Coming of a precision era of the staging systems for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma?
Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is the second most common primary liver cancer. Appropriate treatment of this aggressive and heterogeneous cancer requires accurate staging and prognostic stratification, as does patient selection for clinical trials. Over the past two decades, several staging s...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Autor*in: |
Cheng, Zhangjun [verfasserIn] |
---|
Format: |
E-Artikel |
---|---|
Sprache: |
Englisch |
Erschienen: |
2019transfer abstract |
---|
Schlagwörter: |
---|
Umfang: |
8 |
---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: GW26-e0273 Relationship between thrombelastography test and routine platelet parameters in patients with acute coronary syndrome - Hao, Lijun ELSEVIER, 2015, an international journal providing a forum for original and pertinent contributions in cancer research, Amsterdam [u.a.] |
---|---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:460 ; year:2019 ; day:28 ; month:09 ; pages:10-17 ; extent:8 |
Links: |
---|
DOI / URN: |
10.1016/j.canlet.2019.114426 |
---|
Katalog-ID: |
ELV047320737 |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | ELV047320737 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20230626015432.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 191021s2019 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.canlet.2019.114426 |2 doi | |
028 | 5 | 2 | |a GBV00000000000683.pica |
035 | |a (DE-627)ELV047320737 | ||
035 | |a (ELSEVIER)S0304-3835(19)30348-9 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
082 | 0 | 4 | |a 610 |q VZ |
082 | 0 | 4 | |a 600 |a 690 |q VZ |
084 | |a 51.00 |2 bkl | ||
084 | |a 51.32 |2 bkl | ||
100 | 1 | |a Cheng, Zhangjun |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Coming of a precision era of the staging systems for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma? |
264 | 1 | |c 2019transfer abstract | |
300 | |a 8 | ||
336 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zzz |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b z |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zu |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is the second most common primary liver cancer. Appropriate treatment of this aggressive and heterogeneous cancer requires accurate staging and prognostic stratification, as does patient selection for clinical trials. Over the past two decades, several staging systems and prognostic models for ICC have been developed. Most include independent prognostic factors such as tumor extent, clinical parameters and histopathological features and are inaccurate. Accumulating findings offer new insights into the genetic and molecular basis of ICC progression. Hence, staging systems and prognostic models that incorporate in clinicalpathological factors, molecular and genomic information, and tumor biomarkers, and hence more accurately estimate prognosis, will become a reality. This review summarizes the current staging systems and prognostic models for ICC and highlights the need to establish more precise and personalized systems and models that incorporate tumor biologic factors. | ||
520 | |a Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is the second most common primary liver cancer. Appropriate treatment of this aggressive and heterogeneous cancer requires accurate staging and prognostic stratification, as does patient selection for clinical trials. Over the past two decades, several staging systems and prognostic models for ICC have been developed. Most include independent prognostic factors such as tumor extent, clinical parameters and histopathological features and are inaccurate. Accumulating findings offer new insights into the genetic and molecular basis of ICC progression. Hence, staging systems and prognostic models that incorporate in clinicalpathological factors, molecular and genomic information, and tumor biomarkers, and hence more accurately estimate prognosis, will become a reality. This review summarizes the current staging systems and prognostic models for ICC and highlights the need to establish more precise and personalized systems and models that incorporate tumor biologic factors. | ||
650 | 7 | |a Precision medicine |2 Elsevier | |
650 | 7 | |a Staging |2 Elsevier | |
650 | 7 | |a Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma |2 Elsevier | |
650 | 7 | |a Survival |2 Elsevier | |
650 | 7 | |a Prognostic factors |2 Elsevier | |
700 | 1 | |a Lei, Zhengqing |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Shen, Feng |4 oth | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |n Elsevier Science |a Hao, Lijun ELSEVIER |t GW26-e0273 Relationship between thrombelastography test and routine platelet parameters in patients with acute coronary syndrome |d 2015 |d an international journal providing a forum for original and pertinent contributions in cancer research |g Amsterdam [u.a.] |w (DE-627)ELV013094742 |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:460 |g year:2019 |g day:28 |g month:09 |g pages:10-17 |g extent:8 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1016/j.canlet.2019.114426 |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_U | ||
912 | |a GBV_ELV | ||
912 | |a SYSFLAG_U | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_11 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_40 | ||
936 | b | k | |a 51.00 |j Werkstoffkunde: Allgemeines |q VZ |
936 | b | k | |a 51.32 |j Werkstoffmechanik |q VZ |
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 460 |j 2019 |b 28 |c 0928 |h 10-17 |g 8 |
author_variant |
z c zc |
---|---|
matchkey_str |
chengzhangjunleizhengqingshenfeng:2019----:oigfpeiinrotetgnssesoitaeai |
hierarchy_sort_str |
2019transfer abstract |
bklnumber |
51.00 51.32 |
publishDate |
2019 |
allfields |
10.1016/j.canlet.2019.114426 doi GBV00000000000683.pica (DE-627)ELV047320737 (ELSEVIER)S0304-3835(19)30348-9 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 610 VZ 600 690 VZ 51.00 bkl 51.32 bkl Cheng, Zhangjun verfasserin aut Coming of a precision era of the staging systems for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma? 2019transfer abstract 8 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is the second most common primary liver cancer. Appropriate treatment of this aggressive and heterogeneous cancer requires accurate staging and prognostic stratification, as does patient selection for clinical trials. Over the past two decades, several staging systems and prognostic models for ICC have been developed. Most include independent prognostic factors such as tumor extent, clinical parameters and histopathological features and are inaccurate. Accumulating findings offer new insights into the genetic and molecular basis of ICC progression. Hence, staging systems and prognostic models that incorporate in clinicalpathological factors, molecular and genomic information, and tumor biomarkers, and hence more accurately estimate prognosis, will become a reality. This review summarizes the current staging systems and prognostic models for ICC and highlights the need to establish more precise and personalized systems and models that incorporate tumor biologic factors. Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is the second most common primary liver cancer. Appropriate treatment of this aggressive and heterogeneous cancer requires accurate staging and prognostic stratification, as does patient selection for clinical trials. Over the past two decades, several staging systems and prognostic models for ICC have been developed. Most include independent prognostic factors such as tumor extent, clinical parameters and histopathological features and are inaccurate. Accumulating findings offer new insights into the genetic and molecular basis of ICC progression. Hence, staging systems and prognostic models that incorporate in clinicalpathological factors, molecular and genomic information, and tumor biomarkers, and hence more accurately estimate prognosis, will become a reality. This review summarizes the current staging systems and prognostic models for ICC and highlights the need to establish more precise and personalized systems and models that incorporate tumor biologic factors. Precision medicine Elsevier Staging Elsevier Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma Elsevier Survival Elsevier Prognostic factors Elsevier Lei, Zhengqing oth Shen, Feng oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Hao, Lijun ELSEVIER GW26-e0273 Relationship between thrombelastography test and routine platelet parameters in patients with acute coronary syndrome 2015 an international journal providing a forum for original and pertinent contributions in cancer research Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV013094742 volume:460 year:2019 day:28 month:09 pages:10-17 extent:8 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.canlet.2019.114426 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_40 51.00 Werkstoffkunde: Allgemeines VZ 51.32 Werkstoffmechanik VZ AR 460 2019 28 0928 10-17 8 |
spelling |
10.1016/j.canlet.2019.114426 doi GBV00000000000683.pica (DE-627)ELV047320737 (ELSEVIER)S0304-3835(19)30348-9 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 610 VZ 600 690 VZ 51.00 bkl 51.32 bkl Cheng, Zhangjun verfasserin aut Coming of a precision era of the staging systems for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma? 2019transfer abstract 8 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is the second most common primary liver cancer. Appropriate treatment of this aggressive and heterogeneous cancer requires accurate staging and prognostic stratification, as does patient selection for clinical trials. Over the past two decades, several staging systems and prognostic models for ICC have been developed. Most include independent prognostic factors such as tumor extent, clinical parameters and histopathological features and are inaccurate. Accumulating findings offer new insights into the genetic and molecular basis of ICC progression. Hence, staging systems and prognostic models that incorporate in clinicalpathological factors, molecular and genomic information, and tumor biomarkers, and hence more accurately estimate prognosis, will become a reality. This review summarizes the current staging systems and prognostic models for ICC and highlights the need to establish more precise and personalized systems and models that incorporate tumor biologic factors. Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is the second most common primary liver cancer. Appropriate treatment of this aggressive and heterogeneous cancer requires accurate staging and prognostic stratification, as does patient selection for clinical trials. Over the past two decades, several staging systems and prognostic models for ICC have been developed. Most include independent prognostic factors such as tumor extent, clinical parameters and histopathological features and are inaccurate. Accumulating findings offer new insights into the genetic and molecular basis of ICC progression. Hence, staging systems and prognostic models that incorporate in clinicalpathological factors, molecular and genomic information, and tumor biomarkers, and hence more accurately estimate prognosis, will become a reality. This review summarizes the current staging systems and prognostic models for ICC and highlights the need to establish more precise and personalized systems and models that incorporate tumor biologic factors. Precision medicine Elsevier Staging Elsevier Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma Elsevier Survival Elsevier Prognostic factors Elsevier Lei, Zhengqing oth Shen, Feng oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Hao, Lijun ELSEVIER GW26-e0273 Relationship between thrombelastography test and routine platelet parameters in patients with acute coronary syndrome 2015 an international journal providing a forum for original and pertinent contributions in cancer research Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV013094742 volume:460 year:2019 day:28 month:09 pages:10-17 extent:8 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.canlet.2019.114426 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_40 51.00 Werkstoffkunde: Allgemeines VZ 51.32 Werkstoffmechanik VZ AR 460 2019 28 0928 10-17 8 |
allfields_unstemmed |
10.1016/j.canlet.2019.114426 doi GBV00000000000683.pica (DE-627)ELV047320737 (ELSEVIER)S0304-3835(19)30348-9 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 610 VZ 600 690 VZ 51.00 bkl 51.32 bkl Cheng, Zhangjun verfasserin aut Coming of a precision era of the staging systems for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma? 2019transfer abstract 8 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is the second most common primary liver cancer. Appropriate treatment of this aggressive and heterogeneous cancer requires accurate staging and prognostic stratification, as does patient selection for clinical trials. Over the past two decades, several staging systems and prognostic models for ICC have been developed. Most include independent prognostic factors such as tumor extent, clinical parameters and histopathological features and are inaccurate. Accumulating findings offer new insights into the genetic and molecular basis of ICC progression. Hence, staging systems and prognostic models that incorporate in clinicalpathological factors, molecular and genomic information, and tumor biomarkers, and hence more accurately estimate prognosis, will become a reality. This review summarizes the current staging systems and prognostic models for ICC and highlights the need to establish more precise and personalized systems and models that incorporate tumor biologic factors. Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is the second most common primary liver cancer. Appropriate treatment of this aggressive and heterogeneous cancer requires accurate staging and prognostic stratification, as does patient selection for clinical trials. Over the past two decades, several staging systems and prognostic models for ICC have been developed. Most include independent prognostic factors such as tumor extent, clinical parameters and histopathological features and are inaccurate. Accumulating findings offer new insights into the genetic and molecular basis of ICC progression. Hence, staging systems and prognostic models that incorporate in clinicalpathological factors, molecular and genomic information, and tumor biomarkers, and hence more accurately estimate prognosis, will become a reality. This review summarizes the current staging systems and prognostic models for ICC and highlights the need to establish more precise and personalized systems and models that incorporate tumor biologic factors. Precision medicine Elsevier Staging Elsevier Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma Elsevier Survival Elsevier Prognostic factors Elsevier Lei, Zhengqing oth Shen, Feng oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Hao, Lijun ELSEVIER GW26-e0273 Relationship between thrombelastography test and routine platelet parameters in patients with acute coronary syndrome 2015 an international journal providing a forum for original and pertinent contributions in cancer research Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV013094742 volume:460 year:2019 day:28 month:09 pages:10-17 extent:8 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.canlet.2019.114426 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_40 51.00 Werkstoffkunde: Allgemeines VZ 51.32 Werkstoffmechanik VZ AR 460 2019 28 0928 10-17 8 |
allfieldsGer |
10.1016/j.canlet.2019.114426 doi GBV00000000000683.pica (DE-627)ELV047320737 (ELSEVIER)S0304-3835(19)30348-9 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 610 VZ 600 690 VZ 51.00 bkl 51.32 bkl Cheng, Zhangjun verfasserin aut Coming of a precision era of the staging systems for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma? 2019transfer abstract 8 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is the second most common primary liver cancer. Appropriate treatment of this aggressive and heterogeneous cancer requires accurate staging and prognostic stratification, as does patient selection for clinical trials. Over the past two decades, several staging systems and prognostic models for ICC have been developed. Most include independent prognostic factors such as tumor extent, clinical parameters and histopathological features and are inaccurate. Accumulating findings offer new insights into the genetic and molecular basis of ICC progression. Hence, staging systems and prognostic models that incorporate in clinicalpathological factors, molecular and genomic information, and tumor biomarkers, and hence more accurately estimate prognosis, will become a reality. This review summarizes the current staging systems and prognostic models for ICC and highlights the need to establish more precise and personalized systems and models that incorporate tumor biologic factors. Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is the second most common primary liver cancer. Appropriate treatment of this aggressive and heterogeneous cancer requires accurate staging and prognostic stratification, as does patient selection for clinical trials. Over the past two decades, several staging systems and prognostic models for ICC have been developed. Most include independent prognostic factors such as tumor extent, clinical parameters and histopathological features and are inaccurate. Accumulating findings offer new insights into the genetic and molecular basis of ICC progression. Hence, staging systems and prognostic models that incorporate in clinicalpathological factors, molecular and genomic information, and tumor biomarkers, and hence more accurately estimate prognosis, will become a reality. This review summarizes the current staging systems and prognostic models for ICC and highlights the need to establish more precise and personalized systems and models that incorporate tumor biologic factors. Precision medicine Elsevier Staging Elsevier Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma Elsevier Survival Elsevier Prognostic factors Elsevier Lei, Zhengqing oth Shen, Feng oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Hao, Lijun ELSEVIER GW26-e0273 Relationship between thrombelastography test and routine platelet parameters in patients with acute coronary syndrome 2015 an international journal providing a forum for original and pertinent contributions in cancer research Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV013094742 volume:460 year:2019 day:28 month:09 pages:10-17 extent:8 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.canlet.2019.114426 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_40 51.00 Werkstoffkunde: Allgemeines VZ 51.32 Werkstoffmechanik VZ AR 460 2019 28 0928 10-17 8 |
allfieldsSound |
10.1016/j.canlet.2019.114426 doi GBV00000000000683.pica (DE-627)ELV047320737 (ELSEVIER)S0304-3835(19)30348-9 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 610 VZ 600 690 VZ 51.00 bkl 51.32 bkl Cheng, Zhangjun verfasserin aut Coming of a precision era of the staging systems for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma? 2019transfer abstract 8 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is the second most common primary liver cancer. Appropriate treatment of this aggressive and heterogeneous cancer requires accurate staging and prognostic stratification, as does patient selection for clinical trials. Over the past two decades, several staging systems and prognostic models for ICC have been developed. Most include independent prognostic factors such as tumor extent, clinical parameters and histopathological features and are inaccurate. Accumulating findings offer new insights into the genetic and molecular basis of ICC progression. Hence, staging systems and prognostic models that incorporate in clinicalpathological factors, molecular and genomic information, and tumor biomarkers, and hence more accurately estimate prognosis, will become a reality. This review summarizes the current staging systems and prognostic models for ICC and highlights the need to establish more precise and personalized systems and models that incorporate tumor biologic factors. Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is the second most common primary liver cancer. Appropriate treatment of this aggressive and heterogeneous cancer requires accurate staging and prognostic stratification, as does patient selection for clinical trials. Over the past two decades, several staging systems and prognostic models for ICC have been developed. Most include independent prognostic factors such as tumor extent, clinical parameters and histopathological features and are inaccurate. Accumulating findings offer new insights into the genetic and molecular basis of ICC progression. Hence, staging systems and prognostic models that incorporate in clinicalpathological factors, molecular and genomic information, and tumor biomarkers, and hence more accurately estimate prognosis, will become a reality. This review summarizes the current staging systems and prognostic models for ICC and highlights the need to establish more precise and personalized systems and models that incorporate tumor biologic factors. Precision medicine Elsevier Staging Elsevier Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma Elsevier Survival Elsevier Prognostic factors Elsevier Lei, Zhengqing oth Shen, Feng oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Hao, Lijun ELSEVIER GW26-e0273 Relationship between thrombelastography test and routine platelet parameters in patients with acute coronary syndrome 2015 an international journal providing a forum for original and pertinent contributions in cancer research Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV013094742 volume:460 year:2019 day:28 month:09 pages:10-17 extent:8 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.canlet.2019.114426 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_40 51.00 Werkstoffkunde: Allgemeines VZ 51.32 Werkstoffmechanik VZ AR 460 2019 28 0928 10-17 8 |
language |
English |
source |
Enthalten in GW26-e0273 Relationship between thrombelastography test and routine platelet parameters in patients with acute coronary syndrome Amsterdam [u.a.] volume:460 year:2019 day:28 month:09 pages:10-17 extent:8 |
sourceStr |
Enthalten in GW26-e0273 Relationship between thrombelastography test and routine platelet parameters in patients with acute coronary syndrome Amsterdam [u.a.] volume:460 year:2019 day:28 month:09 pages:10-17 extent:8 |
format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
bklname |
Werkstoffkunde: Allgemeines Werkstoffmechanik |
institution |
findex.gbv.de |
topic_facet |
Precision medicine Staging Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma Survival Prognostic factors |
dewey-raw |
610 |
isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
container_title |
GW26-e0273 Relationship between thrombelastography test and routine platelet parameters in patients with acute coronary syndrome |
authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Cheng, Zhangjun @@aut@@ Lei, Zhengqing @@oth@@ Shen, Feng @@oth@@ |
publishDateDaySort_date |
2019-01-28T00:00:00Z |
hierarchy_top_id |
ELV013094742 |
dewey-sort |
3610 |
id |
ELV047320737 |
language_de |
englisch |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV047320737</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230626015432.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">191021s2019 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.canlet.2019.114426</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">GBV00000000000683.pica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV047320737</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0304-3835(19)30348-9</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">610</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">600</subfield><subfield code="a">690</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">51.00</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">51.32</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Cheng, Zhangjun</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Coming of a precision era of the staging systems for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma?</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2019transfer abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">8</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is the second most common primary liver cancer. Appropriate treatment of this aggressive and heterogeneous cancer requires accurate staging and prognostic stratification, as does patient selection for clinical trials. Over the past two decades, several staging systems and prognostic models for ICC have been developed. Most include independent prognostic factors such as tumor extent, clinical parameters and histopathological features and are inaccurate. Accumulating findings offer new insights into the genetic and molecular basis of ICC progression. Hence, staging systems and prognostic models that incorporate in clinicalpathological factors, molecular and genomic information, and tumor biomarkers, and hence more accurately estimate prognosis, will become a reality. This review summarizes the current staging systems and prognostic models for ICC and highlights the need to establish more precise and personalized systems and models that incorporate tumor biologic factors.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is the second most common primary liver cancer. Appropriate treatment of this aggressive and heterogeneous cancer requires accurate staging and prognostic stratification, as does patient selection for clinical trials. Over the past two decades, several staging systems and prognostic models for ICC have been developed. Most include independent prognostic factors such as tumor extent, clinical parameters and histopathological features and are inaccurate. Accumulating findings offer new insights into the genetic and molecular basis of ICC progression. Hence, staging systems and prognostic models that incorporate in clinicalpathological factors, molecular and genomic information, and tumor biomarkers, and hence more accurately estimate prognosis, will become a reality. This review summarizes the current staging systems and prognostic models for ICC and highlights the need to establish more precise and personalized systems and models that incorporate tumor biologic factors.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Precision medicine</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Staging</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Survival</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Prognostic factors</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Lei, Zhengqing</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Shen, Feng</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="n">Elsevier Science</subfield><subfield code="a">Hao, Lijun ELSEVIER</subfield><subfield code="t">GW26-e0273 Relationship between thrombelastography test and routine platelet parameters in patients with acute coronary syndrome</subfield><subfield code="d">2015</subfield><subfield code="d">an international journal providing a forum for original and pertinent contributions in cancer research</subfield><subfield code="g">Amsterdam [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)ELV013094742</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:460</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2019</subfield><subfield code="g">day:28</subfield><subfield code="g">month:09</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:10-17</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:8</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.canlet.2019.114426</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">51.00</subfield><subfield code="j">Werkstoffkunde: Allgemeines</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">51.32</subfield><subfield code="j">Werkstoffmechanik</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">460</subfield><subfield code="j">2019</subfield><subfield code="b">28</subfield><subfield code="c">0928</subfield><subfield code="h">10-17</subfield><subfield code="g">8</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
author |
Cheng, Zhangjun |
spellingShingle |
Cheng, Zhangjun ddc 610 ddc 600 bkl 51.00 bkl 51.32 Elsevier Precision medicine Elsevier Staging Elsevier Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma Elsevier Survival Elsevier Prognostic factors Coming of a precision era of the staging systems for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma? |
authorStr |
Cheng, Zhangjun |
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)ELV013094742 |
format |
electronic Article |
dewey-ones |
610 - Medicine & health 600 - Technology 690 - Buildings |
delete_txt_mv |
keep |
author_role |
aut |
collection |
elsevier |
remote_str |
true |
illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
topic_title |
610 VZ 600 690 VZ 51.00 bkl 51.32 bkl Coming of a precision era of the staging systems for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma? Precision medicine Elsevier Staging Elsevier Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma Elsevier Survival Elsevier Prognostic factors Elsevier |
topic |
ddc 610 ddc 600 bkl 51.00 bkl 51.32 Elsevier Precision medicine Elsevier Staging Elsevier Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma Elsevier Survival Elsevier Prognostic factors |
topic_unstemmed |
ddc 610 ddc 600 bkl 51.00 bkl 51.32 Elsevier Precision medicine Elsevier Staging Elsevier Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma Elsevier Survival Elsevier Prognostic factors |
topic_browse |
ddc 610 ddc 600 bkl 51.00 bkl 51.32 Elsevier Precision medicine Elsevier Staging Elsevier Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma Elsevier Survival Elsevier Prognostic factors |
format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
carriertype_str_mv |
zu |
author2_variant |
z l zl f s fs |
hierarchy_parent_title |
GW26-e0273 Relationship between thrombelastography test and routine platelet parameters in patients with acute coronary syndrome |
hierarchy_parent_id |
ELV013094742 |
dewey-tens |
610 - Medicine & health 600 - Technology 690 - Building & construction |
hierarchy_top_title |
GW26-e0273 Relationship between thrombelastography test and routine platelet parameters in patients with acute coronary syndrome |
isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)ELV013094742 |
title |
Coming of a precision era of the staging systems for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma? |
ctrlnum |
(DE-627)ELV047320737 (ELSEVIER)S0304-3835(19)30348-9 |
title_full |
Coming of a precision era of the staging systems for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma? |
author_sort |
Cheng, Zhangjun |
journal |
GW26-e0273 Relationship between thrombelastography test and routine platelet parameters in patients with acute coronary syndrome |
journalStr |
GW26-e0273 Relationship between thrombelastography test and routine platelet parameters in patients with acute coronary syndrome |
lang_code |
eng |
isOA_bool |
false |
dewey-hundreds |
600 - Technology |
recordtype |
marc |
publishDateSort |
2019 |
contenttype_str_mv |
zzz |
container_start_page |
10 |
author_browse |
Cheng, Zhangjun |
container_volume |
460 |
physical |
8 |
class |
610 VZ 600 690 VZ 51.00 bkl 51.32 bkl |
format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
author-letter |
Cheng, Zhangjun |
doi_str_mv |
10.1016/j.canlet.2019.114426 |
dewey-full |
610 600 690 |
title_sort |
coming of a precision era of the staging systems for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma? |
title_auth |
Coming of a precision era of the staging systems for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma? |
abstract |
Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is the second most common primary liver cancer. Appropriate treatment of this aggressive and heterogeneous cancer requires accurate staging and prognostic stratification, as does patient selection for clinical trials. Over the past two decades, several staging systems and prognostic models for ICC have been developed. Most include independent prognostic factors such as tumor extent, clinical parameters and histopathological features and are inaccurate. Accumulating findings offer new insights into the genetic and molecular basis of ICC progression. Hence, staging systems and prognostic models that incorporate in clinicalpathological factors, molecular and genomic information, and tumor biomarkers, and hence more accurately estimate prognosis, will become a reality. This review summarizes the current staging systems and prognostic models for ICC and highlights the need to establish more precise and personalized systems and models that incorporate tumor biologic factors. |
abstractGer |
Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is the second most common primary liver cancer. Appropriate treatment of this aggressive and heterogeneous cancer requires accurate staging and prognostic stratification, as does patient selection for clinical trials. Over the past two decades, several staging systems and prognostic models for ICC have been developed. Most include independent prognostic factors such as tumor extent, clinical parameters and histopathological features and are inaccurate. Accumulating findings offer new insights into the genetic and molecular basis of ICC progression. Hence, staging systems and prognostic models that incorporate in clinicalpathological factors, molecular and genomic information, and tumor biomarkers, and hence more accurately estimate prognosis, will become a reality. This review summarizes the current staging systems and prognostic models for ICC and highlights the need to establish more precise and personalized systems and models that incorporate tumor biologic factors. |
abstract_unstemmed |
Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is the second most common primary liver cancer. Appropriate treatment of this aggressive and heterogeneous cancer requires accurate staging and prognostic stratification, as does patient selection for clinical trials. Over the past two decades, several staging systems and prognostic models for ICC have been developed. Most include independent prognostic factors such as tumor extent, clinical parameters and histopathological features and are inaccurate. Accumulating findings offer new insights into the genetic and molecular basis of ICC progression. Hence, staging systems and prognostic models that incorporate in clinicalpathological factors, molecular and genomic information, and tumor biomarkers, and hence more accurately estimate prognosis, will become a reality. This review summarizes the current staging systems and prognostic models for ICC and highlights the need to establish more precise and personalized systems and models that incorporate tumor biologic factors. |
collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_40 |
title_short |
Coming of a precision era of the staging systems for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma? |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.canlet.2019.114426 |
remote_bool |
true |
author2 |
Lei, Zhengqing Shen, Feng |
author2Str |
Lei, Zhengqing Shen, Feng |
ppnlink |
ELV013094742 |
mediatype_str_mv |
z |
isOA_txt |
false |
hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
author2_role |
oth oth |
doi_str |
10.1016/j.canlet.2019.114426 |
up_date |
2024-07-06T22:34:30.366Z |
_version_ |
1803870819180347392 |
fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV047320737</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230626015432.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">191021s2019 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.canlet.2019.114426</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">GBV00000000000683.pica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV047320737</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0304-3835(19)30348-9</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">610</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">600</subfield><subfield code="a">690</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">51.00</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">51.32</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Cheng, Zhangjun</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Coming of a precision era of the staging systems for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma?</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2019transfer abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">8</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is the second most common primary liver cancer. Appropriate treatment of this aggressive and heterogeneous cancer requires accurate staging and prognostic stratification, as does patient selection for clinical trials. Over the past two decades, several staging systems and prognostic models for ICC have been developed. Most include independent prognostic factors such as tumor extent, clinical parameters and histopathological features and are inaccurate. Accumulating findings offer new insights into the genetic and molecular basis of ICC progression. Hence, staging systems and prognostic models that incorporate in clinicalpathological factors, molecular and genomic information, and tumor biomarkers, and hence more accurately estimate prognosis, will become a reality. This review summarizes the current staging systems and prognostic models for ICC and highlights the need to establish more precise and personalized systems and models that incorporate tumor biologic factors.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is the second most common primary liver cancer. Appropriate treatment of this aggressive and heterogeneous cancer requires accurate staging and prognostic stratification, as does patient selection for clinical trials. Over the past two decades, several staging systems and prognostic models for ICC have been developed. Most include independent prognostic factors such as tumor extent, clinical parameters and histopathological features and are inaccurate. Accumulating findings offer new insights into the genetic and molecular basis of ICC progression. Hence, staging systems and prognostic models that incorporate in clinicalpathological factors, molecular and genomic information, and tumor biomarkers, and hence more accurately estimate prognosis, will become a reality. This review summarizes the current staging systems and prognostic models for ICC and highlights the need to establish more precise and personalized systems and models that incorporate tumor biologic factors.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Precision medicine</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Staging</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Survival</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Prognostic factors</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Lei, Zhengqing</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Shen, Feng</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="n">Elsevier Science</subfield><subfield code="a">Hao, Lijun ELSEVIER</subfield><subfield code="t">GW26-e0273 Relationship between thrombelastography test and routine platelet parameters in patients with acute coronary syndrome</subfield><subfield code="d">2015</subfield><subfield code="d">an international journal providing a forum for original and pertinent contributions in cancer research</subfield><subfield code="g">Amsterdam [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)ELV013094742</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:460</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2019</subfield><subfield code="g">day:28</subfield><subfield code="g">month:09</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:10-17</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:8</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.canlet.2019.114426</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">51.00</subfield><subfield code="j">Werkstoffkunde: Allgemeines</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">51.32</subfield><subfield code="j">Werkstoffmechanik</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">460</subfield><subfield code="j">2019</subfield><subfield code="b">28</subfield><subfield code="c">0928</subfield><subfield code="h">10-17</subfield><subfield code="g">8</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
score |
7.401434 |