Marginal reef paradox: A possible refuge from environmental changes?
The occurrence of coral reef communities under extreme and different-from-optimum conditions makes it possible to test hypotheses about resilience in the face of increasing local and global impacts. Recently, coastal marginal reefs have been hypothesized to provide refugia from natural and anthropog...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Soares, Marcelo de Oliveira [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2020transfer abstract |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Novel and emerging treatments for major depression - Marwaha, Steven ELSEVIER, 2023, Amsterdam [u.a.] |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:185 ; year:2020 ; day:1 ; month:03 ; pages:0 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2019.105063 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
ELV049072609 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ELV049072609 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230626023443.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 200128s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2019.105063 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001392.pica |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)ELV049072609 | ||
| 035 | |a (ELSEVIER)S0964-5691(19)30932-9 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Soares, Marcelo de Oliveira |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Marginal reef paradox: A possible refuge from environmental changes? |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2020transfer abstract | |
| 336 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zzz |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b z |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zu |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a The occurrence of coral reef communities under extreme and different-from-optimum conditions makes it possible to test hypotheses about resilience in the face of increasing local and global impacts. Recently, coastal marginal reefs have been hypothesized to provide refugia from natural and anthropogenic impacts. Herein, I present empirical evidence contradicting this assumption and explain a new idea, called the “marginal reef paradox”. The marginal reef paradox has two main contradictory concepts. First, the hypothesis that marginal reefs may be more resilient to global changes (such as global warming and heat waves) but less resilient to local ones (such as overfishing, runoff, local pollution, dredging, river discharge, and habitat destruction). Second, that despite the resilience to thermal stress, the marginal reefs are not refugia to other reef ecosystems owing to their vulnerability and because these reefs significantly differ from their tropical counterparts. Thus, marginal reefs such as turbid-zone and high-latitude reefs are ecologically distinct ecosystems and represent limited potential as refugia for other reef ecosystems. I also argue that marginal reefs are under severe anthropogenic pressure and in as much need of conservation actions as “classical” coral reefs. Moreover, their resilience will be lost within the next few decades if proper and urgent conservation actions are not taken. | ||
| 520 | |a The occurrence of coral reef communities under extreme and different-from-optimum conditions makes it possible to test hypotheses about resilience in the face of increasing local and global impacts. Recently, coastal marginal reefs have been hypothesized to provide refugia from natural and anthropogenic impacts. Herein, I present empirical evidence contradicting this assumption and explain a new idea, called the “marginal reef paradox”. The marginal reef paradox has two main contradictory concepts. First, the hypothesis that marginal reefs may be more resilient to global changes (such as global warming and heat waves) but less resilient to local ones (such as overfishing, runoff, local pollution, dredging, river discharge, and habitat destruction). Second, that despite the resilience to thermal stress, the marginal reefs are not refugia to other reef ecosystems owing to their vulnerability and because these reefs significantly differ from their tropical counterparts. Thus, marginal reefs such as turbid-zone and high-latitude reefs are ecologically distinct ecosystems and represent limited potential as refugia for other reef ecosystems. I also argue that marginal reefs are under severe anthropogenic pressure and in as much need of conservation actions as “classical” coral reefs. Moreover, their resilience will be lost within the next few decades if proper and urgent conservation actions are not taken. | ||
| 650 | 7 | |a Coral reefs |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Turbid-zone reefs |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Pollution |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Global warming |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a High-latitude reefs |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Resilience |2 Elsevier | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |n Elsevier Science |a Marwaha, Steven ELSEVIER |t Novel and emerging treatments for major depression |d 2023 |g Amsterdam [u.a.] |w (DE-627)ELV010017429 |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:185 |g year:2020 |g day:1 |g month:03 |g pages:0 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2019.105063 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_U | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ELV | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_U | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_20 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_22 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_23 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_30 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_40 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_70 | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 185 |j 2020 |b 1 |c 0301 |h 0 | ||
| author_variant |
m d o s mdo mdos |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
soaresmarcelodeoliveira:2020----:agnlefaaoaosbeeuermni |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2020transfer abstract |
| publishDate |
2020 |
| allfields |
10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2019.105063 doi /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001392.pica (DE-627)ELV049072609 (ELSEVIER)S0964-5691(19)30932-9 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Soares, Marcelo de Oliveira verfasserin aut Marginal reef paradox: A possible refuge from environmental changes? 2020transfer abstract nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier The occurrence of coral reef communities under extreme and different-from-optimum conditions makes it possible to test hypotheses about resilience in the face of increasing local and global impacts. Recently, coastal marginal reefs have been hypothesized to provide refugia from natural and anthropogenic impacts. Herein, I present empirical evidence contradicting this assumption and explain a new idea, called the “marginal reef paradox”. The marginal reef paradox has two main contradictory concepts. First, the hypothesis that marginal reefs may be more resilient to global changes (such as global warming and heat waves) but less resilient to local ones (such as overfishing, runoff, local pollution, dredging, river discharge, and habitat destruction). Second, that despite the resilience to thermal stress, the marginal reefs are not refugia to other reef ecosystems owing to their vulnerability and because these reefs significantly differ from their tropical counterparts. Thus, marginal reefs such as turbid-zone and high-latitude reefs are ecologically distinct ecosystems and represent limited potential as refugia for other reef ecosystems. I also argue that marginal reefs are under severe anthropogenic pressure and in as much need of conservation actions as “classical” coral reefs. Moreover, their resilience will be lost within the next few decades if proper and urgent conservation actions are not taken. The occurrence of coral reef communities under extreme and different-from-optimum conditions makes it possible to test hypotheses about resilience in the face of increasing local and global impacts. Recently, coastal marginal reefs have been hypothesized to provide refugia from natural and anthropogenic impacts. Herein, I present empirical evidence contradicting this assumption and explain a new idea, called the “marginal reef paradox”. The marginal reef paradox has two main contradictory concepts. First, the hypothesis that marginal reefs may be more resilient to global changes (such as global warming and heat waves) but less resilient to local ones (such as overfishing, runoff, local pollution, dredging, river discharge, and habitat destruction). Second, that despite the resilience to thermal stress, the marginal reefs are not refugia to other reef ecosystems owing to their vulnerability and because these reefs significantly differ from their tropical counterparts. Thus, marginal reefs such as turbid-zone and high-latitude reefs are ecologically distinct ecosystems and represent limited potential as refugia for other reef ecosystems. I also argue that marginal reefs are under severe anthropogenic pressure and in as much need of conservation actions as “classical” coral reefs. Moreover, their resilience will be lost within the next few decades if proper and urgent conservation actions are not taken. Coral reefs Elsevier Turbid-zone reefs Elsevier Pollution Elsevier Global warming Elsevier High-latitude reefs Elsevier Resilience Elsevier Enthalten in Elsevier Science Marwaha, Steven ELSEVIER Novel and emerging treatments for major depression 2023 Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV010017429 volume:185 year:2020 day:1 month:03 pages:0 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2019.105063 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_30 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_70 AR 185 2020 1 0301 0 |
| spelling |
10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2019.105063 doi /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001392.pica (DE-627)ELV049072609 (ELSEVIER)S0964-5691(19)30932-9 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Soares, Marcelo de Oliveira verfasserin aut Marginal reef paradox: A possible refuge from environmental changes? 2020transfer abstract nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier The occurrence of coral reef communities under extreme and different-from-optimum conditions makes it possible to test hypotheses about resilience in the face of increasing local and global impacts. Recently, coastal marginal reefs have been hypothesized to provide refugia from natural and anthropogenic impacts. Herein, I present empirical evidence contradicting this assumption and explain a new idea, called the “marginal reef paradox”. The marginal reef paradox has two main contradictory concepts. First, the hypothesis that marginal reefs may be more resilient to global changes (such as global warming and heat waves) but less resilient to local ones (such as overfishing, runoff, local pollution, dredging, river discharge, and habitat destruction). Second, that despite the resilience to thermal stress, the marginal reefs are not refugia to other reef ecosystems owing to their vulnerability and because these reefs significantly differ from their tropical counterparts. Thus, marginal reefs such as turbid-zone and high-latitude reefs are ecologically distinct ecosystems and represent limited potential as refugia for other reef ecosystems. I also argue that marginal reefs are under severe anthropogenic pressure and in as much need of conservation actions as “classical” coral reefs. Moreover, their resilience will be lost within the next few decades if proper and urgent conservation actions are not taken. The occurrence of coral reef communities under extreme and different-from-optimum conditions makes it possible to test hypotheses about resilience in the face of increasing local and global impacts. Recently, coastal marginal reefs have been hypothesized to provide refugia from natural and anthropogenic impacts. Herein, I present empirical evidence contradicting this assumption and explain a new idea, called the “marginal reef paradox”. The marginal reef paradox has two main contradictory concepts. First, the hypothesis that marginal reefs may be more resilient to global changes (such as global warming and heat waves) but less resilient to local ones (such as overfishing, runoff, local pollution, dredging, river discharge, and habitat destruction). Second, that despite the resilience to thermal stress, the marginal reefs are not refugia to other reef ecosystems owing to their vulnerability and because these reefs significantly differ from their tropical counterparts. Thus, marginal reefs such as turbid-zone and high-latitude reefs are ecologically distinct ecosystems and represent limited potential as refugia for other reef ecosystems. I also argue that marginal reefs are under severe anthropogenic pressure and in as much need of conservation actions as “classical” coral reefs. Moreover, their resilience will be lost within the next few decades if proper and urgent conservation actions are not taken. Coral reefs Elsevier Turbid-zone reefs Elsevier Pollution Elsevier Global warming Elsevier High-latitude reefs Elsevier Resilience Elsevier Enthalten in Elsevier Science Marwaha, Steven ELSEVIER Novel and emerging treatments for major depression 2023 Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV010017429 volume:185 year:2020 day:1 month:03 pages:0 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2019.105063 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_30 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_70 AR 185 2020 1 0301 0 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2019.105063 doi /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001392.pica (DE-627)ELV049072609 (ELSEVIER)S0964-5691(19)30932-9 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Soares, Marcelo de Oliveira verfasserin aut Marginal reef paradox: A possible refuge from environmental changes? 2020transfer abstract nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier The occurrence of coral reef communities under extreme and different-from-optimum conditions makes it possible to test hypotheses about resilience in the face of increasing local and global impacts. Recently, coastal marginal reefs have been hypothesized to provide refugia from natural and anthropogenic impacts. Herein, I present empirical evidence contradicting this assumption and explain a new idea, called the “marginal reef paradox”. The marginal reef paradox has two main contradictory concepts. First, the hypothesis that marginal reefs may be more resilient to global changes (such as global warming and heat waves) but less resilient to local ones (such as overfishing, runoff, local pollution, dredging, river discharge, and habitat destruction). Second, that despite the resilience to thermal stress, the marginal reefs are not refugia to other reef ecosystems owing to their vulnerability and because these reefs significantly differ from their tropical counterparts. Thus, marginal reefs such as turbid-zone and high-latitude reefs are ecologically distinct ecosystems and represent limited potential as refugia for other reef ecosystems. I also argue that marginal reefs are under severe anthropogenic pressure and in as much need of conservation actions as “classical” coral reefs. Moreover, their resilience will be lost within the next few decades if proper and urgent conservation actions are not taken. The occurrence of coral reef communities under extreme and different-from-optimum conditions makes it possible to test hypotheses about resilience in the face of increasing local and global impacts. Recently, coastal marginal reefs have been hypothesized to provide refugia from natural and anthropogenic impacts. Herein, I present empirical evidence contradicting this assumption and explain a new idea, called the “marginal reef paradox”. The marginal reef paradox has two main contradictory concepts. First, the hypothesis that marginal reefs may be more resilient to global changes (such as global warming and heat waves) but less resilient to local ones (such as overfishing, runoff, local pollution, dredging, river discharge, and habitat destruction). Second, that despite the resilience to thermal stress, the marginal reefs are not refugia to other reef ecosystems owing to their vulnerability and because these reefs significantly differ from their tropical counterparts. Thus, marginal reefs such as turbid-zone and high-latitude reefs are ecologically distinct ecosystems and represent limited potential as refugia for other reef ecosystems. I also argue that marginal reefs are under severe anthropogenic pressure and in as much need of conservation actions as “classical” coral reefs. Moreover, their resilience will be lost within the next few decades if proper and urgent conservation actions are not taken. Coral reefs Elsevier Turbid-zone reefs Elsevier Pollution Elsevier Global warming Elsevier High-latitude reefs Elsevier Resilience Elsevier Enthalten in Elsevier Science Marwaha, Steven ELSEVIER Novel and emerging treatments for major depression 2023 Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV010017429 volume:185 year:2020 day:1 month:03 pages:0 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2019.105063 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_30 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_70 AR 185 2020 1 0301 0 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2019.105063 doi /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001392.pica (DE-627)ELV049072609 (ELSEVIER)S0964-5691(19)30932-9 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Soares, Marcelo de Oliveira verfasserin aut Marginal reef paradox: A possible refuge from environmental changes? 2020transfer abstract nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier The occurrence of coral reef communities under extreme and different-from-optimum conditions makes it possible to test hypotheses about resilience in the face of increasing local and global impacts. Recently, coastal marginal reefs have been hypothesized to provide refugia from natural and anthropogenic impacts. Herein, I present empirical evidence contradicting this assumption and explain a new idea, called the “marginal reef paradox”. The marginal reef paradox has two main contradictory concepts. First, the hypothesis that marginal reefs may be more resilient to global changes (such as global warming and heat waves) but less resilient to local ones (such as overfishing, runoff, local pollution, dredging, river discharge, and habitat destruction). Second, that despite the resilience to thermal stress, the marginal reefs are not refugia to other reef ecosystems owing to their vulnerability and because these reefs significantly differ from their tropical counterparts. Thus, marginal reefs such as turbid-zone and high-latitude reefs are ecologically distinct ecosystems and represent limited potential as refugia for other reef ecosystems. I also argue that marginal reefs are under severe anthropogenic pressure and in as much need of conservation actions as “classical” coral reefs. Moreover, their resilience will be lost within the next few decades if proper and urgent conservation actions are not taken. The occurrence of coral reef communities under extreme and different-from-optimum conditions makes it possible to test hypotheses about resilience in the face of increasing local and global impacts. Recently, coastal marginal reefs have been hypothesized to provide refugia from natural and anthropogenic impacts. Herein, I present empirical evidence contradicting this assumption and explain a new idea, called the “marginal reef paradox”. The marginal reef paradox has two main contradictory concepts. First, the hypothesis that marginal reefs may be more resilient to global changes (such as global warming and heat waves) but less resilient to local ones (such as overfishing, runoff, local pollution, dredging, river discharge, and habitat destruction). Second, that despite the resilience to thermal stress, the marginal reefs are not refugia to other reef ecosystems owing to their vulnerability and because these reefs significantly differ from their tropical counterparts. Thus, marginal reefs such as turbid-zone and high-latitude reefs are ecologically distinct ecosystems and represent limited potential as refugia for other reef ecosystems. I also argue that marginal reefs are under severe anthropogenic pressure and in as much need of conservation actions as “classical” coral reefs. Moreover, their resilience will be lost within the next few decades if proper and urgent conservation actions are not taken. Coral reefs Elsevier Turbid-zone reefs Elsevier Pollution Elsevier Global warming Elsevier High-latitude reefs Elsevier Resilience Elsevier Enthalten in Elsevier Science Marwaha, Steven ELSEVIER Novel and emerging treatments for major depression 2023 Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV010017429 volume:185 year:2020 day:1 month:03 pages:0 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2019.105063 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_30 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_70 AR 185 2020 1 0301 0 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2019.105063 doi /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001392.pica (DE-627)ELV049072609 (ELSEVIER)S0964-5691(19)30932-9 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Soares, Marcelo de Oliveira verfasserin aut Marginal reef paradox: A possible refuge from environmental changes? 2020transfer abstract nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier The occurrence of coral reef communities under extreme and different-from-optimum conditions makes it possible to test hypotheses about resilience in the face of increasing local and global impacts. Recently, coastal marginal reefs have been hypothesized to provide refugia from natural and anthropogenic impacts. Herein, I present empirical evidence contradicting this assumption and explain a new idea, called the “marginal reef paradox”. The marginal reef paradox has two main contradictory concepts. First, the hypothesis that marginal reefs may be more resilient to global changes (such as global warming and heat waves) but less resilient to local ones (such as overfishing, runoff, local pollution, dredging, river discharge, and habitat destruction). Second, that despite the resilience to thermal stress, the marginal reefs are not refugia to other reef ecosystems owing to their vulnerability and because these reefs significantly differ from their tropical counterparts. Thus, marginal reefs such as turbid-zone and high-latitude reefs are ecologically distinct ecosystems and represent limited potential as refugia for other reef ecosystems. I also argue that marginal reefs are under severe anthropogenic pressure and in as much need of conservation actions as “classical” coral reefs. Moreover, their resilience will be lost within the next few decades if proper and urgent conservation actions are not taken. The occurrence of coral reef communities under extreme and different-from-optimum conditions makes it possible to test hypotheses about resilience in the face of increasing local and global impacts. Recently, coastal marginal reefs have been hypothesized to provide refugia from natural and anthropogenic impacts. Herein, I present empirical evidence contradicting this assumption and explain a new idea, called the “marginal reef paradox”. The marginal reef paradox has two main contradictory concepts. First, the hypothesis that marginal reefs may be more resilient to global changes (such as global warming and heat waves) but less resilient to local ones (such as overfishing, runoff, local pollution, dredging, river discharge, and habitat destruction). Second, that despite the resilience to thermal stress, the marginal reefs are not refugia to other reef ecosystems owing to their vulnerability and because these reefs significantly differ from their tropical counterparts. Thus, marginal reefs such as turbid-zone and high-latitude reefs are ecologically distinct ecosystems and represent limited potential as refugia for other reef ecosystems. I also argue that marginal reefs are under severe anthropogenic pressure and in as much need of conservation actions as “classical” coral reefs. Moreover, their resilience will be lost within the next few decades if proper and urgent conservation actions are not taken. Coral reefs Elsevier Turbid-zone reefs Elsevier Pollution Elsevier Global warming Elsevier High-latitude reefs Elsevier Resilience Elsevier Enthalten in Elsevier Science Marwaha, Steven ELSEVIER Novel and emerging treatments for major depression 2023 Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV010017429 volume:185 year:2020 day:1 month:03 pages:0 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2019.105063 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_30 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_70 AR 185 2020 1 0301 0 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in Novel and emerging treatments for major depression Amsterdam [u.a.] volume:185 year:2020 day:1 month:03 pages:0 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in Novel and emerging treatments for major depression Amsterdam [u.a.] volume:185 year:2020 day:1 month:03 pages:0 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
Coral reefs Turbid-zone reefs Pollution Global warming High-latitude reefs Resilience |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
Novel and emerging treatments for major depression |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Soares, Marcelo de Oliveira @@aut@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2020-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
ELV010017429 |
| id |
ELV049072609 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV049072609</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230626023443.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">200128s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2019.105063</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">/cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001392.pica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV049072609</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0964-5691(19)30932-9</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Soares, Marcelo de Oliveira</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Marginal reef paradox: A possible refuge from environmental changes?</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2020transfer abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The occurrence of coral reef communities under extreme and different-from-optimum conditions makes it possible to test hypotheses about resilience in the face of increasing local and global impacts. Recently, coastal marginal reefs have been hypothesized to provide refugia from natural and anthropogenic impacts. Herein, I present empirical evidence contradicting this assumption and explain a new idea, called the “marginal reef paradox”. The marginal reef paradox has two main contradictory concepts. First, the hypothesis that marginal reefs may be more resilient to global changes (such as global warming and heat waves) but less resilient to local ones (such as overfishing, runoff, local pollution, dredging, river discharge, and habitat destruction). Second, that despite the resilience to thermal stress, the marginal reefs are not refugia to other reef ecosystems owing to their vulnerability and because these reefs significantly differ from their tropical counterparts. Thus, marginal reefs such as turbid-zone and high-latitude reefs are ecologically distinct ecosystems and represent limited potential as refugia for other reef ecosystems. I also argue that marginal reefs are under severe anthropogenic pressure and in as much need of conservation actions as “classical” coral reefs. Moreover, their resilience will be lost within the next few decades if proper and urgent conservation actions are not taken.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The occurrence of coral reef communities under extreme and different-from-optimum conditions makes it possible to test hypotheses about resilience in the face of increasing local and global impacts. Recently, coastal marginal reefs have been hypothesized to provide refugia from natural and anthropogenic impacts. Herein, I present empirical evidence contradicting this assumption and explain a new idea, called the “marginal reef paradox”. The marginal reef paradox has two main contradictory concepts. First, the hypothesis that marginal reefs may be more resilient to global changes (such as global warming and heat waves) but less resilient to local ones (such as overfishing, runoff, local pollution, dredging, river discharge, and habitat destruction). Second, that despite the resilience to thermal stress, the marginal reefs are not refugia to other reef ecosystems owing to their vulnerability and because these reefs significantly differ from their tropical counterparts. Thus, marginal reefs such as turbid-zone and high-latitude reefs are ecologically distinct ecosystems and represent limited potential as refugia for other reef ecosystems. I also argue that marginal reefs are under severe anthropogenic pressure and in as much need of conservation actions as “classical” coral reefs. Moreover, their resilience will be lost within the next few decades if proper and urgent conservation actions are not taken.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Coral reefs</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Turbid-zone reefs</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Pollution</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Global warming</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">High-latitude reefs</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Resilience</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="n">Elsevier Science</subfield><subfield code="a">Marwaha, Steven ELSEVIER</subfield><subfield code="t">Novel and emerging treatments for major depression</subfield><subfield code="d">2023</subfield><subfield code="g">Amsterdam [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)ELV010017429</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:185</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2020</subfield><subfield code="g">day:1</subfield><subfield code="g">month:03</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2019.105063</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_30</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">185</subfield><subfield code="j">2020</subfield><subfield code="b">1</subfield><subfield code="c">0301</subfield><subfield code="h">0</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Soares, Marcelo de Oliveira |
| spellingShingle |
Soares, Marcelo de Oliveira Elsevier Coral reefs Elsevier Turbid-zone reefs Elsevier Pollution Elsevier Global warming Elsevier High-latitude reefs Elsevier Resilience Marginal reef paradox: A possible refuge from environmental changes? |
| authorStr |
Soares, Marcelo de Oliveira |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)ELV010017429 |
| format |
electronic Article |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut |
| collection |
elsevier |
| remote_str |
true |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| topic_title |
Marginal reef paradox: A possible refuge from environmental changes? Coral reefs Elsevier Turbid-zone reefs Elsevier Pollution Elsevier Global warming Elsevier High-latitude reefs Elsevier Resilience Elsevier |
| topic |
Elsevier Coral reefs Elsevier Turbid-zone reefs Elsevier Pollution Elsevier Global warming Elsevier High-latitude reefs Elsevier Resilience |
| topic_unstemmed |
Elsevier Coral reefs Elsevier Turbid-zone reefs Elsevier Pollution Elsevier Global warming Elsevier High-latitude reefs Elsevier Resilience |
| topic_browse |
Elsevier Coral reefs Elsevier Turbid-zone reefs Elsevier Pollution Elsevier Global warming Elsevier High-latitude reefs Elsevier Resilience |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
zu |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Novel and emerging treatments for major depression |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
ELV010017429 |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Novel and emerging treatments for major depression |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)ELV010017429 |
| title |
Marginal reef paradox: A possible refuge from environmental changes? |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)ELV049072609 (ELSEVIER)S0964-5691(19)30932-9 |
| title_full |
Marginal reef paradox: A possible refuge from environmental changes? |
| author_sort |
Soares, Marcelo de Oliveira |
| journal |
Novel and emerging treatments for major depression |
| journalStr |
Novel and emerging treatments for major depression |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2020 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
zzz |
| container_start_page |
0 |
| author_browse |
Soares, Marcelo de Oliveira |
| container_volume |
185 |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Soares, Marcelo de Oliveira |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2019.105063 |
| title_sort |
marginal reef paradox: a possible refuge from environmental changes? |
| title_auth |
Marginal reef paradox: A possible refuge from environmental changes? |
| abstract |
The occurrence of coral reef communities under extreme and different-from-optimum conditions makes it possible to test hypotheses about resilience in the face of increasing local and global impacts. Recently, coastal marginal reefs have been hypothesized to provide refugia from natural and anthropogenic impacts. Herein, I present empirical evidence contradicting this assumption and explain a new idea, called the “marginal reef paradox”. The marginal reef paradox has two main contradictory concepts. First, the hypothesis that marginal reefs may be more resilient to global changes (such as global warming and heat waves) but less resilient to local ones (such as overfishing, runoff, local pollution, dredging, river discharge, and habitat destruction). Second, that despite the resilience to thermal stress, the marginal reefs are not refugia to other reef ecosystems owing to their vulnerability and because these reefs significantly differ from their tropical counterparts. Thus, marginal reefs such as turbid-zone and high-latitude reefs are ecologically distinct ecosystems and represent limited potential as refugia for other reef ecosystems. I also argue that marginal reefs are under severe anthropogenic pressure and in as much need of conservation actions as “classical” coral reefs. Moreover, their resilience will be lost within the next few decades if proper and urgent conservation actions are not taken. |
| abstractGer |
The occurrence of coral reef communities under extreme and different-from-optimum conditions makes it possible to test hypotheses about resilience in the face of increasing local and global impacts. Recently, coastal marginal reefs have been hypothesized to provide refugia from natural and anthropogenic impacts. Herein, I present empirical evidence contradicting this assumption and explain a new idea, called the “marginal reef paradox”. The marginal reef paradox has two main contradictory concepts. First, the hypothesis that marginal reefs may be more resilient to global changes (such as global warming and heat waves) but less resilient to local ones (such as overfishing, runoff, local pollution, dredging, river discharge, and habitat destruction). Second, that despite the resilience to thermal stress, the marginal reefs are not refugia to other reef ecosystems owing to their vulnerability and because these reefs significantly differ from their tropical counterparts. Thus, marginal reefs such as turbid-zone and high-latitude reefs are ecologically distinct ecosystems and represent limited potential as refugia for other reef ecosystems. I also argue that marginal reefs are under severe anthropogenic pressure and in as much need of conservation actions as “classical” coral reefs. Moreover, their resilience will be lost within the next few decades if proper and urgent conservation actions are not taken. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
The occurrence of coral reef communities under extreme and different-from-optimum conditions makes it possible to test hypotheses about resilience in the face of increasing local and global impacts. Recently, coastal marginal reefs have been hypothesized to provide refugia from natural and anthropogenic impacts. Herein, I present empirical evidence contradicting this assumption and explain a new idea, called the “marginal reef paradox”. The marginal reef paradox has two main contradictory concepts. First, the hypothesis that marginal reefs may be more resilient to global changes (such as global warming and heat waves) but less resilient to local ones (such as overfishing, runoff, local pollution, dredging, river discharge, and habitat destruction). Second, that despite the resilience to thermal stress, the marginal reefs are not refugia to other reef ecosystems owing to their vulnerability and because these reefs significantly differ from their tropical counterparts. Thus, marginal reefs such as turbid-zone and high-latitude reefs are ecologically distinct ecosystems and represent limited potential as refugia for other reef ecosystems. I also argue that marginal reefs are under severe anthropogenic pressure and in as much need of conservation actions as “classical” coral reefs. Moreover, their resilience will be lost within the next few decades if proper and urgent conservation actions are not taken. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_30 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_70 |
| title_short |
Marginal reef paradox: A possible refuge from environmental changes? |
| url |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2019.105063 |
| remote_bool |
true |
| ppnlink |
ELV010017429 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
z |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| doi_str |
10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2019.105063 |
| up_date |
2024-07-06T20:33:50.997Z |
| _version_ |
1803863228152807424 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV049072609</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230626023443.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">200128s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2019.105063</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">/cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001392.pica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV049072609</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0964-5691(19)30932-9</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Soares, Marcelo de Oliveira</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Marginal reef paradox: A possible refuge from environmental changes?</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2020transfer abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The occurrence of coral reef communities under extreme and different-from-optimum conditions makes it possible to test hypotheses about resilience in the face of increasing local and global impacts. Recently, coastal marginal reefs have been hypothesized to provide refugia from natural and anthropogenic impacts. Herein, I present empirical evidence contradicting this assumption and explain a new idea, called the “marginal reef paradox”. The marginal reef paradox has two main contradictory concepts. First, the hypothesis that marginal reefs may be more resilient to global changes (such as global warming and heat waves) but less resilient to local ones (such as overfishing, runoff, local pollution, dredging, river discharge, and habitat destruction). Second, that despite the resilience to thermal stress, the marginal reefs are not refugia to other reef ecosystems owing to their vulnerability and because these reefs significantly differ from their tropical counterparts. Thus, marginal reefs such as turbid-zone and high-latitude reefs are ecologically distinct ecosystems and represent limited potential as refugia for other reef ecosystems. I also argue that marginal reefs are under severe anthropogenic pressure and in as much need of conservation actions as “classical” coral reefs. Moreover, their resilience will be lost within the next few decades if proper and urgent conservation actions are not taken.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The occurrence of coral reef communities under extreme and different-from-optimum conditions makes it possible to test hypotheses about resilience in the face of increasing local and global impacts. Recently, coastal marginal reefs have been hypothesized to provide refugia from natural and anthropogenic impacts. Herein, I present empirical evidence contradicting this assumption and explain a new idea, called the “marginal reef paradox”. The marginal reef paradox has two main contradictory concepts. First, the hypothesis that marginal reefs may be more resilient to global changes (such as global warming and heat waves) but less resilient to local ones (such as overfishing, runoff, local pollution, dredging, river discharge, and habitat destruction). Second, that despite the resilience to thermal stress, the marginal reefs are not refugia to other reef ecosystems owing to their vulnerability and because these reefs significantly differ from their tropical counterparts. Thus, marginal reefs such as turbid-zone and high-latitude reefs are ecologically distinct ecosystems and represent limited potential as refugia for other reef ecosystems. I also argue that marginal reefs are under severe anthropogenic pressure and in as much need of conservation actions as “classical” coral reefs. Moreover, their resilience will be lost within the next few decades if proper and urgent conservation actions are not taken.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Coral reefs</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Turbid-zone reefs</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Pollution</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Global warming</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">High-latitude reefs</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Resilience</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="n">Elsevier Science</subfield><subfield code="a">Marwaha, Steven ELSEVIER</subfield><subfield code="t">Novel and emerging treatments for major depression</subfield><subfield code="d">2023</subfield><subfield code="g">Amsterdam [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)ELV010017429</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:185</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2020</subfield><subfield code="g">day:1</subfield><subfield code="g">month:03</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2019.105063</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_30</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">185</subfield><subfield code="j">2020</subfield><subfield code="b">1</subfield><subfield code="c">0301</subfield><subfield code="h">0</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.399356 |