Wind power externalities: A meta-analysis
This study presents the first quantitative meta-analysis of the non-market valuation literature on the external effects associated with wind power production. A data set of 60 observations drawn from 32 studies is constructed. The relative economic values of different types of externalities as well...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Mattmann, Matteo [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2016transfer abstract |
|---|
| Umfang: |
14 |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: The impact of electrified transport on local grid infrastructure: A comparison between electric cars and light rail - 2012transfer abstract, Amsterdam [u.a.] |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:127 ; year:2016 ; pages:23-36 ; extent:14 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.04.005 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
ELV035398604 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ELV035398604 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230625204116.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 180603s2016 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.04.005 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a GBVA2016015000009.pica |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)ELV035398604 | ||
| 035 | |a (ELSEVIER)S0921-8009(15)30476-6 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 082 | 0 | |a 330 |a 570 | |
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 330 |q DE-600 |
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 570 |q DE-600 |
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 620 |q VZ |
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 610 |q VZ |
| 084 | |a 77.50 |2 bkl | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Mattmann, Matteo |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Wind power externalities: A meta-analysis |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2016transfer abstract | |
| 300 | |a 14 | ||
| 336 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zzz |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b z |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zu |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a This study presents the first quantitative meta-analysis of the non-market valuation literature on the external effects associated with wind power production. A data set of 60 observations drawn from 32 studies is constructed. The relative economic values of different types of externalities as well as the impact of various methodological and sample characteristics on welfare estimates are examined. The results indicate a significant effect of visual externalities on welfare estimates in both directions, i.e., a positive effect of visual improvements and a negative effect of deteriorations. This finding corresponds to predictions of the importance of visual impacts in the social science literature. External effects of wind power on biodiversity (mainly birds) do not affect welfare estimates. Indirect externalities caused by conventional sources of electricity that can be avoided by wind power, such as a the reduction of air pollution, do neither have a significant impact on welfare measures. Methodologically, we find substantial but inelastic income effects and, for choice experiments, clear evidence of sensitivity to scope. From a policy point of view, our results suggest that a policy mix combining a promotion of wind turbines with another green policy facilitates expansion of wind energy. | ||
| 520 | |a This study presents the first quantitative meta-analysis of the non-market valuation literature on the external effects associated with wind power production. A data set of 60 observations drawn from 32 studies is constructed. The relative economic values of different types of externalities as well as the impact of various methodological and sample characteristics on welfare estimates are examined. The results indicate a significant effect of visual externalities on welfare estimates in both directions, i.e., a positive effect of visual improvements and a negative effect of deteriorations. This finding corresponds to predictions of the importance of visual impacts in the social science literature. External effects of wind power on biodiversity (mainly birds) do not affect welfare estimates. Indirect externalities caused by conventional sources of electricity that can be avoided by wind power, such as a the reduction of air pollution, do neither have a significant impact on welfare measures. Methodologically, we find substantial but inelastic income effects and, for choice experiments, clear evidence of sensitivity to scope. From a policy point of view, our results suggest that a policy mix combining a promotion of wind turbines with another green policy facilitates expansion of wind energy. | ||
| 700 | 1 | |a Logar, Ivana |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Brouwer, Roy |4 oth | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |n Elsevier Science |t The impact of electrified transport on local grid infrastructure: A comparison between electric cars and light rail |d 2012transfer abstract |g Amsterdam [u.a.] |w (DE-627)ELV016225309 |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:127 |g year:2016 |g pages:23-36 |g extent:14 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.04.005 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_U | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ELV | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_U | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-PHA | ||
| 936 | b | k | |a 77.50 |j Psychophysiologie |q VZ |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 127 |j 2016 |h 23-36 |g 14 | ||
| 953 | |2 045F |a 330 | ||
| author_variant |
m m mm |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
mattmannmatteologarivanabrouwerroy:2016----:idoeetraiism |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2016transfer abstract |
| bklnumber |
77.50 |
| publishDate |
2016 |
| allfields |
10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.04.005 doi GBVA2016015000009.pica (DE-627)ELV035398604 (ELSEVIER)S0921-8009(15)30476-6 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 330 570 330 DE-600 570 DE-600 620 VZ 610 VZ 77.50 bkl Mattmann, Matteo verfasserin aut Wind power externalities: A meta-analysis 2016transfer abstract 14 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier This study presents the first quantitative meta-analysis of the non-market valuation literature on the external effects associated with wind power production. A data set of 60 observations drawn from 32 studies is constructed. The relative economic values of different types of externalities as well as the impact of various methodological and sample characteristics on welfare estimates are examined. The results indicate a significant effect of visual externalities on welfare estimates in both directions, i.e., a positive effect of visual improvements and a negative effect of deteriorations. This finding corresponds to predictions of the importance of visual impacts in the social science literature. External effects of wind power on biodiversity (mainly birds) do not affect welfare estimates. Indirect externalities caused by conventional sources of electricity that can be avoided by wind power, such as a the reduction of air pollution, do neither have a significant impact on welfare measures. Methodologically, we find substantial but inelastic income effects and, for choice experiments, clear evidence of sensitivity to scope. From a policy point of view, our results suggest that a policy mix combining a promotion of wind turbines with another green policy facilitates expansion of wind energy. This study presents the first quantitative meta-analysis of the non-market valuation literature on the external effects associated with wind power production. A data set of 60 observations drawn from 32 studies is constructed. The relative economic values of different types of externalities as well as the impact of various methodological and sample characteristics on welfare estimates are examined. The results indicate a significant effect of visual externalities on welfare estimates in both directions, i.e., a positive effect of visual improvements and a negative effect of deteriorations. This finding corresponds to predictions of the importance of visual impacts in the social science literature. External effects of wind power on biodiversity (mainly birds) do not affect welfare estimates. Indirect externalities caused by conventional sources of electricity that can be avoided by wind power, such as a the reduction of air pollution, do neither have a significant impact on welfare measures. Methodologically, we find substantial but inelastic income effects and, for choice experiments, clear evidence of sensitivity to scope. From a policy point of view, our results suggest that a policy mix combining a promotion of wind turbines with another green policy facilitates expansion of wind energy. Logar, Ivana oth Brouwer, Roy oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science The impact of electrified transport on local grid infrastructure: A comparison between electric cars and light rail 2012transfer abstract Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV016225309 volume:127 year:2016 pages:23-36 extent:14 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.04.005 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA 77.50 Psychophysiologie VZ AR 127 2016 23-36 14 045F 330 |
| spelling |
10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.04.005 doi GBVA2016015000009.pica (DE-627)ELV035398604 (ELSEVIER)S0921-8009(15)30476-6 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 330 570 330 DE-600 570 DE-600 620 VZ 610 VZ 77.50 bkl Mattmann, Matteo verfasserin aut Wind power externalities: A meta-analysis 2016transfer abstract 14 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier This study presents the first quantitative meta-analysis of the non-market valuation literature on the external effects associated with wind power production. A data set of 60 observations drawn from 32 studies is constructed. The relative economic values of different types of externalities as well as the impact of various methodological and sample characteristics on welfare estimates are examined. The results indicate a significant effect of visual externalities on welfare estimates in both directions, i.e., a positive effect of visual improvements and a negative effect of deteriorations. This finding corresponds to predictions of the importance of visual impacts in the social science literature. External effects of wind power on biodiversity (mainly birds) do not affect welfare estimates. Indirect externalities caused by conventional sources of electricity that can be avoided by wind power, such as a the reduction of air pollution, do neither have a significant impact on welfare measures. Methodologically, we find substantial but inelastic income effects and, for choice experiments, clear evidence of sensitivity to scope. From a policy point of view, our results suggest that a policy mix combining a promotion of wind turbines with another green policy facilitates expansion of wind energy. This study presents the first quantitative meta-analysis of the non-market valuation literature on the external effects associated with wind power production. A data set of 60 observations drawn from 32 studies is constructed. The relative economic values of different types of externalities as well as the impact of various methodological and sample characteristics on welfare estimates are examined. The results indicate a significant effect of visual externalities on welfare estimates in both directions, i.e., a positive effect of visual improvements and a negative effect of deteriorations. This finding corresponds to predictions of the importance of visual impacts in the social science literature. External effects of wind power on biodiversity (mainly birds) do not affect welfare estimates. Indirect externalities caused by conventional sources of electricity that can be avoided by wind power, such as a the reduction of air pollution, do neither have a significant impact on welfare measures. Methodologically, we find substantial but inelastic income effects and, for choice experiments, clear evidence of sensitivity to scope. From a policy point of view, our results suggest that a policy mix combining a promotion of wind turbines with another green policy facilitates expansion of wind energy. Logar, Ivana oth Brouwer, Roy oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science The impact of electrified transport on local grid infrastructure: A comparison between electric cars and light rail 2012transfer abstract Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV016225309 volume:127 year:2016 pages:23-36 extent:14 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.04.005 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA 77.50 Psychophysiologie VZ AR 127 2016 23-36 14 045F 330 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.04.005 doi GBVA2016015000009.pica (DE-627)ELV035398604 (ELSEVIER)S0921-8009(15)30476-6 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 330 570 330 DE-600 570 DE-600 620 VZ 610 VZ 77.50 bkl Mattmann, Matteo verfasserin aut Wind power externalities: A meta-analysis 2016transfer abstract 14 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier This study presents the first quantitative meta-analysis of the non-market valuation literature on the external effects associated with wind power production. A data set of 60 observations drawn from 32 studies is constructed. The relative economic values of different types of externalities as well as the impact of various methodological and sample characteristics on welfare estimates are examined. The results indicate a significant effect of visual externalities on welfare estimates in both directions, i.e., a positive effect of visual improvements and a negative effect of deteriorations. This finding corresponds to predictions of the importance of visual impacts in the social science literature. External effects of wind power on biodiversity (mainly birds) do not affect welfare estimates. Indirect externalities caused by conventional sources of electricity that can be avoided by wind power, such as a the reduction of air pollution, do neither have a significant impact on welfare measures. Methodologically, we find substantial but inelastic income effects and, for choice experiments, clear evidence of sensitivity to scope. From a policy point of view, our results suggest that a policy mix combining a promotion of wind turbines with another green policy facilitates expansion of wind energy. This study presents the first quantitative meta-analysis of the non-market valuation literature on the external effects associated with wind power production. A data set of 60 observations drawn from 32 studies is constructed. The relative economic values of different types of externalities as well as the impact of various methodological and sample characteristics on welfare estimates are examined. The results indicate a significant effect of visual externalities on welfare estimates in both directions, i.e., a positive effect of visual improvements and a negative effect of deteriorations. This finding corresponds to predictions of the importance of visual impacts in the social science literature. External effects of wind power on biodiversity (mainly birds) do not affect welfare estimates. Indirect externalities caused by conventional sources of electricity that can be avoided by wind power, such as a the reduction of air pollution, do neither have a significant impact on welfare measures. Methodologically, we find substantial but inelastic income effects and, for choice experiments, clear evidence of sensitivity to scope. From a policy point of view, our results suggest that a policy mix combining a promotion of wind turbines with another green policy facilitates expansion of wind energy. Logar, Ivana oth Brouwer, Roy oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science The impact of electrified transport on local grid infrastructure: A comparison between electric cars and light rail 2012transfer abstract Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV016225309 volume:127 year:2016 pages:23-36 extent:14 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.04.005 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA 77.50 Psychophysiologie VZ AR 127 2016 23-36 14 045F 330 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.04.005 doi GBVA2016015000009.pica (DE-627)ELV035398604 (ELSEVIER)S0921-8009(15)30476-6 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 330 570 330 DE-600 570 DE-600 620 VZ 610 VZ 77.50 bkl Mattmann, Matteo verfasserin aut Wind power externalities: A meta-analysis 2016transfer abstract 14 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier This study presents the first quantitative meta-analysis of the non-market valuation literature on the external effects associated with wind power production. A data set of 60 observations drawn from 32 studies is constructed. The relative economic values of different types of externalities as well as the impact of various methodological and sample characteristics on welfare estimates are examined. The results indicate a significant effect of visual externalities on welfare estimates in both directions, i.e., a positive effect of visual improvements and a negative effect of deteriorations. This finding corresponds to predictions of the importance of visual impacts in the social science literature. External effects of wind power on biodiversity (mainly birds) do not affect welfare estimates. Indirect externalities caused by conventional sources of electricity that can be avoided by wind power, such as a the reduction of air pollution, do neither have a significant impact on welfare measures. Methodologically, we find substantial but inelastic income effects and, for choice experiments, clear evidence of sensitivity to scope. From a policy point of view, our results suggest that a policy mix combining a promotion of wind turbines with another green policy facilitates expansion of wind energy. This study presents the first quantitative meta-analysis of the non-market valuation literature on the external effects associated with wind power production. A data set of 60 observations drawn from 32 studies is constructed. The relative economic values of different types of externalities as well as the impact of various methodological and sample characteristics on welfare estimates are examined. The results indicate a significant effect of visual externalities on welfare estimates in both directions, i.e., a positive effect of visual improvements and a negative effect of deteriorations. This finding corresponds to predictions of the importance of visual impacts in the social science literature. External effects of wind power on biodiversity (mainly birds) do not affect welfare estimates. Indirect externalities caused by conventional sources of electricity that can be avoided by wind power, such as a the reduction of air pollution, do neither have a significant impact on welfare measures. Methodologically, we find substantial but inelastic income effects and, for choice experiments, clear evidence of sensitivity to scope. From a policy point of view, our results suggest that a policy mix combining a promotion of wind turbines with another green policy facilitates expansion of wind energy. Logar, Ivana oth Brouwer, Roy oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science The impact of electrified transport on local grid infrastructure: A comparison between electric cars and light rail 2012transfer abstract Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV016225309 volume:127 year:2016 pages:23-36 extent:14 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.04.005 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA 77.50 Psychophysiologie VZ AR 127 2016 23-36 14 045F 330 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.04.005 doi GBVA2016015000009.pica (DE-627)ELV035398604 (ELSEVIER)S0921-8009(15)30476-6 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 330 570 330 DE-600 570 DE-600 620 VZ 610 VZ 77.50 bkl Mattmann, Matteo verfasserin aut Wind power externalities: A meta-analysis 2016transfer abstract 14 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier This study presents the first quantitative meta-analysis of the non-market valuation literature on the external effects associated with wind power production. A data set of 60 observations drawn from 32 studies is constructed. The relative economic values of different types of externalities as well as the impact of various methodological and sample characteristics on welfare estimates are examined. The results indicate a significant effect of visual externalities on welfare estimates in both directions, i.e., a positive effect of visual improvements and a negative effect of deteriorations. This finding corresponds to predictions of the importance of visual impacts in the social science literature. External effects of wind power on biodiversity (mainly birds) do not affect welfare estimates. Indirect externalities caused by conventional sources of electricity that can be avoided by wind power, such as a the reduction of air pollution, do neither have a significant impact on welfare measures. Methodologically, we find substantial but inelastic income effects and, for choice experiments, clear evidence of sensitivity to scope. From a policy point of view, our results suggest that a policy mix combining a promotion of wind turbines with another green policy facilitates expansion of wind energy. This study presents the first quantitative meta-analysis of the non-market valuation literature on the external effects associated with wind power production. A data set of 60 observations drawn from 32 studies is constructed. The relative economic values of different types of externalities as well as the impact of various methodological and sample characteristics on welfare estimates are examined. The results indicate a significant effect of visual externalities on welfare estimates in both directions, i.e., a positive effect of visual improvements and a negative effect of deteriorations. This finding corresponds to predictions of the importance of visual impacts in the social science literature. External effects of wind power on biodiversity (mainly birds) do not affect welfare estimates. Indirect externalities caused by conventional sources of electricity that can be avoided by wind power, such as a the reduction of air pollution, do neither have a significant impact on welfare measures. Methodologically, we find substantial but inelastic income effects and, for choice experiments, clear evidence of sensitivity to scope. From a policy point of view, our results suggest that a policy mix combining a promotion of wind turbines with another green policy facilitates expansion of wind energy. Logar, Ivana oth Brouwer, Roy oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science The impact of electrified transport on local grid infrastructure: A comparison between electric cars and light rail 2012transfer abstract Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV016225309 volume:127 year:2016 pages:23-36 extent:14 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.04.005 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA 77.50 Psychophysiologie VZ AR 127 2016 23-36 14 045F 330 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in The impact of electrified transport on local grid infrastructure: A comparison between electric cars and light rail Amsterdam [u.a.] volume:127 year:2016 pages:23-36 extent:14 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in The impact of electrified transport on local grid infrastructure: A comparison between electric cars and light rail Amsterdam [u.a.] volume:127 year:2016 pages:23-36 extent:14 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| bklname |
Psychophysiologie |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| dewey-raw |
330 |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
The impact of electrified transport on local grid infrastructure: A comparison between electric cars and light rail |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Mattmann, Matteo @@aut@@ Logar, Ivana @@oth@@ Brouwer, Roy @@oth@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2016-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
ELV016225309 |
| dewey-sort |
3330 |
| id |
ELV035398604 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV035398604</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230625204116.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">180603s2016 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.04.005</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">GBVA2016015000009.pica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV035398604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0921-8009(15)30476-6</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">330</subfield><subfield code="a">570</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">330</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">570</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">620</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">610</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">77.50</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Mattmann, Matteo</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Wind power externalities: A meta-analysis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2016transfer abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">14</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">This study presents the first quantitative meta-analysis of the non-market valuation literature on the external effects associated with wind power production. A data set of 60 observations drawn from 32 studies is constructed. The relative economic values of different types of externalities as well as the impact of various methodological and sample characteristics on welfare estimates are examined. The results indicate a significant effect of visual externalities on welfare estimates in both directions, i.e., a positive effect of visual improvements and a negative effect of deteriorations. This finding corresponds to predictions of the importance of visual impacts in the social science literature. External effects of wind power on biodiversity (mainly birds) do not affect welfare estimates. Indirect externalities caused by conventional sources of electricity that can be avoided by wind power, such as a the reduction of air pollution, do neither have a significant impact on welfare measures. Methodologically, we find substantial but inelastic income effects and, for choice experiments, clear evidence of sensitivity to scope. From a policy point of view, our results suggest that a policy mix combining a promotion of wind turbines with another green policy facilitates expansion of wind energy.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">This study presents the first quantitative meta-analysis of the non-market valuation literature on the external effects associated with wind power production. A data set of 60 observations drawn from 32 studies is constructed. The relative economic values of different types of externalities as well as the impact of various methodological and sample characteristics on welfare estimates are examined. The results indicate a significant effect of visual externalities on welfare estimates in both directions, i.e., a positive effect of visual improvements and a negative effect of deteriorations. This finding corresponds to predictions of the importance of visual impacts in the social science literature. External effects of wind power on biodiversity (mainly birds) do not affect welfare estimates. Indirect externalities caused by conventional sources of electricity that can be avoided by wind power, such as a the reduction of air pollution, do neither have a significant impact on welfare measures. Methodologically, we find substantial but inelastic income effects and, for choice experiments, clear evidence of sensitivity to scope. From a policy point of view, our results suggest that a policy mix combining a promotion of wind turbines with another green policy facilitates expansion of wind energy.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Logar, Ivana</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Brouwer, Roy</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="n">Elsevier Science</subfield><subfield code="t">The impact of electrified transport on local grid infrastructure: A comparison between electric cars and light rail</subfield><subfield code="d">2012transfer abstract</subfield><subfield code="g">Amsterdam [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)ELV016225309</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:127</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2016</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:23-36</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:14</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.04.005</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">77.50</subfield><subfield code="j">Psychophysiologie</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">127</subfield><subfield code="j">2016</subfield><subfield code="h">23-36</subfield><subfield code="g">14</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="953" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="2">045F</subfield><subfield code="a">330</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Mattmann, Matteo |
| spellingShingle |
Mattmann, Matteo ddc 330 ddc 570 ddc 620 ddc 610 bkl 77.50 Wind power externalities: A meta-analysis |
| authorStr |
Mattmann, Matteo |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)ELV016225309 |
| format |
electronic Article |
| dewey-ones |
330 - Economics 570 - Life sciences; biology 620 - Engineering & allied operations 610 - Medicine & health |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut |
| collection |
elsevier |
| remote_str |
true |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| topic_title |
330 570 330 DE-600 570 DE-600 620 VZ 610 VZ 77.50 bkl Wind power externalities: A meta-analysis |
| topic |
ddc 330 ddc 570 ddc 620 ddc 610 bkl 77.50 |
| topic_unstemmed |
ddc 330 ddc 570 ddc 620 ddc 610 bkl 77.50 |
| topic_browse |
ddc 330 ddc 570 ddc 620 ddc 610 bkl 77.50 |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
zu |
| author2_variant |
i l il r b rb |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
The impact of electrified transport on local grid infrastructure: A comparison between electric cars and light rail |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
ELV016225309 |
| dewey-tens |
330 - Economics 570 - Life sciences; biology 620 - Engineering 610 - Medicine & health |
| hierarchy_top_title |
The impact of electrified transport on local grid infrastructure: A comparison between electric cars and light rail |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)ELV016225309 |
| title |
Wind power externalities: A meta-analysis |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)ELV035398604 (ELSEVIER)S0921-8009(15)30476-6 |
| title_full |
Wind power externalities: A meta-analysis |
| author_sort |
Mattmann, Matteo |
| journal |
The impact of electrified transport on local grid infrastructure: A comparison between electric cars and light rail |
| journalStr |
The impact of electrified transport on local grid infrastructure: A comparison between electric cars and light rail |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| dewey-hundreds |
300 - Social sciences 500 - Science 600 - Technology |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2016 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
zzz |
| container_start_page |
23 |
| author_browse |
Mattmann, Matteo |
| container_volume |
127 |
| physical |
14 |
| class |
330 570 330 DE-600 570 DE-600 620 VZ 610 VZ 77.50 bkl |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Mattmann, Matteo |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.04.005 |
| dewey-full |
330 570 620 610 |
| title_sort |
wind power externalities: a meta-analysis |
| title_auth |
Wind power externalities: A meta-analysis |
| abstract |
This study presents the first quantitative meta-analysis of the non-market valuation literature on the external effects associated with wind power production. A data set of 60 observations drawn from 32 studies is constructed. The relative economic values of different types of externalities as well as the impact of various methodological and sample characteristics on welfare estimates are examined. The results indicate a significant effect of visual externalities on welfare estimates in both directions, i.e., a positive effect of visual improvements and a negative effect of deteriorations. This finding corresponds to predictions of the importance of visual impacts in the social science literature. External effects of wind power on biodiversity (mainly birds) do not affect welfare estimates. Indirect externalities caused by conventional sources of electricity that can be avoided by wind power, such as a the reduction of air pollution, do neither have a significant impact on welfare measures. Methodologically, we find substantial but inelastic income effects and, for choice experiments, clear evidence of sensitivity to scope. From a policy point of view, our results suggest that a policy mix combining a promotion of wind turbines with another green policy facilitates expansion of wind energy. |
| abstractGer |
This study presents the first quantitative meta-analysis of the non-market valuation literature on the external effects associated with wind power production. A data set of 60 observations drawn from 32 studies is constructed. The relative economic values of different types of externalities as well as the impact of various methodological and sample characteristics on welfare estimates are examined. The results indicate a significant effect of visual externalities on welfare estimates in both directions, i.e., a positive effect of visual improvements and a negative effect of deteriorations. This finding corresponds to predictions of the importance of visual impacts in the social science literature. External effects of wind power on biodiversity (mainly birds) do not affect welfare estimates. Indirect externalities caused by conventional sources of electricity that can be avoided by wind power, such as a the reduction of air pollution, do neither have a significant impact on welfare measures. Methodologically, we find substantial but inelastic income effects and, for choice experiments, clear evidence of sensitivity to scope. From a policy point of view, our results suggest that a policy mix combining a promotion of wind turbines with another green policy facilitates expansion of wind energy. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
This study presents the first quantitative meta-analysis of the non-market valuation literature on the external effects associated with wind power production. A data set of 60 observations drawn from 32 studies is constructed. The relative economic values of different types of externalities as well as the impact of various methodological and sample characteristics on welfare estimates are examined. The results indicate a significant effect of visual externalities on welfare estimates in both directions, i.e., a positive effect of visual improvements and a negative effect of deteriorations. This finding corresponds to predictions of the importance of visual impacts in the social science literature. External effects of wind power on biodiversity (mainly birds) do not affect welfare estimates. Indirect externalities caused by conventional sources of electricity that can be avoided by wind power, such as a the reduction of air pollution, do neither have a significant impact on welfare measures. Methodologically, we find substantial but inelastic income effects and, for choice experiments, clear evidence of sensitivity to scope. From a policy point of view, our results suggest that a policy mix combining a promotion of wind turbines with another green policy facilitates expansion of wind energy. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA |
| title_short |
Wind power externalities: A meta-analysis |
| url |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.04.005 |
| remote_bool |
true |
| author2 |
Logar, Ivana Brouwer, Roy |
| author2Str |
Logar, Ivana Brouwer, Roy |
| ppnlink |
ELV016225309 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
z |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| author2_role |
oth oth |
| doi_str |
10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.04.005 |
| up_date |
2024-07-06T17:27:20.842Z |
| _version_ |
1803851494424838144 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV035398604</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230625204116.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">180603s2016 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.04.005</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">GBVA2016015000009.pica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV035398604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0921-8009(15)30476-6</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">330</subfield><subfield code="a">570</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">330</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">570</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">620</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">610</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">77.50</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Mattmann, Matteo</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Wind power externalities: A meta-analysis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2016transfer abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">14</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">This study presents the first quantitative meta-analysis of the non-market valuation literature on the external effects associated with wind power production. A data set of 60 observations drawn from 32 studies is constructed. The relative economic values of different types of externalities as well as the impact of various methodological and sample characteristics on welfare estimates are examined. The results indicate a significant effect of visual externalities on welfare estimates in both directions, i.e., a positive effect of visual improvements and a negative effect of deteriorations. This finding corresponds to predictions of the importance of visual impacts in the social science literature. External effects of wind power on biodiversity (mainly birds) do not affect welfare estimates. Indirect externalities caused by conventional sources of electricity that can be avoided by wind power, such as a the reduction of air pollution, do neither have a significant impact on welfare measures. Methodologically, we find substantial but inelastic income effects and, for choice experiments, clear evidence of sensitivity to scope. From a policy point of view, our results suggest that a policy mix combining a promotion of wind turbines with another green policy facilitates expansion of wind energy.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">This study presents the first quantitative meta-analysis of the non-market valuation literature on the external effects associated with wind power production. A data set of 60 observations drawn from 32 studies is constructed. The relative economic values of different types of externalities as well as the impact of various methodological and sample characteristics on welfare estimates are examined. The results indicate a significant effect of visual externalities on welfare estimates in both directions, i.e., a positive effect of visual improvements and a negative effect of deteriorations. This finding corresponds to predictions of the importance of visual impacts in the social science literature. External effects of wind power on biodiversity (mainly birds) do not affect welfare estimates. Indirect externalities caused by conventional sources of electricity that can be avoided by wind power, such as a the reduction of air pollution, do neither have a significant impact on welfare measures. Methodologically, we find substantial but inelastic income effects and, for choice experiments, clear evidence of sensitivity to scope. From a policy point of view, our results suggest that a policy mix combining a promotion of wind turbines with another green policy facilitates expansion of wind energy.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Logar, Ivana</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Brouwer, Roy</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="n">Elsevier Science</subfield><subfield code="t">The impact of electrified transport on local grid infrastructure: A comparison between electric cars and light rail</subfield><subfield code="d">2012transfer abstract</subfield><subfield code="g">Amsterdam [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)ELV016225309</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:127</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2016</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:23-36</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:14</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.04.005</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">77.50</subfield><subfield code="j">Psychophysiologie</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">127</subfield><subfield code="j">2016</subfield><subfield code="h">23-36</subfield><subfield code="g">14</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="953" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="2">045F</subfield><subfield code="a">330</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.3996077 |