposition estimates of aermod and calpuff from area sources in flat terrain |
| title_auth |
Comparison of dry deposition estimates of AERMOD and CALPUFF from area sources in flat terrain |
| abstract |
The dry deposition algorithms of AERMOD and CALPUFF were compared, studying emissions from hypothetical area and point sources in flat terrain. The deposited fractions calculated by AERMOD and CALPUFF are different for the C, D and F stability classes. In all the studied scenarios the differences between the deposited fractions calculated by AERMOD and CALPUFF are much smaller than those calculated previously in complex terrain. Yet, the detected differences in the deposited fractions may affect the ambient concentrations calculated by AERMOD and CALPUFF in the receptor points as a part of an environmental impact assessment and lead to different conclusions on the residents' exposure. The distinct account of AERMOD and CALPUFF to certain wind speeds and stability classes, and their different algorithms for calculating the dispersion coefficients, is the only explanation for the different estimates of deposited fractions between AERMOD and CALPUFF over absolutely flat terrain. |
| abstractGer |
The dry deposition algorithms of AERMOD and CALPUFF were compared, studying emissions from hypothetical area and point sources in flat terrain. The deposited fractions calculated by AERMOD and CALPUFF are different for the C, D and F stability classes. In all the studied scenarios the differences between the deposited fractions calculated by AERMOD and CALPUFF are much smaller than those calculated previously in complex terrain. Yet, the detected differences in the deposited fractions may affect the ambient concentrations calculated by AERMOD and CALPUFF in the receptor points as a part of an environmental impact assessment and lead to different conclusions on the residents' exposure. The distinct account of AERMOD and CALPUFF to certain wind speeds and stability classes, and their different algorithms for calculating the dispersion coefficients, is the only explanation for the different estimates of deposited fractions between AERMOD and CALPUFF over absolutely flat terrain. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
The dry deposition algorithms of AERMOD and CALPUFF were compared, studying emissions from hypothetical area and point sources in flat terrain. The deposited fractions calculated by AERMOD and CALPUFF are different for the C, D and F stability classes. In all the studied scenarios the differences between the deposited fractions calculated by AERMOD and CALPUFF are much smaller than those calculated previously in complex terrain. Yet, the detected differences in the deposited fractions may affect the ambient concentrations calculated by AERMOD and CALPUFF in the receptor points as a part of an environmental impact assessment and lead to different conclusions on the residents' exposure. The distinct account of AERMOD and CALPUFF to certain wind speeds and stability classes, and their different algorithms for calculating the dispersion coefficients, is the only explanation for the different estimates of deposited fractions between AERMOD and CALPUFF over absolutely flat terrain. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA |
| title_short |
Comparison of dry deposition estimates of AERMOD and CALPUFF from area sources in flat terrain |
| url |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.08.035 |
| remote_bool |
true |
| author2 |
Stern, Eli Broday, David M. |
| author2Str |
Stern, Eli Broday, David M. |
| ppnlink |
ELV00656139X |
| mediatype_str_mv |
z |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| author2_role |
oth oth |
| doi_str |
10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.08.035 |
| up_date |
2024-07-06T22:58:37.107Z |
| _version_ |
1803872336199286784 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV030017300</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230625180230.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">180603s2016 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.08.035</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">/cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001214.pica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV030017300</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S1352-2310(16)30628-8</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">610</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">44.65</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Tartakovsky, Dmitry</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Comparison of dry deposition estimates of AERMOD and CALPUFF from area sources in flat terrain</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2016transfer abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">3</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The dry deposition algorithms of AERMOD and CALPUFF were compared, studying emissions from hypothetical area and point sources in flat terrain. The deposited fractions calculated by AERMOD and CALPUFF are different for the C, D and F stability classes. In all the studied scenarios the differences between the deposited fractions calculated by AERMOD and CALPUFF are much smaller than those calculated previously in complex terrain. Yet, the detected differences in the deposited fractions may affect the ambient concentrations calculated by AERMOD and CALPUFF in the receptor points as a part of an environmental impact assessment and lead to different conclusions on the residents' exposure. The distinct account of AERMOD and CALPUFF to certain wind speeds and stability classes, and their different algorithms for calculating the dispersion coefficients, is the only explanation for the different estimates of deposited fractions between AERMOD and CALPUFF over absolutely flat terrain.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The dry deposition algorithms of AERMOD and CALPUFF were compared, studying emissions from hypothetical area and point sources in flat terrain. The deposited fractions calculated by AERMOD and CALPUFF are different for the C, D and F stability classes. In all the studied scenarios the differences between the deposited fractions calculated by AERMOD and CALPUFF are much smaller than those calculated previously in complex terrain. Yet, the detected differences in the deposited fractions may affect the ambient concentrations calculated by AERMOD and CALPUFF in the receptor points as a part of an environmental impact assessment and lead to different conclusions on the residents' exposure. The distinct account of AERMOD and CALPUFF to certain wind speeds and stability classes, and their different algorithms for calculating the dispersion coefficients, is the only explanation for the different estimates of deposited fractions between AERMOD and CALPUFF over absolutely flat terrain.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Dispersion modeling</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">CALPUFF</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Particulate matter</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">AERMOD</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Stern, Eli</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Broday, David M.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="n">Elsevier Science</subfield><subfield code="a">Nassar, M.K. ELSEVIER</subfield><subfield code="t">The internal pudendal artery turnover (IPAT) flap: A new, simple and reliable technique for perineal reconstruction</subfield><subfield code="d">2021</subfield><subfield code="g">Amsterdam [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)ELV00656139X</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:142</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2016</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:430-432</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:3</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.08.035</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">44.65</subfield><subfield code="j">Chirurgie</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">142</subfield><subfield code="j">2016</subfield><subfield code="h">430-432</subfield><subfield code="g">3</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.4011307 |