The importance of localized culling in stabilizing chronic wasting disease prevalence in white-tailed deer populations
Strategies to contain the spread of disease often are developed with incomplete knowledge of the possible outcomes but are intended to minimize the risks associated with delaying control. Culling of game species by government agencies is one approach to control disease in wild populations but is unp...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Autor*in: |
Manjerovic, Mary Beth [verfasserIn] |
---|
Format: |
E-Artikel |
---|---|
Sprache: |
Englisch |
Erschienen: |
2014transfer abstract |
---|
Schlagwörter: |
---|
Umfang: |
7 |
---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Modelling the continuous calcination of CaCO3 in a Ca-looping system - Martínez, I. ELSEVIER, 2013, an international journal on research and development in veterinary epidemiology, animal disease prevention and control, and animal health economics, Amsterdam [u.a.] |
---|---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:113 ; year:2014 ; number:1 ; day:1 ; month:01 ; pages:139-145 ; extent:7 |
Links: |
---|
DOI / URN: |
10.1016/j.prevetmed.2013.09.011 |
---|
Katalog-ID: |
ELV033745390 |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | ELV033745390 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20230625194848.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 180603s2014 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2013.09.011 |2 doi | |
028 | 5 | 2 | |a GBVA2014006000005.pica |
035 | |a (DE-627)ELV033745390 | ||
035 | |a (ELSEVIER)S0167-5877(13)00289-4 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
082 | 0 | |a 630 | |
082 | 0 | 4 | |a 630 |q DE-600 |
082 | 0 | 4 | |a 660 |q VZ |
082 | 0 | 4 | |a 660 |q VZ |
082 | 0 | 4 | |a 530 |a 600 |a 670 |q VZ |
084 | |a 51.00 |2 bkl | ||
100 | 1 | |a Manjerovic, Mary Beth |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 4 | |a The importance of localized culling in stabilizing chronic wasting disease prevalence in white-tailed deer populations |
264 | 1 | |c 2014transfer abstract | |
300 | |a 7 | ||
336 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zzz |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b z |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zu |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a Strategies to contain the spread of disease often are developed with incomplete knowledge of the possible outcomes but are intended to minimize the risks associated with delaying control. Culling of game species by government agencies is one approach to control disease in wild populations but is unpopular with hunters and wildlife enthusiasts, politically unpalatable, and erodes public support for agencies responsible for wildlife management. We addressed the functional differences between hunting and government culling programs for managing chronic wasting disease (CWD) in white-tailed deer by comparing prevalence over a 10-year period in Illinois and Wisconsin. When both Illinois and Wisconsin were actively culling from 2003 – 2007, there were no statistical differences between state CWD prevalence estimates. Wisconsin government culling concluded in 2007 and average prevalence over the next five years was 3.09 ± 1.13% with an average annual increase of 0.63%. During that same time period, Illinois continued government culling and there was no change in prevalence throughout Illinois. Despite its unpopularity among hunters, localized culling is a disease management strategy that can maintain low disease prevalence while minimizing impacts on recreational deer harvest. | ||
520 | |a Strategies to contain the spread of disease often are developed with incomplete knowledge of the possible outcomes but are intended to minimize the risks associated with delaying control. Culling of game species by government agencies is one approach to control disease in wild populations but is unpopular with hunters and wildlife enthusiasts, politically unpalatable, and erodes public support for agencies responsible for wildlife management. We addressed the functional differences between hunting and government culling programs for managing chronic wasting disease (CWD) in white-tailed deer by comparing prevalence over a 10-year period in Illinois and Wisconsin. When both Illinois and Wisconsin were actively culling from 2003 – 2007, there were no statistical differences between state CWD prevalence estimates. Wisconsin government culling concluded in 2007 and average prevalence over the next five years was 3.09 ± 1.13% with an average annual increase of 0.63%. During that same time period, Illinois continued government culling and there was no change in prevalence throughout Illinois. Despite its unpopularity among hunters, localized culling is a disease management strategy that can maintain low disease prevalence while minimizing impacts on recreational deer harvest. | ||
650 | 7 | |a Prevalence |2 Elsevier | |
650 | 7 | |a Chronic wasting disease |2 Elsevier | |
650 | 7 | |a Wildlife |2 Elsevier | |
650 | 7 | |a Prion |2 Elsevier | |
650 | 7 | |a Disease management |2 Elsevier | |
650 | 7 | |a White-tailed deer |2 Elsevier | |
650 | 7 | |a Culling |2 Elsevier | |
700 | 1 | |a Green, Michelle L. |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Mateus-Pinilla, Nohra |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Novakofski, Jan |4 oth | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |n Elsevier Science |a Martínez, I. ELSEVIER |t Modelling the continuous calcination of CaCO3 in a Ca-looping system |d 2013 |d an international journal on research and development in veterinary epidemiology, animal disease prevention and control, and animal health economics |g Amsterdam [u.a.] |w (DE-627)ELV011355530 |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:113 |g year:2014 |g number:1 |g day:1 |g month:01 |g pages:139-145 |g extent:7 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2013.09.011 |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_U | ||
912 | |a GBV_ELV | ||
912 | |a SYSFLAG_U | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_20 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_21 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_22 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_24 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_40 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_70 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_77 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_121 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_130 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_666 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_683 | ||
936 | b | k | |a 51.00 |j Werkstoffkunde: Allgemeines |q VZ |
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 113 |j 2014 |e 1 |b 1 |c 0101 |h 139-145 |g 7 | ||
953 | |2 045F |a 630 |
author_variant |
m b m mb mbm |
---|---|
matchkey_str |
manjerovicmarybethgreenmichellelmateuspi:2014----:hipracolclzdulnisaiiighoiwsigiespeaec |
hierarchy_sort_str |
2014transfer abstract |
bklnumber |
51.00 |
publishDate |
2014 |
allfields |
10.1016/j.prevetmed.2013.09.011 doi GBVA2014006000005.pica (DE-627)ELV033745390 (ELSEVIER)S0167-5877(13)00289-4 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 630 630 DE-600 660 VZ 660 VZ 530 600 670 VZ 51.00 bkl Manjerovic, Mary Beth verfasserin aut The importance of localized culling in stabilizing chronic wasting disease prevalence in white-tailed deer populations 2014transfer abstract 7 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Strategies to contain the spread of disease often are developed with incomplete knowledge of the possible outcomes but are intended to minimize the risks associated with delaying control. Culling of game species by government agencies is one approach to control disease in wild populations but is unpopular with hunters and wildlife enthusiasts, politically unpalatable, and erodes public support for agencies responsible for wildlife management. We addressed the functional differences between hunting and government culling programs for managing chronic wasting disease (CWD) in white-tailed deer by comparing prevalence over a 10-year period in Illinois and Wisconsin. When both Illinois and Wisconsin were actively culling from 2003 – 2007, there were no statistical differences between state CWD prevalence estimates. Wisconsin government culling concluded in 2007 and average prevalence over the next five years was 3.09 ± 1.13% with an average annual increase of 0.63%. During that same time period, Illinois continued government culling and there was no change in prevalence throughout Illinois. Despite its unpopularity among hunters, localized culling is a disease management strategy that can maintain low disease prevalence while minimizing impacts on recreational deer harvest. Strategies to contain the spread of disease often are developed with incomplete knowledge of the possible outcomes but are intended to minimize the risks associated with delaying control. Culling of game species by government agencies is one approach to control disease in wild populations but is unpopular with hunters and wildlife enthusiasts, politically unpalatable, and erodes public support for agencies responsible for wildlife management. We addressed the functional differences between hunting and government culling programs for managing chronic wasting disease (CWD) in white-tailed deer by comparing prevalence over a 10-year period in Illinois and Wisconsin. When both Illinois and Wisconsin were actively culling from 2003 – 2007, there were no statistical differences between state CWD prevalence estimates. Wisconsin government culling concluded in 2007 and average prevalence over the next five years was 3.09 ± 1.13% with an average annual increase of 0.63%. During that same time period, Illinois continued government culling and there was no change in prevalence throughout Illinois. Despite its unpopularity among hunters, localized culling is a disease management strategy that can maintain low disease prevalence while minimizing impacts on recreational deer harvest. Prevalence Elsevier Chronic wasting disease Elsevier Wildlife Elsevier Prion Elsevier Disease management Elsevier White-tailed deer Elsevier Culling Elsevier Green, Michelle L. oth Mateus-Pinilla, Nohra oth Novakofski, Jan oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Martínez, I. ELSEVIER Modelling the continuous calcination of CaCO3 in a Ca-looping system 2013 an international journal on research and development in veterinary epidemiology, animal disease prevention and control, and animal health economics Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV011355530 volume:113 year:2014 number:1 day:1 month:01 pages:139-145 extent:7 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2013.09.011 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_21 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_77 GBV_ILN_121 GBV_ILN_130 GBV_ILN_666 GBV_ILN_683 51.00 Werkstoffkunde: Allgemeines VZ AR 113 2014 1 1 0101 139-145 7 045F 630 |
spelling |
10.1016/j.prevetmed.2013.09.011 doi GBVA2014006000005.pica (DE-627)ELV033745390 (ELSEVIER)S0167-5877(13)00289-4 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 630 630 DE-600 660 VZ 660 VZ 530 600 670 VZ 51.00 bkl Manjerovic, Mary Beth verfasserin aut The importance of localized culling in stabilizing chronic wasting disease prevalence in white-tailed deer populations 2014transfer abstract 7 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Strategies to contain the spread of disease often are developed with incomplete knowledge of the possible outcomes but are intended to minimize the risks associated with delaying control. Culling of game species by government agencies is one approach to control disease in wild populations but is unpopular with hunters and wildlife enthusiasts, politically unpalatable, and erodes public support for agencies responsible for wildlife management. We addressed the functional differences between hunting and government culling programs for managing chronic wasting disease (CWD) in white-tailed deer by comparing prevalence over a 10-year period in Illinois and Wisconsin. When both Illinois and Wisconsin were actively culling from 2003 – 2007, there were no statistical differences between state CWD prevalence estimates. Wisconsin government culling concluded in 2007 and average prevalence over the next five years was 3.09 ± 1.13% with an average annual increase of 0.63%. During that same time period, Illinois continued government culling and there was no change in prevalence throughout Illinois. Despite its unpopularity among hunters, localized culling is a disease management strategy that can maintain low disease prevalence while minimizing impacts on recreational deer harvest. Strategies to contain the spread of disease often are developed with incomplete knowledge of the possible outcomes but are intended to minimize the risks associated with delaying control. Culling of game species by government agencies is one approach to control disease in wild populations but is unpopular with hunters and wildlife enthusiasts, politically unpalatable, and erodes public support for agencies responsible for wildlife management. We addressed the functional differences between hunting and government culling programs for managing chronic wasting disease (CWD) in white-tailed deer by comparing prevalence over a 10-year period in Illinois and Wisconsin. When both Illinois and Wisconsin were actively culling from 2003 – 2007, there were no statistical differences between state CWD prevalence estimates. Wisconsin government culling concluded in 2007 and average prevalence over the next five years was 3.09 ± 1.13% with an average annual increase of 0.63%. During that same time period, Illinois continued government culling and there was no change in prevalence throughout Illinois. Despite its unpopularity among hunters, localized culling is a disease management strategy that can maintain low disease prevalence while minimizing impacts on recreational deer harvest. Prevalence Elsevier Chronic wasting disease Elsevier Wildlife Elsevier Prion Elsevier Disease management Elsevier White-tailed deer Elsevier Culling Elsevier Green, Michelle L. oth Mateus-Pinilla, Nohra oth Novakofski, Jan oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Martínez, I. ELSEVIER Modelling the continuous calcination of CaCO3 in a Ca-looping system 2013 an international journal on research and development in veterinary epidemiology, animal disease prevention and control, and animal health economics Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV011355530 volume:113 year:2014 number:1 day:1 month:01 pages:139-145 extent:7 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2013.09.011 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_21 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_77 GBV_ILN_121 GBV_ILN_130 GBV_ILN_666 GBV_ILN_683 51.00 Werkstoffkunde: Allgemeines VZ AR 113 2014 1 1 0101 139-145 7 045F 630 |
allfields_unstemmed |
10.1016/j.prevetmed.2013.09.011 doi GBVA2014006000005.pica (DE-627)ELV033745390 (ELSEVIER)S0167-5877(13)00289-4 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 630 630 DE-600 660 VZ 660 VZ 530 600 670 VZ 51.00 bkl Manjerovic, Mary Beth verfasserin aut The importance of localized culling in stabilizing chronic wasting disease prevalence in white-tailed deer populations 2014transfer abstract 7 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Strategies to contain the spread of disease often are developed with incomplete knowledge of the possible outcomes but are intended to minimize the risks associated with delaying control. Culling of game species by government agencies is one approach to control disease in wild populations but is unpopular with hunters and wildlife enthusiasts, politically unpalatable, and erodes public support for agencies responsible for wildlife management. We addressed the functional differences between hunting and government culling programs for managing chronic wasting disease (CWD) in white-tailed deer by comparing prevalence over a 10-year period in Illinois and Wisconsin. When both Illinois and Wisconsin were actively culling from 2003 – 2007, there were no statistical differences between state CWD prevalence estimates. Wisconsin government culling concluded in 2007 and average prevalence over the next five years was 3.09 ± 1.13% with an average annual increase of 0.63%. During that same time period, Illinois continued government culling and there was no change in prevalence throughout Illinois. Despite its unpopularity among hunters, localized culling is a disease management strategy that can maintain low disease prevalence while minimizing impacts on recreational deer harvest. Strategies to contain the spread of disease often are developed with incomplete knowledge of the possible outcomes but are intended to minimize the risks associated with delaying control. Culling of game species by government agencies is one approach to control disease in wild populations but is unpopular with hunters and wildlife enthusiasts, politically unpalatable, and erodes public support for agencies responsible for wildlife management. We addressed the functional differences between hunting and government culling programs for managing chronic wasting disease (CWD) in white-tailed deer by comparing prevalence over a 10-year period in Illinois and Wisconsin. When both Illinois and Wisconsin were actively culling from 2003 – 2007, there were no statistical differences between state CWD prevalence estimates. Wisconsin government culling concluded in 2007 and average prevalence over the next five years was 3.09 ± 1.13% with an average annual increase of 0.63%. During that same time period, Illinois continued government culling and there was no change in prevalence throughout Illinois. Despite its unpopularity among hunters, localized culling is a disease management strategy that can maintain low disease prevalence while minimizing impacts on recreational deer harvest. Prevalence Elsevier Chronic wasting disease Elsevier Wildlife Elsevier Prion Elsevier Disease management Elsevier White-tailed deer Elsevier Culling Elsevier Green, Michelle L. oth Mateus-Pinilla, Nohra oth Novakofski, Jan oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Martínez, I. ELSEVIER Modelling the continuous calcination of CaCO3 in a Ca-looping system 2013 an international journal on research and development in veterinary epidemiology, animal disease prevention and control, and animal health economics Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV011355530 volume:113 year:2014 number:1 day:1 month:01 pages:139-145 extent:7 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2013.09.011 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_21 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_77 GBV_ILN_121 GBV_ILN_130 GBV_ILN_666 GBV_ILN_683 51.00 Werkstoffkunde: Allgemeines VZ AR 113 2014 1 1 0101 139-145 7 045F 630 |
allfieldsGer |
10.1016/j.prevetmed.2013.09.011 doi GBVA2014006000005.pica (DE-627)ELV033745390 (ELSEVIER)S0167-5877(13)00289-4 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 630 630 DE-600 660 VZ 660 VZ 530 600 670 VZ 51.00 bkl Manjerovic, Mary Beth verfasserin aut The importance of localized culling in stabilizing chronic wasting disease prevalence in white-tailed deer populations 2014transfer abstract 7 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Strategies to contain the spread of disease often are developed with incomplete knowledge of the possible outcomes but are intended to minimize the risks associated with delaying control. Culling of game species by government agencies is one approach to control disease in wild populations but is unpopular with hunters and wildlife enthusiasts, politically unpalatable, and erodes public support for agencies responsible for wildlife management. We addressed the functional differences between hunting and government culling programs for managing chronic wasting disease (CWD) in white-tailed deer by comparing prevalence over a 10-year period in Illinois and Wisconsin. When both Illinois and Wisconsin were actively culling from 2003 – 2007, there were no statistical differences between state CWD prevalence estimates. Wisconsin government culling concluded in 2007 and average prevalence over the next five years was 3.09 ± 1.13% with an average annual increase of 0.63%. During that same time period, Illinois continued government culling and there was no change in prevalence throughout Illinois. Despite its unpopularity among hunters, localized culling is a disease management strategy that can maintain low disease prevalence while minimizing impacts on recreational deer harvest. Strategies to contain the spread of disease often are developed with incomplete knowledge of the possible outcomes but are intended to minimize the risks associated with delaying control. Culling of game species by government agencies is one approach to control disease in wild populations but is unpopular with hunters and wildlife enthusiasts, politically unpalatable, and erodes public support for agencies responsible for wildlife management. We addressed the functional differences between hunting and government culling programs for managing chronic wasting disease (CWD) in white-tailed deer by comparing prevalence over a 10-year period in Illinois and Wisconsin. When both Illinois and Wisconsin were actively culling from 2003 – 2007, there were no statistical differences between state CWD prevalence estimates. Wisconsin government culling concluded in 2007 and average prevalence over the next five years was 3.09 ± 1.13% with an average annual increase of 0.63%. During that same time period, Illinois continued government culling and there was no change in prevalence throughout Illinois. Despite its unpopularity among hunters, localized culling is a disease management strategy that can maintain low disease prevalence while minimizing impacts on recreational deer harvest. Prevalence Elsevier Chronic wasting disease Elsevier Wildlife Elsevier Prion Elsevier Disease management Elsevier White-tailed deer Elsevier Culling Elsevier Green, Michelle L. oth Mateus-Pinilla, Nohra oth Novakofski, Jan oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Martínez, I. ELSEVIER Modelling the continuous calcination of CaCO3 in a Ca-looping system 2013 an international journal on research and development in veterinary epidemiology, animal disease prevention and control, and animal health economics Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV011355530 volume:113 year:2014 number:1 day:1 month:01 pages:139-145 extent:7 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2013.09.011 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_21 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_77 GBV_ILN_121 GBV_ILN_130 GBV_ILN_666 GBV_ILN_683 51.00 Werkstoffkunde: Allgemeines VZ AR 113 2014 1 1 0101 139-145 7 045F 630 |
allfieldsSound |
10.1016/j.prevetmed.2013.09.011 doi GBVA2014006000005.pica (DE-627)ELV033745390 (ELSEVIER)S0167-5877(13)00289-4 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 630 630 DE-600 660 VZ 660 VZ 530 600 670 VZ 51.00 bkl Manjerovic, Mary Beth verfasserin aut The importance of localized culling in stabilizing chronic wasting disease prevalence in white-tailed deer populations 2014transfer abstract 7 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Strategies to contain the spread of disease often are developed with incomplete knowledge of the possible outcomes but are intended to minimize the risks associated with delaying control. Culling of game species by government agencies is one approach to control disease in wild populations but is unpopular with hunters and wildlife enthusiasts, politically unpalatable, and erodes public support for agencies responsible for wildlife management. We addressed the functional differences between hunting and government culling programs for managing chronic wasting disease (CWD) in white-tailed deer by comparing prevalence over a 10-year period in Illinois and Wisconsin. When both Illinois and Wisconsin were actively culling from 2003 – 2007, there were no statistical differences between state CWD prevalence estimates. Wisconsin government culling concluded in 2007 and average prevalence over the next five years was 3.09 ± 1.13% with an average annual increase of 0.63%. During that same time period, Illinois continued government culling and there was no change in prevalence throughout Illinois. Despite its unpopularity among hunters, localized culling is a disease management strategy that can maintain low disease prevalence while minimizing impacts on recreational deer harvest. Strategies to contain the spread of disease often are developed with incomplete knowledge of the possible outcomes but are intended to minimize the risks associated with delaying control. Culling of game species by government agencies is one approach to control disease in wild populations but is unpopular with hunters and wildlife enthusiasts, politically unpalatable, and erodes public support for agencies responsible for wildlife management. We addressed the functional differences between hunting and government culling programs for managing chronic wasting disease (CWD) in white-tailed deer by comparing prevalence over a 10-year period in Illinois and Wisconsin. When both Illinois and Wisconsin were actively culling from 2003 – 2007, there were no statistical differences between state CWD prevalence estimates. Wisconsin government culling concluded in 2007 and average prevalence over the next five years was 3.09 ± 1.13% with an average annual increase of 0.63%. During that same time period, Illinois continued government culling and there was no change in prevalence throughout Illinois. Despite its unpopularity among hunters, localized culling is a disease management strategy that can maintain low disease prevalence while minimizing impacts on recreational deer harvest. Prevalence Elsevier Chronic wasting disease Elsevier Wildlife Elsevier Prion Elsevier Disease management Elsevier White-tailed deer Elsevier Culling Elsevier Green, Michelle L. oth Mateus-Pinilla, Nohra oth Novakofski, Jan oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Martínez, I. ELSEVIER Modelling the continuous calcination of CaCO3 in a Ca-looping system 2013 an international journal on research and development in veterinary epidemiology, animal disease prevention and control, and animal health economics Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV011355530 volume:113 year:2014 number:1 day:1 month:01 pages:139-145 extent:7 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2013.09.011 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_21 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_77 GBV_ILN_121 GBV_ILN_130 GBV_ILN_666 GBV_ILN_683 51.00 Werkstoffkunde: Allgemeines VZ AR 113 2014 1 1 0101 139-145 7 045F 630 |
language |
English |
source |
Enthalten in Modelling the continuous calcination of CaCO3 in a Ca-looping system Amsterdam [u.a.] volume:113 year:2014 number:1 day:1 month:01 pages:139-145 extent:7 |
sourceStr |
Enthalten in Modelling the continuous calcination of CaCO3 in a Ca-looping system Amsterdam [u.a.] volume:113 year:2014 number:1 day:1 month:01 pages:139-145 extent:7 |
format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
bklname |
Werkstoffkunde: Allgemeines |
institution |
findex.gbv.de |
topic_facet |
Prevalence Chronic wasting disease Wildlife Prion Disease management White-tailed deer Culling |
dewey-raw |
630 |
isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
container_title |
Modelling the continuous calcination of CaCO3 in a Ca-looping system |
authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Manjerovic, Mary Beth @@aut@@ Green, Michelle L. @@oth@@ Mateus-Pinilla, Nohra @@oth@@ Novakofski, Jan @@oth@@ |
publishDateDaySort_date |
2014-01-01T00:00:00Z |
hierarchy_top_id |
ELV011355530 |
dewey-sort |
3630 |
id |
ELV033745390 |
language_de |
englisch |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV033745390</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230625194848.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">180603s2014 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.prevetmed.2013.09.011</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">GBVA2014006000005.pica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV033745390</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0167-5877(13)00289-4</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">630</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">630</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">660</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">660</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">530</subfield><subfield code="a">600</subfield><subfield code="a">670</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">51.00</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Manjerovic, Mary Beth</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">The importance of localized culling in stabilizing chronic wasting disease prevalence in white-tailed deer populations</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2014transfer abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">7</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Strategies to contain the spread of disease often are developed with incomplete knowledge of the possible outcomes but are intended to minimize the risks associated with delaying control. Culling of game species by government agencies is one approach to control disease in wild populations but is unpopular with hunters and wildlife enthusiasts, politically unpalatable, and erodes public support for agencies responsible for wildlife management. We addressed the functional differences between hunting and government culling programs for managing chronic wasting disease (CWD) in white-tailed deer by comparing prevalence over a 10-year period in Illinois and Wisconsin. When both Illinois and Wisconsin were actively culling from 2003 – 2007, there were no statistical differences between state CWD prevalence estimates. Wisconsin government culling concluded in 2007 and average prevalence over the next five years was 3.09 ± 1.13% with an average annual increase of 0.63%. During that same time period, Illinois continued government culling and there was no change in prevalence throughout Illinois. Despite its unpopularity among hunters, localized culling is a disease management strategy that can maintain low disease prevalence while minimizing impacts on recreational deer harvest.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Strategies to contain the spread of disease often are developed with incomplete knowledge of the possible outcomes but are intended to minimize the risks associated with delaying control. Culling of game species by government agencies is one approach to control disease in wild populations but is unpopular with hunters and wildlife enthusiasts, politically unpalatable, and erodes public support for agencies responsible for wildlife management. We addressed the functional differences between hunting and government culling programs for managing chronic wasting disease (CWD) in white-tailed deer by comparing prevalence over a 10-year period in Illinois and Wisconsin. When both Illinois and Wisconsin were actively culling from 2003 – 2007, there were no statistical differences between state CWD prevalence estimates. Wisconsin government culling concluded in 2007 and average prevalence over the next five years was 3.09 ± 1.13% with an average annual increase of 0.63%. During that same time period, Illinois continued government culling and there was no change in prevalence throughout Illinois. Despite its unpopularity among hunters, localized culling is a disease management strategy that can maintain low disease prevalence while minimizing impacts on recreational deer harvest.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Prevalence</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Chronic wasting disease</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Wildlife</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Prion</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Disease management</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">White-tailed deer</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Culling</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Green, Michelle L.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Mateus-Pinilla, Nohra</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Novakofski, Jan</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="n">Elsevier Science</subfield><subfield code="a">Martínez, I. ELSEVIER</subfield><subfield code="t">Modelling the continuous calcination of CaCO3 in a Ca-looping system</subfield><subfield code="d">2013</subfield><subfield code="d">an international journal on research and development in veterinary epidemiology, animal disease prevention and control, and animal health economics</subfield><subfield code="g">Amsterdam [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)ELV011355530</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:113</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2014</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1</subfield><subfield code="g">day:1</subfield><subfield code="g">month:01</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:139-145</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:7</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2013.09.011</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_21</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_77</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_121</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_130</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_666</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_683</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">51.00</subfield><subfield code="j">Werkstoffkunde: Allgemeines</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">113</subfield><subfield code="j">2014</subfield><subfield code="e">1</subfield><subfield code="b">1</subfield><subfield code="c">0101</subfield><subfield code="h">139-145</subfield><subfield code="g">7</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="953" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="2">045F</subfield><subfield code="a">630</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
author |
Manjerovic, Mary Beth |
spellingShingle |
Manjerovic, Mary Beth ddc 630 ddc 660 ddc 530 bkl 51.00 Elsevier Prevalence Elsevier Chronic wasting disease Elsevier Wildlife Elsevier Prion Elsevier Disease management Elsevier White-tailed deer Elsevier Culling The importance of localized culling in stabilizing chronic wasting disease prevalence in white-tailed deer populations |
authorStr |
Manjerovic, Mary Beth |
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)ELV011355530 |
format |
electronic Article |
dewey-ones |
630 - Agriculture & related technologies 660 - Chemical engineering 530 - Physics 600 - Technology 670 - Manufacturing |
delete_txt_mv |
keep |
author_role |
aut |
collection |
elsevier |
remote_str |
true |
illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
topic_title |
630 630 DE-600 660 VZ 530 600 670 VZ 51.00 bkl The importance of localized culling in stabilizing chronic wasting disease prevalence in white-tailed deer populations Prevalence Elsevier Chronic wasting disease Elsevier Wildlife Elsevier Prion Elsevier Disease management Elsevier White-tailed deer Elsevier Culling Elsevier |
topic |
ddc 630 ddc 660 ddc 530 bkl 51.00 Elsevier Prevalence Elsevier Chronic wasting disease Elsevier Wildlife Elsevier Prion Elsevier Disease management Elsevier White-tailed deer Elsevier Culling |
topic_unstemmed |
ddc 630 ddc 660 ddc 530 bkl 51.00 Elsevier Prevalence Elsevier Chronic wasting disease Elsevier Wildlife Elsevier Prion Elsevier Disease management Elsevier White-tailed deer Elsevier Culling |
topic_browse |
ddc 630 ddc 660 ddc 530 bkl 51.00 Elsevier Prevalence Elsevier Chronic wasting disease Elsevier Wildlife Elsevier Prion Elsevier Disease management Elsevier White-tailed deer Elsevier Culling |
format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
carriertype_str_mv |
zu |
author2_variant |
m l g ml mlg n m p nmp j n jn |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Modelling the continuous calcination of CaCO3 in a Ca-looping system |
hierarchy_parent_id |
ELV011355530 |
dewey-tens |
630 - Agriculture 660 - Chemical engineering 530 - Physics 600 - Technology 670 - Manufacturing |
hierarchy_top_title |
Modelling the continuous calcination of CaCO3 in a Ca-looping system |
isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)ELV011355530 |
title |
The importance of localized culling in stabilizing chronic wasting disease prevalence in white-tailed deer populations |
ctrlnum |
(DE-627)ELV033745390 (ELSEVIER)S0167-5877(13)00289-4 |
title_full |
The importance of localized culling in stabilizing chronic wasting disease prevalence in white-tailed deer populations |
author_sort |
Manjerovic, Mary Beth |
journal |
Modelling the continuous calcination of CaCO3 in a Ca-looping system |
journalStr |
Modelling the continuous calcination of CaCO3 in a Ca-looping system |
lang_code |
eng |
isOA_bool |
false |
dewey-hundreds |
600 - Technology 500 - Science |
recordtype |
marc |
publishDateSort |
2014 |
contenttype_str_mv |
zzz |
container_start_page |
139 |
author_browse |
Manjerovic, Mary Beth |
container_volume |
113 |
physical |
7 |
class |
630 630 DE-600 660 VZ 530 600 670 VZ 51.00 bkl |
format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
author-letter |
Manjerovic, Mary Beth |
doi_str_mv |
10.1016/j.prevetmed.2013.09.011 |
dewey-full |
630 660 530 600 670 |
title_sort |
importance of localized culling in stabilizing chronic wasting disease prevalence in white-tailed deer populations |
title_auth |
The importance of localized culling in stabilizing chronic wasting disease prevalence in white-tailed deer populations |
abstract |
Strategies to contain the spread of disease often are developed with incomplete knowledge of the possible outcomes but are intended to minimize the risks associated with delaying control. Culling of game species by government agencies is one approach to control disease in wild populations but is unpopular with hunters and wildlife enthusiasts, politically unpalatable, and erodes public support for agencies responsible for wildlife management. We addressed the functional differences between hunting and government culling programs for managing chronic wasting disease (CWD) in white-tailed deer by comparing prevalence over a 10-year period in Illinois and Wisconsin. When both Illinois and Wisconsin were actively culling from 2003 – 2007, there were no statistical differences between state CWD prevalence estimates. Wisconsin government culling concluded in 2007 and average prevalence over the next five years was 3.09 ± 1.13% with an average annual increase of 0.63%. During that same time period, Illinois continued government culling and there was no change in prevalence throughout Illinois. Despite its unpopularity among hunters, localized culling is a disease management strategy that can maintain low disease prevalence while minimizing impacts on recreational deer harvest. |
abstractGer |
Strategies to contain the spread of disease often are developed with incomplete knowledge of the possible outcomes but are intended to minimize the risks associated with delaying control. Culling of game species by government agencies is one approach to control disease in wild populations but is unpopular with hunters and wildlife enthusiasts, politically unpalatable, and erodes public support for agencies responsible for wildlife management. We addressed the functional differences between hunting and government culling programs for managing chronic wasting disease (CWD) in white-tailed deer by comparing prevalence over a 10-year period in Illinois and Wisconsin. When both Illinois and Wisconsin were actively culling from 2003 – 2007, there were no statistical differences between state CWD prevalence estimates. Wisconsin government culling concluded in 2007 and average prevalence over the next five years was 3.09 ± 1.13% with an average annual increase of 0.63%. During that same time period, Illinois continued government culling and there was no change in prevalence throughout Illinois. Despite its unpopularity among hunters, localized culling is a disease management strategy that can maintain low disease prevalence while minimizing impacts on recreational deer harvest. |
abstract_unstemmed |
Strategies to contain the spread of disease often are developed with incomplete knowledge of the possible outcomes but are intended to minimize the risks associated with delaying control. Culling of game species by government agencies is one approach to control disease in wild populations but is unpopular with hunters and wildlife enthusiasts, politically unpalatable, and erodes public support for agencies responsible for wildlife management. We addressed the functional differences between hunting and government culling programs for managing chronic wasting disease (CWD) in white-tailed deer by comparing prevalence over a 10-year period in Illinois and Wisconsin. When both Illinois and Wisconsin were actively culling from 2003 – 2007, there were no statistical differences between state CWD prevalence estimates. Wisconsin government culling concluded in 2007 and average prevalence over the next five years was 3.09 ± 1.13% with an average annual increase of 0.63%. During that same time period, Illinois continued government culling and there was no change in prevalence throughout Illinois. Despite its unpopularity among hunters, localized culling is a disease management strategy that can maintain low disease prevalence while minimizing impacts on recreational deer harvest. |
collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_21 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_77 GBV_ILN_121 GBV_ILN_130 GBV_ILN_666 GBV_ILN_683 |
container_issue |
1 |
title_short |
The importance of localized culling in stabilizing chronic wasting disease prevalence in white-tailed deer populations |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2013.09.011 |
remote_bool |
true |
author2 |
Green, Michelle L. Mateus-Pinilla, Nohra Novakofski, Jan |
author2Str |
Green, Michelle L. Mateus-Pinilla, Nohra Novakofski, Jan |
ppnlink |
ELV011355530 |
mediatype_str_mv |
z |
isOA_txt |
false |
hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
author2_role |
oth oth oth |
doi_str |
10.1016/j.prevetmed.2013.09.011 |
up_date |
2024-07-06T19:20:47.704Z |
_version_ |
1803858631936966656 |
fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV033745390</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230625194848.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">180603s2014 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.prevetmed.2013.09.011</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">GBVA2014006000005.pica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV033745390</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0167-5877(13)00289-4</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">630</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">630</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">660</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">660</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">530</subfield><subfield code="a">600</subfield><subfield code="a">670</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">51.00</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Manjerovic, Mary Beth</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">The importance of localized culling in stabilizing chronic wasting disease prevalence in white-tailed deer populations</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2014transfer abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">7</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Strategies to contain the spread of disease often are developed with incomplete knowledge of the possible outcomes but are intended to minimize the risks associated with delaying control. Culling of game species by government agencies is one approach to control disease in wild populations but is unpopular with hunters and wildlife enthusiasts, politically unpalatable, and erodes public support for agencies responsible for wildlife management. We addressed the functional differences between hunting and government culling programs for managing chronic wasting disease (CWD) in white-tailed deer by comparing prevalence over a 10-year period in Illinois and Wisconsin. When both Illinois and Wisconsin were actively culling from 2003 – 2007, there were no statistical differences between state CWD prevalence estimates. Wisconsin government culling concluded in 2007 and average prevalence over the next five years was 3.09 ± 1.13% with an average annual increase of 0.63%. During that same time period, Illinois continued government culling and there was no change in prevalence throughout Illinois. Despite its unpopularity among hunters, localized culling is a disease management strategy that can maintain low disease prevalence while minimizing impacts on recreational deer harvest.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Strategies to contain the spread of disease often are developed with incomplete knowledge of the possible outcomes but are intended to minimize the risks associated with delaying control. Culling of game species by government agencies is one approach to control disease in wild populations but is unpopular with hunters and wildlife enthusiasts, politically unpalatable, and erodes public support for agencies responsible for wildlife management. We addressed the functional differences between hunting and government culling programs for managing chronic wasting disease (CWD) in white-tailed deer by comparing prevalence over a 10-year period in Illinois and Wisconsin. When both Illinois and Wisconsin were actively culling from 2003 – 2007, there were no statistical differences between state CWD prevalence estimates. Wisconsin government culling concluded in 2007 and average prevalence over the next five years was 3.09 ± 1.13% with an average annual increase of 0.63%. During that same time period, Illinois continued government culling and there was no change in prevalence throughout Illinois. Despite its unpopularity among hunters, localized culling is a disease management strategy that can maintain low disease prevalence while minimizing impacts on recreational deer harvest.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Prevalence</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Chronic wasting disease</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Wildlife</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Prion</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Disease management</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">White-tailed deer</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Culling</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Green, Michelle L.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Mateus-Pinilla, Nohra</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Novakofski, Jan</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="n">Elsevier Science</subfield><subfield code="a">Martínez, I. ELSEVIER</subfield><subfield code="t">Modelling the continuous calcination of CaCO3 in a Ca-looping system</subfield><subfield code="d">2013</subfield><subfield code="d">an international journal on research and development in veterinary epidemiology, animal disease prevention and control, and animal health economics</subfield><subfield code="g">Amsterdam [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)ELV011355530</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:113</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2014</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1</subfield><subfield code="g">day:1</subfield><subfield code="g">month:01</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:139-145</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:7</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2013.09.011</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_21</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_77</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_121</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_130</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_666</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_683</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">51.00</subfield><subfield code="j">Werkstoffkunde: Allgemeines</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">113</subfield><subfield code="j">2014</subfield><subfield code="e">1</subfield><subfield code="b">1</subfield><subfield code="c">0101</subfield><subfield code="h">139-145</subfield><subfield code="g">7</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="953" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="2">045F</subfield><subfield code="a">630</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
score |
7.3985205 |