The comparison of environmental flow assessment - The barrier for investment in Poland or river protection?
Investments that make use of renewable resources of flowing waters must be based on the absolute necessity of protection of the water environment and that dependent on water. In practice, it means the obligation of leaving environmental flow in the river bed in the cross section below the place of w...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Operacz, Agnieszka [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2018transfer abstract |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Umfang: |
18 |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Self-assembled 3D hierarchical MnCO - Rajendiran, Rajmohan ELSEVIER, 2020, Amsterdam [u.a.] |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:193 ; year:2018 ; day:20 ; month:08 ; pages:575-592 ; extent:18 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.098 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
ELV043375146 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ELV043375146 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230626003554.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 180726s2018 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.098 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000000869.pica |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)ELV043375146 | ||
| 035 | |a (ELSEVIER)S0959-6526(18)31434-3 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 540 |q VZ |
| 084 | |a 35.18 |2 bkl | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Operacz, Agnieszka |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 4 | |a The comparison of environmental flow assessment - The barrier for investment in Poland or river protection? |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2018transfer abstract | |
| 300 | |a 18 | ||
| 336 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zzz |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b z |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zu |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Investments that make use of renewable resources of flowing waters must be based on the absolute necessity of protection of the water environment and that dependent on water. In practice, it means the obligation of leaving environmental flow in the river bed in the cross section below the place of water abstraction. The places of surface water abstraction for drinking and industrial purposes are thus limited with the volume of water obligatorily left in the flow for water organisms. In case of hydropower plants located directly in the watercourse, the environmental flow value corresponds approximately with the volume of water run in the fish pass obligatorily provided to maintain patency of the watercourse, in particular in the aspect of migration of diadromous fishes. Environmental flow is ineffective in investment terms, but highly important from the point of view of environmental protection. Thus, the proper calculation of the environmental flow value should be the compromise between the protection of the environment and the economics of the investment. No unanimous methodology in this respect has been applied in Poland for many years, and calculations were done with one of subjectively selected methods functioning in the literature. This work presents the methodology of environmental flow calculations broken down into water regions. Calculation path has been presented along with the possible inconveniences resulting from the effective legal regulations in Poland as regards the possibilities of carrying out projects that take advantage of flowing surface waters. | ||
| 520 | |a Investments that make use of renewable resources of flowing waters must be based on the absolute necessity of protection of the water environment and that dependent on water. In practice, it means the obligation of leaving environmental flow in the river bed in the cross section below the place of water abstraction. The places of surface water abstraction for drinking and industrial purposes are thus limited with the volume of water obligatorily left in the flow for water organisms. In case of hydropower plants located directly in the watercourse, the environmental flow value corresponds approximately with the volume of water run in the fish pass obligatorily provided to maintain patency of the watercourse, in particular in the aspect of migration of diadromous fishes. Environmental flow is ineffective in investment terms, but highly important from the point of view of environmental protection. Thus, the proper calculation of the environmental flow value should be the compromise between the protection of the environment and the economics of the investment. No unanimous methodology in this respect has been applied in Poland for many years, and calculations were done with one of subjectively selected methods functioning in the literature. This work presents the methodology of environmental flow calculations broken down into water regions. Calculation path has been presented along with the possible inconveniences resulting from the effective legal regulations in Poland as regards the possibilities of carrying out projects that take advantage of flowing surface waters. | ||
| 650 | 7 | |a Water ecosystems |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Water management |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Environmental flow |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Minimum acceptable flow |2 Elsevier | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Wałęga, Andrzej |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Cupak, Agnieszka |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Tomaszewska, Barbara |4 oth | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |n Elsevier Science |a Rajendiran, Rajmohan ELSEVIER |t Self-assembled 3D hierarchical MnCO |d 2020 |g Amsterdam [u.a.] |w (DE-627)ELV003750353 |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:193 |g year:2018 |g day:20 |g month:08 |g pages:575-592 |g extent:18 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.098 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_U | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ELV | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_U | ||
| 936 | b | k | |a 35.18 |j Kolloidchemie |j Grenzflächenchemie |q VZ |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 193 |j 2018 |b 20 |c 0820 |h 575-592 |g 18 | ||
| author_variant |
a o ao |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
operaczagnieszkawagaandrzejcupakagnieszk:2018----:hcmaiooevrnetllwsesethbriroivsmni |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2018transfer abstract |
| bklnumber |
35.18 |
| publishDate |
2018 |
| allfields |
10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.098 doi /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000000869.pica (DE-627)ELV043375146 (ELSEVIER)S0959-6526(18)31434-3 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 540 VZ 35.18 bkl Operacz, Agnieszka verfasserin aut The comparison of environmental flow assessment - The barrier for investment in Poland or river protection? 2018transfer abstract 18 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Investments that make use of renewable resources of flowing waters must be based on the absolute necessity of protection of the water environment and that dependent on water. In practice, it means the obligation of leaving environmental flow in the river bed in the cross section below the place of water abstraction. The places of surface water abstraction for drinking and industrial purposes are thus limited with the volume of water obligatorily left in the flow for water organisms. In case of hydropower plants located directly in the watercourse, the environmental flow value corresponds approximately with the volume of water run in the fish pass obligatorily provided to maintain patency of the watercourse, in particular in the aspect of migration of diadromous fishes. Environmental flow is ineffective in investment terms, but highly important from the point of view of environmental protection. Thus, the proper calculation of the environmental flow value should be the compromise between the protection of the environment and the economics of the investment. No unanimous methodology in this respect has been applied in Poland for many years, and calculations were done with one of subjectively selected methods functioning in the literature. This work presents the methodology of environmental flow calculations broken down into water regions. Calculation path has been presented along with the possible inconveniences resulting from the effective legal regulations in Poland as regards the possibilities of carrying out projects that take advantage of flowing surface waters. Investments that make use of renewable resources of flowing waters must be based on the absolute necessity of protection of the water environment and that dependent on water. In practice, it means the obligation of leaving environmental flow in the river bed in the cross section below the place of water abstraction. The places of surface water abstraction for drinking and industrial purposes are thus limited with the volume of water obligatorily left in the flow for water organisms. In case of hydropower plants located directly in the watercourse, the environmental flow value corresponds approximately with the volume of water run in the fish pass obligatorily provided to maintain patency of the watercourse, in particular in the aspect of migration of diadromous fishes. Environmental flow is ineffective in investment terms, but highly important from the point of view of environmental protection. Thus, the proper calculation of the environmental flow value should be the compromise between the protection of the environment and the economics of the investment. No unanimous methodology in this respect has been applied in Poland for many years, and calculations were done with one of subjectively selected methods functioning in the literature. This work presents the methodology of environmental flow calculations broken down into water regions. Calculation path has been presented along with the possible inconveniences resulting from the effective legal regulations in Poland as regards the possibilities of carrying out projects that take advantage of flowing surface waters. Water ecosystems Elsevier Water management Elsevier Environmental flow Elsevier Minimum acceptable flow Elsevier Wałęga, Andrzej oth Cupak, Agnieszka oth Tomaszewska, Barbara oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Rajendiran, Rajmohan ELSEVIER Self-assembled 3D hierarchical MnCO 2020 Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV003750353 volume:193 year:2018 day:20 month:08 pages:575-592 extent:18 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.098 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U 35.18 Kolloidchemie Grenzflächenchemie VZ AR 193 2018 20 0820 575-592 18 |
| spelling |
10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.098 doi /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000000869.pica (DE-627)ELV043375146 (ELSEVIER)S0959-6526(18)31434-3 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 540 VZ 35.18 bkl Operacz, Agnieszka verfasserin aut The comparison of environmental flow assessment - The barrier for investment in Poland or river protection? 2018transfer abstract 18 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Investments that make use of renewable resources of flowing waters must be based on the absolute necessity of protection of the water environment and that dependent on water. In practice, it means the obligation of leaving environmental flow in the river bed in the cross section below the place of water abstraction. The places of surface water abstraction for drinking and industrial purposes are thus limited with the volume of water obligatorily left in the flow for water organisms. In case of hydropower plants located directly in the watercourse, the environmental flow value corresponds approximately with the volume of water run in the fish pass obligatorily provided to maintain patency of the watercourse, in particular in the aspect of migration of diadromous fishes. Environmental flow is ineffective in investment terms, but highly important from the point of view of environmental protection. Thus, the proper calculation of the environmental flow value should be the compromise between the protection of the environment and the economics of the investment. No unanimous methodology in this respect has been applied in Poland for many years, and calculations were done with one of subjectively selected methods functioning in the literature. This work presents the methodology of environmental flow calculations broken down into water regions. Calculation path has been presented along with the possible inconveniences resulting from the effective legal regulations in Poland as regards the possibilities of carrying out projects that take advantage of flowing surface waters. Investments that make use of renewable resources of flowing waters must be based on the absolute necessity of protection of the water environment and that dependent on water. In practice, it means the obligation of leaving environmental flow in the river bed in the cross section below the place of water abstraction. The places of surface water abstraction for drinking and industrial purposes are thus limited with the volume of water obligatorily left in the flow for water organisms. In case of hydropower plants located directly in the watercourse, the environmental flow value corresponds approximately with the volume of water run in the fish pass obligatorily provided to maintain patency of the watercourse, in particular in the aspect of migration of diadromous fishes. Environmental flow is ineffective in investment terms, but highly important from the point of view of environmental protection. Thus, the proper calculation of the environmental flow value should be the compromise between the protection of the environment and the economics of the investment. No unanimous methodology in this respect has been applied in Poland for many years, and calculations were done with one of subjectively selected methods functioning in the literature. This work presents the methodology of environmental flow calculations broken down into water regions. Calculation path has been presented along with the possible inconveniences resulting from the effective legal regulations in Poland as regards the possibilities of carrying out projects that take advantage of flowing surface waters. Water ecosystems Elsevier Water management Elsevier Environmental flow Elsevier Minimum acceptable flow Elsevier Wałęga, Andrzej oth Cupak, Agnieszka oth Tomaszewska, Barbara oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Rajendiran, Rajmohan ELSEVIER Self-assembled 3D hierarchical MnCO 2020 Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV003750353 volume:193 year:2018 day:20 month:08 pages:575-592 extent:18 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.098 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U 35.18 Kolloidchemie Grenzflächenchemie VZ AR 193 2018 20 0820 575-592 18 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.098 doi /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000000869.pica (DE-627)ELV043375146 (ELSEVIER)S0959-6526(18)31434-3 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 540 VZ 35.18 bkl Operacz, Agnieszka verfasserin aut The comparison of environmental flow assessment - The barrier for investment in Poland or river protection? 2018transfer abstract 18 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Investments that make use of renewable resources of flowing waters must be based on the absolute necessity of protection of the water environment and that dependent on water. In practice, it means the obligation of leaving environmental flow in the river bed in the cross section below the place of water abstraction. The places of surface water abstraction for drinking and industrial purposes are thus limited with the volume of water obligatorily left in the flow for water organisms. In case of hydropower plants located directly in the watercourse, the environmental flow value corresponds approximately with the volume of water run in the fish pass obligatorily provided to maintain patency of the watercourse, in particular in the aspect of migration of diadromous fishes. Environmental flow is ineffective in investment terms, but highly important from the point of view of environmental protection. Thus, the proper calculation of the environmental flow value should be the compromise between the protection of the environment and the economics of the investment. No unanimous methodology in this respect has been applied in Poland for many years, and calculations were done with one of subjectively selected methods functioning in the literature. This work presents the methodology of environmental flow calculations broken down into water regions. Calculation path has been presented along with the possible inconveniences resulting from the effective legal regulations in Poland as regards the possibilities of carrying out projects that take advantage of flowing surface waters. Investments that make use of renewable resources of flowing waters must be based on the absolute necessity of protection of the water environment and that dependent on water. In practice, it means the obligation of leaving environmental flow in the river bed in the cross section below the place of water abstraction. The places of surface water abstraction for drinking and industrial purposes are thus limited with the volume of water obligatorily left in the flow for water organisms. In case of hydropower plants located directly in the watercourse, the environmental flow value corresponds approximately with the volume of water run in the fish pass obligatorily provided to maintain patency of the watercourse, in particular in the aspect of migration of diadromous fishes. Environmental flow is ineffective in investment terms, but highly important from the point of view of environmental protection. Thus, the proper calculation of the environmental flow value should be the compromise between the protection of the environment and the economics of the investment. No unanimous methodology in this respect has been applied in Poland for many years, and calculations were done with one of subjectively selected methods functioning in the literature. This work presents the methodology of environmental flow calculations broken down into water regions. Calculation path has been presented along with the possible inconveniences resulting from the effective legal regulations in Poland as regards the possibilities of carrying out projects that take advantage of flowing surface waters. Water ecosystems Elsevier Water management Elsevier Environmental flow Elsevier Minimum acceptable flow Elsevier Wałęga, Andrzej oth Cupak, Agnieszka oth Tomaszewska, Barbara oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Rajendiran, Rajmohan ELSEVIER Self-assembled 3D hierarchical MnCO 2020 Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV003750353 volume:193 year:2018 day:20 month:08 pages:575-592 extent:18 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.098 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U 35.18 Kolloidchemie Grenzflächenchemie VZ AR 193 2018 20 0820 575-592 18 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.098 doi /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000000869.pica (DE-627)ELV043375146 (ELSEVIER)S0959-6526(18)31434-3 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 540 VZ 35.18 bkl Operacz, Agnieszka verfasserin aut The comparison of environmental flow assessment - The barrier for investment in Poland or river protection? 2018transfer abstract 18 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Investments that make use of renewable resources of flowing waters must be based on the absolute necessity of protection of the water environment and that dependent on water. In practice, it means the obligation of leaving environmental flow in the river bed in the cross section below the place of water abstraction. The places of surface water abstraction for drinking and industrial purposes are thus limited with the volume of water obligatorily left in the flow for water organisms. In case of hydropower plants located directly in the watercourse, the environmental flow value corresponds approximately with the volume of water run in the fish pass obligatorily provided to maintain patency of the watercourse, in particular in the aspect of migration of diadromous fishes. Environmental flow is ineffective in investment terms, but highly important from the point of view of environmental protection. Thus, the proper calculation of the environmental flow value should be the compromise between the protection of the environment and the economics of the investment. No unanimous methodology in this respect has been applied in Poland for many years, and calculations were done with one of subjectively selected methods functioning in the literature. This work presents the methodology of environmental flow calculations broken down into water regions. Calculation path has been presented along with the possible inconveniences resulting from the effective legal regulations in Poland as regards the possibilities of carrying out projects that take advantage of flowing surface waters. Investments that make use of renewable resources of flowing waters must be based on the absolute necessity of protection of the water environment and that dependent on water. In practice, it means the obligation of leaving environmental flow in the river bed in the cross section below the place of water abstraction. The places of surface water abstraction for drinking and industrial purposes are thus limited with the volume of water obligatorily left in the flow for water organisms. In case of hydropower plants located directly in the watercourse, the environmental flow value corresponds approximately with the volume of water run in the fish pass obligatorily provided to maintain patency of the watercourse, in particular in the aspect of migration of diadromous fishes. Environmental flow is ineffective in investment terms, but highly important from the point of view of environmental protection. Thus, the proper calculation of the environmental flow value should be the compromise between the protection of the environment and the economics of the investment. No unanimous methodology in this respect has been applied in Poland for many years, and calculations were done with one of subjectively selected methods functioning in the literature. This work presents the methodology of environmental flow calculations broken down into water regions. Calculation path has been presented along with the possible inconveniences resulting from the effective legal regulations in Poland as regards the possibilities of carrying out projects that take advantage of flowing surface waters. Water ecosystems Elsevier Water management Elsevier Environmental flow Elsevier Minimum acceptable flow Elsevier Wałęga, Andrzej oth Cupak, Agnieszka oth Tomaszewska, Barbara oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Rajendiran, Rajmohan ELSEVIER Self-assembled 3D hierarchical MnCO 2020 Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV003750353 volume:193 year:2018 day:20 month:08 pages:575-592 extent:18 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.098 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U 35.18 Kolloidchemie Grenzflächenchemie VZ AR 193 2018 20 0820 575-592 18 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.098 doi /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000000869.pica (DE-627)ELV043375146 (ELSEVIER)S0959-6526(18)31434-3 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 540 VZ 35.18 bkl Operacz, Agnieszka verfasserin aut The comparison of environmental flow assessment - The barrier for investment in Poland or river protection? 2018transfer abstract 18 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Investments that make use of renewable resources of flowing waters must be based on the absolute necessity of protection of the water environment and that dependent on water. In practice, it means the obligation of leaving environmental flow in the river bed in the cross section below the place of water abstraction. The places of surface water abstraction for drinking and industrial purposes are thus limited with the volume of water obligatorily left in the flow for water organisms. In case of hydropower plants located directly in the watercourse, the environmental flow value corresponds approximately with the volume of water run in the fish pass obligatorily provided to maintain patency of the watercourse, in particular in the aspect of migration of diadromous fishes. Environmental flow is ineffective in investment terms, but highly important from the point of view of environmental protection. Thus, the proper calculation of the environmental flow value should be the compromise between the protection of the environment and the economics of the investment. No unanimous methodology in this respect has been applied in Poland for many years, and calculations were done with one of subjectively selected methods functioning in the literature. This work presents the methodology of environmental flow calculations broken down into water regions. Calculation path has been presented along with the possible inconveniences resulting from the effective legal regulations in Poland as regards the possibilities of carrying out projects that take advantage of flowing surface waters. Investments that make use of renewable resources of flowing waters must be based on the absolute necessity of protection of the water environment and that dependent on water. In practice, it means the obligation of leaving environmental flow in the river bed in the cross section below the place of water abstraction. The places of surface water abstraction for drinking and industrial purposes are thus limited with the volume of water obligatorily left in the flow for water organisms. In case of hydropower plants located directly in the watercourse, the environmental flow value corresponds approximately with the volume of water run in the fish pass obligatorily provided to maintain patency of the watercourse, in particular in the aspect of migration of diadromous fishes. Environmental flow is ineffective in investment terms, but highly important from the point of view of environmental protection. Thus, the proper calculation of the environmental flow value should be the compromise between the protection of the environment and the economics of the investment. No unanimous methodology in this respect has been applied in Poland for many years, and calculations were done with one of subjectively selected methods functioning in the literature. This work presents the methodology of environmental flow calculations broken down into water regions. Calculation path has been presented along with the possible inconveniences resulting from the effective legal regulations in Poland as regards the possibilities of carrying out projects that take advantage of flowing surface waters. Water ecosystems Elsevier Water management Elsevier Environmental flow Elsevier Minimum acceptable flow Elsevier Wałęga, Andrzej oth Cupak, Agnieszka oth Tomaszewska, Barbara oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Rajendiran, Rajmohan ELSEVIER Self-assembled 3D hierarchical MnCO 2020 Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV003750353 volume:193 year:2018 day:20 month:08 pages:575-592 extent:18 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.098 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U 35.18 Kolloidchemie Grenzflächenchemie VZ AR 193 2018 20 0820 575-592 18 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in Self-assembled 3D hierarchical MnCO Amsterdam [u.a.] volume:193 year:2018 day:20 month:08 pages:575-592 extent:18 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in Self-assembled 3D hierarchical MnCO Amsterdam [u.a.] volume:193 year:2018 day:20 month:08 pages:575-592 extent:18 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| bklname |
Kolloidchemie Grenzflächenchemie |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
Water ecosystems Water management Environmental flow Minimum acceptable flow |
| dewey-raw |
540 |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
Self-assembled 3D hierarchical MnCO |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Operacz, Agnieszka @@aut@@ Wałęga, Andrzej @@oth@@ Cupak, Agnieszka @@oth@@ Tomaszewska, Barbara @@oth@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2018-01-20T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
ELV003750353 |
| dewey-sort |
3540 |
| id |
ELV043375146 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV043375146</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230626003554.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">180726s2018 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.098</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">/cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000000869.pica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV043375146</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0959-6526(18)31434-3</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">540</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">35.18</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Operacz, Agnieszka</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">The comparison of environmental flow assessment - The barrier for investment in Poland or river protection?</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2018transfer abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">18</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Investments that make use of renewable resources of flowing waters must be based on the absolute necessity of protection of the water environment and that dependent on water. In practice, it means the obligation of leaving environmental flow in the river bed in the cross section below the place of water abstraction. The places of surface water abstraction for drinking and industrial purposes are thus limited with the volume of water obligatorily left in the flow for water organisms. In case of hydropower plants located directly in the watercourse, the environmental flow value corresponds approximately with the volume of water run in the fish pass obligatorily provided to maintain patency of the watercourse, in particular in the aspect of migration of diadromous fishes. Environmental flow is ineffective in investment terms, but highly important from the point of view of environmental protection. Thus, the proper calculation of the environmental flow value should be the compromise between the protection of the environment and the economics of the investment. No unanimous methodology in this respect has been applied in Poland for many years, and calculations were done with one of subjectively selected methods functioning in the literature. This work presents the methodology of environmental flow calculations broken down into water regions. Calculation path has been presented along with the possible inconveniences resulting from the effective legal regulations in Poland as regards the possibilities of carrying out projects that take advantage of flowing surface waters.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Investments that make use of renewable resources of flowing waters must be based on the absolute necessity of protection of the water environment and that dependent on water. In practice, it means the obligation of leaving environmental flow in the river bed in the cross section below the place of water abstraction. The places of surface water abstraction for drinking and industrial purposes are thus limited with the volume of water obligatorily left in the flow for water organisms. In case of hydropower plants located directly in the watercourse, the environmental flow value corresponds approximately with the volume of water run in the fish pass obligatorily provided to maintain patency of the watercourse, in particular in the aspect of migration of diadromous fishes. Environmental flow is ineffective in investment terms, but highly important from the point of view of environmental protection. Thus, the proper calculation of the environmental flow value should be the compromise between the protection of the environment and the economics of the investment. No unanimous methodology in this respect has been applied in Poland for many years, and calculations were done with one of subjectively selected methods functioning in the literature. This work presents the methodology of environmental flow calculations broken down into water regions. Calculation path has been presented along with the possible inconveniences resulting from the effective legal regulations in Poland as regards the possibilities of carrying out projects that take advantage of flowing surface waters.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Water ecosystems</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Water management</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Environmental flow</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Minimum acceptable flow</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Wałęga, Andrzej</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Cupak, Agnieszka</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Tomaszewska, Barbara</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="n">Elsevier Science</subfield><subfield code="a">Rajendiran, Rajmohan ELSEVIER</subfield><subfield code="t">Self-assembled 3D hierarchical MnCO</subfield><subfield code="d">2020</subfield><subfield code="g">Amsterdam [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)ELV003750353</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:193</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2018</subfield><subfield code="g">day:20</subfield><subfield code="g">month:08</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:575-592</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:18</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.098</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">35.18</subfield><subfield code="j">Kolloidchemie</subfield><subfield code="j">Grenzflächenchemie</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">193</subfield><subfield code="j">2018</subfield><subfield code="b">20</subfield><subfield code="c">0820</subfield><subfield code="h">575-592</subfield><subfield code="g">18</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Operacz, Agnieszka |
| spellingShingle |
Operacz, Agnieszka ddc 540 bkl 35.18 Elsevier Water ecosystems Elsevier Water management Elsevier Environmental flow Elsevier Minimum acceptable flow The comparison of environmental flow assessment - The barrier for investment in Poland or river protection? |
| authorStr |
Operacz, Agnieszka |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)ELV003750353 |
| format |
electronic Article |
| dewey-ones |
540 - Chemistry & allied sciences |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut |
| collection |
elsevier |
| remote_str |
true |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| topic_title |
540 VZ 35.18 bkl The comparison of environmental flow assessment - The barrier for investment in Poland or river protection? Water ecosystems Elsevier Water management Elsevier Environmental flow Elsevier Minimum acceptable flow Elsevier |
| topic |
ddc 540 bkl 35.18 Elsevier Water ecosystems Elsevier Water management Elsevier Environmental flow Elsevier Minimum acceptable flow |
| topic_unstemmed |
ddc 540 bkl 35.18 Elsevier Water ecosystems Elsevier Water management Elsevier Environmental flow Elsevier Minimum acceptable flow |
| topic_browse |
ddc 540 bkl 35.18 Elsevier Water ecosystems Elsevier Water management Elsevier Environmental flow Elsevier Minimum acceptable flow |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
zu |
| author2_variant |
a w aw a c ac b t bt |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Self-assembled 3D hierarchical MnCO |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
ELV003750353 |
| dewey-tens |
540 - Chemistry |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Self-assembled 3D hierarchical MnCO |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)ELV003750353 |
| title |
The comparison of environmental flow assessment - The barrier for investment in Poland or river protection? |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)ELV043375146 (ELSEVIER)S0959-6526(18)31434-3 |
| title_full |
The comparison of environmental flow assessment - The barrier for investment in Poland or river protection? |
| author_sort |
Operacz, Agnieszka |
| journal |
Self-assembled 3D hierarchical MnCO |
| journalStr |
Self-assembled 3D hierarchical MnCO |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| dewey-hundreds |
500 - Science |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2018 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
zzz |
| container_start_page |
575 |
| author_browse |
Operacz, Agnieszka |
| container_volume |
193 |
| physical |
18 |
| class |
540 VZ 35.18 bkl |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Operacz, Agnieszka |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.098 |
| dewey-full |
540 |
| title_sort |
comparison of environmental flow assessment - the barrier for investment in poland or river protection? |
| title_auth |
The comparison of environmental flow assessment - The barrier for investment in Poland or river protection? |
| abstract |
Investments that make use of renewable resources of flowing waters must be based on the absolute necessity of protection of the water environment and that dependent on water. In practice, it means the obligation of leaving environmental flow in the river bed in the cross section below the place of water abstraction. The places of surface water abstraction for drinking and industrial purposes are thus limited with the volume of water obligatorily left in the flow for water organisms. In case of hydropower plants located directly in the watercourse, the environmental flow value corresponds approximately with the volume of water run in the fish pass obligatorily provided to maintain patency of the watercourse, in particular in the aspect of migration of diadromous fishes. Environmental flow is ineffective in investment terms, but highly important from the point of view of environmental protection. Thus, the proper calculation of the environmental flow value should be the compromise between the protection of the environment and the economics of the investment. No unanimous methodology in this respect has been applied in Poland for many years, and calculations were done with one of subjectively selected methods functioning in the literature. This work presents the methodology of environmental flow calculations broken down into water regions. Calculation path has been presented along with the possible inconveniences resulting from the effective legal regulations in Poland as regards the possibilities of carrying out projects that take advantage of flowing surface waters. |
| abstractGer |
Investments that make use of renewable resources of flowing waters must be based on the absolute necessity of protection of the water environment and that dependent on water. In practice, it means the obligation of leaving environmental flow in the river bed in the cross section below the place of water abstraction. The places of surface water abstraction for drinking and industrial purposes are thus limited with the volume of water obligatorily left in the flow for water organisms. In case of hydropower plants located directly in the watercourse, the environmental flow value corresponds approximately with the volume of water run in the fish pass obligatorily provided to maintain patency of the watercourse, in particular in the aspect of migration of diadromous fishes. Environmental flow is ineffective in investment terms, but highly important from the point of view of environmental protection. Thus, the proper calculation of the environmental flow value should be the compromise between the protection of the environment and the economics of the investment. No unanimous methodology in this respect has been applied in Poland for many years, and calculations were done with one of subjectively selected methods functioning in the literature. This work presents the methodology of environmental flow calculations broken down into water regions. Calculation path has been presented along with the possible inconveniences resulting from the effective legal regulations in Poland as regards the possibilities of carrying out projects that take advantage of flowing surface waters. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
Investments that make use of renewable resources of flowing waters must be based on the absolute necessity of protection of the water environment and that dependent on water. In practice, it means the obligation of leaving environmental flow in the river bed in the cross section below the place of water abstraction. The places of surface water abstraction for drinking and industrial purposes are thus limited with the volume of water obligatorily left in the flow for water organisms. In case of hydropower plants located directly in the watercourse, the environmental flow value corresponds approximately with the volume of water run in the fish pass obligatorily provided to maintain patency of the watercourse, in particular in the aspect of migration of diadromous fishes. Environmental flow is ineffective in investment terms, but highly important from the point of view of environmental protection. Thus, the proper calculation of the environmental flow value should be the compromise between the protection of the environment and the economics of the investment. No unanimous methodology in this respect has been applied in Poland for many years, and calculations were done with one of subjectively selected methods functioning in the literature. This work presents the methodology of environmental flow calculations broken down into water regions. Calculation path has been presented along with the possible inconveniences resulting from the effective legal regulations in Poland as regards the possibilities of carrying out projects that take advantage of flowing surface waters. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U |
| title_short |
The comparison of environmental flow assessment - The barrier for investment in Poland or river protection? |
| url |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.098 |
| remote_bool |
true |
| author2 |
Wałęga, Andrzej Cupak, Agnieszka Tomaszewska, Barbara |
| author2Str |
Wałęga, Andrzej Cupak, Agnieszka Tomaszewska, Barbara |
| ppnlink |
ELV003750353 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
z |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| author2_role |
oth oth oth |
| doi_str |
10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.098 |
| up_date |
2024-07-06T18:39:33.519Z |
| _version_ |
1803856037563858944 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV043375146</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230626003554.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">180726s2018 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.098</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">/cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000000869.pica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV043375146</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0959-6526(18)31434-3</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">540</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">35.18</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Operacz, Agnieszka</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">The comparison of environmental flow assessment - The barrier for investment in Poland or river protection?</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2018transfer abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">18</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Investments that make use of renewable resources of flowing waters must be based on the absolute necessity of protection of the water environment and that dependent on water. In practice, it means the obligation of leaving environmental flow in the river bed in the cross section below the place of water abstraction. The places of surface water abstraction for drinking and industrial purposes are thus limited with the volume of water obligatorily left in the flow for water organisms. In case of hydropower plants located directly in the watercourse, the environmental flow value corresponds approximately with the volume of water run in the fish pass obligatorily provided to maintain patency of the watercourse, in particular in the aspect of migration of diadromous fishes. Environmental flow is ineffective in investment terms, but highly important from the point of view of environmental protection. Thus, the proper calculation of the environmental flow value should be the compromise between the protection of the environment and the economics of the investment. No unanimous methodology in this respect has been applied in Poland for many years, and calculations were done with one of subjectively selected methods functioning in the literature. This work presents the methodology of environmental flow calculations broken down into water regions. Calculation path has been presented along with the possible inconveniences resulting from the effective legal regulations in Poland as regards the possibilities of carrying out projects that take advantage of flowing surface waters.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Investments that make use of renewable resources of flowing waters must be based on the absolute necessity of protection of the water environment and that dependent on water. In practice, it means the obligation of leaving environmental flow in the river bed in the cross section below the place of water abstraction. The places of surface water abstraction for drinking and industrial purposes are thus limited with the volume of water obligatorily left in the flow for water organisms. In case of hydropower plants located directly in the watercourse, the environmental flow value corresponds approximately with the volume of water run in the fish pass obligatorily provided to maintain patency of the watercourse, in particular in the aspect of migration of diadromous fishes. Environmental flow is ineffective in investment terms, but highly important from the point of view of environmental protection. Thus, the proper calculation of the environmental flow value should be the compromise between the protection of the environment and the economics of the investment. No unanimous methodology in this respect has been applied in Poland for many years, and calculations were done with one of subjectively selected methods functioning in the literature. This work presents the methodology of environmental flow calculations broken down into water regions. Calculation path has been presented along with the possible inconveniences resulting from the effective legal regulations in Poland as regards the possibilities of carrying out projects that take advantage of flowing surface waters.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Water ecosystems</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Water management</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Environmental flow</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Minimum acceptable flow</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Wałęga, Andrzej</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Cupak, Agnieszka</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Tomaszewska, Barbara</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="n">Elsevier Science</subfield><subfield code="a">Rajendiran, Rajmohan ELSEVIER</subfield><subfield code="t">Self-assembled 3D hierarchical MnCO</subfield><subfield code="d">2020</subfield><subfield code="g">Amsterdam [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)ELV003750353</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:193</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2018</subfield><subfield code="g">day:20</subfield><subfield code="g">month:08</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:575-592</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:18</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.098</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">35.18</subfield><subfield code="j">Kolloidchemie</subfield><subfield code="j">Grenzflächenchemie</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">193</subfield><subfield code="j">2018</subfield><subfield code="b">20</subfield><subfield code="c">0820</subfield><subfield code="h">575-592</subfield><subfield code="g">18</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.400943 |