Automation of static and dynamic non-dispersive liquid phase microextraction. Part 1: Approaches based on extractant drop-, plug-, film- and microflow-formation
Simplicity, effectiveness, swiftness, and environmental friendliness – these are the typical requirements for the state of the art development of green analytical techniques. Liquid phase microextraction (LPME) stands for a family of elegant sample pretreatment and analyte preconcentration technique...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Alexovič, Michal [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2016transfer abstract |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
Static liquid phase microextraction Dynamic liquid phase microextraction In-syringe liquid phase microextraction |
|---|
| Umfang: |
19 |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Neuro-Brucellosis - Gouider, R. ELSEVIER, 2015, an international journal devoted to all branches of analytical chemistry, Amsterdam |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:906 ; year:2016 ; day:4 ; month:02 ; pages:22-40 ; extent:19 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1016/j.aca.2015.11.038 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
ELV035562145 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ELV035562145 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230625204724.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 180603s2016 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.aca.2015.11.038 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a GBVA2016020000017.pica |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)ELV035562145 | ||
| 035 | |a (ELSEVIER)S0003-2670(15)30024-6 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 082 | 0 | |a 540 | |
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 540 |q DE-600 |
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 610 |q VZ |
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 540 |q VZ |
| 084 | |a 35.10 |2 bkl | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Alexovič, Michal |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Automation of static and dynamic non-dispersive liquid phase microextraction. Part 1: Approaches based on extractant drop-, plug-, film- and microflow-formation |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2016transfer abstract | |
| 300 | |a 19 | ||
| 336 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zzz |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b z |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zu |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Simplicity, effectiveness, swiftness, and environmental friendliness – these are the typical requirements for the state of the art development of green analytical techniques. Liquid phase microextraction (LPME) stands for a family of elegant sample pretreatment and analyte preconcentration techniques preserving these principles in numerous applications. By using only fractions of solvent and sample compared to classical liquid–liquid extraction, the extraction kinetics, the preconcentration factor, and the cost efficiency can be increased. Moreover, significant improvements can be made by automation, which is still a hot topic in analytical chemistry. This review surveys comprehensively and in two parts the developments of automation of non-dispersive LPME methodologies performed in static and dynamic modes. Their advantages and limitations and the reported analytical performances are discussed and put into perspective with the corresponding manual procedures. The automation strategies, techniques, and their operation advantages as well as their potentials are further described and discussed. | ||
| 520 | |a Simplicity, effectiveness, swiftness, and environmental friendliness – these are the typical requirements for the state of the art development of green analytical techniques. Liquid phase microextraction (LPME) stands for a family of elegant sample pretreatment and analyte preconcentration techniques preserving these principles in numerous applications. By using only fractions of solvent and sample compared to classical liquid–liquid extraction, the extraction kinetics, the preconcentration factor, and the cost efficiency can be increased. Moreover, significant improvements can be made by automation, which is still a hot topic in analytical chemistry. This review surveys comprehensively and in two parts the developments of automation of non-dispersive LPME methodologies performed in static and dynamic modes. Their advantages and limitations and the reported analytical performances are discussed and put into perspective with the corresponding manual procedures. The automation strategies, techniques, and their operation advantages as well as their potentials are further described and discussed. | ||
| 650 | 7 | |a Miniaturisation |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Wetting film microextraction |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Automation |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Single drop microextraction |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Static liquid phase microextraction |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Dynamic liquid phase microextraction |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a In-syringe liquid phase microextraction |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Solvent plug microextraction |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Microfluidic-based liquid phase microextraction |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Liquid phase microextraction |2 Elsevier | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Horstkotte, Burkhard |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Solich, Petr |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Sabo, Ján |4 oth | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |n Elsevier Science |a Gouider, R. ELSEVIER |t Neuro-Brucellosis |d 2015 |d an international journal devoted to all branches of analytical chemistry |g Amsterdam |w (DE-627)ELV013501887 |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:906 |g year:2016 |g day:4 |g month:02 |g pages:22-40 |g extent:19 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2015.11.038 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_U | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ELV | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_U | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-PHA | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_40 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_120 | ||
| 936 | b | k | |a 35.10 |j Physikalische Chemie: Allgemeines |q VZ |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 906 |j 2016 |b 4 |c 0204 |h 22-40 |g 19 | ||
| 953 | |2 045F |a 540 | ||
| author_variant |
m a ma |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
alexovimichalhorstkotteburkhardsolichpet:2016----:uoainfttcndnmcodsesvlqipaeiretatopr1prahsaeoetatn |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2016transfer abstract |
| bklnumber |
35.10 |
| publishDate |
2016 |
| allfields |
10.1016/j.aca.2015.11.038 doi GBVA2016020000017.pica (DE-627)ELV035562145 (ELSEVIER)S0003-2670(15)30024-6 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 540 540 DE-600 610 VZ 540 VZ 35.10 bkl Alexovič, Michal verfasserin aut Automation of static and dynamic non-dispersive liquid phase microextraction. Part 1: Approaches based on extractant drop-, plug-, film- and microflow-formation 2016transfer abstract 19 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Simplicity, effectiveness, swiftness, and environmental friendliness – these are the typical requirements for the state of the art development of green analytical techniques. Liquid phase microextraction (LPME) stands for a family of elegant sample pretreatment and analyte preconcentration techniques preserving these principles in numerous applications. By using only fractions of solvent and sample compared to classical liquid–liquid extraction, the extraction kinetics, the preconcentration factor, and the cost efficiency can be increased. Moreover, significant improvements can be made by automation, which is still a hot topic in analytical chemistry. This review surveys comprehensively and in two parts the developments of automation of non-dispersive LPME methodologies performed in static and dynamic modes. Their advantages and limitations and the reported analytical performances are discussed and put into perspective with the corresponding manual procedures. The automation strategies, techniques, and their operation advantages as well as their potentials are further described and discussed. Simplicity, effectiveness, swiftness, and environmental friendliness – these are the typical requirements for the state of the art development of green analytical techniques. Liquid phase microextraction (LPME) stands for a family of elegant sample pretreatment and analyte preconcentration techniques preserving these principles in numerous applications. By using only fractions of solvent and sample compared to classical liquid–liquid extraction, the extraction kinetics, the preconcentration factor, and the cost efficiency can be increased. Moreover, significant improvements can be made by automation, which is still a hot topic in analytical chemistry. This review surveys comprehensively and in two parts the developments of automation of non-dispersive LPME methodologies performed in static and dynamic modes. Their advantages and limitations and the reported analytical performances are discussed and put into perspective with the corresponding manual procedures. The automation strategies, techniques, and their operation advantages as well as their potentials are further described and discussed. Miniaturisation Elsevier Wetting film microextraction Elsevier Automation Elsevier Single drop microextraction Elsevier Static liquid phase microextraction Elsevier Dynamic liquid phase microextraction Elsevier In-syringe liquid phase microextraction Elsevier Solvent plug microextraction Elsevier Microfluidic-based liquid phase microextraction Elsevier Liquid phase microextraction Elsevier Horstkotte, Burkhard oth Solich, Petr oth Sabo, Ján oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Gouider, R. ELSEVIER Neuro-Brucellosis 2015 an international journal devoted to all branches of analytical chemistry Amsterdam (DE-627)ELV013501887 volume:906 year:2016 day:4 month:02 pages:22-40 extent:19 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2015.11.038 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_120 35.10 Physikalische Chemie: Allgemeines VZ AR 906 2016 4 0204 22-40 19 045F 540 |
| spelling |
10.1016/j.aca.2015.11.038 doi GBVA2016020000017.pica (DE-627)ELV035562145 (ELSEVIER)S0003-2670(15)30024-6 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 540 540 DE-600 610 VZ 540 VZ 35.10 bkl Alexovič, Michal verfasserin aut Automation of static and dynamic non-dispersive liquid phase microextraction. Part 1: Approaches based on extractant drop-, plug-, film- and microflow-formation 2016transfer abstract 19 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Simplicity, effectiveness, swiftness, and environmental friendliness – these are the typical requirements for the state of the art development of green analytical techniques. Liquid phase microextraction (LPME) stands for a family of elegant sample pretreatment and analyte preconcentration techniques preserving these principles in numerous applications. By using only fractions of solvent and sample compared to classical liquid–liquid extraction, the extraction kinetics, the preconcentration factor, and the cost efficiency can be increased. Moreover, significant improvements can be made by automation, which is still a hot topic in analytical chemistry. This review surveys comprehensively and in two parts the developments of automation of non-dispersive LPME methodologies performed in static and dynamic modes. Their advantages and limitations and the reported analytical performances are discussed and put into perspective with the corresponding manual procedures. The automation strategies, techniques, and their operation advantages as well as their potentials are further described and discussed. Simplicity, effectiveness, swiftness, and environmental friendliness – these are the typical requirements for the state of the art development of green analytical techniques. Liquid phase microextraction (LPME) stands for a family of elegant sample pretreatment and analyte preconcentration techniques preserving these principles in numerous applications. By using only fractions of solvent and sample compared to classical liquid–liquid extraction, the extraction kinetics, the preconcentration factor, and the cost efficiency can be increased. Moreover, significant improvements can be made by automation, which is still a hot topic in analytical chemistry. This review surveys comprehensively and in two parts the developments of automation of non-dispersive LPME methodologies performed in static and dynamic modes. Their advantages and limitations and the reported analytical performances are discussed and put into perspective with the corresponding manual procedures. The automation strategies, techniques, and their operation advantages as well as their potentials are further described and discussed. Miniaturisation Elsevier Wetting film microextraction Elsevier Automation Elsevier Single drop microextraction Elsevier Static liquid phase microextraction Elsevier Dynamic liquid phase microextraction Elsevier In-syringe liquid phase microextraction Elsevier Solvent plug microextraction Elsevier Microfluidic-based liquid phase microextraction Elsevier Liquid phase microextraction Elsevier Horstkotte, Burkhard oth Solich, Petr oth Sabo, Ján oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Gouider, R. ELSEVIER Neuro-Brucellosis 2015 an international journal devoted to all branches of analytical chemistry Amsterdam (DE-627)ELV013501887 volume:906 year:2016 day:4 month:02 pages:22-40 extent:19 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2015.11.038 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_120 35.10 Physikalische Chemie: Allgemeines VZ AR 906 2016 4 0204 22-40 19 045F 540 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1016/j.aca.2015.11.038 doi GBVA2016020000017.pica (DE-627)ELV035562145 (ELSEVIER)S0003-2670(15)30024-6 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 540 540 DE-600 610 VZ 540 VZ 35.10 bkl Alexovič, Michal verfasserin aut Automation of static and dynamic non-dispersive liquid phase microextraction. Part 1: Approaches based on extractant drop-, plug-, film- and microflow-formation 2016transfer abstract 19 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Simplicity, effectiveness, swiftness, and environmental friendliness – these are the typical requirements for the state of the art development of green analytical techniques. Liquid phase microextraction (LPME) stands for a family of elegant sample pretreatment and analyte preconcentration techniques preserving these principles in numerous applications. By using only fractions of solvent and sample compared to classical liquid–liquid extraction, the extraction kinetics, the preconcentration factor, and the cost efficiency can be increased. Moreover, significant improvements can be made by automation, which is still a hot topic in analytical chemistry. This review surveys comprehensively and in two parts the developments of automation of non-dispersive LPME methodologies performed in static and dynamic modes. Their advantages and limitations and the reported analytical performances are discussed and put into perspective with the corresponding manual procedures. The automation strategies, techniques, and their operation advantages as well as their potentials are further described and discussed. Simplicity, effectiveness, swiftness, and environmental friendliness – these are the typical requirements for the state of the art development of green analytical techniques. Liquid phase microextraction (LPME) stands for a family of elegant sample pretreatment and analyte preconcentration techniques preserving these principles in numerous applications. By using only fractions of solvent and sample compared to classical liquid–liquid extraction, the extraction kinetics, the preconcentration factor, and the cost efficiency can be increased. Moreover, significant improvements can be made by automation, which is still a hot topic in analytical chemistry. This review surveys comprehensively and in two parts the developments of automation of non-dispersive LPME methodologies performed in static and dynamic modes. Their advantages and limitations and the reported analytical performances are discussed and put into perspective with the corresponding manual procedures. The automation strategies, techniques, and their operation advantages as well as their potentials are further described and discussed. Miniaturisation Elsevier Wetting film microextraction Elsevier Automation Elsevier Single drop microextraction Elsevier Static liquid phase microextraction Elsevier Dynamic liquid phase microextraction Elsevier In-syringe liquid phase microextraction Elsevier Solvent plug microextraction Elsevier Microfluidic-based liquid phase microextraction Elsevier Liquid phase microextraction Elsevier Horstkotte, Burkhard oth Solich, Petr oth Sabo, Ján oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Gouider, R. ELSEVIER Neuro-Brucellosis 2015 an international journal devoted to all branches of analytical chemistry Amsterdam (DE-627)ELV013501887 volume:906 year:2016 day:4 month:02 pages:22-40 extent:19 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2015.11.038 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_120 35.10 Physikalische Chemie: Allgemeines VZ AR 906 2016 4 0204 22-40 19 045F 540 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1016/j.aca.2015.11.038 doi GBVA2016020000017.pica (DE-627)ELV035562145 (ELSEVIER)S0003-2670(15)30024-6 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 540 540 DE-600 610 VZ 540 VZ 35.10 bkl Alexovič, Michal verfasserin aut Automation of static and dynamic non-dispersive liquid phase microextraction. Part 1: Approaches based on extractant drop-, plug-, film- and microflow-formation 2016transfer abstract 19 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Simplicity, effectiveness, swiftness, and environmental friendliness – these are the typical requirements for the state of the art development of green analytical techniques. Liquid phase microextraction (LPME) stands for a family of elegant sample pretreatment and analyte preconcentration techniques preserving these principles in numerous applications. By using only fractions of solvent and sample compared to classical liquid–liquid extraction, the extraction kinetics, the preconcentration factor, and the cost efficiency can be increased. Moreover, significant improvements can be made by automation, which is still a hot topic in analytical chemistry. This review surveys comprehensively and in two parts the developments of automation of non-dispersive LPME methodologies performed in static and dynamic modes. Their advantages and limitations and the reported analytical performances are discussed and put into perspective with the corresponding manual procedures. The automation strategies, techniques, and their operation advantages as well as their potentials are further described and discussed. Simplicity, effectiveness, swiftness, and environmental friendliness – these are the typical requirements for the state of the art development of green analytical techniques. Liquid phase microextraction (LPME) stands for a family of elegant sample pretreatment and analyte preconcentration techniques preserving these principles in numerous applications. By using only fractions of solvent and sample compared to classical liquid–liquid extraction, the extraction kinetics, the preconcentration factor, and the cost efficiency can be increased. Moreover, significant improvements can be made by automation, which is still a hot topic in analytical chemistry. This review surveys comprehensively and in two parts the developments of automation of non-dispersive LPME methodologies performed in static and dynamic modes. Their advantages and limitations and the reported analytical performances are discussed and put into perspective with the corresponding manual procedures. The automation strategies, techniques, and their operation advantages as well as their potentials are further described and discussed. Miniaturisation Elsevier Wetting film microextraction Elsevier Automation Elsevier Single drop microextraction Elsevier Static liquid phase microextraction Elsevier Dynamic liquid phase microextraction Elsevier In-syringe liquid phase microextraction Elsevier Solvent plug microextraction Elsevier Microfluidic-based liquid phase microextraction Elsevier Liquid phase microextraction Elsevier Horstkotte, Burkhard oth Solich, Petr oth Sabo, Ján oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Gouider, R. ELSEVIER Neuro-Brucellosis 2015 an international journal devoted to all branches of analytical chemistry Amsterdam (DE-627)ELV013501887 volume:906 year:2016 day:4 month:02 pages:22-40 extent:19 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2015.11.038 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_120 35.10 Physikalische Chemie: Allgemeines VZ AR 906 2016 4 0204 22-40 19 045F 540 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1016/j.aca.2015.11.038 doi GBVA2016020000017.pica (DE-627)ELV035562145 (ELSEVIER)S0003-2670(15)30024-6 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 540 540 DE-600 610 VZ 540 VZ 35.10 bkl Alexovič, Michal verfasserin aut Automation of static and dynamic non-dispersive liquid phase microextraction. Part 1: Approaches based on extractant drop-, plug-, film- and microflow-formation 2016transfer abstract 19 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Simplicity, effectiveness, swiftness, and environmental friendliness – these are the typical requirements for the state of the art development of green analytical techniques. Liquid phase microextraction (LPME) stands for a family of elegant sample pretreatment and analyte preconcentration techniques preserving these principles in numerous applications. By using only fractions of solvent and sample compared to classical liquid–liquid extraction, the extraction kinetics, the preconcentration factor, and the cost efficiency can be increased. Moreover, significant improvements can be made by automation, which is still a hot topic in analytical chemistry. This review surveys comprehensively and in two parts the developments of automation of non-dispersive LPME methodologies performed in static and dynamic modes. Their advantages and limitations and the reported analytical performances are discussed and put into perspective with the corresponding manual procedures. The automation strategies, techniques, and their operation advantages as well as their potentials are further described and discussed. Simplicity, effectiveness, swiftness, and environmental friendliness – these are the typical requirements for the state of the art development of green analytical techniques. Liquid phase microextraction (LPME) stands for a family of elegant sample pretreatment and analyte preconcentration techniques preserving these principles in numerous applications. By using only fractions of solvent and sample compared to classical liquid–liquid extraction, the extraction kinetics, the preconcentration factor, and the cost efficiency can be increased. Moreover, significant improvements can be made by automation, which is still a hot topic in analytical chemistry. This review surveys comprehensively and in two parts the developments of automation of non-dispersive LPME methodologies performed in static and dynamic modes. Their advantages and limitations and the reported analytical performances are discussed and put into perspective with the corresponding manual procedures. The automation strategies, techniques, and their operation advantages as well as their potentials are further described and discussed. Miniaturisation Elsevier Wetting film microextraction Elsevier Automation Elsevier Single drop microextraction Elsevier Static liquid phase microextraction Elsevier Dynamic liquid phase microextraction Elsevier In-syringe liquid phase microextraction Elsevier Solvent plug microextraction Elsevier Microfluidic-based liquid phase microextraction Elsevier Liquid phase microextraction Elsevier Horstkotte, Burkhard oth Solich, Petr oth Sabo, Ján oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Gouider, R. ELSEVIER Neuro-Brucellosis 2015 an international journal devoted to all branches of analytical chemistry Amsterdam (DE-627)ELV013501887 volume:906 year:2016 day:4 month:02 pages:22-40 extent:19 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2015.11.038 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_120 35.10 Physikalische Chemie: Allgemeines VZ AR 906 2016 4 0204 22-40 19 045F 540 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in Neuro-Brucellosis Amsterdam volume:906 year:2016 day:4 month:02 pages:22-40 extent:19 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in Neuro-Brucellosis Amsterdam volume:906 year:2016 day:4 month:02 pages:22-40 extent:19 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| bklname |
Physikalische Chemie: Allgemeines |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
Miniaturisation Wetting film microextraction Automation Single drop microextraction Static liquid phase microextraction Dynamic liquid phase microextraction In-syringe liquid phase microextraction Solvent plug microextraction Microfluidic-based liquid phase microextraction Liquid phase microextraction |
| dewey-raw |
540 |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
Neuro-Brucellosis |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Alexovič, Michal @@aut@@ Horstkotte, Burkhard @@oth@@ Solich, Petr @@oth@@ Sabo, Ján @@oth@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2016-01-04T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
ELV013501887 |
| dewey-sort |
3540 |
| id |
ELV035562145 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV035562145</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230625204724.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">180603s2016 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.aca.2015.11.038</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">GBVA2016020000017.pica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV035562145</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0003-2670(15)30024-6</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">540</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">540</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">610</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">540</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">35.10</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Alexovič, Michal</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Automation of static and dynamic non-dispersive liquid phase microextraction. Part 1: Approaches based on extractant drop-, plug-, film- and microflow-formation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2016transfer abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">19</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Simplicity, effectiveness, swiftness, and environmental friendliness – these are the typical requirements for the state of the art development of green analytical techniques. Liquid phase microextraction (LPME) stands for a family of elegant sample pretreatment and analyte preconcentration techniques preserving these principles in numerous applications. By using only fractions of solvent and sample compared to classical liquid–liquid extraction, the extraction kinetics, the preconcentration factor, and the cost efficiency can be increased. Moreover, significant improvements can be made by automation, which is still a hot topic in analytical chemistry. This review surveys comprehensively and in two parts the developments of automation of non-dispersive LPME methodologies performed in static and dynamic modes. Their advantages and limitations and the reported analytical performances are discussed and put into perspective with the corresponding manual procedures. The automation strategies, techniques, and their operation advantages as well as their potentials are further described and discussed.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Simplicity, effectiveness, swiftness, and environmental friendliness – these are the typical requirements for the state of the art development of green analytical techniques. Liquid phase microextraction (LPME) stands for a family of elegant sample pretreatment and analyte preconcentration techniques preserving these principles in numerous applications. By using only fractions of solvent and sample compared to classical liquid–liquid extraction, the extraction kinetics, the preconcentration factor, and the cost efficiency can be increased. Moreover, significant improvements can be made by automation, which is still a hot topic in analytical chemistry. This review surveys comprehensively and in two parts the developments of automation of non-dispersive LPME methodologies performed in static and dynamic modes. Their advantages and limitations and the reported analytical performances are discussed and put into perspective with the corresponding manual procedures. The automation strategies, techniques, and their operation advantages as well as their potentials are further described and discussed.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Miniaturisation</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Wetting film microextraction</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Automation</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Single drop microextraction</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Static liquid phase microextraction</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Dynamic liquid phase microextraction</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">In-syringe liquid phase microextraction</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Solvent plug microextraction</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Microfluidic-based liquid phase microextraction</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Liquid phase microextraction</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Horstkotte, Burkhard</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Solich, Petr</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Sabo, Ján</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="n">Elsevier Science</subfield><subfield code="a">Gouider, R. ELSEVIER</subfield><subfield code="t">Neuro-Brucellosis</subfield><subfield code="d">2015</subfield><subfield code="d">an international journal devoted to all branches of analytical chemistry</subfield><subfield code="g">Amsterdam</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)ELV013501887</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:906</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2016</subfield><subfield code="g">day:4</subfield><subfield code="g">month:02</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:22-40</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:19</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2015.11.038</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_120</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">35.10</subfield><subfield code="j">Physikalische Chemie: Allgemeines</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">906</subfield><subfield code="j">2016</subfield><subfield code="b">4</subfield><subfield code="c">0204</subfield><subfield code="h">22-40</subfield><subfield code="g">19</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="953" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="2">045F</subfield><subfield code="a">540</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Alexovič, Michal |
| spellingShingle |
Alexovič, Michal ddc 540 ddc 610 bkl 35.10 Elsevier Miniaturisation Elsevier Wetting film microextraction Elsevier Automation Elsevier Single drop microextraction Elsevier Static liquid phase microextraction Elsevier Dynamic liquid phase microextraction Elsevier In-syringe liquid phase microextraction Elsevier Solvent plug microextraction Elsevier Microfluidic-based liquid phase microextraction Elsevier Liquid phase microextraction Automation of static and dynamic non-dispersive liquid phase microextraction. Part 1: Approaches based on extractant drop-, plug-, film- and microflow-formation |
| authorStr |
Alexovič, Michal |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)ELV013501887 |
| format |
electronic Article |
| dewey-ones |
540 - Chemistry & allied sciences 610 - Medicine & health |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut |
| collection |
elsevier |
| remote_str |
true |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| topic_title |
540 540 DE-600 610 VZ 540 VZ 35.10 bkl Automation of static and dynamic non-dispersive liquid phase microextraction. Part 1: Approaches based on extractant drop-, plug-, film- and microflow-formation Miniaturisation Elsevier Wetting film microextraction Elsevier Automation Elsevier Single drop microextraction Elsevier Static liquid phase microextraction Elsevier Dynamic liquid phase microextraction Elsevier In-syringe liquid phase microextraction Elsevier Solvent plug microextraction Elsevier Microfluidic-based liquid phase microextraction Elsevier Liquid phase microextraction Elsevier |
| topic |
ddc 540 ddc 610 bkl 35.10 Elsevier Miniaturisation Elsevier Wetting film microextraction Elsevier Automation Elsevier Single drop microextraction Elsevier Static liquid phase microextraction Elsevier Dynamic liquid phase microextraction Elsevier In-syringe liquid phase microextraction Elsevier Solvent plug microextraction Elsevier Microfluidic-based liquid phase microextraction Elsevier Liquid phase microextraction |
| topic_unstemmed |
ddc 540 ddc 610 bkl 35.10 Elsevier Miniaturisation Elsevier Wetting film microextraction Elsevier Automation Elsevier Single drop microextraction Elsevier Static liquid phase microextraction Elsevier Dynamic liquid phase microextraction Elsevier In-syringe liquid phase microextraction Elsevier Solvent plug microextraction Elsevier Microfluidic-based liquid phase microextraction Elsevier Liquid phase microextraction |
| topic_browse |
ddc 540 ddc 610 bkl 35.10 Elsevier Miniaturisation Elsevier Wetting film microextraction Elsevier Automation Elsevier Single drop microextraction Elsevier Static liquid phase microextraction Elsevier Dynamic liquid phase microextraction Elsevier In-syringe liquid phase microextraction Elsevier Solvent plug microextraction Elsevier Microfluidic-based liquid phase microextraction Elsevier Liquid phase microextraction |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
zu |
| author2_variant |
b h bh p s ps j s js |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Neuro-Brucellosis |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
ELV013501887 |
| dewey-tens |
540 - Chemistry 610 - Medicine & health |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Neuro-Brucellosis |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)ELV013501887 |
| title |
Automation of static and dynamic non-dispersive liquid phase microextraction. Part 1: Approaches based on extractant drop-, plug-, film- and microflow-formation |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)ELV035562145 (ELSEVIER)S0003-2670(15)30024-6 |
| title_full |
Automation of static and dynamic non-dispersive liquid phase microextraction. Part 1: Approaches based on extractant drop-, plug-, film- and microflow-formation |
| author_sort |
Alexovič, Michal |
| journal |
Neuro-Brucellosis |
| journalStr |
Neuro-Brucellosis |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| dewey-hundreds |
500 - Science 600 - Technology |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2016 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
zzz |
| container_start_page |
22 |
| author_browse |
Alexovič, Michal |
| container_volume |
906 |
| physical |
19 |
| class |
540 540 DE-600 610 VZ 540 VZ 35.10 bkl |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Alexovič, Michal |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1016/j.aca.2015.11.038 |
| dewey-full |
540 610 |
| title_sort |
automation of static and dynamic non-dispersive liquid phase microextraction. part 1: approaches based on extractant drop-, plug-, film- and microflow-formation |
| title_auth |
Automation of static and dynamic non-dispersive liquid phase microextraction. Part 1: Approaches based on extractant drop-, plug-, film- and microflow-formation |
| abstract |
Simplicity, effectiveness, swiftness, and environmental friendliness – these are the typical requirements for the state of the art development of green analytical techniques. Liquid phase microextraction (LPME) stands for a family of elegant sample pretreatment and analyte preconcentration techniques preserving these principles in numerous applications. By using only fractions of solvent and sample compared to classical liquid–liquid extraction, the extraction kinetics, the preconcentration factor, and the cost efficiency can be increased. Moreover, significant improvements can be made by automation, which is still a hot topic in analytical chemistry. This review surveys comprehensively and in two parts the developments of automation of non-dispersive LPME methodologies performed in static and dynamic modes. Their advantages and limitations and the reported analytical performances are discussed and put into perspective with the corresponding manual procedures. The automation strategies, techniques, and their operation advantages as well as their potentials are further described and discussed. |
| abstractGer |
Simplicity, effectiveness, swiftness, and environmental friendliness – these are the typical requirements for the state of the art development of green analytical techniques. Liquid phase microextraction (LPME) stands for a family of elegant sample pretreatment and analyte preconcentration techniques preserving these principles in numerous applications. By using only fractions of solvent and sample compared to classical liquid–liquid extraction, the extraction kinetics, the preconcentration factor, and the cost efficiency can be increased. Moreover, significant improvements can be made by automation, which is still a hot topic in analytical chemistry. This review surveys comprehensively and in two parts the developments of automation of non-dispersive LPME methodologies performed in static and dynamic modes. Their advantages and limitations and the reported analytical performances are discussed and put into perspective with the corresponding manual procedures. The automation strategies, techniques, and their operation advantages as well as their potentials are further described and discussed. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
Simplicity, effectiveness, swiftness, and environmental friendliness – these are the typical requirements for the state of the art development of green analytical techniques. Liquid phase microextraction (LPME) stands for a family of elegant sample pretreatment and analyte preconcentration techniques preserving these principles in numerous applications. By using only fractions of solvent and sample compared to classical liquid–liquid extraction, the extraction kinetics, the preconcentration factor, and the cost efficiency can be increased. Moreover, significant improvements can be made by automation, which is still a hot topic in analytical chemistry. This review surveys comprehensively and in two parts the developments of automation of non-dispersive LPME methodologies performed in static and dynamic modes. Their advantages and limitations and the reported analytical performances are discussed and put into perspective with the corresponding manual procedures. The automation strategies, techniques, and their operation advantages as well as their potentials are further described and discussed. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_120 |
| title_short |
Automation of static and dynamic non-dispersive liquid phase microextraction. Part 1: Approaches based on extractant drop-, plug-, film- and microflow-formation |
| url |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2015.11.038 |
| remote_bool |
true |
| author2 |
Horstkotte, Burkhard Solich, Petr Sabo, Ján |
| author2Str |
Horstkotte, Burkhard Solich, Petr Sabo, Ján |
| ppnlink |
ELV013501887 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
z |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| author2_role |
oth oth oth |
| doi_str |
10.1016/j.aca.2015.11.038 |
| up_date |
2024-07-06T17:52:37.256Z |
| _version_ |
1803853084500164608 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV035562145</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230625204724.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">180603s2016 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.aca.2015.11.038</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">GBVA2016020000017.pica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV035562145</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0003-2670(15)30024-6</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">540</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">540</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">610</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">540</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">35.10</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Alexovič, Michal</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Automation of static and dynamic non-dispersive liquid phase microextraction. Part 1: Approaches based on extractant drop-, plug-, film- and microflow-formation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2016transfer abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">19</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Simplicity, effectiveness, swiftness, and environmental friendliness – these are the typical requirements for the state of the art development of green analytical techniques. Liquid phase microextraction (LPME) stands for a family of elegant sample pretreatment and analyte preconcentration techniques preserving these principles in numerous applications. By using only fractions of solvent and sample compared to classical liquid–liquid extraction, the extraction kinetics, the preconcentration factor, and the cost efficiency can be increased. Moreover, significant improvements can be made by automation, which is still a hot topic in analytical chemistry. This review surveys comprehensively and in two parts the developments of automation of non-dispersive LPME methodologies performed in static and dynamic modes. Their advantages and limitations and the reported analytical performances are discussed and put into perspective with the corresponding manual procedures. The automation strategies, techniques, and their operation advantages as well as their potentials are further described and discussed.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Simplicity, effectiveness, swiftness, and environmental friendliness – these are the typical requirements for the state of the art development of green analytical techniques. Liquid phase microextraction (LPME) stands for a family of elegant sample pretreatment and analyte preconcentration techniques preserving these principles in numerous applications. By using only fractions of solvent and sample compared to classical liquid–liquid extraction, the extraction kinetics, the preconcentration factor, and the cost efficiency can be increased. Moreover, significant improvements can be made by automation, which is still a hot topic in analytical chemistry. This review surveys comprehensively and in two parts the developments of automation of non-dispersive LPME methodologies performed in static and dynamic modes. Their advantages and limitations and the reported analytical performances are discussed and put into perspective with the corresponding manual procedures. The automation strategies, techniques, and their operation advantages as well as their potentials are further described and discussed.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Miniaturisation</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Wetting film microextraction</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Automation</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Single drop microextraction</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Static liquid phase microextraction</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Dynamic liquid phase microextraction</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">In-syringe liquid phase microextraction</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Solvent plug microextraction</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Microfluidic-based liquid phase microextraction</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Liquid phase microextraction</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Horstkotte, Burkhard</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Solich, Petr</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Sabo, Ján</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="n">Elsevier Science</subfield><subfield code="a">Gouider, R. ELSEVIER</subfield><subfield code="t">Neuro-Brucellosis</subfield><subfield code="d">2015</subfield><subfield code="d">an international journal devoted to all branches of analytical chemistry</subfield><subfield code="g">Amsterdam</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)ELV013501887</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:906</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2016</subfield><subfield code="g">day:4</subfield><subfield code="g">month:02</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:22-40</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:19</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2015.11.038</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_120</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">35.10</subfield><subfield code="j">Physikalische Chemie: Allgemeines</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">906</subfield><subfield code="j">2016</subfield><subfield code="b">4</subfield><subfield code="c">0204</subfield><subfield code="h">22-40</subfield><subfield code="g">19</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="953" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="2">045F</subfield><subfield code="a">540</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.3999777 |