Meal planning by high and low health conscious individuals during a simulated shop in the supermarket: A mixed methods study
Planning is an essential component of home meal preparation. While level of health consciousness permeates both activities, this relationship is underexplored in the scientific literature. Using a mixed-methods convergent parallel design this study identified the reasoning behind meal planning and c...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Autor*in: |
Camargo, Anice M. de [verfasserIn] |
---|
Format: |
E-Artikel |
---|---|
Sprache: |
Englisch |
Erschienen: |
2020transfer abstract |
---|
Schlagwörter: |
---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Analysis of fracture interference – Coupling of flow and geomechanical computations with discrete fracture modeling using MRST - Chen, Jiahui ELSEVIER, 2022, determinants and consequences of eating and drinking, Amsterdam [u.a.] |
---|---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:144 ; year:2020 ; day:1 ; month:01 ; pages:0 |
Links: |
---|
DOI / URN: |
10.1016/j.appet.2019.104468 |
---|
Katalog-ID: |
ELV048524441 |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | ELV048524441 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20230626022141.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 200108s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.appet.2019.104468 |2 doi | |
028 | 5 | 2 | |a /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000000836.pica |
035 | |a (DE-627)ELV048524441 | ||
035 | |a (ELSEVIER)S0195-6663(19)30555-0 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
082 | 0 | 4 | |a 660 |q VZ |
084 | |a 38.51 |2 bkl | ||
084 | |a 57.36 |2 bkl | ||
100 | 1 | |a Camargo, Anice M. de |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Meal planning by high and low health conscious individuals during a simulated shop in the supermarket: A mixed methods study |
264 | 1 | |c 2020transfer abstract | |
336 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zzz |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b z |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zu |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a Planning is an essential component of home meal preparation. While level of health consciousness permeates both activities, this relationship is underexplored in the scientific literature. Using a mixed-methods convergent parallel design this study identified the reasoning behind meal planning and compared the characteristics of meals planned by high and low health-conscious adults during a simulated shopping task in a supermarket store. Participants were assigned a task where they were asked to choose ingredients to prepare a hot evening meal for a last-minute guest. High Health Conscious (HHC) participants planned healthier meals with more whole grains/breads/pasta, fruits, and vegetables than Low Health Conscious (LHC) participants. HHC participants mentioned not only health-related motives, but also ingredients' characteristics and cooking habits as influencers of their choices. LHC individuals focused on their own preferences, acknowledged that they struggled with the skills needed to prepare a meal and considered the presence of a guest as the only reason why they would prepare a meal. The mixed methods approach enabled us to link the participants’ reasoning with the quantitative differences between meals planned by them - HHC individuals planned healthier meals and manifested closeness to the act of cooking. This suggests that the link between health interest and learning how to cook deserves to be further explored. | ||
520 | |a Planning is an essential component of home meal preparation. While level of health consciousness permeates both activities, this relationship is underexplored in the scientific literature. Using a mixed-methods convergent parallel design this study identified the reasoning behind meal planning and compared the characteristics of meals planned by high and low health-conscious adults during a simulated shopping task in a supermarket store. Participants were assigned a task where they were asked to choose ingredients to prepare a hot evening meal for a last-minute guest. High Health Conscious (HHC) participants planned healthier meals with more whole grains/breads/pasta, fruits, and vegetables than Low Health Conscious (LHC) participants. HHC participants mentioned not only health-related motives, but also ingredients' characteristics and cooking habits as influencers of their choices. LHC individuals focused on their own preferences, acknowledged that they struggled with the skills needed to prepare a meal and considered the presence of a guest as the only reason why they would prepare a meal. The mixed methods approach enabled us to link the participants’ reasoning with the quantitative differences between meals planned by them - HHC individuals planned healthier meals and manifested closeness to the act of cooking. This suggests that the link between health interest and learning how to cook deserves to be further explored. | ||
650 | 7 | |a Meal quality |2 Elsevier | |
650 | 7 | |a Healthy meals |2 Elsevier | |
650 | 7 | |a Culinary practices |2 Elsevier | |
650 | 7 | |a Homemade meals |2 Elsevier | |
650 | 7 | |a Dinner |2 Elsevier | |
650 | 7 | |a Meal planning |2 Elsevier | |
700 | 1 | |a Botelho, Alyne M. |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Dean, Moira |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Fiates, Giovanna M.R. |4 oth | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |n Elsevier |a Chen, Jiahui ELSEVIER |t Analysis of fracture interference – Coupling of flow and geomechanical computations with discrete fracture modeling using MRST |d 2022 |d determinants and consequences of eating and drinking |g Amsterdam [u.a.] |w (DE-627)ELV008716951 |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:144 |g year:2020 |g day:1 |g month:01 |g pages:0 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2019.104468 |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_U | ||
912 | |a GBV_ELV | ||
912 | |a SYSFLAG_U | ||
912 | |a SSG-OLC-PHA | ||
912 | |a SSG-OPC-GGO | ||
936 | b | k | |a 38.51 |j Geologie fossiler Brennstoffe |q VZ |
936 | b | k | |a 57.36 |j Erdölgewinnung |j Erdgasgewinnung |q VZ |
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 144 |j 2020 |b 1 |c 0101 |h 0 |
author_variant |
a m d c amd amdc |
---|---|
matchkey_str |
camargoanicemdebotelhoalynemdeanmoirafia:2020----:ellnigyihnlwelhosiuidvdasuigsmltdhpnhsp |
hierarchy_sort_str |
2020transfer abstract |
bklnumber |
38.51 57.36 |
publishDate |
2020 |
allfields |
10.1016/j.appet.2019.104468 doi /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000000836.pica (DE-627)ELV048524441 (ELSEVIER)S0195-6663(19)30555-0 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 660 VZ 38.51 bkl 57.36 bkl Camargo, Anice M. de verfasserin aut Meal planning by high and low health conscious individuals during a simulated shop in the supermarket: A mixed methods study 2020transfer abstract nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Planning is an essential component of home meal preparation. While level of health consciousness permeates both activities, this relationship is underexplored in the scientific literature. Using a mixed-methods convergent parallel design this study identified the reasoning behind meal planning and compared the characteristics of meals planned by high and low health-conscious adults during a simulated shopping task in a supermarket store. Participants were assigned a task where they were asked to choose ingredients to prepare a hot evening meal for a last-minute guest. High Health Conscious (HHC) participants planned healthier meals with more whole grains/breads/pasta, fruits, and vegetables than Low Health Conscious (LHC) participants. HHC participants mentioned not only health-related motives, but also ingredients' characteristics and cooking habits as influencers of their choices. LHC individuals focused on their own preferences, acknowledged that they struggled with the skills needed to prepare a meal and considered the presence of a guest as the only reason why they would prepare a meal. The mixed methods approach enabled us to link the participants’ reasoning with the quantitative differences between meals planned by them - HHC individuals planned healthier meals and manifested closeness to the act of cooking. This suggests that the link between health interest and learning how to cook deserves to be further explored. Planning is an essential component of home meal preparation. While level of health consciousness permeates both activities, this relationship is underexplored in the scientific literature. Using a mixed-methods convergent parallel design this study identified the reasoning behind meal planning and compared the characteristics of meals planned by high and low health-conscious adults during a simulated shopping task in a supermarket store. Participants were assigned a task where they were asked to choose ingredients to prepare a hot evening meal for a last-minute guest. High Health Conscious (HHC) participants planned healthier meals with more whole grains/breads/pasta, fruits, and vegetables than Low Health Conscious (LHC) participants. HHC participants mentioned not only health-related motives, but also ingredients' characteristics and cooking habits as influencers of their choices. LHC individuals focused on their own preferences, acknowledged that they struggled with the skills needed to prepare a meal and considered the presence of a guest as the only reason why they would prepare a meal. The mixed methods approach enabled us to link the participants’ reasoning with the quantitative differences between meals planned by them - HHC individuals planned healthier meals and manifested closeness to the act of cooking. This suggests that the link between health interest and learning how to cook deserves to be further explored. Meal quality Elsevier Healthy meals Elsevier Culinary practices Elsevier Homemade meals Elsevier Dinner Elsevier Meal planning Elsevier Botelho, Alyne M. oth Dean, Moira oth Fiates, Giovanna M.R. oth Enthalten in Elsevier Chen, Jiahui ELSEVIER Analysis of fracture interference – Coupling of flow and geomechanical computations with discrete fracture modeling using MRST 2022 determinants and consequences of eating and drinking Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV008716951 volume:144 year:2020 day:1 month:01 pages:0 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2019.104468 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA SSG-OPC-GGO 38.51 Geologie fossiler Brennstoffe VZ 57.36 Erdölgewinnung Erdgasgewinnung VZ AR 144 2020 1 0101 0 |
spelling |
10.1016/j.appet.2019.104468 doi /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000000836.pica (DE-627)ELV048524441 (ELSEVIER)S0195-6663(19)30555-0 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 660 VZ 38.51 bkl 57.36 bkl Camargo, Anice M. de verfasserin aut Meal planning by high and low health conscious individuals during a simulated shop in the supermarket: A mixed methods study 2020transfer abstract nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Planning is an essential component of home meal preparation. While level of health consciousness permeates both activities, this relationship is underexplored in the scientific literature. Using a mixed-methods convergent parallel design this study identified the reasoning behind meal planning and compared the characteristics of meals planned by high and low health-conscious adults during a simulated shopping task in a supermarket store. Participants were assigned a task where they were asked to choose ingredients to prepare a hot evening meal for a last-minute guest. High Health Conscious (HHC) participants planned healthier meals with more whole grains/breads/pasta, fruits, and vegetables than Low Health Conscious (LHC) participants. HHC participants mentioned not only health-related motives, but also ingredients' characteristics and cooking habits as influencers of their choices. LHC individuals focused on their own preferences, acknowledged that they struggled with the skills needed to prepare a meal and considered the presence of a guest as the only reason why they would prepare a meal. The mixed methods approach enabled us to link the participants’ reasoning with the quantitative differences between meals planned by them - HHC individuals planned healthier meals and manifested closeness to the act of cooking. This suggests that the link between health interest and learning how to cook deserves to be further explored. Planning is an essential component of home meal preparation. While level of health consciousness permeates both activities, this relationship is underexplored in the scientific literature. Using a mixed-methods convergent parallel design this study identified the reasoning behind meal planning and compared the characteristics of meals planned by high and low health-conscious adults during a simulated shopping task in a supermarket store. Participants were assigned a task where they were asked to choose ingredients to prepare a hot evening meal for a last-minute guest. High Health Conscious (HHC) participants planned healthier meals with more whole grains/breads/pasta, fruits, and vegetables than Low Health Conscious (LHC) participants. HHC participants mentioned not only health-related motives, but also ingredients' characteristics and cooking habits as influencers of their choices. LHC individuals focused on their own preferences, acknowledged that they struggled with the skills needed to prepare a meal and considered the presence of a guest as the only reason why they would prepare a meal. The mixed methods approach enabled us to link the participants’ reasoning with the quantitative differences between meals planned by them - HHC individuals planned healthier meals and manifested closeness to the act of cooking. This suggests that the link between health interest and learning how to cook deserves to be further explored. Meal quality Elsevier Healthy meals Elsevier Culinary practices Elsevier Homemade meals Elsevier Dinner Elsevier Meal planning Elsevier Botelho, Alyne M. oth Dean, Moira oth Fiates, Giovanna M.R. oth Enthalten in Elsevier Chen, Jiahui ELSEVIER Analysis of fracture interference – Coupling of flow and geomechanical computations with discrete fracture modeling using MRST 2022 determinants and consequences of eating and drinking Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV008716951 volume:144 year:2020 day:1 month:01 pages:0 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2019.104468 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA SSG-OPC-GGO 38.51 Geologie fossiler Brennstoffe VZ 57.36 Erdölgewinnung Erdgasgewinnung VZ AR 144 2020 1 0101 0 |
allfields_unstemmed |
10.1016/j.appet.2019.104468 doi /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000000836.pica (DE-627)ELV048524441 (ELSEVIER)S0195-6663(19)30555-0 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 660 VZ 38.51 bkl 57.36 bkl Camargo, Anice M. de verfasserin aut Meal planning by high and low health conscious individuals during a simulated shop in the supermarket: A mixed methods study 2020transfer abstract nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Planning is an essential component of home meal preparation. While level of health consciousness permeates both activities, this relationship is underexplored in the scientific literature. Using a mixed-methods convergent parallel design this study identified the reasoning behind meal planning and compared the characteristics of meals planned by high and low health-conscious adults during a simulated shopping task in a supermarket store. Participants were assigned a task where they were asked to choose ingredients to prepare a hot evening meal for a last-minute guest. High Health Conscious (HHC) participants planned healthier meals with more whole grains/breads/pasta, fruits, and vegetables than Low Health Conscious (LHC) participants. HHC participants mentioned not only health-related motives, but also ingredients' characteristics and cooking habits as influencers of their choices. LHC individuals focused on their own preferences, acknowledged that they struggled with the skills needed to prepare a meal and considered the presence of a guest as the only reason why they would prepare a meal. The mixed methods approach enabled us to link the participants’ reasoning with the quantitative differences between meals planned by them - HHC individuals planned healthier meals and manifested closeness to the act of cooking. This suggests that the link between health interest and learning how to cook deserves to be further explored. Planning is an essential component of home meal preparation. While level of health consciousness permeates both activities, this relationship is underexplored in the scientific literature. Using a mixed-methods convergent parallel design this study identified the reasoning behind meal planning and compared the characteristics of meals planned by high and low health-conscious adults during a simulated shopping task in a supermarket store. Participants were assigned a task where they were asked to choose ingredients to prepare a hot evening meal for a last-minute guest. High Health Conscious (HHC) participants planned healthier meals with more whole grains/breads/pasta, fruits, and vegetables than Low Health Conscious (LHC) participants. HHC participants mentioned not only health-related motives, but also ingredients' characteristics and cooking habits as influencers of their choices. LHC individuals focused on their own preferences, acknowledged that they struggled with the skills needed to prepare a meal and considered the presence of a guest as the only reason why they would prepare a meal. The mixed methods approach enabled us to link the participants’ reasoning with the quantitative differences between meals planned by them - HHC individuals planned healthier meals and manifested closeness to the act of cooking. This suggests that the link between health interest and learning how to cook deserves to be further explored. Meal quality Elsevier Healthy meals Elsevier Culinary practices Elsevier Homemade meals Elsevier Dinner Elsevier Meal planning Elsevier Botelho, Alyne M. oth Dean, Moira oth Fiates, Giovanna M.R. oth Enthalten in Elsevier Chen, Jiahui ELSEVIER Analysis of fracture interference – Coupling of flow and geomechanical computations with discrete fracture modeling using MRST 2022 determinants and consequences of eating and drinking Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV008716951 volume:144 year:2020 day:1 month:01 pages:0 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2019.104468 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA SSG-OPC-GGO 38.51 Geologie fossiler Brennstoffe VZ 57.36 Erdölgewinnung Erdgasgewinnung VZ AR 144 2020 1 0101 0 |
allfieldsGer |
10.1016/j.appet.2019.104468 doi /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000000836.pica (DE-627)ELV048524441 (ELSEVIER)S0195-6663(19)30555-0 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 660 VZ 38.51 bkl 57.36 bkl Camargo, Anice M. de verfasserin aut Meal planning by high and low health conscious individuals during a simulated shop in the supermarket: A mixed methods study 2020transfer abstract nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Planning is an essential component of home meal preparation. While level of health consciousness permeates both activities, this relationship is underexplored in the scientific literature. Using a mixed-methods convergent parallel design this study identified the reasoning behind meal planning and compared the characteristics of meals planned by high and low health-conscious adults during a simulated shopping task in a supermarket store. Participants were assigned a task where they were asked to choose ingredients to prepare a hot evening meal for a last-minute guest. High Health Conscious (HHC) participants planned healthier meals with more whole grains/breads/pasta, fruits, and vegetables than Low Health Conscious (LHC) participants. HHC participants mentioned not only health-related motives, but also ingredients' characteristics and cooking habits as influencers of their choices. LHC individuals focused on their own preferences, acknowledged that they struggled with the skills needed to prepare a meal and considered the presence of a guest as the only reason why they would prepare a meal. The mixed methods approach enabled us to link the participants’ reasoning with the quantitative differences between meals planned by them - HHC individuals planned healthier meals and manifested closeness to the act of cooking. This suggests that the link between health interest and learning how to cook deserves to be further explored. Planning is an essential component of home meal preparation. While level of health consciousness permeates both activities, this relationship is underexplored in the scientific literature. Using a mixed-methods convergent parallel design this study identified the reasoning behind meal planning and compared the characteristics of meals planned by high and low health-conscious adults during a simulated shopping task in a supermarket store. Participants were assigned a task where they were asked to choose ingredients to prepare a hot evening meal for a last-minute guest. High Health Conscious (HHC) participants planned healthier meals with more whole grains/breads/pasta, fruits, and vegetables than Low Health Conscious (LHC) participants. HHC participants mentioned not only health-related motives, but also ingredients' characteristics and cooking habits as influencers of their choices. LHC individuals focused on their own preferences, acknowledged that they struggled with the skills needed to prepare a meal and considered the presence of a guest as the only reason why they would prepare a meal. The mixed methods approach enabled us to link the participants’ reasoning with the quantitative differences between meals planned by them - HHC individuals planned healthier meals and manifested closeness to the act of cooking. This suggests that the link between health interest and learning how to cook deserves to be further explored. Meal quality Elsevier Healthy meals Elsevier Culinary practices Elsevier Homemade meals Elsevier Dinner Elsevier Meal planning Elsevier Botelho, Alyne M. oth Dean, Moira oth Fiates, Giovanna M.R. oth Enthalten in Elsevier Chen, Jiahui ELSEVIER Analysis of fracture interference – Coupling of flow and geomechanical computations with discrete fracture modeling using MRST 2022 determinants and consequences of eating and drinking Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV008716951 volume:144 year:2020 day:1 month:01 pages:0 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2019.104468 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA SSG-OPC-GGO 38.51 Geologie fossiler Brennstoffe VZ 57.36 Erdölgewinnung Erdgasgewinnung VZ AR 144 2020 1 0101 0 |
allfieldsSound |
10.1016/j.appet.2019.104468 doi /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000000836.pica (DE-627)ELV048524441 (ELSEVIER)S0195-6663(19)30555-0 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 660 VZ 38.51 bkl 57.36 bkl Camargo, Anice M. de verfasserin aut Meal planning by high and low health conscious individuals during a simulated shop in the supermarket: A mixed methods study 2020transfer abstract nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Planning is an essential component of home meal preparation. While level of health consciousness permeates both activities, this relationship is underexplored in the scientific literature. Using a mixed-methods convergent parallel design this study identified the reasoning behind meal planning and compared the characteristics of meals planned by high and low health-conscious adults during a simulated shopping task in a supermarket store. Participants were assigned a task where they were asked to choose ingredients to prepare a hot evening meal for a last-minute guest. High Health Conscious (HHC) participants planned healthier meals with more whole grains/breads/pasta, fruits, and vegetables than Low Health Conscious (LHC) participants. HHC participants mentioned not only health-related motives, but also ingredients' characteristics and cooking habits as influencers of their choices. LHC individuals focused on their own preferences, acknowledged that they struggled with the skills needed to prepare a meal and considered the presence of a guest as the only reason why they would prepare a meal. The mixed methods approach enabled us to link the participants’ reasoning with the quantitative differences between meals planned by them - HHC individuals planned healthier meals and manifested closeness to the act of cooking. This suggests that the link between health interest and learning how to cook deserves to be further explored. Planning is an essential component of home meal preparation. While level of health consciousness permeates both activities, this relationship is underexplored in the scientific literature. Using a mixed-methods convergent parallel design this study identified the reasoning behind meal planning and compared the characteristics of meals planned by high and low health-conscious adults during a simulated shopping task in a supermarket store. Participants were assigned a task where they were asked to choose ingredients to prepare a hot evening meal for a last-minute guest. High Health Conscious (HHC) participants planned healthier meals with more whole grains/breads/pasta, fruits, and vegetables than Low Health Conscious (LHC) participants. HHC participants mentioned not only health-related motives, but also ingredients' characteristics and cooking habits as influencers of their choices. LHC individuals focused on their own preferences, acknowledged that they struggled with the skills needed to prepare a meal and considered the presence of a guest as the only reason why they would prepare a meal. The mixed methods approach enabled us to link the participants’ reasoning with the quantitative differences between meals planned by them - HHC individuals planned healthier meals and manifested closeness to the act of cooking. This suggests that the link between health interest and learning how to cook deserves to be further explored. Meal quality Elsevier Healthy meals Elsevier Culinary practices Elsevier Homemade meals Elsevier Dinner Elsevier Meal planning Elsevier Botelho, Alyne M. oth Dean, Moira oth Fiates, Giovanna M.R. oth Enthalten in Elsevier Chen, Jiahui ELSEVIER Analysis of fracture interference – Coupling of flow and geomechanical computations with discrete fracture modeling using MRST 2022 determinants and consequences of eating and drinking Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV008716951 volume:144 year:2020 day:1 month:01 pages:0 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2019.104468 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA SSG-OPC-GGO 38.51 Geologie fossiler Brennstoffe VZ 57.36 Erdölgewinnung Erdgasgewinnung VZ AR 144 2020 1 0101 0 |
language |
English |
source |
Enthalten in Analysis of fracture interference – Coupling of flow and geomechanical computations with discrete fracture modeling using MRST Amsterdam [u.a.] volume:144 year:2020 day:1 month:01 pages:0 |
sourceStr |
Enthalten in Analysis of fracture interference – Coupling of flow and geomechanical computations with discrete fracture modeling using MRST Amsterdam [u.a.] volume:144 year:2020 day:1 month:01 pages:0 |
format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
bklname |
Geologie fossiler Brennstoffe Erdölgewinnung Erdgasgewinnung |
institution |
findex.gbv.de |
topic_facet |
Meal quality Healthy meals Culinary practices Homemade meals Dinner Meal planning |
dewey-raw |
660 |
isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
container_title |
Analysis of fracture interference – Coupling of flow and geomechanical computations with discrete fracture modeling using MRST |
authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Camargo, Anice M. de @@aut@@ Botelho, Alyne M. @@oth@@ Dean, Moira @@oth@@ Fiates, Giovanna M.R. @@oth@@ |
publishDateDaySort_date |
2020-01-01T00:00:00Z |
hierarchy_top_id |
ELV008716951 |
dewey-sort |
3660 |
id |
ELV048524441 |
language_de |
englisch |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV048524441</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230626022141.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">200108s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.appet.2019.104468</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">/cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000000836.pica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV048524441</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0195-6663(19)30555-0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">660</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">38.51</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">57.36</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Camargo, Anice M. de</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Meal planning by high and low health conscious individuals during a simulated shop in the supermarket: A mixed methods study</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2020transfer abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Planning is an essential component of home meal preparation. While level of health consciousness permeates both activities, this relationship is underexplored in the scientific literature. Using a mixed-methods convergent parallel design this study identified the reasoning behind meal planning and compared the characteristics of meals planned by high and low health-conscious adults during a simulated shopping task in a supermarket store. Participants were assigned a task where they were asked to choose ingredients to prepare a hot evening meal for a last-minute guest. High Health Conscious (HHC) participants planned healthier meals with more whole grains/breads/pasta, fruits, and vegetables than Low Health Conscious (LHC) participants. HHC participants mentioned not only health-related motives, but also ingredients' characteristics and cooking habits as influencers of their choices. LHC individuals focused on their own preferences, acknowledged that they struggled with the skills needed to prepare a meal and considered the presence of a guest as the only reason why they would prepare a meal. The mixed methods approach enabled us to link the participants’ reasoning with the quantitative differences between meals planned by them - HHC individuals planned healthier meals and manifested closeness to the act of cooking. This suggests that the link between health interest and learning how to cook deserves to be further explored.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Planning is an essential component of home meal preparation. While level of health consciousness permeates both activities, this relationship is underexplored in the scientific literature. Using a mixed-methods convergent parallel design this study identified the reasoning behind meal planning and compared the characteristics of meals planned by high and low health-conscious adults during a simulated shopping task in a supermarket store. Participants were assigned a task where they were asked to choose ingredients to prepare a hot evening meal for a last-minute guest. High Health Conscious (HHC) participants planned healthier meals with more whole grains/breads/pasta, fruits, and vegetables than Low Health Conscious (LHC) participants. HHC participants mentioned not only health-related motives, but also ingredients' characteristics and cooking habits as influencers of their choices. LHC individuals focused on their own preferences, acknowledged that they struggled with the skills needed to prepare a meal and considered the presence of a guest as the only reason why they would prepare a meal. The mixed methods approach enabled us to link the participants’ reasoning with the quantitative differences between meals planned by them - HHC individuals planned healthier meals and manifested closeness to the act of cooking. This suggests that the link between health interest and learning how to cook deserves to be further explored.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Meal quality</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Healthy meals</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Culinary practices</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Homemade meals</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Dinner</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Meal planning</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Botelho, Alyne M.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Dean, Moira</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Fiates, Giovanna M.R.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="n">Elsevier</subfield><subfield code="a">Chen, Jiahui ELSEVIER</subfield><subfield code="t">Analysis of fracture interference – Coupling of flow and geomechanical computations with discrete fracture modeling using MRST</subfield><subfield code="d">2022</subfield><subfield code="d">determinants and consequences of eating and drinking</subfield><subfield code="g">Amsterdam [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)ELV008716951</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:144</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2020</subfield><subfield code="g">day:1</subfield><subfield code="g">month:01</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2019.104468</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OPC-GGO</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">38.51</subfield><subfield code="j">Geologie fossiler Brennstoffe</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">57.36</subfield><subfield code="j">Erdölgewinnung</subfield><subfield code="j">Erdgasgewinnung</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">144</subfield><subfield code="j">2020</subfield><subfield code="b">1</subfield><subfield code="c">0101</subfield><subfield code="h">0</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
author |
Camargo, Anice M. de |
spellingShingle |
Camargo, Anice M. de ddc 660 bkl 38.51 bkl 57.36 Elsevier Meal quality Elsevier Healthy meals Elsevier Culinary practices Elsevier Homemade meals Elsevier Dinner Elsevier Meal planning Meal planning by high and low health conscious individuals during a simulated shop in the supermarket: A mixed methods study |
authorStr |
Camargo, Anice M. de |
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)ELV008716951 |
format |
electronic Article |
dewey-ones |
660 - Chemical engineering |
delete_txt_mv |
keep |
author_role |
aut |
collection |
elsevier |
remote_str |
true |
illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
topic_title |
660 VZ 38.51 bkl 57.36 bkl Meal planning by high and low health conscious individuals during a simulated shop in the supermarket: A mixed methods study Meal quality Elsevier Healthy meals Elsevier Culinary practices Elsevier Homemade meals Elsevier Dinner Elsevier Meal planning Elsevier |
topic |
ddc 660 bkl 38.51 bkl 57.36 Elsevier Meal quality Elsevier Healthy meals Elsevier Culinary practices Elsevier Homemade meals Elsevier Dinner Elsevier Meal planning |
topic_unstemmed |
ddc 660 bkl 38.51 bkl 57.36 Elsevier Meal quality Elsevier Healthy meals Elsevier Culinary practices Elsevier Homemade meals Elsevier Dinner Elsevier Meal planning |
topic_browse |
ddc 660 bkl 38.51 bkl 57.36 Elsevier Meal quality Elsevier Healthy meals Elsevier Culinary practices Elsevier Homemade meals Elsevier Dinner Elsevier Meal planning |
format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
carriertype_str_mv |
zu |
author2_variant |
a m b am amb m d md g m f gm gmf |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Analysis of fracture interference – Coupling of flow and geomechanical computations with discrete fracture modeling using MRST |
hierarchy_parent_id |
ELV008716951 |
dewey-tens |
660 - Chemical engineering |
hierarchy_top_title |
Analysis of fracture interference – Coupling of flow and geomechanical computations with discrete fracture modeling using MRST |
isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)ELV008716951 |
title |
Meal planning by high and low health conscious individuals during a simulated shop in the supermarket: A mixed methods study |
ctrlnum |
(DE-627)ELV048524441 (ELSEVIER)S0195-6663(19)30555-0 |
title_full |
Meal planning by high and low health conscious individuals during a simulated shop in the supermarket: A mixed methods study |
author_sort |
Camargo, Anice M. de |
journal |
Analysis of fracture interference – Coupling of flow and geomechanical computations with discrete fracture modeling using MRST |
journalStr |
Analysis of fracture interference – Coupling of flow and geomechanical computations with discrete fracture modeling using MRST |
lang_code |
eng |
isOA_bool |
false |
dewey-hundreds |
600 - Technology |
recordtype |
marc |
publishDateSort |
2020 |
contenttype_str_mv |
zzz |
container_start_page |
0 |
author_browse |
Camargo, Anice M. de |
container_volume |
144 |
class |
660 VZ 38.51 bkl 57.36 bkl |
format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
author-letter |
Camargo, Anice M. de |
doi_str_mv |
10.1016/j.appet.2019.104468 |
dewey-full |
660 |
title_sort |
meal planning by high and low health conscious individuals during a simulated shop in the supermarket: a mixed methods study |
title_auth |
Meal planning by high and low health conscious individuals during a simulated shop in the supermarket: A mixed methods study |
abstract |
Planning is an essential component of home meal preparation. While level of health consciousness permeates both activities, this relationship is underexplored in the scientific literature. Using a mixed-methods convergent parallel design this study identified the reasoning behind meal planning and compared the characteristics of meals planned by high and low health-conscious adults during a simulated shopping task in a supermarket store. Participants were assigned a task where they were asked to choose ingredients to prepare a hot evening meal for a last-minute guest. High Health Conscious (HHC) participants planned healthier meals with more whole grains/breads/pasta, fruits, and vegetables than Low Health Conscious (LHC) participants. HHC participants mentioned not only health-related motives, but also ingredients' characteristics and cooking habits as influencers of their choices. LHC individuals focused on their own preferences, acknowledged that they struggled with the skills needed to prepare a meal and considered the presence of a guest as the only reason why they would prepare a meal. The mixed methods approach enabled us to link the participants’ reasoning with the quantitative differences between meals planned by them - HHC individuals planned healthier meals and manifested closeness to the act of cooking. This suggests that the link between health interest and learning how to cook deserves to be further explored. |
abstractGer |
Planning is an essential component of home meal preparation. While level of health consciousness permeates both activities, this relationship is underexplored in the scientific literature. Using a mixed-methods convergent parallel design this study identified the reasoning behind meal planning and compared the characteristics of meals planned by high and low health-conscious adults during a simulated shopping task in a supermarket store. Participants were assigned a task where they were asked to choose ingredients to prepare a hot evening meal for a last-minute guest. High Health Conscious (HHC) participants planned healthier meals with more whole grains/breads/pasta, fruits, and vegetables than Low Health Conscious (LHC) participants. HHC participants mentioned not only health-related motives, but also ingredients' characteristics and cooking habits as influencers of their choices. LHC individuals focused on their own preferences, acknowledged that they struggled with the skills needed to prepare a meal and considered the presence of a guest as the only reason why they would prepare a meal. The mixed methods approach enabled us to link the participants’ reasoning with the quantitative differences between meals planned by them - HHC individuals planned healthier meals and manifested closeness to the act of cooking. This suggests that the link between health interest and learning how to cook deserves to be further explored. |
abstract_unstemmed |
Planning is an essential component of home meal preparation. While level of health consciousness permeates both activities, this relationship is underexplored in the scientific literature. Using a mixed-methods convergent parallel design this study identified the reasoning behind meal planning and compared the characteristics of meals planned by high and low health-conscious adults during a simulated shopping task in a supermarket store. Participants were assigned a task where they were asked to choose ingredients to prepare a hot evening meal for a last-minute guest. High Health Conscious (HHC) participants planned healthier meals with more whole grains/breads/pasta, fruits, and vegetables than Low Health Conscious (LHC) participants. HHC participants mentioned not only health-related motives, but also ingredients' characteristics and cooking habits as influencers of their choices. LHC individuals focused on their own preferences, acknowledged that they struggled with the skills needed to prepare a meal and considered the presence of a guest as the only reason why they would prepare a meal. The mixed methods approach enabled us to link the participants’ reasoning with the quantitative differences between meals planned by them - HHC individuals planned healthier meals and manifested closeness to the act of cooking. This suggests that the link between health interest and learning how to cook deserves to be further explored. |
collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA SSG-OPC-GGO |
title_short |
Meal planning by high and low health conscious individuals during a simulated shop in the supermarket: A mixed methods study |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2019.104468 |
remote_bool |
true |
author2 |
Botelho, Alyne M. Dean, Moira Fiates, Giovanna M.R. |
author2Str |
Botelho, Alyne M. Dean, Moira Fiates, Giovanna M.R. |
ppnlink |
ELV008716951 |
mediatype_str_mv |
z |
isOA_txt |
false |
hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
author2_role |
oth oth oth |
doi_str |
10.1016/j.appet.2019.104468 |
up_date |
2024-07-06T19:04:46.824Z |
_version_ |
1803857624379162624 |
fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV048524441</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230626022141.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">200108s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.appet.2019.104468</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">/cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000000836.pica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV048524441</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0195-6663(19)30555-0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">660</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">38.51</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">57.36</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Camargo, Anice M. de</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Meal planning by high and low health conscious individuals during a simulated shop in the supermarket: A mixed methods study</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2020transfer abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Planning is an essential component of home meal preparation. While level of health consciousness permeates both activities, this relationship is underexplored in the scientific literature. Using a mixed-methods convergent parallel design this study identified the reasoning behind meal planning and compared the characteristics of meals planned by high and low health-conscious adults during a simulated shopping task in a supermarket store. Participants were assigned a task where they were asked to choose ingredients to prepare a hot evening meal for a last-minute guest. High Health Conscious (HHC) participants planned healthier meals with more whole grains/breads/pasta, fruits, and vegetables than Low Health Conscious (LHC) participants. HHC participants mentioned not only health-related motives, but also ingredients' characteristics and cooking habits as influencers of their choices. LHC individuals focused on their own preferences, acknowledged that they struggled with the skills needed to prepare a meal and considered the presence of a guest as the only reason why they would prepare a meal. The mixed methods approach enabled us to link the participants’ reasoning with the quantitative differences between meals planned by them - HHC individuals planned healthier meals and manifested closeness to the act of cooking. This suggests that the link between health interest and learning how to cook deserves to be further explored.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Planning is an essential component of home meal preparation. While level of health consciousness permeates both activities, this relationship is underexplored in the scientific literature. Using a mixed-methods convergent parallel design this study identified the reasoning behind meal planning and compared the characteristics of meals planned by high and low health-conscious adults during a simulated shopping task in a supermarket store. Participants were assigned a task where they were asked to choose ingredients to prepare a hot evening meal for a last-minute guest. High Health Conscious (HHC) participants planned healthier meals with more whole grains/breads/pasta, fruits, and vegetables than Low Health Conscious (LHC) participants. HHC participants mentioned not only health-related motives, but also ingredients' characteristics and cooking habits as influencers of their choices. LHC individuals focused on their own preferences, acknowledged that they struggled with the skills needed to prepare a meal and considered the presence of a guest as the only reason why they would prepare a meal. The mixed methods approach enabled us to link the participants’ reasoning with the quantitative differences between meals planned by them - HHC individuals planned healthier meals and manifested closeness to the act of cooking. This suggests that the link between health interest and learning how to cook deserves to be further explored.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Meal quality</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Healthy meals</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Culinary practices</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Homemade meals</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Dinner</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Meal planning</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Botelho, Alyne M.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Dean, Moira</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Fiates, Giovanna M.R.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="n">Elsevier</subfield><subfield code="a">Chen, Jiahui ELSEVIER</subfield><subfield code="t">Analysis of fracture interference – Coupling of flow and geomechanical computations with discrete fracture modeling using MRST</subfield><subfield code="d">2022</subfield><subfield code="d">determinants and consequences of eating and drinking</subfield><subfield code="g">Amsterdam [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)ELV008716951</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:144</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2020</subfield><subfield code="g">day:1</subfield><subfield code="g">month:01</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2019.104468</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OPC-GGO</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">38.51</subfield><subfield code="j">Geologie fossiler Brennstoffe</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">57.36</subfield><subfield code="j">Erdölgewinnung</subfield><subfield code="j">Erdgasgewinnung</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">144</subfield><subfield code="j">2020</subfield><subfield code="b">1</subfield><subfield code="c">0101</subfield><subfield code="h">0</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
score |
7.3996964 |