Monitoring what is real: The effects of modality and action on accuracy and type of reality monitoring error
Reality monitoring refers to processes involved in distinguishing internally generated information from information presented in the external world, an activity thought to be based, in part, on assessment of activated features such as the amount and type of cognitive operations and perceptual conten...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Garrison, Jane R. [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2017transfer abstract |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Umfang: |
10 |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Do species life history traits explain population responses to roads? A meta-analysis - Rytwinski, Trina ELSEVIER, 2011, a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behaviour, Paris |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:87 ; year:2017 ; pages:108-117 ; extent:10 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1016/j.cortex.2016.06.018 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
ELV036148148 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ELV036148148 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230625210957.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 180603s2017 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.cortex.2016.06.018 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a GBV00000000000076A.pica |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)ELV036148148 | ||
| 035 | |a (ELSEVIER)S0010-9452(16)30174-5 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 082 | 0 | |a 570 |a 610 | |
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 570 |q DE-600 |
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 610 |q DE-600 |
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 570 |q VZ |
| 084 | |a BIODIV |q DE-30 |2 fid | ||
| 084 | |a 42.00 |2 bkl | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Garrison, Jane R. |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Monitoring what is real: The effects of modality and action on accuracy and type of reality monitoring error |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2017transfer abstract | |
| 300 | |a 10 | ||
| 336 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zzz |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b z |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zu |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Reality monitoring refers to processes involved in distinguishing internally generated information from information presented in the external world, an activity thought to be based, in part, on assessment of activated features such as the amount and type of cognitive operations and perceptual content. Impairment in reality monitoring has been implicated in symptoms of mental illness and associated more widely with the occurrence of anomalous perceptions as well as false memories and beliefs. In the present experiment, the cognitive mechanisms of reality monitoring were probed in healthy individuals using a task that investigated the effects of stimulus modality (auditory vs visual) and the type of action undertaken during encoding (thought vs speech) on subsequent source memory. There was reduced source accuracy for auditory stimuli compared with visual, and when encoding was accompanied by thought as opposed to speech, and a greater rate of externalization than internalization errors that was stable across factors. Interpreted within the source monitoring framework (Johnson, Hashtroudi, & Lindsay, 1993), the results are consistent with the greater prevalence of clinically observed auditory than visual reality discrimination failures. The significance of these findings is discussed in light of theories of hallucinations, delusions and confabulation. | ||
| 520 | |a Reality monitoring refers to processes involved in distinguishing internally generated information from information presented in the external world, an activity thought to be based, in part, on assessment of activated features such as the amount and type of cognitive operations and perceptual content. Impairment in reality monitoring has been implicated in symptoms of mental illness and associated more widely with the occurrence of anomalous perceptions as well as false memories and beliefs. In the present experiment, the cognitive mechanisms of reality monitoring were probed in healthy individuals using a task that investigated the effects of stimulus modality (auditory vs visual) and the type of action undertaken during encoding (thought vs speech) on subsequent source memory. There was reduced source accuracy for auditory stimuli compared with visual, and when encoding was accompanied by thought as opposed to speech, and a greater rate of externalization than internalization errors that was stable across factors. Interpreted within the source monitoring framework (Johnson, Hashtroudi, & Lindsay, 1993), the results are consistent with the greater prevalence of clinically observed auditory than visual reality discrimination failures. The significance of these findings is discussed in light of theories of hallucinations, delusions and confabulation. | ||
| 650 | 7 | |a Confabulation |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Reality monitoring |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Delusions |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Hallucinations |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Schizophrenia |2 Elsevier | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Bond, Rebecca |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Gibbard, Emma |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Johnson, Marcia K. |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Simons, Jon S. |4 oth | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |n Elsevier Masson |a Rytwinski, Trina ELSEVIER |t Do species life history traits explain population responses to roads? A meta-analysis |d 2011 |d a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behaviour |g Paris |w (DE-627)ELV008365814 |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:87 |g year:2017 |g pages:108-117 |g extent:10 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2016.06.018 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_U | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ELV | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_U | ||
| 912 | |a FID-BIODIV | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-PHA | ||
| 936 | b | k | |a 42.00 |j Biologie: Allgemeines |q VZ |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 87 |j 2017 |h 108-117 |g 10 | ||
| 953 | |2 045F |a 570 | ||
| author_variant |
j r g jr jrg |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
garrisonjanerbondrebeccagibbardemmajohns:2017----:oioightselhefcsfoaiynatooacrcadye |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2017transfer abstract |
| bklnumber |
42.00 |
| publishDate |
2017 |
| allfields |
10.1016/j.cortex.2016.06.018 doi GBV00000000000076A.pica (DE-627)ELV036148148 (ELSEVIER)S0010-9452(16)30174-5 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 570 610 570 DE-600 610 DE-600 570 VZ BIODIV DE-30 fid 42.00 bkl Garrison, Jane R. verfasserin aut Monitoring what is real: The effects of modality and action on accuracy and type of reality monitoring error 2017transfer abstract 10 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Reality monitoring refers to processes involved in distinguishing internally generated information from information presented in the external world, an activity thought to be based, in part, on assessment of activated features such as the amount and type of cognitive operations and perceptual content. Impairment in reality monitoring has been implicated in symptoms of mental illness and associated more widely with the occurrence of anomalous perceptions as well as false memories and beliefs. In the present experiment, the cognitive mechanisms of reality monitoring were probed in healthy individuals using a task that investigated the effects of stimulus modality (auditory vs visual) and the type of action undertaken during encoding (thought vs speech) on subsequent source memory. There was reduced source accuracy for auditory stimuli compared with visual, and when encoding was accompanied by thought as opposed to speech, and a greater rate of externalization than internalization errors that was stable across factors. Interpreted within the source monitoring framework (Johnson, Hashtroudi, & Lindsay, 1993), the results are consistent with the greater prevalence of clinically observed auditory than visual reality discrimination failures. The significance of these findings is discussed in light of theories of hallucinations, delusions and confabulation. Reality monitoring refers to processes involved in distinguishing internally generated information from information presented in the external world, an activity thought to be based, in part, on assessment of activated features such as the amount and type of cognitive operations and perceptual content. Impairment in reality monitoring has been implicated in symptoms of mental illness and associated more widely with the occurrence of anomalous perceptions as well as false memories and beliefs. In the present experiment, the cognitive mechanisms of reality monitoring were probed in healthy individuals using a task that investigated the effects of stimulus modality (auditory vs visual) and the type of action undertaken during encoding (thought vs speech) on subsequent source memory. There was reduced source accuracy for auditory stimuli compared with visual, and when encoding was accompanied by thought as opposed to speech, and a greater rate of externalization than internalization errors that was stable across factors. Interpreted within the source monitoring framework (Johnson, Hashtroudi, & Lindsay, 1993), the results are consistent with the greater prevalence of clinically observed auditory than visual reality discrimination failures. The significance of these findings is discussed in light of theories of hallucinations, delusions and confabulation. Confabulation Elsevier Reality monitoring Elsevier Delusions Elsevier Hallucinations Elsevier Schizophrenia Elsevier Bond, Rebecca oth Gibbard, Emma oth Johnson, Marcia K. oth Simons, Jon S. oth Enthalten in Elsevier Masson Rytwinski, Trina ELSEVIER Do species life history traits explain population responses to roads? A meta-analysis 2011 a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behaviour Paris (DE-627)ELV008365814 volume:87 year:2017 pages:108-117 extent:10 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2016.06.018 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U FID-BIODIV SSG-OLC-PHA 42.00 Biologie: Allgemeines VZ AR 87 2017 108-117 10 045F 570 |
| spelling |
10.1016/j.cortex.2016.06.018 doi GBV00000000000076A.pica (DE-627)ELV036148148 (ELSEVIER)S0010-9452(16)30174-5 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 570 610 570 DE-600 610 DE-600 570 VZ BIODIV DE-30 fid 42.00 bkl Garrison, Jane R. verfasserin aut Monitoring what is real: The effects of modality and action on accuracy and type of reality monitoring error 2017transfer abstract 10 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Reality monitoring refers to processes involved in distinguishing internally generated information from information presented in the external world, an activity thought to be based, in part, on assessment of activated features such as the amount and type of cognitive operations and perceptual content. Impairment in reality monitoring has been implicated in symptoms of mental illness and associated more widely with the occurrence of anomalous perceptions as well as false memories and beliefs. In the present experiment, the cognitive mechanisms of reality monitoring were probed in healthy individuals using a task that investigated the effects of stimulus modality (auditory vs visual) and the type of action undertaken during encoding (thought vs speech) on subsequent source memory. There was reduced source accuracy for auditory stimuli compared with visual, and when encoding was accompanied by thought as opposed to speech, and a greater rate of externalization than internalization errors that was stable across factors. Interpreted within the source monitoring framework (Johnson, Hashtroudi, & Lindsay, 1993), the results are consistent with the greater prevalence of clinically observed auditory than visual reality discrimination failures. The significance of these findings is discussed in light of theories of hallucinations, delusions and confabulation. Reality monitoring refers to processes involved in distinguishing internally generated information from information presented in the external world, an activity thought to be based, in part, on assessment of activated features such as the amount and type of cognitive operations and perceptual content. Impairment in reality monitoring has been implicated in symptoms of mental illness and associated more widely with the occurrence of anomalous perceptions as well as false memories and beliefs. In the present experiment, the cognitive mechanisms of reality monitoring were probed in healthy individuals using a task that investigated the effects of stimulus modality (auditory vs visual) and the type of action undertaken during encoding (thought vs speech) on subsequent source memory. There was reduced source accuracy for auditory stimuli compared with visual, and when encoding was accompanied by thought as opposed to speech, and a greater rate of externalization than internalization errors that was stable across factors. Interpreted within the source monitoring framework (Johnson, Hashtroudi, & Lindsay, 1993), the results are consistent with the greater prevalence of clinically observed auditory than visual reality discrimination failures. The significance of these findings is discussed in light of theories of hallucinations, delusions and confabulation. Confabulation Elsevier Reality monitoring Elsevier Delusions Elsevier Hallucinations Elsevier Schizophrenia Elsevier Bond, Rebecca oth Gibbard, Emma oth Johnson, Marcia K. oth Simons, Jon S. oth Enthalten in Elsevier Masson Rytwinski, Trina ELSEVIER Do species life history traits explain population responses to roads? A meta-analysis 2011 a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behaviour Paris (DE-627)ELV008365814 volume:87 year:2017 pages:108-117 extent:10 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2016.06.018 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U FID-BIODIV SSG-OLC-PHA 42.00 Biologie: Allgemeines VZ AR 87 2017 108-117 10 045F 570 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1016/j.cortex.2016.06.018 doi GBV00000000000076A.pica (DE-627)ELV036148148 (ELSEVIER)S0010-9452(16)30174-5 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 570 610 570 DE-600 610 DE-600 570 VZ BIODIV DE-30 fid 42.00 bkl Garrison, Jane R. verfasserin aut Monitoring what is real: The effects of modality and action on accuracy and type of reality monitoring error 2017transfer abstract 10 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Reality monitoring refers to processes involved in distinguishing internally generated information from information presented in the external world, an activity thought to be based, in part, on assessment of activated features such as the amount and type of cognitive operations and perceptual content. Impairment in reality monitoring has been implicated in symptoms of mental illness and associated more widely with the occurrence of anomalous perceptions as well as false memories and beliefs. In the present experiment, the cognitive mechanisms of reality monitoring were probed in healthy individuals using a task that investigated the effects of stimulus modality (auditory vs visual) and the type of action undertaken during encoding (thought vs speech) on subsequent source memory. There was reduced source accuracy for auditory stimuli compared with visual, and when encoding was accompanied by thought as opposed to speech, and a greater rate of externalization than internalization errors that was stable across factors. Interpreted within the source monitoring framework (Johnson, Hashtroudi, & Lindsay, 1993), the results are consistent with the greater prevalence of clinically observed auditory than visual reality discrimination failures. The significance of these findings is discussed in light of theories of hallucinations, delusions and confabulation. Reality monitoring refers to processes involved in distinguishing internally generated information from information presented in the external world, an activity thought to be based, in part, on assessment of activated features such as the amount and type of cognitive operations and perceptual content. Impairment in reality monitoring has been implicated in symptoms of mental illness and associated more widely with the occurrence of anomalous perceptions as well as false memories and beliefs. In the present experiment, the cognitive mechanisms of reality monitoring were probed in healthy individuals using a task that investigated the effects of stimulus modality (auditory vs visual) and the type of action undertaken during encoding (thought vs speech) on subsequent source memory. There was reduced source accuracy for auditory stimuli compared with visual, and when encoding was accompanied by thought as opposed to speech, and a greater rate of externalization than internalization errors that was stable across factors. Interpreted within the source monitoring framework (Johnson, Hashtroudi, & Lindsay, 1993), the results are consistent with the greater prevalence of clinically observed auditory than visual reality discrimination failures. The significance of these findings is discussed in light of theories of hallucinations, delusions and confabulation. Confabulation Elsevier Reality monitoring Elsevier Delusions Elsevier Hallucinations Elsevier Schizophrenia Elsevier Bond, Rebecca oth Gibbard, Emma oth Johnson, Marcia K. oth Simons, Jon S. oth Enthalten in Elsevier Masson Rytwinski, Trina ELSEVIER Do species life history traits explain population responses to roads? A meta-analysis 2011 a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behaviour Paris (DE-627)ELV008365814 volume:87 year:2017 pages:108-117 extent:10 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2016.06.018 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U FID-BIODIV SSG-OLC-PHA 42.00 Biologie: Allgemeines VZ AR 87 2017 108-117 10 045F 570 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1016/j.cortex.2016.06.018 doi GBV00000000000076A.pica (DE-627)ELV036148148 (ELSEVIER)S0010-9452(16)30174-5 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 570 610 570 DE-600 610 DE-600 570 VZ BIODIV DE-30 fid 42.00 bkl Garrison, Jane R. verfasserin aut Monitoring what is real: The effects of modality and action on accuracy and type of reality monitoring error 2017transfer abstract 10 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Reality monitoring refers to processes involved in distinguishing internally generated information from information presented in the external world, an activity thought to be based, in part, on assessment of activated features such as the amount and type of cognitive operations and perceptual content. Impairment in reality monitoring has been implicated in symptoms of mental illness and associated more widely with the occurrence of anomalous perceptions as well as false memories and beliefs. In the present experiment, the cognitive mechanisms of reality monitoring were probed in healthy individuals using a task that investigated the effects of stimulus modality (auditory vs visual) and the type of action undertaken during encoding (thought vs speech) on subsequent source memory. There was reduced source accuracy for auditory stimuli compared with visual, and when encoding was accompanied by thought as opposed to speech, and a greater rate of externalization than internalization errors that was stable across factors. Interpreted within the source monitoring framework (Johnson, Hashtroudi, & Lindsay, 1993), the results are consistent with the greater prevalence of clinically observed auditory than visual reality discrimination failures. The significance of these findings is discussed in light of theories of hallucinations, delusions and confabulation. Reality monitoring refers to processes involved in distinguishing internally generated information from information presented in the external world, an activity thought to be based, in part, on assessment of activated features such as the amount and type of cognitive operations and perceptual content. Impairment in reality monitoring has been implicated in symptoms of mental illness and associated more widely with the occurrence of anomalous perceptions as well as false memories and beliefs. In the present experiment, the cognitive mechanisms of reality monitoring were probed in healthy individuals using a task that investigated the effects of stimulus modality (auditory vs visual) and the type of action undertaken during encoding (thought vs speech) on subsequent source memory. There was reduced source accuracy for auditory stimuli compared with visual, and when encoding was accompanied by thought as opposed to speech, and a greater rate of externalization than internalization errors that was stable across factors. Interpreted within the source monitoring framework (Johnson, Hashtroudi, & Lindsay, 1993), the results are consistent with the greater prevalence of clinically observed auditory than visual reality discrimination failures. The significance of these findings is discussed in light of theories of hallucinations, delusions and confabulation. Confabulation Elsevier Reality monitoring Elsevier Delusions Elsevier Hallucinations Elsevier Schizophrenia Elsevier Bond, Rebecca oth Gibbard, Emma oth Johnson, Marcia K. oth Simons, Jon S. oth Enthalten in Elsevier Masson Rytwinski, Trina ELSEVIER Do species life history traits explain population responses to roads? A meta-analysis 2011 a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behaviour Paris (DE-627)ELV008365814 volume:87 year:2017 pages:108-117 extent:10 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2016.06.018 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U FID-BIODIV SSG-OLC-PHA 42.00 Biologie: Allgemeines VZ AR 87 2017 108-117 10 045F 570 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1016/j.cortex.2016.06.018 doi GBV00000000000076A.pica (DE-627)ELV036148148 (ELSEVIER)S0010-9452(16)30174-5 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 570 610 570 DE-600 610 DE-600 570 VZ BIODIV DE-30 fid 42.00 bkl Garrison, Jane R. verfasserin aut Monitoring what is real: The effects of modality and action on accuracy and type of reality monitoring error 2017transfer abstract 10 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Reality monitoring refers to processes involved in distinguishing internally generated information from information presented in the external world, an activity thought to be based, in part, on assessment of activated features such as the amount and type of cognitive operations and perceptual content. Impairment in reality monitoring has been implicated in symptoms of mental illness and associated more widely with the occurrence of anomalous perceptions as well as false memories and beliefs. In the present experiment, the cognitive mechanisms of reality monitoring were probed in healthy individuals using a task that investigated the effects of stimulus modality (auditory vs visual) and the type of action undertaken during encoding (thought vs speech) on subsequent source memory. There was reduced source accuracy for auditory stimuli compared with visual, and when encoding was accompanied by thought as opposed to speech, and a greater rate of externalization than internalization errors that was stable across factors. Interpreted within the source monitoring framework (Johnson, Hashtroudi, & Lindsay, 1993), the results are consistent with the greater prevalence of clinically observed auditory than visual reality discrimination failures. The significance of these findings is discussed in light of theories of hallucinations, delusions and confabulation. Reality monitoring refers to processes involved in distinguishing internally generated information from information presented in the external world, an activity thought to be based, in part, on assessment of activated features such as the amount and type of cognitive operations and perceptual content. Impairment in reality monitoring has been implicated in symptoms of mental illness and associated more widely with the occurrence of anomalous perceptions as well as false memories and beliefs. In the present experiment, the cognitive mechanisms of reality monitoring were probed in healthy individuals using a task that investigated the effects of stimulus modality (auditory vs visual) and the type of action undertaken during encoding (thought vs speech) on subsequent source memory. There was reduced source accuracy for auditory stimuli compared with visual, and when encoding was accompanied by thought as opposed to speech, and a greater rate of externalization than internalization errors that was stable across factors. Interpreted within the source monitoring framework (Johnson, Hashtroudi, & Lindsay, 1993), the results are consistent with the greater prevalence of clinically observed auditory than visual reality discrimination failures. The significance of these findings is discussed in light of theories of hallucinations, delusions and confabulation. Confabulation Elsevier Reality monitoring Elsevier Delusions Elsevier Hallucinations Elsevier Schizophrenia Elsevier Bond, Rebecca oth Gibbard, Emma oth Johnson, Marcia K. oth Simons, Jon S. oth Enthalten in Elsevier Masson Rytwinski, Trina ELSEVIER Do species life history traits explain population responses to roads? A meta-analysis 2011 a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behaviour Paris (DE-627)ELV008365814 volume:87 year:2017 pages:108-117 extent:10 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2016.06.018 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U FID-BIODIV SSG-OLC-PHA 42.00 Biologie: Allgemeines VZ AR 87 2017 108-117 10 045F 570 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in Do species life history traits explain population responses to roads? A meta-analysis Paris volume:87 year:2017 pages:108-117 extent:10 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in Do species life history traits explain population responses to roads? A meta-analysis Paris volume:87 year:2017 pages:108-117 extent:10 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| bklname |
Biologie: Allgemeines |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
Confabulation Reality monitoring Delusions Hallucinations Schizophrenia |
| dewey-raw |
570 |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
Do species life history traits explain population responses to roads? A meta-analysis |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Garrison, Jane R. @@aut@@ Bond, Rebecca @@oth@@ Gibbard, Emma @@oth@@ Johnson, Marcia K. @@oth@@ Simons, Jon S. @@oth@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2017-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
ELV008365814 |
| dewey-sort |
3570 |
| id |
ELV036148148 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV036148148</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230625210957.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">180603s2017 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.cortex.2016.06.018</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">GBV00000000000076A.pica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV036148148</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0010-9452(16)30174-5</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">570</subfield><subfield code="a">610</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">570</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">610</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">570</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">BIODIV</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-30</subfield><subfield code="2">fid</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">42.00</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Garrison, Jane R.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Monitoring what is real: The effects of modality and action on accuracy and type of reality monitoring error</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2017transfer abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Reality monitoring refers to processes involved in distinguishing internally generated information from information presented in the external world, an activity thought to be based, in part, on assessment of activated features such as the amount and type of cognitive operations and perceptual content. Impairment in reality monitoring has been implicated in symptoms of mental illness and associated more widely with the occurrence of anomalous perceptions as well as false memories and beliefs. In the present experiment, the cognitive mechanisms of reality monitoring were probed in healthy individuals using a task that investigated the effects of stimulus modality (auditory vs visual) and the type of action undertaken during encoding (thought vs speech) on subsequent source memory. There was reduced source accuracy for auditory stimuli compared with visual, and when encoding was accompanied by thought as opposed to speech, and a greater rate of externalization than internalization errors that was stable across factors. Interpreted within the source monitoring framework (Johnson, Hashtroudi, & Lindsay, 1993), the results are consistent with the greater prevalence of clinically observed auditory than visual reality discrimination failures. The significance of these findings is discussed in light of theories of hallucinations, delusions and confabulation.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Reality monitoring refers to processes involved in distinguishing internally generated information from information presented in the external world, an activity thought to be based, in part, on assessment of activated features such as the amount and type of cognitive operations and perceptual content. Impairment in reality monitoring has been implicated in symptoms of mental illness and associated more widely with the occurrence of anomalous perceptions as well as false memories and beliefs. In the present experiment, the cognitive mechanisms of reality monitoring were probed in healthy individuals using a task that investigated the effects of stimulus modality (auditory vs visual) and the type of action undertaken during encoding (thought vs speech) on subsequent source memory. There was reduced source accuracy for auditory stimuli compared with visual, and when encoding was accompanied by thought as opposed to speech, and a greater rate of externalization than internalization errors that was stable across factors. Interpreted within the source monitoring framework (Johnson, Hashtroudi, & Lindsay, 1993), the results are consistent with the greater prevalence of clinically observed auditory than visual reality discrimination failures. The significance of these findings is discussed in light of theories of hallucinations, delusions and confabulation.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Confabulation</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Reality monitoring</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Delusions</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Hallucinations</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Schizophrenia</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Bond, Rebecca</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Gibbard, Emma</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Johnson, Marcia K.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Simons, Jon S.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="n">Elsevier Masson</subfield><subfield code="a">Rytwinski, Trina ELSEVIER</subfield><subfield code="t">Do species life history traits explain population responses to roads? A meta-analysis</subfield><subfield code="d">2011</subfield><subfield code="d">a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behaviour</subfield><subfield code="g">Paris</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)ELV008365814</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:87</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2017</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:108-117</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:10</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2016.06.018</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">FID-BIODIV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">42.00</subfield><subfield code="j">Biologie: Allgemeines</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">87</subfield><subfield code="j">2017</subfield><subfield code="h">108-117</subfield><subfield code="g">10</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="953" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="2">045F</subfield><subfield code="a">570</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Garrison, Jane R. |
| spellingShingle |
Garrison, Jane R. ddc 570 ddc 610 fid BIODIV bkl 42.00 Elsevier Confabulation Elsevier Reality monitoring Elsevier Delusions Elsevier Hallucinations Elsevier Schizophrenia Monitoring what is real: The effects of modality and action on accuracy and type of reality monitoring error |
| authorStr |
Garrison, Jane R. |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)ELV008365814 |
| format |
electronic Article |
| dewey-ones |
570 - Life sciences; biology 610 - Medicine & health |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut |
| collection |
elsevier |
| remote_str |
true |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| topic_title |
570 610 570 DE-600 610 DE-600 570 VZ BIODIV DE-30 fid 42.00 bkl Monitoring what is real: The effects of modality and action on accuracy and type of reality monitoring error Confabulation Elsevier Reality monitoring Elsevier Delusions Elsevier Hallucinations Elsevier Schizophrenia Elsevier |
| topic |
ddc 570 ddc 610 fid BIODIV bkl 42.00 Elsevier Confabulation Elsevier Reality monitoring Elsevier Delusions Elsevier Hallucinations Elsevier Schizophrenia |
| topic_unstemmed |
ddc 570 ddc 610 fid BIODIV bkl 42.00 Elsevier Confabulation Elsevier Reality monitoring Elsevier Delusions Elsevier Hallucinations Elsevier Schizophrenia |
| topic_browse |
ddc 570 ddc 610 fid BIODIV bkl 42.00 Elsevier Confabulation Elsevier Reality monitoring Elsevier Delusions Elsevier Hallucinations Elsevier Schizophrenia |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
zu |
| author2_variant |
r b rb e g eg m k j mk mkj j s s js jss |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Do species life history traits explain population responses to roads? A meta-analysis |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
ELV008365814 |
| dewey-tens |
570 - Life sciences; biology 610 - Medicine & health |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Do species life history traits explain population responses to roads? A meta-analysis |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)ELV008365814 |
| title |
Monitoring what is real: The effects of modality and action on accuracy and type of reality monitoring error |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)ELV036148148 (ELSEVIER)S0010-9452(16)30174-5 |
| title_full |
Monitoring what is real: The effects of modality and action on accuracy and type of reality monitoring error |
| author_sort |
Garrison, Jane R. |
| journal |
Do species life history traits explain population responses to roads? A meta-analysis |
| journalStr |
Do species life history traits explain population responses to roads? A meta-analysis |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| dewey-hundreds |
500 - Science 600 - Technology |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2017 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
zzz |
| container_start_page |
108 |
| author_browse |
Garrison, Jane R. |
| container_volume |
87 |
| physical |
10 |
| class |
570 610 570 DE-600 610 DE-600 570 VZ BIODIV DE-30 fid 42.00 bkl |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Garrison, Jane R. |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1016/j.cortex.2016.06.018 |
| dewey-full |
570 610 |
| title_sort |
monitoring what is real: the effects of modality and action on accuracy and type of reality monitoring error |
| title_auth |
Monitoring what is real: The effects of modality and action on accuracy and type of reality monitoring error |
| abstract |
Reality monitoring refers to processes involved in distinguishing internally generated information from information presented in the external world, an activity thought to be based, in part, on assessment of activated features such as the amount and type of cognitive operations and perceptual content. Impairment in reality monitoring has been implicated in symptoms of mental illness and associated more widely with the occurrence of anomalous perceptions as well as false memories and beliefs. In the present experiment, the cognitive mechanisms of reality monitoring were probed in healthy individuals using a task that investigated the effects of stimulus modality (auditory vs visual) and the type of action undertaken during encoding (thought vs speech) on subsequent source memory. There was reduced source accuracy for auditory stimuli compared with visual, and when encoding was accompanied by thought as opposed to speech, and a greater rate of externalization than internalization errors that was stable across factors. Interpreted within the source monitoring framework (Johnson, Hashtroudi, & Lindsay, 1993), the results are consistent with the greater prevalence of clinically observed auditory than visual reality discrimination failures. The significance of these findings is discussed in light of theories of hallucinations, delusions and confabulation. |
| abstractGer |
Reality monitoring refers to processes involved in distinguishing internally generated information from information presented in the external world, an activity thought to be based, in part, on assessment of activated features such as the amount and type of cognitive operations and perceptual content. Impairment in reality monitoring has been implicated in symptoms of mental illness and associated more widely with the occurrence of anomalous perceptions as well as false memories and beliefs. In the present experiment, the cognitive mechanisms of reality monitoring were probed in healthy individuals using a task that investigated the effects of stimulus modality (auditory vs visual) and the type of action undertaken during encoding (thought vs speech) on subsequent source memory. There was reduced source accuracy for auditory stimuli compared with visual, and when encoding was accompanied by thought as opposed to speech, and a greater rate of externalization than internalization errors that was stable across factors. Interpreted within the source monitoring framework (Johnson, Hashtroudi, & Lindsay, 1993), the results are consistent with the greater prevalence of clinically observed auditory than visual reality discrimination failures. The significance of these findings is discussed in light of theories of hallucinations, delusions and confabulation. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
Reality monitoring refers to processes involved in distinguishing internally generated information from information presented in the external world, an activity thought to be based, in part, on assessment of activated features such as the amount and type of cognitive operations and perceptual content. Impairment in reality monitoring has been implicated in symptoms of mental illness and associated more widely with the occurrence of anomalous perceptions as well as false memories and beliefs. In the present experiment, the cognitive mechanisms of reality monitoring were probed in healthy individuals using a task that investigated the effects of stimulus modality (auditory vs visual) and the type of action undertaken during encoding (thought vs speech) on subsequent source memory. There was reduced source accuracy for auditory stimuli compared with visual, and when encoding was accompanied by thought as opposed to speech, and a greater rate of externalization than internalization errors that was stable across factors. Interpreted within the source monitoring framework (Johnson, Hashtroudi, & Lindsay, 1993), the results are consistent with the greater prevalence of clinically observed auditory than visual reality discrimination failures. The significance of these findings is discussed in light of theories of hallucinations, delusions and confabulation. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U FID-BIODIV SSG-OLC-PHA |
| title_short |
Monitoring what is real: The effects of modality and action on accuracy and type of reality monitoring error |
| url |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2016.06.018 |
| remote_bool |
true |
| author2 |
Bond, Rebecca Gibbard, Emma Johnson, Marcia K. Simons, Jon S. |
| author2Str |
Bond, Rebecca Gibbard, Emma Johnson, Marcia K. Simons, Jon S. |
| ppnlink |
ELV008365814 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
z |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| author2_role |
oth oth oth oth |
| doi_str |
10.1016/j.cortex.2016.06.018 |
| up_date |
2024-07-06T19:25:32.861Z |
| _version_ |
1803858930943655936 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV036148148</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230625210957.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">180603s2017 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.cortex.2016.06.018</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">GBV00000000000076A.pica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV036148148</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0010-9452(16)30174-5</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">570</subfield><subfield code="a">610</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">570</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">610</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">570</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">BIODIV</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-30</subfield><subfield code="2">fid</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">42.00</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Garrison, Jane R.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Monitoring what is real: The effects of modality and action on accuracy and type of reality monitoring error</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2017transfer abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Reality monitoring refers to processes involved in distinguishing internally generated information from information presented in the external world, an activity thought to be based, in part, on assessment of activated features such as the amount and type of cognitive operations and perceptual content. Impairment in reality monitoring has been implicated in symptoms of mental illness and associated more widely with the occurrence of anomalous perceptions as well as false memories and beliefs. In the present experiment, the cognitive mechanisms of reality monitoring were probed in healthy individuals using a task that investigated the effects of stimulus modality (auditory vs visual) and the type of action undertaken during encoding (thought vs speech) on subsequent source memory. There was reduced source accuracy for auditory stimuli compared with visual, and when encoding was accompanied by thought as opposed to speech, and a greater rate of externalization than internalization errors that was stable across factors. Interpreted within the source monitoring framework (Johnson, Hashtroudi, & Lindsay, 1993), the results are consistent with the greater prevalence of clinically observed auditory than visual reality discrimination failures. The significance of these findings is discussed in light of theories of hallucinations, delusions and confabulation.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Reality monitoring refers to processes involved in distinguishing internally generated information from information presented in the external world, an activity thought to be based, in part, on assessment of activated features such as the amount and type of cognitive operations and perceptual content. Impairment in reality monitoring has been implicated in symptoms of mental illness and associated more widely with the occurrence of anomalous perceptions as well as false memories and beliefs. In the present experiment, the cognitive mechanisms of reality monitoring were probed in healthy individuals using a task that investigated the effects of stimulus modality (auditory vs visual) and the type of action undertaken during encoding (thought vs speech) on subsequent source memory. There was reduced source accuracy for auditory stimuli compared with visual, and when encoding was accompanied by thought as opposed to speech, and a greater rate of externalization than internalization errors that was stable across factors. Interpreted within the source monitoring framework (Johnson, Hashtroudi, & Lindsay, 1993), the results are consistent with the greater prevalence of clinically observed auditory than visual reality discrimination failures. The significance of these findings is discussed in light of theories of hallucinations, delusions and confabulation.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Confabulation</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Reality monitoring</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Delusions</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Hallucinations</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Schizophrenia</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Bond, Rebecca</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Gibbard, Emma</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Johnson, Marcia K.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Simons, Jon S.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="n">Elsevier Masson</subfield><subfield code="a">Rytwinski, Trina ELSEVIER</subfield><subfield code="t">Do species life history traits explain population responses to roads? A meta-analysis</subfield><subfield code="d">2011</subfield><subfield code="d">a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behaviour</subfield><subfield code="g">Paris</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)ELV008365814</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:87</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2017</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:108-117</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:10</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2016.06.018</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">FID-BIODIV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">42.00</subfield><subfield code="j">Biologie: Allgemeines</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">87</subfield><subfield code="j">2017</subfield><subfield code="h">108-117</subfield><subfield code="g">10</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="953" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="2">045F</subfield><subfield code="a">570</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.398719 |