Comparisons and challenges of modern neutrino scattering experiments (TENSIONS2016 report)
Over the last decade, there has been enormous effort to measure neutrino interaction cross sections important to oscillation experiments. However, a number of results from modern experiments appear to be in tension with each other, despite purporting to measure the same processes. The TENSIONS2016 w...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Betancourt, M. [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2018transfer abstract |
|---|
| Umfang: |
28 |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Motion and emotion while standing on stable and unstable surfaces - Farias, Sara ELSEVIER, 2016, Amsterdam [u.a.] |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:773 ; year:2018 ; day:20 ; month:11 ; pages:1-28 ; extent:28 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1016/j.physrep.2018.08.003 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
ELV044984162 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ELV044984162 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230626010144.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 181123s2018 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.physrep.2018.08.003 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a GBV00000000000432.pica |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)ELV044984162 | ||
| 035 | |a (ELSEVIER)S0370-1573(18)30217-5 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 610 |q VZ |
| 084 | |a 77.50 |2 bkl | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Betancourt, M. |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Comparisons and challenges of modern neutrino scattering experiments (TENSIONS2016 report) |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2018transfer abstract | |
| 300 | |a 28 | ||
| 336 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zzz |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b z |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zu |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Over the last decade, there has been enormous effort to measure neutrino interaction cross sections important to oscillation experiments. However, a number of results from modern experiments appear to be in tension with each other, despite purporting to measure the same processes. The TENSIONS2016 workshop was held at University of Pittsburgh July 24–31, 2016 and was sponsored by the Pittsburgh Particle Physics, Astronomy, and Cosmology Center (PITT PACC). The focus was on bringing experts from three experimental collaborations together to compare results in detail and try to find the source of tension by clarifying and comparing signal definitions and the analysis strategies used for each measurement. A set of comparisons between the measurements using a consistent set of models was also made. This paper summarizes the main conclusions of that work. | ||
| 520 | |a Over the last decade, there has been enormous effort to measure neutrino interaction cross sections important to oscillation experiments. However, a number of results from modern experiments appear to be in tension with each other, despite purporting to measure the same processes. The TENSIONS2016 workshop was held at University of Pittsburgh July 24–31, 2016 and was sponsored by the Pittsburgh Particle Physics, Astronomy, and Cosmology Center (PITT PACC). The focus was on bringing experts from three experimental collaborations together to compare results in detail and try to find the source of tension by clarifying and comparing signal definitions and the analysis strategies used for each measurement. A set of comparisons between the measurements using a consistent set of models was also made. This paper summarizes the main conclusions of that work. | ||
| 700 | 1 | |a Bolognesi, S. |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Calcutt, J. |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Castillo Fernandez, R. |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Cudd, A. |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Dytman, S. |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Eberly, B. |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Furmanski, A.P. |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Fine, R. |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Grange, J. |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Jiang, L. |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Katori, T. |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Kleckner, J. |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Kleykamp, J. |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Mahn, K. |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Messerly, B. |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Perdue, G. |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Pickering, L. |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Stowell, J.P. |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Sobczyk, J. |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Suarez, N. |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Tanaka, H. |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Tayloe, R. |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Thornton, R.T. |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Wilking, M. |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Wilkinson, C. |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Wret, C. |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Zeller, G.P. |4 oth | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |n Elsevier Science, North-Holland |a Farias, Sara ELSEVIER |t Motion and emotion while standing on stable and unstable surfaces |d 2016 |g Amsterdam [u.a.] |w (DE-627)ELV000152234 |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:773 |g year:2018 |g day:20 |g month:11 |g pages:1-28 |g extent:28 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2018.08.003 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_U | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ELV | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_U | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-PHA | ||
| 936 | b | k | |a 77.50 |j Psychophysiologie |q VZ |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 773 |j 2018 |b 20 |c 1120 |h 1-28 |g 28 | ||
| author_variant |
m b mb |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
betancourtmbolognesiscalcuttjcastillofer:2018----:oprsnadhlegsfoenetiocteigxei |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2018transfer abstract |
| bklnumber |
77.50 |
| publishDate |
2018 |
| allfields |
10.1016/j.physrep.2018.08.003 doi GBV00000000000432.pica (DE-627)ELV044984162 (ELSEVIER)S0370-1573(18)30217-5 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 610 VZ 77.50 bkl Betancourt, M. verfasserin aut Comparisons and challenges of modern neutrino scattering experiments (TENSIONS2016 report) 2018transfer abstract 28 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Over the last decade, there has been enormous effort to measure neutrino interaction cross sections important to oscillation experiments. However, a number of results from modern experiments appear to be in tension with each other, despite purporting to measure the same processes. The TENSIONS2016 workshop was held at University of Pittsburgh July 24–31, 2016 and was sponsored by the Pittsburgh Particle Physics, Astronomy, and Cosmology Center (PITT PACC). The focus was on bringing experts from three experimental collaborations together to compare results in detail and try to find the source of tension by clarifying and comparing signal definitions and the analysis strategies used for each measurement. A set of comparisons between the measurements using a consistent set of models was also made. This paper summarizes the main conclusions of that work. Over the last decade, there has been enormous effort to measure neutrino interaction cross sections important to oscillation experiments. However, a number of results from modern experiments appear to be in tension with each other, despite purporting to measure the same processes. The TENSIONS2016 workshop was held at University of Pittsburgh July 24–31, 2016 and was sponsored by the Pittsburgh Particle Physics, Astronomy, and Cosmology Center (PITT PACC). The focus was on bringing experts from three experimental collaborations together to compare results in detail and try to find the source of tension by clarifying and comparing signal definitions and the analysis strategies used for each measurement. A set of comparisons between the measurements using a consistent set of models was also made. This paper summarizes the main conclusions of that work. Bolognesi, S. oth Calcutt, J. oth Castillo Fernandez, R. oth Cudd, A. oth Dytman, S. oth Eberly, B. oth Furmanski, A.P. oth Fine, R. oth Grange, J. oth Jiang, L. oth Katori, T. oth Kleckner, J. oth Kleykamp, J. oth Mahn, K. oth Messerly, B. oth Perdue, G. oth Pickering, L. oth Stowell, J.P. oth Sobczyk, J. oth Suarez, N. oth Tanaka, H. oth Tayloe, R. oth Thornton, R.T. oth Wilking, M. oth Wilkinson, C. oth Wret, C. oth Zeller, G.P. oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science, North-Holland Farias, Sara ELSEVIER Motion and emotion while standing on stable and unstable surfaces 2016 Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV000152234 volume:773 year:2018 day:20 month:11 pages:1-28 extent:28 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2018.08.003 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA 77.50 Psychophysiologie VZ AR 773 2018 20 1120 1-28 28 |
| spelling |
10.1016/j.physrep.2018.08.003 doi GBV00000000000432.pica (DE-627)ELV044984162 (ELSEVIER)S0370-1573(18)30217-5 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 610 VZ 77.50 bkl Betancourt, M. verfasserin aut Comparisons and challenges of modern neutrino scattering experiments (TENSIONS2016 report) 2018transfer abstract 28 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Over the last decade, there has been enormous effort to measure neutrino interaction cross sections important to oscillation experiments. However, a number of results from modern experiments appear to be in tension with each other, despite purporting to measure the same processes. The TENSIONS2016 workshop was held at University of Pittsburgh July 24–31, 2016 and was sponsored by the Pittsburgh Particle Physics, Astronomy, and Cosmology Center (PITT PACC). The focus was on bringing experts from three experimental collaborations together to compare results in detail and try to find the source of tension by clarifying and comparing signal definitions and the analysis strategies used for each measurement. A set of comparisons between the measurements using a consistent set of models was also made. This paper summarizes the main conclusions of that work. Over the last decade, there has been enormous effort to measure neutrino interaction cross sections important to oscillation experiments. However, a number of results from modern experiments appear to be in tension with each other, despite purporting to measure the same processes. The TENSIONS2016 workshop was held at University of Pittsburgh July 24–31, 2016 and was sponsored by the Pittsburgh Particle Physics, Astronomy, and Cosmology Center (PITT PACC). The focus was on bringing experts from three experimental collaborations together to compare results in detail and try to find the source of tension by clarifying and comparing signal definitions and the analysis strategies used for each measurement. A set of comparisons between the measurements using a consistent set of models was also made. This paper summarizes the main conclusions of that work. Bolognesi, S. oth Calcutt, J. oth Castillo Fernandez, R. oth Cudd, A. oth Dytman, S. oth Eberly, B. oth Furmanski, A.P. oth Fine, R. oth Grange, J. oth Jiang, L. oth Katori, T. oth Kleckner, J. oth Kleykamp, J. oth Mahn, K. oth Messerly, B. oth Perdue, G. oth Pickering, L. oth Stowell, J.P. oth Sobczyk, J. oth Suarez, N. oth Tanaka, H. oth Tayloe, R. oth Thornton, R.T. oth Wilking, M. oth Wilkinson, C. oth Wret, C. oth Zeller, G.P. oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science, North-Holland Farias, Sara ELSEVIER Motion and emotion while standing on stable and unstable surfaces 2016 Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV000152234 volume:773 year:2018 day:20 month:11 pages:1-28 extent:28 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2018.08.003 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA 77.50 Psychophysiologie VZ AR 773 2018 20 1120 1-28 28 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1016/j.physrep.2018.08.003 doi GBV00000000000432.pica (DE-627)ELV044984162 (ELSEVIER)S0370-1573(18)30217-5 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 610 VZ 77.50 bkl Betancourt, M. verfasserin aut Comparisons and challenges of modern neutrino scattering experiments (TENSIONS2016 report) 2018transfer abstract 28 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Over the last decade, there has been enormous effort to measure neutrino interaction cross sections important to oscillation experiments. However, a number of results from modern experiments appear to be in tension with each other, despite purporting to measure the same processes. The TENSIONS2016 workshop was held at University of Pittsburgh July 24–31, 2016 and was sponsored by the Pittsburgh Particle Physics, Astronomy, and Cosmology Center (PITT PACC). The focus was on bringing experts from three experimental collaborations together to compare results in detail and try to find the source of tension by clarifying and comparing signal definitions and the analysis strategies used for each measurement. A set of comparisons between the measurements using a consistent set of models was also made. This paper summarizes the main conclusions of that work. Over the last decade, there has been enormous effort to measure neutrino interaction cross sections important to oscillation experiments. However, a number of results from modern experiments appear to be in tension with each other, despite purporting to measure the same processes. The TENSIONS2016 workshop was held at University of Pittsburgh July 24–31, 2016 and was sponsored by the Pittsburgh Particle Physics, Astronomy, and Cosmology Center (PITT PACC). The focus was on bringing experts from three experimental collaborations together to compare results in detail and try to find the source of tension by clarifying and comparing signal definitions and the analysis strategies used for each measurement. A set of comparisons between the measurements using a consistent set of models was also made. This paper summarizes the main conclusions of that work. Bolognesi, S. oth Calcutt, J. oth Castillo Fernandez, R. oth Cudd, A. oth Dytman, S. oth Eberly, B. oth Furmanski, A.P. oth Fine, R. oth Grange, J. oth Jiang, L. oth Katori, T. oth Kleckner, J. oth Kleykamp, J. oth Mahn, K. oth Messerly, B. oth Perdue, G. oth Pickering, L. oth Stowell, J.P. oth Sobczyk, J. oth Suarez, N. oth Tanaka, H. oth Tayloe, R. oth Thornton, R.T. oth Wilking, M. oth Wilkinson, C. oth Wret, C. oth Zeller, G.P. oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science, North-Holland Farias, Sara ELSEVIER Motion and emotion while standing on stable and unstable surfaces 2016 Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV000152234 volume:773 year:2018 day:20 month:11 pages:1-28 extent:28 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2018.08.003 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA 77.50 Psychophysiologie VZ AR 773 2018 20 1120 1-28 28 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1016/j.physrep.2018.08.003 doi GBV00000000000432.pica (DE-627)ELV044984162 (ELSEVIER)S0370-1573(18)30217-5 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 610 VZ 77.50 bkl Betancourt, M. verfasserin aut Comparisons and challenges of modern neutrino scattering experiments (TENSIONS2016 report) 2018transfer abstract 28 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Over the last decade, there has been enormous effort to measure neutrino interaction cross sections important to oscillation experiments. However, a number of results from modern experiments appear to be in tension with each other, despite purporting to measure the same processes. The TENSIONS2016 workshop was held at University of Pittsburgh July 24–31, 2016 and was sponsored by the Pittsburgh Particle Physics, Astronomy, and Cosmology Center (PITT PACC). The focus was on bringing experts from three experimental collaborations together to compare results in detail and try to find the source of tension by clarifying and comparing signal definitions and the analysis strategies used for each measurement. A set of comparisons between the measurements using a consistent set of models was also made. This paper summarizes the main conclusions of that work. Over the last decade, there has been enormous effort to measure neutrino interaction cross sections important to oscillation experiments. However, a number of results from modern experiments appear to be in tension with each other, despite purporting to measure the same processes. The TENSIONS2016 workshop was held at University of Pittsburgh July 24–31, 2016 and was sponsored by the Pittsburgh Particle Physics, Astronomy, and Cosmology Center (PITT PACC). The focus was on bringing experts from three experimental collaborations together to compare results in detail and try to find the source of tension by clarifying and comparing signal definitions and the analysis strategies used for each measurement. A set of comparisons between the measurements using a consistent set of models was also made. This paper summarizes the main conclusions of that work. Bolognesi, S. oth Calcutt, J. oth Castillo Fernandez, R. oth Cudd, A. oth Dytman, S. oth Eberly, B. oth Furmanski, A.P. oth Fine, R. oth Grange, J. oth Jiang, L. oth Katori, T. oth Kleckner, J. oth Kleykamp, J. oth Mahn, K. oth Messerly, B. oth Perdue, G. oth Pickering, L. oth Stowell, J.P. oth Sobczyk, J. oth Suarez, N. oth Tanaka, H. oth Tayloe, R. oth Thornton, R.T. oth Wilking, M. oth Wilkinson, C. oth Wret, C. oth Zeller, G.P. oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science, North-Holland Farias, Sara ELSEVIER Motion and emotion while standing on stable and unstable surfaces 2016 Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV000152234 volume:773 year:2018 day:20 month:11 pages:1-28 extent:28 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2018.08.003 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA 77.50 Psychophysiologie VZ AR 773 2018 20 1120 1-28 28 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1016/j.physrep.2018.08.003 doi GBV00000000000432.pica (DE-627)ELV044984162 (ELSEVIER)S0370-1573(18)30217-5 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 610 VZ 77.50 bkl Betancourt, M. verfasserin aut Comparisons and challenges of modern neutrino scattering experiments (TENSIONS2016 report) 2018transfer abstract 28 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Over the last decade, there has been enormous effort to measure neutrino interaction cross sections important to oscillation experiments. However, a number of results from modern experiments appear to be in tension with each other, despite purporting to measure the same processes. The TENSIONS2016 workshop was held at University of Pittsburgh July 24–31, 2016 and was sponsored by the Pittsburgh Particle Physics, Astronomy, and Cosmology Center (PITT PACC). The focus was on bringing experts from three experimental collaborations together to compare results in detail and try to find the source of tension by clarifying and comparing signal definitions and the analysis strategies used for each measurement. A set of comparisons between the measurements using a consistent set of models was also made. This paper summarizes the main conclusions of that work. Over the last decade, there has been enormous effort to measure neutrino interaction cross sections important to oscillation experiments. However, a number of results from modern experiments appear to be in tension with each other, despite purporting to measure the same processes. The TENSIONS2016 workshop was held at University of Pittsburgh July 24–31, 2016 and was sponsored by the Pittsburgh Particle Physics, Astronomy, and Cosmology Center (PITT PACC). The focus was on bringing experts from three experimental collaborations together to compare results in detail and try to find the source of tension by clarifying and comparing signal definitions and the analysis strategies used for each measurement. A set of comparisons between the measurements using a consistent set of models was also made. This paper summarizes the main conclusions of that work. Bolognesi, S. oth Calcutt, J. oth Castillo Fernandez, R. oth Cudd, A. oth Dytman, S. oth Eberly, B. oth Furmanski, A.P. oth Fine, R. oth Grange, J. oth Jiang, L. oth Katori, T. oth Kleckner, J. oth Kleykamp, J. oth Mahn, K. oth Messerly, B. oth Perdue, G. oth Pickering, L. oth Stowell, J.P. oth Sobczyk, J. oth Suarez, N. oth Tanaka, H. oth Tayloe, R. oth Thornton, R.T. oth Wilking, M. oth Wilkinson, C. oth Wret, C. oth Zeller, G.P. oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science, North-Holland Farias, Sara ELSEVIER Motion and emotion while standing on stable and unstable surfaces 2016 Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV000152234 volume:773 year:2018 day:20 month:11 pages:1-28 extent:28 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2018.08.003 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA 77.50 Psychophysiologie VZ AR 773 2018 20 1120 1-28 28 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in Motion and emotion while standing on stable and unstable surfaces Amsterdam [u.a.] volume:773 year:2018 day:20 month:11 pages:1-28 extent:28 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in Motion and emotion while standing on stable and unstable surfaces Amsterdam [u.a.] volume:773 year:2018 day:20 month:11 pages:1-28 extent:28 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| bklname |
Psychophysiologie |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| dewey-raw |
610 |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
Motion and emotion while standing on stable and unstable surfaces |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Betancourt, M. @@aut@@ Bolognesi, S. @@oth@@ Calcutt, J. @@oth@@ Castillo Fernandez, R. @@oth@@ Cudd, A. @@oth@@ Dytman, S. @@oth@@ Eberly, B. @@oth@@ Furmanski, A.P. @@oth@@ Fine, R. @@oth@@ Grange, J. @@oth@@ Jiang, L. @@oth@@ Katori, T. @@oth@@ Kleckner, J. @@oth@@ Kleykamp, J. @@oth@@ Mahn, K. @@oth@@ Messerly, B. @@oth@@ Perdue, G. @@oth@@ Pickering, L. @@oth@@ Stowell, J.P. @@oth@@ Sobczyk, J. @@oth@@ Suarez, N. @@oth@@ Tanaka, H. @@oth@@ Tayloe, R. @@oth@@ Thornton, R.T. @@oth@@ Wilking, M. @@oth@@ Wilkinson, C. @@oth@@ Wret, C. @@oth@@ Zeller, G.P. @@oth@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2018-01-20T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
ELV000152234 |
| dewey-sort |
3610 |
| id |
ELV044984162 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV044984162</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230626010144.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">181123s2018 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.physrep.2018.08.003</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">GBV00000000000432.pica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV044984162</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0370-1573(18)30217-5</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">610</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">77.50</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Betancourt, M.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Comparisons and challenges of modern neutrino scattering experiments (TENSIONS2016 report)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2018transfer abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">28</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Over the last decade, there has been enormous effort to measure neutrino interaction cross sections important to oscillation experiments. However, a number of results from modern experiments appear to be in tension with each other, despite purporting to measure the same processes. The TENSIONS2016 workshop was held at University of Pittsburgh July 24–31, 2016 and was sponsored by the Pittsburgh Particle Physics, Astronomy, and Cosmology Center (PITT PACC). The focus was on bringing experts from three experimental collaborations together to compare results in detail and try to find the source of tension by clarifying and comparing signal definitions and the analysis strategies used for each measurement. A set of comparisons between the measurements using a consistent set of models was also made. This paper summarizes the main conclusions of that work.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Over the last decade, there has been enormous effort to measure neutrino interaction cross sections important to oscillation experiments. However, a number of results from modern experiments appear to be in tension with each other, despite purporting to measure the same processes. The TENSIONS2016 workshop was held at University of Pittsburgh July 24–31, 2016 and was sponsored by the Pittsburgh Particle Physics, Astronomy, and Cosmology Center (PITT PACC). The focus was on bringing experts from three experimental collaborations together to compare results in detail and try to find the source of tension by clarifying and comparing signal definitions and the analysis strategies used for each measurement. A set of comparisons between the measurements using a consistent set of models was also made. This paper summarizes the main conclusions of that work.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Bolognesi, S.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Calcutt, J.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Castillo Fernandez, R.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Cudd, A.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Dytman, S.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Eberly, B.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Furmanski, A.P.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Fine, R.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Grange, J.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Jiang, L.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Katori, T.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Kleckner, J.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Kleykamp, J.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Mahn, K.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Messerly, B.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Perdue, G.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Pickering, L.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Stowell, J.P.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Sobczyk, J.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Suarez, N.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Tanaka, H.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Tayloe, R.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Thornton, R.T.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Wilking, M.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Wilkinson, C.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Wret, C.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Zeller, G.P.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="n">Elsevier Science, North-Holland</subfield><subfield code="a">Farias, Sara ELSEVIER</subfield><subfield code="t">Motion and emotion while standing on stable and unstable surfaces</subfield><subfield code="d">2016</subfield><subfield code="g">Amsterdam [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)ELV000152234</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:773</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2018</subfield><subfield code="g">day:20</subfield><subfield code="g">month:11</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:1-28</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:28</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2018.08.003</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">77.50</subfield><subfield code="j">Psychophysiologie</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">773</subfield><subfield code="j">2018</subfield><subfield code="b">20</subfield><subfield code="c">1120</subfield><subfield code="h">1-28</subfield><subfield code="g">28</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Betancourt, M. |
| spellingShingle |
Betancourt, M. ddc 610 bkl 77.50 Comparisons and challenges of modern neutrino scattering experiments (TENSIONS2016 report) |
| authorStr |
Betancourt, M. |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)ELV000152234 |
| format |
electronic Article |
| dewey-ones |
610 - Medicine & health |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut |
| collection |
elsevier |
| remote_str |
true |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| topic_title |
610 VZ 77.50 bkl Comparisons and challenges of modern neutrino scattering experiments (TENSIONS2016 report) |
| topic |
ddc 610 bkl 77.50 |
| topic_unstemmed |
ddc 610 bkl 77.50 |
| topic_browse |
ddc 610 bkl 77.50 |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
zu |
| author2_variant |
s b sb j c jc f r c fr frc a c ac s d sd b e be a f af r f rf j g jg l j lj t k tk j k jk j k jk k m km b m bm g p gp l p lp j s js j s js n s ns h t ht r t rt r t rt m w mw c w cw c w cw g z gz |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Motion and emotion while standing on stable and unstable surfaces |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
ELV000152234 |
| dewey-tens |
610 - Medicine & health |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Motion and emotion while standing on stable and unstable surfaces |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)ELV000152234 |
| title |
Comparisons and challenges of modern neutrino scattering experiments (TENSIONS2016 report) |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)ELV044984162 (ELSEVIER)S0370-1573(18)30217-5 |
| title_full |
Comparisons and challenges of modern neutrino scattering experiments (TENSIONS2016 report) |
| author_sort |
Betancourt, M. |
| journal |
Motion and emotion while standing on stable and unstable surfaces |
| journalStr |
Motion and emotion while standing on stable and unstable surfaces |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| dewey-hundreds |
600 - Technology |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2018 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
zzz |
| container_start_page |
1 |
| author_browse |
Betancourt, M. |
| container_volume |
773 |
| physical |
28 |
| class |
610 VZ 77.50 bkl |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Betancourt, M. |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1016/j.physrep.2018.08.003 |
| dewey-full |
610 |
| title_sort |
comparisons and challenges of modern neutrino scattering experiments (tensions2016 report) |
| title_auth |
Comparisons and challenges of modern neutrino scattering experiments (TENSIONS2016 report) |
| abstract |
Over the last decade, there has been enormous effort to measure neutrino interaction cross sections important to oscillation experiments. However, a number of results from modern experiments appear to be in tension with each other, despite purporting to measure the same processes. The TENSIONS2016 workshop was held at University of Pittsburgh July 24–31, 2016 and was sponsored by the Pittsburgh Particle Physics, Astronomy, and Cosmology Center (PITT PACC). The focus was on bringing experts from three experimental collaborations together to compare results in detail and try to find the source of tension by clarifying and comparing signal definitions and the analysis strategies used for each measurement. A set of comparisons between the measurements using a consistent set of models was also made. This paper summarizes the main conclusions of that work. |
| abstractGer |
Over the last decade, there has been enormous effort to measure neutrino interaction cross sections important to oscillation experiments. However, a number of results from modern experiments appear to be in tension with each other, despite purporting to measure the same processes. The TENSIONS2016 workshop was held at University of Pittsburgh July 24–31, 2016 and was sponsored by the Pittsburgh Particle Physics, Astronomy, and Cosmology Center (PITT PACC). The focus was on bringing experts from three experimental collaborations together to compare results in detail and try to find the source of tension by clarifying and comparing signal definitions and the analysis strategies used for each measurement. A set of comparisons between the measurements using a consistent set of models was also made. This paper summarizes the main conclusions of that work. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
Over the last decade, there has been enormous effort to measure neutrino interaction cross sections important to oscillation experiments. However, a number of results from modern experiments appear to be in tension with each other, despite purporting to measure the same processes. The TENSIONS2016 workshop was held at University of Pittsburgh July 24–31, 2016 and was sponsored by the Pittsburgh Particle Physics, Astronomy, and Cosmology Center (PITT PACC). The focus was on bringing experts from three experimental collaborations together to compare results in detail and try to find the source of tension by clarifying and comparing signal definitions and the analysis strategies used for each measurement. A set of comparisons between the measurements using a consistent set of models was also made. This paper summarizes the main conclusions of that work. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA |
| title_short |
Comparisons and challenges of modern neutrino scattering experiments (TENSIONS2016 report) |
| url |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2018.08.003 |
| remote_bool |
true |
| author2 |
Bolognesi, S. Calcutt, J. Castillo Fernandez, R. Cudd, A. Dytman, S. Eberly, B. Furmanski, A.P. Fine, R. Grange, J. Jiang, L. Katori, T. Kleckner, J. Kleykamp, J. Mahn, K. Messerly, B. Perdue, G. Pickering, L. Stowell, J.P. Sobczyk, J. Suarez, N. Tanaka, H. Tayloe, R. Thornton, R.T. Wilking, M. Wilkinson, C. Wret, C. Zeller, G.P. |
| author2Str |
Bolognesi, S. Calcutt, J. Castillo Fernandez, R. Cudd, A. Dytman, S. Eberly, B. Furmanski, A.P. Fine, R. Grange, J. Jiang, L. Katori, T. Kleckner, J. Kleykamp, J. Mahn, K. Messerly, B. Perdue, G. Pickering, L. Stowell, J.P. Sobczyk, J. Suarez, N. Tanaka, H. Tayloe, R. Thornton, R.T. Wilking, M. Wilkinson, C. Wret, C. Zeller, G.P. |
| ppnlink |
ELV000152234 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
z |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| author2_role |
oth oth oth oth oth oth oth oth oth oth oth oth oth oth oth oth oth oth oth oth oth oth oth oth oth oth oth |
| doi_str |
10.1016/j.physrep.2018.08.003 |
| up_date |
2024-07-06T22:55:49.768Z |
| _version_ |
1803872160731627520 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV044984162</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230626010144.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">181123s2018 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.physrep.2018.08.003</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">GBV00000000000432.pica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV044984162</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0370-1573(18)30217-5</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">610</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">77.50</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Betancourt, M.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Comparisons and challenges of modern neutrino scattering experiments (TENSIONS2016 report)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2018transfer abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">28</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Over the last decade, there has been enormous effort to measure neutrino interaction cross sections important to oscillation experiments. However, a number of results from modern experiments appear to be in tension with each other, despite purporting to measure the same processes. The TENSIONS2016 workshop was held at University of Pittsburgh July 24–31, 2016 and was sponsored by the Pittsburgh Particle Physics, Astronomy, and Cosmology Center (PITT PACC). The focus was on bringing experts from three experimental collaborations together to compare results in detail and try to find the source of tension by clarifying and comparing signal definitions and the analysis strategies used for each measurement. A set of comparisons between the measurements using a consistent set of models was also made. This paper summarizes the main conclusions of that work.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Over the last decade, there has been enormous effort to measure neutrino interaction cross sections important to oscillation experiments. However, a number of results from modern experiments appear to be in tension with each other, despite purporting to measure the same processes. The TENSIONS2016 workshop was held at University of Pittsburgh July 24–31, 2016 and was sponsored by the Pittsburgh Particle Physics, Astronomy, and Cosmology Center (PITT PACC). The focus was on bringing experts from three experimental collaborations together to compare results in detail and try to find the source of tension by clarifying and comparing signal definitions and the analysis strategies used for each measurement. A set of comparisons between the measurements using a consistent set of models was also made. This paper summarizes the main conclusions of that work.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Bolognesi, S.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Calcutt, J.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Castillo Fernandez, R.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Cudd, A.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Dytman, S.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Eberly, B.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Furmanski, A.P.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Fine, R.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Grange, J.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Jiang, L.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Katori, T.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Kleckner, J.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Kleykamp, J.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Mahn, K.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Messerly, B.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Perdue, G.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Pickering, L.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Stowell, J.P.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Sobczyk, J.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Suarez, N.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Tanaka, H.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Tayloe, R.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Thornton, R.T.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Wilking, M.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Wilkinson, C.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Wret, C.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Zeller, G.P.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="n">Elsevier Science, North-Holland</subfield><subfield code="a">Farias, Sara ELSEVIER</subfield><subfield code="t">Motion and emotion while standing on stable and unstable surfaces</subfield><subfield code="d">2016</subfield><subfield code="g">Amsterdam [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)ELV000152234</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:773</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2018</subfield><subfield code="g">day:20</subfield><subfield code="g">month:11</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:1-28</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:28</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2018.08.003</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">77.50</subfield><subfield code="j">Psychophysiologie</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">773</subfield><subfield code="j">2018</subfield><subfield code="b">20</subfield><subfield code="c">1120</subfield><subfield code="h">1-28</subfield><subfield code="g">28</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.4010057 |