A geospatial model to quantify mean thickness of peat in cranberry bogs
Commercial cranberry (Vaccinium macrocarpon Ait.) is cultivated on postglacial deposits of peat capped by 0.3–1m of anthropogenic sand. Despite distinct soil layering, a general paucity of information exists on the physical properties of sand and peat in cranberry bogs. Field measurements and ground...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Kennedy, Casey D. [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2018transfer abstract |
|---|
| Umfang: |
10 |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Assessment and mitigation of the influence of rising charging demand of electric vehicles on the aging of distribution transformers - Diahovchenko, Illia ELSEVIER, 2023, an international journal of soil science, Amsterdam [u.a.] |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:319 ; year:2018 ; day:1 ; month:06 ; pages:122-131 ; extent:10 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1016/j.geoderma.2017.12.032 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
ELV041812573 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ELV041812573 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230625235708.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 180726s2018 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.geoderma.2017.12.032 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000000980.pica |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)ELV041812573 | ||
| 035 | |a (ELSEVIER)S0016-7061(17)31624-5 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 620 |q VZ |
| 084 | |a 52.52 |2 bkl | ||
| 084 | |a 53.31 |2 bkl | ||
| 084 | |a 53.39 |2 bkl | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Kennedy, Casey D. |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a A geospatial model to quantify mean thickness of peat in cranberry bogs |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2018transfer abstract | |
| 300 | |a 10 | ||
| 336 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zzz |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b z |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zu |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Commercial cranberry (Vaccinium macrocarpon Ait.) is cultivated on postglacial deposits of peat capped by 0.3–1m of anthropogenic sand. Despite distinct soil layering, a general paucity of information exists on the physical properties of sand and peat in cranberry bogs. Field measurements and ground penetrating radar (GPR) were used to determine sand and peat thicknesses of 30 cranberry bogs in Massachusetts, United States. GPR-based estimates of peat volume and detailed soil maps were then used to develop a geospatial model of mean peat thickness (L*) in cranberry bogs. The model was applied to 505 cranberry bogs that covered in area of 2827ha. Based on model results and field measurements, average sand and peat thicknesses were 0.5 and 0.9m, respectively. For individual bogs, mean peat thickness exhibited considerable range, with deep peat (L*>1.8m) identified in 22% of the cranberry bogs. Peat was absent (L*=0m) in 26% of the cranberry bogs, which reflected modified upland or glaciolacustrine soils rather than peat. Using average thickness, nutrient concentration, and bulk density of peat and sand layers, a typical cranberry bog stores 750Mgha−1 of carbon, 22,900kgha−1 of nitrogen, and 790kgha−1 of phosphorus. We estimate that peat stores 91% and 78% (by mass) of carbon and nitrogen in cranberry bogs, respectively. In contrast, sand stores the majority of P (78% by mass) in cranberry bogs. | ||
| 520 | |a Commercial cranberry (Vaccinium macrocarpon Ait.) is cultivated on postglacial deposits of peat capped by 0.3–1m of anthropogenic sand. Despite distinct soil layering, a general paucity of information exists on the physical properties of sand and peat in cranberry bogs. Field measurements and ground penetrating radar (GPR) were used to determine sand and peat thicknesses of 30 cranberry bogs in Massachusetts, United States. GPR-based estimates of peat volume and detailed soil maps were then used to develop a geospatial model of mean peat thickness (L*) in cranberry bogs. The model was applied to 505 cranberry bogs that covered in area of 2827ha. Based on model results and field measurements, average sand and peat thicknesses were 0.5 and 0.9m, respectively. For individual bogs, mean peat thickness exhibited considerable range, with deep peat (L*>1.8m) identified in 22% of the cranberry bogs. Peat was absent (L*=0m) in 26% of the cranberry bogs, which reflected modified upland or glaciolacustrine soils rather than peat. Using average thickness, nutrient concentration, and bulk density of peat and sand layers, a typical cranberry bog stores 750Mgha−1 of carbon, 22,900kgha−1 of nitrogen, and 790kgha−1 of phosphorus. We estimate that peat stores 91% and 78% (by mass) of carbon and nitrogen in cranberry bogs, respectively. In contrast, sand stores the majority of P (78% by mass) in cranberry bogs. | ||
| 700 | 1 | |a Wilderotter, Sophie |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Payne, Maggie |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Buda, Anthony R. |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Kleinman, Peter J.A. |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Bryant, Ray B. |4 oth | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |n Elsevier Science |a Diahovchenko, Illia ELSEVIER |t Assessment and mitigation of the influence of rising charging demand of electric vehicles on the aging of distribution transformers |d 2023 |d an international journal of soil science |g Amsterdam [u.a.] |w (DE-627)ELV010107800 |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:319 |g year:2018 |g day:1 |g month:06 |g pages:122-131 |g extent:10 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2017.12.032 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_U | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ELV | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_U | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_20 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_21 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_22 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_30 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_40 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_70 | ||
| 936 | b | k | |a 52.52 |j Thermische Energieerzeugung |j Wärmetechnik |q VZ |
| 936 | b | k | |a 53.31 |j Elektrische Energieübertragung |q VZ |
| 936 | b | k | |a 53.39 |j Elektrische Energietechnik: Sonstiges |q VZ |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 319 |j 2018 |b 1 |c 0601 |h 122-131 |g 10 | ||
| author_variant |
c d k cd cdk |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
kennedycaseydwilderottersophiepaynemaggi:2018----:goptamdlouniyenhcnsopa |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2018transfer abstract |
| bklnumber |
52.52 53.31 53.39 |
| publishDate |
2018 |
| allfields |
10.1016/j.geoderma.2017.12.032 doi /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000000980.pica (DE-627)ELV041812573 (ELSEVIER)S0016-7061(17)31624-5 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 620 VZ 52.52 bkl 53.31 bkl 53.39 bkl Kennedy, Casey D. verfasserin aut A geospatial model to quantify mean thickness of peat in cranberry bogs 2018transfer abstract 10 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Commercial cranberry (Vaccinium macrocarpon Ait.) is cultivated on postglacial deposits of peat capped by 0.3–1m of anthropogenic sand. Despite distinct soil layering, a general paucity of information exists on the physical properties of sand and peat in cranberry bogs. Field measurements and ground penetrating radar (GPR) were used to determine sand and peat thicknesses of 30 cranberry bogs in Massachusetts, United States. GPR-based estimates of peat volume and detailed soil maps were then used to develop a geospatial model of mean peat thickness (L*) in cranberry bogs. The model was applied to 505 cranberry bogs that covered in area of 2827ha. Based on model results and field measurements, average sand and peat thicknesses were 0.5 and 0.9m, respectively. For individual bogs, mean peat thickness exhibited considerable range, with deep peat (L*>1.8m) identified in 22% of the cranberry bogs. Peat was absent (L*=0m) in 26% of the cranberry bogs, which reflected modified upland or glaciolacustrine soils rather than peat. Using average thickness, nutrient concentration, and bulk density of peat and sand layers, a typical cranberry bog stores 750Mgha−1 of carbon, 22,900kgha−1 of nitrogen, and 790kgha−1 of phosphorus. We estimate that peat stores 91% and 78% (by mass) of carbon and nitrogen in cranberry bogs, respectively. In contrast, sand stores the majority of P (78% by mass) in cranberry bogs. Commercial cranberry (Vaccinium macrocarpon Ait.) is cultivated on postglacial deposits of peat capped by 0.3–1m of anthropogenic sand. Despite distinct soil layering, a general paucity of information exists on the physical properties of sand and peat in cranberry bogs. Field measurements and ground penetrating radar (GPR) were used to determine sand and peat thicknesses of 30 cranberry bogs in Massachusetts, United States. GPR-based estimates of peat volume and detailed soil maps were then used to develop a geospatial model of mean peat thickness (L*) in cranberry bogs. The model was applied to 505 cranberry bogs that covered in area of 2827ha. Based on model results and field measurements, average sand and peat thicknesses were 0.5 and 0.9m, respectively. For individual bogs, mean peat thickness exhibited considerable range, with deep peat (L*>1.8m) identified in 22% of the cranberry bogs. Peat was absent (L*=0m) in 26% of the cranberry bogs, which reflected modified upland or glaciolacustrine soils rather than peat. Using average thickness, nutrient concentration, and bulk density of peat and sand layers, a typical cranberry bog stores 750Mgha−1 of carbon, 22,900kgha−1 of nitrogen, and 790kgha−1 of phosphorus. We estimate that peat stores 91% and 78% (by mass) of carbon and nitrogen in cranberry bogs, respectively. In contrast, sand stores the majority of P (78% by mass) in cranberry bogs. Wilderotter, Sophie oth Payne, Maggie oth Buda, Anthony R. oth Kleinman, Peter J.A. oth Bryant, Ray B. oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Diahovchenko, Illia ELSEVIER Assessment and mitigation of the influence of rising charging demand of electric vehicles on the aging of distribution transformers 2023 an international journal of soil science Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV010107800 volume:319 year:2018 day:1 month:06 pages:122-131 extent:10 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2017.12.032 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_21 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_30 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_70 52.52 Thermische Energieerzeugung Wärmetechnik VZ 53.31 Elektrische Energieübertragung VZ 53.39 Elektrische Energietechnik: Sonstiges VZ AR 319 2018 1 0601 122-131 10 |
| spelling |
10.1016/j.geoderma.2017.12.032 doi /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000000980.pica (DE-627)ELV041812573 (ELSEVIER)S0016-7061(17)31624-5 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 620 VZ 52.52 bkl 53.31 bkl 53.39 bkl Kennedy, Casey D. verfasserin aut A geospatial model to quantify mean thickness of peat in cranberry bogs 2018transfer abstract 10 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Commercial cranberry (Vaccinium macrocarpon Ait.) is cultivated on postglacial deposits of peat capped by 0.3–1m of anthropogenic sand. Despite distinct soil layering, a general paucity of information exists on the physical properties of sand and peat in cranberry bogs. Field measurements and ground penetrating radar (GPR) were used to determine sand and peat thicknesses of 30 cranberry bogs in Massachusetts, United States. GPR-based estimates of peat volume and detailed soil maps were then used to develop a geospatial model of mean peat thickness (L*) in cranberry bogs. The model was applied to 505 cranberry bogs that covered in area of 2827ha. Based on model results and field measurements, average sand and peat thicknesses were 0.5 and 0.9m, respectively. For individual bogs, mean peat thickness exhibited considerable range, with deep peat (L*>1.8m) identified in 22% of the cranberry bogs. Peat was absent (L*=0m) in 26% of the cranberry bogs, which reflected modified upland or glaciolacustrine soils rather than peat. Using average thickness, nutrient concentration, and bulk density of peat and sand layers, a typical cranberry bog stores 750Mgha−1 of carbon, 22,900kgha−1 of nitrogen, and 790kgha−1 of phosphorus. We estimate that peat stores 91% and 78% (by mass) of carbon and nitrogen in cranberry bogs, respectively. In contrast, sand stores the majority of P (78% by mass) in cranberry bogs. Commercial cranberry (Vaccinium macrocarpon Ait.) is cultivated on postglacial deposits of peat capped by 0.3–1m of anthropogenic sand. Despite distinct soil layering, a general paucity of information exists on the physical properties of sand and peat in cranberry bogs. Field measurements and ground penetrating radar (GPR) were used to determine sand and peat thicknesses of 30 cranberry bogs in Massachusetts, United States. GPR-based estimates of peat volume and detailed soil maps were then used to develop a geospatial model of mean peat thickness (L*) in cranberry bogs. The model was applied to 505 cranberry bogs that covered in area of 2827ha. Based on model results and field measurements, average sand and peat thicknesses were 0.5 and 0.9m, respectively. For individual bogs, mean peat thickness exhibited considerable range, with deep peat (L*>1.8m) identified in 22% of the cranberry bogs. Peat was absent (L*=0m) in 26% of the cranberry bogs, which reflected modified upland or glaciolacustrine soils rather than peat. Using average thickness, nutrient concentration, and bulk density of peat and sand layers, a typical cranberry bog stores 750Mgha−1 of carbon, 22,900kgha−1 of nitrogen, and 790kgha−1 of phosphorus. We estimate that peat stores 91% and 78% (by mass) of carbon and nitrogen in cranberry bogs, respectively. In contrast, sand stores the majority of P (78% by mass) in cranberry bogs. Wilderotter, Sophie oth Payne, Maggie oth Buda, Anthony R. oth Kleinman, Peter J.A. oth Bryant, Ray B. oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Diahovchenko, Illia ELSEVIER Assessment and mitigation of the influence of rising charging demand of electric vehicles on the aging of distribution transformers 2023 an international journal of soil science Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV010107800 volume:319 year:2018 day:1 month:06 pages:122-131 extent:10 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2017.12.032 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_21 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_30 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_70 52.52 Thermische Energieerzeugung Wärmetechnik VZ 53.31 Elektrische Energieübertragung VZ 53.39 Elektrische Energietechnik: Sonstiges VZ AR 319 2018 1 0601 122-131 10 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1016/j.geoderma.2017.12.032 doi /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000000980.pica (DE-627)ELV041812573 (ELSEVIER)S0016-7061(17)31624-5 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 620 VZ 52.52 bkl 53.31 bkl 53.39 bkl Kennedy, Casey D. verfasserin aut A geospatial model to quantify mean thickness of peat in cranberry bogs 2018transfer abstract 10 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Commercial cranberry (Vaccinium macrocarpon Ait.) is cultivated on postglacial deposits of peat capped by 0.3–1m of anthropogenic sand. Despite distinct soil layering, a general paucity of information exists on the physical properties of sand and peat in cranberry bogs. Field measurements and ground penetrating radar (GPR) were used to determine sand and peat thicknesses of 30 cranberry bogs in Massachusetts, United States. GPR-based estimates of peat volume and detailed soil maps were then used to develop a geospatial model of mean peat thickness (L*) in cranberry bogs. The model was applied to 505 cranberry bogs that covered in area of 2827ha. Based on model results and field measurements, average sand and peat thicknesses were 0.5 and 0.9m, respectively. For individual bogs, mean peat thickness exhibited considerable range, with deep peat (L*>1.8m) identified in 22% of the cranberry bogs. Peat was absent (L*=0m) in 26% of the cranberry bogs, which reflected modified upland or glaciolacustrine soils rather than peat. Using average thickness, nutrient concentration, and bulk density of peat and sand layers, a typical cranberry bog stores 750Mgha−1 of carbon, 22,900kgha−1 of nitrogen, and 790kgha−1 of phosphorus. We estimate that peat stores 91% and 78% (by mass) of carbon and nitrogen in cranberry bogs, respectively. In contrast, sand stores the majority of P (78% by mass) in cranberry bogs. Commercial cranberry (Vaccinium macrocarpon Ait.) is cultivated on postglacial deposits of peat capped by 0.3–1m of anthropogenic sand. Despite distinct soil layering, a general paucity of information exists on the physical properties of sand and peat in cranberry bogs. Field measurements and ground penetrating radar (GPR) were used to determine sand and peat thicknesses of 30 cranberry bogs in Massachusetts, United States. GPR-based estimates of peat volume and detailed soil maps were then used to develop a geospatial model of mean peat thickness (L*) in cranberry bogs. The model was applied to 505 cranberry bogs that covered in area of 2827ha. Based on model results and field measurements, average sand and peat thicknesses were 0.5 and 0.9m, respectively. For individual bogs, mean peat thickness exhibited considerable range, with deep peat (L*>1.8m) identified in 22% of the cranberry bogs. Peat was absent (L*=0m) in 26% of the cranberry bogs, which reflected modified upland or glaciolacustrine soils rather than peat. Using average thickness, nutrient concentration, and bulk density of peat and sand layers, a typical cranberry bog stores 750Mgha−1 of carbon, 22,900kgha−1 of nitrogen, and 790kgha−1 of phosphorus. We estimate that peat stores 91% and 78% (by mass) of carbon and nitrogen in cranberry bogs, respectively. In contrast, sand stores the majority of P (78% by mass) in cranberry bogs. Wilderotter, Sophie oth Payne, Maggie oth Buda, Anthony R. oth Kleinman, Peter J.A. oth Bryant, Ray B. oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Diahovchenko, Illia ELSEVIER Assessment and mitigation of the influence of rising charging demand of electric vehicles on the aging of distribution transformers 2023 an international journal of soil science Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV010107800 volume:319 year:2018 day:1 month:06 pages:122-131 extent:10 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2017.12.032 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_21 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_30 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_70 52.52 Thermische Energieerzeugung Wärmetechnik VZ 53.31 Elektrische Energieübertragung VZ 53.39 Elektrische Energietechnik: Sonstiges VZ AR 319 2018 1 0601 122-131 10 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1016/j.geoderma.2017.12.032 doi /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000000980.pica (DE-627)ELV041812573 (ELSEVIER)S0016-7061(17)31624-5 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 620 VZ 52.52 bkl 53.31 bkl 53.39 bkl Kennedy, Casey D. verfasserin aut A geospatial model to quantify mean thickness of peat in cranberry bogs 2018transfer abstract 10 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Commercial cranberry (Vaccinium macrocarpon Ait.) is cultivated on postglacial deposits of peat capped by 0.3–1m of anthropogenic sand. Despite distinct soil layering, a general paucity of information exists on the physical properties of sand and peat in cranberry bogs. Field measurements and ground penetrating radar (GPR) were used to determine sand and peat thicknesses of 30 cranberry bogs in Massachusetts, United States. GPR-based estimates of peat volume and detailed soil maps were then used to develop a geospatial model of mean peat thickness (L*) in cranberry bogs. The model was applied to 505 cranberry bogs that covered in area of 2827ha. Based on model results and field measurements, average sand and peat thicknesses were 0.5 and 0.9m, respectively. For individual bogs, mean peat thickness exhibited considerable range, with deep peat (L*>1.8m) identified in 22% of the cranberry bogs. Peat was absent (L*=0m) in 26% of the cranberry bogs, which reflected modified upland or glaciolacustrine soils rather than peat. Using average thickness, nutrient concentration, and bulk density of peat and sand layers, a typical cranberry bog stores 750Mgha−1 of carbon, 22,900kgha−1 of nitrogen, and 790kgha−1 of phosphorus. We estimate that peat stores 91% and 78% (by mass) of carbon and nitrogen in cranberry bogs, respectively. In contrast, sand stores the majority of P (78% by mass) in cranberry bogs. Commercial cranberry (Vaccinium macrocarpon Ait.) is cultivated on postglacial deposits of peat capped by 0.3–1m of anthropogenic sand. Despite distinct soil layering, a general paucity of information exists on the physical properties of sand and peat in cranberry bogs. Field measurements and ground penetrating radar (GPR) were used to determine sand and peat thicknesses of 30 cranberry bogs in Massachusetts, United States. GPR-based estimates of peat volume and detailed soil maps were then used to develop a geospatial model of mean peat thickness (L*) in cranberry bogs. The model was applied to 505 cranberry bogs that covered in area of 2827ha. Based on model results and field measurements, average sand and peat thicknesses were 0.5 and 0.9m, respectively. For individual bogs, mean peat thickness exhibited considerable range, with deep peat (L*>1.8m) identified in 22% of the cranberry bogs. Peat was absent (L*=0m) in 26% of the cranberry bogs, which reflected modified upland or glaciolacustrine soils rather than peat. Using average thickness, nutrient concentration, and bulk density of peat and sand layers, a typical cranberry bog stores 750Mgha−1 of carbon, 22,900kgha−1 of nitrogen, and 790kgha−1 of phosphorus. We estimate that peat stores 91% and 78% (by mass) of carbon and nitrogen in cranberry bogs, respectively. In contrast, sand stores the majority of P (78% by mass) in cranberry bogs. Wilderotter, Sophie oth Payne, Maggie oth Buda, Anthony R. oth Kleinman, Peter J.A. oth Bryant, Ray B. oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Diahovchenko, Illia ELSEVIER Assessment and mitigation of the influence of rising charging demand of electric vehicles on the aging of distribution transformers 2023 an international journal of soil science Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV010107800 volume:319 year:2018 day:1 month:06 pages:122-131 extent:10 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2017.12.032 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_21 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_30 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_70 52.52 Thermische Energieerzeugung Wärmetechnik VZ 53.31 Elektrische Energieübertragung VZ 53.39 Elektrische Energietechnik: Sonstiges VZ AR 319 2018 1 0601 122-131 10 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1016/j.geoderma.2017.12.032 doi /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000000980.pica (DE-627)ELV041812573 (ELSEVIER)S0016-7061(17)31624-5 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 620 VZ 52.52 bkl 53.31 bkl 53.39 bkl Kennedy, Casey D. verfasserin aut A geospatial model to quantify mean thickness of peat in cranberry bogs 2018transfer abstract 10 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Commercial cranberry (Vaccinium macrocarpon Ait.) is cultivated on postglacial deposits of peat capped by 0.3–1m of anthropogenic sand. Despite distinct soil layering, a general paucity of information exists on the physical properties of sand and peat in cranberry bogs. Field measurements and ground penetrating radar (GPR) were used to determine sand and peat thicknesses of 30 cranberry bogs in Massachusetts, United States. GPR-based estimates of peat volume and detailed soil maps were then used to develop a geospatial model of mean peat thickness (L*) in cranberry bogs. The model was applied to 505 cranberry bogs that covered in area of 2827ha. Based on model results and field measurements, average sand and peat thicknesses were 0.5 and 0.9m, respectively. For individual bogs, mean peat thickness exhibited considerable range, with deep peat (L*>1.8m) identified in 22% of the cranberry bogs. Peat was absent (L*=0m) in 26% of the cranberry bogs, which reflected modified upland or glaciolacustrine soils rather than peat. Using average thickness, nutrient concentration, and bulk density of peat and sand layers, a typical cranberry bog stores 750Mgha−1 of carbon, 22,900kgha−1 of nitrogen, and 790kgha−1 of phosphorus. We estimate that peat stores 91% and 78% (by mass) of carbon and nitrogen in cranberry bogs, respectively. In contrast, sand stores the majority of P (78% by mass) in cranberry bogs. Commercial cranberry (Vaccinium macrocarpon Ait.) is cultivated on postglacial deposits of peat capped by 0.3–1m of anthropogenic sand. Despite distinct soil layering, a general paucity of information exists on the physical properties of sand and peat in cranberry bogs. Field measurements and ground penetrating radar (GPR) were used to determine sand and peat thicknesses of 30 cranberry bogs in Massachusetts, United States. GPR-based estimates of peat volume and detailed soil maps were then used to develop a geospatial model of mean peat thickness (L*) in cranberry bogs. The model was applied to 505 cranberry bogs that covered in area of 2827ha. Based on model results and field measurements, average sand and peat thicknesses were 0.5 and 0.9m, respectively. For individual bogs, mean peat thickness exhibited considerable range, with deep peat (L*>1.8m) identified in 22% of the cranberry bogs. Peat was absent (L*=0m) in 26% of the cranberry bogs, which reflected modified upland or glaciolacustrine soils rather than peat. Using average thickness, nutrient concentration, and bulk density of peat and sand layers, a typical cranberry bog stores 750Mgha−1 of carbon, 22,900kgha−1 of nitrogen, and 790kgha−1 of phosphorus. We estimate that peat stores 91% and 78% (by mass) of carbon and nitrogen in cranberry bogs, respectively. In contrast, sand stores the majority of P (78% by mass) in cranberry bogs. Wilderotter, Sophie oth Payne, Maggie oth Buda, Anthony R. oth Kleinman, Peter J.A. oth Bryant, Ray B. oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Diahovchenko, Illia ELSEVIER Assessment and mitigation of the influence of rising charging demand of electric vehicles on the aging of distribution transformers 2023 an international journal of soil science Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV010107800 volume:319 year:2018 day:1 month:06 pages:122-131 extent:10 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2017.12.032 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_21 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_30 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_70 52.52 Thermische Energieerzeugung Wärmetechnik VZ 53.31 Elektrische Energieübertragung VZ 53.39 Elektrische Energietechnik: Sonstiges VZ AR 319 2018 1 0601 122-131 10 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in Assessment and mitigation of the influence of rising charging demand of electric vehicles on the aging of distribution transformers Amsterdam [u.a.] volume:319 year:2018 day:1 month:06 pages:122-131 extent:10 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in Assessment and mitigation of the influence of rising charging demand of electric vehicles on the aging of distribution transformers Amsterdam [u.a.] volume:319 year:2018 day:1 month:06 pages:122-131 extent:10 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| bklname |
Thermische Energieerzeugung Wärmetechnik Elektrische Energieübertragung Elektrische Energietechnik: Sonstiges |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| dewey-raw |
620 |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
Assessment and mitigation of the influence of rising charging demand of electric vehicles on the aging of distribution transformers |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Kennedy, Casey D. @@aut@@ Wilderotter, Sophie @@oth@@ Payne, Maggie @@oth@@ Buda, Anthony R. @@oth@@ Kleinman, Peter J.A. @@oth@@ Bryant, Ray B. @@oth@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2018-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
ELV010107800 |
| dewey-sort |
3620 |
| id |
ELV041812573 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV041812573</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230625235708.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">180726s2018 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.geoderma.2017.12.032</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">/cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000000980.pica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV041812573</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0016-7061(17)31624-5</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">620</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">52.52</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">53.31</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">53.39</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Kennedy, Casey D.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">A geospatial model to quantify mean thickness of peat in cranberry bogs</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2018transfer abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Commercial cranberry (Vaccinium macrocarpon Ait.) is cultivated on postglacial deposits of peat capped by 0.3–1m of anthropogenic sand. Despite distinct soil layering, a general paucity of information exists on the physical properties of sand and peat in cranberry bogs. Field measurements and ground penetrating radar (GPR) were used to determine sand and peat thicknesses of 30 cranberry bogs in Massachusetts, United States. GPR-based estimates of peat volume and detailed soil maps were then used to develop a geospatial model of mean peat thickness (L*) in cranberry bogs. The model was applied to 505 cranberry bogs that covered in area of 2827ha. Based on model results and field measurements, average sand and peat thicknesses were 0.5 and 0.9m, respectively. For individual bogs, mean peat thickness exhibited considerable range, with deep peat (L*>1.8m) identified in 22% of the cranberry bogs. Peat was absent (L*=0m) in 26% of the cranberry bogs, which reflected modified upland or glaciolacustrine soils rather than peat. Using average thickness, nutrient concentration, and bulk density of peat and sand layers, a typical cranberry bog stores 750Mgha−1 of carbon, 22,900kgha−1 of nitrogen, and 790kgha−1 of phosphorus. We estimate that peat stores 91% and 78% (by mass) of carbon and nitrogen in cranberry bogs, respectively. In contrast, sand stores the majority of P (78% by mass) in cranberry bogs.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Commercial cranberry (Vaccinium macrocarpon Ait.) is cultivated on postglacial deposits of peat capped by 0.3–1m of anthropogenic sand. Despite distinct soil layering, a general paucity of information exists on the physical properties of sand and peat in cranberry bogs. Field measurements and ground penetrating radar (GPR) were used to determine sand and peat thicknesses of 30 cranberry bogs in Massachusetts, United States. GPR-based estimates of peat volume and detailed soil maps were then used to develop a geospatial model of mean peat thickness (L*) in cranberry bogs. The model was applied to 505 cranberry bogs that covered in area of 2827ha. Based on model results and field measurements, average sand and peat thicknesses were 0.5 and 0.9m, respectively. For individual bogs, mean peat thickness exhibited considerable range, with deep peat (L*>1.8m) identified in 22% of the cranberry bogs. Peat was absent (L*=0m) in 26% of the cranberry bogs, which reflected modified upland or glaciolacustrine soils rather than peat. Using average thickness, nutrient concentration, and bulk density of peat and sand layers, a typical cranberry bog stores 750Mgha−1 of carbon, 22,900kgha−1 of nitrogen, and 790kgha−1 of phosphorus. We estimate that peat stores 91% and 78% (by mass) of carbon and nitrogen in cranberry bogs, respectively. In contrast, sand stores the majority of P (78% by mass) in cranberry bogs.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Wilderotter, Sophie</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Payne, Maggie</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Buda, Anthony R.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Kleinman, Peter J.A.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Bryant, Ray B.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="n">Elsevier Science</subfield><subfield code="a">Diahovchenko, Illia ELSEVIER</subfield><subfield code="t">Assessment and mitigation of the influence of rising charging demand of electric vehicles on the aging of distribution transformers</subfield><subfield code="d">2023</subfield><subfield code="d">an international journal of soil science</subfield><subfield code="g">Amsterdam [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)ELV010107800</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:319</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2018</subfield><subfield code="g">day:1</subfield><subfield code="g">month:06</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:122-131</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:10</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2017.12.032</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_21</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_30</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">52.52</subfield><subfield code="j">Thermische Energieerzeugung</subfield><subfield code="j">Wärmetechnik</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">53.31</subfield><subfield code="j">Elektrische Energieübertragung</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">53.39</subfield><subfield code="j">Elektrische Energietechnik: Sonstiges</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">319</subfield><subfield code="j">2018</subfield><subfield code="b">1</subfield><subfield code="c">0601</subfield><subfield code="h">122-131</subfield><subfield code="g">10</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Kennedy, Casey D. |
| spellingShingle |
Kennedy, Casey D. ddc 620 bkl 52.52 bkl 53.31 bkl 53.39 A geospatial model to quantify mean thickness of peat in cranberry bogs |
| authorStr |
Kennedy, Casey D. |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)ELV010107800 |
| format |
electronic Article |
| dewey-ones |
620 - Engineering & allied operations |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut |
| collection |
elsevier |
| remote_str |
true |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| topic_title |
620 VZ 52.52 bkl 53.31 bkl 53.39 bkl A geospatial model to quantify mean thickness of peat in cranberry bogs |
| topic |
ddc 620 bkl 52.52 bkl 53.31 bkl 53.39 |
| topic_unstemmed |
ddc 620 bkl 52.52 bkl 53.31 bkl 53.39 |
| topic_browse |
ddc 620 bkl 52.52 bkl 53.31 bkl 53.39 |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
zu |
| author2_variant |
s w sw m p mp a r b ar arb p j k pj pjk r b b rb rbb |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Assessment and mitigation of the influence of rising charging demand of electric vehicles on the aging of distribution transformers |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
ELV010107800 |
| dewey-tens |
620 - Engineering |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Assessment and mitigation of the influence of rising charging demand of electric vehicles on the aging of distribution transformers |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)ELV010107800 |
| title |
A geospatial model to quantify mean thickness of peat in cranberry bogs |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)ELV041812573 (ELSEVIER)S0016-7061(17)31624-5 |
| title_full |
A geospatial model to quantify mean thickness of peat in cranberry bogs |
| author_sort |
Kennedy, Casey D. |
| journal |
Assessment and mitigation of the influence of rising charging demand of electric vehicles on the aging of distribution transformers |
| journalStr |
Assessment and mitigation of the influence of rising charging demand of electric vehicles on the aging of distribution transformers |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| dewey-hundreds |
600 - Technology |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2018 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
zzz |
| container_start_page |
122 |
| author_browse |
Kennedy, Casey D. |
| container_volume |
319 |
| physical |
10 |
| class |
620 VZ 52.52 bkl 53.31 bkl 53.39 bkl |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Kennedy, Casey D. |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1016/j.geoderma.2017.12.032 |
| dewey-full |
620 |
| title_sort |
a geospatial model to quantify mean thickness of peat in cranberry bogs |
| title_auth |
A geospatial model to quantify mean thickness of peat in cranberry bogs |
| abstract |
Commercial cranberry (Vaccinium macrocarpon Ait.) is cultivated on postglacial deposits of peat capped by 0.3–1m of anthropogenic sand. Despite distinct soil layering, a general paucity of information exists on the physical properties of sand and peat in cranberry bogs. Field measurements and ground penetrating radar (GPR) were used to determine sand and peat thicknesses of 30 cranberry bogs in Massachusetts, United States. GPR-based estimates of peat volume and detailed soil maps were then used to develop a geospatial model of mean peat thickness (L*) in cranberry bogs. The model was applied to 505 cranberry bogs that covered in area of 2827ha. Based on model results and field measurements, average sand and peat thicknesses were 0.5 and 0.9m, respectively. For individual bogs, mean peat thickness exhibited considerable range, with deep peat (L*>1.8m) identified in 22% of the cranberry bogs. Peat was absent (L*=0m) in 26% of the cranberry bogs, which reflected modified upland or glaciolacustrine soils rather than peat. Using average thickness, nutrient concentration, and bulk density of peat and sand layers, a typical cranberry bog stores 750Mgha−1 of carbon, 22,900kgha−1 of nitrogen, and 790kgha−1 of phosphorus. We estimate that peat stores 91% and 78% (by mass) of carbon and nitrogen in cranberry bogs, respectively. In contrast, sand stores the majority of P (78% by mass) in cranberry bogs. |
| abstractGer |
Commercial cranberry (Vaccinium macrocarpon Ait.) is cultivated on postglacial deposits of peat capped by 0.3–1m of anthropogenic sand. Despite distinct soil layering, a general paucity of information exists on the physical properties of sand and peat in cranberry bogs. Field measurements and ground penetrating radar (GPR) were used to determine sand and peat thicknesses of 30 cranberry bogs in Massachusetts, United States. GPR-based estimates of peat volume and detailed soil maps were then used to develop a geospatial model of mean peat thickness (L*) in cranberry bogs. The model was applied to 505 cranberry bogs that covered in area of 2827ha. Based on model results and field measurements, average sand and peat thicknesses were 0.5 and 0.9m, respectively. For individual bogs, mean peat thickness exhibited considerable range, with deep peat (L*>1.8m) identified in 22% of the cranberry bogs. Peat was absent (L*=0m) in 26% of the cranberry bogs, which reflected modified upland or glaciolacustrine soils rather than peat. Using average thickness, nutrient concentration, and bulk density of peat and sand layers, a typical cranberry bog stores 750Mgha−1 of carbon, 22,900kgha−1 of nitrogen, and 790kgha−1 of phosphorus. We estimate that peat stores 91% and 78% (by mass) of carbon and nitrogen in cranberry bogs, respectively. In contrast, sand stores the majority of P (78% by mass) in cranberry bogs. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
Commercial cranberry (Vaccinium macrocarpon Ait.) is cultivated on postglacial deposits of peat capped by 0.3–1m of anthropogenic sand. Despite distinct soil layering, a general paucity of information exists on the physical properties of sand and peat in cranberry bogs. Field measurements and ground penetrating radar (GPR) were used to determine sand and peat thicknesses of 30 cranberry bogs in Massachusetts, United States. GPR-based estimates of peat volume and detailed soil maps were then used to develop a geospatial model of mean peat thickness (L*) in cranberry bogs. The model was applied to 505 cranberry bogs that covered in area of 2827ha. Based on model results and field measurements, average sand and peat thicknesses were 0.5 and 0.9m, respectively. For individual bogs, mean peat thickness exhibited considerable range, with deep peat (L*>1.8m) identified in 22% of the cranberry bogs. Peat was absent (L*=0m) in 26% of the cranberry bogs, which reflected modified upland or glaciolacustrine soils rather than peat. Using average thickness, nutrient concentration, and bulk density of peat and sand layers, a typical cranberry bog stores 750Mgha−1 of carbon, 22,900kgha−1 of nitrogen, and 790kgha−1 of phosphorus. We estimate that peat stores 91% and 78% (by mass) of carbon and nitrogen in cranberry bogs, respectively. In contrast, sand stores the majority of P (78% by mass) in cranberry bogs. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_21 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_30 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_70 |
| title_short |
A geospatial model to quantify mean thickness of peat in cranberry bogs |
| url |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2017.12.032 |
| remote_bool |
true |
| author2 |
Wilderotter, Sophie Payne, Maggie Buda, Anthony R. Kleinman, Peter J.A. Bryant, Ray B. |
| author2Str |
Wilderotter, Sophie Payne, Maggie Buda, Anthony R. Kleinman, Peter J.A. Bryant, Ray B. |
| ppnlink |
ELV010107800 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
z |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| author2_role |
oth oth oth oth oth |
| doi_str |
10.1016/j.geoderma.2017.12.032 |
| up_date |
2024-07-06T21:08:15.501Z |
| _version_ |
1803865392942153728 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV041812573</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230625235708.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">180726s2018 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.geoderma.2017.12.032</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">/cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000000980.pica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV041812573</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0016-7061(17)31624-5</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">620</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">52.52</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">53.31</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">53.39</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Kennedy, Casey D.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">A geospatial model to quantify mean thickness of peat in cranberry bogs</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2018transfer abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Commercial cranberry (Vaccinium macrocarpon Ait.) is cultivated on postglacial deposits of peat capped by 0.3–1m of anthropogenic sand. Despite distinct soil layering, a general paucity of information exists on the physical properties of sand and peat in cranberry bogs. Field measurements and ground penetrating radar (GPR) were used to determine sand and peat thicknesses of 30 cranberry bogs in Massachusetts, United States. GPR-based estimates of peat volume and detailed soil maps were then used to develop a geospatial model of mean peat thickness (L*) in cranberry bogs. The model was applied to 505 cranberry bogs that covered in area of 2827ha. Based on model results and field measurements, average sand and peat thicknesses were 0.5 and 0.9m, respectively. For individual bogs, mean peat thickness exhibited considerable range, with deep peat (L*>1.8m) identified in 22% of the cranberry bogs. Peat was absent (L*=0m) in 26% of the cranberry bogs, which reflected modified upland or glaciolacustrine soils rather than peat. Using average thickness, nutrient concentration, and bulk density of peat and sand layers, a typical cranberry bog stores 750Mgha−1 of carbon, 22,900kgha−1 of nitrogen, and 790kgha−1 of phosphorus. We estimate that peat stores 91% and 78% (by mass) of carbon and nitrogen in cranberry bogs, respectively. In contrast, sand stores the majority of P (78% by mass) in cranberry bogs.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Commercial cranberry (Vaccinium macrocarpon Ait.) is cultivated on postglacial deposits of peat capped by 0.3–1m of anthropogenic sand. Despite distinct soil layering, a general paucity of information exists on the physical properties of sand and peat in cranberry bogs. Field measurements and ground penetrating radar (GPR) were used to determine sand and peat thicknesses of 30 cranberry bogs in Massachusetts, United States. GPR-based estimates of peat volume and detailed soil maps were then used to develop a geospatial model of mean peat thickness (L*) in cranberry bogs. The model was applied to 505 cranberry bogs that covered in area of 2827ha. Based on model results and field measurements, average sand and peat thicknesses were 0.5 and 0.9m, respectively. For individual bogs, mean peat thickness exhibited considerable range, with deep peat (L*>1.8m) identified in 22% of the cranberry bogs. Peat was absent (L*=0m) in 26% of the cranberry bogs, which reflected modified upland or glaciolacustrine soils rather than peat. Using average thickness, nutrient concentration, and bulk density of peat and sand layers, a typical cranberry bog stores 750Mgha−1 of carbon, 22,900kgha−1 of nitrogen, and 790kgha−1 of phosphorus. We estimate that peat stores 91% and 78% (by mass) of carbon and nitrogen in cranberry bogs, respectively. In contrast, sand stores the majority of P (78% by mass) in cranberry bogs.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Wilderotter, Sophie</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Payne, Maggie</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Buda, Anthony R.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Kleinman, Peter J.A.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Bryant, Ray B.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="n">Elsevier Science</subfield><subfield code="a">Diahovchenko, Illia ELSEVIER</subfield><subfield code="t">Assessment and mitigation of the influence of rising charging demand of electric vehicles on the aging of distribution transformers</subfield><subfield code="d">2023</subfield><subfield code="d">an international journal of soil science</subfield><subfield code="g">Amsterdam [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)ELV010107800</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:319</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2018</subfield><subfield code="g">day:1</subfield><subfield code="g">month:06</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:122-131</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:10</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2017.12.032</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_21</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_30</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">52.52</subfield><subfield code="j">Thermische Energieerzeugung</subfield><subfield code="j">Wärmetechnik</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">53.31</subfield><subfield code="j">Elektrische Energieübertragung</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">53.39</subfield><subfield code="j">Elektrische Energietechnik: Sonstiges</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">319</subfield><subfield code="j">2018</subfield><subfield code="b">1</subfield><subfield code="c">0601</subfield><subfield code="h">122-131</subfield><subfield code="g">10</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.4027443 |