Diagnosis of uncommon renal epithelial neoplasms: performances of fluorescence in situ hybridization
Renal cell carcinomas (RCC) are divided in several subtypes, characterized by morphological and histological features, protein expression patterns and genetics criteria. The main subtypes include Clear cell renal cell carcinoma (CCRCC), Papillary RCC (PRCC), Chromophobe RCC (ChRCC), oncocytoma, TFE3...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Beaumont, Marion [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2019transfer abstract |
|---|
| Umfang: |
10 |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Chronic Total Occlusion – Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (CTO-PCI) Experience in a Single, Multi-operator Australian Centre: Need for dedicated CTO-PCI programs - BoganaShanmugam, Vimalraj ELSEVIER, 2016, New York, NY [u.a.] |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:92 ; year:2019 ; pages:81-90 ; extent:10 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1016/j.humpath.2019.08.005 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
ELV04850386X |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ELV04850386X | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230626022109.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 200108s2019 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.humpath.2019.08.005 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000000874.pica |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)ELV04850386X | ||
| 035 | |a (ELSEVIER)S0046-8177(19)30138-8 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 610 |q VZ |
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 550 |q VZ |
| 084 | |a 38.48 |2 bkl | ||
| 084 | |a 38.90 |2 bkl | ||
| 084 | |a 42.94 |2 bkl | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Beaumont, Marion |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Diagnosis of uncommon renal epithelial neoplasms: performances of fluorescence in situ hybridization |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2019transfer abstract | |
| 300 | |a 10 | ||
| 336 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zzz |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b z |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zu |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Renal cell carcinomas (RCC) are divided in several subtypes, characterized by morphological and histological features, protein expression patterns and genetics criteria. The main subtypes include Clear cell renal cell carcinoma (CCRCC), Papillary RCC (PRCC), Chromophobe RCC (ChRCC), oncocytoma, TFE3 and TFEB Translocation renal cell carcinoma (TRCC). In most cases, RCC can be easily classified according to histological criteria and immunohistochemistry. Nevertheless, the subtyping process can be more complex in some cases: differential diagnosis (CCRCC or TFE3 TRCC, PRCC or TFE3 TRCC, oncocytic tumors corresponding to ChRCC or oncocytoma), molecular confirmation (TFEB TRCC) and unclassified RCC. Complementary analyses are required such as fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) for the detection of chromosomal abnormalities associated to each subtype. In this aim, this study assessed the performance of FISH analysis in the histological classification of 359 RCC exhibiting unusual histological characteristics and/or occurring in young people. FISH probes were selected according to the histological features of each tumor. FISH analysis contributed to the histological classification in 73% of the RCC (261/359). Conversely, FISH did not contribute to the diagnosis in 19% of the cases (69/359) and a hybridization failure was observed for the remaining tumors (8%; 29/359). Considering the different RCC subtypes, FISH analysis was highly efficient to confirm the histological diagnosis of CCRCC, PRCC, and TFE3 TRCC and to identify abnormalities of the TFEB gene. However, this strategy showed some limitations for the diagnosis of oncocytic tumors and unclassified RCC, suggesting that additional molecular assays should be evaluated in these cases. | ||
| 520 | |a Renal cell carcinomas (RCC) are divided in several subtypes, characterized by morphological and histological features, protein expression patterns and genetics criteria. The main subtypes include Clear cell renal cell carcinoma (CCRCC), Papillary RCC (PRCC), Chromophobe RCC (ChRCC), oncocytoma, TFE3 and TFEB Translocation renal cell carcinoma (TRCC). In most cases, RCC can be easily classified according to histological criteria and immunohistochemistry. Nevertheless, the subtyping process can be more complex in some cases: differential diagnosis (CCRCC or TFE3 TRCC, PRCC or TFE3 TRCC, oncocytic tumors corresponding to ChRCC or oncocytoma), molecular confirmation (TFEB TRCC) and unclassified RCC. Complementary analyses are required such as fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) for the detection of chromosomal abnormalities associated to each subtype. In this aim, this study assessed the performance of FISH analysis in the histological classification of 359 RCC exhibiting unusual histological characteristics and/or occurring in young people. FISH probes were selected according to the histological features of each tumor. FISH analysis contributed to the histological classification in 73% of the RCC (261/359). Conversely, FISH did not contribute to the diagnosis in 19% of the cases (69/359) and a hybridization failure was observed for the remaining tumors (8%; 29/359). Considering the different RCC subtypes, FISH analysis was highly efficient to confirm the histological diagnosis of CCRCC, PRCC, and TFE3 TRCC and to identify abnormalities of the TFEB gene. However, this strategy showed some limitations for the diagnosis of oncocytic tumors and unclassified RCC, suggesting that additional molecular assays should be evaluated in these cases. | ||
| 700 | 1 | |a Dugay, Frédéric |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Kammerer-Jacquet, Solène-Florence |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Jaillard, Sylvie |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Cabillic, Florian |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Mathieu, Romain |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Verhoest, Gregory |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Bensalah, Karim |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Rioux-Leclercq, Nathalie |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Belaud-Rotureau, Marc-Antoine |4 oth | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |n Elsevier |a BoganaShanmugam, Vimalraj ELSEVIER |t Chronic Total Occlusion – Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (CTO-PCI) Experience in a Single, Multi-operator Australian Centre: Need for dedicated CTO-PCI programs |d 2016 |g New York, NY [u.a.] |w (DE-627)ELV019059760 |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:92 |g year:2019 |g pages:81-90 |g extent:10 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humpath.2019.08.005 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_U | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ELV | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_U | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OPC-GGO | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_60 | ||
| 936 | b | k | |a 38.48 |j Marine Geologie |q VZ |
| 936 | b | k | |a 38.90 |j Ozeanologie |j Ozeanographie |q VZ |
| 936 | b | k | |a 42.94 |j Meeresbiologie |q VZ |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 92 |j 2019 |h 81-90 |g 10 | ||
| author_variant |
m b mb |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
beaumontmariondugayfrdrickammererjacquet:2019----:igoioucmornlpteilepampromneofurse |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2019transfer abstract |
| bklnumber |
38.48 38.90 42.94 |
| publishDate |
2019 |
| allfields |
10.1016/j.humpath.2019.08.005 doi /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000000874.pica (DE-627)ELV04850386X (ELSEVIER)S0046-8177(19)30138-8 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 610 VZ 550 VZ 38.48 bkl 38.90 bkl 42.94 bkl Beaumont, Marion verfasserin aut Diagnosis of uncommon renal epithelial neoplasms: performances of fluorescence in situ hybridization 2019transfer abstract 10 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Renal cell carcinomas (RCC) are divided in several subtypes, characterized by morphological and histological features, protein expression patterns and genetics criteria. The main subtypes include Clear cell renal cell carcinoma (CCRCC), Papillary RCC (PRCC), Chromophobe RCC (ChRCC), oncocytoma, TFE3 and TFEB Translocation renal cell carcinoma (TRCC). In most cases, RCC can be easily classified according to histological criteria and immunohistochemistry. Nevertheless, the subtyping process can be more complex in some cases: differential diagnosis (CCRCC or TFE3 TRCC, PRCC or TFE3 TRCC, oncocytic tumors corresponding to ChRCC or oncocytoma), molecular confirmation (TFEB TRCC) and unclassified RCC. Complementary analyses are required such as fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) for the detection of chromosomal abnormalities associated to each subtype. In this aim, this study assessed the performance of FISH analysis in the histological classification of 359 RCC exhibiting unusual histological characteristics and/or occurring in young people. FISH probes were selected according to the histological features of each tumor. FISH analysis contributed to the histological classification in 73% of the RCC (261/359). Conversely, FISH did not contribute to the diagnosis in 19% of the cases (69/359) and a hybridization failure was observed for the remaining tumors (8%; 29/359). Considering the different RCC subtypes, FISH analysis was highly efficient to confirm the histological diagnosis of CCRCC, PRCC, and TFE3 TRCC and to identify abnormalities of the TFEB gene. However, this strategy showed some limitations for the diagnosis of oncocytic tumors and unclassified RCC, suggesting that additional molecular assays should be evaluated in these cases. Renal cell carcinomas (RCC) are divided in several subtypes, characterized by morphological and histological features, protein expression patterns and genetics criteria. The main subtypes include Clear cell renal cell carcinoma (CCRCC), Papillary RCC (PRCC), Chromophobe RCC (ChRCC), oncocytoma, TFE3 and TFEB Translocation renal cell carcinoma (TRCC). In most cases, RCC can be easily classified according to histological criteria and immunohistochemistry. Nevertheless, the subtyping process can be more complex in some cases: differential diagnosis (CCRCC or TFE3 TRCC, PRCC or TFE3 TRCC, oncocytic tumors corresponding to ChRCC or oncocytoma), molecular confirmation (TFEB TRCC) and unclassified RCC. Complementary analyses are required such as fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) for the detection of chromosomal abnormalities associated to each subtype. In this aim, this study assessed the performance of FISH analysis in the histological classification of 359 RCC exhibiting unusual histological characteristics and/or occurring in young people. FISH probes were selected according to the histological features of each tumor. FISH analysis contributed to the histological classification in 73% of the RCC (261/359). Conversely, FISH did not contribute to the diagnosis in 19% of the cases (69/359) and a hybridization failure was observed for the remaining tumors (8%; 29/359). Considering the different RCC subtypes, FISH analysis was highly efficient to confirm the histological diagnosis of CCRCC, PRCC, and TFE3 TRCC and to identify abnormalities of the TFEB gene. However, this strategy showed some limitations for the diagnosis of oncocytic tumors and unclassified RCC, suggesting that additional molecular assays should be evaluated in these cases. Dugay, Frédéric oth Kammerer-Jacquet, Solène-Florence oth Jaillard, Sylvie oth Cabillic, Florian oth Mathieu, Romain oth Verhoest, Gregory oth Bensalah, Karim oth Rioux-Leclercq, Nathalie oth Belaud-Rotureau, Marc-Antoine oth Enthalten in Elsevier BoganaShanmugam, Vimalraj ELSEVIER Chronic Total Occlusion – Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (CTO-PCI) Experience in a Single, Multi-operator Australian Centre: Need for dedicated CTO-PCI programs 2016 New York, NY [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV019059760 volume:92 year:2019 pages:81-90 extent:10 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humpath.2019.08.005 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OPC-GGO GBV_ILN_60 38.48 Marine Geologie VZ 38.90 Ozeanologie Ozeanographie VZ 42.94 Meeresbiologie VZ AR 92 2019 81-90 10 |
| spelling |
10.1016/j.humpath.2019.08.005 doi /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000000874.pica (DE-627)ELV04850386X (ELSEVIER)S0046-8177(19)30138-8 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 610 VZ 550 VZ 38.48 bkl 38.90 bkl 42.94 bkl Beaumont, Marion verfasserin aut Diagnosis of uncommon renal epithelial neoplasms: performances of fluorescence in situ hybridization 2019transfer abstract 10 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Renal cell carcinomas (RCC) are divided in several subtypes, characterized by morphological and histological features, protein expression patterns and genetics criteria. The main subtypes include Clear cell renal cell carcinoma (CCRCC), Papillary RCC (PRCC), Chromophobe RCC (ChRCC), oncocytoma, TFE3 and TFEB Translocation renal cell carcinoma (TRCC). In most cases, RCC can be easily classified according to histological criteria and immunohistochemistry. Nevertheless, the subtyping process can be more complex in some cases: differential diagnosis (CCRCC or TFE3 TRCC, PRCC or TFE3 TRCC, oncocytic tumors corresponding to ChRCC or oncocytoma), molecular confirmation (TFEB TRCC) and unclassified RCC. Complementary analyses are required such as fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) for the detection of chromosomal abnormalities associated to each subtype. In this aim, this study assessed the performance of FISH analysis in the histological classification of 359 RCC exhibiting unusual histological characteristics and/or occurring in young people. FISH probes were selected according to the histological features of each tumor. FISH analysis contributed to the histological classification in 73% of the RCC (261/359). Conversely, FISH did not contribute to the diagnosis in 19% of the cases (69/359) and a hybridization failure was observed for the remaining tumors (8%; 29/359). Considering the different RCC subtypes, FISH analysis was highly efficient to confirm the histological diagnosis of CCRCC, PRCC, and TFE3 TRCC and to identify abnormalities of the TFEB gene. However, this strategy showed some limitations for the diagnosis of oncocytic tumors and unclassified RCC, suggesting that additional molecular assays should be evaluated in these cases. Renal cell carcinomas (RCC) are divided in several subtypes, characterized by morphological and histological features, protein expression patterns and genetics criteria. The main subtypes include Clear cell renal cell carcinoma (CCRCC), Papillary RCC (PRCC), Chromophobe RCC (ChRCC), oncocytoma, TFE3 and TFEB Translocation renal cell carcinoma (TRCC). In most cases, RCC can be easily classified according to histological criteria and immunohistochemistry. Nevertheless, the subtyping process can be more complex in some cases: differential diagnosis (CCRCC or TFE3 TRCC, PRCC or TFE3 TRCC, oncocytic tumors corresponding to ChRCC or oncocytoma), molecular confirmation (TFEB TRCC) and unclassified RCC. Complementary analyses are required such as fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) for the detection of chromosomal abnormalities associated to each subtype. In this aim, this study assessed the performance of FISH analysis in the histological classification of 359 RCC exhibiting unusual histological characteristics and/or occurring in young people. FISH probes were selected according to the histological features of each tumor. FISH analysis contributed to the histological classification in 73% of the RCC (261/359). Conversely, FISH did not contribute to the diagnosis in 19% of the cases (69/359) and a hybridization failure was observed for the remaining tumors (8%; 29/359). Considering the different RCC subtypes, FISH analysis was highly efficient to confirm the histological diagnosis of CCRCC, PRCC, and TFE3 TRCC and to identify abnormalities of the TFEB gene. However, this strategy showed some limitations for the diagnosis of oncocytic tumors and unclassified RCC, suggesting that additional molecular assays should be evaluated in these cases. Dugay, Frédéric oth Kammerer-Jacquet, Solène-Florence oth Jaillard, Sylvie oth Cabillic, Florian oth Mathieu, Romain oth Verhoest, Gregory oth Bensalah, Karim oth Rioux-Leclercq, Nathalie oth Belaud-Rotureau, Marc-Antoine oth Enthalten in Elsevier BoganaShanmugam, Vimalraj ELSEVIER Chronic Total Occlusion – Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (CTO-PCI) Experience in a Single, Multi-operator Australian Centre: Need for dedicated CTO-PCI programs 2016 New York, NY [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV019059760 volume:92 year:2019 pages:81-90 extent:10 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humpath.2019.08.005 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OPC-GGO GBV_ILN_60 38.48 Marine Geologie VZ 38.90 Ozeanologie Ozeanographie VZ 42.94 Meeresbiologie VZ AR 92 2019 81-90 10 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1016/j.humpath.2019.08.005 doi /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000000874.pica (DE-627)ELV04850386X (ELSEVIER)S0046-8177(19)30138-8 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 610 VZ 550 VZ 38.48 bkl 38.90 bkl 42.94 bkl Beaumont, Marion verfasserin aut Diagnosis of uncommon renal epithelial neoplasms: performances of fluorescence in situ hybridization 2019transfer abstract 10 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Renal cell carcinomas (RCC) are divided in several subtypes, characterized by morphological and histological features, protein expression patterns and genetics criteria. The main subtypes include Clear cell renal cell carcinoma (CCRCC), Papillary RCC (PRCC), Chromophobe RCC (ChRCC), oncocytoma, TFE3 and TFEB Translocation renal cell carcinoma (TRCC). In most cases, RCC can be easily classified according to histological criteria and immunohistochemistry. Nevertheless, the subtyping process can be more complex in some cases: differential diagnosis (CCRCC or TFE3 TRCC, PRCC or TFE3 TRCC, oncocytic tumors corresponding to ChRCC or oncocytoma), molecular confirmation (TFEB TRCC) and unclassified RCC. Complementary analyses are required such as fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) for the detection of chromosomal abnormalities associated to each subtype. In this aim, this study assessed the performance of FISH analysis in the histological classification of 359 RCC exhibiting unusual histological characteristics and/or occurring in young people. FISH probes were selected according to the histological features of each tumor. FISH analysis contributed to the histological classification in 73% of the RCC (261/359). Conversely, FISH did not contribute to the diagnosis in 19% of the cases (69/359) and a hybridization failure was observed for the remaining tumors (8%; 29/359). Considering the different RCC subtypes, FISH analysis was highly efficient to confirm the histological diagnosis of CCRCC, PRCC, and TFE3 TRCC and to identify abnormalities of the TFEB gene. However, this strategy showed some limitations for the diagnosis of oncocytic tumors and unclassified RCC, suggesting that additional molecular assays should be evaluated in these cases. Renal cell carcinomas (RCC) are divided in several subtypes, characterized by morphological and histological features, protein expression patterns and genetics criteria. The main subtypes include Clear cell renal cell carcinoma (CCRCC), Papillary RCC (PRCC), Chromophobe RCC (ChRCC), oncocytoma, TFE3 and TFEB Translocation renal cell carcinoma (TRCC). In most cases, RCC can be easily classified according to histological criteria and immunohistochemistry. Nevertheless, the subtyping process can be more complex in some cases: differential diagnosis (CCRCC or TFE3 TRCC, PRCC or TFE3 TRCC, oncocytic tumors corresponding to ChRCC or oncocytoma), molecular confirmation (TFEB TRCC) and unclassified RCC. Complementary analyses are required such as fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) for the detection of chromosomal abnormalities associated to each subtype. In this aim, this study assessed the performance of FISH analysis in the histological classification of 359 RCC exhibiting unusual histological characteristics and/or occurring in young people. FISH probes were selected according to the histological features of each tumor. FISH analysis contributed to the histological classification in 73% of the RCC (261/359). Conversely, FISH did not contribute to the diagnosis in 19% of the cases (69/359) and a hybridization failure was observed for the remaining tumors (8%; 29/359). Considering the different RCC subtypes, FISH analysis was highly efficient to confirm the histological diagnosis of CCRCC, PRCC, and TFE3 TRCC and to identify abnormalities of the TFEB gene. However, this strategy showed some limitations for the diagnosis of oncocytic tumors and unclassified RCC, suggesting that additional molecular assays should be evaluated in these cases. Dugay, Frédéric oth Kammerer-Jacquet, Solène-Florence oth Jaillard, Sylvie oth Cabillic, Florian oth Mathieu, Romain oth Verhoest, Gregory oth Bensalah, Karim oth Rioux-Leclercq, Nathalie oth Belaud-Rotureau, Marc-Antoine oth Enthalten in Elsevier BoganaShanmugam, Vimalraj ELSEVIER Chronic Total Occlusion – Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (CTO-PCI) Experience in a Single, Multi-operator Australian Centre: Need for dedicated CTO-PCI programs 2016 New York, NY [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV019059760 volume:92 year:2019 pages:81-90 extent:10 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humpath.2019.08.005 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OPC-GGO GBV_ILN_60 38.48 Marine Geologie VZ 38.90 Ozeanologie Ozeanographie VZ 42.94 Meeresbiologie VZ AR 92 2019 81-90 10 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1016/j.humpath.2019.08.005 doi /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000000874.pica (DE-627)ELV04850386X (ELSEVIER)S0046-8177(19)30138-8 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 610 VZ 550 VZ 38.48 bkl 38.90 bkl 42.94 bkl Beaumont, Marion verfasserin aut Diagnosis of uncommon renal epithelial neoplasms: performances of fluorescence in situ hybridization 2019transfer abstract 10 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Renal cell carcinomas (RCC) are divided in several subtypes, characterized by morphological and histological features, protein expression patterns and genetics criteria. The main subtypes include Clear cell renal cell carcinoma (CCRCC), Papillary RCC (PRCC), Chromophobe RCC (ChRCC), oncocytoma, TFE3 and TFEB Translocation renal cell carcinoma (TRCC). In most cases, RCC can be easily classified according to histological criteria and immunohistochemistry. Nevertheless, the subtyping process can be more complex in some cases: differential diagnosis (CCRCC or TFE3 TRCC, PRCC or TFE3 TRCC, oncocytic tumors corresponding to ChRCC or oncocytoma), molecular confirmation (TFEB TRCC) and unclassified RCC. Complementary analyses are required such as fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) for the detection of chromosomal abnormalities associated to each subtype. In this aim, this study assessed the performance of FISH analysis in the histological classification of 359 RCC exhibiting unusual histological characteristics and/or occurring in young people. FISH probes were selected according to the histological features of each tumor. FISH analysis contributed to the histological classification in 73% of the RCC (261/359). Conversely, FISH did not contribute to the diagnosis in 19% of the cases (69/359) and a hybridization failure was observed for the remaining tumors (8%; 29/359). Considering the different RCC subtypes, FISH analysis was highly efficient to confirm the histological diagnosis of CCRCC, PRCC, and TFE3 TRCC and to identify abnormalities of the TFEB gene. However, this strategy showed some limitations for the diagnosis of oncocytic tumors and unclassified RCC, suggesting that additional molecular assays should be evaluated in these cases. Renal cell carcinomas (RCC) are divided in several subtypes, characterized by morphological and histological features, protein expression patterns and genetics criteria. The main subtypes include Clear cell renal cell carcinoma (CCRCC), Papillary RCC (PRCC), Chromophobe RCC (ChRCC), oncocytoma, TFE3 and TFEB Translocation renal cell carcinoma (TRCC). In most cases, RCC can be easily classified according to histological criteria and immunohistochemistry. Nevertheless, the subtyping process can be more complex in some cases: differential diagnosis (CCRCC or TFE3 TRCC, PRCC or TFE3 TRCC, oncocytic tumors corresponding to ChRCC or oncocytoma), molecular confirmation (TFEB TRCC) and unclassified RCC. Complementary analyses are required such as fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) for the detection of chromosomal abnormalities associated to each subtype. In this aim, this study assessed the performance of FISH analysis in the histological classification of 359 RCC exhibiting unusual histological characteristics and/or occurring in young people. FISH probes were selected according to the histological features of each tumor. FISH analysis contributed to the histological classification in 73% of the RCC (261/359). Conversely, FISH did not contribute to the diagnosis in 19% of the cases (69/359) and a hybridization failure was observed for the remaining tumors (8%; 29/359). Considering the different RCC subtypes, FISH analysis was highly efficient to confirm the histological diagnosis of CCRCC, PRCC, and TFE3 TRCC and to identify abnormalities of the TFEB gene. However, this strategy showed some limitations for the diagnosis of oncocytic tumors and unclassified RCC, suggesting that additional molecular assays should be evaluated in these cases. Dugay, Frédéric oth Kammerer-Jacquet, Solène-Florence oth Jaillard, Sylvie oth Cabillic, Florian oth Mathieu, Romain oth Verhoest, Gregory oth Bensalah, Karim oth Rioux-Leclercq, Nathalie oth Belaud-Rotureau, Marc-Antoine oth Enthalten in Elsevier BoganaShanmugam, Vimalraj ELSEVIER Chronic Total Occlusion – Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (CTO-PCI) Experience in a Single, Multi-operator Australian Centre: Need for dedicated CTO-PCI programs 2016 New York, NY [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV019059760 volume:92 year:2019 pages:81-90 extent:10 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humpath.2019.08.005 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OPC-GGO GBV_ILN_60 38.48 Marine Geologie VZ 38.90 Ozeanologie Ozeanographie VZ 42.94 Meeresbiologie VZ AR 92 2019 81-90 10 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1016/j.humpath.2019.08.005 doi /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000000874.pica (DE-627)ELV04850386X (ELSEVIER)S0046-8177(19)30138-8 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 610 VZ 550 VZ 38.48 bkl 38.90 bkl 42.94 bkl Beaumont, Marion verfasserin aut Diagnosis of uncommon renal epithelial neoplasms: performances of fluorescence in situ hybridization 2019transfer abstract 10 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Renal cell carcinomas (RCC) are divided in several subtypes, characterized by morphological and histological features, protein expression patterns and genetics criteria. The main subtypes include Clear cell renal cell carcinoma (CCRCC), Papillary RCC (PRCC), Chromophobe RCC (ChRCC), oncocytoma, TFE3 and TFEB Translocation renal cell carcinoma (TRCC). In most cases, RCC can be easily classified according to histological criteria and immunohistochemistry. Nevertheless, the subtyping process can be more complex in some cases: differential diagnosis (CCRCC or TFE3 TRCC, PRCC or TFE3 TRCC, oncocytic tumors corresponding to ChRCC or oncocytoma), molecular confirmation (TFEB TRCC) and unclassified RCC. Complementary analyses are required such as fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) for the detection of chromosomal abnormalities associated to each subtype. In this aim, this study assessed the performance of FISH analysis in the histological classification of 359 RCC exhibiting unusual histological characteristics and/or occurring in young people. FISH probes were selected according to the histological features of each tumor. FISH analysis contributed to the histological classification in 73% of the RCC (261/359). Conversely, FISH did not contribute to the diagnosis in 19% of the cases (69/359) and a hybridization failure was observed for the remaining tumors (8%; 29/359). Considering the different RCC subtypes, FISH analysis was highly efficient to confirm the histological diagnosis of CCRCC, PRCC, and TFE3 TRCC and to identify abnormalities of the TFEB gene. However, this strategy showed some limitations for the diagnosis of oncocytic tumors and unclassified RCC, suggesting that additional molecular assays should be evaluated in these cases. Renal cell carcinomas (RCC) are divided in several subtypes, characterized by morphological and histological features, protein expression patterns and genetics criteria. The main subtypes include Clear cell renal cell carcinoma (CCRCC), Papillary RCC (PRCC), Chromophobe RCC (ChRCC), oncocytoma, TFE3 and TFEB Translocation renal cell carcinoma (TRCC). In most cases, RCC can be easily classified according to histological criteria and immunohistochemistry. Nevertheless, the subtyping process can be more complex in some cases: differential diagnosis (CCRCC or TFE3 TRCC, PRCC or TFE3 TRCC, oncocytic tumors corresponding to ChRCC or oncocytoma), molecular confirmation (TFEB TRCC) and unclassified RCC. Complementary analyses are required such as fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) for the detection of chromosomal abnormalities associated to each subtype. In this aim, this study assessed the performance of FISH analysis in the histological classification of 359 RCC exhibiting unusual histological characteristics and/or occurring in young people. FISH probes were selected according to the histological features of each tumor. FISH analysis contributed to the histological classification in 73% of the RCC (261/359). Conversely, FISH did not contribute to the diagnosis in 19% of the cases (69/359) and a hybridization failure was observed for the remaining tumors (8%; 29/359). Considering the different RCC subtypes, FISH analysis was highly efficient to confirm the histological diagnosis of CCRCC, PRCC, and TFE3 TRCC and to identify abnormalities of the TFEB gene. However, this strategy showed some limitations for the diagnosis of oncocytic tumors and unclassified RCC, suggesting that additional molecular assays should be evaluated in these cases. Dugay, Frédéric oth Kammerer-Jacquet, Solène-Florence oth Jaillard, Sylvie oth Cabillic, Florian oth Mathieu, Romain oth Verhoest, Gregory oth Bensalah, Karim oth Rioux-Leclercq, Nathalie oth Belaud-Rotureau, Marc-Antoine oth Enthalten in Elsevier BoganaShanmugam, Vimalraj ELSEVIER Chronic Total Occlusion – Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (CTO-PCI) Experience in a Single, Multi-operator Australian Centre: Need for dedicated CTO-PCI programs 2016 New York, NY [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV019059760 volume:92 year:2019 pages:81-90 extent:10 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humpath.2019.08.005 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OPC-GGO GBV_ILN_60 38.48 Marine Geologie VZ 38.90 Ozeanologie Ozeanographie VZ 42.94 Meeresbiologie VZ AR 92 2019 81-90 10 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in Chronic Total Occlusion – Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (CTO-PCI) Experience in a Single, Multi-operator Australian Centre: Need for dedicated CTO-PCI programs New York, NY [u.a.] volume:92 year:2019 pages:81-90 extent:10 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in Chronic Total Occlusion – Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (CTO-PCI) Experience in a Single, Multi-operator Australian Centre: Need for dedicated CTO-PCI programs New York, NY [u.a.] volume:92 year:2019 pages:81-90 extent:10 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| bklname |
Marine Geologie Ozeanologie Ozeanographie Meeresbiologie |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| dewey-raw |
610 |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
Chronic Total Occlusion – Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (CTO-PCI) Experience in a Single, Multi-operator Australian Centre: Need for dedicated CTO-PCI programs |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Beaumont, Marion @@aut@@ Dugay, Frédéric @@oth@@ Kammerer-Jacquet, Solène-Florence @@oth@@ Jaillard, Sylvie @@oth@@ Cabillic, Florian @@oth@@ Mathieu, Romain @@oth@@ Verhoest, Gregory @@oth@@ Bensalah, Karim @@oth@@ Rioux-Leclercq, Nathalie @@oth@@ Belaud-Rotureau, Marc-Antoine @@oth@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2019-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
ELV019059760 |
| dewey-sort |
3610 |
| id |
ELV04850386X |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV04850386X</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230626022109.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">200108s2019 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.humpath.2019.08.005</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">/cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000000874.pica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV04850386X</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0046-8177(19)30138-8</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">610</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">550</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">38.48</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">38.90</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">42.94</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Beaumont, Marion</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Diagnosis of uncommon renal epithelial neoplasms: performances of fluorescence in situ hybridization</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2019transfer abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Renal cell carcinomas (RCC) are divided in several subtypes, characterized by morphological and histological features, protein expression patterns and genetics criteria. The main subtypes include Clear cell renal cell carcinoma (CCRCC), Papillary RCC (PRCC), Chromophobe RCC (ChRCC), oncocytoma, TFE3 and TFEB Translocation renal cell carcinoma (TRCC). In most cases, RCC can be easily classified according to histological criteria and immunohistochemistry. Nevertheless, the subtyping process can be more complex in some cases: differential diagnosis (CCRCC or TFE3 TRCC, PRCC or TFE3 TRCC, oncocytic tumors corresponding to ChRCC or oncocytoma), molecular confirmation (TFEB TRCC) and unclassified RCC. Complementary analyses are required such as fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) for the detection of chromosomal abnormalities associated to each subtype. In this aim, this study assessed the performance of FISH analysis in the histological classification of 359 RCC exhibiting unusual histological characteristics and/or occurring in young people. FISH probes were selected according to the histological features of each tumor. FISH analysis contributed to the histological classification in 73% of the RCC (261/359). Conversely, FISH did not contribute to the diagnosis in 19% of the cases (69/359) and a hybridization failure was observed for the remaining tumors (8%; 29/359). Considering the different RCC subtypes, FISH analysis was highly efficient to confirm the histological diagnosis of CCRCC, PRCC, and TFE3 TRCC and to identify abnormalities of the TFEB gene. However, this strategy showed some limitations for the diagnosis of oncocytic tumors and unclassified RCC, suggesting that additional molecular assays should be evaluated in these cases.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Renal cell carcinomas (RCC) are divided in several subtypes, characterized by morphological and histological features, protein expression patterns and genetics criteria. The main subtypes include Clear cell renal cell carcinoma (CCRCC), Papillary RCC (PRCC), Chromophobe RCC (ChRCC), oncocytoma, TFE3 and TFEB Translocation renal cell carcinoma (TRCC). In most cases, RCC can be easily classified according to histological criteria and immunohistochemistry. Nevertheless, the subtyping process can be more complex in some cases: differential diagnosis (CCRCC or TFE3 TRCC, PRCC or TFE3 TRCC, oncocytic tumors corresponding to ChRCC or oncocytoma), molecular confirmation (TFEB TRCC) and unclassified RCC. Complementary analyses are required such as fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) for the detection of chromosomal abnormalities associated to each subtype. In this aim, this study assessed the performance of FISH analysis in the histological classification of 359 RCC exhibiting unusual histological characteristics and/or occurring in young people. FISH probes were selected according to the histological features of each tumor. FISH analysis contributed to the histological classification in 73% of the RCC (261/359). Conversely, FISH did not contribute to the diagnosis in 19% of the cases (69/359) and a hybridization failure was observed for the remaining tumors (8%; 29/359). Considering the different RCC subtypes, FISH analysis was highly efficient to confirm the histological diagnosis of CCRCC, PRCC, and TFE3 TRCC and to identify abnormalities of the TFEB gene. However, this strategy showed some limitations for the diagnosis of oncocytic tumors and unclassified RCC, suggesting that additional molecular assays should be evaluated in these cases.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Dugay, Frédéric</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Kammerer-Jacquet, Solène-Florence</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Jaillard, Sylvie</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Cabillic, Florian</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Mathieu, Romain</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Verhoest, Gregory</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Bensalah, Karim</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Rioux-Leclercq, Nathalie</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Belaud-Rotureau, Marc-Antoine</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="n">Elsevier</subfield><subfield code="a">BoganaShanmugam, Vimalraj ELSEVIER</subfield><subfield code="t">Chronic Total Occlusion – Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (CTO-PCI) Experience in a Single, Multi-operator Australian Centre: Need for dedicated CTO-PCI programs</subfield><subfield code="d">2016</subfield><subfield code="g">New York, NY [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)ELV019059760</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:92</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2019</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:81-90</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:10</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humpath.2019.08.005</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OPC-GGO</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">38.48</subfield><subfield code="j">Marine Geologie</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">38.90</subfield><subfield code="j">Ozeanologie</subfield><subfield code="j">Ozeanographie</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">42.94</subfield><subfield code="j">Meeresbiologie</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">92</subfield><subfield code="j">2019</subfield><subfield code="h">81-90</subfield><subfield code="g">10</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Beaumont, Marion |
| spellingShingle |
Beaumont, Marion ddc 610 ddc 550 bkl 38.48 bkl 38.90 bkl 42.94 Diagnosis of uncommon renal epithelial neoplasms: performances of fluorescence in situ hybridization |
| authorStr |
Beaumont, Marion |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)ELV019059760 |
| format |
electronic Article |
| dewey-ones |
610 - Medicine & health 550 - Earth sciences |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut |
| collection |
elsevier |
| remote_str |
true |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| topic_title |
610 VZ 550 VZ 38.48 bkl 38.90 bkl 42.94 bkl Diagnosis of uncommon renal epithelial neoplasms: performances of fluorescence in situ hybridization |
| topic |
ddc 610 ddc 550 bkl 38.48 bkl 38.90 bkl 42.94 |
| topic_unstemmed |
ddc 610 ddc 550 bkl 38.48 bkl 38.90 bkl 42.94 |
| topic_browse |
ddc 610 ddc 550 bkl 38.48 bkl 38.90 bkl 42.94 |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
zu |
| author2_variant |
f d fd s f k j sfkj s j sj f c fc r m rm g v gv k b kb n r l nrl m a b r mabr |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Chronic Total Occlusion – Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (CTO-PCI) Experience in a Single, Multi-operator Australian Centre: Need for dedicated CTO-PCI programs |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
ELV019059760 |
| dewey-tens |
610 - Medicine & health 550 - Earth sciences & geology |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Chronic Total Occlusion – Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (CTO-PCI) Experience in a Single, Multi-operator Australian Centre: Need for dedicated CTO-PCI programs |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)ELV019059760 |
| title |
Diagnosis of uncommon renal epithelial neoplasms: performances of fluorescence in situ hybridization |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)ELV04850386X (ELSEVIER)S0046-8177(19)30138-8 |
| title_full |
Diagnosis of uncommon renal epithelial neoplasms: performances of fluorescence in situ hybridization |
| author_sort |
Beaumont, Marion |
| journal |
Chronic Total Occlusion – Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (CTO-PCI) Experience in a Single, Multi-operator Australian Centre: Need for dedicated CTO-PCI programs |
| journalStr |
Chronic Total Occlusion – Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (CTO-PCI) Experience in a Single, Multi-operator Australian Centre: Need for dedicated CTO-PCI programs |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| dewey-hundreds |
600 - Technology 500 - Science |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2019 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
zzz |
| container_start_page |
81 |
| author_browse |
Beaumont, Marion |
| container_volume |
92 |
| physical |
10 |
| class |
610 VZ 550 VZ 38.48 bkl 38.90 bkl 42.94 bkl |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Beaumont, Marion |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1016/j.humpath.2019.08.005 |
| dewey-full |
610 550 |
| title_sort |
diagnosis of uncommon renal epithelial neoplasms: performances of fluorescence in situ hybridization |
| title_auth |
Diagnosis of uncommon renal epithelial neoplasms: performances of fluorescence in situ hybridization |
| abstract |
Renal cell carcinomas (RCC) are divided in several subtypes, characterized by morphological and histological features, protein expression patterns and genetics criteria. The main subtypes include Clear cell renal cell carcinoma (CCRCC), Papillary RCC (PRCC), Chromophobe RCC (ChRCC), oncocytoma, TFE3 and TFEB Translocation renal cell carcinoma (TRCC). In most cases, RCC can be easily classified according to histological criteria and immunohistochemistry. Nevertheless, the subtyping process can be more complex in some cases: differential diagnosis (CCRCC or TFE3 TRCC, PRCC or TFE3 TRCC, oncocytic tumors corresponding to ChRCC or oncocytoma), molecular confirmation (TFEB TRCC) and unclassified RCC. Complementary analyses are required such as fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) for the detection of chromosomal abnormalities associated to each subtype. In this aim, this study assessed the performance of FISH analysis in the histological classification of 359 RCC exhibiting unusual histological characteristics and/or occurring in young people. FISH probes were selected according to the histological features of each tumor. FISH analysis contributed to the histological classification in 73% of the RCC (261/359). Conversely, FISH did not contribute to the diagnosis in 19% of the cases (69/359) and a hybridization failure was observed for the remaining tumors (8%; 29/359). Considering the different RCC subtypes, FISH analysis was highly efficient to confirm the histological diagnosis of CCRCC, PRCC, and TFE3 TRCC and to identify abnormalities of the TFEB gene. However, this strategy showed some limitations for the diagnosis of oncocytic tumors and unclassified RCC, suggesting that additional molecular assays should be evaluated in these cases. |
| abstractGer |
Renal cell carcinomas (RCC) are divided in several subtypes, characterized by morphological and histological features, protein expression patterns and genetics criteria. The main subtypes include Clear cell renal cell carcinoma (CCRCC), Papillary RCC (PRCC), Chromophobe RCC (ChRCC), oncocytoma, TFE3 and TFEB Translocation renal cell carcinoma (TRCC). In most cases, RCC can be easily classified according to histological criteria and immunohistochemistry. Nevertheless, the subtyping process can be more complex in some cases: differential diagnosis (CCRCC or TFE3 TRCC, PRCC or TFE3 TRCC, oncocytic tumors corresponding to ChRCC or oncocytoma), molecular confirmation (TFEB TRCC) and unclassified RCC. Complementary analyses are required such as fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) for the detection of chromosomal abnormalities associated to each subtype. In this aim, this study assessed the performance of FISH analysis in the histological classification of 359 RCC exhibiting unusual histological characteristics and/or occurring in young people. FISH probes were selected according to the histological features of each tumor. FISH analysis contributed to the histological classification in 73% of the RCC (261/359). Conversely, FISH did not contribute to the diagnosis in 19% of the cases (69/359) and a hybridization failure was observed for the remaining tumors (8%; 29/359). Considering the different RCC subtypes, FISH analysis was highly efficient to confirm the histological diagnosis of CCRCC, PRCC, and TFE3 TRCC and to identify abnormalities of the TFEB gene. However, this strategy showed some limitations for the diagnosis of oncocytic tumors and unclassified RCC, suggesting that additional molecular assays should be evaluated in these cases. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
Renal cell carcinomas (RCC) are divided in several subtypes, characterized by morphological and histological features, protein expression patterns and genetics criteria. The main subtypes include Clear cell renal cell carcinoma (CCRCC), Papillary RCC (PRCC), Chromophobe RCC (ChRCC), oncocytoma, TFE3 and TFEB Translocation renal cell carcinoma (TRCC). In most cases, RCC can be easily classified according to histological criteria and immunohistochemistry. Nevertheless, the subtyping process can be more complex in some cases: differential diagnosis (CCRCC or TFE3 TRCC, PRCC or TFE3 TRCC, oncocytic tumors corresponding to ChRCC or oncocytoma), molecular confirmation (TFEB TRCC) and unclassified RCC. Complementary analyses are required such as fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) for the detection of chromosomal abnormalities associated to each subtype. In this aim, this study assessed the performance of FISH analysis in the histological classification of 359 RCC exhibiting unusual histological characteristics and/or occurring in young people. FISH probes were selected according to the histological features of each tumor. FISH analysis contributed to the histological classification in 73% of the RCC (261/359). Conversely, FISH did not contribute to the diagnosis in 19% of the cases (69/359) and a hybridization failure was observed for the remaining tumors (8%; 29/359). Considering the different RCC subtypes, FISH analysis was highly efficient to confirm the histological diagnosis of CCRCC, PRCC, and TFE3 TRCC and to identify abnormalities of the TFEB gene. However, this strategy showed some limitations for the diagnosis of oncocytic tumors and unclassified RCC, suggesting that additional molecular assays should be evaluated in these cases. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OPC-GGO GBV_ILN_60 |
| title_short |
Diagnosis of uncommon renal epithelial neoplasms: performances of fluorescence in situ hybridization |
| url |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humpath.2019.08.005 |
| remote_bool |
true |
| author2 |
Dugay, Frédéric Kammerer-Jacquet, Solène-Florence Jaillard, Sylvie Cabillic, Florian Mathieu, Romain Verhoest, Gregory Bensalah, Karim Rioux-Leclercq, Nathalie Belaud-Rotureau, Marc-Antoine |
| author2Str |
Dugay, Frédéric Kammerer-Jacquet, Solène-Florence Jaillard, Sylvie Cabillic, Florian Mathieu, Romain Verhoest, Gregory Bensalah, Karim Rioux-Leclercq, Nathalie Belaud-Rotureau, Marc-Antoine |
| ppnlink |
ELV019059760 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
z |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| author2_role |
oth oth oth oth oth oth oth oth oth |
| doi_str |
10.1016/j.humpath.2019.08.005 |
| up_date |
2024-07-06T19:01:16.266Z |
| _version_ |
1803857403595194368 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV04850386X</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230626022109.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">200108s2019 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.humpath.2019.08.005</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">/cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000000874.pica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV04850386X</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0046-8177(19)30138-8</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">610</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">550</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">38.48</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">38.90</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">42.94</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Beaumont, Marion</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Diagnosis of uncommon renal epithelial neoplasms: performances of fluorescence in situ hybridization</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2019transfer abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Renal cell carcinomas (RCC) are divided in several subtypes, characterized by morphological and histological features, protein expression patterns and genetics criteria. The main subtypes include Clear cell renal cell carcinoma (CCRCC), Papillary RCC (PRCC), Chromophobe RCC (ChRCC), oncocytoma, TFE3 and TFEB Translocation renal cell carcinoma (TRCC). In most cases, RCC can be easily classified according to histological criteria and immunohistochemistry. Nevertheless, the subtyping process can be more complex in some cases: differential diagnosis (CCRCC or TFE3 TRCC, PRCC or TFE3 TRCC, oncocytic tumors corresponding to ChRCC or oncocytoma), molecular confirmation (TFEB TRCC) and unclassified RCC. Complementary analyses are required such as fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) for the detection of chromosomal abnormalities associated to each subtype. In this aim, this study assessed the performance of FISH analysis in the histological classification of 359 RCC exhibiting unusual histological characteristics and/or occurring in young people. FISH probes were selected according to the histological features of each tumor. FISH analysis contributed to the histological classification in 73% of the RCC (261/359). Conversely, FISH did not contribute to the diagnosis in 19% of the cases (69/359) and a hybridization failure was observed for the remaining tumors (8%; 29/359). Considering the different RCC subtypes, FISH analysis was highly efficient to confirm the histological diagnosis of CCRCC, PRCC, and TFE3 TRCC and to identify abnormalities of the TFEB gene. However, this strategy showed some limitations for the diagnosis of oncocytic tumors and unclassified RCC, suggesting that additional molecular assays should be evaluated in these cases.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Renal cell carcinomas (RCC) are divided in several subtypes, characterized by morphological and histological features, protein expression patterns and genetics criteria. The main subtypes include Clear cell renal cell carcinoma (CCRCC), Papillary RCC (PRCC), Chromophobe RCC (ChRCC), oncocytoma, TFE3 and TFEB Translocation renal cell carcinoma (TRCC). In most cases, RCC can be easily classified according to histological criteria and immunohistochemistry. Nevertheless, the subtyping process can be more complex in some cases: differential diagnosis (CCRCC or TFE3 TRCC, PRCC or TFE3 TRCC, oncocytic tumors corresponding to ChRCC or oncocytoma), molecular confirmation (TFEB TRCC) and unclassified RCC. Complementary analyses are required such as fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) for the detection of chromosomal abnormalities associated to each subtype. In this aim, this study assessed the performance of FISH analysis in the histological classification of 359 RCC exhibiting unusual histological characteristics and/or occurring in young people. FISH probes were selected according to the histological features of each tumor. FISH analysis contributed to the histological classification in 73% of the RCC (261/359). Conversely, FISH did not contribute to the diagnosis in 19% of the cases (69/359) and a hybridization failure was observed for the remaining tumors (8%; 29/359). Considering the different RCC subtypes, FISH analysis was highly efficient to confirm the histological diagnosis of CCRCC, PRCC, and TFE3 TRCC and to identify abnormalities of the TFEB gene. However, this strategy showed some limitations for the diagnosis of oncocytic tumors and unclassified RCC, suggesting that additional molecular assays should be evaluated in these cases.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Dugay, Frédéric</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Kammerer-Jacquet, Solène-Florence</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Jaillard, Sylvie</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Cabillic, Florian</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Mathieu, Romain</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Verhoest, Gregory</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Bensalah, Karim</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Rioux-Leclercq, Nathalie</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Belaud-Rotureau, Marc-Antoine</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="n">Elsevier</subfield><subfield code="a">BoganaShanmugam, Vimalraj ELSEVIER</subfield><subfield code="t">Chronic Total Occlusion – Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (CTO-PCI) Experience in a Single, Multi-operator Australian Centre: Need for dedicated CTO-PCI programs</subfield><subfield code="d">2016</subfield><subfield code="g">New York, NY [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)ELV019059760</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:92</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2019</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:81-90</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:10</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humpath.2019.08.005</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OPC-GGO</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">38.48</subfield><subfield code="j">Marine Geologie</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">38.90</subfield><subfield code="j">Ozeanologie</subfield><subfield code="j">Ozeanographie</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">42.94</subfield><subfield code="j">Meeresbiologie</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">92</subfield><subfield code="j">2019</subfield><subfield code="h">81-90</subfield><subfield code="g">10</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.401513 |