Cattle behaviours and stockperson actions related to impaired animal welfare at Swedish slaughter plants
At a slaughter plant, cattle are sometimes exposed to rough handling which may reduce animal welfare (AW). In an observational study at four Swedish commercial slaughter plants, AW-related behaviours of cattle and actions of abattoir stockpersons handling the same animals were recorded simultaneousl...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Hultgren, Jan [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2014transfer abstract |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Umfang: |
15 |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: The first record of a bryophyte in Upper Cretaceous amber from Taimyr, northern Siberia: Taimyrobryum martynoviorum gen. et sp. nov. (Bryopsida) - Ignatov, Michael S. ELSEVIER, 2016transfer abstract, an international scientific journal reporting on the application of ethology to animals used by man, Amsterdam [u.a.] |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:152 ; year:2014 ; pages:23-37 ; extent:15 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1016/j.applanim.2013.12.005 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
ELV039232328 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ELV039232328 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230625224406.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 180603s2014 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.applanim.2013.12.005 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a GBVA2014005000015.pica |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)ELV039232328 | ||
| 035 | |a (ELSEVIER)S0168-1591(13)00294-3 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 082 | 0 | |a 590 | |
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 590 |q DE-600 |
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 550 |q VZ |
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 610 |q VZ |
| 084 | |a 44.65 |2 bkl | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Hultgren, Jan |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Cattle behaviours and stockperson actions related to impaired animal welfare at Swedish slaughter plants |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2014transfer abstract | |
| 300 | |a 15 | ||
| 336 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zzz |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b z |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zu |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a At a slaughter plant, cattle are sometimes exposed to rough handling which may reduce animal welfare (AW). In an observational study at four Swedish commercial slaughter plants, AW-related behaviours of cattle and actions of abattoir stockpersons handling the same animals were recorded simultaneously. The objective was to estimate the occurrence of different behaviours and actions related to negative AW during driving and stunning at large-scale cattle abattoirs, assess associations between such behaviours and actions, and analyse differences between plants and animal categories (dairy cows, beef cows, adult bulls and heifers/bullocks). Direct continuous observations of focal animals were made using laptops either in a section of the driving race to the stun box (132 animals) or in the stun box (313 animals), generating a total of 14.5h of observations. The animals were stunned using a penetrating captive bolt gun or a rifle. Counts per animal of 14 behaviours and 16 stockperson actions were calculated. Sixteen percent of the observed animals displayed total behaviour counts >5 in the driving race, and 2% did so in the stun box; 32 and 8% of the observed animals received total counts >5 of stockperson actions in the race and stun box, respectively. We estimated that two-thirds of the animals were processed without displaying/receiving any of the behaviours/actions associated with severely negative AW. AW scores were acquired by adding together all observed behaviour counts (and action counts, separately) weighted by expert-assessed ratings denoting the degree of impaired AW. Spearman rank correlation was used to analyse associations between behaviour counts, action counts and AW scores. Only three moderate to strong correlations (ρ ≥0.4, P ≤0.001) between single behaviours/actions were found (“slapping rear” and “slapping front”; “prodding” and “shouting”; and “prodding” and “beating rear” in the driving race). The correlation between AW scores based on behaviours and actions was statistically significant but rather weak both in the driving race (ρ =0.37, P <0.0001) and stun box (ρ =0.22, P =0.0002). The effects of slaughter plant and animal category on behaviour counts and AW scores were estimated using standard or zero-inflated negative-binomial regression. The risks of most behaviours related to negative AW differed considerably between plants. In the stun box, adult bulls had a 2.5 times higher risk of “struggling-kicking” (P =0.016) and a 2.0 times... | ||
| 520 | |a At a slaughter plant, cattle are sometimes exposed to rough handling which may reduce animal welfare (AW). In an observational study at four Swedish commercial slaughter plants, AW-related behaviours of cattle and actions of abattoir stockpersons handling the same animals were recorded simultaneously. The objective was to estimate the occurrence of different behaviours and actions related to negative AW during driving and stunning at large-scale cattle abattoirs, assess associations between such behaviours and actions, and analyse differences between plants and animal categories (dairy cows, beef cows, adult bulls and heifers/bullocks). Direct continuous observations of focal animals were made using laptops either in a section of the driving race to the stun box (132 animals) or in the stun box (313 animals), generating a total of 14.5h of observations. The animals were stunned using a penetrating captive bolt gun or a rifle. Counts per animal of 14 behaviours and 16 stockperson actions were calculated. Sixteen percent of the observed animals displayed total behaviour counts >5 in the driving race, and 2% did so in the stun box; 32 and 8% of the observed animals received total counts >5 of stockperson actions in the race and stun box, respectively. We estimated that two-thirds of the animals were processed without displaying/receiving any of the behaviours/actions associated with severely negative AW. AW scores were acquired by adding together all observed behaviour counts (and action counts, separately) weighted by expert-assessed ratings denoting the degree of impaired AW. Spearman rank correlation was used to analyse associations between behaviour counts, action counts and AW scores. Only three moderate to strong correlations (ρ ≥0.4, P ≤0.001) between single behaviours/actions were found (“slapping rear” and “slapping front”; “prodding” and “shouting”; and “prodding” and “beating rear” in the driving race). The correlation between AW scores based on behaviours and actions was statistically significant but rather weak both in the driving race (ρ =0.37, P <0.0001) and stun box (ρ =0.22, P =0.0002). The effects of slaughter plant and animal category on behaviour counts and AW scores were estimated using standard or zero-inflated negative-binomial regression. The risks of most behaviours related to negative AW differed considerably between plants. In the stun box, adult bulls had a 2.5 times higher risk of “struggling-kicking” (P =0.016) and a 2.0 times... | ||
| 650 | 7 | |a Stunning |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Cattle |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Abattoir |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Stockperson |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Driving |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Human–animal interaction |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Slaughterhouse |2 Elsevier | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Wiberg, Sofia |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Berg, Charlotte |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Cvek, Katarina |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Lunner Kolstrup, Christina |4 oth | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |n Elsevier Science |a Ignatov, Michael S. ELSEVIER |t The first record of a bryophyte in Upper Cretaceous amber from Taimyr, northern Siberia: Taimyrobryum martynoviorum gen. et sp. nov. (Bryopsida) |d 2016transfer abstract |d an international scientific journal reporting on the application of ethology to animals used by man |g Amsterdam [u.a.] |w (DE-627)ELV019209428 |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:152 |g year:2014 |g pages:23-37 |g extent:15 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2013.12.005 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_U | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ELV | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_U | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-PHA | ||
| 936 | b | k | |a 44.65 |j Chirurgie |q VZ |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 152 |j 2014 |h 23-37 |g 15 | ||
| 953 | |2 045F |a 590 | ||
| author_variant |
j h jh |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
hultgrenjanwibergsofiabergcharlottecvekk:2014----:ateeaiusnsokesncinrltdomardnmlefr |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2014transfer abstract |
| bklnumber |
44.65 |
| publishDate |
2014 |
| allfields |
10.1016/j.applanim.2013.12.005 doi GBVA2014005000015.pica (DE-627)ELV039232328 (ELSEVIER)S0168-1591(13)00294-3 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 590 590 DE-600 550 VZ 610 VZ 44.65 bkl Hultgren, Jan verfasserin aut Cattle behaviours and stockperson actions related to impaired animal welfare at Swedish slaughter plants 2014transfer abstract 15 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier At a slaughter plant, cattle are sometimes exposed to rough handling which may reduce animal welfare (AW). In an observational study at four Swedish commercial slaughter plants, AW-related behaviours of cattle and actions of abattoir stockpersons handling the same animals were recorded simultaneously. The objective was to estimate the occurrence of different behaviours and actions related to negative AW during driving and stunning at large-scale cattle abattoirs, assess associations between such behaviours and actions, and analyse differences between plants and animal categories (dairy cows, beef cows, adult bulls and heifers/bullocks). Direct continuous observations of focal animals were made using laptops either in a section of the driving race to the stun box (132 animals) or in the stun box (313 animals), generating a total of 14.5h of observations. The animals were stunned using a penetrating captive bolt gun or a rifle. Counts per animal of 14 behaviours and 16 stockperson actions were calculated. Sixteen percent of the observed animals displayed total behaviour counts >5 in the driving race, and 2% did so in the stun box; 32 and 8% of the observed animals received total counts >5 of stockperson actions in the race and stun box, respectively. We estimated that two-thirds of the animals were processed without displaying/receiving any of the behaviours/actions associated with severely negative AW. AW scores were acquired by adding together all observed behaviour counts (and action counts, separately) weighted by expert-assessed ratings denoting the degree of impaired AW. Spearman rank correlation was used to analyse associations between behaviour counts, action counts and AW scores. Only three moderate to strong correlations (ρ ≥0.4, P ≤0.001) between single behaviours/actions were found (“slapping rear” and “slapping front”; “prodding” and “shouting”; and “prodding” and “beating rear” in the driving race). The correlation between AW scores based on behaviours and actions was statistically significant but rather weak both in the driving race (ρ =0.37, P <0.0001) and stun box (ρ =0.22, P =0.0002). The effects of slaughter plant and animal category on behaviour counts and AW scores were estimated using standard or zero-inflated negative-binomial regression. The risks of most behaviours related to negative AW differed considerably between plants. In the stun box, adult bulls had a 2.5 times higher risk of “struggling-kicking” (P =0.016) and a 2.0 times... At a slaughter plant, cattle are sometimes exposed to rough handling which may reduce animal welfare (AW). In an observational study at four Swedish commercial slaughter plants, AW-related behaviours of cattle and actions of abattoir stockpersons handling the same animals were recorded simultaneously. The objective was to estimate the occurrence of different behaviours and actions related to negative AW during driving and stunning at large-scale cattle abattoirs, assess associations between such behaviours and actions, and analyse differences between plants and animal categories (dairy cows, beef cows, adult bulls and heifers/bullocks). Direct continuous observations of focal animals were made using laptops either in a section of the driving race to the stun box (132 animals) or in the stun box (313 animals), generating a total of 14.5h of observations. The animals were stunned using a penetrating captive bolt gun or a rifle. Counts per animal of 14 behaviours and 16 stockperson actions were calculated. Sixteen percent of the observed animals displayed total behaviour counts >5 in the driving race, and 2% did so in the stun box; 32 and 8% of the observed animals received total counts >5 of stockperson actions in the race and stun box, respectively. We estimated that two-thirds of the animals were processed without displaying/receiving any of the behaviours/actions associated with severely negative AW. AW scores were acquired by adding together all observed behaviour counts (and action counts, separately) weighted by expert-assessed ratings denoting the degree of impaired AW. Spearman rank correlation was used to analyse associations between behaviour counts, action counts and AW scores. Only three moderate to strong correlations (ρ ≥0.4, P ≤0.001) between single behaviours/actions were found (“slapping rear” and “slapping front”; “prodding” and “shouting”; and “prodding” and “beating rear” in the driving race). The correlation between AW scores based on behaviours and actions was statistically significant but rather weak both in the driving race (ρ =0.37, P <0.0001) and stun box (ρ =0.22, P =0.0002). The effects of slaughter plant and animal category on behaviour counts and AW scores were estimated using standard or zero-inflated negative-binomial regression. The risks of most behaviours related to negative AW differed considerably between plants. In the stun box, adult bulls had a 2.5 times higher risk of “struggling-kicking” (P =0.016) and a 2.0 times... Stunning Elsevier Cattle Elsevier Abattoir Elsevier Stockperson Elsevier Driving Elsevier Human–animal interaction Elsevier Slaughterhouse Elsevier Wiberg, Sofia oth Berg, Charlotte oth Cvek, Katarina oth Lunner Kolstrup, Christina oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Ignatov, Michael S. ELSEVIER The first record of a bryophyte in Upper Cretaceous amber from Taimyr, northern Siberia: Taimyrobryum martynoviorum gen. et sp. nov. (Bryopsida) 2016transfer abstract an international scientific journal reporting on the application of ethology to animals used by man Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV019209428 volume:152 year:2014 pages:23-37 extent:15 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2013.12.005 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA 44.65 Chirurgie VZ AR 152 2014 23-37 15 045F 590 |
| spelling |
10.1016/j.applanim.2013.12.005 doi GBVA2014005000015.pica (DE-627)ELV039232328 (ELSEVIER)S0168-1591(13)00294-3 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 590 590 DE-600 550 VZ 610 VZ 44.65 bkl Hultgren, Jan verfasserin aut Cattle behaviours and stockperson actions related to impaired animal welfare at Swedish slaughter plants 2014transfer abstract 15 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier At a slaughter plant, cattle are sometimes exposed to rough handling which may reduce animal welfare (AW). In an observational study at four Swedish commercial slaughter plants, AW-related behaviours of cattle and actions of abattoir stockpersons handling the same animals were recorded simultaneously. The objective was to estimate the occurrence of different behaviours and actions related to negative AW during driving and stunning at large-scale cattle abattoirs, assess associations between such behaviours and actions, and analyse differences between plants and animal categories (dairy cows, beef cows, adult bulls and heifers/bullocks). Direct continuous observations of focal animals were made using laptops either in a section of the driving race to the stun box (132 animals) or in the stun box (313 animals), generating a total of 14.5h of observations. The animals were stunned using a penetrating captive bolt gun or a rifle. Counts per animal of 14 behaviours and 16 stockperson actions were calculated. Sixteen percent of the observed animals displayed total behaviour counts >5 in the driving race, and 2% did so in the stun box; 32 and 8% of the observed animals received total counts >5 of stockperson actions in the race and stun box, respectively. We estimated that two-thirds of the animals were processed without displaying/receiving any of the behaviours/actions associated with severely negative AW. AW scores were acquired by adding together all observed behaviour counts (and action counts, separately) weighted by expert-assessed ratings denoting the degree of impaired AW. Spearman rank correlation was used to analyse associations between behaviour counts, action counts and AW scores. Only three moderate to strong correlations (ρ ≥0.4, P ≤0.001) between single behaviours/actions were found (“slapping rear” and “slapping front”; “prodding” and “shouting”; and “prodding” and “beating rear” in the driving race). The correlation between AW scores based on behaviours and actions was statistically significant but rather weak both in the driving race (ρ =0.37, P <0.0001) and stun box (ρ =0.22, P =0.0002). The effects of slaughter plant and animal category on behaviour counts and AW scores were estimated using standard or zero-inflated negative-binomial regression. The risks of most behaviours related to negative AW differed considerably between plants. In the stun box, adult bulls had a 2.5 times higher risk of “struggling-kicking” (P =0.016) and a 2.0 times... At a slaughter plant, cattle are sometimes exposed to rough handling which may reduce animal welfare (AW). In an observational study at four Swedish commercial slaughter plants, AW-related behaviours of cattle and actions of abattoir stockpersons handling the same animals were recorded simultaneously. The objective was to estimate the occurrence of different behaviours and actions related to negative AW during driving and stunning at large-scale cattle abattoirs, assess associations between such behaviours and actions, and analyse differences between plants and animal categories (dairy cows, beef cows, adult bulls and heifers/bullocks). Direct continuous observations of focal animals were made using laptops either in a section of the driving race to the stun box (132 animals) or in the stun box (313 animals), generating a total of 14.5h of observations. The animals were stunned using a penetrating captive bolt gun or a rifle. Counts per animal of 14 behaviours and 16 stockperson actions were calculated. Sixteen percent of the observed animals displayed total behaviour counts >5 in the driving race, and 2% did so in the stun box; 32 and 8% of the observed animals received total counts >5 of stockperson actions in the race and stun box, respectively. We estimated that two-thirds of the animals were processed without displaying/receiving any of the behaviours/actions associated with severely negative AW. AW scores were acquired by adding together all observed behaviour counts (and action counts, separately) weighted by expert-assessed ratings denoting the degree of impaired AW. Spearman rank correlation was used to analyse associations between behaviour counts, action counts and AW scores. Only three moderate to strong correlations (ρ ≥0.4, P ≤0.001) between single behaviours/actions were found (“slapping rear” and “slapping front”; “prodding” and “shouting”; and “prodding” and “beating rear” in the driving race). The correlation between AW scores based on behaviours and actions was statistically significant but rather weak both in the driving race (ρ =0.37, P <0.0001) and stun box (ρ =0.22, P =0.0002). The effects of slaughter plant and animal category on behaviour counts and AW scores were estimated using standard or zero-inflated negative-binomial regression. The risks of most behaviours related to negative AW differed considerably between plants. In the stun box, adult bulls had a 2.5 times higher risk of “struggling-kicking” (P =0.016) and a 2.0 times... Stunning Elsevier Cattle Elsevier Abattoir Elsevier Stockperson Elsevier Driving Elsevier Human–animal interaction Elsevier Slaughterhouse Elsevier Wiberg, Sofia oth Berg, Charlotte oth Cvek, Katarina oth Lunner Kolstrup, Christina oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Ignatov, Michael S. ELSEVIER The first record of a bryophyte in Upper Cretaceous amber from Taimyr, northern Siberia: Taimyrobryum martynoviorum gen. et sp. nov. (Bryopsida) 2016transfer abstract an international scientific journal reporting on the application of ethology to animals used by man Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV019209428 volume:152 year:2014 pages:23-37 extent:15 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2013.12.005 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA 44.65 Chirurgie VZ AR 152 2014 23-37 15 045F 590 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1016/j.applanim.2013.12.005 doi GBVA2014005000015.pica (DE-627)ELV039232328 (ELSEVIER)S0168-1591(13)00294-3 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 590 590 DE-600 550 VZ 610 VZ 44.65 bkl Hultgren, Jan verfasserin aut Cattle behaviours and stockperson actions related to impaired animal welfare at Swedish slaughter plants 2014transfer abstract 15 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier At a slaughter plant, cattle are sometimes exposed to rough handling which may reduce animal welfare (AW). In an observational study at four Swedish commercial slaughter plants, AW-related behaviours of cattle and actions of abattoir stockpersons handling the same animals were recorded simultaneously. The objective was to estimate the occurrence of different behaviours and actions related to negative AW during driving and stunning at large-scale cattle abattoirs, assess associations between such behaviours and actions, and analyse differences between plants and animal categories (dairy cows, beef cows, adult bulls and heifers/bullocks). Direct continuous observations of focal animals were made using laptops either in a section of the driving race to the stun box (132 animals) or in the stun box (313 animals), generating a total of 14.5h of observations. The animals were stunned using a penetrating captive bolt gun or a rifle. Counts per animal of 14 behaviours and 16 stockperson actions were calculated. Sixteen percent of the observed animals displayed total behaviour counts >5 in the driving race, and 2% did so in the stun box; 32 and 8% of the observed animals received total counts >5 of stockperson actions in the race and stun box, respectively. We estimated that two-thirds of the animals were processed without displaying/receiving any of the behaviours/actions associated with severely negative AW. AW scores were acquired by adding together all observed behaviour counts (and action counts, separately) weighted by expert-assessed ratings denoting the degree of impaired AW. Spearman rank correlation was used to analyse associations between behaviour counts, action counts and AW scores. Only three moderate to strong correlations (ρ ≥0.4, P ≤0.001) between single behaviours/actions were found (“slapping rear” and “slapping front”; “prodding” and “shouting”; and “prodding” and “beating rear” in the driving race). The correlation between AW scores based on behaviours and actions was statistically significant but rather weak both in the driving race (ρ =0.37, P <0.0001) and stun box (ρ =0.22, P =0.0002). The effects of slaughter plant and animal category on behaviour counts and AW scores were estimated using standard or zero-inflated negative-binomial regression. The risks of most behaviours related to negative AW differed considerably between plants. In the stun box, adult bulls had a 2.5 times higher risk of “struggling-kicking” (P =0.016) and a 2.0 times... At a slaughter plant, cattle are sometimes exposed to rough handling which may reduce animal welfare (AW). In an observational study at four Swedish commercial slaughter plants, AW-related behaviours of cattle and actions of abattoir stockpersons handling the same animals were recorded simultaneously. The objective was to estimate the occurrence of different behaviours and actions related to negative AW during driving and stunning at large-scale cattle abattoirs, assess associations between such behaviours and actions, and analyse differences between plants and animal categories (dairy cows, beef cows, adult bulls and heifers/bullocks). Direct continuous observations of focal animals were made using laptops either in a section of the driving race to the stun box (132 animals) or in the stun box (313 animals), generating a total of 14.5h of observations. The animals were stunned using a penetrating captive bolt gun or a rifle. Counts per animal of 14 behaviours and 16 stockperson actions were calculated. Sixteen percent of the observed animals displayed total behaviour counts >5 in the driving race, and 2% did so in the stun box; 32 and 8% of the observed animals received total counts >5 of stockperson actions in the race and stun box, respectively. We estimated that two-thirds of the animals were processed without displaying/receiving any of the behaviours/actions associated with severely negative AW. AW scores were acquired by adding together all observed behaviour counts (and action counts, separately) weighted by expert-assessed ratings denoting the degree of impaired AW. Spearman rank correlation was used to analyse associations between behaviour counts, action counts and AW scores. Only three moderate to strong correlations (ρ ≥0.4, P ≤0.001) between single behaviours/actions were found (“slapping rear” and “slapping front”; “prodding” and “shouting”; and “prodding” and “beating rear” in the driving race). The correlation between AW scores based on behaviours and actions was statistically significant but rather weak both in the driving race (ρ =0.37, P <0.0001) and stun box (ρ =0.22, P =0.0002). The effects of slaughter plant and animal category on behaviour counts and AW scores were estimated using standard or zero-inflated negative-binomial regression. The risks of most behaviours related to negative AW differed considerably between plants. In the stun box, adult bulls had a 2.5 times higher risk of “struggling-kicking” (P =0.016) and a 2.0 times... Stunning Elsevier Cattle Elsevier Abattoir Elsevier Stockperson Elsevier Driving Elsevier Human–animal interaction Elsevier Slaughterhouse Elsevier Wiberg, Sofia oth Berg, Charlotte oth Cvek, Katarina oth Lunner Kolstrup, Christina oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Ignatov, Michael S. ELSEVIER The first record of a bryophyte in Upper Cretaceous amber from Taimyr, northern Siberia: Taimyrobryum martynoviorum gen. et sp. nov. (Bryopsida) 2016transfer abstract an international scientific journal reporting on the application of ethology to animals used by man Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV019209428 volume:152 year:2014 pages:23-37 extent:15 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2013.12.005 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA 44.65 Chirurgie VZ AR 152 2014 23-37 15 045F 590 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1016/j.applanim.2013.12.005 doi GBVA2014005000015.pica (DE-627)ELV039232328 (ELSEVIER)S0168-1591(13)00294-3 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 590 590 DE-600 550 VZ 610 VZ 44.65 bkl Hultgren, Jan verfasserin aut Cattle behaviours and stockperson actions related to impaired animal welfare at Swedish slaughter plants 2014transfer abstract 15 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier At a slaughter plant, cattle are sometimes exposed to rough handling which may reduce animal welfare (AW). In an observational study at four Swedish commercial slaughter plants, AW-related behaviours of cattle and actions of abattoir stockpersons handling the same animals were recorded simultaneously. The objective was to estimate the occurrence of different behaviours and actions related to negative AW during driving and stunning at large-scale cattle abattoirs, assess associations between such behaviours and actions, and analyse differences between plants and animal categories (dairy cows, beef cows, adult bulls and heifers/bullocks). Direct continuous observations of focal animals were made using laptops either in a section of the driving race to the stun box (132 animals) or in the stun box (313 animals), generating a total of 14.5h of observations. The animals were stunned using a penetrating captive bolt gun or a rifle. Counts per animal of 14 behaviours and 16 stockperson actions were calculated. Sixteen percent of the observed animals displayed total behaviour counts >5 in the driving race, and 2% did so in the stun box; 32 and 8% of the observed animals received total counts >5 of stockperson actions in the race and stun box, respectively. We estimated that two-thirds of the animals were processed without displaying/receiving any of the behaviours/actions associated with severely negative AW. AW scores were acquired by adding together all observed behaviour counts (and action counts, separately) weighted by expert-assessed ratings denoting the degree of impaired AW. Spearman rank correlation was used to analyse associations between behaviour counts, action counts and AW scores. Only three moderate to strong correlations (ρ ≥0.4, P ≤0.001) between single behaviours/actions were found (“slapping rear” and “slapping front”; “prodding” and “shouting”; and “prodding” and “beating rear” in the driving race). The correlation between AW scores based on behaviours and actions was statistically significant but rather weak both in the driving race (ρ =0.37, P <0.0001) and stun box (ρ =0.22, P =0.0002). The effects of slaughter plant and animal category on behaviour counts and AW scores were estimated using standard or zero-inflated negative-binomial regression. The risks of most behaviours related to negative AW differed considerably between plants. In the stun box, adult bulls had a 2.5 times higher risk of “struggling-kicking” (P =0.016) and a 2.0 times... At a slaughter plant, cattle are sometimes exposed to rough handling which may reduce animal welfare (AW). In an observational study at four Swedish commercial slaughter plants, AW-related behaviours of cattle and actions of abattoir stockpersons handling the same animals were recorded simultaneously. The objective was to estimate the occurrence of different behaviours and actions related to negative AW during driving and stunning at large-scale cattle abattoirs, assess associations between such behaviours and actions, and analyse differences between plants and animal categories (dairy cows, beef cows, adult bulls and heifers/bullocks). Direct continuous observations of focal animals were made using laptops either in a section of the driving race to the stun box (132 animals) or in the stun box (313 animals), generating a total of 14.5h of observations. The animals were stunned using a penetrating captive bolt gun or a rifle. Counts per animal of 14 behaviours and 16 stockperson actions were calculated. Sixteen percent of the observed animals displayed total behaviour counts >5 in the driving race, and 2% did so in the stun box; 32 and 8% of the observed animals received total counts >5 of stockperson actions in the race and stun box, respectively. We estimated that two-thirds of the animals were processed without displaying/receiving any of the behaviours/actions associated with severely negative AW. AW scores were acquired by adding together all observed behaviour counts (and action counts, separately) weighted by expert-assessed ratings denoting the degree of impaired AW. Spearman rank correlation was used to analyse associations between behaviour counts, action counts and AW scores. Only three moderate to strong correlations (ρ ≥0.4, P ≤0.001) between single behaviours/actions were found (“slapping rear” and “slapping front”; “prodding” and “shouting”; and “prodding” and “beating rear” in the driving race). The correlation between AW scores based on behaviours and actions was statistically significant but rather weak both in the driving race (ρ =0.37, P <0.0001) and stun box (ρ =0.22, P =0.0002). The effects of slaughter plant and animal category on behaviour counts and AW scores were estimated using standard or zero-inflated negative-binomial regression. The risks of most behaviours related to negative AW differed considerably between plants. In the stun box, adult bulls had a 2.5 times higher risk of “struggling-kicking” (P =0.016) and a 2.0 times... Stunning Elsevier Cattle Elsevier Abattoir Elsevier Stockperson Elsevier Driving Elsevier Human–animal interaction Elsevier Slaughterhouse Elsevier Wiberg, Sofia oth Berg, Charlotte oth Cvek, Katarina oth Lunner Kolstrup, Christina oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Ignatov, Michael S. ELSEVIER The first record of a bryophyte in Upper Cretaceous amber from Taimyr, northern Siberia: Taimyrobryum martynoviorum gen. et sp. nov. (Bryopsida) 2016transfer abstract an international scientific journal reporting on the application of ethology to animals used by man Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV019209428 volume:152 year:2014 pages:23-37 extent:15 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2013.12.005 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA 44.65 Chirurgie VZ AR 152 2014 23-37 15 045F 590 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1016/j.applanim.2013.12.005 doi GBVA2014005000015.pica (DE-627)ELV039232328 (ELSEVIER)S0168-1591(13)00294-3 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 590 590 DE-600 550 VZ 610 VZ 44.65 bkl Hultgren, Jan verfasserin aut Cattle behaviours and stockperson actions related to impaired animal welfare at Swedish slaughter plants 2014transfer abstract 15 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier At a slaughter plant, cattle are sometimes exposed to rough handling which may reduce animal welfare (AW). In an observational study at four Swedish commercial slaughter plants, AW-related behaviours of cattle and actions of abattoir stockpersons handling the same animals were recorded simultaneously. The objective was to estimate the occurrence of different behaviours and actions related to negative AW during driving and stunning at large-scale cattle abattoirs, assess associations between such behaviours and actions, and analyse differences between plants and animal categories (dairy cows, beef cows, adult bulls and heifers/bullocks). Direct continuous observations of focal animals were made using laptops either in a section of the driving race to the stun box (132 animals) or in the stun box (313 animals), generating a total of 14.5h of observations. The animals were stunned using a penetrating captive bolt gun or a rifle. Counts per animal of 14 behaviours and 16 stockperson actions were calculated. Sixteen percent of the observed animals displayed total behaviour counts >5 in the driving race, and 2% did so in the stun box; 32 and 8% of the observed animals received total counts >5 of stockperson actions in the race and stun box, respectively. We estimated that two-thirds of the animals were processed without displaying/receiving any of the behaviours/actions associated with severely negative AW. AW scores were acquired by adding together all observed behaviour counts (and action counts, separately) weighted by expert-assessed ratings denoting the degree of impaired AW. Spearman rank correlation was used to analyse associations between behaviour counts, action counts and AW scores. Only three moderate to strong correlations (ρ ≥0.4, P ≤0.001) between single behaviours/actions were found (“slapping rear” and “slapping front”; “prodding” and “shouting”; and “prodding” and “beating rear” in the driving race). The correlation between AW scores based on behaviours and actions was statistically significant but rather weak both in the driving race (ρ =0.37, P <0.0001) and stun box (ρ =0.22, P =0.0002). The effects of slaughter plant and animal category on behaviour counts and AW scores were estimated using standard or zero-inflated negative-binomial regression. The risks of most behaviours related to negative AW differed considerably between plants. In the stun box, adult bulls had a 2.5 times higher risk of “struggling-kicking” (P =0.016) and a 2.0 times... At a slaughter plant, cattle are sometimes exposed to rough handling which may reduce animal welfare (AW). In an observational study at four Swedish commercial slaughter plants, AW-related behaviours of cattle and actions of abattoir stockpersons handling the same animals were recorded simultaneously. The objective was to estimate the occurrence of different behaviours and actions related to negative AW during driving and stunning at large-scale cattle abattoirs, assess associations between such behaviours and actions, and analyse differences between plants and animal categories (dairy cows, beef cows, adult bulls and heifers/bullocks). Direct continuous observations of focal animals were made using laptops either in a section of the driving race to the stun box (132 animals) or in the stun box (313 animals), generating a total of 14.5h of observations. The animals were stunned using a penetrating captive bolt gun or a rifle. Counts per animal of 14 behaviours and 16 stockperson actions were calculated. Sixteen percent of the observed animals displayed total behaviour counts >5 in the driving race, and 2% did so in the stun box; 32 and 8% of the observed animals received total counts >5 of stockperson actions in the race and stun box, respectively. We estimated that two-thirds of the animals were processed without displaying/receiving any of the behaviours/actions associated with severely negative AW. AW scores were acquired by adding together all observed behaviour counts (and action counts, separately) weighted by expert-assessed ratings denoting the degree of impaired AW. Spearman rank correlation was used to analyse associations between behaviour counts, action counts and AW scores. Only three moderate to strong correlations (ρ ≥0.4, P ≤0.001) between single behaviours/actions were found (“slapping rear” and “slapping front”; “prodding” and “shouting”; and “prodding” and “beating rear” in the driving race). The correlation between AW scores based on behaviours and actions was statistically significant but rather weak both in the driving race (ρ =0.37, P <0.0001) and stun box (ρ =0.22, P =0.0002). The effects of slaughter plant and animal category on behaviour counts and AW scores were estimated using standard or zero-inflated negative-binomial regression. The risks of most behaviours related to negative AW differed considerably between plants. In the stun box, adult bulls had a 2.5 times higher risk of “struggling-kicking” (P =0.016) and a 2.0 times... Stunning Elsevier Cattle Elsevier Abattoir Elsevier Stockperson Elsevier Driving Elsevier Human–animal interaction Elsevier Slaughterhouse Elsevier Wiberg, Sofia oth Berg, Charlotte oth Cvek, Katarina oth Lunner Kolstrup, Christina oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Ignatov, Michael S. ELSEVIER The first record of a bryophyte in Upper Cretaceous amber from Taimyr, northern Siberia: Taimyrobryum martynoviorum gen. et sp. nov. (Bryopsida) 2016transfer abstract an international scientific journal reporting on the application of ethology to animals used by man Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV019209428 volume:152 year:2014 pages:23-37 extent:15 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2013.12.005 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA 44.65 Chirurgie VZ AR 152 2014 23-37 15 045F 590 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in The first record of a bryophyte in Upper Cretaceous amber from Taimyr, northern Siberia: Taimyrobryum martynoviorum gen. et sp. nov. (Bryopsida) Amsterdam [u.a.] volume:152 year:2014 pages:23-37 extent:15 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in The first record of a bryophyte in Upper Cretaceous amber from Taimyr, northern Siberia: Taimyrobryum martynoviorum gen. et sp. nov. (Bryopsida) Amsterdam [u.a.] volume:152 year:2014 pages:23-37 extent:15 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| bklname |
Chirurgie |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
Stunning Cattle Abattoir Stockperson Driving Human–animal interaction Slaughterhouse |
| dewey-raw |
590 |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
The first record of a bryophyte in Upper Cretaceous amber from Taimyr, northern Siberia: Taimyrobryum martynoviorum gen. et sp. nov. (Bryopsida) |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Hultgren, Jan @@aut@@ Wiberg, Sofia @@oth@@ Berg, Charlotte @@oth@@ Cvek, Katarina @@oth@@ Lunner Kolstrup, Christina @@oth@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2014-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
ELV019209428 |
| dewey-sort |
3590 |
| id |
ELV039232328 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV039232328</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230625224406.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">180603s2014 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.applanim.2013.12.005</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">GBVA2014005000015.pica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV039232328</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0168-1591(13)00294-3</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">590</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">590</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">550</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">610</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">44.65</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Hultgren, Jan</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Cattle behaviours and stockperson actions related to impaired animal welfare at Swedish slaughter plants</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2014transfer abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">15</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">At a slaughter plant, cattle are sometimes exposed to rough handling which may reduce animal welfare (AW). In an observational study at four Swedish commercial slaughter plants, AW-related behaviours of cattle and actions of abattoir stockpersons handling the same animals were recorded simultaneously. The objective was to estimate the occurrence of different behaviours and actions related to negative AW during driving and stunning at large-scale cattle abattoirs, assess associations between such behaviours and actions, and analyse differences between plants and animal categories (dairy cows, beef cows, adult bulls and heifers/bullocks). Direct continuous observations of focal animals were made using laptops either in a section of the driving race to the stun box (132 animals) or in the stun box (313 animals), generating a total of 14.5h of observations. The animals were stunned using a penetrating captive bolt gun or a rifle. Counts per animal of 14 behaviours and 16 stockperson actions were calculated. Sixteen percent of the observed animals displayed total behaviour counts >5 in the driving race, and 2% did so in the stun box; 32 and 8% of the observed animals received total counts >5 of stockperson actions in the race and stun box, respectively. We estimated that two-thirds of the animals were processed without displaying/receiving any of the behaviours/actions associated with severely negative AW. AW scores were acquired by adding together all observed behaviour counts (and action counts, separately) weighted by expert-assessed ratings denoting the degree of impaired AW. Spearman rank correlation was used to analyse associations between behaviour counts, action counts and AW scores. Only three moderate to strong correlations (ρ ≥0.4, P ≤0.001) between single behaviours/actions were found (“slapping rear” and “slapping front”; “prodding” and “shouting”; and “prodding” and “beating rear” in the driving race). The correlation between AW scores based on behaviours and actions was statistically significant but rather weak both in the driving race (ρ =0.37, P <0.0001) and stun box (ρ =0.22, P =0.0002). The effects of slaughter plant and animal category on behaviour counts and AW scores were estimated using standard or zero-inflated negative-binomial regression. The risks of most behaviours related to negative AW differed considerably between plants. In the stun box, adult bulls had a 2.5 times higher risk of “struggling-kicking” (P =0.016) and a 2.0 times...</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">At a slaughter plant, cattle are sometimes exposed to rough handling which may reduce animal welfare (AW). In an observational study at four Swedish commercial slaughter plants, AW-related behaviours of cattle and actions of abattoir stockpersons handling the same animals were recorded simultaneously. The objective was to estimate the occurrence of different behaviours and actions related to negative AW during driving and stunning at large-scale cattle abattoirs, assess associations between such behaviours and actions, and analyse differences between plants and animal categories (dairy cows, beef cows, adult bulls and heifers/bullocks). Direct continuous observations of focal animals were made using laptops either in a section of the driving race to the stun box (132 animals) or in the stun box (313 animals), generating a total of 14.5h of observations. The animals were stunned using a penetrating captive bolt gun or a rifle. Counts per animal of 14 behaviours and 16 stockperson actions were calculated. Sixteen percent of the observed animals displayed total behaviour counts >5 in the driving race, and 2% did so in the stun box; 32 and 8% of the observed animals received total counts >5 of stockperson actions in the race and stun box, respectively. We estimated that two-thirds of the animals were processed without displaying/receiving any of the behaviours/actions associated with severely negative AW. AW scores were acquired by adding together all observed behaviour counts (and action counts, separately) weighted by expert-assessed ratings denoting the degree of impaired AW. Spearman rank correlation was used to analyse associations between behaviour counts, action counts and AW scores. Only three moderate to strong correlations (ρ ≥0.4, P ≤0.001) between single behaviours/actions were found (“slapping rear” and “slapping front”; “prodding” and “shouting”; and “prodding” and “beating rear” in the driving race). The correlation between AW scores based on behaviours and actions was statistically significant but rather weak both in the driving race (ρ =0.37, P <0.0001) and stun box (ρ =0.22, P =0.0002). The effects of slaughter plant and animal category on behaviour counts and AW scores were estimated using standard or zero-inflated negative-binomial regression. The risks of most behaviours related to negative AW differed considerably between plants. In the stun box, adult bulls had a 2.5 times higher risk of “struggling-kicking” (P =0.016) and a 2.0 times...</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Stunning</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Cattle</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Abattoir</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Stockperson</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Driving</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Human–animal interaction</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Slaughterhouse</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Wiberg, Sofia</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Berg, Charlotte</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Cvek, Katarina</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Lunner Kolstrup, Christina</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="n">Elsevier Science</subfield><subfield code="a">Ignatov, Michael S. ELSEVIER</subfield><subfield code="t">The first record of a bryophyte in Upper Cretaceous amber from Taimyr, northern Siberia: Taimyrobryum martynoviorum gen. et sp. nov. (Bryopsida)</subfield><subfield code="d">2016transfer abstract</subfield><subfield code="d">an international scientific journal reporting on the application of ethology to animals used by man</subfield><subfield code="g">Amsterdam [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)ELV019209428</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:152</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2014</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:23-37</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:15</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2013.12.005</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">44.65</subfield><subfield code="j">Chirurgie</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">152</subfield><subfield code="j">2014</subfield><subfield code="h">23-37</subfield><subfield code="g">15</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="953" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="2">045F</subfield><subfield code="a">590</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Hultgren, Jan |
| spellingShingle |
Hultgren, Jan ddc 590 ddc 550 ddc 610 bkl 44.65 Elsevier Stunning Elsevier Cattle Elsevier Abattoir Elsevier Stockperson Elsevier Driving Elsevier Human–animal interaction Elsevier Slaughterhouse Cattle behaviours and stockperson actions related to impaired animal welfare at Swedish slaughter plants |
| authorStr |
Hultgren, Jan |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)ELV019209428 |
| format |
electronic Article |
| dewey-ones |
590 - Animals (Zoology) 550 - Earth sciences 610 - Medicine & health |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut |
| collection |
elsevier |
| remote_str |
true |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| topic_title |
590 590 DE-600 550 VZ 610 VZ 44.65 bkl Cattle behaviours and stockperson actions related to impaired animal welfare at Swedish slaughter plants Stunning Elsevier Cattle Elsevier Abattoir Elsevier Stockperson Elsevier Driving Elsevier Human–animal interaction Elsevier Slaughterhouse Elsevier |
| topic |
ddc 590 ddc 550 ddc 610 bkl 44.65 Elsevier Stunning Elsevier Cattle Elsevier Abattoir Elsevier Stockperson Elsevier Driving Elsevier Human–animal interaction Elsevier Slaughterhouse |
| topic_unstemmed |
ddc 590 ddc 550 ddc 610 bkl 44.65 Elsevier Stunning Elsevier Cattle Elsevier Abattoir Elsevier Stockperson Elsevier Driving Elsevier Human–animal interaction Elsevier Slaughterhouse |
| topic_browse |
ddc 590 ddc 550 ddc 610 bkl 44.65 Elsevier Stunning Elsevier Cattle Elsevier Abattoir Elsevier Stockperson Elsevier Driving Elsevier Human–animal interaction Elsevier Slaughterhouse |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
zu |
| author2_variant |
s w sw c b cb k c kc k c l kc kcl |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
The first record of a bryophyte in Upper Cretaceous amber from Taimyr, northern Siberia: Taimyrobryum martynoviorum gen. et sp. nov. (Bryopsida) |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
ELV019209428 |
| dewey-tens |
590 - Animals (Zoology) 550 - Earth sciences & geology 610 - Medicine & health |
| hierarchy_top_title |
The first record of a bryophyte in Upper Cretaceous amber from Taimyr, northern Siberia: Taimyrobryum martynoviorum gen. et sp. nov. (Bryopsida) |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)ELV019209428 |
| title |
Cattle behaviours and stockperson actions related to impaired animal welfare at Swedish slaughter plants |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)ELV039232328 (ELSEVIER)S0168-1591(13)00294-3 |
| title_full |
Cattle behaviours and stockperson actions related to impaired animal welfare at Swedish slaughter plants |
| author_sort |
Hultgren, Jan |
| journal |
The first record of a bryophyte in Upper Cretaceous amber from Taimyr, northern Siberia: Taimyrobryum martynoviorum gen. et sp. nov. (Bryopsida) |
| journalStr |
The first record of a bryophyte in Upper Cretaceous amber from Taimyr, northern Siberia: Taimyrobryum martynoviorum gen. et sp. nov. (Bryopsida) |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| dewey-hundreds |
500 - Science 600 - Technology |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2014 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
zzz |
| container_start_page |
23 |
| author_browse |
Hultgren, Jan |
| container_volume |
152 |
| physical |
15 |
| class |
590 590 DE-600 550 VZ 610 VZ 44.65 bkl |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Hultgren, Jan |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1016/j.applanim.2013.12.005 |
| dewey-full |
590 550 610 |
| title_sort |
cattle behaviours and stockperson actions related to impaired animal welfare at swedish slaughter plants |
| title_auth |
Cattle behaviours and stockperson actions related to impaired animal welfare at Swedish slaughter plants |
| abstract |
At a slaughter plant, cattle are sometimes exposed to rough handling which may reduce animal welfare (AW). In an observational study at four Swedish commercial slaughter plants, AW-related behaviours of cattle and actions of abattoir stockpersons handling the same animals were recorded simultaneously. The objective was to estimate the occurrence of different behaviours and actions related to negative AW during driving and stunning at large-scale cattle abattoirs, assess associations between such behaviours and actions, and analyse differences between plants and animal categories (dairy cows, beef cows, adult bulls and heifers/bullocks). Direct continuous observations of focal animals were made using laptops either in a section of the driving race to the stun box (132 animals) or in the stun box (313 animals), generating a total of 14.5h of observations. The animals were stunned using a penetrating captive bolt gun or a rifle. Counts per animal of 14 behaviours and 16 stockperson actions were calculated. Sixteen percent of the observed animals displayed total behaviour counts >5 in the driving race, and 2% did so in the stun box; 32 and 8% of the observed animals received total counts >5 of stockperson actions in the race and stun box, respectively. We estimated that two-thirds of the animals were processed without displaying/receiving any of the behaviours/actions associated with severely negative AW. AW scores were acquired by adding together all observed behaviour counts (and action counts, separately) weighted by expert-assessed ratings denoting the degree of impaired AW. Spearman rank correlation was used to analyse associations between behaviour counts, action counts and AW scores. Only three moderate to strong correlations (ρ ≥0.4, P ≤0.001) between single behaviours/actions were found (“slapping rear” and “slapping front”; “prodding” and “shouting”; and “prodding” and “beating rear” in the driving race). The correlation between AW scores based on behaviours and actions was statistically significant but rather weak both in the driving race (ρ =0.37, P <0.0001) and stun box (ρ =0.22, P =0.0002). The effects of slaughter plant and animal category on behaviour counts and AW scores were estimated using standard or zero-inflated negative-binomial regression. The risks of most behaviours related to negative AW differed considerably between plants. In the stun box, adult bulls had a 2.5 times higher risk of “struggling-kicking” (P =0.016) and a 2.0 times... |
| abstractGer |
At a slaughter plant, cattle are sometimes exposed to rough handling which may reduce animal welfare (AW). In an observational study at four Swedish commercial slaughter plants, AW-related behaviours of cattle and actions of abattoir stockpersons handling the same animals were recorded simultaneously. The objective was to estimate the occurrence of different behaviours and actions related to negative AW during driving and stunning at large-scale cattle abattoirs, assess associations between such behaviours and actions, and analyse differences between plants and animal categories (dairy cows, beef cows, adult bulls and heifers/bullocks). Direct continuous observations of focal animals were made using laptops either in a section of the driving race to the stun box (132 animals) or in the stun box (313 animals), generating a total of 14.5h of observations. The animals were stunned using a penetrating captive bolt gun or a rifle. Counts per animal of 14 behaviours and 16 stockperson actions were calculated. Sixteen percent of the observed animals displayed total behaviour counts >5 in the driving race, and 2% did so in the stun box; 32 and 8% of the observed animals received total counts >5 of stockperson actions in the race and stun box, respectively. We estimated that two-thirds of the animals were processed without displaying/receiving any of the behaviours/actions associated with severely negative AW. AW scores were acquired by adding together all observed behaviour counts (and action counts, separately) weighted by expert-assessed ratings denoting the degree of impaired AW. Spearman rank correlation was used to analyse associations between behaviour counts, action counts and AW scores. Only three moderate to strong correlations (ρ ≥0.4, P ≤0.001) between single behaviours/actions were found (“slapping rear” and “slapping front”; “prodding” and “shouting”; and “prodding” and “beating rear” in the driving race). The correlation between AW scores based on behaviours and actions was statistically significant but rather weak both in the driving race (ρ =0.37, P <0.0001) and stun box (ρ =0.22, P =0.0002). The effects of slaughter plant and animal category on behaviour counts and AW scores were estimated using standard or zero-inflated negative-binomial regression. The risks of most behaviours related to negative AW differed considerably between plants. In the stun box, adult bulls had a 2.5 times higher risk of “struggling-kicking” (P =0.016) and a 2.0 times... |
| abstract_unstemmed |
At a slaughter plant, cattle are sometimes exposed to rough handling which may reduce animal welfare (AW). In an observational study at four Swedish commercial slaughter plants, AW-related behaviours of cattle and actions of abattoir stockpersons handling the same animals were recorded simultaneously. The objective was to estimate the occurrence of different behaviours and actions related to negative AW during driving and stunning at large-scale cattle abattoirs, assess associations between such behaviours and actions, and analyse differences between plants and animal categories (dairy cows, beef cows, adult bulls and heifers/bullocks). Direct continuous observations of focal animals were made using laptops either in a section of the driving race to the stun box (132 animals) or in the stun box (313 animals), generating a total of 14.5h of observations. The animals were stunned using a penetrating captive bolt gun or a rifle. Counts per animal of 14 behaviours and 16 stockperson actions were calculated. Sixteen percent of the observed animals displayed total behaviour counts >5 in the driving race, and 2% did so in the stun box; 32 and 8% of the observed animals received total counts >5 of stockperson actions in the race and stun box, respectively. We estimated that two-thirds of the animals were processed without displaying/receiving any of the behaviours/actions associated with severely negative AW. AW scores were acquired by adding together all observed behaviour counts (and action counts, separately) weighted by expert-assessed ratings denoting the degree of impaired AW. Spearman rank correlation was used to analyse associations between behaviour counts, action counts and AW scores. Only three moderate to strong correlations (ρ ≥0.4, P ≤0.001) between single behaviours/actions were found (“slapping rear” and “slapping front”; “prodding” and “shouting”; and “prodding” and “beating rear” in the driving race). The correlation between AW scores based on behaviours and actions was statistically significant but rather weak both in the driving race (ρ =0.37, P <0.0001) and stun box (ρ =0.22, P =0.0002). The effects of slaughter plant and animal category on behaviour counts and AW scores were estimated using standard or zero-inflated negative-binomial regression. The risks of most behaviours related to negative AW differed considerably between plants. In the stun box, adult bulls had a 2.5 times higher risk of “struggling-kicking” (P =0.016) and a 2.0 times... |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA |
| title_short |
Cattle behaviours and stockperson actions related to impaired animal welfare at Swedish slaughter plants |
| url |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2013.12.005 |
| remote_bool |
true |
| author2 |
Wiberg, Sofia Berg, Charlotte Cvek, Katarina Lunner Kolstrup, Christina |
| author2Str |
Wiberg, Sofia Berg, Charlotte Cvek, Katarina Lunner Kolstrup, Christina |
| ppnlink |
ELV019209428 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
z |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| author2_role |
oth oth oth oth |
| doi_str |
10.1016/j.applanim.2013.12.005 |
| up_date |
2024-07-06T20:06:43.521Z |
| _version_ |
1803861521620533248 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV039232328</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230625224406.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">180603s2014 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.applanim.2013.12.005</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">GBVA2014005000015.pica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV039232328</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0168-1591(13)00294-3</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">590</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">590</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">550</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">610</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">44.65</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Hultgren, Jan</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Cattle behaviours and stockperson actions related to impaired animal welfare at Swedish slaughter plants</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2014transfer abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">15</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">At a slaughter plant, cattle are sometimes exposed to rough handling which may reduce animal welfare (AW). In an observational study at four Swedish commercial slaughter plants, AW-related behaviours of cattle and actions of abattoir stockpersons handling the same animals were recorded simultaneously. The objective was to estimate the occurrence of different behaviours and actions related to negative AW during driving and stunning at large-scale cattle abattoirs, assess associations between such behaviours and actions, and analyse differences between plants and animal categories (dairy cows, beef cows, adult bulls and heifers/bullocks). Direct continuous observations of focal animals were made using laptops either in a section of the driving race to the stun box (132 animals) or in the stun box (313 animals), generating a total of 14.5h of observations. The animals were stunned using a penetrating captive bolt gun or a rifle. Counts per animal of 14 behaviours and 16 stockperson actions were calculated. Sixteen percent of the observed animals displayed total behaviour counts >5 in the driving race, and 2% did so in the stun box; 32 and 8% of the observed animals received total counts >5 of stockperson actions in the race and stun box, respectively. We estimated that two-thirds of the animals were processed without displaying/receiving any of the behaviours/actions associated with severely negative AW. AW scores were acquired by adding together all observed behaviour counts (and action counts, separately) weighted by expert-assessed ratings denoting the degree of impaired AW. Spearman rank correlation was used to analyse associations between behaviour counts, action counts and AW scores. Only three moderate to strong correlations (ρ ≥0.4, P ≤0.001) between single behaviours/actions were found (“slapping rear” and “slapping front”; “prodding” and “shouting”; and “prodding” and “beating rear” in the driving race). The correlation between AW scores based on behaviours and actions was statistically significant but rather weak both in the driving race (ρ =0.37, P <0.0001) and stun box (ρ =0.22, P =0.0002). The effects of slaughter plant and animal category on behaviour counts and AW scores were estimated using standard or zero-inflated negative-binomial regression. The risks of most behaviours related to negative AW differed considerably between plants. In the stun box, adult bulls had a 2.5 times higher risk of “struggling-kicking” (P =0.016) and a 2.0 times...</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">At a slaughter plant, cattle are sometimes exposed to rough handling which may reduce animal welfare (AW). In an observational study at four Swedish commercial slaughter plants, AW-related behaviours of cattle and actions of abattoir stockpersons handling the same animals were recorded simultaneously. The objective was to estimate the occurrence of different behaviours and actions related to negative AW during driving and stunning at large-scale cattle abattoirs, assess associations between such behaviours and actions, and analyse differences between plants and animal categories (dairy cows, beef cows, adult bulls and heifers/bullocks). Direct continuous observations of focal animals were made using laptops either in a section of the driving race to the stun box (132 animals) or in the stun box (313 animals), generating a total of 14.5h of observations. The animals were stunned using a penetrating captive bolt gun or a rifle. Counts per animal of 14 behaviours and 16 stockperson actions were calculated. Sixteen percent of the observed animals displayed total behaviour counts >5 in the driving race, and 2% did so in the stun box; 32 and 8% of the observed animals received total counts >5 of stockperson actions in the race and stun box, respectively. We estimated that two-thirds of the animals were processed without displaying/receiving any of the behaviours/actions associated with severely negative AW. AW scores were acquired by adding together all observed behaviour counts (and action counts, separately) weighted by expert-assessed ratings denoting the degree of impaired AW. Spearman rank correlation was used to analyse associations between behaviour counts, action counts and AW scores. Only three moderate to strong correlations (ρ ≥0.4, P ≤0.001) between single behaviours/actions were found (“slapping rear” and “slapping front”; “prodding” and “shouting”; and “prodding” and “beating rear” in the driving race). The correlation between AW scores based on behaviours and actions was statistically significant but rather weak both in the driving race (ρ =0.37, P <0.0001) and stun box (ρ =0.22, P =0.0002). The effects of slaughter plant and animal category on behaviour counts and AW scores were estimated using standard or zero-inflated negative-binomial regression. The risks of most behaviours related to negative AW differed considerably between plants. In the stun box, adult bulls had a 2.5 times higher risk of “struggling-kicking” (P =0.016) and a 2.0 times...</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Stunning</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Cattle</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Abattoir</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Stockperson</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Driving</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Human–animal interaction</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Slaughterhouse</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Wiberg, Sofia</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Berg, Charlotte</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Cvek, Katarina</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Lunner Kolstrup, Christina</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="n">Elsevier Science</subfield><subfield code="a">Ignatov, Michael S. ELSEVIER</subfield><subfield code="t">The first record of a bryophyte in Upper Cretaceous amber from Taimyr, northern Siberia: Taimyrobryum martynoviorum gen. et sp. nov. (Bryopsida)</subfield><subfield code="d">2016transfer abstract</subfield><subfield code="d">an international scientific journal reporting on the application of ethology to animals used by man</subfield><subfield code="g">Amsterdam [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)ELV019209428</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:152</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2014</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:23-37</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:15</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2013.12.005</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">44.65</subfield><subfield code="j">Chirurgie</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">152</subfield><subfield code="j">2014</subfield><subfield code="h">23-37</subfield><subfield code="g">15</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="953" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="2">045F</subfield><subfield code="a">590</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.4013624 |