Energy deposition calculated by PHITS code in Pb spallation target
Energy deposition in a Pb spallation target irradiated by high energetic protons was calculated by PHITS2.52 code. The validation of the energy deposition and neutron production calculated by PHITS code was performed. Results show good agreements between the simulation results and the experimental d...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Yu, Quanzhi [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2016transfer abstract |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Umfang: |
6 |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Editorial Comment - Unwala, Darius J. ELSEVIER, 2013, a journal on accelerators, instrumentation and techniques applied to research in nuclear and atomic physics, materials science and related fields in physics, Amsterdam [u.a.] |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:367 ; year:2016 ; day:15 ; month:01 ; pages:8-13 ; extent:6 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1016/j.nimb.2015.11.014 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
ELV039996069 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ELV039996069 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230625230509.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 180603s2016 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.nimb.2015.11.014 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a GBVA2016005000017.pica |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)ELV039996069 | ||
| 035 | |a (ELSEVIER)S0168-583X(15)01197-0 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 082 | 0 | |a 530 | |
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 530 |q DE-600 |
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 610 |q VZ |
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 610 |q VZ |
| 084 | |a 44.85 |2 bkl | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Yu, Quanzhi |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Energy deposition calculated by PHITS code in Pb spallation target |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2016transfer abstract | |
| 300 | |a 6 | ||
| 336 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zzz |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b z |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zu |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Energy deposition in a Pb spallation target irradiated by high energetic protons was calculated by PHITS2.52 code. The validation of the energy deposition and neutron production calculated by PHITS code was performed. Results show good agreements between the simulation results and the experimental data. Detailed comparison shows that for the total energy deposition, PHITS simulation result was about 15% overestimation than that of the experimental data. For the energy deposition along the length of the Pb target, the discrepancy mainly presented at the front part of the Pb target. Calculation indicates that most of the energy deposition comes from the ionizations of the primary protons and the produced secondary particles. With the event generator mode of PHITS, the deposit energy distribution for the particles and the light nulclei is presented for the first time. It indicates that the primary protons with energy more than 100MeV are the most contributors to the total energy deposition. The energy depositions peaking at 10MeV and 0.1MeV, are mainly caused by the electrons, pions, d, t, 3He and also α particles during the cascade process and the evaporation process, respectively. The energy deposition density caused by different proton beam profiles are also calculated and compared. Such calculation and analyses are much helpful for better understanding the physical mechanism of energy deposition in the spallation target, and greatly useful for the thermal hydraulic design of the spallation target. | ||
| 520 | |a Energy deposition in a Pb spallation target irradiated by high energetic protons was calculated by PHITS2.52 code. The validation of the energy deposition and neutron production calculated by PHITS code was performed. Results show good agreements between the simulation results and the experimental data. Detailed comparison shows that for the total energy deposition, PHITS simulation result was about 15% overestimation than that of the experimental data. For the energy deposition along the length of the Pb target, the discrepancy mainly presented at the front part of the Pb target. Calculation indicates that most of the energy deposition comes from the ionizations of the primary protons and the produced secondary particles. With the event generator mode of PHITS, the deposit energy distribution for the particles and the light nulclei is presented for the first time. It indicates that the primary protons with energy more than 100MeV are the most contributors to the total energy deposition. The energy depositions peaking at 10MeV and 0.1MeV, are mainly caused by the electrons, pions, d, t, 3He and also α particles during the cascade process and the evaporation process, respectively. The energy deposition density caused by different proton beam profiles are also calculated and compared. Such calculation and analyses are much helpful for better understanding the physical mechanism of energy deposition in the spallation target, and greatly useful for the thermal hydraulic design of the spallation target. | ||
| 650 | 7 | |a Energy deposition |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Spallation target |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a PHITS code |2 Elsevier | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |n Elsevier |a Unwala, Darius J. ELSEVIER |t Editorial Comment |d 2013 |d a journal on accelerators, instrumentation and techniques applied to research in nuclear and atomic physics, materials science and related fields in physics |g Amsterdam [u.a.] |w (DE-627)ELV011304669 |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:367 |g year:2016 |g day:15 |g month:01 |g pages:8-13 |g extent:6 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nimb.2015.11.014 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_U | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ELV | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_U | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-PHA | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_21 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_22 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_24 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_40 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_62 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2001 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2003 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2005 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2007 | ||
| 936 | b | k | |a 44.85 |j Kardiologie |j Angiologie |q VZ |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 367 |j 2016 |b 15 |c 0115 |h 8-13 |g 6 | ||
| 953 | |2 045F |a 530 | ||
| author_variant |
q y qy |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
yuquanzhi:2016----:nryeoiinacltdyhtcdips |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2016transfer abstract |
| bklnumber |
44.85 |
| publishDate |
2016 |
| allfields |
10.1016/j.nimb.2015.11.014 doi GBVA2016005000017.pica (DE-627)ELV039996069 (ELSEVIER)S0168-583X(15)01197-0 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 530 530 DE-600 610 VZ 610 VZ 44.85 bkl Yu, Quanzhi verfasserin aut Energy deposition calculated by PHITS code in Pb spallation target 2016transfer abstract 6 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Energy deposition in a Pb spallation target irradiated by high energetic protons was calculated by PHITS2.52 code. The validation of the energy deposition and neutron production calculated by PHITS code was performed. Results show good agreements between the simulation results and the experimental data. Detailed comparison shows that for the total energy deposition, PHITS simulation result was about 15% overestimation than that of the experimental data. For the energy deposition along the length of the Pb target, the discrepancy mainly presented at the front part of the Pb target. Calculation indicates that most of the energy deposition comes from the ionizations of the primary protons and the produced secondary particles. With the event generator mode of PHITS, the deposit energy distribution for the particles and the light nulclei is presented for the first time. It indicates that the primary protons with energy more than 100MeV are the most contributors to the total energy deposition. The energy depositions peaking at 10MeV and 0.1MeV, are mainly caused by the electrons, pions, d, t, 3He and also α particles during the cascade process and the evaporation process, respectively. The energy deposition density caused by different proton beam profiles are also calculated and compared. Such calculation and analyses are much helpful for better understanding the physical mechanism of energy deposition in the spallation target, and greatly useful for the thermal hydraulic design of the spallation target. Energy deposition in a Pb spallation target irradiated by high energetic protons was calculated by PHITS2.52 code. The validation of the energy deposition and neutron production calculated by PHITS code was performed. Results show good agreements between the simulation results and the experimental data. Detailed comparison shows that for the total energy deposition, PHITS simulation result was about 15% overestimation than that of the experimental data. For the energy deposition along the length of the Pb target, the discrepancy mainly presented at the front part of the Pb target. Calculation indicates that most of the energy deposition comes from the ionizations of the primary protons and the produced secondary particles. With the event generator mode of PHITS, the deposit energy distribution for the particles and the light nulclei is presented for the first time. It indicates that the primary protons with energy more than 100MeV are the most contributors to the total energy deposition. The energy depositions peaking at 10MeV and 0.1MeV, are mainly caused by the electrons, pions, d, t, 3He and also α particles during the cascade process and the evaporation process, respectively. The energy deposition density caused by different proton beam profiles are also calculated and compared. Such calculation and analyses are much helpful for better understanding the physical mechanism of energy deposition in the spallation target, and greatly useful for the thermal hydraulic design of the spallation target. Energy deposition Elsevier Spallation target Elsevier PHITS code Elsevier Enthalten in Elsevier Unwala, Darius J. ELSEVIER Editorial Comment 2013 a journal on accelerators, instrumentation and techniques applied to research in nuclear and atomic physics, materials science and related fields in physics Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV011304669 volume:367 year:2016 day:15 month:01 pages:8-13 extent:6 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nimb.2015.11.014 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_21 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2007 44.85 Kardiologie Angiologie VZ AR 367 2016 15 0115 8-13 6 045F 530 |
| spelling |
10.1016/j.nimb.2015.11.014 doi GBVA2016005000017.pica (DE-627)ELV039996069 (ELSEVIER)S0168-583X(15)01197-0 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 530 530 DE-600 610 VZ 610 VZ 44.85 bkl Yu, Quanzhi verfasserin aut Energy deposition calculated by PHITS code in Pb spallation target 2016transfer abstract 6 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Energy deposition in a Pb spallation target irradiated by high energetic protons was calculated by PHITS2.52 code. The validation of the energy deposition and neutron production calculated by PHITS code was performed. Results show good agreements between the simulation results and the experimental data. Detailed comparison shows that for the total energy deposition, PHITS simulation result was about 15% overestimation than that of the experimental data. For the energy deposition along the length of the Pb target, the discrepancy mainly presented at the front part of the Pb target. Calculation indicates that most of the energy deposition comes from the ionizations of the primary protons and the produced secondary particles. With the event generator mode of PHITS, the deposit energy distribution for the particles and the light nulclei is presented for the first time. It indicates that the primary protons with energy more than 100MeV are the most contributors to the total energy deposition. The energy depositions peaking at 10MeV and 0.1MeV, are mainly caused by the electrons, pions, d, t, 3He and also α particles during the cascade process and the evaporation process, respectively. The energy deposition density caused by different proton beam profiles are also calculated and compared. Such calculation and analyses are much helpful for better understanding the physical mechanism of energy deposition in the spallation target, and greatly useful for the thermal hydraulic design of the spallation target. Energy deposition in a Pb spallation target irradiated by high energetic protons was calculated by PHITS2.52 code. The validation of the energy deposition and neutron production calculated by PHITS code was performed. Results show good agreements between the simulation results and the experimental data. Detailed comparison shows that for the total energy deposition, PHITS simulation result was about 15% overestimation than that of the experimental data. For the energy deposition along the length of the Pb target, the discrepancy mainly presented at the front part of the Pb target. Calculation indicates that most of the energy deposition comes from the ionizations of the primary protons and the produced secondary particles. With the event generator mode of PHITS, the deposit energy distribution for the particles and the light nulclei is presented for the first time. It indicates that the primary protons with energy more than 100MeV are the most contributors to the total energy deposition. The energy depositions peaking at 10MeV and 0.1MeV, are mainly caused by the electrons, pions, d, t, 3He and also α particles during the cascade process and the evaporation process, respectively. The energy deposition density caused by different proton beam profiles are also calculated and compared. Such calculation and analyses are much helpful for better understanding the physical mechanism of energy deposition in the spallation target, and greatly useful for the thermal hydraulic design of the spallation target. Energy deposition Elsevier Spallation target Elsevier PHITS code Elsevier Enthalten in Elsevier Unwala, Darius J. ELSEVIER Editorial Comment 2013 a journal on accelerators, instrumentation and techniques applied to research in nuclear and atomic physics, materials science and related fields in physics Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV011304669 volume:367 year:2016 day:15 month:01 pages:8-13 extent:6 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nimb.2015.11.014 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_21 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2007 44.85 Kardiologie Angiologie VZ AR 367 2016 15 0115 8-13 6 045F 530 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1016/j.nimb.2015.11.014 doi GBVA2016005000017.pica (DE-627)ELV039996069 (ELSEVIER)S0168-583X(15)01197-0 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 530 530 DE-600 610 VZ 610 VZ 44.85 bkl Yu, Quanzhi verfasserin aut Energy deposition calculated by PHITS code in Pb spallation target 2016transfer abstract 6 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Energy deposition in a Pb spallation target irradiated by high energetic protons was calculated by PHITS2.52 code. The validation of the energy deposition and neutron production calculated by PHITS code was performed. Results show good agreements between the simulation results and the experimental data. Detailed comparison shows that for the total energy deposition, PHITS simulation result was about 15% overestimation than that of the experimental data. For the energy deposition along the length of the Pb target, the discrepancy mainly presented at the front part of the Pb target. Calculation indicates that most of the energy deposition comes from the ionizations of the primary protons and the produced secondary particles. With the event generator mode of PHITS, the deposit energy distribution for the particles and the light nulclei is presented for the first time. It indicates that the primary protons with energy more than 100MeV are the most contributors to the total energy deposition. The energy depositions peaking at 10MeV and 0.1MeV, are mainly caused by the electrons, pions, d, t, 3He and also α particles during the cascade process and the evaporation process, respectively. The energy deposition density caused by different proton beam profiles are also calculated and compared. Such calculation and analyses are much helpful for better understanding the physical mechanism of energy deposition in the spallation target, and greatly useful for the thermal hydraulic design of the spallation target. Energy deposition in a Pb spallation target irradiated by high energetic protons was calculated by PHITS2.52 code. The validation of the energy deposition and neutron production calculated by PHITS code was performed. Results show good agreements between the simulation results and the experimental data. Detailed comparison shows that for the total energy deposition, PHITS simulation result was about 15% overestimation than that of the experimental data. For the energy deposition along the length of the Pb target, the discrepancy mainly presented at the front part of the Pb target. Calculation indicates that most of the energy deposition comes from the ionizations of the primary protons and the produced secondary particles. With the event generator mode of PHITS, the deposit energy distribution for the particles and the light nulclei is presented for the first time. It indicates that the primary protons with energy more than 100MeV are the most contributors to the total energy deposition. The energy depositions peaking at 10MeV and 0.1MeV, are mainly caused by the electrons, pions, d, t, 3He and also α particles during the cascade process and the evaporation process, respectively. The energy deposition density caused by different proton beam profiles are also calculated and compared. Such calculation and analyses are much helpful for better understanding the physical mechanism of energy deposition in the spallation target, and greatly useful for the thermal hydraulic design of the spallation target. Energy deposition Elsevier Spallation target Elsevier PHITS code Elsevier Enthalten in Elsevier Unwala, Darius J. ELSEVIER Editorial Comment 2013 a journal on accelerators, instrumentation and techniques applied to research in nuclear and atomic physics, materials science and related fields in physics Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV011304669 volume:367 year:2016 day:15 month:01 pages:8-13 extent:6 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nimb.2015.11.014 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_21 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2007 44.85 Kardiologie Angiologie VZ AR 367 2016 15 0115 8-13 6 045F 530 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1016/j.nimb.2015.11.014 doi GBVA2016005000017.pica (DE-627)ELV039996069 (ELSEVIER)S0168-583X(15)01197-0 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 530 530 DE-600 610 VZ 610 VZ 44.85 bkl Yu, Quanzhi verfasserin aut Energy deposition calculated by PHITS code in Pb spallation target 2016transfer abstract 6 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Energy deposition in a Pb spallation target irradiated by high energetic protons was calculated by PHITS2.52 code. The validation of the energy deposition and neutron production calculated by PHITS code was performed. Results show good agreements between the simulation results and the experimental data. Detailed comparison shows that for the total energy deposition, PHITS simulation result was about 15% overestimation than that of the experimental data. For the energy deposition along the length of the Pb target, the discrepancy mainly presented at the front part of the Pb target. Calculation indicates that most of the energy deposition comes from the ionizations of the primary protons and the produced secondary particles. With the event generator mode of PHITS, the deposit energy distribution for the particles and the light nulclei is presented for the first time. It indicates that the primary protons with energy more than 100MeV are the most contributors to the total energy deposition. The energy depositions peaking at 10MeV and 0.1MeV, are mainly caused by the electrons, pions, d, t, 3He and also α particles during the cascade process and the evaporation process, respectively. The energy deposition density caused by different proton beam profiles are also calculated and compared. Such calculation and analyses are much helpful for better understanding the physical mechanism of energy deposition in the spallation target, and greatly useful for the thermal hydraulic design of the spallation target. Energy deposition in a Pb spallation target irradiated by high energetic protons was calculated by PHITS2.52 code. The validation of the energy deposition and neutron production calculated by PHITS code was performed. Results show good agreements between the simulation results and the experimental data. Detailed comparison shows that for the total energy deposition, PHITS simulation result was about 15% overestimation than that of the experimental data. For the energy deposition along the length of the Pb target, the discrepancy mainly presented at the front part of the Pb target. Calculation indicates that most of the energy deposition comes from the ionizations of the primary protons and the produced secondary particles. With the event generator mode of PHITS, the deposit energy distribution for the particles and the light nulclei is presented for the first time. It indicates that the primary protons with energy more than 100MeV are the most contributors to the total energy deposition. The energy depositions peaking at 10MeV and 0.1MeV, are mainly caused by the electrons, pions, d, t, 3He and also α particles during the cascade process and the evaporation process, respectively. The energy deposition density caused by different proton beam profiles are also calculated and compared. Such calculation and analyses are much helpful for better understanding the physical mechanism of energy deposition in the spallation target, and greatly useful for the thermal hydraulic design of the spallation target. Energy deposition Elsevier Spallation target Elsevier PHITS code Elsevier Enthalten in Elsevier Unwala, Darius J. ELSEVIER Editorial Comment 2013 a journal on accelerators, instrumentation and techniques applied to research in nuclear and atomic physics, materials science and related fields in physics Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV011304669 volume:367 year:2016 day:15 month:01 pages:8-13 extent:6 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nimb.2015.11.014 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_21 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2007 44.85 Kardiologie Angiologie VZ AR 367 2016 15 0115 8-13 6 045F 530 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1016/j.nimb.2015.11.014 doi GBVA2016005000017.pica (DE-627)ELV039996069 (ELSEVIER)S0168-583X(15)01197-0 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 530 530 DE-600 610 VZ 610 VZ 44.85 bkl Yu, Quanzhi verfasserin aut Energy deposition calculated by PHITS code in Pb spallation target 2016transfer abstract 6 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Energy deposition in a Pb spallation target irradiated by high energetic protons was calculated by PHITS2.52 code. The validation of the energy deposition and neutron production calculated by PHITS code was performed. Results show good agreements between the simulation results and the experimental data. Detailed comparison shows that for the total energy deposition, PHITS simulation result was about 15% overestimation than that of the experimental data. For the energy deposition along the length of the Pb target, the discrepancy mainly presented at the front part of the Pb target. Calculation indicates that most of the energy deposition comes from the ionizations of the primary protons and the produced secondary particles. With the event generator mode of PHITS, the deposit energy distribution for the particles and the light nulclei is presented for the first time. It indicates that the primary protons with energy more than 100MeV are the most contributors to the total energy deposition. The energy depositions peaking at 10MeV and 0.1MeV, are mainly caused by the electrons, pions, d, t, 3He and also α particles during the cascade process and the evaporation process, respectively. The energy deposition density caused by different proton beam profiles are also calculated and compared. Such calculation and analyses are much helpful for better understanding the physical mechanism of energy deposition in the spallation target, and greatly useful for the thermal hydraulic design of the spallation target. Energy deposition in a Pb spallation target irradiated by high energetic protons was calculated by PHITS2.52 code. The validation of the energy deposition and neutron production calculated by PHITS code was performed. Results show good agreements between the simulation results and the experimental data. Detailed comparison shows that for the total energy deposition, PHITS simulation result was about 15% overestimation than that of the experimental data. For the energy deposition along the length of the Pb target, the discrepancy mainly presented at the front part of the Pb target. Calculation indicates that most of the energy deposition comes from the ionizations of the primary protons and the produced secondary particles. With the event generator mode of PHITS, the deposit energy distribution for the particles and the light nulclei is presented for the first time. It indicates that the primary protons with energy more than 100MeV are the most contributors to the total energy deposition. The energy depositions peaking at 10MeV and 0.1MeV, are mainly caused by the electrons, pions, d, t, 3He and also α particles during the cascade process and the evaporation process, respectively. The energy deposition density caused by different proton beam profiles are also calculated and compared. Such calculation and analyses are much helpful for better understanding the physical mechanism of energy deposition in the spallation target, and greatly useful for the thermal hydraulic design of the spallation target. Energy deposition Elsevier Spallation target Elsevier PHITS code Elsevier Enthalten in Elsevier Unwala, Darius J. ELSEVIER Editorial Comment 2013 a journal on accelerators, instrumentation and techniques applied to research in nuclear and atomic physics, materials science and related fields in physics Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV011304669 volume:367 year:2016 day:15 month:01 pages:8-13 extent:6 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nimb.2015.11.014 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_21 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2007 44.85 Kardiologie Angiologie VZ AR 367 2016 15 0115 8-13 6 045F 530 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in Editorial Comment Amsterdam [u.a.] volume:367 year:2016 day:15 month:01 pages:8-13 extent:6 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in Editorial Comment Amsterdam [u.a.] volume:367 year:2016 day:15 month:01 pages:8-13 extent:6 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| bklname |
Kardiologie Angiologie |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
Energy deposition Spallation target PHITS code |
| dewey-raw |
530 |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
Editorial Comment |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Yu, Quanzhi @@aut@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2016-01-15T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
ELV011304669 |
| dewey-sort |
3530 |
| id |
ELV039996069 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV039996069</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230625230509.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">180603s2016 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.nimb.2015.11.014</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">GBVA2016005000017.pica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV039996069</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0168-583X(15)01197-0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">530</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">530</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">610</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">610</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">44.85</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Yu, Quanzhi</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Energy deposition calculated by PHITS code in Pb spallation target</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2016transfer abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">6</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Energy deposition in a Pb spallation target irradiated by high energetic protons was calculated by PHITS2.52 code. The validation of the energy deposition and neutron production calculated by PHITS code was performed. Results show good agreements between the simulation results and the experimental data. Detailed comparison shows that for the total energy deposition, PHITS simulation result was about 15% overestimation than that of the experimental data. For the energy deposition along the length of the Pb target, the discrepancy mainly presented at the front part of the Pb target. Calculation indicates that most of the energy deposition comes from the ionizations of the primary protons and the produced secondary particles. With the event generator mode of PHITS, the deposit energy distribution for the particles and the light nulclei is presented for the first time. It indicates that the primary protons with energy more than 100MeV are the most contributors to the total energy deposition. The energy depositions peaking at 10MeV and 0.1MeV, are mainly caused by the electrons, pions, d, t, 3He and also α particles during the cascade process and the evaporation process, respectively. The energy deposition density caused by different proton beam profiles are also calculated and compared. Such calculation and analyses are much helpful for better understanding the physical mechanism of energy deposition in the spallation target, and greatly useful for the thermal hydraulic design of the spallation target.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Energy deposition in a Pb spallation target irradiated by high energetic protons was calculated by PHITS2.52 code. The validation of the energy deposition and neutron production calculated by PHITS code was performed. Results show good agreements between the simulation results and the experimental data. Detailed comparison shows that for the total energy deposition, PHITS simulation result was about 15% overestimation than that of the experimental data. For the energy deposition along the length of the Pb target, the discrepancy mainly presented at the front part of the Pb target. Calculation indicates that most of the energy deposition comes from the ionizations of the primary protons and the produced secondary particles. With the event generator mode of PHITS, the deposit energy distribution for the particles and the light nulclei is presented for the first time. It indicates that the primary protons with energy more than 100MeV are the most contributors to the total energy deposition. The energy depositions peaking at 10MeV and 0.1MeV, are mainly caused by the electrons, pions, d, t, 3He and also α particles during the cascade process and the evaporation process, respectively. The energy deposition density caused by different proton beam profiles are also calculated and compared. Such calculation and analyses are much helpful for better understanding the physical mechanism of energy deposition in the spallation target, and greatly useful for the thermal hydraulic design of the spallation target.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Energy deposition</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Spallation target</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">PHITS code</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="n">Elsevier</subfield><subfield code="a">Unwala, Darius J. ELSEVIER</subfield><subfield code="t">Editorial Comment</subfield><subfield code="d">2013</subfield><subfield code="d">a journal on accelerators, instrumentation and techniques applied to research in nuclear and atomic physics, materials science and related fields in physics</subfield><subfield code="g">Amsterdam [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)ELV011304669</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:367</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2016</subfield><subfield code="g">day:15</subfield><subfield code="g">month:01</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:8-13</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:6</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nimb.2015.11.014</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_21</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2001</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2007</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">44.85</subfield><subfield code="j">Kardiologie</subfield><subfield code="j">Angiologie</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">367</subfield><subfield code="j">2016</subfield><subfield code="b">15</subfield><subfield code="c">0115</subfield><subfield code="h">8-13</subfield><subfield code="g">6</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="953" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="2">045F</subfield><subfield code="a">530</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Yu, Quanzhi |
| spellingShingle |
Yu, Quanzhi ddc 530 ddc 610 bkl 44.85 Elsevier Energy deposition Elsevier Spallation target Elsevier PHITS code Energy deposition calculated by PHITS code in Pb spallation target |
| authorStr |
Yu, Quanzhi |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)ELV011304669 |
| format |
electronic Article |
| dewey-ones |
530 - Physics 610 - Medicine & health |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut |
| collection |
elsevier |
| remote_str |
true |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| topic_title |
530 530 DE-600 610 VZ 44.85 bkl Energy deposition calculated by PHITS code in Pb spallation target Energy deposition Elsevier Spallation target Elsevier PHITS code Elsevier |
| topic |
ddc 530 ddc 610 bkl 44.85 Elsevier Energy deposition Elsevier Spallation target Elsevier PHITS code |
| topic_unstemmed |
ddc 530 ddc 610 bkl 44.85 Elsevier Energy deposition Elsevier Spallation target Elsevier PHITS code |
| topic_browse |
ddc 530 ddc 610 bkl 44.85 Elsevier Energy deposition Elsevier Spallation target Elsevier PHITS code |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
zu |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Editorial Comment |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
ELV011304669 |
| dewey-tens |
530 - Physics 610 - Medicine & health |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Editorial Comment |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)ELV011304669 |
| title |
Energy deposition calculated by PHITS code in Pb spallation target |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)ELV039996069 (ELSEVIER)S0168-583X(15)01197-0 |
| title_full |
Energy deposition calculated by PHITS code in Pb spallation target |
| author_sort |
Yu, Quanzhi |
| journal |
Editorial Comment |
| journalStr |
Editorial Comment |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| dewey-hundreds |
500 - Science 600 - Technology |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2016 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
zzz |
| container_start_page |
8 |
| author_browse |
Yu, Quanzhi |
| container_volume |
367 |
| physical |
6 |
| class |
530 530 DE-600 610 VZ 44.85 bkl |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Yu, Quanzhi |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1016/j.nimb.2015.11.014 |
| dewey-full |
530 610 |
| title_sort |
energy deposition calculated by phits code in pb spallation target |
| title_auth |
Energy deposition calculated by PHITS code in Pb spallation target |
| abstract |
Energy deposition in a Pb spallation target irradiated by high energetic protons was calculated by PHITS2.52 code. The validation of the energy deposition and neutron production calculated by PHITS code was performed. Results show good agreements between the simulation results and the experimental data. Detailed comparison shows that for the total energy deposition, PHITS simulation result was about 15% overestimation than that of the experimental data. For the energy deposition along the length of the Pb target, the discrepancy mainly presented at the front part of the Pb target. Calculation indicates that most of the energy deposition comes from the ionizations of the primary protons and the produced secondary particles. With the event generator mode of PHITS, the deposit energy distribution for the particles and the light nulclei is presented for the first time. It indicates that the primary protons with energy more than 100MeV are the most contributors to the total energy deposition. The energy depositions peaking at 10MeV and 0.1MeV, are mainly caused by the electrons, pions, d, t, 3He and also α particles during the cascade process and the evaporation process, respectively. The energy deposition density caused by different proton beam profiles are also calculated and compared. Such calculation and analyses are much helpful for better understanding the physical mechanism of energy deposition in the spallation target, and greatly useful for the thermal hydraulic design of the spallation target. |
| abstractGer |
Energy deposition in a Pb spallation target irradiated by high energetic protons was calculated by PHITS2.52 code. The validation of the energy deposition and neutron production calculated by PHITS code was performed. Results show good agreements between the simulation results and the experimental data. Detailed comparison shows that for the total energy deposition, PHITS simulation result was about 15% overestimation than that of the experimental data. For the energy deposition along the length of the Pb target, the discrepancy mainly presented at the front part of the Pb target. Calculation indicates that most of the energy deposition comes from the ionizations of the primary protons and the produced secondary particles. With the event generator mode of PHITS, the deposit energy distribution for the particles and the light nulclei is presented for the first time. It indicates that the primary protons with energy more than 100MeV are the most contributors to the total energy deposition. The energy depositions peaking at 10MeV and 0.1MeV, are mainly caused by the electrons, pions, d, t, 3He and also α particles during the cascade process and the evaporation process, respectively. The energy deposition density caused by different proton beam profiles are also calculated and compared. Such calculation and analyses are much helpful for better understanding the physical mechanism of energy deposition in the spallation target, and greatly useful for the thermal hydraulic design of the spallation target. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
Energy deposition in a Pb spallation target irradiated by high energetic protons was calculated by PHITS2.52 code. The validation of the energy deposition and neutron production calculated by PHITS code was performed. Results show good agreements between the simulation results and the experimental data. Detailed comparison shows that for the total energy deposition, PHITS simulation result was about 15% overestimation than that of the experimental data. For the energy deposition along the length of the Pb target, the discrepancy mainly presented at the front part of the Pb target. Calculation indicates that most of the energy deposition comes from the ionizations of the primary protons and the produced secondary particles. With the event generator mode of PHITS, the deposit energy distribution for the particles and the light nulclei is presented for the first time. It indicates that the primary protons with energy more than 100MeV are the most contributors to the total energy deposition. The energy depositions peaking at 10MeV and 0.1MeV, are mainly caused by the electrons, pions, d, t, 3He and also α particles during the cascade process and the evaporation process, respectively. The energy deposition density caused by different proton beam profiles are also calculated and compared. Such calculation and analyses are much helpful for better understanding the physical mechanism of energy deposition in the spallation target, and greatly useful for the thermal hydraulic design of the spallation target. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_21 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2007 |
| title_short |
Energy deposition calculated by PHITS code in Pb spallation target |
| url |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nimb.2015.11.014 |
| remote_bool |
true |
| ppnlink |
ELV011304669 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
z |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| doi_str |
10.1016/j.nimb.2015.11.014 |
| up_date |
2024-07-06T22:00:40.416Z |
| _version_ |
1803868690623496192 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV039996069</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230625230509.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">180603s2016 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.nimb.2015.11.014</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">GBVA2016005000017.pica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV039996069</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0168-583X(15)01197-0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">530</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">530</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">610</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">610</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">44.85</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Yu, Quanzhi</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Energy deposition calculated by PHITS code in Pb spallation target</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2016transfer abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">6</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Energy deposition in a Pb spallation target irradiated by high energetic protons was calculated by PHITS2.52 code. The validation of the energy deposition and neutron production calculated by PHITS code was performed. Results show good agreements between the simulation results and the experimental data. Detailed comparison shows that for the total energy deposition, PHITS simulation result was about 15% overestimation than that of the experimental data. For the energy deposition along the length of the Pb target, the discrepancy mainly presented at the front part of the Pb target. Calculation indicates that most of the energy deposition comes from the ionizations of the primary protons and the produced secondary particles. With the event generator mode of PHITS, the deposit energy distribution for the particles and the light nulclei is presented for the first time. It indicates that the primary protons with energy more than 100MeV are the most contributors to the total energy deposition. The energy depositions peaking at 10MeV and 0.1MeV, are mainly caused by the electrons, pions, d, t, 3He and also α particles during the cascade process and the evaporation process, respectively. The energy deposition density caused by different proton beam profiles are also calculated and compared. Such calculation and analyses are much helpful for better understanding the physical mechanism of energy deposition in the spallation target, and greatly useful for the thermal hydraulic design of the spallation target.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Energy deposition in a Pb spallation target irradiated by high energetic protons was calculated by PHITS2.52 code. The validation of the energy deposition and neutron production calculated by PHITS code was performed. Results show good agreements between the simulation results and the experimental data. Detailed comparison shows that for the total energy deposition, PHITS simulation result was about 15% overestimation than that of the experimental data. For the energy deposition along the length of the Pb target, the discrepancy mainly presented at the front part of the Pb target. Calculation indicates that most of the energy deposition comes from the ionizations of the primary protons and the produced secondary particles. With the event generator mode of PHITS, the deposit energy distribution for the particles and the light nulclei is presented for the first time. It indicates that the primary protons with energy more than 100MeV are the most contributors to the total energy deposition. The energy depositions peaking at 10MeV and 0.1MeV, are mainly caused by the electrons, pions, d, t, 3He and also α particles during the cascade process and the evaporation process, respectively. The energy deposition density caused by different proton beam profiles are also calculated and compared. Such calculation and analyses are much helpful for better understanding the physical mechanism of energy deposition in the spallation target, and greatly useful for the thermal hydraulic design of the spallation target.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Energy deposition</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Spallation target</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">PHITS code</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="n">Elsevier</subfield><subfield code="a">Unwala, Darius J. ELSEVIER</subfield><subfield code="t">Editorial Comment</subfield><subfield code="d">2013</subfield><subfield code="d">a journal on accelerators, instrumentation and techniques applied to research in nuclear and atomic physics, materials science and related fields in physics</subfield><subfield code="g">Amsterdam [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)ELV011304669</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:367</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2016</subfield><subfield code="g">day:15</subfield><subfield code="g">month:01</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:8-13</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:6</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nimb.2015.11.014</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_21</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2001</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2007</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">44.85</subfield><subfield code="j">Kardiologie</subfield><subfield code="j">Angiologie</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">367</subfield><subfield code="j">2016</subfield><subfield code="b">15</subfield><subfield code="c">0115</subfield><subfield code="h">8-13</subfield><subfield code="g">6</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="953" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="2">045F</subfield><subfield code="a">530</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.401457 |