Learning Fuzzy Cognitive Maps with modified asexual reproduction optimisation algorithm
This paper present a comparison between Fuzzy Cognitive Map (FCM) learning approaches and algorithms. FCMs are fuzzy digraphs with weights and feedback loops, consisting of nodes interconnected through directed arcs mostly used for knowledge representation and system modelling. One of the most impor...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Autor*in: |
Salmeron, Jose L. [verfasserIn] |
---|
Format: |
E-Artikel |
---|---|
Sprache: |
Englisch |
Erschienen: |
2019transfer abstract |
---|
Schlagwörter: |
---|
Umfang: |
13 |
---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Subsurface fluid flow at an active cold seep area in the Qiongdongnan Basin, northern South China Sea - Wang, Jiliang ELSEVIER, 2018, Amsterdam [u.a.] |
---|---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:163 ; year:2019 ; day:1 ; month:01 ; pages:723-735 ; extent:13 |
Links: |
---|
DOI / URN: |
10.1016/j.knosys.2018.09.034 |
---|
Katalog-ID: |
ELV044985924 |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | ELV044985924 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20230626010146.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 181123s2019 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.knosys.2018.09.034 |2 doi | |
028 | 5 | 2 | |a GBV00000000000455.pica |
035 | |a (DE-627)ELV044985924 | ||
035 | |a (ELSEVIER)S0950-7051(18)30485-4 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
082 | 0 | 4 | |a 550 |q VZ |
084 | |a 38.00 |2 bkl | ||
100 | 1 | |a Salmeron, Jose L. |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Learning Fuzzy Cognitive Maps with modified asexual reproduction optimisation algorithm |
264 | 1 | |c 2019transfer abstract | |
300 | |a 13 | ||
336 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zzz |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b z |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zu |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a This paper present a comparison between Fuzzy Cognitive Map (FCM) learning approaches and algorithms. FCMs are fuzzy digraphs with weights and feedback loops, consisting of nodes interconnected through directed arcs mostly used for knowledge representation and system modelling. One of the most important characteristics of FCMs is their learning capabilities. FCMs are normally constructed through experts’ opinions, thus they maybe subjective. Learning algorithms are introduced to overcome this inconvenient. One of the main problem of the new proposed algorithms is their validation. Using theoretical and experimental analysis, this research aims to (1) compare FCM learning algorithms proposed in the literature, (2) provide a validation tool for new FCM learning algorithms (3) present a new algorithm called Asexual Reproduction Optimisation (ARO) with one of its extensions – Modified ARO (MARO) – as a novel FCM learning algorithm to use the validation tool proposed. According to the findings from the literature, it seems that among FCM learning approaches, population-based algorithms perform better compared to other algorithms. Also, the testing was done in five benchmark datasets and a synthetic dataset with different node sizes using two criteria of in-sample and out-of-sample errors. The results show that MARO outperforms other algorithms in both error functions in terms accuracy and robustness. | ||
520 | |a This paper present a comparison between Fuzzy Cognitive Map (FCM) learning approaches and algorithms. FCMs are fuzzy digraphs with weights and feedback loops, consisting of nodes interconnected through directed arcs mostly used for knowledge representation and system modelling. One of the most important characteristics of FCMs is their learning capabilities. FCMs are normally constructed through experts’ opinions, thus they maybe subjective. Learning algorithms are introduced to overcome this inconvenient. One of the main problem of the new proposed algorithms is their validation. Using theoretical and experimental analysis, this research aims to (1) compare FCM learning algorithms proposed in the literature, (2) provide a validation tool for new FCM learning algorithms (3) present a new algorithm called Asexual Reproduction Optimisation (ARO) with one of its extensions – Modified ARO (MARO) – as a novel FCM learning algorithm to use the validation tool proposed. According to the findings from the literature, it seems that among FCM learning approaches, population-based algorithms perform better compared to other algorithms. Also, the testing was done in five benchmark datasets and a synthetic dataset with different node sizes using two criteria of in-sample and out-of-sample errors. The results show that MARO outperforms other algorithms in both error functions in terms accuracy and robustness. | ||
650 | 7 | |a Machine learning |2 Elsevier | |
650 | 7 | |a Evolutionary algorithms |2 Elsevier | |
650 | 7 | |a Fuzzy Cognitive Maps |2 Elsevier | |
700 | 1 | |a Mansouri, Taha |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Moghadam, Mohammad Reza Sadeghi |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Mardani, Amirhosein |4 oth | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |n Elsevier Science |a Wang, Jiliang ELSEVIER |t Subsurface fluid flow at an active cold seep area in the Qiongdongnan Basin, northern South China Sea |d 2018 |g Amsterdam [u.a.] |w (DE-627)ELV001104926 |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:163 |g year:2019 |g day:1 |g month:01 |g pages:723-735 |g extent:13 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2018.09.034 |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_U | ||
912 | |a GBV_ELV | ||
912 | |a SYSFLAG_U | ||
912 | |a SSG-OPC-GGO | ||
936 | b | k | |a 38.00 |j Geowissenschaften: Allgemeines |q VZ |
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 163 |j 2019 |b 1 |c 0101 |h 723-735 |g 13 |
author_variant |
j l s jl jls |
---|---|
matchkey_str |
salmeronjoselmansouritahamoghadammohamma:2019----:eriguzcgiieasihoiidsxarpouto |
hierarchy_sort_str |
2019transfer abstract |
bklnumber |
38.00 |
publishDate |
2019 |
allfields |
10.1016/j.knosys.2018.09.034 doi GBV00000000000455.pica (DE-627)ELV044985924 (ELSEVIER)S0950-7051(18)30485-4 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 550 VZ 38.00 bkl Salmeron, Jose L. verfasserin aut Learning Fuzzy Cognitive Maps with modified asexual reproduction optimisation algorithm 2019transfer abstract 13 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier This paper present a comparison between Fuzzy Cognitive Map (FCM) learning approaches and algorithms. FCMs are fuzzy digraphs with weights and feedback loops, consisting of nodes interconnected through directed arcs mostly used for knowledge representation and system modelling. One of the most important characteristics of FCMs is their learning capabilities. FCMs are normally constructed through experts’ opinions, thus they maybe subjective. Learning algorithms are introduced to overcome this inconvenient. One of the main problem of the new proposed algorithms is their validation. Using theoretical and experimental analysis, this research aims to (1) compare FCM learning algorithms proposed in the literature, (2) provide a validation tool for new FCM learning algorithms (3) present a new algorithm called Asexual Reproduction Optimisation (ARO) with one of its extensions – Modified ARO (MARO) – as a novel FCM learning algorithm to use the validation tool proposed. According to the findings from the literature, it seems that among FCM learning approaches, population-based algorithms perform better compared to other algorithms. Also, the testing was done in five benchmark datasets and a synthetic dataset with different node sizes using two criteria of in-sample and out-of-sample errors. The results show that MARO outperforms other algorithms in both error functions in terms accuracy and robustness. This paper present a comparison between Fuzzy Cognitive Map (FCM) learning approaches and algorithms. FCMs are fuzzy digraphs with weights and feedback loops, consisting of nodes interconnected through directed arcs mostly used for knowledge representation and system modelling. One of the most important characteristics of FCMs is their learning capabilities. FCMs are normally constructed through experts’ opinions, thus they maybe subjective. Learning algorithms are introduced to overcome this inconvenient. One of the main problem of the new proposed algorithms is their validation. Using theoretical and experimental analysis, this research aims to (1) compare FCM learning algorithms proposed in the literature, (2) provide a validation tool for new FCM learning algorithms (3) present a new algorithm called Asexual Reproduction Optimisation (ARO) with one of its extensions – Modified ARO (MARO) – as a novel FCM learning algorithm to use the validation tool proposed. According to the findings from the literature, it seems that among FCM learning approaches, population-based algorithms perform better compared to other algorithms. Also, the testing was done in five benchmark datasets and a synthetic dataset with different node sizes using two criteria of in-sample and out-of-sample errors. The results show that MARO outperforms other algorithms in both error functions in terms accuracy and robustness. Machine learning Elsevier Evolutionary algorithms Elsevier Fuzzy Cognitive Maps Elsevier Mansouri, Taha oth Moghadam, Mohammad Reza Sadeghi oth Mardani, Amirhosein oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Wang, Jiliang ELSEVIER Subsurface fluid flow at an active cold seep area in the Qiongdongnan Basin, northern South China Sea 2018 Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV001104926 volume:163 year:2019 day:1 month:01 pages:723-735 extent:13 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2018.09.034 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OPC-GGO 38.00 Geowissenschaften: Allgemeines VZ AR 163 2019 1 0101 723-735 13 |
spelling |
10.1016/j.knosys.2018.09.034 doi GBV00000000000455.pica (DE-627)ELV044985924 (ELSEVIER)S0950-7051(18)30485-4 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 550 VZ 38.00 bkl Salmeron, Jose L. verfasserin aut Learning Fuzzy Cognitive Maps with modified asexual reproduction optimisation algorithm 2019transfer abstract 13 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier This paper present a comparison between Fuzzy Cognitive Map (FCM) learning approaches and algorithms. FCMs are fuzzy digraphs with weights and feedback loops, consisting of nodes interconnected through directed arcs mostly used for knowledge representation and system modelling. One of the most important characteristics of FCMs is their learning capabilities. FCMs are normally constructed through experts’ opinions, thus they maybe subjective. Learning algorithms are introduced to overcome this inconvenient. One of the main problem of the new proposed algorithms is their validation. Using theoretical and experimental analysis, this research aims to (1) compare FCM learning algorithms proposed in the literature, (2) provide a validation tool for new FCM learning algorithms (3) present a new algorithm called Asexual Reproduction Optimisation (ARO) with one of its extensions – Modified ARO (MARO) – as a novel FCM learning algorithm to use the validation tool proposed. According to the findings from the literature, it seems that among FCM learning approaches, population-based algorithms perform better compared to other algorithms. Also, the testing was done in five benchmark datasets and a synthetic dataset with different node sizes using two criteria of in-sample and out-of-sample errors. The results show that MARO outperforms other algorithms in both error functions in terms accuracy and robustness. This paper present a comparison between Fuzzy Cognitive Map (FCM) learning approaches and algorithms. FCMs are fuzzy digraphs with weights and feedback loops, consisting of nodes interconnected through directed arcs mostly used for knowledge representation and system modelling. One of the most important characteristics of FCMs is their learning capabilities. FCMs are normally constructed through experts’ opinions, thus they maybe subjective. Learning algorithms are introduced to overcome this inconvenient. One of the main problem of the new proposed algorithms is their validation. Using theoretical and experimental analysis, this research aims to (1) compare FCM learning algorithms proposed in the literature, (2) provide a validation tool for new FCM learning algorithms (3) present a new algorithm called Asexual Reproduction Optimisation (ARO) with one of its extensions – Modified ARO (MARO) – as a novel FCM learning algorithm to use the validation tool proposed. According to the findings from the literature, it seems that among FCM learning approaches, population-based algorithms perform better compared to other algorithms. Also, the testing was done in five benchmark datasets and a synthetic dataset with different node sizes using two criteria of in-sample and out-of-sample errors. The results show that MARO outperforms other algorithms in both error functions in terms accuracy and robustness. Machine learning Elsevier Evolutionary algorithms Elsevier Fuzzy Cognitive Maps Elsevier Mansouri, Taha oth Moghadam, Mohammad Reza Sadeghi oth Mardani, Amirhosein oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Wang, Jiliang ELSEVIER Subsurface fluid flow at an active cold seep area in the Qiongdongnan Basin, northern South China Sea 2018 Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV001104926 volume:163 year:2019 day:1 month:01 pages:723-735 extent:13 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2018.09.034 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OPC-GGO 38.00 Geowissenschaften: Allgemeines VZ AR 163 2019 1 0101 723-735 13 |
allfields_unstemmed |
10.1016/j.knosys.2018.09.034 doi GBV00000000000455.pica (DE-627)ELV044985924 (ELSEVIER)S0950-7051(18)30485-4 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 550 VZ 38.00 bkl Salmeron, Jose L. verfasserin aut Learning Fuzzy Cognitive Maps with modified asexual reproduction optimisation algorithm 2019transfer abstract 13 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier This paper present a comparison between Fuzzy Cognitive Map (FCM) learning approaches and algorithms. FCMs are fuzzy digraphs with weights and feedback loops, consisting of nodes interconnected through directed arcs mostly used for knowledge representation and system modelling. One of the most important characteristics of FCMs is their learning capabilities. FCMs are normally constructed through experts’ opinions, thus they maybe subjective. Learning algorithms are introduced to overcome this inconvenient. One of the main problem of the new proposed algorithms is their validation. Using theoretical and experimental analysis, this research aims to (1) compare FCM learning algorithms proposed in the literature, (2) provide a validation tool for new FCM learning algorithms (3) present a new algorithm called Asexual Reproduction Optimisation (ARO) with one of its extensions – Modified ARO (MARO) – as a novel FCM learning algorithm to use the validation tool proposed. According to the findings from the literature, it seems that among FCM learning approaches, population-based algorithms perform better compared to other algorithms. Also, the testing was done in five benchmark datasets and a synthetic dataset with different node sizes using two criteria of in-sample and out-of-sample errors. The results show that MARO outperforms other algorithms in both error functions in terms accuracy and robustness. This paper present a comparison between Fuzzy Cognitive Map (FCM) learning approaches and algorithms. FCMs are fuzzy digraphs with weights and feedback loops, consisting of nodes interconnected through directed arcs mostly used for knowledge representation and system modelling. One of the most important characteristics of FCMs is their learning capabilities. FCMs are normally constructed through experts’ opinions, thus they maybe subjective. Learning algorithms are introduced to overcome this inconvenient. One of the main problem of the new proposed algorithms is their validation. Using theoretical and experimental analysis, this research aims to (1) compare FCM learning algorithms proposed in the literature, (2) provide a validation tool for new FCM learning algorithms (3) present a new algorithm called Asexual Reproduction Optimisation (ARO) with one of its extensions – Modified ARO (MARO) – as a novel FCM learning algorithm to use the validation tool proposed. According to the findings from the literature, it seems that among FCM learning approaches, population-based algorithms perform better compared to other algorithms. Also, the testing was done in five benchmark datasets and a synthetic dataset with different node sizes using two criteria of in-sample and out-of-sample errors. The results show that MARO outperforms other algorithms in both error functions in terms accuracy and robustness. Machine learning Elsevier Evolutionary algorithms Elsevier Fuzzy Cognitive Maps Elsevier Mansouri, Taha oth Moghadam, Mohammad Reza Sadeghi oth Mardani, Amirhosein oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Wang, Jiliang ELSEVIER Subsurface fluid flow at an active cold seep area in the Qiongdongnan Basin, northern South China Sea 2018 Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV001104926 volume:163 year:2019 day:1 month:01 pages:723-735 extent:13 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2018.09.034 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OPC-GGO 38.00 Geowissenschaften: Allgemeines VZ AR 163 2019 1 0101 723-735 13 |
allfieldsGer |
10.1016/j.knosys.2018.09.034 doi GBV00000000000455.pica (DE-627)ELV044985924 (ELSEVIER)S0950-7051(18)30485-4 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 550 VZ 38.00 bkl Salmeron, Jose L. verfasserin aut Learning Fuzzy Cognitive Maps with modified asexual reproduction optimisation algorithm 2019transfer abstract 13 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier This paper present a comparison between Fuzzy Cognitive Map (FCM) learning approaches and algorithms. FCMs are fuzzy digraphs with weights and feedback loops, consisting of nodes interconnected through directed arcs mostly used for knowledge representation and system modelling. One of the most important characteristics of FCMs is their learning capabilities. FCMs are normally constructed through experts’ opinions, thus they maybe subjective. Learning algorithms are introduced to overcome this inconvenient. One of the main problem of the new proposed algorithms is their validation. Using theoretical and experimental analysis, this research aims to (1) compare FCM learning algorithms proposed in the literature, (2) provide a validation tool for new FCM learning algorithms (3) present a new algorithm called Asexual Reproduction Optimisation (ARO) with one of its extensions – Modified ARO (MARO) – as a novel FCM learning algorithm to use the validation tool proposed. According to the findings from the literature, it seems that among FCM learning approaches, population-based algorithms perform better compared to other algorithms. Also, the testing was done in five benchmark datasets and a synthetic dataset with different node sizes using two criteria of in-sample and out-of-sample errors. The results show that MARO outperforms other algorithms in both error functions in terms accuracy and robustness. This paper present a comparison between Fuzzy Cognitive Map (FCM) learning approaches and algorithms. FCMs are fuzzy digraphs with weights and feedback loops, consisting of nodes interconnected through directed arcs mostly used for knowledge representation and system modelling. One of the most important characteristics of FCMs is their learning capabilities. FCMs are normally constructed through experts’ opinions, thus they maybe subjective. Learning algorithms are introduced to overcome this inconvenient. One of the main problem of the new proposed algorithms is their validation. Using theoretical and experimental analysis, this research aims to (1) compare FCM learning algorithms proposed in the literature, (2) provide a validation tool for new FCM learning algorithms (3) present a new algorithm called Asexual Reproduction Optimisation (ARO) with one of its extensions – Modified ARO (MARO) – as a novel FCM learning algorithm to use the validation tool proposed. According to the findings from the literature, it seems that among FCM learning approaches, population-based algorithms perform better compared to other algorithms. Also, the testing was done in five benchmark datasets and a synthetic dataset with different node sizes using two criteria of in-sample and out-of-sample errors. The results show that MARO outperforms other algorithms in both error functions in terms accuracy and robustness. Machine learning Elsevier Evolutionary algorithms Elsevier Fuzzy Cognitive Maps Elsevier Mansouri, Taha oth Moghadam, Mohammad Reza Sadeghi oth Mardani, Amirhosein oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Wang, Jiliang ELSEVIER Subsurface fluid flow at an active cold seep area in the Qiongdongnan Basin, northern South China Sea 2018 Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV001104926 volume:163 year:2019 day:1 month:01 pages:723-735 extent:13 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2018.09.034 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OPC-GGO 38.00 Geowissenschaften: Allgemeines VZ AR 163 2019 1 0101 723-735 13 |
allfieldsSound |
10.1016/j.knosys.2018.09.034 doi GBV00000000000455.pica (DE-627)ELV044985924 (ELSEVIER)S0950-7051(18)30485-4 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 550 VZ 38.00 bkl Salmeron, Jose L. verfasserin aut Learning Fuzzy Cognitive Maps with modified asexual reproduction optimisation algorithm 2019transfer abstract 13 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier This paper present a comparison between Fuzzy Cognitive Map (FCM) learning approaches and algorithms. FCMs are fuzzy digraphs with weights and feedback loops, consisting of nodes interconnected through directed arcs mostly used for knowledge representation and system modelling. One of the most important characteristics of FCMs is their learning capabilities. FCMs are normally constructed through experts’ opinions, thus they maybe subjective. Learning algorithms are introduced to overcome this inconvenient. One of the main problem of the new proposed algorithms is their validation. Using theoretical and experimental analysis, this research aims to (1) compare FCM learning algorithms proposed in the literature, (2) provide a validation tool for new FCM learning algorithms (3) present a new algorithm called Asexual Reproduction Optimisation (ARO) with one of its extensions – Modified ARO (MARO) – as a novel FCM learning algorithm to use the validation tool proposed. According to the findings from the literature, it seems that among FCM learning approaches, population-based algorithms perform better compared to other algorithms. Also, the testing was done in five benchmark datasets and a synthetic dataset with different node sizes using two criteria of in-sample and out-of-sample errors. The results show that MARO outperforms other algorithms in both error functions in terms accuracy and robustness. This paper present a comparison between Fuzzy Cognitive Map (FCM) learning approaches and algorithms. FCMs are fuzzy digraphs with weights and feedback loops, consisting of nodes interconnected through directed arcs mostly used for knowledge representation and system modelling. One of the most important characteristics of FCMs is their learning capabilities. FCMs are normally constructed through experts’ opinions, thus they maybe subjective. Learning algorithms are introduced to overcome this inconvenient. One of the main problem of the new proposed algorithms is their validation. Using theoretical and experimental analysis, this research aims to (1) compare FCM learning algorithms proposed in the literature, (2) provide a validation tool for new FCM learning algorithms (3) present a new algorithm called Asexual Reproduction Optimisation (ARO) with one of its extensions – Modified ARO (MARO) – as a novel FCM learning algorithm to use the validation tool proposed. According to the findings from the literature, it seems that among FCM learning approaches, population-based algorithms perform better compared to other algorithms. Also, the testing was done in five benchmark datasets and a synthetic dataset with different node sizes using two criteria of in-sample and out-of-sample errors. The results show that MARO outperforms other algorithms in both error functions in terms accuracy and robustness. Machine learning Elsevier Evolutionary algorithms Elsevier Fuzzy Cognitive Maps Elsevier Mansouri, Taha oth Moghadam, Mohammad Reza Sadeghi oth Mardani, Amirhosein oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Wang, Jiliang ELSEVIER Subsurface fluid flow at an active cold seep area in the Qiongdongnan Basin, northern South China Sea 2018 Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV001104926 volume:163 year:2019 day:1 month:01 pages:723-735 extent:13 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2018.09.034 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OPC-GGO 38.00 Geowissenschaften: Allgemeines VZ AR 163 2019 1 0101 723-735 13 |
language |
English |
source |
Enthalten in Subsurface fluid flow at an active cold seep area in the Qiongdongnan Basin, northern South China Sea Amsterdam [u.a.] volume:163 year:2019 day:1 month:01 pages:723-735 extent:13 |
sourceStr |
Enthalten in Subsurface fluid flow at an active cold seep area in the Qiongdongnan Basin, northern South China Sea Amsterdam [u.a.] volume:163 year:2019 day:1 month:01 pages:723-735 extent:13 |
format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
bklname |
Geowissenschaften: Allgemeines |
institution |
findex.gbv.de |
topic_facet |
Machine learning Evolutionary algorithms Fuzzy Cognitive Maps |
dewey-raw |
550 |
isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
container_title |
Subsurface fluid flow at an active cold seep area in the Qiongdongnan Basin, northern South China Sea |
authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Salmeron, Jose L. @@aut@@ Mansouri, Taha @@oth@@ Moghadam, Mohammad Reza Sadeghi @@oth@@ Mardani, Amirhosein @@oth@@ |
publishDateDaySort_date |
2019-01-01T00:00:00Z |
hierarchy_top_id |
ELV001104926 |
dewey-sort |
3550 |
id |
ELV044985924 |
language_de |
englisch |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV044985924</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230626010146.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">181123s2019 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.knosys.2018.09.034</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">GBV00000000000455.pica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV044985924</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0950-7051(18)30485-4</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">550</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">38.00</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Salmeron, Jose L.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Learning Fuzzy Cognitive Maps with modified asexual reproduction optimisation algorithm</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2019transfer abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">13</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">This paper present a comparison between Fuzzy Cognitive Map (FCM) learning approaches and algorithms. FCMs are fuzzy digraphs with weights and feedback loops, consisting of nodes interconnected through directed arcs mostly used for knowledge representation and system modelling. One of the most important characteristics of FCMs is their learning capabilities. FCMs are normally constructed through experts’ opinions, thus they maybe subjective. Learning algorithms are introduced to overcome this inconvenient. One of the main problem of the new proposed algorithms is their validation. Using theoretical and experimental analysis, this research aims to (1) compare FCM learning algorithms proposed in the literature, (2) provide a validation tool for new FCM learning algorithms (3) present a new algorithm called Asexual Reproduction Optimisation (ARO) with one of its extensions – Modified ARO (MARO) – as a novel FCM learning algorithm to use the validation tool proposed. According to the findings from the literature, it seems that among FCM learning approaches, population-based algorithms perform better compared to other algorithms. Also, the testing was done in five benchmark datasets and a synthetic dataset with different node sizes using two criteria of in-sample and out-of-sample errors. The results show that MARO outperforms other algorithms in both error functions in terms accuracy and robustness.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">This paper present a comparison between Fuzzy Cognitive Map (FCM) learning approaches and algorithms. FCMs are fuzzy digraphs with weights and feedback loops, consisting of nodes interconnected through directed arcs mostly used for knowledge representation and system modelling. One of the most important characteristics of FCMs is their learning capabilities. FCMs are normally constructed through experts’ opinions, thus they maybe subjective. Learning algorithms are introduced to overcome this inconvenient. One of the main problem of the new proposed algorithms is their validation. Using theoretical and experimental analysis, this research aims to (1) compare FCM learning algorithms proposed in the literature, (2) provide a validation tool for new FCM learning algorithms (3) present a new algorithm called Asexual Reproduction Optimisation (ARO) with one of its extensions – Modified ARO (MARO) – as a novel FCM learning algorithm to use the validation tool proposed. According to the findings from the literature, it seems that among FCM learning approaches, population-based algorithms perform better compared to other algorithms. Also, the testing was done in five benchmark datasets and a synthetic dataset with different node sizes using two criteria of in-sample and out-of-sample errors. The results show that MARO outperforms other algorithms in both error functions in terms accuracy and robustness.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Machine learning</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Evolutionary algorithms</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Fuzzy Cognitive Maps</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Mansouri, Taha</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Moghadam, Mohammad Reza Sadeghi</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Mardani, Amirhosein</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="n">Elsevier Science</subfield><subfield code="a">Wang, Jiliang ELSEVIER</subfield><subfield code="t">Subsurface fluid flow at an active cold seep area in the Qiongdongnan Basin, northern South China Sea</subfield><subfield code="d">2018</subfield><subfield code="g">Amsterdam [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)ELV001104926</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:163</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2019</subfield><subfield code="g">day:1</subfield><subfield code="g">month:01</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:723-735</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:13</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2018.09.034</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OPC-GGO</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">38.00</subfield><subfield code="j">Geowissenschaften: Allgemeines</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">163</subfield><subfield code="j">2019</subfield><subfield code="b">1</subfield><subfield code="c">0101</subfield><subfield code="h">723-735</subfield><subfield code="g">13</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
author |
Salmeron, Jose L. |
spellingShingle |
Salmeron, Jose L. ddc 550 bkl 38.00 Elsevier Machine learning Elsevier Evolutionary algorithms Elsevier Fuzzy Cognitive Maps Learning Fuzzy Cognitive Maps with modified asexual reproduction optimisation algorithm |
authorStr |
Salmeron, Jose L. |
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)ELV001104926 |
format |
electronic Article |
dewey-ones |
550 - Earth sciences |
delete_txt_mv |
keep |
author_role |
aut |
collection |
elsevier |
remote_str |
true |
illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
topic_title |
550 VZ 38.00 bkl Learning Fuzzy Cognitive Maps with modified asexual reproduction optimisation algorithm Machine learning Elsevier Evolutionary algorithms Elsevier Fuzzy Cognitive Maps Elsevier |
topic |
ddc 550 bkl 38.00 Elsevier Machine learning Elsevier Evolutionary algorithms Elsevier Fuzzy Cognitive Maps |
topic_unstemmed |
ddc 550 bkl 38.00 Elsevier Machine learning Elsevier Evolutionary algorithms Elsevier Fuzzy Cognitive Maps |
topic_browse |
ddc 550 bkl 38.00 Elsevier Machine learning Elsevier Evolutionary algorithms Elsevier Fuzzy Cognitive Maps |
format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
carriertype_str_mv |
zu |
author2_variant |
t m tm m r s m mrs mrsm a m am |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Subsurface fluid flow at an active cold seep area in the Qiongdongnan Basin, northern South China Sea |
hierarchy_parent_id |
ELV001104926 |
dewey-tens |
550 - Earth sciences & geology |
hierarchy_top_title |
Subsurface fluid flow at an active cold seep area in the Qiongdongnan Basin, northern South China Sea |
isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)ELV001104926 |
title |
Learning Fuzzy Cognitive Maps with modified asexual reproduction optimisation algorithm |
ctrlnum |
(DE-627)ELV044985924 (ELSEVIER)S0950-7051(18)30485-4 |
title_full |
Learning Fuzzy Cognitive Maps with modified asexual reproduction optimisation algorithm |
author_sort |
Salmeron, Jose L. |
journal |
Subsurface fluid flow at an active cold seep area in the Qiongdongnan Basin, northern South China Sea |
journalStr |
Subsurface fluid flow at an active cold seep area in the Qiongdongnan Basin, northern South China Sea |
lang_code |
eng |
isOA_bool |
false |
dewey-hundreds |
500 - Science |
recordtype |
marc |
publishDateSort |
2019 |
contenttype_str_mv |
zzz |
container_start_page |
723 |
author_browse |
Salmeron, Jose L. |
container_volume |
163 |
physical |
13 |
class |
550 VZ 38.00 bkl |
format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
author-letter |
Salmeron, Jose L. |
doi_str_mv |
10.1016/j.knosys.2018.09.034 |
dewey-full |
550 |
title_sort |
learning fuzzy cognitive maps with modified asexual reproduction optimisation algorithm |
title_auth |
Learning Fuzzy Cognitive Maps with modified asexual reproduction optimisation algorithm |
abstract |
This paper present a comparison between Fuzzy Cognitive Map (FCM) learning approaches and algorithms. FCMs are fuzzy digraphs with weights and feedback loops, consisting of nodes interconnected through directed arcs mostly used for knowledge representation and system modelling. One of the most important characteristics of FCMs is their learning capabilities. FCMs are normally constructed through experts’ opinions, thus they maybe subjective. Learning algorithms are introduced to overcome this inconvenient. One of the main problem of the new proposed algorithms is their validation. Using theoretical and experimental analysis, this research aims to (1) compare FCM learning algorithms proposed in the literature, (2) provide a validation tool for new FCM learning algorithms (3) present a new algorithm called Asexual Reproduction Optimisation (ARO) with one of its extensions – Modified ARO (MARO) – as a novel FCM learning algorithm to use the validation tool proposed. According to the findings from the literature, it seems that among FCM learning approaches, population-based algorithms perform better compared to other algorithms. Also, the testing was done in five benchmark datasets and a synthetic dataset with different node sizes using two criteria of in-sample and out-of-sample errors. The results show that MARO outperforms other algorithms in both error functions in terms accuracy and robustness. |
abstractGer |
This paper present a comparison between Fuzzy Cognitive Map (FCM) learning approaches and algorithms. FCMs are fuzzy digraphs with weights and feedback loops, consisting of nodes interconnected through directed arcs mostly used for knowledge representation and system modelling. One of the most important characteristics of FCMs is their learning capabilities. FCMs are normally constructed through experts’ opinions, thus they maybe subjective. Learning algorithms are introduced to overcome this inconvenient. One of the main problem of the new proposed algorithms is their validation. Using theoretical and experimental analysis, this research aims to (1) compare FCM learning algorithms proposed in the literature, (2) provide a validation tool for new FCM learning algorithms (3) present a new algorithm called Asexual Reproduction Optimisation (ARO) with one of its extensions – Modified ARO (MARO) – as a novel FCM learning algorithm to use the validation tool proposed. According to the findings from the literature, it seems that among FCM learning approaches, population-based algorithms perform better compared to other algorithms. Also, the testing was done in five benchmark datasets and a synthetic dataset with different node sizes using two criteria of in-sample and out-of-sample errors. The results show that MARO outperforms other algorithms in both error functions in terms accuracy and robustness. |
abstract_unstemmed |
This paper present a comparison between Fuzzy Cognitive Map (FCM) learning approaches and algorithms. FCMs are fuzzy digraphs with weights and feedback loops, consisting of nodes interconnected through directed arcs mostly used for knowledge representation and system modelling. One of the most important characteristics of FCMs is their learning capabilities. FCMs are normally constructed through experts’ opinions, thus they maybe subjective. Learning algorithms are introduced to overcome this inconvenient. One of the main problem of the new proposed algorithms is their validation. Using theoretical and experimental analysis, this research aims to (1) compare FCM learning algorithms proposed in the literature, (2) provide a validation tool for new FCM learning algorithms (3) present a new algorithm called Asexual Reproduction Optimisation (ARO) with one of its extensions – Modified ARO (MARO) – as a novel FCM learning algorithm to use the validation tool proposed. According to the findings from the literature, it seems that among FCM learning approaches, population-based algorithms perform better compared to other algorithms. Also, the testing was done in five benchmark datasets and a synthetic dataset with different node sizes using two criteria of in-sample and out-of-sample errors. The results show that MARO outperforms other algorithms in both error functions in terms accuracy and robustness. |
collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OPC-GGO |
title_short |
Learning Fuzzy Cognitive Maps with modified asexual reproduction optimisation algorithm |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2018.09.034 |
remote_bool |
true |
author2 |
Mansouri, Taha Moghadam, Mohammad Reza Sadeghi Mardani, Amirhosein |
author2Str |
Mansouri, Taha Moghadam, Mohammad Reza Sadeghi Mardani, Amirhosein |
ppnlink |
ELV001104926 |
mediatype_str_mv |
z |
isOA_txt |
false |
hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
author2_role |
oth oth oth |
doi_str |
10.1016/j.knosys.2018.09.034 |
up_date |
2024-07-06T22:56:04.991Z |
_version_ |
1803872176694099968 |
fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV044985924</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230626010146.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">181123s2019 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.knosys.2018.09.034</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">GBV00000000000455.pica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV044985924</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0950-7051(18)30485-4</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">550</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">38.00</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Salmeron, Jose L.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Learning Fuzzy Cognitive Maps with modified asexual reproduction optimisation algorithm</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2019transfer abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">13</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">This paper present a comparison between Fuzzy Cognitive Map (FCM) learning approaches and algorithms. FCMs are fuzzy digraphs with weights and feedback loops, consisting of nodes interconnected through directed arcs mostly used for knowledge representation and system modelling. One of the most important characteristics of FCMs is their learning capabilities. FCMs are normally constructed through experts’ opinions, thus they maybe subjective. Learning algorithms are introduced to overcome this inconvenient. One of the main problem of the new proposed algorithms is their validation. Using theoretical and experimental analysis, this research aims to (1) compare FCM learning algorithms proposed in the literature, (2) provide a validation tool for new FCM learning algorithms (3) present a new algorithm called Asexual Reproduction Optimisation (ARO) with one of its extensions – Modified ARO (MARO) – as a novel FCM learning algorithm to use the validation tool proposed. According to the findings from the literature, it seems that among FCM learning approaches, population-based algorithms perform better compared to other algorithms. Also, the testing was done in five benchmark datasets and a synthetic dataset with different node sizes using two criteria of in-sample and out-of-sample errors. The results show that MARO outperforms other algorithms in both error functions in terms accuracy and robustness.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">This paper present a comparison between Fuzzy Cognitive Map (FCM) learning approaches and algorithms. FCMs are fuzzy digraphs with weights and feedback loops, consisting of nodes interconnected through directed arcs mostly used for knowledge representation and system modelling. One of the most important characteristics of FCMs is their learning capabilities. FCMs are normally constructed through experts’ opinions, thus they maybe subjective. Learning algorithms are introduced to overcome this inconvenient. One of the main problem of the new proposed algorithms is their validation. Using theoretical and experimental analysis, this research aims to (1) compare FCM learning algorithms proposed in the literature, (2) provide a validation tool for new FCM learning algorithms (3) present a new algorithm called Asexual Reproduction Optimisation (ARO) with one of its extensions – Modified ARO (MARO) – as a novel FCM learning algorithm to use the validation tool proposed. According to the findings from the literature, it seems that among FCM learning approaches, population-based algorithms perform better compared to other algorithms. Also, the testing was done in five benchmark datasets and a synthetic dataset with different node sizes using two criteria of in-sample and out-of-sample errors. The results show that MARO outperforms other algorithms in both error functions in terms accuracy and robustness.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Machine learning</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Evolutionary algorithms</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Fuzzy Cognitive Maps</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Mansouri, Taha</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Moghadam, Mohammad Reza Sadeghi</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Mardani, Amirhosein</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="n">Elsevier Science</subfield><subfield code="a">Wang, Jiliang ELSEVIER</subfield><subfield code="t">Subsurface fluid flow at an active cold seep area in the Qiongdongnan Basin, northern South China Sea</subfield><subfield code="d">2018</subfield><subfield code="g">Amsterdam [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)ELV001104926</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:163</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2019</subfield><subfield code="g">day:1</subfield><subfield code="g">month:01</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:723-735</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:13</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2018.09.034</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OPC-GGO</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">38.00</subfield><subfield code="j">Geowissenschaften: Allgemeines</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">163</subfield><subfield code="j">2019</subfield><subfield code="b">1</subfield><subfield code="c">0101</subfield><subfield code="h">723-735</subfield><subfield code="g">13</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
score |
7.400275 |