Can authority change through deliberative politics?
Based on the review of relevant literature, this paper investigates how forest authority is produced or reproduced in the course of forest policy change, by drawing on the past four decades of participatory forest policy reform in Nepal. We analyze various waves of deliberative politics that emerged...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Autor*in: |
Ojha, Hemant R. [verfasserIn] |
---|
Format: |
E-Artikel |
---|---|
Sprache: |
Englisch |
Erschienen: |
2014transfer abstract |
---|
Umfang: |
9 |
---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Specific mechanical energy – An essential parameter in the processing of amorphous solid dispersions - Thompson, Stephen A. ELSEVIER, 2021, a companion journal to Forest ecology and management, Amsterdam [u.a.] |
---|---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:46 ; year:2014 ; pages:1-9 ; extent:9 |
Links: |
---|
DOI / URN: |
10.1016/j.forpol.2014.04.005 |
---|
Katalog-ID: |
ELV039175103 |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | ELV039175103 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20230625224228.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 180603s2014 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.forpol.2014.04.005 |2 doi | |
028 | 5 | 2 | |a GBVA2014003000009.pica |
035 | |a (DE-627)ELV039175103 | ||
035 | |a (ELSEVIER)S1389-9341(14)00078-1 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
082 | 0 | |a 630 |a 640 | |
082 | 0 | 4 | |a 630 |q DE-600 |
082 | 0 | 4 | |a 640 |q DE-600 |
082 | 0 | 4 | |a 610 |q VZ |
084 | |a 15,3 |2 ssgn | ||
084 | |a PHARM |q DE-84 |2 fid | ||
084 | |a 58.28 |2 bkl | ||
084 | |a 44.40 |2 bkl | ||
100 | 1 | |a Ojha, Hemant R. |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Can authority change through deliberative politics? |
264 | 1 | |c 2014transfer abstract | |
300 | |a 9 | ||
336 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zzz |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b z |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zu |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a Based on the review of relevant literature, this paper investigates how forest authority is produced or reproduced in the course of forest policy change, by drawing on the past four decades of participatory forest policy reform in Nepal. We analyze various waves of deliberative politics that emerged in different contexts related to the Himalayan crisis, the flow of international aid for conservation and development projects, civil conflict and democratic transition, and most recently the policy responses to climate change. The analysis shows how such deliberative politics contributed to the change or continuity of conventional authorities around forest policy and practice. It shows that despite notable participatory policy reform, the conventional authority has become further re-entrenched. Based on this analysis, we argue that efforts to understand forest policy change can be more meaningful if attention is paid to whether and how deliberative politics emerge to challenge the hegemonic claims to power and knowledge about resource governance practices. Such approach to policy analysis can open new possibilities for understanding democratic policy reform by explicating the nuances of deliberation and policy politics occurring at multiple scales. | ||
520 | |a Based on the review of relevant literature, this paper investigates how forest authority is produced or reproduced in the course of forest policy change, by drawing on the past four decades of participatory forest policy reform in Nepal. We analyze various waves of deliberative politics that emerged in different contexts related to the Himalayan crisis, the flow of international aid for conservation and development projects, civil conflict and democratic transition, and most recently the policy responses to climate change. The analysis shows how such deliberative politics contributed to the change or continuity of conventional authorities around forest policy and practice. It shows that despite notable participatory policy reform, the conventional authority has become further re-entrenched. Based on this analysis, we argue that efforts to understand forest policy change can be more meaningful if attention is paid to whether and how deliberative politics emerge to challenge the hegemonic claims to power and knowledge about resource governance practices. Such approach to policy analysis can open new possibilities for understanding democratic policy reform by explicating the nuances of deliberation and policy politics occurring at multiple scales. | ||
700 | 1 | |a Banjade, Mani R. |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Sunam, Ramesh K. |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Bhattarai, Basundhara |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Jana, Sudeep |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Goutam, Keshab R. |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Dhungana, Sindhu |4 oth | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |n Elsevier |a Thompson, Stephen A. ELSEVIER |t Specific mechanical energy – An essential parameter in the processing of amorphous solid dispersions |d 2021 |d a companion journal to Forest ecology and management |g Amsterdam [u.a.] |w (DE-627)ELV006104916 |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:46 |g year:2014 |g pages:1-9 |g extent:9 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2014.04.005 |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_U | ||
912 | |a GBV_ELV | ||
912 | |a SYSFLAG_U | ||
912 | |a FID-PHARM | ||
912 | |a SSG-OLC-PHA | ||
912 | |a SSG-OPC-PHA | ||
936 | b | k | |a 58.28 |j Pharmazeutische Technologie |q VZ |
936 | b | k | |a 44.40 |j Pharmazie |j Pharmazeutika |q VZ |
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 46 |j 2014 |h 1-9 |g 9 | ||
953 | |2 045F |a 630 |
author_variant |
h r o hr hro |
---|---|
matchkey_str |
ojhahemantrbanjademanirsunamrameshkbhatt:2014----:aatoiyhnehogdlbr |
hierarchy_sort_str |
2014transfer abstract |
bklnumber |
58.28 44.40 |
publishDate |
2014 |
allfields |
10.1016/j.forpol.2014.04.005 doi GBVA2014003000009.pica (DE-627)ELV039175103 (ELSEVIER)S1389-9341(14)00078-1 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 630 640 630 DE-600 640 DE-600 610 VZ 15,3 ssgn PHARM DE-84 fid 58.28 bkl 44.40 bkl Ojha, Hemant R. verfasserin aut Can authority change through deliberative politics? 2014transfer abstract 9 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Based on the review of relevant literature, this paper investigates how forest authority is produced or reproduced in the course of forest policy change, by drawing on the past four decades of participatory forest policy reform in Nepal. We analyze various waves of deliberative politics that emerged in different contexts related to the Himalayan crisis, the flow of international aid for conservation and development projects, civil conflict and democratic transition, and most recently the policy responses to climate change. The analysis shows how such deliberative politics contributed to the change or continuity of conventional authorities around forest policy and practice. It shows that despite notable participatory policy reform, the conventional authority has become further re-entrenched. Based on this analysis, we argue that efforts to understand forest policy change can be more meaningful if attention is paid to whether and how deliberative politics emerge to challenge the hegemonic claims to power and knowledge about resource governance practices. Such approach to policy analysis can open new possibilities for understanding democratic policy reform by explicating the nuances of deliberation and policy politics occurring at multiple scales. Based on the review of relevant literature, this paper investigates how forest authority is produced or reproduced in the course of forest policy change, by drawing on the past four decades of participatory forest policy reform in Nepal. We analyze various waves of deliberative politics that emerged in different contexts related to the Himalayan crisis, the flow of international aid for conservation and development projects, civil conflict and democratic transition, and most recently the policy responses to climate change. The analysis shows how such deliberative politics contributed to the change or continuity of conventional authorities around forest policy and practice. It shows that despite notable participatory policy reform, the conventional authority has become further re-entrenched. Based on this analysis, we argue that efforts to understand forest policy change can be more meaningful if attention is paid to whether and how deliberative politics emerge to challenge the hegemonic claims to power and knowledge about resource governance practices. Such approach to policy analysis can open new possibilities for understanding democratic policy reform by explicating the nuances of deliberation and policy politics occurring at multiple scales. Banjade, Mani R. oth Sunam, Ramesh K. oth Bhattarai, Basundhara oth Jana, Sudeep oth Goutam, Keshab R. oth Dhungana, Sindhu oth Enthalten in Elsevier Thompson, Stephen A. ELSEVIER Specific mechanical energy – An essential parameter in the processing of amorphous solid dispersions 2021 a companion journal to Forest ecology and management Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV006104916 volume:46 year:2014 pages:1-9 extent:9 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2014.04.005 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U FID-PHARM SSG-OLC-PHA SSG-OPC-PHA 58.28 Pharmazeutische Technologie VZ 44.40 Pharmazie Pharmazeutika VZ AR 46 2014 1-9 9 045F 630 |
spelling |
10.1016/j.forpol.2014.04.005 doi GBVA2014003000009.pica (DE-627)ELV039175103 (ELSEVIER)S1389-9341(14)00078-1 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 630 640 630 DE-600 640 DE-600 610 VZ 15,3 ssgn PHARM DE-84 fid 58.28 bkl 44.40 bkl Ojha, Hemant R. verfasserin aut Can authority change through deliberative politics? 2014transfer abstract 9 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Based on the review of relevant literature, this paper investigates how forest authority is produced or reproduced in the course of forest policy change, by drawing on the past four decades of participatory forest policy reform in Nepal. We analyze various waves of deliberative politics that emerged in different contexts related to the Himalayan crisis, the flow of international aid for conservation and development projects, civil conflict and democratic transition, and most recently the policy responses to climate change. The analysis shows how such deliberative politics contributed to the change or continuity of conventional authorities around forest policy and practice. It shows that despite notable participatory policy reform, the conventional authority has become further re-entrenched. Based on this analysis, we argue that efforts to understand forest policy change can be more meaningful if attention is paid to whether and how deliberative politics emerge to challenge the hegemonic claims to power and knowledge about resource governance practices. Such approach to policy analysis can open new possibilities for understanding democratic policy reform by explicating the nuances of deliberation and policy politics occurring at multiple scales. Based on the review of relevant literature, this paper investigates how forest authority is produced or reproduced in the course of forest policy change, by drawing on the past four decades of participatory forest policy reform in Nepal. We analyze various waves of deliberative politics that emerged in different contexts related to the Himalayan crisis, the flow of international aid for conservation and development projects, civil conflict and democratic transition, and most recently the policy responses to climate change. The analysis shows how such deliberative politics contributed to the change or continuity of conventional authorities around forest policy and practice. It shows that despite notable participatory policy reform, the conventional authority has become further re-entrenched. Based on this analysis, we argue that efforts to understand forest policy change can be more meaningful if attention is paid to whether and how deliberative politics emerge to challenge the hegemonic claims to power and knowledge about resource governance practices. Such approach to policy analysis can open new possibilities for understanding democratic policy reform by explicating the nuances of deliberation and policy politics occurring at multiple scales. Banjade, Mani R. oth Sunam, Ramesh K. oth Bhattarai, Basundhara oth Jana, Sudeep oth Goutam, Keshab R. oth Dhungana, Sindhu oth Enthalten in Elsevier Thompson, Stephen A. ELSEVIER Specific mechanical energy – An essential parameter in the processing of amorphous solid dispersions 2021 a companion journal to Forest ecology and management Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV006104916 volume:46 year:2014 pages:1-9 extent:9 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2014.04.005 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U FID-PHARM SSG-OLC-PHA SSG-OPC-PHA 58.28 Pharmazeutische Technologie VZ 44.40 Pharmazie Pharmazeutika VZ AR 46 2014 1-9 9 045F 630 |
allfields_unstemmed |
10.1016/j.forpol.2014.04.005 doi GBVA2014003000009.pica (DE-627)ELV039175103 (ELSEVIER)S1389-9341(14)00078-1 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 630 640 630 DE-600 640 DE-600 610 VZ 15,3 ssgn PHARM DE-84 fid 58.28 bkl 44.40 bkl Ojha, Hemant R. verfasserin aut Can authority change through deliberative politics? 2014transfer abstract 9 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Based on the review of relevant literature, this paper investigates how forest authority is produced or reproduced in the course of forest policy change, by drawing on the past four decades of participatory forest policy reform in Nepal. We analyze various waves of deliberative politics that emerged in different contexts related to the Himalayan crisis, the flow of international aid for conservation and development projects, civil conflict and democratic transition, and most recently the policy responses to climate change. The analysis shows how such deliberative politics contributed to the change or continuity of conventional authorities around forest policy and practice. It shows that despite notable participatory policy reform, the conventional authority has become further re-entrenched. Based on this analysis, we argue that efforts to understand forest policy change can be more meaningful if attention is paid to whether and how deliberative politics emerge to challenge the hegemonic claims to power and knowledge about resource governance practices. Such approach to policy analysis can open new possibilities for understanding democratic policy reform by explicating the nuances of deliberation and policy politics occurring at multiple scales. Based on the review of relevant literature, this paper investigates how forest authority is produced or reproduced in the course of forest policy change, by drawing on the past four decades of participatory forest policy reform in Nepal. We analyze various waves of deliberative politics that emerged in different contexts related to the Himalayan crisis, the flow of international aid for conservation and development projects, civil conflict and democratic transition, and most recently the policy responses to climate change. The analysis shows how such deliberative politics contributed to the change or continuity of conventional authorities around forest policy and practice. It shows that despite notable participatory policy reform, the conventional authority has become further re-entrenched. Based on this analysis, we argue that efforts to understand forest policy change can be more meaningful if attention is paid to whether and how deliberative politics emerge to challenge the hegemonic claims to power and knowledge about resource governance practices. Such approach to policy analysis can open new possibilities for understanding democratic policy reform by explicating the nuances of deliberation and policy politics occurring at multiple scales. Banjade, Mani R. oth Sunam, Ramesh K. oth Bhattarai, Basundhara oth Jana, Sudeep oth Goutam, Keshab R. oth Dhungana, Sindhu oth Enthalten in Elsevier Thompson, Stephen A. ELSEVIER Specific mechanical energy – An essential parameter in the processing of amorphous solid dispersions 2021 a companion journal to Forest ecology and management Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV006104916 volume:46 year:2014 pages:1-9 extent:9 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2014.04.005 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U FID-PHARM SSG-OLC-PHA SSG-OPC-PHA 58.28 Pharmazeutische Technologie VZ 44.40 Pharmazie Pharmazeutika VZ AR 46 2014 1-9 9 045F 630 |
allfieldsGer |
10.1016/j.forpol.2014.04.005 doi GBVA2014003000009.pica (DE-627)ELV039175103 (ELSEVIER)S1389-9341(14)00078-1 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 630 640 630 DE-600 640 DE-600 610 VZ 15,3 ssgn PHARM DE-84 fid 58.28 bkl 44.40 bkl Ojha, Hemant R. verfasserin aut Can authority change through deliberative politics? 2014transfer abstract 9 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Based on the review of relevant literature, this paper investigates how forest authority is produced or reproduced in the course of forest policy change, by drawing on the past four decades of participatory forest policy reform in Nepal. We analyze various waves of deliberative politics that emerged in different contexts related to the Himalayan crisis, the flow of international aid for conservation and development projects, civil conflict and democratic transition, and most recently the policy responses to climate change. The analysis shows how such deliberative politics contributed to the change or continuity of conventional authorities around forest policy and practice. It shows that despite notable participatory policy reform, the conventional authority has become further re-entrenched. Based on this analysis, we argue that efforts to understand forest policy change can be more meaningful if attention is paid to whether and how deliberative politics emerge to challenge the hegemonic claims to power and knowledge about resource governance practices. Such approach to policy analysis can open new possibilities for understanding democratic policy reform by explicating the nuances of deliberation and policy politics occurring at multiple scales. Based on the review of relevant literature, this paper investigates how forest authority is produced or reproduced in the course of forest policy change, by drawing on the past four decades of participatory forest policy reform in Nepal. We analyze various waves of deliberative politics that emerged in different contexts related to the Himalayan crisis, the flow of international aid for conservation and development projects, civil conflict and democratic transition, and most recently the policy responses to climate change. The analysis shows how such deliberative politics contributed to the change or continuity of conventional authorities around forest policy and practice. It shows that despite notable participatory policy reform, the conventional authority has become further re-entrenched. Based on this analysis, we argue that efforts to understand forest policy change can be more meaningful if attention is paid to whether and how deliberative politics emerge to challenge the hegemonic claims to power and knowledge about resource governance practices. Such approach to policy analysis can open new possibilities for understanding democratic policy reform by explicating the nuances of deliberation and policy politics occurring at multiple scales. Banjade, Mani R. oth Sunam, Ramesh K. oth Bhattarai, Basundhara oth Jana, Sudeep oth Goutam, Keshab R. oth Dhungana, Sindhu oth Enthalten in Elsevier Thompson, Stephen A. ELSEVIER Specific mechanical energy – An essential parameter in the processing of amorphous solid dispersions 2021 a companion journal to Forest ecology and management Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV006104916 volume:46 year:2014 pages:1-9 extent:9 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2014.04.005 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U FID-PHARM SSG-OLC-PHA SSG-OPC-PHA 58.28 Pharmazeutische Technologie VZ 44.40 Pharmazie Pharmazeutika VZ AR 46 2014 1-9 9 045F 630 |
allfieldsSound |
10.1016/j.forpol.2014.04.005 doi GBVA2014003000009.pica (DE-627)ELV039175103 (ELSEVIER)S1389-9341(14)00078-1 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 630 640 630 DE-600 640 DE-600 610 VZ 15,3 ssgn PHARM DE-84 fid 58.28 bkl 44.40 bkl Ojha, Hemant R. verfasserin aut Can authority change through deliberative politics? 2014transfer abstract 9 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Based on the review of relevant literature, this paper investigates how forest authority is produced or reproduced in the course of forest policy change, by drawing on the past four decades of participatory forest policy reform in Nepal. We analyze various waves of deliberative politics that emerged in different contexts related to the Himalayan crisis, the flow of international aid for conservation and development projects, civil conflict and democratic transition, and most recently the policy responses to climate change. The analysis shows how such deliberative politics contributed to the change or continuity of conventional authorities around forest policy and practice. It shows that despite notable participatory policy reform, the conventional authority has become further re-entrenched. Based on this analysis, we argue that efforts to understand forest policy change can be more meaningful if attention is paid to whether and how deliberative politics emerge to challenge the hegemonic claims to power and knowledge about resource governance practices. Such approach to policy analysis can open new possibilities for understanding democratic policy reform by explicating the nuances of deliberation and policy politics occurring at multiple scales. Based on the review of relevant literature, this paper investigates how forest authority is produced or reproduced in the course of forest policy change, by drawing on the past four decades of participatory forest policy reform in Nepal. We analyze various waves of deliberative politics that emerged in different contexts related to the Himalayan crisis, the flow of international aid for conservation and development projects, civil conflict and democratic transition, and most recently the policy responses to climate change. The analysis shows how such deliberative politics contributed to the change or continuity of conventional authorities around forest policy and practice. It shows that despite notable participatory policy reform, the conventional authority has become further re-entrenched. Based on this analysis, we argue that efforts to understand forest policy change can be more meaningful if attention is paid to whether and how deliberative politics emerge to challenge the hegemonic claims to power and knowledge about resource governance practices. Such approach to policy analysis can open new possibilities for understanding democratic policy reform by explicating the nuances of deliberation and policy politics occurring at multiple scales. Banjade, Mani R. oth Sunam, Ramesh K. oth Bhattarai, Basundhara oth Jana, Sudeep oth Goutam, Keshab R. oth Dhungana, Sindhu oth Enthalten in Elsevier Thompson, Stephen A. ELSEVIER Specific mechanical energy – An essential parameter in the processing of amorphous solid dispersions 2021 a companion journal to Forest ecology and management Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV006104916 volume:46 year:2014 pages:1-9 extent:9 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2014.04.005 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U FID-PHARM SSG-OLC-PHA SSG-OPC-PHA 58.28 Pharmazeutische Technologie VZ 44.40 Pharmazie Pharmazeutika VZ AR 46 2014 1-9 9 045F 630 |
language |
English |
source |
Enthalten in Specific mechanical energy – An essential parameter in the processing of amorphous solid dispersions Amsterdam [u.a.] volume:46 year:2014 pages:1-9 extent:9 |
sourceStr |
Enthalten in Specific mechanical energy – An essential parameter in the processing of amorphous solid dispersions Amsterdam [u.a.] volume:46 year:2014 pages:1-9 extent:9 |
format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
bklname |
Pharmazeutische Technologie Pharmazie Pharmazeutika |
institution |
findex.gbv.de |
dewey-raw |
630 |
isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
container_title |
Specific mechanical energy – An essential parameter in the processing of amorphous solid dispersions |
authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Ojha, Hemant R. @@aut@@ Banjade, Mani R. @@oth@@ Sunam, Ramesh K. @@oth@@ Bhattarai, Basundhara @@oth@@ Jana, Sudeep @@oth@@ Goutam, Keshab R. @@oth@@ Dhungana, Sindhu @@oth@@ |
publishDateDaySort_date |
2014-01-01T00:00:00Z |
hierarchy_top_id |
ELV006104916 |
dewey-sort |
3630 |
id |
ELV039175103 |
language_de |
englisch |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV039175103</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230625224228.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">180603s2014 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.forpol.2014.04.005</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">GBVA2014003000009.pica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV039175103</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S1389-9341(14)00078-1</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">630</subfield><subfield code="a">640</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">630</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">640</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">610</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">15,3</subfield><subfield code="2">ssgn</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">PHARM</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-84</subfield><subfield code="2">fid</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">58.28</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">44.40</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ojha, Hemant R.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Can authority change through deliberative politics?</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2014transfer abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Based on the review of relevant literature, this paper investigates how forest authority is produced or reproduced in the course of forest policy change, by drawing on the past four decades of participatory forest policy reform in Nepal. We analyze various waves of deliberative politics that emerged in different contexts related to the Himalayan crisis, the flow of international aid for conservation and development projects, civil conflict and democratic transition, and most recently the policy responses to climate change. The analysis shows how such deliberative politics contributed to the change or continuity of conventional authorities around forest policy and practice. It shows that despite notable participatory policy reform, the conventional authority has become further re-entrenched. Based on this analysis, we argue that efforts to understand forest policy change can be more meaningful if attention is paid to whether and how deliberative politics emerge to challenge the hegemonic claims to power and knowledge about resource governance practices. Such approach to policy analysis can open new possibilities for understanding democratic policy reform by explicating the nuances of deliberation and policy politics occurring at multiple scales.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Based on the review of relevant literature, this paper investigates how forest authority is produced or reproduced in the course of forest policy change, by drawing on the past four decades of participatory forest policy reform in Nepal. We analyze various waves of deliberative politics that emerged in different contexts related to the Himalayan crisis, the flow of international aid for conservation and development projects, civil conflict and democratic transition, and most recently the policy responses to climate change. The analysis shows how such deliberative politics contributed to the change or continuity of conventional authorities around forest policy and practice. It shows that despite notable participatory policy reform, the conventional authority has become further re-entrenched. Based on this analysis, we argue that efforts to understand forest policy change can be more meaningful if attention is paid to whether and how deliberative politics emerge to challenge the hegemonic claims to power and knowledge about resource governance practices. Such approach to policy analysis can open new possibilities for understanding democratic policy reform by explicating the nuances of deliberation and policy politics occurring at multiple scales.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Banjade, Mani R.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Sunam, Ramesh K.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Bhattarai, Basundhara</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Jana, Sudeep</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Goutam, Keshab R.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Dhungana, Sindhu</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="n">Elsevier</subfield><subfield code="a">Thompson, Stephen A. ELSEVIER</subfield><subfield code="t">Specific mechanical energy – An essential parameter in the processing of amorphous solid dispersions</subfield><subfield code="d">2021</subfield><subfield code="d">a companion journal to Forest ecology and management</subfield><subfield code="g">Amsterdam [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)ELV006104916</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:46</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2014</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:1-9</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:9</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2014.04.005</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">FID-PHARM</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OPC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">58.28</subfield><subfield code="j">Pharmazeutische Technologie</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">44.40</subfield><subfield code="j">Pharmazie</subfield><subfield code="j">Pharmazeutika</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">46</subfield><subfield code="j">2014</subfield><subfield code="h">1-9</subfield><subfield code="g">9</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="953" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="2">045F</subfield><subfield code="a">630</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
author |
Ojha, Hemant R. |
spellingShingle |
Ojha, Hemant R. ddc 630 ddc 640 ddc 610 ssgn 15,3 fid PHARM bkl 58.28 bkl 44.40 Can authority change through deliberative politics? |
authorStr |
Ojha, Hemant R. |
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)ELV006104916 |
format |
electronic Article |
dewey-ones |
630 - Agriculture & related technologies 640 - Home & family management 610 - Medicine & health |
delete_txt_mv |
keep |
author_role |
aut |
collection |
elsevier |
remote_str |
true |
illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
topic_title |
630 640 630 DE-600 640 DE-600 610 VZ 15,3 ssgn PHARM DE-84 fid 58.28 bkl 44.40 bkl Can authority change through deliberative politics? |
topic |
ddc 630 ddc 640 ddc 610 ssgn 15,3 fid PHARM bkl 58.28 bkl 44.40 |
topic_unstemmed |
ddc 630 ddc 640 ddc 610 ssgn 15,3 fid PHARM bkl 58.28 bkl 44.40 |
topic_browse |
ddc 630 ddc 640 ddc 610 ssgn 15,3 fid PHARM bkl 58.28 bkl 44.40 |
format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
carriertype_str_mv |
zu |
author2_variant |
m r b mr mrb r k s rk rks b b bb s j sj k r g kr krg s d sd |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Specific mechanical energy – An essential parameter in the processing of amorphous solid dispersions |
hierarchy_parent_id |
ELV006104916 |
dewey-tens |
630 - Agriculture 640 - Home & family management 610 - Medicine & health |
hierarchy_top_title |
Specific mechanical energy – An essential parameter in the processing of amorphous solid dispersions |
isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)ELV006104916 |
title |
Can authority change through deliberative politics? |
ctrlnum |
(DE-627)ELV039175103 (ELSEVIER)S1389-9341(14)00078-1 |
title_full |
Can authority change through deliberative politics? |
author_sort |
Ojha, Hemant R. |
journal |
Specific mechanical energy – An essential parameter in the processing of amorphous solid dispersions |
journalStr |
Specific mechanical energy – An essential parameter in the processing of amorphous solid dispersions |
lang_code |
eng |
isOA_bool |
false |
dewey-hundreds |
600 - Technology |
recordtype |
marc |
publishDateSort |
2014 |
contenttype_str_mv |
zzz |
container_start_page |
1 |
author_browse |
Ojha, Hemant R. |
container_volume |
46 |
physical |
9 |
class |
630 640 630 DE-600 640 DE-600 610 VZ 15,3 ssgn PHARM DE-84 fid 58.28 bkl 44.40 bkl |
format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
author-letter |
Ojha, Hemant R. |
doi_str_mv |
10.1016/j.forpol.2014.04.005 |
dewey-full |
630 640 610 |
title_sort |
can authority change through deliberative politics? |
title_auth |
Can authority change through deliberative politics? |
abstract |
Based on the review of relevant literature, this paper investigates how forest authority is produced or reproduced in the course of forest policy change, by drawing on the past four decades of participatory forest policy reform in Nepal. We analyze various waves of deliberative politics that emerged in different contexts related to the Himalayan crisis, the flow of international aid for conservation and development projects, civil conflict and democratic transition, and most recently the policy responses to climate change. The analysis shows how such deliberative politics contributed to the change or continuity of conventional authorities around forest policy and practice. It shows that despite notable participatory policy reform, the conventional authority has become further re-entrenched. Based on this analysis, we argue that efforts to understand forest policy change can be more meaningful if attention is paid to whether and how deliberative politics emerge to challenge the hegemonic claims to power and knowledge about resource governance practices. Such approach to policy analysis can open new possibilities for understanding democratic policy reform by explicating the nuances of deliberation and policy politics occurring at multiple scales. |
abstractGer |
Based on the review of relevant literature, this paper investigates how forest authority is produced or reproduced in the course of forest policy change, by drawing on the past four decades of participatory forest policy reform in Nepal. We analyze various waves of deliberative politics that emerged in different contexts related to the Himalayan crisis, the flow of international aid for conservation and development projects, civil conflict and democratic transition, and most recently the policy responses to climate change. The analysis shows how such deliberative politics contributed to the change or continuity of conventional authorities around forest policy and practice. It shows that despite notable participatory policy reform, the conventional authority has become further re-entrenched. Based on this analysis, we argue that efforts to understand forest policy change can be more meaningful if attention is paid to whether and how deliberative politics emerge to challenge the hegemonic claims to power and knowledge about resource governance practices. Such approach to policy analysis can open new possibilities for understanding democratic policy reform by explicating the nuances of deliberation and policy politics occurring at multiple scales. |
abstract_unstemmed |
Based on the review of relevant literature, this paper investigates how forest authority is produced or reproduced in the course of forest policy change, by drawing on the past four decades of participatory forest policy reform in Nepal. We analyze various waves of deliberative politics that emerged in different contexts related to the Himalayan crisis, the flow of international aid for conservation and development projects, civil conflict and democratic transition, and most recently the policy responses to climate change. The analysis shows how such deliberative politics contributed to the change or continuity of conventional authorities around forest policy and practice. It shows that despite notable participatory policy reform, the conventional authority has become further re-entrenched. Based on this analysis, we argue that efforts to understand forest policy change can be more meaningful if attention is paid to whether and how deliberative politics emerge to challenge the hegemonic claims to power and knowledge about resource governance practices. Such approach to policy analysis can open new possibilities for understanding democratic policy reform by explicating the nuances of deliberation and policy politics occurring at multiple scales. |
collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U FID-PHARM SSG-OLC-PHA SSG-OPC-PHA |
title_short |
Can authority change through deliberative politics? |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2014.04.005 |
remote_bool |
true |
author2 |
Banjade, Mani R. Sunam, Ramesh K. Bhattarai, Basundhara Jana, Sudeep Goutam, Keshab R. Dhungana, Sindhu |
author2Str |
Banjade, Mani R. Sunam, Ramesh K. Bhattarai, Basundhara Jana, Sudeep Goutam, Keshab R. Dhungana, Sindhu |
ppnlink |
ELV006104916 |
mediatype_str_mv |
z |
isOA_txt |
false |
hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
author2_role |
oth oth oth oth oth oth |
doi_str |
10.1016/j.forpol.2014.04.005 |
up_date |
2024-07-06T19:58:05.944Z |
_version_ |
1803860978899615744 |
fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV039175103</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230625224228.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">180603s2014 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.forpol.2014.04.005</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">GBVA2014003000009.pica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV039175103</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S1389-9341(14)00078-1</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">630</subfield><subfield code="a">640</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">630</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">640</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">610</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">15,3</subfield><subfield code="2">ssgn</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">PHARM</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-84</subfield><subfield code="2">fid</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">58.28</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">44.40</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ojha, Hemant R.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Can authority change through deliberative politics?</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2014transfer abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Based on the review of relevant literature, this paper investigates how forest authority is produced or reproduced in the course of forest policy change, by drawing on the past four decades of participatory forest policy reform in Nepal. We analyze various waves of deliberative politics that emerged in different contexts related to the Himalayan crisis, the flow of international aid for conservation and development projects, civil conflict and democratic transition, and most recently the policy responses to climate change. The analysis shows how such deliberative politics contributed to the change or continuity of conventional authorities around forest policy and practice. It shows that despite notable participatory policy reform, the conventional authority has become further re-entrenched. Based on this analysis, we argue that efforts to understand forest policy change can be more meaningful if attention is paid to whether and how deliberative politics emerge to challenge the hegemonic claims to power and knowledge about resource governance practices. Such approach to policy analysis can open new possibilities for understanding democratic policy reform by explicating the nuances of deliberation and policy politics occurring at multiple scales.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Based on the review of relevant literature, this paper investigates how forest authority is produced or reproduced in the course of forest policy change, by drawing on the past four decades of participatory forest policy reform in Nepal. We analyze various waves of deliberative politics that emerged in different contexts related to the Himalayan crisis, the flow of international aid for conservation and development projects, civil conflict and democratic transition, and most recently the policy responses to climate change. The analysis shows how such deliberative politics contributed to the change or continuity of conventional authorities around forest policy and practice. It shows that despite notable participatory policy reform, the conventional authority has become further re-entrenched. Based on this analysis, we argue that efforts to understand forest policy change can be more meaningful if attention is paid to whether and how deliberative politics emerge to challenge the hegemonic claims to power and knowledge about resource governance practices. Such approach to policy analysis can open new possibilities for understanding democratic policy reform by explicating the nuances of deliberation and policy politics occurring at multiple scales.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Banjade, Mani R.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Sunam, Ramesh K.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Bhattarai, Basundhara</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Jana, Sudeep</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Goutam, Keshab R.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Dhungana, Sindhu</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="n">Elsevier</subfield><subfield code="a">Thompson, Stephen A. ELSEVIER</subfield><subfield code="t">Specific mechanical energy – An essential parameter in the processing of amorphous solid dispersions</subfield><subfield code="d">2021</subfield><subfield code="d">a companion journal to Forest ecology and management</subfield><subfield code="g">Amsterdam [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)ELV006104916</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:46</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2014</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:1-9</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:9</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2014.04.005</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">FID-PHARM</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OPC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">58.28</subfield><subfield code="j">Pharmazeutische Technologie</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">44.40</subfield><subfield code="j">Pharmazie</subfield><subfield code="j">Pharmazeutika</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">46</subfield><subfield code="j">2014</subfield><subfield code="h">1-9</subfield><subfield code="g">9</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="953" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="2">045F</subfield><subfield code="a">630</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
score |
7.4014435 |