Wronger than wrong: Graded mapping of the errors of an avatar in the performance monitoring system of the onlooker
EEG studies show that observing errors in one's own or others' actions triggers specific electro-cortical signatures in the onlooker's brain, but whether the brain error-monitoring system operates according to graded or discrete rules is still largely unknown. To explore this issue, w...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Autor*in: |
Spinelli, G. [verfasserIn] |
---|
Format: |
E-Artikel |
---|---|
Sprache: |
Englisch |
Erschienen: |
2018transfer abstract |
---|
Schlagwörter: |
---|
Umfang: |
10 |
---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Field study of a soft X-ray aerosol neutralizer combined with electrostatic classifiers for nanoparticle size distribution measurements - Nicosia, Alessia ELSEVIER, 2017, a journal of brain function, Orlando, Fla |
---|---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:167 ; year:2018 ; day:15 ; month:02 ; pages:1-10 ; extent:10 |
Links: |
---|
DOI / URN: |
10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.11.019 |
---|
Katalog-ID: |
ELV04218570X |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | ELV04218570X | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20230626000757.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 180726s2018 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.11.019 |2 doi | |
028 | 5 | 2 | |a GBV00000000000554.pica |
035 | |a (DE-627)ELV04218570X | ||
035 | |a (ELSEVIER)S1053-8119(17)30926-6 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
100 | 1 | |a Spinelli, G. |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Wronger than wrong: Graded mapping of the errors of an avatar in the performance monitoring system of the onlooker |
264 | 1 | |c 2018transfer abstract | |
300 | |a 10 | ||
336 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zzz |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b z |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zu |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a EEG studies show that observing errors in one's own or others' actions triggers specific electro-cortical signatures in the onlooker's brain, but whether the brain error-monitoring system operates according to graded or discrete rules is still largely unknown. To explore this issue, we combined immersive virtual reality with EEG recording in participants who observed an avatar reaching-to-grasp a glass from a first-person perspective. The avatar could perform correct or erroneous actions. Erroneous grasps were defined as small or large depending on the magnitude of the trajectory deviation from the to-be-grasped glass. Results show that electro-cortical indices of error detection (indexed by ERN and mid-frontal theta oscillations), but not those of error awareness (indexed by error-Positivity), were gradually modulated by the magnitude of the observed errors. Moreover, the phase connectivity analysis revealed that enhancement of mid-frontal theta phase synchronization paralleled the magnitude of the observed error. Thus, theta oscillations represent an electro-cortical index of the degree of control exerted by mid-frontal regions whose activation depends on how much an observed action outcome results maladaptive for the onlooker. Our study provides novel neurophysiological evidence that the error monitoring system maps observed errors of different magnitude according to fine-grain, graded rather than all-or-none rules. | ||
520 | |a EEG studies show that observing errors in one's own or others' actions triggers specific electro-cortical signatures in the onlooker's brain, but whether the brain error-monitoring system operates according to graded or discrete rules is still largely unknown. To explore this issue, we combined immersive virtual reality with EEG recording in participants who observed an avatar reaching-to-grasp a glass from a first-person perspective. The avatar could perform correct or erroneous actions. Erroneous grasps were defined as small or large depending on the magnitude of the trajectory deviation from the to-be-grasped glass. Results show that electro-cortical indices of error detection (indexed by ERN and mid-frontal theta oscillations), but not those of error awareness (indexed by error-Positivity), were gradually modulated by the magnitude of the observed errors. Moreover, the phase connectivity analysis revealed that enhancement of mid-frontal theta phase synchronization paralleled the magnitude of the observed error. Thus, theta oscillations represent an electro-cortical index of the degree of control exerted by mid-frontal regions whose activation depends on how much an observed action outcome results maladaptive for the onlooker. Our study provides novel neurophysiological evidence that the error monitoring system maps observed errors of different magnitude according to fine-grain, graded rather than all-or-none rules. | ||
650 | 7 | |a ERN |2 Elsevier | |
650 | 7 | |a Error observation |2 Elsevier | |
650 | 7 | |a Theta oscillations |2 Elsevier | |
650 | 7 | |a Virtual reality |2 Elsevier | |
650 | 7 | |a Error magnitude |2 Elsevier | |
700 | 1 | |a Tieri, G. |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Pavone, E.F. |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Aglioti, S.M. |4 oth | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |n Academic Press |a Nicosia, Alessia ELSEVIER |t Field study of a soft X-ray aerosol neutralizer combined with electrostatic classifiers for nanoparticle size distribution measurements |d 2017 |d a journal of brain function |g Orlando, Fla |w (DE-627)ELV001942808 |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:167 |g year:2018 |g day:15 |g month:02 |g pages:1-10 |g extent:10 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.11.019 |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_U | ||
912 | |a GBV_ELV | ||
912 | |a SYSFLAG_U | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 167 |j 2018 |b 15 |c 0215 |h 1-10 |g 10 |
author_variant |
g s gs |
---|---|
matchkey_str |
spinelligtierigpavoneefagliotism:2018----:rnetawogrddapnoterosfnvtrnhpromneo |
hierarchy_sort_str |
2018transfer abstract |
publishDate |
2018 |
allfields |
10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.11.019 doi GBV00000000000554.pica (DE-627)ELV04218570X (ELSEVIER)S1053-8119(17)30926-6 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Spinelli, G. verfasserin aut Wronger than wrong: Graded mapping of the errors of an avatar in the performance monitoring system of the onlooker 2018transfer abstract 10 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier EEG studies show that observing errors in one's own or others' actions triggers specific electro-cortical signatures in the onlooker's brain, but whether the brain error-monitoring system operates according to graded or discrete rules is still largely unknown. To explore this issue, we combined immersive virtual reality with EEG recording in participants who observed an avatar reaching-to-grasp a glass from a first-person perspective. The avatar could perform correct or erroneous actions. Erroneous grasps were defined as small or large depending on the magnitude of the trajectory deviation from the to-be-grasped glass. Results show that electro-cortical indices of error detection (indexed by ERN and mid-frontal theta oscillations), but not those of error awareness (indexed by error-Positivity), were gradually modulated by the magnitude of the observed errors. Moreover, the phase connectivity analysis revealed that enhancement of mid-frontal theta phase synchronization paralleled the magnitude of the observed error. Thus, theta oscillations represent an electro-cortical index of the degree of control exerted by mid-frontal regions whose activation depends on how much an observed action outcome results maladaptive for the onlooker. Our study provides novel neurophysiological evidence that the error monitoring system maps observed errors of different magnitude according to fine-grain, graded rather than all-or-none rules. EEG studies show that observing errors in one's own or others' actions triggers specific electro-cortical signatures in the onlooker's brain, but whether the brain error-monitoring system operates according to graded or discrete rules is still largely unknown. To explore this issue, we combined immersive virtual reality with EEG recording in participants who observed an avatar reaching-to-grasp a glass from a first-person perspective. The avatar could perform correct or erroneous actions. Erroneous grasps were defined as small or large depending on the magnitude of the trajectory deviation from the to-be-grasped glass. Results show that electro-cortical indices of error detection (indexed by ERN and mid-frontal theta oscillations), but not those of error awareness (indexed by error-Positivity), were gradually modulated by the magnitude of the observed errors. Moreover, the phase connectivity analysis revealed that enhancement of mid-frontal theta phase synchronization paralleled the magnitude of the observed error. Thus, theta oscillations represent an electro-cortical index of the degree of control exerted by mid-frontal regions whose activation depends on how much an observed action outcome results maladaptive for the onlooker. Our study provides novel neurophysiological evidence that the error monitoring system maps observed errors of different magnitude according to fine-grain, graded rather than all-or-none rules. ERN Elsevier Error observation Elsevier Theta oscillations Elsevier Virtual reality Elsevier Error magnitude Elsevier Tieri, G. oth Pavone, E.F. oth Aglioti, S.M. oth Enthalten in Academic Press Nicosia, Alessia ELSEVIER Field study of a soft X-ray aerosol neutralizer combined with electrostatic classifiers for nanoparticle size distribution measurements 2017 a journal of brain function Orlando, Fla (DE-627)ELV001942808 volume:167 year:2018 day:15 month:02 pages:1-10 extent:10 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.11.019 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U AR 167 2018 15 0215 1-10 10 |
spelling |
10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.11.019 doi GBV00000000000554.pica (DE-627)ELV04218570X (ELSEVIER)S1053-8119(17)30926-6 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Spinelli, G. verfasserin aut Wronger than wrong: Graded mapping of the errors of an avatar in the performance monitoring system of the onlooker 2018transfer abstract 10 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier EEG studies show that observing errors in one's own or others' actions triggers specific electro-cortical signatures in the onlooker's brain, but whether the brain error-monitoring system operates according to graded or discrete rules is still largely unknown. To explore this issue, we combined immersive virtual reality with EEG recording in participants who observed an avatar reaching-to-grasp a glass from a first-person perspective. The avatar could perform correct or erroneous actions. Erroneous grasps were defined as small or large depending on the magnitude of the trajectory deviation from the to-be-grasped glass. Results show that electro-cortical indices of error detection (indexed by ERN and mid-frontal theta oscillations), but not those of error awareness (indexed by error-Positivity), were gradually modulated by the magnitude of the observed errors. Moreover, the phase connectivity analysis revealed that enhancement of mid-frontal theta phase synchronization paralleled the magnitude of the observed error. Thus, theta oscillations represent an electro-cortical index of the degree of control exerted by mid-frontal regions whose activation depends on how much an observed action outcome results maladaptive for the onlooker. Our study provides novel neurophysiological evidence that the error monitoring system maps observed errors of different magnitude according to fine-grain, graded rather than all-or-none rules. EEG studies show that observing errors in one's own or others' actions triggers specific electro-cortical signatures in the onlooker's brain, but whether the brain error-monitoring system operates according to graded or discrete rules is still largely unknown. To explore this issue, we combined immersive virtual reality with EEG recording in participants who observed an avatar reaching-to-grasp a glass from a first-person perspective. The avatar could perform correct or erroneous actions. Erroneous grasps were defined as small or large depending on the magnitude of the trajectory deviation from the to-be-grasped glass. Results show that electro-cortical indices of error detection (indexed by ERN and mid-frontal theta oscillations), but not those of error awareness (indexed by error-Positivity), were gradually modulated by the magnitude of the observed errors. Moreover, the phase connectivity analysis revealed that enhancement of mid-frontal theta phase synchronization paralleled the magnitude of the observed error. Thus, theta oscillations represent an electro-cortical index of the degree of control exerted by mid-frontal regions whose activation depends on how much an observed action outcome results maladaptive for the onlooker. Our study provides novel neurophysiological evidence that the error monitoring system maps observed errors of different magnitude according to fine-grain, graded rather than all-or-none rules. ERN Elsevier Error observation Elsevier Theta oscillations Elsevier Virtual reality Elsevier Error magnitude Elsevier Tieri, G. oth Pavone, E.F. oth Aglioti, S.M. oth Enthalten in Academic Press Nicosia, Alessia ELSEVIER Field study of a soft X-ray aerosol neutralizer combined with electrostatic classifiers for nanoparticle size distribution measurements 2017 a journal of brain function Orlando, Fla (DE-627)ELV001942808 volume:167 year:2018 day:15 month:02 pages:1-10 extent:10 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.11.019 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U AR 167 2018 15 0215 1-10 10 |
allfields_unstemmed |
10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.11.019 doi GBV00000000000554.pica (DE-627)ELV04218570X (ELSEVIER)S1053-8119(17)30926-6 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Spinelli, G. verfasserin aut Wronger than wrong: Graded mapping of the errors of an avatar in the performance monitoring system of the onlooker 2018transfer abstract 10 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier EEG studies show that observing errors in one's own or others' actions triggers specific electro-cortical signatures in the onlooker's brain, but whether the brain error-monitoring system operates according to graded or discrete rules is still largely unknown. To explore this issue, we combined immersive virtual reality with EEG recording in participants who observed an avatar reaching-to-grasp a glass from a first-person perspective. The avatar could perform correct or erroneous actions. Erroneous grasps were defined as small or large depending on the magnitude of the trajectory deviation from the to-be-grasped glass. Results show that electro-cortical indices of error detection (indexed by ERN and mid-frontal theta oscillations), but not those of error awareness (indexed by error-Positivity), were gradually modulated by the magnitude of the observed errors. Moreover, the phase connectivity analysis revealed that enhancement of mid-frontal theta phase synchronization paralleled the magnitude of the observed error. Thus, theta oscillations represent an electro-cortical index of the degree of control exerted by mid-frontal regions whose activation depends on how much an observed action outcome results maladaptive for the onlooker. Our study provides novel neurophysiological evidence that the error monitoring system maps observed errors of different magnitude according to fine-grain, graded rather than all-or-none rules. EEG studies show that observing errors in one's own or others' actions triggers specific electro-cortical signatures in the onlooker's brain, but whether the brain error-monitoring system operates according to graded or discrete rules is still largely unknown. To explore this issue, we combined immersive virtual reality with EEG recording in participants who observed an avatar reaching-to-grasp a glass from a first-person perspective. The avatar could perform correct or erroneous actions. Erroneous grasps were defined as small or large depending on the magnitude of the trajectory deviation from the to-be-grasped glass. Results show that electro-cortical indices of error detection (indexed by ERN and mid-frontal theta oscillations), but not those of error awareness (indexed by error-Positivity), were gradually modulated by the magnitude of the observed errors. Moreover, the phase connectivity analysis revealed that enhancement of mid-frontal theta phase synchronization paralleled the magnitude of the observed error. Thus, theta oscillations represent an electro-cortical index of the degree of control exerted by mid-frontal regions whose activation depends on how much an observed action outcome results maladaptive for the onlooker. Our study provides novel neurophysiological evidence that the error monitoring system maps observed errors of different magnitude according to fine-grain, graded rather than all-or-none rules. ERN Elsevier Error observation Elsevier Theta oscillations Elsevier Virtual reality Elsevier Error magnitude Elsevier Tieri, G. oth Pavone, E.F. oth Aglioti, S.M. oth Enthalten in Academic Press Nicosia, Alessia ELSEVIER Field study of a soft X-ray aerosol neutralizer combined with electrostatic classifiers for nanoparticle size distribution measurements 2017 a journal of brain function Orlando, Fla (DE-627)ELV001942808 volume:167 year:2018 day:15 month:02 pages:1-10 extent:10 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.11.019 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U AR 167 2018 15 0215 1-10 10 |
allfieldsGer |
10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.11.019 doi GBV00000000000554.pica (DE-627)ELV04218570X (ELSEVIER)S1053-8119(17)30926-6 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Spinelli, G. verfasserin aut Wronger than wrong: Graded mapping of the errors of an avatar in the performance monitoring system of the onlooker 2018transfer abstract 10 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier EEG studies show that observing errors in one's own or others' actions triggers specific electro-cortical signatures in the onlooker's brain, but whether the brain error-monitoring system operates according to graded or discrete rules is still largely unknown. To explore this issue, we combined immersive virtual reality with EEG recording in participants who observed an avatar reaching-to-grasp a glass from a first-person perspective. The avatar could perform correct or erroneous actions. Erroneous grasps were defined as small or large depending on the magnitude of the trajectory deviation from the to-be-grasped glass. Results show that electro-cortical indices of error detection (indexed by ERN and mid-frontal theta oscillations), but not those of error awareness (indexed by error-Positivity), were gradually modulated by the magnitude of the observed errors. Moreover, the phase connectivity analysis revealed that enhancement of mid-frontal theta phase synchronization paralleled the magnitude of the observed error. Thus, theta oscillations represent an electro-cortical index of the degree of control exerted by mid-frontal regions whose activation depends on how much an observed action outcome results maladaptive for the onlooker. Our study provides novel neurophysiological evidence that the error monitoring system maps observed errors of different magnitude according to fine-grain, graded rather than all-or-none rules. EEG studies show that observing errors in one's own or others' actions triggers specific electro-cortical signatures in the onlooker's brain, but whether the brain error-monitoring system operates according to graded or discrete rules is still largely unknown. To explore this issue, we combined immersive virtual reality with EEG recording in participants who observed an avatar reaching-to-grasp a glass from a first-person perspective. The avatar could perform correct or erroneous actions. Erroneous grasps were defined as small or large depending on the magnitude of the trajectory deviation from the to-be-grasped glass. Results show that electro-cortical indices of error detection (indexed by ERN and mid-frontal theta oscillations), but not those of error awareness (indexed by error-Positivity), were gradually modulated by the magnitude of the observed errors. Moreover, the phase connectivity analysis revealed that enhancement of mid-frontal theta phase synchronization paralleled the magnitude of the observed error. Thus, theta oscillations represent an electro-cortical index of the degree of control exerted by mid-frontal regions whose activation depends on how much an observed action outcome results maladaptive for the onlooker. Our study provides novel neurophysiological evidence that the error monitoring system maps observed errors of different magnitude according to fine-grain, graded rather than all-or-none rules. ERN Elsevier Error observation Elsevier Theta oscillations Elsevier Virtual reality Elsevier Error magnitude Elsevier Tieri, G. oth Pavone, E.F. oth Aglioti, S.M. oth Enthalten in Academic Press Nicosia, Alessia ELSEVIER Field study of a soft X-ray aerosol neutralizer combined with electrostatic classifiers for nanoparticle size distribution measurements 2017 a journal of brain function Orlando, Fla (DE-627)ELV001942808 volume:167 year:2018 day:15 month:02 pages:1-10 extent:10 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.11.019 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U AR 167 2018 15 0215 1-10 10 |
allfieldsSound |
10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.11.019 doi GBV00000000000554.pica (DE-627)ELV04218570X (ELSEVIER)S1053-8119(17)30926-6 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Spinelli, G. verfasserin aut Wronger than wrong: Graded mapping of the errors of an avatar in the performance monitoring system of the onlooker 2018transfer abstract 10 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier EEG studies show that observing errors in one's own or others' actions triggers specific electro-cortical signatures in the onlooker's brain, but whether the brain error-monitoring system operates according to graded or discrete rules is still largely unknown. To explore this issue, we combined immersive virtual reality with EEG recording in participants who observed an avatar reaching-to-grasp a glass from a first-person perspective. The avatar could perform correct or erroneous actions. Erroneous grasps were defined as small or large depending on the magnitude of the trajectory deviation from the to-be-grasped glass. Results show that electro-cortical indices of error detection (indexed by ERN and mid-frontal theta oscillations), but not those of error awareness (indexed by error-Positivity), were gradually modulated by the magnitude of the observed errors. Moreover, the phase connectivity analysis revealed that enhancement of mid-frontal theta phase synchronization paralleled the magnitude of the observed error. Thus, theta oscillations represent an electro-cortical index of the degree of control exerted by mid-frontal regions whose activation depends on how much an observed action outcome results maladaptive for the onlooker. Our study provides novel neurophysiological evidence that the error monitoring system maps observed errors of different magnitude according to fine-grain, graded rather than all-or-none rules. EEG studies show that observing errors in one's own or others' actions triggers specific electro-cortical signatures in the onlooker's brain, but whether the brain error-monitoring system operates according to graded or discrete rules is still largely unknown. To explore this issue, we combined immersive virtual reality with EEG recording in participants who observed an avatar reaching-to-grasp a glass from a first-person perspective. The avatar could perform correct or erroneous actions. Erroneous grasps were defined as small or large depending on the magnitude of the trajectory deviation from the to-be-grasped glass. Results show that electro-cortical indices of error detection (indexed by ERN and mid-frontal theta oscillations), but not those of error awareness (indexed by error-Positivity), were gradually modulated by the magnitude of the observed errors. Moreover, the phase connectivity analysis revealed that enhancement of mid-frontal theta phase synchronization paralleled the magnitude of the observed error. Thus, theta oscillations represent an electro-cortical index of the degree of control exerted by mid-frontal regions whose activation depends on how much an observed action outcome results maladaptive for the onlooker. Our study provides novel neurophysiological evidence that the error monitoring system maps observed errors of different magnitude according to fine-grain, graded rather than all-or-none rules. ERN Elsevier Error observation Elsevier Theta oscillations Elsevier Virtual reality Elsevier Error magnitude Elsevier Tieri, G. oth Pavone, E.F. oth Aglioti, S.M. oth Enthalten in Academic Press Nicosia, Alessia ELSEVIER Field study of a soft X-ray aerosol neutralizer combined with electrostatic classifiers for nanoparticle size distribution measurements 2017 a journal of brain function Orlando, Fla (DE-627)ELV001942808 volume:167 year:2018 day:15 month:02 pages:1-10 extent:10 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.11.019 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U AR 167 2018 15 0215 1-10 10 |
language |
English |
source |
Enthalten in Field study of a soft X-ray aerosol neutralizer combined with electrostatic classifiers for nanoparticle size distribution measurements Orlando, Fla volume:167 year:2018 day:15 month:02 pages:1-10 extent:10 |
sourceStr |
Enthalten in Field study of a soft X-ray aerosol neutralizer combined with electrostatic classifiers for nanoparticle size distribution measurements Orlando, Fla volume:167 year:2018 day:15 month:02 pages:1-10 extent:10 |
format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
institution |
findex.gbv.de |
topic_facet |
ERN Error observation Theta oscillations Virtual reality Error magnitude |
isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
container_title |
Field study of a soft X-ray aerosol neutralizer combined with electrostatic classifiers for nanoparticle size distribution measurements |
authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Spinelli, G. @@aut@@ Tieri, G. @@oth@@ Pavone, E.F. @@oth@@ Aglioti, S.M. @@oth@@ |
publishDateDaySort_date |
2018-01-15T00:00:00Z |
hierarchy_top_id |
ELV001942808 |
id |
ELV04218570X |
language_de |
englisch |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV04218570X</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230626000757.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">180726s2018 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.11.019</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">GBV00000000000554.pica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV04218570X</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S1053-8119(17)30926-6</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Spinelli, G.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Wronger than wrong: Graded mapping of the errors of an avatar in the performance monitoring system of the onlooker</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2018transfer abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">EEG studies show that observing errors in one's own or others' actions triggers specific electro-cortical signatures in the onlooker's brain, but whether the brain error-monitoring system operates according to graded or discrete rules is still largely unknown. To explore this issue, we combined immersive virtual reality with EEG recording in participants who observed an avatar reaching-to-grasp a glass from a first-person perspective. The avatar could perform correct or erroneous actions. Erroneous grasps were defined as small or large depending on the magnitude of the trajectory deviation from the to-be-grasped glass. Results show that electro-cortical indices of error detection (indexed by ERN and mid-frontal theta oscillations), but not those of error awareness (indexed by error-Positivity), were gradually modulated by the magnitude of the observed errors. Moreover, the phase connectivity analysis revealed that enhancement of mid-frontal theta phase synchronization paralleled the magnitude of the observed error. Thus, theta oscillations represent an electro-cortical index of the degree of control exerted by mid-frontal regions whose activation depends on how much an observed action outcome results maladaptive for the onlooker. Our study provides novel neurophysiological evidence that the error monitoring system maps observed errors of different magnitude according to fine-grain, graded rather than all-or-none rules.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">EEG studies show that observing errors in one's own or others' actions triggers specific electro-cortical signatures in the onlooker's brain, but whether the brain error-monitoring system operates according to graded or discrete rules is still largely unknown. To explore this issue, we combined immersive virtual reality with EEG recording in participants who observed an avatar reaching-to-grasp a glass from a first-person perspective. The avatar could perform correct or erroneous actions. Erroneous grasps were defined as small or large depending on the magnitude of the trajectory deviation from the to-be-grasped glass. Results show that electro-cortical indices of error detection (indexed by ERN and mid-frontal theta oscillations), but not those of error awareness (indexed by error-Positivity), were gradually modulated by the magnitude of the observed errors. Moreover, the phase connectivity analysis revealed that enhancement of mid-frontal theta phase synchronization paralleled the magnitude of the observed error. Thus, theta oscillations represent an electro-cortical index of the degree of control exerted by mid-frontal regions whose activation depends on how much an observed action outcome results maladaptive for the onlooker. Our study provides novel neurophysiological evidence that the error monitoring system maps observed errors of different magnitude according to fine-grain, graded rather than all-or-none rules.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">ERN</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Error observation</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Theta oscillations</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Virtual reality</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Error magnitude</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Tieri, G.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Pavone, E.F.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Aglioti, S.M.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="n">Academic Press</subfield><subfield code="a">Nicosia, Alessia ELSEVIER</subfield><subfield code="t">Field study of a soft X-ray aerosol neutralizer combined with electrostatic classifiers for nanoparticle size distribution measurements</subfield><subfield code="d">2017</subfield><subfield code="d">a journal of brain function</subfield><subfield code="g">Orlando, Fla</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)ELV001942808</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:167</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2018</subfield><subfield code="g">day:15</subfield><subfield code="g">month:02</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:1-10</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:10</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.11.019</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">167</subfield><subfield code="j">2018</subfield><subfield code="b">15</subfield><subfield code="c">0215</subfield><subfield code="h">1-10</subfield><subfield code="g">10</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
author |
Spinelli, G. |
spellingShingle |
Spinelli, G. Elsevier ERN Elsevier Error observation Elsevier Theta oscillations Elsevier Virtual reality Elsevier Error magnitude Wronger than wrong: Graded mapping of the errors of an avatar in the performance monitoring system of the onlooker |
authorStr |
Spinelli, G. |
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)ELV001942808 |
format |
electronic Article |
delete_txt_mv |
keep |
author_role |
aut |
collection |
elsevier |
remote_str |
true |
illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
topic_title |
Wronger than wrong: Graded mapping of the errors of an avatar in the performance monitoring system of the onlooker ERN Elsevier Error observation Elsevier Theta oscillations Elsevier Virtual reality Elsevier Error magnitude Elsevier |
topic |
Elsevier ERN Elsevier Error observation Elsevier Theta oscillations Elsevier Virtual reality Elsevier Error magnitude |
topic_unstemmed |
Elsevier ERN Elsevier Error observation Elsevier Theta oscillations Elsevier Virtual reality Elsevier Error magnitude |
topic_browse |
Elsevier ERN Elsevier Error observation Elsevier Theta oscillations Elsevier Virtual reality Elsevier Error magnitude |
format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
carriertype_str_mv |
zu |
author2_variant |
g t gt e p ep s a sa |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Field study of a soft X-ray aerosol neutralizer combined with electrostatic classifiers for nanoparticle size distribution measurements |
hierarchy_parent_id |
ELV001942808 |
hierarchy_top_title |
Field study of a soft X-ray aerosol neutralizer combined with electrostatic classifiers for nanoparticle size distribution measurements |
isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)ELV001942808 |
title |
Wronger than wrong: Graded mapping of the errors of an avatar in the performance monitoring system of the onlooker |
ctrlnum |
(DE-627)ELV04218570X (ELSEVIER)S1053-8119(17)30926-6 |
title_full |
Wronger than wrong: Graded mapping of the errors of an avatar in the performance monitoring system of the onlooker |
author_sort |
Spinelli, G. |
journal |
Field study of a soft X-ray aerosol neutralizer combined with electrostatic classifiers for nanoparticle size distribution measurements |
journalStr |
Field study of a soft X-ray aerosol neutralizer combined with electrostatic classifiers for nanoparticle size distribution measurements |
lang_code |
eng |
isOA_bool |
false |
recordtype |
marc |
publishDateSort |
2018 |
contenttype_str_mv |
zzz |
container_start_page |
1 |
author_browse |
Spinelli, G. |
container_volume |
167 |
physical |
10 |
format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
author-letter |
Spinelli, G. |
doi_str_mv |
10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.11.019 |
title_sort |
wronger than wrong: graded mapping of the errors of an avatar in the performance monitoring system of the onlooker |
title_auth |
Wronger than wrong: Graded mapping of the errors of an avatar in the performance monitoring system of the onlooker |
abstract |
EEG studies show that observing errors in one's own or others' actions triggers specific electro-cortical signatures in the onlooker's brain, but whether the brain error-monitoring system operates according to graded or discrete rules is still largely unknown. To explore this issue, we combined immersive virtual reality with EEG recording in participants who observed an avatar reaching-to-grasp a glass from a first-person perspective. The avatar could perform correct or erroneous actions. Erroneous grasps were defined as small or large depending on the magnitude of the trajectory deviation from the to-be-grasped glass. Results show that electro-cortical indices of error detection (indexed by ERN and mid-frontal theta oscillations), but not those of error awareness (indexed by error-Positivity), were gradually modulated by the magnitude of the observed errors. Moreover, the phase connectivity analysis revealed that enhancement of mid-frontal theta phase synchronization paralleled the magnitude of the observed error. Thus, theta oscillations represent an electro-cortical index of the degree of control exerted by mid-frontal regions whose activation depends on how much an observed action outcome results maladaptive for the onlooker. Our study provides novel neurophysiological evidence that the error monitoring system maps observed errors of different magnitude according to fine-grain, graded rather than all-or-none rules. |
abstractGer |
EEG studies show that observing errors in one's own or others' actions triggers specific electro-cortical signatures in the onlooker's brain, but whether the brain error-monitoring system operates according to graded or discrete rules is still largely unknown. To explore this issue, we combined immersive virtual reality with EEG recording in participants who observed an avatar reaching-to-grasp a glass from a first-person perspective. The avatar could perform correct or erroneous actions. Erroneous grasps were defined as small or large depending on the magnitude of the trajectory deviation from the to-be-grasped glass. Results show that electro-cortical indices of error detection (indexed by ERN and mid-frontal theta oscillations), but not those of error awareness (indexed by error-Positivity), were gradually modulated by the magnitude of the observed errors. Moreover, the phase connectivity analysis revealed that enhancement of mid-frontal theta phase synchronization paralleled the magnitude of the observed error. Thus, theta oscillations represent an electro-cortical index of the degree of control exerted by mid-frontal regions whose activation depends on how much an observed action outcome results maladaptive for the onlooker. Our study provides novel neurophysiological evidence that the error monitoring system maps observed errors of different magnitude according to fine-grain, graded rather than all-or-none rules. |
abstract_unstemmed |
EEG studies show that observing errors in one's own or others' actions triggers specific electro-cortical signatures in the onlooker's brain, but whether the brain error-monitoring system operates according to graded or discrete rules is still largely unknown. To explore this issue, we combined immersive virtual reality with EEG recording in participants who observed an avatar reaching-to-grasp a glass from a first-person perspective. The avatar could perform correct or erroneous actions. Erroneous grasps were defined as small or large depending on the magnitude of the trajectory deviation from the to-be-grasped glass. Results show that electro-cortical indices of error detection (indexed by ERN and mid-frontal theta oscillations), but not those of error awareness (indexed by error-Positivity), were gradually modulated by the magnitude of the observed errors. Moreover, the phase connectivity analysis revealed that enhancement of mid-frontal theta phase synchronization paralleled the magnitude of the observed error. Thus, theta oscillations represent an electro-cortical index of the degree of control exerted by mid-frontal regions whose activation depends on how much an observed action outcome results maladaptive for the onlooker. Our study provides novel neurophysiological evidence that the error monitoring system maps observed errors of different magnitude according to fine-grain, graded rather than all-or-none rules. |
collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U |
title_short |
Wronger than wrong: Graded mapping of the errors of an avatar in the performance monitoring system of the onlooker |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.11.019 |
remote_bool |
true |
author2 |
Tieri, G. Pavone, E.F. Aglioti, S.M. |
author2Str |
Tieri, G. Pavone, E.F. Aglioti, S.M. |
ppnlink |
ELV001942808 |
mediatype_str_mv |
z |
isOA_txt |
false |
hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
author2_role |
oth oth oth |
doi_str |
10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.11.019 |
up_date |
2024-07-06T22:08:21.349Z |
_version_ |
1803869173946777600 |
fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV04218570X</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230626000757.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">180726s2018 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.11.019</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">GBV00000000000554.pica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV04218570X</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S1053-8119(17)30926-6</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Spinelli, G.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Wronger than wrong: Graded mapping of the errors of an avatar in the performance monitoring system of the onlooker</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2018transfer abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">EEG studies show that observing errors in one's own or others' actions triggers specific electro-cortical signatures in the onlooker's brain, but whether the brain error-monitoring system operates according to graded or discrete rules is still largely unknown. To explore this issue, we combined immersive virtual reality with EEG recording in participants who observed an avatar reaching-to-grasp a glass from a first-person perspective. The avatar could perform correct or erroneous actions. Erroneous grasps were defined as small or large depending on the magnitude of the trajectory deviation from the to-be-grasped glass. Results show that electro-cortical indices of error detection (indexed by ERN and mid-frontal theta oscillations), but not those of error awareness (indexed by error-Positivity), were gradually modulated by the magnitude of the observed errors. Moreover, the phase connectivity analysis revealed that enhancement of mid-frontal theta phase synchronization paralleled the magnitude of the observed error. Thus, theta oscillations represent an electro-cortical index of the degree of control exerted by mid-frontal regions whose activation depends on how much an observed action outcome results maladaptive for the onlooker. Our study provides novel neurophysiological evidence that the error monitoring system maps observed errors of different magnitude according to fine-grain, graded rather than all-or-none rules.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">EEG studies show that observing errors in one's own or others' actions triggers specific electro-cortical signatures in the onlooker's brain, but whether the brain error-monitoring system operates according to graded or discrete rules is still largely unknown. To explore this issue, we combined immersive virtual reality with EEG recording in participants who observed an avatar reaching-to-grasp a glass from a first-person perspective. The avatar could perform correct or erroneous actions. Erroneous grasps were defined as small or large depending on the magnitude of the trajectory deviation from the to-be-grasped glass. Results show that electro-cortical indices of error detection (indexed by ERN and mid-frontal theta oscillations), but not those of error awareness (indexed by error-Positivity), were gradually modulated by the magnitude of the observed errors. Moreover, the phase connectivity analysis revealed that enhancement of mid-frontal theta phase synchronization paralleled the magnitude of the observed error. Thus, theta oscillations represent an electro-cortical index of the degree of control exerted by mid-frontal regions whose activation depends on how much an observed action outcome results maladaptive for the onlooker. Our study provides novel neurophysiological evidence that the error monitoring system maps observed errors of different magnitude according to fine-grain, graded rather than all-or-none rules.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">ERN</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Error observation</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Theta oscillations</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Virtual reality</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Error magnitude</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Tieri, G.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Pavone, E.F.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Aglioti, S.M.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="n">Academic Press</subfield><subfield code="a">Nicosia, Alessia ELSEVIER</subfield><subfield code="t">Field study of a soft X-ray aerosol neutralizer combined with electrostatic classifiers for nanoparticle size distribution measurements</subfield><subfield code="d">2017</subfield><subfield code="d">a journal of brain function</subfield><subfield code="g">Orlando, Fla</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)ELV001942808</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:167</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2018</subfield><subfield code="g">day:15</subfield><subfield code="g">month:02</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:1-10</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:10</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.11.019</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">167</subfield><subfield code="j">2018</subfield><subfield code="b">15</subfield><subfield code="c">0215</subfield><subfield code="h">1-10</subfield><subfield code="g">10</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
score |
7.3977413 |