Controlling for out-of-plane lumbar moments during unidirectional trunk efforts: Learning and reliability issues related to trunk muscle activation estimates
To assess the electromyographic (EMG) activation of trunk muscle during exertions performed in one primary plane (sagittal, frontal, transverse), we previously proposed a protocol allowing minimizing out-of-plane efforts (coupled moments – CMs) with the use of a static dynamometer combined with a vi...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Larivière, Christian [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2014transfer abstract |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Umfang: |
11 |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Emerging roles of miRNAs in the development of pancreatic cancer - Fathi, Mohadeseh ELSEVIER, 2021, official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiology and Kinesiology, Amsterdam [u.a.] |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:24 ; year:2014 ; number:4 ; pages:531-541 ; extent:11 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1016/j.jelekin.2014.04.010 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
ELV03413574X |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ELV03413574X | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230625195954.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 180603s2014 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.jelekin.2014.04.010 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a GBVA2014017000028.pica |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)ELV03413574X | ||
| 035 | |a (ELSEVIER)S1050-6411(14)00074-1 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 082 | 0 | |a 610 | |
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 610 |q DE-600 |
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 610 |q VZ |
| 084 | |a 44.40 |2 bkl | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Larivière, Christian |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Controlling for out-of-plane lumbar moments during unidirectional trunk efforts: Learning and reliability issues related to trunk muscle activation estimates |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2014transfer abstract | |
| 300 | |a 11 | ||
| 336 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zzz |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b z |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zu |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a To assess the electromyographic (EMG) activation of trunk muscle during exertions performed in one primary plane (sagittal, frontal, transverse), we previously proposed a protocol allowing minimizing out-of-plane efforts (coupled moments – CMs) with the use of a static dynamometer combined with a visual feedback system. The aims of this study were to go further by testing motor learning and reliability issues related to such a protocol. Three identical sessions were conducted, where maximal voluntary contractions and submaximal ramp contractions were performed in six different directions while standing in the dynamometer. Two feedback conditions were tested, the simple 1D-feedback in the primary plane and the full 3D-feedback in all planes simultaneously. Surface EMG signals were collected from back and abdominal muscles and EMG amplitude and CMs were computed during the ramp contractions. Providing a 3D feedback to minimize CMs did not improve EMG reliability or in other words, did not reduce the within-subject variability. Providing three assessment days had practically no effect (no learning) on CMs and EMG variables. Overall, the reliability of EMG was at best moderate. However, although this limits its use on an individual basis, it still allows within- and between-group comparisons for research applications. | ||
| 520 | |a To assess the electromyographic (EMG) activation of trunk muscle during exertions performed in one primary plane (sagittal, frontal, transverse), we previously proposed a protocol allowing minimizing out-of-plane efforts (coupled moments – CMs) with the use of a static dynamometer combined with a visual feedback system. The aims of this study were to go further by testing motor learning and reliability issues related to such a protocol. Three identical sessions were conducted, where maximal voluntary contractions and submaximal ramp contractions were performed in six different directions while standing in the dynamometer. Two feedback conditions were tested, the simple 1D-feedback in the primary plane and the full 3D-feedback in all planes simultaneously. Surface EMG signals were collected from back and abdominal muscles and EMG amplitude and CMs were computed during the ramp contractions. Providing a 3D feedback to minimize CMs did not improve EMG reliability or in other words, did not reduce the within-subject variability. Providing three assessment days had practically no effect (no learning) on CMs and EMG variables. Overall, the reliability of EMG was at best moderate. However, although this limits its use on an individual basis, it still allows within- and between-group comparisons for research applications. | ||
| 650 | 7 | |a Trunk muscle coordination |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Feedback |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Variability |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Dynamometry |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Electromyography |2 Elsevier | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Gagnon, Denis |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Genest, Karine |4 oth | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |n Elsevier Science |a Fathi, Mohadeseh ELSEVIER |t Emerging roles of miRNAs in the development of pancreatic cancer |d 2021 |d official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiology and Kinesiology |g Amsterdam [u.a.] |w (DE-627)ELV006547923 |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:24 |g year:2014 |g number:4 |g pages:531-541 |g extent:11 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelekin.2014.04.010 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_U | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ELV | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_U | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-PHA | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OPC-PHA | ||
| 936 | b | k | |a 44.40 |j Pharmazie |j Pharmazeutika |q VZ |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 24 |j 2014 |e 4 |h 531-541 |g 11 | ||
| 953 | |2 045F |a 610 | ||
| author_variant |
c l cl |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
larivirechristiangagnondenisgenestkarine:2014----:otolnfruopaeubroetdrnuiietoatukfotlannadeibltiserlt |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2014transfer abstract |
| bklnumber |
44.40 |
| publishDate |
2014 |
| allfields |
10.1016/j.jelekin.2014.04.010 doi GBVA2014017000028.pica (DE-627)ELV03413574X (ELSEVIER)S1050-6411(14)00074-1 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 610 610 DE-600 610 VZ 44.40 bkl Larivière, Christian verfasserin aut Controlling for out-of-plane lumbar moments during unidirectional trunk efforts: Learning and reliability issues related to trunk muscle activation estimates 2014transfer abstract 11 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier To assess the electromyographic (EMG) activation of trunk muscle during exertions performed in one primary plane (sagittal, frontal, transverse), we previously proposed a protocol allowing minimizing out-of-plane efforts (coupled moments – CMs) with the use of a static dynamometer combined with a visual feedback system. The aims of this study were to go further by testing motor learning and reliability issues related to such a protocol. Three identical sessions were conducted, where maximal voluntary contractions and submaximal ramp contractions were performed in six different directions while standing in the dynamometer. Two feedback conditions were tested, the simple 1D-feedback in the primary plane and the full 3D-feedback in all planes simultaneously. Surface EMG signals were collected from back and abdominal muscles and EMG amplitude and CMs were computed during the ramp contractions. Providing a 3D feedback to minimize CMs did not improve EMG reliability or in other words, did not reduce the within-subject variability. Providing three assessment days had practically no effect (no learning) on CMs and EMG variables. Overall, the reliability of EMG was at best moderate. However, although this limits its use on an individual basis, it still allows within- and between-group comparisons for research applications. To assess the electromyographic (EMG) activation of trunk muscle during exertions performed in one primary plane (sagittal, frontal, transverse), we previously proposed a protocol allowing minimizing out-of-plane efforts (coupled moments – CMs) with the use of a static dynamometer combined with a visual feedback system. The aims of this study were to go further by testing motor learning and reliability issues related to such a protocol. Three identical sessions were conducted, where maximal voluntary contractions and submaximal ramp contractions were performed in six different directions while standing in the dynamometer. Two feedback conditions were tested, the simple 1D-feedback in the primary plane and the full 3D-feedback in all planes simultaneously. Surface EMG signals were collected from back and abdominal muscles and EMG amplitude and CMs were computed during the ramp contractions. Providing a 3D feedback to minimize CMs did not improve EMG reliability or in other words, did not reduce the within-subject variability. Providing three assessment days had practically no effect (no learning) on CMs and EMG variables. Overall, the reliability of EMG was at best moderate. However, although this limits its use on an individual basis, it still allows within- and between-group comparisons for research applications. Trunk muscle coordination Elsevier Feedback Elsevier Variability Elsevier Dynamometry Elsevier Electromyography Elsevier Gagnon, Denis oth Genest, Karine oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Fathi, Mohadeseh ELSEVIER Emerging roles of miRNAs in the development of pancreatic cancer 2021 official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiology and Kinesiology Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV006547923 volume:24 year:2014 number:4 pages:531-541 extent:11 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelekin.2014.04.010 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA SSG-OPC-PHA 44.40 Pharmazie Pharmazeutika VZ AR 24 2014 4 531-541 11 045F 610 |
| spelling |
10.1016/j.jelekin.2014.04.010 doi GBVA2014017000028.pica (DE-627)ELV03413574X (ELSEVIER)S1050-6411(14)00074-1 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 610 610 DE-600 610 VZ 44.40 bkl Larivière, Christian verfasserin aut Controlling for out-of-plane lumbar moments during unidirectional trunk efforts: Learning and reliability issues related to trunk muscle activation estimates 2014transfer abstract 11 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier To assess the electromyographic (EMG) activation of trunk muscle during exertions performed in one primary plane (sagittal, frontal, transverse), we previously proposed a protocol allowing minimizing out-of-plane efforts (coupled moments – CMs) with the use of a static dynamometer combined with a visual feedback system. The aims of this study were to go further by testing motor learning and reliability issues related to such a protocol. Three identical sessions were conducted, where maximal voluntary contractions and submaximal ramp contractions were performed in six different directions while standing in the dynamometer. Two feedback conditions were tested, the simple 1D-feedback in the primary plane and the full 3D-feedback in all planes simultaneously. Surface EMG signals were collected from back and abdominal muscles and EMG amplitude and CMs were computed during the ramp contractions. Providing a 3D feedback to minimize CMs did not improve EMG reliability or in other words, did not reduce the within-subject variability. Providing three assessment days had practically no effect (no learning) on CMs and EMG variables. Overall, the reliability of EMG was at best moderate. However, although this limits its use on an individual basis, it still allows within- and between-group comparisons for research applications. To assess the electromyographic (EMG) activation of trunk muscle during exertions performed in one primary plane (sagittal, frontal, transverse), we previously proposed a protocol allowing minimizing out-of-plane efforts (coupled moments – CMs) with the use of a static dynamometer combined with a visual feedback system. The aims of this study were to go further by testing motor learning and reliability issues related to such a protocol. Three identical sessions were conducted, where maximal voluntary contractions and submaximal ramp contractions were performed in six different directions while standing in the dynamometer. Two feedback conditions were tested, the simple 1D-feedback in the primary plane and the full 3D-feedback in all planes simultaneously. Surface EMG signals were collected from back and abdominal muscles and EMG amplitude and CMs were computed during the ramp contractions. Providing a 3D feedback to minimize CMs did not improve EMG reliability or in other words, did not reduce the within-subject variability. Providing three assessment days had practically no effect (no learning) on CMs and EMG variables. Overall, the reliability of EMG was at best moderate. However, although this limits its use on an individual basis, it still allows within- and between-group comparisons for research applications. Trunk muscle coordination Elsevier Feedback Elsevier Variability Elsevier Dynamometry Elsevier Electromyography Elsevier Gagnon, Denis oth Genest, Karine oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Fathi, Mohadeseh ELSEVIER Emerging roles of miRNAs in the development of pancreatic cancer 2021 official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiology and Kinesiology Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV006547923 volume:24 year:2014 number:4 pages:531-541 extent:11 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelekin.2014.04.010 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA SSG-OPC-PHA 44.40 Pharmazie Pharmazeutika VZ AR 24 2014 4 531-541 11 045F 610 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1016/j.jelekin.2014.04.010 doi GBVA2014017000028.pica (DE-627)ELV03413574X (ELSEVIER)S1050-6411(14)00074-1 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 610 610 DE-600 610 VZ 44.40 bkl Larivière, Christian verfasserin aut Controlling for out-of-plane lumbar moments during unidirectional trunk efforts: Learning and reliability issues related to trunk muscle activation estimates 2014transfer abstract 11 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier To assess the electromyographic (EMG) activation of trunk muscle during exertions performed in one primary plane (sagittal, frontal, transverse), we previously proposed a protocol allowing minimizing out-of-plane efforts (coupled moments – CMs) with the use of a static dynamometer combined with a visual feedback system. The aims of this study were to go further by testing motor learning and reliability issues related to such a protocol. Three identical sessions were conducted, where maximal voluntary contractions and submaximal ramp contractions were performed in six different directions while standing in the dynamometer. Two feedback conditions were tested, the simple 1D-feedback in the primary plane and the full 3D-feedback in all planes simultaneously. Surface EMG signals were collected from back and abdominal muscles and EMG amplitude and CMs were computed during the ramp contractions. Providing a 3D feedback to minimize CMs did not improve EMG reliability or in other words, did not reduce the within-subject variability. Providing three assessment days had practically no effect (no learning) on CMs and EMG variables. Overall, the reliability of EMG was at best moderate. However, although this limits its use on an individual basis, it still allows within- and between-group comparisons for research applications. To assess the electromyographic (EMG) activation of trunk muscle during exertions performed in one primary plane (sagittal, frontal, transverse), we previously proposed a protocol allowing minimizing out-of-plane efforts (coupled moments – CMs) with the use of a static dynamometer combined with a visual feedback system. The aims of this study were to go further by testing motor learning and reliability issues related to such a protocol. Three identical sessions were conducted, where maximal voluntary contractions and submaximal ramp contractions were performed in six different directions while standing in the dynamometer. Two feedback conditions were tested, the simple 1D-feedback in the primary plane and the full 3D-feedback in all planes simultaneously. Surface EMG signals were collected from back and abdominal muscles and EMG amplitude and CMs were computed during the ramp contractions. Providing a 3D feedback to minimize CMs did not improve EMG reliability or in other words, did not reduce the within-subject variability. Providing three assessment days had practically no effect (no learning) on CMs and EMG variables. Overall, the reliability of EMG was at best moderate. However, although this limits its use on an individual basis, it still allows within- and between-group comparisons for research applications. Trunk muscle coordination Elsevier Feedback Elsevier Variability Elsevier Dynamometry Elsevier Electromyography Elsevier Gagnon, Denis oth Genest, Karine oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Fathi, Mohadeseh ELSEVIER Emerging roles of miRNAs in the development of pancreatic cancer 2021 official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiology and Kinesiology Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV006547923 volume:24 year:2014 number:4 pages:531-541 extent:11 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelekin.2014.04.010 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA SSG-OPC-PHA 44.40 Pharmazie Pharmazeutika VZ AR 24 2014 4 531-541 11 045F 610 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1016/j.jelekin.2014.04.010 doi GBVA2014017000028.pica (DE-627)ELV03413574X (ELSEVIER)S1050-6411(14)00074-1 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 610 610 DE-600 610 VZ 44.40 bkl Larivière, Christian verfasserin aut Controlling for out-of-plane lumbar moments during unidirectional trunk efforts: Learning and reliability issues related to trunk muscle activation estimates 2014transfer abstract 11 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier To assess the electromyographic (EMG) activation of trunk muscle during exertions performed in one primary plane (sagittal, frontal, transverse), we previously proposed a protocol allowing minimizing out-of-plane efforts (coupled moments – CMs) with the use of a static dynamometer combined with a visual feedback system. The aims of this study were to go further by testing motor learning and reliability issues related to such a protocol. Three identical sessions were conducted, where maximal voluntary contractions and submaximal ramp contractions were performed in six different directions while standing in the dynamometer. Two feedback conditions were tested, the simple 1D-feedback in the primary plane and the full 3D-feedback in all planes simultaneously. Surface EMG signals were collected from back and abdominal muscles and EMG amplitude and CMs were computed during the ramp contractions. Providing a 3D feedback to minimize CMs did not improve EMG reliability or in other words, did not reduce the within-subject variability. Providing three assessment days had practically no effect (no learning) on CMs and EMG variables. Overall, the reliability of EMG was at best moderate. However, although this limits its use on an individual basis, it still allows within- and between-group comparisons for research applications. To assess the electromyographic (EMG) activation of trunk muscle during exertions performed in one primary plane (sagittal, frontal, transverse), we previously proposed a protocol allowing minimizing out-of-plane efforts (coupled moments – CMs) with the use of a static dynamometer combined with a visual feedback system. The aims of this study were to go further by testing motor learning and reliability issues related to such a protocol. Three identical sessions were conducted, where maximal voluntary contractions and submaximal ramp contractions were performed in six different directions while standing in the dynamometer. Two feedback conditions were tested, the simple 1D-feedback in the primary plane and the full 3D-feedback in all planes simultaneously. Surface EMG signals were collected from back and abdominal muscles and EMG amplitude and CMs were computed during the ramp contractions. Providing a 3D feedback to minimize CMs did not improve EMG reliability or in other words, did not reduce the within-subject variability. Providing three assessment days had practically no effect (no learning) on CMs and EMG variables. Overall, the reliability of EMG was at best moderate. However, although this limits its use on an individual basis, it still allows within- and between-group comparisons for research applications. Trunk muscle coordination Elsevier Feedback Elsevier Variability Elsevier Dynamometry Elsevier Electromyography Elsevier Gagnon, Denis oth Genest, Karine oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Fathi, Mohadeseh ELSEVIER Emerging roles of miRNAs in the development of pancreatic cancer 2021 official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiology and Kinesiology Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV006547923 volume:24 year:2014 number:4 pages:531-541 extent:11 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelekin.2014.04.010 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA SSG-OPC-PHA 44.40 Pharmazie Pharmazeutika VZ AR 24 2014 4 531-541 11 045F 610 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1016/j.jelekin.2014.04.010 doi GBVA2014017000028.pica (DE-627)ELV03413574X (ELSEVIER)S1050-6411(14)00074-1 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 610 610 DE-600 610 VZ 44.40 bkl Larivière, Christian verfasserin aut Controlling for out-of-plane lumbar moments during unidirectional trunk efforts: Learning and reliability issues related to trunk muscle activation estimates 2014transfer abstract 11 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier To assess the electromyographic (EMG) activation of trunk muscle during exertions performed in one primary plane (sagittal, frontal, transverse), we previously proposed a protocol allowing minimizing out-of-plane efforts (coupled moments – CMs) with the use of a static dynamometer combined with a visual feedback system. The aims of this study were to go further by testing motor learning and reliability issues related to such a protocol. Three identical sessions were conducted, where maximal voluntary contractions and submaximal ramp contractions were performed in six different directions while standing in the dynamometer. Two feedback conditions were tested, the simple 1D-feedback in the primary plane and the full 3D-feedback in all planes simultaneously. Surface EMG signals were collected from back and abdominal muscles and EMG amplitude and CMs were computed during the ramp contractions. Providing a 3D feedback to minimize CMs did not improve EMG reliability or in other words, did not reduce the within-subject variability. Providing three assessment days had practically no effect (no learning) on CMs and EMG variables. Overall, the reliability of EMG was at best moderate. However, although this limits its use on an individual basis, it still allows within- and between-group comparisons for research applications. To assess the electromyographic (EMG) activation of trunk muscle during exertions performed in one primary plane (sagittal, frontal, transverse), we previously proposed a protocol allowing minimizing out-of-plane efforts (coupled moments – CMs) with the use of a static dynamometer combined with a visual feedback system. The aims of this study were to go further by testing motor learning and reliability issues related to such a protocol. Three identical sessions were conducted, where maximal voluntary contractions and submaximal ramp contractions were performed in six different directions while standing in the dynamometer. Two feedback conditions were tested, the simple 1D-feedback in the primary plane and the full 3D-feedback in all planes simultaneously. Surface EMG signals were collected from back and abdominal muscles and EMG amplitude and CMs were computed during the ramp contractions. Providing a 3D feedback to minimize CMs did not improve EMG reliability or in other words, did not reduce the within-subject variability. Providing three assessment days had practically no effect (no learning) on CMs and EMG variables. Overall, the reliability of EMG was at best moderate. However, although this limits its use on an individual basis, it still allows within- and between-group comparisons for research applications. Trunk muscle coordination Elsevier Feedback Elsevier Variability Elsevier Dynamometry Elsevier Electromyography Elsevier Gagnon, Denis oth Genest, Karine oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Fathi, Mohadeseh ELSEVIER Emerging roles of miRNAs in the development of pancreatic cancer 2021 official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiology and Kinesiology Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV006547923 volume:24 year:2014 number:4 pages:531-541 extent:11 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelekin.2014.04.010 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA SSG-OPC-PHA 44.40 Pharmazie Pharmazeutika VZ AR 24 2014 4 531-541 11 045F 610 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in Emerging roles of miRNAs in the development of pancreatic cancer Amsterdam [u.a.] volume:24 year:2014 number:4 pages:531-541 extent:11 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in Emerging roles of miRNAs in the development of pancreatic cancer Amsterdam [u.a.] volume:24 year:2014 number:4 pages:531-541 extent:11 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| bklname |
Pharmazie Pharmazeutika |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
Trunk muscle coordination Feedback Variability Dynamometry Electromyography |
| dewey-raw |
610 |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
Emerging roles of miRNAs in the development of pancreatic cancer |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Larivière, Christian @@aut@@ Gagnon, Denis @@oth@@ Genest, Karine @@oth@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2014-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
ELV006547923 |
| dewey-sort |
3610 |
| id |
ELV03413574X |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV03413574X</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230625195954.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">180603s2014 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.jelekin.2014.04.010</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">GBVA2014017000028.pica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV03413574X</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S1050-6411(14)00074-1</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">610</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">610</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">610</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">44.40</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Larivière, Christian</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Controlling for out-of-plane lumbar moments during unidirectional trunk efforts: Learning and reliability issues related to trunk muscle activation estimates</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2014transfer abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">To assess the electromyographic (EMG) activation of trunk muscle during exertions performed in one primary plane (sagittal, frontal, transverse), we previously proposed a protocol allowing minimizing out-of-plane efforts (coupled moments – CMs) with the use of a static dynamometer combined with a visual feedback system. The aims of this study were to go further by testing motor learning and reliability issues related to such a protocol. Three identical sessions were conducted, where maximal voluntary contractions and submaximal ramp contractions were performed in six different directions while standing in the dynamometer. Two feedback conditions were tested, the simple 1D-feedback in the primary plane and the full 3D-feedback in all planes simultaneously. Surface EMG signals were collected from back and abdominal muscles and EMG amplitude and CMs were computed during the ramp contractions. Providing a 3D feedback to minimize CMs did not improve EMG reliability or in other words, did not reduce the within-subject variability. Providing three assessment days had practically no effect (no learning) on CMs and EMG variables. Overall, the reliability of EMG was at best moderate. However, although this limits its use on an individual basis, it still allows within- and between-group comparisons for research applications.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">To assess the electromyographic (EMG) activation of trunk muscle during exertions performed in one primary plane (sagittal, frontal, transverse), we previously proposed a protocol allowing minimizing out-of-plane efforts (coupled moments – CMs) with the use of a static dynamometer combined with a visual feedback system. The aims of this study were to go further by testing motor learning and reliability issues related to such a protocol. Three identical sessions were conducted, where maximal voluntary contractions and submaximal ramp contractions were performed in six different directions while standing in the dynamometer. Two feedback conditions were tested, the simple 1D-feedback in the primary plane and the full 3D-feedback in all planes simultaneously. Surface EMG signals were collected from back and abdominal muscles and EMG amplitude and CMs were computed during the ramp contractions. Providing a 3D feedback to minimize CMs did not improve EMG reliability or in other words, did not reduce the within-subject variability. Providing three assessment days had practically no effect (no learning) on CMs and EMG variables. Overall, the reliability of EMG was at best moderate. However, although this limits its use on an individual basis, it still allows within- and between-group comparisons for research applications.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Trunk muscle coordination</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Feedback</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Variability</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Dynamometry</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Electromyography</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Gagnon, Denis</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Genest, Karine</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="n">Elsevier Science</subfield><subfield code="a">Fathi, Mohadeseh ELSEVIER</subfield><subfield code="t">Emerging roles of miRNAs in the development of pancreatic cancer</subfield><subfield code="d">2021</subfield><subfield code="d">official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiology and Kinesiology</subfield><subfield code="g">Amsterdam [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)ELV006547923</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:24</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2014</subfield><subfield code="g">number:4</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:531-541</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelekin.2014.04.010</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OPC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">44.40</subfield><subfield code="j">Pharmazie</subfield><subfield code="j">Pharmazeutika</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">24</subfield><subfield code="j">2014</subfield><subfield code="e">4</subfield><subfield code="h">531-541</subfield><subfield code="g">11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="953" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="2">045F</subfield><subfield code="a">610</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Larivière, Christian |
| spellingShingle |
Larivière, Christian ddc 610 bkl 44.40 Elsevier Trunk muscle coordination Elsevier Feedback Elsevier Variability Elsevier Dynamometry Elsevier Electromyography Controlling for out-of-plane lumbar moments during unidirectional trunk efforts: Learning and reliability issues related to trunk muscle activation estimates |
| authorStr |
Larivière, Christian |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)ELV006547923 |
| format |
electronic Article |
| dewey-ones |
610 - Medicine & health |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut |
| collection |
elsevier |
| remote_str |
true |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| topic_title |
610 610 DE-600 610 VZ 44.40 bkl Controlling for out-of-plane lumbar moments during unidirectional trunk efforts: Learning and reliability issues related to trunk muscle activation estimates Trunk muscle coordination Elsevier Feedback Elsevier Variability Elsevier Dynamometry Elsevier Electromyography Elsevier |
| topic |
ddc 610 bkl 44.40 Elsevier Trunk muscle coordination Elsevier Feedback Elsevier Variability Elsevier Dynamometry Elsevier Electromyography |
| topic_unstemmed |
ddc 610 bkl 44.40 Elsevier Trunk muscle coordination Elsevier Feedback Elsevier Variability Elsevier Dynamometry Elsevier Electromyography |
| topic_browse |
ddc 610 bkl 44.40 Elsevier Trunk muscle coordination Elsevier Feedback Elsevier Variability Elsevier Dynamometry Elsevier Electromyography |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
zu |
| author2_variant |
d g dg k g kg |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Emerging roles of miRNAs in the development of pancreatic cancer |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
ELV006547923 |
| dewey-tens |
610 - Medicine & health |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Emerging roles of miRNAs in the development of pancreatic cancer |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)ELV006547923 |
| title |
Controlling for out-of-plane lumbar moments during unidirectional trunk efforts: Learning and reliability issues related to trunk muscle activation estimates |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)ELV03413574X (ELSEVIER)S1050-6411(14)00074-1 |
| title_full |
Controlling for out-of-plane lumbar moments during unidirectional trunk efforts: Learning and reliability issues related to trunk muscle activation estimates |
| author_sort |
Larivière, Christian |
| journal |
Emerging roles of miRNAs in the development of pancreatic cancer |
| journalStr |
Emerging roles of miRNAs in the development of pancreatic cancer |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| dewey-hundreds |
600 - Technology |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2014 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
zzz |
| container_start_page |
531 |
| author_browse |
Larivière, Christian |
| container_volume |
24 |
| physical |
11 |
| class |
610 610 DE-600 610 VZ 44.40 bkl |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Larivière, Christian |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1016/j.jelekin.2014.04.010 |
| dewey-full |
610 |
| title_sort |
controlling for out-of-plane lumbar moments during unidirectional trunk efforts: learning and reliability issues related to trunk muscle activation estimates |
| title_auth |
Controlling for out-of-plane lumbar moments during unidirectional trunk efforts: Learning and reliability issues related to trunk muscle activation estimates |
| abstract |
To assess the electromyographic (EMG) activation of trunk muscle during exertions performed in one primary plane (sagittal, frontal, transverse), we previously proposed a protocol allowing minimizing out-of-plane efforts (coupled moments – CMs) with the use of a static dynamometer combined with a visual feedback system. The aims of this study were to go further by testing motor learning and reliability issues related to such a protocol. Three identical sessions were conducted, where maximal voluntary contractions and submaximal ramp contractions were performed in six different directions while standing in the dynamometer. Two feedback conditions were tested, the simple 1D-feedback in the primary plane and the full 3D-feedback in all planes simultaneously. Surface EMG signals were collected from back and abdominal muscles and EMG amplitude and CMs were computed during the ramp contractions. Providing a 3D feedback to minimize CMs did not improve EMG reliability or in other words, did not reduce the within-subject variability. Providing three assessment days had practically no effect (no learning) on CMs and EMG variables. Overall, the reliability of EMG was at best moderate. However, although this limits its use on an individual basis, it still allows within- and between-group comparisons for research applications. |
| abstractGer |
To assess the electromyographic (EMG) activation of trunk muscle during exertions performed in one primary plane (sagittal, frontal, transverse), we previously proposed a protocol allowing minimizing out-of-plane efforts (coupled moments – CMs) with the use of a static dynamometer combined with a visual feedback system. The aims of this study were to go further by testing motor learning and reliability issues related to such a protocol. Three identical sessions were conducted, where maximal voluntary contractions and submaximal ramp contractions were performed in six different directions while standing in the dynamometer. Two feedback conditions were tested, the simple 1D-feedback in the primary plane and the full 3D-feedback in all planes simultaneously. Surface EMG signals were collected from back and abdominal muscles and EMG amplitude and CMs were computed during the ramp contractions. Providing a 3D feedback to minimize CMs did not improve EMG reliability or in other words, did not reduce the within-subject variability. Providing three assessment days had practically no effect (no learning) on CMs and EMG variables. Overall, the reliability of EMG was at best moderate. However, although this limits its use on an individual basis, it still allows within- and between-group comparisons for research applications. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
To assess the electromyographic (EMG) activation of trunk muscle during exertions performed in one primary plane (sagittal, frontal, transverse), we previously proposed a protocol allowing minimizing out-of-plane efforts (coupled moments – CMs) with the use of a static dynamometer combined with a visual feedback system. The aims of this study were to go further by testing motor learning and reliability issues related to such a protocol. Three identical sessions were conducted, where maximal voluntary contractions and submaximal ramp contractions were performed in six different directions while standing in the dynamometer. Two feedback conditions were tested, the simple 1D-feedback in the primary plane and the full 3D-feedback in all planes simultaneously. Surface EMG signals were collected from back and abdominal muscles and EMG amplitude and CMs were computed during the ramp contractions. Providing a 3D feedback to minimize CMs did not improve EMG reliability or in other words, did not reduce the within-subject variability. Providing three assessment days had practically no effect (no learning) on CMs and EMG variables. Overall, the reliability of EMG was at best moderate. However, although this limits its use on an individual basis, it still allows within- and between-group comparisons for research applications. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA SSG-OPC-PHA |
| container_issue |
4 |
| title_short |
Controlling for out-of-plane lumbar moments during unidirectional trunk efforts: Learning and reliability issues related to trunk muscle activation estimates |
| url |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelekin.2014.04.010 |
| remote_bool |
true |
| author2 |
Gagnon, Denis Genest, Karine |
| author2Str |
Gagnon, Denis Genest, Karine |
| ppnlink |
ELV006547923 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
z |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| author2_role |
oth oth |
| doi_str |
10.1016/j.jelekin.2014.04.010 |
| up_date |
2024-07-06T20:21:47.254Z |
| _version_ |
1803862469253267456 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV03413574X</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230625195954.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">180603s2014 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.jelekin.2014.04.010</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">GBVA2014017000028.pica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV03413574X</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S1050-6411(14)00074-1</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">610</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">610</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">610</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">44.40</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Larivière, Christian</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Controlling for out-of-plane lumbar moments during unidirectional trunk efforts: Learning and reliability issues related to trunk muscle activation estimates</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2014transfer abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">To assess the electromyographic (EMG) activation of trunk muscle during exertions performed in one primary plane (sagittal, frontal, transverse), we previously proposed a protocol allowing minimizing out-of-plane efforts (coupled moments – CMs) with the use of a static dynamometer combined with a visual feedback system. The aims of this study were to go further by testing motor learning and reliability issues related to such a protocol. Three identical sessions were conducted, where maximal voluntary contractions and submaximal ramp contractions were performed in six different directions while standing in the dynamometer. Two feedback conditions were tested, the simple 1D-feedback in the primary plane and the full 3D-feedback in all planes simultaneously. Surface EMG signals were collected from back and abdominal muscles and EMG amplitude and CMs were computed during the ramp contractions. Providing a 3D feedback to minimize CMs did not improve EMG reliability or in other words, did not reduce the within-subject variability. Providing three assessment days had practically no effect (no learning) on CMs and EMG variables. Overall, the reliability of EMG was at best moderate. However, although this limits its use on an individual basis, it still allows within- and between-group comparisons for research applications.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">To assess the electromyographic (EMG) activation of trunk muscle during exertions performed in one primary plane (sagittal, frontal, transverse), we previously proposed a protocol allowing minimizing out-of-plane efforts (coupled moments – CMs) with the use of a static dynamometer combined with a visual feedback system. The aims of this study were to go further by testing motor learning and reliability issues related to such a protocol. Three identical sessions were conducted, where maximal voluntary contractions and submaximal ramp contractions were performed in six different directions while standing in the dynamometer. Two feedback conditions were tested, the simple 1D-feedback in the primary plane and the full 3D-feedback in all planes simultaneously. Surface EMG signals were collected from back and abdominal muscles and EMG amplitude and CMs were computed during the ramp contractions. Providing a 3D feedback to minimize CMs did not improve EMG reliability or in other words, did not reduce the within-subject variability. Providing three assessment days had practically no effect (no learning) on CMs and EMG variables. Overall, the reliability of EMG was at best moderate. However, although this limits its use on an individual basis, it still allows within- and between-group comparisons for research applications.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Trunk muscle coordination</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Feedback</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Variability</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Dynamometry</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Electromyography</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Gagnon, Denis</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Genest, Karine</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="n">Elsevier Science</subfield><subfield code="a">Fathi, Mohadeseh ELSEVIER</subfield><subfield code="t">Emerging roles of miRNAs in the development of pancreatic cancer</subfield><subfield code="d">2021</subfield><subfield code="d">official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiology and Kinesiology</subfield><subfield code="g">Amsterdam [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)ELV006547923</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:24</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2014</subfield><subfield code="g">number:4</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:531-541</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelekin.2014.04.010</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OPC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">44.40</subfield><subfield code="j">Pharmazie</subfield><subfield code="j">Pharmazeutika</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">24</subfield><subfield code="j">2014</subfield><subfield code="e">4</subfield><subfield code="h">531-541</subfield><subfield code="g">11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="953" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="2">045F</subfield><subfield code="a">610</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.4002647 |