Evidence based treatment for unstable slipped upper femoral epiphysis: Systematic review and exploratory patient level analysis
The management of slipped upper femoral epiphysis is controversial and evolving as insight into the condition develops. Loder introduced the concept of slip stability and demonstrated a strong association between poor outcome and instability. Almost half of patients with unstable slip developed femo...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Alshryda, S. [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2018transfer abstract |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Umfang: |
9 |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: 397 Procedure Volume and Practice-Based Characteristics are Associated With Adherence to Celiac Disease Biopsy Guidelines - 2012, journal of the Royal Colleges of Surgeons of Edinburgh and Ireland, Edinburgh |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:16 ; year:2018 ; number:1 ; pages:46-54 ; extent:9 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1016/j.surge.2016.04.001 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
ELV04173243X |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ELV04173243X | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230625235437.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 180726s2018 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.surge.2016.04.001 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a GBV00000000000117A.pica |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)ELV04173243X | ||
| 035 | |a (ELSEVIER)S1479-666X(16)30007-5 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 082 | 0 | |a 610 | |
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 610 |q DE-600 |
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 610 |q VZ |
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 570 |q VZ |
| 084 | |a BIODIV |q DE-30 |2 fid | ||
| 084 | |a 35.70 |2 bkl | ||
| 084 | |a 42.12 |2 bkl | ||
| 084 | |a 42.15 |2 bkl | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Alshryda, S. |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Evidence based treatment for unstable slipped upper femoral epiphysis: Systematic review and exploratory patient level analysis |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2018transfer abstract | |
| 300 | |a 9 | ||
| 336 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zzz |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b z |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zu |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a The management of slipped upper femoral epiphysis is controversial and evolving as insight into the condition develops. Loder introduced the concept of slip stability and demonstrated a strong association between poor outcome and instability. Almost half of patients with unstable slip developed femoral head osteonecrosis. This has been influential in surgeons' choice of treatments. Some surgeons have adopted a minimal intervention approach such as pinning in situ or gentle reduction and pinning whereas others advocated an urgent open reduction and stabilisation of slip using various surgical techniques. In this review we analysed the influence of various interventions, timing of surgery and severity of the slip on the outcome of unstable slip. | ||
| 520 | |a The management of slipped upper femoral epiphysis is controversial and evolving as insight into the condition develops. Loder introduced the concept of slip stability and demonstrated a strong association between poor outcome and instability. Almost half of patients with unstable slip developed femoral head osteonecrosis. This has been influential in surgeons' choice of treatments. Some surgeons have adopted a minimal intervention approach such as pinning in situ or gentle reduction and pinning whereas others advocated an urgent open reduction and stabilisation of slip using various surgical techniques. In this review we analysed the influence of various interventions, timing of surgery and severity of the slip on the outcome of unstable slip. | ||
| 650 | 7 | |a Slipped capital epiphysis |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Unstable slip |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Slipped upper femoral epiphysis |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a SUFE |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a SCFE |2 Elsevier | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Tsang, K. |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Chytas, A. |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Chaudhry, M. |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Sacchi, K. |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Ahmad, M. |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Mason, J.M. |4 oth | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |n Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland |t 397 Procedure Volume and Practice-Based Characteristics are Associated With Adherence to Celiac Disease Biopsy Guidelines |d 2012 |d journal of the Royal Colleges of Surgeons of Edinburgh and Ireland |g Edinburgh |w (DE-627)ELV011281278 |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:16 |g year:2018 |g number:1 |g pages:46-54 |g extent:9 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surge.2016.04.001 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_U | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ELV | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_U | ||
| 912 | |a FID-BIODIV | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-PHA | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_11 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_20 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_21 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_22 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_24 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_40 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_63 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_65 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_70 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_78 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_91 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_110 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_111 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_118 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_120 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_130 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_151 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_181 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_203 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_227 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_234 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_244 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_300 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_370 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_606 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_676 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_737 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_813 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2001 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2002 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2003 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2005 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2006 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2008 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2011 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2014 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2015 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2016 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2018 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2031 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2046 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2112 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2116 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2249 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2315 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2440 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2485 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2540 | ||
| 936 | b | k | |a 35.70 |j Biochemie: Allgemeines |q VZ |
| 936 | b | k | |a 42.12 |j Biophysik |q VZ |
| 936 | b | k | |a 42.15 |j Zellbiologie |q VZ |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 16 |j 2018 |e 1 |h 46-54 |g 9 | ||
| 953 | |2 045F |a 610 | ||
| author_variant |
s a sa |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
alshrydastsangkchytasachaudhrymsacchikah:2018----:vdneaetetetousalsipdpefmrlppyisseairvead |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2018transfer abstract |
| bklnumber |
35.70 42.12 42.15 |
| publishDate |
2018 |
| allfields |
10.1016/j.surge.2016.04.001 doi GBV00000000000117A.pica (DE-627)ELV04173243X (ELSEVIER)S1479-666X(16)30007-5 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 610 610 DE-600 610 VZ 570 VZ BIODIV DE-30 fid 35.70 bkl 42.12 bkl 42.15 bkl Alshryda, S. verfasserin aut Evidence based treatment for unstable slipped upper femoral epiphysis: Systematic review and exploratory patient level analysis 2018transfer abstract 9 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier The management of slipped upper femoral epiphysis is controversial and evolving as insight into the condition develops. Loder introduced the concept of slip stability and demonstrated a strong association between poor outcome and instability. Almost half of patients with unstable slip developed femoral head osteonecrosis. This has been influential in surgeons' choice of treatments. Some surgeons have adopted a minimal intervention approach such as pinning in situ or gentle reduction and pinning whereas others advocated an urgent open reduction and stabilisation of slip using various surgical techniques. In this review we analysed the influence of various interventions, timing of surgery and severity of the slip on the outcome of unstable slip. The management of slipped upper femoral epiphysis is controversial and evolving as insight into the condition develops. Loder introduced the concept of slip stability and demonstrated a strong association between poor outcome and instability. Almost half of patients with unstable slip developed femoral head osteonecrosis. This has been influential in surgeons' choice of treatments. Some surgeons have adopted a minimal intervention approach such as pinning in situ or gentle reduction and pinning whereas others advocated an urgent open reduction and stabilisation of slip using various surgical techniques. In this review we analysed the influence of various interventions, timing of surgery and severity of the slip on the outcome of unstable slip. Slipped capital epiphysis Elsevier Unstable slip Elsevier Slipped upper femoral epiphysis Elsevier SUFE Elsevier SCFE Elsevier Tsang, K. oth Chytas, A. oth Chaudhry, M. oth Sacchi, K. oth Ahmad, M. oth Mason, J.M. oth Enthalten in Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland 397 Procedure Volume and Practice-Based Characteristics are Associated With Adherence to Celiac Disease Biopsy Guidelines 2012 journal of the Royal Colleges of Surgeons of Edinburgh and Ireland Edinburgh (DE-627)ELV011281278 volume:16 year:2018 number:1 pages:46-54 extent:9 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surge.2016.04.001 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U FID-BIODIV SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_21 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_78 GBV_ILN_91 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_111 GBV_ILN_118 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_130 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_181 GBV_ILN_203 GBV_ILN_227 GBV_ILN_234 GBV_ILN_244 GBV_ILN_300 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_606 GBV_ILN_676 GBV_ILN_737 GBV_ILN_813 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2002 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2016 GBV_ILN_2018 GBV_ILN_2031 GBV_ILN_2046 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2116 GBV_ILN_2249 GBV_ILN_2315 GBV_ILN_2440 GBV_ILN_2485 GBV_ILN_2540 35.70 Biochemie: Allgemeines VZ 42.12 Biophysik VZ 42.15 Zellbiologie VZ AR 16 2018 1 46-54 9 045F 610 |
| spelling |
10.1016/j.surge.2016.04.001 doi GBV00000000000117A.pica (DE-627)ELV04173243X (ELSEVIER)S1479-666X(16)30007-5 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 610 610 DE-600 610 VZ 570 VZ BIODIV DE-30 fid 35.70 bkl 42.12 bkl 42.15 bkl Alshryda, S. verfasserin aut Evidence based treatment for unstable slipped upper femoral epiphysis: Systematic review and exploratory patient level analysis 2018transfer abstract 9 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier The management of slipped upper femoral epiphysis is controversial and evolving as insight into the condition develops. Loder introduced the concept of slip stability and demonstrated a strong association between poor outcome and instability. Almost half of patients with unstable slip developed femoral head osteonecrosis. This has been influential in surgeons' choice of treatments. Some surgeons have adopted a minimal intervention approach such as pinning in situ or gentle reduction and pinning whereas others advocated an urgent open reduction and stabilisation of slip using various surgical techniques. In this review we analysed the influence of various interventions, timing of surgery and severity of the slip on the outcome of unstable slip. The management of slipped upper femoral epiphysis is controversial and evolving as insight into the condition develops. Loder introduced the concept of slip stability and demonstrated a strong association between poor outcome and instability. Almost half of patients with unstable slip developed femoral head osteonecrosis. This has been influential in surgeons' choice of treatments. Some surgeons have adopted a minimal intervention approach such as pinning in situ or gentle reduction and pinning whereas others advocated an urgent open reduction and stabilisation of slip using various surgical techniques. In this review we analysed the influence of various interventions, timing of surgery and severity of the slip on the outcome of unstable slip. Slipped capital epiphysis Elsevier Unstable slip Elsevier Slipped upper femoral epiphysis Elsevier SUFE Elsevier SCFE Elsevier Tsang, K. oth Chytas, A. oth Chaudhry, M. oth Sacchi, K. oth Ahmad, M. oth Mason, J.M. oth Enthalten in Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland 397 Procedure Volume and Practice-Based Characteristics are Associated With Adherence to Celiac Disease Biopsy Guidelines 2012 journal of the Royal Colleges of Surgeons of Edinburgh and Ireland Edinburgh (DE-627)ELV011281278 volume:16 year:2018 number:1 pages:46-54 extent:9 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surge.2016.04.001 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U FID-BIODIV SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_21 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_78 GBV_ILN_91 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_111 GBV_ILN_118 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_130 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_181 GBV_ILN_203 GBV_ILN_227 GBV_ILN_234 GBV_ILN_244 GBV_ILN_300 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_606 GBV_ILN_676 GBV_ILN_737 GBV_ILN_813 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2002 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2016 GBV_ILN_2018 GBV_ILN_2031 GBV_ILN_2046 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2116 GBV_ILN_2249 GBV_ILN_2315 GBV_ILN_2440 GBV_ILN_2485 GBV_ILN_2540 35.70 Biochemie: Allgemeines VZ 42.12 Biophysik VZ 42.15 Zellbiologie VZ AR 16 2018 1 46-54 9 045F 610 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1016/j.surge.2016.04.001 doi GBV00000000000117A.pica (DE-627)ELV04173243X (ELSEVIER)S1479-666X(16)30007-5 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 610 610 DE-600 610 VZ 570 VZ BIODIV DE-30 fid 35.70 bkl 42.12 bkl 42.15 bkl Alshryda, S. verfasserin aut Evidence based treatment for unstable slipped upper femoral epiphysis: Systematic review and exploratory patient level analysis 2018transfer abstract 9 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier The management of slipped upper femoral epiphysis is controversial and evolving as insight into the condition develops. Loder introduced the concept of slip stability and demonstrated a strong association between poor outcome and instability. Almost half of patients with unstable slip developed femoral head osteonecrosis. This has been influential in surgeons' choice of treatments. Some surgeons have adopted a minimal intervention approach such as pinning in situ or gentle reduction and pinning whereas others advocated an urgent open reduction and stabilisation of slip using various surgical techniques. In this review we analysed the influence of various interventions, timing of surgery and severity of the slip on the outcome of unstable slip. The management of slipped upper femoral epiphysis is controversial and evolving as insight into the condition develops. Loder introduced the concept of slip stability and demonstrated a strong association between poor outcome and instability. Almost half of patients with unstable slip developed femoral head osteonecrosis. This has been influential in surgeons' choice of treatments. Some surgeons have adopted a minimal intervention approach such as pinning in situ or gentle reduction and pinning whereas others advocated an urgent open reduction and stabilisation of slip using various surgical techniques. In this review we analysed the influence of various interventions, timing of surgery and severity of the slip on the outcome of unstable slip. Slipped capital epiphysis Elsevier Unstable slip Elsevier Slipped upper femoral epiphysis Elsevier SUFE Elsevier SCFE Elsevier Tsang, K. oth Chytas, A. oth Chaudhry, M. oth Sacchi, K. oth Ahmad, M. oth Mason, J.M. oth Enthalten in Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland 397 Procedure Volume and Practice-Based Characteristics are Associated With Adherence to Celiac Disease Biopsy Guidelines 2012 journal of the Royal Colleges of Surgeons of Edinburgh and Ireland Edinburgh (DE-627)ELV011281278 volume:16 year:2018 number:1 pages:46-54 extent:9 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surge.2016.04.001 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U FID-BIODIV SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_21 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_78 GBV_ILN_91 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_111 GBV_ILN_118 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_130 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_181 GBV_ILN_203 GBV_ILN_227 GBV_ILN_234 GBV_ILN_244 GBV_ILN_300 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_606 GBV_ILN_676 GBV_ILN_737 GBV_ILN_813 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2002 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2016 GBV_ILN_2018 GBV_ILN_2031 GBV_ILN_2046 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2116 GBV_ILN_2249 GBV_ILN_2315 GBV_ILN_2440 GBV_ILN_2485 GBV_ILN_2540 35.70 Biochemie: Allgemeines VZ 42.12 Biophysik VZ 42.15 Zellbiologie VZ AR 16 2018 1 46-54 9 045F 610 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1016/j.surge.2016.04.001 doi GBV00000000000117A.pica (DE-627)ELV04173243X (ELSEVIER)S1479-666X(16)30007-5 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 610 610 DE-600 610 VZ 570 VZ BIODIV DE-30 fid 35.70 bkl 42.12 bkl 42.15 bkl Alshryda, S. verfasserin aut Evidence based treatment for unstable slipped upper femoral epiphysis: Systematic review and exploratory patient level analysis 2018transfer abstract 9 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier The management of slipped upper femoral epiphysis is controversial and evolving as insight into the condition develops. Loder introduced the concept of slip stability and demonstrated a strong association between poor outcome and instability. Almost half of patients with unstable slip developed femoral head osteonecrosis. This has been influential in surgeons' choice of treatments. Some surgeons have adopted a minimal intervention approach such as pinning in situ or gentle reduction and pinning whereas others advocated an urgent open reduction and stabilisation of slip using various surgical techniques. In this review we analysed the influence of various interventions, timing of surgery and severity of the slip on the outcome of unstable slip. The management of slipped upper femoral epiphysis is controversial and evolving as insight into the condition develops. Loder introduced the concept of slip stability and demonstrated a strong association between poor outcome and instability. Almost half of patients with unstable slip developed femoral head osteonecrosis. This has been influential in surgeons' choice of treatments. Some surgeons have adopted a minimal intervention approach such as pinning in situ or gentle reduction and pinning whereas others advocated an urgent open reduction and stabilisation of slip using various surgical techniques. In this review we analysed the influence of various interventions, timing of surgery and severity of the slip on the outcome of unstable slip. Slipped capital epiphysis Elsevier Unstable slip Elsevier Slipped upper femoral epiphysis Elsevier SUFE Elsevier SCFE Elsevier Tsang, K. oth Chytas, A. oth Chaudhry, M. oth Sacchi, K. oth Ahmad, M. oth Mason, J.M. oth Enthalten in Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland 397 Procedure Volume and Practice-Based Characteristics are Associated With Adherence to Celiac Disease Biopsy Guidelines 2012 journal of the Royal Colleges of Surgeons of Edinburgh and Ireland Edinburgh (DE-627)ELV011281278 volume:16 year:2018 number:1 pages:46-54 extent:9 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surge.2016.04.001 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U FID-BIODIV SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_21 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_78 GBV_ILN_91 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_111 GBV_ILN_118 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_130 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_181 GBV_ILN_203 GBV_ILN_227 GBV_ILN_234 GBV_ILN_244 GBV_ILN_300 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_606 GBV_ILN_676 GBV_ILN_737 GBV_ILN_813 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2002 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2016 GBV_ILN_2018 GBV_ILN_2031 GBV_ILN_2046 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2116 GBV_ILN_2249 GBV_ILN_2315 GBV_ILN_2440 GBV_ILN_2485 GBV_ILN_2540 35.70 Biochemie: Allgemeines VZ 42.12 Biophysik VZ 42.15 Zellbiologie VZ AR 16 2018 1 46-54 9 045F 610 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1016/j.surge.2016.04.001 doi GBV00000000000117A.pica (DE-627)ELV04173243X (ELSEVIER)S1479-666X(16)30007-5 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 610 610 DE-600 610 VZ 570 VZ BIODIV DE-30 fid 35.70 bkl 42.12 bkl 42.15 bkl Alshryda, S. verfasserin aut Evidence based treatment for unstable slipped upper femoral epiphysis: Systematic review and exploratory patient level analysis 2018transfer abstract 9 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier The management of slipped upper femoral epiphysis is controversial and evolving as insight into the condition develops. Loder introduced the concept of slip stability and demonstrated a strong association between poor outcome and instability. Almost half of patients with unstable slip developed femoral head osteonecrosis. This has been influential in surgeons' choice of treatments. Some surgeons have adopted a minimal intervention approach such as pinning in situ or gentle reduction and pinning whereas others advocated an urgent open reduction and stabilisation of slip using various surgical techniques. In this review we analysed the influence of various interventions, timing of surgery and severity of the slip on the outcome of unstable slip. The management of slipped upper femoral epiphysis is controversial and evolving as insight into the condition develops. Loder introduced the concept of slip stability and demonstrated a strong association between poor outcome and instability. Almost half of patients with unstable slip developed femoral head osteonecrosis. This has been influential in surgeons' choice of treatments. Some surgeons have adopted a minimal intervention approach such as pinning in situ or gentle reduction and pinning whereas others advocated an urgent open reduction and stabilisation of slip using various surgical techniques. In this review we analysed the influence of various interventions, timing of surgery and severity of the slip on the outcome of unstable slip. Slipped capital epiphysis Elsevier Unstable slip Elsevier Slipped upper femoral epiphysis Elsevier SUFE Elsevier SCFE Elsevier Tsang, K. oth Chytas, A. oth Chaudhry, M. oth Sacchi, K. oth Ahmad, M. oth Mason, J.M. oth Enthalten in Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland 397 Procedure Volume and Practice-Based Characteristics are Associated With Adherence to Celiac Disease Biopsy Guidelines 2012 journal of the Royal Colleges of Surgeons of Edinburgh and Ireland Edinburgh (DE-627)ELV011281278 volume:16 year:2018 number:1 pages:46-54 extent:9 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surge.2016.04.001 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U FID-BIODIV SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_21 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_78 GBV_ILN_91 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_111 GBV_ILN_118 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_130 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_181 GBV_ILN_203 GBV_ILN_227 GBV_ILN_234 GBV_ILN_244 GBV_ILN_300 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_606 GBV_ILN_676 GBV_ILN_737 GBV_ILN_813 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2002 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2016 GBV_ILN_2018 GBV_ILN_2031 GBV_ILN_2046 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2116 GBV_ILN_2249 GBV_ILN_2315 GBV_ILN_2440 GBV_ILN_2485 GBV_ILN_2540 35.70 Biochemie: Allgemeines VZ 42.12 Biophysik VZ 42.15 Zellbiologie VZ AR 16 2018 1 46-54 9 045F 610 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in 397 Procedure Volume and Practice-Based Characteristics are Associated With Adherence to Celiac Disease Biopsy Guidelines Edinburgh volume:16 year:2018 number:1 pages:46-54 extent:9 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in 397 Procedure Volume and Practice-Based Characteristics are Associated With Adherence to Celiac Disease Biopsy Guidelines Edinburgh volume:16 year:2018 number:1 pages:46-54 extent:9 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| bklname |
Biochemie: Allgemeines Biophysik Zellbiologie |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
Slipped capital epiphysis Unstable slip Slipped upper femoral epiphysis SUFE SCFE |
| dewey-raw |
610 |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
397 Procedure Volume and Practice-Based Characteristics are Associated With Adherence to Celiac Disease Biopsy Guidelines |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Alshryda, S. @@aut@@ Tsang, K. @@oth@@ Chytas, A. @@oth@@ Chaudhry, M. @@oth@@ Sacchi, K. @@oth@@ Ahmad, M. @@oth@@ Mason, J.M. @@oth@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2018-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
ELV011281278 |
| dewey-sort |
3610 |
| id |
ELV04173243X |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV04173243X</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230625235437.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">180726s2018 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.surge.2016.04.001</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">GBV00000000000117A.pica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV04173243X</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S1479-666X(16)30007-5</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">610</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">610</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">610</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">570</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">BIODIV</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-30</subfield><subfield code="2">fid</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">35.70</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">42.12</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">42.15</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Alshryda, S.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Evidence based treatment for unstable slipped upper femoral epiphysis: Systematic review and exploratory patient level analysis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2018transfer abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The management of slipped upper femoral epiphysis is controversial and evolving as insight into the condition develops. Loder introduced the concept of slip stability and demonstrated a strong association between poor outcome and instability. Almost half of patients with unstable slip developed femoral head osteonecrosis. This has been influential in surgeons' choice of treatments. Some surgeons have adopted a minimal intervention approach such as pinning in situ or gentle reduction and pinning whereas others advocated an urgent open reduction and stabilisation of slip using various surgical techniques. In this review we analysed the influence of various interventions, timing of surgery and severity of the slip on the outcome of unstable slip.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The management of slipped upper femoral epiphysis is controversial and evolving as insight into the condition develops. Loder introduced the concept of slip stability and demonstrated a strong association between poor outcome and instability. Almost half of patients with unstable slip developed femoral head osteonecrosis. This has been influential in surgeons' choice of treatments. Some surgeons have adopted a minimal intervention approach such as pinning in situ or gentle reduction and pinning whereas others advocated an urgent open reduction and stabilisation of slip using various surgical techniques. In this review we analysed the influence of various interventions, timing of surgery and severity of the slip on the outcome of unstable slip.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Slipped capital epiphysis</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Unstable slip</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Slipped upper femoral epiphysis</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">SUFE</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">SCFE</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Tsang, K.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Chytas, A.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Chaudhry, M.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Sacchi, K.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ahmad, M.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Mason, J.M.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="n">Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland</subfield><subfield code="t">397 Procedure Volume and Practice-Based Characteristics are Associated With Adherence to Celiac Disease Biopsy Guidelines</subfield><subfield code="d">2012</subfield><subfield code="d">journal of the Royal Colleges of Surgeons of Edinburgh and Ireland</subfield><subfield code="g">Edinburgh</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)ELV011281278</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:16</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2018</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:46-54</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:9</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surge.2016.04.001</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">FID-BIODIV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_21</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_78</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_91</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_118</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_120</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_130</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_181</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_203</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_227</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_234</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_244</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_300</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_606</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_676</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_737</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_813</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2001</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2002</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2006</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2008</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2016</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2018</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2031</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2046</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2116</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2315</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2440</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2485</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2540</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">35.70</subfield><subfield code="j">Biochemie: Allgemeines</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">42.12</subfield><subfield code="j">Biophysik</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">42.15</subfield><subfield code="j">Zellbiologie</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">16</subfield><subfield code="j">2018</subfield><subfield code="e">1</subfield><subfield code="h">46-54</subfield><subfield code="g">9</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="953" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="2">045F</subfield><subfield code="a">610</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Alshryda, S. |
| spellingShingle |
Alshryda, S. ddc 610 ddc 570 fid BIODIV bkl 35.70 bkl 42.12 bkl 42.15 Elsevier Slipped capital epiphysis Elsevier Unstable slip Elsevier Slipped upper femoral epiphysis Elsevier SUFE Elsevier SCFE Evidence based treatment for unstable slipped upper femoral epiphysis: Systematic review and exploratory patient level analysis |
| authorStr |
Alshryda, S. |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)ELV011281278 |
| format |
electronic Article |
| dewey-ones |
610 - Medicine & health 570 - Life sciences; biology |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut |
| collection |
elsevier |
| remote_str |
true |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| topic_title |
610 610 DE-600 610 VZ 570 VZ BIODIV DE-30 fid 35.70 bkl 42.12 bkl 42.15 bkl Evidence based treatment for unstable slipped upper femoral epiphysis: Systematic review and exploratory patient level analysis Slipped capital epiphysis Elsevier Unstable slip Elsevier Slipped upper femoral epiphysis Elsevier SUFE Elsevier SCFE Elsevier |
| topic |
ddc 610 ddc 570 fid BIODIV bkl 35.70 bkl 42.12 bkl 42.15 Elsevier Slipped capital epiphysis Elsevier Unstable slip Elsevier Slipped upper femoral epiphysis Elsevier SUFE Elsevier SCFE |
| topic_unstemmed |
ddc 610 ddc 570 fid BIODIV bkl 35.70 bkl 42.12 bkl 42.15 Elsevier Slipped capital epiphysis Elsevier Unstable slip Elsevier Slipped upper femoral epiphysis Elsevier SUFE Elsevier SCFE |
| topic_browse |
ddc 610 ddc 570 fid BIODIV bkl 35.70 bkl 42.12 bkl 42.15 Elsevier Slipped capital epiphysis Elsevier Unstable slip Elsevier Slipped upper femoral epiphysis Elsevier SUFE Elsevier SCFE |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
zu |
| author2_variant |
k t kt a c ac m c mc k s ks m a ma j m jm |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
397 Procedure Volume and Practice-Based Characteristics are Associated With Adherence to Celiac Disease Biopsy Guidelines |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
ELV011281278 |
| dewey-tens |
610 - Medicine & health 570 - Life sciences; biology |
| hierarchy_top_title |
397 Procedure Volume and Practice-Based Characteristics are Associated With Adherence to Celiac Disease Biopsy Guidelines |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)ELV011281278 |
| title |
Evidence based treatment for unstable slipped upper femoral epiphysis: Systematic review and exploratory patient level analysis |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)ELV04173243X (ELSEVIER)S1479-666X(16)30007-5 |
| title_full |
Evidence based treatment for unstable slipped upper femoral epiphysis: Systematic review and exploratory patient level analysis |
| author_sort |
Alshryda, S. |
| journal |
397 Procedure Volume and Practice-Based Characteristics are Associated With Adherence to Celiac Disease Biopsy Guidelines |
| journalStr |
397 Procedure Volume and Practice-Based Characteristics are Associated With Adherence to Celiac Disease Biopsy Guidelines |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| dewey-hundreds |
600 - Technology 500 - Science |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2018 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
zzz |
| container_start_page |
46 |
| author_browse |
Alshryda, S. |
| container_volume |
16 |
| physical |
9 |
| class |
610 610 DE-600 610 VZ 570 VZ BIODIV DE-30 fid 35.70 bkl 42.12 bkl 42.15 bkl |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Alshryda, S. |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1016/j.surge.2016.04.001 |
| dewey-full |
610 570 |
| title_sort |
evidence based treatment for unstable slipped upper femoral epiphysis: systematic review and exploratory patient level analysis |
| title_auth |
Evidence based treatment for unstable slipped upper femoral epiphysis: Systematic review and exploratory patient level analysis |
| abstract |
The management of slipped upper femoral epiphysis is controversial and evolving as insight into the condition develops. Loder introduced the concept of slip stability and demonstrated a strong association between poor outcome and instability. Almost half of patients with unstable slip developed femoral head osteonecrosis. This has been influential in surgeons' choice of treatments. Some surgeons have adopted a minimal intervention approach such as pinning in situ or gentle reduction and pinning whereas others advocated an urgent open reduction and stabilisation of slip using various surgical techniques. In this review we analysed the influence of various interventions, timing of surgery and severity of the slip on the outcome of unstable slip. |
| abstractGer |
The management of slipped upper femoral epiphysis is controversial and evolving as insight into the condition develops. Loder introduced the concept of slip stability and demonstrated a strong association between poor outcome and instability. Almost half of patients with unstable slip developed femoral head osteonecrosis. This has been influential in surgeons' choice of treatments. Some surgeons have adopted a minimal intervention approach such as pinning in situ or gentle reduction and pinning whereas others advocated an urgent open reduction and stabilisation of slip using various surgical techniques. In this review we analysed the influence of various interventions, timing of surgery and severity of the slip on the outcome of unstable slip. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
The management of slipped upper femoral epiphysis is controversial and evolving as insight into the condition develops. Loder introduced the concept of slip stability and demonstrated a strong association between poor outcome and instability. Almost half of patients with unstable slip developed femoral head osteonecrosis. This has been influential in surgeons' choice of treatments. Some surgeons have adopted a minimal intervention approach such as pinning in situ or gentle reduction and pinning whereas others advocated an urgent open reduction and stabilisation of slip using various surgical techniques. In this review we analysed the influence of various interventions, timing of surgery and severity of the slip on the outcome of unstable slip. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U FID-BIODIV SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_21 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_78 GBV_ILN_91 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_111 GBV_ILN_118 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_130 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_181 GBV_ILN_203 GBV_ILN_227 GBV_ILN_234 GBV_ILN_244 GBV_ILN_300 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_606 GBV_ILN_676 GBV_ILN_737 GBV_ILN_813 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2002 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2016 GBV_ILN_2018 GBV_ILN_2031 GBV_ILN_2046 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2116 GBV_ILN_2249 GBV_ILN_2315 GBV_ILN_2440 GBV_ILN_2485 GBV_ILN_2540 |
| container_issue |
1 |
| title_short |
Evidence based treatment for unstable slipped upper femoral epiphysis: Systematic review and exploratory patient level analysis |
| url |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surge.2016.04.001 |
| remote_bool |
true |
| author2 |
Tsang, K. Chytas, A. Chaudhry, M. Sacchi, K. Ahmad, M. Mason, J.M. |
| author2Str |
Tsang, K. Chytas, A. Chaudhry, M. Sacchi, K. Ahmad, M. Mason, J.M. |
| ppnlink |
ELV011281278 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
z |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| author2_role |
oth oth oth oth oth oth |
| doi_str |
10.1016/j.surge.2016.04.001 |
| up_date |
2024-07-06T20:55:01.756Z |
| _version_ |
1803864560639148032 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV04173243X</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230625235437.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">180726s2018 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.surge.2016.04.001</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">GBV00000000000117A.pica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV04173243X</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S1479-666X(16)30007-5</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">610</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">610</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">610</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">570</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">BIODIV</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-30</subfield><subfield code="2">fid</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">35.70</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">42.12</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">42.15</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Alshryda, S.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Evidence based treatment for unstable slipped upper femoral epiphysis: Systematic review and exploratory patient level analysis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2018transfer abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The management of slipped upper femoral epiphysis is controversial and evolving as insight into the condition develops. Loder introduced the concept of slip stability and demonstrated a strong association between poor outcome and instability. Almost half of patients with unstable slip developed femoral head osteonecrosis. This has been influential in surgeons' choice of treatments. Some surgeons have adopted a minimal intervention approach such as pinning in situ or gentle reduction and pinning whereas others advocated an urgent open reduction and stabilisation of slip using various surgical techniques. In this review we analysed the influence of various interventions, timing of surgery and severity of the slip on the outcome of unstable slip.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The management of slipped upper femoral epiphysis is controversial and evolving as insight into the condition develops. Loder introduced the concept of slip stability and demonstrated a strong association between poor outcome and instability. Almost half of patients with unstable slip developed femoral head osteonecrosis. This has been influential in surgeons' choice of treatments. Some surgeons have adopted a minimal intervention approach such as pinning in situ or gentle reduction and pinning whereas others advocated an urgent open reduction and stabilisation of slip using various surgical techniques. In this review we analysed the influence of various interventions, timing of surgery and severity of the slip on the outcome of unstable slip.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Slipped capital epiphysis</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Unstable slip</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Slipped upper femoral epiphysis</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">SUFE</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">SCFE</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Tsang, K.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Chytas, A.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Chaudhry, M.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Sacchi, K.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ahmad, M.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Mason, J.M.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="n">Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland</subfield><subfield code="t">397 Procedure Volume and Practice-Based Characteristics are Associated With Adherence to Celiac Disease Biopsy Guidelines</subfield><subfield code="d">2012</subfield><subfield code="d">journal of the Royal Colleges of Surgeons of Edinburgh and Ireland</subfield><subfield code="g">Edinburgh</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)ELV011281278</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:16</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2018</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:46-54</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:9</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surge.2016.04.001</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">FID-BIODIV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_21</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_78</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_91</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_118</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_120</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_130</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_181</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_203</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_227</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_234</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_244</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_300</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_606</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_676</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_737</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_813</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2001</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2002</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2006</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2008</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2016</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2018</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2031</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2046</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2116</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2315</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2440</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2485</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2540</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">35.70</subfield><subfield code="j">Biochemie: Allgemeines</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">42.12</subfield><subfield code="j">Biophysik</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">42.15</subfield><subfield code="j">Zellbiologie</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">16</subfield><subfield code="j">2018</subfield><subfield code="e">1</subfield><subfield code="h">46-54</subfield><subfield code="g">9</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="953" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="2">045F</subfield><subfield code="a">610</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.3982067 |