Identifying culturally significant areas for marine spatial planning
Despite the growing recognition of their importance, immaterial cultural values associated with the sea still tend to be neglected in marine spatial planning (MSP). This socio-cultural evidence gap is due to inherent difficulties in defining and eliciting cultural values, but also to difficulties in...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Autor*in: |
Gee, Kira [verfasserIn] |
---|
Format: |
E-Artikel |
---|---|
Sprache: |
Englisch |
Erschienen: |
2017transfer abstract |
---|
Schlagwörter: |
---|
Umfang: |
9 |
---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Novel and emerging treatments for major depression - Marwaha, Steven ELSEVIER, 2023, Amsterdam [u.a.] |
---|---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:136 ; year:2017 ; pages:139-147 ; extent:9 |
Links: |
---|
DOI / URN: |
10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2016.11.026 |
---|
Katalog-ID: |
ELV03065761X |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | ELV03065761X | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20230625182328.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 180603s2017 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2016.11.026 |2 doi | |
028 | 5 | 2 | |a GBV00000000000052A.pica |
035 | |a (DE-627)ELV03065761X | ||
035 | |a (ELSEVIER)S0964-5691(16)30362-3 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
082 | 0 | |a 330 |a 550 |a 380 | |
082 | 0 | 4 | |a 330 |q DE-600 |
082 | 0 | 4 | |a 550 |q DE-600 |
082 | 0 | 4 | |a 380 |q DE-600 |
100 | 1 | |a Gee, Kira |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Identifying culturally significant areas for marine spatial planning |
264 | 1 | |c 2017transfer abstract | |
300 | |a 9 | ||
336 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zzz |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b z |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zu |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a Despite the growing recognition of their importance, immaterial cultural values associated with the sea still tend to be neglected in marine spatial planning (MSP). This socio-cultural evidence gap is due to inherent difficulties in defining and eliciting cultural values, but also to difficulties in linking cultural values to specific places, thus enabling an area-based approach to management. This paper addresses three aspects that are important for including marine cultural values in MSP: Defining cultural values, identifying places of cultural importance, and establishing the relative significance of places of cultural importance. We argue that common classification schemes such as cultural ecosystem services can be a helpful starting point for identifying cultural values, but only go so far in capturing communities' cultural connections with the sea. A method is proposed for structuring a community-based narrative on cultural values and “spatialising” them for MSP purposes, using five criteria that can lead to the definition of “culturally significant areas”. A baseline of culturally significant areas is suggested as an aid to planners to pinpoint places where cultural connections to the sea are particularly strong. Throughout, we emphasise the need for participative processes. | ||
520 | |a Despite the growing recognition of their importance, immaterial cultural values associated with the sea still tend to be neglected in marine spatial planning (MSP). This socio-cultural evidence gap is due to inherent difficulties in defining and eliciting cultural values, but also to difficulties in linking cultural values to specific places, thus enabling an area-based approach to management. This paper addresses three aspects that are important for including marine cultural values in MSP: Defining cultural values, identifying places of cultural importance, and establishing the relative significance of places of cultural importance. We argue that common classification schemes such as cultural ecosystem services can be a helpful starting point for identifying cultural values, but only go so far in capturing communities' cultural connections with the sea. A method is proposed for structuring a community-based narrative on cultural values and “spatialising” them for MSP purposes, using five criteria that can lead to the definition of “culturally significant areas”. A baseline of culturally significant areas is suggested as an aid to planners to pinpoint places where cultural connections to the sea are particularly strong. Throughout, we emphasise the need for participative processes. | ||
650 | 7 | |a Culturally significant areas |2 Elsevier | |
650 | 7 | |a Participatory approach |2 Elsevier | |
650 | 7 | |a Socio-cultural values |2 Elsevier | |
650 | 7 | |a Marine spatial planning |2 Elsevier | |
700 | 1 | |a Kannen, Andreas |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Adlam, Robert |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Brooks, Cecilia |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Chapman, Mollie |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Cormier, Roland |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Fischer, Christian |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Fletcher, Steve |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Gubbins, Matt |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Shucksmith, Rachel |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Shellock, Rebecca |4 oth | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |n Elsevier Science |a Marwaha, Steven ELSEVIER |t Novel and emerging treatments for major depression |d 2023 |g Amsterdam [u.a.] |w (DE-627)ELV010017429 |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:136 |g year:2017 |g pages:139-147 |g extent:9 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2016.11.026 |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_U | ||
912 | |a GBV_ELV | ||
912 | |a SYSFLAG_U | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_20 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_22 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_23 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_30 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_40 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_70 | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 136 |j 2017 |h 139-147 |g 9 | ||
953 | |2 045F |a 330 |
author_variant |
k g kg |
---|---|
matchkey_str |
geekirakannenandreasadlamrobertbrookscec:2017----:dniynclualsgiiatrafrai |
hierarchy_sort_str |
2017transfer abstract |
publishDate |
2017 |
allfields |
10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2016.11.026 doi GBV00000000000052A.pica (DE-627)ELV03065761X (ELSEVIER)S0964-5691(16)30362-3 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 330 550 380 330 DE-600 550 DE-600 380 DE-600 Gee, Kira verfasserin aut Identifying culturally significant areas for marine spatial planning 2017transfer abstract 9 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Despite the growing recognition of their importance, immaterial cultural values associated with the sea still tend to be neglected in marine spatial planning (MSP). This socio-cultural evidence gap is due to inherent difficulties in defining and eliciting cultural values, but also to difficulties in linking cultural values to specific places, thus enabling an area-based approach to management. This paper addresses three aspects that are important for including marine cultural values in MSP: Defining cultural values, identifying places of cultural importance, and establishing the relative significance of places of cultural importance. We argue that common classification schemes such as cultural ecosystem services can be a helpful starting point for identifying cultural values, but only go so far in capturing communities' cultural connections with the sea. A method is proposed for structuring a community-based narrative on cultural values and “spatialising” them for MSP purposes, using five criteria that can lead to the definition of “culturally significant areas”. A baseline of culturally significant areas is suggested as an aid to planners to pinpoint places where cultural connections to the sea are particularly strong. Throughout, we emphasise the need for participative processes. Despite the growing recognition of their importance, immaterial cultural values associated with the sea still tend to be neglected in marine spatial planning (MSP). This socio-cultural evidence gap is due to inherent difficulties in defining and eliciting cultural values, but also to difficulties in linking cultural values to specific places, thus enabling an area-based approach to management. This paper addresses three aspects that are important for including marine cultural values in MSP: Defining cultural values, identifying places of cultural importance, and establishing the relative significance of places of cultural importance. We argue that common classification schemes such as cultural ecosystem services can be a helpful starting point for identifying cultural values, but only go so far in capturing communities' cultural connections with the sea. A method is proposed for structuring a community-based narrative on cultural values and “spatialising” them for MSP purposes, using five criteria that can lead to the definition of “culturally significant areas”. A baseline of culturally significant areas is suggested as an aid to planners to pinpoint places where cultural connections to the sea are particularly strong. Throughout, we emphasise the need for participative processes. Culturally significant areas Elsevier Participatory approach Elsevier Socio-cultural values Elsevier Marine spatial planning Elsevier Kannen, Andreas oth Adlam, Robert oth Brooks, Cecilia oth Chapman, Mollie oth Cormier, Roland oth Fischer, Christian oth Fletcher, Steve oth Gubbins, Matt oth Shucksmith, Rachel oth Shellock, Rebecca oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Marwaha, Steven ELSEVIER Novel and emerging treatments for major depression 2023 Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV010017429 volume:136 year:2017 pages:139-147 extent:9 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2016.11.026 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_30 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_70 AR 136 2017 139-147 9 045F 330 |
spelling |
10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2016.11.026 doi GBV00000000000052A.pica (DE-627)ELV03065761X (ELSEVIER)S0964-5691(16)30362-3 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 330 550 380 330 DE-600 550 DE-600 380 DE-600 Gee, Kira verfasserin aut Identifying culturally significant areas for marine spatial planning 2017transfer abstract 9 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Despite the growing recognition of their importance, immaterial cultural values associated with the sea still tend to be neglected in marine spatial planning (MSP). This socio-cultural evidence gap is due to inherent difficulties in defining and eliciting cultural values, but also to difficulties in linking cultural values to specific places, thus enabling an area-based approach to management. This paper addresses three aspects that are important for including marine cultural values in MSP: Defining cultural values, identifying places of cultural importance, and establishing the relative significance of places of cultural importance. We argue that common classification schemes such as cultural ecosystem services can be a helpful starting point for identifying cultural values, but only go so far in capturing communities' cultural connections with the sea. A method is proposed for structuring a community-based narrative on cultural values and “spatialising” them for MSP purposes, using five criteria that can lead to the definition of “culturally significant areas”. A baseline of culturally significant areas is suggested as an aid to planners to pinpoint places where cultural connections to the sea are particularly strong. Throughout, we emphasise the need for participative processes. Despite the growing recognition of their importance, immaterial cultural values associated with the sea still tend to be neglected in marine spatial planning (MSP). This socio-cultural evidence gap is due to inherent difficulties in defining and eliciting cultural values, but also to difficulties in linking cultural values to specific places, thus enabling an area-based approach to management. This paper addresses three aspects that are important for including marine cultural values in MSP: Defining cultural values, identifying places of cultural importance, and establishing the relative significance of places of cultural importance. We argue that common classification schemes such as cultural ecosystem services can be a helpful starting point for identifying cultural values, but only go so far in capturing communities' cultural connections with the sea. A method is proposed for structuring a community-based narrative on cultural values and “spatialising” them for MSP purposes, using five criteria that can lead to the definition of “culturally significant areas”. A baseline of culturally significant areas is suggested as an aid to planners to pinpoint places where cultural connections to the sea are particularly strong. Throughout, we emphasise the need for participative processes. Culturally significant areas Elsevier Participatory approach Elsevier Socio-cultural values Elsevier Marine spatial planning Elsevier Kannen, Andreas oth Adlam, Robert oth Brooks, Cecilia oth Chapman, Mollie oth Cormier, Roland oth Fischer, Christian oth Fletcher, Steve oth Gubbins, Matt oth Shucksmith, Rachel oth Shellock, Rebecca oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Marwaha, Steven ELSEVIER Novel and emerging treatments for major depression 2023 Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV010017429 volume:136 year:2017 pages:139-147 extent:9 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2016.11.026 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_30 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_70 AR 136 2017 139-147 9 045F 330 |
allfields_unstemmed |
10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2016.11.026 doi GBV00000000000052A.pica (DE-627)ELV03065761X (ELSEVIER)S0964-5691(16)30362-3 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 330 550 380 330 DE-600 550 DE-600 380 DE-600 Gee, Kira verfasserin aut Identifying culturally significant areas for marine spatial planning 2017transfer abstract 9 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Despite the growing recognition of their importance, immaterial cultural values associated with the sea still tend to be neglected in marine spatial planning (MSP). This socio-cultural evidence gap is due to inherent difficulties in defining and eliciting cultural values, but also to difficulties in linking cultural values to specific places, thus enabling an area-based approach to management. This paper addresses three aspects that are important for including marine cultural values in MSP: Defining cultural values, identifying places of cultural importance, and establishing the relative significance of places of cultural importance. We argue that common classification schemes such as cultural ecosystem services can be a helpful starting point for identifying cultural values, but only go so far in capturing communities' cultural connections with the sea. A method is proposed for structuring a community-based narrative on cultural values and “spatialising” them for MSP purposes, using five criteria that can lead to the definition of “culturally significant areas”. A baseline of culturally significant areas is suggested as an aid to planners to pinpoint places where cultural connections to the sea are particularly strong. Throughout, we emphasise the need for participative processes. Despite the growing recognition of their importance, immaterial cultural values associated with the sea still tend to be neglected in marine spatial planning (MSP). This socio-cultural evidence gap is due to inherent difficulties in defining and eliciting cultural values, but also to difficulties in linking cultural values to specific places, thus enabling an area-based approach to management. This paper addresses three aspects that are important for including marine cultural values in MSP: Defining cultural values, identifying places of cultural importance, and establishing the relative significance of places of cultural importance. We argue that common classification schemes such as cultural ecosystem services can be a helpful starting point for identifying cultural values, but only go so far in capturing communities' cultural connections with the sea. A method is proposed for structuring a community-based narrative on cultural values and “spatialising” them for MSP purposes, using five criteria that can lead to the definition of “culturally significant areas”. A baseline of culturally significant areas is suggested as an aid to planners to pinpoint places where cultural connections to the sea are particularly strong. Throughout, we emphasise the need for participative processes. Culturally significant areas Elsevier Participatory approach Elsevier Socio-cultural values Elsevier Marine spatial planning Elsevier Kannen, Andreas oth Adlam, Robert oth Brooks, Cecilia oth Chapman, Mollie oth Cormier, Roland oth Fischer, Christian oth Fletcher, Steve oth Gubbins, Matt oth Shucksmith, Rachel oth Shellock, Rebecca oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Marwaha, Steven ELSEVIER Novel and emerging treatments for major depression 2023 Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV010017429 volume:136 year:2017 pages:139-147 extent:9 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2016.11.026 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_30 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_70 AR 136 2017 139-147 9 045F 330 |
allfieldsGer |
10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2016.11.026 doi GBV00000000000052A.pica (DE-627)ELV03065761X (ELSEVIER)S0964-5691(16)30362-3 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 330 550 380 330 DE-600 550 DE-600 380 DE-600 Gee, Kira verfasserin aut Identifying culturally significant areas for marine spatial planning 2017transfer abstract 9 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Despite the growing recognition of their importance, immaterial cultural values associated with the sea still tend to be neglected in marine spatial planning (MSP). This socio-cultural evidence gap is due to inherent difficulties in defining and eliciting cultural values, but also to difficulties in linking cultural values to specific places, thus enabling an area-based approach to management. This paper addresses three aspects that are important for including marine cultural values in MSP: Defining cultural values, identifying places of cultural importance, and establishing the relative significance of places of cultural importance. We argue that common classification schemes such as cultural ecosystem services can be a helpful starting point for identifying cultural values, but only go so far in capturing communities' cultural connections with the sea. A method is proposed for structuring a community-based narrative on cultural values and “spatialising” them for MSP purposes, using five criteria that can lead to the definition of “culturally significant areas”. A baseline of culturally significant areas is suggested as an aid to planners to pinpoint places where cultural connections to the sea are particularly strong. Throughout, we emphasise the need for participative processes. Despite the growing recognition of their importance, immaterial cultural values associated with the sea still tend to be neglected in marine spatial planning (MSP). This socio-cultural evidence gap is due to inherent difficulties in defining and eliciting cultural values, but also to difficulties in linking cultural values to specific places, thus enabling an area-based approach to management. This paper addresses three aspects that are important for including marine cultural values in MSP: Defining cultural values, identifying places of cultural importance, and establishing the relative significance of places of cultural importance. We argue that common classification schemes such as cultural ecosystem services can be a helpful starting point for identifying cultural values, but only go so far in capturing communities' cultural connections with the sea. A method is proposed for structuring a community-based narrative on cultural values and “spatialising” them for MSP purposes, using five criteria that can lead to the definition of “culturally significant areas”. A baseline of culturally significant areas is suggested as an aid to planners to pinpoint places where cultural connections to the sea are particularly strong. Throughout, we emphasise the need for participative processes. Culturally significant areas Elsevier Participatory approach Elsevier Socio-cultural values Elsevier Marine spatial planning Elsevier Kannen, Andreas oth Adlam, Robert oth Brooks, Cecilia oth Chapman, Mollie oth Cormier, Roland oth Fischer, Christian oth Fletcher, Steve oth Gubbins, Matt oth Shucksmith, Rachel oth Shellock, Rebecca oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Marwaha, Steven ELSEVIER Novel and emerging treatments for major depression 2023 Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV010017429 volume:136 year:2017 pages:139-147 extent:9 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2016.11.026 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_30 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_70 AR 136 2017 139-147 9 045F 330 |
allfieldsSound |
10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2016.11.026 doi GBV00000000000052A.pica (DE-627)ELV03065761X (ELSEVIER)S0964-5691(16)30362-3 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 330 550 380 330 DE-600 550 DE-600 380 DE-600 Gee, Kira verfasserin aut Identifying culturally significant areas for marine spatial planning 2017transfer abstract 9 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Despite the growing recognition of their importance, immaterial cultural values associated with the sea still tend to be neglected in marine spatial planning (MSP). This socio-cultural evidence gap is due to inherent difficulties in defining and eliciting cultural values, but also to difficulties in linking cultural values to specific places, thus enabling an area-based approach to management. This paper addresses three aspects that are important for including marine cultural values in MSP: Defining cultural values, identifying places of cultural importance, and establishing the relative significance of places of cultural importance. We argue that common classification schemes such as cultural ecosystem services can be a helpful starting point for identifying cultural values, but only go so far in capturing communities' cultural connections with the sea. A method is proposed for structuring a community-based narrative on cultural values and “spatialising” them for MSP purposes, using five criteria that can lead to the definition of “culturally significant areas”. A baseline of culturally significant areas is suggested as an aid to planners to pinpoint places where cultural connections to the sea are particularly strong. Throughout, we emphasise the need for participative processes. Despite the growing recognition of their importance, immaterial cultural values associated with the sea still tend to be neglected in marine spatial planning (MSP). This socio-cultural evidence gap is due to inherent difficulties in defining and eliciting cultural values, but also to difficulties in linking cultural values to specific places, thus enabling an area-based approach to management. This paper addresses three aspects that are important for including marine cultural values in MSP: Defining cultural values, identifying places of cultural importance, and establishing the relative significance of places of cultural importance. We argue that common classification schemes such as cultural ecosystem services can be a helpful starting point for identifying cultural values, but only go so far in capturing communities' cultural connections with the sea. A method is proposed for structuring a community-based narrative on cultural values and “spatialising” them for MSP purposes, using five criteria that can lead to the definition of “culturally significant areas”. A baseline of culturally significant areas is suggested as an aid to planners to pinpoint places where cultural connections to the sea are particularly strong. Throughout, we emphasise the need for participative processes. Culturally significant areas Elsevier Participatory approach Elsevier Socio-cultural values Elsevier Marine spatial planning Elsevier Kannen, Andreas oth Adlam, Robert oth Brooks, Cecilia oth Chapman, Mollie oth Cormier, Roland oth Fischer, Christian oth Fletcher, Steve oth Gubbins, Matt oth Shucksmith, Rachel oth Shellock, Rebecca oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Marwaha, Steven ELSEVIER Novel and emerging treatments for major depression 2023 Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV010017429 volume:136 year:2017 pages:139-147 extent:9 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2016.11.026 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_30 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_70 AR 136 2017 139-147 9 045F 330 |
language |
English |
source |
Enthalten in Novel and emerging treatments for major depression Amsterdam [u.a.] volume:136 year:2017 pages:139-147 extent:9 |
sourceStr |
Enthalten in Novel and emerging treatments for major depression Amsterdam [u.a.] volume:136 year:2017 pages:139-147 extent:9 |
format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
institution |
findex.gbv.de |
topic_facet |
Culturally significant areas Participatory approach Socio-cultural values Marine spatial planning |
dewey-raw |
330 |
isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
container_title |
Novel and emerging treatments for major depression |
authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Gee, Kira @@aut@@ Kannen, Andreas @@oth@@ Adlam, Robert @@oth@@ Brooks, Cecilia @@oth@@ Chapman, Mollie @@oth@@ Cormier, Roland @@oth@@ Fischer, Christian @@oth@@ Fletcher, Steve @@oth@@ Gubbins, Matt @@oth@@ Shucksmith, Rachel @@oth@@ Shellock, Rebecca @@oth@@ |
publishDateDaySort_date |
2017-01-01T00:00:00Z |
hierarchy_top_id |
ELV010017429 |
dewey-sort |
3330 |
id |
ELV03065761X |
language_de |
englisch |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV03065761X</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230625182328.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">180603s2017 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2016.11.026</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">GBV00000000000052A.pica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV03065761X</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0964-5691(16)30362-3</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">330</subfield><subfield code="a">550</subfield><subfield code="a">380</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">330</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">550</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">380</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Gee, Kira</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Identifying culturally significant areas for marine spatial planning</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2017transfer abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Despite the growing recognition of their importance, immaterial cultural values associated with the sea still tend to be neglected in marine spatial planning (MSP). This socio-cultural evidence gap is due to inherent difficulties in defining and eliciting cultural values, but also to difficulties in linking cultural values to specific places, thus enabling an area-based approach to management. This paper addresses three aspects that are important for including marine cultural values in MSP: Defining cultural values, identifying places of cultural importance, and establishing the relative significance of places of cultural importance. We argue that common classification schemes such as cultural ecosystem services can be a helpful starting point for identifying cultural values, but only go so far in capturing communities' cultural connections with the sea. A method is proposed for structuring a community-based narrative on cultural values and “spatialising” them for MSP purposes, using five criteria that can lead to the definition of “culturally significant areas”. A baseline of culturally significant areas is suggested as an aid to planners to pinpoint places where cultural connections to the sea are particularly strong. Throughout, we emphasise the need for participative processes.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Despite the growing recognition of their importance, immaterial cultural values associated with the sea still tend to be neglected in marine spatial planning (MSP). This socio-cultural evidence gap is due to inherent difficulties in defining and eliciting cultural values, but also to difficulties in linking cultural values to specific places, thus enabling an area-based approach to management. This paper addresses three aspects that are important for including marine cultural values in MSP: Defining cultural values, identifying places of cultural importance, and establishing the relative significance of places of cultural importance. We argue that common classification schemes such as cultural ecosystem services can be a helpful starting point for identifying cultural values, but only go so far in capturing communities' cultural connections with the sea. A method is proposed for structuring a community-based narrative on cultural values and “spatialising” them for MSP purposes, using five criteria that can lead to the definition of “culturally significant areas”. A baseline of culturally significant areas is suggested as an aid to planners to pinpoint places where cultural connections to the sea are particularly strong. Throughout, we emphasise the need for participative processes.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Culturally significant areas</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Participatory approach</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Socio-cultural values</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Marine spatial planning</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Kannen, Andreas</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Adlam, Robert</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Brooks, Cecilia</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Chapman, Mollie</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Cormier, Roland</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Fischer, Christian</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Fletcher, Steve</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Gubbins, Matt</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Shucksmith, Rachel</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Shellock, Rebecca</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="n">Elsevier Science</subfield><subfield code="a">Marwaha, Steven ELSEVIER</subfield><subfield code="t">Novel and emerging treatments for major depression</subfield><subfield code="d">2023</subfield><subfield code="g">Amsterdam [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)ELV010017429</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:136</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2017</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:139-147</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:9</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2016.11.026</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_30</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">136</subfield><subfield code="j">2017</subfield><subfield code="h">139-147</subfield><subfield code="g">9</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="953" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="2">045F</subfield><subfield code="a">330</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
author |
Gee, Kira |
spellingShingle |
Gee, Kira ddc 330 ddc 550 ddc 380 Elsevier Culturally significant areas Elsevier Participatory approach Elsevier Socio-cultural values Elsevier Marine spatial planning Identifying culturally significant areas for marine spatial planning |
authorStr |
Gee, Kira |
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)ELV010017429 |
format |
electronic Article |
dewey-ones |
330 - Economics 550 - Earth sciences 380 - Commerce, communications & transportation |
delete_txt_mv |
keep |
author_role |
aut |
collection |
elsevier |
remote_str |
true |
illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
topic_title |
330 550 380 330 DE-600 550 DE-600 380 DE-600 Identifying culturally significant areas for marine spatial planning Culturally significant areas Elsevier Participatory approach Elsevier Socio-cultural values Elsevier Marine spatial planning Elsevier |
topic |
ddc 330 ddc 550 ddc 380 Elsevier Culturally significant areas Elsevier Participatory approach Elsevier Socio-cultural values Elsevier Marine spatial planning |
topic_unstemmed |
ddc 330 ddc 550 ddc 380 Elsevier Culturally significant areas Elsevier Participatory approach Elsevier Socio-cultural values Elsevier Marine spatial planning |
topic_browse |
ddc 330 ddc 550 ddc 380 Elsevier Culturally significant areas Elsevier Participatory approach Elsevier Socio-cultural values Elsevier Marine spatial planning |
format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
carriertype_str_mv |
zu |
author2_variant |
a k ak r a ra c b cb m c mc r c rc c f cf s f sf m g mg r s rs r s rs |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Novel and emerging treatments for major depression |
hierarchy_parent_id |
ELV010017429 |
dewey-tens |
330 - Economics 550 - Earth sciences & geology 380 - Commerce, communications & transportation |
hierarchy_top_title |
Novel and emerging treatments for major depression |
isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)ELV010017429 |
title |
Identifying culturally significant areas for marine spatial planning |
ctrlnum |
(DE-627)ELV03065761X (ELSEVIER)S0964-5691(16)30362-3 |
title_full |
Identifying culturally significant areas for marine spatial planning |
author_sort |
Gee, Kira |
journal |
Novel and emerging treatments for major depression |
journalStr |
Novel and emerging treatments for major depression |
lang_code |
eng |
isOA_bool |
false |
dewey-hundreds |
300 - Social sciences 500 - Science |
recordtype |
marc |
publishDateSort |
2017 |
contenttype_str_mv |
zzz |
container_start_page |
139 |
author_browse |
Gee, Kira |
container_volume |
136 |
physical |
9 |
class |
330 550 380 330 DE-600 550 DE-600 380 DE-600 |
format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
author-letter |
Gee, Kira |
doi_str_mv |
10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2016.11.026 |
dewey-full |
330 550 380 |
title_sort |
identifying culturally significant areas for marine spatial planning |
title_auth |
Identifying culturally significant areas for marine spatial planning |
abstract |
Despite the growing recognition of their importance, immaterial cultural values associated with the sea still tend to be neglected in marine spatial planning (MSP). This socio-cultural evidence gap is due to inherent difficulties in defining and eliciting cultural values, but also to difficulties in linking cultural values to specific places, thus enabling an area-based approach to management. This paper addresses three aspects that are important for including marine cultural values in MSP: Defining cultural values, identifying places of cultural importance, and establishing the relative significance of places of cultural importance. We argue that common classification schemes such as cultural ecosystem services can be a helpful starting point for identifying cultural values, but only go so far in capturing communities' cultural connections with the sea. A method is proposed for structuring a community-based narrative on cultural values and “spatialising” them for MSP purposes, using five criteria that can lead to the definition of “culturally significant areas”. A baseline of culturally significant areas is suggested as an aid to planners to pinpoint places where cultural connections to the sea are particularly strong. Throughout, we emphasise the need for participative processes. |
abstractGer |
Despite the growing recognition of their importance, immaterial cultural values associated with the sea still tend to be neglected in marine spatial planning (MSP). This socio-cultural evidence gap is due to inherent difficulties in defining and eliciting cultural values, but also to difficulties in linking cultural values to specific places, thus enabling an area-based approach to management. This paper addresses three aspects that are important for including marine cultural values in MSP: Defining cultural values, identifying places of cultural importance, and establishing the relative significance of places of cultural importance. We argue that common classification schemes such as cultural ecosystem services can be a helpful starting point for identifying cultural values, but only go so far in capturing communities' cultural connections with the sea. A method is proposed for structuring a community-based narrative on cultural values and “spatialising” them for MSP purposes, using five criteria that can lead to the definition of “culturally significant areas”. A baseline of culturally significant areas is suggested as an aid to planners to pinpoint places where cultural connections to the sea are particularly strong. Throughout, we emphasise the need for participative processes. |
abstract_unstemmed |
Despite the growing recognition of their importance, immaterial cultural values associated with the sea still tend to be neglected in marine spatial planning (MSP). This socio-cultural evidence gap is due to inherent difficulties in defining and eliciting cultural values, but also to difficulties in linking cultural values to specific places, thus enabling an area-based approach to management. This paper addresses three aspects that are important for including marine cultural values in MSP: Defining cultural values, identifying places of cultural importance, and establishing the relative significance of places of cultural importance. We argue that common classification schemes such as cultural ecosystem services can be a helpful starting point for identifying cultural values, but only go so far in capturing communities' cultural connections with the sea. A method is proposed for structuring a community-based narrative on cultural values and “spatialising” them for MSP purposes, using five criteria that can lead to the definition of “culturally significant areas”. A baseline of culturally significant areas is suggested as an aid to planners to pinpoint places where cultural connections to the sea are particularly strong. Throughout, we emphasise the need for participative processes. |
collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_30 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_70 |
title_short |
Identifying culturally significant areas for marine spatial planning |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2016.11.026 |
remote_bool |
true |
author2 |
Kannen, Andreas Adlam, Robert Brooks, Cecilia Chapman, Mollie Cormier, Roland Fischer, Christian Fletcher, Steve Gubbins, Matt Shucksmith, Rachel Shellock, Rebecca |
author2Str |
Kannen, Andreas Adlam, Robert Brooks, Cecilia Chapman, Mollie Cormier, Roland Fischer, Christian Fletcher, Steve Gubbins, Matt Shucksmith, Rachel Shellock, Rebecca |
ppnlink |
ELV010017429 |
mediatype_str_mv |
z |
isOA_txt |
false |
hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
author2_role |
oth oth oth oth oth oth oth oth oth oth |
doi_str |
10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2016.11.026 |
up_date |
2024-07-06T18:08:55.671Z |
_version_ |
1803854110442651648 |
fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV03065761X</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230625182328.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">180603s2017 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2016.11.026</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">GBV00000000000052A.pica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV03065761X</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0964-5691(16)30362-3</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">330</subfield><subfield code="a">550</subfield><subfield code="a">380</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">330</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">550</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">380</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Gee, Kira</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Identifying culturally significant areas for marine spatial planning</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2017transfer abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Despite the growing recognition of their importance, immaterial cultural values associated with the sea still tend to be neglected in marine spatial planning (MSP). This socio-cultural evidence gap is due to inherent difficulties in defining and eliciting cultural values, but also to difficulties in linking cultural values to specific places, thus enabling an area-based approach to management. This paper addresses three aspects that are important for including marine cultural values in MSP: Defining cultural values, identifying places of cultural importance, and establishing the relative significance of places of cultural importance. We argue that common classification schemes such as cultural ecosystem services can be a helpful starting point for identifying cultural values, but only go so far in capturing communities' cultural connections with the sea. A method is proposed for structuring a community-based narrative on cultural values and “spatialising” them for MSP purposes, using five criteria that can lead to the definition of “culturally significant areas”. A baseline of culturally significant areas is suggested as an aid to planners to pinpoint places where cultural connections to the sea are particularly strong. Throughout, we emphasise the need for participative processes.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Despite the growing recognition of their importance, immaterial cultural values associated with the sea still tend to be neglected in marine spatial planning (MSP). This socio-cultural evidence gap is due to inherent difficulties in defining and eliciting cultural values, but also to difficulties in linking cultural values to specific places, thus enabling an area-based approach to management. This paper addresses three aspects that are important for including marine cultural values in MSP: Defining cultural values, identifying places of cultural importance, and establishing the relative significance of places of cultural importance. We argue that common classification schemes such as cultural ecosystem services can be a helpful starting point for identifying cultural values, but only go so far in capturing communities' cultural connections with the sea. A method is proposed for structuring a community-based narrative on cultural values and “spatialising” them for MSP purposes, using five criteria that can lead to the definition of “culturally significant areas”. A baseline of culturally significant areas is suggested as an aid to planners to pinpoint places where cultural connections to the sea are particularly strong. Throughout, we emphasise the need for participative processes.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Culturally significant areas</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Participatory approach</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Socio-cultural values</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Marine spatial planning</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Kannen, Andreas</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Adlam, Robert</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Brooks, Cecilia</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Chapman, Mollie</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Cormier, Roland</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Fischer, Christian</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Fletcher, Steve</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Gubbins, Matt</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Shucksmith, Rachel</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Shellock, Rebecca</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="n">Elsevier Science</subfield><subfield code="a">Marwaha, Steven ELSEVIER</subfield><subfield code="t">Novel and emerging treatments for major depression</subfield><subfield code="d">2023</subfield><subfield code="g">Amsterdam [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)ELV010017429</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:136</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2017</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:139-147</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:9</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2016.11.026</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_30</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">136</subfield><subfield code="j">2017</subfield><subfield code="h">139-147</subfield><subfield code="g">9</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="953" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="2">045F</subfield><subfield code="a">330</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
score |
7.3997517 |