Landauer defended: Reply to Norton
Ladyman, Presnell, and Short (2007) proposed a model of the implementation of logical operations by physical processes in order to clarify the exact statement of Landauer's Principle, and then offered a new proof of the latter based on the construction of a thermodynamic cycle, arguing that if...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Ladyman, James [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2013transfer abstract |
|---|
| Umfang: |
9 |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Reply: Radical hysterectomy and survival outcomes in the management of early stage cervical cancer - Mendivil, Alberto A. ELSEVIER, 2016, Amsterdam [u.a.] |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:44 ; year:2013 ; number:3 ; pages:263-271 ; extent:9 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1016/j.shpsb.2013.02.005 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
ELV039041743 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ELV039041743 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230625223846.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 180603s2013 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.shpsb.2013.02.005 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a GBVA2013018000025.pica |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)ELV039041743 | ||
| 035 | |a (ELSEVIER)S1355-2198(13)00020-8 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 082 | 0 | |a 100 |a 900 | |
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 100 |q DE-600 |
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 900 |q DE-600 |
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 610 |q VZ |
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 570 |q VZ |
| 084 | |a BIODIV |q DE-30 |2 fid | ||
| 084 | |a 35.70 |2 bkl | ||
| 084 | |a 42.12 |2 bkl | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Ladyman, James |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Landauer defended: Reply to Norton |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2013transfer abstract | |
| 300 | |a 9 | ||
| 336 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zzz |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b z |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zu |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Ladyman, Presnell, and Short (2007) proposed a model of the implementation of logical operations by physical processes in order to clarify the exact statement of Landauer's Principle, and then offered a new proof of the latter based on the construction of a thermodynamic cycle, arguing that if Landauer's Principle were false it would be possible to harness a machine that violated it to produce a violation of the second law of thermodynamics. In a recent paper in this journal, John Norton (2011) directly challenges the consistency of that proof. In the present paper we defend the proof given by Ladyman et al. against his critique. In particular, contrary to what Norton claims, we argue that the processes used in the proof cannot be used to construct a cycle that enacts erasure in a thermodynamically reversible way, and that he does not show that the processes used in the proof violate the Second Law of Thermodynamics. | ||
| 520 | |a Ladyman, Presnell, and Short (2007) proposed a model of the implementation of logical operations by physical processes in order to clarify the exact statement of Landauer's Principle, and then offered a new proof of the latter based on the construction of a thermodynamic cycle, arguing that if Landauer's Principle were false it would be possible to harness a machine that violated it to produce a violation of the second law of thermodynamics. In a recent paper in this journal, John Norton (2011) directly challenges the consistency of that proof. In the present paper we defend the proof given by Ladyman et al. against his critique. In particular, contrary to what Norton claims, we argue that the processes used in the proof cannot be used to construct a cycle that enacts erasure in a thermodynamically reversible way, and that he does not show that the processes used in the proof violate the Second Law of Thermodynamics. | ||
| 700 | 1 | |a Robertson, Katie |4 oth | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |n Elsevier Science |a Mendivil, Alberto A. ELSEVIER |t Reply: Radical hysterectomy and survival outcomes in the management of early stage cervical cancer |d 2016 |g Amsterdam [u.a.] |w (DE-627)ELV014391791 |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:44 |g year:2013 |g number:3 |g pages:263-271 |g extent:9 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsb.2013.02.005 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_U | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ELV | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_U | ||
| 912 | |a FID-BIODIV | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-PHA | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_22 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_40 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_105 | ||
| 936 | b | k | |a 35.70 |j Biochemie: Allgemeines |q VZ |
| 936 | b | k | |a 42.12 |j Biophysik |q VZ |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 44 |j 2013 |e 3 |h 263-271 |g 9 | ||
| 953 | |2 045F |a 100 | ||
| author_variant |
j l jl |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
ladymanjamesrobertsonkatie:2013----:adureeddel |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2013transfer abstract |
| bklnumber |
35.70 42.12 |
| publishDate |
2013 |
| allfields |
10.1016/j.shpsb.2013.02.005 doi GBVA2013018000025.pica (DE-627)ELV039041743 (ELSEVIER)S1355-2198(13)00020-8 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 100 900 100 DE-600 900 DE-600 610 VZ 570 VZ BIODIV DE-30 fid 35.70 bkl 42.12 bkl Ladyman, James verfasserin aut Landauer defended: Reply to Norton 2013transfer abstract 9 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Ladyman, Presnell, and Short (2007) proposed a model of the implementation of logical operations by physical processes in order to clarify the exact statement of Landauer's Principle, and then offered a new proof of the latter based on the construction of a thermodynamic cycle, arguing that if Landauer's Principle were false it would be possible to harness a machine that violated it to produce a violation of the second law of thermodynamics. In a recent paper in this journal, John Norton (2011) directly challenges the consistency of that proof. In the present paper we defend the proof given by Ladyman et al. against his critique. In particular, contrary to what Norton claims, we argue that the processes used in the proof cannot be used to construct a cycle that enacts erasure in a thermodynamically reversible way, and that he does not show that the processes used in the proof violate the Second Law of Thermodynamics. Ladyman, Presnell, and Short (2007) proposed a model of the implementation of logical operations by physical processes in order to clarify the exact statement of Landauer's Principle, and then offered a new proof of the latter based on the construction of a thermodynamic cycle, arguing that if Landauer's Principle were false it would be possible to harness a machine that violated it to produce a violation of the second law of thermodynamics. In a recent paper in this journal, John Norton (2011) directly challenges the consistency of that proof. In the present paper we defend the proof given by Ladyman et al. against his critique. In particular, contrary to what Norton claims, we argue that the processes used in the proof cannot be used to construct a cycle that enacts erasure in a thermodynamically reversible way, and that he does not show that the processes used in the proof violate the Second Law of Thermodynamics. Robertson, Katie oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Mendivil, Alberto A. ELSEVIER Reply: Radical hysterectomy and survival outcomes in the management of early stage cervical cancer 2016 Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV014391791 volume:44 year:2013 number:3 pages:263-271 extent:9 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsb.2013.02.005 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U FID-BIODIV SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_105 35.70 Biochemie: Allgemeines VZ 42.12 Biophysik VZ AR 44 2013 3 263-271 9 045F 100 |
| spelling |
10.1016/j.shpsb.2013.02.005 doi GBVA2013018000025.pica (DE-627)ELV039041743 (ELSEVIER)S1355-2198(13)00020-8 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 100 900 100 DE-600 900 DE-600 610 VZ 570 VZ BIODIV DE-30 fid 35.70 bkl 42.12 bkl Ladyman, James verfasserin aut Landauer defended: Reply to Norton 2013transfer abstract 9 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Ladyman, Presnell, and Short (2007) proposed a model of the implementation of logical operations by physical processes in order to clarify the exact statement of Landauer's Principle, and then offered a new proof of the latter based on the construction of a thermodynamic cycle, arguing that if Landauer's Principle were false it would be possible to harness a machine that violated it to produce a violation of the second law of thermodynamics. In a recent paper in this journal, John Norton (2011) directly challenges the consistency of that proof. In the present paper we defend the proof given by Ladyman et al. against his critique. In particular, contrary to what Norton claims, we argue that the processes used in the proof cannot be used to construct a cycle that enacts erasure in a thermodynamically reversible way, and that he does not show that the processes used in the proof violate the Second Law of Thermodynamics. Ladyman, Presnell, and Short (2007) proposed a model of the implementation of logical operations by physical processes in order to clarify the exact statement of Landauer's Principle, and then offered a new proof of the latter based on the construction of a thermodynamic cycle, arguing that if Landauer's Principle were false it would be possible to harness a machine that violated it to produce a violation of the second law of thermodynamics. In a recent paper in this journal, John Norton (2011) directly challenges the consistency of that proof. In the present paper we defend the proof given by Ladyman et al. against his critique. In particular, contrary to what Norton claims, we argue that the processes used in the proof cannot be used to construct a cycle that enacts erasure in a thermodynamically reversible way, and that he does not show that the processes used in the proof violate the Second Law of Thermodynamics. Robertson, Katie oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Mendivil, Alberto A. ELSEVIER Reply: Radical hysterectomy and survival outcomes in the management of early stage cervical cancer 2016 Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV014391791 volume:44 year:2013 number:3 pages:263-271 extent:9 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsb.2013.02.005 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U FID-BIODIV SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_105 35.70 Biochemie: Allgemeines VZ 42.12 Biophysik VZ AR 44 2013 3 263-271 9 045F 100 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1016/j.shpsb.2013.02.005 doi GBVA2013018000025.pica (DE-627)ELV039041743 (ELSEVIER)S1355-2198(13)00020-8 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 100 900 100 DE-600 900 DE-600 610 VZ 570 VZ BIODIV DE-30 fid 35.70 bkl 42.12 bkl Ladyman, James verfasserin aut Landauer defended: Reply to Norton 2013transfer abstract 9 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Ladyman, Presnell, and Short (2007) proposed a model of the implementation of logical operations by physical processes in order to clarify the exact statement of Landauer's Principle, and then offered a new proof of the latter based on the construction of a thermodynamic cycle, arguing that if Landauer's Principle were false it would be possible to harness a machine that violated it to produce a violation of the second law of thermodynamics. In a recent paper in this journal, John Norton (2011) directly challenges the consistency of that proof. In the present paper we defend the proof given by Ladyman et al. against his critique. In particular, contrary to what Norton claims, we argue that the processes used in the proof cannot be used to construct a cycle that enacts erasure in a thermodynamically reversible way, and that he does not show that the processes used in the proof violate the Second Law of Thermodynamics. Ladyman, Presnell, and Short (2007) proposed a model of the implementation of logical operations by physical processes in order to clarify the exact statement of Landauer's Principle, and then offered a new proof of the latter based on the construction of a thermodynamic cycle, arguing that if Landauer's Principle were false it would be possible to harness a machine that violated it to produce a violation of the second law of thermodynamics. In a recent paper in this journal, John Norton (2011) directly challenges the consistency of that proof. In the present paper we defend the proof given by Ladyman et al. against his critique. In particular, contrary to what Norton claims, we argue that the processes used in the proof cannot be used to construct a cycle that enacts erasure in a thermodynamically reversible way, and that he does not show that the processes used in the proof violate the Second Law of Thermodynamics. Robertson, Katie oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Mendivil, Alberto A. ELSEVIER Reply: Radical hysterectomy and survival outcomes in the management of early stage cervical cancer 2016 Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV014391791 volume:44 year:2013 number:3 pages:263-271 extent:9 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsb.2013.02.005 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U FID-BIODIV SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_105 35.70 Biochemie: Allgemeines VZ 42.12 Biophysik VZ AR 44 2013 3 263-271 9 045F 100 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1016/j.shpsb.2013.02.005 doi GBVA2013018000025.pica (DE-627)ELV039041743 (ELSEVIER)S1355-2198(13)00020-8 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 100 900 100 DE-600 900 DE-600 610 VZ 570 VZ BIODIV DE-30 fid 35.70 bkl 42.12 bkl Ladyman, James verfasserin aut Landauer defended: Reply to Norton 2013transfer abstract 9 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Ladyman, Presnell, and Short (2007) proposed a model of the implementation of logical operations by physical processes in order to clarify the exact statement of Landauer's Principle, and then offered a new proof of the latter based on the construction of a thermodynamic cycle, arguing that if Landauer's Principle were false it would be possible to harness a machine that violated it to produce a violation of the second law of thermodynamics. In a recent paper in this journal, John Norton (2011) directly challenges the consistency of that proof. In the present paper we defend the proof given by Ladyman et al. against his critique. In particular, contrary to what Norton claims, we argue that the processes used in the proof cannot be used to construct a cycle that enacts erasure in a thermodynamically reversible way, and that he does not show that the processes used in the proof violate the Second Law of Thermodynamics. Ladyman, Presnell, and Short (2007) proposed a model of the implementation of logical operations by physical processes in order to clarify the exact statement of Landauer's Principle, and then offered a new proof of the latter based on the construction of a thermodynamic cycle, arguing that if Landauer's Principle were false it would be possible to harness a machine that violated it to produce a violation of the second law of thermodynamics. In a recent paper in this journal, John Norton (2011) directly challenges the consistency of that proof. In the present paper we defend the proof given by Ladyman et al. against his critique. In particular, contrary to what Norton claims, we argue that the processes used in the proof cannot be used to construct a cycle that enacts erasure in a thermodynamically reversible way, and that he does not show that the processes used in the proof violate the Second Law of Thermodynamics. Robertson, Katie oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Mendivil, Alberto A. ELSEVIER Reply: Radical hysterectomy and survival outcomes in the management of early stage cervical cancer 2016 Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV014391791 volume:44 year:2013 number:3 pages:263-271 extent:9 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsb.2013.02.005 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U FID-BIODIV SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_105 35.70 Biochemie: Allgemeines VZ 42.12 Biophysik VZ AR 44 2013 3 263-271 9 045F 100 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1016/j.shpsb.2013.02.005 doi GBVA2013018000025.pica (DE-627)ELV039041743 (ELSEVIER)S1355-2198(13)00020-8 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 100 900 100 DE-600 900 DE-600 610 VZ 570 VZ BIODIV DE-30 fid 35.70 bkl 42.12 bkl Ladyman, James verfasserin aut Landauer defended: Reply to Norton 2013transfer abstract 9 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Ladyman, Presnell, and Short (2007) proposed a model of the implementation of logical operations by physical processes in order to clarify the exact statement of Landauer's Principle, and then offered a new proof of the latter based on the construction of a thermodynamic cycle, arguing that if Landauer's Principle were false it would be possible to harness a machine that violated it to produce a violation of the second law of thermodynamics. In a recent paper in this journal, John Norton (2011) directly challenges the consistency of that proof. In the present paper we defend the proof given by Ladyman et al. against his critique. In particular, contrary to what Norton claims, we argue that the processes used in the proof cannot be used to construct a cycle that enacts erasure in a thermodynamically reversible way, and that he does not show that the processes used in the proof violate the Second Law of Thermodynamics. Ladyman, Presnell, and Short (2007) proposed a model of the implementation of logical operations by physical processes in order to clarify the exact statement of Landauer's Principle, and then offered a new proof of the latter based on the construction of a thermodynamic cycle, arguing that if Landauer's Principle were false it would be possible to harness a machine that violated it to produce a violation of the second law of thermodynamics. In a recent paper in this journal, John Norton (2011) directly challenges the consistency of that proof. In the present paper we defend the proof given by Ladyman et al. against his critique. In particular, contrary to what Norton claims, we argue that the processes used in the proof cannot be used to construct a cycle that enacts erasure in a thermodynamically reversible way, and that he does not show that the processes used in the proof violate the Second Law of Thermodynamics. Robertson, Katie oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Mendivil, Alberto A. ELSEVIER Reply: Radical hysterectomy and survival outcomes in the management of early stage cervical cancer 2016 Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV014391791 volume:44 year:2013 number:3 pages:263-271 extent:9 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsb.2013.02.005 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U FID-BIODIV SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_105 35.70 Biochemie: Allgemeines VZ 42.12 Biophysik VZ AR 44 2013 3 263-271 9 045F 100 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in Reply: Radical hysterectomy and survival outcomes in the management of early stage cervical cancer Amsterdam [u.a.] volume:44 year:2013 number:3 pages:263-271 extent:9 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in Reply: Radical hysterectomy and survival outcomes in the management of early stage cervical cancer Amsterdam [u.a.] volume:44 year:2013 number:3 pages:263-271 extent:9 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| bklname |
Biochemie: Allgemeines Biophysik |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| dewey-raw |
100 |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
Reply: Radical hysterectomy and survival outcomes in the management of early stage cervical cancer |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Ladyman, James @@aut@@ Robertson, Katie @@oth@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2013-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
ELV014391791 |
| dewey-sort |
3100 |
| id |
ELV039041743 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV039041743</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230625223846.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">180603s2013 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.shpsb.2013.02.005</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">GBVA2013018000025.pica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV039041743</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S1355-2198(13)00020-8</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">100</subfield><subfield code="a">900</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">100</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">900</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">610</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">570</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">BIODIV</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-30</subfield><subfield code="2">fid</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">35.70</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">42.12</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ladyman, James</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Landauer defended: Reply to Norton</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2013transfer abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ladyman, Presnell, and Short (2007) proposed a model of the implementation of logical operations by physical processes in order to clarify the exact statement of Landauer's Principle, and then offered a new proof of the latter based on the construction of a thermodynamic cycle, arguing that if Landauer's Principle were false it would be possible to harness a machine that violated it to produce a violation of the second law of thermodynamics. In a recent paper in this journal, John Norton (2011) directly challenges the consistency of that proof. In the present paper we defend the proof given by Ladyman et al. against his critique. In particular, contrary to what Norton claims, we argue that the processes used in the proof cannot be used to construct a cycle that enacts erasure in a thermodynamically reversible way, and that he does not show that the processes used in the proof violate the Second Law of Thermodynamics.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ladyman, Presnell, and Short (2007) proposed a model of the implementation of logical operations by physical processes in order to clarify the exact statement of Landauer's Principle, and then offered a new proof of the latter based on the construction of a thermodynamic cycle, arguing that if Landauer's Principle were false it would be possible to harness a machine that violated it to produce a violation of the second law of thermodynamics. In a recent paper in this journal, John Norton (2011) directly challenges the consistency of that proof. In the present paper we defend the proof given by Ladyman et al. against his critique. In particular, contrary to what Norton claims, we argue that the processes used in the proof cannot be used to construct a cycle that enacts erasure in a thermodynamically reversible way, and that he does not show that the processes used in the proof violate the Second Law of Thermodynamics.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Robertson, Katie</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="n">Elsevier Science</subfield><subfield code="a">Mendivil, Alberto A. ELSEVIER</subfield><subfield code="t">Reply: Radical hysterectomy and survival outcomes in the management of early stage cervical cancer</subfield><subfield code="d">2016</subfield><subfield code="g">Amsterdam [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)ELV014391791</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:44</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2013</subfield><subfield code="g">number:3</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:263-271</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:9</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsb.2013.02.005</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">FID-BIODIV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">35.70</subfield><subfield code="j">Biochemie: Allgemeines</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">42.12</subfield><subfield code="j">Biophysik</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">44</subfield><subfield code="j">2013</subfield><subfield code="e">3</subfield><subfield code="h">263-271</subfield><subfield code="g">9</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="953" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="2">045F</subfield><subfield code="a">100</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Ladyman, James |
| spellingShingle |
Ladyman, James ddc 100 ddc 900 ddc 610 ddc 570 fid BIODIV bkl 35.70 bkl 42.12 Landauer defended: Reply to Norton |
| authorStr |
Ladyman, James |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)ELV014391791 |
| format |
electronic Article |
| dewey-ones |
100 - Philosophy & psychology 900 - History & geography 610 - Medicine & health 570 - Life sciences; biology |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut |
| collection |
elsevier |
| remote_str |
true |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| topic_title |
100 900 100 DE-600 900 DE-600 610 VZ 570 VZ BIODIV DE-30 fid 35.70 bkl 42.12 bkl Landauer defended: Reply to Norton |
| topic |
ddc 100 ddc 900 ddc 610 ddc 570 fid BIODIV bkl 35.70 bkl 42.12 |
| topic_unstemmed |
ddc 100 ddc 900 ddc 610 ddc 570 fid BIODIV bkl 35.70 bkl 42.12 |
| topic_browse |
ddc 100 ddc 900 ddc 610 ddc 570 fid BIODIV bkl 35.70 bkl 42.12 |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
zu |
| author2_variant |
k r kr |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Reply: Radical hysterectomy and survival outcomes in the management of early stage cervical cancer |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
ELV014391791 |
| dewey-tens |
100 - Philosophy 900 - History 610 - Medicine & health 570 - Life sciences; biology |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Reply: Radical hysterectomy and survival outcomes in the management of early stage cervical cancer |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)ELV014391791 |
| title |
Landauer defended: Reply to Norton |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)ELV039041743 (ELSEVIER)S1355-2198(13)00020-8 |
| title_full |
Landauer defended: Reply to Norton |
| author_sort |
Ladyman, James |
| journal |
Reply: Radical hysterectomy and survival outcomes in the management of early stage cervical cancer |
| journalStr |
Reply: Radical hysterectomy and survival outcomes in the management of early stage cervical cancer |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| dewey-hundreds |
100 - Philosophy & psychology 900 - History & geography 600 - Technology 500 - Science |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2013 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
zzz |
| container_start_page |
263 |
| author_browse |
Ladyman, James |
| container_volume |
44 |
| physical |
9 |
| class |
100 900 100 DE-600 900 DE-600 610 VZ 570 VZ BIODIV DE-30 fid 35.70 bkl 42.12 bkl |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Ladyman, James |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1016/j.shpsb.2013.02.005 |
| dewey-full |
100 900 610 570 |
| title_sort |
landauer defended: reply to norton |
| title_auth |
Landauer defended: Reply to Norton |
| abstract |
Ladyman, Presnell, and Short (2007) proposed a model of the implementation of logical operations by physical processes in order to clarify the exact statement of Landauer's Principle, and then offered a new proof of the latter based on the construction of a thermodynamic cycle, arguing that if Landauer's Principle were false it would be possible to harness a machine that violated it to produce a violation of the second law of thermodynamics. In a recent paper in this journal, John Norton (2011) directly challenges the consistency of that proof. In the present paper we defend the proof given by Ladyman et al. against his critique. In particular, contrary to what Norton claims, we argue that the processes used in the proof cannot be used to construct a cycle that enacts erasure in a thermodynamically reversible way, and that he does not show that the processes used in the proof violate the Second Law of Thermodynamics. |
| abstractGer |
Ladyman, Presnell, and Short (2007) proposed a model of the implementation of logical operations by physical processes in order to clarify the exact statement of Landauer's Principle, and then offered a new proof of the latter based on the construction of a thermodynamic cycle, arguing that if Landauer's Principle were false it would be possible to harness a machine that violated it to produce a violation of the second law of thermodynamics. In a recent paper in this journal, John Norton (2011) directly challenges the consistency of that proof. In the present paper we defend the proof given by Ladyman et al. against his critique. In particular, contrary to what Norton claims, we argue that the processes used in the proof cannot be used to construct a cycle that enacts erasure in a thermodynamically reversible way, and that he does not show that the processes used in the proof violate the Second Law of Thermodynamics. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
Ladyman, Presnell, and Short (2007) proposed a model of the implementation of logical operations by physical processes in order to clarify the exact statement of Landauer's Principle, and then offered a new proof of the latter based on the construction of a thermodynamic cycle, arguing that if Landauer's Principle were false it would be possible to harness a machine that violated it to produce a violation of the second law of thermodynamics. In a recent paper in this journal, John Norton (2011) directly challenges the consistency of that proof. In the present paper we defend the proof given by Ladyman et al. against his critique. In particular, contrary to what Norton claims, we argue that the processes used in the proof cannot be used to construct a cycle that enacts erasure in a thermodynamically reversible way, and that he does not show that the processes used in the proof violate the Second Law of Thermodynamics. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U FID-BIODIV SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_105 |
| container_issue |
3 |
| title_short |
Landauer defended: Reply to Norton |
| url |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsb.2013.02.005 |
| remote_bool |
true |
| author2 |
Robertson, Katie |
| author2Str |
Robertson, Katie |
| ppnlink |
ELV014391791 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
z |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| author2_role |
oth |
| doi_str |
10.1016/j.shpsb.2013.02.005 |
| up_date |
2024-07-06T19:39:34.682Z |
| _version_ |
1803859813658001408 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV039041743</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230625223846.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">180603s2013 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.shpsb.2013.02.005</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">GBVA2013018000025.pica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV039041743</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S1355-2198(13)00020-8</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">100</subfield><subfield code="a">900</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">100</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">900</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">610</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">570</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">BIODIV</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-30</subfield><subfield code="2">fid</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">35.70</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">42.12</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ladyman, James</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Landauer defended: Reply to Norton</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2013transfer abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ladyman, Presnell, and Short (2007) proposed a model of the implementation of logical operations by physical processes in order to clarify the exact statement of Landauer's Principle, and then offered a new proof of the latter based on the construction of a thermodynamic cycle, arguing that if Landauer's Principle were false it would be possible to harness a machine that violated it to produce a violation of the second law of thermodynamics. In a recent paper in this journal, John Norton (2011) directly challenges the consistency of that proof. In the present paper we defend the proof given by Ladyman et al. against his critique. In particular, contrary to what Norton claims, we argue that the processes used in the proof cannot be used to construct a cycle that enacts erasure in a thermodynamically reversible way, and that he does not show that the processes used in the proof violate the Second Law of Thermodynamics.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ladyman, Presnell, and Short (2007) proposed a model of the implementation of logical operations by physical processes in order to clarify the exact statement of Landauer's Principle, and then offered a new proof of the latter based on the construction of a thermodynamic cycle, arguing that if Landauer's Principle were false it would be possible to harness a machine that violated it to produce a violation of the second law of thermodynamics. In a recent paper in this journal, John Norton (2011) directly challenges the consistency of that proof. In the present paper we defend the proof given by Ladyman et al. against his critique. In particular, contrary to what Norton claims, we argue that the processes used in the proof cannot be used to construct a cycle that enacts erasure in a thermodynamically reversible way, and that he does not show that the processes used in the proof violate the Second Law of Thermodynamics.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Robertson, Katie</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="n">Elsevier Science</subfield><subfield code="a">Mendivil, Alberto A. ELSEVIER</subfield><subfield code="t">Reply: Radical hysterectomy and survival outcomes in the management of early stage cervical cancer</subfield><subfield code="d">2016</subfield><subfield code="g">Amsterdam [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)ELV014391791</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:44</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2013</subfield><subfield code="g">number:3</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:263-271</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:9</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsb.2013.02.005</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">FID-BIODIV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">35.70</subfield><subfield code="j">Biochemie: Allgemeines</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">42.12</subfield><subfield code="j">Biophysik</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">44</subfield><subfield code="j">2013</subfield><subfield code="e">3</subfield><subfield code="h">263-271</subfield><subfield code="g">9</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="953" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="2">045F</subfield><subfield code="a">100</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.399952 |