Use of indentation to study the degradation of photovoltaic backsheets
The ability of electrical insulating materials within a module to act as insulators is a key safety requirement for photovoltaic (PV) technology. Presently, however, the durability of backsheets may not be readily assessed. For example, the mechanical tensile test continues to be developed, and its...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Miller, David C. [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2019transfer abstract |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Question answering method for infrastructure damage information retrieval from textual data using bidirectional encoder representations from transformers - Kim, Yohan ELSEVIER, 2021, an international journal devoted to photovoltaic, photothermal, and photochemical solar energy conversion, Amsterdam [u.a.] |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:201 ; year:2019 ; pages:0 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1016/j.solmat.2019.110082 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
ELV047790326 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ELV047790326 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230626020444.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 191022s2019 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.solmat.2019.110082 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001082.pica |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)ELV047790326 | ||
| 035 | |a (ELSEVIER)S0927-0248(19)30411-8 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 690 |q VZ |
| 084 | |a 56.03 |2 bkl | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Miller, David C. |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Use of indentation to study the degradation of photovoltaic backsheets |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2019transfer abstract | |
| 336 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zzz |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b z |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zu |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a The ability of electrical insulating materials within a module to act as insulators is a key safety requirement for photovoltaic (PV) technology. Presently, however, the durability of backsheets may not be readily assessed. For example, the mechanical tensile test continues to be developed, and its use has not been validated such that a technically based pass/fail criteria may be established. This study examines the use of simple indentation methods, including durometer hardness and instrumented indentation, as a means to quantitively assess the degradation of PV backsheets. Characteristics including: hardness, modulus, load/displacement profile, creep hold response, and residual impression are explored in an empirical study. Glass/encapsulant/backsheet mini-modules constructed using backsheets including: polyamide (specifically the AAA backsheet product), poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET), polyvinyl fluoride (PVF) laminate (“TPE”), and polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) were examined. An M-type durometer as well as Berkovich and cube-corner tips were used in the indentation experiments. Additional characterizations were performed to interpret the indentation measurements including: surface roughness measurements using atomic force microscopy (AFM), a chemical structure study using Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), and phase-transition measurements using differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). The results are analyzed in the context of the combined accelerated stress test (C-AST) also explored in this study. Instrumented indentation (i.e., using a Berkovich tip) was able to distinguish between backsheets and quantify the effects of accelerated testing (including up to 60%, 25%, and 20% change in hardness, modulus, and creep displacement, respectively). The embrittlement of the backsheets was not readily assessable using cube-corner indentation. Cracking of the known-bad polyamide backsheet was observed from the C-AST, which was not observed to result from steady state UV weathering. | ||
| 520 | |a The ability of electrical insulating materials within a module to act as insulators is a key safety requirement for photovoltaic (PV) technology. Presently, however, the durability of backsheets may not be readily assessed. For example, the mechanical tensile test continues to be developed, and its use has not been validated such that a technically based pass/fail criteria may be established. This study examines the use of simple indentation methods, including durometer hardness and instrumented indentation, as a means to quantitively assess the degradation of PV backsheets. Characteristics including: hardness, modulus, load/displacement profile, creep hold response, and residual impression are explored in an empirical study. Glass/encapsulant/backsheet mini-modules constructed using backsheets including: polyamide (specifically the AAA backsheet product), poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET), polyvinyl fluoride (PVF) laminate (“TPE”), and polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) were examined. An M-type durometer as well as Berkovich and cube-corner tips were used in the indentation experiments. Additional characterizations were performed to interpret the indentation measurements including: surface roughness measurements using atomic force microscopy (AFM), a chemical structure study using Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), and phase-transition measurements using differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). The results are analyzed in the context of the combined accelerated stress test (C-AST) also explored in this study. Instrumented indentation (i.e., using a Berkovich tip) was able to distinguish between backsheets and quantify the effects of accelerated testing (including up to 60%, 25%, and 20% change in hardness, modulus, and creep displacement, respectively). The embrittlement of the backsheets was not readily assessable using cube-corner indentation. Cracking of the known-bad polyamide backsheet was observed from the C-AST, which was not observed to result from steady state UV weathering. | ||
| 650 | 7 | |a Instrumented indentation |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Backsheet |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Nanoindentation |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Durability |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Reliability |2 Elsevier | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Owen-Bellini, Michael |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Hacke, Peter L. |4 oth | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |n NH, Elsevier |a Kim, Yohan ELSEVIER |t Question answering method for infrastructure damage information retrieval from textual data using bidirectional encoder representations from transformers |d 2021 |d an international journal devoted to photovoltaic, photothermal, and photochemical solar energy conversion |g Amsterdam [u.a.] |w (DE-627)ELV00721202X |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:201 |g year:2019 |g pages:0 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solmat.2019.110082 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_U | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ELV | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_U | ||
| 936 | b | k | |a 56.03 |j Methoden im Bauingenieurwesen |q VZ |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 201 |j 2019 |h 0 | ||
| author_variant |
d c m dc dcm |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
millerdavidcowenbellinimichaelhackepeter:2019----:soidnainotdteerdtoopoo |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2019transfer abstract |
| bklnumber |
56.03 |
| publishDate |
2019 |
| allfields |
10.1016/j.solmat.2019.110082 doi /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001082.pica (DE-627)ELV047790326 (ELSEVIER)S0927-0248(19)30411-8 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 690 VZ 56.03 bkl Miller, David C. verfasserin aut Use of indentation to study the degradation of photovoltaic backsheets 2019transfer abstract nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier The ability of electrical insulating materials within a module to act as insulators is a key safety requirement for photovoltaic (PV) technology. Presently, however, the durability of backsheets may not be readily assessed. For example, the mechanical tensile test continues to be developed, and its use has not been validated such that a technically based pass/fail criteria may be established. This study examines the use of simple indentation methods, including durometer hardness and instrumented indentation, as a means to quantitively assess the degradation of PV backsheets. Characteristics including: hardness, modulus, load/displacement profile, creep hold response, and residual impression are explored in an empirical study. Glass/encapsulant/backsheet mini-modules constructed using backsheets including: polyamide (specifically the AAA backsheet product), poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET), polyvinyl fluoride (PVF) laminate (“TPE”), and polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) were examined. An M-type durometer as well as Berkovich and cube-corner tips were used in the indentation experiments. Additional characterizations were performed to interpret the indentation measurements including: surface roughness measurements using atomic force microscopy (AFM), a chemical structure study using Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), and phase-transition measurements using differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). The results are analyzed in the context of the combined accelerated stress test (C-AST) also explored in this study. Instrumented indentation (i.e., using a Berkovich tip) was able to distinguish between backsheets and quantify the effects of accelerated testing (including up to 60%, 25%, and 20% change in hardness, modulus, and creep displacement, respectively). The embrittlement of the backsheets was not readily assessable using cube-corner indentation. Cracking of the known-bad polyamide backsheet was observed from the C-AST, which was not observed to result from steady state UV weathering. The ability of electrical insulating materials within a module to act as insulators is a key safety requirement for photovoltaic (PV) technology. Presently, however, the durability of backsheets may not be readily assessed. For example, the mechanical tensile test continues to be developed, and its use has not been validated such that a technically based pass/fail criteria may be established. This study examines the use of simple indentation methods, including durometer hardness and instrumented indentation, as a means to quantitively assess the degradation of PV backsheets. Characteristics including: hardness, modulus, load/displacement profile, creep hold response, and residual impression are explored in an empirical study. Glass/encapsulant/backsheet mini-modules constructed using backsheets including: polyamide (specifically the AAA backsheet product), poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET), polyvinyl fluoride (PVF) laminate (“TPE”), and polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) were examined. An M-type durometer as well as Berkovich and cube-corner tips were used in the indentation experiments. Additional characterizations were performed to interpret the indentation measurements including: surface roughness measurements using atomic force microscopy (AFM), a chemical structure study using Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), and phase-transition measurements using differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). The results are analyzed in the context of the combined accelerated stress test (C-AST) also explored in this study. Instrumented indentation (i.e., using a Berkovich tip) was able to distinguish between backsheets and quantify the effects of accelerated testing (including up to 60%, 25%, and 20% change in hardness, modulus, and creep displacement, respectively). The embrittlement of the backsheets was not readily assessable using cube-corner indentation. Cracking of the known-bad polyamide backsheet was observed from the C-AST, which was not observed to result from steady state UV weathering. Instrumented indentation Elsevier Backsheet Elsevier Nanoindentation Elsevier Durability Elsevier Reliability Elsevier Owen-Bellini, Michael oth Hacke, Peter L. oth Enthalten in NH, Elsevier Kim, Yohan ELSEVIER Question answering method for infrastructure damage information retrieval from textual data using bidirectional encoder representations from transformers 2021 an international journal devoted to photovoltaic, photothermal, and photochemical solar energy conversion Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV00721202X volume:201 year:2019 pages:0 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solmat.2019.110082 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U 56.03 Methoden im Bauingenieurwesen VZ AR 201 2019 0 |
| spelling |
10.1016/j.solmat.2019.110082 doi /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001082.pica (DE-627)ELV047790326 (ELSEVIER)S0927-0248(19)30411-8 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 690 VZ 56.03 bkl Miller, David C. verfasserin aut Use of indentation to study the degradation of photovoltaic backsheets 2019transfer abstract nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier The ability of electrical insulating materials within a module to act as insulators is a key safety requirement for photovoltaic (PV) technology. Presently, however, the durability of backsheets may not be readily assessed. For example, the mechanical tensile test continues to be developed, and its use has not been validated such that a technically based pass/fail criteria may be established. This study examines the use of simple indentation methods, including durometer hardness and instrumented indentation, as a means to quantitively assess the degradation of PV backsheets. Characteristics including: hardness, modulus, load/displacement profile, creep hold response, and residual impression are explored in an empirical study. Glass/encapsulant/backsheet mini-modules constructed using backsheets including: polyamide (specifically the AAA backsheet product), poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET), polyvinyl fluoride (PVF) laminate (“TPE”), and polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) were examined. An M-type durometer as well as Berkovich and cube-corner tips were used in the indentation experiments. Additional characterizations were performed to interpret the indentation measurements including: surface roughness measurements using atomic force microscopy (AFM), a chemical structure study using Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), and phase-transition measurements using differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). The results are analyzed in the context of the combined accelerated stress test (C-AST) also explored in this study. Instrumented indentation (i.e., using a Berkovich tip) was able to distinguish between backsheets and quantify the effects of accelerated testing (including up to 60%, 25%, and 20% change in hardness, modulus, and creep displacement, respectively). The embrittlement of the backsheets was not readily assessable using cube-corner indentation. Cracking of the known-bad polyamide backsheet was observed from the C-AST, which was not observed to result from steady state UV weathering. The ability of electrical insulating materials within a module to act as insulators is a key safety requirement for photovoltaic (PV) technology. Presently, however, the durability of backsheets may not be readily assessed. For example, the mechanical tensile test continues to be developed, and its use has not been validated such that a technically based pass/fail criteria may be established. This study examines the use of simple indentation methods, including durometer hardness and instrumented indentation, as a means to quantitively assess the degradation of PV backsheets. Characteristics including: hardness, modulus, load/displacement profile, creep hold response, and residual impression are explored in an empirical study. Glass/encapsulant/backsheet mini-modules constructed using backsheets including: polyamide (specifically the AAA backsheet product), poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET), polyvinyl fluoride (PVF) laminate (“TPE”), and polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) were examined. An M-type durometer as well as Berkovich and cube-corner tips were used in the indentation experiments. Additional characterizations were performed to interpret the indentation measurements including: surface roughness measurements using atomic force microscopy (AFM), a chemical structure study using Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), and phase-transition measurements using differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). The results are analyzed in the context of the combined accelerated stress test (C-AST) also explored in this study. Instrumented indentation (i.e., using a Berkovich tip) was able to distinguish between backsheets and quantify the effects of accelerated testing (including up to 60%, 25%, and 20% change in hardness, modulus, and creep displacement, respectively). The embrittlement of the backsheets was not readily assessable using cube-corner indentation. Cracking of the known-bad polyamide backsheet was observed from the C-AST, which was not observed to result from steady state UV weathering. Instrumented indentation Elsevier Backsheet Elsevier Nanoindentation Elsevier Durability Elsevier Reliability Elsevier Owen-Bellini, Michael oth Hacke, Peter L. oth Enthalten in NH, Elsevier Kim, Yohan ELSEVIER Question answering method for infrastructure damage information retrieval from textual data using bidirectional encoder representations from transformers 2021 an international journal devoted to photovoltaic, photothermal, and photochemical solar energy conversion Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV00721202X volume:201 year:2019 pages:0 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solmat.2019.110082 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U 56.03 Methoden im Bauingenieurwesen VZ AR 201 2019 0 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1016/j.solmat.2019.110082 doi /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001082.pica (DE-627)ELV047790326 (ELSEVIER)S0927-0248(19)30411-8 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 690 VZ 56.03 bkl Miller, David C. verfasserin aut Use of indentation to study the degradation of photovoltaic backsheets 2019transfer abstract nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier The ability of electrical insulating materials within a module to act as insulators is a key safety requirement for photovoltaic (PV) technology. Presently, however, the durability of backsheets may not be readily assessed. For example, the mechanical tensile test continues to be developed, and its use has not been validated such that a technically based pass/fail criteria may be established. This study examines the use of simple indentation methods, including durometer hardness and instrumented indentation, as a means to quantitively assess the degradation of PV backsheets. Characteristics including: hardness, modulus, load/displacement profile, creep hold response, and residual impression are explored in an empirical study. Glass/encapsulant/backsheet mini-modules constructed using backsheets including: polyamide (specifically the AAA backsheet product), poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET), polyvinyl fluoride (PVF) laminate (“TPE”), and polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) were examined. An M-type durometer as well as Berkovich and cube-corner tips were used in the indentation experiments. Additional characterizations were performed to interpret the indentation measurements including: surface roughness measurements using atomic force microscopy (AFM), a chemical structure study using Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), and phase-transition measurements using differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). The results are analyzed in the context of the combined accelerated stress test (C-AST) also explored in this study. Instrumented indentation (i.e., using a Berkovich tip) was able to distinguish between backsheets and quantify the effects of accelerated testing (including up to 60%, 25%, and 20% change in hardness, modulus, and creep displacement, respectively). The embrittlement of the backsheets was not readily assessable using cube-corner indentation. Cracking of the known-bad polyamide backsheet was observed from the C-AST, which was not observed to result from steady state UV weathering. The ability of electrical insulating materials within a module to act as insulators is a key safety requirement for photovoltaic (PV) technology. Presently, however, the durability of backsheets may not be readily assessed. For example, the mechanical tensile test continues to be developed, and its use has not been validated such that a technically based pass/fail criteria may be established. This study examines the use of simple indentation methods, including durometer hardness and instrumented indentation, as a means to quantitively assess the degradation of PV backsheets. Characteristics including: hardness, modulus, load/displacement profile, creep hold response, and residual impression are explored in an empirical study. Glass/encapsulant/backsheet mini-modules constructed using backsheets including: polyamide (specifically the AAA backsheet product), poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET), polyvinyl fluoride (PVF) laminate (“TPE”), and polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) were examined. An M-type durometer as well as Berkovich and cube-corner tips were used in the indentation experiments. Additional characterizations were performed to interpret the indentation measurements including: surface roughness measurements using atomic force microscopy (AFM), a chemical structure study using Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), and phase-transition measurements using differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). The results are analyzed in the context of the combined accelerated stress test (C-AST) also explored in this study. Instrumented indentation (i.e., using a Berkovich tip) was able to distinguish between backsheets and quantify the effects of accelerated testing (including up to 60%, 25%, and 20% change in hardness, modulus, and creep displacement, respectively). The embrittlement of the backsheets was not readily assessable using cube-corner indentation. Cracking of the known-bad polyamide backsheet was observed from the C-AST, which was not observed to result from steady state UV weathering. Instrumented indentation Elsevier Backsheet Elsevier Nanoindentation Elsevier Durability Elsevier Reliability Elsevier Owen-Bellini, Michael oth Hacke, Peter L. oth Enthalten in NH, Elsevier Kim, Yohan ELSEVIER Question answering method for infrastructure damage information retrieval from textual data using bidirectional encoder representations from transformers 2021 an international journal devoted to photovoltaic, photothermal, and photochemical solar energy conversion Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV00721202X volume:201 year:2019 pages:0 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solmat.2019.110082 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U 56.03 Methoden im Bauingenieurwesen VZ AR 201 2019 0 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1016/j.solmat.2019.110082 doi /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001082.pica (DE-627)ELV047790326 (ELSEVIER)S0927-0248(19)30411-8 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 690 VZ 56.03 bkl Miller, David C. verfasserin aut Use of indentation to study the degradation of photovoltaic backsheets 2019transfer abstract nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier The ability of electrical insulating materials within a module to act as insulators is a key safety requirement for photovoltaic (PV) technology. Presently, however, the durability of backsheets may not be readily assessed. For example, the mechanical tensile test continues to be developed, and its use has not been validated such that a technically based pass/fail criteria may be established. This study examines the use of simple indentation methods, including durometer hardness and instrumented indentation, as a means to quantitively assess the degradation of PV backsheets. Characteristics including: hardness, modulus, load/displacement profile, creep hold response, and residual impression are explored in an empirical study. Glass/encapsulant/backsheet mini-modules constructed using backsheets including: polyamide (specifically the AAA backsheet product), poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET), polyvinyl fluoride (PVF) laminate (“TPE”), and polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) were examined. An M-type durometer as well as Berkovich and cube-corner tips were used in the indentation experiments. Additional characterizations were performed to interpret the indentation measurements including: surface roughness measurements using atomic force microscopy (AFM), a chemical structure study using Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), and phase-transition measurements using differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). The results are analyzed in the context of the combined accelerated stress test (C-AST) also explored in this study. Instrumented indentation (i.e., using a Berkovich tip) was able to distinguish between backsheets and quantify the effects of accelerated testing (including up to 60%, 25%, and 20% change in hardness, modulus, and creep displacement, respectively). The embrittlement of the backsheets was not readily assessable using cube-corner indentation. Cracking of the known-bad polyamide backsheet was observed from the C-AST, which was not observed to result from steady state UV weathering. The ability of electrical insulating materials within a module to act as insulators is a key safety requirement for photovoltaic (PV) technology. Presently, however, the durability of backsheets may not be readily assessed. For example, the mechanical tensile test continues to be developed, and its use has not been validated such that a technically based pass/fail criteria may be established. This study examines the use of simple indentation methods, including durometer hardness and instrumented indentation, as a means to quantitively assess the degradation of PV backsheets. Characteristics including: hardness, modulus, load/displacement profile, creep hold response, and residual impression are explored in an empirical study. Glass/encapsulant/backsheet mini-modules constructed using backsheets including: polyamide (specifically the AAA backsheet product), poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET), polyvinyl fluoride (PVF) laminate (“TPE”), and polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) were examined. An M-type durometer as well as Berkovich and cube-corner tips were used in the indentation experiments. Additional characterizations were performed to interpret the indentation measurements including: surface roughness measurements using atomic force microscopy (AFM), a chemical structure study using Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), and phase-transition measurements using differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). The results are analyzed in the context of the combined accelerated stress test (C-AST) also explored in this study. Instrumented indentation (i.e., using a Berkovich tip) was able to distinguish between backsheets and quantify the effects of accelerated testing (including up to 60%, 25%, and 20% change in hardness, modulus, and creep displacement, respectively). The embrittlement of the backsheets was not readily assessable using cube-corner indentation. Cracking of the known-bad polyamide backsheet was observed from the C-AST, which was not observed to result from steady state UV weathering. Instrumented indentation Elsevier Backsheet Elsevier Nanoindentation Elsevier Durability Elsevier Reliability Elsevier Owen-Bellini, Michael oth Hacke, Peter L. oth Enthalten in NH, Elsevier Kim, Yohan ELSEVIER Question answering method for infrastructure damage information retrieval from textual data using bidirectional encoder representations from transformers 2021 an international journal devoted to photovoltaic, photothermal, and photochemical solar energy conversion Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV00721202X volume:201 year:2019 pages:0 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solmat.2019.110082 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U 56.03 Methoden im Bauingenieurwesen VZ AR 201 2019 0 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1016/j.solmat.2019.110082 doi /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001082.pica (DE-627)ELV047790326 (ELSEVIER)S0927-0248(19)30411-8 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 690 VZ 56.03 bkl Miller, David C. verfasserin aut Use of indentation to study the degradation of photovoltaic backsheets 2019transfer abstract nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier The ability of electrical insulating materials within a module to act as insulators is a key safety requirement for photovoltaic (PV) technology. Presently, however, the durability of backsheets may not be readily assessed. For example, the mechanical tensile test continues to be developed, and its use has not been validated such that a technically based pass/fail criteria may be established. This study examines the use of simple indentation methods, including durometer hardness and instrumented indentation, as a means to quantitively assess the degradation of PV backsheets. Characteristics including: hardness, modulus, load/displacement profile, creep hold response, and residual impression are explored in an empirical study. Glass/encapsulant/backsheet mini-modules constructed using backsheets including: polyamide (specifically the AAA backsheet product), poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET), polyvinyl fluoride (PVF) laminate (“TPE”), and polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) were examined. An M-type durometer as well as Berkovich and cube-corner tips were used in the indentation experiments. Additional characterizations were performed to interpret the indentation measurements including: surface roughness measurements using atomic force microscopy (AFM), a chemical structure study using Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), and phase-transition measurements using differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). The results are analyzed in the context of the combined accelerated stress test (C-AST) also explored in this study. Instrumented indentation (i.e., using a Berkovich tip) was able to distinguish between backsheets and quantify the effects of accelerated testing (including up to 60%, 25%, and 20% change in hardness, modulus, and creep displacement, respectively). The embrittlement of the backsheets was not readily assessable using cube-corner indentation. Cracking of the known-bad polyamide backsheet was observed from the C-AST, which was not observed to result from steady state UV weathering. The ability of electrical insulating materials within a module to act as insulators is a key safety requirement for photovoltaic (PV) technology. Presently, however, the durability of backsheets may not be readily assessed. For example, the mechanical tensile test continues to be developed, and its use has not been validated such that a technically based pass/fail criteria may be established. This study examines the use of simple indentation methods, including durometer hardness and instrumented indentation, as a means to quantitively assess the degradation of PV backsheets. Characteristics including: hardness, modulus, load/displacement profile, creep hold response, and residual impression are explored in an empirical study. Glass/encapsulant/backsheet mini-modules constructed using backsheets including: polyamide (specifically the AAA backsheet product), poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET), polyvinyl fluoride (PVF) laminate (“TPE”), and polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) were examined. An M-type durometer as well as Berkovich and cube-corner tips were used in the indentation experiments. Additional characterizations were performed to interpret the indentation measurements including: surface roughness measurements using atomic force microscopy (AFM), a chemical structure study using Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), and phase-transition measurements using differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). The results are analyzed in the context of the combined accelerated stress test (C-AST) also explored in this study. Instrumented indentation (i.e., using a Berkovich tip) was able to distinguish between backsheets and quantify the effects of accelerated testing (including up to 60%, 25%, and 20% change in hardness, modulus, and creep displacement, respectively). The embrittlement of the backsheets was not readily assessable using cube-corner indentation. Cracking of the known-bad polyamide backsheet was observed from the C-AST, which was not observed to result from steady state UV weathering. Instrumented indentation Elsevier Backsheet Elsevier Nanoindentation Elsevier Durability Elsevier Reliability Elsevier Owen-Bellini, Michael oth Hacke, Peter L. oth Enthalten in NH, Elsevier Kim, Yohan ELSEVIER Question answering method for infrastructure damage information retrieval from textual data using bidirectional encoder representations from transformers 2021 an international journal devoted to photovoltaic, photothermal, and photochemical solar energy conversion Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV00721202X volume:201 year:2019 pages:0 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solmat.2019.110082 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U 56.03 Methoden im Bauingenieurwesen VZ AR 201 2019 0 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in Question answering method for infrastructure damage information retrieval from textual data using bidirectional encoder representations from transformers Amsterdam [u.a.] volume:201 year:2019 pages:0 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in Question answering method for infrastructure damage information retrieval from textual data using bidirectional encoder representations from transformers Amsterdam [u.a.] volume:201 year:2019 pages:0 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| bklname |
Methoden im Bauingenieurwesen |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
Instrumented indentation Backsheet Nanoindentation Durability Reliability |
| dewey-raw |
690 |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
Question answering method for infrastructure damage information retrieval from textual data using bidirectional encoder representations from transformers |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Miller, David C. @@aut@@ Owen-Bellini, Michael @@oth@@ Hacke, Peter L. @@oth@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2019-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
ELV00721202X |
| dewey-sort |
3690 |
| id |
ELV047790326 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV047790326</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230626020444.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">191022s2019 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.solmat.2019.110082</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">/cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001082.pica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV047790326</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0927-0248(19)30411-8</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">690</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">56.03</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Miller, David C.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Use of indentation to study the degradation of photovoltaic backsheets</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2019transfer abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The ability of electrical insulating materials within a module to act as insulators is a key safety requirement for photovoltaic (PV) technology. Presently, however, the durability of backsheets may not be readily assessed. For example, the mechanical tensile test continues to be developed, and its use has not been validated such that a technically based pass/fail criteria may be established. This study examines the use of simple indentation methods, including durometer hardness and instrumented indentation, as a means to quantitively assess the degradation of PV backsheets. Characteristics including: hardness, modulus, load/displacement profile, creep hold response, and residual impression are explored in an empirical study. Glass/encapsulant/backsheet mini-modules constructed using backsheets including: polyamide (specifically the AAA backsheet product), poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET), polyvinyl fluoride (PVF) laminate (“TPE”), and polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) were examined. An M-type durometer as well as Berkovich and cube-corner tips were used in the indentation experiments. Additional characterizations were performed to interpret the indentation measurements including: surface roughness measurements using atomic force microscopy (AFM), a chemical structure study using Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), and phase-transition measurements using differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). The results are analyzed in the context of the combined accelerated stress test (C-AST) also explored in this study. Instrumented indentation (i.e., using a Berkovich tip) was able to distinguish between backsheets and quantify the effects of accelerated testing (including up to 60%, 25%, and 20% change in hardness, modulus, and creep displacement, respectively). The embrittlement of the backsheets was not readily assessable using cube-corner indentation. Cracking of the known-bad polyamide backsheet was observed from the C-AST, which was not observed to result from steady state UV weathering.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The ability of electrical insulating materials within a module to act as insulators is a key safety requirement for photovoltaic (PV) technology. Presently, however, the durability of backsheets may not be readily assessed. For example, the mechanical tensile test continues to be developed, and its use has not been validated such that a technically based pass/fail criteria may be established. This study examines the use of simple indentation methods, including durometer hardness and instrumented indentation, as a means to quantitively assess the degradation of PV backsheets. Characteristics including: hardness, modulus, load/displacement profile, creep hold response, and residual impression are explored in an empirical study. Glass/encapsulant/backsheet mini-modules constructed using backsheets including: polyamide (specifically the AAA backsheet product), poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET), polyvinyl fluoride (PVF) laminate (“TPE”), and polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) were examined. An M-type durometer as well as Berkovich and cube-corner tips were used in the indentation experiments. Additional characterizations were performed to interpret the indentation measurements including: surface roughness measurements using atomic force microscopy (AFM), a chemical structure study using Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), and phase-transition measurements using differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). The results are analyzed in the context of the combined accelerated stress test (C-AST) also explored in this study. Instrumented indentation (i.e., using a Berkovich tip) was able to distinguish between backsheets and quantify the effects of accelerated testing (including up to 60%, 25%, and 20% change in hardness, modulus, and creep displacement, respectively). The embrittlement of the backsheets was not readily assessable using cube-corner indentation. Cracking of the known-bad polyamide backsheet was observed from the C-AST, which was not observed to result from steady state UV weathering.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Instrumented indentation</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Backsheet</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Nanoindentation</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Durability</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Reliability</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Owen-Bellini, Michael</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Hacke, Peter L.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="n">NH, Elsevier</subfield><subfield code="a">Kim, Yohan ELSEVIER</subfield><subfield code="t">Question answering method for infrastructure damage information retrieval from textual data using bidirectional encoder representations from transformers</subfield><subfield code="d">2021</subfield><subfield code="d">an international journal devoted to photovoltaic, photothermal, and photochemical solar energy conversion</subfield><subfield code="g">Amsterdam [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)ELV00721202X</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:201</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2019</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solmat.2019.110082</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">56.03</subfield><subfield code="j">Methoden im Bauingenieurwesen</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">201</subfield><subfield code="j">2019</subfield><subfield code="h">0</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Miller, David C. |
| spellingShingle |
Miller, David C. ddc 690 bkl 56.03 Elsevier Instrumented indentation Elsevier Backsheet Elsevier Nanoindentation Elsevier Durability Elsevier Reliability Use of indentation to study the degradation of photovoltaic backsheets |
| authorStr |
Miller, David C. |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)ELV00721202X |
| format |
electronic Article |
| dewey-ones |
690 - Buildings |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut |
| collection |
elsevier |
| remote_str |
true |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| topic_title |
690 VZ 56.03 bkl Use of indentation to study the degradation of photovoltaic backsheets Instrumented indentation Elsevier Backsheet Elsevier Nanoindentation Elsevier Durability Elsevier Reliability Elsevier |
| topic |
ddc 690 bkl 56.03 Elsevier Instrumented indentation Elsevier Backsheet Elsevier Nanoindentation Elsevier Durability Elsevier Reliability |
| topic_unstemmed |
ddc 690 bkl 56.03 Elsevier Instrumented indentation Elsevier Backsheet Elsevier Nanoindentation Elsevier Durability Elsevier Reliability |
| topic_browse |
ddc 690 bkl 56.03 Elsevier Instrumented indentation Elsevier Backsheet Elsevier Nanoindentation Elsevier Durability Elsevier Reliability |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
zu |
| author2_variant |
m o b mob p l h pl plh |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Question answering method for infrastructure damage information retrieval from textual data using bidirectional encoder representations from transformers |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
ELV00721202X |
| dewey-tens |
690 - Building & construction |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Question answering method for infrastructure damage information retrieval from textual data using bidirectional encoder representations from transformers |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)ELV00721202X |
| title |
Use of indentation to study the degradation of photovoltaic backsheets |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)ELV047790326 (ELSEVIER)S0927-0248(19)30411-8 |
| title_full |
Use of indentation to study the degradation of photovoltaic backsheets |
| author_sort |
Miller, David C. |
| journal |
Question answering method for infrastructure damage information retrieval from textual data using bidirectional encoder representations from transformers |
| journalStr |
Question answering method for infrastructure damage information retrieval from textual data using bidirectional encoder representations from transformers |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| dewey-hundreds |
600 - Technology |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2019 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
zzz |
| container_start_page |
0 |
| author_browse |
Miller, David C. |
| container_volume |
201 |
| class |
690 VZ 56.03 bkl |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Miller, David C. |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1016/j.solmat.2019.110082 |
| dewey-full |
690 |
| title_sort |
use of indentation to study the degradation of photovoltaic backsheets |
| title_auth |
Use of indentation to study the degradation of photovoltaic backsheets |
| abstract |
The ability of electrical insulating materials within a module to act as insulators is a key safety requirement for photovoltaic (PV) technology. Presently, however, the durability of backsheets may not be readily assessed. For example, the mechanical tensile test continues to be developed, and its use has not been validated such that a technically based pass/fail criteria may be established. This study examines the use of simple indentation methods, including durometer hardness and instrumented indentation, as a means to quantitively assess the degradation of PV backsheets. Characteristics including: hardness, modulus, load/displacement profile, creep hold response, and residual impression are explored in an empirical study. Glass/encapsulant/backsheet mini-modules constructed using backsheets including: polyamide (specifically the AAA backsheet product), poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET), polyvinyl fluoride (PVF) laminate (“TPE”), and polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) were examined. An M-type durometer as well as Berkovich and cube-corner tips were used in the indentation experiments. Additional characterizations were performed to interpret the indentation measurements including: surface roughness measurements using atomic force microscopy (AFM), a chemical structure study using Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), and phase-transition measurements using differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). The results are analyzed in the context of the combined accelerated stress test (C-AST) also explored in this study. Instrumented indentation (i.e., using a Berkovich tip) was able to distinguish between backsheets and quantify the effects of accelerated testing (including up to 60%, 25%, and 20% change in hardness, modulus, and creep displacement, respectively). The embrittlement of the backsheets was not readily assessable using cube-corner indentation. Cracking of the known-bad polyamide backsheet was observed from the C-AST, which was not observed to result from steady state UV weathering. |
| abstractGer |
The ability of electrical insulating materials within a module to act as insulators is a key safety requirement for photovoltaic (PV) technology. Presently, however, the durability of backsheets may not be readily assessed. For example, the mechanical tensile test continues to be developed, and its use has not been validated such that a technically based pass/fail criteria may be established. This study examines the use of simple indentation methods, including durometer hardness and instrumented indentation, as a means to quantitively assess the degradation of PV backsheets. Characteristics including: hardness, modulus, load/displacement profile, creep hold response, and residual impression are explored in an empirical study. Glass/encapsulant/backsheet mini-modules constructed using backsheets including: polyamide (specifically the AAA backsheet product), poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET), polyvinyl fluoride (PVF) laminate (“TPE”), and polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) were examined. An M-type durometer as well as Berkovich and cube-corner tips were used in the indentation experiments. Additional characterizations were performed to interpret the indentation measurements including: surface roughness measurements using atomic force microscopy (AFM), a chemical structure study using Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), and phase-transition measurements using differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). The results are analyzed in the context of the combined accelerated stress test (C-AST) also explored in this study. Instrumented indentation (i.e., using a Berkovich tip) was able to distinguish between backsheets and quantify the effects of accelerated testing (including up to 60%, 25%, and 20% change in hardness, modulus, and creep displacement, respectively). The embrittlement of the backsheets was not readily assessable using cube-corner indentation. Cracking of the known-bad polyamide backsheet was observed from the C-AST, which was not observed to result from steady state UV weathering. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
The ability of electrical insulating materials within a module to act as insulators is a key safety requirement for photovoltaic (PV) technology. Presently, however, the durability of backsheets may not be readily assessed. For example, the mechanical tensile test continues to be developed, and its use has not been validated such that a technically based pass/fail criteria may be established. This study examines the use of simple indentation methods, including durometer hardness and instrumented indentation, as a means to quantitively assess the degradation of PV backsheets. Characteristics including: hardness, modulus, load/displacement profile, creep hold response, and residual impression are explored in an empirical study. Glass/encapsulant/backsheet mini-modules constructed using backsheets including: polyamide (specifically the AAA backsheet product), poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET), polyvinyl fluoride (PVF) laminate (“TPE”), and polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) were examined. An M-type durometer as well as Berkovich and cube-corner tips were used in the indentation experiments. Additional characterizations were performed to interpret the indentation measurements including: surface roughness measurements using atomic force microscopy (AFM), a chemical structure study using Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), and phase-transition measurements using differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). The results are analyzed in the context of the combined accelerated stress test (C-AST) also explored in this study. Instrumented indentation (i.e., using a Berkovich tip) was able to distinguish between backsheets and quantify the effects of accelerated testing (including up to 60%, 25%, and 20% change in hardness, modulus, and creep displacement, respectively). The embrittlement of the backsheets was not readily assessable using cube-corner indentation. Cracking of the known-bad polyamide backsheet was observed from the C-AST, which was not observed to result from steady state UV weathering. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U |
| title_short |
Use of indentation to study the degradation of photovoltaic backsheets |
| url |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solmat.2019.110082 |
| remote_bool |
true |
| author2 |
Owen-Bellini, Michael Hacke, Peter L. |
| author2Str |
Owen-Bellini, Michael Hacke, Peter L. |
| ppnlink |
ELV00721202X |
| mediatype_str_mv |
z |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| author2_role |
oth oth |
| doi_str |
10.1016/j.solmat.2019.110082 |
| up_date |
2024-07-06T17:07:12.837Z |
| _version_ |
1803850227741884416 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV047790326</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230626020444.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">191022s2019 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.solmat.2019.110082</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">/cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001082.pica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV047790326</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0927-0248(19)30411-8</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">690</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">56.03</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Miller, David C.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Use of indentation to study the degradation of photovoltaic backsheets</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2019transfer abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The ability of electrical insulating materials within a module to act as insulators is a key safety requirement for photovoltaic (PV) technology. Presently, however, the durability of backsheets may not be readily assessed. For example, the mechanical tensile test continues to be developed, and its use has not been validated such that a technically based pass/fail criteria may be established. This study examines the use of simple indentation methods, including durometer hardness and instrumented indentation, as a means to quantitively assess the degradation of PV backsheets. Characteristics including: hardness, modulus, load/displacement profile, creep hold response, and residual impression are explored in an empirical study. Glass/encapsulant/backsheet mini-modules constructed using backsheets including: polyamide (specifically the AAA backsheet product), poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET), polyvinyl fluoride (PVF) laminate (“TPE”), and polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) were examined. An M-type durometer as well as Berkovich and cube-corner tips were used in the indentation experiments. Additional characterizations were performed to interpret the indentation measurements including: surface roughness measurements using atomic force microscopy (AFM), a chemical structure study using Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), and phase-transition measurements using differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). The results are analyzed in the context of the combined accelerated stress test (C-AST) also explored in this study. Instrumented indentation (i.e., using a Berkovich tip) was able to distinguish between backsheets and quantify the effects of accelerated testing (including up to 60%, 25%, and 20% change in hardness, modulus, and creep displacement, respectively). The embrittlement of the backsheets was not readily assessable using cube-corner indentation. Cracking of the known-bad polyamide backsheet was observed from the C-AST, which was not observed to result from steady state UV weathering.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The ability of electrical insulating materials within a module to act as insulators is a key safety requirement for photovoltaic (PV) technology. Presently, however, the durability of backsheets may not be readily assessed. For example, the mechanical tensile test continues to be developed, and its use has not been validated such that a technically based pass/fail criteria may be established. This study examines the use of simple indentation methods, including durometer hardness and instrumented indentation, as a means to quantitively assess the degradation of PV backsheets. Characteristics including: hardness, modulus, load/displacement profile, creep hold response, and residual impression are explored in an empirical study. Glass/encapsulant/backsheet mini-modules constructed using backsheets including: polyamide (specifically the AAA backsheet product), poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET), polyvinyl fluoride (PVF) laminate (“TPE”), and polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) were examined. An M-type durometer as well as Berkovich and cube-corner tips were used in the indentation experiments. Additional characterizations were performed to interpret the indentation measurements including: surface roughness measurements using atomic force microscopy (AFM), a chemical structure study using Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), and phase-transition measurements using differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). The results are analyzed in the context of the combined accelerated stress test (C-AST) also explored in this study. Instrumented indentation (i.e., using a Berkovich tip) was able to distinguish between backsheets and quantify the effects of accelerated testing (including up to 60%, 25%, and 20% change in hardness, modulus, and creep displacement, respectively). The embrittlement of the backsheets was not readily assessable using cube-corner indentation. Cracking of the known-bad polyamide backsheet was observed from the C-AST, which was not observed to result from steady state UV weathering.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Instrumented indentation</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Backsheet</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Nanoindentation</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Durability</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Reliability</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Owen-Bellini, Michael</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Hacke, Peter L.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="n">NH, Elsevier</subfield><subfield code="a">Kim, Yohan ELSEVIER</subfield><subfield code="t">Question answering method for infrastructure damage information retrieval from textual data using bidirectional encoder representations from transformers</subfield><subfield code="d">2021</subfield><subfield code="d">an international journal devoted to photovoltaic, photothermal, and photochemical solar energy conversion</subfield><subfield code="g">Amsterdam [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)ELV00721202X</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:201</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2019</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solmat.2019.110082</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">56.03</subfield><subfield code="j">Methoden im Bauingenieurwesen</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">201</subfield><subfield code="j">2019</subfield><subfield code="h">0</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.4013615 |