Direct behavior rating as a school-based behavior screener for elementary and middle grades
The purpose of this study was to investigate how Direct Behavior Rating Single Item Scales (DBR-SIS) involving targets of academically engaged, disruptive, and respectful behaviors function in school-based screening assessment. Participants included 831 students in kindergarten through eighth grades...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Chafouleas, Sandra M. [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2013transfer abstract |
|---|
| Umfang: |
19 |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Letter to the Editor re: article: “A systematic review of the safety, efficacy and acceptability of task sharing tubal sterilization to mid-level providers” by Rodriguez and Gordon-Maclean (Epub) - Taylor, Diana ELSEVIER, 2015, Amsterdam [u.a.] |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:51 ; year:2013 ; number:3 ; pages:367-385 ; extent:19 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1016/j.jsp.2013.04.002 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
ELV039122336 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ELV039122336 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230625224106.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 180603s2013 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.jsp.2013.04.002 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a GBVA2013022000016.pica |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)ELV039122336 | ||
| 035 | |a (ELSEVIER)S0022-4405(13)00027-7 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 082 | 0 | |a 150 |a 370 | |
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 150 |q DE-600 |
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 370 |q DE-600 |
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 610 |q VZ |
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 300 |q VZ |
| 084 | |a 70.00 |2 bkl | ||
| 084 | |a 71.00 |2 bkl | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Chafouleas, Sandra M. |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Direct behavior rating as a school-based behavior screener for elementary and middle grades |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2013transfer abstract | |
| 300 | |a 19 | ||
| 336 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zzz |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b z |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zu |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a The purpose of this study was to investigate how Direct Behavior Rating Single Item Scales (DBR-SIS) involving targets of academically engaged, disruptive, and respectful behaviors function in school-based screening assessment. Participants included 831 students in kindergarten through eighth grades who attended schools in the northeastern United States. Teachers provided behavior ratings for a sample of students in their classrooms on the DBR-SIS, the Behavioral and Emotional Screening System (Kamphaus & Reynolds, 2007), and the Student Risk Screening Scale (Drummond, 1994). Given variations in rating procedures to accommodate scheduling differences across grades, analysis was conducted separately for elementary school and middle school grade levels. Results suggested that the recommended cut scores, the combination of behavior targets, and the resulting conditional probability indices varied depending on grade level grouping (lower elementary, upper elementary, middle). For example, for the lower elementary grade level grouping, a combination of disruptive behavior (cut score=2) and academically engaged behavior (cut score=8) was considered to offer the best balance among indices of diagnostic accuracy, whereas a cut score of 1 for disruptive behavior and 8 for academically engaged behavior were recommended for the upper elementary school grade level grouping and cut scores of 1 and 9, respectively, were suggested for middle school grade level grouping. Generally, DBR-SIS cut scores considered optimal for screening using single or combined targets including academically engaged behavior and disruptive behavior by offering a reasonable balance of indices for sensitivity (.51–.90), specificity (.47–.83), negative predictive power (.94–.98), and positive predictive power (.14–.41). The single target of respectful behavior performed poorly across all grade level groups, and performance of DBR-SIS targets was relatively better in the elementary school than middle school grade level groups. Overall, results supported that disruptive behavior is highly important in evaluating risk status in lower grade levels and that academically engaged behavior becomes more pertinent as students reach higher grade levels. Limitations, future directions, and implications are discussed. | ||
| 520 | |a The purpose of this study was to investigate how Direct Behavior Rating Single Item Scales (DBR-SIS) involving targets of academically engaged, disruptive, and respectful behaviors function in school-based screening assessment. Participants included 831 students in kindergarten through eighth grades who attended schools in the northeastern United States. Teachers provided behavior ratings for a sample of students in their classrooms on the DBR-SIS, the Behavioral and Emotional Screening System (Kamphaus & Reynolds, 2007), and the Student Risk Screening Scale (Drummond, 1994). Given variations in rating procedures to accommodate scheduling differences across grades, analysis was conducted separately for elementary school and middle school grade levels. Results suggested that the recommended cut scores, the combination of behavior targets, and the resulting conditional probability indices varied depending on grade level grouping (lower elementary, upper elementary, middle). For example, for the lower elementary grade level grouping, a combination of disruptive behavior (cut score=2) and academically engaged behavior (cut score=8) was considered to offer the best balance among indices of diagnostic accuracy, whereas a cut score of 1 for disruptive behavior and 8 for academically engaged behavior were recommended for the upper elementary school grade level grouping and cut scores of 1 and 9, respectively, were suggested for middle school grade level grouping. Generally, DBR-SIS cut scores considered optimal for screening using single or combined targets including academically engaged behavior and disruptive behavior by offering a reasonable balance of indices for sensitivity (.51–.90), specificity (.47–.83), negative predictive power (.94–.98), and positive predictive power (.14–.41). The single target of respectful behavior performed poorly across all grade level groups, and performance of DBR-SIS targets was relatively better in the elementary school than middle school grade level groups. Overall, results supported that disruptive behavior is highly important in evaluating risk status in lower grade levels and that academically engaged behavior becomes more pertinent as students reach higher grade levels. Limitations, future directions, and implications are discussed. | ||
| 700 | 1 | |a Kilgus, Stephen P. |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Jaffery, Rose |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Riley-Tillman, T. Chris |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Welsh, Megan |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Christ, Theodore J. |4 oth | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |n Elsevier Science |a Taylor, Diana ELSEVIER |t Letter to the Editor re: article: “A systematic review of the safety, efficacy and acceptability of task sharing tubal sterilization to mid-level providers” by Rodriguez and Gordon-Maclean (Epub) |d 2015 |g Amsterdam [u.a.] |w (DE-627)ELV023926147 |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:51 |g year:2013 |g number:3 |g pages:367-385 |g extent:19 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2013.04.002 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_U | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ELV | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_U | ||
| 936 | b | k | |a 70.00 |j Sozialwissenschaften allgemein: Allgemeines |q VZ |
| 936 | b | k | |a 71.00 |j Soziologie: Allgemeines |q VZ |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 51 |j 2013 |e 3 |h 367-385 |g 19 | ||
| 953 | |2 045F |a 150 | ||
| author_variant |
s m c sm smc |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
chafouleassandramkilgusstephenpjafferyro:2013----:ieteairaigsshobsdeaircenroee |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2013transfer abstract |
| bklnumber |
70.00 71.00 |
| publishDate |
2013 |
| allfields |
10.1016/j.jsp.2013.04.002 doi GBVA2013022000016.pica (DE-627)ELV039122336 (ELSEVIER)S0022-4405(13)00027-7 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 150 370 150 DE-600 370 DE-600 610 VZ 300 VZ 70.00 bkl 71.00 bkl Chafouleas, Sandra M. verfasserin aut Direct behavior rating as a school-based behavior screener for elementary and middle grades 2013transfer abstract 19 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier The purpose of this study was to investigate how Direct Behavior Rating Single Item Scales (DBR-SIS) involving targets of academically engaged, disruptive, and respectful behaviors function in school-based screening assessment. Participants included 831 students in kindergarten through eighth grades who attended schools in the northeastern United States. Teachers provided behavior ratings for a sample of students in their classrooms on the DBR-SIS, the Behavioral and Emotional Screening System (Kamphaus & Reynolds, 2007), and the Student Risk Screening Scale (Drummond, 1994). Given variations in rating procedures to accommodate scheduling differences across grades, analysis was conducted separately for elementary school and middle school grade levels. Results suggested that the recommended cut scores, the combination of behavior targets, and the resulting conditional probability indices varied depending on grade level grouping (lower elementary, upper elementary, middle). For example, for the lower elementary grade level grouping, a combination of disruptive behavior (cut score=2) and academically engaged behavior (cut score=8) was considered to offer the best balance among indices of diagnostic accuracy, whereas a cut score of 1 for disruptive behavior and 8 for academically engaged behavior were recommended for the upper elementary school grade level grouping and cut scores of 1 and 9, respectively, were suggested for middle school grade level grouping. Generally, DBR-SIS cut scores considered optimal for screening using single or combined targets including academically engaged behavior and disruptive behavior by offering a reasonable balance of indices for sensitivity (.51–.90), specificity (.47–.83), negative predictive power (.94–.98), and positive predictive power (.14–.41). The single target of respectful behavior performed poorly across all grade level groups, and performance of DBR-SIS targets was relatively better in the elementary school than middle school grade level groups. Overall, results supported that disruptive behavior is highly important in evaluating risk status in lower grade levels and that academically engaged behavior becomes more pertinent as students reach higher grade levels. Limitations, future directions, and implications are discussed. The purpose of this study was to investigate how Direct Behavior Rating Single Item Scales (DBR-SIS) involving targets of academically engaged, disruptive, and respectful behaviors function in school-based screening assessment. Participants included 831 students in kindergarten through eighth grades who attended schools in the northeastern United States. Teachers provided behavior ratings for a sample of students in their classrooms on the DBR-SIS, the Behavioral and Emotional Screening System (Kamphaus & Reynolds, 2007), and the Student Risk Screening Scale (Drummond, 1994). Given variations in rating procedures to accommodate scheduling differences across grades, analysis was conducted separately for elementary school and middle school grade levels. Results suggested that the recommended cut scores, the combination of behavior targets, and the resulting conditional probability indices varied depending on grade level grouping (lower elementary, upper elementary, middle). For example, for the lower elementary grade level grouping, a combination of disruptive behavior (cut score=2) and academically engaged behavior (cut score=8) was considered to offer the best balance among indices of diagnostic accuracy, whereas a cut score of 1 for disruptive behavior and 8 for academically engaged behavior were recommended for the upper elementary school grade level grouping and cut scores of 1 and 9, respectively, were suggested for middle school grade level grouping. Generally, DBR-SIS cut scores considered optimal for screening using single or combined targets including academically engaged behavior and disruptive behavior by offering a reasonable balance of indices for sensitivity (.51–.90), specificity (.47–.83), negative predictive power (.94–.98), and positive predictive power (.14–.41). The single target of respectful behavior performed poorly across all grade level groups, and performance of DBR-SIS targets was relatively better in the elementary school than middle school grade level groups. Overall, results supported that disruptive behavior is highly important in evaluating risk status in lower grade levels and that academically engaged behavior becomes more pertinent as students reach higher grade levels. Limitations, future directions, and implications are discussed. Kilgus, Stephen P. oth Jaffery, Rose oth Riley-Tillman, T. Chris oth Welsh, Megan oth Christ, Theodore J. oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Taylor, Diana ELSEVIER Letter to the Editor re: article: “A systematic review of the safety, efficacy and acceptability of task sharing tubal sterilization to mid-level providers” by Rodriguez and Gordon-Maclean (Epub) 2015 Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV023926147 volume:51 year:2013 number:3 pages:367-385 extent:19 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2013.04.002 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U 70.00 Sozialwissenschaften allgemein: Allgemeines VZ 71.00 Soziologie: Allgemeines VZ AR 51 2013 3 367-385 19 045F 150 |
| spelling |
10.1016/j.jsp.2013.04.002 doi GBVA2013022000016.pica (DE-627)ELV039122336 (ELSEVIER)S0022-4405(13)00027-7 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 150 370 150 DE-600 370 DE-600 610 VZ 300 VZ 70.00 bkl 71.00 bkl Chafouleas, Sandra M. verfasserin aut Direct behavior rating as a school-based behavior screener for elementary and middle grades 2013transfer abstract 19 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier The purpose of this study was to investigate how Direct Behavior Rating Single Item Scales (DBR-SIS) involving targets of academically engaged, disruptive, and respectful behaviors function in school-based screening assessment. Participants included 831 students in kindergarten through eighth grades who attended schools in the northeastern United States. Teachers provided behavior ratings for a sample of students in their classrooms on the DBR-SIS, the Behavioral and Emotional Screening System (Kamphaus & Reynolds, 2007), and the Student Risk Screening Scale (Drummond, 1994). Given variations in rating procedures to accommodate scheduling differences across grades, analysis was conducted separately for elementary school and middle school grade levels. Results suggested that the recommended cut scores, the combination of behavior targets, and the resulting conditional probability indices varied depending on grade level grouping (lower elementary, upper elementary, middle). For example, for the lower elementary grade level grouping, a combination of disruptive behavior (cut score=2) and academically engaged behavior (cut score=8) was considered to offer the best balance among indices of diagnostic accuracy, whereas a cut score of 1 for disruptive behavior and 8 for academically engaged behavior were recommended for the upper elementary school grade level grouping and cut scores of 1 and 9, respectively, were suggested for middle school grade level grouping. Generally, DBR-SIS cut scores considered optimal for screening using single or combined targets including academically engaged behavior and disruptive behavior by offering a reasonable balance of indices for sensitivity (.51–.90), specificity (.47–.83), negative predictive power (.94–.98), and positive predictive power (.14–.41). The single target of respectful behavior performed poorly across all grade level groups, and performance of DBR-SIS targets was relatively better in the elementary school than middle school grade level groups. Overall, results supported that disruptive behavior is highly important in evaluating risk status in lower grade levels and that academically engaged behavior becomes more pertinent as students reach higher grade levels. Limitations, future directions, and implications are discussed. The purpose of this study was to investigate how Direct Behavior Rating Single Item Scales (DBR-SIS) involving targets of academically engaged, disruptive, and respectful behaviors function in school-based screening assessment. Participants included 831 students in kindergarten through eighth grades who attended schools in the northeastern United States. Teachers provided behavior ratings for a sample of students in their classrooms on the DBR-SIS, the Behavioral and Emotional Screening System (Kamphaus & Reynolds, 2007), and the Student Risk Screening Scale (Drummond, 1994). Given variations in rating procedures to accommodate scheduling differences across grades, analysis was conducted separately for elementary school and middle school grade levels. Results suggested that the recommended cut scores, the combination of behavior targets, and the resulting conditional probability indices varied depending on grade level grouping (lower elementary, upper elementary, middle). For example, for the lower elementary grade level grouping, a combination of disruptive behavior (cut score=2) and academically engaged behavior (cut score=8) was considered to offer the best balance among indices of diagnostic accuracy, whereas a cut score of 1 for disruptive behavior and 8 for academically engaged behavior were recommended for the upper elementary school grade level grouping and cut scores of 1 and 9, respectively, were suggested for middle school grade level grouping. Generally, DBR-SIS cut scores considered optimal for screening using single or combined targets including academically engaged behavior and disruptive behavior by offering a reasonable balance of indices for sensitivity (.51–.90), specificity (.47–.83), negative predictive power (.94–.98), and positive predictive power (.14–.41). The single target of respectful behavior performed poorly across all grade level groups, and performance of DBR-SIS targets was relatively better in the elementary school than middle school grade level groups. Overall, results supported that disruptive behavior is highly important in evaluating risk status in lower grade levels and that academically engaged behavior becomes more pertinent as students reach higher grade levels. Limitations, future directions, and implications are discussed. Kilgus, Stephen P. oth Jaffery, Rose oth Riley-Tillman, T. Chris oth Welsh, Megan oth Christ, Theodore J. oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Taylor, Diana ELSEVIER Letter to the Editor re: article: “A systematic review of the safety, efficacy and acceptability of task sharing tubal sterilization to mid-level providers” by Rodriguez and Gordon-Maclean (Epub) 2015 Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV023926147 volume:51 year:2013 number:3 pages:367-385 extent:19 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2013.04.002 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U 70.00 Sozialwissenschaften allgemein: Allgemeines VZ 71.00 Soziologie: Allgemeines VZ AR 51 2013 3 367-385 19 045F 150 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1016/j.jsp.2013.04.002 doi GBVA2013022000016.pica (DE-627)ELV039122336 (ELSEVIER)S0022-4405(13)00027-7 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 150 370 150 DE-600 370 DE-600 610 VZ 300 VZ 70.00 bkl 71.00 bkl Chafouleas, Sandra M. verfasserin aut Direct behavior rating as a school-based behavior screener for elementary and middle grades 2013transfer abstract 19 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier The purpose of this study was to investigate how Direct Behavior Rating Single Item Scales (DBR-SIS) involving targets of academically engaged, disruptive, and respectful behaviors function in school-based screening assessment. Participants included 831 students in kindergarten through eighth grades who attended schools in the northeastern United States. Teachers provided behavior ratings for a sample of students in their classrooms on the DBR-SIS, the Behavioral and Emotional Screening System (Kamphaus & Reynolds, 2007), and the Student Risk Screening Scale (Drummond, 1994). Given variations in rating procedures to accommodate scheduling differences across grades, analysis was conducted separately for elementary school and middle school grade levels. Results suggested that the recommended cut scores, the combination of behavior targets, and the resulting conditional probability indices varied depending on grade level grouping (lower elementary, upper elementary, middle). For example, for the lower elementary grade level grouping, a combination of disruptive behavior (cut score=2) and academically engaged behavior (cut score=8) was considered to offer the best balance among indices of diagnostic accuracy, whereas a cut score of 1 for disruptive behavior and 8 for academically engaged behavior were recommended for the upper elementary school grade level grouping and cut scores of 1 and 9, respectively, were suggested for middle school grade level grouping. Generally, DBR-SIS cut scores considered optimal for screening using single or combined targets including academically engaged behavior and disruptive behavior by offering a reasonable balance of indices for sensitivity (.51–.90), specificity (.47–.83), negative predictive power (.94–.98), and positive predictive power (.14–.41). The single target of respectful behavior performed poorly across all grade level groups, and performance of DBR-SIS targets was relatively better in the elementary school than middle school grade level groups. Overall, results supported that disruptive behavior is highly important in evaluating risk status in lower grade levels and that academically engaged behavior becomes more pertinent as students reach higher grade levels. Limitations, future directions, and implications are discussed. The purpose of this study was to investigate how Direct Behavior Rating Single Item Scales (DBR-SIS) involving targets of academically engaged, disruptive, and respectful behaviors function in school-based screening assessment. Participants included 831 students in kindergarten through eighth grades who attended schools in the northeastern United States. Teachers provided behavior ratings for a sample of students in their classrooms on the DBR-SIS, the Behavioral and Emotional Screening System (Kamphaus & Reynolds, 2007), and the Student Risk Screening Scale (Drummond, 1994). Given variations in rating procedures to accommodate scheduling differences across grades, analysis was conducted separately for elementary school and middle school grade levels. Results suggested that the recommended cut scores, the combination of behavior targets, and the resulting conditional probability indices varied depending on grade level grouping (lower elementary, upper elementary, middle). For example, for the lower elementary grade level grouping, a combination of disruptive behavior (cut score=2) and academically engaged behavior (cut score=8) was considered to offer the best balance among indices of diagnostic accuracy, whereas a cut score of 1 for disruptive behavior and 8 for academically engaged behavior were recommended for the upper elementary school grade level grouping and cut scores of 1 and 9, respectively, were suggested for middle school grade level grouping. Generally, DBR-SIS cut scores considered optimal for screening using single or combined targets including academically engaged behavior and disruptive behavior by offering a reasonable balance of indices for sensitivity (.51–.90), specificity (.47–.83), negative predictive power (.94–.98), and positive predictive power (.14–.41). The single target of respectful behavior performed poorly across all grade level groups, and performance of DBR-SIS targets was relatively better in the elementary school than middle school grade level groups. Overall, results supported that disruptive behavior is highly important in evaluating risk status in lower grade levels and that academically engaged behavior becomes more pertinent as students reach higher grade levels. Limitations, future directions, and implications are discussed. Kilgus, Stephen P. oth Jaffery, Rose oth Riley-Tillman, T. Chris oth Welsh, Megan oth Christ, Theodore J. oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Taylor, Diana ELSEVIER Letter to the Editor re: article: “A systematic review of the safety, efficacy and acceptability of task sharing tubal sterilization to mid-level providers” by Rodriguez and Gordon-Maclean (Epub) 2015 Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV023926147 volume:51 year:2013 number:3 pages:367-385 extent:19 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2013.04.002 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U 70.00 Sozialwissenschaften allgemein: Allgemeines VZ 71.00 Soziologie: Allgemeines VZ AR 51 2013 3 367-385 19 045F 150 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1016/j.jsp.2013.04.002 doi GBVA2013022000016.pica (DE-627)ELV039122336 (ELSEVIER)S0022-4405(13)00027-7 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 150 370 150 DE-600 370 DE-600 610 VZ 300 VZ 70.00 bkl 71.00 bkl Chafouleas, Sandra M. verfasserin aut Direct behavior rating as a school-based behavior screener for elementary and middle grades 2013transfer abstract 19 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier The purpose of this study was to investigate how Direct Behavior Rating Single Item Scales (DBR-SIS) involving targets of academically engaged, disruptive, and respectful behaviors function in school-based screening assessment. Participants included 831 students in kindergarten through eighth grades who attended schools in the northeastern United States. Teachers provided behavior ratings for a sample of students in their classrooms on the DBR-SIS, the Behavioral and Emotional Screening System (Kamphaus & Reynolds, 2007), and the Student Risk Screening Scale (Drummond, 1994). Given variations in rating procedures to accommodate scheduling differences across grades, analysis was conducted separately for elementary school and middle school grade levels. Results suggested that the recommended cut scores, the combination of behavior targets, and the resulting conditional probability indices varied depending on grade level grouping (lower elementary, upper elementary, middle). For example, for the lower elementary grade level grouping, a combination of disruptive behavior (cut score=2) and academically engaged behavior (cut score=8) was considered to offer the best balance among indices of diagnostic accuracy, whereas a cut score of 1 for disruptive behavior and 8 for academically engaged behavior were recommended for the upper elementary school grade level grouping and cut scores of 1 and 9, respectively, were suggested for middle school grade level grouping. Generally, DBR-SIS cut scores considered optimal for screening using single or combined targets including academically engaged behavior and disruptive behavior by offering a reasonable balance of indices for sensitivity (.51–.90), specificity (.47–.83), negative predictive power (.94–.98), and positive predictive power (.14–.41). The single target of respectful behavior performed poorly across all grade level groups, and performance of DBR-SIS targets was relatively better in the elementary school than middle school grade level groups. Overall, results supported that disruptive behavior is highly important in evaluating risk status in lower grade levels and that academically engaged behavior becomes more pertinent as students reach higher grade levels. Limitations, future directions, and implications are discussed. The purpose of this study was to investigate how Direct Behavior Rating Single Item Scales (DBR-SIS) involving targets of academically engaged, disruptive, and respectful behaviors function in school-based screening assessment. Participants included 831 students in kindergarten through eighth grades who attended schools in the northeastern United States. Teachers provided behavior ratings for a sample of students in their classrooms on the DBR-SIS, the Behavioral and Emotional Screening System (Kamphaus & Reynolds, 2007), and the Student Risk Screening Scale (Drummond, 1994). Given variations in rating procedures to accommodate scheduling differences across grades, analysis was conducted separately for elementary school and middle school grade levels. Results suggested that the recommended cut scores, the combination of behavior targets, and the resulting conditional probability indices varied depending on grade level grouping (lower elementary, upper elementary, middle). For example, for the lower elementary grade level grouping, a combination of disruptive behavior (cut score=2) and academically engaged behavior (cut score=8) was considered to offer the best balance among indices of diagnostic accuracy, whereas a cut score of 1 for disruptive behavior and 8 for academically engaged behavior were recommended for the upper elementary school grade level grouping and cut scores of 1 and 9, respectively, were suggested for middle school grade level grouping. Generally, DBR-SIS cut scores considered optimal for screening using single or combined targets including academically engaged behavior and disruptive behavior by offering a reasonable balance of indices for sensitivity (.51–.90), specificity (.47–.83), negative predictive power (.94–.98), and positive predictive power (.14–.41). The single target of respectful behavior performed poorly across all grade level groups, and performance of DBR-SIS targets was relatively better in the elementary school than middle school grade level groups. Overall, results supported that disruptive behavior is highly important in evaluating risk status in lower grade levels and that academically engaged behavior becomes more pertinent as students reach higher grade levels. Limitations, future directions, and implications are discussed. Kilgus, Stephen P. oth Jaffery, Rose oth Riley-Tillman, T. Chris oth Welsh, Megan oth Christ, Theodore J. oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Taylor, Diana ELSEVIER Letter to the Editor re: article: “A systematic review of the safety, efficacy and acceptability of task sharing tubal sterilization to mid-level providers” by Rodriguez and Gordon-Maclean (Epub) 2015 Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV023926147 volume:51 year:2013 number:3 pages:367-385 extent:19 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2013.04.002 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U 70.00 Sozialwissenschaften allgemein: Allgemeines VZ 71.00 Soziologie: Allgemeines VZ AR 51 2013 3 367-385 19 045F 150 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1016/j.jsp.2013.04.002 doi GBVA2013022000016.pica (DE-627)ELV039122336 (ELSEVIER)S0022-4405(13)00027-7 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 150 370 150 DE-600 370 DE-600 610 VZ 300 VZ 70.00 bkl 71.00 bkl Chafouleas, Sandra M. verfasserin aut Direct behavior rating as a school-based behavior screener for elementary and middle grades 2013transfer abstract 19 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier The purpose of this study was to investigate how Direct Behavior Rating Single Item Scales (DBR-SIS) involving targets of academically engaged, disruptive, and respectful behaviors function in school-based screening assessment. Participants included 831 students in kindergarten through eighth grades who attended schools in the northeastern United States. Teachers provided behavior ratings for a sample of students in their classrooms on the DBR-SIS, the Behavioral and Emotional Screening System (Kamphaus & Reynolds, 2007), and the Student Risk Screening Scale (Drummond, 1994). Given variations in rating procedures to accommodate scheduling differences across grades, analysis was conducted separately for elementary school and middle school grade levels. Results suggested that the recommended cut scores, the combination of behavior targets, and the resulting conditional probability indices varied depending on grade level grouping (lower elementary, upper elementary, middle). For example, for the lower elementary grade level grouping, a combination of disruptive behavior (cut score=2) and academically engaged behavior (cut score=8) was considered to offer the best balance among indices of diagnostic accuracy, whereas a cut score of 1 for disruptive behavior and 8 for academically engaged behavior were recommended for the upper elementary school grade level grouping and cut scores of 1 and 9, respectively, were suggested for middle school grade level grouping. Generally, DBR-SIS cut scores considered optimal for screening using single or combined targets including academically engaged behavior and disruptive behavior by offering a reasonable balance of indices for sensitivity (.51–.90), specificity (.47–.83), negative predictive power (.94–.98), and positive predictive power (.14–.41). The single target of respectful behavior performed poorly across all grade level groups, and performance of DBR-SIS targets was relatively better in the elementary school than middle school grade level groups. Overall, results supported that disruptive behavior is highly important in evaluating risk status in lower grade levels and that academically engaged behavior becomes more pertinent as students reach higher grade levels. Limitations, future directions, and implications are discussed. The purpose of this study was to investigate how Direct Behavior Rating Single Item Scales (DBR-SIS) involving targets of academically engaged, disruptive, and respectful behaviors function in school-based screening assessment. Participants included 831 students in kindergarten through eighth grades who attended schools in the northeastern United States. Teachers provided behavior ratings for a sample of students in their classrooms on the DBR-SIS, the Behavioral and Emotional Screening System (Kamphaus & Reynolds, 2007), and the Student Risk Screening Scale (Drummond, 1994). Given variations in rating procedures to accommodate scheduling differences across grades, analysis was conducted separately for elementary school and middle school grade levels. Results suggested that the recommended cut scores, the combination of behavior targets, and the resulting conditional probability indices varied depending on grade level grouping (lower elementary, upper elementary, middle). For example, for the lower elementary grade level grouping, a combination of disruptive behavior (cut score=2) and academically engaged behavior (cut score=8) was considered to offer the best balance among indices of diagnostic accuracy, whereas a cut score of 1 for disruptive behavior and 8 for academically engaged behavior were recommended for the upper elementary school grade level grouping and cut scores of 1 and 9, respectively, were suggested for middle school grade level grouping. Generally, DBR-SIS cut scores considered optimal for screening using single or combined targets including academically engaged behavior and disruptive behavior by offering a reasonable balance of indices for sensitivity (.51–.90), specificity (.47–.83), negative predictive power (.94–.98), and positive predictive power (.14–.41). The single target of respectful behavior performed poorly across all grade level groups, and performance of DBR-SIS targets was relatively better in the elementary school than middle school grade level groups. Overall, results supported that disruptive behavior is highly important in evaluating risk status in lower grade levels and that academically engaged behavior becomes more pertinent as students reach higher grade levels. Limitations, future directions, and implications are discussed. Kilgus, Stephen P. oth Jaffery, Rose oth Riley-Tillman, T. Chris oth Welsh, Megan oth Christ, Theodore J. oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Taylor, Diana ELSEVIER Letter to the Editor re: article: “A systematic review of the safety, efficacy and acceptability of task sharing tubal sterilization to mid-level providers” by Rodriguez and Gordon-Maclean (Epub) 2015 Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV023926147 volume:51 year:2013 number:3 pages:367-385 extent:19 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2013.04.002 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U 70.00 Sozialwissenschaften allgemein: Allgemeines VZ 71.00 Soziologie: Allgemeines VZ AR 51 2013 3 367-385 19 045F 150 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in Letter to the Editor re: article: “A systematic review of the safety, efficacy and acceptability of task sharing tubal sterilization to mid-level providers” by Rodriguez and Gordon-Maclean (Epub) Amsterdam [u.a.] volume:51 year:2013 number:3 pages:367-385 extent:19 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in Letter to the Editor re: article: “A systematic review of the safety, efficacy and acceptability of task sharing tubal sterilization to mid-level providers” by Rodriguez and Gordon-Maclean (Epub) Amsterdam [u.a.] volume:51 year:2013 number:3 pages:367-385 extent:19 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| bklname |
Sozialwissenschaften allgemein: Allgemeines Soziologie: Allgemeines |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| dewey-raw |
150 |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
Letter to the Editor re: article: “A systematic review of the safety, efficacy and acceptability of task sharing tubal sterilization to mid-level providers” by Rodriguez and Gordon-Maclean (Epub) |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Chafouleas, Sandra M. @@aut@@ Kilgus, Stephen P. @@oth@@ Jaffery, Rose @@oth@@ Riley-Tillman, T. Chris @@oth@@ Welsh, Megan @@oth@@ Christ, Theodore J. @@oth@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2013-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
ELV023926147 |
| dewey-sort |
3150 |
| id |
ELV039122336 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV039122336</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230625224106.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">180603s2013 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.jsp.2013.04.002</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">GBVA2013022000016.pica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV039122336</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0022-4405(13)00027-7</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">150</subfield><subfield code="a">370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">150</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">370</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">610</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">300</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">70.00</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">71.00</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Chafouleas, Sandra M.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Direct behavior rating as a school-based behavior screener for elementary and middle grades</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2013transfer abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">19</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The purpose of this study was to investigate how Direct Behavior Rating Single Item Scales (DBR-SIS) involving targets of academically engaged, disruptive, and respectful behaviors function in school-based screening assessment. Participants included 831 students in kindergarten through eighth grades who attended schools in the northeastern United States. Teachers provided behavior ratings for a sample of students in their classrooms on the DBR-SIS, the Behavioral and Emotional Screening System (Kamphaus & Reynolds, 2007), and the Student Risk Screening Scale (Drummond, 1994). Given variations in rating procedures to accommodate scheduling differences across grades, analysis was conducted separately for elementary school and middle school grade levels. Results suggested that the recommended cut scores, the combination of behavior targets, and the resulting conditional probability indices varied depending on grade level grouping (lower elementary, upper elementary, middle). For example, for the lower elementary grade level grouping, a combination of disruptive behavior (cut score=2) and academically engaged behavior (cut score=8) was considered to offer the best balance among indices of diagnostic accuracy, whereas a cut score of 1 for disruptive behavior and 8 for academically engaged behavior were recommended for the upper elementary school grade level grouping and cut scores of 1 and 9, respectively, were suggested for middle school grade level grouping. Generally, DBR-SIS cut scores considered optimal for screening using single or combined targets including academically engaged behavior and disruptive behavior by offering a reasonable balance of indices for sensitivity (.51–.90), specificity (.47–.83), negative predictive power (.94–.98), and positive predictive power (.14–.41). The single target of respectful behavior performed poorly across all grade level groups, and performance of DBR-SIS targets was relatively better in the elementary school than middle school grade level groups. Overall, results supported that disruptive behavior is highly important in evaluating risk status in lower grade levels and that academically engaged behavior becomes more pertinent as students reach higher grade levels. Limitations, future directions, and implications are discussed.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The purpose of this study was to investigate how Direct Behavior Rating Single Item Scales (DBR-SIS) involving targets of academically engaged, disruptive, and respectful behaviors function in school-based screening assessment. Participants included 831 students in kindergarten through eighth grades who attended schools in the northeastern United States. Teachers provided behavior ratings for a sample of students in their classrooms on the DBR-SIS, the Behavioral and Emotional Screening System (Kamphaus & Reynolds, 2007), and the Student Risk Screening Scale (Drummond, 1994). Given variations in rating procedures to accommodate scheduling differences across grades, analysis was conducted separately for elementary school and middle school grade levels. Results suggested that the recommended cut scores, the combination of behavior targets, and the resulting conditional probability indices varied depending on grade level grouping (lower elementary, upper elementary, middle). For example, for the lower elementary grade level grouping, a combination of disruptive behavior (cut score=2) and academically engaged behavior (cut score=8) was considered to offer the best balance among indices of diagnostic accuracy, whereas a cut score of 1 for disruptive behavior and 8 for academically engaged behavior were recommended for the upper elementary school grade level grouping and cut scores of 1 and 9, respectively, were suggested for middle school grade level grouping. Generally, DBR-SIS cut scores considered optimal for screening using single or combined targets including academically engaged behavior and disruptive behavior by offering a reasonable balance of indices for sensitivity (.51–.90), specificity (.47–.83), negative predictive power (.94–.98), and positive predictive power (.14–.41). The single target of respectful behavior performed poorly across all grade level groups, and performance of DBR-SIS targets was relatively better in the elementary school than middle school grade level groups. Overall, results supported that disruptive behavior is highly important in evaluating risk status in lower grade levels and that academically engaged behavior becomes more pertinent as students reach higher grade levels. Limitations, future directions, and implications are discussed.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Kilgus, Stephen P.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Jaffery, Rose</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Riley-Tillman, T. Chris</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Welsh, Megan</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Christ, Theodore J.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="n">Elsevier Science</subfield><subfield code="a">Taylor, Diana ELSEVIER</subfield><subfield code="t">Letter to the Editor re: article: “A systematic review of the safety, efficacy and acceptability of task sharing tubal sterilization to mid-level providers” by Rodriguez and Gordon-Maclean (Epub)</subfield><subfield code="d">2015</subfield><subfield code="g">Amsterdam [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)ELV023926147</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:51</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2013</subfield><subfield code="g">number:3</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:367-385</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:19</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2013.04.002</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">70.00</subfield><subfield code="j">Sozialwissenschaften allgemein: Allgemeines</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">71.00</subfield><subfield code="j">Soziologie: Allgemeines</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">51</subfield><subfield code="j">2013</subfield><subfield code="e">3</subfield><subfield code="h">367-385</subfield><subfield code="g">19</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="953" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="2">045F</subfield><subfield code="a">150</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Chafouleas, Sandra M. |
| spellingShingle |
Chafouleas, Sandra M. ddc 150 ddc 370 ddc 610 ddc 300 bkl 70.00 bkl 71.00 Direct behavior rating as a school-based behavior screener for elementary and middle grades |
| authorStr |
Chafouleas, Sandra M. |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)ELV023926147 |
| format |
electronic Article |
| dewey-ones |
150 - Psychology 370 - Education 610 - Medicine & health 300 - Social sciences |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut |
| collection |
elsevier |
| remote_str |
true |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| topic_title |
150 370 150 DE-600 370 DE-600 610 VZ 300 VZ 70.00 bkl 71.00 bkl Direct behavior rating as a school-based behavior screener for elementary and middle grades |
| topic |
ddc 150 ddc 370 ddc 610 ddc 300 bkl 70.00 bkl 71.00 |
| topic_unstemmed |
ddc 150 ddc 370 ddc 610 ddc 300 bkl 70.00 bkl 71.00 |
| topic_browse |
ddc 150 ddc 370 ddc 610 ddc 300 bkl 70.00 bkl 71.00 |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
zu |
| author2_variant |
s p k sp spk r j rj t c r t tcr tcrt m w mw t j c tj tjc |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Letter to the Editor re: article: “A systematic review of the safety, efficacy and acceptability of task sharing tubal sterilization to mid-level providers” by Rodriguez and Gordon-Maclean (Epub) |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
ELV023926147 |
| dewey-tens |
150 - Psychology 370 - Education 610 - Medicine & health 300 - Social sciences, sociology & anthropology |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Letter to the Editor re: article: “A systematic review of the safety, efficacy and acceptability of task sharing tubal sterilization to mid-level providers” by Rodriguez and Gordon-Maclean (Epub) |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)ELV023926147 |
| title |
Direct behavior rating as a school-based behavior screener for elementary and middle grades |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)ELV039122336 (ELSEVIER)S0022-4405(13)00027-7 |
| title_full |
Direct behavior rating as a school-based behavior screener for elementary and middle grades |
| author_sort |
Chafouleas, Sandra M. |
| journal |
Letter to the Editor re: article: “A systematic review of the safety, efficacy and acceptability of task sharing tubal sterilization to mid-level providers” by Rodriguez and Gordon-Maclean (Epub) |
| journalStr |
Letter to the Editor re: article: “A systematic review of the safety, efficacy and acceptability of task sharing tubal sterilization to mid-level providers” by Rodriguez and Gordon-Maclean (Epub) |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| dewey-hundreds |
100 - Philosophy & psychology 300 - Social sciences 600 - Technology |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2013 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
zzz |
| container_start_page |
367 |
| author_browse |
Chafouleas, Sandra M. |
| container_volume |
51 |
| physical |
19 |
| class |
150 370 150 DE-600 370 DE-600 610 VZ 300 VZ 70.00 bkl 71.00 bkl |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Chafouleas, Sandra M. |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1016/j.jsp.2013.04.002 |
| dewey-full |
150 370 610 300 |
| title_sort |
direct behavior rating as a school-based behavior screener for elementary and middle grades |
| title_auth |
Direct behavior rating as a school-based behavior screener for elementary and middle grades |
| abstract |
The purpose of this study was to investigate how Direct Behavior Rating Single Item Scales (DBR-SIS) involving targets of academically engaged, disruptive, and respectful behaviors function in school-based screening assessment. Participants included 831 students in kindergarten through eighth grades who attended schools in the northeastern United States. Teachers provided behavior ratings for a sample of students in their classrooms on the DBR-SIS, the Behavioral and Emotional Screening System (Kamphaus & Reynolds, 2007), and the Student Risk Screening Scale (Drummond, 1994). Given variations in rating procedures to accommodate scheduling differences across grades, analysis was conducted separately for elementary school and middle school grade levels. Results suggested that the recommended cut scores, the combination of behavior targets, and the resulting conditional probability indices varied depending on grade level grouping (lower elementary, upper elementary, middle). For example, for the lower elementary grade level grouping, a combination of disruptive behavior (cut score=2) and academically engaged behavior (cut score=8) was considered to offer the best balance among indices of diagnostic accuracy, whereas a cut score of 1 for disruptive behavior and 8 for academically engaged behavior were recommended for the upper elementary school grade level grouping and cut scores of 1 and 9, respectively, were suggested for middle school grade level grouping. Generally, DBR-SIS cut scores considered optimal for screening using single or combined targets including academically engaged behavior and disruptive behavior by offering a reasonable balance of indices for sensitivity (.51–.90), specificity (.47–.83), negative predictive power (.94–.98), and positive predictive power (.14–.41). The single target of respectful behavior performed poorly across all grade level groups, and performance of DBR-SIS targets was relatively better in the elementary school than middle school grade level groups. Overall, results supported that disruptive behavior is highly important in evaluating risk status in lower grade levels and that academically engaged behavior becomes more pertinent as students reach higher grade levels. Limitations, future directions, and implications are discussed. |
| abstractGer |
The purpose of this study was to investigate how Direct Behavior Rating Single Item Scales (DBR-SIS) involving targets of academically engaged, disruptive, and respectful behaviors function in school-based screening assessment. Participants included 831 students in kindergarten through eighth grades who attended schools in the northeastern United States. Teachers provided behavior ratings for a sample of students in their classrooms on the DBR-SIS, the Behavioral and Emotional Screening System (Kamphaus & Reynolds, 2007), and the Student Risk Screening Scale (Drummond, 1994). Given variations in rating procedures to accommodate scheduling differences across grades, analysis was conducted separately for elementary school and middle school grade levels. Results suggested that the recommended cut scores, the combination of behavior targets, and the resulting conditional probability indices varied depending on grade level grouping (lower elementary, upper elementary, middle). For example, for the lower elementary grade level grouping, a combination of disruptive behavior (cut score=2) and academically engaged behavior (cut score=8) was considered to offer the best balance among indices of diagnostic accuracy, whereas a cut score of 1 for disruptive behavior and 8 for academically engaged behavior were recommended for the upper elementary school grade level grouping and cut scores of 1 and 9, respectively, were suggested for middle school grade level grouping. Generally, DBR-SIS cut scores considered optimal for screening using single or combined targets including academically engaged behavior and disruptive behavior by offering a reasonable balance of indices for sensitivity (.51–.90), specificity (.47–.83), negative predictive power (.94–.98), and positive predictive power (.14–.41). The single target of respectful behavior performed poorly across all grade level groups, and performance of DBR-SIS targets was relatively better in the elementary school than middle school grade level groups. Overall, results supported that disruptive behavior is highly important in evaluating risk status in lower grade levels and that academically engaged behavior becomes more pertinent as students reach higher grade levels. Limitations, future directions, and implications are discussed. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
The purpose of this study was to investigate how Direct Behavior Rating Single Item Scales (DBR-SIS) involving targets of academically engaged, disruptive, and respectful behaviors function in school-based screening assessment. Participants included 831 students in kindergarten through eighth grades who attended schools in the northeastern United States. Teachers provided behavior ratings for a sample of students in their classrooms on the DBR-SIS, the Behavioral and Emotional Screening System (Kamphaus & Reynolds, 2007), and the Student Risk Screening Scale (Drummond, 1994). Given variations in rating procedures to accommodate scheduling differences across grades, analysis was conducted separately for elementary school and middle school grade levels. Results suggested that the recommended cut scores, the combination of behavior targets, and the resulting conditional probability indices varied depending on grade level grouping (lower elementary, upper elementary, middle). For example, for the lower elementary grade level grouping, a combination of disruptive behavior (cut score=2) and academically engaged behavior (cut score=8) was considered to offer the best balance among indices of diagnostic accuracy, whereas a cut score of 1 for disruptive behavior and 8 for academically engaged behavior were recommended for the upper elementary school grade level grouping and cut scores of 1 and 9, respectively, were suggested for middle school grade level grouping. Generally, DBR-SIS cut scores considered optimal for screening using single or combined targets including academically engaged behavior and disruptive behavior by offering a reasonable balance of indices for sensitivity (.51–.90), specificity (.47–.83), negative predictive power (.94–.98), and positive predictive power (.14–.41). The single target of respectful behavior performed poorly across all grade level groups, and performance of DBR-SIS targets was relatively better in the elementary school than middle school grade level groups. Overall, results supported that disruptive behavior is highly important in evaluating risk status in lower grade levels and that academically engaged behavior becomes more pertinent as students reach higher grade levels. Limitations, future directions, and implications are discussed. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U |
| container_issue |
3 |
| title_short |
Direct behavior rating as a school-based behavior screener for elementary and middle grades |
| url |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2013.04.002 |
| remote_bool |
true |
| author2 |
Kilgus, Stephen P. Jaffery, Rose Riley-Tillman, T. Chris Welsh, Megan Christ, Theodore J. |
| author2Str |
Kilgus, Stephen P. Jaffery, Rose Riley-Tillman, T. Chris Welsh, Megan Christ, Theodore J. |
| ppnlink |
ELV023926147 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
z |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| author2_role |
oth oth oth oth oth |
| doi_str |
10.1016/j.jsp.2013.04.002 |
| up_date |
2024-07-06T19:50:42.077Z |
| _version_ |
1803860513471332352 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV039122336</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230625224106.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">180603s2013 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.jsp.2013.04.002</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">GBVA2013022000016.pica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV039122336</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0022-4405(13)00027-7</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">150</subfield><subfield code="a">370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">150</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">370</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">610</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">300</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">70.00</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">71.00</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Chafouleas, Sandra M.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Direct behavior rating as a school-based behavior screener for elementary and middle grades</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2013transfer abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">19</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The purpose of this study was to investigate how Direct Behavior Rating Single Item Scales (DBR-SIS) involving targets of academically engaged, disruptive, and respectful behaviors function in school-based screening assessment. Participants included 831 students in kindergarten through eighth grades who attended schools in the northeastern United States. Teachers provided behavior ratings for a sample of students in their classrooms on the DBR-SIS, the Behavioral and Emotional Screening System (Kamphaus & Reynolds, 2007), and the Student Risk Screening Scale (Drummond, 1994). Given variations in rating procedures to accommodate scheduling differences across grades, analysis was conducted separately for elementary school and middle school grade levels. Results suggested that the recommended cut scores, the combination of behavior targets, and the resulting conditional probability indices varied depending on grade level grouping (lower elementary, upper elementary, middle). For example, for the lower elementary grade level grouping, a combination of disruptive behavior (cut score=2) and academically engaged behavior (cut score=8) was considered to offer the best balance among indices of diagnostic accuracy, whereas a cut score of 1 for disruptive behavior and 8 for academically engaged behavior were recommended for the upper elementary school grade level grouping and cut scores of 1 and 9, respectively, were suggested for middle school grade level grouping. Generally, DBR-SIS cut scores considered optimal for screening using single or combined targets including academically engaged behavior and disruptive behavior by offering a reasonable balance of indices for sensitivity (.51–.90), specificity (.47–.83), negative predictive power (.94–.98), and positive predictive power (.14–.41). The single target of respectful behavior performed poorly across all grade level groups, and performance of DBR-SIS targets was relatively better in the elementary school than middle school grade level groups. Overall, results supported that disruptive behavior is highly important in evaluating risk status in lower grade levels and that academically engaged behavior becomes more pertinent as students reach higher grade levels. Limitations, future directions, and implications are discussed.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The purpose of this study was to investigate how Direct Behavior Rating Single Item Scales (DBR-SIS) involving targets of academically engaged, disruptive, and respectful behaviors function in school-based screening assessment. Participants included 831 students in kindergarten through eighth grades who attended schools in the northeastern United States. Teachers provided behavior ratings for a sample of students in their classrooms on the DBR-SIS, the Behavioral and Emotional Screening System (Kamphaus & Reynolds, 2007), and the Student Risk Screening Scale (Drummond, 1994). Given variations in rating procedures to accommodate scheduling differences across grades, analysis was conducted separately for elementary school and middle school grade levels. Results suggested that the recommended cut scores, the combination of behavior targets, and the resulting conditional probability indices varied depending on grade level grouping (lower elementary, upper elementary, middle). For example, for the lower elementary grade level grouping, a combination of disruptive behavior (cut score=2) and academically engaged behavior (cut score=8) was considered to offer the best balance among indices of diagnostic accuracy, whereas a cut score of 1 for disruptive behavior and 8 for academically engaged behavior were recommended for the upper elementary school grade level grouping and cut scores of 1 and 9, respectively, were suggested for middle school grade level grouping. Generally, DBR-SIS cut scores considered optimal for screening using single or combined targets including academically engaged behavior and disruptive behavior by offering a reasonable balance of indices for sensitivity (.51–.90), specificity (.47–.83), negative predictive power (.94–.98), and positive predictive power (.14–.41). The single target of respectful behavior performed poorly across all grade level groups, and performance of DBR-SIS targets was relatively better in the elementary school than middle school grade level groups. Overall, results supported that disruptive behavior is highly important in evaluating risk status in lower grade levels and that academically engaged behavior becomes more pertinent as students reach higher grade levels. Limitations, future directions, and implications are discussed.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Kilgus, Stephen P.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Jaffery, Rose</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Riley-Tillman, T. Chris</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Welsh, Megan</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Christ, Theodore J.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="n">Elsevier Science</subfield><subfield code="a">Taylor, Diana ELSEVIER</subfield><subfield code="t">Letter to the Editor re: article: “A systematic review of the safety, efficacy and acceptability of task sharing tubal sterilization to mid-level providers” by Rodriguez and Gordon-Maclean (Epub)</subfield><subfield code="d">2015</subfield><subfield code="g">Amsterdam [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)ELV023926147</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:51</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2013</subfield><subfield code="g">number:3</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:367-385</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:19</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2013.04.002</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">70.00</subfield><subfield code="j">Sozialwissenschaften allgemein: Allgemeines</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">71.00</subfield><subfield code="j">Soziologie: Allgemeines</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">51</subfield><subfield code="j">2013</subfield><subfield code="e">3</subfield><subfield code="h">367-385</subfield><subfield code="g">19</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="953" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="2">045F</subfield><subfield code="a">150</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.399638 |