It depends on who you run against: Inter-racial context and Asian American candidates in US elections
Do White voters evaluate minority candidates differently by the racial context of an election? This paper addresses this question by measuring the effects of racial contexts on candidate evaluation. Drawing upon two prominent theories of interracial relations – racial priming and racial triangulatio...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Go, Min Hee [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2018transfer abstract |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Umfang: |
12 |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: 6D phase space electron beam analysis and machine sensitivity studies for ELI-NP GBS - Giribono, A. ELSEVIER, 2016transfer abstract, IJIR : official publ. of SIETAR, the Society for Intercultural Education, Training and Research, New York, NY [u.a.] |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:65 ; year:2018 ; pages:61-72 ; extent:12 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1016/j.ijintrel.2018.04.003 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
ELV043417639 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ELV043417639 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230626003633.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 180726s2018 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.ijintrel.2018.04.003 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a GBV00000000000258A.pica |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)ELV043417639 | ||
| 035 | |a (ELSEVIER)S0147-1767(17)30063-9 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 082 | 0 | |a 370 |a 300 | |
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 370 |q DE-600 |
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 300 |q DE-600 |
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 530 |q VZ |
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 610 |q VZ |
| 084 | |a 44.90 |2 bkl | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Go, Min Hee |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a It depends on who you run against: Inter-racial context and Asian American candidates in US elections |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2018transfer abstract | |
| 300 | |a 12 | ||
| 336 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zzz |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b z |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zu |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Do White voters evaluate minority candidates differently by the racial context of an election? This paper addresses this question by measuring the effects of racial contexts on candidate evaluation. Drawing upon two prominent theories of interracial relations – racial priming and racial triangulation theories -, I argue that White voters change their assessments on candidates depending on the racial context of an election, and the contextual effects occur only in select areas of candidate evaluation. I support this argument by setting up a unique survey experiment that places an Asian American candidate in racially varying electoral contexts and conclude two major findings: First, racial context takes effect in assessing candidates’ issue competence but not their personal traits. Second, Whites evaluate Asian candidates’ issue competence based on the racialized nature of a give issue. | ||
| 520 | |a Do White voters evaluate minority candidates differently by the racial context of an election? This paper addresses this question by measuring the effects of racial contexts on candidate evaluation. Drawing upon two prominent theories of interracial relations – racial priming and racial triangulation theories -, I argue that White voters change their assessments on candidates depending on the racial context of an election, and the contextual effects occur only in select areas of candidate evaluation. I support this argument by setting up a unique survey experiment that places an Asian American candidate in racially varying electoral contexts and conclude two major findings: First, racial context takes effect in assessing candidates’ issue competence but not their personal traits. Second, Whites evaluate Asian candidates’ issue competence based on the racialized nature of a give issue. | ||
| 650 | 7 | |a Racial triangulation theory |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Candidate evaluation |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Asian Americans |2 Elsevier | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |n Pergamon Press |a Giribono, A. ELSEVIER |t 6D phase space electron beam analysis and machine sensitivity studies for ELI-NP GBS |d 2016transfer abstract |d IJIR : official publ. of SIETAR, the Society for Intercultural Education, Training and Research |g New York, NY [u.a.] |w (DE-627)ELV019164491 |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:65 |g year:2018 |g pages:61-72 |g extent:12 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2018.04.003 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_U | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ELV | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_U | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-PHA | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_60 | ||
| 936 | b | k | |a 44.90 |j Neurologie |q VZ |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 65 |j 2018 |h 61-72 |g 12 | ||
| 953 | |2 045F |a 370 | ||
| author_variant |
m h g mh mhg |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
gominhee:2018----:teedowoorngisitrailotxadsaaeiac |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2018transfer abstract |
| bklnumber |
44.90 |
| publishDate |
2018 |
| allfields |
10.1016/j.ijintrel.2018.04.003 doi GBV00000000000258A.pica (DE-627)ELV043417639 (ELSEVIER)S0147-1767(17)30063-9 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 370 300 370 DE-600 300 DE-600 530 VZ 610 VZ 44.90 bkl Go, Min Hee verfasserin aut It depends on who you run against: Inter-racial context and Asian American candidates in US elections 2018transfer abstract 12 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Do White voters evaluate minority candidates differently by the racial context of an election? This paper addresses this question by measuring the effects of racial contexts on candidate evaluation. Drawing upon two prominent theories of interracial relations – racial priming and racial triangulation theories -, I argue that White voters change their assessments on candidates depending on the racial context of an election, and the contextual effects occur only in select areas of candidate evaluation. I support this argument by setting up a unique survey experiment that places an Asian American candidate in racially varying electoral contexts and conclude two major findings: First, racial context takes effect in assessing candidates’ issue competence but not their personal traits. Second, Whites evaluate Asian candidates’ issue competence based on the racialized nature of a give issue. Do White voters evaluate minority candidates differently by the racial context of an election? This paper addresses this question by measuring the effects of racial contexts on candidate evaluation. Drawing upon two prominent theories of interracial relations – racial priming and racial triangulation theories -, I argue that White voters change their assessments on candidates depending on the racial context of an election, and the contextual effects occur only in select areas of candidate evaluation. I support this argument by setting up a unique survey experiment that places an Asian American candidate in racially varying electoral contexts and conclude two major findings: First, racial context takes effect in assessing candidates’ issue competence but not their personal traits. Second, Whites evaluate Asian candidates’ issue competence based on the racialized nature of a give issue. Racial triangulation theory Elsevier Candidate evaluation Elsevier Asian Americans Elsevier Enthalten in Pergamon Press Giribono, A. ELSEVIER 6D phase space electron beam analysis and machine sensitivity studies for ELI-NP GBS 2016transfer abstract IJIR : official publ. of SIETAR, the Society for Intercultural Education, Training and Research New York, NY [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV019164491 volume:65 year:2018 pages:61-72 extent:12 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2018.04.003 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_60 44.90 Neurologie VZ AR 65 2018 61-72 12 045F 370 |
| spelling |
10.1016/j.ijintrel.2018.04.003 doi GBV00000000000258A.pica (DE-627)ELV043417639 (ELSEVIER)S0147-1767(17)30063-9 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 370 300 370 DE-600 300 DE-600 530 VZ 610 VZ 44.90 bkl Go, Min Hee verfasserin aut It depends on who you run against: Inter-racial context and Asian American candidates in US elections 2018transfer abstract 12 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Do White voters evaluate minority candidates differently by the racial context of an election? This paper addresses this question by measuring the effects of racial contexts on candidate evaluation. Drawing upon two prominent theories of interracial relations – racial priming and racial triangulation theories -, I argue that White voters change their assessments on candidates depending on the racial context of an election, and the contextual effects occur only in select areas of candidate evaluation. I support this argument by setting up a unique survey experiment that places an Asian American candidate in racially varying electoral contexts and conclude two major findings: First, racial context takes effect in assessing candidates’ issue competence but not their personal traits. Second, Whites evaluate Asian candidates’ issue competence based on the racialized nature of a give issue. Do White voters evaluate minority candidates differently by the racial context of an election? This paper addresses this question by measuring the effects of racial contexts on candidate evaluation. Drawing upon two prominent theories of interracial relations – racial priming and racial triangulation theories -, I argue that White voters change their assessments on candidates depending on the racial context of an election, and the contextual effects occur only in select areas of candidate evaluation. I support this argument by setting up a unique survey experiment that places an Asian American candidate in racially varying electoral contexts and conclude two major findings: First, racial context takes effect in assessing candidates’ issue competence but not their personal traits. Second, Whites evaluate Asian candidates’ issue competence based on the racialized nature of a give issue. Racial triangulation theory Elsevier Candidate evaluation Elsevier Asian Americans Elsevier Enthalten in Pergamon Press Giribono, A. ELSEVIER 6D phase space electron beam analysis and machine sensitivity studies for ELI-NP GBS 2016transfer abstract IJIR : official publ. of SIETAR, the Society for Intercultural Education, Training and Research New York, NY [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV019164491 volume:65 year:2018 pages:61-72 extent:12 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2018.04.003 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_60 44.90 Neurologie VZ AR 65 2018 61-72 12 045F 370 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1016/j.ijintrel.2018.04.003 doi GBV00000000000258A.pica (DE-627)ELV043417639 (ELSEVIER)S0147-1767(17)30063-9 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 370 300 370 DE-600 300 DE-600 530 VZ 610 VZ 44.90 bkl Go, Min Hee verfasserin aut It depends on who you run against: Inter-racial context and Asian American candidates in US elections 2018transfer abstract 12 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Do White voters evaluate minority candidates differently by the racial context of an election? This paper addresses this question by measuring the effects of racial contexts on candidate evaluation. Drawing upon two prominent theories of interracial relations – racial priming and racial triangulation theories -, I argue that White voters change their assessments on candidates depending on the racial context of an election, and the contextual effects occur only in select areas of candidate evaluation. I support this argument by setting up a unique survey experiment that places an Asian American candidate in racially varying electoral contexts and conclude two major findings: First, racial context takes effect in assessing candidates’ issue competence but not their personal traits. Second, Whites evaluate Asian candidates’ issue competence based on the racialized nature of a give issue. Do White voters evaluate minority candidates differently by the racial context of an election? This paper addresses this question by measuring the effects of racial contexts on candidate evaluation. Drawing upon two prominent theories of interracial relations – racial priming and racial triangulation theories -, I argue that White voters change their assessments on candidates depending on the racial context of an election, and the contextual effects occur only in select areas of candidate evaluation. I support this argument by setting up a unique survey experiment that places an Asian American candidate in racially varying electoral contexts and conclude two major findings: First, racial context takes effect in assessing candidates’ issue competence but not their personal traits. Second, Whites evaluate Asian candidates’ issue competence based on the racialized nature of a give issue. Racial triangulation theory Elsevier Candidate evaluation Elsevier Asian Americans Elsevier Enthalten in Pergamon Press Giribono, A. ELSEVIER 6D phase space electron beam analysis and machine sensitivity studies for ELI-NP GBS 2016transfer abstract IJIR : official publ. of SIETAR, the Society for Intercultural Education, Training and Research New York, NY [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV019164491 volume:65 year:2018 pages:61-72 extent:12 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2018.04.003 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_60 44.90 Neurologie VZ AR 65 2018 61-72 12 045F 370 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1016/j.ijintrel.2018.04.003 doi GBV00000000000258A.pica (DE-627)ELV043417639 (ELSEVIER)S0147-1767(17)30063-9 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 370 300 370 DE-600 300 DE-600 530 VZ 610 VZ 44.90 bkl Go, Min Hee verfasserin aut It depends on who you run against: Inter-racial context and Asian American candidates in US elections 2018transfer abstract 12 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Do White voters evaluate minority candidates differently by the racial context of an election? This paper addresses this question by measuring the effects of racial contexts on candidate evaluation. Drawing upon two prominent theories of interracial relations – racial priming and racial triangulation theories -, I argue that White voters change their assessments on candidates depending on the racial context of an election, and the contextual effects occur only in select areas of candidate evaluation. I support this argument by setting up a unique survey experiment that places an Asian American candidate in racially varying electoral contexts and conclude two major findings: First, racial context takes effect in assessing candidates’ issue competence but not their personal traits. Second, Whites evaluate Asian candidates’ issue competence based on the racialized nature of a give issue. Do White voters evaluate minority candidates differently by the racial context of an election? This paper addresses this question by measuring the effects of racial contexts on candidate evaluation. Drawing upon two prominent theories of interracial relations – racial priming and racial triangulation theories -, I argue that White voters change their assessments on candidates depending on the racial context of an election, and the contextual effects occur only in select areas of candidate evaluation. I support this argument by setting up a unique survey experiment that places an Asian American candidate in racially varying electoral contexts and conclude two major findings: First, racial context takes effect in assessing candidates’ issue competence but not their personal traits. Second, Whites evaluate Asian candidates’ issue competence based on the racialized nature of a give issue. Racial triangulation theory Elsevier Candidate evaluation Elsevier Asian Americans Elsevier Enthalten in Pergamon Press Giribono, A. ELSEVIER 6D phase space electron beam analysis and machine sensitivity studies for ELI-NP GBS 2016transfer abstract IJIR : official publ. of SIETAR, the Society for Intercultural Education, Training and Research New York, NY [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV019164491 volume:65 year:2018 pages:61-72 extent:12 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2018.04.003 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_60 44.90 Neurologie VZ AR 65 2018 61-72 12 045F 370 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1016/j.ijintrel.2018.04.003 doi GBV00000000000258A.pica (DE-627)ELV043417639 (ELSEVIER)S0147-1767(17)30063-9 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 370 300 370 DE-600 300 DE-600 530 VZ 610 VZ 44.90 bkl Go, Min Hee verfasserin aut It depends on who you run against: Inter-racial context and Asian American candidates in US elections 2018transfer abstract 12 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Do White voters evaluate minority candidates differently by the racial context of an election? This paper addresses this question by measuring the effects of racial contexts on candidate evaluation. Drawing upon two prominent theories of interracial relations – racial priming and racial triangulation theories -, I argue that White voters change their assessments on candidates depending on the racial context of an election, and the contextual effects occur only in select areas of candidate evaluation. I support this argument by setting up a unique survey experiment that places an Asian American candidate in racially varying electoral contexts and conclude two major findings: First, racial context takes effect in assessing candidates’ issue competence but not their personal traits. Second, Whites evaluate Asian candidates’ issue competence based on the racialized nature of a give issue. Do White voters evaluate minority candidates differently by the racial context of an election? This paper addresses this question by measuring the effects of racial contexts on candidate evaluation. Drawing upon two prominent theories of interracial relations – racial priming and racial triangulation theories -, I argue that White voters change their assessments on candidates depending on the racial context of an election, and the contextual effects occur only in select areas of candidate evaluation. I support this argument by setting up a unique survey experiment that places an Asian American candidate in racially varying electoral contexts and conclude two major findings: First, racial context takes effect in assessing candidates’ issue competence but not their personal traits. Second, Whites evaluate Asian candidates’ issue competence based on the racialized nature of a give issue. Racial triangulation theory Elsevier Candidate evaluation Elsevier Asian Americans Elsevier Enthalten in Pergamon Press Giribono, A. ELSEVIER 6D phase space electron beam analysis and machine sensitivity studies for ELI-NP GBS 2016transfer abstract IJIR : official publ. of SIETAR, the Society for Intercultural Education, Training and Research New York, NY [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV019164491 volume:65 year:2018 pages:61-72 extent:12 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2018.04.003 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_60 44.90 Neurologie VZ AR 65 2018 61-72 12 045F 370 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in 6D phase space electron beam analysis and machine sensitivity studies for ELI-NP GBS New York, NY [u.a.] volume:65 year:2018 pages:61-72 extent:12 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in 6D phase space electron beam analysis and machine sensitivity studies for ELI-NP GBS New York, NY [u.a.] volume:65 year:2018 pages:61-72 extent:12 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| bklname |
Neurologie |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
Racial triangulation theory Candidate evaluation Asian Americans |
| dewey-raw |
370 |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
6D phase space electron beam analysis and machine sensitivity studies for ELI-NP GBS |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Go, Min Hee @@aut@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2018-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
ELV019164491 |
| dewey-sort |
3370 |
| id |
ELV043417639 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV043417639</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230626003633.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">180726s2018 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.ijintrel.2018.04.003</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">GBV00000000000258A.pica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV043417639</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0147-1767(17)30063-9</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">370</subfield><subfield code="a">300</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">370</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">300</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">530</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">610</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">44.90</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Go, Min Hee</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">It depends on who you run against: Inter-racial context and Asian American candidates in US elections</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2018transfer abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">12</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Do White voters evaluate minority candidates differently by the racial context of an election? This paper addresses this question by measuring the effects of racial contexts on candidate evaluation. Drawing upon two prominent theories of interracial relations – racial priming and racial triangulation theories -, I argue that White voters change their assessments on candidates depending on the racial context of an election, and the contextual effects occur only in select areas of candidate evaluation. I support this argument by setting up a unique survey experiment that places an Asian American candidate in racially varying electoral contexts and conclude two major findings: First, racial context takes effect in assessing candidates’ issue competence but not their personal traits. Second, Whites evaluate Asian candidates’ issue competence based on the racialized nature of a give issue.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Do White voters evaluate minority candidates differently by the racial context of an election? This paper addresses this question by measuring the effects of racial contexts on candidate evaluation. Drawing upon two prominent theories of interracial relations – racial priming and racial triangulation theories -, I argue that White voters change their assessments on candidates depending on the racial context of an election, and the contextual effects occur only in select areas of candidate evaluation. I support this argument by setting up a unique survey experiment that places an Asian American candidate in racially varying electoral contexts and conclude two major findings: First, racial context takes effect in assessing candidates’ issue competence but not their personal traits. Second, Whites evaluate Asian candidates’ issue competence based on the racialized nature of a give issue.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Racial triangulation theory</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Candidate evaluation</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Asian Americans</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="n">Pergamon Press</subfield><subfield code="a">Giribono, A. ELSEVIER</subfield><subfield code="t">6D phase space electron beam analysis and machine sensitivity studies for ELI-NP GBS</subfield><subfield code="d">2016transfer abstract</subfield><subfield code="d">IJIR : official publ. of SIETAR, the Society for Intercultural Education, Training and Research</subfield><subfield code="g">New York, NY [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)ELV019164491</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:65</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2018</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:61-72</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:12</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2018.04.003</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">44.90</subfield><subfield code="j">Neurologie</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">65</subfield><subfield code="j">2018</subfield><subfield code="h">61-72</subfield><subfield code="g">12</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="953" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="2">045F</subfield><subfield code="a">370</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Go, Min Hee |
| spellingShingle |
Go, Min Hee ddc 370 ddc 300 ddc 530 ddc 610 bkl 44.90 Elsevier Racial triangulation theory Elsevier Candidate evaluation Elsevier Asian Americans It depends on who you run against: Inter-racial context and Asian American candidates in US elections |
| authorStr |
Go, Min Hee |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)ELV019164491 |
| format |
electronic Article |
| dewey-ones |
370 - Education 300 - Social sciences 530 - Physics 610 - Medicine & health |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut |
| collection |
elsevier |
| remote_str |
true |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| topic_title |
370 300 370 DE-600 300 DE-600 530 VZ 610 VZ 44.90 bkl It depends on who you run against: Inter-racial context and Asian American candidates in US elections Racial triangulation theory Elsevier Candidate evaluation Elsevier Asian Americans Elsevier |
| topic |
ddc 370 ddc 300 ddc 530 ddc 610 bkl 44.90 Elsevier Racial triangulation theory Elsevier Candidate evaluation Elsevier Asian Americans |
| topic_unstemmed |
ddc 370 ddc 300 ddc 530 ddc 610 bkl 44.90 Elsevier Racial triangulation theory Elsevier Candidate evaluation Elsevier Asian Americans |
| topic_browse |
ddc 370 ddc 300 ddc 530 ddc 610 bkl 44.90 Elsevier Racial triangulation theory Elsevier Candidate evaluation Elsevier Asian Americans |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
zu |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
6D phase space electron beam analysis and machine sensitivity studies for ELI-NP GBS |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
ELV019164491 |
| dewey-tens |
370 - Education 300 - Social sciences, sociology & anthropology 530 - Physics 610 - Medicine & health |
| hierarchy_top_title |
6D phase space electron beam analysis and machine sensitivity studies for ELI-NP GBS |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)ELV019164491 |
| title |
It depends on who you run against: Inter-racial context and Asian American candidates in US elections |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)ELV043417639 (ELSEVIER)S0147-1767(17)30063-9 |
| title_full |
It depends on who you run against: Inter-racial context and Asian American candidates in US elections |
| author_sort |
Go, Min Hee |
| journal |
6D phase space electron beam analysis and machine sensitivity studies for ELI-NP GBS |
| journalStr |
6D phase space electron beam analysis and machine sensitivity studies for ELI-NP GBS |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| dewey-hundreds |
300 - Social sciences 500 - Science 600 - Technology |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2018 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
zzz |
| container_start_page |
61 |
| author_browse |
Go, Min Hee |
| container_volume |
65 |
| physical |
12 |
| class |
370 300 370 DE-600 300 DE-600 530 VZ 610 VZ 44.90 bkl |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Go, Min Hee |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1016/j.ijintrel.2018.04.003 |
| dewey-full |
370 300 530 610 |
| title_sort |
it depends on who you run against: inter-racial context and asian american candidates in us elections |
| title_auth |
It depends on who you run against: Inter-racial context and Asian American candidates in US elections |
| abstract |
Do White voters evaluate minority candidates differently by the racial context of an election? This paper addresses this question by measuring the effects of racial contexts on candidate evaluation. Drawing upon two prominent theories of interracial relations – racial priming and racial triangulation theories -, I argue that White voters change their assessments on candidates depending on the racial context of an election, and the contextual effects occur only in select areas of candidate evaluation. I support this argument by setting up a unique survey experiment that places an Asian American candidate in racially varying electoral contexts and conclude two major findings: First, racial context takes effect in assessing candidates’ issue competence but not their personal traits. Second, Whites evaluate Asian candidates’ issue competence based on the racialized nature of a give issue. |
| abstractGer |
Do White voters evaluate minority candidates differently by the racial context of an election? This paper addresses this question by measuring the effects of racial contexts on candidate evaluation. Drawing upon two prominent theories of interracial relations – racial priming and racial triangulation theories -, I argue that White voters change their assessments on candidates depending on the racial context of an election, and the contextual effects occur only in select areas of candidate evaluation. I support this argument by setting up a unique survey experiment that places an Asian American candidate in racially varying electoral contexts and conclude two major findings: First, racial context takes effect in assessing candidates’ issue competence but not their personal traits. Second, Whites evaluate Asian candidates’ issue competence based on the racialized nature of a give issue. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
Do White voters evaluate minority candidates differently by the racial context of an election? This paper addresses this question by measuring the effects of racial contexts on candidate evaluation. Drawing upon two prominent theories of interracial relations – racial priming and racial triangulation theories -, I argue that White voters change their assessments on candidates depending on the racial context of an election, and the contextual effects occur only in select areas of candidate evaluation. I support this argument by setting up a unique survey experiment that places an Asian American candidate in racially varying electoral contexts and conclude two major findings: First, racial context takes effect in assessing candidates’ issue competence but not their personal traits. Second, Whites evaluate Asian candidates’ issue competence based on the racialized nature of a give issue. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_60 |
| title_short |
It depends on who you run against: Inter-racial context and Asian American candidates in US elections |
| url |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2018.04.003 |
| remote_bool |
true |
| ppnlink |
ELV019164491 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
z |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| doi_str |
10.1016/j.ijintrel.2018.04.003 |
| up_date |
2024-07-06T18:46:15.090Z |
| _version_ |
1803856458642620416 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV043417639</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230626003633.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">180726s2018 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.ijintrel.2018.04.003</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">GBV00000000000258A.pica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV043417639</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0147-1767(17)30063-9</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">370</subfield><subfield code="a">300</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">370</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">300</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">530</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">610</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">44.90</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Go, Min Hee</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">It depends on who you run against: Inter-racial context and Asian American candidates in US elections</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2018transfer abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">12</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Do White voters evaluate minority candidates differently by the racial context of an election? This paper addresses this question by measuring the effects of racial contexts on candidate evaluation. Drawing upon two prominent theories of interracial relations – racial priming and racial triangulation theories -, I argue that White voters change their assessments on candidates depending on the racial context of an election, and the contextual effects occur only in select areas of candidate evaluation. I support this argument by setting up a unique survey experiment that places an Asian American candidate in racially varying electoral contexts and conclude two major findings: First, racial context takes effect in assessing candidates’ issue competence but not their personal traits. Second, Whites evaluate Asian candidates’ issue competence based on the racialized nature of a give issue.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Do White voters evaluate minority candidates differently by the racial context of an election? This paper addresses this question by measuring the effects of racial contexts on candidate evaluation. Drawing upon two prominent theories of interracial relations – racial priming and racial triangulation theories -, I argue that White voters change their assessments on candidates depending on the racial context of an election, and the contextual effects occur only in select areas of candidate evaluation. I support this argument by setting up a unique survey experiment that places an Asian American candidate in racially varying electoral contexts and conclude two major findings: First, racial context takes effect in assessing candidates’ issue competence but not their personal traits. Second, Whites evaluate Asian candidates’ issue competence based on the racialized nature of a give issue.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Racial triangulation theory</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Candidate evaluation</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Asian Americans</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="n">Pergamon Press</subfield><subfield code="a">Giribono, A. ELSEVIER</subfield><subfield code="t">6D phase space electron beam analysis and machine sensitivity studies for ELI-NP GBS</subfield><subfield code="d">2016transfer abstract</subfield><subfield code="d">IJIR : official publ. of SIETAR, the Society for Intercultural Education, Training and Research</subfield><subfield code="g">New York, NY [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)ELV019164491</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:65</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2018</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:61-72</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:12</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2018.04.003</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">44.90</subfield><subfield code="j">Neurologie</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">65</subfield><subfield code="j">2018</subfield><subfield code="h">61-72</subfield><subfield code="g">12</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="953" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="2">045F</subfield><subfield code="a">370</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.3987875 |