Performance assessment of bifacial c-Si PV modules through device simulations and outdoor measurements
Bifacial solar cells are receiving increased attention in the PV market due to their higher energy yield compared to conventional monofacial modules thanks to additional light conversion through their back surface. This additional rear side energy gain creates a potential for significant reduction o...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Katsaounis, Th. [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2019transfer abstract |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Umfang: |
14 |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Technologies and practice of CO - HU, Yongle ELSEVIER, 2019, an international journal : the official journal of WREN, The World Renewable Energy Network, Amsterdam [u.a.] |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:143 ; year:2019 ; pages:1285-1298 ; extent:14 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1016/j.renene.2019.05.057 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
ELV047238275 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ELV047238275 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230626015236.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 191021s2019 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.renene.2019.05.057 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a GBV00000000000667.pica |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)ELV047238275 | ||
| 035 | |a (ELSEVIER)S0960-1481(19)30717-7 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Katsaounis, Th. |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Performance assessment of bifacial c-Si PV modules through device simulations and outdoor measurements |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2019transfer abstract | |
| 300 | |a 14 | ||
| 336 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zzz |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b z |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zu |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Bifacial solar cells are receiving increased attention in the PV market due to their higher energy yield compared to conventional monofacial modules thanks to additional light conversion through their back surface. This additional rear side energy gain creates a potential for significant reduction of the overall levelized cost of energy (LCOE). Despite this fact, wide deployment of bifacial PV modules is very limited because of the high unpredictability of their power output due to various factors such as ground reflectance, module elevation angle, orientation and tilt angle. Due to this complexity, modelling of bifacial modules and systems is currently not developed at the same level of maturity as monofacial ones, where established commercial tools have been developed for PV system designers. In this regard, a customized 2D device model has been developed to simulate bifacial PV structures based on the numerical solution of the transport equations by the finite element method. The model was used to simulate actual PV performance and energy yield based on measured outdoor environmental parameters including solar radiation spectrum and temperature. Bifacial device output was also compared with a monofacial one based on the industrial standard Al-BSF structure. Simulated results were also compared and validated with outdoor experimental data based on IV measurements of monofacial and bifacial modules installed at various tilt angles at a location near the Western coast of Saudi Arabia. | ||
| 520 | |a Bifacial solar cells are receiving increased attention in the PV market due to their higher energy yield compared to conventional monofacial modules thanks to additional light conversion through their back surface. This additional rear side energy gain creates a potential for significant reduction of the overall levelized cost of energy (LCOE). Despite this fact, wide deployment of bifacial PV modules is very limited because of the high unpredictability of their power output due to various factors such as ground reflectance, module elevation angle, orientation and tilt angle. Due to this complexity, modelling of bifacial modules and systems is currently not developed at the same level of maturity as monofacial ones, where established commercial tools have been developed for PV system designers. In this regard, a customized 2D device model has been developed to simulate bifacial PV structures based on the numerical solution of the transport equations by the finite element method. The model was used to simulate actual PV performance and energy yield based on measured outdoor environmental parameters including solar radiation spectrum and temperature. Bifacial device output was also compared with a monofacial one based on the industrial standard Al-BSF structure. Simulated results were also compared and validated with outdoor experimental data based on IV measurements of monofacial and bifacial modules installed at various tilt angles at a location near the Western coast of Saudi Arabia. | ||
| 650 | 7 | |a Bifacial PV device |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Local climate conditions |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Customized 2D solar cell simulator |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Hazy days favour bifacial devices |2 Elsevier | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Kotsovos, K. |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Gereige, I. |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Basaheeh, A. |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Abdullah, M. |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Khayat, A. |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Al-Habshi, E. |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Al-Saggaf, A. |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Tzavaras, A.E. |4 oth | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |n Elsevier Science |a HU, Yongle ELSEVIER |t Technologies and practice of CO |d 2019 |d an international journal : the official journal of WREN, The World Renewable Energy Network |g Amsterdam [u.a.] |w (DE-627)ELV002723662 |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:143 |g year:2019 |g pages:1285-1298 |g extent:14 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.05.057 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_U | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ELV | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_U | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 143 |j 2019 |h 1285-1298 |g 14 | ||
| author_variant |
t k tk |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
katsaounisthkotsovoskgereigeibasaheehaab:2019----:efracassmnobfcacivouetruheieiuain |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2019transfer abstract |
| publishDate |
2019 |
| allfields |
10.1016/j.renene.2019.05.057 doi GBV00000000000667.pica (DE-627)ELV047238275 (ELSEVIER)S0960-1481(19)30717-7 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Katsaounis, Th. verfasserin aut Performance assessment of bifacial c-Si PV modules through device simulations and outdoor measurements 2019transfer abstract 14 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Bifacial solar cells are receiving increased attention in the PV market due to their higher energy yield compared to conventional monofacial modules thanks to additional light conversion through their back surface. This additional rear side energy gain creates a potential for significant reduction of the overall levelized cost of energy (LCOE). Despite this fact, wide deployment of bifacial PV modules is very limited because of the high unpredictability of their power output due to various factors such as ground reflectance, module elevation angle, orientation and tilt angle. Due to this complexity, modelling of bifacial modules and systems is currently not developed at the same level of maturity as monofacial ones, where established commercial tools have been developed for PV system designers. In this regard, a customized 2D device model has been developed to simulate bifacial PV structures based on the numerical solution of the transport equations by the finite element method. The model was used to simulate actual PV performance and energy yield based on measured outdoor environmental parameters including solar radiation spectrum and temperature. Bifacial device output was also compared with a monofacial one based on the industrial standard Al-BSF structure. Simulated results were also compared and validated with outdoor experimental data based on IV measurements of monofacial and bifacial modules installed at various tilt angles at a location near the Western coast of Saudi Arabia. Bifacial solar cells are receiving increased attention in the PV market due to their higher energy yield compared to conventional monofacial modules thanks to additional light conversion through their back surface. This additional rear side energy gain creates a potential for significant reduction of the overall levelized cost of energy (LCOE). Despite this fact, wide deployment of bifacial PV modules is very limited because of the high unpredictability of their power output due to various factors such as ground reflectance, module elevation angle, orientation and tilt angle. Due to this complexity, modelling of bifacial modules and systems is currently not developed at the same level of maturity as monofacial ones, where established commercial tools have been developed for PV system designers. In this regard, a customized 2D device model has been developed to simulate bifacial PV structures based on the numerical solution of the transport equations by the finite element method. The model was used to simulate actual PV performance and energy yield based on measured outdoor environmental parameters including solar radiation spectrum and temperature. Bifacial device output was also compared with a monofacial one based on the industrial standard Al-BSF structure. Simulated results were also compared and validated with outdoor experimental data based on IV measurements of monofacial and bifacial modules installed at various tilt angles at a location near the Western coast of Saudi Arabia. Bifacial PV device Elsevier Local climate conditions Elsevier Customized 2D solar cell simulator Elsevier Hazy days favour bifacial devices Elsevier Kotsovos, K. oth Gereige, I. oth Basaheeh, A. oth Abdullah, M. oth Khayat, A. oth Al-Habshi, E. oth Al-Saggaf, A. oth Tzavaras, A.E. oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science HU, Yongle ELSEVIER Technologies and practice of CO 2019 an international journal : the official journal of WREN, The World Renewable Energy Network Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV002723662 volume:143 year:2019 pages:1285-1298 extent:14 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.05.057 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U AR 143 2019 1285-1298 14 |
| spelling |
10.1016/j.renene.2019.05.057 doi GBV00000000000667.pica (DE-627)ELV047238275 (ELSEVIER)S0960-1481(19)30717-7 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Katsaounis, Th. verfasserin aut Performance assessment of bifacial c-Si PV modules through device simulations and outdoor measurements 2019transfer abstract 14 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Bifacial solar cells are receiving increased attention in the PV market due to their higher energy yield compared to conventional monofacial modules thanks to additional light conversion through their back surface. This additional rear side energy gain creates a potential for significant reduction of the overall levelized cost of energy (LCOE). Despite this fact, wide deployment of bifacial PV modules is very limited because of the high unpredictability of their power output due to various factors such as ground reflectance, module elevation angle, orientation and tilt angle. Due to this complexity, modelling of bifacial modules and systems is currently not developed at the same level of maturity as monofacial ones, where established commercial tools have been developed for PV system designers. In this regard, a customized 2D device model has been developed to simulate bifacial PV structures based on the numerical solution of the transport equations by the finite element method. The model was used to simulate actual PV performance and energy yield based on measured outdoor environmental parameters including solar radiation spectrum and temperature. Bifacial device output was also compared with a monofacial one based on the industrial standard Al-BSF structure. Simulated results were also compared and validated with outdoor experimental data based on IV measurements of monofacial and bifacial modules installed at various tilt angles at a location near the Western coast of Saudi Arabia. Bifacial solar cells are receiving increased attention in the PV market due to their higher energy yield compared to conventional monofacial modules thanks to additional light conversion through their back surface. This additional rear side energy gain creates a potential for significant reduction of the overall levelized cost of energy (LCOE). Despite this fact, wide deployment of bifacial PV modules is very limited because of the high unpredictability of their power output due to various factors such as ground reflectance, module elevation angle, orientation and tilt angle. Due to this complexity, modelling of bifacial modules and systems is currently not developed at the same level of maturity as monofacial ones, where established commercial tools have been developed for PV system designers. In this regard, a customized 2D device model has been developed to simulate bifacial PV structures based on the numerical solution of the transport equations by the finite element method. The model was used to simulate actual PV performance and energy yield based on measured outdoor environmental parameters including solar radiation spectrum and temperature. Bifacial device output was also compared with a monofacial one based on the industrial standard Al-BSF structure. Simulated results were also compared and validated with outdoor experimental data based on IV measurements of monofacial and bifacial modules installed at various tilt angles at a location near the Western coast of Saudi Arabia. Bifacial PV device Elsevier Local climate conditions Elsevier Customized 2D solar cell simulator Elsevier Hazy days favour bifacial devices Elsevier Kotsovos, K. oth Gereige, I. oth Basaheeh, A. oth Abdullah, M. oth Khayat, A. oth Al-Habshi, E. oth Al-Saggaf, A. oth Tzavaras, A.E. oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science HU, Yongle ELSEVIER Technologies and practice of CO 2019 an international journal : the official journal of WREN, The World Renewable Energy Network Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV002723662 volume:143 year:2019 pages:1285-1298 extent:14 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.05.057 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U AR 143 2019 1285-1298 14 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1016/j.renene.2019.05.057 doi GBV00000000000667.pica (DE-627)ELV047238275 (ELSEVIER)S0960-1481(19)30717-7 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Katsaounis, Th. verfasserin aut Performance assessment of bifacial c-Si PV modules through device simulations and outdoor measurements 2019transfer abstract 14 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Bifacial solar cells are receiving increased attention in the PV market due to their higher energy yield compared to conventional monofacial modules thanks to additional light conversion through their back surface. This additional rear side energy gain creates a potential for significant reduction of the overall levelized cost of energy (LCOE). Despite this fact, wide deployment of bifacial PV modules is very limited because of the high unpredictability of their power output due to various factors such as ground reflectance, module elevation angle, orientation and tilt angle. Due to this complexity, modelling of bifacial modules and systems is currently not developed at the same level of maturity as monofacial ones, where established commercial tools have been developed for PV system designers. In this regard, a customized 2D device model has been developed to simulate bifacial PV structures based on the numerical solution of the transport equations by the finite element method. The model was used to simulate actual PV performance and energy yield based on measured outdoor environmental parameters including solar radiation spectrum and temperature. Bifacial device output was also compared with a monofacial one based on the industrial standard Al-BSF structure. Simulated results were also compared and validated with outdoor experimental data based on IV measurements of monofacial and bifacial modules installed at various tilt angles at a location near the Western coast of Saudi Arabia. Bifacial solar cells are receiving increased attention in the PV market due to their higher energy yield compared to conventional monofacial modules thanks to additional light conversion through their back surface. This additional rear side energy gain creates a potential for significant reduction of the overall levelized cost of energy (LCOE). Despite this fact, wide deployment of bifacial PV modules is very limited because of the high unpredictability of their power output due to various factors such as ground reflectance, module elevation angle, orientation and tilt angle. Due to this complexity, modelling of bifacial modules and systems is currently not developed at the same level of maturity as monofacial ones, where established commercial tools have been developed for PV system designers. In this regard, a customized 2D device model has been developed to simulate bifacial PV structures based on the numerical solution of the transport equations by the finite element method. The model was used to simulate actual PV performance and energy yield based on measured outdoor environmental parameters including solar radiation spectrum and temperature. Bifacial device output was also compared with a monofacial one based on the industrial standard Al-BSF structure. Simulated results were also compared and validated with outdoor experimental data based on IV measurements of monofacial and bifacial modules installed at various tilt angles at a location near the Western coast of Saudi Arabia. Bifacial PV device Elsevier Local climate conditions Elsevier Customized 2D solar cell simulator Elsevier Hazy days favour bifacial devices Elsevier Kotsovos, K. oth Gereige, I. oth Basaheeh, A. oth Abdullah, M. oth Khayat, A. oth Al-Habshi, E. oth Al-Saggaf, A. oth Tzavaras, A.E. oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science HU, Yongle ELSEVIER Technologies and practice of CO 2019 an international journal : the official journal of WREN, The World Renewable Energy Network Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV002723662 volume:143 year:2019 pages:1285-1298 extent:14 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.05.057 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U AR 143 2019 1285-1298 14 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1016/j.renene.2019.05.057 doi GBV00000000000667.pica (DE-627)ELV047238275 (ELSEVIER)S0960-1481(19)30717-7 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Katsaounis, Th. verfasserin aut Performance assessment of bifacial c-Si PV modules through device simulations and outdoor measurements 2019transfer abstract 14 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Bifacial solar cells are receiving increased attention in the PV market due to their higher energy yield compared to conventional monofacial modules thanks to additional light conversion through their back surface. This additional rear side energy gain creates a potential for significant reduction of the overall levelized cost of energy (LCOE). Despite this fact, wide deployment of bifacial PV modules is very limited because of the high unpredictability of their power output due to various factors such as ground reflectance, module elevation angle, orientation and tilt angle. Due to this complexity, modelling of bifacial modules and systems is currently not developed at the same level of maturity as monofacial ones, where established commercial tools have been developed for PV system designers. In this regard, a customized 2D device model has been developed to simulate bifacial PV structures based on the numerical solution of the transport equations by the finite element method. The model was used to simulate actual PV performance and energy yield based on measured outdoor environmental parameters including solar radiation spectrum and temperature. Bifacial device output was also compared with a monofacial one based on the industrial standard Al-BSF structure. Simulated results were also compared and validated with outdoor experimental data based on IV measurements of monofacial and bifacial modules installed at various tilt angles at a location near the Western coast of Saudi Arabia. Bifacial solar cells are receiving increased attention in the PV market due to their higher energy yield compared to conventional monofacial modules thanks to additional light conversion through their back surface. This additional rear side energy gain creates a potential for significant reduction of the overall levelized cost of energy (LCOE). Despite this fact, wide deployment of bifacial PV modules is very limited because of the high unpredictability of their power output due to various factors such as ground reflectance, module elevation angle, orientation and tilt angle. Due to this complexity, modelling of bifacial modules and systems is currently not developed at the same level of maturity as monofacial ones, where established commercial tools have been developed for PV system designers. In this regard, a customized 2D device model has been developed to simulate bifacial PV structures based on the numerical solution of the transport equations by the finite element method. The model was used to simulate actual PV performance and energy yield based on measured outdoor environmental parameters including solar radiation spectrum and temperature. Bifacial device output was also compared with a monofacial one based on the industrial standard Al-BSF structure. Simulated results were also compared and validated with outdoor experimental data based on IV measurements of monofacial and bifacial modules installed at various tilt angles at a location near the Western coast of Saudi Arabia. Bifacial PV device Elsevier Local climate conditions Elsevier Customized 2D solar cell simulator Elsevier Hazy days favour bifacial devices Elsevier Kotsovos, K. oth Gereige, I. oth Basaheeh, A. oth Abdullah, M. oth Khayat, A. oth Al-Habshi, E. oth Al-Saggaf, A. oth Tzavaras, A.E. oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science HU, Yongle ELSEVIER Technologies and practice of CO 2019 an international journal : the official journal of WREN, The World Renewable Energy Network Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV002723662 volume:143 year:2019 pages:1285-1298 extent:14 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.05.057 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U AR 143 2019 1285-1298 14 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1016/j.renene.2019.05.057 doi GBV00000000000667.pica (DE-627)ELV047238275 (ELSEVIER)S0960-1481(19)30717-7 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Katsaounis, Th. verfasserin aut Performance assessment of bifacial c-Si PV modules through device simulations and outdoor measurements 2019transfer abstract 14 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Bifacial solar cells are receiving increased attention in the PV market due to their higher energy yield compared to conventional monofacial modules thanks to additional light conversion through their back surface. This additional rear side energy gain creates a potential for significant reduction of the overall levelized cost of energy (LCOE). Despite this fact, wide deployment of bifacial PV modules is very limited because of the high unpredictability of their power output due to various factors such as ground reflectance, module elevation angle, orientation and tilt angle. Due to this complexity, modelling of bifacial modules and systems is currently not developed at the same level of maturity as monofacial ones, where established commercial tools have been developed for PV system designers. In this regard, a customized 2D device model has been developed to simulate bifacial PV structures based on the numerical solution of the transport equations by the finite element method. The model was used to simulate actual PV performance and energy yield based on measured outdoor environmental parameters including solar radiation spectrum and temperature. Bifacial device output was also compared with a monofacial one based on the industrial standard Al-BSF structure. Simulated results were also compared and validated with outdoor experimental data based on IV measurements of monofacial and bifacial modules installed at various tilt angles at a location near the Western coast of Saudi Arabia. Bifacial solar cells are receiving increased attention in the PV market due to their higher energy yield compared to conventional monofacial modules thanks to additional light conversion through their back surface. This additional rear side energy gain creates a potential for significant reduction of the overall levelized cost of energy (LCOE). Despite this fact, wide deployment of bifacial PV modules is very limited because of the high unpredictability of their power output due to various factors such as ground reflectance, module elevation angle, orientation and tilt angle. Due to this complexity, modelling of bifacial modules and systems is currently not developed at the same level of maturity as monofacial ones, where established commercial tools have been developed for PV system designers. In this regard, a customized 2D device model has been developed to simulate bifacial PV structures based on the numerical solution of the transport equations by the finite element method. The model was used to simulate actual PV performance and energy yield based on measured outdoor environmental parameters including solar radiation spectrum and temperature. Bifacial device output was also compared with a monofacial one based on the industrial standard Al-BSF structure. Simulated results were also compared and validated with outdoor experimental data based on IV measurements of monofacial and bifacial modules installed at various tilt angles at a location near the Western coast of Saudi Arabia. Bifacial PV device Elsevier Local climate conditions Elsevier Customized 2D solar cell simulator Elsevier Hazy days favour bifacial devices Elsevier Kotsovos, K. oth Gereige, I. oth Basaheeh, A. oth Abdullah, M. oth Khayat, A. oth Al-Habshi, E. oth Al-Saggaf, A. oth Tzavaras, A.E. oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science HU, Yongle ELSEVIER Technologies and practice of CO 2019 an international journal : the official journal of WREN, The World Renewable Energy Network Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV002723662 volume:143 year:2019 pages:1285-1298 extent:14 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.05.057 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U AR 143 2019 1285-1298 14 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in Technologies and practice of CO Amsterdam [u.a.] volume:143 year:2019 pages:1285-1298 extent:14 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in Technologies and practice of CO Amsterdam [u.a.] volume:143 year:2019 pages:1285-1298 extent:14 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
Bifacial PV device Local climate conditions Customized 2D solar cell simulator Hazy days favour bifacial devices |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
Technologies and practice of CO |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Katsaounis, Th. @@aut@@ Kotsovos, K. @@oth@@ Gereige, I. @@oth@@ Basaheeh, A. @@oth@@ Abdullah, M. @@oth@@ Khayat, A. @@oth@@ Al-Habshi, E. @@oth@@ Al-Saggaf, A. @@oth@@ Tzavaras, A.E. @@oth@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2019-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
ELV002723662 |
| id |
ELV047238275 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV047238275</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230626015236.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">191021s2019 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.renene.2019.05.057</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">GBV00000000000667.pica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV047238275</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0960-1481(19)30717-7</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Katsaounis, Th.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Performance assessment of bifacial c-Si PV modules through device simulations and outdoor measurements</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2019transfer abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">14</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Bifacial solar cells are receiving increased attention in the PV market due to their higher energy yield compared to conventional monofacial modules thanks to additional light conversion through their back surface. This additional rear side energy gain creates a potential for significant reduction of the overall levelized cost of energy (LCOE). Despite this fact, wide deployment of bifacial PV modules is very limited because of the high unpredictability of their power output due to various factors such as ground reflectance, module elevation angle, orientation and tilt angle. Due to this complexity, modelling of bifacial modules and systems is currently not developed at the same level of maturity as monofacial ones, where established commercial tools have been developed for PV system designers. In this regard, a customized 2D device model has been developed to simulate bifacial PV structures based on the numerical solution of the transport equations by the finite element method. The model was used to simulate actual PV performance and energy yield based on measured outdoor environmental parameters including solar radiation spectrum and temperature. Bifacial device output was also compared with a monofacial one based on the industrial standard Al-BSF structure. Simulated results were also compared and validated with outdoor experimental data based on IV measurements of monofacial and bifacial modules installed at various tilt angles at a location near the Western coast of Saudi Arabia.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Bifacial solar cells are receiving increased attention in the PV market due to their higher energy yield compared to conventional monofacial modules thanks to additional light conversion through their back surface. This additional rear side energy gain creates a potential for significant reduction of the overall levelized cost of energy (LCOE). Despite this fact, wide deployment of bifacial PV modules is very limited because of the high unpredictability of their power output due to various factors such as ground reflectance, module elevation angle, orientation and tilt angle. Due to this complexity, modelling of bifacial modules and systems is currently not developed at the same level of maturity as monofacial ones, where established commercial tools have been developed for PV system designers. In this regard, a customized 2D device model has been developed to simulate bifacial PV structures based on the numerical solution of the transport equations by the finite element method. The model was used to simulate actual PV performance and energy yield based on measured outdoor environmental parameters including solar radiation spectrum and temperature. Bifacial device output was also compared with a monofacial one based on the industrial standard Al-BSF structure. Simulated results were also compared and validated with outdoor experimental data based on IV measurements of monofacial and bifacial modules installed at various tilt angles at a location near the Western coast of Saudi Arabia.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Bifacial PV device</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Local climate conditions</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Customized 2D solar cell simulator</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Hazy days favour bifacial devices</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Kotsovos, K.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Gereige, I.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Basaheeh, A.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abdullah, M.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Khayat, A.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Al-Habshi, E.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Al-Saggaf, A.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Tzavaras, A.E.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="n">Elsevier Science</subfield><subfield code="a">HU, Yongle ELSEVIER</subfield><subfield code="t">Technologies and practice of CO</subfield><subfield code="d">2019</subfield><subfield code="d">an international journal : the official journal of WREN, The World Renewable Energy Network</subfield><subfield code="g">Amsterdam [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)ELV002723662</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:143</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2019</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:1285-1298</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:14</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.05.057</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">143</subfield><subfield code="j">2019</subfield><subfield code="h">1285-1298</subfield><subfield code="g">14</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Katsaounis, Th. |
| spellingShingle |
Katsaounis, Th. Elsevier Bifacial PV device Elsevier Local climate conditions Elsevier Customized 2D solar cell simulator Elsevier Hazy days favour bifacial devices Performance assessment of bifacial c-Si PV modules through device simulations and outdoor measurements |
| authorStr |
Katsaounis, Th. |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)ELV002723662 |
| format |
electronic Article |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut |
| collection |
elsevier |
| remote_str |
true |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| topic_title |
Performance assessment of bifacial c-Si PV modules through device simulations and outdoor measurements Bifacial PV device Elsevier Local climate conditions Elsevier Customized 2D solar cell simulator Elsevier Hazy days favour bifacial devices Elsevier |
| topic |
Elsevier Bifacial PV device Elsevier Local climate conditions Elsevier Customized 2D solar cell simulator Elsevier Hazy days favour bifacial devices |
| topic_unstemmed |
Elsevier Bifacial PV device Elsevier Local climate conditions Elsevier Customized 2D solar cell simulator Elsevier Hazy days favour bifacial devices |
| topic_browse |
Elsevier Bifacial PV device Elsevier Local climate conditions Elsevier Customized 2D solar cell simulator Elsevier Hazy days favour bifacial devices |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
zu |
| author2_variant |
k k kk i g ig a b ab m a ma a k ak e a h eah a a s aas a t at |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Technologies and practice of CO |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
ELV002723662 |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Technologies and practice of CO |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)ELV002723662 |
| title |
Performance assessment of bifacial c-Si PV modules through device simulations and outdoor measurements |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)ELV047238275 (ELSEVIER)S0960-1481(19)30717-7 |
| title_full |
Performance assessment of bifacial c-Si PV modules through device simulations and outdoor measurements |
| author_sort |
Katsaounis, Th. |
| journal |
Technologies and practice of CO |
| journalStr |
Technologies and practice of CO |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2019 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
zzz |
| container_start_page |
1285 |
| author_browse |
Katsaounis, Th. |
| container_volume |
143 |
| physical |
14 |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Katsaounis, Th. |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1016/j.renene.2019.05.057 |
| title_sort |
performance assessment of bifacial c-si pv modules through device simulations and outdoor measurements |
| title_auth |
Performance assessment of bifacial c-Si PV modules through device simulations and outdoor measurements |
| abstract |
Bifacial solar cells are receiving increased attention in the PV market due to their higher energy yield compared to conventional monofacial modules thanks to additional light conversion through their back surface. This additional rear side energy gain creates a potential for significant reduction of the overall levelized cost of energy (LCOE). Despite this fact, wide deployment of bifacial PV modules is very limited because of the high unpredictability of their power output due to various factors such as ground reflectance, module elevation angle, orientation and tilt angle. Due to this complexity, modelling of bifacial modules and systems is currently not developed at the same level of maturity as monofacial ones, where established commercial tools have been developed for PV system designers. In this regard, a customized 2D device model has been developed to simulate bifacial PV structures based on the numerical solution of the transport equations by the finite element method. The model was used to simulate actual PV performance and energy yield based on measured outdoor environmental parameters including solar radiation spectrum and temperature. Bifacial device output was also compared with a monofacial one based on the industrial standard Al-BSF structure. Simulated results were also compared and validated with outdoor experimental data based on IV measurements of monofacial and bifacial modules installed at various tilt angles at a location near the Western coast of Saudi Arabia. |
| abstractGer |
Bifacial solar cells are receiving increased attention in the PV market due to their higher energy yield compared to conventional monofacial modules thanks to additional light conversion through their back surface. This additional rear side energy gain creates a potential for significant reduction of the overall levelized cost of energy (LCOE). Despite this fact, wide deployment of bifacial PV modules is very limited because of the high unpredictability of their power output due to various factors such as ground reflectance, module elevation angle, orientation and tilt angle. Due to this complexity, modelling of bifacial modules and systems is currently not developed at the same level of maturity as monofacial ones, where established commercial tools have been developed for PV system designers. In this regard, a customized 2D device model has been developed to simulate bifacial PV structures based on the numerical solution of the transport equations by the finite element method. The model was used to simulate actual PV performance and energy yield based on measured outdoor environmental parameters including solar radiation spectrum and temperature. Bifacial device output was also compared with a monofacial one based on the industrial standard Al-BSF structure. Simulated results were also compared and validated with outdoor experimental data based on IV measurements of monofacial and bifacial modules installed at various tilt angles at a location near the Western coast of Saudi Arabia. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
Bifacial solar cells are receiving increased attention in the PV market due to their higher energy yield compared to conventional monofacial modules thanks to additional light conversion through their back surface. This additional rear side energy gain creates a potential for significant reduction of the overall levelized cost of energy (LCOE). Despite this fact, wide deployment of bifacial PV modules is very limited because of the high unpredictability of their power output due to various factors such as ground reflectance, module elevation angle, orientation and tilt angle. Due to this complexity, modelling of bifacial modules and systems is currently not developed at the same level of maturity as monofacial ones, where established commercial tools have been developed for PV system designers. In this regard, a customized 2D device model has been developed to simulate bifacial PV structures based on the numerical solution of the transport equations by the finite element method. The model was used to simulate actual PV performance and energy yield based on measured outdoor environmental parameters including solar radiation spectrum and temperature. Bifacial device output was also compared with a monofacial one based on the industrial standard Al-BSF structure. Simulated results were also compared and validated with outdoor experimental data based on IV measurements of monofacial and bifacial modules installed at various tilt angles at a location near the Western coast of Saudi Arabia. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U |
| title_short |
Performance assessment of bifacial c-Si PV modules through device simulations and outdoor measurements |
| url |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.05.057 |
| remote_bool |
true |
| author2 |
Kotsovos, K. Gereige, I. Basaheeh, A. Abdullah, M. Khayat, A. Al-Habshi, E. Al-Saggaf, A. Tzavaras, A.E. |
| author2Str |
Kotsovos, K. Gereige, I. Basaheeh, A. Abdullah, M. Khayat, A. Al-Habshi, E. Al-Saggaf, A. Tzavaras, A.E. |
| ppnlink |
ELV002723662 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
z |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| author2_role |
oth oth oth oth oth oth oth oth |
| doi_str |
10.1016/j.renene.2019.05.057 |
| up_date |
2024-07-06T22:20:51.854Z |
| _version_ |
1803869960909357056 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV047238275</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230626015236.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">191021s2019 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.renene.2019.05.057</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">GBV00000000000667.pica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV047238275</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0960-1481(19)30717-7</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Katsaounis, Th.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Performance assessment of bifacial c-Si PV modules through device simulations and outdoor measurements</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2019transfer abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">14</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Bifacial solar cells are receiving increased attention in the PV market due to their higher energy yield compared to conventional monofacial modules thanks to additional light conversion through their back surface. This additional rear side energy gain creates a potential for significant reduction of the overall levelized cost of energy (LCOE). Despite this fact, wide deployment of bifacial PV modules is very limited because of the high unpredictability of their power output due to various factors such as ground reflectance, module elevation angle, orientation and tilt angle. Due to this complexity, modelling of bifacial modules and systems is currently not developed at the same level of maturity as monofacial ones, where established commercial tools have been developed for PV system designers. In this regard, a customized 2D device model has been developed to simulate bifacial PV structures based on the numerical solution of the transport equations by the finite element method. The model was used to simulate actual PV performance and energy yield based on measured outdoor environmental parameters including solar radiation spectrum and temperature. Bifacial device output was also compared with a monofacial one based on the industrial standard Al-BSF structure. Simulated results were also compared and validated with outdoor experimental data based on IV measurements of monofacial and bifacial modules installed at various tilt angles at a location near the Western coast of Saudi Arabia.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Bifacial solar cells are receiving increased attention in the PV market due to their higher energy yield compared to conventional monofacial modules thanks to additional light conversion through their back surface. This additional rear side energy gain creates a potential for significant reduction of the overall levelized cost of energy (LCOE). Despite this fact, wide deployment of bifacial PV modules is very limited because of the high unpredictability of their power output due to various factors such as ground reflectance, module elevation angle, orientation and tilt angle. Due to this complexity, modelling of bifacial modules and systems is currently not developed at the same level of maturity as monofacial ones, where established commercial tools have been developed for PV system designers. In this regard, a customized 2D device model has been developed to simulate bifacial PV structures based on the numerical solution of the transport equations by the finite element method. The model was used to simulate actual PV performance and energy yield based on measured outdoor environmental parameters including solar radiation spectrum and temperature. Bifacial device output was also compared with a monofacial one based on the industrial standard Al-BSF structure. Simulated results were also compared and validated with outdoor experimental data based on IV measurements of monofacial and bifacial modules installed at various tilt angles at a location near the Western coast of Saudi Arabia.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Bifacial PV device</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Local climate conditions</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Customized 2D solar cell simulator</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Hazy days favour bifacial devices</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Kotsovos, K.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Gereige, I.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Basaheeh, A.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abdullah, M.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Khayat, A.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Al-Habshi, E.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Al-Saggaf, A.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Tzavaras, A.E.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="n">Elsevier Science</subfield><subfield code="a">HU, Yongle ELSEVIER</subfield><subfield code="t">Technologies and practice of CO</subfield><subfield code="d">2019</subfield><subfield code="d">an international journal : the official journal of WREN, The World Renewable Energy Network</subfield><subfield code="g">Amsterdam [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)ELV002723662</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:143</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2019</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:1285-1298</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:14</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.05.057</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">143</subfield><subfield code="j">2019</subfield><subfield code="h">1285-1298</subfield><subfield code="g">14</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.3996115 |