Comparison of slow and fast pyrolysis for converting biomass into fuel
In this work, the conversion of sugarcane bagasse into fuel was studied as a low cost source material. The conversion was carried out experimentally in a batch pyrolysis reactor. Two pyrolysis methods were compared; namely, fast pyrolysis and slow or conventional pyrolysis. This comparison was based...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Al Arni, Saleh [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2018transfer abstract |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Umfang: |
5 |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Technologies and practice of CO - HU, Yongle ELSEVIER, 2019, an international journal : the official journal of WREN, The World Renewable Energy Network, Amsterdam [u.a.] |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:124 ; year:2018 ; pages:197-201 ; extent:5 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1016/j.renene.2017.04.060 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
ELV042656761 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ELV042656761 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230626001957.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 180726s2018 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.renene.2017.04.060 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a GBV00000000000197A.pica |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)ELV042656761 | ||
| 035 | |a (ELSEVIER)S0960-1481(17)30376-2 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 082 | 0 | |a 530 |a 620 | |
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 530 |q DE-600 |
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 620 |q DE-600 |
| 100 | 1 | |a Al Arni, Saleh |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Comparison of slow and fast pyrolysis for converting biomass into fuel |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2018transfer abstract | |
| 300 | |a 5 | ||
| 336 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zzz |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b z |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zu |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a In this work, the conversion of sugarcane bagasse into fuel was studied as a low cost source material. The conversion was carried out experimentally in a batch pyrolysis reactor. Two pyrolysis methods were compared; namely, fast pyrolysis and slow or conventional pyrolysis. This comparison was based on the thermal decomposition of biomass into fuel and on the product yields. Since the yields are affected by the type of pyrolysis and the operating temperature of the reactor, the comparisons have been conducted at three fixed temperature values of 753, 853 and 953 K. The results revealed that the conventional pyrolysis produce more syngas yield with the increases of temperature. In the case of fast pyrolysis, it was observed that losses and solid yield increase with temperature increase. Moreover, it was found that the highest losses in both cases are less than 15% and that it was higher in conventional pyrolysis. Gases released during the thermal decomposition of biomass were identified as H2, CO, CO2, CH4 and some light molecular weight of hydrocarbons, such as C2H4 and C2H6. The low temperature was favored for the production of methane other than hydrogen for both processes, while high temperature was favored for the production of hydrogen. The produced H2 can be used in typical fuel cells. | ||
| 520 | |a In this work, the conversion of sugarcane bagasse into fuel was studied as a low cost source material. The conversion was carried out experimentally in a batch pyrolysis reactor. Two pyrolysis methods were compared; namely, fast pyrolysis and slow or conventional pyrolysis. This comparison was based on the thermal decomposition of biomass into fuel and on the product yields. Since the yields are affected by the type of pyrolysis and the operating temperature of the reactor, the comparisons have been conducted at three fixed temperature values of 753, 853 and 953 K. The results revealed that the conventional pyrolysis produce more syngas yield with the increases of temperature. In the case of fast pyrolysis, it was observed that losses and solid yield increase with temperature increase. Moreover, it was found that the highest losses in both cases are less than 15% and that it was higher in conventional pyrolysis. Gases released during the thermal decomposition of biomass were identified as H2, CO, CO2, CH4 and some light molecular weight of hydrocarbons, such as C2H4 and C2H6. The low temperature was favored for the production of methane other than hydrogen for both processes, while high temperature was favored for the production of hydrogen. The produced H2 can be used in typical fuel cells. | ||
| 650 | 7 | |a Sugarcane bagasse and agricultural waste |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Fast pyrolysis |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Slow pyrolysis |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Biomass pyrolysis |2 Elsevier | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |n Elsevier Science |a HU, Yongle ELSEVIER |t Technologies and practice of CO |d 2019 |d an international journal : the official journal of WREN, The World Renewable Energy Network |g Amsterdam [u.a.] |w (DE-627)ELV002723662 |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:124 |g year:2018 |g pages:197-201 |g extent:5 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2017.04.060 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_U | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ELV | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_U | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 124 |j 2018 |h 197-201 |g 5 | ||
| 953 | |2 045F |a 530 | ||
| author_variant |
a s a as asa |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
alarnisaleh:2018----:oprsnflwnfsprlssocnetn |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2018transfer abstract |
| publishDate |
2018 |
| allfields |
10.1016/j.renene.2017.04.060 doi GBV00000000000197A.pica (DE-627)ELV042656761 (ELSEVIER)S0960-1481(17)30376-2 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 530 620 530 DE-600 620 DE-600 Al Arni, Saleh verfasserin aut Comparison of slow and fast pyrolysis for converting biomass into fuel 2018transfer abstract 5 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier In this work, the conversion of sugarcane bagasse into fuel was studied as a low cost source material. The conversion was carried out experimentally in a batch pyrolysis reactor. Two pyrolysis methods were compared; namely, fast pyrolysis and slow or conventional pyrolysis. This comparison was based on the thermal decomposition of biomass into fuel and on the product yields. Since the yields are affected by the type of pyrolysis and the operating temperature of the reactor, the comparisons have been conducted at three fixed temperature values of 753, 853 and 953 K. The results revealed that the conventional pyrolysis produce more syngas yield with the increases of temperature. In the case of fast pyrolysis, it was observed that losses and solid yield increase with temperature increase. Moreover, it was found that the highest losses in both cases are less than 15% and that it was higher in conventional pyrolysis. Gases released during the thermal decomposition of biomass were identified as H2, CO, CO2, CH4 and some light molecular weight of hydrocarbons, such as C2H4 and C2H6. The low temperature was favored for the production of methane other than hydrogen for both processes, while high temperature was favored for the production of hydrogen. The produced H2 can be used in typical fuel cells. In this work, the conversion of sugarcane bagasse into fuel was studied as a low cost source material. The conversion was carried out experimentally in a batch pyrolysis reactor. Two pyrolysis methods were compared; namely, fast pyrolysis and slow or conventional pyrolysis. This comparison was based on the thermal decomposition of biomass into fuel and on the product yields. Since the yields are affected by the type of pyrolysis and the operating temperature of the reactor, the comparisons have been conducted at three fixed temperature values of 753, 853 and 953 K. The results revealed that the conventional pyrolysis produce more syngas yield with the increases of temperature. In the case of fast pyrolysis, it was observed that losses and solid yield increase with temperature increase. Moreover, it was found that the highest losses in both cases are less than 15% and that it was higher in conventional pyrolysis. Gases released during the thermal decomposition of biomass were identified as H2, CO, CO2, CH4 and some light molecular weight of hydrocarbons, such as C2H4 and C2H6. The low temperature was favored for the production of methane other than hydrogen for both processes, while high temperature was favored for the production of hydrogen. The produced H2 can be used in typical fuel cells. Sugarcane bagasse and agricultural waste Elsevier Fast pyrolysis Elsevier Slow pyrolysis Elsevier Biomass pyrolysis Elsevier Enthalten in Elsevier Science HU, Yongle ELSEVIER Technologies and practice of CO 2019 an international journal : the official journal of WREN, The World Renewable Energy Network Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV002723662 volume:124 year:2018 pages:197-201 extent:5 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2017.04.060 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U AR 124 2018 197-201 5 045F 530 |
| spelling |
10.1016/j.renene.2017.04.060 doi GBV00000000000197A.pica (DE-627)ELV042656761 (ELSEVIER)S0960-1481(17)30376-2 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 530 620 530 DE-600 620 DE-600 Al Arni, Saleh verfasserin aut Comparison of slow and fast pyrolysis for converting biomass into fuel 2018transfer abstract 5 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier In this work, the conversion of sugarcane bagasse into fuel was studied as a low cost source material. The conversion was carried out experimentally in a batch pyrolysis reactor. Two pyrolysis methods were compared; namely, fast pyrolysis and slow or conventional pyrolysis. This comparison was based on the thermal decomposition of biomass into fuel and on the product yields. Since the yields are affected by the type of pyrolysis and the operating temperature of the reactor, the comparisons have been conducted at three fixed temperature values of 753, 853 and 953 K. The results revealed that the conventional pyrolysis produce more syngas yield with the increases of temperature. In the case of fast pyrolysis, it was observed that losses and solid yield increase with temperature increase. Moreover, it was found that the highest losses in both cases are less than 15% and that it was higher in conventional pyrolysis. Gases released during the thermal decomposition of biomass were identified as H2, CO, CO2, CH4 and some light molecular weight of hydrocarbons, such as C2H4 and C2H6. The low temperature was favored for the production of methane other than hydrogen for both processes, while high temperature was favored for the production of hydrogen. The produced H2 can be used in typical fuel cells. In this work, the conversion of sugarcane bagasse into fuel was studied as a low cost source material. The conversion was carried out experimentally in a batch pyrolysis reactor. Two pyrolysis methods were compared; namely, fast pyrolysis and slow or conventional pyrolysis. This comparison was based on the thermal decomposition of biomass into fuel and on the product yields. Since the yields are affected by the type of pyrolysis and the operating temperature of the reactor, the comparisons have been conducted at three fixed temperature values of 753, 853 and 953 K. The results revealed that the conventional pyrolysis produce more syngas yield with the increases of temperature. In the case of fast pyrolysis, it was observed that losses and solid yield increase with temperature increase. Moreover, it was found that the highest losses in both cases are less than 15% and that it was higher in conventional pyrolysis. Gases released during the thermal decomposition of biomass were identified as H2, CO, CO2, CH4 and some light molecular weight of hydrocarbons, such as C2H4 and C2H6. The low temperature was favored for the production of methane other than hydrogen for both processes, while high temperature was favored for the production of hydrogen. The produced H2 can be used in typical fuel cells. Sugarcane bagasse and agricultural waste Elsevier Fast pyrolysis Elsevier Slow pyrolysis Elsevier Biomass pyrolysis Elsevier Enthalten in Elsevier Science HU, Yongle ELSEVIER Technologies and practice of CO 2019 an international journal : the official journal of WREN, The World Renewable Energy Network Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV002723662 volume:124 year:2018 pages:197-201 extent:5 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2017.04.060 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U AR 124 2018 197-201 5 045F 530 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1016/j.renene.2017.04.060 doi GBV00000000000197A.pica (DE-627)ELV042656761 (ELSEVIER)S0960-1481(17)30376-2 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 530 620 530 DE-600 620 DE-600 Al Arni, Saleh verfasserin aut Comparison of slow and fast pyrolysis for converting biomass into fuel 2018transfer abstract 5 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier In this work, the conversion of sugarcane bagasse into fuel was studied as a low cost source material. The conversion was carried out experimentally in a batch pyrolysis reactor. Two pyrolysis methods were compared; namely, fast pyrolysis and slow or conventional pyrolysis. This comparison was based on the thermal decomposition of biomass into fuel and on the product yields. Since the yields are affected by the type of pyrolysis and the operating temperature of the reactor, the comparisons have been conducted at three fixed temperature values of 753, 853 and 953 K. The results revealed that the conventional pyrolysis produce more syngas yield with the increases of temperature. In the case of fast pyrolysis, it was observed that losses and solid yield increase with temperature increase. Moreover, it was found that the highest losses in both cases are less than 15% and that it was higher in conventional pyrolysis. Gases released during the thermal decomposition of biomass were identified as H2, CO, CO2, CH4 and some light molecular weight of hydrocarbons, such as C2H4 and C2H6. The low temperature was favored for the production of methane other than hydrogen for both processes, while high temperature was favored for the production of hydrogen. The produced H2 can be used in typical fuel cells. In this work, the conversion of sugarcane bagasse into fuel was studied as a low cost source material. The conversion was carried out experimentally in a batch pyrolysis reactor. Two pyrolysis methods were compared; namely, fast pyrolysis and slow or conventional pyrolysis. This comparison was based on the thermal decomposition of biomass into fuel and on the product yields. Since the yields are affected by the type of pyrolysis and the operating temperature of the reactor, the comparisons have been conducted at three fixed temperature values of 753, 853 and 953 K. The results revealed that the conventional pyrolysis produce more syngas yield with the increases of temperature. In the case of fast pyrolysis, it was observed that losses and solid yield increase with temperature increase. Moreover, it was found that the highest losses in both cases are less than 15% and that it was higher in conventional pyrolysis. Gases released during the thermal decomposition of biomass were identified as H2, CO, CO2, CH4 and some light molecular weight of hydrocarbons, such as C2H4 and C2H6. The low temperature was favored for the production of methane other than hydrogen for both processes, while high temperature was favored for the production of hydrogen. The produced H2 can be used in typical fuel cells. Sugarcane bagasse and agricultural waste Elsevier Fast pyrolysis Elsevier Slow pyrolysis Elsevier Biomass pyrolysis Elsevier Enthalten in Elsevier Science HU, Yongle ELSEVIER Technologies and practice of CO 2019 an international journal : the official journal of WREN, The World Renewable Energy Network Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV002723662 volume:124 year:2018 pages:197-201 extent:5 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2017.04.060 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U AR 124 2018 197-201 5 045F 530 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1016/j.renene.2017.04.060 doi GBV00000000000197A.pica (DE-627)ELV042656761 (ELSEVIER)S0960-1481(17)30376-2 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 530 620 530 DE-600 620 DE-600 Al Arni, Saleh verfasserin aut Comparison of slow and fast pyrolysis for converting biomass into fuel 2018transfer abstract 5 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier In this work, the conversion of sugarcane bagasse into fuel was studied as a low cost source material. The conversion was carried out experimentally in a batch pyrolysis reactor. Two pyrolysis methods were compared; namely, fast pyrolysis and slow or conventional pyrolysis. This comparison was based on the thermal decomposition of biomass into fuel and on the product yields. Since the yields are affected by the type of pyrolysis and the operating temperature of the reactor, the comparisons have been conducted at three fixed temperature values of 753, 853 and 953 K. The results revealed that the conventional pyrolysis produce more syngas yield with the increases of temperature. In the case of fast pyrolysis, it was observed that losses and solid yield increase with temperature increase. Moreover, it was found that the highest losses in both cases are less than 15% and that it was higher in conventional pyrolysis. Gases released during the thermal decomposition of biomass were identified as H2, CO, CO2, CH4 and some light molecular weight of hydrocarbons, such as C2H4 and C2H6. The low temperature was favored for the production of methane other than hydrogen for both processes, while high temperature was favored for the production of hydrogen. The produced H2 can be used in typical fuel cells. In this work, the conversion of sugarcane bagasse into fuel was studied as a low cost source material. The conversion was carried out experimentally in a batch pyrolysis reactor. Two pyrolysis methods were compared; namely, fast pyrolysis and slow or conventional pyrolysis. This comparison was based on the thermal decomposition of biomass into fuel and on the product yields. Since the yields are affected by the type of pyrolysis and the operating temperature of the reactor, the comparisons have been conducted at three fixed temperature values of 753, 853 and 953 K. The results revealed that the conventional pyrolysis produce more syngas yield with the increases of temperature. In the case of fast pyrolysis, it was observed that losses and solid yield increase with temperature increase. Moreover, it was found that the highest losses in both cases are less than 15% and that it was higher in conventional pyrolysis. Gases released during the thermal decomposition of biomass were identified as H2, CO, CO2, CH4 and some light molecular weight of hydrocarbons, such as C2H4 and C2H6. The low temperature was favored for the production of methane other than hydrogen for both processes, while high temperature was favored for the production of hydrogen. The produced H2 can be used in typical fuel cells. Sugarcane bagasse and agricultural waste Elsevier Fast pyrolysis Elsevier Slow pyrolysis Elsevier Biomass pyrolysis Elsevier Enthalten in Elsevier Science HU, Yongle ELSEVIER Technologies and practice of CO 2019 an international journal : the official journal of WREN, The World Renewable Energy Network Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV002723662 volume:124 year:2018 pages:197-201 extent:5 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2017.04.060 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U AR 124 2018 197-201 5 045F 530 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1016/j.renene.2017.04.060 doi GBV00000000000197A.pica (DE-627)ELV042656761 (ELSEVIER)S0960-1481(17)30376-2 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 530 620 530 DE-600 620 DE-600 Al Arni, Saleh verfasserin aut Comparison of slow and fast pyrolysis for converting biomass into fuel 2018transfer abstract 5 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier In this work, the conversion of sugarcane bagasse into fuel was studied as a low cost source material. The conversion was carried out experimentally in a batch pyrolysis reactor. Two pyrolysis methods were compared; namely, fast pyrolysis and slow or conventional pyrolysis. This comparison was based on the thermal decomposition of biomass into fuel and on the product yields. Since the yields are affected by the type of pyrolysis and the operating temperature of the reactor, the comparisons have been conducted at three fixed temperature values of 753, 853 and 953 K. The results revealed that the conventional pyrolysis produce more syngas yield with the increases of temperature. In the case of fast pyrolysis, it was observed that losses and solid yield increase with temperature increase. Moreover, it was found that the highest losses in both cases are less than 15% and that it was higher in conventional pyrolysis. Gases released during the thermal decomposition of biomass were identified as H2, CO, CO2, CH4 and some light molecular weight of hydrocarbons, such as C2H4 and C2H6. The low temperature was favored for the production of methane other than hydrogen for both processes, while high temperature was favored for the production of hydrogen. The produced H2 can be used in typical fuel cells. In this work, the conversion of sugarcane bagasse into fuel was studied as a low cost source material. The conversion was carried out experimentally in a batch pyrolysis reactor. Two pyrolysis methods were compared; namely, fast pyrolysis and slow or conventional pyrolysis. This comparison was based on the thermal decomposition of biomass into fuel and on the product yields. Since the yields are affected by the type of pyrolysis and the operating temperature of the reactor, the comparisons have been conducted at three fixed temperature values of 753, 853 and 953 K. The results revealed that the conventional pyrolysis produce more syngas yield with the increases of temperature. In the case of fast pyrolysis, it was observed that losses and solid yield increase with temperature increase. Moreover, it was found that the highest losses in both cases are less than 15% and that it was higher in conventional pyrolysis. Gases released during the thermal decomposition of biomass were identified as H2, CO, CO2, CH4 and some light molecular weight of hydrocarbons, such as C2H4 and C2H6. The low temperature was favored for the production of methane other than hydrogen for both processes, while high temperature was favored for the production of hydrogen. The produced H2 can be used in typical fuel cells. Sugarcane bagasse and agricultural waste Elsevier Fast pyrolysis Elsevier Slow pyrolysis Elsevier Biomass pyrolysis Elsevier Enthalten in Elsevier Science HU, Yongle ELSEVIER Technologies and practice of CO 2019 an international journal : the official journal of WREN, The World Renewable Energy Network Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV002723662 volume:124 year:2018 pages:197-201 extent:5 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2017.04.060 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U AR 124 2018 197-201 5 045F 530 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in Technologies and practice of CO Amsterdam [u.a.] volume:124 year:2018 pages:197-201 extent:5 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in Technologies and practice of CO Amsterdam [u.a.] volume:124 year:2018 pages:197-201 extent:5 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
Sugarcane bagasse and agricultural waste Fast pyrolysis Slow pyrolysis Biomass pyrolysis |
| dewey-raw |
530 |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
Technologies and practice of CO |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Al Arni, Saleh @@aut@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2018-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
ELV002723662 |
| dewey-sort |
3530 |
| id |
ELV042656761 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV042656761</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230626001957.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">180726s2018 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.renene.2017.04.060</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">GBV00000000000197A.pica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV042656761</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0960-1481(17)30376-2</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">530</subfield><subfield code="a">620</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">530</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">620</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Al Arni, Saleh</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Comparison of slow and fast pyrolysis for converting biomass into fuel</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2018transfer abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">5</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">In this work, the conversion of sugarcane bagasse into fuel was studied as a low cost source material. The conversion was carried out experimentally in a batch pyrolysis reactor. Two pyrolysis methods were compared; namely, fast pyrolysis and slow or conventional pyrolysis. This comparison was based on the thermal decomposition of biomass into fuel and on the product yields. Since the yields are affected by the type of pyrolysis and the operating temperature of the reactor, the comparisons have been conducted at three fixed temperature values of 753, 853 and 953 K. The results revealed that the conventional pyrolysis produce more syngas yield with the increases of temperature. In the case of fast pyrolysis, it was observed that losses and solid yield increase with temperature increase. Moreover, it was found that the highest losses in both cases are less than 15% and that it was higher in conventional pyrolysis. Gases released during the thermal decomposition of biomass were identified as H2, CO, CO2, CH4 and some light molecular weight of hydrocarbons, such as C2H4 and C2H6. The low temperature was favored for the production of methane other than hydrogen for both processes, while high temperature was favored for the production of hydrogen. The produced H2 can be used in typical fuel cells.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">In this work, the conversion of sugarcane bagasse into fuel was studied as a low cost source material. The conversion was carried out experimentally in a batch pyrolysis reactor. Two pyrolysis methods were compared; namely, fast pyrolysis and slow or conventional pyrolysis. This comparison was based on the thermal decomposition of biomass into fuel and on the product yields. Since the yields are affected by the type of pyrolysis and the operating temperature of the reactor, the comparisons have been conducted at three fixed temperature values of 753, 853 and 953 K. The results revealed that the conventional pyrolysis produce more syngas yield with the increases of temperature. In the case of fast pyrolysis, it was observed that losses and solid yield increase with temperature increase. Moreover, it was found that the highest losses in both cases are less than 15% and that it was higher in conventional pyrolysis. Gases released during the thermal decomposition of biomass were identified as H2, CO, CO2, CH4 and some light molecular weight of hydrocarbons, such as C2H4 and C2H6. The low temperature was favored for the production of methane other than hydrogen for both processes, while high temperature was favored for the production of hydrogen. The produced H2 can be used in typical fuel cells.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Sugarcane bagasse and agricultural waste</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Fast pyrolysis</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Slow pyrolysis</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Biomass pyrolysis</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="n">Elsevier Science</subfield><subfield code="a">HU, Yongle ELSEVIER</subfield><subfield code="t">Technologies and practice of CO</subfield><subfield code="d">2019</subfield><subfield code="d">an international journal : the official journal of WREN, The World Renewable Energy Network</subfield><subfield code="g">Amsterdam [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)ELV002723662</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:124</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2018</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:197-201</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:5</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2017.04.060</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">124</subfield><subfield code="j">2018</subfield><subfield code="h">197-201</subfield><subfield code="g">5</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="953" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="2">045F</subfield><subfield code="a">530</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Al Arni, Saleh |
| spellingShingle |
Al Arni, Saleh ddc 530 ddc 620 Elsevier Sugarcane bagasse and agricultural waste Elsevier Fast pyrolysis Elsevier Slow pyrolysis Elsevier Biomass pyrolysis Comparison of slow and fast pyrolysis for converting biomass into fuel |
| authorStr |
Al Arni, Saleh |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)ELV002723662 |
| format |
electronic Article |
| dewey-ones |
530 - Physics 620 - Engineering & allied operations |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut |
| collection |
elsevier |
| remote_str |
true |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| topic_title |
530 620 530 DE-600 620 DE-600 Comparison of slow and fast pyrolysis for converting biomass into fuel Sugarcane bagasse and agricultural waste Elsevier Fast pyrolysis Elsevier Slow pyrolysis Elsevier Biomass pyrolysis Elsevier |
| topic |
ddc 530 ddc 620 Elsevier Sugarcane bagasse and agricultural waste Elsevier Fast pyrolysis Elsevier Slow pyrolysis Elsevier Biomass pyrolysis |
| topic_unstemmed |
ddc 530 ddc 620 Elsevier Sugarcane bagasse and agricultural waste Elsevier Fast pyrolysis Elsevier Slow pyrolysis Elsevier Biomass pyrolysis |
| topic_browse |
ddc 530 ddc 620 Elsevier Sugarcane bagasse and agricultural waste Elsevier Fast pyrolysis Elsevier Slow pyrolysis Elsevier Biomass pyrolysis |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
zu |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Technologies and practice of CO |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
ELV002723662 |
| dewey-tens |
530 - Physics 620 - Engineering |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Technologies and practice of CO |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)ELV002723662 |
| title |
Comparison of slow and fast pyrolysis for converting biomass into fuel |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)ELV042656761 (ELSEVIER)S0960-1481(17)30376-2 |
| title_full |
Comparison of slow and fast pyrolysis for converting biomass into fuel |
| author_sort |
Al Arni, Saleh |
| journal |
Technologies and practice of CO |
| journalStr |
Technologies and practice of CO |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| dewey-hundreds |
500 - Science 600 - Technology |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2018 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
zzz |
| container_start_page |
197 |
| author_browse |
Al Arni, Saleh |
| container_volume |
124 |
| physical |
5 |
| class |
530 620 530 DE-600 620 DE-600 |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Al Arni, Saleh |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1016/j.renene.2017.04.060 |
| dewey-full |
530 620 |
| title_sort |
comparison of slow and fast pyrolysis for converting biomass into fuel |
| title_auth |
Comparison of slow and fast pyrolysis for converting biomass into fuel |
| abstract |
In this work, the conversion of sugarcane bagasse into fuel was studied as a low cost source material. The conversion was carried out experimentally in a batch pyrolysis reactor. Two pyrolysis methods were compared; namely, fast pyrolysis and slow or conventional pyrolysis. This comparison was based on the thermal decomposition of biomass into fuel and on the product yields. Since the yields are affected by the type of pyrolysis and the operating temperature of the reactor, the comparisons have been conducted at three fixed temperature values of 753, 853 and 953 K. The results revealed that the conventional pyrolysis produce more syngas yield with the increases of temperature. In the case of fast pyrolysis, it was observed that losses and solid yield increase with temperature increase. Moreover, it was found that the highest losses in both cases are less than 15% and that it was higher in conventional pyrolysis. Gases released during the thermal decomposition of biomass were identified as H2, CO, CO2, CH4 and some light molecular weight of hydrocarbons, such as C2H4 and C2H6. The low temperature was favored for the production of methane other than hydrogen for both processes, while high temperature was favored for the production of hydrogen. The produced H2 can be used in typical fuel cells. |
| abstractGer |
In this work, the conversion of sugarcane bagasse into fuel was studied as a low cost source material. The conversion was carried out experimentally in a batch pyrolysis reactor. Two pyrolysis methods were compared; namely, fast pyrolysis and slow or conventional pyrolysis. This comparison was based on the thermal decomposition of biomass into fuel and on the product yields. Since the yields are affected by the type of pyrolysis and the operating temperature of the reactor, the comparisons have been conducted at three fixed temperature values of 753, 853 and 953 K. The results revealed that the conventional pyrolysis produce more syngas yield with the increases of temperature. In the case of fast pyrolysis, it was observed that losses and solid yield increase with temperature increase. Moreover, it was found that the highest losses in both cases are less than 15% and that it was higher in conventional pyrolysis. Gases released during the thermal decomposition of biomass were identified as H2, CO, CO2, CH4 and some light molecular weight of hydrocarbons, such as C2H4 and C2H6. The low temperature was favored for the production of methane other than hydrogen for both processes, while high temperature was favored for the production of hydrogen. The produced H2 can be used in typical fuel cells. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
In this work, the conversion of sugarcane bagasse into fuel was studied as a low cost source material. The conversion was carried out experimentally in a batch pyrolysis reactor. Two pyrolysis methods were compared; namely, fast pyrolysis and slow or conventional pyrolysis. This comparison was based on the thermal decomposition of biomass into fuel and on the product yields. Since the yields are affected by the type of pyrolysis and the operating temperature of the reactor, the comparisons have been conducted at three fixed temperature values of 753, 853 and 953 K. The results revealed that the conventional pyrolysis produce more syngas yield with the increases of temperature. In the case of fast pyrolysis, it was observed that losses and solid yield increase with temperature increase. Moreover, it was found that the highest losses in both cases are less than 15% and that it was higher in conventional pyrolysis. Gases released during the thermal decomposition of biomass were identified as H2, CO, CO2, CH4 and some light molecular weight of hydrocarbons, such as C2H4 and C2H6. The low temperature was favored for the production of methane other than hydrogen for both processes, while high temperature was favored for the production of hydrogen. The produced H2 can be used in typical fuel cells. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U |
| title_short |
Comparison of slow and fast pyrolysis for converting biomass into fuel |
| url |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2017.04.060 |
| remote_bool |
true |
| ppnlink |
ELV002723662 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
z |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| doi_str |
10.1016/j.renene.2017.04.060 |
| up_date |
2024-07-06T16:45:32.093Z |
| _version_ |
1803848863811895296 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV042656761</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230626001957.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">180726s2018 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.renene.2017.04.060</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">GBV00000000000197A.pica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV042656761</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0960-1481(17)30376-2</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">530</subfield><subfield code="a">620</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">530</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">620</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Al Arni, Saleh</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Comparison of slow and fast pyrolysis for converting biomass into fuel</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2018transfer abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">5</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">In this work, the conversion of sugarcane bagasse into fuel was studied as a low cost source material. The conversion was carried out experimentally in a batch pyrolysis reactor. Two pyrolysis methods were compared; namely, fast pyrolysis and slow or conventional pyrolysis. This comparison was based on the thermal decomposition of biomass into fuel and on the product yields. Since the yields are affected by the type of pyrolysis and the operating temperature of the reactor, the comparisons have been conducted at three fixed temperature values of 753, 853 and 953 K. The results revealed that the conventional pyrolysis produce more syngas yield with the increases of temperature. In the case of fast pyrolysis, it was observed that losses and solid yield increase with temperature increase. Moreover, it was found that the highest losses in both cases are less than 15% and that it was higher in conventional pyrolysis. Gases released during the thermal decomposition of biomass were identified as H2, CO, CO2, CH4 and some light molecular weight of hydrocarbons, such as C2H4 and C2H6. The low temperature was favored for the production of methane other than hydrogen for both processes, while high temperature was favored for the production of hydrogen. The produced H2 can be used in typical fuel cells.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">In this work, the conversion of sugarcane bagasse into fuel was studied as a low cost source material. The conversion was carried out experimentally in a batch pyrolysis reactor. Two pyrolysis methods were compared; namely, fast pyrolysis and slow or conventional pyrolysis. This comparison was based on the thermal decomposition of biomass into fuel and on the product yields. Since the yields are affected by the type of pyrolysis and the operating temperature of the reactor, the comparisons have been conducted at three fixed temperature values of 753, 853 and 953 K. The results revealed that the conventional pyrolysis produce more syngas yield with the increases of temperature. In the case of fast pyrolysis, it was observed that losses and solid yield increase with temperature increase. Moreover, it was found that the highest losses in both cases are less than 15% and that it was higher in conventional pyrolysis. Gases released during the thermal decomposition of biomass were identified as H2, CO, CO2, CH4 and some light molecular weight of hydrocarbons, such as C2H4 and C2H6. The low temperature was favored for the production of methane other than hydrogen for both processes, while high temperature was favored for the production of hydrogen. The produced H2 can be used in typical fuel cells.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Sugarcane bagasse and agricultural waste</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Fast pyrolysis</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Slow pyrolysis</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Biomass pyrolysis</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="n">Elsevier Science</subfield><subfield code="a">HU, Yongle ELSEVIER</subfield><subfield code="t">Technologies and practice of CO</subfield><subfield code="d">2019</subfield><subfield code="d">an international journal : the official journal of WREN, The World Renewable Energy Network</subfield><subfield code="g">Amsterdam [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)ELV002723662</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:124</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2018</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:197-201</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:5</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2017.04.060</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">124</subfield><subfield code="j">2018</subfield><subfield code="h">197-201</subfield><subfield code="g">5</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="953" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="2">045F</subfield><subfield code="a">530</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.399666 |