A meta-analysis of human-system interfaces in unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) swarm management
A meta-analysis was conducted to systematically evaluate the current state of research on human-system interfaces for users controlling semi-autonomous swarms composed of groups of drones or unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs). UAV swarms pose several human factors challenges, such as high cognitive dem...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Autor*in: |
Hocraffer, Amy [verfasserIn] |
---|
Format: |
E-Artikel |
---|---|
Sprache: |
Englisch |
Erschienen: |
2017transfer abstract |
---|
Schlagwörter: |
---|
Umfang: |
15 |
---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Effects of external electric field on the optical and electronic properties of blue phosphorene nanoribbons: A DFT study - Ospina, D.A. ELSEVIER, 2017, human factors in technology and society, Amsterdam [u.a.] |
---|---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:58 ; year:2017 ; pages:66-80 ; extent:15 |
Links: |
---|
DOI / URN: |
10.1016/j.apergo.2016.05.011 |
---|
Katalog-ID: |
ELV030756014 |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | ELV030756014 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20230625182619.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 180603s2017 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.apergo.2016.05.011 |2 doi | |
028 | 5 | 2 | |a GBVA2017019000025.pica |
035 | |a (DE-627)ELV030756014 | ||
035 | |a (ELSEVIER)S0003-6870(16)30098-9 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
082 | 0 | |a 330 | |
082 | 0 | 4 | |a 330 |q DE-600 |
082 | 0 | 4 | |a 530 |q VZ |
082 | 0 | 4 | |a 600 |a 670 |a 530 |q VZ |
084 | |a 51.00 |2 bkl | ||
100 | 1 | |a Hocraffer, Amy |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a A meta-analysis of human-system interfaces in unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) swarm management |
264 | 1 | |c 2017transfer abstract | |
300 | |a 15 | ||
336 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zzz |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b z |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zu |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a A meta-analysis was conducted to systematically evaluate the current state of research on human-system interfaces for users controlling semi-autonomous swarms composed of groups of drones or unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs). UAV swarms pose several human factors challenges, such as high cognitive demands, non-intuitive behavior, and serious consequences for errors. This article presents findings from a meta-analysis of 27 UAV swarm management papers focused on the human-system interface and human factors concerns, providing an overview of the advantages, challenges, and limitations of current UAV management interfaces, as well as information on how these interfaces are currently evaluated. In general allowing user and mission-specific customization to user interfaces and raising the swarm’s level of autonomy to reduce operator cognitive workload are beneficial and improve situation awareness (SA). It is clear more research is needed in this rapidly evolving field. | ||
520 | |a A meta-analysis was conducted to systematically evaluate the current state of research on human-system interfaces for users controlling semi-autonomous swarms composed of groups of drones or unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs). UAV swarms pose several human factors challenges, such as high cognitive demands, non-intuitive behavior, and serious consequences for errors. This article presents findings from a meta-analysis of 27 UAV swarm management papers focused on the human-system interface and human factors concerns, providing an overview of the advantages, challenges, and limitations of current UAV management interfaces, as well as information on how these interfaces are currently evaluated. In general allowing user and mission-specific customization to user interfaces and raising the swarm’s level of autonomy to reduce operator cognitive workload are beneficial and improve situation awareness (SA). It is clear more research is needed in this rapidly evolving field. | ||
650 | 7 | |a Swarm |2 Elsevier | |
650 | 7 | |a Unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) |2 Elsevier | |
650 | 7 | |a Human-system interface |2 Elsevier | |
650 | 7 | |a Human-robot interaction |2 Elsevier | |
650 | 7 | |a Human-swarm interaction |2 Elsevier | |
650 | 7 | |a Human factors |2 Elsevier | |
650 | 7 | |a Multi-robot systems |2 Elsevier | |
700 | 1 | |a Nam, Chang S. |4 oth | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |n Elsevier Science |a Ospina, D.A. ELSEVIER |t Effects of external electric field on the optical and electronic properties of blue phosphorene nanoribbons: A DFT study |d 2017 |d human factors in technology and society |g Amsterdam [u.a.] |w (DE-627)ELV020430949 |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:58 |g year:2017 |g pages:66-80 |g extent:15 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2016.05.011 |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_U | ||
912 | |a GBV_ELV | ||
912 | |a SYSFLAG_U | ||
936 | b | k | |a 51.00 |j Werkstoffkunde: Allgemeines |q VZ |
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 58 |j 2017 |h 66-80 |g 15 | ||
953 | |2 045F |a 330 |
author_variant |
a h ah |
---|---|
matchkey_str |
hocrafferamynamchangs:2017----:mtaayiohmnytmnefcsnnandeilei |
hierarchy_sort_str |
2017transfer abstract |
bklnumber |
51.00 |
publishDate |
2017 |
allfields |
10.1016/j.apergo.2016.05.011 doi GBVA2017019000025.pica (DE-627)ELV030756014 (ELSEVIER)S0003-6870(16)30098-9 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 330 330 DE-600 530 VZ 600 670 530 VZ 51.00 bkl Hocraffer, Amy verfasserin aut A meta-analysis of human-system interfaces in unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) swarm management 2017transfer abstract 15 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier A meta-analysis was conducted to systematically evaluate the current state of research on human-system interfaces for users controlling semi-autonomous swarms composed of groups of drones or unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs). UAV swarms pose several human factors challenges, such as high cognitive demands, non-intuitive behavior, and serious consequences for errors. This article presents findings from a meta-analysis of 27 UAV swarm management papers focused on the human-system interface and human factors concerns, providing an overview of the advantages, challenges, and limitations of current UAV management interfaces, as well as information on how these interfaces are currently evaluated. In general allowing user and mission-specific customization to user interfaces and raising the swarm’s level of autonomy to reduce operator cognitive workload are beneficial and improve situation awareness (SA). It is clear more research is needed in this rapidly evolving field. A meta-analysis was conducted to systematically evaluate the current state of research on human-system interfaces for users controlling semi-autonomous swarms composed of groups of drones or unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs). UAV swarms pose several human factors challenges, such as high cognitive demands, non-intuitive behavior, and serious consequences for errors. This article presents findings from a meta-analysis of 27 UAV swarm management papers focused on the human-system interface and human factors concerns, providing an overview of the advantages, challenges, and limitations of current UAV management interfaces, as well as information on how these interfaces are currently evaluated. In general allowing user and mission-specific customization to user interfaces and raising the swarm’s level of autonomy to reduce operator cognitive workload are beneficial and improve situation awareness (SA). It is clear more research is needed in this rapidly evolving field. Swarm Elsevier Unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) Elsevier Human-system interface Elsevier Human-robot interaction Elsevier Human-swarm interaction Elsevier Human factors Elsevier Multi-robot systems Elsevier Nam, Chang S. oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Ospina, D.A. ELSEVIER Effects of external electric field on the optical and electronic properties of blue phosphorene nanoribbons: A DFT study 2017 human factors in technology and society Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV020430949 volume:58 year:2017 pages:66-80 extent:15 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2016.05.011 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U 51.00 Werkstoffkunde: Allgemeines VZ AR 58 2017 66-80 15 045F 330 |
spelling |
10.1016/j.apergo.2016.05.011 doi GBVA2017019000025.pica (DE-627)ELV030756014 (ELSEVIER)S0003-6870(16)30098-9 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 330 330 DE-600 530 VZ 600 670 530 VZ 51.00 bkl Hocraffer, Amy verfasserin aut A meta-analysis of human-system interfaces in unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) swarm management 2017transfer abstract 15 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier A meta-analysis was conducted to systematically evaluate the current state of research on human-system interfaces for users controlling semi-autonomous swarms composed of groups of drones or unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs). UAV swarms pose several human factors challenges, such as high cognitive demands, non-intuitive behavior, and serious consequences for errors. This article presents findings from a meta-analysis of 27 UAV swarm management papers focused on the human-system interface and human factors concerns, providing an overview of the advantages, challenges, and limitations of current UAV management interfaces, as well as information on how these interfaces are currently evaluated. In general allowing user and mission-specific customization to user interfaces and raising the swarm’s level of autonomy to reduce operator cognitive workload are beneficial and improve situation awareness (SA). It is clear more research is needed in this rapidly evolving field. A meta-analysis was conducted to systematically evaluate the current state of research on human-system interfaces for users controlling semi-autonomous swarms composed of groups of drones or unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs). UAV swarms pose several human factors challenges, such as high cognitive demands, non-intuitive behavior, and serious consequences for errors. This article presents findings from a meta-analysis of 27 UAV swarm management papers focused on the human-system interface and human factors concerns, providing an overview of the advantages, challenges, and limitations of current UAV management interfaces, as well as information on how these interfaces are currently evaluated. In general allowing user and mission-specific customization to user interfaces and raising the swarm’s level of autonomy to reduce operator cognitive workload are beneficial and improve situation awareness (SA). It is clear more research is needed in this rapidly evolving field. Swarm Elsevier Unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) Elsevier Human-system interface Elsevier Human-robot interaction Elsevier Human-swarm interaction Elsevier Human factors Elsevier Multi-robot systems Elsevier Nam, Chang S. oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Ospina, D.A. ELSEVIER Effects of external electric field on the optical and electronic properties of blue phosphorene nanoribbons: A DFT study 2017 human factors in technology and society Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV020430949 volume:58 year:2017 pages:66-80 extent:15 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2016.05.011 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U 51.00 Werkstoffkunde: Allgemeines VZ AR 58 2017 66-80 15 045F 330 |
allfields_unstemmed |
10.1016/j.apergo.2016.05.011 doi GBVA2017019000025.pica (DE-627)ELV030756014 (ELSEVIER)S0003-6870(16)30098-9 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 330 330 DE-600 530 VZ 600 670 530 VZ 51.00 bkl Hocraffer, Amy verfasserin aut A meta-analysis of human-system interfaces in unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) swarm management 2017transfer abstract 15 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier A meta-analysis was conducted to systematically evaluate the current state of research on human-system interfaces for users controlling semi-autonomous swarms composed of groups of drones or unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs). UAV swarms pose several human factors challenges, such as high cognitive demands, non-intuitive behavior, and serious consequences for errors. This article presents findings from a meta-analysis of 27 UAV swarm management papers focused on the human-system interface and human factors concerns, providing an overview of the advantages, challenges, and limitations of current UAV management interfaces, as well as information on how these interfaces are currently evaluated. In general allowing user and mission-specific customization to user interfaces and raising the swarm’s level of autonomy to reduce operator cognitive workload are beneficial and improve situation awareness (SA). It is clear more research is needed in this rapidly evolving field. A meta-analysis was conducted to systematically evaluate the current state of research on human-system interfaces for users controlling semi-autonomous swarms composed of groups of drones or unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs). UAV swarms pose several human factors challenges, such as high cognitive demands, non-intuitive behavior, and serious consequences for errors. This article presents findings from a meta-analysis of 27 UAV swarm management papers focused on the human-system interface and human factors concerns, providing an overview of the advantages, challenges, and limitations of current UAV management interfaces, as well as information on how these interfaces are currently evaluated. In general allowing user and mission-specific customization to user interfaces and raising the swarm’s level of autonomy to reduce operator cognitive workload are beneficial and improve situation awareness (SA). It is clear more research is needed in this rapidly evolving field. Swarm Elsevier Unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) Elsevier Human-system interface Elsevier Human-robot interaction Elsevier Human-swarm interaction Elsevier Human factors Elsevier Multi-robot systems Elsevier Nam, Chang S. oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Ospina, D.A. ELSEVIER Effects of external electric field on the optical and electronic properties of blue phosphorene nanoribbons: A DFT study 2017 human factors in technology and society Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV020430949 volume:58 year:2017 pages:66-80 extent:15 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2016.05.011 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U 51.00 Werkstoffkunde: Allgemeines VZ AR 58 2017 66-80 15 045F 330 |
allfieldsGer |
10.1016/j.apergo.2016.05.011 doi GBVA2017019000025.pica (DE-627)ELV030756014 (ELSEVIER)S0003-6870(16)30098-9 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 330 330 DE-600 530 VZ 600 670 530 VZ 51.00 bkl Hocraffer, Amy verfasserin aut A meta-analysis of human-system interfaces in unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) swarm management 2017transfer abstract 15 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier A meta-analysis was conducted to systematically evaluate the current state of research on human-system interfaces for users controlling semi-autonomous swarms composed of groups of drones or unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs). UAV swarms pose several human factors challenges, such as high cognitive demands, non-intuitive behavior, and serious consequences for errors. This article presents findings from a meta-analysis of 27 UAV swarm management papers focused on the human-system interface and human factors concerns, providing an overview of the advantages, challenges, and limitations of current UAV management interfaces, as well as information on how these interfaces are currently evaluated. In general allowing user and mission-specific customization to user interfaces and raising the swarm’s level of autonomy to reduce operator cognitive workload are beneficial and improve situation awareness (SA). It is clear more research is needed in this rapidly evolving field. A meta-analysis was conducted to systematically evaluate the current state of research on human-system interfaces for users controlling semi-autonomous swarms composed of groups of drones or unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs). UAV swarms pose several human factors challenges, such as high cognitive demands, non-intuitive behavior, and serious consequences for errors. This article presents findings from a meta-analysis of 27 UAV swarm management papers focused on the human-system interface and human factors concerns, providing an overview of the advantages, challenges, and limitations of current UAV management interfaces, as well as information on how these interfaces are currently evaluated. In general allowing user and mission-specific customization to user interfaces and raising the swarm’s level of autonomy to reduce operator cognitive workload are beneficial and improve situation awareness (SA). It is clear more research is needed in this rapidly evolving field. Swarm Elsevier Unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) Elsevier Human-system interface Elsevier Human-robot interaction Elsevier Human-swarm interaction Elsevier Human factors Elsevier Multi-robot systems Elsevier Nam, Chang S. oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Ospina, D.A. ELSEVIER Effects of external electric field on the optical and electronic properties of blue phosphorene nanoribbons: A DFT study 2017 human factors in technology and society Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV020430949 volume:58 year:2017 pages:66-80 extent:15 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2016.05.011 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U 51.00 Werkstoffkunde: Allgemeines VZ AR 58 2017 66-80 15 045F 330 |
allfieldsSound |
10.1016/j.apergo.2016.05.011 doi GBVA2017019000025.pica (DE-627)ELV030756014 (ELSEVIER)S0003-6870(16)30098-9 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 330 330 DE-600 530 VZ 600 670 530 VZ 51.00 bkl Hocraffer, Amy verfasserin aut A meta-analysis of human-system interfaces in unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) swarm management 2017transfer abstract 15 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier A meta-analysis was conducted to systematically evaluate the current state of research on human-system interfaces for users controlling semi-autonomous swarms composed of groups of drones or unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs). UAV swarms pose several human factors challenges, such as high cognitive demands, non-intuitive behavior, and serious consequences for errors. This article presents findings from a meta-analysis of 27 UAV swarm management papers focused on the human-system interface and human factors concerns, providing an overview of the advantages, challenges, and limitations of current UAV management interfaces, as well as information on how these interfaces are currently evaluated. In general allowing user and mission-specific customization to user interfaces and raising the swarm’s level of autonomy to reduce operator cognitive workload are beneficial and improve situation awareness (SA). It is clear more research is needed in this rapidly evolving field. A meta-analysis was conducted to systematically evaluate the current state of research on human-system interfaces for users controlling semi-autonomous swarms composed of groups of drones or unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs). UAV swarms pose several human factors challenges, such as high cognitive demands, non-intuitive behavior, and serious consequences for errors. This article presents findings from a meta-analysis of 27 UAV swarm management papers focused on the human-system interface and human factors concerns, providing an overview of the advantages, challenges, and limitations of current UAV management interfaces, as well as information on how these interfaces are currently evaluated. In general allowing user and mission-specific customization to user interfaces and raising the swarm’s level of autonomy to reduce operator cognitive workload are beneficial and improve situation awareness (SA). It is clear more research is needed in this rapidly evolving field. Swarm Elsevier Unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) Elsevier Human-system interface Elsevier Human-robot interaction Elsevier Human-swarm interaction Elsevier Human factors Elsevier Multi-robot systems Elsevier Nam, Chang S. oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Ospina, D.A. ELSEVIER Effects of external electric field on the optical and electronic properties of blue phosphorene nanoribbons: A DFT study 2017 human factors in technology and society Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV020430949 volume:58 year:2017 pages:66-80 extent:15 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2016.05.011 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U 51.00 Werkstoffkunde: Allgemeines VZ AR 58 2017 66-80 15 045F 330 |
language |
English |
source |
Enthalten in Effects of external electric field on the optical and electronic properties of blue phosphorene nanoribbons: A DFT study Amsterdam [u.a.] volume:58 year:2017 pages:66-80 extent:15 |
sourceStr |
Enthalten in Effects of external electric field on the optical and electronic properties of blue phosphorene nanoribbons: A DFT study Amsterdam [u.a.] volume:58 year:2017 pages:66-80 extent:15 |
format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
bklname |
Werkstoffkunde: Allgemeines |
institution |
findex.gbv.de |
topic_facet |
Swarm Unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) Human-system interface Human-robot interaction Human-swarm interaction Human factors Multi-robot systems |
dewey-raw |
330 |
isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
container_title |
Effects of external electric field on the optical and electronic properties of blue phosphorene nanoribbons: A DFT study |
authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Hocraffer, Amy @@aut@@ Nam, Chang S. @@oth@@ |
publishDateDaySort_date |
2017-01-01T00:00:00Z |
hierarchy_top_id |
ELV020430949 |
dewey-sort |
3330 |
id |
ELV030756014 |
language_de |
englisch |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV030756014</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230625182619.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">180603s2017 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.apergo.2016.05.011</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">GBVA2017019000025.pica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV030756014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0003-6870(16)30098-9</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">330</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">330</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">530</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">600</subfield><subfield code="a">670</subfield><subfield code="a">530</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">51.00</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Hocraffer, Amy</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">A meta-analysis of human-system interfaces in unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) swarm management</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2017transfer abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">15</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">A meta-analysis was conducted to systematically evaluate the current state of research on human-system interfaces for users controlling semi-autonomous swarms composed of groups of drones or unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs). UAV swarms pose several human factors challenges, such as high cognitive demands, non-intuitive behavior, and serious consequences for errors. This article presents findings from a meta-analysis of 27 UAV swarm management papers focused on the human-system interface and human factors concerns, providing an overview of the advantages, challenges, and limitations of current UAV management interfaces, as well as information on how these interfaces are currently evaluated. In general allowing user and mission-specific customization to user interfaces and raising the swarm’s level of autonomy to reduce operator cognitive workload are beneficial and improve situation awareness (SA). It is clear more research is needed in this rapidly evolving field.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">A meta-analysis was conducted to systematically evaluate the current state of research on human-system interfaces for users controlling semi-autonomous swarms composed of groups of drones or unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs). UAV swarms pose several human factors challenges, such as high cognitive demands, non-intuitive behavior, and serious consequences for errors. This article presents findings from a meta-analysis of 27 UAV swarm management papers focused on the human-system interface and human factors concerns, providing an overview of the advantages, challenges, and limitations of current UAV management interfaces, as well as information on how these interfaces are currently evaluated. In general allowing user and mission-specific customization to user interfaces and raising the swarm’s level of autonomy to reduce operator cognitive workload are beneficial and improve situation awareness (SA). It is clear more research is needed in this rapidly evolving field.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Swarm</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV)</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Human-system interface</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Human-robot interaction</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Human-swarm interaction</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Human factors</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Multi-robot systems</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Nam, Chang S.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="n">Elsevier Science</subfield><subfield code="a">Ospina, D.A. ELSEVIER</subfield><subfield code="t">Effects of external electric field on the optical and electronic properties of blue phosphorene nanoribbons: A DFT study</subfield><subfield code="d">2017</subfield><subfield code="d">human factors in technology and society</subfield><subfield code="g">Amsterdam [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)ELV020430949</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:58</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2017</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:66-80</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:15</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2016.05.011</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">51.00</subfield><subfield code="j">Werkstoffkunde: Allgemeines</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">58</subfield><subfield code="j">2017</subfield><subfield code="h">66-80</subfield><subfield code="g">15</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="953" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="2">045F</subfield><subfield code="a">330</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
author |
Hocraffer, Amy |
spellingShingle |
Hocraffer, Amy ddc 330 ddc 530 ddc 600 bkl 51.00 Elsevier Swarm Elsevier Unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) Elsevier Human-system interface Elsevier Human-robot interaction Elsevier Human-swarm interaction Elsevier Human factors Elsevier Multi-robot systems A meta-analysis of human-system interfaces in unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) swarm management |
authorStr |
Hocraffer, Amy |
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)ELV020430949 |
format |
electronic Article |
dewey-ones |
330 - Economics 530 - Physics 600 - Technology 670 - Manufacturing |
delete_txt_mv |
keep |
author_role |
aut |
collection |
elsevier |
remote_str |
true |
illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
topic_title |
330 330 DE-600 530 VZ 600 670 530 VZ 51.00 bkl A meta-analysis of human-system interfaces in unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) swarm management Swarm Elsevier Unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) Elsevier Human-system interface Elsevier Human-robot interaction Elsevier Human-swarm interaction Elsevier Human factors Elsevier Multi-robot systems Elsevier |
topic |
ddc 330 ddc 530 ddc 600 bkl 51.00 Elsevier Swarm Elsevier Unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) Elsevier Human-system interface Elsevier Human-robot interaction Elsevier Human-swarm interaction Elsevier Human factors Elsevier Multi-robot systems |
topic_unstemmed |
ddc 330 ddc 530 ddc 600 bkl 51.00 Elsevier Swarm Elsevier Unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) Elsevier Human-system interface Elsevier Human-robot interaction Elsevier Human-swarm interaction Elsevier Human factors Elsevier Multi-robot systems |
topic_browse |
ddc 330 ddc 530 ddc 600 bkl 51.00 Elsevier Swarm Elsevier Unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) Elsevier Human-system interface Elsevier Human-robot interaction Elsevier Human-swarm interaction Elsevier Human factors Elsevier Multi-robot systems |
format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
carriertype_str_mv |
zu |
author2_variant |
c s n cs csn |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Effects of external electric field on the optical and electronic properties of blue phosphorene nanoribbons: A DFT study |
hierarchy_parent_id |
ELV020430949 |
dewey-tens |
330 - Economics 530 - Physics 600 - Technology 670 - Manufacturing |
hierarchy_top_title |
Effects of external electric field on the optical and electronic properties of blue phosphorene nanoribbons: A DFT study |
isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)ELV020430949 |
title |
A meta-analysis of human-system interfaces in unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) swarm management |
ctrlnum |
(DE-627)ELV030756014 (ELSEVIER)S0003-6870(16)30098-9 |
title_full |
A meta-analysis of human-system interfaces in unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) swarm management |
author_sort |
Hocraffer, Amy |
journal |
Effects of external electric field on the optical and electronic properties of blue phosphorene nanoribbons: A DFT study |
journalStr |
Effects of external electric field on the optical and electronic properties of blue phosphorene nanoribbons: A DFT study |
lang_code |
eng |
isOA_bool |
false |
dewey-hundreds |
300 - Social sciences 500 - Science 600 - Technology |
recordtype |
marc |
publishDateSort |
2017 |
contenttype_str_mv |
zzz |
container_start_page |
66 |
author_browse |
Hocraffer, Amy |
container_volume |
58 |
physical |
15 |
class |
330 330 DE-600 530 VZ 600 670 530 VZ 51.00 bkl |
format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
author-letter |
Hocraffer, Amy |
doi_str_mv |
10.1016/j.apergo.2016.05.011 |
dewey-full |
330 530 600 670 |
title_sort |
a meta-analysis of human-system interfaces in unmanned aerial vehicle (uav) swarm management |
title_auth |
A meta-analysis of human-system interfaces in unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) swarm management |
abstract |
A meta-analysis was conducted to systematically evaluate the current state of research on human-system interfaces for users controlling semi-autonomous swarms composed of groups of drones or unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs). UAV swarms pose several human factors challenges, such as high cognitive demands, non-intuitive behavior, and serious consequences for errors. This article presents findings from a meta-analysis of 27 UAV swarm management papers focused on the human-system interface and human factors concerns, providing an overview of the advantages, challenges, and limitations of current UAV management interfaces, as well as information on how these interfaces are currently evaluated. In general allowing user and mission-specific customization to user interfaces and raising the swarm’s level of autonomy to reduce operator cognitive workload are beneficial and improve situation awareness (SA). It is clear more research is needed in this rapidly evolving field. |
abstractGer |
A meta-analysis was conducted to systematically evaluate the current state of research on human-system interfaces for users controlling semi-autonomous swarms composed of groups of drones or unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs). UAV swarms pose several human factors challenges, such as high cognitive demands, non-intuitive behavior, and serious consequences for errors. This article presents findings from a meta-analysis of 27 UAV swarm management papers focused on the human-system interface and human factors concerns, providing an overview of the advantages, challenges, and limitations of current UAV management interfaces, as well as information on how these interfaces are currently evaluated. In general allowing user and mission-specific customization to user interfaces and raising the swarm’s level of autonomy to reduce operator cognitive workload are beneficial and improve situation awareness (SA). It is clear more research is needed in this rapidly evolving field. |
abstract_unstemmed |
A meta-analysis was conducted to systematically evaluate the current state of research on human-system interfaces for users controlling semi-autonomous swarms composed of groups of drones or unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs). UAV swarms pose several human factors challenges, such as high cognitive demands, non-intuitive behavior, and serious consequences for errors. This article presents findings from a meta-analysis of 27 UAV swarm management papers focused on the human-system interface and human factors concerns, providing an overview of the advantages, challenges, and limitations of current UAV management interfaces, as well as information on how these interfaces are currently evaluated. In general allowing user and mission-specific customization to user interfaces and raising the swarm’s level of autonomy to reduce operator cognitive workload are beneficial and improve situation awareness (SA). It is clear more research is needed in this rapidly evolving field. |
collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U |
title_short |
A meta-analysis of human-system interfaces in unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) swarm management |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2016.05.011 |
remote_bool |
true |
author2 |
Nam, Chang S. |
author2Str |
Nam, Chang S. |
ppnlink |
ELV020430949 |
mediatype_str_mv |
z |
isOA_txt |
false |
hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
author2_role |
oth |
doi_str |
10.1016/j.apergo.2016.05.011 |
up_date |
2024-07-06T18:24:29.129Z |
_version_ |
1803855089244307456 |
fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV030756014</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230625182619.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">180603s2017 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.apergo.2016.05.011</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">GBVA2017019000025.pica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV030756014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0003-6870(16)30098-9</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">330</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">330</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">530</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">600</subfield><subfield code="a">670</subfield><subfield code="a">530</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">51.00</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Hocraffer, Amy</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">A meta-analysis of human-system interfaces in unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) swarm management</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2017transfer abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">15</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">A meta-analysis was conducted to systematically evaluate the current state of research on human-system interfaces for users controlling semi-autonomous swarms composed of groups of drones or unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs). UAV swarms pose several human factors challenges, such as high cognitive demands, non-intuitive behavior, and serious consequences for errors. This article presents findings from a meta-analysis of 27 UAV swarm management papers focused on the human-system interface and human factors concerns, providing an overview of the advantages, challenges, and limitations of current UAV management interfaces, as well as information on how these interfaces are currently evaluated. In general allowing user and mission-specific customization to user interfaces and raising the swarm’s level of autonomy to reduce operator cognitive workload are beneficial and improve situation awareness (SA). It is clear more research is needed in this rapidly evolving field.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">A meta-analysis was conducted to systematically evaluate the current state of research on human-system interfaces for users controlling semi-autonomous swarms composed of groups of drones or unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs). UAV swarms pose several human factors challenges, such as high cognitive demands, non-intuitive behavior, and serious consequences for errors. This article presents findings from a meta-analysis of 27 UAV swarm management papers focused on the human-system interface and human factors concerns, providing an overview of the advantages, challenges, and limitations of current UAV management interfaces, as well as information on how these interfaces are currently evaluated. In general allowing user and mission-specific customization to user interfaces and raising the swarm’s level of autonomy to reduce operator cognitive workload are beneficial and improve situation awareness (SA). It is clear more research is needed in this rapidly evolving field.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Swarm</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV)</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Human-system interface</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Human-robot interaction</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Human-swarm interaction</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Human factors</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Multi-robot systems</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Nam, Chang S.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="n">Elsevier Science</subfield><subfield code="a">Ospina, D.A. ELSEVIER</subfield><subfield code="t">Effects of external electric field on the optical and electronic properties of blue phosphorene nanoribbons: A DFT study</subfield><subfield code="d">2017</subfield><subfield code="d">human factors in technology and society</subfield><subfield code="g">Amsterdam [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)ELV020430949</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:58</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2017</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:66-80</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:15</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2016.05.011</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">51.00</subfield><subfield code="j">Werkstoffkunde: Allgemeines</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">58</subfield><subfield code="j">2017</subfield><subfield code="h">66-80</subfield><subfield code="g">15</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="953" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="2">045F</subfield><subfield code="a">330</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
score |
7.3987713 |