Recording and interpreting enamel hypoplasia in samples from archaeological and palaeoanthropological contexts
Enamel hypoplasia is often split into several macroscopic categories, including pit, localised, linear and plane-form defects. All types have been considered a sign of ‘non-specific stress’ during dental development in archaeological, as well as palaeoanthropological and other samples. There is grow...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Towle, Ian [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2020transfer abstract |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Efficient representation and counting of antipower factors in words - Kociumaka, Tomasz ELSEVIER, 2021, Amsterdam [u.a.] |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:114 ; year:2020 ; pages:0 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1016/j.jas.2020.105077 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
ELV049194925 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ELV049194925 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230626023728.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 200518s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.jas.2020.105077 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001005.pica |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)ELV049194925 | ||
| 035 | |a (ELSEVIER)S0305-4403(18)30652-6 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 330 |a 004 |q VZ |
| 084 | |a LING |q DE-30 |2 fid | ||
| 084 | |a 54.00 |2 bkl | ||
| 084 | |a 31.80 |2 bkl | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Towle, Ian |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Recording and interpreting enamel hypoplasia in samples from archaeological and palaeoanthropological contexts |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2020transfer abstract | |
| 336 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zzz |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b z |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zu |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Enamel hypoplasia is often split into several macroscopic categories, including pit, localised, linear and plane-form defects. All types have been considered a sign of ‘non-specific stress’ during dental development in archaeological, as well as palaeoanthropological and other samples. There is growing evidence suggesting many defects may not be caused by illness or malnutrition during childhood, instead relating to trauma to the developing tooth, genetic conditions or specific environmental factors, i.e., may not be associated with ‘stress’ to the individual. In this study all types of macroscopic enamel hypoplasia were recorded, including pitting, linear, plane and localised type defects, in two extant great ape species and three fossil hominin species. The aim is to compare the characteristics and prevalence of different types of enamel hypoplasia among species and discuss potential differences in aetiology. The results show that samples have diverse prevalence's of different kinds of defects, and pitting, linear and localised defects likely have different aetiologies. Additionally, dental characteristics (e.g., tooth morphology, developmental timing/speed and enamel structure) heavily influence the likelihood of specific types of enamel hypoplasia forming. In sum, studies that include only one type of enamel hypoplasia, or focus on one tooth type, to generate a ‘stress’ rating for a sample may miss relevant information when comparing groups. Instead, it may be beneficial to record different types of defects separately, for all teeth, and then consider how genetic, environmental and tooth property factors may influence sample differences. | ||
| 520 | |a Enamel hypoplasia is often split into several macroscopic categories, including pit, localised, linear and plane-form defects. All types have been considered a sign of ‘non-specific stress’ during dental development in archaeological, as well as palaeoanthropological and other samples. There is growing evidence suggesting many defects may not be caused by illness or malnutrition during childhood, instead relating to trauma to the developing tooth, genetic conditions or specific environmental factors, i.e., may not be associated with ‘stress’ to the individual. In this study all types of macroscopic enamel hypoplasia were recorded, including pitting, linear, plane and localised type defects, in two extant great ape species and three fossil hominin species. The aim is to compare the characteristics and prevalence of different types of enamel hypoplasia among species and discuss potential differences in aetiology. The results show that samples have diverse prevalence's of different kinds of defects, and pitting, linear and localised defects likely have different aetiologies. Additionally, dental characteristics (e.g., tooth morphology, developmental timing/speed and enamel structure) heavily influence the likelihood of specific types of enamel hypoplasia forming. In sum, studies that include only one type of enamel hypoplasia, or focus on one tooth type, to generate a ‘stress’ rating for a sample may miss relevant information when comparing groups. Instead, it may be beneficial to record different types of defects separately, for all teeth, and then consider how genetic, environmental and tooth property factors may influence sample differences. | ||
| 650 | 7 | |a Dental development |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Linear enamel hypoplasia |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Pitting enamel hypoplasia |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Fossil hominins |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Primates |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Dental defects |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Amelogenesis imperfecta |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Localised enamel hypoplasia |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Stress |2 Elsevier | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Irish, Joel D. |4 oth | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |n Elsevier |a Kociumaka, Tomasz ELSEVIER |t Efficient representation and counting of antipower factors in words |d 2021 |g Amsterdam [u.a.] |w (DE-627)ELV008027838 |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:114 |g year:2020 |g pages:0 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2020.105077 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_U | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ELV | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_U | ||
| 912 | |a FID-LING | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OPC-MAT | ||
| 936 | b | k | |a 54.00 |j Informatik: Allgemeines |q VZ |
| 936 | b | k | |a 31.80 |j Angewandte Mathematik |q VZ |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 114 |j 2020 |h 0 | ||
| author_variant |
i t it |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
towleianirishjoeld:2020----:eodnadnepeignmlyolsanapefoacaooiaada |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2020transfer abstract |
| bklnumber |
54.00 31.80 |
| publishDate |
2020 |
| allfields |
10.1016/j.jas.2020.105077 doi /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001005.pica (DE-627)ELV049194925 (ELSEVIER)S0305-4403(18)30652-6 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 330 004 VZ LING DE-30 fid 54.00 bkl 31.80 bkl Towle, Ian verfasserin aut Recording and interpreting enamel hypoplasia in samples from archaeological and palaeoanthropological contexts 2020transfer abstract nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Enamel hypoplasia is often split into several macroscopic categories, including pit, localised, linear and plane-form defects. All types have been considered a sign of ‘non-specific stress’ during dental development in archaeological, as well as palaeoanthropological and other samples. There is growing evidence suggesting many defects may not be caused by illness or malnutrition during childhood, instead relating to trauma to the developing tooth, genetic conditions or specific environmental factors, i.e., may not be associated with ‘stress’ to the individual. In this study all types of macroscopic enamel hypoplasia were recorded, including pitting, linear, plane and localised type defects, in two extant great ape species and three fossil hominin species. The aim is to compare the characteristics and prevalence of different types of enamel hypoplasia among species and discuss potential differences in aetiology. The results show that samples have diverse prevalence's of different kinds of defects, and pitting, linear and localised defects likely have different aetiologies. Additionally, dental characteristics (e.g., tooth morphology, developmental timing/speed and enamel structure) heavily influence the likelihood of specific types of enamel hypoplasia forming. In sum, studies that include only one type of enamel hypoplasia, or focus on one tooth type, to generate a ‘stress’ rating for a sample may miss relevant information when comparing groups. Instead, it may be beneficial to record different types of defects separately, for all teeth, and then consider how genetic, environmental and tooth property factors may influence sample differences. Enamel hypoplasia is often split into several macroscopic categories, including pit, localised, linear and plane-form defects. All types have been considered a sign of ‘non-specific stress’ during dental development in archaeological, as well as palaeoanthropological and other samples. There is growing evidence suggesting many defects may not be caused by illness or malnutrition during childhood, instead relating to trauma to the developing tooth, genetic conditions or specific environmental factors, i.e., may not be associated with ‘stress’ to the individual. In this study all types of macroscopic enamel hypoplasia were recorded, including pitting, linear, plane and localised type defects, in two extant great ape species and three fossil hominin species. The aim is to compare the characteristics and prevalence of different types of enamel hypoplasia among species and discuss potential differences in aetiology. The results show that samples have diverse prevalence's of different kinds of defects, and pitting, linear and localised defects likely have different aetiologies. Additionally, dental characteristics (e.g., tooth morphology, developmental timing/speed and enamel structure) heavily influence the likelihood of specific types of enamel hypoplasia forming. In sum, studies that include only one type of enamel hypoplasia, or focus on one tooth type, to generate a ‘stress’ rating for a sample may miss relevant information when comparing groups. Instead, it may be beneficial to record different types of defects separately, for all teeth, and then consider how genetic, environmental and tooth property factors may influence sample differences. Dental development Elsevier Linear enamel hypoplasia Elsevier Pitting enamel hypoplasia Elsevier Fossil hominins Elsevier Primates Elsevier Dental defects Elsevier Amelogenesis imperfecta Elsevier Localised enamel hypoplasia Elsevier Stress Elsevier Irish, Joel D. oth Enthalten in Elsevier Kociumaka, Tomasz ELSEVIER Efficient representation and counting of antipower factors in words 2021 Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV008027838 volume:114 year:2020 pages:0 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2020.105077 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U FID-LING SSG-OPC-MAT 54.00 Informatik: Allgemeines VZ 31.80 Angewandte Mathematik VZ AR 114 2020 0 |
| spelling |
10.1016/j.jas.2020.105077 doi /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001005.pica (DE-627)ELV049194925 (ELSEVIER)S0305-4403(18)30652-6 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 330 004 VZ LING DE-30 fid 54.00 bkl 31.80 bkl Towle, Ian verfasserin aut Recording and interpreting enamel hypoplasia in samples from archaeological and palaeoanthropological contexts 2020transfer abstract nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Enamel hypoplasia is often split into several macroscopic categories, including pit, localised, linear and plane-form defects. All types have been considered a sign of ‘non-specific stress’ during dental development in archaeological, as well as palaeoanthropological and other samples. There is growing evidence suggesting many defects may not be caused by illness or malnutrition during childhood, instead relating to trauma to the developing tooth, genetic conditions or specific environmental factors, i.e., may not be associated with ‘stress’ to the individual. In this study all types of macroscopic enamel hypoplasia were recorded, including pitting, linear, plane and localised type defects, in two extant great ape species and three fossil hominin species. The aim is to compare the characteristics and prevalence of different types of enamel hypoplasia among species and discuss potential differences in aetiology. The results show that samples have diverse prevalence's of different kinds of defects, and pitting, linear and localised defects likely have different aetiologies. Additionally, dental characteristics (e.g., tooth morphology, developmental timing/speed and enamel structure) heavily influence the likelihood of specific types of enamel hypoplasia forming. In sum, studies that include only one type of enamel hypoplasia, or focus on one tooth type, to generate a ‘stress’ rating for a sample may miss relevant information when comparing groups. Instead, it may be beneficial to record different types of defects separately, for all teeth, and then consider how genetic, environmental and tooth property factors may influence sample differences. Enamel hypoplasia is often split into several macroscopic categories, including pit, localised, linear and plane-form defects. All types have been considered a sign of ‘non-specific stress’ during dental development in archaeological, as well as palaeoanthropological and other samples. There is growing evidence suggesting many defects may not be caused by illness or malnutrition during childhood, instead relating to trauma to the developing tooth, genetic conditions or specific environmental factors, i.e., may not be associated with ‘stress’ to the individual. In this study all types of macroscopic enamel hypoplasia were recorded, including pitting, linear, plane and localised type defects, in two extant great ape species and three fossil hominin species. The aim is to compare the characteristics and prevalence of different types of enamel hypoplasia among species and discuss potential differences in aetiology. The results show that samples have diverse prevalence's of different kinds of defects, and pitting, linear and localised defects likely have different aetiologies. Additionally, dental characteristics (e.g., tooth morphology, developmental timing/speed and enamel structure) heavily influence the likelihood of specific types of enamel hypoplasia forming. In sum, studies that include only one type of enamel hypoplasia, or focus on one tooth type, to generate a ‘stress’ rating for a sample may miss relevant information when comparing groups. Instead, it may be beneficial to record different types of defects separately, for all teeth, and then consider how genetic, environmental and tooth property factors may influence sample differences. Dental development Elsevier Linear enamel hypoplasia Elsevier Pitting enamel hypoplasia Elsevier Fossil hominins Elsevier Primates Elsevier Dental defects Elsevier Amelogenesis imperfecta Elsevier Localised enamel hypoplasia Elsevier Stress Elsevier Irish, Joel D. oth Enthalten in Elsevier Kociumaka, Tomasz ELSEVIER Efficient representation and counting of antipower factors in words 2021 Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV008027838 volume:114 year:2020 pages:0 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2020.105077 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U FID-LING SSG-OPC-MAT 54.00 Informatik: Allgemeines VZ 31.80 Angewandte Mathematik VZ AR 114 2020 0 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1016/j.jas.2020.105077 doi /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001005.pica (DE-627)ELV049194925 (ELSEVIER)S0305-4403(18)30652-6 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 330 004 VZ LING DE-30 fid 54.00 bkl 31.80 bkl Towle, Ian verfasserin aut Recording and interpreting enamel hypoplasia in samples from archaeological and palaeoanthropological contexts 2020transfer abstract nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Enamel hypoplasia is often split into several macroscopic categories, including pit, localised, linear and plane-form defects. All types have been considered a sign of ‘non-specific stress’ during dental development in archaeological, as well as palaeoanthropological and other samples. There is growing evidence suggesting many defects may not be caused by illness or malnutrition during childhood, instead relating to trauma to the developing tooth, genetic conditions or specific environmental factors, i.e., may not be associated with ‘stress’ to the individual. In this study all types of macroscopic enamel hypoplasia were recorded, including pitting, linear, plane and localised type defects, in two extant great ape species and three fossil hominin species. The aim is to compare the characteristics and prevalence of different types of enamel hypoplasia among species and discuss potential differences in aetiology. The results show that samples have diverse prevalence's of different kinds of defects, and pitting, linear and localised defects likely have different aetiologies. Additionally, dental characteristics (e.g., tooth morphology, developmental timing/speed and enamel structure) heavily influence the likelihood of specific types of enamel hypoplasia forming. In sum, studies that include only one type of enamel hypoplasia, or focus on one tooth type, to generate a ‘stress’ rating for a sample may miss relevant information when comparing groups. Instead, it may be beneficial to record different types of defects separately, for all teeth, and then consider how genetic, environmental and tooth property factors may influence sample differences. Enamel hypoplasia is often split into several macroscopic categories, including pit, localised, linear and plane-form defects. All types have been considered a sign of ‘non-specific stress’ during dental development in archaeological, as well as palaeoanthropological and other samples. There is growing evidence suggesting many defects may not be caused by illness or malnutrition during childhood, instead relating to trauma to the developing tooth, genetic conditions or specific environmental factors, i.e., may not be associated with ‘stress’ to the individual. In this study all types of macroscopic enamel hypoplasia were recorded, including pitting, linear, plane and localised type defects, in two extant great ape species and three fossil hominin species. The aim is to compare the characteristics and prevalence of different types of enamel hypoplasia among species and discuss potential differences in aetiology. The results show that samples have diverse prevalence's of different kinds of defects, and pitting, linear and localised defects likely have different aetiologies. Additionally, dental characteristics (e.g., tooth morphology, developmental timing/speed and enamel structure) heavily influence the likelihood of specific types of enamel hypoplasia forming. In sum, studies that include only one type of enamel hypoplasia, or focus on one tooth type, to generate a ‘stress’ rating for a sample may miss relevant information when comparing groups. Instead, it may be beneficial to record different types of defects separately, for all teeth, and then consider how genetic, environmental and tooth property factors may influence sample differences. Dental development Elsevier Linear enamel hypoplasia Elsevier Pitting enamel hypoplasia Elsevier Fossil hominins Elsevier Primates Elsevier Dental defects Elsevier Amelogenesis imperfecta Elsevier Localised enamel hypoplasia Elsevier Stress Elsevier Irish, Joel D. oth Enthalten in Elsevier Kociumaka, Tomasz ELSEVIER Efficient representation and counting of antipower factors in words 2021 Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV008027838 volume:114 year:2020 pages:0 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2020.105077 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U FID-LING SSG-OPC-MAT 54.00 Informatik: Allgemeines VZ 31.80 Angewandte Mathematik VZ AR 114 2020 0 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1016/j.jas.2020.105077 doi /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001005.pica (DE-627)ELV049194925 (ELSEVIER)S0305-4403(18)30652-6 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 330 004 VZ LING DE-30 fid 54.00 bkl 31.80 bkl Towle, Ian verfasserin aut Recording and interpreting enamel hypoplasia in samples from archaeological and palaeoanthropological contexts 2020transfer abstract nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Enamel hypoplasia is often split into several macroscopic categories, including pit, localised, linear and plane-form defects. All types have been considered a sign of ‘non-specific stress’ during dental development in archaeological, as well as palaeoanthropological and other samples. There is growing evidence suggesting many defects may not be caused by illness or malnutrition during childhood, instead relating to trauma to the developing tooth, genetic conditions or specific environmental factors, i.e., may not be associated with ‘stress’ to the individual. In this study all types of macroscopic enamel hypoplasia were recorded, including pitting, linear, plane and localised type defects, in two extant great ape species and three fossil hominin species. The aim is to compare the characteristics and prevalence of different types of enamel hypoplasia among species and discuss potential differences in aetiology. The results show that samples have diverse prevalence's of different kinds of defects, and pitting, linear and localised defects likely have different aetiologies. Additionally, dental characteristics (e.g., tooth morphology, developmental timing/speed and enamel structure) heavily influence the likelihood of specific types of enamel hypoplasia forming. In sum, studies that include only one type of enamel hypoplasia, or focus on one tooth type, to generate a ‘stress’ rating for a sample may miss relevant information when comparing groups. Instead, it may be beneficial to record different types of defects separately, for all teeth, and then consider how genetic, environmental and tooth property factors may influence sample differences. Enamel hypoplasia is often split into several macroscopic categories, including pit, localised, linear and plane-form defects. All types have been considered a sign of ‘non-specific stress’ during dental development in archaeological, as well as palaeoanthropological and other samples. There is growing evidence suggesting many defects may not be caused by illness or malnutrition during childhood, instead relating to trauma to the developing tooth, genetic conditions or specific environmental factors, i.e., may not be associated with ‘stress’ to the individual. In this study all types of macroscopic enamel hypoplasia were recorded, including pitting, linear, plane and localised type defects, in two extant great ape species and three fossil hominin species. The aim is to compare the characteristics and prevalence of different types of enamel hypoplasia among species and discuss potential differences in aetiology. The results show that samples have diverse prevalence's of different kinds of defects, and pitting, linear and localised defects likely have different aetiologies. Additionally, dental characteristics (e.g., tooth morphology, developmental timing/speed and enamel structure) heavily influence the likelihood of specific types of enamel hypoplasia forming. In sum, studies that include only one type of enamel hypoplasia, or focus on one tooth type, to generate a ‘stress’ rating for a sample may miss relevant information when comparing groups. Instead, it may be beneficial to record different types of defects separately, for all teeth, and then consider how genetic, environmental and tooth property factors may influence sample differences. Dental development Elsevier Linear enamel hypoplasia Elsevier Pitting enamel hypoplasia Elsevier Fossil hominins Elsevier Primates Elsevier Dental defects Elsevier Amelogenesis imperfecta Elsevier Localised enamel hypoplasia Elsevier Stress Elsevier Irish, Joel D. oth Enthalten in Elsevier Kociumaka, Tomasz ELSEVIER Efficient representation and counting of antipower factors in words 2021 Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV008027838 volume:114 year:2020 pages:0 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2020.105077 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U FID-LING SSG-OPC-MAT 54.00 Informatik: Allgemeines VZ 31.80 Angewandte Mathematik VZ AR 114 2020 0 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1016/j.jas.2020.105077 doi /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001005.pica (DE-627)ELV049194925 (ELSEVIER)S0305-4403(18)30652-6 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 330 004 VZ LING DE-30 fid 54.00 bkl 31.80 bkl Towle, Ian verfasserin aut Recording and interpreting enamel hypoplasia in samples from archaeological and palaeoanthropological contexts 2020transfer abstract nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Enamel hypoplasia is often split into several macroscopic categories, including pit, localised, linear and plane-form defects. All types have been considered a sign of ‘non-specific stress’ during dental development in archaeological, as well as palaeoanthropological and other samples. There is growing evidence suggesting many defects may not be caused by illness or malnutrition during childhood, instead relating to trauma to the developing tooth, genetic conditions or specific environmental factors, i.e., may not be associated with ‘stress’ to the individual. In this study all types of macroscopic enamel hypoplasia were recorded, including pitting, linear, plane and localised type defects, in two extant great ape species and three fossil hominin species. The aim is to compare the characteristics and prevalence of different types of enamel hypoplasia among species and discuss potential differences in aetiology. The results show that samples have diverse prevalence's of different kinds of defects, and pitting, linear and localised defects likely have different aetiologies. Additionally, dental characteristics (e.g., tooth morphology, developmental timing/speed and enamel structure) heavily influence the likelihood of specific types of enamel hypoplasia forming. In sum, studies that include only one type of enamel hypoplasia, or focus on one tooth type, to generate a ‘stress’ rating for a sample may miss relevant information when comparing groups. Instead, it may be beneficial to record different types of defects separately, for all teeth, and then consider how genetic, environmental and tooth property factors may influence sample differences. Enamel hypoplasia is often split into several macroscopic categories, including pit, localised, linear and plane-form defects. All types have been considered a sign of ‘non-specific stress’ during dental development in archaeological, as well as palaeoanthropological and other samples. There is growing evidence suggesting many defects may not be caused by illness or malnutrition during childhood, instead relating to trauma to the developing tooth, genetic conditions or specific environmental factors, i.e., may not be associated with ‘stress’ to the individual. In this study all types of macroscopic enamel hypoplasia were recorded, including pitting, linear, plane and localised type defects, in two extant great ape species and three fossil hominin species. The aim is to compare the characteristics and prevalence of different types of enamel hypoplasia among species and discuss potential differences in aetiology. The results show that samples have diverse prevalence's of different kinds of defects, and pitting, linear and localised defects likely have different aetiologies. Additionally, dental characteristics (e.g., tooth morphology, developmental timing/speed and enamel structure) heavily influence the likelihood of specific types of enamel hypoplasia forming. In sum, studies that include only one type of enamel hypoplasia, or focus on one tooth type, to generate a ‘stress’ rating for a sample may miss relevant information when comparing groups. Instead, it may be beneficial to record different types of defects separately, for all teeth, and then consider how genetic, environmental and tooth property factors may influence sample differences. Dental development Elsevier Linear enamel hypoplasia Elsevier Pitting enamel hypoplasia Elsevier Fossil hominins Elsevier Primates Elsevier Dental defects Elsevier Amelogenesis imperfecta Elsevier Localised enamel hypoplasia Elsevier Stress Elsevier Irish, Joel D. oth Enthalten in Elsevier Kociumaka, Tomasz ELSEVIER Efficient representation and counting of antipower factors in words 2021 Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV008027838 volume:114 year:2020 pages:0 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2020.105077 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U FID-LING SSG-OPC-MAT 54.00 Informatik: Allgemeines VZ 31.80 Angewandte Mathematik VZ AR 114 2020 0 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in Efficient representation and counting of antipower factors in words Amsterdam [u.a.] volume:114 year:2020 pages:0 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in Efficient representation and counting of antipower factors in words Amsterdam [u.a.] volume:114 year:2020 pages:0 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| bklname |
Informatik: Allgemeines Angewandte Mathematik |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
Dental development Linear enamel hypoplasia Pitting enamel hypoplasia Fossil hominins Primates Dental defects Amelogenesis imperfecta Localised enamel hypoplasia Stress |
| dewey-raw |
330 |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
Efficient representation and counting of antipower factors in words |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Towle, Ian @@aut@@ Irish, Joel D. @@oth@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2020-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
ELV008027838 |
| dewey-sort |
3330 |
| id |
ELV049194925 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV049194925</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230626023728.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">200518s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.jas.2020.105077</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">/cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001005.pica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV049194925</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0305-4403(18)30652-6</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">330</subfield><subfield code="a">004</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">LING</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-30</subfield><subfield code="2">fid</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">54.00</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">31.80</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Towle, Ian</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Recording and interpreting enamel hypoplasia in samples from archaeological and palaeoanthropological contexts</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2020transfer abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Enamel hypoplasia is often split into several macroscopic categories, including pit, localised, linear and plane-form defects. All types have been considered a sign of ‘non-specific stress’ during dental development in archaeological, as well as palaeoanthropological and other samples. There is growing evidence suggesting many defects may not be caused by illness or malnutrition during childhood, instead relating to trauma to the developing tooth, genetic conditions or specific environmental factors, i.e., may not be associated with ‘stress’ to the individual. In this study all types of macroscopic enamel hypoplasia were recorded, including pitting, linear, plane and localised type defects, in two extant great ape species and three fossil hominin species. The aim is to compare the characteristics and prevalence of different types of enamel hypoplasia among species and discuss potential differences in aetiology. The results show that samples have diverse prevalence's of different kinds of defects, and pitting, linear and localised defects likely have different aetiologies. Additionally, dental characteristics (e.g., tooth morphology, developmental timing/speed and enamel structure) heavily influence the likelihood of specific types of enamel hypoplasia forming. In sum, studies that include only one type of enamel hypoplasia, or focus on one tooth type, to generate a ‘stress’ rating for a sample may miss relevant information when comparing groups. Instead, it may be beneficial to record different types of defects separately, for all teeth, and then consider how genetic, environmental and tooth property factors may influence sample differences.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Enamel hypoplasia is often split into several macroscopic categories, including pit, localised, linear and plane-form defects. All types have been considered a sign of ‘non-specific stress’ during dental development in archaeological, as well as palaeoanthropological and other samples. There is growing evidence suggesting many defects may not be caused by illness or malnutrition during childhood, instead relating to trauma to the developing tooth, genetic conditions or specific environmental factors, i.e., may not be associated with ‘stress’ to the individual. In this study all types of macroscopic enamel hypoplasia were recorded, including pitting, linear, plane and localised type defects, in two extant great ape species and three fossil hominin species. The aim is to compare the characteristics and prevalence of different types of enamel hypoplasia among species and discuss potential differences in aetiology. The results show that samples have diverse prevalence's of different kinds of defects, and pitting, linear and localised defects likely have different aetiologies. Additionally, dental characteristics (e.g., tooth morphology, developmental timing/speed and enamel structure) heavily influence the likelihood of specific types of enamel hypoplasia forming. In sum, studies that include only one type of enamel hypoplasia, or focus on one tooth type, to generate a ‘stress’ rating for a sample may miss relevant information when comparing groups. Instead, it may be beneficial to record different types of defects separately, for all teeth, and then consider how genetic, environmental and tooth property factors may influence sample differences.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Dental development</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Linear enamel hypoplasia</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Pitting enamel hypoplasia</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Fossil hominins</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Primates</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Dental defects</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Amelogenesis imperfecta</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Localised enamel hypoplasia</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Stress</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Irish, Joel D.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="n">Elsevier</subfield><subfield code="a">Kociumaka, Tomasz ELSEVIER</subfield><subfield code="t">Efficient representation and counting of antipower factors in words</subfield><subfield code="d">2021</subfield><subfield code="g">Amsterdam [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)ELV008027838</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:114</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2020</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2020.105077</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">FID-LING</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OPC-MAT</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">54.00</subfield><subfield code="j">Informatik: Allgemeines</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">31.80</subfield><subfield code="j">Angewandte Mathematik</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">114</subfield><subfield code="j">2020</subfield><subfield code="h">0</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Towle, Ian |
| spellingShingle |
Towle, Ian ddc 330 fid LING bkl 54.00 bkl 31.80 Elsevier Dental development Elsevier Linear enamel hypoplasia Elsevier Pitting enamel hypoplasia Elsevier Fossil hominins Elsevier Primates Elsevier Dental defects Elsevier Amelogenesis imperfecta Elsevier Localised enamel hypoplasia Elsevier Stress Recording and interpreting enamel hypoplasia in samples from archaeological and palaeoanthropological contexts |
| authorStr |
Towle, Ian |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)ELV008027838 |
| format |
electronic Article |
| dewey-ones |
330 - Economics 004 - Data processing & computer science |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut |
| collection |
elsevier |
| remote_str |
true |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| topic_title |
330 004 VZ LING DE-30 fid 54.00 bkl 31.80 bkl Recording and interpreting enamel hypoplasia in samples from archaeological and palaeoanthropological contexts Dental development Elsevier Linear enamel hypoplasia Elsevier Pitting enamel hypoplasia Elsevier Fossil hominins Elsevier Primates Elsevier Dental defects Elsevier Amelogenesis imperfecta Elsevier Localised enamel hypoplasia Elsevier Stress Elsevier |
| topic |
ddc 330 fid LING bkl 54.00 bkl 31.80 Elsevier Dental development Elsevier Linear enamel hypoplasia Elsevier Pitting enamel hypoplasia Elsevier Fossil hominins Elsevier Primates Elsevier Dental defects Elsevier Amelogenesis imperfecta Elsevier Localised enamel hypoplasia Elsevier Stress |
| topic_unstemmed |
ddc 330 fid LING bkl 54.00 bkl 31.80 Elsevier Dental development Elsevier Linear enamel hypoplasia Elsevier Pitting enamel hypoplasia Elsevier Fossil hominins Elsevier Primates Elsevier Dental defects Elsevier Amelogenesis imperfecta Elsevier Localised enamel hypoplasia Elsevier Stress |
| topic_browse |
ddc 330 fid LING bkl 54.00 bkl 31.80 Elsevier Dental development Elsevier Linear enamel hypoplasia Elsevier Pitting enamel hypoplasia Elsevier Fossil hominins Elsevier Primates Elsevier Dental defects Elsevier Amelogenesis imperfecta Elsevier Localised enamel hypoplasia Elsevier Stress |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
zu |
| author2_variant |
j d i jd jdi |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Efficient representation and counting of antipower factors in words |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
ELV008027838 |
| dewey-tens |
330 - Economics 000 - Computer science, knowledge & systems |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Efficient representation and counting of antipower factors in words |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)ELV008027838 |
| title |
Recording and interpreting enamel hypoplasia in samples from archaeological and palaeoanthropological contexts |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)ELV049194925 (ELSEVIER)S0305-4403(18)30652-6 |
| title_full |
Recording and interpreting enamel hypoplasia in samples from archaeological and palaeoanthropological contexts |
| author_sort |
Towle, Ian |
| journal |
Efficient representation and counting of antipower factors in words |
| journalStr |
Efficient representation and counting of antipower factors in words |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| dewey-hundreds |
300 - Social sciences 000 - Computer science, information & general works |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2020 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
zzz |
| container_start_page |
0 |
| author_browse |
Towle, Ian |
| container_volume |
114 |
| class |
330 004 VZ LING DE-30 fid 54.00 bkl 31.80 bkl |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Towle, Ian |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1016/j.jas.2020.105077 |
| dewey-full |
330 004 |
| title_sort |
recording and interpreting enamel hypoplasia in samples from archaeological and palaeoanthropological contexts |
| title_auth |
Recording and interpreting enamel hypoplasia in samples from archaeological and palaeoanthropological contexts |
| abstract |
Enamel hypoplasia is often split into several macroscopic categories, including pit, localised, linear and plane-form defects. All types have been considered a sign of ‘non-specific stress’ during dental development in archaeological, as well as palaeoanthropological and other samples. There is growing evidence suggesting many defects may not be caused by illness or malnutrition during childhood, instead relating to trauma to the developing tooth, genetic conditions or specific environmental factors, i.e., may not be associated with ‘stress’ to the individual. In this study all types of macroscopic enamel hypoplasia were recorded, including pitting, linear, plane and localised type defects, in two extant great ape species and three fossil hominin species. The aim is to compare the characteristics and prevalence of different types of enamel hypoplasia among species and discuss potential differences in aetiology. The results show that samples have diverse prevalence's of different kinds of defects, and pitting, linear and localised defects likely have different aetiologies. Additionally, dental characteristics (e.g., tooth morphology, developmental timing/speed and enamel structure) heavily influence the likelihood of specific types of enamel hypoplasia forming. In sum, studies that include only one type of enamel hypoplasia, or focus on one tooth type, to generate a ‘stress’ rating for a sample may miss relevant information when comparing groups. Instead, it may be beneficial to record different types of defects separately, for all teeth, and then consider how genetic, environmental and tooth property factors may influence sample differences. |
| abstractGer |
Enamel hypoplasia is often split into several macroscopic categories, including pit, localised, linear and plane-form defects. All types have been considered a sign of ‘non-specific stress’ during dental development in archaeological, as well as palaeoanthropological and other samples. There is growing evidence suggesting many defects may not be caused by illness or malnutrition during childhood, instead relating to trauma to the developing tooth, genetic conditions or specific environmental factors, i.e., may not be associated with ‘stress’ to the individual. In this study all types of macroscopic enamel hypoplasia were recorded, including pitting, linear, plane and localised type defects, in two extant great ape species and three fossil hominin species. The aim is to compare the characteristics and prevalence of different types of enamel hypoplasia among species and discuss potential differences in aetiology. The results show that samples have diverse prevalence's of different kinds of defects, and pitting, linear and localised defects likely have different aetiologies. Additionally, dental characteristics (e.g., tooth morphology, developmental timing/speed and enamel structure) heavily influence the likelihood of specific types of enamel hypoplasia forming. In sum, studies that include only one type of enamel hypoplasia, or focus on one tooth type, to generate a ‘stress’ rating for a sample may miss relevant information when comparing groups. Instead, it may be beneficial to record different types of defects separately, for all teeth, and then consider how genetic, environmental and tooth property factors may influence sample differences. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
Enamel hypoplasia is often split into several macroscopic categories, including pit, localised, linear and plane-form defects. All types have been considered a sign of ‘non-specific stress’ during dental development in archaeological, as well as palaeoanthropological and other samples. There is growing evidence suggesting many defects may not be caused by illness or malnutrition during childhood, instead relating to trauma to the developing tooth, genetic conditions or specific environmental factors, i.e., may not be associated with ‘stress’ to the individual. In this study all types of macroscopic enamel hypoplasia were recorded, including pitting, linear, plane and localised type defects, in two extant great ape species and three fossil hominin species. The aim is to compare the characteristics and prevalence of different types of enamel hypoplasia among species and discuss potential differences in aetiology. The results show that samples have diverse prevalence's of different kinds of defects, and pitting, linear and localised defects likely have different aetiologies. Additionally, dental characteristics (e.g., tooth morphology, developmental timing/speed and enamel structure) heavily influence the likelihood of specific types of enamel hypoplasia forming. In sum, studies that include only one type of enamel hypoplasia, or focus on one tooth type, to generate a ‘stress’ rating for a sample may miss relevant information when comparing groups. Instead, it may be beneficial to record different types of defects separately, for all teeth, and then consider how genetic, environmental and tooth property factors may influence sample differences. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U FID-LING SSG-OPC-MAT |
| title_short |
Recording and interpreting enamel hypoplasia in samples from archaeological and palaeoanthropological contexts |
| url |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2020.105077 |
| remote_bool |
true |
| author2 |
Irish, Joel D. |
| author2Str |
Irish, Joel D. |
| ppnlink |
ELV008027838 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
z |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| author2_role |
oth |
| doi_str |
10.1016/j.jas.2020.105077 |
| up_date |
2024-07-06T20:53:57.382Z |
| _version_ |
1803864493138116608 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV049194925</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230626023728.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">200518s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.jas.2020.105077</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">/cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001005.pica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV049194925</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0305-4403(18)30652-6</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">330</subfield><subfield code="a">004</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">LING</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-30</subfield><subfield code="2">fid</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">54.00</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">31.80</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Towle, Ian</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Recording and interpreting enamel hypoplasia in samples from archaeological and palaeoanthropological contexts</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2020transfer abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Enamel hypoplasia is often split into several macroscopic categories, including pit, localised, linear and plane-form defects. All types have been considered a sign of ‘non-specific stress’ during dental development in archaeological, as well as palaeoanthropological and other samples. There is growing evidence suggesting many defects may not be caused by illness or malnutrition during childhood, instead relating to trauma to the developing tooth, genetic conditions or specific environmental factors, i.e., may not be associated with ‘stress’ to the individual. In this study all types of macroscopic enamel hypoplasia were recorded, including pitting, linear, plane and localised type defects, in two extant great ape species and three fossil hominin species. The aim is to compare the characteristics and prevalence of different types of enamel hypoplasia among species and discuss potential differences in aetiology. The results show that samples have diverse prevalence's of different kinds of defects, and pitting, linear and localised defects likely have different aetiologies. Additionally, dental characteristics (e.g., tooth morphology, developmental timing/speed and enamel structure) heavily influence the likelihood of specific types of enamel hypoplasia forming. In sum, studies that include only one type of enamel hypoplasia, or focus on one tooth type, to generate a ‘stress’ rating for a sample may miss relevant information when comparing groups. Instead, it may be beneficial to record different types of defects separately, for all teeth, and then consider how genetic, environmental and tooth property factors may influence sample differences.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Enamel hypoplasia is often split into several macroscopic categories, including pit, localised, linear and plane-form defects. All types have been considered a sign of ‘non-specific stress’ during dental development in archaeological, as well as palaeoanthropological and other samples. There is growing evidence suggesting many defects may not be caused by illness or malnutrition during childhood, instead relating to trauma to the developing tooth, genetic conditions or specific environmental factors, i.e., may not be associated with ‘stress’ to the individual. In this study all types of macroscopic enamel hypoplasia were recorded, including pitting, linear, plane and localised type defects, in two extant great ape species and three fossil hominin species. The aim is to compare the characteristics and prevalence of different types of enamel hypoplasia among species and discuss potential differences in aetiology. The results show that samples have diverse prevalence's of different kinds of defects, and pitting, linear and localised defects likely have different aetiologies. Additionally, dental characteristics (e.g., tooth morphology, developmental timing/speed and enamel structure) heavily influence the likelihood of specific types of enamel hypoplasia forming. In sum, studies that include only one type of enamel hypoplasia, or focus on one tooth type, to generate a ‘stress’ rating for a sample may miss relevant information when comparing groups. Instead, it may be beneficial to record different types of defects separately, for all teeth, and then consider how genetic, environmental and tooth property factors may influence sample differences.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Dental development</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Linear enamel hypoplasia</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Pitting enamel hypoplasia</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Fossil hominins</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Primates</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Dental defects</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Amelogenesis imperfecta</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Localised enamel hypoplasia</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Stress</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Irish, Joel D.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="n">Elsevier</subfield><subfield code="a">Kociumaka, Tomasz ELSEVIER</subfield><subfield code="t">Efficient representation and counting of antipower factors in words</subfield><subfield code="d">2021</subfield><subfield code="g">Amsterdam [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)ELV008027838</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:114</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2020</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2020.105077</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">FID-LING</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OPC-MAT</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">54.00</subfield><subfield code="j">Informatik: Allgemeines</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">31.80</subfield><subfield code="j">Angewandte Mathematik</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">114</subfield><subfield code="j">2020</subfield><subfield code="h">0</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.4011583 |