Metacognition – What did James H. Flavell really say and the implications for the conceptualization and design of metacognitive interventions
In the last two decades years, several interventions have been designed for people with major psychological disorders that all have “metacognitive” in their name: Metacognitive Therapy (MCT), Metacognitive Training (e.g., for people with psychosis) and Metacognitive Reflection and Insight Therapy (M...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Moritz, Steffen [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2018transfer abstract |
|---|
| Umfang: |
7 |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Idiopathic Environmental Intolerance: A Treatment Model - Van den Bergh, Omer ELSEVIER, 2021, an international multidisciplinary journal, Amsterdam [u.a.] |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:201 ; year:2018 ; pages:20-26 ; extent:7 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1016/j.schres.2018.06.001 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
ELV044972229 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ELV044972229 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230626010127.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 181123s2018 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.schres.2018.06.001 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a GBV00000000000521.pica |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)ELV044972229 | ||
| 035 | |a (ELSEVIER)S0920-9964(18)30312-8 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 150 |q VZ |
| 100 | 1 | |a Moritz, Steffen |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Metacognition – What did James H. Flavell really say and the implications for the conceptualization and design of metacognitive interventions |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2018transfer abstract | |
| 300 | |a 7 | ||
| 336 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zzz |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b z |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zu |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a In the last two decades years, several interventions have been designed for people with major psychological disorders that all have “metacognitive” in their name: Metacognitive Therapy (MCT), Metacognitive Training (e.g., for people with psychosis) and Metacognitive Reflection and Insight Therapy (MERIT). Two of these interventions are primarily targeted at patients with schizophrenia. Prompted by a recent discussion about what constitutes “true” metacognitive treatment, we will first explore the original concept of metacognition as defined by James H. Flavell. Then, we will describe each approach in detail before highlighting how each intervention picks up on slightly different aspects of Flavell's original metacognitive construct. We will also discuss inherent problems with the label “metacognition.” | ||
| 520 | |a In the last two decades years, several interventions have been designed for people with major psychological disorders that all have “metacognitive” in their name: Metacognitive Therapy (MCT), Metacognitive Training (e.g., for people with psychosis) and Metacognitive Reflection and Insight Therapy (MERIT). Two of these interventions are primarily targeted at patients with schizophrenia. Prompted by a recent discussion about what constitutes “true” metacognitive treatment, we will first explore the original concept of metacognition as defined by James H. Flavell. Then, we will describe each approach in detail before highlighting how each intervention picks up on slightly different aspects of Flavell's original metacognitive construct. We will also discuss inherent problems with the label “metacognition.” | ||
| 700 | 1 | |a Lysaker, Paul H. |4 oth | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |n Elsevier Science |a Van den Bergh, Omer ELSEVIER |t Idiopathic Environmental Intolerance: A Treatment Model |d 2021 |d an international multidisciplinary journal |g Amsterdam [u.a.] |w (DE-627)ELV005829860 |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:201 |g year:2018 |g pages:20-26 |g extent:7 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1016/j.schres.2018.06.001 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_U | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ELV | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_U | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 201 |j 2018 |h 20-26 |g 7 | ||
| author_variant |
s m sm |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
moritzsteffenlysakerpaulh:2018----:eaontowaddaehlvlralsyntemlctosoteocpulztoadei |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2018transfer abstract |
| publishDate |
2018 |
| allfields |
10.1016/j.schres.2018.06.001 doi GBV00000000000521.pica (DE-627)ELV044972229 (ELSEVIER)S0920-9964(18)30312-8 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 150 VZ Moritz, Steffen verfasserin aut Metacognition – What did James H. Flavell really say and the implications for the conceptualization and design of metacognitive interventions 2018transfer abstract 7 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier In the last two decades years, several interventions have been designed for people with major psychological disorders that all have “metacognitive” in their name: Metacognitive Therapy (MCT), Metacognitive Training (e.g., for people with psychosis) and Metacognitive Reflection and Insight Therapy (MERIT). Two of these interventions are primarily targeted at patients with schizophrenia. Prompted by a recent discussion about what constitutes “true” metacognitive treatment, we will first explore the original concept of metacognition as defined by James H. Flavell. Then, we will describe each approach in detail before highlighting how each intervention picks up on slightly different aspects of Flavell's original metacognitive construct. We will also discuss inherent problems with the label “metacognition.” In the last two decades years, several interventions have been designed for people with major psychological disorders that all have “metacognitive” in their name: Metacognitive Therapy (MCT), Metacognitive Training (e.g., for people with psychosis) and Metacognitive Reflection and Insight Therapy (MERIT). Two of these interventions are primarily targeted at patients with schizophrenia. Prompted by a recent discussion about what constitutes “true” metacognitive treatment, we will first explore the original concept of metacognition as defined by James H. Flavell. Then, we will describe each approach in detail before highlighting how each intervention picks up on slightly different aspects of Flavell's original metacognitive construct. We will also discuss inherent problems with the label “metacognition.” Lysaker, Paul H. oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Van den Bergh, Omer ELSEVIER Idiopathic Environmental Intolerance: A Treatment Model 2021 an international multidisciplinary journal Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV005829860 volume:201 year:2018 pages:20-26 extent:7 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.schres.2018.06.001 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U AR 201 2018 20-26 7 |
| spelling |
10.1016/j.schres.2018.06.001 doi GBV00000000000521.pica (DE-627)ELV044972229 (ELSEVIER)S0920-9964(18)30312-8 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 150 VZ Moritz, Steffen verfasserin aut Metacognition – What did James H. Flavell really say and the implications for the conceptualization and design of metacognitive interventions 2018transfer abstract 7 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier In the last two decades years, several interventions have been designed for people with major psychological disorders that all have “metacognitive” in their name: Metacognitive Therapy (MCT), Metacognitive Training (e.g., for people with psychosis) and Metacognitive Reflection and Insight Therapy (MERIT). Two of these interventions are primarily targeted at patients with schizophrenia. Prompted by a recent discussion about what constitutes “true” metacognitive treatment, we will first explore the original concept of metacognition as defined by James H. Flavell. Then, we will describe each approach in detail before highlighting how each intervention picks up on slightly different aspects of Flavell's original metacognitive construct. We will also discuss inherent problems with the label “metacognition.” In the last two decades years, several interventions have been designed for people with major psychological disorders that all have “metacognitive” in their name: Metacognitive Therapy (MCT), Metacognitive Training (e.g., for people with psychosis) and Metacognitive Reflection and Insight Therapy (MERIT). Two of these interventions are primarily targeted at patients with schizophrenia. Prompted by a recent discussion about what constitutes “true” metacognitive treatment, we will first explore the original concept of metacognition as defined by James H. Flavell. Then, we will describe each approach in detail before highlighting how each intervention picks up on slightly different aspects of Flavell's original metacognitive construct. We will also discuss inherent problems with the label “metacognition.” Lysaker, Paul H. oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Van den Bergh, Omer ELSEVIER Idiopathic Environmental Intolerance: A Treatment Model 2021 an international multidisciplinary journal Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV005829860 volume:201 year:2018 pages:20-26 extent:7 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.schres.2018.06.001 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U AR 201 2018 20-26 7 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1016/j.schres.2018.06.001 doi GBV00000000000521.pica (DE-627)ELV044972229 (ELSEVIER)S0920-9964(18)30312-8 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 150 VZ Moritz, Steffen verfasserin aut Metacognition – What did James H. Flavell really say and the implications for the conceptualization and design of metacognitive interventions 2018transfer abstract 7 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier In the last two decades years, several interventions have been designed for people with major psychological disorders that all have “metacognitive” in their name: Metacognitive Therapy (MCT), Metacognitive Training (e.g., for people with psychosis) and Metacognitive Reflection and Insight Therapy (MERIT). Two of these interventions are primarily targeted at patients with schizophrenia. Prompted by a recent discussion about what constitutes “true” metacognitive treatment, we will first explore the original concept of metacognition as defined by James H. Flavell. Then, we will describe each approach in detail before highlighting how each intervention picks up on slightly different aspects of Flavell's original metacognitive construct. We will also discuss inherent problems with the label “metacognition.” In the last two decades years, several interventions have been designed for people with major psychological disorders that all have “metacognitive” in their name: Metacognitive Therapy (MCT), Metacognitive Training (e.g., for people with psychosis) and Metacognitive Reflection and Insight Therapy (MERIT). Two of these interventions are primarily targeted at patients with schizophrenia. Prompted by a recent discussion about what constitutes “true” metacognitive treatment, we will first explore the original concept of metacognition as defined by James H. Flavell. Then, we will describe each approach in detail before highlighting how each intervention picks up on slightly different aspects of Flavell's original metacognitive construct. We will also discuss inherent problems with the label “metacognition.” Lysaker, Paul H. oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Van den Bergh, Omer ELSEVIER Idiopathic Environmental Intolerance: A Treatment Model 2021 an international multidisciplinary journal Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV005829860 volume:201 year:2018 pages:20-26 extent:7 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.schres.2018.06.001 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U AR 201 2018 20-26 7 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1016/j.schres.2018.06.001 doi GBV00000000000521.pica (DE-627)ELV044972229 (ELSEVIER)S0920-9964(18)30312-8 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 150 VZ Moritz, Steffen verfasserin aut Metacognition – What did James H. Flavell really say and the implications for the conceptualization and design of metacognitive interventions 2018transfer abstract 7 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier In the last two decades years, several interventions have been designed for people with major psychological disorders that all have “metacognitive” in their name: Metacognitive Therapy (MCT), Metacognitive Training (e.g., for people with psychosis) and Metacognitive Reflection and Insight Therapy (MERIT). Two of these interventions are primarily targeted at patients with schizophrenia. Prompted by a recent discussion about what constitutes “true” metacognitive treatment, we will first explore the original concept of metacognition as defined by James H. Flavell. Then, we will describe each approach in detail before highlighting how each intervention picks up on slightly different aspects of Flavell's original metacognitive construct. We will also discuss inherent problems with the label “metacognition.” In the last two decades years, several interventions have been designed for people with major psychological disorders that all have “metacognitive” in their name: Metacognitive Therapy (MCT), Metacognitive Training (e.g., for people with psychosis) and Metacognitive Reflection and Insight Therapy (MERIT). Two of these interventions are primarily targeted at patients with schizophrenia. Prompted by a recent discussion about what constitutes “true” metacognitive treatment, we will first explore the original concept of metacognition as defined by James H. Flavell. Then, we will describe each approach in detail before highlighting how each intervention picks up on slightly different aspects of Flavell's original metacognitive construct. We will also discuss inherent problems with the label “metacognition.” Lysaker, Paul H. oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Van den Bergh, Omer ELSEVIER Idiopathic Environmental Intolerance: A Treatment Model 2021 an international multidisciplinary journal Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV005829860 volume:201 year:2018 pages:20-26 extent:7 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.schres.2018.06.001 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U AR 201 2018 20-26 7 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1016/j.schres.2018.06.001 doi GBV00000000000521.pica (DE-627)ELV044972229 (ELSEVIER)S0920-9964(18)30312-8 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 150 VZ Moritz, Steffen verfasserin aut Metacognition – What did James H. Flavell really say and the implications for the conceptualization and design of metacognitive interventions 2018transfer abstract 7 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier In the last two decades years, several interventions have been designed for people with major psychological disorders that all have “metacognitive” in their name: Metacognitive Therapy (MCT), Metacognitive Training (e.g., for people with psychosis) and Metacognitive Reflection and Insight Therapy (MERIT). Two of these interventions are primarily targeted at patients with schizophrenia. Prompted by a recent discussion about what constitutes “true” metacognitive treatment, we will first explore the original concept of metacognition as defined by James H. Flavell. Then, we will describe each approach in detail before highlighting how each intervention picks up on slightly different aspects of Flavell's original metacognitive construct. We will also discuss inherent problems with the label “metacognition.” In the last two decades years, several interventions have been designed for people with major psychological disorders that all have “metacognitive” in their name: Metacognitive Therapy (MCT), Metacognitive Training (e.g., for people with psychosis) and Metacognitive Reflection and Insight Therapy (MERIT). Two of these interventions are primarily targeted at patients with schizophrenia. Prompted by a recent discussion about what constitutes “true” metacognitive treatment, we will first explore the original concept of metacognition as defined by James H. Flavell. Then, we will describe each approach in detail before highlighting how each intervention picks up on slightly different aspects of Flavell's original metacognitive construct. We will also discuss inherent problems with the label “metacognition.” Lysaker, Paul H. oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Van den Bergh, Omer ELSEVIER Idiopathic Environmental Intolerance: A Treatment Model 2021 an international multidisciplinary journal Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV005829860 volume:201 year:2018 pages:20-26 extent:7 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.schres.2018.06.001 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U AR 201 2018 20-26 7 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in Idiopathic Environmental Intolerance: A Treatment Model Amsterdam [u.a.] volume:201 year:2018 pages:20-26 extent:7 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in Idiopathic Environmental Intolerance: A Treatment Model Amsterdam [u.a.] volume:201 year:2018 pages:20-26 extent:7 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| dewey-raw |
150 |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
Idiopathic Environmental Intolerance: A Treatment Model |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Moritz, Steffen @@aut@@ Lysaker, Paul H. @@oth@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2018-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
ELV005829860 |
| dewey-sort |
3150 |
| id |
ELV044972229 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV044972229</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230626010127.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">181123s2018 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.schres.2018.06.001</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">GBV00000000000521.pica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV044972229</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0920-9964(18)30312-8</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">150</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Moritz, Steffen</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Metacognition – What did James H. Flavell really say and the implications for the conceptualization and design of metacognitive interventions</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2018transfer abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">7</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">In the last two decades years, several interventions have been designed for people with major psychological disorders that all have “metacognitive” in their name: Metacognitive Therapy (MCT), Metacognitive Training (e.g., for people with psychosis) and Metacognitive Reflection and Insight Therapy (MERIT). Two of these interventions are primarily targeted at patients with schizophrenia. Prompted by a recent discussion about what constitutes “true” metacognitive treatment, we will first explore the original concept of metacognition as defined by James H. Flavell. Then, we will describe each approach in detail before highlighting how each intervention picks up on slightly different aspects of Flavell's original metacognitive construct. We will also discuss inherent problems with the label “metacognition.”</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">In the last two decades years, several interventions have been designed for people with major psychological disorders that all have “metacognitive” in their name: Metacognitive Therapy (MCT), Metacognitive Training (e.g., for people with psychosis) and Metacognitive Reflection and Insight Therapy (MERIT). Two of these interventions are primarily targeted at patients with schizophrenia. Prompted by a recent discussion about what constitutes “true” metacognitive treatment, we will first explore the original concept of metacognition as defined by James H. Flavell. Then, we will describe each approach in detail before highlighting how each intervention picks up on slightly different aspects of Flavell's original metacognitive construct. We will also discuss inherent problems with the label “metacognition.”</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Lysaker, Paul H.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="n">Elsevier Science</subfield><subfield code="a">Van den Bergh, Omer ELSEVIER</subfield><subfield code="t">Idiopathic Environmental Intolerance: A Treatment Model</subfield><subfield code="d">2021</subfield><subfield code="d">an international multidisciplinary journal</subfield><subfield code="g">Amsterdam [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)ELV005829860</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:201</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2018</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:20-26</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:7</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.schres.2018.06.001</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">201</subfield><subfield code="j">2018</subfield><subfield code="h">20-26</subfield><subfield code="g">7</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Moritz, Steffen |
| spellingShingle |
Moritz, Steffen ddc 150 Metacognition – What did James H. Flavell really say and the implications for the conceptualization and design of metacognitive interventions |
| authorStr |
Moritz, Steffen |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)ELV005829860 |
| format |
electronic Article |
| dewey-ones |
150 - Psychology |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut |
| collection |
elsevier |
| remote_str |
true |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| topic_title |
150 VZ Metacognition – What did James H. Flavell really say and the implications for the conceptualization and design of metacognitive interventions |
| topic |
ddc 150 |
| topic_unstemmed |
ddc 150 |
| topic_browse |
ddc 150 |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
zu |
| author2_variant |
p h l ph phl |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Idiopathic Environmental Intolerance: A Treatment Model |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
ELV005829860 |
| dewey-tens |
150 - Psychology |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Idiopathic Environmental Intolerance: A Treatment Model |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)ELV005829860 |
| title |
Metacognition – What did James H. Flavell really say and the implications for the conceptualization and design of metacognitive interventions |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)ELV044972229 (ELSEVIER)S0920-9964(18)30312-8 |
| title_full |
Metacognition – What did James H. Flavell really say and the implications for the conceptualization and design of metacognitive interventions |
| author_sort |
Moritz, Steffen |
| journal |
Idiopathic Environmental Intolerance: A Treatment Model |
| journalStr |
Idiopathic Environmental Intolerance: A Treatment Model |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| dewey-hundreds |
100 - Philosophy & psychology |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2018 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
zzz |
| container_start_page |
20 |
| author_browse |
Moritz, Steffen |
| container_volume |
201 |
| physical |
7 |
| class |
150 VZ |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Moritz, Steffen |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1016/j.schres.2018.06.001 |
| dewey-full |
150 |
| title_sort |
metacognition – what did james h. flavell really say and the implications for the conceptualization and design of metacognitive interventions |
| title_auth |
Metacognition – What did James H. Flavell really say and the implications for the conceptualization and design of metacognitive interventions |
| abstract |
In the last two decades years, several interventions have been designed for people with major psychological disorders that all have “metacognitive” in their name: Metacognitive Therapy (MCT), Metacognitive Training (e.g., for people with psychosis) and Metacognitive Reflection and Insight Therapy (MERIT). Two of these interventions are primarily targeted at patients with schizophrenia. Prompted by a recent discussion about what constitutes “true” metacognitive treatment, we will first explore the original concept of metacognition as defined by James H. Flavell. Then, we will describe each approach in detail before highlighting how each intervention picks up on slightly different aspects of Flavell's original metacognitive construct. We will also discuss inherent problems with the label “metacognition.” |
| abstractGer |
In the last two decades years, several interventions have been designed for people with major psychological disorders that all have “metacognitive” in their name: Metacognitive Therapy (MCT), Metacognitive Training (e.g., for people with psychosis) and Metacognitive Reflection and Insight Therapy (MERIT). Two of these interventions are primarily targeted at patients with schizophrenia. Prompted by a recent discussion about what constitutes “true” metacognitive treatment, we will first explore the original concept of metacognition as defined by James H. Flavell. Then, we will describe each approach in detail before highlighting how each intervention picks up on slightly different aspects of Flavell's original metacognitive construct. We will also discuss inherent problems with the label “metacognition.” |
| abstract_unstemmed |
In the last two decades years, several interventions have been designed for people with major psychological disorders that all have “metacognitive” in their name: Metacognitive Therapy (MCT), Metacognitive Training (e.g., for people with psychosis) and Metacognitive Reflection and Insight Therapy (MERIT). Two of these interventions are primarily targeted at patients with schizophrenia. Prompted by a recent discussion about what constitutes “true” metacognitive treatment, we will first explore the original concept of metacognition as defined by James H. Flavell. Then, we will describe each approach in detail before highlighting how each intervention picks up on slightly different aspects of Flavell's original metacognitive construct. We will also discuss inherent problems with the label “metacognition.” |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U |
| title_short |
Metacognition – What did James H. Flavell really say and the implications for the conceptualization and design of metacognitive interventions |
| url |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.schres.2018.06.001 |
| remote_bool |
true |
| author2 |
Lysaker, Paul H. |
| author2Str |
Lysaker, Paul H. |
| ppnlink |
ELV005829860 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
z |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| author2_role |
oth |
| doi_str |
10.1016/j.schres.2018.06.001 |
| up_date |
2024-07-06T22:53:48.277Z |
| _version_ |
1803872033338032128 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV044972229</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230626010127.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">181123s2018 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.schres.2018.06.001</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">GBV00000000000521.pica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV044972229</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0920-9964(18)30312-8</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">150</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Moritz, Steffen</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Metacognition – What did James H. Flavell really say and the implications for the conceptualization and design of metacognitive interventions</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2018transfer abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">7</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">In the last two decades years, several interventions have been designed for people with major psychological disorders that all have “metacognitive” in their name: Metacognitive Therapy (MCT), Metacognitive Training (e.g., for people with psychosis) and Metacognitive Reflection and Insight Therapy (MERIT). Two of these interventions are primarily targeted at patients with schizophrenia. Prompted by a recent discussion about what constitutes “true” metacognitive treatment, we will first explore the original concept of metacognition as defined by James H. Flavell. Then, we will describe each approach in detail before highlighting how each intervention picks up on slightly different aspects of Flavell's original metacognitive construct. We will also discuss inherent problems with the label “metacognition.”</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">In the last two decades years, several interventions have been designed for people with major psychological disorders that all have “metacognitive” in their name: Metacognitive Therapy (MCT), Metacognitive Training (e.g., for people with psychosis) and Metacognitive Reflection and Insight Therapy (MERIT). Two of these interventions are primarily targeted at patients with schizophrenia. Prompted by a recent discussion about what constitutes “true” metacognitive treatment, we will first explore the original concept of metacognition as defined by James H. Flavell. Then, we will describe each approach in detail before highlighting how each intervention picks up on slightly different aspects of Flavell's original metacognitive construct. We will also discuss inherent problems with the label “metacognition.”</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Lysaker, Paul H.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="n">Elsevier Science</subfield><subfield code="a">Van den Bergh, Omer ELSEVIER</subfield><subfield code="t">Idiopathic Environmental Intolerance: A Treatment Model</subfield><subfield code="d">2021</subfield><subfield code="d">an international multidisciplinary journal</subfield><subfield code="g">Amsterdam [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)ELV005829860</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:201</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2018</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:20-26</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:7</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.schres.2018.06.001</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">201</subfield><subfield code="j">2018</subfield><subfield code="h">20-26</subfield><subfield code="g">7</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.399646 |