Field-based soil-texture estimates could replace laboratory analysis
Texture is one of the most important and most frequently measured parameters in soil science. It is common knowledge among field experienced soil scientists that soil texture can be well estimated in the field manually with so called “texture-by-feel”. However, no systematic evaluation exists that a...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Autor*in: |
Vos, Cora [verfasserIn] |
---|
Format: |
E-Artikel |
---|---|
Sprache: |
Englisch |
Erschienen: |
2016transfer abstract |
---|
Umfang: |
5 |
---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Assessment and mitigation of the influence of rising charging demand of electric vehicles on the aging of distribution transformers - Diahovchenko, Illia ELSEVIER, 2023, an international journal of soil science, Amsterdam [u.a.] |
---|---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:267 ; year:2016 ; day:1 ; month:04 ; pages:215-219 ; extent:5 |
Links: |
---|
DOI / URN: |
10.1016/j.geoderma.2015.12.022 |
---|
Katalog-ID: |
ELV030093864 |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | ELV030093864 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20230625180557.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 180603s2016 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.geoderma.2015.12.022 |2 doi | |
028 | 5 | 2 | |a GBVA2016021000025.pica |
035 | |a (DE-627)ELV030093864 | ||
035 | |a (ELSEVIER)S0016-7061(15)30174-9 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
082 | 0 | |a 550 |a 910 | |
082 | 0 | 4 | |a 550 |q DE-600 |
082 | 0 | 4 | |a 910 |q DE-600 |
082 | 0 | 4 | |a 620 |q VZ |
084 | |a 52.52 |2 bkl | ||
084 | |a 53.31 |2 bkl | ||
084 | |a 53.39 |2 bkl | ||
100 | 1 | |a Vos, Cora |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Field-based soil-texture estimates could replace laboratory analysis |
264 | 1 | |c 2016transfer abstract | |
300 | |a 5 | ||
336 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zzz |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b z |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zu |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a Texture is one of the most important and most frequently measured parameters in soil science. It is common knowledge among field experienced soil scientists that soil texture can be well estimated in the field manually with so called “texture-by-feel”. However, no systematic evaluation exists that assessed the precision and accuracy of field based texture estimates as compared to the common, but time consuming, standard laboratory methods. In the course of the German Agricultural Soil Inventory, the texture of 3896 soil samples from 728 soil pits was estimated manually in the field and measured in the laboratory using standard sedimentation techniques. The field based estimations of the sand, silt and clay content showed a relative deviation from the measurements of only 3.8, 11.5 and 15.5%, respectively. The absolute uncertainty of field texture was 23, 32 and 17gkg−1 for sand, silt and clay, respectively. A large fraction (57–72%) of deviations between field and laboratory derived texture estimates was due to the laboratory measurement uncertainty, and due to the fact that only texture classes were estimated in the field and not mass fractions. Our findings indicate that for most purposes it is sufficient to estimate the soil texture manually “by feel” instead of conducting expensive particle size analyses in the laboratory. | ||
520 | |a Texture is one of the most important and most frequently measured parameters in soil science. It is common knowledge among field experienced soil scientists that soil texture can be well estimated in the field manually with so called “texture-by-feel”. However, no systematic evaluation exists that assessed the precision and accuracy of field based texture estimates as compared to the common, but time consuming, standard laboratory methods. In the course of the German Agricultural Soil Inventory, the texture of 3896 soil samples from 728 soil pits was estimated manually in the field and measured in the laboratory using standard sedimentation techniques. The field based estimations of the sand, silt and clay content showed a relative deviation from the measurements of only 3.8, 11.5 and 15.5%, respectively. The absolute uncertainty of field texture was 23, 32 and 17gkg−1 for sand, silt and clay, respectively. A large fraction (57–72%) of deviations between field and laboratory derived texture estimates was due to the laboratory measurement uncertainty, and due to the fact that only texture classes were estimated in the field and not mass fractions. Our findings indicate that for most purposes it is sufficient to estimate the soil texture manually “by feel” instead of conducting expensive particle size analyses in the laboratory. | ||
700 | 1 | |a Don, Axel |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Prietz, Roland |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Heidkamp, Arne |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Freibauer, Annette |4 oth | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |n Elsevier Science |a Diahovchenko, Illia ELSEVIER |t Assessment and mitigation of the influence of rising charging demand of electric vehicles on the aging of distribution transformers |d 2023 |d an international journal of soil science |g Amsterdam [u.a.] |w (DE-627)ELV010107800 |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:267 |g year:2016 |g day:1 |g month:04 |g pages:215-219 |g extent:5 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2015.12.022 |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_U | ||
912 | |a GBV_ELV | ||
912 | |a SYSFLAG_U | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_20 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_21 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_22 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_30 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_40 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_70 | ||
936 | b | k | |a 52.52 |j Thermische Energieerzeugung |j Wärmetechnik |q VZ |
936 | b | k | |a 53.31 |j Elektrische Energieübertragung |q VZ |
936 | b | k | |a 53.39 |j Elektrische Energietechnik: Sonstiges |q VZ |
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 267 |j 2016 |b 1 |c 0401 |h 215-219 |g 5 | ||
953 | |2 045F |a 550 |
author_variant |
c v cv |
---|---|
matchkey_str |
voscoradonaxelprietzrolandheidkamparnefr:2016----:ilbsdoletretmtsolrpaea |
hierarchy_sort_str |
2016transfer abstract |
bklnumber |
52.52 53.31 53.39 |
publishDate |
2016 |
allfields |
10.1016/j.geoderma.2015.12.022 doi GBVA2016021000025.pica (DE-627)ELV030093864 (ELSEVIER)S0016-7061(15)30174-9 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 550 910 550 DE-600 910 DE-600 620 VZ 52.52 bkl 53.31 bkl 53.39 bkl Vos, Cora verfasserin aut Field-based soil-texture estimates could replace laboratory analysis 2016transfer abstract 5 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Texture is one of the most important and most frequently measured parameters in soil science. It is common knowledge among field experienced soil scientists that soil texture can be well estimated in the field manually with so called “texture-by-feel”. However, no systematic evaluation exists that assessed the precision and accuracy of field based texture estimates as compared to the common, but time consuming, standard laboratory methods. In the course of the German Agricultural Soil Inventory, the texture of 3896 soil samples from 728 soil pits was estimated manually in the field and measured in the laboratory using standard sedimentation techniques. The field based estimations of the sand, silt and clay content showed a relative deviation from the measurements of only 3.8, 11.5 and 15.5%, respectively. The absolute uncertainty of field texture was 23, 32 and 17gkg−1 for sand, silt and clay, respectively. A large fraction (57–72%) of deviations between field and laboratory derived texture estimates was due to the laboratory measurement uncertainty, and due to the fact that only texture classes were estimated in the field and not mass fractions. Our findings indicate that for most purposes it is sufficient to estimate the soil texture manually “by feel” instead of conducting expensive particle size analyses in the laboratory. Texture is one of the most important and most frequently measured parameters in soil science. It is common knowledge among field experienced soil scientists that soil texture can be well estimated in the field manually with so called “texture-by-feel”. However, no systematic evaluation exists that assessed the precision and accuracy of field based texture estimates as compared to the common, but time consuming, standard laboratory methods. In the course of the German Agricultural Soil Inventory, the texture of 3896 soil samples from 728 soil pits was estimated manually in the field and measured in the laboratory using standard sedimentation techniques. The field based estimations of the sand, silt and clay content showed a relative deviation from the measurements of only 3.8, 11.5 and 15.5%, respectively. The absolute uncertainty of field texture was 23, 32 and 17gkg−1 for sand, silt and clay, respectively. A large fraction (57–72%) of deviations between field and laboratory derived texture estimates was due to the laboratory measurement uncertainty, and due to the fact that only texture classes were estimated in the field and not mass fractions. Our findings indicate that for most purposes it is sufficient to estimate the soil texture manually “by feel” instead of conducting expensive particle size analyses in the laboratory. Don, Axel oth Prietz, Roland oth Heidkamp, Arne oth Freibauer, Annette oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Diahovchenko, Illia ELSEVIER Assessment and mitigation of the influence of rising charging demand of electric vehicles on the aging of distribution transformers 2023 an international journal of soil science Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV010107800 volume:267 year:2016 day:1 month:04 pages:215-219 extent:5 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2015.12.022 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_21 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_30 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_70 52.52 Thermische Energieerzeugung Wärmetechnik VZ 53.31 Elektrische Energieübertragung VZ 53.39 Elektrische Energietechnik: Sonstiges VZ AR 267 2016 1 0401 215-219 5 045F 550 |
spelling |
10.1016/j.geoderma.2015.12.022 doi GBVA2016021000025.pica (DE-627)ELV030093864 (ELSEVIER)S0016-7061(15)30174-9 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 550 910 550 DE-600 910 DE-600 620 VZ 52.52 bkl 53.31 bkl 53.39 bkl Vos, Cora verfasserin aut Field-based soil-texture estimates could replace laboratory analysis 2016transfer abstract 5 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Texture is one of the most important and most frequently measured parameters in soil science. It is common knowledge among field experienced soil scientists that soil texture can be well estimated in the field manually with so called “texture-by-feel”. However, no systematic evaluation exists that assessed the precision and accuracy of field based texture estimates as compared to the common, but time consuming, standard laboratory methods. In the course of the German Agricultural Soil Inventory, the texture of 3896 soil samples from 728 soil pits was estimated manually in the field and measured in the laboratory using standard sedimentation techniques. The field based estimations of the sand, silt and clay content showed a relative deviation from the measurements of only 3.8, 11.5 and 15.5%, respectively. The absolute uncertainty of field texture was 23, 32 and 17gkg−1 for sand, silt and clay, respectively. A large fraction (57–72%) of deviations between field and laboratory derived texture estimates was due to the laboratory measurement uncertainty, and due to the fact that only texture classes were estimated in the field and not mass fractions. Our findings indicate that for most purposes it is sufficient to estimate the soil texture manually “by feel” instead of conducting expensive particle size analyses in the laboratory. Texture is one of the most important and most frequently measured parameters in soil science. It is common knowledge among field experienced soil scientists that soil texture can be well estimated in the field manually with so called “texture-by-feel”. However, no systematic evaluation exists that assessed the precision and accuracy of field based texture estimates as compared to the common, but time consuming, standard laboratory methods. In the course of the German Agricultural Soil Inventory, the texture of 3896 soil samples from 728 soil pits was estimated manually in the field and measured in the laboratory using standard sedimentation techniques. The field based estimations of the sand, silt and clay content showed a relative deviation from the measurements of only 3.8, 11.5 and 15.5%, respectively. The absolute uncertainty of field texture was 23, 32 and 17gkg−1 for sand, silt and clay, respectively. A large fraction (57–72%) of deviations between field and laboratory derived texture estimates was due to the laboratory measurement uncertainty, and due to the fact that only texture classes were estimated in the field and not mass fractions. Our findings indicate that for most purposes it is sufficient to estimate the soil texture manually “by feel” instead of conducting expensive particle size analyses in the laboratory. Don, Axel oth Prietz, Roland oth Heidkamp, Arne oth Freibauer, Annette oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Diahovchenko, Illia ELSEVIER Assessment and mitigation of the influence of rising charging demand of electric vehicles on the aging of distribution transformers 2023 an international journal of soil science Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV010107800 volume:267 year:2016 day:1 month:04 pages:215-219 extent:5 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2015.12.022 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_21 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_30 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_70 52.52 Thermische Energieerzeugung Wärmetechnik VZ 53.31 Elektrische Energieübertragung VZ 53.39 Elektrische Energietechnik: Sonstiges VZ AR 267 2016 1 0401 215-219 5 045F 550 |
allfields_unstemmed |
10.1016/j.geoderma.2015.12.022 doi GBVA2016021000025.pica (DE-627)ELV030093864 (ELSEVIER)S0016-7061(15)30174-9 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 550 910 550 DE-600 910 DE-600 620 VZ 52.52 bkl 53.31 bkl 53.39 bkl Vos, Cora verfasserin aut Field-based soil-texture estimates could replace laboratory analysis 2016transfer abstract 5 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Texture is one of the most important and most frequently measured parameters in soil science. It is common knowledge among field experienced soil scientists that soil texture can be well estimated in the field manually with so called “texture-by-feel”. However, no systematic evaluation exists that assessed the precision and accuracy of field based texture estimates as compared to the common, but time consuming, standard laboratory methods. In the course of the German Agricultural Soil Inventory, the texture of 3896 soil samples from 728 soil pits was estimated manually in the field and measured in the laboratory using standard sedimentation techniques. The field based estimations of the sand, silt and clay content showed a relative deviation from the measurements of only 3.8, 11.5 and 15.5%, respectively. The absolute uncertainty of field texture was 23, 32 and 17gkg−1 for sand, silt and clay, respectively. A large fraction (57–72%) of deviations between field and laboratory derived texture estimates was due to the laboratory measurement uncertainty, and due to the fact that only texture classes were estimated in the field and not mass fractions. Our findings indicate that for most purposes it is sufficient to estimate the soil texture manually “by feel” instead of conducting expensive particle size analyses in the laboratory. Texture is one of the most important and most frequently measured parameters in soil science. It is common knowledge among field experienced soil scientists that soil texture can be well estimated in the field manually with so called “texture-by-feel”. However, no systematic evaluation exists that assessed the precision and accuracy of field based texture estimates as compared to the common, but time consuming, standard laboratory methods. In the course of the German Agricultural Soil Inventory, the texture of 3896 soil samples from 728 soil pits was estimated manually in the field and measured in the laboratory using standard sedimentation techniques. The field based estimations of the sand, silt and clay content showed a relative deviation from the measurements of only 3.8, 11.5 and 15.5%, respectively. The absolute uncertainty of field texture was 23, 32 and 17gkg−1 for sand, silt and clay, respectively. A large fraction (57–72%) of deviations between field and laboratory derived texture estimates was due to the laboratory measurement uncertainty, and due to the fact that only texture classes were estimated in the field and not mass fractions. Our findings indicate that for most purposes it is sufficient to estimate the soil texture manually “by feel” instead of conducting expensive particle size analyses in the laboratory. Don, Axel oth Prietz, Roland oth Heidkamp, Arne oth Freibauer, Annette oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Diahovchenko, Illia ELSEVIER Assessment and mitigation of the influence of rising charging demand of electric vehicles on the aging of distribution transformers 2023 an international journal of soil science Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV010107800 volume:267 year:2016 day:1 month:04 pages:215-219 extent:5 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2015.12.022 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_21 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_30 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_70 52.52 Thermische Energieerzeugung Wärmetechnik VZ 53.31 Elektrische Energieübertragung VZ 53.39 Elektrische Energietechnik: Sonstiges VZ AR 267 2016 1 0401 215-219 5 045F 550 |
allfieldsGer |
10.1016/j.geoderma.2015.12.022 doi GBVA2016021000025.pica (DE-627)ELV030093864 (ELSEVIER)S0016-7061(15)30174-9 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 550 910 550 DE-600 910 DE-600 620 VZ 52.52 bkl 53.31 bkl 53.39 bkl Vos, Cora verfasserin aut Field-based soil-texture estimates could replace laboratory analysis 2016transfer abstract 5 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Texture is one of the most important and most frequently measured parameters in soil science. It is common knowledge among field experienced soil scientists that soil texture can be well estimated in the field manually with so called “texture-by-feel”. However, no systematic evaluation exists that assessed the precision and accuracy of field based texture estimates as compared to the common, but time consuming, standard laboratory methods. In the course of the German Agricultural Soil Inventory, the texture of 3896 soil samples from 728 soil pits was estimated manually in the field and measured in the laboratory using standard sedimentation techniques. The field based estimations of the sand, silt and clay content showed a relative deviation from the measurements of only 3.8, 11.5 and 15.5%, respectively. The absolute uncertainty of field texture was 23, 32 and 17gkg−1 for sand, silt and clay, respectively. A large fraction (57–72%) of deviations between field and laboratory derived texture estimates was due to the laboratory measurement uncertainty, and due to the fact that only texture classes were estimated in the field and not mass fractions. Our findings indicate that for most purposes it is sufficient to estimate the soil texture manually “by feel” instead of conducting expensive particle size analyses in the laboratory. Texture is one of the most important and most frequently measured parameters in soil science. It is common knowledge among field experienced soil scientists that soil texture can be well estimated in the field manually with so called “texture-by-feel”. However, no systematic evaluation exists that assessed the precision and accuracy of field based texture estimates as compared to the common, but time consuming, standard laboratory methods. In the course of the German Agricultural Soil Inventory, the texture of 3896 soil samples from 728 soil pits was estimated manually in the field and measured in the laboratory using standard sedimentation techniques. The field based estimations of the sand, silt and clay content showed a relative deviation from the measurements of only 3.8, 11.5 and 15.5%, respectively. The absolute uncertainty of field texture was 23, 32 and 17gkg−1 for sand, silt and clay, respectively. A large fraction (57–72%) of deviations between field and laboratory derived texture estimates was due to the laboratory measurement uncertainty, and due to the fact that only texture classes were estimated in the field and not mass fractions. Our findings indicate that for most purposes it is sufficient to estimate the soil texture manually “by feel” instead of conducting expensive particle size analyses in the laboratory. Don, Axel oth Prietz, Roland oth Heidkamp, Arne oth Freibauer, Annette oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Diahovchenko, Illia ELSEVIER Assessment and mitigation of the influence of rising charging demand of electric vehicles on the aging of distribution transformers 2023 an international journal of soil science Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV010107800 volume:267 year:2016 day:1 month:04 pages:215-219 extent:5 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2015.12.022 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_21 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_30 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_70 52.52 Thermische Energieerzeugung Wärmetechnik VZ 53.31 Elektrische Energieübertragung VZ 53.39 Elektrische Energietechnik: Sonstiges VZ AR 267 2016 1 0401 215-219 5 045F 550 |
allfieldsSound |
10.1016/j.geoderma.2015.12.022 doi GBVA2016021000025.pica (DE-627)ELV030093864 (ELSEVIER)S0016-7061(15)30174-9 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 550 910 550 DE-600 910 DE-600 620 VZ 52.52 bkl 53.31 bkl 53.39 bkl Vos, Cora verfasserin aut Field-based soil-texture estimates could replace laboratory analysis 2016transfer abstract 5 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Texture is one of the most important and most frequently measured parameters in soil science. It is common knowledge among field experienced soil scientists that soil texture can be well estimated in the field manually with so called “texture-by-feel”. However, no systematic evaluation exists that assessed the precision and accuracy of field based texture estimates as compared to the common, but time consuming, standard laboratory methods. In the course of the German Agricultural Soil Inventory, the texture of 3896 soil samples from 728 soil pits was estimated manually in the field and measured in the laboratory using standard sedimentation techniques. The field based estimations of the sand, silt and clay content showed a relative deviation from the measurements of only 3.8, 11.5 and 15.5%, respectively. The absolute uncertainty of field texture was 23, 32 and 17gkg−1 for sand, silt and clay, respectively. A large fraction (57–72%) of deviations between field and laboratory derived texture estimates was due to the laboratory measurement uncertainty, and due to the fact that only texture classes were estimated in the field and not mass fractions. Our findings indicate that for most purposes it is sufficient to estimate the soil texture manually “by feel” instead of conducting expensive particle size analyses in the laboratory. Texture is one of the most important and most frequently measured parameters in soil science. It is common knowledge among field experienced soil scientists that soil texture can be well estimated in the field manually with so called “texture-by-feel”. However, no systematic evaluation exists that assessed the precision and accuracy of field based texture estimates as compared to the common, but time consuming, standard laboratory methods. In the course of the German Agricultural Soil Inventory, the texture of 3896 soil samples from 728 soil pits was estimated manually in the field and measured in the laboratory using standard sedimentation techniques. The field based estimations of the sand, silt and clay content showed a relative deviation from the measurements of only 3.8, 11.5 and 15.5%, respectively. The absolute uncertainty of field texture was 23, 32 and 17gkg−1 for sand, silt and clay, respectively. A large fraction (57–72%) of deviations between field and laboratory derived texture estimates was due to the laboratory measurement uncertainty, and due to the fact that only texture classes were estimated in the field and not mass fractions. Our findings indicate that for most purposes it is sufficient to estimate the soil texture manually “by feel” instead of conducting expensive particle size analyses in the laboratory. Don, Axel oth Prietz, Roland oth Heidkamp, Arne oth Freibauer, Annette oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Diahovchenko, Illia ELSEVIER Assessment and mitigation of the influence of rising charging demand of electric vehicles on the aging of distribution transformers 2023 an international journal of soil science Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV010107800 volume:267 year:2016 day:1 month:04 pages:215-219 extent:5 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2015.12.022 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_21 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_30 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_70 52.52 Thermische Energieerzeugung Wärmetechnik VZ 53.31 Elektrische Energieübertragung VZ 53.39 Elektrische Energietechnik: Sonstiges VZ AR 267 2016 1 0401 215-219 5 045F 550 |
language |
English |
source |
Enthalten in Assessment and mitigation of the influence of rising charging demand of electric vehicles on the aging of distribution transformers Amsterdam [u.a.] volume:267 year:2016 day:1 month:04 pages:215-219 extent:5 |
sourceStr |
Enthalten in Assessment and mitigation of the influence of rising charging demand of electric vehicles on the aging of distribution transformers Amsterdam [u.a.] volume:267 year:2016 day:1 month:04 pages:215-219 extent:5 |
format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
bklname |
Thermische Energieerzeugung Wärmetechnik Elektrische Energieübertragung Elektrische Energietechnik: Sonstiges |
institution |
findex.gbv.de |
dewey-raw |
550 |
isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
container_title |
Assessment and mitigation of the influence of rising charging demand of electric vehicles on the aging of distribution transformers |
authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Vos, Cora @@aut@@ Don, Axel @@oth@@ Prietz, Roland @@oth@@ Heidkamp, Arne @@oth@@ Freibauer, Annette @@oth@@ |
publishDateDaySort_date |
2016-01-01T00:00:00Z |
hierarchy_top_id |
ELV010107800 |
dewey-sort |
3550 |
id |
ELV030093864 |
language_de |
englisch |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV030093864</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230625180557.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">180603s2016 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.geoderma.2015.12.022</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">GBVA2016021000025.pica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV030093864</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0016-7061(15)30174-9</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">550</subfield><subfield code="a">910</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">550</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">910</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">620</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">52.52</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">53.31</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">53.39</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Vos, Cora</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Field-based soil-texture estimates could replace laboratory analysis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2016transfer abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">5</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Texture is one of the most important and most frequently measured parameters in soil science. It is common knowledge among field experienced soil scientists that soil texture can be well estimated in the field manually with so called “texture-by-feel”. However, no systematic evaluation exists that assessed the precision and accuracy of field based texture estimates as compared to the common, but time consuming, standard laboratory methods. In the course of the German Agricultural Soil Inventory, the texture of 3896 soil samples from 728 soil pits was estimated manually in the field and measured in the laboratory using standard sedimentation techniques. The field based estimations of the sand, silt and clay content showed a relative deviation from the measurements of only 3.8, 11.5 and 15.5%, respectively. The absolute uncertainty of field texture was 23, 32 and 17gkg−1 for sand, silt and clay, respectively. A large fraction (57–72%) of deviations between field and laboratory derived texture estimates was due to the laboratory measurement uncertainty, and due to the fact that only texture classes were estimated in the field and not mass fractions. Our findings indicate that for most purposes it is sufficient to estimate the soil texture manually “by feel” instead of conducting expensive particle size analyses in the laboratory.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Texture is one of the most important and most frequently measured parameters in soil science. It is common knowledge among field experienced soil scientists that soil texture can be well estimated in the field manually with so called “texture-by-feel”. However, no systematic evaluation exists that assessed the precision and accuracy of field based texture estimates as compared to the common, but time consuming, standard laboratory methods. In the course of the German Agricultural Soil Inventory, the texture of 3896 soil samples from 728 soil pits was estimated manually in the field and measured in the laboratory using standard sedimentation techniques. The field based estimations of the sand, silt and clay content showed a relative deviation from the measurements of only 3.8, 11.5 and 15.5%, respectively. The absolute uncertainty of field texture was 23, 32 and 17gkg−1 for sand, silt and clay, respectively. A large fraction (57–72%) of deviations between field and laboratory derived texture estimates was due to the laboratory measurement uncertainty, and due to the fact that only texture classes were estimated in the field and not mass fractions. Our findings indicate that for most purposes it is sufficient to estimate the soil texture manually “by feel” instead of conducting expensive particle size analyses in the laboratory.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Don, Axel</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Prietz, Roland</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Heidkamp, Arne</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Freibauer, Annette</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="n">Elsevier Science</subfield><subfield code="a">Diahovchenko, Illia ELSEVIER</subfield><subfield code="t">Assessment and mitigation of the influence of rising charging demand of electric vehicles on the aging of distribution transformers</subfield><subfield code="d">2023</subfield><subfield code="d">an international journal of soil science</subfield><subfield code="g">Amsterdam [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)ELV010107800</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:267</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2016</subfield><subfield code="g">day:1</subfield><subfield code="g">month:04</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:215-219</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:5</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2015.12.022</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_21</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_30</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">52.52</subfield><subfield code="j">Thermische Energieerzeugung</subfield><subfield code="j">Wärmetechnik</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">53.31</subfield><subfield code="j">Elektrische Energieübertragung</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">53.39</subfield><subfield code="j">Elektrische Energietechnik: Sonstiges</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">267</subfield><subfield code="j">2016</subfield><subfield code="b">1</subfield><subfield code="c">0401</subfield><subfield code="h">215-219</subfield><subfield code="g">5</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="953" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="2">045F</subfield><subfield code="a">550</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
author |
Vos, Cora |
spellingShingle |
Vos, Cora ddc 550 ddc 910 ddc 620 bkl 52.52 bkl 53.31 bkl 53.39 Field-based soil-texture estimates could replace laboratory analysis |
authorStr |
Vos, Cora |
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)ELV010107800 |
format |
electronic Article |
dewey-ones |
550 - Earth sciences 910 - Geography & travel 620 - Engineering & allied operations |
delete_txt_mv |
keep |
author_role |
aut |
collection |
elsevier |
remote_str |
true |
illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
topic_title |
550 910 550 DE-600 910 DE-600 620 VZ 52.52 bkl 53.31 bkl 53.39 bkl Field-based soil-texture estimates could replace laboratory analysis |
topic |
ddc 550 ddc 910 ddc 620 bkl 52.52 bkl 53.31 bkl 53.39 |
topic_unstemmed |
ddc 550 ddc 910 ddc 620 bkl 52.52 bkl 53.31 bkl 53.39 |
topic_browse |
ddc 550 ddc 910 ddc 620 bkl 52.52 bkl 53.31 bkl 53.39 |
format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
carriertype_str_mv |
zu |
author2_variant |
a d ad r p rp a h ah a f af |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Assessment and mitigation of the influence of rising charging demand of electric vehicles on the aging of distribution transformers |
hierarchy_parent_id |
ELV010107800 |
dewey-tens |
550 - Earth sciences & geology 910 - Geography & travel 620 - Engineering |
hierarchy_top_title |
Assessment and mitigation of the influence of rising charging demand of electric vehicles on the aging of distribution transformers |
isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)ELV010107800 |
title |
Field-based soil-texture estimates could replace laboratory analysis |
ctrlnum |
(DE-627)ELV030093864 (ELSEVIER)S0016-7061(15)30174-9 |
title_full |
Field-based soil-texture estimates could replace laboratory analysis |
author_sort |
Vos, Cora |
journal |
Assessment and mitigation of the influence of rising charging demand of electric vehicles on the aging of distribution transformers |
journalStr |
Assessment and mitigation of the influence of rising charging demand of electric vehicles on the aging of distribution transformers |
lang_code |
eng |
isOA_bool |
false |
dewey-hundreds |
500 - Science 900 - History & geography 600 - Technology |
recordtype |
marc |
publishDateSort |
2016 |
contenttype_str_mv |
zzz |
container_start_page |
215 |
author_browse |
Vos, Cora |
container_volume |
267 |
physical |
5 |
class |
550 910 550 DE-600 910 DE-600 620 VZ 52.52 bkl 53.31 bkl 53.39 bkl |
format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
author-letter |
Vos, Cora |
doi_str_mv |
10.1016/j.geoderma.2015.12.022 |
dewey-full |
550 910 620 |
title_sort |
field-based soil-texture estimates could replace laboratory analysis |
title_auth |
Field-based soil-texture estimates could replace laboratory analysis |
abstract |
Texture is one of the most important and most frequently measured parameters in soil science. It is common knowledge among field experienced soil scientists that soil texture can be well estimated in the field manually with so called “texture-by-feel”. However, no systematic evaluation exists that assessed the precision and accuracy of field based texture estimates as compared to the common, but time consuming, standard laboratory methods. In the course of the German Agricultural Soil Inventory, the texture of 3896 soil samples from 728 soil pits was estimated manually in the field and measured in the laboratory using standard sedimentation techniques. The field based estimations of the sand, silt and clay content showed a relative deviation from the measurements of only 3.8, 11.5 and 15.5%, respectively. The absolute uncertainty of field texture was 23, 32 and 17gkg−1 for sand, silt and clay, respectively. A large fraction (57–72%) of deviations between field and laboratory derived texture estimates was due to the laboratory measurement uncertainty, and due to the fact that only texture classes were estimated in the field and not mass fractions. Our findings indicate that for most purposes it is sufficient to estimate the soil texture manually “by feel” instead of conducting expensive particle size analyses in the laboratory. |
abstractGer |
Texture is one of the most important and most frequently measured parameters in soil science. It is common knowledge among field experienced soil scientists that soil texture can be well estimated in the field manually with so called “texture-by-feel”. However, no systematic evaluation exists that assessed the precision and accuracy of field based texture estimates as compared to the common, but time consuming, standard laboratory methods. In the course of the German Agricultural Soil Inventory, the texture of 3896 soil samples from 728 soil pits was estimated manually in the field and measured in the laboratory using standard sedimentation techniques. The field based estimations of the sand, silt and clay content showed a relative deviation from the measurements of only 3.8, 11.5 and 15.5%, respectively. The absolute uncertainty of field texture was 23, 32 and 17gkg−1 for sand, silt and clay, respectively. A large fraction (57–72%) of deviations between field and laboratory derived texture estimates was due to the laboratory measurement uncertainty, and due to the fact that only texture classes were estimated in the field and not mass fractions. Our findings indicate that for most purposes it is sufficient to estimate the soil texture manually “by feel” instead of conducting expensive particle size analyses in the laboratory. |
abstract_unstemmed |
Texture is one of the most important and most frequently measured parameters in soil science. It is common knowledge among field experienced soil scientists that soil texture can be well estimated in the field manually with so called “texture-by-feel”. However, no systematic evaluation exists that assessed the precision and accuracy of field based texture estimates as compared to the common, but time consuming, standard laboratory methods. In the course of the German Agricultural Soil Inventory, the texture of 3896 soil samples from 728 soil pits was estimated manually in the field and measured in the laboratory using standard sedimentation techniques. The field based estimations of the sand, silt and clay content showed a relative deviation from the measurements of only 3.8, 11.5 and 15.5%, respectively. The absolute uncertainty of field texture was 23, 32 and 17gkg−1 for sand, silt and clay, respectively. A large fraction (57–72%) of deviations between field and laboratory derived texture estimates was due to the laboratory measurement uncertainty, and due to the fact that only texture classes were estimated in the field and not mass fractions. Our findings indicate that for most purposes it is sufficient to estimate the soil texture manually “by feel” instead of conducting expensive particle size analyses in the laboratory. |
collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_21 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_30 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_70 |
title_short |
Field-based soil-texture estimates could replace laboratory analysis |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2015.12.022 |
remote_bool |
true |
author2 |
Don, Axel Prietz, Roland Heidkamp, Arne Freibauer, Annette |
author2Str |
Don, Axel Prietz, Roland Heidkamp, Arne Freibauer, Annette |
ppnlink |
ELV010107800 |
mediatype_str_mv |
z |
isOA_txt |
false |
hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
author2_role |
oth oth oth oth |
doi_str |
10.1016/j.geoderma.2015.12.022 |
up_date |
2024-07-06T16:40:38.326Z |
_version_ |
1803848555776966656 |
fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV030093864</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230625180557.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">180603s2016 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.geoderma.2015.12.022</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">GBVA2016021000025.pica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV030093864</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0016-7061(15)30174-9</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">550</subfield><subfield code="a">910</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">550</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">910</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">620</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">52.52</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">53.31</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">53.39</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Vos, Cora</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Field-based soil-texture estimates could replace laboratory analysis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2016transfer abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">5</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Texture is one of the most important and most frequently measured parameters in soil science. It is common knowledge among field experienced soil scientists that soil texture can be well estimated in the field manually with so called “texture-by-feel”. However, no systematic evaluation exists that assessed the precision and accuracy of field based texture estimates as compared to the common, but time consuming, standard laboratory methods. In the course of the German Agricultural Soil Inventory, the texture of 3896 soil samples from 728 soil pits was estimated manually in the field and measured in the laboratory using standard sedimentation techniques. The field based estimations of the sand, silt and clay content showed a relative deviation from the measurements of only 3.8, 11.5 and 15.5%, respectively. The absolute uncertainty of field texture was 23, 32 and 17gkg−1 for sand, silt and clay, respectively. A large fraction (57–72%) of deviations between field and laboratory derived texture estimates was due to the laboratory measurement uncertainty, and due to the fact that only texture classes were estimated in the field and not mass fractions. Our findings indicate that for most purposes it is sufficient to estimate the soil texture manually “by feel” instead of conducting expensive particle size analyses in the laboratory.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Texture is one of the most important and most frequently measured parameters in soil science. It is common knowledge among field experienced soil scientists that soil texture can be well estimated in the field manually with so called “texture-by-feel”. However, no systematic evaluation exists that assessed the precision and accuracy of field based texture estimates as compared to the common, but time consuming, standard laboratory methods. In the course of the German Agricultural Soil Inventory, the texture of 3896 soil samples from 728 soil pits was estimated manually in the field and measured in the laboratory using standard sedimentation techniques. The field based estimations of the sand, silt and clay content showed a relative deviation from the measurements of only 3.8, 11.5 and 15.5%, respectively. The absolute uncertainty of field texture was 23, 32 and 17gkg−1 for sand, silt and clay, respectively. A large fraction (57–72%) of deviations between field and laboratory derived texture estimates was due to the laboratory measurement uncertainty, and due to the fact that only texture classes were estimated in the field and not mass fractions. Our findings indicate that for most purposes it is sufficient to estimate the soil texture manually “by feel” instead of conducting expensive particle size analyses in the laboratory.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Don, Axel</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Prietz, Roland</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Heidkamp, Arne</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Freibauer, Annette</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="n">Elsevier Science</subfield><subfield code="a">Diahovchenko, Illia ELSEVIER</subfield><subfield code="t">Assessment and mitigation of the influence of rising charging demand of electric vehicles on the aging of distribution transformers</subfield><subfield code="d">2023</subfield><subfield code="d">an international journal of soil science</subfield><subfield code="g">Amsterdam [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)ELV010107800</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:267</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2016</subfield><subfield code="g">day:1</subfield><subfield code="g">month:04</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:215-219</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:5</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2015.12.022</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_21</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_30</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">52.52</subfield><subfield code="j">Thermische Energieerzeugung</subfield><subfield code="j">Wärmetechnik</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">53.31</subfield><subfield code="j">Elektrische Energieübertragung</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">53.39</subfield><subfield code="j">Elektrische Energietechnik: Sonstiges</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">267</subfield><subfield code="j">2016</subfield><subfield code="b">1</subfield><subfield code="c">0401</subfield><subfield code="h">215-219</subfield><subfield code="g">5</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="953" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="2">045F</subfield><subfield code="a">550</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
score |
7.402128 |