On topology modifications for wideband antenna miniaturization
Introducing various topological modifications is a common practice in the design of miniaturized wideband antennas. Some examples of successful alterations include ground plane stubs or slits below the feed line. In general, novel antenna topologies are reported on the case-to-case basis, often in t...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Aziz Ul Haq, Muhammad [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2018transfer abstract |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Umfang: |
6 |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Editorial Board - 2016, München |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:94 ; year:2018 ; pages:215-220 ; extent:6 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1016/j.aeue.2018.07.006 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
ELV044059094 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ELV044059094 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230626004550.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 181113s2018 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.aeue.2018.07.006 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a GBV00000000000393.pica |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)ELV044059094 | ||
| 035 | |a (ELSEVIER)S1434-8411(18)30912-9 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 610 |q VZ |
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 370 |q VZ |
| 100 | 1 | |a Aziz Ul Haq, Muhammad |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a On topology modifications for wideband antenna miniaturization |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2018transfer abstract | |
| 300 | |a 6 | ||
| 336 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zzz |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b z |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zu |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Introducing various topological modifications is a common practice in the design of miniaturized wideband antennas. Some examples of successful alterations include ground plane stubs or slits below the feed line. In general, novel antenna topologies are reported on the case-to-case basis, often in the form of geometry evolution supported by parameter sweeps, supposedly demonstrating the benefits of the particular changes made to the device. The fundamental problem of such approaches is that neither the reference nor the modified structures are properly optimized. Due to complex interactions between geometry parameters and electrical/field properties of the antenna, the actual suitability of specific topology modifications is therefore unclear or even may lead to performance degradation. In order to illustrate this point, three antenna structures selected from the available literature are considered with geometry parameters rigorously optimized in order to find the minimum-size designs, with and without particular topology changes introduced by the authors of the respective papers. The results indicate that the optimization process virtually removes the said modifications and the optimized antenna footprints are smaller without these. The major message of the work is that conclusive assessment of the suitability of any geometry changes requires proper optimization of all relevant antenna parameters. Numerical results presented in the paper are validated experimentally. | ||
| 520 | |a Introducing various topological modifications is a common practice in the design of miniaturized wideband antennas. Some examples of successful alterations include ground plane stubs or slits below the feed line. In general, novel antenna topologies are reported on the case-to-case basis, often in the form of geometry evolution supported by parameter sweeps, supposedly demonstrating the benefits of the particular changes made to the device. The fundamental problem of such approaches is that neither the reference nor the modified structures are properly optimized. Due to complex interactions between geometry parameters and electrical/field properties of the antenna, the actual suitability of specific topology modifications is therefore unclear or even may lead to performance degradation. In order to illustrate this point, three antenna structures selected from the available literature are considered with geometry parameters rigorously optimized in order to find the minimum-size designs, with and without particular topology changes introduced by the authors of the respective papers. The results indicate that the optimization process virtually removes the said modifications and the optimized antenna footprints are smaller without these. The major message of the work is that conclusive assessment of the suitability of any geometry changes requires proper optimization of all relevant antenna parameters. Numerical results presented in the paper are validated experimentally. | ||
| 650 | 7 | |a Simulation-driven design |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Antenna miniaturization |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Wideband antennas |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Topology modifications |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Design optimization |2 Elsevier | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Koziel, Slawomir |4 oth | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |n Elsevier |t Editorial Board |d 2016 |g München |w (DE-627)ELV019902425 |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:94 |g year:2018 |g pages:215-220 |g extent:6 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aeue.2018.07.006 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_U | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ELV | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_U | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 94 |j 2018 |h 215-220 |g 6 | ||
| author_variant |
u h m a uhm uhma |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
azizulhaqmuhammadkozielslawomir:2018----:noooyoiiainfrieadnenm |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2018transfer abstract |
| publishDate |
2018 |
| allfields |
10.1016/j.aeue.2018.07.006 doi GBV00000000000393.pica (DE-627)ELV044059094 (ELSEVIER)S1434-8411(18)30912-9 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 610 VZ 370 VZ Aziz Ul Haq, Muhammad verfasserin aut On topology modifications for wideband antenna miniaturization 2018transfer abstract 6 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Introducing various topological modifications is a common practice in the design of miniaturized wideband antennas. Some examples of successful alterations include ground plane stubs or slits below the feed line. In general, novel antenna topologies are reported on the case-to-case basis, often in the form of geometry evolution supported by parameter sweeps, supposedly demonstrating the benefits of the particular changes made to the device. The fundamental problem of such approaches is that neither the reference nor the modified structures are properly optimized. Due to complex interactions between geometry parameters and electrical/field properties of the antenna, the actual suitability of specific topology modifications is therefore unclear or even may lead to performance degradation. In order to illustrate this point, three antenna structures selected from the available literature are considered with geometry parameters rigorously optimized in order to find the minimum-size designs, with and without particular topology changes introduced by the authors of the respective papers. The results indicate that the optimization process virtually removes the said modifications and the optimized antenna footprints are smaller without these. The major message of the work is that conclusive assessment of the suitability of any geometry changes requires proper optimization of all relevant antenna parameters. Numerical results presented in the paper are validated experimentally. Introducing various topological modifications is a common practice in the design of miniaturized wideband antennas. Some examples of successful alterations include ground plane stubs or slits below the feed line. In general, novel antenna topologies are reported on the case-to-case basis, often in the form of geometry evolution supported by parameter sweeps, supposedly demonstrating the benefits of the particular changes made to the device. The fundamental problem of such approaches is that neither the reference nor the modified structures are properly optimized. Due to complex interactions between geometry parameters and electrical/field properties of the antenna, the actual suitability of specific topology modifications is therefore unclear or even may lead to performance degradation. In order to illustrate this point, three antenna structures selected from the available literature are considered with geometry parameters rigorously optimized in order to find the minimum-size designs, with and without particular topology changes introduced by the authors of the respective papers. The results indicate that the optimization process virtually removes the said modifications and the optimized antenna footprints are smaller without these. The major message of the work is that conclusive assessment of the suitability of any geometry changes requires proper optimization of all relevant antenna parameters. Numerical results presented in the paper are validated experimentally. Simulation-driven design Elsevier Antenna miniaturization Elsevier Wideband antennas Elsevier Topology modifications Elsevier Design optimization Elsevier Koziel, Slawomir oth Enthalten in Elsevier Editorial Board 2016 München (DE-627)ELV019902425 volume:94 year:2018 pages:215-220 extent:6 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aeue.2018.07.006 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U AR 94 2018 215-220 6 |
| spelling |
10.1016/j.aeue.2018.07.006 doi GBV00000000000393.pica (DE-627)ELV044059094 (ELSEVIER)S1434-8411(18)30912-9 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 610 VZ 370 VZ Aziz Ul Haq, Muhammad verfasserin aut On topology modifications for wideband antenna miniaturization 2018transfer abstract 6 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Introducing various topological modifications is a common practice in the design of miniaturized wideband antennas. Some examples of successful alterations include ground plane stubs or slits below the feed line. In general, novel antenna topologies are reported on the case-to-case basis, often in the form of geometry evolution supported by parameter sweeps, supposedly demonstrating the benefits of the particular changes made to the device. The fundamental problem of such approaches is that neither the reference nor the modified structures are properly optimized. Due to complex interactions between geometry parameters and electrical/field properties of the antenna, the actual suitability of specific topology modifications is therefore unclear or even may lead to performance degradation. In order to illustrate this point, three antenna structures selected from the available literature are considered with geometry parameters rigorously optimized in order to find the minimum-size designs, with and without particular topology changes introduced by the authors of the respective papers. The results indicate that the optimization process virtually removes the said modifications and the optimized antenna footprints are smaller without these. The major message of the work is that conclusive assessment of the suitability of any geometry changes requires proper optimization of all relevant antenna parameters. Numerical results presented in the paper are validated experimentally. Introducing various topological modifications is a common practice in the design of miniaturized wideband antennas. Some examples of successful alterations include ground plane stubs or slits below the feed line. In general, novel antenna topologies are reported on the case-to-case basis, often in the form of geometry evolution supported by parameter sweeps, supposedly demonstrating the benefits of the particular changes made to the device. The fundamental problem of such approaches is that neither the reference nor the modified structures are properly optimized. Due to complex interactions between geometry parameters and electrical/field properties of the antenna, the actual suitability of specific topology modifications is therefore unclear or even may lead to performance degradation. In order to illustrate this point, three antenna structures selected from the available literature are considered with geometry parameters rigorously optimized in order to find the minimum-size designs, with and without particular topology changes introduced by the authors of the respective papers. The results indicate that the optimization process virtually removes the said modifications and the optimized antenna footprints are smaller without these. The major message of the work is that conclusive assessment of the suitability of any geometry changes requires proper optimization of all relevant antenna parameters. Numerical results presented in the paper are validated experimentally. Simulation-driven design Elsevier Antenna miniaturization Elsevier Wideband antennas Elsevier Topology modifications Elsevier Design optimization Elsevier Koziel, Slawomir oth Enthalten in Elsevier Editorial Board 2016 München (DE-627)ELV019902425 volume:94 year:2018 pages:215-220 extent:6 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aeue.2018.07.006 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U AR 94 2018 215-220 6 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1016/j.aeue.2018.07.006 doi GBV00000000000393.pica (DE-627)ELV044059094 (ELSEVIER)S1434-8411(18)30912-9 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 610 VZ 370 VZ Aziz Ul Haq, Muhammad verfasserin aut On topology modifications for wideband antenna miniaturization 2018transfer abstract 6 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Introducing various topological modifications is a common practice in the design of miniaturized wideband antennas. Some examples of successful alterations include ground plane stubs or slits below the feed line. In general, novel antenna topologies are reported on the case-to-case basis, often in the form of geometry evolution supported by parameter sweeps, supposedly demonstrating the benefits of the particular changes made to the device. The fundamental problem of such approaches is that neither the reference nor the modified structures are properly optimized. Due to complex interactions between geometry parameters and electrical/field properties of the antenna, the actual suitability of specific topology modifications is therefore unclear or even may lead to performance degradation. In order to illustrate this point, three antenna structures selected from the available literature are considered with geometry parameters rigorously optimized in order to find the minimum-size designs, with and without particular topology changes introduced by the authors of the respective papers. The results indicate that the optimization process virtually removes the said modifications and the optimized antenna footprints are smaller without these. The major message of the work is that conclusive assessment of the suitability of any geometry changes requires proper optimization of all relevant antenna parameters. Numerical results presented in the paper are validated experimentally. Introducing various topological modifications is a common practice in the design of miniaturized wideband antennas. Some examples of successful alterations include ground plane stubs or slits below the feed line. In general, novel antenna topologies are reported on the case-to-case basis, often in the form of geometry evolution supported by parameter sweeps, supposedly demonstrating the benefits of the particular changes made to the device. The fundamental problem of such approaches is that neither the reference nor the modified structures are properly optimized. Due to complex interactions between geometry parameters and electrical/field properties of the antenna, the actual suitability of specific topology modifications is therefore unclear or even may lead to performance degradation. In order to illustrate this point, three antenna structures selected from the available literature are considered with geometry parameters rigorously optimized in order to find the minimum-size designs, with and without particular topology changes introduced by the authors of the respective papers. The results indicate that the optimization process virtually removes the said modifications and the optimized antenna footprints are smaller without these. The major message of the work is that conclusive assessment of the suitability of any geometry changes requires proper optimization of all relevant antenna parameters. Numerical results presented in the paper are validated experimentally. Simulation-driven design Elsevier Antenna miniaturization Elsevier Wideband antennas Elsevier Topology modifications Elsevier Design optimization Elsevier Koziel, Slawomir oth Enthalten in Elsevier Editorial Board 2016 München (DE-627)ELV019902425 volume:94 year:2018 pages:215-220 extent:6 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aeue.2018.07.006 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U AR 94 2018 215-220 6 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1016/j.aeue.2018.07.006 doi GBV00000000000393.pica (DE-627)ELV044059094 (ELSEVIER)S1434-8411(18)30912-9 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 610 VZ 370 VZ Aziz Ul Haq, Muhammad verfasserin aut On topology modifications for wideband antenna miniaturization 2018transfer abstract 6 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Introducing various topological modifications is a common practice in the design of miniaturized wideband antennas. Some examples of successful alterations include ground plane stubs or slits below the feed line. In general, novel antenna topologies are reported on the case-to-case basis, often in the form of geometry evolution supported by parameter sweeps, supposedly demonstrating the benefits of the particular changes made to the device. The fundamental problem of such approaches is that neither the reference nor the modified structures are properly optimized. Due to complex interactions between geometry parameters and electrical/field properties of the antenna, the actual suitability of specific topology modifications is therefore unclear or even may lead to performance degradation. In order to illustrate this point, three antenna structures selected from the available literature are considered with geometry parameters rigorously optimized in order to find the minimum-size designs, with and without particular topology changes introduced by the authors of the respective papers. The results indicate that the optimization process virtually removes the said modifications and the optimized antenna footprints are smaller without these. The major message of the work is that conclusive assessment of the suitability of any geometry changes requires proper optimization of all relevant antenna parameters. Numerical results presented in the paper are validated experimentally. Introducing various topological modifications is a common practice in the design of miniaturized wideband antennas. Some examples of successful alterations include ground plane stubs or slits below the feed line. In general, novel antenna topologies are reported on the case-to-case basis, often in the form of geometry evolution supported by parameter sweeps, supposedly demonstrating the benefits of the particular changes made to the device. The fundamental problem of such approaches is that neither the reference nor the modified structures are properly optimized. Due to complex interactions between geometry parameters and electrical/field properties of the antenna, the actual suitability of specific topology modifications is therefore unclear or even may lead to performance degradation. In order to illustrate this point, three antenna structures selected from the available literature are considered with geometry parameters rigorously optimized in order to find the minimum-size designs, with and without particular topology changes introduced by the authors of the respective papers. The results indicate that the optimization process virtually removes the said modifications and the optimized antenna footprints are smaller without these. The major message of the work is that conclusive assessment of the suitability of any geometry changes requires proper optimization of all relevant antenna parameters. Numerical results presented in the paper are validated experimentally. Simulation-driven design Elsevier Antenna miniaturization Elsevier Wideband antennas Elsevier Topology modifications Elsevier Design optimization Elsevier Koziel, Slawomir oth Enthalten in Elsevier Editorial Board 2016 München (DE-627)ELV019902425 volume:94 year:2018 pages:215-220 extent:6 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aeue.2018.07.006 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U AR 94 2018 215-220 6 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1016/j.aeue.2018.07.006 doi GBV00000000000393.pica (DE-627)ELV044059094 (ELSEVIER)S1434-8411(18)30912-9 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 610 VZ 370 VZ Aziz Ul Haq, Muhammad verfasserin aut On topology modifications for wideband antenna miniaturization 2018transfer abstract 6 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Introducing various topological modifications is a common practice in the design of miniaturized wideband antennas. Some examples of successful alterations include ground plane stubs or slits below the feed line. In general, novel antenna topologies are reported on the case-to-case basis, often in the form of geometry evolution supported by parameter sweeps, supposedly demonstrating the benefits of the particular changes made to the device. The fundamental problem of such approaches is that neither the reference nor the modified structures are properly optimized. Due to complex interactions between geometry parameters and electrical/field properties of the antenna, the actual suitability of specific topology modifications is therefore unclear or even may lead to performance degradation. In order to illustrate this point, three antenna structures selected from the available literature are considered with geometry parameters rigorously optimized in order to find the minimum-size designs, with and without particular topology changes introduced by the authors of the respective papers. The results indicate that the optimization process virtually removes the said modifications and the optimized antenna footprints are smaller without these. The major message of the work is that conclusive assessment of the suitability of any geometry changes requires proper optimization of all relevant antenna parameters. Numerical results presented in the paper are validated experimentally. Introducing various topological modifications is a common practice in the design of miniaturized wideband antennas. Some examples of successful alterations include ground plane stubs or slits below the feed line. In general, novel antenna topologies are reported on the case-to-case basis, often in the form of geometry evolution supported by parameter sweeps, supposedly demonstrating the benefits of the particular changes made to the device. The fundamental problem of such approaches is that neither the reference nor the modified structures are properly optimized. Due to complex interactions between geometry parameters and electrical/field properties of the antenna, the actual suitability of specific topology modifications is therefore unclear or even may lead to performance degradation. In order to illustrate this point, three antenna structures selected from the available literature are considered with geometry parameters rigorously optimized in order to find the minimum-size designs, with and without particular topology changes introduced by the authors of the respective papers. The results indicate that the optimization process virtually removes the said modifications and the optimized antenna footprints are smaller without these. The major message of the work is that conclusive assessment of the suitability of any geometry changes requires proper optimization of all relevant antenna parameters. Numerical results presented in the paper are validated experimentally. Simulation-driven design Elsevier Antenna miniaturization Elsevier Wideband antennas Elsevier Topology modifications Elsevier Design optimization Elsevier Koziel, Slawomir oth Enthalten in Elsevier Editorial Board 2016 München (DE-627)ELV019902425 volume:94 year:2018 pages:215-220 extent:6 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aeue.2018.07.006 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U AR 94 2018 215-220 6 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in Editorial Board München volume:94 year:2018 pages:215-220 extent:6 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in Editorial Board München volume:94 year:2018 pages:215-220 extent:6 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
Simulation-driven design Antenna miniaturization Wideband antennas Topology modifications Design optimization |
| dewey-raw |
610 |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
Editorial Board |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Aziz Ul Haq, Muhammad @@aut@@ Koziel, Slawomir @@oth@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2018-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
ELV019902425 |
| dewey-sort |
3610 |
| id |
ELV044059094 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV044059094</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230626004550.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">181113s2018 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.aeue.2018.07.006</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">GBV00000000000393.pica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV044059094</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S1434-8411(18)30912-9</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">610</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">370</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Aziz Ul Haq, Muhammad</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">On topology modifications for wideband antenna miniaturization</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2018transfer abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">6</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Introducing various topological modifications is a common practice in the design of miniaturized wideband antennas. Some examples of successful alterations include ground plane stubs or slits below the feed line. In general, novel antenna topologies are reported on the case-to-case basis, often in the form of geometry evolution supported by parameter sweeps, supposedly demonstrating the benefits of the particular changes made to the device. The fundamental problem of such approaches is that neither the reference nor the modified structures are properly optimized. Due to complex interactions between geometry parameters and electrical/field properties of the antenna, the actual suitability of specific topology modifications is therefore unclear or even may lead to performance degradation. In order to illustrate this point, three antenna structures selected from the available literature are considered with geometry parameters rigorously optimized in order to find the minimum-size designs, with and without particular topology changes introduced by the authors of the respective papers. The results indicate that the optimization process virtually removes the said modifications and the optimized antenna footprints are smaller without these. The major message of the work is that conclusive assessment of the suitability of any geometry changes requires proper optimization of all relevant antenna parameters. Numerical results presented in the paper are validated experimentally.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Introducing various topological modifications is a common practice in the design of miniaturized wideband antennas. Some examples of successful alterations include ground plane stubs or slits below the feed line. In general, novel antenna topologies are reported on the case-to-case basis, often in the form of geometry evolution supported by parameter sweeps, supposedly demonstrating the benefits of the particular changes made to the device. The fundamental problem of such approaches is that neither the reference nor the modified structures are properly optimized. Due to complex interactions between geometry parameters and electrical/field properties of the antenna, the actual suitability of specific topology modifications is therefore unclear or even may lead to performance degradation. In order to illustrate this point, three antenna structures selected from the available literature are considered with geometry parameters rigorously optimized in order to find the minimum-size designs, with and without particular topology changes introduced by the authors of the respective papers. The results indicate that the optimization process virtually removes the said modifications and the optimized antenna footprints are smaller without these. The major message of the work is that conclusive assessment of the suitability of any geometry changes requires proper optimization of all relevant antenna parameters. Numerical results presented in the paper are validated experimentally.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Simulation-driven design</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Antenna miniaturization</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Wideband antennas</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Topology modifications</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Design optimization</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Koziel, Slawomir</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="n">Elsevier</subfield><subfield code="t">Editorial Board</subfield><subfield code="d">2016</subfield><subfield code="g">München</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)ELV019902425</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:94</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2018</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:215-220</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:6</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aeue.2018.07.006</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">94</subfield><subfield code="j">2018</subfield><subfield code="h">215-220</subfield><subfield code="g">6</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Aziz Ul Haq, Muhammad |
| spellingShingle |
Aziz Ul Haq, Muhammad ddc 610 ddc 370 Elsevier Simulation-driven design Elsevier Antenna miniaturization Elsevier Wideband antennas Elsevier Topology modifications Elsevier Design optimization On topology modifications for wideband antenna miniaturization |
| authorStr |
Aziz Ul Haq, Muhammad |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)ELV019902425 |
| format |
electronic Article |
| dewey-ones |
610 - Medicine & health 370 - Education |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut |
| collection |
elsevier |
| remote_str |
true |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| topic_title |
610 VZ 370 VZ On topology modifications for wideband antenna miniaturization Simulation-driven design Elsevier Antenna miniaturization Elsevier Wideband antennas Elsevier Topology modifications Elsevier Design optimization Elsevier |
| topic |
ddc 610 ddc 370 Elsevier Simulation-driven design Elsevier Antenna miniaturization Elsevier Wideband antennas Elsevier Topology modifications Elsevier Design optimization |
| topic_unstemmed |
ddc 610 ddc 370 Elsevier Simulation-driven design Elsevier Antenna miniaturization Elsevier Wideband antennas Elsevier Topology modifications Elsevier Design optimization |
| topic_browse |
ddc 610 ddc 370 Elsevier Simulation-driven design Elsevier Antenna miniaturization Elsevier Wideband antennas Elsevier Topology modifications Elsevier Design optimization |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
zu |
| author2_variant |
s k sk |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Editorial Board |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
ELV019902425 |
| dewey-tens |
610 - Medicine & health 370 - Education |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Editorial Board |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)ELV019902425 |
| title |
On topology modifications for wideband antenna miniaturization |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)ELV044059094 (ELSEVIER)S1434-8411(18)30912-9 |
| title_full |
On topology modifications for wideband antenna miniaturization |
| author_sort |
Aziz Ul Haq, Muhammad |
| journal |
Editorial Board |
| journalStr |
Editorial Board |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| dewey-hundreds |
600 - Technology 300 - Social sciences |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2018 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
zzz |
| container_start_page |
215 |
| author_browse |
Aziz Ul Haq, Muhammad |
| container_volume |
94 |
| physical |
6 |
| class |
610 VZ 370 VZ |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Aziz Ul Haq, Muhammad |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1016/j.aeue.2018.07.006 |
| dewey-full |
610 370 |
| title_sort |
on topology modifications for wideband antenna miniaturization |
| title_auth |
On topology modifications for wideband antenna miniaturization |
| abstract |
Introducing various topological modifications is a common practice in the design of miniaturized wideband antennas. Some examples of successful alterations include ground plane stubs or slits below the feed line. In general, novel antenna topologies are reported on the case-to-case basis, often in the form of geometry evolution supported by parameter sweeps, supposedly demonstrating the benefits of the particular changes made to the device. The fundamental problem of such approaches is that neither the reference nor the modified structures are properly optimized. Due to complex interactions between geometry parameters and electrical/field properties of the antenna, the actual suitability of specific topology modifications is therefore unclear or even may lead to performance degradation. In order to illustrate this point, three antenna structures selected from the available literature are considered with geometry parameters rigorously optimized in order to find the minimum-size designs, with and without particular topology changes introduced by the authors of the respective papers. The results indicate that the optimization process virtually removes the said modifications and the optimized antenna footprints are smaller without these. The major message of the work is that conclusive assessment of the suitability of any geometry changes requires proper optimization of all relevant antenna parameters. Numerical results presented in the paper are validated experimentally. |
| abstractGer |
Introducing various topological modifications is a common practice in the design of miniaturized wideband antennas. Some examples of successful alterations include ground plane stubs or slits below the feed line. In general, novel antenna topologies are reported on the case-to-case basis, often in the form of geometry evolution supported by parameter sweeps, supposedly demonstrating the benefits of the particular changes made to the device. The fundamental problem of such approaches is that neither the reference nor the modified structures are properly optimized. Due to complex interactions between geometry parameters and electrical/field properties of the antenna, the actual suitability of specific topology modifications is therefore unclear or even may lead to performance degradation. In order to illustrate this point, three antenna structures selected from the available literature are considered with geometry parameters rigorously optimized in order to find the minimum-size designs, with and without particular topology changes introduced by the authors of the respective papers. The results indicate that the optimization process virtually removes the said modifications and the optimized antenna footprints are smaller without these. The major message of the work is that conclusive assessment of the suitability of any geometry changes requires proper optimization of all relevant antenna parameters. Numerical results presented in the paper are validated experimentally. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
Introducing various topological modifications is a common practice in the design of miniaturized wideband antennas. Some examples of successful alterations include ground plane stubs or slits below the feed line. In general, novel antenna topologies are reported on the case-to-case basis, often in the form of geometry evolution supported by parameter sweeps, supposedly demonstrating the benefits of the particular changes made to the device. The fundamental problem of such approaches is that neither the reference nor the modified structures are properly optimized. Due to complex interactions between geometry parameters and electrical/field properties of the antenna, the actual suitability of specific topology modifications is therefore unclear or even may lead to performance degradation. In order to illustrate this point, three antenna structures selected from the available literature are considered with geometry parameters rigorously optimized in order to find the minimum-size designs, with and without particular topology changes introduced by the authors of the respective papers. The results indicate that the optimization process virtually removes the said modifications and the optimized antenna footprints are smaller without these. The major message of the work is that conclusive assessment of the suitability of any geometry changes requires proper optimization of all relevant antenna parameters. Numerical results presented in the paper are validated experimentally. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U |
| title_short |
On topology modifications for wideband antenna miniaturization |
| url |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aeue.2018.07.006 |
| remote_bool |
true |
| author2 |
Koziel, Slawomir |
| author2Str |
Koziel, Slawomir |
| ppnlink |
ELV019902425 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
z |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| author2_role |
oth |
| doi_str |
10.1016/j.aeue.2018.07.006 |
| up_date |
2024-07-06T20:28:30.425Z |
| _version_ |
1803862892007653376 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV044059094</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230626004550.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">181113s2018 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.aeue.2018.07.006</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">GBV00000000000393.pica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV044059094</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S1434-8411(18)30912-9</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">610</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">370</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Aziz Ul Haq, Muhammad</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">On topology modifications for wideband antenna miniaturization</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2018transfer abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">6</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Introducing various topological modifications is a common practice in the design of miniaturized wideband antennas. Some examples of successful alterations include ground plane stubs or slits below the feed line. In general, novel antenna topologies are reported on the case-to-case basis, often in the form of geometry evolution supported by parameter sweeps, supposedly demonstrating the benefits of the particular changes made to the device. The fundamental problem of such approaches is that neither the reference nor the modified structures are properly optimized. Due to complex interactions between geometry parameters and electrical/field properties of the antenna, the actual suitability of specific topology modifications is therefore unclear or even may lead to performance degradation. In order to illustrate this point, three antenna structures selected from the available literature are considered with geometry parameters rigorously optimized in order to find the minimum-size designs, with and without particular topology changes introduced by the authors of the respective papers. The results indicate that the optimization process virtually removes the said modifications and the optimized antenna footprints are smaller without these. The major message of the work is that conclusive assessment of the suitability of any geometry changes requires proper optimization of all relevant antenna parameters. Numerical results presented in the paper are validated experimentally.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Introducing various topological modifications is a common practice in the design of miniaturized wideband antennas. Some examples of successful alterations include ground plane stubs or slits below the feed line. In general, novel antenna topologies are reported on the case-to-case basis, often in the form of geometry evolution supported by parameter sweeps, supposedly demonstrating the benefits of the particular changes made to the device. The fundamental problem of such approaches is that neither the reference nor the modified structures are properly optimized. Due to complex interactions between geometry parameters and electrical/field properties of the antenna, the actual suitability of specific topology modifications is therefore unclear or even may lead to performance degradation. In order to illustrate this point, three antenna structures selected from the available literature are considered with geometry parameters rigorously optimized in order to find the minimum-size designs, with and without particular topology changes introduced by the authors of the respective papers. The results indicate that the optimization process virtually removes the said modifications and the optimized antenna footprints are smaller without these. The major message of the work is that conclusive assessment of the suitability of any geometry changes requires proper optimization of all relevant antenna parameters. Numerical results presented in the paper are validated experimentally.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Simulation-driven design</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Antenna miniaturization</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Wideband antennas</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Topology modifications</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Design optimization</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Koziel, Slawomir</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="n">Elsevier</subfield><subfield code="t">Editorial Board</subfield><subfield code="d">2016</subfield><subfield code="g">München</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)ELV019902425</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:94</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2018</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:215-220</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:6</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aeue.2018.07.006</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">94</subfield><subfield code="j">2018</subfield><subfield code="h">215-220</subfield><subfield code="g">6</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.4002237 |