A proposed framework to systematically design and objectively evaluate non-dominated restoration tradeoffs for watershed planning and management
Human-driven alterations to freshwater ecosystems are leading to a global decline of river function and biodiversity. In our experience, managers want to be given many possible options to restore freshwater ecosystems that are workable within spatial, temporal, operational, and budgetary constraints...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Autor*in: |
Martin, David M. [verfasserIn] |
---|
Format: |
E-Artikel |
---|---|
Sprache: |
Englisch |
Erschienen: |
2016transfer abstract |
---|
Umfang: |
10 |
---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: The impact of electrified transport on local grid infrastructure: A comparison between electric cars and light rail - 2012transfer abstract, Amsterdam [u.a.] |
---|---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:127 ; year:2016 ; pages:146-155 ; extent:10 |
Links: |
---|
DOI / URN: |
10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.04.007 |
---|
Katalog-ID: |
ELV035398612 |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | ELV035398612 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20230625204116.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 180603s2016 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.04.007 |2 doi | |
028 | 5 | 2 | |a GBVA2016015000009.pica |
035 | |a (DE-627)ELV035398612 | ||
035 | |a (ELSEVIER)S0921-8009(15)30494-8 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
082 | 0 | |a 330 |a 570 | |
082 | 0 | 4 | |a 330 |q DE-600 |
082 | 0 | 4 | |a 570 |q DE-600 |
082 | 0 | 4 | |a 620 |q VZ |
082 | 0 | 4 | |a 610 |q VZ |
084 | |a 77.50 |2 bkl | ||
100 | 1 | |a Martin, David M. |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a A proposed framework to systematically design and objectively evaluate non-dominated restoration tradeoffs for watershed planning and management |
264 | 1 | |c 2016transfer abstract | |
300 | |a 10 | ||
336 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zzz |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b z |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zu |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a Human-driven alterations to freshwater ecosystems are leading to a global decline of river function and biodiversity. In our experience, managers want to be given many possible options to restore freshwater ecosystems that are workable within spatial, temporal, operational, and budgetary constraints of the system. Correspondingly, a new field for systematic river restoration planning has emerged through the use of well-established systems design concepts like multi-objective optimization and tradeoff analysis. In this article, we propose a decision framework for systematic river restoration planning where economic-environment systems design and tradeoff analyses are employed as a concurrent planning procedure before restoration interventions are implemented. Heuristic optimization and multi-criteria decision analysis methods are proposed to systematically design and objectively evaluate non-dominated economic-environment tradeoffs associated with restoration strategies within a watershed, and to provide a short-list of viable restoration alternatives to decision makers for negotiation and implementation. The proposed framework has the capacity to make science-based information and sophisticated decision support methods available for stakeholder deliberation. To illustrate the phases of the framework, we use a published case study of systematic restoration planning in South East Queensland, Australia. | ||
520 | |a Human-driven alterations to freshwater ecosystems are leading to a global decline of river function and biodiversity. In our experience, managers want to be given many possible options to restore freshwater ecosystems that are workable within spatial, temporal, operational, and budgetary constraints of the system. Correspondingly, a new field for systematic river restoration planning has emerged through the use of well-established systems design concepts like multi-objective optimization and tradeoff analysis. In this article, we propose a decision framework for systematic river restoration planning where economic-environment systems design and tradeoff analyses are employed as a concurrent planning procedure before restoration interventions are implemented. Heuristic optimization and multi-criteria decision analysis methods are proposed to systematically design and objectively evaluate non-dominated economic-environment tradeoffs associated with restoration strategies within a watershed, and to provide a short-list of viable restoration alternatives to decision makers for negotiation and implementation. The proposed framework has the capacity to make science-based information and sophisticated decision support methods available for stakeholder deliberation. To illustrate the phases of the framework, we use a published case study of systematic restoration planning in South East Queensland, Australia. | ||
700 | 1 | |a Hermoso, Virgilio |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Pantus, Francis |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Olley, Jon |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Linke, Simon |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Poff, N. LeRoy |4 oth | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |n Elsevier Science |t The impact of electrified transport on local grid infrastructure: A comparison between electric cars and light rail |d 2012transfer abstract |g Amsterdam [u.a.] |w (DE-627)ELV016225309 |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:127 |g year:2016 |g pages:146-155 |g extent:10 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.04.007 |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_U | ||
912 | |a GBV_ELV | ||
912 | |a SYSFLAG_U | ||
912 | |a SSG-OLC-PHA | ||
936 | b | k | |a 77.50 |j Psychophysiologie |q VZ |
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 127 |j 2016 |h 146-155 |g 10 | ||
953 | |2 045F |a 330 |
author_variant |
d m m dm dmm |
---|---|
matchkey_str |
martindavidmhermosovirgiliopantusfrancis:2016----:pooefaeokoytmtclyeinnojcieyvlaeodmntdetrtotaef |
hierarchy_sort_str |
2016transfer abstract |
bklnumber |
77.50 |
publishDate |
2016 |
allfields |
10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.04.007 doi GBVA2016015000009.pica (DE-627)ELV035398612 (ELSEVIER)S0921-8009(15)30494-8 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 330 570 330 DE-600 570 DE-600 620 VZ 610 VZ 77.50 bkl Martin, David M. verfasserin aut A proposed framework to systematically design and objectively evaluate non-dominated restoration tradeoffs for watershed planning and management 2016transfer abstract 10 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Human-driven alterations to freshwater ecosystems are leading to a global decline of river function and biodiversity. In our experience, managers want to be given many possible options to restore freshwater ecosystems that are workable within spatial, temporal, operational, and budgetary constraints of the system. Correspondingly, a new field for systematic river restoration planning has emerged through the use of well-established systems design concepts like multi-objective optimization and tradeoff analysis. In this article, we propose a decision framework for systematic river restoration planning where economic-environment systems design and tradeoff analyses are employed as a concurrent planning procedure before restoration interventions are implemented. Heuristic optimization and multi-criteria decision analysis methods are proposed to systematically design and objectively evaluate non-dominated economic-environment tradeoffs associated with restoration strategies within a watershed, and to provide a short-list of viable restoration alternatives to decision makers for negotiation and implementation. The proposed framework has the capacity to make science-based information and sophisticated decision support methods available for stakeholder deliberation. To illustrate the phases of the framework, we use a published case study of systematic restoration planning in South East Queensland, Australia. Human-driven alterations to freshwater ecosystems are leading to a global decline of river function and biodiversity. In our experience, managers want to be given many possible options to restore freshwater ecosystems that are workable within spatial, temporal, operational, and budgetary constraints of the system. Correspondingly, a new field for systematic river restoration planning has emerged through the use of well-established systems design concepts like multi-objective optimization and tradeoff analysis. In this article, we propose a decision framework for systematic river restoration planning where economic-environment systems design and tradeoff analyses are employed as a concurrent planning procedure before restoration interventions are implemented. Heuristic optimization and multi-criteria decision analysis methods are proposed to systematically design and objectively evaluate non-dominated economic-environment tradeoffs associated with restoration strategies within a watershed, and to provide a short-list of viable restoration alternatives to decision makers for negotiation and implementation. The proposed framework has the capacity to make science-based information and sophisticated decision support methods available for stakeholder deliberation. To illustrate the phases of the framework, we use a published case study of systematic restoration planning in South East Queensland, Australia. Hermoso, Virgilio oth Pantus, Francis oth Olley, Jon oth Linke, Simon oth Poff, N. LeRoy oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science The impact of electrified transport on local grid infrastructure: A comparison between electric cars and light rail 2012transfer abstract Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV016225309 volume:127 year:2016 pages:146-155 extent:10 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.04.007 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA 77.50 Psychophysiologie VZ AR 127 2016 146-155 10 045F 330 |
spelling |
10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.04.007 doi GBVA2016015000009.pica (DE-627)ELV035398612 (ELSEVIER)S0921-8009(15)30494-8 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 330 570 330 DE-600 570 DE-600 620 VZ 610 VZ 77.50 bkl Martin, David M. verfasserin aut A proposed framework to systematically design and objectively evaluate non-dominated restoration tradeoffs for watershed planning and management 2016transfer abstract 10 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Human-driven alterations to freshwater ecosystems are leading to a global decline of river function and biodiversity. In our experience, managers want to be given many possible options to restore freshwater ecosystems that are workable within spatial, temporal, operational, and budgetary constraints of the system. Correspondingly, a new field for systematic river restoration planning has emerged through the use of well-established systems design concepts like multi-objective optimization and tradeoff analysis. In this article, we propose a decision framework for systematic river restoration planning where economic-environment systems design and tradeoff analyses are employed as a concurrent planning procedure before restoration interventions are implemented. Heuristic optimization and multi-criteria decision analysis methods are proposed to systematically design and objectively evaluate non-dominated economic-environment tradeoffs associated with restoration strategies within a watershed, and to provide a short-list of viable restoration alternatives to decision makers for negotiation and implementation. The proposed framework has the capacity to make science-based information and sophisticated decision support methods available for stakeholder deliberation. To illustrate the phases of the framework, we use a published case study of systematic restoration planning in South East Queensland, Australia. Human-driven alterations to freshwater ecosystems are leading to a global decline of river function and biodiversity. In our experience, managers want to be given many possible options to restore freshwater ecosystems that are workable within spatial, temporal, operational, and budgetary constraints of the system. Correspondingly, a new field for systematic river restoration planning has emerged through the use of well-established systems design concepts like multi-objective optimization and tradeoff analysis. In this article, we propose a decision framework for systematic river restoration planning where economic-environment systems design and tradeoff analyses are employed as a concurrent planning procedure before restoration interventions are implemented. Heuristic optimization and multi-criteria decision analysis methods are proposed to systematically design and objectively evaluate non-dominated economic-environment tradeoffs associated with restoration strategies within a watershed, and to provide a short-list of viable restoration alternatives to decision makers for negotiation and implementation. The proposed framework has the capacity to make science-based information and sophisticated decision support methods available for stakeholder deliberation. To illustrate the phases of the framework, we use a published case study of systematic restoration planning in South East Queensland, Australia. Hermoso, Virgilio oth Pantus, Francis oth Olley, Jon oth Linke, Simon oth Poff, N. LeRoy oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science The impact of electrified transport on local grid infrastructure: A comparison between electric cars and light rail 2012transfer abstract Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV016225309 volume:127 year:2016 pages:146-155 extent:10 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.04.007 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA 77.50 Psychophysiologie VZ AR 127 2016 146-155 10 045F 330 |
allfields_unstemmed |
10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.04.007 doi GBVA2016015000009.pica (DE-627)ELV035398612 (ELSEVIER)S0921-8009(15)30494-8 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 330 570 330 DE-600 570 DE-600 620 VZ 610 VZ 77.50 bkl Martin, David M. verfasserin aut A proposed framework to systematically design and objectively evaluate non-dominated restoration tradeoffs for watershed planning and management 2016transfer abstract 10 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Human-driven alterations to freshwater ecosystems are leading to a global decline of river function and biodiversity. In our experience, managers want to be given many possible options to restore freshwater ecosystems that are workable within spatial, temporal, operational, and budgetary constraints of the system. Correspondingly, a new field for systematic river restoration planning has emerged through the use of well-established systems design concepts like multi-objective optimization and tradeoff analysis. In this article, we propose a decision framework for systematic river restoration planning where economic-environment systems design and tradeoff analyses are employed as a concurrent planning procedure before restoration interventions are implemented. Heuristic optimization and multi-criteria decision analysis methods are proposed to systematically design and objectively evaluate non-dominated economic-environment tradeoffs associated with restoration strategies within a watershed, and to provide a short-list of viable restoration alternatives to decision makers for negotiation and implementation. The proposed framework has the capacity to make science-based information and sophisticated decision support methods available for stakeholder deliberation. To illustrate the phases of the framework, we use a published case study of systematic restoration planning in South East Queensland, Australia. Human-driven alterations to freshwater ecosystems are leading to a global decline of river function and biodiversity. In our experience, managers want to be given many possible options to restore freshwater ecosystems that are workable within spatial, temporal, operational, and budgetary constraints of the system. Correspondingly, a new field for systematic river restoration planning has emerged through the use of well-established systems design concepts like multi-objective optimization and tradeoff analysis. In this article, we propose a decision framework for systematic river restoration planning where economic-environment systems design and tradeoff analyses are employed as a concurrent planning procedure before restoration interventions are implemented. Heuristic optimization and multi-criteria decision analysis methods are proposed to systematically design and objectively evaluate non-dominated economic-environment tradeoffs associated with restoration strategies within a watershed, and to provide a short-list of viable restoration alternatives to decision makers for negotiation and implementation. The proposed framework has the capacity to make science-based information and sophisticated decision support methods available for stakeholder deliberation. To illustrate the phases of the framework, we use a published case study of systematic restoration planning in South East Queensland, Australia. Hermoso, Virgilio oth Pantus, Francis oth Olley, Jon oth Linke, Simon oth Poff, N. LeRoy oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science The impact of electrified transport on local grid infrastructure: A comparison between electric cars and light rail 2012transfer abstract Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV016225309 volume:127 year:2016 pages:146-155 extent:10 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.04.007 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA 77.50 Psychophysiologie VZ AR 127 2016 146-155 10 045F 330 |
allfieldsGer |
10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.04.007 doi GBVA2016015000009.pica (DE-627)ELV035398612 (ELSEVIER)S0921-8009(15)30494-8 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 330 570 330 DE-600 570 DE-600 620 VZ 610 VZ 77.50 bkl Martin, David M. verfasserin aut A proposed framework to systematically design and objectively evaluate non-dominated restoration tradeoffs for watershed planning and management 2016transfer abstract 10 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Human-driven alterations to freshwater ecosystems are leading to a global decline of river function and biodiversity. In our experience, managers want to be given many possible options to restore freshwater ecosystems that are workable within spatial, temporal, operational, and budgetary constraints of the system. Correspondingly, a new field for systematic river restoration planning has emerged through the use of well-established systems design concepts like multi-objective optimization and tradeoff analysis. In this article, we propose a decision framework for systematic river restoration planning where economic-environment systems design and tradeoff analyses are employed as a concurrent planning procedure before restoration interventions are implemented. Heuristic optimization and multi-criteria decision analysis methods are proposed to systematically design and objectively evaluate non-dominated economic-environment tradeoffs associated with restoration strategies within a watershed, and to provide a short-list of viable restoration alternatives to decision makers for negotiation and implementation. The proposed framework has the capacity to make science-based information and sophisticated decision support methods available for stakeholder deliberation. To illustrate the phases of the framework, we use a published case study of systematic restoration planning in South East Queensland, Australia. Human-driven alterations to freshwater ecosystems are leading to a global decline of river function and biodiversity. In our experience, managers want to be given many possible options to restore freshwater ecosystems that are workable within spatial, temporal, operational, and budgetary constraints of the system. Correspondingly, a new field for systematic river restoration planning has emerged through the use of well-established systems design concepts like multi-objective optimization and tradeoff analysis. In this article, we propose a decision framework for systematic river restoration planning where economic-environment systems design and tradeoff analyses are employed as a concurrent planning procedure before restoration interventions are implemented. Heuristic optimization and multi-criteria decision analysis methods are proposed to systematically design and objectively evaluate non-dominated economic-environment tradeoffs associated with restoration strategies within a watershed, and to provide a short-list of viable restoration alternatives to decision makers for negotiation and implementation. The proposed framework has the capacity to make science-based information and sophisticated decision support methods available for stakeholder deliberation. To illustrate the phases of the framework, we use a published case study of systematic restoration planning in South East Queensland, Australia. Hermoso, Virgilio oth Pantus, Francis oth Olley, Jon oth Linke, Simon oth Poff, N. LeRoy oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science The impact of electrified transport on local grid infrastructure: A comparison between electric cars and light rail 2012transfer abstract Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV016225309 volume:127 year:2016 pages:146-155 extent:10 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.04.007 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA 77.50 Psychophysiologie VZ AR 127 2016 146-155 10 045F 330 |
allfieldsSound |
10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.04.007 doi GBVA2016015000009.pica (DE-627)ELV035398612 (ELSEVIER)S0921-8009(15)30494-8 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 330 570 330 DE-600 570 DE-600 620 VZ 610 VZ 77.50 bkl Martin, David M. verfasserin aut A proposed framework to systematically design and objectively evaluate non-dominated restoration tradeoffs for watershed planning and management 2016transfer abstract 10 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Human-driven alterations to freshwater ecosystems are leading to a global decline of river function and biodiversity. In our experience, managers want to be given many possible options to restore freshwater ecosystems that are workable within spatial, temporal, operational, and budgetary constraints of the system. Correspondingly, a new field for systematic river restoration planning has emerged through the use of well-established systems design concepts like multi-objective optimization and tradeoff analysis. In this article, we propose a decision framework for systematic river restoration planning where economic-environment systems design and tradeoff analyses are employed as a concurrent planning procedure before restoration interventions are implemented. Heuristic optimization and multi-criteria decision analysis methods are proposed to systematically design and objectively evaluate non-dominated economic-environment tradeoffs associated with restoration strategies within a watershed, and to provide a short-list of viable restoration alternatives to decision makers for negotiation and implementation. The proposed framework has the capacity to make science-based information and sophisticated decision support methods available for stakeholder deliberation. To illustrate the phases of the framework, we use a published case study of systematic restoration planning in South East Queensland, Australia. Human-driven alterations to freshwater ecosystems are leading to a global decline of river function and biodiversity. In our experience, managers want to be given many possible options to restore freshwater ecosystems that are workable within spatial, temporal, operational, and budgetary constraints of the system. Correspondingly, a new field for systematic river restoration planning has emerged through the use of well-established systems design concepts like multi-objective optimization and tradeoff analysis. In this article, we propose a decision framework for systematic river restoration planning where economic-environment systems design and tradeoff analyses are employed as a concurrent planning procedure before restoration interventions are implemented. Heuristic optimization and multi-criteria decision analysis methods are proposed to systematically design and objectively evaluate non-dominated economic-environment tradeoffs associated with restoration strategies within a watershed, and to provide a short-list of viable restoration alternatives to decision makers for negotiation and implementation. The proposed framework has the capacity to make science-based information and sophisticated decision support methods available for stakeholder deliberation. To illustrate the phases of the framework, we use a published case study of systematic restoration planning in South East Queensland, Australia. Hermoso, Virgilio oth Pantus, Francis oth Olley, Jon oth Linke, Simon oth Poff, N. LeRoy oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science The impact of electrified transport on local grid infrastructure: A comparison between electric cars and light rail 2012transfer abstract Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV016225309 volume:127 year:2016 pages:146-155 extent:10 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.04.007 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA 77.50 Psychophysiologie VZ AR 127 2016 146-155 10 045F 330 |
language |
English |
source |
Enthalten in The impact of electrified transport on local grid infrastructure: A comparison between electric cars and light rail Amsterdam [u.a.] volume:127 year:2016 pages:146-155 extent:10 |
sourceStr |
Enthalten in The impact of electrified transport on local grid infrastructure: A comparison between electric cars and light rail Amsterdam [u.a.] volume:127 year:2016 pages:146-155 extent:10 |
format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
bklname |
Psychophysiologie |
institution |
findex.gbv.de |
dewey-raw |
330 |
isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
container_title |
The impact of electrified transport on local grid infrastructure: A comparison between electric cars and light rail |
authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Martin, David M. @@aut@@ Hermoso, Virgilio @@oth@@ Pantus, Francis @@oth@@ Olley, Jon @@oth@@ Linke, Simon @@oth@@ Poff, N. LeRoy @@oth@@ |
publishDateDaySort_date |
2016-01-01T00:00:00Z |
hierarchy_top_id |
ELV016225309 |
dewey-sort |
3330 |
id |
ELV035398612 |
language_de |
englisch |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV035398612</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230625204116.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">180603s2016 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.04.007</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">GBVA2016015000009.pica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV035398612</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0921-8009(15)30494-8</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">330</subfield><subfield code="a">570</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">330</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">570</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">620</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">610</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">77.50</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Martin, David M.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">A proposed framework to systematically design and objectively evaluate non-dominated restoration tradeoffs for watershed planning and management</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2016transfer abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Human-driven alterations to freshwater ecosystems are leading to a global decline of river function and biodiversity. In our experience, managers want to be given many possible options to restore freshwater ecosystems that are workable within spatial, temporal, operational, and budgetary constraints of the system. Correspondingly, a new field for systematic river restoration planning has emerged through the use of well-established systems design concepts like multi-objective optimization and tradeoff analysis. In this article, we propose a decision framework for systematic river restoration planning where economic-environment systems design and tradeoff analyses are employed as a concurrent planning procedure before restoration interventions are implemented. Heuristic optimization and multi-criteria decision analysis methods are proposed to systematically design and objectively evaluate non-dominated economic-environment tradeoffs associated with restoration strategies within a watershed, and to provide a short-list of viable restoration alternatives to decision makers for negotiation and implementation. The proposed framework has the capacity to make science-based information and sophisticated decision support methods available for stakeholder deliberation. To illustrate the phases of the framework, we use a published case study of systematic restoration planning in South East Queensland, Australia.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Human-driven alterations to freshwater ecosystems are leading to a global decline of river function and biodiversity. In our experience, managers want to be given many possible options to restore freshwater ecosystems that are workable within spatial, temporal, operational, and budgetary constraints of the system. Correspondingly, a new field for systematic river restoration planning has emerged through the use of well-established systems design concepts like multi-objective optimization and tradeoff analysis. In this article, we propose a decision framework for systematic river restoration planning where economic-environment systems design and tradeoff analyses are employed as a concurrent planning procedure before restoration interventions are implemented. Heuristic optimization and multi-criteria decision analysis methods are proposed to systematically design and objectively evaluate non-dominated economic-environment tradeoffs associated with restoration strategies within a watershed, and to provide a short-list of viable restoration alternatives to decision makers for negotiation and implementation. The proposed framework has the capacity to make science-based information and sophisticated decision support methods available for stakeholder deliberation. To illustrate the phases of the framework, we use a published case study of systematic restoration planning in South East Queensland, Australia.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Hermoso, Virgilio</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Pantus, Francis</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Olley, Jon</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Linke, Simon</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Poff, N. LeRoy</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="n">Elsevier Science</subfield><subfield code="t">The impact of electrified transport on local grid infrastructure: A comparison between electric cars and light rail</subfield><subfield code="d">2012transfer abstract</subfield><subfield code="g">Amsterdam [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)ELV016225309</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:127</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2016</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:146-155</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:10</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.04.007</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">77.50</subfield><subfield code="j">Psychophysiologie</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">127</subfield><subfield code="j">2016</subfield><subfield code="h">146-155</subfield><subfield code="g">10</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="953" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="2">045F</subfield><subfield code="a">330</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
author |
Martin, David M. |
spellingShingle |
Martin, David M. ddc 330 ddc 570 ddc 620 ddc 610 bkl 77.50 A proposed framework to systematically design and objectively evaluate non-dominated restoration tradeoffs for watershed planning and management |
authorStr |
Martin, David M. |
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)ELV016225309 |
format |
electronic Article |
dewey-ones |
330 - Economics 570 - Life sciences; biology 620 - Engineering & allied operations 610 - Medicine & health |
delete_txt_mv |
keep |
author_role |
aut |
collection |
elsevier |
remote_str |
true |
illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
topic_title |
330 570 330 DE-600 570 DE-600 620 VZ 610 VZ 77.50 bkl A proposed framework to systematically design and objectively evaluate non-dominated restoration tradeoffs for watershed planning and management |
topic |
ddc 330 ddc 570 ddc 620 ddc 610 bkl 77.50 |
topic_unstemmed |
ddc 330 ddc 570 ddc 620 ddc 610 bkl 77.50 |
topic_browse |
ddc 330 ddc 570 ddc 620 ddc 610 bkl 77.50 |
format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
carriertype_str_mv |
zu |
author2_variant |
v h vh f p fp j o jo s l sl n l p nl nlp |
hierarchy_parent_title |
The impact of electrified transport on local grid infrastructure: A comparison between electric cars and light rail |
hierarchy_parent_id |
ELV016225309 |
dewey-tens |
330 - Economics 570 - Life sciences; biology 620 - Engineering 610 - Medicine & health |
hierarchy_top_title |
The impact of electrified transport on local grid infrastructure: A comparison between electric cars and light rail |
isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)ELV016225309 |
title |
A proposed framework to systematically design and objectively evaluate non-dominated restoration tradeoffs for watershed planning and management |
ctrlnum |
(DE-627)ELV035398612 (ELSEVIER)S0921-8009(15)30494-8 |
title_full |
A proposed framework to systematically design and objectively evaluate non-dominated restoration tradeoffs for watershed planning and management |
author_sort |
Martin, David M. |
journal |
The impact of electrified transport on local grid infrastructure: A comparison between electric cars and light rail |
journalStr |
The impact of electrified transport on local grid infrastructure: A comparison between electric cars and light rail |
lang_code |
eng |
isOA_bool |
false |
dewey-hundreds |
300 - Social sciences 500 - Science 600 - Technology |
recordtype |
marc |
publishDateSort |
2016 |
contenttype_str_mv |
zzz |
container_start_page |
146 |
author_browse |
Martin, David M. |
container_volume |
127 |
physical |
10 |
class |
330 570 330 DE-600 570 DE-600 620 VZ 610 VZ 77.50 bkl |
format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
author-letter |
Martin, David M. |
doi_str_mv |
10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.04.007 |
dewey-full |
330 570 620 610 |
title_sort |
a proposed framework to systematically design and objectively evaluate non-dominated restoration tradeoffs for watershed planning and management |
title_auth |
A proposed framework to systematically design and objectively evaluate non-dominated restoration tradeoffs for watershed planning and management |
abstract |
Human-driven alterations to freshwater ecosystems are leading to a global decline of river function and biodiversity. In our experience, managers want to be given many possible options to restore freshwater ecosystems that are workable within spatial, temporal, operational, and budgetary constraints of the system. Correspondingly, a new field for systematic river restoration planning has emerged through the use of well-established systems design concepts like multi-objective optimization and tradeoff analysis. In this article, we propose a decision framework for systematic river restoration planning where economic-environment systems design and tradeoff analyses are employed as a concurrent planning procedure before restoration interventions are implemented. Heuristic optimization and multi-criteria decision analysis methods are proposed to systematically design and objectively evaluate non-dominated economic-environment tradeoffs associated with restoration strategies within a watershed, and to provide a short-list of viable restoration alternatives to decision makers for negotiation and implementation. The proposed framework has the capacity to make science-based information and sophisticated decision support methods available for stakeholder deliberation. To illustrate the phases of the framework, we use a published case study of systematic restoration planning in South East Queensland, Australia. |
abstractGer |
Human-driven alterations to freshwater ecosystems are leading to a global decline of river function and biodiversity. In our experience, managers want to be given many possible options to restore freshwater ecosystems that are workable within spatial, temporal, operational, and budgetary constraints of the system. Correspondingly, a new field for systematic river restoration planning has emerged through the use of well-established systems design concepts like multi-objective optimization and tradeoff analysis. In this article, we propose a decision framework for systematic river restoration planning where economic-environment systems design and tradeoff analyses are employed as a concurrent planning procedure before restoration interventions are implemented. Heuristic optimization and multi-criteria decision analysis methods are proposed to systematically design and objectively evaluate non-dominated economic-environment tradeoffs associated with restoration strategies within a watershed, and to provide a short-list of viable restoration alternatives to decision makers for negotiation and implementation. The proposed framework has the capacity to make science-based information and sophisticated decision support methods available for stakeholder deliberation. To illustrate the phases of the framework, we use a published case study of systematic restoration planning in South East Queensland, Australia. |
abstract_unstemmed |
Human-driven alterations to freshwater ecosystems are leading to a global decline of river function and biodiversity. In our experience, managers want to be given many possible options to restore freshwater ecosystems that are workable within spatial, temporal, operational, and budgetary constraints of the system. Correspondingly, a new field for systematic river restoration planning has emerged through the use of well-established systems design concepts like multi-objective optimization and tradeoff analysis. In this article, we propose a decision framework for systematic river restoration planning where economic-environment systems design and tradeoff analyses are employed as a concurrent planning procedure before restoration interventions are implemented. Heuristic optimization and multi-criteria decision analysis methods are proposed to systematically design and objectively evaluate non-dominated economic-environment tradeoffs associated with restoration strategies within a watershed, and to provide a short-list of viable restoration alternatives to decision makers for negotiation and implementation. The proposed framework has the capacity to make science-based information and sophisticated decision support methods available for stakeholder deliberation. To illustrate the phases of the framework, we use a published case study of systematic restoration planning in South East Queensland, Australia. |
collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA |
title_short |
A proposed framework to systematically design and objectively evaluate non-dominated restoration tradeoffs for watershed planning and management |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.04.007 |
remote_bool |
true |
author2 |
Hermoso, Virgilio Pantus, Francis Olley, Jon Linke, Simon Poff, N. LeRoy |
author2Str |
Hermoso, Virgilio Pantus, Francis Olley, Jon Linke, Simon Poff, N. LeRoy |
ppnlink |
ELV016225309 |
mediatype_str_mv |
z |
isOA_txt |
false |
hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
author2_role |
oth oth oth oth oth |
doi_str |
10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.04.007 |
up_date |
2024-07-06T17:27:20.949Z |
_version_ |
1803851494538084352 |
fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV035398612</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230625204116.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">180603s2016 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.04.007</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">GBVA2016015000009.pica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV035398612</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0921-8009(15)30494-8</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">330</subfield><subfield code="a">570</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">330</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">570</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">620</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">610</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">77.50</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Martin, David M.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">A proposed framework to systematically design and objectively evaluate non-dominated restoration tradeoffs for watershed planning and management</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2016transfer abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Human-driven alterations to freshwater ecosystems are leading to a global decline of river function and biodiversity. In our experience, managers want to be given many possible options to restore freshwater ecosystems that are workable within spatial, temporal, operational, and budgetary constraints of the system. Correspondingly, a new field for systematic river restoration planning has emerged through the use of well-established systems design concepts like multi-objective optimization and tradeoff analysis. In this article, we propose a decision framework for systematic river restoration planning where economic-environment systems design and tradeoff analyses are employed as a concurrent planning procedure before restoration interventions are implemented. Heuristic optimization and multi-criteria decision analysis methods are proposed to systematically design and objectively evaluate non-dominated economic-environment tradeoffs associated with restoration strategies within a watershed, and to provide a short-list of viable restoration alternatives to decision makers for negotiation and implementation. The proposed framework has the capacity to make science-based information and sophisticated decision support methods available for stakeholder deliberation. To illustrate the phases of the framework, we use a published case study of systematic restoration planning in South East Queensland, Australia.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Human-driven alterations to freshwater ecosystems are leading to a global decline of river function and biodiversity. In our experience, managers want to be given many possible options to restore freshwater ecosystems that are workable within spatial, temporal, operational, and budgetary constraints of the system. Correspondingly, a new field for systematic river restoration planning has emerged through the use of well-established systems design concepts like multi-objective optimization and tradeoff analysis. In this article, we propose a decision framework for systematic river restoration planning where economic-environment systems design and tradeoff analyses are employed as a concurrent planning procedure before restoration interventions are implemented. Heuristic optimization and multi-criteria decision analysis methods are proposed to systematically design and objectively evaluate non-dominated economic-environment tradeoffs associated with restoration strategies within a watershed, and to provide a short-list of viable restoration alternatives to decision makers for negotiation and implementation. The proposed framework has the capacity to make science-based information and sophisticated decision support methods available for stakeholder deliberation. To illustrate the phases of the framework, we use a published case study of systematic restoration planning in South East Queensland, Australia.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Hermoso, Virgilio</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Pantus, Francis</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Olley, Jon</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Linke, Simon</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Poff, N. LeRoy</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="n">Elsevier Science</subfield><subfield code="t">The impact of electrified transport on local grid infrastructure: A comparison between electric cars and light rail</subfield><subfield code="d">2012transfer abstract</subfield><subfield code="g">Amsterdam [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)ELV016225309</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:127</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2016</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:146-155</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:10</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.04.007</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">77.50</subfield><subfield code="j">Psychophysiologie</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">127</subfield><subfield code="j">2016</subfield><subfield code="h">146-155</subfield><subfield code="g">10</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="953" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="2">045F</subfield><subfield code="a">330</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
score |
7.4010725 |