Difference in the parameters of ICMEs in Ejecta and Sheath region and their impact on Dst index during 1997–2014
The comparisons in respect of mean parameters in ejecta and sheath region during 1997–2014 have been studied here. The results from statistical analysis indicate that all the parameters, are more powerful (in respect of amplitude) in the sheath region than that of ejecta, whether there is magnetic c...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Goswami, A. [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2018transfer abstract |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Umfang: |
15 |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Posttranscriptional actions of triiodothyronine on - Bargi-Souza, Paula ELSEVIER, 2018, including COSPAR information bulletin : the official journal of the Committee on Space Research (COSPAR), a scientific committee of the International Council of Scientific Unions (ICSU), Amsterdam [u.a.] |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:62 ; year:2018 ; number:3 ; day:1 ; month:08 ; pages:692-706 ; extent:15 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1016/j.asr.2018.05.017 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
ELV043553230 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ELV043553230 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230626003819.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 180726s2018 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.asr.2018.05.017 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a GBV00000000000689.pica |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)ELV043553230 | ||
| 035 | |a (ELSEVIER)S0273-1177(18)30413-7 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 610 |a 570 |q VZ |
| 084 | |a 44.89 |2 bkl | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Goswami, A. |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Difference in the parameters of ICMEs in Ejecta and Sheath region and their impact on Dst index during 1997–2014 |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2018transfer abstract | |
| 300 | |a 15 | ||
| 336 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zzz |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b z |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zu |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a The comparisons in respect of mean parameters in ejecta and sheath region during 1997–2014 have been studied here. The results from statistical analysis indicate that all the parameters, are more powerful (in respect of amplitude) in the sheath region than that of ejecta, whether there is magnetic cloud (MC) structure or not. Probably, a shock plays the key role to such increases. The inter-relation of parameters in the sheath is higher than that of ejecta. In addition, I also discuss the nature of storm influence parameters variation in the sheath and ejecta separately for MC or non MC. The results in respect of t-test and correlations confirm that, associated with the shock, the magnetic field in the sheath region are opened up and sheath parameters are more energetic for producing geomagnetic storm. I have proposed multiple linear regression model for the prediction of response variable (Dst index) by using mean of the total magnetic field, southward magnetic field, velocity of the solar wind. About 61% of the observed value can be predicted using this model for MC. The correlation becomes strong in case of addition and multipliction functions from the dependent components of multiple regression line equation with Dst index than that of individual parameters of MC and non MC with Dst index. Thus it is preferable to investigate accomulated effect of ICMEs causing successive geomagnetic stroms as compaired to their isolated effects. One ultimate finding is that, there is a higher correlation between Dst index and solar wind parameters (individually or combined) in the sheath than the ones in the ejecta, for both MCs and non-MCs. | ||
| 520 | |a The comparisons in respect of mean parameters in ejecta and sheath region during 1997–2014 have been studied here. The results from statistical analysis indicate that all the parameters, are more powerful (in respect of amplitude) in the sheath region than that of ejecta, whether there is magnetic cloud (MC) structure or not. Probably, a shock plays the key role to such increases. The inter-relation of parameters in the sheath is higher than that of ejecta. In addition, I also discuss the nature of storm influence parameters variation in the sheath and ejecta separately for MC or non MC. The results in respect of t-test and correlations confirm that, associated with the shock, the magnetic field in the sheath region are opened up and sheath parameters are more energetic for producing geomagnetic storm. I have proposed multiple linear regression model for the prediction of response variable (Dst index) by using mean of the total magnetic field, southward magnetic field, velocity of the solar wind. About 61% of the observed value can be predicted using this model for MC. The correlation becomes strong in case of addition and multipliction functions from the dependent components of multiple regression line equation with Dst index than that of individual parameters of MC and non MC with Dst index. Thus it is preferable to investigate accomulated effect of ICMEs causing successive geomagnetic stroms as compaired to their isolated effects. One ultimate finding is that, there is a higher correlation between Dst index and solar wind parameters (individually or combined) in the sheath than the ones in the ejecta, for both MCs and non-MCs. | ||
| 650 | 7 | |a ICME |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Ejecta |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Dst index |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Sheath |2 Elsevier | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |n Elsevier Science |a Bargi-Souza, Paula ELSEVIER |t Posttranscriptional actions of triiodothyronine on |d 2018 |d including COSPAR information bulletin : the official journal of the Committee on Space Research (COSPAR), a scientific committee of the International Council of Scientific Unions (ICSU) |g Amsterdam [u.a.] |w (DE-627)ELV000905844 |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:62 |g year:2018 |g number:3 |g day:1 |g month:08 |g pages:692-706 |g extent:15 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2018.05.017 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_U | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ELV | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_U | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-PHA | ||
| 936 | b | k | |a 44.89 |j Endokrinologie |q VZ |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 62 |j 2018 |e 3 |b 1 |c 0801 |h 692-706 |g 15 | ||
| author_variant |
a g ag |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
goswamia:2018----:ifrnenhprmtroimsnjcansetrgoadhiipc |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2018transfer abstract |
| bklnumber |
44.89 |
| publishDate |
2018 |
| allfields |
10.1016/j.asr.2018.05.017 doi GBV00000000000689.pica (DE-627)ELV043553230 (ELSEVIER)S0273-1177(18)30413-7 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 610 570 VZ 44.89 bkl Goswami, A. verfasserin aut Difference in the parameters of ICMEs in Ejecta and Sheath region and their impact on Dst index during 1997–2014 2018transfer abstract 15 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier The comparisons in respect of mean parameters in ejecta and sheath region during 1997–2014 have been studied here. The results from statistical analysis indicate that all the parameters, are more powerful (in respect of amplitude) in the sheath region than that of ejecta, whether there is magnetic cloud (MC) structure or not. Probably, a shock plays the key role to such increases. The inter-relation of parameters in the sheath is higher than that of ejecta. In addition, I also discuss the nature of storm influence parameters variation in the sheath and ejecta separately for MC or non MC. The results in respect of t-test and correlations confirm that, associated with the shock, the magnetic field in the sheath region are opened up and sheath parameters are more energetic for producing geomagnetic storm. I have proposed multiple linear regression model for the prediction of response variable (Dst index) by using mean of the total magnetic field, southward magnetic field, velocity of the solar wind. About 61% of the observed value can be predicted using this model for MC. The correlation becomes strong in case of addition and multipliction functions from the dependent components of multiple regression line equation with Dst index than that of individual parameters of MC and non MC with Dst index. Thus it is preferable to investigate accomulated effect of ICMEs causing successive geomagnetic stroms as compaired to their isolated effects. One ultimate finding is that, there is a higher correlation between Dst index and solar wind parameters (individually or combined) in the sheath than the ones in the ejecta, for both MCs and non-MCs. The comparisons in respect of mean parameters in ejecta and sheath region during 1997–2014 have been studied here. The results from statistical analysis indicate that all the parameters, are more powerful (in respect of amplitude) in the sheath region than that of ejecta, whether there is magnetic cloud (MC) structure or not. Probably, a shock plays the key role to such increases. The inter-relation of parameters in the sheath is higher than that of ejecta. In addition, I also discuss the nature of storm influence parameters variation in the sheath and ejecta separately for MC or non MC. The results in respect of t-test and correlations confirm that, associated with the shock, the magnetic field in the sheath region are opened up and sheath parameters are more energetic for producing geomagnetic storm. I have proposed multiple linear regression model for the prediction of response variable (Dst index) by using mean of the total magnetic field, southward magnetic field, velocity of the solar wind. About 61% of the observed value can be predicted using this model for MC. The correlation becomes strong in case of addition and multipliction functions from the dependent components of multiple regression line equation with Dst index than that of individual parameters of MC and non MC with Dst index. Thus it is preferable to investigate accomulated effect of ICMEs causing successive geomagnetic stroms as compaired to their isolated effects. One ultimate finding is that, there is a higher correlation between Dst index and solar wind parameters (individually or combined) in the sheath than the ones in the ejecta, for both MCs and non-MCs. ICME Elsevier Ejecta Elsevier Dst index Elsevier Sheath Elsevier Enthalten in Elsevier Science Bargi-Souza, Paula ELSEVIER Posttranscriptional actions of triiodothyronine on 2018 including COSPAR information bulletin : the official journal of the Committee on Space Research (COSPAR), a scientific committee of the International Council of Scientific Unions (ICSU) Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV000905844 volume:62 year:2018 number:3 day:1 month:08 pages:692-706 extent:15 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2018.05.017 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA 44.89 Endokrinologie VZ AR 62 2018 3 1 0801 692-706 15 |
| spelling |
10.1016/j.asr.2018.05.017 doi GBV00000000000689.pica (DE-627)ELV043553230 (ELSEVIER)S0273-1177(18)30413-7 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 610 570 VZ 44.89 bkl Goswami, A. verfasserin aut Difference in the parameters of ICMEs in Ejecta and Sheath region and their impact on Dst index during 1997–2014 2018transfer abstract 15 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier The comparisons in respect of mean parameters in ejecta and sheath region during 1997–2014 have been studied here. The results from statistical analysis indicate that all the parameters, are more powerful (in respect of amplitude) in the sheath region than that of ejecta, whether there is magnetic cloud (MC) structure or not. Probably, a shock plays the key role to such increases. The inter-relation of parameters in the sheath is higher than that of ejecta. In addition, I also discuss the nature of storm influence parameters variation in the sheath and ejecta separately for MC or non MC. The results in respect of t-test and correlations confirm that, associated with the shock, the magnetic field in the sheath region are opened up and sheath parameters are more energetic for producing geomagnetic storm. I have proposed multiple linear regression model for the prediction of response variable (Dst index) by using mean of the total magnetic field, southward magnetic field, velocity of the solar wind. About 61% of the observed value can be predicted using this model for MC. The correlation becomes strong in case of addition and multipliction functions from the dependent components of multiple regression line equation with Dst index than that of individual parameters of MC and non MC with Dst index. Thus it is preferable to investigate accomulated effect of ICMEs causing successive geomagnetic stroms as compaired to their isolated effects. One ultimate finding is that, there is a higher correlation between Dst index and solar wind parameters (individually or combined) in the sheath than the ones in the ejecta, for both MCs and non-MCs. The comparisons in respect of mean parameters in ejecta and sheath region during 1997–2014 have been studied here. The results from statistical analysis indicate that all the parameters, are more powerful (in respect of amplitude) in the sheath region than that of ejecta, whether there is magnetic cloud (MC) structure or not. Probably, a shock plays the key role to such increases. The inter-relation of parameters in the sheath is higher than that of ejecta. In addition, I also discuss the nature of storm influence parameters variation in the sheath and ejecta separately for MC or non MC. The results in respect of t-test and correlations confirm that, associated with the shock, the magnetic field in the sheath region are opened up and sheath parameters are more energetic for producing geomagnetic storm. I have proposed multiple linear regression model for the prediction of response variable (Dst index) by using mean of the total magnetic field, southward magnetic field, velocity of the solar wind. About 61% of the observed value can be predicted using this model for MC. The correlation becomes strong in case of addition and multipliction functions from the dependent components of multiple regression line equation with Dst index than that of individual parameters of MC and non MC with Dst index. Thus it is preferable to investigate accomulated effect of ICMEs causing successive geomagnetic stroms as compaired to their isolated effects. One ultimate finding is that, there is a higher correlation between Dst index and solar wind parameters (individually or combined) in the sheath than the ones in the ejecta, for both MCs and non-MCs. ICME Elsevier Ejecta Elsevier Dst index Elsevier Sheath Elsevier Enthalten in Elsevier Science Bargi-Souza, Paula ELSEVIER Posttranscriptional actions of triiodothyronine on 2018 including COSPAR information bulletin : the official journal of the Committee on Space Research (COSPAR), a scientific committee of the International Council of Scientific Unions (ICSU) Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV000905844 volume:62 year:2018 number:3 day:1 month:08 pages:692-706 extent:15 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2018.05.017 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA 44.89 Endokrinologie VZ AR 62 2018 3 1 0801 692-706 15 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1016/j.asr.2018.05.017 doi GBV00000000000689.pica (DE-627)ELV043553230 (ELSEVIER)S0273-1177(18)30413-7 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 610 570 VZ 44.89 bkl Goswami, A. verfasserin aut Difference in the parameters of ICMEs in Ejecta and Sheath region and their impact on Dst index during 1997–2014 2018transfer abstract 15 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier The comparisons in respect of mean parameters in ejecta and sheath region during 1997–2014 have been studied here. The results from statistical analysis indicate that all the parameters, are more powerful (in respect of amplitude) in the sheath region than that of ejecta, whether there is magnetic cloud (MC) structure or not. Probably, a shock plays the key role to such increases. The inter-relation of parameters in the sheath is higher than that of ejecta. In addition, I also discuss the nature of storm influence parameters variation in the sheath and ejecta separately for MC or non MC. The results in respect of t-test and correlations confirm that, associated with the shock, the magnetic field in the sheath region are opened up and sheath parameters are more energetic for producing geomagnetic storm. I have proposed multiple linear regression model for the prediction of response variable (Dst index) by using mean of the total magnetic field, southward magnetic field, velocity of the solar wind. About 61% of the observed value can be predicted using this model for MC. The correlation becomes strong in case of addition and multipliction functions from the dependent components of multiple regression line equation with Dst index than that of individual parameters of MC and non MC with Dst index. Thus it is preferable to investigate accomulated effect of ICMEs causing successive geomagnetic stroms as compaired to their isolated effects. One ultimate finding is that, there is a higher correlation between Dst index and solar wind parameters (individually or combined) in the sheath than the ones in the ejecta, for both MCs and non-MCs. The comparisons in respect of mean parameters in ejecta and sheath region during 1997–2014 have been studied here. The results from statistical analysis indicate that all the parameters, are more powerful (in respect of amplitude) in the sheath region than that of ejecta, whether there is magnetic cloud (MC) structure or not. Probably, a shock plays the key role to such increases. The inter-relation of parameters in the sheath is higher than that of ejecta. In addition, I also discuss the nature of storm influence parameters variation in the sheath and ejecta separately for MC or non MC. The results in respect of t-test and correlations confirm that, associated with the shock, the magnetic field in the sheath region are opened up and sheath parameters are more energetic for producing geomagnetic storm. I have proposed multiple linear regression model for the prediction of response variable (Dst index) by using mean of the total magnetic field, southward magnetic field, velocity of the solar wind. About 61% of the observed value can be predicted using this model for MC. The correlation becomes strong in case of addition and multipliction functions from the dependent components of multiple regression line equation with Dst index than that of individual parameters of MC and non MC with Dst index. Thus it is preferable to investigate accomulated effect of ICMEs causing successive geomagnetic stroms as compaired to their isolated effects. One ultimate finding is that, there is a higher correlation between Dst index and solar wind parameters (individually or combined) in the sheath than the ones in the ejecta, for both MCs and non-MCs. ICME Elsevier Ejecta Elsevier Dst index Elsevier Sheath Elsevier Enthalten in Elsevier Science Bargi-Souza, Paula ELSEVIER Posttranscriptional actions of triiodothyronine on 2018 including COSPAR information bulletin : the official journal of the Committee on Space Research (COSPAR), a scientific committee of the International Council of Scientific Unions (ICSU) Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV000905844 volume:62 year:2018 number:3 day:1 month:08 pages:692-706 extent:15 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2018.05.017 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA 44.89 Endokrinologie VZ AR 62 2018 3 1 0801 692-706 15 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1016/j.asr.2018.05.017 doi GBV00000000000689.pica (DE-627)ELV043553230 (ELSEVIER)S0273-1177(18)30413-7 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 610 570 VZ 44.89 bkl Goswami, A. verfasserin aut Difference in the parameters of ICMEs in Ejecta and Sheath region and their impact on Dst index during 1997–2014 2018transfer abstract 15 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier The comparisons in respect of mean parameters in ejecta and sheath region during 1997–2014 have been studied here. The results from statistical analysis indicate that all the parameters, are more powerful (in respect of amplitude) in the sheath region than that of ejecta, whether there is magnetic cloud (MC) structure or not. Probably, a shock plays the key role to such increases. The inter-relation of parameters in the sheath is higher than that of ejecta. In addition, I also discuss the nature of storm influence parameters variation in the sheath and ejecta separately for MC or non MC. The results in respect of t-test and correlations confirm that, associated with the shock, the magnetic field in the sheath region are opened up and sheath parameters are more energetic for producing geomagnetic storm. I have proposed multiple linear regression model for the prediction of response variable (Dst index) by using mean of the total magnetic field, southward magnetic field, velocity of the solar wind. About 61% of the observed value can be predicted using this model for MC. The correlation becomes strong in case of addition and multipliction functions from the dependent components of multiple regression line equation with Dst index than that of individual parameters of MC and non MC with Dst index. Thus it is preferable to investigate accomulated effect of ICMEs causing successive geomagnetic stroms as compaired to their isolated effects. One ultimate finding is that, there is a higher correlation between Dst index and solar wind parameters (individually or combined) in the sheath than the ones in the ejecta, for both MCs and non-MCs. The comparisons in respect of mean parameters in ejecta and sheath region during 1997–2014 have been studied here. The results from statistical analysis indicate that all the parameters, are more powerful (in respect of amplitude) in the sheath region than that of ejecta, whether there is magnetic cloud (MC) structure or not. Probably, a shock plays the key role to such increases. The inter-relation of parameters in the sheath is higher than that of ejecta. In addition, I also discuss the nature of storm influence parameters variation in the sheath and ejecta separately for MC or non MC. The results in respect of t-test and correlations confirm that, associated with the shock, the magnetic field in the sheath region are opened up and sheath parameters are more energetic for producing geomagnetic storm. I have proposed multiple linear regression model for the prediction of response variable (Dst index) by using mean of the total magnetic field, southward magnetic field, velocity of the solar wind. About 61% of the observed value can be predicted using this model for MC. The correlation becomes strong in case of addition and multipliction functions from the dependent components of multiple regression line equation with Dst index than that of individual parameters of MC and non MC with Dst index. Thus it is preferable to investigate accomulated effect of ICMEs causing successive geomagnetic stroms as compaired to their isolated effects. One ultimate finding is that, there is a higher correlation between Dst index and solar wind parameters (individually or combined) in the sheath than the ones in the ejecta, for both MCs and non-MCs. ICME Elsevier Ejecta Elsevier Dst index Elsevier Sheath Elsevier Enthalten in Elsevier Science Bargi-Souza, Paula ELSEVIER Posttranscriptional actions of triiodothyronine on 2018 including COSPAR information bulletin : the official journal of the Committee on Space Research (COSPAR), a scientific committee of the International Council of Scientific Unions (ICSU) Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV000905844 volume:62 year:2018 number:3 day:1 month:08 pages:692-706 extent:15 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2018.05.017 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA 44.89 Endokrinologie VZ AR 62 2018 3 1 0801 692-706 15 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1016/j.asr.2018.05.017 doi GBV00000000000689.pica (DE-627)ELV043553230 (ELSEVIER)S0273-1177(18)30413-7 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 610 570 VZ 44.89 bkl Goswami, A. verfasserin aut Difference in the parameters of ICMEs in Ejecta and Sheath region and their impact on Dst index during 1997–2014 2018transfer abstract 15 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier The comparisons in respect of mean parameters in ejecta and sheath region during 1997–2014 have been studied here. The results from statistical analysis indicate that all the parameters, are more powerful (in respect of amplitude) in the sheath region than that of ejecta, whether there is magnetic cloud (MC) structure or not. Probably, a shock plays the key role to such increases. The inter-relation of parameters in the sheath is higher than that of ejecta. In addition, I also discuss the nature of storm influence parameters variation in the sheath and ejecta separately for MC or non MC. The results in respect of t-test and correlations confirm that, associated with the shock, the magnetic field in the sheath region are opened up and sheath parameters are more energetic for producing geomagnetic storm. I have proposed multiple linear regression model for the prediction of response variable (Dst index) by using mean of the total magnetic field, southward magnetic field, velocity of the solar wind. About 61% of the observed value can be predicted using this model for MC. The correlation becomes strong in case of addition and multipliction functions from the dependent components of multiple regression line equation with Dst index than that of individual parameters of MC and non MC with Dst index. Thus it is preferable to investigate accomulated effect of ICMEs causing successive geomagnetic stroms as compaired to their isolated effects. One ultimate finding is that, there is a higher correlation between Dst index and solar wind parameters (individually or combined) in the sheath than the ones in the ejecta, for both MCs and non-MCs. The comparisons in respect of mean parameters in ejecta and sheath region during 1997–2014 have been studied here. The results from statistical analysis indicate that all the parameters, are more powerful (in respect of amplitude) in the sheath region than that of ejecta, whether there is magnetic cloud (MC) structure or not. Probably, a shock plays the key role to such increases. The inter-relation of parameters in the sheath is higher than that of ejecta. In addition, I also discuss the nature of storm influence parameters variation in the sheath and ejecta separately for MC or non MC. The results in respect of t-test and correlations confirm that, associated with the shock, the magnetic field in the sheath region are opened up and sheath parameters are more energetic for producing geomagnetic storm. I have proposed multiple linear regression model for the prediction of response variable (Dst index) by using mean of the total magnetic field, southward magnetic field, velocity of the solar wind. About 61% of the observed value can be predicted using this model for MC. The correlation becomes strong in case of addition and multipliction functions from the dependent components of multiple regression line equation with Dst index than that of individual parameters of MC and non MC with Dst index. Thus it is preferable to investigate accomulated effect of ICMEs causing successive geomagnetic stroms as compaired to their isolated effects. One ultimate finding is that, there is a higher correlation between Dst index and solar wind parameters (individually or combined) in the sheath than the ones in the ejecta, for both MCs and non-MCs. ICME Elsevier Ejecta Elsevier Dst index Elsevier Sheath Elsevier Enthalten in Elsevier Science Bargi-Souza, Paula ELSEVIER Posttranscriptional actions of triiodothyronine on 2018 including COSPAR information bulletin : the official journal of the Committee on Space Research (COSPAR), a scientific committee of the International Council of Scientific Unions (ICSU) Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV000905844 volume:62 year:2018 number:3 day:1 month:08 pages:692-706 extent:15 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2018.05.017 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA 44.89 Endokrinologie VZ AR 62 2018 3 1 0801 692-706 15 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in Posttranscriptional actions of triiodothyronine on Amsterdam [u.a.] volume:62 year:2018 number:3 day:1 month:08 pages:692-706 extent:15 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in Posttranscriptional actions of triiodothyronine on Amsterdam [u.a.] volume:62 year:2018 number:3 day:1 month:08 pages:692-706 extent:15 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| bklname |
Endokrinologie |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
ICME Ejecta Dst index Sheath |
| dewey-raw |
610 |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
Posttranscriptional actions of triiodothyronine on |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Goswami, A. @@aut@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2018-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
ELV000905844 |
| dewey-sort |
3610 |
| id |
ELV043553230 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV043553230</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230626003819.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">180726s2018 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.asr.2018.05.017</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">GBV00000000000689.pica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV043553230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0273-1177(18)30413-7</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">610</subfield><subfield code="a">570</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">44.89</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Goswami, A.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Difference in the parameters of ICMEs in Ejecta and Sheath region and their impact on Dst index during 1997–2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2018transfer abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">15</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The comparisons in respect of mean parameters in ejecta and sheath region during 1997–2014 have been studied here. The results from statistical analysis indicate that all the parameters, are more powerful (in respect of amplitude) in the sheath region than that of ejecta, whether there is magnetic cloud (MC) structure or not. Probably, a shock plays the key role to such increases. The inter-relation of parameters in the sheath is higher than that of ejecta. In addition, I also discuss the nature of storm influence parameters variation in the sheath and ejecta separately for MC or non MC. The results in respect of t-test and correlations confirm that, associated with the shock, the magnetic field in the sheath region are opened up and sheath parameters are more energetic for producing geomagnetic storm. I have proposed multiple linear regression model for the prediction of response variable (Dst index) by using mean of the total magnetic field, southward magnetic field, velocity of the solar wind. About 61% of the observed value can be predicted using this model for MC. The correlation becomes strong in case of addition and multipliction functions from the dependent components of multiple regression line equation with Dst index than that of individual parameters of MC and non MC with Dst index. Thus it is preferable to investigate accomulated effect of ICMEs causing successive geomagnetic stroms as compaired to their isolated effects. One ultimate finding is that, there is a higher correlation between Dst index and solar wind parameters (individually or combined) in the sheath than the ones in the ejecta, for both MCs and non-MCs.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The comparisons in respect of mean parameters in ejecta and sheath region during 1997–2014 have been studied here. The results from statistical analysis indicate that all the parameters, are more powerful (in respect of amplitude) in the sheath region than that of ejecta, whether there is magnetic cloud (MC) structure or not. Probably, a shock plays the key role to such increases. The inter-relation of parameters in the sheath is higher than that of ejecta. In addition, I also discuss the nature of storm influence parameters variation in the sheath and ejecta separately for MC or non MC. The results in respect of t-test and correlations confirm that, associated with the shock, the magnetic field in the sheath region are opened up and sheath parameters are more energetic for producing geomagnetic storm. I have proposed multiple linear regression model for the prediction of response variable (Dst index) by using mean of the total magnetic field, southward magnetic field, velocity of the solar wind. About 61% of the observed value can be predicted using this model for MC. The correlation becomes strong in case of addition and multipliction functions from the dependent components of multiple regression line equation with Dst index than that of individual parameters of MC and non MC with Dst index. Thus it is preferable to investigate accomulated effect of ICMEs causing successive geomagnetic stroms as compaired to their isolated effects. One ultimate finding is that, there is a higher correlation between Dst index and solar wind parameters (individually or combined) in the sheath than the ones in the ejecta, for both MCs and non-MCs.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">ICME</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Ejecta</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Dst index</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Sheath</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="n">Elsevier Science</subfield><subfield code="a">Bargi-Souza, Paula ELSEVIER</subfield><subfield code="t">Posttranscriptional actions of triiodothyronine on</subfield><subfield code="d">2018</subfield><subfield code="d">including COSPAR information bulletin : the official journal of the Committee on Space Research (COSPAR), a scientific committee of the International Council of Scientific Unions (ICSU)</subfield><subfield code="g">Amsterdam [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)ELV000905844</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:62</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2018</subfield><subfield code="g">number:3</subfield><subfield code="g">day:1</subfield><subfield code="g">month:08</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:692-706</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:15</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2018.05.017</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">44.89</subfield><subfield code="j">Endokrinologie</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">62</subfield><subfield code="j">2018</subfield><subfield code="e">3</subfield><subfield code="b">1</subfield><subfield code="c">0801</subfield><subfield code="h">692-706</subfield><subfield code="g">15</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Goswami, A. |
| spellingShingle |
Goswami, A. ddc 610 bkl 44.89 Elsevier ICME Elsevier Ejecta Elsevier Dst index Elsevier Sheath Difference in the parameters of ICMEs in Ejecta and Sheath region and their impact on Dst index during 1997–2014 |
| authorStr |
Goswami, A. |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)ELV000905844 |
| format |
electronic Article |
| dewey-ones |
610 - Medicine & health 570 - Life sciences; biology |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut |
| collection |
elsevier |
| remote_str |
true |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| topic_title |
610 570 VZ 44.89 bkl Difference in the parameters of ICMEs in Ejecta and Sheath region and their impact on Dst index during 1997–2014 ICME Elsevier Ejecta Elsevier Dst index Elsevier Sheath Elsevier |
| topic |
ddc 610 bkl 44.89 Elsevier ICME Elsevier Ejecta Elsevier Dst index Elsevier Sheath |
| topic_unstemmed |
ddc 610 bkl 44.89 Elsevier ICME Elsevier Ejecta Elsevier Dst index Elsevier Sheath |
| topic_browse |
ddc 610 bkl 44.89 Elsevier ICME Elsevier Ejecta Elsevier Dst index Elsevier Sheath |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
zu |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Posttranscriptional actions of triiodothyronine on |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
ELV000905844 |
| dewey-tens |
610 - Medicine & health 570 - Life sciences; biology |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Posttranscriptional actions of triiodothyronine on |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)ELV000905844 |
| title |
Difference in the parameters of ICMEs in Ejecta and Sheath region and their impact on Dst index during 1997–2014 |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)ELV043553230 (ELSEVIER)S0273-1177(18)30413-7 |
| title_full |
Difference in the parameters of ICMEs in Ejecta and Sheath region and their impact on Dst index during 1997–2014 |
| author_sort |
Goswami, A. |
| journal |
Posttranscriptional actions of triiodothyronine on |
| journalStr |
Posttranscriptional actions of triiodothyronine on |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| dewey-hundreds |
600 - Technology 500 - Science |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2018 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
zzz |
| container_start_page |
692 |
| author_browse |
Goswami, A. |
| container_volume |
62 |
| physical |
15 |
| class |
610 570 VZ 44.89 bkl |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Goswami, A. |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1016/j.asr.2018.05.017 |
| dewey-full |
610 570 |
| title_sort |
difference in the parameters of icmes in ejecta and sheath region and their impact on dst index during 1997–2014 |
| title_auth |
Difference in the parameters of ICMEs in Ejecta and Sheath region and their impact on Dst index during 1997–2014 |
| abstract |
The comparisons in respect of mean parameters in ejecta and sheath region during 1997–2014 have been studied here. The results from statistical analysis indicate that all the parameters, are more powerful (in respect of amplitude) in the sheath region than that of ejecta, whether there is magnetic cloud (MC) structure or not. Probably, a shock plays the key role to such increases. The inter-relation of parameters in the sheath is higher than that of ejecta. In addition, I also discuss the nature of storm influence parameters variation in the sheath and ejecta separately for MC or non MC. The results in respect of t-test and correlations confirm that, associated with the shock, the magnetic field in the sheath region are opened up and sheath parameters are more energetic for producing geomagnetic storm. I have proposed multiple linear regression model for the prediction of response variable (Dst index) by using mean of the total magnetic field, southward magnetic field, velocity of the solar wind. About 61% of the observed value can be predicted using this model for MC. The correlation becomes strong in case of addition and multipliction functions from the dependent components of multiple regression line equation with Dst index than that of individual parameters of MC and non MC with Dst index. Thus it is preferable to investigate accomulated effect of ICMEs causing successive geomagnetic stroms as compaired to their isolated effects. One ultimate finding is that, there is a higher correlation between Dst index and solar wind parameters (individually or combined) in the sheath than the ones in the ejecta, for both MCs and non-MCs. |
| abstractGer |
The comparisons in respect of mean parameters in ejecta and sheath region during 1997–2014 have been studied here. The results from statistical analysis indicate that all the parameters, are more powerful (in respect of amplitude) in the sheath region than that of ejecta, whether there is magnetic cloud (MC) structure or not. Probably, a shock plays the key role to such increases. The inter-relation of parameters in the sheath is higher than that of ejecta. In addition, I also discuss the nature of storm influence parameters variation in the sheath and ejecta separately for MC or non MC. The results in respect of t-test and correlations confirm that, associated with the shock, the magnetic field in the sheath region are opened up and sheath parameters are more energetic for producing geomagnetic storm. I have proposed multiple linear regression model for the prediction of response variable (Dst index) by using mean of the total magnetic field, southward magnetic field, velocity of the solar wind. About 61% of the observed value can be predicted using this model for MC. The correlation becomes strong in case of addition and multipliction functions from the dependent components of multiple regression line equation with Dst index than that of individual parameters of MC and non MC with Dst index. Thus it is preferable to investigate accomulated effect of ICMEs causing successive geomagnetic stroms as compaired to their isolated effects. One ultimate finding is that, there is a higher correlation between Dst index and solar wind parameters (individually or combined) in the sheath than the ones in the ejecta, for both MCs and non-MCs. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
The comparisons in respect of mean parameters in ejecta and sheath region during 1997–2014 have been studied here. The results from statistical analysis indicate that all the parameters, are more powerful (in respect of amplitude) in the sheath region than that of ejecta, whether there is magnetic cloud (MC) structure or not. Probably, a shock plays the key role to such increases. The inter-relation of parameters in the sheath is higher than that of ejecta. In addition, I also discuss the nature of storm influence parameters variation in the sheath and ejecta separately for MC or non MC. The results in respect of t-test and correlations confirm that, associated with the shock, the magnetic field in the sheath region are opened up and sheath parameters are more energetic for producing geomagnetic storm. I have proposed multiple linear regression model for the prediction of response variable (Dst index) by using mean of the total magnetic field, southward magnetic field, velocity of the solar wind. About 61% of the observed value can be predicted using this model for MC. The correlation becomes strong in case of addition and multipliction functions from the dependent components of multiple regression line equation with Dst index than that of individual parameters of MC and non MC with Dst index. Thus it is preferable to investigate accomulated effect of ICMEs causing successive geomagnetic stroms as compaired to their isolated effects. One ultimate finding is that, there is a higher correlation between Dst index and solar wind parameters (individually or combined) in the sheath than the ones in the ejecta, for both MCs and non-MCs. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA |
| container_issue |
3 |
| title_short |
Difference in the parameters of ICMEs in Ejecta and Sheath region and their impact on Dst index during 1997–2014 |
| url |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2018.05.017 |
| remote_bool |
true |
| ppnlink |
ELV000905844 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
z |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| doi_str |
10.1016/j.asr.2018.05.017 |
| up_date |
2024-07-06T19:07:50.581Z |
| _version_ |
1803857817064439808 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV043553230</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230626003819.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">180726s2018 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.asr.2018.05.017</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">GBV00000000000689.pica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV043553230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0273-1177(18)30413-7</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">610</subfield><subfield code="a">570</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">44.89</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Goswami, A.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Difference in the parameters of ICMEs in Ejecta and Sheath region and their impact on Dst index during 1997–2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2018transfer abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">15</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The comparisons in respect of mean parameters in ejecta and sheath region during 1997–2014 have been studied here. The results from statistical analysis indicate that all the parameters, are more powerful (in respect of amplitude) in the sheath region than that of ejecta, whether there is magnetic cloud (MC) structure or not. Probably, a shock plays the key role to such increases. The inter-relation of parameters in the sheath is higher than that of ejecta. In addition, I also discuss the nature of storm influence parameters variation in the sheath and ejecta separately for MC or non MC. The results in respect of t-test and correlations confirm that, associated with the shock, the magnetic field in the sheath region are opened up and sheath parameters are more energetic for producing geomagnetic storm. I have proposed multiple linear regression model for the prediction of response variable (Dst index) by using mean of the total magnetic field, southward magnetic field, velocity of the solar wind. About 61% of the observed value can be predicted using this model for MC. The correlation becomes strong in case of addition and multipliction functions from the dependent components of multiple regression line equation with Dst index than that of individual parameters of MC and non MC with Dst index. Thus it is preferable to investigate accomulated effect of ICMEs causing successive geomagnetic stroms as compaired to their isolated effects. One ultimate finding is that, there is a higher correlation between Dst index and solar wind parameters (individually or combined) in the sheath than the ones in the ejecta, for both MCs and non-MCs.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The comparisons in respect of mean parameters in ejecta and sheath region during 1997–2014 have been studied here. The results from statistical analysis indicate that all the parameters, are more powerful (in respect of amplitude) in the sheath region than that of ejecta, whether there is magnetic cloud (MC) structure or not. Probably, a shock plays the key role to such increases. The inter-relation of parameters in the sheath is higher than that of ejecta. In addition, I also discuss the nature of storm influence parameters variation in the sheath and ejecta separately for MC or non MC. The results in respect of t-test and correlations confirm that, associated with the shock, the magnetic field in the sheath region are opened up and sheath parameters are more energetic for producing geomagnetic storm. I have proposed multiple linear regression model for the prediction of response variable (Dst index) by using mean of the total magnetic field, southward magnetic field, velocity of the solar wind. About 61% of the observed value can be predicted using this model for MC. The correlation becomes strong in case of addition and multipliction functions from the dependent components of multiple regression line equation with Dst index than that of individual parameters of MC and non MC with Dst index. Thus it is preferable to investigate accomulated effect of ICMEs causing successive geomagnetic stroms as compaired to their isolated effects. One ultimate finding is that, there is a higher correlation between Dst index and solar wind parameters (individually or combined) in the sheath than the ones in the ejecta, for both MCs and non-MCs.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">ICME</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Ejecta</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Dst index</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Sheath</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="n">Elsevier Science</subfield><subfield code="a">Bargi-Souza, Paula ELSEVIER</subfield><subfield code="t">Posttranscriptional actions of triiodothyronine on</subfield><subfield code="d">2018</subfield><subfield code="d">including COSPAR information bulletin : the official journal of the Committee on Space Research (COSPAR), a scientific committee of the International Council of Scientific Unions (ICSU)</subfield><subfield code="g">Amsterdam [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)ELV000905844</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:62</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2018</subfield><subfield code="g">number:3</subfield><subfield code="g">day:1</subfield><subfield code="g">month:08</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:692-706</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:15</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2018.05.017</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">44.89</subfield><subfield code="j">Endokrinologie</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">62</subfield><subfield code="j">2018</subfield><subfield code="e">3</subfield><subfield code="b">1</subfield><subfield code="c">0801</subfield><subfield code="h">692-706</subfield><subfield code="g">15</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.4011116 |