An assessment of potential synergies and trade-offs between climate mitigation and adaptation policies of Nepal
Climate actions are centered on either mitigation or adaptation or both. Mitigation and adaptation actions can interact with each other resulting in synergies or tradeoffs. An integrated approach that considers these interactions is important to harness the synergies to create win-win situations and...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Autor*in: |
Shrestha, Subina [verfasserIn] |
---|
Format: |
E-Artikel |
---|---|
Sprache: |
Englisch |
Erschienen: |
2019transfer abstract |
---|
Schlagwörter: |
---|
Umfang: |
11 |
---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Cohort, signaling, and early-career dynamics: The hidden significance of class in black-white earnings inequality - Ren, Chunhui ELSEVIER, 2022, Amsterdam [u.a.] |
---|---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:235 ; year:2019 ; day:1 ; month:04 ; pages:535-545 ; extent:11 |
Links: |
---|
DOI / URN: |
10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.01.035 |
---|
Katalog-ID: |
ELV045695598 |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | ELV045695598 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20230626012042.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 191021s2019 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.01.035 |2 doi | |
028 | 5 | 2 | |a GBV00000000000512.pica |
035 | |a (DE-627)ELV045695598 | ||
035 | |a (ELSEVIER)S0301-4797(19)30035-0 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
082 | 0 | 4 | |a 300 |q VZ |
084 | |a 70.00 |2 bkl | ||
084 | |a 71.00 |2 bkl | ||
100 | 1 | |a Shrestha, Subina |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a An assessment of potential synergies and trade-offs between climate mitigation and adaptation policies of Nepal |
264 | 1 | |c 2019transfer abstract | |
300 | |a 11 | ||
336 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zzz |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b z |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zu |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a Climate actions are centered on either mitigation or adaptation or both. Mitigation and adaptation actions can interact with each other resulting in synergies or tradeoffs. An integrated approach that considers these interactions is important to harness the synergies to create win-win situations and to avoid trade-offs for no-regret decisions. In this context, this study presents a qualitative analysis of the existing national level climate policies of Nepal to identify the extent and mechanism of their mitigation-adaptation interactions based on expert survey. Four key sectors having inter-relationships between mitigation and adaptation were identified as Agriculture, Forestry and Land use (AFOLU), urban planning, energy and water. We used Analytical Hierarchical Process (AHP) to rank and prioritize the opportunities and barriers for harnessing synergies and avoiding trade-offs of mitigation-adaptation interlinkage with these sectors in view. Our results show that such interactions in the Nepalese policy context are present mostly in the form of synergies in the order of AFOLU > Urban Planning > Energy > Water. We identified that developing an institution dedicated to climate change at the national level is the most important opportunity while inadequate institutional co-ordination is the most important barrier for harnessing these synergies. | ||
520 | |a Climate actions are centered on either mitigation or adaptation or both. Mitigation and adaptation actions can interact with each other resulting in synergies or tradeoffs. An integrated approach that considers these interactions is important to harness the synergies to create win-win situations and to avoid trade-offs for no-regret decisions. In this context, this study presents a qualitative analysis of the existing national level climate policies of Nepal to identify the extent and mechanism of their mitigation-adaptation interactions based on expert survey. Four key sectors having inter-relationships between mitigation and adaptation were identified as Agriculture, Forestry and Land use (AFOLU), urban planning, energy and water. We used Analytical Hierarchical Process (AHP) to rank and prioritize the opportunities and barriers for harnessing synergies and avoiding trade-offs of mitigation-adaptation interlinkage with these sectors in view. Our results show that such interactions in the Nepalese policy context are present mostly in the form of synergies in the order of AFOLU > Urban Planning > Energy > Water. We identified that developing an institution dedicated to climate change at the national level is the most important opportunity while inadequate institutional co-ordination is the most important barrier for harnessing these synergies. | ||
650 | 7 | |a Climate change |2 Elsevier | |
650 | 7 | |a Mitigation-adaptation |2 Elsevier | |
650 | 7 | |a Barriers |2 Elsevier | |
650 | 7 | |a Synergy and trade-offs |2 Elsevier | |
650 | 7 | |a Nepal |2 Elsevier | |
700 | 1 | |a Dhakal, Shobhakar |4 oth | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |n Elsevier |a Ren, Chunhui ELSEVIER |t Cohort, signaling, and early-career dynamics: The hidden significance of class in black-white earnings inequality |d 2022 |g Amsterdam [u.a.] |w (DE-627)ELV008002754 |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:235 |g year:2019 |g day:1 |g month:04 |g pages:535-545 |g extent:11 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.01.035 |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_U | ||
912 | |a GBV_ELV | ||
912 | |a SYSFLAG_U | ||
936 | b | k | |a 70.00 |j Sozialwissenschaften allgemein: Allgemeines |q VZ |
936 | b | k | |a 71.00 |j Soziologie: Allgemeines |q VZ |
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 235 |j 2019 |b 1 |c 0401 |h 535-545 |g 11 |
author_variant |
s s ss |
---|---|
matchkey_str |
shresthasubinadhakalshobhakar:2019----:nsesetfoetasnrisntaefseweciaeiiainna |
hierarchy_sort_str |
2019transfer abstract |
bklnumber |
70.00 71.00 |
publishDate |
2019 |
allfields |
10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.01.035 doi GBV00000000000512.pica (DE-627)ELV045695598 (ELSEVIER)S0301-4797(19)30035-0 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 300 VZ 70.00 bkl 71.00 bkl Shrestha, Subina verfasserin aut An assessment of potential synergies and trade-offs between climate mitigation and adaptation policies of Nepal 2019transfer abstract 11 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Climate actions are centered on either mitigation or adaptation or both. Mitigation and adaptation actions can interact with each other resulting in synergies or tradeoffs. An integrated approach that considers these interactions is important to harness the synergies to create win-win situations and to avoid trade-offs for no-regret decisions. In this context, this study presents a qualitative analysis of the existing national level climate policies of Nepal to identify the extent and mechanism of their mitigation-adaptation interactions based on expert survey. Four key sectors having inter-relationships between mitigation and adaptation were identified as Agriculture, Forestry and Land use (AFOLU), urban planning, energy and water. We used Analytical Hierarchical Process (AHP) to rank and prioritize the opportunities and barriers for harnessing synergies and avoiding trade-offs of mitigation-adaptation interlinkage with these sectors in view. Our results show that such interactions in the Nepalese policy context are present mostly in the form of synergies in the order of AFOLU > Urban Planning > Energy > Water. We identified that developing an institution dedicated to climate change at the national level is the most important opportunity while inadequate institutional co-ordination is the most important barrier for harnessing these synergies. Climate actions are centered on either mitigation or adaptation or both. Mitigation and adaptation actions can interact with each other resulting in synergies or tradeoffs. An integrated approach that considers these interactions is important to harness the synergies to create win-win situations and to avoid trade-offs for no-regret decisions. In this context, this study presents a qualitative analysis of the existing national level climate policies of Nepal to identify the extent and mechanism of their mitigation-adaptation interactions based on expert survey. Four key sectors having inter-relationships between mitigation and adaptation were identified as Agriculture, Forestry and Land use (AFOLU), urban planning, energy and water. We used Analytical Hierarchical Process (AHP) to rank and prioritize the opportunities and barriers for harnessing synergies and avoiding trade-offs of mitigation-adaptation interlinkage with these sectors in view. Our results show that such interactions in the Nepalese policy context are present mostly in the form of synergies in the order of AFOLU > Urban Planning > Energy > Water. We identified that developing an institution dedicated to climate change at the national level is the most important opportunity while inadequate institutional co-ordination is the most important barrier for harnessing these synergies. Climate change Elsevier Mitigation-adaptation Elsevier Barriers Elsevier Synergy and trade-offs Elsevier Nepal Elsevier Dhakal, Shobhakar oth Enthalten in Elsevier Ren, Chunhui ELSEVIER Cohort, signaling, and early-career dynamics: The hidden significance of class in black-white earnings inequality 2022 Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV008002754 volume:235 year:2019 day:1 month:04 pages:535-545 extent:11 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.01.035 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U 70.00 Sozialwissenschaften allgemein: Allgemeines VZ 71.00 Soziologie: Allgemeines VZ AR 235 2019 1 0401 535-545 11 |
spelling |
10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.01.035 doi GBV00000000000512.pica (DE-627)ELV045695598 (ELSEVIER)S0301-4797(19)30035-0 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 300 VZ 70.00 bkl 71.00 bkl Shrestha, Subina verfasserin aut An assessment of potential synergies and trade-offs between climate mitigation and adaptation policies of Nepal 2019transfer abstract 11 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Climate actions are centered on either mitigation or adaptation or both. Mitigation and adaptation actions can interact with each other resulting in synergies or tradeoffs. An integrated approach that considers these interactions is important to harness the synergies to create win-win situations and to avoid trade-offs for no-regret decisions. In this context, this study presents a qualitative analysis of the existing national level climate policies of Nepal to identify the extent and mechanism of their mitigation-adaptation interactions based on expert survey. Four key sectors having inter-relationships between mitigation and adaptation were identified as Agriculture, Forestry and Land use (AFOLU), urban planning, energy and water. We used Analytical Hierarchical Process (AHP) to rank and prioritize the opportunities and barriers for harnessing synergies and avoiding trade-offs of mitigation-adaptation interlinkage with these sectors in view. Our results show that such interactions in the Nepalese policy context are present mostly in the form of synergies in the order of AFOLU > Urban Planning > Energy > Water. We identified that developing an institution dedicated to climate change at the national level is the most important opportunity while inadequate institutional co-ordination is the most important barrier for harnessing these synergies. Climate actions are centered on either mitigation or adaptation or both. Mitigation and adaptation actions can interact with each other resulting in synergies or tradeoffs. An integrated approach that considers these interactions is important to harness the synergies to create win-win situations and to avoid trade-offs for no-regret decisions. In this context, this study presents a qualitative analysis of the existing national level climate policies of Nepal to identify the extent and mechanism of their mitigation-adaptation interactions based on expert survey. Four key sectors having inter-relationships between mitigation and adaptation were identified as Agriculture, Forestry and Land use (AFOLU), urban planning, energy and water. We used Analytical Hierarchical Process (AHP) to rank and prioritize the opportunities and barriers for harnessing synergies and avoiding trade-offs of mitigation-adaptation interlinkage with these sectors in view. Our results show that such interactions in the Nepalese policy context are present mostly in the form of synergies in the order of AFOLU > Urban Planning > Energy > Water. We identified that developing an institution dedicated to climate change at the national level is the most important opportunity while inadequate institutional co-ordination is the most important barrier for harnessing these synergies. Climate change Elsevier Mitigation-adaptation Elsevier Barriers Elsevier Synergy and trade-offs Elsevier Nepal Elsevier Dhakal, Shobhakar oth Enthalten in Elsevier Ren, Chunhui ELSEVIER Cohort, signaling, and early-career dynamics: The hidden significance of class in black-white earnings inequality 2022 Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV008002754 volume:235 year:2019 day:1 month:04 pages:535-545 extent:11 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.01.035 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U 70.00 Sozialwissenschaften allgemein: Allgemeines VZ 71.00 Soziologie: Allgemeines VZ AR 235 2019 1 0401 535-545 11 |
allfields_unstemmed |
10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.01.035 doi GBV00000000000512.pica (DE-627)ELV045695598 (ELSEVIER)S0301-4797(19)30035-0 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 300 VZ 70.00 bkl 71.00 bkl Shrestha, Subina verfasserin aut An assessment of potential synergies and trade-offs between climate mitigation and adaptation policies of Nepal 2019transfer abstract 11 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Climate actions are centered on either mitigation or adaptation or both. Mitigation and adaptation actions can interact with each other resulting in synergies or tradeoffs. An integrated approach that considers these interactions is important to harness the synergies to create win-win situations and to avoid trade-offs for no-regret decisions. In this context, this study presents a qualitative analysis of the existing national level climate policies of Nepal to identify the extent and mechanism of their mitigation-adaptation interactions based on expert survey. Four key sectors having inter-relationships between mitigation and adaptation were identified as Agriculture, Forestry and Land use (AFOLU), urban planning, energy and water. We used Analytical Hierarchical Process (AHP) to rank and prioritize the opportunities and barriers for harnessing synergies and avoiding trade-offs of mitigation-adaptation interlinkage with these sectors in view. Our results show that such interactions in the Nepalese policy context are present mostly in the form of synergies in the order of AFOLU > Urban Planning > Energy > Water. We identified that developing an institution dedicated to climate change at the national level is the most important opportunity while inadequate institutional co-ordination is the most important barrier for harnessing these synergies. Climate actions are centered on either mitigation or adaptation or both. Mitigation and adaptation actions can interact with each other resulting in synergies or tradeoffs. An integrated approach that considers these interactions is important to harness the synergies to create win-win situations and to avoid trade-offs for no-regret decisions. In this context, this study presents a qualitative analysis of the existing national level climate policies of Nepal to identify the extent and mechanism of their mitigation-adaptation interactions based on expert survey. Four key sectors having inter-relationships between mitigation and adaptation were identified as Agriculture, Forestry and Land use (AFOLU), urban planning, energy and water. We used Analytical Hierarchical Process (AHP) to rank and prioritize the opportunities and barriers for harnessing synergies and avoiding trade-offs of mitigation-adaptation interlinkage with these sectors in view. Our results show that such interactions in the Nepalese policy context are present mostly in the form of synergies in the order of AFOLU > Urban Planning > Energy > Water. We identified that developing an institution dedicated to climate change at the national level is the most important opportunity while inadequate institutional co-ordination is the most important barrier for harnessing these synergies. Climate change Elsevier Mitigation-adaptation Elsevier Barriers Elsevier Synergy and trade-offs Elsevier Nepal Elsevier Dhakal, Shobhakar oth Enthalten in Elsevier Ren, Chunhui ELSEVIER Cohort, signaling, and early-career dynamics: The hidden significance of class in black-white earnings inequality 2022 Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV008002754 volume:235 year:2019 day:1 month:04 pages:535-545 extent:11 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.01.035 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U 70.00 Sozialwissenschaften allgemein: Allgemeines VZ 71.00 Soziologie: Allgemeines VZ AR 235 2019 1 0401 535-545 11 |
allfieldsGer |
10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.01.035 doi GBV00000000000512.pica (DE-627)ELV045695598 (ELSEVIER)S0301-4797(19)30035-0 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 300 VZ 70.00 bkl 71.00 bkl Shrestha, Subina verfasserin aut An assessment of potential synergies and trade-offs between climate mitigation and adaptation policies of Nepal 2019transfer abstract 11 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Climate actions are centered on either mitigation or adaptation or both. Mitigation and adaptation actions can interact with each other resulting in synergies or tradeoffs. An integrated approach that considers these interactions is important to harness the synergies to create win-win situations and to avoid trade-offs for no-regret decisions. In this context, this study presents a qualitative analysis of the existing national level climate policies of Nepal to identify the extent and mechanism of their mitigation-adaptation interactions based on expert survey. Four key sectors having inter-relationships between mitigation and adaptation were identified as Agriculture, Forestry and Land use (AFOLU), urban planning, energy and water. We used Analytical Hierarchical Process (AHP) to rank and prioritize the opportunities and barriers for harnessing synergies and avoiding trade-offs of mitigation-adaptation interlinkage with these sectors in view. Our results show that such interactions in the Nepalese policy context are present mostly in the form of synergies in the order of AFOLU > Urban Planning > Energy > Water. We identified that developing an institution dedicated to climate change at the national level is the most important opportunity while inadequate institutional co-ordination is the most important barrier for harnessing these synergies. Climate actions are centered on either mitigation or adaptation or both. Mitigation and adaptation actions can interact with each other resulting in synergies or tradeoffs. An integrated approach that considers these interactions is important to harness the synergies to create win-win situations and to avoid trade-offs for no-regret decisions. In this context, this study presents a qualitative analysis of the existing national level climate policies of Nepal to identify the extent and mechanism of their mitigation-adaptation interactions based on expert survey. Four key sectors having inter-relationships between mitigation and adaptation were identified as Agriculture, Forestry and Land use (AFOLU), urban planning, energy and water. We used Analytical Hierarchical Process (AHP) to rank and prioritize the opportunities and barriers for harnessing synergies and avoiding trade-offs of mitigation-adaptation interlinkage with these sectors in view. Our results show that such interactions in the Nepalese policy context are present mostly in the form of synergies in the order of AFOLU > Urban Planning > Energy > Water. We identified that developing an institution dedicated to climate change at the national level is the most important opportunity while inadequate institutional co-ordination is the most important barrier for harnessing these synergies. Climate change Elsevier Mitigation-adaptation Elsevier Barriers Elsevier Synergy and trade-offs Elsevier Nepal Elsevier Dhakal, Shobhakar oth Enthalten in Elsevier Ren, Chunhui ELSEVIER Cohort, signaling, and early-career dynamics: The hidden significance of class in black-white earnings inequality 2022 Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV008002754 volume:235 year:2019 day:1 month:04 pages:535-545 extent:11 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.01.035 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U 70.00 Sozialwissenschaften allgemein: Allgemeines VZ 71.00 Soziologie: Allgemeines VZ AR 235 2019 1 0401 535-545 11 |
allfieldsSound |
10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.01.035 doi GBV00000000000512.pica (DE-627)ELV045695598 (ELSEVIER)S0301-4797(19)30035-0 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 300 VZ 70.00 bkl 71.00 bkl Shrestha, Subina verfasserin aut An assessment of potential synergies and trade-offs between climate mitigation and adaptation policies of Nepal 2019transfer abstract 11 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Climate actions are centered on either mitigation or adaptation or both. Mitigation and adaptation actions can interact with each other resulting in synergies or tradeoffs. An integrated approach that considers these interactions is important to harness the synergies to create win-win situations and to avoid trade-offs for no-regret decisions. In this context, this study presents a qualitative analysis of the existing national level climate policies of Nepal to identify the extent and mechanism of their mitigation-adaptation interactions based on expert survey. Four key sectors having inter-relationships between mitigation and adaptation were identified as Agriculture, Forestry and Land use (AFOLU), urban planning, energy and water. We used Analytical Hierarchical Process (AHP) to rank and prioritize the opportunities and barriers for harnessing synergies and avoiding trade-offs of mitigation-adaptation interlinkage with these sectors in view. Our results show that such interactions in the Nepalese policy context are present mostly in the form of synergies in the order of AFOLU > Urban Planning > Energy > Water. We identified that developing an institution dedicated to climate change at the national level is the most important opportunity while inadequate institutional co-ordination is the most important barrier for harnessing these synergies. Climate actions are centered on either mitigation or adaptation or both. Mitigation and adaptation actions can interact with each other resulting in synergies or tradeoffs. An integrated approach that considers these interactions is important to harness the synergies to create win-win situations and to avoid trade-offs for no-regret decisions. In this context, this study presents a qualitative analysis of the existing national level climate policies of Nepal to identify the extent and mechanism of their mitigation-adaptation interactions based on expert survey. Four key sectors having inter-relationships between mitigation and adaptation were identified as Agriculture, Forestry and Land use (AFOLU), urban planning, energy and water. We used Analytical Hierarchical Process (AHP) to rank and prioritize the opportunities and barriers for harnessing synergies and avoiding trade-offs of mitigation-adaptation interlinkage with these sectors in view. Our results show that such interactions in the Nepalese policy context are present mostly in the form of synergies in the order of AFOLU > Urban Planning > Energy > Water. We identified that developing an institution dedicated to climate change at the national level is the most important opportunity while inadequate institutional co-ordination is the most important barrier for harnessing these synergies. Climate change Elsevier Mitigation-adaptation Elsevier Barriers Elsevier Synergy and trade-offs Elsevier Nepal Elsevier Dhakal, Shobhakar oth Enthalten in Elsevier Ren, Chunhui ELSEVIER Cohort, signaling, and early-career dynamics: The hidden significance of class in black-white earnings inequality 2022 Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV008002754 volume:235 year:2019 day:1 month:04 pages:535-545 extent:11 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.01.035 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U 70.00 Sozialwissenschaften allgemein: Allgemeines VZ 71.00 Soziologie: Allgemeines VZ AR 235 2019 1 0401 535-545 11 |
language |
English |
source |
Enthalten in Cohort, signaling, and early-career dynamics: The hidden significance of class in black-white earnings inequality Amsterdam [u.a.] volume:235 year:2019 day:1 month:04 pages:535-545 extent:11 |
sourceStr |
Enthalten in Cohort, signaling, and early-career dynamics: The hidden significance of class in black-white earnings inequality Amsterdam [u.a.] volume:235 year:2019 day:1 month:04 pages:535-545 extent:11 |
format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
bklname |
Sozialwissenschaften allgemein: Allgemeines Soziologie: Allgemeines |
institution |
findex.gbv.de |
topic_facet |
Climate change Mitigation-adaptation Barriers Synergy and trade-offs Nepal |
dewey-raw |
300 |
isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
container_title |
Cohort, signaling, and early-career dynamics: The hidden significance of class in black-white earnings inequality |
authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Shrestha, Subina @@aut@@ Dhakal, Shobhakar @@oth@@ |
publishDateDaySort_date |
2019-01-01T00:00:00Z |
hierarchy_top_id |
ELV008002754 |
dewey-sort |
3300 |
id |
ELV045695598 |
language_de |
englisch |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV045695598</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230626012042.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">191021s2019 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.01.035</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">GBV00000000000512.pica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV045695598</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0301-4797(19)30035-0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">300</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">70.00</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">71.00</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Shrestha, Subina</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">An assessment of potential synergies and trade-offs between climate mitigation and adaptation policies of Nepal</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2019transfer abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Climate actions are centered on either mitigation or adaptation or both. Mitigation and adaptation actions can interact with each other resulting in synergies or tradeoffs. An integrated approach that considers these interactions is important to harness the synergies to create win-win situations and to avoid trade-offs for no-regret decisions. In this context, this study presents a qualitative analysis of the existing national level climate policies of Nepal to identify the extent and mechanism of their mitigation-adaptation interactions based on expert survey. Four key sectors having inter-relationships between mitigation and adaptation were identified as Agriculture, Forestry and Land use (AFOLU), urban planning, energy and water. We used Analytical Hierarchical Process (AHP) to rank and prioritize the opportunities and barriers for harnessing synergies and avoiding trade-offs of mitigation-adaptation interlinkage with these sectors in view. Our results show that such interactions in the Nepalese policy context are present mostly in the form of synergies in the order of AFOLU > Urban Planning > Energy > Water. We identified that developing an institution dedicated to climate change at the national level is the most important opportunity while inadequate institutional co-ordination is the most important barrier for harnessing these synergies.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Climate actions are centered on either mitigation or adaptation or both. Mitigation and adaptation actions can interact with each other resulting in synergies or tradeoffs. An integrated approach that considers these interactions is important to harness the synergies to create win-win situations and to avoid trade-offs for no-regret decisions. In this context, this study presents a qualitative analysis of the existing national level climate policies of Nepal to identify the extent and mechanism of their mitigation-adaptation interactions based on expert survey. Four key sectors having inter-relationships between mitigation and adaptation were identified as Agriculture, Forestry and Land use (AFOLU), urban planning, energy and water. We used Analytical Hierarchical Process (AHP) to rank and prioritize the opportunities and barriers for harnessing synergies and avoiding trade-offs of mitigation-adaptation interlinkage with these sectors in view. Our results show that such interactions in the Nepalese policy context are present mostly in the form of synergies in the order of AFOLU > Urban Planning > Energy > Water. We identified that developing an institution dedicated to climate change at the national level is the most important opportunity while inadequate institutional co-ordination is the most important barrier for harnessing these synergies.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Climate change</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Mitigation-adaptation</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Barriers</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Synergy and trade-offs</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Nepal</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Dhakal, Shobhakar</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="n">Elsevier</subfield><subfield code="a">Ren, Chunhui ELSEVIER</subfield><subfield code="t">Cohort, signaling, and early-career dynamics: The hidden significance of class in black-white earnings inequality</subfield><subfield code="d">2022</subfield><subfield code="g">Amsterdam [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)ELV008002754</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:235</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2019</subfield><subfield code="g">day:1</subfield><subfield code="g">month:04</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:535-545</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.01.035</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">70.00</subfield><subfield code="j">Sozialwissenschaften allgemein: Allgemeines</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">71.00</subfield><subfield code="j">Soziologie: Allgemeines</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">235</subfield><subfield code="j">2019</subfield><subfield code="b">1</subfield><subfield code="c">0401</subfield><subfield code="h">535-545</subfield><subfield code="g">11</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
author |
Shrestha, Subina |
spellingShingle |
Shrestha, Subina ddc 300 bkl 70.00 bkl 71.00 Elsevier Climate change Elsevier Mitigation-adaptation Elsevier Barriers Elsevier Synergy and trade-offs Elsevier Nepal An assessment of potential synergies and trade-offs between climate mitigation and adaptation policies of Nepal |
authorStr |
Shrestha, Subina |
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)ELV008002754 |
format |
electronic Article |
dewey-ones |
300 - Social sciences |
delete_txt_mv |
keep |
author_role |
aut |
collection |
elsevier |
remote_str |
true |
illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
topic_title |
300 VZ 70.00 bkl 71.00 bkl An assessment of potential synergies and trade-offs between climate mitigation and adaptation policies of Nepal Climate change Elsevier Mitigation-adaptation Elsevier Barriers Elsevier Synergy and trade-offs Elsevier Nepal Elsevier |
topic |
ddc 300 bkl 70.00 bkl 71.00 Elsevier Climate change Elsevier Mitigation-adaptation Elsevier Barriers Elsevier Synergy and trade-offs Elsevier Nepal |
topic_unstemmed |
ddc 300 bkl 70.00 bkl 71.00 Elsevier Climate change Elsevier Mitigation-adaptation Elsevier Barriers Elsevier Synergy and trade-offs Elsevier Nepal |
topic_browse |
ddc 300 bkl 70.00 bkl 71.00 Elsevier Climate change Elsevier Mitigation-adaptation Elsevier Barriers Elsevier Synergy and trade-offs Elsevier Nepal |
format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
carriertype_str_mv |
zu |
author2_variant |
s d sd |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Cohort, signaling, and early-career dynamics: The hidden significance of class in black-white earnings inequality |
hierarchy_parent_id |
ELV008002754 |
dewey-tens |
300 - Social sciences, sociology & anthropology |
hierarchy_top_title |
Cohort, signaling, and early-career dynamics: The hidden significance of class in black-white earnings inequality |
isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)ELV008002754 |
title |
An assessment of potential synergies and trade-offs between climate mitigation and adaptation policies of Nepal |
ctrlnum |
(DE-627)ELV045695598 (ELSEVIER)S0301-4797(19)30035-0 |
title_full |
An assessment of potential synergies and trade-offs between climate mitigation and adaptation policies of Nepal |
author_sort |
Shrestha, Subina |
journal |
Cohort, signaling, and early-career dynamics: The hidden significance of class in black-white earnings inequality |
journalStr |
Cohort, signaling, and early-career dynamics: The hidden significance of class in black-white earnings inequality |
lang_code |
eng |
isOA_bool |
false |
dewey-hundreds |
300 - Social sciences |
recordtype |
marc |
publishDateSort |
2019 |
contenttype_str_mv |
zzz |
container_start_page |
535 |
author_browse |
Shrestha, Subina |
container_volume |
235 |
physical |
11 |
class |
300 VZ 70.00 bkl 71.00 bkl |
format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
author-letter |
Shrestha, Subina |
doi_str_mv |
10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.01.035 |
dewey-full |
300 |
title_sort |
an assessment of potential synergies and trade-offs between climate mitigation and adaptation policies of nepal |
title_auth |
An assessment of potential synergies and trade-offs between climate mitigation and adaptation policies of Nepal |
abstract |
Climate actions are centered on either mitigation or adaptation or both. Mitigation and adaptation actions can interact with each other resulting in synergies or tradeoffs. An integrated approach that considers these interactions is important to harness the synergies to create win-win situations and to avoid trade-offs for no-regret decisions. In this context, this study presents a qualitative analysis of the existing national level climate policies of Nepal to identify the extent and mechanism of their mitigation-adaptation interactions based on expert survey. Four key sectors having inter-relationships between mitigation and adaptation were identified as Agriculture, Forestry and Land use (AFOLU), urban planning, energy and water. We used Analytical Hierarchical Process (AHP) to rank and prioritize the opportunities and barriers for harnessing synergies and avoiding trade-offs of mitigation-adaptation interlinkage with these sectors in view. Our results show that such interactions in the Nepalese policy context are present mostly in the form of synergies in the order of AFOLU > Urban Planning > Energy > Water. We identified that developing an institution dedicated to climate change at the national level is the most important opportunity while inadequate institutional co-ordination is the most important barrier for harnessing these synergies. |
abstractGer |
Climate actions are centered on either mitigation or adaptation or both. Mitigation and adaptation actions can interact with each other resulting in synergies or tradeoffs. An integrated approach that considers these interactions is important to harness the synergies to create win-win situations and to avoid trade-offs for no-regret decisions. In this context, this study presents a qualitative analysis of the existing national level climate policies of Nepal to identify the extent and mechanism of their mitigation-adaptation interactions based on expert survey. Four key sectors having inter-relationships between mitigation and adaptation were identified as Agriculture, Forestry and Land use (AFOLU), urban planning, energy and water. We used Analytical Hierarchical Process (AHP) to rank and prioritize the opportunities and barriers for harnessing synergies and avoiding trade-offs of mitigation-adaptation interlinkage with these sectors in view. Our results show that such interactions in the Nepalese policy context are present mostly in the form of synergies in the order of AFOLU > Urban Planning > Energy > Water. We identified that developing an institution dedicated to climate change at the national level is the most important opportunity while inadequate institutional co-ordination is the most important barrier for harnessing these synergies. |
abstract_unstemmed |
Climate actions are centered on either mitigation or adaptation or both. Mitigation and adaptation actions can interact with each other resulting in synergies or tradeoffs. An integrated approach that considers these interactions is important to harness the synergies to create win-win situations and to avoid trade-offs for no-regret decisions. In this context, this study presents a qualitative analysis of the existing national level climate policies of Nepal to identify the extent and mechanism of their mitigation-adaptation interactions based on expert survey. Four key sectors having inter-relationships between mitigation and adaptation were identified as Agriculture, Forestry and Land use (AFOLU), urban planning, energy and water. We used Analytical Hierarchical Process (AHP) to rank and prioritize the opportunities and barriers for harnessing synergies and avoiding trade-offs of mitigation-adaptation interlinkage with these sectors in view. Our results show that such interactions in the Nepalese policy context are present mostly in the form of synergies in the order of AFOLU > Urban Planning > Energy > Water. We identified that developing an institution dedicated to climate change at the national level is the most important opportunity while inadequate institutional co-ordination is the most important barrier for harnessing these synergies. |
collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U |
title_short |
An assessment of potential synergies and trade-offs between climate mitigation and adaptation policies of Nepal |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.01.035 |
remote_bool |
true |
author2 |
Dhakal, Shobhakar |
author2Str |
Dhakal, Shobhakar |
ppnlink |
ELV008002754 |
mediatype_str_mv |
z |
isOA_txt |
false |
hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
author2_role |
oth |
doi_str |
10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.01.035 |
up_date |
2024-07-06T18:14:39.208Z |
_version_ |
1803854470667304960 |
fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV045695598</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230626012042.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">191021s2019 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.01.035</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">GBV00000000000512.pica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV045695598</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0301-4797(19)30035-0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">300</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">70.00</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">71.00</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Shrestha, Subina</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">An assessment of potential synergies and trade-offs between climate mitigation and adaptation policies of Nepal</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2019transfer abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Climate actions are centered on either mitigation or adaptation or both. Mitigation and adaptation actions can interact with each other resulting in synergies or tradeoffs. An integrated approach that considers these interactions is important to harness the synergies to create win-win situations and to avoid trade-offs for no-regret decisions. In this context, this study presents a qualitative analysis of the existing national level climate policies of Nepal to identify the extent and mechanism of their mitigation-adaptation interactions based on expert survey. Four key sectors having inter-relationships between mitigation and adaptation were identified as Agriculture, Forestry and Land use (AFOLU), urban planning, energy and water. We used Analytical Hierarchical Process (AHP) to rank and prioritize the opportunities and barriers for harnessing synergies and avoiding trade-offs of mitigation-adaptation interlinkage with these sectors in view. Our results show that such interactions in the Nepalese policy context are present mostly in the form of synergies in the order of AFOLU > Urban Planning > Energy > Water. We identified that developing an institution dedicated to climate change at the national level is the most important opportunity while inadequate institutional co-ordination is the most important barrier for harnessing these synergies.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Climate actions are centered on either mitigation or adaptation or both. Mitigation and adaptation actions can interact with each other resulting in synergies or tradeoffs. An integrated approach that considers these interactions is important to harness the synergies to create win-win situations and to avoid trade-offs for no-regret decisions. In this context, this study presents a qualitative analysis of the existing national level climate policies of Nepal to identify the extent and mechanism of their mitigation-adaptation interactions based on expert survey. Four key sectors having inter-relationships between mitigation and adaptation were identified as Agriculture, Forestry and Land use (AFOLU), urban planning, energy and water. We used Analytical Hierarchical Process (AHP) to rank and prioritize the opportunities and barriers for harnessing synergies and avoiding trade-offs of mitigation-adaptation interlinkage with these sectors in view. Our results show that such interactions in the Nepalese policy context are present mostly in the form of synergies in the order of AFOLU > Urban Planning > Energy > Water. We identified that developing an institution dedicated to climate change at the national level is the most important opportunity while inadequate institutional co-ordination is the most important barrier for harnessing these synergies.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Climate change</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Mitigation-adaptation</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Barriers</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Synergy and trade-offs</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Nepal</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Dhakal, Shobhakar</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="n">Elsevier</subfield><subfield code="a">Ren, Chunhui ELSEVIER</subfield><subfield code="t">Cohort, signaling, and early-career dynamics: The hidden significance of class in black-white earnings inequality</subfield><subfield code="d">2022</subfield><subfield code="g">Amsterdam [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)ELV008002754</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:235</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2019</subfield><subfield code="g">day:1</subfield><subfield code="g">month:04</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:535-545</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.01.035</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">70.00</subfield><subfield code="j">Sozialwissenschaften allgemein: Allgemeines</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">71.00</subfield><subfield code="j">Soziologie: Allgemeines</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">235</subfield><subfield code="j">2019</subfield><subfield code="b">1</subfield><subfield code="c">0401</subfield><subfield code="h">535-545</subfield><subfield code="g">11</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
score |
7.3980665 |